Goodbye

edit

I’ve worked with you on many articles and you were always a great editor to have around. Sad to see how your time on Wikipedia ended but maybe it is for the better. You left a legacy here and I hope that it is remembered positively.  Hamza Ali Shah  Talk 02:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

A goat for you!

edit
 

I only just saw. I'm so sorry.

Drmies (talk) 21:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

All the best

edit

I am so sorry about this L. You are one of the best here on WikiP and in real life. Thanks for all your editing and for the things you shared with me over the years. Best wishes always. MarnetteD|Talk 22:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
  The Original Barnstar
I hereby award this barnstar to editor Lugnuts for his unrivalled and titanic contributions to the encyclopaedia. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I found out what happened a few weeks back and still can't believe it. Sorry I never said anything for you at the case, didn't see this one coming. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deletion templates

edit

Since so many editors are reverting deletion notifications, have you considered Category:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages for preventing semi-automated deletion notifications from appearing on this talk page? NytharT.C 11:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Goodbye

edit

It is sad to see that your time is Wikipedia ended the way it did. I am one who has benefitted from your stub articles. I wouldn't have probably bothered to add more material to Devraj Puri, Santosh Reddy, Syed Moinuddin and others if you hadn't already created stubs for them. People who consider stubs as evil may not understand it. Tintin 13:06, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I'm sad that your time on Wikipeda has ended.

You had made many pages and worked tirelessly to make many pages Coolberry-pedia (talk) 22:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Howzat!

edit
  Top read of the day
The top read article yesterday was the 2023 ICC World Test Championship final. It has achieved over a million readers since Lugnuts created it. Well played, sir! Andrew🐉(talk) 10:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for 2023 ICC World Test Championship Final

edit

On 13 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 ICC World Test Championship Final, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ktin (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

How do you know philip cassidy?

edit

Im a related, he my dads cusin. How does Lugnuts know about him. 94.191.136.157 (talk) 20:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

lugnuts won't be able to answer you. But he wrote articles about Olympians, mostly using online sources for info. Most articles on Wikipedia are written by people who don't personally know the subject. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 20:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
You can email Lugnuts if you really want to know, he cannot answer here unfortunately. X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 22:51, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mohamed Helmi for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamed Helmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Helmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ben5218 (talk) 23:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Hisham Saleh" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Hisham Saleh has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 17 § Hisham Saleh until a consensus is reached. Ben5218 (talk) 00:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Mahmoud Saleh Hisham" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Mahmoud Saleh Hisham has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 17 § Mahmoud Saleh Hisham until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Josef Kopecký for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josef Kopecký is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josef Kopecký until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clara A. Djalim (talk) 11:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jana Mlakar for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jana Mlakar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Mlakar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clara A. Djalim (talk) 10:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jannie Sand

edit
 

The article Jannie Sand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 48JCL TALK 00:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rafael Jiménez

edit
 

The article Rafael Jiménez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article consists of only a single sentence with a single source. Does not meet notability requirements.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~~~ Garsh (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mahbubul Alam Anik

edit
 

The article Mahbubul Alam Anik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is a BLP with no substantial notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Garsh (talk) 17:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hermias Strauss for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hermias Strauss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermias Strauss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Danie van Schoor for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danie van Schoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danie van Schoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ricardo Strauss (cricketer) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo Strauss (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Strauss (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sam Burke

edit
 

The article Sam Burke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable umpire with only a DB link as a source. Only participated in three matches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Leneve Damens for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leneve Damens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leneve Damens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 23:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Clayton Brown for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clayton Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marcello Bertinetti (fencer born 1952) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcello Bertinetti (fencer born 1952) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcello Bertinetti (fencer born 1952) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Normanhunter2 (talk) 13:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paul Parkinson (athlete)

edit
 

The article Paul Parkinson (athlete) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. It also has one source in the article, but there is not enough information for justification to be notable on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Normanhunter2 (talk) 23:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nemanja Marković for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nemanja Marković is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemanja Marković until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XabqEfdg (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miguel Ángel Sierra for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miguel Ángel Sierra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Ángel Sierra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XabqEfdg (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Martin Liška for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Liška is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Liška until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 12:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marek Małecki for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marek Małecki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marek Małecki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Antoni Gołaś for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antoni Gołaś is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoni Gołaś until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Suonii180 (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Livio Tesconi

edit
 

The article Livio Tesconi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hornpipe2 (talk) 14:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Michal Pšenko for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michal Pšenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michal Pšenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Joe McMenamin for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe McMenamin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe McMenamin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Frost 16:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Harry Eaton (actor)

edit

Hello, Lugnuts

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Harry Eaton (actor), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template:Estonia-record-label-stub has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Template:Estonia-record-label-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nelson Ruiz for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nelson Ruiz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelson Ruiz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jean Bernard Djambou for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Bernard Djambou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Bernard Djambou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 13:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jamal Abdi Hassan for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamal Abdi Hassan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamal Abdi Hassan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Marcus Markup (talk) 19:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Montserrat at the 2015 World Championships in Athletics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, sent one athlete who did not advance. No secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 05:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Montserrat at the 2015 World Championships in Athletics for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Montserrat at the 2015 World Championships in Athletics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montserrat at the 2015 World Championships in Athletics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 07:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Julio Illescas for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julio Illescas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio Illescas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 20:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to Join the Belgian Cinema Task Force

edit

Hi Lugnuts, I hope this message finds you well!

I've noticed your valuable contributions related to Belgian cinema, and I wanted to reach out to see if you'd be interested in joining a new initiative—the Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Belgian cinema task force. The goal of the task force is to enhance and expand our coverage of Belgian films and filmmakers on Wikipedia. Your expertise and passion would be a great asset to this effort.

If you're interested, please add your username and any comments to the list of members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Belgian cinema task force/Participants. Having more users involved will help us gain approval for the task force. I'd love to have you on board! Best regards, Earthh (talk) 09:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Giant Records (independent) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giant Records (independent) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant Records (independent) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

toweli (talk) 12:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Luis Campos (athlete)

edit
 

The article Luis Campos (athlete) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not finding WP:SIGCOV, finished 37th in the only event they participated in.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Asia Cup 2020

edit

Hello Lugnuts,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Asia Cup 2020 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply