User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2011-03

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

If you are considering initiating an xfd on material I started

2004, 2005, 2006-01--2006-06, 2006-07--2006-10, 2006-10--2005-12, 2007-01--2007-06, 2007-07--2007-09, 2007-10--2007-12, 2008-01--2008-06, 2008-07--2008-09, 2008-10--2008-12, 2009-01--2009-03, 2009-04--2009-06, 2009-07--2009-09, 2009-10--2009-12, 2010-01, 2010-02, 2010-03, 2010-04, 2010-05, 2010-06, 2010-07, 2010-08, 2010-09, 2010-10, 2010-11, 2010-12, 2011-01, 2011-02, 2011-03, 2011-04, 2011-05, 2011-06, 2011-07, 2011-08, 2011-09, 2011-10, 2011-11, 2011-12, 2012-01, 2012-02, 2012-03, 2012-04, 2012-05, 2012-06, 2012-07, 2012-08, 2012-09, 2012-10, 2012-11, 2012-12, 2013-01, 2013-02, 2013-03, 2013-04, 2013-05, 2013-06, 2013-07, 2013-08, 2013-09, 2013-10, 2013-11, 2013-12, 2014-01, 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-04, 2014-05, 2014-06, 2014-07, 2014-08, 2014-09, 2014-10, 2014-11, 2014-12, 2015-01, 2015-02, 2015-03, 2015-04, 2015-05, 2015-06, 2015-07, 2015-08, 2015-09, 2015-10, 2015-11, 2015-12, 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, 2016-06, 2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12, 2017-01, 2017-02, 2017-03, 2017-04, 2017-05, 2017-06, 2017-07, 2017-08, 2017-09, 2017-10, 2017-11, 2017-12, 2018-01, 2018-02, 2018-03, 2018-04, 2018-05, 2018-06, 2018-07, 2018-08, 2018-09, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-12, 2019-01, 2019-02, 2019-03, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-06, 2019-07, 2019-08, 2019-09, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2019-12, 2020-01, 2020-02, 2020-03, 2020-04, 2020-05, 2020-06, 2020-07, 2020-08, 2020-09, 2020-10, 2020-11, User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/list

Your response to your RfC/U

Hi. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Geo Swan is set to close in about 10 days (that will mean that no users can submit further comments, responses, or endorsements after this time). Could you please clarify the status of your response? If my assumption is correct that you will be submitting one soon, do you have an idea on which date it will be ready? Thanks, Ncmvocalist (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Sharifullah (detainee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharifullah (detainee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharifullah (detainee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anotherclown (talk) 09:37, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rais Khan (disambiguation)

The article Rais Khan (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No need for a disambiguation with only one target

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 20:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rais Mohammed Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rais Mohammed Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rais Mohammed Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Anotherclown (talk) 10:39, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Shabir (detainee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shabir (detainee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabir (detainee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Geo Swan#Closing statement?

A closing statement for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Geo Swan is being drafted at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Geo Swan#Closing statement?. Do you intend to post a response to the RfC, and do you have any comments about the draft closing statement? Cunard (talk) 00:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abdul Jalal (disambiguation)

The article Abdul Jalal (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

disambiguation page that lists only one article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.   TRBP  talk  14:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Gulam Rabbani Abu Bakr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gulam Rabbani Abu Bakr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulam Rabbani Abu Bakr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IQinn (talk) 07:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Lack of responsiveness to the messages you have been sent on this page

That's fine; however, I am concerned that despite being sent more than two messages regarding the status of your response, you failed to clarify that status or to seek assistance. I note that despite reverting this closure yourself, you have not yet submitted a response. Ncmvocalist (talk) 03:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Egyptian guesthouse listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Egyptian guesthouse. Since you had some involvement with the Egyptian guesthouse redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IQinn (talk) 04:37, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Tunisian guest house, Afghanistan listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tunisian guest house, Afghanistan. Since you had some involvement with the Tunisian guest house, Afghanistan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IQinn (talk) 04:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Cairo Intercontinental Hotel listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cairo Intercontinental Hotel. Since you had some involvement with the Cairo Intercontinental Hotel redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). IQinn (talk) 04:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Mentorship?

Would you be willing to be placed under mentorship on BLP issues if you continue editing those areas of the project? If so, would you be OK if Fetchcomms was one of your mentors? (Note - there would probably be at least one more mentor, for the occasions where Fetchcomms is briefly unavailable). Ncmvocalist (talk) 17:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Obscured titles on watchlist subpage

Hello Geo Swan. I obscured two titles on your watchlist subpage, because they contained personal attacks that were appearing in search engine results. (The __NOINDEX__ directive has no effect on some mirrors of Wikipedia.) —Pathoschild 20:55:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Brian Clark (September 11 attacks survivor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Clark (September 11 attacks survivor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Clark (September 11 attacks survivor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 21:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)