User talk:Iamthemintman
Add topic| This is Iamthemintman's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Blink (2024 Short Film) (July 14)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blink (2024 Short Film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Iamthemintman!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thorne Baker (July 14)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thorne Baker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitchel Corrado (July 14)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mitchel Corrado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
July 2024
[edit]Hi @Iamthemintman. I appreciate your enthusiasm in creating drafts, but please carefully read our policies and guidelines first, as currently all three drafts you made are unsuitable for Wikipedia. Qcne (talk) 13:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to Boston College (England) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 19:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]
A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and contains unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with other attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. Synorem (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
The page SmartSchoolBoy9 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:
G10: Biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please review our policy relating to articles on living people, WP:BLP. Pretty much everything you say about a person, or for that matter any subject, must be backed up by a reliable published source, and the more extraordinary or contentious the claim, the better the source needed to support it. This draft was completely unreferenced, and contained multiple statement which clearly violated the BLP rules; in fact, I wouldn't be surprised if they potentially amounted to defamation. Please do not attempt to create such articles again, or add such content on any page. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Thorne Baker
[edit] Hello, Iamthemintman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thorne Baker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 13:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- this page was not made with the intention to attack an individual. i'm unsure why you think this page has been made for that reason. if i am given feed back i will try update the page to wikipedia's standards Iamthemintman (talk) 15:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Mitchel Corrado
[edit] Hello, Iamthemintman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mitchel Corrado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mitchel Corrado
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mitchel Corrado requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 23:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to T US 380. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Bruno the Bloodhound moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Bruno the Bloodhound. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 17:04, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Bruno the Bloodhound moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Bruno the Bloodhound. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster talk 18:05, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bruno the Bloodhound (July 9)
[edit]- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bruno the Bloodhound and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Nomination of Bruno the Bloodhound for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno the Bloodhound until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 17:00, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Garten of Banban for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garten of Banban until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Teenage Disaster discography moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Teenage Disaster discography. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Thorne Baker moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Thorne Baker. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:19, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Removing maintenance templates
[edit]Hi there, I'm one of Wikipedia's volunteer New Page Reviewers. I'd ask you not to remove maintenance templates placed by other reviewers, as you did with a notability template placed by @MPGuy2824 on Draft:Thorne Baker. Feel free to start a discussion with the other editor to understand their concerns. These templates help identify issues that need to be resolved in the New Page Review process, and removing them can result in duplicative work for volunteers. Thanks for understanding. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thorne Baker (September 10)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thorne Baker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Nomination of Hunter Hancock (disambiguation) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Hancock (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.September 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm LaffyTaffer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Wilbur Soot, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Taffer😊💬(she/they) 23:08, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- oh my bad i'll go grab some sources Iamthemintman (talk) 23:10, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Ted Nivison moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Ted Nivison. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ednabrenze (talk) 13:55, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ted Nivison (September 17)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ted Nivison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sr Pelo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Links to draft articles
[edit]
Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to Nivison. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
Rebecca Young (inventor) moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Rebecca Young (inventor). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
Rusty Cage
[edit]Hi, thanks for starting the article about the YouTuber. Please note that the original article about the song has been around since 2004, and had a lot of inbound links from other articles. A potentially controversial move like this needs to be discussed before moving, to get consensus about which of two titles (or possibly neither) is the WP:Primary topic for disambiguation. You can do that by posting at WP:Requested moves. I've reverted your good faith move for now, but if you still think that the new article Rusty Cage (YouTuber) should be moved, then you're welcome to post up a request for that at the requested moves page. Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- my bad, i didn't realise it was that serious. i'm more then happy to leave them as they are now just as long as they both have a link to the other to not confuse readers Iamthemintman (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- No worries! We're all learning here. Wikishovel (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
Rusty Cage (YouTuber) moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Rusty Cage (YouTuber). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 00:08, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Marc M.. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 07:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Otomo no Sahito for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otomo no Sahito until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Disambiguation link notification for November 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leighton Labute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gore. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Leighton Labute for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leighton Labute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.November 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Raymond S. Persi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 11:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
The article List of movies based on memes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Vague list criteria. No real sources.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 18:02, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- my bad, I can look for sources and add them Iamthemintman (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
[edit]A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 02:20, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- @DoubleGrazing: courtesy ping per comment a year ago. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 02:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:01, 28 December 2025 (UTC)- I am concerned about your edit history since I last had reason to be here. You clearly either don't understand, or care about, some of our most essential policies and guidelines, and until you do, you are blocked from editing articles in the published encyclopaedia. You may create new article drafts, but must put them through AfC review. You may also make edit requests and discuss live articles on their talk pages. I actually came close to blocking you outright, but in the end I decided to leave you with a meaningful possibility to demonstrate improvement and development. I hope you will use these liberties well to convince us in time that this block is not needed.-- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but i don't understand what i did wrong, could you name the page(s) and my issues with them to help me understand please? Iamthemintman (talk) 14:31, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- I don't need to, you can just review yourself the long list of advisory and warning messages posted on this page, as well as some of your reverted edits and also the various AfD discussions. And if you still don't understand where the problems lie, then that in itself proves that it isn't safe to lift the present block. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- i don't see the issue with what i created though, the only one i understand is notability. Every living person i edit i try to do with an unbiased opinion and try to source everything i can find. Iamthemintman (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- I don't need to, you can just review yourself the long list of advisory and warning messages posted on this page, as well as some of your reverted edits and also the various AfD discussions. And if you still don't understand where the problems lie, then that in itself proves that it isn't safe to lift the present block. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but i don't understand what i did wrong, could you name the page(s) and my issues with them to help me understand please? Iamthemintman (talk) 14:31, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Zaid Garcia has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
- It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appeared to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:11, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Iamthemintman. Thank you for your work on Murder of Adi Whiting. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this article for a crime that shows sustained media coverage in national newspapers, meeting WP:NCRIME. Clearly written and focussed.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Concern regarding Draft:Teenage Disaster discography
[edit] Hello, Iamthemintman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Teenage Disaster discography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rebecca Young (inventor)
[edit] Hello, Iamthemintman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rebecca Young (inventor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Iamthemintman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I was inexperienced and just excited to contribute to Wikipedia. I have since educated myself on the proper terms of how and when to edit/create pages
Decline reason:
You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts; you'll need to address that in any future unblock request. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Iamthemintman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
i only created multiple accounts as i couldn't edit on my original. i understand this was not the best way to go about it but i was unaware of the unblock apeal request feature.
Decline reason:
I think you should take the standard offer and re-apply in six months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your draft article, Draft:Rebecca Young (inventor)
[edit]
Hello, Iamthemintman. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rebecca Young".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 02:26, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rusty Cage (YouTuber)
[edit] Hello, Iamthemintman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rusty Cage (YouTuber), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:10, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rusty Cage (YouTuber)
[edit]Hello, Iamthemintman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rusty Cage".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Marc M.
[edit] Hello, Iamthemintman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marc M., a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Marc M.
[edit]Hello, Iamthemintman. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Marc M.".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:25, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Thorne Baker
[edit]Hello, Iamthemintman. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Thorne Baker".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of List of movies based on memes for deletion
[edit]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of movies based on memes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Unblock appeal
[edit]
Iamthemintman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= My last attempt to be unblocked recommended I waited 6 months with no trouble which is exactly what I have done. I understand given my messy talk page I don't seem very trustworthy to be unblocked, but I would still like the chance to appeal. A large portion of my issues stem from creating pointless pages so with an appeal I promise to only edit pre existing pages or if I truly believe that a page is worth creating, use my sandbox and wait for approval on it. I understand that this is what I should have been doing in the first place but since my first edit/removal I have had a lot of time to grow and read over the propper rules. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= My last attempt to be unblocked recommended I waited 6 months with no trouble which is exactly what I have done. I understand given my messy talk page I don't seem very trustworthy to be unblocked, but I would still like the chance to appeal. A large portion of my issues stem from creating pointless pages so with an appeal I promise to only edit pre existing pages or if I truly believe that a page is worth creating, use my sandbox and wait for approval on it. I understand that this is what I should have been doing in the first place but since my first edit/removal I have had a lot of time to grow and read over the propper rules. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= My last attempt to be unblocked recommended I waited 6 months with no trouble which is exactly what I have done. I understand given my messy talk page I don't seem very trustworthy to be unblocked, but I would still like the chance to appeal. A large portion of my issues stem from creating pointless pages so with an appeal I promise to only edit pre existing pages or if I truly believe that a page is worth creating, use my sandbox and wait for approval on it. I understand that this is what I should have been doing in the first place but since my first edit/removal I have had a lot of time to grow and read over the propper rules. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Iamthemintman (talk) 16:57, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Although it's not yet been six months, I took a look at the technical data. I see no evidence of recent block evasion. That clears the CU part of the block. --Yamla (talk) 17:01, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of King Kong Balls for deletion
[edit]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Kong Balls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.