User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 37

Latest comment: 6 years ago by JoJo Eumerus mobile in topic Note to self
Archive 30Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39Archive 40

Your GA nomination of Tacora

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tacora you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 19:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sollipulli

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sollipulli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sollipulli

The article Sollipulli you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Sollipulli for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tacora

The article Tacora you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Tacora for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 20:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sollipulli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

How is this supposed to be moved to Commons, considering that it is an unfree file? --Stefan2 (talk) 15:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Wow, talk about a screwup. I am sure I wanted to close that discussion as "delete". Now done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Enlightenment in Western secular tradition

Hi,

I noticed from my watchlist that you deleted Talk:Enlightenment in Western secular tradition after the AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enlightenment in Western secular tradition but that the article itself still exists. I can't see any deletion review pages under "What links here" so I was wondering if that was a mistake. --DanielRigal (talk) 10:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Seems like the script broke. I've deleted it manually now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:13, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Dave Pszenyczny

I read that Dave Pszenyczny was named the head coach of the new Quad City Southern Professional Hockey League team. This Wikipedia article was previously deleted in 2017 but since there is more coverage, thought it should be reopened with the new information. Thank youSyracusestorm (talk) 23:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Well, does that team meet one of the inclusion criteria of WP:NHOCKEY? I am a little unclear on this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I can answer that (I still check many of Syracusestorm edits and watch all SPHL pages). The SPHL is a couple of levels of down from presumed notability in NHOCKEY. Now that Pszenyczny has been named a coach (which is viewed in NHOCKEY as just another contract signing), he has generated one more event of general routine coverage, moving from about 250 G-News hits to 274 last I checked of equivalent coverage equating to "Today Pszenyczny signed with {insert local team here}"). Still fails NHOCKEY, but maybe moved from fails GNG to borderline GNG pass. (Although, in the hockey project, they tend to lean towards delete with borderline subjects as opposed to having tons of sub-stubs). Hope that helps. Yosemiter (talk) 18:58, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
2   Lake Bassano (talk) Add sources
251   Altiplano (talk) Add sources
27   The Chemicals Between Us (talk) Add sources
764   Santa María (volcano) (talk) Add sources
10   Lake Connecticut (talk) Add sources
1,037   Salar de Uyuni (talk) Add sources
1,541   Holocene (talk) Cleanup
1,702   Moai (talk) Cleanup
96   Seismicity (talk) Cleanup
77   Lake Poopó (talk) Expand
70   Andean Volcanic Belt (talk) Expand
108   Interferometric synthetic-aperture radar (talk) Expand
306   Leith (talk) Unencyclopaedic
196   Collaboration in German-occupied Poland (talk) Unencyclopaedic
20   Holocene glacial retreat (talk) Unencyclopaedic
23   Lava bench (talk) Merge
43   Lava delta (talk) Merge
4   Mount Hiuchigatake (talk) Merge
2   Chiqllarasu (talk) Wikify
122   Pygmy blue whale (talk) Wikify
221   The End of the World (Skeeter Davis song) (talk) Wikify
3   Caquena (talk) Orphan
3   Gonzalo Figueroa Garcia Huidobro (talk) Orphan
2   Agha Iqrar Haroon (talk) Orphan
13   Hac Sa Beach (talk) Stub
4   Payachata (talk) Stub
4   Lake Stowe (talk) Stub
5   National Geology and Mining Service (talk) Stub
26   Lineament (talk) Stub
21   PS Wingfield Castle (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Antofalla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Fault, Continental and Salar
Galán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sinter
Lake Minchin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Oruro

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vilama (caldera)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vilama (caldera) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 20:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Page

Hello. i need to know, does this page need more sources or can it be deleted by someone if they are not eligible?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Darbos Advim (talk) 14:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, it needs more sources, preferably independent ones that aren't self-published. I am not familiar with the topic so I can't comment much beyond this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok thank you. Advim (talk) 14:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Mental note

That Alto Toroni may deserve a re-do under the more common name. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Use this source for Cerro Blanco (volcano) and Galán, this source for Antofalla. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Also need to check the following https://scholar.google.ch/scholar?start=320&q=%22parinacota%22&hl=de&as_sdt=1,5&as_ylo=2017. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vilama (caldera)

The article Vilama (caldera) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Vilama (caldera) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceranthor -- Ceranthor (talk) 22:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of article Sable Winters

Why was this page deleted without Talk or notification in November of 2017? It was shocking to see the eradication and disappearance of years of presence and reference of this article on singer/songwriter, recording artist, two-time Grammy Board of Governors nominee Sable Winters. We have created and put lots of time and years into updating this article. The deletion of the article has effectively defamed a respected artist who has earned recognition in her field and continues to contribute to the evolution and advocacy of recording artists in the music industry. A deeper question is what qualifications do you possess that designates as expert in the field of music and entertainment industry? --Betty4 (talk) 22:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please use care in your efforts. The best practice in editing is to use the "Talk" feature first to allow for any corrections or updates. It is not customary to simply delete an article for lack of additional references, etc. Research revealed there is a pattern of deleting articles that ultimately defame as reported here Weighed in Wikipedia’s balances and found wanting and In Challenging Wikipedia‘s Masked Mob, It’s Not Just Intelligent Design Proponents and Wikipedia Shreds the Truth and Call it the “Mystery of the Missing Memo”--Betty4 (talk) 23:41, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sable Winters, which is where the deletion was decided on. This isn't something I decided on unilaterally, other people agreed to it beforehand. Wikipedia has articles only on topics that are commented upon by reliable independent sources, and there was a prominent notification on the page that it was up for deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Sollipulli

On 23 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sollipulli, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the caldera of the volcano Sollipulli is filled with ice (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sollipulli. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sollipulli), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tatajachura, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

your opinion please...

You closed Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ed_Brown_(boxer) as delete. I see four people voiced delete opinions, and no one voiced a keep.

Yesterday I took a look at the version of the article in draft space. It seemed to me that what those arguing for delete were overlooking was the symbolic role Brown assumed, following his death.

Did Brown measure up to our inclusion standards, while alive? No. No way. But the reporting on his death went beyond the facts. Reliable sources used his death as an example of the excesses of American gun violence. American contributors may not recognize it, but American gun violence is shocking to the rest of the world.

Our inclusion policies explicitly say that a decision not to cover an individual in a standalone article does not mean they should not be covered at all. Rather, they say that coverage may belong in related articles.

In my opinion, when an individual is related to more than one existing article, that is an argument for a standalone article, because we shouldn't have a wikilink in one of the article related to them pointing to a subsection of another article related to them.

What do you think? Geo Swan (talk) 15:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

I can't find anything, sorry. Maybe it's the overly generic name. I'd probably try to write a new draft. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Non-free road signs used in list article

Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus. I saw that you closed Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 14#Non-free road signs used in list article as "Remove from list articles". Technically speaking, the files' non-free uses in only one list article (List of British Columbia provincial highways) were being discussed; so, I'm assuming that's what you meant. The files are not showing up as currently being used in any other list articles; maybe they were being used somewhere else, but have been since removed. Anyway, would you mind removing the files from that one list article and then removing the corresponding rationales from the files' pages? If anyone other than the closing admin does those things, the edits might just be reverted. That particular FFD began in January and has been relisted multiple times. Not everyone involved at the beginning may still have it on their watchlist and see your close, but they probably are still watching the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Greetings. I've yanked the files involved. I admit that these discussions with lengthy posts are hard to process. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:37, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that. Would you also mind removing the corresponding non-free use rationales for that list article from the files' pages? They were added only after the files were removed from the article for WP:NFCC#10c reasons (see User talk:Fhsig13#Non-free image use), and leaving them might mistakenly lead others to think that the non-free use in that article is OK since {{Oldffdfull}} templates are added to file talk pages unlike {{Non-free reviewed}} templates which are added to file pages. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:51, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Huh. There is something about your and my post that is stopping it from showing up. Anyway, done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Your edit removing the files was reverted. @Fhsig13: seems to feel your removal of the files was done in error and posted this at Talk:List of British Columbia provincial highways#Discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 January 18#Non-free road signs used in list article. I've advised Fhsig13 to discuss any concerns he may have about the close with you here. The "Please see" link was to the original discussion, which was subsequently relisted, so it might be mistakenly assumed that the original discussion was not closed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:31, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi again Jo-Jo Eumerus. I see that you've also closed Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 17#File:Otto Dix Sy von Harden.jpg. Would you mind removing the files from those articles where non-free use is not NFCCP-compliant? FWIW, I'm not trying to be a nag about this kind of thing, but quite a number of FFDs were started for various non-free images of artwork like the Dix painting, and some of these discussions have been a bit contentious (see WT:WPVA#Under attack and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive370#User:Coldcreation reported by User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (Result: Page protected) and User talk:NeilN#Guernica for just some examples). My concern is that if anyone other than the closing admin removes the files from articles and their corresponding rationales from file pages, edit warring might possibly break out again. At least if you as the closing admin do so, you can add a link to the FFD so that they know who to discuss things with if they disagree with your close. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I got them. Honestly, I think that someone should look for a freely licensed or WP:NFCC#8-compliant replacement image on each of these uses. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Would you mind also taking care of Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 17#File:Christinasworld.jpg like you did for the one mentioned above. Thanks in advance. —- Marchjuly (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Did these as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

DYK for Tacora

On 2 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tacora, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tacora (pictured), Chile's northernmost volcano, was the site of substantial sulfur mining operations that were explicitly given to Chile in a 1929 treaty with Peru? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tacora. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tacora), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
 
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Cheers! —PaleoNeonate07:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jo-Jo. Maybe you still have this on your watch, but I pinged you instead. Fhsig13 re-added all of the files discussed in that FFD back to the article despite the attempts to explain things to him on the article's talk page. These edits were subsequently reverted, but I'm concern about the possibility of edit warring. FWIW, the reason given by Fhsig do not address the reasons why the files were removed from that article and don't show any understanding of the NFCCP or WP:OTHERIMAGE

I'm beginning to wonder whether this is a case of WP:CIR, WP:IDHT or a combination of both with this editor. I'm not basing this only on the edits related to these files, but also on other discussions the editor has been involved in both here and on Commons. The editor seems to feel his preferred version of articles should be the default version until a consensus establishes that it isn't instead of trying to establish a consensus that it is. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Seems like they have gone to WP:ANI, with predictable outcome. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Yes and in all honestly that was unfortunate. It's never a good feeling to see someone get indef'd, even when it might be necessary. The thing is that other editors were reverting the re-adding of the those files and also warning Fshig13 about edit warring over them, yet for some reason he/she somehow assumed it must of been me. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:15, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Reminder

1257 Samalas eruption has additional sources. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Check also the seamount articles such as Arago and Macdonald. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 14:33, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps also consider Pito Seamount. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library resources

Hello. I've noticed you have been requesting multiple sources from databases that are available free from The Wikipedia Library. You can register for an account for JSTOR, ScienceDirect, Taylor&Francis, etc. JSTOR has a waitlist but the other two currently has available accounts. Maybe you might find these and other TWL resources useful :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:02, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, but I've requested stuff for all three of them already. ScienceDirect doesn't cover all articles, JSTOR is waitlisted, Wiley isn't on the library and T&F doesn't work. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:09, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Giuseppina Projetto

About a year ago,you closed a deletion proposal on the strength of 3 votes received in a week,and deleted the Giuseppina Projetto article making it a redirect to the list of italian supercentenarians.In the year between that deletion and her death,she became significantly more notable...becoming first the oldest citizen of Italy,then oldest resident of Italy as well,and at last oldest documented person in Europe and second oldest in the world.The link to her article (being a redirect) has just been pulled from her Deaths in 2018 article and if it stays a redirect for a month will result in her deletion from the death archive entirely. I think she is ripe for undeletion. 12.144.5.2 (talk) 01:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Are there reliable sources discussing her? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:59, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Most of the Google hits on her (14,600 general,2,160 in news just now) are in Italian (her Italian Wikipedia page was not deleted) but she certainly had a profile in the press including "reliable" media.12.144.5.2 (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps you can write a draft article with good sources and sent it to WP:AFC? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Vilama (caldera)

On 9 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vilama (caldera), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Vilama caldera volcano on the border between Bolivia and Argentina produced over 1,200 cubic kilometres (290 cu mi) of rock in a single eruption? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vilama (caldera). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Vilama (caldera)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:42, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Note to self

Wōdejebato needs last polishing and sources. Other candidates are Chachani, Limalok, Ruwituntun, Takuyo-Daisan, Lo-En, MIT (seamount), Heezen Guyot, Allison Guyot and Resolution Guyot. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 08:06, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

23:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)