User talk:Soni/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Soni. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Category:Wikipedians who like VisualEditor has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedians who like VisualEditor, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 10:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
{{Year}}
As a result of this redirects discussion, the purpose of {{Year}} has been changed from {{Year needed}} to {{YEAR}}. I'm writing this message to let you know that there are existing uses of this template on your user subpage User:Soni/sandbox 2 and User:Soni/sandbox 3 which need to be checked manually and migrated as appropriate. Deryck C. 17:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
References
How can I get to that list to fix broken links? Thanks, JGourlay (talk) 15:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC) JGourlay (talk) 15:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Please participate to the talk pages consultation
Hello
Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.
We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.
Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update
The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.
The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.
Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Requesting Adoption
Hi Soni,
I'm a newbie to Wiki. I'm interested in publishing an article on the Coral Restoration Foundation, based in Key Largo, FL, but I need some help in getting it done.
Could you please adopt me so that I can make progress?
Thanks! FLkeyseditor (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
[WikiConference India 2020] Conference & Event Grant proposal
WikiConference India 2020 team is happy to inform you that the Conference & Event Grant proposal for WikiConference India 2020 has been submitted to the Wikimedia Foundation. This is to notify community members that for the last two weeks we have opened the proposal for community review, according to the timeline, post notifying on Indian Wikimedia community mailing list. After receiving feedback from several community members, certain aspects of the proposal and the budget have been changed. However, community members can still continue engage on the talk page, for any suggestions/questions/comments. After going through the proposal + FAQs, if you feel contented, please endorse the proposal at WikiConference_India_2020#Endorsements, along with a rationale for endorsing this project. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Adopter
You have been removed from the list of WP:ADOPTERS due to inactivity. If you wish to re-add yourself, you may do so at any time. Here is the text that you used: |description=Hi there. My name is Soni and I am a Wikipedia editor. I prefer to interact directly with my adoptees and I'm willing to be patient enough to help any adoptees. I specialise in areas involving dealing with new editors, and editor retention. |image=Sukhoi_Su-30_inflight.jpg CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Editor of the Week : nominations needed!
The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.
The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up a citation.
Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
"Do or do not, there is no try" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Do or do not, there is no try. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 29#Do or do not, there is no try until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aasim (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Arbitration request
Regarding this edit: nice to see you continue to edit on English Wikipedia. In the past I've given you some feedback on the nature of your comments, so I wanted to tell you that I felt your comment expressed yourself very well. Thanks very much! I have a minor note regarding your reference to the bureaucrats' noticeboard. In spite of your edit to "will exist" (which is a little confusing in itself, as the noticeboard exists, even if administrative action review is in a bit more of an intermediate state), it seems to imply that bureaucrats have a current role regarding removing administrative privileges. (I understand that you don't actually think this.) Regarding your final general note, it's a bit of an aside, since arbitrators can't accept or reject a request based on the community thinking another process should exist. (Of course, many editors have digressions in their statements.) I only mention these in passing; the key point is that I think your comment overall did a good job in raising and explaining some new points to consider. Happy writing! isaacl (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Isaacl: Hey Isaac, nice to see you again. I've been lurking for a while, but only slowly started re-dipping my feet into the rest of community and editing. I actually was just yesterday looking at EOTW to see where it had landed and was considering just being BOLD and updating some templates and headers there. Not sure if you're still active in that space, but it was good to check back and reminisce over them.
- What areas are you active on currently? Since I've been meaning to try editing more, I'm actually actively looking for a bite sized project or two I can attack. I'm currently most active on discord, in case you're also around there.
- As for the comment, thank you. Like I said, I was actually trying to stay away and continue lurking, but felt like someone had to raise those points. This entire last couple months of following enWiki has been... a bit jarring. But also, what you said is partly why I ended up noting my replies as a "Comment" instead of a "Statement". I thought it was adjacent enough to the discussion matter and wanted to talk on it, just wasn't sure if it was directly interacting with all of the case as a whole.
- As for XRV/BN... Do you have a suggested phrasing? I was trying to fit the 500 word mark and only later realised your clarification on the state of XRV (Which I actually am somewhat still unfamiliar with). Happy to phrase myself better, I just didn't know what the current state of it exactly was.
- Soni (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- There's disagreement on the state of the administrative action review process. As much as I'd like calmer heads to prevail and find a happy path forward, I don't really know how it's going to happen, so I can't say it's effective use of time right now to learn about it. Regarding wording, you can correct me if I'm mistaken: I think you meant to say that you thought there could be a role in future for bureaucrats in a process to remove administrative privileges. By referring specifically to the noticeboard, along with a process that is actually being developed, it made it seem like there was already a process that used the noticeboard.
- Not much has changed since the editor retention project started: the reasons I added there regarding why I'm not excited to edit articles are still true. Wikipedia works fine when most people agree, but not so well when there is significant disagreement, even (maybe especially) if in good-faith.
- Buster7 continues to be the one-person show behind Editor of the Week. I stopped paying attention to the nominations to the extent that I let a nomination for me slip by. When the recognition was given, I thought the most graceful approach was to accept it. I'm sure he would appreciate more nominations and people dropping by to thank the recipients. isaacl (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Isaacl: Understood. It's been a while since I saw any of WER, so pardon me I don't quite remember most of what happened after, just the initial burst to make EoTW heh. And gotcha. Maybe I shall, just to nominate Buster hehe Soni (talk) 00:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Soni. Let me take this opportunity to personally thank you for the nomination. I will receive it on 8/7/2022; my 75th Birthday. By that time 450 editors will have received a small acknowledgement for their efforts but none can feel more honored than me. ―Buster7 ☎ 15:53, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Critical area (computing) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical area (computing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Reference link in MacDowell Colony page broken
There is a reference link on our page that appears to be broken, most likely a defunct web page link. When I try to edit that section of our article, I get this code:
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)