Ribosome786

Blocked

Latest comment: 5 months ago6 comments4 people in discussion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. — Diannaa (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

This talk page is full of warnings for disruptive editing and copyright violations. I would recommend no unblock without topic ban from South Asian articles. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ribosome786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason 1)Copyright is a legal right that grants the creator of an original work exclusive rights to its use and distribution. 2)Wikipedia allows anyone to use its content for free, as long as they give credit to the original authors and share any changes or additions they make in the same way. 3)Copyrighted content is not allowed on Wikipedia because it goes against the platform's rule of sharing knowledge for free. Using copyrighted material can cause legal problems and limit access to information. 4)Copyrighted material can be used on Wikipedia if it has a license that allows for its use, or if it falls under fair use for educational or informational purposes. Permission can also be requested from the copyright holder to use their material on Wikipedia. *Request:I apologize for using copyrighted material on Wikipedia. I will removed it and will adhere to copyright policies in the future. Please unblock me. 5)To avoid violating Wikipedia's copyright policy in the future, I will ensure that I only use content that is properly sourced and attributed, and that I obtain permission when necessary.

Decline reason:

According to zerogpt.com, your request was generated by an AI chatbot. As we don't want AI chatbots editing Wikipedia, I won't accept an unblock request generated by a chatbot. Additionally, you do not mention whether or not you plan to accept a topic ban from South Asian articles. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ribosome786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1)Copyright is a legal right that grants the creator of an original work exclusive rights to its use and distribution. 2)Wikipedia allows anyone to use its content for free, as long as they give credit to the original authors and share any changes or additions they make in the same way. 3)Copyrighted content is not allowed on Wikipedia because it goes against the platform's rule of sharing knowledge for free. Using copyrighted material can cause legal problems and limit access to information. 4)Copyrighted material can be used on Wikipedia if it has a license that allows for its use, or if it falls under fair use for educational or informational purposes. Permission can also be requested from the copyright holder to use their material on Wikipedia.

Request:I apologize for using copyrighted material on Wikipedia. I will removed it and will adhere to copyright policies in the future. Please unblock me. I was unaware of this because I was new in wikipedia but next I will take care of it so give me once chance please to prove myself and next time I will do better.

5)To avoid violating Wikipedia's copyright policy in the future, I will ensure that I only use content that is properly sourced and attributed, and that I obtain permission when necessary.

Decline reason:

You seem to be still using AI answers. Interestingly, the answers aren't especially good, you don't say what license Wikipedia uses for example. Anyway, talk page access has been revoked, so this is an obvious decline. PhilKnight (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to edit or remove a declined unblock request for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Sarsuti (June 7)

Latest comment: 5 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lulu.com is a vanity press.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Sarsuti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 01:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Ribosome786! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 01:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Imran expedition against Kaikan jats

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Ribosome786

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Babegriev, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Imran expedition against Kaikan jats, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Babegriev}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bgv. (talk) 07:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muslims Invasion of Kaikan (June 17)

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article calls it the Arab conquest, the title does not- should be consistent with what sources call it

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muslims Invasion of Kaikan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 13:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Battle of Indus River 1027

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Battle of Indus River 1027 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources refer to this an event within the larger conflict, and multiple mention that the death tolls and boat accounts seem exaggerated

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Battle of Ash-Sharki

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Battle of Ash-Sharki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:GNG; no WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nxcrypto Message 16:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Battle of fort Rawar

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Battle of fort Rawar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG; no WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nxcrypto Message 16:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reconquest of Kangra has been accepted

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Reconquest of Kangra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Al Junayd Invasion in India

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Ribosome786. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Al Junayd Invasion in India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.