User talk:Serial Number 54129/Archive 27
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Serial Number 54129. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello
Is it me you're looking for? 92.40.180.4 (talk) 22:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello
Is it me you're looking for? 92.40.180.4 (talk) 22:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
deletion of comment
Could you explain why you have deleted my comments on the Magdalen Berns discussion please? Boynamedsue (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- It's not deleted, it's on the talk page. Where it belongs. Creating a new section for your personal opinion places far too much weight on what is just that; an opinion. The AfD is for discussing the notability of an article; meta-discussion on the process itself should be kept on the talk page. ——Serial 12:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough re the new section, but I've seen procedural discussion on AfD main pages in the past, and I've seen AfD's cancelled for this reason following discussion on the main AfD page. Is it really unacceptable to talk about procedure in the main AfD space? Boynamedsue (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
I'll ask here, so that the RfA can stay on-topic: Which Twitter comment? Same as elsewhere, I talk too much on Twitter, and spent all of yesterday telling off LTAs, so forgive me if I forget what comment you're referencing lol. Best, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 12:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI: Shit. The guy complaining @JimmyWales that e.wp was about to elect a fascist, and you pointed out they were about to elect a socialist? (Or, like that) ——Serial 13:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, yeah. That might be a sock of a banned user, actually (don't ask). It's quite depressing, reading wikihaters. Maybe I really should forget the drama and do content creation, like I keep telling myself... Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 13:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Metroid dread
That was not a supervote. The basis for delisting the article is not part of the gar process. Aircorn (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Aircorn (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
UDA edit
Hi, just thought I'd mention I've posted on the Ulster Defence Association talkpage regarding your recent reversion of my edit. I'd appreciate your input. Alssa1 (talk) 22:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- See my latest edit summary Alssa1. Apologies for putting you to the trouble of starting a talk page discussion, but that was merely an accidental rollback. All things being equal, I agree with you that a local shop for local people can't demonstrate the purchasing power of an entire state! 09:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Templates
You don't want to be using XFD closer on the templates, since you're removing the link to the original (20 June) discussion I restored. FDW777 (talk) 14:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Problem with your close
Hello SN, please check on the edit you made to Template:Peninsular War 1810 1811 mobile - there is an open TFD on this that I opened, but your recent edit has made it look like there is now no TFD in process. — xaosflux Talk 14:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- I've reverted your last edit there, as I think it was in error (despite being involved) - if it was not in error please feel free to revert me again. — xaosflux Talk 17:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thnkas both—schoolboy error—long day huh. Thanks for catching it and dealing with it +dramahlessness. ——Serial 18:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Warning me for what?!
I've made no changes to any biographies, so please explain your nonsensical warning to me. Keddie28 (talk) 17:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Keddie28: (I like the totally non-SPA user name there!). What's Sheila up to these days? ——Serial 18:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi there (June 2021)
Hi Serial Number 54129, Following Girth Summit's removal of essentially half the Henley Business School page I thought it was important to restore and update the reputation section. The content provided was sourced and came from searching the rankings and achievements of the college like from the Economist. I have been watching the page with all the changes going on and so wanted to update it when users are making unsourced edits or just removing sections. I had written it in an unbiased way so I don't agree with you saying it appears to be promotional. As I mentioned, with all the edits and deletions going on I wanted to restore some of it and help as the page now looks a bit naff compared to previously. Teeside42 (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi there (June 2021)
Hi Serial Number 54129, Following Girth Summit's removal of essentially half the Henley Business School page I thought it was important to restore and update the reputation section. The content provided was sourced and came from searching the rankings and achievements of the college like from the Economist. I have been watching the page with all the changes going on and so wanted to update it when users are making unsourced edits or just removing sections. I had written it in an unbiased way so I don't agree with you saying it appears to be promotional. As I mentioned, with all the edits and deletions going on I wanted to restore some of it and help as the page now looks a bit naff compared to previously. Teeside42 (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
I have username blocked this account; there is no acceptable reason to have words like that in a username. However, I doubt they'll be back to appeal since it hasn't been used for some years. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah: 942 days, which is why I didn't report it. Thanks for that though. ——Serial 16:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
I have username blocked this account; there is no acceptable reason to have words like that in a username. However, I doubt they'll be back to appeal since it hasn't been used for some years. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah: 942 days, which is why I didn't report it. Thanks for that though. ——Serial 16:37, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
Image
On my talk, I use your image today, - thank you! Her best obit is her user page. - Some impressions of places, flowers and music for you, and I had the chance to take one pic of three people "with an article" yesterday, - hasn't happened before. Sibelius and Mendelssohn's Reformation were the lovely occasion, - listening to the first live concert this year, on livestream in today's version (- president's speech, + another Mendelssohn). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
still on my talk, with more focus --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 |
... and still, now in July, and the new image even a better match --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
More music: 2 songs, the morning song - about rising from being down, in more than one sense - is a GA, - there should be more given my initials, but I also want to care for articles of those who recently died (now Esther Béjarano). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
SchroCat complaint
Hey, SN. Listen, SchroCat has pinged me to a complaint (here) about you. As noted in my response there, I'm not sure that you knew it was him, but just in case, here is some context. On Sept 2020, SchroCat scrambled his password thereby abandoning his registered account (irrevocably). A few months later, he returned to editing as an IP (floating), mostlyish uneventfully. His departure from the SchroCat account was not done under a cloud and he was/is not subject to any standing sanctions (that I know of). Hoping to resolve this with minimum friction. Best regards, El_C 10:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Just as a pointer: discussion is also taking place at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SchroCat (of which I was only made aware after posting the above). El_C 11:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks El_C; I see an experienced CU has weighed in there, saying much of what I would have. Personally, I think that range has been infested by a Joe-jobbing LTA: SC was (is) a gent, whereas the accusations and aggression that has occasionally come from that IP ([1],[2])—including edit-warring and more blocks (at least one from Black Kite, I see—and such choice edit-summaries as "piss off", and "idiot". Best, ——Serial 12:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 July newsletter
The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:
The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.
In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Murder of William de Cantilupe scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 17 August, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page if one has been posted. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi SN. If the blurb remains that short, it will need an image for the Main Page ... any suggestions? - Dank (push to talk) 19:15, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 |
Thank you today for the article, introduced: "Presenting, "Murder of a Watermelon",(©Drmies) also known as "The Cook, the Chamberlain, the Wife and her Lover", a medieval murder mystery that Christie would be pleased with. In this case, almost literally, the butler did do it. / Although it's amusing to joke about it 600 years later, it's a bit of a sordid story really—as I suppose, actually, it would be today. On a lighter note, this received a thorough GA review recently from the Lady Ealdgyth, of this parish, so as they say, any remaining errors are my own. Looking forward to straightforward comments and criticism: although a relatively short article, some of the legal machinery seems may seem byzantine, so a non-expert opinion would be welcome."! When I saw you wrote it I was reminded of bringing back the image 'missing'. - More of my images - no watermelon yet this summer, more mushrooms and other works of cooks - when you click on the songs. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
At first glance, I read "William de Cantaloupe." A quick thank-you for interesting content like the above, and something-or-other about Oxford students versus the townsfolk. I've enjoyed reading your work on medieval England. Best, Jip Orlando (talk) 15:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Good to see you're still around!
Popping by to say hello - hope all is well! Patient Zerotalk 01:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Serial Number 54129:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
- News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban
- In the media: Vive la différence!
- Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year
- Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs
- News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia
- Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview
- Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan
- Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia
WikiCup 2021 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, 
The Rambling Man and 
Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being 
Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are .svg){kind=small}
Gog the Mild, 
Lee Vilenski, 
BennyOnTheLoose, 
Amakuru and 
Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. .jpg){kind=small}
Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
ty
Thank you for the SV image. Great work, and it's appreciated. — Ched (talk) 16:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
- From the editor: Different stories, same place
- News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
- Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
- Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
- Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia
- Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
- Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
- Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp
- Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
- WikiProject report: Redirection
- Humour: A very Wiki crossword
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:A possible consequence of biting.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused Wikipedia-specific image
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
re ARC
Hi. With the move to Liberia for IRC and the clerk mailing list taking 4 hours to process my email, it took a while for me to get approval from an arb to remove as premature. It has been done so now. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Cheers Dreamy Jazz. Hope I wasn't too blunt; it certainly wasn't the fault of any one individual. Excepting your striking mailman perhaps :) But it's frustrating to see such a (potential) timesink be so easily started. Is placing WP:RFAR under semi- or even extended confirmed protected a "perennial discussion"? Or not, by any chance...? Thanks for your help. ——Serial 16:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- I do get it and you were not too blunt, my message was mainly to let you know it had been removed.
- Perhaps semi or even ec protection might stop case requests being filed, but it would also prevent those users from commenting. Although the Arbitration Committee pages in general are only edited by autoconfirmed editors, experienced editors who have preferred to use IPs would need to make edit requests to comment. Filing parties to case requests which are then accepted should be autoconfirmed at the time of filing as the previous dispute resolution should mean they have made enough edits and spent enough time to at least get autoconfirmed.
- However, page protection isn't the only thing which could be used to prevent non autoconfirmed / extended confirmed editors from filing case requests. One thought I had in response to your comment was using a edit filter which catches the filing of case requests by non-autoconfirmed editors. I'm not sure if disallowing would be accepted by the community at large, but perhaps setting one which warns for the time being until consensus from the arbitrators and/or community could be gained. This would allow another banner to be shown for non-autoconfirmed users which reminds them to use the talk page, go to ANI etc. first. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks DJ. I realise, you're correct about blocking respected IPs (and obviously, there are a few of them), which would be unfair and potentially stifle productive input where it was (at that point in time) most needed. But the edit filter... that sounds a good idea, although I've no idea how that would work in practice. (Mainly due to technical non-ability!) I guess if an EF immediately alerted all arbs and clerks they could shut it down with the minimum of delay, but I don't see how other editors except those with the EF would ever know! Anyway, let me know if you ever get any traction with this, I'd be interested in discussing it further. Cheers, ——Serial 18:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- The edit filter would either let us know via a log, warn the user about filing the case request by preventing their save once while also logging the attempted / made edit, or disallow them from filing the case request while also logging this disallowed edit. The log would be publicly accessible, and would show up in per user edit filter logs (for example if I was non-autoconfirmed and tried to file a case it would show up in my abuse filter log) and a log which contains all edits which hit that filter. I'll see if I can set something up to log for now. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Said filter has been created, and I think you can view it at Special:AbuseFilter/1153 Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- I've just realized that ARC is already semi-protected *facepalm*. I'll make the edit filter use extended confirmed instead. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- The edit filter would either let us know via a log, warn the user about filing the case request by preventing their save once while also logging the attempted / made edit, or disallow them from filing the case request while also logging this disallowed edit. The log would be publicly accessible, and would show up in per user edit filter logs (for example if I was non-autoconfirmed and tried to file a case it would show up in my abuse filter log) and a log which contains all edits which hit that filter. I'll see if I can set something up to log for now. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks DJ. I realise, you're correct about blocking respected IPs (and obviously, there are a few of them), which would be unfair and potentially stifle productive input where it was (at that point in time) most needed. But the edit filter... that sounds a good idea, although I've no idea how that would work in practice. (Mainly due to technical non-ability!) I guess if an EF immediately alerted all arbs and clerks they could shut it down with the minimum of delay, but I don't see how other editors except those with the EF would ever know! Anyway, let me know if you ever get any traction with this, I'd be interested in discussing it further. Cheers, ——Serial 18:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Good faith?
Why should I assume people are acting in good faith when nothing about their actions indicates that they are? Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 15:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- (a) because it's expected of you here; and (b) because you can catch more flies with honey, etc. Thank you for your work on that article, but it was still in need of a lot of work (as Black Kite said kind of unkindly at that unnameable site)—which I and others have now mucked in and done a bit of; if you assume bad faith of everybody and don't even give a coherent "Keep" rationale based on the notability criteria, you're less likely to get such help for the article you want to save, let alone persuading others in the discussion (for the vast majority of articles taken to AfD, only those who've already worked on the article will have heard of the topic. Persuasion, not outrage for others' not sharing your particular background and interests.) Serial Number 54129 is actually one of the good'uns, a very useful friend in a pinch. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- I see what you're saying, it's just incredibly frustrating when there are two editors who are friends and obviously working in concert to get a page deleted, giving spurious reasons to do so. Even the most cursory look over the page and its references reveals that it clearly meets notability criteria. Then adding in stuff about me being a single purpose account? Please. This sort of thing is what really puts ordinary people (and I'd probably class myself in that category) off editing Wikipedia, because users who know all the technical and administrative tricks can and do act in bad faith, then hide behind spurious references to policies that they themselves surely must know they aren't really complying with. It leaves you feeling like you're dealing with a Kafkaesque bureaucracy, with players who know the game able to behave in ways you aren't simply because you don't know how to cheat. Anyway, I've calmed down now and added a concise response to the deletion discussion Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 07:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Removing newsletters from retired users' talkpages
Hi, it seems we have a bit of disagreement over this. I tend to remove such newsletters - and unsubscribe the users - as since they are retired, the talkpage is presumably not going to be read by them. Instead, it exists to serve the general editing community - and following that, newsletters are irrelevant to most people (and those who wish to receive them should subscribe themselves). TPO isn't really relevant as these aren't comments left by an actual person. It's a bot message, if people really care, it's available in the page history. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- That 'presumably' is doing one heluva lot of heavy lifting there; I don't think you should assume any such thing. I also think you should respect other editors' user pages, at least until it is clear that they have actually retired (and not simply placed {{Retired}} in a fit of emotion, which, due to the circumstances, could very well be the case). In a minority of cases–where a user has long since ceased editing–I agree that stripping pages of bot-notices, newsletters etc., is a good thing, but our default position be that the talk page remains under the stewardship of its editor. It's certainly not forus to randomly judge what they may/may not want.I suggest you cease
tend[ing] to remove such newsletters
in line with WP:NOBAN. This certainly includes creating archive pages which you then redirect ([3], [4]) to your own user space—what in Sam Hill?! ——Serial 13:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)you then redirect ([1], [2]) to your own user space—what in Sam Hill?!
you don't need to diff me here lol, I thought I explained that. I assumed that an archive existed and would prefer to archive instead of blank. Upon seeing there wasn't an archive that already existed, I decided not to keep the one I had just created. I could've just as easily tagged for G7 instead of moving to my userspace with the exact same effect (except confusing you, apparently).- I tend to assume that people who claim to have retired have actually retired and treat them accordingly, unless they have a previous pattern of acting otherwise. I only do this on talkpages I come across, though, I'm not seeking out pages to do this on - it's usually because the messages got in my way. I don't see a good reason for why keeping the messages there improves the encyclopedia, vs removing them. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- You make an awful lot of assumptions, very few of them based on anything more concrete than your personal preferences, it seems. Among things that improve the encyclopedia, I would count editor retention and an maintaining a collegial atmosphere towards those who may have left or be taking a break. In other words, keep their pages how they left them and assume nothing but good faith. It's literally none of our business, and if they do come back, we are hardly encouraging them by making them trawl through their own history.By the way, the diffs above were not for your benefit, but for the handful of experienced editors who watch this page. HTH. ——Serial 13:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
keep their pages how they left them and assume nothing but good faith
their talkpage didn't have the message on it when they retired, did it? And I did assume good faith - that they were honest and genuine about their retirement. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)...keep[ing] their pages how they left them
clearly implies "receiving such newsletters, etc., as they personally signed up for". And that you're removing things from another user's page because because they get in your way is bizarre and inappropriate. In any case, I think we're done here: you've provided no policy or guideline that allows you to edit other user's talk pages, so if you wish to contest my edits, I suggest you file at the appropriate notice board. Best, ——Serial 13:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- You make an awful lot of assumptions, very few of them based on anything more concrete than your personal preferences, it seems. Among things that improve the encyclopedia, I would count editor retention and an maintaining a collegial atmosphere towards those who may have left or be taking a break. In other words, keep their pages how they left them and assume nothing but good faith. It's literally none of our business, and if they do come back, we are hardly encouraging them by making them trawl through their own history.By the way, the diffs above were not for your benefit, but for the handful of experienced editors who watch this page. HTH. ——Serial 13:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Since (talk page watcher) is/are mentioned: Elli STOP! Do not do these things again. Serial Num is correct here, and you can consider this a formal warning. Do NOT go mucking about other people's talk pages such as is described above. Do NOT remove other editors posts on pages which are not in your name space, bot or not. Do NOT move their talk archives. Retired does NOT give anyone the right to act in their stead. If you continue to do these things, there's a very real chance you will be blocked. I hope this is now clear to you. — Ched (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ched: fair. I wasn't planning on continuing to revert or do this on other recently-retired editors' pages.
- I did not move anyone's talk archives, of course, that would be completely inappropriate, nor was I attempting to act in their stead. Elli (talk | contribs) 13:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Since (talk page watcher) is/are mentioned: Elli STOP! Do not do these things again. Serial Num is correct here, and you can consider this a formal warning. Do NOT go mucking about other people's talk pages such as is described above. Do NOT remove other editors posts on pages which are not in your name space, bot or not. Do NOT move their talk archives. Retired does NOT give anyone the right to act in their stead. If you continue to do these things, there's a very real chance you will be blocked. I hope this is now clear to you. — Ched (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Once upon a time
... you told me you may be able to find more sources on Nepal for me. I was wondering if the offer still stood. And, of course, posting this here, in case your TPWs have something.
In general, any sources on Nepal-related topics would do. We've only got History of Nepal (not in an ideal shape) and I'm planning to build sub-articles we ought to have. Specifically, right now, I wish I had a more or less current source on Name of Nepal. I have a tertiary source from 1983 which gives me an idea of what the situation was back then, and what's due and what's not. I have a hunch that no progress has been made toward identifying the etymology of Nepal since then, but if I had a recent source on the topic that said no new thing, I could be sure that the article is complete, and rewrite it with that in mind, and publish it. Best wishes, Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:14, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hey, Usedtobecool, hope you're well. Now then. I can't remember saying that at all! <g> But I took a module on Nepalese history a while back, so yes, I was probably thinking on the strength of that. I could send you what I can still find. Not sure I ever looked into the etymological aspect of the name, unfortunately, but it certainly sounds like an interesting area of research. Let me have a dig around; if I can find the folder, I'll ping you an email. Thanks for popping in! ——Serial 14:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- I should say that you've already sent me DR Regmi's books (I think they include 5,7,9,10,11 from Dilli Raman Regmi#Historian) (he guesses that prehistoric Nepalese probably cultivated maize, among other things, which I thought was interesting
), they are an excellent source. Thanks! Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Righto Usedtobecool, I've put together a folder: unfortunately it probably duplicates the Regmi pieces, as I kind of lost track of what I had/hadn't already got. However, there's lots more besides—over 30 things @ 900MB :) on its way! ——Serial 17:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- And
Sent ——Serial 17:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you very much! There's a lot indeed. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:55, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- I should say that you've already sent me DR Regmi's books (I think they include 5,7,9,10,11 from Dilli Raman Regmi#Historian) (he guesses that prehistoric Nepalese probably cultivated maize, among other things, which I thought was interesting
WikiCup 2021 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:
- The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points- Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
- Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
- BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
- Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
- Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points
All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
- Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Signature change?
Hello Serial! On an IP's talk page and on Teahouse, your signature showed User:Serial Number 54129, however all of the sudden you have a proper signature. Did you change it or did something get messed up? ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Also I hope you don't mind but I"m stealing your lazy userbox from the top of your talk page because I too am lazy. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Blaze The Wolf: I think I can guess which IP talk page you mean ;) no signature change for me recently, it's been
[[Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#960303">'''——'''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:blue">'''S'''erial</span>]]for some months now. But you've got me interested—any chance of linking to where you mean? (I can't even remember the last time I posted at the Teahouse for example!). Thanks for the message, Blaze, I'll certainly look into it if you can show me where :) ——Serial 18:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC) - By the way—I think that's absolutely the spirit behind the lazyness userbox! Heh :) ——Serial 18:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- I might be thinking of the Help Desk since I get Teahouse and Help Desk confused because of their similarity. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Blaze The Wolf: I think I can guess which IP talk page you mean ;) no signature change for me recently, it's been
Oromia Region
You are not looking my suggestion in the talk page and I cite sources for my assertion. I also gave reason repeatedly that the subject talks about a particular region, thus implying capitalization as proper name. There are also a lot of regions in Ethiopia that take capitlized name. The miniscule region is not retained to Oromia region as the subject talks the particular region name in Ethiopia. I also agreed to replace with Oromia (region) if neither Region nor region are compatible with naming convention. The Supermind (talk) 14:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- @The Supermind: I'm afraid that's not to the point. The point is that, per procedure, there was a move request which—while you took part in it—your proposal received no traction, and a clear consensus for the page title in its present format was established by a neutral closer. As I said at MR/T, and at your talk page, you cannot "contest" an established consensus by simply reverting it: in the knowledge that things might change, another move request might establish a different result. But as I also suggested, another request of the same kind so soon after the previous one will, frankly, probably be seen as simply disruptive. ——Serial 14:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Update: Ah, you thought you'd go ahead and request a move anyway. Interesting... ——Serial 15:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
curious.
Sorry to bother. Regarding the picture at the top, above, what happened to Slim Virgin? Just curious. Thanks, warshy (¥¥) 16:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Warshy: No bother. See her talk. All the best, ——Serial 16:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, ——Serial! I am glad I asked. I agree with your sentiments. Thanks again, warshy (¥¥) 17:37, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- It left me speechless first. Thank you for the image. I think it would be great also on her talk. I was quite moved when I found that one of the last things she did here was also missing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:02, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- ps: am I the only one thinking that these little templated candles on user and talk page are not in her style and might go? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Try clicking on parts of the image now Gerda Arendt, and let me know what you think. But if you want to place it anywhere else, or use it in any way, you know you can do that. I think you probably have better judgement than me in these matters; if I do it, I'l have an admin down here accusing me of trolling so fast it'd make our heads swim.You know—I think you're right about those candles. They're very twee, and I don't think anyone could ever have called her that! The problem, I guess, is that we only have "one" way of doing these kind of things, when of course we haven't only got "one" sort of editor. Is that making sense? It's like a one-size-fits-all response.Thanks for the words. Hope you're well. ——Serial 18:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- I clicked on image parts before you asked, and clicked thank you. Fine, but that's here. You decide how to show your tribute. I mention her in a "in memoriam" section. - The little candles: I told enough people that I don't want them when I die, - a category would be quite enough. I know a great user talk undisturbed by them, but better no link ... - There's a discussion about the topic on my talk, but not many felt it was even worth talking about. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:03, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- I forgot to answer "well". If you see my talk, you may notice that I decorated for a friend's birthday. I am healthy but know too many people who are not. (sig late, thank you for reformation on my talk, - DYK it's the first word one my user page, after the todo block?) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Try clicking on parts of the image now Gerda Arendt, and let me know what you think. But if you want to place it anywhere else, or use it in any way, you know you can do that. I think you probably have better judgement than me in these matters; if I do it, I'l have an admin down here accusing me of trolling so fast it'd make our heads swim.You know—I think you're right about those candles. They're very twee, and I don't think anyone could ever have called her that! The problem, I guess, is that we only have "one" way of doing these kind of things, when of course we haven't only got "one" sort of editor. Is that making sense? It's like a one-size-fits-all response.Thanks for the words. Hope you're well. ——Serial 18:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
About AfD
None of the stuff I added was biased. The party is widely considered to be a National Conservative party that openly opposes mass-immigration and radical Islam. If I was being biased, I would've added "Fascism" and "Neo-Nazism" to the infobox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AWorldThatNeverExisted (talk • contribs) 11:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Might as well tell you where I am with this - the only good sources I can find are this and this and a trivial passing mention in this - that's about it. A shame, because I have wanted to put "DYK ... that Ben Comeau thinks Donald Trump is a wanker and Boris Johnson is a lying shit?" on the main page for .... quite some time. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- [5], [6], [7] --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Cheers, Gerda - I recall doing GA reviews for your Bach articles that www.bach-cantatas.com is a reliable source, right? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- That was when Francis Schonken was around, the only one who thought so. Of course, the bio there is taken from somewhere else (given at the bottom, and often no longer available.) I like their links, and their images, and for recordings, immense detail. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Cheers, Gerda - I recall doing GA reviews for your Bach articles that www.bach-cantatas.com is a reliable source, right? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hope you are well
Hello! I saw this Wikipedia:Help_desk#Submission_Violation, and thought I could always tell you, perhaps you'll be inspired to go Eric Easton again. There's an amount of copypasting. [8] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2021
- In the media: Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
- Deletion report: What we lost, what we gained
- From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
- Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
- Discussion report: On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent
- Technology report: What does it take to upload a file?
- WikiProject report: Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
- Recent research: Vandalizing Wikipedia as rational behavior
- Humour: A very new very Wiki crossword
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Excuse me, that was not very civil.
Why did you remove that tag, and give that warning? The talk page was moved elsewhere, and will be returned once this is deleted. I am trying to get a content dispute off my talk page, as I can't be bothered arbitrating over it any longer. if you have the technical ability to delete this page, please do so. Then the talk page will be restored. it is currently hanging out at User Talk:The Alternate Mako/Moved Mako001 (talk) 15:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- @The Alternate Mako: That is completely bizarre, and out of process. Redirecting your talk page to the main page, really. If you don't want editors posting at your talk, just tell them per WP:NOBAN and if they do not honour your request except for required notices, file them at WP:ANI. And, like it or not, all you've now done is archive your talk page to a subpage which makes the new page you've created your talk page which as I have already said, are not usually deleted (WP:DELTALK) in order to keep the history.All of this pallava could have been avoided if you had only asked someone (WP:TEAHOUSE, WP:HELPDESK are at Least two places where you will get a more polite reply than here) as to your next move. ——Serial 16:08, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- OK, it was a bit stupid. I admit that. The History is at the Moved subpage, not at the original page anyway though? Mako001 (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Goodbye. I won't bother you any longer, I'm just nonsense anyway. Mako001 (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- OK, it was a bit stupid. I admit that. The History is at the Moved subpage, not at the original page anyway though? Mako001 (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
User:JTommyZ deleting my talk page
Hi, can you help me to check my talk page, User:JTommyZ is repeatedly deleting my own message on my own talk page. Thank you.--Jellylovers (talk) 17:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Holiday greetings (2021)
SN 54129,
I sincerely hope your holiday season goes well this year especially with what we went through last year. I'm optimistic that 2022 will be a better year for all of us: both in real life and on Wikipedia. Wishing you the best from, Interstellarity (talk) 19:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Io, Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2021 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas!
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа!
Hello, Serial Number 54129! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
|
Merry Christmas Serial Number 54129 |
|
Hi Serial Number 54129, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.
|
Merry Christmas
Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Retainers and fee'd men of Richard Neville, 5th Earl of Salisbury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chancery.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 22
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 22nd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter. This issue will be covering new and updated user scripts from the past seven months (June through December 2021).
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
|
|
|
New scripts
- Ahecht:
- draft-sorter sorts AfC drafts by adding WikiProject banners to their talk pages. It supersedes User:Enterprisey/draft-sorter, adding a few features and fixing some bugs.
- massmove, a modified User:Plastikspork/massmove.js that adds a link to the left column, allows adding and removing both prefixes and suffixes.
- watchlistcleaner removes missing pages (redlinks), redirects, pages you haven't edited recently, and/or pages you've never edited from your watchlist.
- Awesome Aasim:
- Infiniscroll adds infinite scrolling to user contributions, page histories, and log pages.
- Quick create allows for the fast creation of red-linked pages with two clicks.
- Caburum:
- UTCclock adds a clock displaying the current UTC time.
- Chlod:
- CopiedTemplateEditor, mainly for CCI case handlers, allows graphically editing a talk page's {{copied}} templates.
- DaxServer:
- BooksToSfn adds a portlet link in Visual Editor's source mode editing, in main namespace articles or in the user's Sandbox. When clicked, it converts one
{{cite book}}inside a<ref>...</ref>tag block into an{{Sfn}}.
- BooksToSfn adds a portlet link in Visual Editor's source mode editing, in main namespace articles or in the user's Sandbox. When clicked, it converts one
- FlightTime:
- OneClickArchiver is a custom version of User:Technical_13/Scripts/OneClickArchiver which doesn't prepend {{Clear}} to the top of each section on the archive page.
- Jon Harald Søby:
- diffedit enables editing directly from viewing a diff "when, for instance, you notice a tiny mistake deep into an article, and don't want to edit the entire article and re-find that one line to fix that tiny mistake".
- warnOnLargeFile warns you if you're about to open a very large file (width/height >10,000px or file size >100 MB) from a file page.
- JPxG:
- PressPass adds a collection of tools for Newspapers.com including configurable automatic citation generation in five different formats.
- CurrentSwitcher gives you links on the contribs page to hide duplicate entries, current revisions, rollbacks, huggles, twinkles, and redwarns.
- TrackSum lets you automatically sum the lengths of tracks in templates like {{track listing}} and get total runtimes.
- Nardog:
- CopySectLink adds a button to copy the unencoded page title or section path next to each heading.
- IPAInput allows you to type in IPA symbols by directly looking at an IPA key like Help:IPA/English and clicking on the symbols.
- TemplatePreviewGuard warns when you try to use "Preview page with this template" with a page that doesn't transclude the template.
- NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh:
- ContribsTabVector adds "Contributions" and "Statistics" tabs to user and user talk pages on the Vector skin.
- CopyvioChecker adds a "CopyvioCheck" tab to all pages, except Special (Vector skin only).
- LiveDiffLink is a version of Equazcion's LiveDiffLink which shows a wikilink instead of a URL.
- QuickDiff (by OneTwoThreeFall at Fandom) lets you quickly view any diff link on a wiki, whether on Recent Changes, contribs pages, history pages, the diff view itself, or elsewhere. For more information, view its page on Fandom.
- Novem Linguae:
- DetectSNG scans a list of 1,600 SNG keywords and displays them at the top of the article.
- NotSoFast highlights recently created articles in the new pages feed, to discourage patrolling them too quickly.
- UserRightsDiff concisely displays what perm was added or removed when viewing Special:UserRights.
- VoteCounter displays a rough count of keeps and deletes at XFDs, RFCs, etc.
- WatchlistAFD automatically watchlists the AFDs of any pages you AFC accept or NPP patrol, to help you calibrate your reviewing.
- P.T.Đ:
- TwinkleMobile enables Twinkle on mobile view (Minerva skin).
- Qwerfjkl:
- editRedirect adds a → link after redirects to edit them.
- RegExTypoFix, a script for fixing typos, is a wrapper for User:Joeytje50/RETF.js.
- talkback creates links after user talk page links like this: |C|TB (with the first linking to the user's contributions, and the latter giving the option of sending a {{talkback}} notice). It also adds a [copy] link next to section headers.
- Rublov:
- diff-link shows "copy" links on history and contributions pages that copy an internal link to the diff (e.g., Special:Diff/1026402230) to your clipboard when clicked.
- Rummskartoffel:
- auto-watchlist-expiry automatically watchlists every page you edit for a user-definable duration (you can still pick a different time using the dropdown, though).
- generate pings generates the wikitext needed to ping all members of a category, up to 50 editors (the limit defined by MediaWiki).
- share ExpandTemplates url allows for easy sharing of your inputs to Special:ExpandTemplates. It adds a button that, when clicked, copies a shareable URL to your exact invocation of the page, like this. Other editors do not need to have this script installed in order to access the URL generated.
- show tag names shows the real names of tags next to their display names in places such as page revision histories or the watchlist.
- Tol:
- VisualEditor Citation Needed adds a button (under "Insert") in VisualEditor to add a {{citation needed}} tag.
- Venkat TL:
- ColourContrib color-codes the user contributions page so that pages you've edited last are sharply distinguished from pages where another editor was the last to edit the page.
- Vukky:
- StatusChanger is a fork of Enterprisey's Status Changer, which adds a UI to the script. (using Morebits, so you'll need to have Twinkle enabled to use it).
All in all, some very neat scripts were written in these last few months. Hoping to see many more in the next issue -- drop us a line on the talk page if you've been writing (or seeing) anything cool and good. Filling in for DannyS712, this has been jp×g. Take care, and merry Christmas! jp×g 07:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Notification of template substitution
|
Greetings, Serial Number 54129. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
Disambiguation link notification for January 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Retainers and fee'd men of Richard Neville, 5th Earl of Salisbury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Stapleton.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
- From the editor: Here is the news
- News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
- Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?
- In the media: The past is not even past
- Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
- By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers
- Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
- Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021
- Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed
- Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all
- Humour: Buying Wikipedia
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
ANI query
Hi SN - hope you are well and a happy new year. Per your propsal at ANI, which was enforced, you stated in your opening line "perhaps 500 words? —which is the minimum accepted at WP:DYK so has a precedent". I've had a quick look at WP:DYK, and it doesn't mention 500 words anywhere, but 1,500 characters (WP:DYKCRIT, point 2). Do you have any objections on my restriction being changed to match the DYK standard that you initially suggested? I doubt some of my better articles(!) would pass the 500 word limit, such as this, this and this, but they'd pass the DYK requirements (on length). Happy to discuss.
Also @Spartaz: as the closer of that thread.
Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:50, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Lugnuts, and I hope I'm not a complete hypocrite for wishing you and yours a happy new year too. Yes, please do get the change in restriction effected if you can—it was that DYK criterion I was intending, and I apologise for misleading you (and ANI for that matter!). Please let me know if I need to reaffirm this anywhere, any time. All the best! SN54129 — Review here please :) 18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ahh, that's good to see. Easy to flip 500/1500! I've let Spartaz know about my post here, so hopefully they can update this to reflect this. No hypocrisy either - all is good. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- The term word was used twice in the proposal and rereading the discussion and noting the number of users advocating for a total ban on article creation, there was clearly no consensus that less than a total ban would fly unless substantial articles were produced. Regardless of the original meaning, the concept that gripped was a substantial article and multiple users endorsed 500 words. I don’t feel comfortable arbitrarily changing it to characters as that wasn’t the consensus of the discussion. If you want to shorten it, I think you need a fresh consensus and should open a thread at AN. Spartaz Humbug! 18:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ahh, that's good to see. Easy to flip 500/1500! I've let Spartaz know about my post here, so hopefully they can update this to reflect this. No hypocrisy either - all is good. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Notification of administrators without tools
|
|
Greetings, Serial Number 54129. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: |
| |
Re: 2401:E180:8861:6F45:8188:7AE:398E:8D01
Thanks. I've blocked the /64 range. Bishonen | tålk 08:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC).
- No, thank you Bishonen. But you denied me my return to AIV—would have been my 51st in over eight years :) SN54129 09:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Btw, the emphasis there was meant to be on "No, thank you Bishonen", while I've just noticed that it might read more like "No, thank you Bishonen" or even "No, thank you Bishonen". The vagaries of old mother tongue eh! :) SN54129 19:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- I couldn't say. It's not my mother tongue. See how I use italics to make sure of communicating — you've made me nervous now! Howsomever, I did read your reply the way you meant it. Bishonen | tålk 20:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC).
Llywelyn the Elder
Hi, thanks for the alteration, you were right about a common name, I was a bit confused doing research into the naming of Llywelyn and suppose I left a flaw to catch up on. I would like to bring it to your attention that Elder Llywelyn is actually Llywelyn Fawr, and this name has been taken by Llywelyn the Great, who is not actually 'Fawr', and someone has potentially made a mistake in naming these articles. This assumption can be verified through references : Llywelyn Fawr - Pierce, Thomas Jones. "LLYWELYN FAWR and LLYWELYN FYCHAN (fl. early 13th century). lords of Merioneth". Dictionary of Welsh Biography. National Library of Wales. Llywelyn the Great - Stephen, Leslie, ed. (1888). . Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 16. London: Smith, Elder & Co. p. 831. , Lee, Sidney, ed. (1893). . Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 34. London: Smith, Elder & Co. pp. 7–13. , Pierce, Thomas Jones (1959). "LLYWELYN ap IORWERTH". Dictionary of Welsh Biography. National Library of Wales. Officially at no stage in these references or any others found online is Llywelyn the Great name Fawr, however in the very few sources avaialble for Llywlyn the Elder he is named Fawr, eg. Myth of Llywelyn Fawr. There's some resarch into the topic, I've also opened discussions on relevant talk pages to try and get a general consensus. Cltjames (talk) 10:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, my Welsh is insufficient to the task. But good luck with it! An Bhreatain Bheag abú! :) SN54129 17:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 17:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: Indeed, I replied 15 minutes ago
SN54129 17:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, missed that until, of course, I posted the above. Doug Weller talk 21:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Wonderful!
Could you run an eye over Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 18, 2022 for me? 985 characters used against a hard limit of 1,025. Ta. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Joseph Lister
Hi Serial Number 54129, for some reason I can't email to you. I changed my email back to the oldest one I have some time ago, and it's not sending the confirmation email. Anyway, can you please forward the Joseph Lister article to scope_creep dot hotmail dot com. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 16:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Scope creep: Sounds bizarre! But Sent as directed :) SN54129 16:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- That was quick. If only sources research was like that. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 16:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2022
- Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
- News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election
- Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"
- Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?
- WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
- Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021
- Obituary: Twofingered Typist
- Essay: The prime directive
- In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing
- Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"
- Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword