User talk:Ealdgyth/Archive 88
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ealdgyth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | Archive 89 | Archive 90 | → | Archive 95 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, 
The Rambling Man and 
Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being 
Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are .svg){kind=small}
Gog the Mild, 
Lee Vilenski, 
BennyOnTheLoose, 
Amakuru and 
Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. .jpg){kind=small}
Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Norman Duke Editing Question(s)/Feedback
Hello, Ealdgyth! Sorry for reaching out to you via Discord, I was completely unaware that accounts had Talk pages! As I said, I was just asking if I could get some feedback on the kinds of images I should use for articles. I saw that you deleted mine for being an imaginary non-contemporary image. I’d like to note that Robert the Magnificent uses a statue from the same place as the one I used. If I shouldn’t use statues at all, can I use ones like Duke Rollo’s image? Thanks! TheREALSlavicElmo (talk) 19:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- The problem with those images is that they are made hundreds of years after the death of the person they are supposed to represent. In that situation, they are what the sculptor/artist imagines they looked like, and they are misleading to the reader. One thing about wikipedia - just because some other article does something doesn't mean that it should be done elsewhere. Just because someone hasn't removed that image in Robert's article doesn't mean we should add ones like it to others (I don't happen to have Robert's article watchlisted, thus I don't edit it and don't notice changes there. As for Rollo - note that the sculptures aren't the first image in the infobox, instead they are further down the page. General readers think that the image in the infobox is supposed to be an accurate representation of the person - that's what we do with more modern people, so having an "artist's rendering" in that spot is more misleading than putting a modern image further down the page. Ealdgyth (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response! I get what you mean. About Rollo, I was talking about the manuscript art he has, not his sculpture. I know where those manuscripts come from (here) so I was wondering if I could get a picture of William Longsword’s illustration and place it there. TheREALSlavicElmo (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
long-term WikiLove
.png)
|
continuatrix cronicorum |
| thanks for doing all these medieval chaps so well Katiehawks (talk) 06:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Use of {{Flagicon}}
I appreciate your edit here, whereby you removed {{Flagicon}}s per MOS:FLAGICON. Since I've put such icons in many family tree articles already, can you please give me some guidance as to how they can/can't be used in such family trees. The MOS was vague on this. Thanks! —GoldRingChip 16:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- My opinion is that FLAGICON is pretty clear - they shouldn't be used, as they aren't very helpful. They are also a bit anachronistic when used in medieval biographies - as they weren't in common use in the period. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- You'd cited MOS:FLAGICON as the reason for your edit, so I was trying to find that reference. Yes, however, I agree that flags are anachronistic in medieval biographies. As a whole, I dislike their overuse. I find them only helpful in certain rare situations, such as family trees of monarchs, to distinugish their monarchies, etc. —GoldRingChip 20:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Why use a flag there when the prose is already stating "king of England". If you MUST use a little blob of pixels, wouldn't a crown be better as that would actually indicate monarchial status? But it's undue to single out the monarchs with little decorations vs. the others that don't get the same decoration - why do the queens not get little flags? It just gives undue prominence to one aspect, which the whole of MOS:ICON argues against. Ealdgyth (talk) 20:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- I get what you're saying. The reason I distinguish them, and maybe you'd think it is arbitrary, is to give reigning monarchs, not consorts, some sort of distinction. That way the reader can see the flow of succession, which is helpful in a family tree. When queens reign (such as the current Queen of the United Kingdom), then they are also singled out. But if we'd rather not use little decorations or a little blob of pixels, then I've chosen to highlight the surrounding box with color or thickness. I also think it might be helpful to have something also to distinguish foreign monarchs. After all, the family tree box on this article we're discussing is, "Richard's relationship with the rulers of Western Europe." Therefore it might be helpful to the reader to see who these rulers are. I'm not sold on this whole idea of using flags or whatever, but I want to find a way to help the readers without giving undue emphasis to flags, anachronistic ideas of nation-states, or monarchs over other people. I appreciate, therefore, your help here. —GoldRingChip 01:39, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- Why use a flag there when the prose is already stating "king of England". If you MUST use a little blob of pixels, wouldn't a crown be better as that would actually indicate monarchial status? But it's undue to single out the monarchs with little decorations vs. the others that don't get the same decoration - why do the queens not get little flags? It just gives undue prominence to one aspect, which the whole of MOS:ICON argues against. Ealdgyth (talk) 20:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- You'd cited MOS:FLAGICON as the reason for your edit, so I was trying to find that reference. Yes, however, I agree that flags are anachronistic in medieval biographies. As a whole, I dislike their overuse. I find them only helpful in certain rare situations, such as family trees of monarchs, to distinugish their monarchies, etc. —GoldRingChip 20:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
...for the work you've put in as a FAC coordinator. I was thinking that "Thanks to Ealdgyth" comments would follow the new coordinators section, so I held off, but now people have started I don't want to seem grumpy nor do I want to start a trend of people adding to their own posts in case someone thinks they didn't appreciate you! So thanks. I hope we get to see more of your submissions at FAC. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, many thanks! Johnbod (talk) 21:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Main reason I'm stepping back is that I just am insanely busy in RL and it's not looking like it's going to change any time soon. I'm going to be doing well to keep my articles free of cruft...Ealdgyth (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)