User talk:Saff V./Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dua-e Ahad has been accepted

Dua-e Ahad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Saff V.! I'm Ahecht. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jawshan Kabir (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysquirrel was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jawshan Kabir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Happy Squirrel (talk) 18:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Saff V., I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Happy Squirrel (talk) 18:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Saff V.. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Happy Squirrel (talk) 18:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jawshan Kabir has been accepted

Jawshan Kabir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Happy Squirrel (talk) 15:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations on the article! It was much more informative. Here is some basic followup and advice to help you with future articles and help you improve this one. Please excuse my heavy reliance on Catholic examples, but I am Catholic and I don't want to misuse examples I don't understand.

• Wikipedia has to stay neutral. This means that we cannot state the truth of any religious position in Wikipedia's voice. What we can do is say "Muslims believe", "the Catholic Church teaches", "according to the New Testament" or "Dawkins says that" and then say what they say. Note where I added this to the article. If you can give more specific in-text attribution, that would be amazing!
• When you say the "context" of a prayer, I am rather confused, could you specify? I just left those sentences as is, but they should be clarified.
• You can pipe links. This means that the text of the link need not be the title of the linked article. What you do is write [[name of linked article|text to appear]] and you have a piped link.
• I added Gabriel in parenthesis to the article text. Feel free to remove. I just thought that since anyone Christian or with a Christian cultural background will recognize that name better, it might improve comprehension for a large number of your readers.

Anyways, nice job on the article. It was a pleasure to review and accept it. Happy editing! Happy Squirrel (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

How to format GoogleBooks links

Hello Saff, I notice that some of your footnotes are just cited as a title and "google.com". This is unhelpful because a reader can't easily see the author, date, publisher, etc. of the book.

If you have any footnote to a book on GoogleBooks, please just take the link and plug it into the tool at http://reftag.appspot.com, and it will instantly give you a fully-formatted Wikipedia footnote you can paste in. Please just take 10-15 minutes, and go to the articles you have published so far, and use that tool to format your footnotes so they are nice, clear, and full. That way too, if the link is ever broken (due to websites changing), readers can still see exactly what book you mean, and find a better/current link. It's a very useful tool and I use it all the time, so good luck with it! MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the useful link and tool.Saff V. (talk) 09:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Saff V.. You have new messages at Masum Ibn Musa's talk page.
Message added 06:56, 3 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 06:56, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The warning verse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abu Talib. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The verses of Hijab (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The verses of Hijab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 13:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Verse of Wilayah (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Verse of Wilayah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Saff V., I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your article

I reviewed your article and found it eligible to be transferred to the main space but this does not mean that is complete. You may improve it by finding some more reliable source. Mhhossein (talk) 05:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

@Mhhossein:Thanks for your help. I have a question. What is orphan and what should I do?Saff V. (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

This tag shows that there's no link to your article from other articles. In fact you should put the link of your article in other articles so that the readers have the chance of finding this article. Mhhossein (talk) 05:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

More explanation is found here. Mhhossein (talk) 05:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/The supplication of Abu Hamzah al-Thumali at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmad ibn Muhammad Ardabili, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AH. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

GOCE Requests

Hi. I had to remove one of your requests because you added three. You're only allowed two at any time (see instructions at the top of the Requests page). As soon as one of them has been done and archived, you may make a new request. Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

@Stfg Thanks a lot.Saff V. (talk) 12:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

How to make a proposal

I noticed your merger proposal. Please note to instructions on how to propose a merger. Mhhossein (talk) 10:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tasbih, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatima. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghurar al-Hikam wa Durar al-Kalim, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Persian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Supplication of Abu Hamzah al-Thumali

Hello, Saff V. - In response to your request of a copyedit of Supplication of Abu Hamzah al-Thumali at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests, I just read and did my best to copyedit the article. Since I know nothing about the subject, it was not easy. If I've made any errors, please feel free to correct them. If you wish, you can explain to me what you would like to say, and I will try to word [express] it correctly. There were two things I wasn't sure about:

1) In trying to make the second-to-last sentence of the section Supplication of Abu Hamzah al-Thumali#Chain of authority grammatically correct, I had to delete something about "confirmed" or "confirming". If that needs to be in the article, you'll have to figure out a way to express it, or try to explain it to me so that I can put it into correct English.

2) Recited at night/in the evening or at dawn or recited at night/in the evening and at dawn? Now I've got "or" in one place and "and" at another. That's got to be made consistent. Corinne (talk) 00:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

I thought of two more things that would improve the article:

1) For non-Muslim readers, you might either explain what "supplication" means in this context (that is, the particular meaning of "supplication" as it is used in this article), and/or link the word to an article or part of an article so readers can read more if they want to.

2) Also, even though the name Abu Hamza al-Thumali is linked to an article, you might think about giving a few details about when and where he lived and wrote. I don't see a single mention of a date or time period in the article. Corinne (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

P.S. Why do you have "Hamzah" in bold at the beginning of the article and "Hamza" throughout the article? Corinne (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

@Corinne: Thanks for your contribution in the article. In reply to your question:

1.The better sentence is The Shia scholars of biographical evaluation and historians believed that Abu Hamza al-Thumali's narration was accurate. If the difference appear between narrations, scholars prefer his narration and solve the problem. Also, hadiths or narration that have some connection to him are verified by scholars of biographical evaluation such as Najasi, Shaykh Tusi, Ibn Babawayh, and Ibn Shahre Ashub. The Sunni scholars have not confirmed him. 2. In the correct style, is better use or between these words (every night and dawn). Because the Du'a recite one time in day and Imam al-Sajjad, the fourth Shia Imam , invoked the Du'a in every night or dawn of Ramadan. Therefore, The correct sentence is Imam al-Sajjad, the fourth Shia Imam , invoked the supplication of Abu Hamza al-Thimali in every night or dawn of Ramadan. 3. I linked the supplication word to Du'a page and in this page readers can read more information about the word. Also, I added Du'a in the see also. 4. I added Abu Hamza al-Thimali section in the article and wrote a few details about him and his character. 5. The correct spell was Hamza and Hamzah replaced with Hamza.Saff V. (talk) 10:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

@Corinne:I done and added your notice in the article and have made a number of edits subsequent after has received its copyedit. Therefore, BlueMoonset stated that Reviewer should check that previous issues raised here have been addressed.Saff V. (talk) 04:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Saff V., I have made a few more minor changes in wording to improve the clarity of the article. However, there are still some things that need clarifying. I know these things may be clear to you, but they will not be clear to a native speaker of English.

1) First, I'm going to repeat something I said earlier: I strongly recommend giving some indication of when al-Thumali lived. It's not enough to say he was a companion of three imams if your readers don't know when they lived, either. It helps the reader to know when in history al-Thumali lived and worked.

2) This phrase is not clear: "scholars of biographical evaluation". "Biographical evaluation" just doesn't make sense in English. Try to find another way to say this. I'm just going to guess; perhaps one of these will be right (the words separated by slashes (/) are just alternatives from which you can choose):

• scholars who specialize in evaluating the authenticity/accuracy/credentials/quality of earlier scholars / scholars' writings ...

• scholars who evaluate earlier scholars / scholars' writings for [see above], ...

• When evaluating earlier writers / scholars / scholars' writings , Shia scholars...

3) In this sentence in the lead: "The supplication is mentioned in the eqbal al-a’mal of Sayyed Ibn Tawus", the phrase "eqbal al-a’mal" will definitely not be clear to the general reader of Wikipedia. I suggest either adding an explanatory phrase after it (or after the author's name) enclosed in a pair of commas, or a short descriptive phrase before it ("the .... eqbal al-a’mal"), or linking it, or some combination of these.

4) In the very first sentence in the lead, "The supplication of Abu Hamza al-Thumali (Arabic: دعاء أبي حمزة الثمالي) is a Du'a narrated from Imam al-Sajjad", the phrase "is...narrated from" does not make sense. (This construction also appears in the section on "Chain of authority" and it doesn't make sense there, either.) The normal usage of the verb to narrate is in the active voice, followed by an object: "Mr. X narrated the events of the weekend." The verb means "to tell the events [to someone]" – usually in the order in which they happened. You can say this with passive voice: "The events of the weekend were narrated [by Mr. X]." You will see that there is no "from" in either of these. What do you mean by "from"? Maybe "narrate" is not even the right verb here. Joshua Jonathan Perhaps you can help with this and some of the other issues.

5) In the first section after the lead you have this sentence:

• It was reported on the authority of Ali al-Ridha, who said, "Abu Hamza in his time was like Salman in his time."

When I see this sentence, my first question is, "What is 'it'?" What was reported? i think maybe this sentence is unnecessarily wordy and could be simplified to something like this:

• Ali al-Ridha also said, "Abu Hamza in his time was like Salman in his time."

What do you think? Would that express what you want to say?

6) In the section on Chain of authority, you have this sentence:

• This Du'a is seen in the Eqbal al-A'mal of Sayyed Ibn Tawus, who writes that the authenticity of the supplication of Abu Hamza al-Thimali reach to Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara who is a recognized scholar in hadith studies.

In this sentence, it is not clear what this means: "the authenticity of the supplication of Abu Hamza al-Thimali reach to Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara". First of all, "reach" is in the wrong form or tense. If you mean today, use present tense, and then it should be "reaches to". If you mean in the past, use past tense: "reached to". But even with that correction, it doesn't make sense. How can the authenticity of a written work "reach to" a person? What do you really mean? Try to explain it to me and I will help you express it right. Well, that's all for now. Corinne (talk) 18:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Saff V. and Corinne. I took a look at the page, but it's really not my topic. I have no idea what would be common terminology and style of writing in this context, so I'm afraid I can't say anything meaningfull about it. i have added a link to "supplication," though; I didn't even know what that is. Best regards, and succes with the article, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Kautilya3 and Ugog Nizdast Can you help resolve some of these issues? Corinne (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

@Corinne: Thanks for your help in editing the article. 1 and 5. First of all, I must to correct the sentence. The correct form is Ali al-Ridha, the eighth Imam of Shia stated about him: "Abu Hamza in his time was similar to Salman in prophet time."

I want to show the great esteem of Abu Hamza for Imams. Also they considered him as a trustworthy person. Any way I preferred indicate that by nomination to statements of one of Imams. Can you find out my mean?

2. Text were edited in this form: Historians and scholars who evaluate earlier narrators (based on the Science of Narration) believed that Abu Hamza al-Thumali's narration was accurate and reliable.

3. Text were edited in this form: Eqbal al-a’mal - is an Arabic book included Du’a, prayer and practice which have been recommended to perform at specific times of the year-

4. Text were edited in this form: The supplication of Abu Hamza al-Thumali (Arabic: دعاء أبي حمزة الثمالي) is a Du'a attributed to Imam al-Sajjad.

6. The correct tens is past form of reach. In Islamic science of narration, when a reliable scholar narrated the Hadith or supplication or etc, we say that this Hadith or supplication has authenticity and is reliable. Another point is a chain of narrators that should be clear. The last link of the chain is Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara that Sayyed Ibn Tawus narrated supplication of him. In other word Sayyed ibn Tawus received the supplication from Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara. I hope to make it clear. Thanks for your patient.

Of course I explained more detail at second sentence of this paragraph. But according to points that you nominated at part 4 and 6 I think, it’s better to rewrite this sentence “According to Eqbal al-A'mal, the chain of authority was described as following: Sayyed Ibn Tawus narrated the supplication from Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara and he narrated from Hassan bin Mahboob Srad. Finally he narrated from Abu Hamza al-Thimali” to this: “According to Eqbal al-A'mal, the chain of authority was described as following: Sayyed Ibn Tawus received it from Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara who received it from Hassan bin Mahboob Srad who received it from Abu Hamza al-Thimali who recived it from Imam al-Sajjad. Is it good? Thanks for your patient.Saff V. (talk) 10:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

• I'm glad you added the additional information about the eqbal (the work in Arabic). I made a few more changes in the text to make it clearer. I think it is approaching a good article now. However, there are a few things:

1) You still didn't clarify "reach to".

2) You still didn't clarify "scholars of biographical evaluation" (see above) I didn't see the link to Science of Narration. Is it there? I'll have to look again.

3) In the sentence you copied above, "Historians and scholars who evaluate earlier narrators (based on the Science of Narration) believed that Abu Hamza al-Thumali's narration was accurate and reliable", if "evaluate" is in present tense, then all the verbs that follow in that sentence should be in present tense. Then the sentence would be about scholars evaluating earlier narrators today, or at any time (always true). So I changed "believed" to "believe", "was" to "is". If this is all about scholars in the past, then "evaluate" should be in past tense, and the other verbs can go back to past tense. It all depends on whether you are referring to scholars today or scholars in the past.

4) I changed the last part, the chain, to successive adjective clauses, "..., who...", which I think is clearer than "..., and he..." Corinne (talk) 14:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

• @Corinne: Greeting, Thanks for your help.

1. My mean of reach to be that Sayyed Ibn Tawus had received the supplication from Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara by brokers. So the means of authenticity is that the brokers are reliable. Is it clear?

My proposal: this sentence According to Eqbal al-A'mal, the chain of authority was described as following: Sayyed Ibn Tawus narrated the supplication from Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara and he narrated from Hassan bin Mahboob Srad. Finally he narrated from Abu Hamza al-Thimali changes to this According to Eqbal al-A'mal, the chain of authority was described as following: Sayyed Ibn Tawus received it from Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara who received it from Hassan bin Mahboob Srad who received it from Abu Hamza al-Thimali who received it from Imam al-Sajjad. Please, see below:

Imam al-Sajjad

Abu Hamza al-Thimali

Hassan bin Mahboob Srad

Harun ibn Musa ibn Ahmad Talla'ukbara

Sayyed Ibn Tawus

Do you agree with me? Is it better to use receive as narrate?

2. You proposed three phrase for "scholars of biographical evaluation" and I choose one of them, but unfortunately it is an ambiguous. To clarifying the phrase, I give reference to Wikipedia article of biographical evaluation. We read: "Biographical evaluation (Arabic: عِلْمُ الرِّجال, translit.: `Ilm al-Rijāl), literally meaning 'Knowledge of Men' but more commonly understood as the science of narration, refers to a discipline of Islamic religious studies within hadith terminology in which the narrators of hadith are evaluated. Its goal is to distinguish authentic and reliable hadiths from unreliable hadiths in establishing the credibility of the narrators, using both historic and religious knowledge.`Ilm ar-rijal is synonymous with what is commonly referred to as al-jarḥ wa al-taʻdīl (discrediting and accrediting) – the criticism and declared acceptance of hadith narrators."

3. Thanks for your attention. It is about scholars at every times, not only past. Thanks for your patient.Saff V. (talk) 06:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

I think one problem is that I don't know anything about Muslim religion or scholarship. Thus, I don't understand the concepts. I think you need a different editor to help you. Corinne (talk) 23:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

@P-123:Can you complete copy editing of supplication of Abu Hamzah al-Thumali article and approve the context? Because, the article is nominated for DYK.Saff V. (talk) 09:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Can someone give an update of what's the current situation. @Corinne:? I've briefly skimmed through and for the two points "reach to" isn't in the article and the link biographical evaluation is given. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Ugog Nizdast I'm sorry, I hadn't realized that "reach to" had been removed and the link to bio. eval. had been given. The article looks good now. Thanks. Corinne (talk) 18:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

@Corinne: and @Ugog Nizdast: I have made a lot of major and minor changes to improve the clarity of the article. However, there is one things in Chain of authority section. Therefore, I wrote this section again and clarify the Chain of authority. If the article is good, please write your positive comments in this page. Thanks Saff V. (talk) 06:32, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for People of Ditch

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al-Yamani (Shiism), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Yamani. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ahmad ibn Muhammad Ardabili

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The verse of Mawadda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The verse of Mawadda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The verse of Mawadda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. shoy (reactions) 15:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Requesting for copyedits

Saff V, thank you for your article creations about Islamic topics! I understand that your English is not very good, so many of your articles need to be copyedited. If you want people to help you copyedit articles, you may want to list them at WP:GOCER. sst^flyer 13:56, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Day of Tasu'a, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yazid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

The verse of Wilayah

No, this edit is not even English, let alone acceptable. If you're claiming that this story appears in the Quran and is not merely a hadith you must provide a verse. (Ideally linked using <ref>{{cite quran|?|?}}</ref>.) If you're giving up on looking, remove the entire claim, not the {{fact}} tag. — LlywelynII 08:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Actually, having checked the two (non-Quranic) sources given for that claim, both of them mention it as a hadith and do not claim that the story was mentioned in the Quran. I'll just remove that idea, pending your finding the relevant verse. — LlywelynII 09:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Kindly also notice that several of your original citations gave the wrong authors, which is pretty unhelpful. When using collections of scholarly articles, you should be careful to see whether Google Books is giving you the author of the whole book or the editor of a collection of articles. If it's the second one, you have to look at the table of contents to find the actual author. — LlywelynII 08:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Al-Yamani (Shiism)

Hello! Your submission of Al-Yamani (Shiism) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein (talk) 04:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for The Verse of Wilayah

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

• @Casliber: I think that my DYK remained less than 12 hours in the main page. 02:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC) my DYK move to main page and must remain until 14:30, 14 October 2015. Can you explain that what's happen?Saff V. (talk) 07:13, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Saff V. I am not sure. They are sometimes shorter if they change late. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations on your third DYK! —GrammarFascist _contribs^talk 22:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

GrammarFascist Thanks.Saff V. (talk) 15:01, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burayr ibn Khuzayr al-Hamadani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatima. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Al-Yamani (Shiism)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Al-Istibsar

Hello! Your submission of Al-Istibsar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Freikorp (talk) 23:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The supplication of Abu Hamzah al-Thumali

Hello! Your submission of The supplication of Abu Hamzah al-Thumali at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! GrammarFascist _contribs^talk 15:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tatbir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iraqi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Supplication of Abu Hamza al-Thumali

Thanks for your help with the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sermon of Ali ibn Husayn in Damascus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatima. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Lohoof) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Lohoof, Saff V.!

Wikipedia editor Mhhossein just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The article needs some copy edits. WP:GOCE will take care of it, if you make your request there.

To reply, leave a comment on Mhhossein's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tawwabin uprising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ra's al-'Ayn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Lohoof

Hello, Saff V. - In response to a request for a copy-edit at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests, I have reviewed Lohoof and made several edits. I did my best to put the sentences into colloquial, Standard English, but in several places I had to guess what was meant. Since I do not know the subject matter very well, I may have gotten some things wrong. I recommend that you read through the article and look at the changes I made to be sure that the article is factually correct and that the sentences convey the intended meaning. Let me know if you need further help with this article. Corinne (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

@Mhhossein: Copy-edit done.Saff V. (talk) 08:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Good, thank you Corinne & Saff V.. Mhhossein (talk) 10:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sermon of Zaynab bint Ali in the court of Yazid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Verse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Du'a Arafah

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

List of casualties in Husayn's army at the Battle of Karbala edit war

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at List of casualties in Husayn's army at the Battle of Karbala. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Toddy1 You must add your reference in the talk page and then edit the article. Your source has POV and is not reliable source for battle of Karbala. for this reason, I reverted your edit but you reverted again. I think that you want to start edit war. Your information about battle of Karbala is incomplete. Please revert your edit until discusses and then edit the article.Saff V. (talk) 08:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey Toddy1, You must selected keep vote

I have tried to keep the article in a decent state since December 2011.[1] I have not tried to rewrite the article, merely to clean it up. I think subdivision of the article in 2011 was better than the one today (though it needed explaining). I put in the numbering, so that readers could see that the number of people allegedly killed was a lot more than the 72 mentioned by Tabari.

Toddy1 The current style has not many different with old version. Please say you reason for old version.Saff V. (talk) 09:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

The big problem of the current list is category 1.2, which has a lot of names in no obvious order. The December 2011 version had lots of small categories, which helped people find information.

Current breakdown of the list

1.1 Descendants of Banu Hashim

1.1.1 Descendants of Ali ibn Abi Talib

1.1.1.1 Sons of Ali ibn Abi Talib

1.1.1.2 Sons of Hassan ibn Ali

1.1.1.3 Sons of Husayn ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib

1.1.1.4 Sons of Abbas ibn Ali

1.1.2 Descendants of Ja'far ibn Abi Talib

1.1.3 Sons of Aqeel ibn Abi Talib

1.2 Army of Husayn ibn Ali (these are not Banu Hashim)

December 2011 breakdown of the list

1 Descendants of Abu Talib

1.1 Descendants of Ali ibn Abu Talib

1.2 Descendants of Ali's brothers

2 Casualties from the Bani Asad clan

3 Casualties from the Banu Hamdan clan

4 Casualties from the Jahni

5 Ansari casualties

6 Bijli and Khas-ami

7 Kindi and Ghaffari

8 Kalbi

9 Azdi

10 Tai and Taymi

11 Abdi

12 Taghleebi

13 Jahani and Tameemi

14 Others

15 Miscellaneous deaths

16 Those who joined the Imam from the enemy army

One solution to the problem would be to reinstate categories for present section 1.2. Another solution would be to turn the whole list into a sortable Wikitable.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

However, of late, I have had enough of the tendentious editing of POV-warriors who refuse to allow articles to have a neutral POV. So I commented, but did not say keep or delete.

If you were interested, you could make the list a lot better. The most obvious thing to do would be to say which sources list which people. If you look at the current citations, some of them are rubbish and do not support the information. The only really reliable source on the battle is Tabari. So why does the article not cite him for the names that he mentions? Another thing the article should be doing is saying how each man died, if mentioned in a reliable source like Tabari.

Toddy1 Can you add Tabari?Add Tabari believed that 72 person was killed in the battle. It is very good source.Saff V. (talk) 09:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

You might also ask why does the article on Husayn ibn Ali not mention criticism of him. For example: he was a racist, he did not understand politics, and he split his community.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible format for sortable Wikitable.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Name	Grouping	Tabari	Kitab al-Irshad	AK Ahmed	GA Mirza	Comments	Source
		mentions this person
Andrew ibn Bill	Sons of Bill ibn Charles	Y	N	N	Y	a half-brother of Dave ibn Bill. Beheaded by Earl ibn Fred
		N	N	N	N
		N	N	N	N
		N	N	N	N
		N	N	N	N
		N	N	N	N
		N	N	N	N
		N	N	N	N

Nomination of Types of mourning of Muharram for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Types of mourning of Muharram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Types of mourning of Muharram until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The signed letter of Muhammad al-Mahdi (Tawqee) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The signed letter of Muhammad al-Mahdi (Tawqee) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The signed letter of Muhammad al-Mahdi (Tawqee) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ziyarat of Ashura for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ziyarat of Ashura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziyarat of Ashura until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Timeline of Ashura for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Ashura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Ashura until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dua-e Ahad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dua-e Ahad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dua-e Ahad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Hadith of closing the doors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hadith of closing the doors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hadith of closing the doors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Hadith of Fatima tablet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hadith of Fatima tablet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hadith of Fatima tablet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mujeer Du'a for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mujeer Du'a is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujeer Du'a until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 05:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saff V., where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 09:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Al-Istibsar

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akhlaq-i Nasiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Platonic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tahdhib al-Ahkam

added links pointing to Tus and Purity

Hilyat al-Muttaqin

added a link pointing to Kohl

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your opinion

Could you please extend your expert opinion in deletion discussion on this page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Shanawar. Nannadeem (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Nannadeem I think that is better the article merge in to the Noha article. There are not sufficient reliable source.Saff V. (talk) 13:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. You may offer your finding at the deletion discussion, please. Nannadeem (talk) 13:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Be careful with copypaste tags

Hi, you seem to tag articles for being copy-pastes, while in reality they are not. I have already told you this at Talk:Muawiya II, but you have again wrongly tagged other articles (Aamir Liaquat Hussain and Lal Bahadur Shastri). Please be aware that another website can have the same text, because it copied the text from Wikipedia. In the future, ask yourself the following before adding a copypaste tag:

1. Did Wikipedia copy the other website?
2. Did the other website copy Wikipedia?

In case #1 you can add a copypaste tag. In case #2 you should NOT add a copypaste tag. - HyperGaruda (talk) 18:25, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Tips when assessing copyvio

If you find a website that has the same text as Wikipedia, you should check a couple of things first. Below are some things which may indicate that another site copies Wikipedia (=case #2):

• "Wikipedia" or "Wikimedia" is mentioned somewhere on the other website.
• There are numbers between square brackets throughout the text on the other website. Example: Blablabla bla bla yada yada bla.[1]
• There are sections named "See also", "References" and "External links".

If you see any of these, then the other website is likely copying Wikipedia (case #2) and you should NOT add a copypaste tag. - HyperGaruda (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Muhammad al-Mahdi in the Quran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad al-Mahdi in the Quran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad al-Mahdi in the Quran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 08:34, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Saff_V. reported by User:FreeatlastChitchat (Result: ). Thank you. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Formatting of talk page

You are making a small mistake in format when you reply on talk pages. For example in this case you did exactly the same number of indentations. When you reply please indent one more step than the post that you are replying to.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

It is important matter. Thanks Saff V. (talk) 10:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Cite template

Please could you read Template:Citation. It would help you to use the citation templates better.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Ustad Husayn Ansarian

Are you able to read Farsi? If you are, please could you consider writing a biographical article about Ayatollah Ustad Husayn Ansarian. I had never heard of him before I started checking sources used in the article on Mujeer Du'a‎. He was clearly important, and it would improve Wikipedia to have an article on him.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Yes, I can read Farsi and Persian is my native language. Please say to consider.Saff V. (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

That is excellent. Please write the article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Write an article about Ayatollah Ustad Husayn Ansarian?Saff V. (talk) 09:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes. Please could you write an article about Ayatollah Ustad Husayn Ansarian.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

He has an article in the Wikipedia and will complete and edit it.Saff V. (talk) 08:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your reply is required

You seemed quite aggressive and threatened me with an ANI report at Nader Mahdavi talk page. Can you please now reply to my comments at the said talkpage?

Nomination of My Journey into the Heart of Terror: Ten Days in the Islamic State for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Journey into the Heart of Terror: Ten Days in the Islamic State is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Journey into the Heart of Terror: Ten Days in the Islamic State until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elektricity (talk) 03:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

S - Elektricity likes to nominate articles for deletion - not always successfully. As the author, you can add your opinion and reasons to Keep or Delete (I am guessing Keep). You can choose to identify yourself as the article creator or not. You can also add more content to the article (within reason) if you believe what you add makes the case for keeping the article. In a week or so an administrator will review the nomination and make a decision. David notMD (talk) 17:07, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Homafaran allegiance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Homafaran allegiance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homafaran allegiance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elektricity (talk) 04:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kingdom of the Unjus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kingdom of the Unjus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Kingdom of the Unjus.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kingdom of the Unjus.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ali Reza Tavassoli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Reza Tavassoli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Reza Tavassoli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NightD 08:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Ali on OTD

Sorry, but Ali already appears on WP:Selected anniversaries/January 29 (his assassination date), so we can't include the date of birth, especially since it also appears that Sunnis do not celebrate it. Regards, —howcheng {chat} 16:09, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

@Howcheng: Thanks for informing me but I can't find out why it appears on January 29?!Saff V. (talk) 06:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

It looks like I moved it to January 26 and switched the blurb to use Assassination of Ali instead. So I suppose we could have used the article after all. Sorry about that. —howcheng {chat} 06:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

I now understand the problem. According to the Islamic calendar, the Assassination of Ali is on 21 Ramadan and as you know, this event changes every year. In other words, 21 Ramadan coincides on June 6 in 2018, also it coincided on June 16 in 2017.

In addition, I nominated Ali for OTD of March 31 because in Iran the birthday of Ali is celebrated as Father's Day.Saff V. (talk) 07:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Well, the assassination is not a holiday, so it stays fixed to the same date each year. I guess next year, birth of Ali will be March 20. —howcheng {chat} 15:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, Your guess is true, But the assassination is a holiday in IRAN. on the other hand, I have two questions. first, why was the nominating Ali for his birthday and actually father's day in Iran failed?Second, what should we do with events that are not same in the calendar of Iran and calendar of Iraq? For example, Ashura is 20 sep (2018) in Iran and is 21 sep (2018) in Iraq. To nominating Ashura as OTD, which calendar is the base? Saff V. (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

@Howcheng: Can I ask you guide me about above problem?Tanks. Saff V. (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Diplomacy

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		Thanks for your valuable attempt at resolving the disputes in a diplomatic manner. Best regards. --Mhhossein talk 17:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of International Hourglass Festival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Hourglass Festival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Hourglass Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Caorongjin (talk) 08:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Move reverted.

Your undiscussed move of Deal of the Century has been reverted, per WP:RM, which requires that potentially controversial moves be discussed and obtain consensus prior to the move being carried out. Please file a move request there if you believe you can provide evidence of a change in the primary topic of the term. Cheers! bd2412 T 23:04, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

@BD2412: the move request was filled!

Nomination of Deal of the Century (draft plan) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deal of the Century (draft plan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deal of the Century (draft plan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Invitation

Dear Saff,

You are cordially invited to join the Portals WikiProject.

This is a very active project. We are in the process of completely revamping the entire portal system, and cleaning up the portal namespace. After these are done, we'll be greatly expanding the collections of portals. We have many design discussions going on, and many task types to choose from.

We also have a newsletter, that covers the progress of portal development, and the latest toys.

If you are interested, please feel welcome to sign-up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Portals#Project_participants.

By the way, I'm very interested in what you think of portals. What do you like most about them? What do they lack that they should have? What can't they do, that you would like them to be able to do?

I look forward to your replies.    — The Transhumanist   09:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: Please {{ping}} me in your reply. Thank you. -TT

1987 Mecca incident

Hey, you may have seen that the article is tagged and probably needs to be edited. I may do it some time later and though you may have time to give it some clicks. Regards. --Mhhossein ^talk 15:09, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Letter of Ali ibn Abi Talib to Malik al-Ashtar

Hello! Your submission of Letter of Ali ibn Abi Talib to Malik al-Ashtar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein ^talk 14:23, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

A topic you have been involved in is under discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:46, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

In Persian

Hey, in order to use the Persian translation of an English word, you may use the template {{lang-fa|ترجمه کلمه}}. Regards. --Mhhossein ^talk 11:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

@Mhhossein: such as the brilliant and useful point. Thanks! Saff V. (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Khomeini on OTD

Hi, you added Ruhollah Khomeini to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/October 6, but his article is already included as an observance on June 4. Per the rules, articles may only be featured once a year, so you have to pick a day for him. He can't be on both days. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 22:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Military history

Hello Saff V.! Thank you for your contributions to military history-related articles.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors who are also working on military history topics, please take a look at the WikiProject Military history—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please add your username here, and a project coordinator will soon be along to welcome you. If you're not sure about joining, why not sign up to receive our monthly newsletter, The Bugle? It is a great way to get a feel for the project. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Most recent issue of The Bugle

Your military history newsletter – Issue CL, October 2018 Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Article news: The month's new featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!) Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the end of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I • Published by the Military history WikiProject • • About the project • Newsroom • Subscribe • Archives •

Can anything be done about this RfC?

Hello Saff V. Since I had to close an edit warring complaint about People's Mujahedin of Iran recently, I've been looking at RfCs on the talk page to see how far they got. Check out this RfC about 'violent' that you opened on 14 October. The comments so far suggest a slight inclination to remove 'violent', but there is no activity on this RfC since 16 October. If you don't think anyone else will comment, do you want to propose that this get closed by an uninvolved person, for instance at WP:AN/RFC? But if some movement is still possible, can you propose a more targeted rewording that would enlist support from the other side? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

@EdJohnston:, I really appreciate you for helping me to solve the issue and apologize for the delay in response. Would you explaine about " a more targeted rewording that would enlist support from the other side " and how should I conduct it? Regards.Saff V. (talk) 07:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Iran–Iraq War into Military operations of the Iran–Iraq War. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. If you had followed this step, the new article would likely not have been nominated for deletion either. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I truthfully forgot it but try to follow it more carefully.Saff V. (talk) 06:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Saff V.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Letter of Ali ibn Abi Talib to Malik al-Ashtar

On 21 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Letter of Ali ibn Abi Talib to Malik al-Ashtar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a letter authored by Ali, the first Shia Imam, to Malik al-Ashtar, governor of Egypt, includes a model for governing based on justice for every place and every time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Letter of Ali ibn Abi Talib to Malik al-Ashtar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Letter of Ali ibn Abi Talib to Malik al-Ashtar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Barakat Foundation logo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Indy beetle looks at military newspapers in East Africa

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...

books around Islam
... you were recipient no. 1811 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at Albert Speer Op-ed: Factotem on common problems affecting infoboxes Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

MEK's military operations against Iran

Stefka Bulgaria is suggesting to add non-trivial information regarding the MEK group. As far as I see, MEK's military invasions against Iran, which is certainly of importance to this article, is not well covered in the article. Please consider that they sided with Saddam Hussain during Iran-Iraq war and carried out several military operations against Iran. Do you have enough time working on them? (Sorry, I'm running short of time :( ). --Mhhossein ^talk 11:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

@Mhhossein:By all means, it is a brilliant idea. I won't let you down and will do little by little.Saff V. (talk) 06:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your comment on my TP

@Saff V.: In response to your comment on my Talk page, following someone around because they're making inappropriate edits, as you've done at the Barakat Foundation, is allowed. This is not harassment, and I warn you to watch your POV on Wikipedia. In the future if you'd like to communicate with me, please ping me on your Talk page. Thanks Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 07:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

@Stefka Bulgaria: Whether or not you're going to accept your hounding, I had to warn you before going to ANI. This would be a wise act on your part to stop your harassment and hounding. Regards!Saff V. (talk) 08:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

@Saff V.: It wouldn't be the first time you've made a false accusation against me, which in itself would constitute harassment. Consider this a warning as well. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Khomeini on OTD Feb 1

Hi, you wanted to feature Ruhollah Khomeini's return to Iran on Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/February 1 this year. However, if we do that, we won't be putting Iranian Revolution in for February 11 because we do not run multiple articles on the same topic very close to each other. Since this is the 40th anniversary of the revolution, I would think that the other article is more important this year, which means that I will take Khomeini's return out. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 09:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

@Howcheng:, You are right, the 40th anniversary of the revolution is a brilliant reason for nomination the Iranian Revolution on February 11 and putting out others in related.Saff V. (talk) 09:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ladsgroup^overleg 23:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Japanese battleship Mikasa

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about United States support for ISIS

Hello, Saff V.,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Icewhiz and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, United States support for ISIS should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States support for ISIS .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Icewhiz}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Icewhiz (talk) 15:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing

On 7 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing, which caused the death of 27 Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, has been reported as one of the deadliest attacks in Iran in years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

ANI thread closed

I have closed the ANI thread you were involved with. You are strongly warned to avoid making personal attacks, to stop treating Wikipedia as a battleground, to seek consensus rather than edit-warring over contentious material, and to be mindful of our policies about maintaining a neutral point of view." Please read through the comments there, and keep them in mind, so that a sanction does not prove necessary. Regards, Vanamonde (Talk) 06:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Scientific names

Thank you for the review of Rhycherus filamentosus at DYK. Please note that by convention, the scientific names of animals and plants are always written in italics. Look at Euryoryzomys emmonsae, a featured article, for example. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: such a brilliant point! Thanks!Saff V. (talk) 06:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

∯WBG^converse 14:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Please STOP. You are editing in one of the most volatile areas of the encyclopedia and I have precisely zero confidence that you have enough competency. Their's weird synthesis; weird language and what not. ∯WBG^converse 14:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

for your information, Picking up unsourced material is nothing to do with POV.Regards!Saff V. (talk) 06:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Navy aviation safety and Australian war crimes trials

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Khums

Hello:

I went through the article Khums recently copy edited by a new member of the Guild of Copy Editors. I fixed a number of issues with the wording, fonts, and Wikilinks etc... One thing I did notice is that the citations are inconsistent and really need some work. In the "India" section I used this incredibly useful tool https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ProveIt ProveIt and fixed a couple of the citations. When you select the template, Journal, for example it automatically places the article in quotation marks and the journal name in italics etc... You might want to install it an go through the citations and fix them.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67, Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at three books focussing on the World Wars Op-ed: Indy Beetle on the fall of Idi Amin

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

MEK designation as terrorist organization

Hi Saff, Many thanks for this new article. It seems, however, that most of the contents of the article is already covered in another article. Your new creation does not seem to be an article split, but rather a WP:POVFORK. You are welcome to work on the main article if you believe the contents presented there is unbalanced. Pls also see WP:SPLIT on creation of article splits. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 09:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jake Brockman:, I am confused! You merged my article just a moment after its creation. As you mentioned, splitting or merging needs to knowing other user opinions. The subject is notable and will be developed, why do you say it covers material from another article without giving time!Saff V. (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The new article would have been in scope of criteria for speedy deletion WP:A10 as it "does not expand upon, detail or improve information within any existing article(s) on the subject". In addition, it changes the point of view of the existing section. Such point of view forks should be resolved by engaging with existing editors in the existing article. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 10:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@Jake Brockman: You immediately deleted this notable subject and well sourced material based on A10, while  by adding new material to existing article, it would become long and split would be needed! It's not normal to my eyes that you delete it because of “it changes the point of view of the existing section”. what is the problem with the changing?you don’t engage discussion to let us enjoy other users opinion rather than lay on just your idea.Saff V. (talk) 11:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia's leadership and medical services in World War II and Peacemaker67 on Israel's targeted assassinations Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the fate of the German fleet at Scapa Flow

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Anniversary of Khomeini's death

Hi, we have the anniversary of Khomeini's death listed in the holidays/observances section of Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/June 4, but there is nothing in the article that says this day is a holiday. Can you please add that in? Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 01:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

@Howcheng:Yes of course. Are you OK with this?I will expand the section during next days with cited sources. Saff V. (talk) 08:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Dambusters, and Hawkeye7 at Allied code breakers and Australia in New Guinea and Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 on the treaty that ended World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Somayeh Mohammadi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Somayeh Mohammadi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somayeh Mohammadi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 07:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)