User talk:Maury Markowitz/Archives/2019

DYK for Organic nuclear reactor

On 6 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Organic nuclear reactor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that organic nuclear reactors, widely reseached in the 1950s and 1960s, replaced the water normally used to cool the reactor core with various organic fluids? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Organic nuclear reactor. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Organic nuclear reactor), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for October to December 2018 reviews. MilHistBot (talk) 01:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Talkback

Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Anna Ringsred.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi! Hope I'm doing this in the right place. I wanted to thank you for the edit of the SKYPIX article. As an editor myself let me say that you improved it tremendously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:4100:B810:E9:A3B8:A3CF:1C23 (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you for ZETA, "built in the UK in the 1950s, the largest and most powerful reactor of its era. ZETA is representative of the fusion field's history - a theoretical breakthrough suggests a new route to fusion power, a reactor is built to take advantage of the design, it proves not to work, and fixing it requires a larger and more expensive design. Unlike other examples, however, ZETA had the rather unfortunate problem of announcing it was successful in very public fashion in newspapers around the world and then having to retract the claim. In spite of this embarrassing event, ZETA went on to have a very productive career and provided several important advances in the field." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for AMES Type 85

On 27 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article AMES Type 85, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Royal Air Force's AMES Type 85 radar was already considered obsolete by the time it became operational? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/AMES Type 85. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, AMES Type 85), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

• Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected

• In focus: The Collective Consciousness of Admin Userpages

• News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives

• In the media: The Signpost's investigative story recognized, Wikipedia turns 18 and gets a birthday gift from Google, and more editors are recognized

• Discussion report: The future of the reference desk

• Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity

• Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope

• Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther

• Technology report: When broken is easily fixed

• Gallery: Let us build a memorial fit for such pain and suffering

• News from the WMF: News from WMF

• Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?

• Essay: How

• Humour: Village pump

• From the archives: An editorial board that includes you

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cavers of Mars II in-game.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cavers of Mars II in-game.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Phobos in-game.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phobos in-game.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Conquest of Mars opening.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Conquest of Mars opening.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

• From the editors: Help wanted (still)

• News and notes: Front-page issues for the community

• In focus: Wikimedia affiliate organizations seek community participation in 2019 board election

• Discussion report: Talking about talk pages

• Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!

• Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee

• Traffic report: Binge-watching

• Technology report: Tool labs casters-up

• Gallery: Signed with pride

• Recent research: Research finds signs of cultural diversity and recreational habits of readers

• Essay: Optimist's guide to Wikipedia

• From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love

• Humour: Pesky Pronouns

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for ASV Mk. II radar

On 10 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article ASV Mk. II radar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first airborne radar system, ASV Mk. II, led to the sinking of the German battleship Bismarck? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/ASV Mk. II radar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ASV Mk. II radar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Apple Inc.

Hello Maury Markowitz,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc ^connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.

RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Atari 8-bit family hardware description

This isn't quite right: "The 2600 had no bitmap graphics support or a character generator, all on-screen graphics were created using Player-Missile graphics (sprites). The CTIA was designed on the same model, and likewise used only sprites for drawing."

The 2600 has 20 bits of background graphics--half a line which can be reflected or repeated. The display combines that background with sprites. Dgpop (talk) 13:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

• From the editors: Getting serious about humor

• News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive

• In the media: Women's history month

• Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding

• Featured content: Out of this world

• Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM

• Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations

• Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles

• News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive

• Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention

• From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion

• Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37

• Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?

• In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch

• Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride

• Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

ACR comments

You have comments that need to be responded to at Project Excaliber; I've responded to your comments at Normandie-class battleship that you need to evaluate.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)== Congratulations from the Military History Project ==

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for January to March 2019 reviews. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Help! :)

I have completely revamped the background section per your requests. I think it's now interesting and incorporates the narrative you wanted to tell. The only major omissions are:

1) I didn't go into detail on the provenance of the sub-periscope. Again, I think that's better suited for its own article.

2) I didn't mention the HoJo's.

3) I put the details of the GRAB system's operations in the Spacecraft section.

I hope you dig. Thank you for your help.

--Neopeius (talk) 20:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

SOLRAD 1 FA is ready! :)

I've added the details of GRAB's ELINT collection and transmission under the Spacecraft section. I think the article is ready to go.

Could you please provide the complete Bamford reference? Thank you for all your help! --Neopeius (talk) 15:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello again. While I am amenable to including material from the Bamford reference, I cannot include it if I don't have it. Could you please give me the complete citation and, if able, a URL to access it? Thank you! :) --Neopeius (talk) 02:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello out there. :) SOLRAD 1 should be ready for you. Thanks again for your help. --Neopeius (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello out there. :) Could you give SOLRAD 1 a final judgment, please? The nomination turns on your assessment, and I've addressed your main issues (breadth and completeness). Thank you! --Neopeius (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ALGOL 68, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parallel processing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

• News and notes: An Action Packed April

• In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?

• Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages

• Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art

• Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee

• Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde

• Technology report: A new special page, and other news

• Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns

• News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?

• Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy

• From the archives: Portals revisited

• Humour: Jimbo and Larry walk into a bar ...

• Opinion: The gaps in our knowledge of our gaps

• Interview: Katherine Maher marks 3 years as executive director

• Community view: 2019 Wikimedia Summit gathers movement affiliate representatives to discuss movement strategy

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:14, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Maury Markowitz/Archives/2019,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for ASV Mark III radar

On 10 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article ASV Mark III radar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ASV Mark III radar was able to hunt down German U-boats with deadly efficiency in part because of a little white lie? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/ASV Mark III radar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ASV Mark III radar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BASIC09, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flow control (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

• From the editors: Picture that

• News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections

• In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball

• Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia

• Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead

• Traffic report: Dark marvels, thrones, a vile serial killer biopic, that's entertainment!

• Technology report: Lots of Bots

• News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey

• Recent research: Wikipedia more useful than academic journals, but is it stealing the news?

• Essay: Paid editing

• From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse question

I'm not going to answer your question at the Teahouse directly, as we don't want to encourage new editors thinking they can come and ask non-Wikipedia related questions there. However, whenever I'm trying to find out about a disuse website, I pop the url into https://archive.org/web/ and search for old archived versions of that site for contacts or other clues. Maybe you might try that? If you have a real name, you could always try https://www.thephonebook.bt.com/person/ - though since the advent of mobile phones, fewer and fewer people list their details there. If the site relates to some specialist activity, I look for clubs and organisations in their home area, then search online member lists and so on. Thinking laterally is the clue to finding someone. If you have a real name you could try modern social media platforms and check all the profiles for a match to the home town. Out of interest, why do you need to contact that person? Regards from the UK Nick Moyes (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes: Here is what I have tried to date: 1) exhaustive google searching, and my google-fu is quite good, 2) looking through several categories looking for anything Lancashire-related where general discussions take place that might be cogent, 3) several attempts to abuse the GeoCities URL format to attempt to trick out additional information, 4) using various "find this person" engines, including Facebook and Twitter. To answer your last question, the person in question wrote a web page where they ran the Rugg/Feldman benchmarks on a variety of machines, and I would like to know if they have any original copy of PCW that contains the original source listings. I guess I could have added that to the Teahouse post, but that did seem OT in that it doesn't actually clarify the request. Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:49, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I very much doubt I can do any better from over this side of the Pond, but if you wanted to email me the details I can try and have a look for you, seeing that it relates to the article you're working on. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Maury Markowitz! You created a thread called Where do I contact people who live in Lancashire? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Breeding blanket

Hello, Maury Markowitz,

Thanks for creating Breeding blanket! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		The Military history A-Class medal
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal for IFF Mark II, GL Mk. I radar, and Project Excalibur Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Microsoft Binary Format, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mantissa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rayleigh scattering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polarization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

• Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia

• News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising

• In the media: The disinformation age

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters

• Technology report: Actors and Bots

• Gallery: Unlike the North Face, Wiki Loves Earth

• Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?

• Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia

• From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching

• Opinion: Why the Terms of Use change didn't curtail undisclosed paid editing—and what might

• In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal

• Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes

• Op-Ed: 2019 Wikimedia Affiliate Selected Board Seats Election Results

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between April and June 2019 Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WDC 65C02, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accumulator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Super Storm on TI.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super Storm on TI.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

• News and notes: Wikimedia grants less accessible for travel, equipment, meetups, and India

• In the media: Politics starts getting rough

• Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban

• Arbitration report: A month of reintegration

• Gallery: Classic panoramas from Heinrich Berann

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?

• News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way

• Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect

• Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract

• Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things

• In focus: The French Wikipedia is overtaking the German

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

CSG 65CE02 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Accumulator, NMOS, Smart terminal and Stack

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Project Rover

Would you be willing to give Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Project Rover/archive1 a review? The subject is esoteric, and I can't think of anyone better qualified. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:51, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Alleged "Lenticular" Telechrome

Maury, I responded to your posts on my talk page. My reply appears on my own talk page. ColorWheel (talk) 02:53, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

FAC

Thought you might be interested in this, given that there is a connection to radar. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:50, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

IFF Mark II scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 30, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 30, 2019. Thanks!—Wehwalt (talk) 11:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Type 271 radar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Randall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/ASV Mark III radar

Just wanted to notify you that the A-class review for ASV Mark III radar has three separate reviews awaiting response. Kges1901 (talk) 22:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

• News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings

• In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff

• In the media: Many layers of fake news: Fake fiction and fake news vandalism

• Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users

• Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes

• Op-Ed: We couldn't have told you this, but Wikipedia was censored

• Opinion: The Curious Case of Croatian Wikipedia

• Community view: Chinese Wikipedia and the battle against extradition from Hong Kong

• News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year

• Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Rugg-Feldman benchmarks

Maury Markowitz, this nomination has been holding fire for over a month, and the lack of sourcing of several Benchmarks plus the final section of article is enough to keep the nomination from succeeding. Are you planning on adding the necessary sourcing, or should the nomination be closed? Please let us know on the nomination template. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: Sorry BM, this had fallen off my radar and I did not see the reviewer's comments. I disagree with his assessment, which strikes me as "maximal". Can you have a look and/or start a 3rd party review? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Maury Markowitz, if you don't plan on adding any further sourcing, then I don't see any point in asking for a new reviewer; Benchmarks 3 through 7 are uncited, as is the Sample results section, and the nomination will not make it to prep without added inline citations per WP:DYKSG#D2. If these citations are added, then proceeding with a second-opinion reviewer or making a post at the DYK talk page asking for others to weigh in on the sourcing independence issue are probably the way to go. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: BM 3 to 7 are cited at the top. These are sub-sections of one large paragraph. I could add the same sfn to all of them, but I struggle to understand how this informs the reader. As to the sample results, I removed the extraneous material at the bottom. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

I simply added the SFN to all of them.Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited System programming language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ESPOL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dragon reactor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Criticality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Type 271 radar

On 26 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Type 271 radar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of the first microwave radars, the British Type 271 (Type 273Q pictured) on board HMS Duke of York, led to the night-time sinking of the German battleship Scharnhorst? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Type 271 radar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Type 271 radar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Ontario Northland and the James Bay Railway

The original charter for the James Bay Railway dates from 1884 when the Lake Nipissing And James Bay Railway was granted their charter for a railway from Callander to James Bay, by William Barclay McMurrich and others. There was an 1895 charter for the James Bay Railway by William Mackenzie and Donald Mann, for a railway incorporated to construct and operate from Parry Sound via French River, Lake Wahnapitae to Moose River on James Bay, but it was NOT planned to build from Parry Sound to North Bay, however, Mackenzie and Mann did manipulate McMurrich & Co. to have the charter of the Lake Nipissing And James Bay Railway changed to include running from Parry Sound to Callander, and this was done in 1897 and not in 1895 or 1884.

Here is A description of the country traversed by this railway between Lake Nipissing & James' Bay Railway, published in 1884 by Copp, Clark & Co. of Toronto. https://archive.org/details/descriptionofcou00nipi/page/n1 W W (talk) 04:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HP 3000, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CISC and End-of-life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

• From the editors: Where do we go from here?

• Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup

• In the media: A net loss: Wikipedia attacked, closing off Russia? welcoming back Turkey?

• Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads

• News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green

• Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report

• Gallery: Finding freely licensed photo collections

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• In focus: Wikidata & Wikibase for national libraries: the inaugural meeting

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you today for IFF Mark II, "t the first IFF system to be used. IFF is an important technology, it's what keeps jets from pilling into each other (as long as the pilots listen to it!), and this is the device that started it all"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Rugg/Feldman benchmarks

On 2 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rugg/Feldman benchmarks, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Steve Wozniak's Integer BASIC was so fast in the Rugg/Feldman benchmarks that Bill Gates complained? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rugg/Feldman benchmarks), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited JOSS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Angeles County Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Operation Catechism

Hi Maury, I think that I've now addressed your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Operation Catechism/archive1. Could you please look in on this review? Thanks, Nick-D (talk) 09:43, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tymshare SUPER BASIC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DTSS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hazeltine Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smart terminal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Type 277 radar at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:27, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Type 277 radar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Antenna and Bandwidth

Rocketdyne S-3D (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blue Streak

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

• In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit

• Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse

• In focus: The BBC looks at Chinese government editing

• Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars

• Community view: Observations from the mainland

• Arbitration report: October actions

• Traffic report: Wrestling with a couple of teenagers, a Nobelist, and a lot of jokers

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast

• Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia

• Essay: Wikipedia is in the real world

• News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Hazeltine 2000 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of FLOW (programming language)

Hello! Your submission of FLOW (programming language) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Alex2006 (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for JOSS

On 6 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article JOSS, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one user said of JOSS, an interactive programming system at RAND, "it's better than beer"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/JOSS. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, JOSS), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hazeltine 2000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

ASV Mark III radar

Hi Maury

I was wondering if you were planning on returning to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/ASV Mark III radar, as it is in danger of being archived for lack of response. Which would be a great shame, as it seems to bee virtually there.

Gog the Mild (talk) 15:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited STIR/SHAKEN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandwidth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

• From the editor: Put on your birthday best

• News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?

• In the media: You say you want a revolution

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases

• Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker

• Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things

• Gallery: Winter and holidays

• Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews

• Essay: Adminitis

• From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited

• In focus: An update on the Wikimedia Movement 2030 Strategy

• Special report: How many people edit in your favorite language? Where are they from?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tymshare RETRIEVE

Hello! Your submission of Tymshare RETRIEVE at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

• Hello! Your submission of Tymshare RETRIEVE at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik ^(talk) 22:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Data General Nova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flip-flop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

DG Nova

@Shieldforyoureyes: moving the convo[1] here. (He hasn't been active in a while. I'm in regular contact with him, though. Recently I've been uploading photos on his behalf.)

See the RCS collection and let me know if additional images are needed and/or desired. We have an S/230, for example.

It looks like you've done some fine work. I'll take a closer look over the weekend. I'll also ping our resident DG expert.[2] --mikeu ^talk 23:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Type 277 radar

On 14 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Type 277 radar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Royal Navy's Type 277 radar was so successful that it served as the basis for Navy radars for years, and was used on land by the Royal Air Force and the British Army? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Type 277 radar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Type 277 radar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 05:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited System programming language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ESPOL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for FLOW (programming language)

On 22 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article FLOW (programming language), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jef Raskin would prove his FLOW language was easy to use by closing his eyes, typing randomly on the keyboard, and producing executable programs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/FLOW (programming language). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, FLOW (programming language)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to FLOW (programming language) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 08:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of STIR/SHAKEN

Hello! Your submission of STIR/SHAKEN at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for SNAP (programming language)

On 26 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SNAP (programming language), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after writing a programming language used to publish books on the humanities, Michael Barnett wrote the SNAP language to teach programming to humanities students? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SNAP (programming language). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SNAP (programming language)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

• From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again

• News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages

• Special report: Are reputation management operatives scrubbing Wikipedia articles?

• In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?

• Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki

• Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee

• Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December

• Technology report: User scripts and more

• Gallery: Holiday wishes

• Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary

• From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Op-Ed: Why we need to keep talking about Wikipedia's gender gap

• WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Focal

hello, since your edit it started saying FOCUS instead of, presumably, FOCAL... And in all subsequent edits you write FOCUS as well. Since yours are apparently good-faith edits I decided to go and ask rather than revert outright. I'm also curious how something like that comes about (over-eager spelling correction software? But then "focal" is a word, too...) Aecho6Ee (talk) 20:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Grammary. 9 times out of 10 it's amazing. The other 1, subtle. Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Category creation

Hi. Please don't create "blank" categories as you did recently with eg Category:General Electric radars. At the very least, you need to add categories so that humans and maintenance bots can use the category hierarchy to find them - and browsing the hierarchy to find suitable parents can help you see whether you have the right name for your new category. It's also nice to link to a relevant article either directly or using {{catmain}}. Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 09:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Le Deluge: I do not understand. That category has several items in it. It is not blank. Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

The category is now in several categories because I added them, but in its original form as you created it it was completely blank. I'm not talking about the category being empty (ie when a category contains no articles), I'm talking about the category itself, which is a "page" like an article, which can be edited in its own right (but normally just has categories, and maybe a template like {{catmain}}). Have a read of Wikipedia:Categorization, or ping me if you need further help. Le Deluge (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Le Deluge: I understand the "nice" at the end of your list, but I am at a loss for the other items. Can you give me a use-case of where this causes failure? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:10, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Honestly, it's worth reading Wikipedia:Categorization. But the key thing is that categories are not "simple" metatags but actual "pages" which can be edited like any other Wikipedia page, as well as "containers" for other pages. Think of it a bit like a library logo on a traditional card index. So if you look at the categories I added to the category after you created it, they are the reason that the radars category now shows up in Category:General Electric systems. Without that categorisation, you would not be able to find the radars category in Category:General Electric systems. And possibly more importantly, there's various automated systems that rely on things being linked in to the category hierarchy.Le Deluge (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Le Deluge: Sorry, family emergency, all good now. I think perhaps I am not explaining myself properly. In your first post, I read it to mean that not adding content would break something. Specifically, what is the problem with the "various automated systems" you refer to? Can you be more specific? Certainly, if the category does not show up in GE, that is not a problem, anyone can fix that at any time like any edit to any article. But you seem to be stating something will actually break. If so, it seems that should be reported. If not, all good. Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Well it should be enough that Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing_pages clearly states Every Wikipedia page should belong to at least one category. A category is itself a Wikipedia page and so every category in turn should be in a category. If you want to change that, you are welcome to find a consensus for it but for now, them's the rules. But just about every maintenance bot (and anybody or any bot using WP:AWB) relies heavily on selecting a top category and then applying some change to it and all the subcategories. For instance, if General Electric changed its corporate name, then an editor would start at Category:General Electric and work their way down through all the subcategories to propose the rename. If the radars category wasn't in that hierarchy, it would be missed and wouldn't get renamed. Or someone might use AWB to add an infobox or subject navigation box to all the articles in Category:Military radars and its subcategories - but not in your category if it didn't have categories. There's a lot of that stuff goes on behind the scenes, and you don't need to worry about it just follow the instruction in WP:Categorization ! Le Deluge (talk) 12:04, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

@Le Deluge: Good, so nothing is actually broken. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Well yes, breaking the category hierarchy means breaking the basis of 90% of Wikipedia automation, on which the whole encyclopedia relies (even if it's not particularly obvious to the average user). And also, what's the point of creating a category if nobody can find it? You might as well not bother. Le Deluge (talk) 13:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

@Le Deluge: Its not broken, it's working fine. You fixed it. Right? Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Yes for this specific category, I thought we were talking about the general principle of not categorising.Le Deluge (talk) 13:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

@Le Deluge: Well I wasn't, but I thought I was clear about that. In any event, there is nothing actually wrong, so I'd like to move on to writing actual content. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)