This is an archive of past discussions with User:Muboshgu. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
On 18 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tyler Zombro, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tyler Zombro had a seizure and skull fracture after he was hit in the head by a 104-mile-per-hour (167 km/h) line drive? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tyler Zombro. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tyler Zombro), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 20 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bob Glenalvin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the parents of Bob Glenalvin insisted that he play baseball under an assumed name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Glenalvin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bob Glenalvin), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 21 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Roger Angell, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 15:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Cherrell410 I figured as much. It is important to add, though. It can get tedious, so it can be helpful to save some of the formatting text elsewhere to copy/paste and not have to type out every time....
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I’ve read some of your articles on Wikipedia, and almost everyone of them involving current politics is slanted to the left, in fact almost to the point of libel. You’re not trading in objectivity, but in political bias. I’m a lawyer with a Harvard Law degree, and I can tell bias and tendentiousness when I see it.
If you’re the one who wrote or changed the article about Ronna McDaniel, then I have proof of your bias right there. The article starts off with every negative thing one can think of about her, and then continues in that same vein. Although the article is footnoted, I’ve read some of the footnote articles, and they are largely so-called “progressive” (leftist) opinions, rather than facts. 63.155.42.108 (talk) 06:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
I created Ronna McDaniel's article, but it's a community effort that got the page where it is. If you're criticizing the Washington Post or New York Times, I don't know what to tell you because that's pretty standard journalism not whatever you think are so-called “progressive” (leftist) opinions. If you want to point out anything specific from the McDaniel article that you think is biased, it's better to do so on the article's talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
DYK for National Baseball Commission
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages.
Stolen election illegitimate President direct quotes
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Can you please explain how a high ranking public figure that claimed two elections were stolen or a president was illegitimate is not included on her Wikipedia profile. Shouldn’t readers know that she once said this? How can Wikipedia be neutral when it whitewashes content like this? These are direct quotes from her. The previous press secretary acknowledged that these statements were made. Shameful if this is t added. 47.203.28.160 (talk) 01:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 3 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Russ Davis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Russ Davis hit the first home run at Safeco Field? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Russ Davis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Russ Davis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, just to make sure you're aware three months prior Myrie's page also had fawning/uncited additions from Special:Contributions/Abe.nysenate, the name nomenclature was obvious enough for me to be suspicious, but I merely reverted and COI noticed them because I saw only tenuous overlapping edits for an SPI. Also, Myrie's middle initial is Y as seen as on his state leg page and twitter and the fact that "FML.nysenate" is an established localpart of a gmail address for Senate staffers, it seems like this might by Myrie himself if not someone with his initials who still works for him, for instances see "Matt Baer Director of Policy and Communications Email: msb.nysenate@gmail.com". No comment on whether the abe.nysenate account was Austin William "Bill" Erwin or someone else on the Myrie staff who is not listed on their State Gov contact us page. JesseRafe (talk) 19:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
JesseRafe, thanks for pointing that out. I think you handled it correctly in March given the circumstances. Now this new account is here. I'm of the impression that it's Myrie himself, or someone in his office or campaign staff. I thought I had seen other users with ".nysenate" in their name. Some of the changes may be constructive, I plan on taking a look later unless you or someone else beats me to it. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Kelsie Whitmore
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 10 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Phil McGrane, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Phil McGrane used food trucks as his inspiration to increase early voting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Phil McGrane. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Phil McGrane), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
This is a case of discrimination. Wikipedia is not supposed to do that. I was disruptively editing. I got banned for one word. I am asking to be unbanned so that I can fix one word without fear of being banned. Cbinetti (talk) 23:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Cbinetti you are incorrect, there is no discrimination, and you've been blocked from editing one page, not banned, for your overall disruption. If you want to address the issue on that page, use the talk page and discuss content, not other editors. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
This is discrimination. I will have to go to the Arbitration Commission or Wikimedia's legal department to assert my rights if the pattern of discrimination and retaliation continue. I was not being disruptive in context. The other editors were bullying me. DeCausa taunted me. I begged for help from Bishonen and he blocked me. This is discrimination and retaliation and it is illegal. I am being discriminated and retaliated against for being Italian, Catholic, and disabled. I was no more disruptive than DeCausa and Doug Weller, but they are white able men, so they can be disruptive. I tried to edit one word. I stopped trying to edit this page for months. I only tried editing it again recently. Bishonen said that I had disrupted for six months. That is a lie. How do I get unblocked? Cbinetti (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
This is discrimination. I tried to edit one word yesterday and got blocked for life for it. This is discriminatory and needs to be fixed. Cbinetti (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Are you the same administrator as Bishonen. He is supposed to review my initial request for appeal. I have apologized to him and DeCausa and Hobomok and Doug Weller. I thought that I had apologized to you, but I do not see it. I got overheated. I am sorry. Please give me another chance to appeal. Cbinetti (talk) 22:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
With my disabilities and past history, it is far too easy for me to feel ganged up on and discriminated and retaliated against. I apologize for all the things I said about you. I was clearly wrong with you. I just am not sure if I was wrong about everybody. I hope to one day be an administrator but I do not think that I ever will get the chance, even if I get unblocked, because I have so many warnings on my record. Thanks again for helping me and I am sorry. Cbinetti (talk) 23:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Floyd Griffin
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 13 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Floyd Griffin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Floyd Griffin lost a mayoral election by just 35 votes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Floyd Griffin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Floyd Griffin), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
On 12 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yumi Nu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Yumi Nu is a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue and Vogue cover model and musician signed to Steve Aoki's record label? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yumi Nu. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yumi Nu), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
So on the Chesa Boudin article, there is someone that keeps editing the infocard. I’m asking you because you seem to know your stuff. Is she right or wrong? I just don’t want to edit it because I’m not as high as her… Bbraxtonlee (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Bbraxtonlee, none of us have status, if that's what you mean by I'm not as high as her. While I'm an admin, that doesn't mean anything when I'm involved in content editing. Ask her on talk why she did what she did, maybe she'll convince you, or you can convince her otherwise. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Brewer Hicklen
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On June 12, 2022, in a game between the Red Sox and the Seattle Mariners, Refsnyder earned his "Superman" nickname by making a sensational diving catch while playing right field.[84][85][86]
You deleted this factual entry. I will submit this dispute for a third opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mixitcat (talk • contribs) 18:55, June 14, 2022 (UTC)
Mixitcat, you can seek other opinions, sure, but what part of Refsnyder earned his "Superman" nickname sounds encyclopedic to you? Neutral? – Muboshgu (talk) 03:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 21 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Clela Rorex, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 22:09, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Question about MLB player
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
On the official roster on the A's website, I saw that Seth Brown was listed as a 1B. On the template however, he's listed as an OF. Should I move him to the INF category or leave him in the OF category? Apdiggs1997 (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 24 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hugh McElhenny, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 06:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Teresa of Jesus, Child – hoax museum
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I pointed out on the AfD page that no other sources existed (besides the website, which was actually in Italian) and the exact dates and location were linked to a different saint. The creator of the article also admitted she made a mistake and wrote it in good faith. 00sClassicGamerFan (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, it's a hard day for me. Scary to be a woman in the US, especially one who is mid-pregnancy. And the hypocrisy is truly amazing. Today "states have a fundamental right to tell women what to do with their bodies and legislate it!" but yesterday "no, no, how dare states try to legislate gun rights, those are federally protected!" PRAXIDICAE🌈14:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
I know. Those fuckers lied in their confirmation hearings. We knew they were lying at the time, but it's not like we could prove perjury. Or that anyone would've tried. I'm sorry as an ally. But congratulations on your pregnancy! – Muboshgu (talk) 14:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
If I weren't such an upstanding Wikicitizen, I'd be having a field day at Susan Collins. She owns this.
You forgot to revdelete the edits for the talk page. On IRC, it appears that other administrators did not approve of your decision, as it was ordinary vandalism. I just think we should be consistent. The consensus appeared to be to undelete. Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Scorpions13256, thank you for pointing out that I missed the talk page. I consider that page move vandalism sufficiently disruptive with no positive intent to be a valid RevDel. None of those admins on IRC have said anything to me about it. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:06, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
They did not want to disturb you. I have been doing antivandalism RCP for 2 years, and I still don't understand RD3. Thank you for your time. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:13, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
That's silly. Noone is disturbing me by posting on my talk page, not even the trolls. I'm open to feedback. RD3 is more of an art than a science. I didn't find it so bad to call SCOTUS illegitimate, but the attack on the Catholic Church I perceived as meeting the threshold. Open to opinions from others. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Issues with the Operation of ANI and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 28 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Katie Phang, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when her boss told her to quit her unpaid television commenting role, Katie Phang quit her paid job instead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Katie Phang. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Katie Phang), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I'm very disappointed that you persist with content on the Kari Lake page that makes statements that are potentially untrue. At the very least, the public should know that the person making the remarks is being sued by Kari Lake as defamatory. This persistence with potentially false content is NOT in the best interests of Wikipedia, which is supposed to be encyclopedic and not a place where people are posting what they think, whether it is true or notAbsent.Editor (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC). Absent.Editor (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'm new to Wiki, but the new picture I posted for McDaniel is not copyrighted. It is his Senate composite picture. The old picture that is presently being use is a copyrighted image. Goldwater1971 (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Goldwater1971, images created by the U.S. federal government are in the public domain, but images from state governments are not. You claimed the McDaniel official portrait to be your "own work", which is false. The image currently used has a valid tag, based on how MSNBC uploaded their video to YouTube. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, Muboshgu! I was wondering if you were going to follow up on nominating any of these articles. If not, I was thinking of bundling them as per my !vote. Thoughts? Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Bison X, yes, I was planning on returning to these articles to see if there's a better way to group them in smaller bunches, or if its best to do them one at a time. What you suggested may be the way to go, but I need to give that more time and thought before proceeding. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:55, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I just made some significant changes to User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool. Since you have the tool active, I am informing you of this since it may affect you. To open the tool you will now have to click the "respond" button. The tool will load a similar interface as before. There is now a live preview of the response. These changes might have introduced some bugs so if you have any concerns / suggestions or run into problems please leave a note at User talk:Terasail/Edit Request Tool Thanks, Terasail[✉️]15:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
Thank you. Yes, the sheeple blindly following the MSM, that's what happening here, obfuscated as "not yet verified" or "fake news". Sad, User:Tide rolls, very sad. Drmies (talk) 16:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article Rob Refsnyder you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rob Refsnyder for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Undelete: List_of_Macintosh_models_by_case_type
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hello,
I think that the list of Apple computers by case type is useful, for example, for collectors who try to have a representative computer of each type. It would be like the sticker album.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.
Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Don't ever post on my talkpage or ping me ever again (this includes handing out of ITN credits). Your support of a US article at WP:ITNC is a clear US bias in my opinion, and I refuse to tolerate it. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Joseph2302, you must be joking. I said I want to support the Copenhagen article, but it's quality is poor. You want to support the Copenhagen article but not Highland Park, that shows your bias is very clearly anti-US. And I don't believe I've posted on your talk page or pinged you, aside from this reply. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
The Highland Park article is no longer a stub, while the Copenhagen article was when I last looked at it about an hour ago. The Copenhagen shooting was 24 hours ago, and the Highland Park shooting was about one or two, so I see that one improving at a much better rate. But, it's American, and you don't want to post American events that make the news, it appears. If the Copenhagen article gets expanded, I'll support it. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Joseph2302, I promise that I will not ping you again after this comment, but I want to be sure that you see this final reply here as I return the favor: don't ever post on my talk page again. I don't know if you've ever pinged me before, but refrain from doing so in the future. With ridiculous comments like this, I don't think you should be replying to nominations that focus on such heated topics. The Highland Park and Copenhagen nominations are separate and independent of each other, except for your attempts to link them. This kind of nonsense behavior is what has made ITN/C such a battleground and I don't appreciate it. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Alex Colome
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
thanks for your edits--i reformulated the contributions to reflect your feedback (e.g., fewer sections) but I think a lot of this is newsworthy and widely reported. for example his political donations were a defining controversy of the republican primary and unusual for a republican ag candidate. the tibbetts affair was reported on by national media and resulted in rare condemnations from republican office holders that typically remain neutral in primaries.
also you eliminated newsworthy details about his business career and grouped his law school and government staffing under the headline of business and legal. there is stil little to no coverage of the various reported controversies from his ranching, banking and legal career. Clowncar1 (talk) 22:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
i added more national (and some local sources) and reformulated to focus on the news worthy elements. working in good faith to get a comprehensive portrait Clowncar1 (talk) 23:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
also the citation to the daily caller is to attest to the coverage itself, not predicated on the truth value of that outlet (for the truth value a cite to the FEC is provided and to credible news organizations). thanks for your work on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clowncar1 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Not sure if you saw the alternative I offered: What if we restore those topics that were included but which are now missing from the bio page Pol pos § in the form they were in prior to [ my splitting out the Pol pos page ], basically undoing part of my large edit? We could then work step-by-step from there. Going that route, there would initially be some duplication of material that's currently in the Foreign policy section, but should be easy to resolve. I'm willing to work from there if that makes it easier for all. Humanengr (talk) 23:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
@Humanengr:, shit I forgot again. I am putting a reminder on my calendar to look at it tomorrow. I will weigh in. Thank you for your patience. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 8 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article James Caan, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 04:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks!
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I reverted the deletion of my April Madison edit which just came to my attention. If he wants to dress frilly, it's not our business to approve of or conceal it for him. I'm guessing his final officeholding tenure will be over in January so paid editors will no longer have any role in supporting him. Activist (talk) 11:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Brewer Hicklen
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 10 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brewer Hicklen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brewer Hicklen(pictured) hosts an annual youth baseball camp in Alabama? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brewer Hicklen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brewer Hicklen), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Thank you for looking over my article, Kaoru Genji from when I first made a DYK nomination... I was able to improve the article immensely because of your help and now I can see it made it to the DYK section. Once again, thank you so much! Ronaa22 (talk) 11:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
New Request on The Players' Tribune page
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi M, since Ronald Acuña Jr. is in the Home Run Derby and All-Star Game this week, it might be a good idea to semi-protect the article for a week or so. I know protection isn't supposed to be preventative, but his article does tend to get more of these edits when he's on national TV. Thanks for whatever you can do. BilCat (talk) 19:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
On 19 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dee Dawkins-Haigler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dee Dawkins-Haigler(pictured) ran in four elections in four months for the same seat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dee Dawkins-Haigler. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dee Dawkins-Haigler), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 21 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Larry Jeffrey, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Leo Posada
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
On 20 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leo Posada, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before his Major League Baseball career, Leo Posada(pictured) represented Cuba internationally in cycling? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leo Posada. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Leo Posada), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 23 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lance McCullers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that doctors told Lance McCullers that he should not continue to pitch in 1990, but he returned to Major League Baseball in 1992? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lance McCullers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lance McCullers), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I'm so sorry I was trying to get rid of semi protection is not active anymore what should I do now instead of deleting? Darnitol95 (talk) 00:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 25 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Lynch, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen00:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Honest debate, not censorship, is required
Latest comment: 2 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion
Muboshgu, on the Paul Krugman cheerleading page, I made reference to a NYTimes op-ed written by Paul Krugman in which Paul Krugman himself says he was wrong.
Several users have tried to create a more balanced article on Paul Krugman, presenting both his good points AND BAD POINTS. The changes were being talked about (not actually made) on the TALK page. Each time, SPECIFICO summarily deletes all dissenting opinion.
How do you consider this censorship as neutral and unbiased? Where is the balance? where is the debate? How can there be a debate when one side is deleted without any consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.75.162.21 (talk) 15:43, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
There can be debate, there cannot be disparagement of the subject of a WP:BLP like whatever Princeton/CUNY nonsense you were spouting, or claiming that a Wikiepdia editor is a PR flack for the subject of the BLP. If you want to discuss adding mention of Krugman's predictions about inflation turning out to be incorrect, thta's fine. But stick to that without disparaging anybody, and you might get somewhere. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:47, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
If you want to be involved in the debate, kindly take the time to educate yourself on the number of times SPECIFICO summarily deleted all dissenting views (from several users, not just me).
Look at the history of "edits". Actually look instead of just taking any one users opinion. SPECIFICO has deleted opposing viewpoints over and over and over.
PS - as someone who was directly involved in the "Princeton nonsense" as you called it, it was a humiliating period for Princeton. The lawsuits I mentioned (that were censored) were widely reported in many newspapers. Some of us wanted the university to come clean, sunshine is the best remedy. Others wanted to save face. The "save face" crowd prevailed, at least in the short term. Krugman was allowed to "retire" and the university avoided further scandal in newspapers. But the matter still simmers in the minds of countless alum. Perhaps Princeton's dirty laundry does not belong on a page specifically about Krugman.
Actually present those newspaper sources rather than alluding to them obliquely. If there is relevant material to add, we can add it. But there are ways to go about doing this, and besmirching either the subject of the article or a Wikipedia editor is not the way. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:08, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
The NY Times link that I included, and SPECIFICO deleted, was this:
You and other editors seem to encourage a tight nit clique of Krugman cheerleaders who censor and delete anything and everything that doesn't meet their very partisan opinions.
Why don't you apply the same standards to them? Why is SPECIFICO allowed (and encouraged) to delete dissenting viewpoints?
If you want civilized dialog, you need to lead by example. You *MUST* apply the same standards to SPECIFICO and crazies like him.
You joining the debate late, failing to read the history -- and taking sides is not going to result in civilzed discussion.
I have given you every opportunity to discuss adding that content in a constructive manner. Instead, you continue to bash us. If you were to engage constructively, we could add something to the article. Instead, I'm blocking you and I don't know that discussion will go anywhere. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Special Barnstar
This is for you, you made the nomination for Charles Johnson for the recent deaths occur. To you, this may not seem like a big deal, I am sure that you have successfully added things on the main page yourself, but do you remember the first time that you did that? I am sure that it made you feel very happy. Whenever you did that, it must have been one of, if not the happiest day of your life. How about the day whenever Derek Jeter became a featured article? You gave the joy down to me, and to be honest, you made me tear up a bit, so I would like to say that you have earned this.Sportsfangnome (talk) 22:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
What do I need to do to update the quality of Mark Ronchetti's Picture
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 27 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Paul Sorvino, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 03:04, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Gentner Drummond
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
On 26 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gentner Drummond, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gentner Drummond flew in the first combat mission of Operation Desert Storm? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gentner Drummond. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gentner Drummond), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trey Ball (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Leonard (baseball) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dom Thompson-Williams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 3 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Larry Jeffrey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Larry Jeffrey had eleven knee surgeries in a span of nine years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Larry Jeffrey. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Larry Jeffrey), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.
Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)
Arbitration
The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.
Miscellaneous
You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Ecker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 7 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dwight Smith (baseball), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that baseball player Dwight Smith recorded a demo rhythm and blues album during the 1993–94 offseason? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dwight Smith (baseball). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dwight Smith (baseball)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Given that discussion of the crime as a lynching was already in the article, I feel like this was an unnecessarily snide reply and not in line with WP:BITE. Can I suggest that you tone it down a shade in the future? VQuakr (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
I don't think he was being bitey - my response was probably a little off the cuff, but he was correct to ask for sources and if it was OR. PRAXIDICAE🌈19:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Description as a lynching and the crime's role an example for driving passage of anti-lynching laws is a major aspect of the subject. Maybe if you are that unfamiliar with the topic and don't have time to look at the article you should let someone else reply? It was mostly the last clause that seemed snide to me. Communication over text can be tricky, though, so I accept the possibility that I am reading it in a way that the neither you intended nor was how it was interpreted by the IP. @Praxidicae: I had started a reply here before you replied, so your response wasn't a contributing factor to my feedback here. VQuakr (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
VQuakr, I"m plenty familiar with the topic, as well as WP:ONUS, AGF, etc. The IP did not put together reasoning behind their one line comment and I was attempting to get them to expand on it, with sources. I can see how it can come across as dismissive, though, and there are other ways I could have gone about responding to that particular comment. It was not my intent to BITE. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
winds of winter
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hello. I see you are trying to keep an article about a non existant book, Winds of Winter. It's a bit too soon to have articles about books that were announced 15 years ago but not written. This book doesn't exist, and you are trying to keep an article on a nonexistent book Polly Rood (talk) 20:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The author has promised no particulars. The article lists characters, plot points, and even a sequel. This book has been "incomplete" for 15 years, and any prose beyond "this may be the title of a sequel" is pure WP:Crystalball The article is sourced largely to 12 year old blog posts, and these are unlikely to be related to the state of the "book" today. There is no such book, it has no characters, it has no prospective release date. It has no publisher. There is no draft manuscript. The author is still blogging that he is thinking about what to include. This book isn't real and may never be released, especially under this title. Just speculation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polly Rood (talk • contribs) 20:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I noticed that you recently reverted the Talk:Nancy Pelosi page back to my most recent edits to that page in which I assessed the article as B-class for WikiProject Politics pending a review of the article for GA-class since the article had been assessed as such before it was added to WikiProject Politics, and I was wondering if you know if it is appropriate to automatically assess the article as GA-class or would it need to be re-nominated again? TommyBoy (talk) 14:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
It doesn't need to be re-reviewed when a new project is added. The article is a GA until/unless a reassessment deems that it shouldn't be. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Muboshgu, I had a new request on The Players' Tribune, was wondering if you had seen it and were interested? Please let me know! I really appreciate all the attention you've paid to the article! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 22:55, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 20 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Captain (miniseries), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Derek Jeter discusses his biracial upbringing and experiencing racism in Michigan in the 1980s and 1990s in The Captain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Captain (miniseries). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Captain (miniseries)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 25 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ken Russell (politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ken Russell went on international yo-yo tours before turning to politics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ken Russell (politician). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ken Russell (politician)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 25 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gary Gaines, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 00:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
Hi Muboshgu, may I ask is there a way to edit G-Eazy’s page to where you can “pull down” his “Early life, career, and discography etc” to where there is the “pencil edit icon” for editors to edit it? For some odd reason you have to go all the way up to the top of the page and hit the pencil icon in order to edit all sections which seemingly opens the entire article, like everything isn’t separated as most usual pages on here should be. Hopefully you understand what I’m saying as it’s sorta hard to word it. Pillowdelight (talk) 01:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Pillowdelight, you mean that you're unable to edit a section on that article and instead have to edit the entire page? Yeah, I see that problem as well. I don't have "pencil icons", but it says "[edit source]" for me at every section. But, not on G-Eazy's page. I don't get those shortcuts. Huh. Something may be broken on that page. Try asking at WP:VPT. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!01:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Repairing access-date info on the FBI Search of Mar-a-Lago article
Latest comment: 2 years ago19 comments4 people in discussion
Thanks for cleaning some of it up.
There is also this revision which cannot be undone, because other edits were mixed in with removal of access-dates. : /
Muboshgu: No, you are misreading the documentation. "Access dates are not required for links to published research papers, published books, or news articles with publication dates." That could not more clearly support my position. Your quote does not appear anywhere in the documentation page. Please revert your "restoration" and reversion of my work. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Andrevan: I was working on cleaning up reference formatting in general on the page, and was standardizing the "cite web" and "cite news" templates for that purpose. I looked to the documentation and, seeing that the "access-date" parameter wasn't needed, systematically removed it. I was going to continue working on cleaning up the references, but, of course, I have been thoroughly reverted. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 21:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
There is no way that access dates are optional for web sources. That's most of what we use to cite articles on Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
User:Muboshgu: I don't know what to tell you: I looked at the template documentation, and it clearly stated that "access-date" is not needed. I agree with that choice, as well, especially with the prevalence of archived sources (which I was also working on). TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 21:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
I see that WP:CITEWEB, a content guideline page, says it's "typically included", along with the other typically included parameters. Required when there is no publication date. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
There is no need for it to be removed, so please just stop. It's useful to know when someone has accessed the article & related information that is being referenced. Thank you! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 21:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
I wouldn't have removed it if I thought the article would've been better with them. They take up space and provide no useful information. The articles may change very quickly when they are first published, such that a day is not sufficiently specific, but then not change for an extended period of time, at which point several days, or even weeks, make no difference. For reference to specific versions, archived copies are valuable; but dates, in the abstract, are not. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
This discussion is probably better suited to the talk page, but as the actual editors are off, it won't progress any further at the moment. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
@TE(æ)A,ea.: These citations, being edited (by you) are for websites where the info may frequently change, these are not citations for news articles from the printed paper version etc. Books and other published material doesn't rapidly change in the same ways as digital information. This is the difference. Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Incident
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is currently a discussion at Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Stone walling. The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitchen Knife (talk • contribs) 15:23, February 2, 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
You are incorrect and letting your emotions get in the way of my edits and you haven't responded to my rebuttal.
"In the documentary "What is a Woman?", Takano is asked a difficult question by interviewer Matt Walsh. Takano begins answering the question, leading him to abruptly end the interview early without providing a reason."
How do I cite this documentary to your satisfaction alsowukai? You didn't add anything to the talk section. Are you disputing this is true? Mangbroson (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
How do I cite this documentary to your satisfaction alsowukai? You can't. This "documentary" is WP:UNDUE for Takano's article. Your citation isn't WP:RS, not that it would overcome UNDUE, and edit isn't WP:NPOV, as well. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
How is this documentary WP: UNDUE for Takano's article? I'm not arguing for or against the opinions in the documentary, I'm stating a fact. I backed up this fact with a citation that you consider unreliable. There is a simple solution - watch the documentary and you will find everything I said is true. There is no issue of neutrality if I am only stating a fact and not providing an opinion. I invited others to add or edit my writing if you think I left out certain facts about the interview. Right now, you've mentioned UNDUE, RS and NPOV as issues with my edit but none of them hold water. I don't want to assume you're arguing against my edit because of your feelings, but right now you're acting like a lawyer trying to stall a case you know you're going to lose. Finally, if you think this fact isn't relevant to his page, I would argue it is far more important than the fact that he makes teriyaki sauce with his family. I'm new to Wiki editing and learning trying to write with less hostility, but it seems you're trying to bully me into submission. @tamzin and User:@peter gulutzan can I get your opinions on this? Mangbroson (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
This is true, relevant and properly cited. Can you explain your reasoning behind why you think this addition should not be allowed? Mangbroson (talk) 19:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Never mind. I saw what I did. Funny, that truly was on accident. I suppose I was a bit hypocritical in that edit. Let me fix it and just do what I intended to do. Since I wanted to do two separate edits, I will leave out the more controversial one for now then. Thank you. ♥Th78blue (talk)♥16:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 1 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sean Barber, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that getting bitten by an eel led Sean Barber to become an umpire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sean Barber. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sean Barber), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.
Technical news
The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please emailMadalina Ana.
Arbitration
An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.
Miscellaneous
The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
Latest comment: 2 years ago15 comments4 people in discussion
My edits are censored even though they are based on fact based material and properly edited, cited etc, but when I try to delete text my edit is disallowed because wiki “does not allow censorship”? Amazing. One might assume you were working to some kind of agenda. Kellogsricecrispies (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Not allowing you or other editors to insert poorly our unsourced content, original research and the like into articles isn't censorship, it's called having standards and some amount of quality control. Or, in your case, not allowing you to indiscriminately remove reliably sourced content just because you don't like it isn't censorship, it's literally the opposite. PICKLEDICAE🥒 17:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Did you read my post? I cited every.single.thing. Everything. “Unsourced content”. So my content which was carefully sourced and cited gets ditched and another source which references a dodgy “official” report insinuating drug use and carelessly disregards the reputation of the individual and his family is accepted as gospel. Way to go man, it’s great that you’ve taken the moral high ground here. Kellogsricecrispies (talk) 17:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
“Reliably sourced information” a rushed urinary drugs screen released by the Columbian authorities against the wishes of the family. Reliable. Right. How in gods name are people like you allowed to moderate? Kellogsricecrispies (talk) 17:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
You should read a bit more carefully. I didn't say that. My friend in the pickle cabal did. But, she's right. You didn't provide the citation in the article as you are supposed to, you are mentioning an article that you failed to link to.
We do not judge the RS to question them the way you are doing. That is original research, and is forbidden. Also I am bothered by your not assuming good faith in your fellow contributors. If you do not engage in this constructively, on the article's talk page, without ad hominem attacks, I will block you. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
I'm not surprised this thread exists - it seems some editors have an issue with the addition of truths they don't like. Muboshgu, you should look in the mirror and ask yourself if you may be censoring legitimate content based on your personal beliefs. You've had 3 people disagree with write threads on your page just this year based on your stonewalling and censoring information. There seems to be a list of "preferred media companies" you have in your mind and if the source doesn't match this list, it is therefore not reliable. Please don't take this an attack - on the contrary, I am telling you in good faith that your personal beliefs may be interfering with the truth. Mangbroson (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Billy Raimondi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 17:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article Billy Raimondi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Billy Raimondi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
3 active discussions where you are censoring/stonewalling
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
I have considered that, but this is an online encyclopedia. In regards to Mark Takano, you've argued that 1) my source is unreliable when it has a video of the incident I wrote about, and what I wrote was not defamatory or opinionated in any way. 2) you are arguing the incident in the documentary is not important while arguing his terayaki recipe is. In the context of his life and career, as an elected politician, how can you justify saying his interview is less important than his terayaki recipe? Seriously, what is your angle on omitting my comment? I have a hard time believing you actually consider this and non-issue. Mangbroson (talk) 16:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I have no "angle". And you're not WP:AGF if you think I have one, beyond the WP:5P. The documentary is not significant to Takano's biography. His position on Taiwan, however, is relevant. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 5 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nate Fisher, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before he made his Major League Baseball debut, Nate Fisher worked as a commercial lending analyst for the First National Bank of Omaha? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nate Fisher. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nate Fisher), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi,
My edit to Tim Ryan’s page was strictly factual.
1. There was a primary on May 3, 2022.
2. Ohioans voted for U.S. Senate candidates.
3. Tim Ryan was a democrat candidate who ran, and won against Morgan Harper and Traci Johnson.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 7 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rob Sand, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Iowa state auditorRob Sand modeled in Milan and Paris while he was in college? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rob Sand. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rob Sand), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I just posted a note in the talk section about the wiki page for William Hurt. Whoever Tropic Wolf is, his commentary is blatantly right wing white supremacist, and the fact he literally has a sycophant posting his praises immediately after his first talk post about the changes he made concerns me greatly. I see you have intervened before, but I am still concerned that there will be further attempts to mangle the page from white supremacists. I really do feel you should move this up the chain, even to the point of banning Tropic Wolf from being able to make ANY edits to any wiki pages, permanently. I believe this person to an actual dangerous individual, dedicated to the exact opposite of what you believe in... truth.
I just read the entire discussion. Your accusations about tropic wolf are inaccurate and defamatory. You are worried the page will be mangled by white supremacists? I'm not sure if you believe what you're saying or if you have an agenda looks Muboshgu. Either way, your attempt to silence tropic thunder is far more dangerous than his quest for fair reporting. Your "dedication to truth" is non-existent. Mangbroson (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
You don't know anything about that situation, you're not contributing to any discussion about the article, you're just trying to knock me down. WP:WIKIHOUNDING is bad behavior that we do not stand for here. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 8 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mark Littell, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm(T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 01:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 9 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Guy Morriss, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 04:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 13 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charley Frazier, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charley Frazier played in the American Football League even though he did not play college football? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charley Frazier. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Charley Frazier), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 14 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zack Kelly, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zack Kelly received a $500 signing bonus, lost money in his first professional seasons, and was released by two organizations before he made his Major League Baseball debut? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zack Kelly. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zack Kelly), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 16 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Me and the Spitter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gaylord Perry(pictured) admitted that he had cheated in baseball in his autobiography Me and the Spitter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Me and the Spitter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Me and the Spitter), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 18 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mark Littell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that baseball player Mark Littell developed an anatomically correct athletic cup called the "Nutty Buddy"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Littell. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mark Littell), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 19 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Stearns, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm(T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 04:27, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 26 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jim Nettles, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jim Nettles followed his older brother to San Diego State University and the Minnesota Twins, but preceded him in being diagnosed for prostate cancer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jim Nettles. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jim Nettles), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
On 14 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ken Starr, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen01:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for these, and approving SWV 36 for DYK! Music was added today, did you see? - The rose pic was taken on 11 Sep 2021, and this year was full of music that day, Tag des offenen Denkmals, not only singing in church and rehearsals for Verdi's Requiem, but two concerts at special places pictured, one a synagogue (pictured on its wall). Today three DYK: a piece we'll perform on Sunday, a violinist we heard in June playing the Berg Concerto (my brother played in the orchestra), and a Youth Orchestra shaped by a conductor who recently died. Almost too much of a good thing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
The page was deleted as a copyright violation of this. But, I believe the tagging editor, Onel5969, and the deleting admin, Ged UK, made a mistake here. That source appears to me to be a mirror site that copies Wikipedia, not the other way around. I believe those edits should be restored, and I'm requesting an informal re-review rather than undeleting it myself. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
The mistake was made due to the material being copied from another WP page without attribution. I pinged the admin who deleted the page to revive it, based on my discussion with the other other editor on their talk page: User talk:Denniscabrams. So, please feel free to undelete it yourself. Onel5969TT me15:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Onel5969, I do try to tell baseball editors to leave the edit summary "splitting from X, see that page history for attribution", and I see I have a few more editors to tell. Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
No worries, it just decreases the workload and avoids problems like this. Thanks for all your efforts. And btw, Yankees10, the original CSD went to your page, since you created the redirect. When I noticed that I deleted it and moved it to Denniscabrams' page, since he split the article. I knew you'd never have a copyvio issue. Onel5969TT me16:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'd appreciate if you would strike your comments on the Noam Chomsky talk page accusing me of hate speech and partisan behaviour, you're experienced enough to know why those comments are flagrantly wrong. XeCyranium (talk) 17:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
There is plenty of room in USER TALK to explain all the many reasons you have for undoing my addition to the Matt Gaetz investigation story. I'm curious what those reasons are. Please respond. Let's try to remain politically neutral and just tell the story. The "anonymous sources" doesn't cut it because there are tons of stories here in Wiki with details that come from anonymous sources. The fact that it's being reported is often part of the story, especially when nobody refutes it. In this case, the prosecutors have NOT stepped forward to call the WaPo claim false. Richwilkinson (talk) 00:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Richwilkinson, talk pages have plenty of space but I think this would be better done on Gaetz's talk page, which others interested in Gaetz's article can more easily find and participate. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Since nobody at the Newspapers.com help desk or at Wikipedia talk:Newspapers.com seems to want to answer me, I'll ask you, who I've seen cite the legacy version of newspapers.com recently: how can one have the legacy version of viewing papers set on the website? Whenever I click on a newspaper, it shows me it through the new version (see here), which I do not like. I like using the legacy version ([1]) much more, but can't seem to find how to have it set as my preference. I would appreciate if you could tell me how to do it. Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On 30 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Coolio, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 02:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
I have demonstrated that what you say you added to Adams' article is not what you added to Adams' article. That's not "bullying". I recommend you edit in a more collaborative manner in the future if you want to achieve your desired outcome(s). – Muboshgu (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Then update it with accuracy since you took away any of my power to do do the appropriate edit
you are a bully - here's the definition - and do not dictate my behavior - it's rude and elitist.
bully - you attempted to intimidate me when you made a false accusation regarding my approval/like/dislike of Mayor Eric Adams and you did this from a position of power with your status on wikipedia
If I was a bully, you would've been blocked by now. I'm not the one engaging in petty name calling here. You're on my talk page, not the other way around. This is unbecoming of any editor. Give it a rest. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:25, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Arbitration
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 17:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rob Refsnyder for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Brewer Hicklen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 10:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Done – Muboshgu (talk) 23:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Draft:2023 College Football Playoff National Championship, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Come on now. Wipe down your crystal ball. Drmies (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
; see Talk:Rob Refsnyder for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buttons to Push Buttons -- Buttons to Push Buttons (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.
Miscellaneous
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Champ Stuart and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 30#Champ Stuart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 04:33, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Administrator changes
There is currently a discussion at Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Stone walling. The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitchen Knife (talk • contribs) 15:23, February 2, 2022 (UTC)
