User talk:Stuartyeates/Archive 27
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Stuartyeates. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026
Hello Stuartyeates,

Backlog update
At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.
After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.
2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.
Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.
BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.
January–February backlog drive
The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.
May backlog drive
An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.
PageTriage
An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election
I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.
-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
My draft
Hi there, thanks for reviewing draft:Sparx maths however, there are multiple independent sources such as one from the guardian, an independent review by the university of cambridge, TES, one from the WPL (that doesnt seem to want to stay linked properly) and Buisness daily Jabba550 ✉ Talk to me :D 10:49, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
- All non-trivial content in the article needs to be sourced to independent secondary sources. Softball interview pieces and recycled press releases do not meet this criteria. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
3 Comma Capital Draft
Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate the candor and the help. I don't have a lot of experience on submitting articles on wikipedia. Anyway, I have substantially revised the draft to address the concerns regarding sourcing and notability. In particular, I have removed a number of primary and routine references and replaced them with additional independent secondary sources from established publications, including Jornal de Negócios, Jornal Económico, Expresso, ECO, FundsPeople Portugal and Essential Business. The revised draft places greater emphasis on independent secondary sources as reviewed. Instead, it is supported by independent editorial coverage of two developments that received attention from multiple unrelated publications: the launch of Portugal's first CMVM-regulated investment fund dedicated exclusively to digital assets with daily liquidity for institutional investors, which was covered by several independent financial media outlets; and the acquisition of 3 Comma Capital by C2 Capital Partners, which was independently reported by Expresso, Jornal Económico and FundsPeople Portugal. I have also simplified the article by removing promotional or descriptive material, reducing the level of detail on the company's products, and ensuring that statements are supported by independent sources wherever possible. I believe the revised draft more closely reflects Wikipedia's requirements for neutral tone and reliance on independent secondary sources. I would be grateful if you could review the updated version. Duartecaldas (talk) 16:29, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hello Stuartyeates! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Could You Please Review My Draft?
I created a Wikipedia draft about a kidney company and have added a number of news references.
Would you mind taking a look User:WhiteFactLoom/sandbox and letting me know if it's good for submission or if there's anything else I should improve? I also have a question about the Articles for Creation process. I know how to move a sandbox draft to the main space, but I'm not sure how to submit it through AfC. Should I copy the entire source into a new draft page and submit it from there, or is there a better way? WhiteFactLoom (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
- It's in the queue and will be reviewed eventually. The Wikipedia:Teahouse was the right place to ask for assistance. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:59, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
Category:Recipients of Marsden grants has been nominated for deletion
Category:Recipients of Marsden grants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 21:08, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
A good decision
I've been loosely working on the Draft:Incest in anime and manga for a while (mainly adding sources to Draft talk:Incest in anime and manga as suggestions) and I personally did NOT think it was ready to be submitted yet, so that was a good decision to decline it. But, I'll see what I can do with the draft myself and try to improve it before submitting it again. In solidarity - Historyday01 (talk) 11:35, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
Draft:Tiptap – sourcing after decline
Hi Stuartyeates,
thanks for reviewing Draft:Tiptap and for the clear note on sourcing. Since the decline I've added several independent sources and, before resubmitting, I'd value your read on whether they move it toward meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies (NCORP), or still fall short.
Independent, secondary coverage now cited:
- Laravel News (2018): a dedicated article about Tiptap by a named staff writer at an established developer publication.
- GIGAZINE (2023): a full hands-on article about Tiptap from an established Japanese tech outlet with editorial oversight.
- Vue.js Amsterdam: a recorded third-party conference talk centred on Tiptap.
Other independent signals: inclusion as a workload in the Speedometer 3.0 browser benchmark (maintained by the major browser vendors), inclusion in Oxx's 2025 Rising Stars of Open Source report, and documented adoption by GitLab, Nextcloud, Statamic, Mantine, Strapi, Filament and TYPO3 (via their own docs).
My question: do Laravel News, GIGAZINE and the conference talk (plus the breadth of independent adoption) clear the bar, or do you consider them not in-depth enough? If it's the latter, I'd rather hold off than resubmit prematurely. Thanks for your time.
Kopfpirat (talk) 10:47, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Re submit it and someone will pick it up from the queue. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:32, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia events in New Zealand

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia events in New Zealand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello Stuartyeates:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.