User talk:Orangemike/Archive 32

Archive 25

←

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

Archive 33

Archive 34

Archive 35

Request for review: Draft of page that was deleted and you are the protecting admin

Hello, I've written up a draft of a page that was deleted and you are the protecting admin. I'd like to request your review of this draft: Draft:Human Design. And, if you find the draft sufficient to reinstate, please feel free to do so. In a discussion about this page the question was raised whether the topic is notable, and also since it is a fringe theory there are other considerations to take into account. I believe the inclusion of Human Design in the Skeptic's Dictionary as a pseudoscience, as well as by an independent author critiquing it (both in a web article and referenced in a print book) do more to make it notable. Besides that, it has been referenced in blog posts on Huffington Post as well as newspapers like the the South China Morning Post in an interview with a rock band. I would like to know what you think, though. Thank you. fissionchips303 (talk) 02:57, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

I don't think you've made much of a case for its notability. The Huff Post item is a breathless blog post by a pair of non-notable credulous writers; the two skeptical write-ups are pretty thin, and clearly opinion pieces, even if I agree with them; the South China Morning Post item is about the band, not the band's belief system; etc. Do you want to dump it into article-space anyway, to sink or swim? --Orange Mike | Talk 17:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

If you don't think it's notable then I'm fine holding off until such time there are more sources. I guess I just look at articles like Cosmobiology which is about a rather obscure school of astrology that only has sources from its creators and practitioners. I know at the Northwest Astrological Conference virtually nobody there practices Cosmobiology, but there are people there doing Human Design, so I figured it's at least as notable as that. I also realize there are far more sources about Human Design from astrologers who have talked about it, that I tried to stay away from including in the article because it seemed like sites like Huff Post and South China Morning Post were better, even if they don't say much, simply because of their audience size and the fact they are theoretically about practitioners of Human Design rather than by them. It's your call, I trust your judgment here. Thanks for the quick response. fissionchips303 (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

I've added a couple more references, an image, and a little more description. I agree that the Skeptic's Dictionary piece is pure opinion but the Morten Tollboll critique is pretty in-depth and makes 6 different logically argued points, that seem to be more than just unqualified opinion. I also found a video of a Human Design practitioner being interviewed on Fox News so that seems to add to notability. Anyway, I would like to see if the article can sink or swim in article-space, if you're willing to approve it. Let me know what you think. Best, fissionchips303 (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Personal attack

Hi, Mike. Sorry to bother you. It looks like you have plenty to do.

I'm hoping you can help me. Situation new to me.

I learn a lot about concensus and policies/practices by reading userpages and usertalk pages. Otherwise I would not have seen this.

User:Otterathome's userpage seems to be redirected to his talk page. No problem. I see more and more people doing that. What surprised me was a link to MY userpage, thusly: "I don't like some people, particularly this user, and this other guy, but I put up with them." I'm having to paraphrase—I tried a copy/paste, but it didn't work. Point is, I seem to be "this user". These links won't work, but if you visit him "at home", the first link—in a hatnote at the top of his talkpage—links to MY userpage. Looking at his edit history, this link seems to have been there since 2008 or 2009. At that time I had made only one edit. I usually remember usernames, unless they are gibberish. but I don't remember ever interacting with this guy at all. From what I'm reading, though, he seems to have a habit of deleting comments from talkpages, if he sees them as off-topic. He seems to have made some enemies (I don't wonder), and maybe he has me confused with one if them. He complains that his page is constantly vandalized. He pisses people off, obviously, but that's not my style, and I can't edit anyway unless I log on. Lately I've been fighting IP "range blocks" which leave me unable to edit even my talkpage. Something about my service provider and 'open proxies' which are beyond my ken. Now I know Wikipedia is a big place, and I really don't care if the person likes me. I would just like that link removed from his talkpage. Were the situation reversed, I'm sure he would have already fixed it, but I try to keep my fingers off of what doesn't belong to me. Then I will be happy to just avoid the Otter and go my merry way.

You might not be the best person to bring this to, so maybe you can direct me to a more proper venue. I tried a couple of admins who have history with the Otter, but both are now inactive. (Btw, glad to see you are still around!) My time here is limited, and I won't spend it on feuding and vendettas, so maybe it would be best to delete this message, once you decide what to do, or do not. I'll go with whatever you decide. Thanks for your time and effort. rags (talk) 06:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

That's Otter's little joke; when a user clicks that link, they are actually clicking on a link to their own userpage. So when I click on it, I am redirected to User:Orangemike. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

By the way, I think you have been pranked. Pretty harmless, but I don't know how to fix it, so ...

When I was looking for yr talk page, I typed 'OrangeMike' into the searchfield. I reached a series of blurbs, the first being 'Mike's Hard Lemonade', including a list of products, starting with OrangeMike's Harder Lemonade, which of course doesn't exist. If it were on the Mike's Hard page, I could edit it, but I don't know how to edit these search results. I've noticed before that they seem to be produced by a different algorithm, or something, and they sometimes don't agree with the "live" article.rags (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

It was probably a bit of vandalism, already reversed, since it doesn't show up now on a search. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

I don't find ptactical jokes very funny. More like malicious. But thanks for setting me straight. On the other hand, the OrangeMike's Harder Lemonade made me laugh, and doesn't hurt anyone. I still see it, but only in the search blurb, not on the live page, and only if I run the words together, like wikiwiki does, and capitalise both of them: OrangeMike. Otherwise I get "nothing found".

Have a great day!,rags (talk) 04:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Washington

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Washington. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Beckethic1944

Can you please indef-block Beckethic1944 (talk · contribs) instead of just for 31 hours? The user is a WP:DUCK sockpuppet of Jack Gaines (talk · contribs) given their vandalism of Alan Jackson articles. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

 Done before you posted this. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:06, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Had to change some templates; cataracts making edits harder nowadays. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Does this edit need to be oversighted, do you think? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:17, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).

Administrator changes

331dot • Cordless Larry • ClueBot NG

Gogo Dodo • Pb30 • Sebastiankessel • Seicer • SoLando

Guideline and policy news

• Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
• Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
• The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
• The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news

• There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

Miscellaneous

• A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
• The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Category: Wisconsin politicians convicted of crimes

Hi-I added a clarification to the Category: Wisconsin politicians convicted of crimes; the crimes are of various crimes. This includes drunken driving, etc., as well as the more serious crimes. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 11:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

eduprogram

To follow up on User_talk:Orangemike/Archive_31#Courses_Modules_are_being_deprecated, this has been processed. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 17:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Husan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Husan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Neo-Nazism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Neo-Nazism. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Poland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Original research IP disruption

Greetings Orangemike, regarding previously discussed OR image on the Haplogroup_T-M184 article (per WP:NORN discussion Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#Creating original images from self-reported commercial sites, whenever the OR image is removed an IP keeps reinserting it [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. They were asked numerous times to provide published RS when they reinsert to no avail. They do not seem responsive on their talk page either, would it be possible to semi-protect the page? Regards--Kzl55 (talk) 16:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Miami Fox Publishing/Hammerhard18

Hi Orangemike. Given this editor’s last user talk page post/rant and their choice for a new username, I don’t see them changing their attitude and deciding to be WP:HERE any time soon. It might be worth watching their user talk for a bit or at least letting them know that the ability to edit it can be taken away if they continue to post such things. They might also not realize that indefinitely blocked does not mean forever. Just a suggestion — Marchjuly (talk) 11:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Just to update: user talk access was removed by another admin in response to additional posts added by Hammerhard18. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Train graveyard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Train graveyard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pimpri-Chinchwad

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pimpri-Chinchwad. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

NaphCare

Hello. I see that you deleted NaphCare (a Birmingham, Alabama-based prison healthcare contractor founded in 1989) in 2011. Do you remember what the article looked like please? I think it could do with an article because:

• Rebman, Stephanie (April 12, 2018). "Birmingham company lands $95 million federal contract". Birmingham Business Journal. Retrieved 16 April 2018.

However, I would only create a stub and let other editors expand it. Please ping me when you reply. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:17, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Entire content was:

NaphCare is an independent health care provider for incarcerated persons in county, state, and federal prisons and jails. Naphcare Inc. was founded in 1989 and is headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. The company is solely owned by its CEO James S. McLane. plus an external link to the company website. Seems to me that the BizJournal article still doesn't constitute the requisite substantial coverage. Companies like this usually fly under the radar until and unless somebody under their coverage dies and the company i s blamed. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Syria

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syria. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy

Hi,

Just ended up being linked to Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy from OTRS - wondering if there's any reason this was put under indef semi?

Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Highly partisan edits violative of WP:BLP, both pro- and anti-Reddy. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Horst-Wessel-Lied

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Horst-Wessel-Lied. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Diablo Cody

I think there is a tremendous amount of confusion happening. Please see the Diablo Cody talk aection for more details. I have zero relationship with Diablo Cody and am not even a fan to be honest. HOWEVER, I saw a blurb for her upcoming movie and then went to her wp page out of curiosity. I made some changes as the information on her page was out of date. I discussed these changes at talk as well. Finally i asked about updating one of the old images and was told by another user the Image must be "free use". I asked this editor for suggestions on finding free use images and was ignored. Finally, since I wasn't her where else to turn, I reached out to Ms Codys representation and asked for a free use photo of her. Me Codys assistant was kind enough to email me a photo. I never attempted to add this photo and I fact contacted the initial user I had asked for help. He then reverted all the PREVIOUS changes I had made to the article saying I have a conflict of interest. Please help me out here. Starcader (talk) 23:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

We have so much trouble here with undisclosed conflict-of-interest editors that I fear we have lost our assumption of good faith which is so important in a situation such as this; and I apologize for that. Your mention of contacting Cody's staff triggered our suspicions, since obviously her staff is going to be interested solely in making her look good. I would advise posting an explanation similar to this one, both to the other editor's talk page and to the talk page of the Cody article; and asking the assistant to contact our permissions people directly in order to license the photo properly. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Sure no problem. This is just bizarre. I am a 42 year old man who has never even seen one of her movies. I made the mistake of having a few beers and then going on Wikipedia. And now all this weird stuff has happened. I should NEVER EVER have emailed her represenatation. All this noise over a topic I could care less about. It's comical more than anything. Anyway thank you for your kind response. ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starcader (talk • contribs) 23:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Well, it's a bummer for you, and I can see that; I really hope it doesn't discourage you from further (sober) editing. At least I think we've got it straightened out. (This kind of thing is why I prefer to edit articles on obscure 19th-century Wisconsin legislators and the like; they don't have press agents, nor do they twitter-feud with white nationalists.) --Orange Mike | Talk 23:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of English monarchs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of English monarchs. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dawenkou culture

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dawenkou culture. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Bert Collier, Darlington School

Yes, however the Bert Collier in question that I removed was credited as a football player on the "Notable Alumni". Also I have access to the Alumni Records of the school, and there is a Bert Collier who graduated in 2005 that I assume it is referring to. Lastly thank you for the suggestion, however the school that I was editing is in The US state of GA, so I doubt a British motorcycle designer would attend. (sidenote: I am very inexperienced with talk pages and anything on wikipedia that isn't editing a page so please excuse any screw-ups with this reply) Keyinsilence (talk) 02:56, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jacques Goulet

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jacques Goulet. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks Yellowboy21 (talk) 10:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Mis-click?

? WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Yup, sure was. Undone now. --Orange Mike | Talk 11:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I disabled the rollback button a few years ago because I kept accidentally clicking it – usually when I wanted to hit the 'thanks' button. I'm slightly slower but much happier as a result of that decision. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

List of IIM Ahmedabad alumni

Hello, I noticed that you deleted entries which did not have wikipedia pages themselves from the page List of IIM Ahmedabad alumni. After checking Wikipedia:Notability, I think that notability criteria apply only for judging whether a subject merits its own page. As such, I believe that it should not be a problem to add people to the list of IIM Ahmedabad alumni who are notable but do not have a wikipedia page. For example, please see the example of "Deep Kalra", who is India's equivalent of the founder of Airbnb but doesn't have a wikipedia page. If you agree, the deleted names can be added back to List of IIM Ahmedabad alumni. Rajanarora95 (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Actually, it is a clear principal that we only list people in such list when there are articles about them. If Kalra is notable, then first create the article about him. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

I did submit the draft: can you take a look? Draft:Deep_Kalra Rajanarora95 (talk) 08:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abortion and the Catholic Church

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abortion and the Catholic Church. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

Administrator changes

None

Chochopk • Coffee • Gryffindor • Jimp • Knowledge Seeker • Lankiveil • Peridon • Rjd0060

Guideline and policy news

• The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
• A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news

• AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
• When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
• The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
• There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee is seeking additional clerks to help with the arbitration process.

Obituaries

• Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

The Gaveltons

Why did you speedy The Gaveltons as a blatant hoax? It's a real show. Whether it's notable or not is another issue - I created it a long time ago, before I really understood GNG. But it's definitely not a hoax. See [6], [7], [8], and [9]. Could you please unspeedy it given it is clearly not a hoax? Smartyllama (talk) 14:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for undeleting it. Can you unclose the AfD and allow it to run its course? I'd do that myself, but I created the page so I'm not sure that's proper. Smartyllama (talk) 18:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Don't know the procedure for unclosing the AfD, alas! --Orange Mike | Talk 20:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Looks like it's already done, anyway. Smartyllama (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Chris Eubank

Hey Mike,

Thank you for blocking C2Promotions (talk · contribs), but I believe the COI is back at Chris Eubank and are removing controversial (but sourced) information. Chriseubank (talk · contribs) claims here they are Chris Eubank. Would you mind protecting the page from further COI edits as they shouldn't even be editing the page themselves if this is true. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

They're back under this name BrookeFontenot (talk · contribs). This new editor just made this edit [10] removing the same information the other two accounts did. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anatolia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anatolia. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Orangemike - just a quick thank you. I noticed that you removed some bias (not referenced) that was made to the Wiki page for the organisation I work for. Looking at your page, I can see that you do a lot of good work here on Wikipedia, keeping the platform true to its ethos. So I wanted to add another thank you for all that you do... Keep up the good work!!GlobalSchoolsWatch (talk) 12:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Hey Mr. Mike

As you may or may not know, I'm working on assembling Eugene V. Debs' Selected Works in 6 volumes for Haymarket Books of Chicago. I was wondering if you ever get up to play in the archive of the Milwaukee County Historical Society... They are holding the Frederic Heath papers, which I have just figured out yesterday probably contains unpublished letters from EVD for the period on which I am currently working (vol. 3, 1897-1904). I realize that one can have one of their archivists dig and photocopy, but I figured that able hands of somebody that knows what's going on would top a couple of called shots for archival folders and hoping that one gets lucky... Any chance that I could steal a day from you to go dig the boxes sometime in the next couple months? Here's the finding aid: [11] Box 1, Folder 5 and a big chunk of Box 2 looks promising. I doubt I have the bucks to do a Milwaukee/Chicago trip this summer, so I thought I'd drop you a line, hoping for the best. Thanks, —tim /// Carrite (talk) 15:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC) /// shoehutch@gmail.com

Tim, with my wife out of work (thank you, Scott Walker, you walking pusbag) I don't have a lot of time for prowling the MCHS. I'll see what I can do, but I'm not optimistic. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of modern names for biblical place names

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of modern names for biblical place names. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Orangemike!

Thanks for your helpful reply to my question. I had guessed that was the reason.

A local paper gave an enthusiastic review of my book. See: http://camdennewjournal.com/article/winning-words

If I ask they will add it in to Wiki. Does this violate the code of practice?

If it does, then how exactly does an edit get added to Wiki? §Cath Writer (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Enterprise Ethereum Alliance

Hi Mike. I can't see the page Enterprise Ethereum Alliance just now, or it's history, as it seems to have been deleted.

2018-05-02T23:13:45 Orangemike (talk | contribs) deleted page Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events)) (thank)

I went looking only 'cause someone put a note on my Talk page saying they had nominated it for speedy deletion. I don't believe I've looked at that article in some time, but do recall it from the past. As I recall, that trade organization is rather notable in its formation, with articles about it in the Wall Street Journal, NYT, and many other pubs, plus had a bunch of the large banks and so forth as members. I'm much less aware of it recently; but seem to recall having read about rather substantial growth of the org.

Just seems really odd for an article on that topic to fail WP:GNC. Hmmm.  ???

I can't comment on what the article looks like recently, as I can't see the article, or it's history, just now.

Not clear to me why a speedy deletion nomination would not have stuck around for 7 days or so.

I'm confused; but would like to look at it and make an assessment on the recent article state, etc. -- and then comment on that.

What can I do to make this possible? Cheers.

N2e (talk) 02:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

The article was almost exclusively sourced to the organization's own press releases and articles in blockchain webzines and the like. According to the edit summaries, it was mostly just copied from the Etherium article's section about the Alliance anyway. (And remember WP:NOTINHERITED: just because a group has notable members, does not mean it is itself notable.) --Orange Mike | Talk 05:35, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

I haven't read that article for a long time, but I recall that it met WP:GNG with multiple articles about it in media like the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, etc., and that it was going to be doing both standards and a reference implementation for Ethereum.

I can't see anything now cause the article doesn't exist, and I can't see it's history, but I think I might have created the original article, and I would not have created it had it not met WP:GNG. And then, the idea that it gets deleted via Speedy rather than an ordinary AfD seems almost bizarre..., and that that happened just after I'd seen press reports (but not followed up and read them) on the organization getting some sort of a standard released in the past month or two.

How can I see the article as it was, so I can decide whether it ought to be contested? Is there some way to allow me to see it's history, and its state at the time someone nominated it for speedy? N2e (talk) 11:21, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

I've sent you the full text by e-mail. Basically, it's a couple of paragraphs, and the sole sources are the subject's own website, and something called "cointelegraph" which seems to be a non-notable website for blockchain/bitcoin enthusiasts. Like I said, it did not make any kind of credible assertion of notability outside that of Ethereum itself; failed WP:GNG and WP:NOTINHERITED. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Mike. I looked it over; you are totally correct, not a single good reference, which is odd, cause I was aware of coverage of the thing in major media back when I knew of the thing a year ago.

How can I see the history (now, am curious who created it. I would not have created an article with such poor sources, or maybe something else happened since then, or maybe I never did create the article. I just don't know.)

Finally, if I would want to clean the article up and make one with reliable sources, where would I go to do that? Is that a WP:ANI thing? Or some other place just for the purpose? Cheers. N2e (talk) 04:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Mike, see above for questions etc. But I just went over to the article on Ethereum, which has a section on Enterprise Ethereum Alliance. That is here:

In March 2017, various blockchain start-ups, research groups, and Fortune 500 companies announced the creation of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA) with 30 founding members. By May, the nonprofit organization had 116 enterprise members—including ConsenSys, CME Group, Cornell University's research group, Toyota Research Institute, Samsung SDS, Microsoft, Intel, J. P. Morgan, Cooley LLP, Merck KGaA, DTCC, Deloitte, Accenture, Banco Santander, BNY Mellon, ING, and National Bank of Canada. By July 2017, there were over 150 members in the alliance, including recent additions MasterCard, Cisco Systems, and Scotiabank.

As you can see, that section shows 4x as much notability for the topic than the article you deleted. Not being able to see the history of the article you deleted, maybe I never worked on that article at all. Still, I think the org clearly is notable per the WSJ, NYT, Forbes and Inc magazine articles. Much of the other stuff would need better sources for sure. Cheers. N2e (talk) 04:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Mike, can you just look at the article history on the deleted Enterprise Ethereum Alliance article. I'm now guessing, but don't know, that it is a redirect I created to a perfectly good section of the article on Ethereum, and only at some later date did some editor create a full article on the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance and they didn't use good Wikipedia sourcing or article creation standards. (I'm guessing that 'cause some editor notified me on my Talk page about the speedy deletion; but I never saw it until the article was poofed.)

I'd like to figure that one out. Can you tell me if I created the reder, and then only later, someone made it into that article that you emailed to me? Cheers. N2e (talk) 02:28, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

References

Please comment on Talk:Basketball Federation of Serbia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Basketball Federation of Serbia. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Problems with My Signature

Hello OrangeMike, I saw that you left a message on my talk page in regards to my signature. I was just going to let you know that I have been doing the suggestions you've wrote and the problem still continues. I'm not sure why this is happening and it's one of several growing frastrations I've been having. Not sure what to do about it. Any suggestions?--Paleface Jack 15:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Waukesha, Wisconsin

Hi-My apologies with the edit of the Waukesha, Wisconsin article; it was an accident-many thanks-23:13, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anatolia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anatolia. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Socionics and falsification of the commission

Dear Orangemike, I ask you to understand the situation with the attempt to present the opinion of the journalist for the opinion of the academic commission. Journalist Sergeev is an editor in geographical sciences and has nothing to do with psychology. The Academic Commission has never considered Socionics, since Socionics has been taught for over 20 years in 200 universities and is even used to train astronauts and civil aviation pilots. All this is in the article. Socionics comes from the famous typology of Carl Jung and is close to the Myers-Briggs typology, which is used by millions of people. However, there are unscrupulous people who are looking for shortcomings and even resort to falsifications.--Sounderk (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Sergeev does not have an article on Wikipedia, he's just a journalist. Therefore, to represent his unqualified fantasies for the decision of the academic commission is a direct falsification. --Sounderk (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Chris Ernesto

"Orangemike"

Regarding using the Article to promote myself or business, I understand your concern -- I just misspoke because I was shocked the page was removed. I did not write the Article myself, and it is not in place to promote myself or business (I've never received a penny for my activism, nor will I ever, by design.) Someone else wrote the content of my article (I just helped them with the technical aspects of getting it posted) to give credibility to my 15 years of antiwar activism with St. Pete for Peace, not to promote it or my business.

Regardless, you had already deleted the page before my misstatement, so what is the real reason my page has been deleted? Are you biased against antiwar activists?

And if subjective or promotional material is a problem for Wikipedia, then why do you personally have a page that is clearly written by you that could easily be perceived as promotional or non-verifiable? So, the editors of Wikipedia can write their own page (without many sources, thus not "verifiable") but the people who have Articles created about them can not?

Is not Wikipedia an encyclopedia to state facts? What on my page is not "verifiable"?

Antiwar activists constantly fight the 'credibility' issue among those who try to bad-mouth our community, so the Article content referring to my business that provides affordable housing is not only true, but to those who believe that antiwar activists are slackers, it provides context and a stereotype-buster. Same holds true for the other items on the page, such as my peer-reviewed journal articles on Alzheimer's Disease, and various antiwar news publications.

You wrote that the content should be "written from a neutral point of view". This is subjective, even according to the fundamental principles of Wikipedia. Still, I agree, and that's why everything on my page is factual and sourced. So what's the issue - what in the Article is not "neutral"?

Antiwar activists like myself (particularly those who don't get paid to be activists) are routinely harassed and arrested, and regularly censored by the mainstream media, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and others, so I'm disappointed the same appears to be the case with Wikipedia, under the premise of the page being used as a promotion. Those of us who speak out against the U.S. military's overseas actions, or don't speak poorly of its "enemies" such as Russia or Syria, are routinely labelled "anti-American" or accused of being on Russia's payroll, and thus denied a platform - is that part of your reasoning for removing the Article?

Finally, everything I read on Wikipedia said editors should keep a non-confrontational tone, but your tone was (laughably) arrogant and condescending, and some of your statements were confrontational, such as: "that statement strongly suggests that you have no idea on Earth how Wikipedia works and what kinds of behavior will not be tolerated". So, is the standard for Wikipedia that the person who is a focal point of an Article needs to understand how "Wikipedia works"? And if you are going to speak in such a manner, your grammar should at least be correct -- "the Earth" is actually "the earth", according to some.) I conclude by wondering if you are just using your bias to censor others' work, particularly those of us in the antiwar community. LCutler43 (talk) 04:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)LCutler43

(talk page watcher) Hi LCutler43. This is just to let you know that I moved your post to the bottom of Orangemike's user talk page per WP:TPG#Fixing layout errors. New posts/threads go at the bottom of talk pages (or the bottom of existing threads) per Wikipedia's talk page guidelines. In addition, I have also added a section heading as well since it's good practice to add heading to new discussion threads so that they can be easily distinguished from others on the same page. I chose "Chris Ernesto" because that appears the deleted article you are discussing, but if that's incorrect, feel free to change the heading for something else.

As for you post, I'll leave it to Orangemike to respond to the specific claims you've made; however, it does seem as if you're misunderstanding the difference between a userpage such as User:Orangemike and an article like Chris Ernesto. They are very different when it comes to Wikipedia and each are subject to different policies and guidelines. I also suggest you take a look at Wikipedia:Why was the page I created deleted?, Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing, Wikipedia:Tendentious editing#Righting great wrongs, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Ownership of content as well since these pages contain information which you might find helpful and help explain why certain types of articles end up being deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Chris, I was an anti-war activist (Student Mobe) being falsely accused of anti-Americanism, while you were still in elementary school. But my ethics require that I apply the same standards to my allies as I do to my opponents; and the article was a way-too-long description of a local activist, like so many hundreds of activists I've known over the past 45 years, who (like most of them) does not meet our standards of notability. You say this was posted "to give credibility to my 15 years of antiwar activism with St. Pete for Peace". In other words, to promote you. Promotion, as Wikipedia defines it, very definitely includes efforts to spread the word about some noble cause or worthy endeavor or undeservedly obscure individual doing good work. What was lacking throughout was any evidence that you had become notable enough to call for an article about you. That's all; no animus involved. --Orange Mike | Talk 07:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Orangemike, again, the person who wrote the content of the Article did so to note the work I've done in the antiwar movement, not to promote me. I'm not sure how you can continue to claim to understand the intent of the writer, and to use that as the reason for deletion. Remember, you deleted the article before I told you the reason I am glad there was a page written about me, so my post-facto comments have nothing to do with the original deletion. And my statement about it giving me and the group credibility is not the same as using it as a promotional tool - you continue to equate the two. Further, regarding an Article that promotes someone or something, I could make the same claim for most Articles on Wikipedia, as the mere presence of them could be used to promote the Article's subject, by design or simply as a byproduct of the page itself.

Just because you claim to have protested the Vietnam war does not necessarily correlate to your views today - there have been dozens of wars since - how many of them have you organized protests for? So I still have no reason to believe that you are just targeting the Article out of personal bias. Again, everything on the page is true.

You also state that the Article's description is "way too long description of a local activist". Who said I was a local activist?

Regardless, even if I were, is being a "local activist" not "notable" enough for Wikipedia, by definition? Equating me to the "hundreds of other activists" you've known is not only unfair but naive. First of all, I live in Washington DC and the group is in Florida. Me and the group have organized hundreds of actions, not only throughout the Tampa Bay area, but we've organized and participated in statewide and national actions, as well. We regularly work with other groups and people like ANSWER, CodePink, the Uhuru Movement, Cindy Sheehan and many others to plan national events. Some of our work has been published in a college text book, others in published books, we've been featured in a New York Times article, have regularly appeared on television, national radio shows, and more. We have the most viewed Obama Fact Sheet in the world, according to Google. We have the world's definitive accounting of arrests made during the Occupy Wall Street movement. We led a years-long fight for free speech that some St. Petersburg city officials said was the most contentious issue the city faced in the past two decades. Our articles, videos and fact sheets have been viewed by millions of people around the globe. We have members from all over the world - we don't just have a once a week protest and potluck, as is the stereotypical view. Activism today is not the same as it was during the Vietnam era, so it seems to me that you are applying your own personal, limited experience in activism to my Article. There is so much more that could have been included in the Article, so "way too long" doesn't make any sense to me, unless Wikipedia is looking for as few facts as possible.

LCutler43 (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2018 (UTC)LCutler43

@LCutler43:: It's not necessary to start a completely new discussion thread everytime you post. If you want to contribute to an exisiting thread, just add you post to the bottom of the thread. The easiest way to do this is by clicking the "edit" button next to the thread/section heading name. It also helps if you can properly WP:INDENT your post since it can make things easier for others to follow.

Now, some other things. OrangeMike did not delete the article Chris Ernesto; rather it was deleted by another administrator named 78.26 based upon the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Ernesto. When an article is deleted, a log is left on the page which states who deleted the article, when it was deleted and why it was deleted. If you click on the red link for the article's name, you should see this. All OrangeMike seems to have done is add some templates to your user talk page to provide information about issues relevant to the article. Article for deletion discussions are place where the Wikipedia community discuss whether an article should be deleted. It's not a vote per se, but a place where the community can discuss whether relevant policies and guidelines are met. The creator of the article was almost certainly notified of the discussion as required by policy and a notice was placed at the top of the article to let others know of the discusison as well. Adminstrator 78.26 assessed the arguments made and based hteir close upon them. 78.26 also left open the possibility of the article being restored at a later date via WP:REFUND. It looks like you know that based upon WP:REFUND#Chris Ernesto, but your request was not accepted. Anachronist did, however, offer to restore the article as a draft where you can continue working on it if you like, but you should discuss the conditions of that directly with Anarchronist.

It sounds like you're involved in lots of worthwhile organziations who try to do lots of good things. There are lots of people around the world who do lots of good things, but this is not really a justification for someone to write an Wikipedia article about them. Being a "local-activist" doesn't mean that Wikipedia cannot host an article about you, but you or whoever wants to add such an article to the encyclopedia is going to have to show how the subject matter meets WP:N. The way this is done is clearly establishing that multiple independent reliable sources have significantly covered the subject in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. So, if you believe can do that, then ask Anachronist to return the article to draft status and work on improving the draft to bring it up to Wikipedia's standards. Once you believe it's ready to be re-added as an article, submit the draft for review via WP:AFC. Even if the draft is declined, the AFC reviewer should provide suggestions on what needs to be improved. There's no limit on the number of times you can submit a draft for review as long as you keep improving it and don't just keep submitting the same version over and over again. OrangeMike sounds like he's familiar with the things you're involved in, so maybe he would be willing to provide some guidance if you asked. You can also try asking for help at WT:BIOG since you might find someone there who also would be interested in helping out.

Yes, there are lots of crappy articles on Wikipedia. There are over 5,000,000 Wikipedia articles, which unfortunately means that quite a few probably shouldn't be added in the first place. Please understand though that Wikipedia wasn't established to be a peer-reviewed encylopedia where every draft has to pass through a vigorous editorial review process before being added. There is WP:AFC, but that's not mandatory which means that most articles probably still tend to be directly added to the encyclopedia by their creators. Over time it is hoped that these will eventually be caught and assessed, but every Wikipedian is a WP:VOLUNTEER and so the process tends to move slowly. The fact that a clunker of an article already exists, however, is not really a justification to added more clunkers to the encyclopedia per WP:OSE. Having a Wikipedia article written about you might seem like a nice feather to have in one's hat, but not having a Wikipedia article written about you doesn't diminish any of the good things you're doing. As OrangeMike pointed out about above, it's not personal so you should try not to take it as such. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Why Was My Teflon Don (rapper) page taken down

Hello, I am Donald Askew Jr. aka Teflon Don. I have a trademark license from Dupont for wordmark "Teflon Don" as a stage name. I have songs with Dj Khaled (platinum artist), iHeartMemphis (platinum artist), Young Buck (platinum artist) of G-Unit. I work with multiplatinum/Grammy nominated producers Carlos Broady, Kurt Clayton, and Young Juve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donaldaskew (talk • contribs) 11:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

So, by your own admission you were trying to advertise yourself and build your brand. We call that "promotion" and will not tolerate it. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. There is no deadline here. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Singapore Airlines destinations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore Airlines destinations. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alaska

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alaska. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Hawaii Five-0 Season 8 Cast.jpg

I saw this image in question in the MCQ page, but saw that you deleted it as invalid fair-use under CSD F7. This is not proper as none of the CSD F7 criteria are met. Cast photos may be used on WP, they do not immediately qualify for CSD. --Masem (t) 05:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Yeah I was on my way here about that as I was the one who originally uploaded the photo and didn't even realize it was deleted until I visited the as article because I wasn't notified on my talk page. Do you have other reasons for deleting this photo? TheDoctorWho (talk) 12:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

The photo is under copyright, and does not meet our criteria for fair use. --Orange Mike | Talk 09:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

I know that WP:OTHERCONTENT is never an argument but just to help me understand what is the difference between this and any other cast photo? I mean for goodness sakes Law & Order: Special Victims Unit has 4 of them one of which is also used on the character page. MOS:TV even supports using cast photos. TheDoctorWho (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

That's nowhere in the MOS that I am seeing. A random cast shot off the Internet is not the same as a "promotional poster". --Orange Mike | Talk 04:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

I apologize for the incorrect link it still exits at MOS:TV in that section it states A single representative image should be placed at the top of the article, aligned to the right, with an appropriate caption. The image should be uploaded and include an appropriate fair use rationale to comply with Wikipedia policies. For character lists, an image showing the whole cast, or most of the series regulars (redacted portions). Also the image was NOT a random cast shot off the internet each year this television show produces a promotional photo-shoot with [most] of the main cast. I can't quite see where the source was from (given you deleted it) however if I remember right it was from the executive producers social media which was the best option at the time given the full shoot hadn't been released yet. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pune

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pune. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review for File:Hawaii Five-0 Season 8 Cast.jpg

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:Hawaii Five-0 Season 8 Cast.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. TheDoctorWho (talk) 23:25, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rescue of Jews by Poles during the Holocaust

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rescue of Jews by Poles during the Holocaust. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Claude of France (1547–1575)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Claude of France (1547–1575). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

Administrator changes

None

Al Ameer son • AliveFreeHappy • Cenarium • Lupo • MichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news

• Following a successful request for comment, administrators are now able to add and remove editors to the "event coordinator" group. Users in the event coordinator group have the ability to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit. Users will no longer need to be in the "account creator" group if they are in the event coordinator group.
• Following an AN discussion, all pages with content related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed, are now under indefinite general sanctions.

Technical news

• IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
• The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
• There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
• It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration

• A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous

• In early May, an unusually high level of failed login attempts was observed. The WMF has stated that this was an "external effort to gain unauthorized access to random accounts". Under Wikipedia policy, administrators are required to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mumbai

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mumbai. Legobot (talk) 07:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you very much for welcoming me. --MrSunshine83 (talk) 00:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Arik Lev a DJ in The Voice of Peace

Why you delete my name ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariklev (talk • contribs) 02:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Additions must have citations to reliable sources. --Orange Mike | Talk 11:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1946 British Embassy bombing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1946 British Embassy bombing. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

User: Vilas County

Hi-I had to removed some links that User: Vilas County added to the Vilas County, Wisconsin and the Arbor Vitae, Wisconsin. My concern that the links were spam. I left a message on the User:Vilas County talk page about a possible conflict of interest. Any assistance would be appreciaited-thank you-RFD (talk) 13:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Possible sock of Dangerzone2014

Hello Orangemike, can you please take a look at user Lovebird291 who was registered the next day you blocked Dangerzone2014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and recreated Danger Zone (rapper) under Danger Zone (Rapper). Thank you GSS (talk|c|em) 11:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Just notice he was soft blocked due to his username. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:H.J. Whitley

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:H.J. Whitley. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

BBC has interviewed me about Wikipedia and my work here

Yesterday, and again today. The primary stimulus seems to be the whole mess surrounding the Philip Cross business and how these things are dealt with. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I got a request as well. I only answer questions via email so I had to decline. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

For anyone interested, "the Philip Cross business" to which Orange Mike linked has been archived and may now be found here. There is also an ongoing ArbCom case, presently in the Evidence phase. KalHolmann (talk) 16:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

• Here's link to the BBC World Service's 15 June 2018 Trending segment (23 minutes) "The Mysterious Wikipedia Editor" featuring interviews with Orange Mike. As Philip Cross notes in an edit summary today, "frankly, this has to be heard to be believed." KalHolmann (talk) 17:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Re "thank"

You're welcome. That was my first admin action aside from protecting my userpage (next was a block to that user). --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

You need to put a templated block notice on his talk page. You should probably tag it as block evasion as well, since this was clearly a new account of User:King of Shit, whom I had blocked a few minutes earlier. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

I used "easyblock" (I think) and have been advised that Twinkle is better (and since added the personal attacks block notice). That was my first block, still learning the ropes. I didn't know about the block evasion. How would I do that after the fact? --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

It was The Lord of Shit, actually. You can just use the "change block" function and change the block rationale, then use Twinkle and uncheck the block option to place the template. Welcome to administration, you meet the nicest people on the Internet, don't you think? Acroterion (talk) 01:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Traduksciigo: Wikidata:Introduction

Saluton Orangemike,

vi ricevas tiun ĉi mesaĝon, ĉar vi registriĝis kiel tradukisto de la lingvo Orangemike ĉe Wikidata. La paĝo Wikidata:Introduction estas tradukpreta. Vi povas traduki ĝin ĉe:

• traduki al Esperanto

Ni tre aprezos vian helpon. Tradukistoj kiel vi helpas al Wikidata funkcii kiel vere multlingva komunumo.

Dankon!

traduk-kunordigantoj de Wikidata‎, 08:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at User:Kudpung/What do admins do?

 You are invited to join the discussion at User:Kudpung/What do admins do?. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:31, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Żegota

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Żegota. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Living dinosaur

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Living dinosaur. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Kudpung/What do admins do?

Hi Orangemike. I would really appreciate if you could take a moment to participate in this. Your comments would be particularly valuable. It's not an RfC or anything like that. It would only take 5 minutes of your time. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:12, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks from the help desk

So glad I came by for visit here after your help with my little query. We have nothing in common politically, but I find you to be a likable guy nonetheless—you don’t see enough of that these days! I like the orange (UVA), Ben Stein, the preference for notability, and the hippie (born in 49). We do share interest in history; about 90 per cent of my work here is on the presidents. And my religion is very important to my happiness, and survival. I’ve always been a Beach Boys fan. Thanks again, Pal, you’re a credit to this place.Hoppyh (talk) 02:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Afsharid dynasty

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Afsharid dynasty. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

sovereign people realityRgojoey (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

<bullshit and lies redacted> --Orange Mike | Talk 18:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political views of American academics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political views of American academics. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

Administrator changes

Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor

Gogo Dodo

Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD

Bureaucrat changes

Andrevan • EVula

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
• A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news

• Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
• Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
• IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous

• Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Not an Organization

Hi there,

I requested to update my username to something more personal, however I haven't received any feedback on that. I was blocked as representing an organization, person or cause, I think because I used my work email. Can I update my email address to my personal one and that would get me unblocked? I am looking forward to being part of the Wikipedia community, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.250.174.202 (talk) 18:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

You should not use any email address as your username. Just pick a new username (revelatory of your identity or not) and request unblocking on the talk page of the blocked page. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Freedom movementRgojoey (talk) 20:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm not editing, I'm discussing with closed-mined people who do not know what a reliable source is or what bias is or what a sovereign human really is.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgojoey (talk • contribs) — Rgojoey (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

1) we do have stringent criteria as to what constitutes a reliable source; 2) we have stringent criteria about bias and neutral point-of-view; and 3) there ain't no such thing as a "sovereign" human, never was, never will be, so the phrase is gibberish and your draft just a rehash of the tired old sovereign citizen horsepuckey. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

George Washington

Mike, thought you might have an interest in stopping by and commenting on the prospects, shortcomings of GW as a FAC. A lot of work by a lot of people in prep, then the nom was unexpectedly and quickly dismissed by the reviewer, then withdrawn. Thanks and Happy 4th pal.Hoppyh (talk) 21:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julius Evola

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julius Evola. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Restore page: John Humphrey (drummer)

I did not create the original wikipedia article for "John Humphrey (drummer)". Someone else created it and recently deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhdrumr (talk • contribs) 18:11, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Good point. I used the wrong template. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stateless nation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stateless nation. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Khalistan movement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Khalistan movement. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mumbai

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mumbai. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political views of American academics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political views of American academics. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of military occupations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of military occupations. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quneitra Governorate

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quneitra Governorate. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Big

On User talk:Orangemike/Archive 25#Books_and_Bytes:_The_Wikipedia_Library_Newsletter there are some tags that should be fixed like this (my bot can't edit your page). regards, -- GreenC 13:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the thoughtfulness, but it appears somebody fixed it. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adolf Hitler. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joseph Tabenkin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joseph Tabenkin. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Disclosure as paid editor

Hey I have disclosed myself as someone with an motive so I have already declared myself as a person of paid interest for Freshdesk and it reflects on my profile. And I won’t be making any edits to the pages too. Let me know if there is anything else I need to do to comple to Wikipedia policy. Mathivathan (talk) 05:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jordan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jordan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

Administrator changes

Sro23

KaisaL • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

• After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
• Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

Technical news

• The WMF Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input on the second set of wireframes for the Special:Block redesign that will introduce partial blocks. The new functionality will allow you to block a user from editing a specific set of pages, pages in a category, a namespace, and for specific actions such as moving pages and uploading files.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Albert Cashier

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Albert Cashier. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stateless nation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stateless nation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Highway 2 (Israel)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Highway 2 (Israel). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Just so you know

After some wrangling (entirely my fault), and with much assistance from the wonderful devs, I've sorted out my password issue. Very glad to be back in full force. Hope all is well with you, of course, and best of luck editing! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States House of Representatives elections, 2018

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States House of Representatives elections, 2018. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States Senate elections, 2018

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States Senate elections, 2018. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United Daughters of the Confederacy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United Daughters of the Confederacy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cleveland, Texas

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cleveland, Texas. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

"scam" allegation

I note that you deleted your rash and libelous "scam" allegation. But I am still baffled: I can't understand what would cause you to think such a thing in the first place. At any rate, this may be of interest. Michael Hardy (talk) 08:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

I notice that your attempt to censor the AfD history has been reverted. You should be careful about slinging the term "libelous" around, as it has very specific meaning in law. As to the word "scam": I feel that most fringe movements include an element of ballyhoo/flimflam/hucksterism, as their advocates often make big bucks (at least from the point of view of a humble office clerk) pitching their theories. Look at the number of people who still make a living with such tired old bullshit as astrology and colonic irrigation. Diet fads have a history all by themselves, including the famous Post and Kelloggs of Battle Creek. "Scam" was, however, an imprecise word; I have no doubt that some of the advocates of fringe theories are true believers rather than actual scamsters. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Did you read the thing to which I linked? Note that the founders are professors at prestigious universities. In fields in which some important issues are controversial among the practitioners of the field, it's not unusual for such "fringe" movements to exist among respected professors. You feel that most "fringe" movements have an element of hucksterism, but you plainly don't know, and you're plainly not aware of this sort of thing among respected professors, which differs from what is found in popular media. And if you call an innocent person a scammer in a public forum, it doesn't seem wreckless to call it libel. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States elections, 2018

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States elections, 2018. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

File:MorojoAND4SJ.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

File:MorojoSola.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 21:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of the Coral Sea

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of the Coral Sea. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MorojoAND4SJ.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MorojoAND4SJ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

"Closed" discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC on reliability of InfoWars

Hi OrangeMike! I noticed that you "closed" the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC on reliability of InfoWars but it's not been properly closed with the atop template. I think the results of the discussion are pretty obvious, and I'm concerned that, given the topic, leaving it open any longer might result in an undesirable situation. Thanks for your time! Waggie (talk) 18:52, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ernest Shackleton

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ernest Shackleton. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

Administrator changes

None

Asterion • Crisco 1492 • KF • Kudpung • Liz • Randykitty • Spartaz

Optimist on the run → Voice of Clam

Interface administrator changes

Amorymeltzer • Mr. Stradivarius • MusikAnimal • MSGJ • TheDJ • Xaosflux

Guideline and policy news

• Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

Technical news

• Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
• Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
• Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Perche

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Perche. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hamas

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hamas. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alt-right

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alt-right. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 in aviation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 in aviation. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Multi-tendency for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Multi-tendency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multi-tendency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 19:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Module talk:Infobox military conflict

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Module talk:Infobox military conflict. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Egypt

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Egypt. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sugar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sugar. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United Daughters of the Confederacy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United Daughters of the Confederacy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Traduksciigo: Help:Sitelinks

Saluton Orangemike,

vi ricevas tiun ĉi mesaĝon, ĉar vi registriĝis kiel tradukisto de la lingvo Orangemike ĉe Wikidata. La paĝo Help:Sitelinks estas tradukpreta. Vi povas traduki ĝin ĉe:

• traduki al Esperanto

Ni tre aprezos vian helpon. Tradukistoj kiel vi helpas al Wikidata funkcii kiel vere multlingva komunumo.

Dankon!

traduk-kunordigantoj de Wikidata‎, 15:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Traduksciigo: Help talk:Property constraints portal/sandbox

Saluton Orangemike,

vi ricevas tiun ĉi mesaĝon, ĉar vi registriĝis kiel tradukisto de la lingvo Orangemike ĉe Wikidata. La paĝo Help talk:Property constraints portal/sandbox estas tradukpreta. Vi povas traduki ĝin ĉe:

• traduki al Esperanto

Ni tre aprezos vian helpon. Tradukistoj kiel vi helpas al Wikidata funkcii kiel vere multlingva komunumo.

Dankon!

traduk-kunordigantoj de Wikidata‎, 15:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Szlachta

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Szlachta. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flag of Australia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Flag of Australia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greece

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greece. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of years in Bulgaria

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of years in Bulgaria. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Orangemike. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Newspapers.com - The Wikipedia Library.
Message added 18:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 18:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Greg Herman / Fashion Designer: Page deletion

Dear Orangemike,

Thank you for all your help in this matter. I appreciate you taking the time to review our appeal. The article has been published in Wikipedia for many years now and has been edited/ revised by members of the Wikipedia community.

The article chronicles Mr. Herman's contribution and importance to the fashion world on an international level which is further documented through many periodicals nationwide and abroad. Wikipedia's position for removal was cited as (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion). Please elaborate. Per our review, we don't see that. Instead, it is a realistic portrayal of Greg Herman - both the individual and the brand that continues to contribute greatly to the world of fashion.

While it could use some edits, none of us could see it through the prism of advertising or promotion. It was a true and accurate depiction of Mr. Herman, his early life, career, etc., and feel that the deletion was extreme. I understand that Wikipedia is filled with many articles that need to be deleted, however, this is not one of them. Greg Herman, his history, this article, etc., has been part of the Wikipedia community for many years and he's been listed in the various Wikipedia lists. His contributions to the fashion community, philanthropy through design, TV accomplishments, etc., were all wiped away at a push of a button in the world of Wikipedia.

We are advocates of anything and everything community, We are shocked, saddened, and disappointed in the removal of this article. Greg, his designs, his struggles have greatly inspired others to take up careers in the field of fashion. So much so, that at one time he was part of the curriculum of F.I.D.M.

Is there anything you can do to restore this article, oversee it, and perhaps make the necessary edits that will satisfy your needs and the needs of the community for it to continue to be part of Wikipedia. I appeal to you, our team appeals to you to please restore his page. Thank you again for your prompt response and for all your help in this matter.

Best,

Robyn Davis ～～～～ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.134.91 (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

1) The language reeked of advertising copy and promotion. There was no viable alternative to the complete removal of the promotional blurb.

2) You have not registered an account, nor have you made the MANDATORY disclosure of your exact connection to the subject. If you refuse to comply with our terms of service, obviously we cannot help you.--Orange Mike | Talk 05:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

HI NICE TO MEET YOU

BEFORE YOU COMMIT LIBEL ON SOMEONES PAGES, PERHAPS LIST WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. I HAVE NEVER PROMOTED FOR STARKID, I ADDED AN UPCOMING PRODUCTION, WHICH IS NOT SOAPBOXING.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Phaeton23 (talk • contribs)

You linked to a Kickstarter page; that's about as promotional as it gets! --Orange Mike | Talk 06:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Regional power

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Regional power. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Undeletion request

can you please undelete my page. Who do you think you are deleting it in the first place? Thank you, human.Jsderwin (talk) 05:46, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Jsderwin: Leave messages on user talk pages, not on user pages. Also, don't mark such edits as minor. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

What page are you talking about? --Orange Mike | Talk 05:50, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

If you're talking about your userpage, you blanked it on 05:03, 1 March 2012; blanking a page is interpreted here as a request to delete it entirely, so I did. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:46, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject 2010 US Census

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject 2010 US Census. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Norsemen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Norsemen. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Small Criticism of the Username Block You Gave Me

You are clearly a respected member of the community and I am a very new one. I understand why you did what I did but I feel I must inform you that my name legitimately is Hugh. It has been a source of ridicule my whole life but genuinely wear it with pride. I don't want to upset you as I see that you are very progressive and I'm sure you wouldn't want to offend. At the time of the ban I was not aware that a change in username would be such an easy solution and was very upset as I am really enjoying the time I spend here. I don't need an apology, I just felt that you should know. I think you made a mistake but everyone does on occasion.

God be with you --Dr Jarse (talk) 10:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Dr Jarse

Please comment on Talk:Mary I of England

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mary I of England. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

Administrator changes

Justlettersandnumbers • L235

Bgwhite • HorsePunchKid • J Greb • KillerChihuahua • Rami R • Winhunter

Interface administrator changes

Cyberpower678 • Deryck Chan • Oshwah • Pharos • Ragesoss • Ritchie333

Oversight changes

Guerillero • NativeForeigner • Snowolf • Xeno

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, the process for appointing interface administrators has been established. Currently only existing admins can request these rights, while a new RfC has begun on whether it should be available to non-admins.
• There is an open request for comment on Meta regarding the creation a new user group for global edit filter management.

Technical news

• Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
• The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
• Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
• The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
• Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
• Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oscar López Rivera

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oscar López Rivera. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about counties

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about counties. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Traduksciigo: Wikidata:Edit groups

Saluton Orangemike,

vi ricevas tiun ĉi mesaĝon, ĉar vi registriĝis kiel tradukisto de la lingvo Orangemike ĉe Wikidata. La paĝo Wikidata:Edit groups estas tradukpreta. Vi povas traduki ĝin ĉe:

• traduki al Esperanto

Ni tre aprezos vian helpon. Tradukistoj kiel vi helpas al Wikidata funkcii kiel vere multlingva komunumo.

Dankon!

traduk-kunordigantoj de Wikidata‎, 08:50, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:History of the Communist Party of China

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of the Communist Party of China. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of vegetarians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of vegetarians. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Inaccurate attributions by Doniago

It appears the editor Doniago is making fraudulent attributions as has been pointed out by others.

Inaccurate Attribution[edit source] In the Salon article cited by reference [18], Aasif Mandvi does not mention or criticize Starship Troopers directly; rather it is used as an example in the accompanying slide show created by Max Rivlin-Nadler.

Whitewashing, a history

I trust such fraudulent behavior will be stopped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Block (talk • contribs) 03:07, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

That is not fraud, that is sloppy attribution. Please assume good faith on the part of your fellow editors. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for helping me getting rid of that spam artist A.R.M. 03:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Hey, it's part of why they gave me the Mop-and-Bucket! --Orange Mike | Talk 03:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Neo-medievalism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Neo-medievalism. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Re User:CityFarmsCanada/sandbox

Those people would do themselves a favour if only they'd grasp that the word "handcrafted" is enough on its own for us to go medieval on their contributions. I mean, seriously. Maybe I should do a search for the word throughout the encyclopedia. (I don't know how, though.) Or put it on the blacklist. (I don't know how to do that either.) Bishonen | talk 21:06, 20 October 2018 (UTC).

"Solutions" (except in limited chemical and mathematical contexts)

"Upcoming" (usually as a misspelling of "up-and-coming")

"Hardcore" (see: WP:NOCAREBAND)

"Authentic"

"Exciting"

I know there are more, but these come to mind. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:16, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Haha, I think "authentic" is my new favorite. There are more gems even just in that sandbox, too — "emerging", "innovative", "sustainable". Bishonen | talk 20:50, 21 October 2018 (UTC).

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Irish stations)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Irish stations). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Reverting of my edit on fascism

Hi Orangemike, could you give me a hint what about my edit is "less than neutral". My reason for editing was to achieve more neutrality in the definition section of fascism. Best regards --Technokratisch (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

You removed sourced information about where support for fascism came from, dismissing it as irrelevant whereas it is highly relevant when examining the origins and policies of fascist governments. --Orange Mike | Talk 07:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

I removed sourced information about the composition of a political movement called fascism from a paragraph in the "Definition" section which, up to that point, defined a political ideology called fascism. I maintain that the former is irrelevant to the latter. This is generally true for definitions of any ideology and its associated movement. Do you not agree?--Technokratisch (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Fascism as an ideology cannot usefully be separated from its origins; Mussolini was clearly making some of it up as he went along. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

talk page watcher Exactly - fascism as an ideology must remain contextualized by its origin; considering the rise in right-wing populism across the globe this is an especially pressing piece of information not to lose. Simonm223 (talk) 12:45, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

On the contrary, considering the rise in populism (and anti-scientific thinking, and as Hanna Ahrendt would say: "people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists") across the globe this is an especially pressing piece of information to remove. Since it is meaningless and just a distraction. What exactly does it add, apart from you being able to insult right-wingers of fascists? The question of whether climate change is man made on the other hand is not meaningless since it has consequences. I have produced references which support the view that positioning ideologies on this spectrum is meaningless. You continue to evade this actual problem and my actual argument, and you have not produced a source which supports your opinion that this positioning is meaningful. Regarding the inseparability of the ideology fascism from the origin, if that is the case then you should remove the (then) misleading paragraph in the definition section which attempts to isolate the ideology (but then out of the blue ends with a comment on who was attracted to it, even the tense is broken!). But lets not get into these details here, they should be discussed in the talk page of the article. The only thing I would like from you both is that you acknowledge that at least maybe I have a point here, that it is not necessarily "less than neutral" (we can maybe talk about whether it is "more than neutral") and that you stop treating me like some 12 year old. What about WP:AGF?--Technokratisch (talk) 13:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Seems awful SPA to me. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 13:28, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I removed an older answer, it was off topic. Please, let us try to stick to arguments.--Technokratisch (talk) 13:54, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

If you think I'm treating you like a 12 year-old perhaps, next time you want to make a major change to a statement with six high-quality references, don't provide a children's schoolbook that doesn't even mention the topic as your sole supporting reference. Simonm223 (talk) 15:43, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

As mentioned before, those references only oppose the reference I gave (of which I have repeatedly admitted to you personally that it isn't great) if they argue that the classification on the left-right spectrum is important and not meaningless. Can we just agree on this before going on? No? Ok, the Routledge Companion on Fascism and the Far Right for example calls the spectrum "rather simplistic"(p.5, in the Introduction). It re-describes it as more of a horseshoe in a plane (ibid). The "Far Right" is then more of a place on a plane than a side of a line. So this reference doesn't really argue that putting ideologies onto this spectrum is important and instead suggests an update to it. It is then not a reference in opposition to the schoolbook (or the Atlantic) reference. That would be a case of WP:SYNTH on your side. As I have said before, I will happily look at further references but I am reluctant to do this if you are just going to shut down the talk discussion again anyway. I hope you can understand this. And I maintain that you still fail to WP:AGF here. I never said my edit was perfection. It said somewhere to be bold, so I was bold. Maybe too bold, fair enough. What was not fair enough was shutting down the talk page prematurely and in bad faith.--Technokratisch (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Articles for creation: Richard Walker (Businessman)

Hello Orangemike,

Thank you for your comments on my talk page regarding Draft:Richard Walker (Businessman). I believe that I have adequately disclosed my conflict of interest and have drafted the article in line with the guidelines on Wikipedia:Articles for creation 'if you choose not to register, or you have a conflict of interest but have an idea for a new article with some references, you can create one here and it will be reviewed and considered for publication'.

I have taken on board the previous comments regarding the references in the article and am looking to review this, but in the mean time if you have any comments on the article itself or my deceleration of COI - please do let me know.

Many thanks,

--Tanykadavson WS (talk) 14:52, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Orange Mike,

This draft has now been updated with further detail and references relevant to Richard Walker's recent activities - would be great to get your thoughts. Alternatively is this something that you feel would be more suited to a Stub article?

Thanks,

Tanykadavson WS (talk) 12:54, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

my username

Hi Orangemike, Thank you. I did this since my username usually is TrainerRed4. I made an account with that name earlier but I forgot the password/email. I did not have a lot on that account so I'm not mad but is there anyway that I could delete that old account and than change the name to TrainerRed4 on the account I'm currently using? Thanks, TrainerLink4 (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)TrainerLink4 (11/1/2018)

What you want to do is called "username usurpation". For this, got to WP:USURP and follow the instructions there. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! TrainerLink4 —Preceding undated comment added 16:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

Administrator changes

Sir Sputnik

Kudpung • Liz • Lourdes

Everyking • Jackmcbarn

Interface administrator changes

Dinoguy1000

CheckUser changes

AGK • Ivanvector • Stwalkerster • TonyBallioni

Oversight changes

Amorymeltzer • Oshwah • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93

Keilana

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment determined that non-administrators will not be able to request interface admin access.
• A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the Mediation Committee should be closed and marked as historical.
• A village pump discussion has been ongoing about whether the proposed deletion policy (PROD) should be clarified or amended.
• A request for comment is in progress to determine whether pending changes protection should be applied automatically to today's featured article (TFA) in order to mitigate a recent trend of severe image vandalism.

Technical news

• Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
• A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
• The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

Arbitration

• Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
• The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Giant Eagle

I saw your name in an "articles for deletion" page and see you're a really experienced editor and an administrator. I was just editing Giant Eagle, a supermarket chain with over 400 stores, and saw that the subsection of one of the company's divsions, Market District, lists literally every Market District store, one by one (1 through 13), in separate paragraphs. Every paragraph starts the same way: The third Market District store opened, The fourth Market District store opened, the fifth, the sixth, etc., all the way up to the thirteenth. It seems to me that the opening or closing of an individual store, and its dimensions and features, isn't noteworthy at all for an encylopdia. And each listing (paragraph) is basically written in a promotional manner. My solution is extreme: to delete all the content in that subsection, except the first sentence and a half, so that it only says: "Giant Eagle rebranded some of its stores as Market District in an attempt to attract upscale shoppers. The initial two stores opened in June 2006." But it's a lot of content to remove so I wanted to let someone a lot more experienced than me know about this issue. I don't want to cause any problems, particularly since I'm an IP editor. There's a bunch of other junk content in the article, too, but I'm sure you'll see it and I just wanted to address the most glaring problem I see. Thanks. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:3059:8016:5847:3E43 (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Orangemike. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

WTF?

Regarding User talk:Kcdabeatmonster, that's his personal name by which he is known, see his contributions. We don't block people for using their personal name. Also his autobiography draft has been deemed a 'keep' at MFD and is not unambiguously promotional. If you're going to block him, I recommend you change the reasoning. A spamusername block isn't appropriate here, since he's using a name that represents only him, not an organization. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

That is not his actual name, that is his brand name. Combined with a history of autobiography/promotional edits, seems to me that merits a spamuserblock. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Anachronist Is unquestionably right. Your block message said "your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site", which is simply not true: it represents a single person. It does not infringe any Wikipedia policy. As for the draft article, not only is it not promotional, but in the deletion discussion which you started every single participant apart from yourself thought it should be kept. Anachronist "recommends" changing the block rationale; I would go further. Since a spamusername block is clearly a mistake, you need to change the rationale, if you intend to keep the editor blocked. A block which is clearly a mistake is liable to be reversed. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

I follow your reasoning, and have changed the block to advertising-only account. I do think, in this era of "personal branding" and other such bullshit, that an account in the name of somebody's stage name, social media "brand", etc. should be treated as a spamusername and blockable as such; but those are not the rules as currently written. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:37, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Account

Please contact trustandsafetywikimedia.org to recover your access to the account. Thank you. — regards, Revi 04:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

Administrator changes

Al Ameer son • Randykitty • Spartaz

Boson • Daniel J. Leivick • Efe • Esanchez7587 • Fred Bauder • Garzo • Martijn Hoekstra • Orangemike

Interface administrator changes

Deryck Chan

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
• A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
• A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
• A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

Technical news

• Administrators and bureaucrats can no longer unblock themselves unless they placed the block initially. This change has been implemented globally. See also this ongoing village pump discussion (permalink).
• To complement the aforementioned change, blocked administrators will soon have the ability to block the administrator that placed their block to mitigate the possibility of a compromised administrator account blocking all other active administrators.
• Since deployment of Partial blocks on Test Wikipedia, several bugs were identified. Most of them are now fixed. Administrators are encouraged to test the new deployment and report new bugs on Phabricator or leave feedback on the Project's talk page. You can request administrator access on the Test Wiki here.

Arbitration

• Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 3 December 2018. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.

Miscellaneous

• In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
• Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Obituaries

• Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (Raymond Arritt) passed away on 14 November 2018. Boris joined Wikipedia as Raymond arritt on 8 May 2006 and was an administrator from 30 July 2007 to 2 June 2008.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

It's good to see you're back (nearly). Cabayi (talk) 09:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Wellspring Consultancy

You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 08:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Orangemike is presently in no position to do that. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

It's been done already, though.

See the section "WTF" above. I'm wondering if that was a result of a compromised account. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:02, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

No, that was me. I feel rather strongly about "personal branding" and the use of stage names, personae, etc. as spamusernames. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:51, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

I am not alone in viewing that action as uncharacteristic of an experienced admin, particularly exhibiting a lack of knowledge about long-standing policies and guidelines. Regardless of how you feel, almost everyone here uses a pseudonym. You do, I do. A stage name is no different. And draft space is the proper venue for COI editors to write about COI subjects. There was no blockable offense. Your desysopping due to your account being compromised served as an explanation for what appeared to be un-sysop-like behavior. Therefore I have undone it. We're all human, I've made errors in judgment too occasionally in my past admin actions. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

resysop

Hello Orangemike, following the ArbCom motion at Special:PermaLink/872000055#Return_of_administrative_rights_for_Orangemike and a request at WP:BN your sysop access has been restored. Welcome back to the admin corps. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:55, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome back! Hope all is well with you and yours. :-) Katie^talk 18:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Well, I got out of hospital a few minutes ago, and the doc said, "No polyps this time!". --Orange Mike | Talk 21:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome back! Hopefully no hackers this time. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 21:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Glad to see you back O. Best wishes for continued good health. MarnetteD|Talk 22:10, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Excellent news — Sláinte! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Just got a page-deletion conflict with you - normally that sort of thing irks me, but this time I was delighted! Good to see that you're back in the game. Yunshui ^雲_水 22:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

• I'm sure glad your back! Would of hated to lose a fellow Wisconsinite! -- Dolotta (talk) 04:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome back! — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 19:46, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome back, Orangemike. I remember meeting you in San Diego in 2016 and wish we had more time to talk there. I am even happier that you got a good report from your doctor. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Traduksciigo: Wikidata:Showcase lexemes

Saluton Orangemike,

vi ricevas tiun ĉi mesaĝon, ĉar vi registriĝis kiel tradukisto de la lingvo Orangemike ĉe Wikidata. La paĝo Wikidata:Showcase lexemes estas tradukpreta. Vi povas traduki ĝin ĉe:

• traduki al Esperanto

Ni tre aprezos vian helpon. Tradukistoj kiel vi helpas al Wikidata funkcii kiel vere multlingva komunumo.

Dankon!

traduk-kunordigantoj de Wikidata‎, 14:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks to your deletion of the old tomppabeats article, I can try and make a better one. puggo 03:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Merry

		Happy Christmas!
		Hello Orangemike, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?" My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 19:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Traduksciigo: Wikidata:Property creators

Saluton Orangemike,

vi ricevas tiun ĉi mesaĝon, ĉar vi registriĝis kiel tradukisto de la lingvo Orangemike ĉe Wikidata. La paĝo Wikidata:Property creators estas tradukpreta. Vi povas traduki ĝin ĉe:

• traduki al Esperanto

Ni tre aprezos vian helpon. Tradukistoj kiel vi helpas al Wikidata funkcii kiel vere multlingva komunumo.

Dankon!

traduk-kunordigantoj de Wikidata‎, 07:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Traduksciigo: Help:P3182

Saluton Orangemike,

vi ricevas tiun ĉi mesaĝon, ĉar vi registriĝis kiel tradukisto de la lingvo Orangemike ĉe Wikidata. La paĝo Help:P3182 estas tradukpreta. Vi povas traduki ĝin ĉe:

• traduki al Esperanto

Ni tre aprezos vian helpon. Tradukistoj kiel vi helpas al Wikidata funkcii kiel vere multlingva komunumo.

Dankon!

traduk-kunordigantoj de Wikidata‎, 17:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Traduksciigo: Wikidata:Administrators

Saluton Orangemike,

vi ricevas tiun ĉi mesaĝon, ĉar vi registriĝis kiel tradukisto de la lingvo Orangemike ĉe Wikidata. La paĝo Wikidata:Administrators estas tradukpreta. Vi povas traduki ĝin ĉe:

• traduki al Esperanto

Ni tre aprezos vian helpon. Tradukistoj kiel vi helpas al Wikidata funkcii kiel vere multlingva komunumo.

Dankon!

traduk-kunordigantoj de Wikidata‎, 17:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)