User talk:Royalmate1/Archive 5
Royalmate1 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. |
- The only errors that have been done are against me. The Wikipedia community is a joke and there needs to be purge of Wikipedia administrators and the Arbitration Committee needs to be disbanded. Only then can real reform be hoped for the site. Until then, I apologize for nothing, and I await the immediate repeal of my indefinite block. RoyalMate1 02:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a subpage of Royalmate1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
|
Disambiguation link notification for October 15editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willis Lucullus Palmer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 10editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you!edit
The Signpost: 03 December 2014edit
The Signpost: 10 December 2014edit
The Signpost: 17 December 2014edit
Test maileditHello, Royalmate1. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the About your signatureeditHey Royalmate1 and Happy Christmas! Recently i noticed that you added your name to the Guild of copy editor's List of participants and i noticed that the signature you put down looked quite a lot like my signature. Chances are that this is just a formatting error as the table nature of it makes some code break, but if it isn't. Could i ask that you add somewhere atribution for copying the code of my signature? As per required by the license Wikipedia is under, you can and i am happy to have people copy my work! But as the licence requires, you have to confirm i'm the original author of the code. You can see the full license here. Cheers, and happy editing! LorHo ho ho 11:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!editDear Royalmate1, This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). Rollback grantededitHi Royalmate1. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal talk 16:42, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2014edit
A beer for you!edit
Cannabis portaleditHey Royalmate1. I notice you joined the cannabis portal recently. This wiki was started at the beginning of 2014 and deals specifically with all things cannabis. I don't like the idea of fishing here but we could really use a few experienced editors who are familiar with wiki markup, which I'm sure you are. Please check it out and if you are keen sign up. Thanks and happy editing. Robvanvee 09:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Invitationedit
Happy New Year!editDear Royalmate1, This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page. Happy New Year!editDear Royalmate1, This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note"). The Signpost: 31 December 2014edit
WikiProject Cosmology - taskeditI decided to drop you a message to make sure you check out the first task of the cosmology project: Help improve the Universe. Please feel free to remove this message after you read it :) Tetra quark (talk) 03:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 07 January 2015edit
Sunshineedit
And thanks for signing my guestbook :)--Bhootrina (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 14 January 2015edit
Relisting of TfD for Template:Infobox academic divisioneditRoyalmate, Template:Infobox academic division has been re-nominated for deletion/merger, following a DRV filed by Andy Mabbett. You participated in the previous TfD discussion, and I thought you would appreciate the opportunity to comment on the newly re-opened/re-listed discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 22#Template:Infobox academic division. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2015edit
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBoteditNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBoteditNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 28 January 2015edit
February 2015editHello, I'm DerbyCountyinNZ. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 2015 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2015, you may be blocked from editing. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 07:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
ignosticismeditI'll help you where needed in this new wikiproject, but not today. I was super busy and and I'm tired. Meanwhile good luck Tetra quark (talk) 04:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 February 2015edit
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBoteditNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 11 February 2015edit
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBoteditNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC) Your revert of my revert in Thucydides article.editHi I just reverted your revert of my changes to Thucydides, because what you unintentionally did was to put back in a vandal's duplication of sections of the article. --Chewings72 (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBoteditNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 18 February 2015edit
Hello-asking for help pleaseeditHello. I noticed that you are a volunteer at Canon Law and although this is loosely related I think, there is something that I don't understand going-on on Wikipedia with the term Latin Church Catholic, compared-to Roman Catholic and I am hoping that if you have a chance that you could please jump-in and comment? Another editor has been trying to help me but I'm failing to understand their points and it would be great to have some other opinions because it affects a few articles. Talk:Latin Church== Too many radical undiscussed changes ==2601:C:67C0:F8:800C:5FD6:3C44:DE7C (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBoteditNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 25 February 2015edit
The Signpost: 25 February 2015edit
The Signpost: 04 March 2015edit
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBoteditNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC) respecting image copyrightseditHi, many images on your userpages (especially but not only on your navigational headers) are copyrighted, but you don't fulfil their licenses' attribution requirements. Please either remove link= from the syntax embedding them or create an "image credits" subpage for each userpage using a copyrighted image this way. FDMS 4 22:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC) The Signpost: 11 March 2015edit
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!edit
-- 05:36, Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2015edit
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Singularityedit
A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Singularity, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Royalmate7edit
A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Royalmate7, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Royalmate6edit
A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Royalmate6, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Administrators Abusing their Privilegesedit
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Royalmate1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Unfairly blocked without warning Decline reason: Block looks fine to me. Challenging a block for personal attacks with personal attacks does not seem like a sound strategy. Kuru (talk) 21:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. March 2015edit You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for blatant insults and personal attacks; serious ownership issues. Wikipedia is not your personal webhost. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)So now it's a week? You have no business telling people who can and cannot edit this site. RoyalMate1 21:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
BlockeditI have blocked you for this edit. Regarding "I may use wikipedua userpages in a manner I wish to" in an edit summary, this is most emphatically not true. We have a clear speedy deletion criterion: U5 - using Wikipedia as a free host. Your pages are just one massive violation of this rule. Ridiculously large pages consisting mainly of copy and pastes of Wikipedia articles having no relationship to the small number of mainspace edits that you are doing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC) You're a fool and I hope you leave Wikipedia immediately. You're the cancer that is killing this site. Stop deleting my userpages or I will ask for you to be blocked from editing due to vandalism. Simply remove the copyrighted material. There is no precedent for not posting parts of articles in a userspace, and if there is, I do not recognize it. RoyalMate1 21:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Scott CoxeditHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Royalmate1/Scott Cox, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PhantomTech (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Unblock requestedit
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Royalmate1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Unfairly blocked without warning; 2=I do not use Wikipedia for webspace storage. This is not my personal website. I don't plan to do this because I never was. I assure that I will not use Wikipedia as a webhost; b) I will not knowingly expose the project to legal action through copyright violations, and c) I will cease insulting and attacking people who are acting on the previous two issues, which are clearly delineated by Wikipedia policy and we all must follow whether we like them or not. Decline reason: Did you genuinely believe that blanking Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2015 February 27 - not just the entry regarding your pages, but everything - was helpful? I rather doubt that. You have accused everybody else of wrongdoing, and you have basically copied an "unblock request" someone else wrote for you, but I don't see you adressing your own conduct beyond a flat denial. Huon (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementeditHello. I noticed you've made edits to articles related to the Latter Day Saint movement and thought you might be interested in participating in the WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. This project aims to serve as a hub for collaboration on elements of the Latter Day Saint movement, Mormonism, Latter Day Saint history, doctrine, practices, and other cultural effects inspired by Joseph Smith. You don't have to be a member of the Latter Day Saint movement to participate. Best wishes! RoyalMate1 22:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC) ANI NoticeeditThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PhantomTech (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Unblock me alreadyedit
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Royalmate1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Some moron has put in a discussion about me at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents because apparently I don't know about Wikipedia policies and guidelines, which is laughably dismissive. In order to discuss in any meaningful debate, I need to be able to edit the page. I may just ignore it anyway. RoyalMate1 01:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request, and have increased the block to indefinite. Edits like this one and your posting of an entire article from Newsweek on this page demonstrate either that you don't understand how copyright law applies to Wikipedia, or have no intention of obeying copyright law. Any further copyright violations on this page will result in your talk page access being revoked. Diannaa (talk) 02:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Now this is just a joke. You're clearly an idiot. I posted the reference which gave due credit to the Newsweek article. I question your capacity as an Administrator here and I demand that you rescind your "judgment" and my indefinite block which is a clear violation of WP policies. It's not a personal attack if it's true. RoyalMate1 02:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC) @Dianaaa - Since you clearly know nothing of copyright law or anything thereof, maybe you should have a look at this article: Copyright law of the United States. RoyalMate1 02:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Royalmate1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Admisitrators are placing undue blocks on me for their lack of udnetrstanding of WP polcies RoyalMate1 02:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC) Decline reason: Talk page access revoked for personal attacks. MER-C 03:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. So far, one administrator has blocked you, two have extended that block and two more have denied appeals. That's 5 different administrators who all agree that you should be blocked. If you genuinely believe that your block was not in line with policy I recommend describing why instead of just repeatedly accusing them of violating policy. PhantomTech (talk) 02:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC) |