User talk:Tolly4bolly/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
The Signpost: 21 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
A cheeseburger for you!
|
Looks like were the sole fighters at Boss $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 08:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC) |
why is the photo not showing?
Hey, I just uploaded the pic to the page why is it not showing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.180.114 (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- You have to upload that image on wikipedia before your image can be shown on the article. Tolly4bolly 07:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Why is the picture removed?
? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaishnavi.sinha123 (talk • contribs) 07:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
Screens count of a Bollywood film’s release needed.
Every Bollywood films should have information of screen count when it is releasing.So I added Rowdy rathore screen count.Its not a vandalism.Not even think about it. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gunaah (1993 film), Torreslfchero!
Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Good reviewed.
To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm FrankDev. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jilla(2013 film), and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, FrankDev
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Danrok. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, India-Ethiopia relations, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Danrok
change in my profile
i changed an adress in my profile form current to new one (edit) [email protected] since i don't use that one any more
thx
59.90.186.230 would like to know why you reverted my edits on the ashtachamma page ?
would like to know why have you reverted my edits on the ashtachamma page ? the page points to a board game site where you can play the game with your facebook friends. i can change the description and put a new one if you suggest , or is it not allowed to put such links. please let me know . the site is clean and not a malware you can see and try it for yourself. Thanks,
Reverted change to Oy Vey
You reverted my change to the Oy Vey article after I conferred with one of my Jewish/hispanic coleagues and she confirmed it.
Your uneducated and moronic edit
What kind of idiot are you to ruin a good article on Jays' Treaty? Someone took the time and effort to write an accurate account of the issues between the US and Britain, and their resolutions and you decided on being a complete moron and ruined it.
The remove RottenTomatoes as well. Reply to TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom
TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom
If you don't know, that that dosent mean that a site dosent exist.
If you apply the same rule you can remove 'rottentomatoes.com' as well, they also """attempting leech off the value of other sites""" as per your remark (ie reviews from various sites) Will you do that? Can you do that?
There has to be a common benchmark.
When did Wikipedia turn unfair and biased?
I have always come across good people in wiki.
First entry for project I am really interested in and it is messed up
Thank you for your kind welcome. I find it most interesting that you work on the Indian Cinema pages and you welcomed me. (I am listening to ″Aja Soniye″) as I am writing this and I watch mainly Indian movies.) Anyway, I added my name to the project list for Indian Cinema, saved, got reminded to write an edit note, did that, saved, looked at the page in real-time and it is messed up and I don't know why which is embarrassing because I have been a programmer and I have worked in the IT field for a very long time. I will appreciate any help you can give me.
Regards,
--Norawashere (talk) 22:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
I fixed it!! Norawashere (talk) 18:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 September 2013
- News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up
- Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds
- Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt
- WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion
- Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible
The Signpost: 11 September 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia
- Featured content: Tintin goes featured
- Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!
- Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1900 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 20 October 2013 (UTC)