User talk:Rhain/2015 July–December

talk

2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014
2015 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2016 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2017 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2018 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2019 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2020 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2021 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2022 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2023 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2024 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)

newsletters

... image: John Robert McPherson

Could you help me?

Hi, I'm trying to get Rust (video game) up to good article standard. I wanna get an opinion on how I'm going so far, I've fixed the lead, development and gameplay sections and I'm going to work on expanding and fixing the reception section later. I know you're good at the whole 'writing good articles' because I've reviewed two of your nominations and all/most of the talk page entries on here are about GA reviews . --Anarchyte 10:56, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Hey Anarchyte, I appreciate the kind words about me! I'm always happy to help, in whatever way possible.

I think what you've achieved so far is really good, although it's always good to proof-read your work for grammar considerations. I've just gone through the article and made some minor edits (if I've done anything that you don't agree with, feel free to revert my edit, or mention it below or on the talk page). If I may be a bit critical: some of the words and phrases used on the article aren't really appropriate for Wikipedia, such as "wouldn't" and "As time went on". That's not a major problem, but I felt like I should mention it.

Another thing I noticed is the excessive use of the phrase "the player" in the 'Gameplay' section. I understand how hard it is to avoid this (I've written these types of sections a few times myself), but it was used a few too many times. I also think a gameplay screenshot should be added to the 'Gameplay' section, if possible. Maybe even a visual comparison between the original game and the updated version could be added to the 'Development' section?

Speaking of which, do you think it would be possible to expand the 'Development' section? Obviously, I haven't really researched the topic, so I can't say much about it, but some editors (including myself) have managed to create entire articles about the development of some games, so I'd expect there to be a bit more information on Rust out there (perhaps you could look for some interviews with the developers?). The lead should also be expanded to include more information about the gameplay, development and reception of the game (see The Last of Us or Grand Theft Auto V).

As for bringing the article up to GA standard: although I have faith that you could bring it up to the standard, I'm not too sure that the nomination would even be reviewed in the near future, as the game is still in alpha (I'm not sure if there's a guideline on this). Instead, I think it would be good to work on the article to a high standard, and maintain this high standard until the game is eventually released, at which point the additional information can be included, and the nomination process can take place. Just a suggestion.

Feel free to let me know if I can help in any other way! Thanks. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 11:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

GANs on unreleased games are quick-failed for completeness/stability, ostensibly because the article will need to radically change in the months following the game's release with reviews and new gameplay updates and whatnot. – czar 14:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

@Rhain1999: Hi again, I wanna compare 2 pictures. I don't know how to do this so umm, could you maybe do it? The 2nd picture is already on the article (I took the screenshot and uploaded it) but the 2nd picture is located here (Source). I don't know if this is allowed to be used because I found it on the Devblog of the game. --Anarchyte 11:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Anarchyte, good choice with the gameplay screenshot on the article (however, it was far too large, per WP:NFCC#3a, so I've reduced the size).

As for the comparison: it would be good to get images of very similar in-game scenarios and compare them (this can be seen here, here and here). If you don't know how to edit two images together, then I can do this for you, if you provide the images. Of course, a comparison image isn't required for the article, but if there is a significant difference between the original and updated versions of the game, then I think it would be a good addition. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 11:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

@Rhain1999: I've found the two pictures.

My picture (I took this screenshot): Uploaded here

Other picture (I did not take this screenshot): Here (Source) Anarchyte 04:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that, Anarchyte. Would it be possible to get screenshots of identical locations/scenes (see my examples above), or were the maps from the old version of the game reset for the new update? – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 04:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

As there's no single player in this game, Rhain1999, the hosts of the muliplayer servers can reset the maps at any time. I might be able to explore one and try and get a picture similar to 2nd one. Anarchyte 04:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Anarchyte, that would be good. I'll upload a comparison image shortly (using your above screenshots), and if you find a better screenshot, just let me know and I'll edit and re-upload the image accordingly. Thanks. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 04:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

@Rhain1999: Here, I took 6 additional screenshots. One may be useful. Anarchyte 08:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that, Anarchyte. I just uploaded the image, and added it to the article. Let me know if you'd like anything changed. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 09:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2015, the project has:

• 193 Featured Articles
• 68 Featured Lists
• 10 Featured Topics

• 23 Featured Pictures
• 869 Good Articles
• 14 Good Topics

---

Content

• Changes to Featured and Good content
• News items and announcements

• Feature: The twists and turns of Editorial Discretion
• Interview: Evan-Amos

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Last of Us: American Dreams

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Last of Us: American Dreams you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 22:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nominations

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/The Last of Us: American Dreams at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Wolfenstein: The New Order at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Last of Us: American Dreams

The article The Last of Us: American Dreams you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Last of Us: American Dreams for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis

Do try and pass this thank you on. Thanks. Victuallers (talk) 00:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Caution on date switches

While I'm not complaining (and probably would have looked to do it in time) about the date format switches you did in this [1], be aware that wholesale date format switches like that should not be done without seeking consensus first , per MOS:DATERET. Other editors are very protective of their selected date format. As I said, in time, I would have likely opened discussion to seek consensus to switch on that article so its not an issue there, just for future situations. --MASEM (t) 14:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about that, Masem. I was cautious to make that change as I was editing, but I ultimately just decided to go with it. In the future, I'll definitely seek consensus beforehand. Thanks! – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 14:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bruce Straley

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bruce Straley you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 11:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bruce Straley

The article Bruce Straley you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bruce Straley for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 11:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bruce Straley

The article Bruce Straley you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bruce Straley for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 13:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Music of L.A. Noire

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ark: Survival Evolved

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:22, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LA Noire Remixed soundtrack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LA Noire Remixed soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for The Last of Us: American Dreams

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:26, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Re GameSpot Archiving on Characters of The Last of Us

Great news, the issue with archiving has been fixed! You can archive on Archive.org and WebCite and restore the archived links that I mentioned in my comments section. Edit: archived refs from the period during which the issue was present are still affected as they saved the site as it was, so fresh archive links needed. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

ProtoDrake, that's great news! I'll go through and replace all applicable links on as many articles as possible later today. Thanks for the update! – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 21:10, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Last Of Us

Left Behind doesn't count, it isn't part of the main game. You don't see Dawnguard's reception mixed with Skyrim's. Freshness For Lettuce (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Wolfenstein: The New Order

Gatoclass (talk) 12:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	Congratulations for your recent list – List of The Last of Us characters – and keep up the great work on articles related to The Last of Us and other video games. -- Frankie talk 21:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 05:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Precious

The Last of Us
Thank you for quality articles on video games such as The Last of Us, supported by featured lists, and Wolfenstein: The New Order, for reviews, redirects and precision, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! This is extremely thoughtful of you. It means a lot. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 07:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Achievement Hunter

Having a staff directory is profoundly unencyclopedic, especially for such a poorly verified article. There is no other place where we do that (a "production manager" isn't like the guitar player in a band), and the article you linked as evidence, The Yogscast, is a bloated, horrible piece of fan work. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Drmies, I understand. Thank you for clarifying. Surely it wouldn't hurt to have the main five hosts listed, though (and perhaps Caleb, Lindsay, Matt and Jeremy, as well)? At the very least? – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 15:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Rhain, there is always an exception, and there actually may be one here (but it was a hard-fought one). On TV stations we do something like "current faces", with the current anchors and stuff, with a reference to the company website. (Not necessarily the reporters, the camera crew, etc.) That could be considered here. (The ones with articles should stay, of course.) If you can trim the list to include those that you can conceivably argue they're important, and provide a link, that would be much better--basically, that's the kind of employees who could easily be notable by our standards. Note that I mentioned "production manager", someone who works off-screen, so to speak; I could have mentioned "community manager" too. Will that work? (Oh, for "former", consensus in those TV and radio articles is that "formers" are only listed if they have articles. Neutralhomer, am I remembering this correctly?) And in general, of course, the best thing you can do for the article is improve the references--you know this stuff better than I do. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Actually, the first part has been changed. Anchors, reporters, and the other on-air staff are no longer considered notable just because they are on the station's "On Air Staff" page. The thinking is, since the station's website is listed and the "On Air Staff" page is easily found on every site, it doesn't need to be listed.

As for the former staff, those with articles are still considered notable and can be listed on the page. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Source for the episode 9 Doctor Who

Hi,

Have you got the sources of the announcement that the episode 9 is written by Mark Gatiss

Cordialy, --Jitrixis (talk) 13:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Jitrixis, Den of Geek mentioned it here. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 13:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but that's only guesses. An article of BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/fd3d5d2b-bb11-4e24-862e-7ce282413e1c said they didn't film this episode yet. So until this episode isn't filmed we can only guess what it is (and maybe they can change their mind). The only one thing that we can say is Mark is one of the lead writter annouced later by the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/doctorwho/entries/3c966a53-430b-4764-9b78-b44aef223a17 . --Jitrixis (talk) 14:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

"Also announced: Mark Gatiss is writing episode nine" does not seem like "only guesses" to me. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 14:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I agree but where. The last publication made by the BBC didn't mention anything of the episode 9. I will made some research in older publication of the BBC and twitter, but I really disagree with the fact of melting official annouce and fan announce, maybe only add some lines about the fact he write for the 9 series and it might be the episode 9. Until, you or me found a stronger source to said "he has written the episode 9", I will reedit in arround 15 min. ;) --Jitrixis (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Neil Druckmann

Gatoclass (talk) 17:37, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of The Last of Us

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Development of The Last of Us you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of The Last of Us

The article Development of The Last of Us you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Development of The Last of Us for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of The Last of Us

The article Development of The Last of Us you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Development of The Last of Us for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 07:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Harv refs

Thanks for the harv refs on Slalom. It's always annoying to have a single source that needs multiple page footnotes... (And you know how much I like citing the original manuals anyway.) Wanted to let you know, though, that {{sfn}} stacks, so you don't need to put it in <ref name="blah"> tags—WP will automatically combine similar {{sfn}} refs together. – czar 09:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

I had to do something similar with Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis, so I know that pain. Thanks for the information about {{sfn}}, too; I knew there was a quicker way to do it, but I couldn't remember it (and never looked into it). Thanks! – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 09:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Bruce Straley

Gatoclass (talk) 16:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Ark: Survival Evolved Edit

If there was something wrong with my edit to the Ark: Survival Evolved article, then the ParaWorld article has the same problem. Zeta1127,89thLegion (talk) 22:40, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Oak Ridge Boys timeline

Hi, it looks like you forgot to add baritone Steve Sanders (1987–95), which is a very important part of the timeline. --Musdan77 (talk) 18:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

huzlers fake

I heard that not allowed to said that GTA is gonna be discontinued. Is it fake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.153.150.186 (talk) 16:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

If you're referring to this article, then yes, it is fake. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 04:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Doctor Who Series 9 Plot Summaries

Are episode synopsis' not allowed? I thought the definition of synopsis was 'A plot summary of a play, book or film' or am i mistaken? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deus Allah (talk • contribs) 13:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps I used the wrong term. The summaries in the table are not supposed to be the little "teaser" text released by the BBC; it should be a short summary of the plot, after the episode airs (see Series 8). – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 13:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mafia III

Hello! Your submission of Mafia III at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Mafia III

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Disruptive Editing

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Grand Theft Auto V. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please do not respond here but on the relevant article's talk page. Thank you. Mainline421 (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

@Mainline421, can you please explain how my edits are disruptive? As far as I'm concerned, you're only reverting them because they don't conform to what you want on the article. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 13:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

To be blunt you seem to be describing your own behavior (probably because you knew I was about to say the same to you but more politely). Your edits serve nothing to enhance the article and so far have all removed information and added incorrect information. They may be good faith but they are only disrupting the process of building an encyclopedia. Mainline421 (talk) 13:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

@Mainline421: I have not added any information to the article (certainly not incorrect information). In addition, the only information that I have removed from the main article is already present on the Development article; it is unnecessary for this to be repeated. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 13:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) This is rather a content dispute. While I admit that edit-warring is disruptive, Mainline421 is in no position to warn Rhain1999 as he/she is also edit warring in response.--Chamith (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing this screwup. Honestly I'm not sure why Twinkle did that; just wanted to clarify that it wasn't meant to be unconstructive or anything. Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 07:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Satellizer, no worries. I figured it was just a mistake, and I know it wasn't intentional. No harm done. :-) – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 07:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Jenna / Clara

Just out of curiousity, why the annoyance at the official report that Jenna is leaving Who? Alex|The|Whovian 09:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

AlexTheWhovian, it's a personal thing; I would have preferred for it to have been a surprise, because then it's more effective when the time comes. I like surprises like that. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 09:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough that. The BBC has always announced before the character leaves that they're leaving, though. Alex|The|Whovian 09:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm aware of that, but I wish things worked differently. I've never been a fan of the announcements. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 09:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

• Editorial: No access is no answer to closed access

• News and notes: Byrd and notifications leave, but page views stay; was a terror suspect editing Wikipedia?

• In the media: Is there life on Mars?

• Featured content: Why did the emu cross the road?

• Traffic report: Another week

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

hello rhain, for the love of gta 5 and medicine, would you help me editing that with the appropriate informations?you have the correct wikipedia knowledge and i can help you with all the medical conclusion and diagnosis necessary to conclude trevor is not a sociopath but a bipolar Type I. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindingulove (talk • contribs) 00:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

GTA 5

hello, im from brazil and im a medical student. recently in trevor post there is a mistake. you said that i don't have the correct sources, would you help me editing it? together with my medical knowledge and your wikipedia knowledge we can find articles and conclusions enough to assume he is bipolar and not a sociopath. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindingulove (talk • contribs) 00:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me, Mindingulove. If you can find a reliable source confirming that Trevor has bipolar, as opposed to being a sociopath, then it can be added to the article accordingly. Unfortunately, without this source, your additions are seen as original research, which is not acceptable. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 01:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

maybe an article? ill get my friends and publish an article at scielo about it, hope its enough.thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mindingulove (talk • contribs) 01:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rhain1999/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Rhain1999/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://gtavspointblank.blogspot.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JustBerry (talk) 04:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

• In the media: PETA makes "monkey selfie" a three-way copyright battle; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

• Op-ed: Can we please stop bashing Wikipedia?

• Featured content: Inside Duke Humfrey's Library

• WikiProject report: Dancing to the beat of a... wikiproject?

• Traffic report: ¡Viva la Revolución! Kinda.

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Claude - Grand Theft Auto III.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Claude - Grand Theft Auto III.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frank Tenpenny.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frank Tenpenny.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Victor Vance.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Victor Vance.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraising report, Montreal to host 2017 Wikimania

• In the media: Irish legislative editing; coffee quarrel; more sports vandalism

• Op-ed: Wikipedia needs more administrators

• Recent research: Wiktionary special; newbies, conflict and tolerance; Is Wikipedia's search function inferior?

• Tech news: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ni no Kuni

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ni no Kuni you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 10:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Menace (video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Menace (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Menace (video game)

The article Menace (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Menace (video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

• Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption

• Traffic report: Reality is for losers

• Featured content: This Week's Featured Content

• Gallery: Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Pakistan

• Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• In the media: Jailed Saudi blogger wins award; PR editing and Wiki-embarassment; Pakistan's third-richest person?

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ni no Kuni

Hello! Your submission of Ni no Kuni at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! '''tAD''' (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frank Tenpenny.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frank Tenpenny.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 3 — 3nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2015, the project has:

• 192 Featured Articles
• 67 Featured Lists
• 9 Featured Topics

• 21 Featured Pictures
• 823 Good Articles
• 14 Good Topics

---

Content

• Changes to Featured and Good content
• News items and announcements
• NEW! WP:VG Talk Page Digest

• Feature: GamerGate, Or How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love Bare Rule-Level Consensus
• Interview: Samwalton9

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ni no Kuni

The article Ni no Kuni you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ni no Kuni for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 03:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ni no Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ni no Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 10:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ni no Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch

The article Ni no Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ni no Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 14:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

• Op-ed: WikiConference USA 2015: built on good faith

• WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States

• Editorial: Why the news media needs a Wikipedian in residence

• News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate

• Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death

• Featured content: A fistful of dollars

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Blog: Third Wikimedia Spain conference takes place in Madrid

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Music of Ni no Kuni

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Music of Ni no Kuni you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maplestrip -- Maplestrip (talk) 11:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Disruptive Editing

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Development of Grand Theft Auto V. 20:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Mainline421 (talk)

do you even have that kind of authority? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.132.96.55 (talk) 21:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

@Mainline421: Allow me to explain every one of my changes to the article:

• The change of "PC, PS4 and Xbox One" to "Re-release" in the "Editions" table is simply due to restricting the use of abbreviations (PS4 instead of PlayStation 4), though I'm apathetic about this.
• Moving the information regarding the PC delay to the end of the paragraph about the other delays is to avoid having such a small paragraph about the PC delays. It's also just nicer (and makes sense) to group related information.
• Adding a link to Trevor Philips in the {{Further}} template makes sense, because there is more information about the development of the character on the article, although I'm also rather apathetic about this.
• It makes more sense to me that the "re-release" section is placed below "Music production", and you've already said that you "don't care that much" about it, so I guess that's clear.
• As for the "Re-release" section itself: placing the image on the right and the quote on the left looks much better and cleaner (in my opinion). Also, the organisation of your edit doesn't make too much sense to me. By splitting the paragraph in two, you're leaving both paragraphs without a reference at the end. Not to mention that it just seems to flow better in my edit (and that's not being stuck-up, by the way; I didn't write the content, I simply adapted it from the earlier re-release article).

If you disagree with any of my points, please feel free to say. Let's get this sorted out, and bring it to an end. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 07:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 10th British Academy Games Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tearaway, Castles in the Sky and Brian Tyler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

• Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching

• News and notes: Wikimedia lawsuit against NSA dismissed; Affiliates mailing list launched

• In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"

• Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus

• Featured content: A more balanced week

• Op-ed: Wikipedia is significantly amplifying the impact of Open Access publications

• Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing

• Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ni no Kuni

Thanks for your help with the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns

Hi, I had some questions regarding the edits you made to my article at Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns, regarding the controversy section specifically.

I believe it would be appropriate to at least mention the facts behind the initial release (of the pre-order as well as the expansion itself). Was my little paragraph too specific, did it feel biased, or what was wrong with it in general? Or should we add a "Reception" part of the article, similar to the main Guild Wars 2 page?

Thanks, and I appreciate the changes and brush-ups that you made to my article!

Kyubei (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Kyubei, thanks for getting in touch! My main concern with the Controversy section was that it was a bit too detailed and specific; mentioning the post on the subreddit (and that it's the highest voted post), might be notable if it's covered by a reliable, independent source, but none were listed on the article. Also, I should mention that the majority of the section relied heavily on the one reference from PCGamesN, which has been deemed unreliable per WP:VG/RS. In saying that, PC Gamer is listed as reliable, so I'm sure something can be written about the reaction to the pricing. In terms of your actual wording: words like "rightly" is editorialising (unless being used as a direct quote), so you should avoid these. Also, contractions such as "don't" should generally be avoided at all costs; use "do not" instead. I definitely think that the section needs a "Reception" section, citing professional reviews from reliable sources; there are plenty of featured articles with well-written Reception sections, such as Grand Theft Auto V and Fez, if you'd like to take a look. Let me know if I can help with anything else! – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 11:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

It's also best to avoid "controversy" sections. czar 14:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

• From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help

• News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles

• In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA

• Op-ed: It’s time to stop the bullying

• Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement

• Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth

• Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages

• Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Community letter: Five million articles

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Blood Money (video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blood Money (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ni no Kuni: Dominion of the Dark Djinn

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ni no Kuni: Dominion of the Dark Djinn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Er, in something sort of separate from the message above, once the GA is finished, could you help me by giving FF Type-0 a source review at FAC? It has three supports (which I think is enough) but I'd feed a lot more comfortable and certain with a source review. If you don't want to, that's fine and I won't press further. And of course, I'll be completely impartial about Dominion of the Dark Djinn as Wikipedia demands whatever you decide. --ProtoDrake (talk) 15:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Music of Ni no Kuni

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ni no Kuni: Dominion of the Dark Djinn

The article Ni no Kuni: Dominion of the Dark Djinn you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ni no Kuni: Dominion of the Dark Djinn for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 15:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Music of L.A. Noire

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Music of L.A. Noire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Famous Hobo -- Famous Hobo (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ni no Kuni mobile games

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

• Op-ed: You are invited to participate in the Community Wishlist Survey

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone

• In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?

• Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad

• Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket

• Gallery: Princess of Asturias Awards 2015 ceremony

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ni no Kuni mobile games

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ni no Kuni mobile games you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ni no Kuni mobile games

The article Ni no Kuni mobile games you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ni no Kuni mobile games for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ni no Kuni: Dominion of the Dark Djinn

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ni no Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

My edit summary

Sorry if my edit summary came off as a little rude, that was not my intent. I guess I shouldn't be editing while sleep deprived.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 09:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@Dcheagle: As someone who is also sleep deprived, I feel your pain. Mind you, your edit summary probably wasn't even that rude; my lack of sleep is making me far too snappy for my own good. But thank you for contacting me—it goes a long way. Sorry for any inconvenience. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 09:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

• Op-ed: As one thousand of us requested, Superprotect has been removed

• Arbitration report: Elections, redirections, and a resignation from the Committee

• Discussion report: Compromise of two administrator accounts prompts security review

• Featured content: Texas, film, and cycling

• In the media: Sanger on Wikipedia; Silver on Vox; lawyers on monkeys

• Traffic report: Doodles of popularity

• Gallery: Paris

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Rhain1999. I'm just posting to let you know that List of The Last of Us characters – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 17 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Home Free (group) page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

• Special report: ArbCom election—candidates’ opinions analysed

• In the media: Icelandic milestone; apolitical editing

• Discussion report: BASC disbanded; other developments in the discussion world

• Arbitration report: Ban Appeals Subcommittee goes up in smoke; 21 candidates running

• Featured content: Fantasia on a Theme by Jimbo Wales

• Traffic report: Darkness and light

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of L.A. Noire characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MediaWorks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Blood Money (video game)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

• Op-ed: Wikidata: the new Rosetta Stone

• News and notes: Fundraising update; FDC recommendations

• In the media: Erasmus Prize awarded to Wikipedia; trouble on the Russian Wikipedia

• Recent research: Do Wikipedia citations mirror scholarly impact?; co-star networks in silent films

• Featured content: Caves and stuff

• Traffic report: J'en ai ras le bol

• Arbitration report: Third Palestine-Israel case closes; Voting begins

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Blog: Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia Deutschland urge Reiss Engelhorn Museum to reconsider suit over public domain works of art

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Music of Red Dead Redemption

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Music of Red Dead Redemption you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 10:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Last of Us characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nathan Drake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Music of Red Dead Redemption

The article Music of Red Dead Redemption you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Music of Red Dead Redemption for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 14:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Ni No Kuni 2: Revenant Kingdom

Hey. Since you made the Ni No Kuni Good Topic, I'm giving you a heads up on the announcement of the new sequel. Ni no Kuni 2: Revenant Kingdom brings a fairytale RPG to PS4. While there's no release yet, by the time the article gets made it will have to be part of the topic, which requires unreleased video games to be peer reviewed first. Just a heads-up. GamerPro64 19:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, GamerPro64! Happy to say that I watched the announcement live, and I'm adding it to the Ni no Kuni article now. I'll be sure to take all of that into consideration when making the article. Thanks again! – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 19:57, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

• Op-ed: Whither Wikidata?

• News and notes: Online harassment consultation; High voter turnout at ArbCom elections

• In the media: Is Wikidata as transparent as it seems?; Wikimedia Fund-raising drive launches

• Traffic report: Jonesing for episodes

• Featured content: This Week's Featured Content

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hi Rhain1999, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 17:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

• News and notes: ArbCom election results announced

• Op-ed: Wikidata: Knowledge from different points of view

• In the media: Political editing in the context of the US presidential primaries

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 winners

• Traffic report: So do you laugh, or does it cry?

• Featured content: Sports, ships, arts... and some other things

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

• In focus: Drone photography: New possibilities and new challenges

• In the media: Wales in China; #Edit2015

• Arbitration report: GMO case decided

• Featured content: An unusually slow week

• WikiProject report: Women in Red—using teamwork and partnerships to elevate online and offline collaborations

• Traffic report: A feast of Spam

• Gallery: WikiConference USA 2015: images, slide decks, and videos

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for List of L.A. Noire characters

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

• News and notes: WMF Board dismisses community-elected trustee

• Arbitration report: Second Arbitration Enforcement case concludes as another case is suspended

• Featured content: The post-Christmas edition

• Traffic report: The Force we expected

• Year in review: The top ten Wikipedia stories of 2015

• In the media: Wikipedia plagued by a "Basket of Deception"

• Gallery: It's that time of year again

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)