User talk:Waggers/Archive 25
This is an archive of my talk page. Please don't edit this page; instead, please post new message on my main talk page. |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
List of Presidents of the United States by time in office
editSeems like you have a brilliant idea about why "Lincoln's Missing Bodyguard" has anything to do with James Garfield. Please share with the audience why. Stupidity is insisting that something wrong is right, and doing it more than once. 84.208.206.123 (talk) 13:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Discuss it on the article's talk page. WaggersTALK 08:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
"If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Waggers"
- I ask you once again: What part of a book about Lincoln, two books actually, has anything to do with James Garfield?
84.208.206.123 (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm glad you're being more civil this time. I saw an edit that removed references without explaining why, other than a garbled rant in the edit summary; these edits were from an IP address not a registered user and had already been reverted several times, by several different editors. I don't think it was unreasonable on that evidence to revert what very much appeared to be an edit-warring IP vandal. Looking at the references in question, I think there is a good case for their removal. As I said above, I suggest you make that case on the article's talk page so that any interested editor can contribute. WaggersTALK 16:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand your arguments. I clearly stated that several of the references were WRONG!!! You did not bother to check, just clicked undo. In a previous attempt to correct the article I wrote:
- "It is common knowledge that these presidents died in office. References about their deaths belongs in the article about the individual presidents. In addition: several of the links are just wrong. Especially Garfield."
The references don't serve any purposes. I have tried to change three times. I won't try a fourth. Not my fault that the Wikipedia police can't understand easy things. Just carry on with inaccurate articles. 84.208.206.123 (talk) 22:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Latest news from the Wikimedia Global Collaboration team, about Notifications, Structured discussions, Edit Review Improvements and Content translation. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.
What's new?
- The Global collaboration report for October is now available.
- All wikis now have the Filters for edit review as the default system on Recent Changes page.
Edit Review Improvements [More information • Help pages]
Most recent changes
- Filters for Watchlists are still on Beta. Please try them and give feedback before we release it for all users!
- Shortcuts to filter Namespaces and Tags are now more visible. [1]
- Discovery of the search bar has been improved. [2]
- If the Recent Changes page or the Watchlist fails to load or is time-outed, a message is now displayed. [3][4]
- The bookmark icon for creating a "Saved filter" is now grayed when it is not possible to save. Before it was not visible. Bookmarking is unavailable when, for example, the current filter set is already saved. [5]
Future changes
- Live updates on Recent changes will be moved out of beta and into the standard feature set by the end of the year. [6]
- Extension:Translate filters for RecentChanges are going to be integrated to the new filters. [7]
- Automatic edit summaries will be filtered as tags. [8]
Content translation [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- List items (suggested items and in-progress/published translations) layout restyled to prevent overflows on small screen sizes.
- Search results for new translation dialog are now embedded, instead of being displayed in floating menu. Search results remain displayed when tabbed out and can be closed using ESC key.
- Missing pages are no longer shown when there is no match for search query. Message informing that there are no results is displayed instead.
- Embedded search results enabled to provide users with more translation opportunities. Articles user recently edited (in currently selected source language wiki) are surfaced when there is no input in search bar, with additional info if article is missing in user's currently selected target language.
- Long suggestion descriptions are limited to three lines, and the rest is truncated, which is indicated by ellipsis.
- Chart data representing user translation statistics in now showing all the months since user's first published translation. Months that went without translation are now displayed in chart as well.
- A loading indicator is shown while suggestions are loading.
- Button to discard dialog is now shown through the whole process of selecting article to translate.
Notifications [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- Edit-user-talk notifications are now expandable. [9]
Structured Discussions [More information • Help pages]
Future changes
- Some work is ongoing to store Structured Discussions contents from HTML to wikitext. That change will allow some specific templates and magic words to work properly on Structured Discussions. [10]
- Some tests are conducted in order to prepare the rewriting of Structured Discussions' interface. That rewriting will have no visible impact on users but it will ease future changes.
Other projects
- Compact Language Links has been deployed on German Wikipedia. [11]
Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Global Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 November 2017
edit- News and notes: Cons, cons, cons
- Arbitration report: Administrator desysoped; How to deal with crosswiki issues; Mister Wiki case likely
- Technology report: Searching and surveying
- Interview: A featured article centurion
- WikiProject report: Recommendations for WikiProjects
- In the media: Open knowledge platform as a media institution
- Traffic report: Strange and inappropriate
- Featured content: We will remember them
- Recent research: Who wrote this? New dataset on the provenance of Wikipedia text
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for signing up
editHi Waggers,
Thank you for signing up our study to try out our recommender system! Right now, we are still waiting for more participants from other WikiProjects to sign up, so I will let you know when we are ready to provide you the recommendations, and will let you know how to use it. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 18:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
New Page Patrol thanks you.
edit
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
For your contributions to NPP. Thank you for your reviews! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 22:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC) |
- Another one for the trophy cabinet! Many thanks Insertcleverphrasehere. WaggersTALK 14:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Waggers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2017
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
- Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.
- Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
- A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.
- Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.
- Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
- The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.
Reverted Ravenhill edit
editHi, Waggers! I cut the line about Ravenhill working on a TV series as repetition because there was no sourcing for the comment and just a section or so down the page, there's a sourced listing for the actual TV series, Vicious. Rudeguerrilla (talk) 20:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Rudeguerrilla
Lady Bird
editHi, Waggers, sorry for that, it is now better, you can check it and see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.209.30.179 (talk) 21:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
edit- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
- Gallery: Wiki loving
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys
Latest news from the Wikimedia Global Collaboration team, about Notifications, Structured discussions, Edit Review Improvements and Content translation. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.
What's new?
Edit Review Improvements [More information • Help pages]
- The filters are now deployed as a default feature on all wikis on RecentChanges and RecentChangesLinked pages.
- The filters are still available as a Beta feature on all wikis on Watchlists. Please try them!
- LiveUpdates have been deployed as a default feature for all wikis.
- On wikis using Extension:Translate, translated messages can now be filtered. System messages can be filtered as well, on all wikis. [12]
- "View new changes since $1" link is now more prominent, to invite users to use that native feature to update the list of results. [13]
- Pagination and time period selectors are now combined and located on the right on left-to-right wikis. [14]
- When a user wanted to click outside of the filter menu to close it, it was possible to click on "revert" link by accident. It is not possible anymore. [15]
- It is now possible to filter the following events using the Tags menu: Making a page a redirect, Changing redirect target, Changing an existing redirect into a non-redirect, Blanking of the page, Removing more than 90% of a page content, Rolling back an edit. [16]
- Some design improvements have been done to Related Changes page to integrate the new filters. [17]
- "Save current filter settings" menu and legend overlapped the results. This is now fixed. [18]
- Some small design improvements have been done. [19]
Content translation [More information • Help pages]
- Now Content Translation prevents source and target language to be set to same language. [20]
- The dialog for selecting article to translate is standardized. It introduces a new component that is used for the selected page on both the "New translation" dialog and the "Suggested pages" list. [21]
- More space is given to the language filter, to increase responsiveness and show more language names without truncation. [22]
- While searching for a new page to translate, duplicates are not shown anymore for user search input. [23]
- Various PHP warnings and JavaScript errors have been fixed. [24][25]
Structured discussions [More information • Help pages]
- It is now possible to use Special:Nuke on hidden Structured discussion topics. [26]
- The Reply button is not active anymore until something is typed. [27]
Miscellaneous
- For wikis that use ORES, preferences for ORES have been rationalized in Special:Preferences, on Recent Changes tab and Watchlist tab. [28]
- ORES will be deployed on Simple English Wikipedia. That wiki will be able to use the Prediction filters. [29]
Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Global Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
14:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Jason MacIntyre for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason MacIntyre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason MacIntyre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kevin McE (talk) 22:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:46, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2018
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
- Muboshgu
- Anetode • Laser brain • Worm That Turned
- None
- A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.
- The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey results have been posted. The Community Tech team will investigate and address the top ten results.
- The Anti-Harassment Tools team is inviting comments on new blocking tools and improvements to existing blocking tools for development in early 2018. Feedback can be left on the discussion page or by email.
- Following the results of the 2017 election, the following editors have been (re)appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Alex Shih, BU Rob13, Callanecc, KrakatoaKatie, Opabinia regalis, Premeditated Chaos, RickinBaltimore, Worm That Turned.
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
edit- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
Itchen College
editThanks for your comments and encouragement about Itchen College. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Latest news from the Wikimedia Global Collaboration team, about Notifications, Structured discussions, Edit Review Improvements and Content translation. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.
What's new?
- The Global Collaboration report for December is now available (in English).
- Filters are better integrated on Related Changes (see below).
- Structured discussions now use the 2017 wikitext editor (see below).
Edit Review Improvements [More information • Help pages]
Bug fixes
- When searching, a click on a filter capsule moved the list of filters. [30]
- On Related Changes page, the page name entry box didn't show the entirety of long page names. [31]
- Transcludeing Special:RelatedChanges on a page added unexpected parameters to the URL. [32]
- Filter menu was opening upwards. [33]
- ORES preferences on Recent Changes and Watchlist preferences pages have been rationalized. [34]
- Users are now prevented from clicking on a link when they click outside of the dropdown menu to close it. [35]
Work in progress
- Filters on Related Changes page are better integrated and get new features, for instance: [36]
- The standard auto-completion mechanism is available when you search for a page to look at.
- It is more clear if you are looking to pages linked from the target page or to the target page.
- You no longer need to click the "Show" button; the page updates automatically when a page is positively identified via autocompletion.
Content translation [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- Further enhancement are made for list (Suggestions/In-progress/Published) items on mobile screens. Long titles no longer overflow or overlap with other interface elements. [37]
- Various changes to the "New translation" dialog and the selected page for translation have been made: [38]
- Longer titles of selected pages are displayed in smaller. Some space has been added around to increase readability.
- Language codes are not truncated by ellipsis anymore. Only full, autonym language names are subject to truncation.
- Minimal screen sizes and selected suggestion dialog have been revisited. They are more consistent in responding to screen size changes.
- Discard button is no longer shown on small screen sizes.
- Language filters no longer render wrong or non-existent language codes. [39]
- The "New translation" dialog now shows a loading indicator and doesn't display an error when you change the source language after an unsuccessful research. [40]
Structured discussions [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- Structured discussions now uses the 2017 wikitext editor instead of its old custom one. This works with your preference for wikitext or visual editor. [41][42]
- The documentation has been updated and needs translations updates.
- Prométhée, from French Wikipedia, has created some gadgets to customise Structured discussions interface.
- The documentation is ready to be translated.
Future changes
- Structured discussions does not always follow wiki's configurations concerning talk pages indexation. This will be fixed. [43]
- Hidden topics will not be indexed by search engines anymore. [44]
Notifications [More information • Help pages]
Bug fixes
- User rights change notifications were displaying a broken link. This is now fixed. [45]
- "Mark as read" buttons had a bad appearance for users who don't have JavaScript activated. [46]
Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Global Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
00:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2018
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
- None
- Blurpeace • Dana boomer • Deltabeignet • Denelson83 • Grandiose • Salvidrim! • Ymblanter
- An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
- Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.
- A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.
- The Arbitration Committee has enacted a change to the discretionary sanctions procedure which requires administrators to add a standardized editnotice when placing page restrictions. Editors cannot be sanctioned for violations of page restrictions if this editnotice was not in place at the time of the violation.
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
edit- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Recommendations for your WikiProject Hampshire will be delivered soon
editHi Waggers,
Thank you for your interest in using our tool. Sorry about the wait. We've been working on improving our tool in the past several weeks, and we will send recommendations to you very soon. Stay tuned. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Recommending new editors to your WP Hampshire
editHi Waggers,
Our system generated a list of potential new editors for your project. They may be interested in collaborating with your project members on your project's articles. As you will notice, the list contains both experienced editors and newcomers. Both are valuable for Wikipedia and your project. Please go ahead and introduce your project to them, and point them to some project tasks to start with. We also provide a template invitation message to make it easier to contact the potential new editors. Just click the invite link to write the invitation message.
We'd appreciate it if you could fill the survey to let us know what you think about our recommendations so we can improve our system.
Username | Why we recommend this editor | First Edit Date | Total Edits in ENWP | Editor Status | Invite | Survey |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mjay0817 (talk · contribs) | Mjay0817's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2017-9-1 | 18 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Camcool11 (talk · contribs) | Camcool11's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Arts and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2014-2-9 | 31 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Forestperson (talk · contribs) | Forestperson made 8 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2015-2-25 | 18 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Acpvynwinch (talk · contribs) | Acpvynwinch made 9 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2018-1-14 | 15 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
McFlurry12 (talk · contribs) | McFlurry12 edited articles similar to articles your project members edited. For example, McFlurry12 and your project member PanthWiki (talk · contribs) edited 5 of the same articles in their most recent 500 edits. | 2017-11-9 | 116 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Theitkid (talk · contribs) | Theitkid made 57 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2014-11-21 | 150 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Craigw87 (talk · contribs) | Craigw87 made 8 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2012-10-13 | 235 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Ralfa73 (talk · contribs) | Ralfa73's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and Arts, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2013-1-30 | 106 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Greenatious (talk · contribs) | Greenatious's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and Technology, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2017-1-11 | 113 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Please let me know below if you have any general feedback about our recommendations. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Waggers, Just wonder if you had a chance to look at the recommendations I sent? Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Waggers, I update the recommendation list sent to you earlier. I fixed some bugs in the previous version (as you might have seen that some editors on the previous list were not quite active). Very sorry about it, but now, everything should be good! Please take a look, and let me know what you think! Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
edit- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Southampton Bassett Green.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 19:06, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- And other map images related to Southampton that are similar; just trying to clear out some very old files that are no longer useful. ~ Rob13Talk 19:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi User:BU Rob13, thanks for the heads-up. These maps were the best we had for a time but I agree there are now much more useful images available. I don't think they would particularly add any value by being moved to Commons; I could go through and speedy delete them under G7 (author requests deletion) but it's probably worthwhile giving other editors the opportunity to rescue them if they wish, so proposed deletion is probably still the best plan. This does make me realise just how long I've been working on Wikipedia and how much things have moved on in the last 12 years! WaggersTALK 09:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Indeed. These images were once extremely valuable, but as we've moved more towards maps generated by templates, they've mostly gone unused. In a sense, it shows how far we've come. I'm trying to clear out a lot of these old files to make it easier to maintain the file namespace, so you may get a couple more messages like this. ~ Rob13Talk 13:53, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi User:BU Rob13, thanks for the heads-up. These maps were the best we had for a time but I agree there are now much more useful images available. I don't think they would particularly add any value by being moved to Commons; I could go through and speedy delete them under G7 (author requests deletion) but it's probably worthwhile giving other editors the opportunity to rescue them if they wish, so proposed deletion is probably still the best plan. This does make me realise just how long I've been working on Wikipedia and how much things have moved on in the last 12 years! WaggersTALK 09:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Waggers
edit- Hi Waggers, it would be great if you have a chance to take a look at the new editors I recommended to you. Thank you! I would also help invite some new members, but they are not the ones on this list. Bobo.03 (talk) 20:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2018
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
- Lourdes†
- AngelOfSadness • Bhadani • Chris 73 • Coren • Friday • Midom • Mike V
- † Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.
- The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
- Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
- A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
- A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.
- CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
- The edit filter has a new feature
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.
- Following the 2018 Steward elections, the following users are our new stewards: -revi, Green Giant, Rxy, There'sNoTime, علاء.
- Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.
Latest news from the Wikimedia Global Collaboration team, about Map improvements 2018, Notifications, Structured discussions and Edit Review Improvements. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.
What's new?
- Collaboration and Language are now going their way separately. Updates about Content Translation are not included in this newsletter anymore. Please refer to the Language report.
- Collaboration has a new project: Map improvements 2018.
- The team’s engagement with maps is based on 2017 Community Wishlist proposal Kartographer Improvements, though the work won’t be restricted to items named there.
- The project is currently in its very early research and planning stages.
- It has a limited term that’s scheduled to conclude at the end of June 2018.
Edit Review Improvements [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- es.wikipedia, es.wikibooks, sv.wikipedia, and simple.wikipedia get ORES predictions on Recent Changes (and on Watchlist through "⧼eri-rcfilters-beta-label⧽" Beta feature). [47][48][49][50]
Problems
- The explanation of the abbreviations on the recent changes page could overlap with the list of changes. This has been fixed. [51][52]
- On Related changes it was not possible to use Saved filters for several articles. It has been fixed. [53]
- Transclude special:relatedchanges on a subpage removed #contentSub. This is now fixed. [54]
Notifications [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- The wording when you send a thanks message has changed. Instead of
Yes
orNo
it saysThank
andCancel
. It is also now easier to understand that all thanks are public. [55] - A notification is now sent to account owner on multiple unsuccessful login attempts. [56]
Problems
- Between week 7 and 20 February, when you thanked someone for an edit, the thank went to the latest unthanked edit to that page. It didn't matter which edit you tried to give thanks for. This has been fixed. [57]
- Long page titles on Special:Notifications were not truncated. This is now fixed. [58]
Structured discussions [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- You can now press CTRL + ENTER to post a new message. [59]
- It wasn't possible to create a description of a Structured discussions board. This has been fixed. [60]
Problems
- On wikis using the Beta feature, it is not possible to enable or disable Structured discussion from the Beta page. However, admins can create and move the pages.
Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
11:29, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Hiding quotes by Sally Miller Gearhart
editCould you please elaborate why we should censor out her controversial statements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kartu (talk • contribs) 08:25, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Kartu: Hi Kartu. First up, we should definitely not censor her statements - Wikipedia is not censored. But we do have to be very careful to make sure that any controversial statements relating to a living person are properly sourced and referenced. Also we need to ensure that our articles read well, so inserting a controversial statement randomly into an article is not constructive. By all means, write a properly sourced, separate paragraph or section - but please take the time to make sure it is well researched, properly referenced, doesn't give undue weight to the controversy and the article flows well and maintains a neutral point of view. Hope that helps. WaggersTALK 08:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick reply, Waggers. Based on it I'm still confused what the issue actually is, as you mention several: * Is it "not properly sourced" (edit history shows that that has been addressed already) * Does not suggestion to reduce population of one gender to 10% not important enough, to be included in summary? * This part is clearly not neutral POV: "Gearhart does not base this radical proposal on the idea that men are innately violent or oppressive", we don't know, what she is basing it on, "male-bonding" being particularly "dangerous", is not mutually exclusive with men being "innately violent or oppressive". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kartu (talk • contribs) 10:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Recommending new editors to WikiProject Hampshire
editHi Waggers,
I am continuing to send you recommendations for project Hampshire. When you have a chance, please take a look. Thank you!
Username | Why we recommend this editor | First Edit Date | Total Edits in ENWP | Editor Status | Invite | Survey |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Teresa Stokes (talk · contribs) | Teresa Stokes's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2012-4-17 | 98 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Ohgoshhi (talk · contribs) | Ohgoshhi's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2015-11-30 | 64 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Acpvynwinch (talk · contribs) | Acpvynwinch made 9 out of their most recent 15 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2018-1-14 | 15 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Forestperson (talk · contribs) | Forestperson made 8 out of their most recent 18 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2015-2-25 | 18 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Hellinadustcart (talk · contribs) | Hellinadustcart made 4 out of their most recent 200 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2014-8-28 | 200 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
CelestialKeystone (talk · contribs) | CelestialKeystone made 2 out of their most recent 227 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2017-11-21 | 227 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Loweredtone (talk · contribs) | Loweredtone's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Geography and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2016-10-28 | 254 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
PittsfieldPete (talk · contribs) | PittsfieldPete's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and Arts, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2016-9-10 | 130 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Bobo.03 (talk) 04:50, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks @Bobo.03:, some of these have already been invited and others aren't a great fit for the project so now new invitations sent this time around. WaggersTALK 12:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Reason for deletation
editWe recently noticed that a wiki about fanport has been deleted. Would like to know the reason behind deletion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanport this is the old link.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.110.219.119 (talk) 11:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- @83.110.219.119: The article was deleted under criterion A7 of the Criteria for Speedy Deletion - the article did not indicate why its subject is important or significant. WaggersTALK 09:51, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Latest news from the Wikimedia Collaboration team, about Map improvements 2018, Notifications, Structured discussions and Edit Review Improvements. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.
What's new?
The Collaboration team has announced the start of a new project: In-Context Help and Onboarding. The idea is to improve retention of new wiki editors by giving them short tutorials and other training experiences related to, and triggered by, their current activities on the wikis (that’s the “in context” part). The project follows from the conclusions of the New Editor Experiences research. The work is in its very early stages, but we’d like to hear from people with ideas on the subject—particularly if you have experience supporting or training new contributors.
Map improvements 2018 [More information]
- Maps using Maplink and Mapframe functions now include an extra zoom level (level 19). This is part of the Kartographer Improvements, the number one request of the 2017 Community Wishlist survey. [61]
Edit Review Improvements [More information • Help pages]
- Number of edit to show in recent changes information text was incorrect in Special:Preferences. It has been rephrased. [62]
Notifications [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- You can notify users in edit summaries. They will get a ping just as if they had been mentioned on a wiki page. That new feature has been documented. [63]
- Preferences panel on Special:Notifications was overlapping other elements. This has been fixed. [64]
Future changes
- An important work is under progress to allow thanks of log entry. This is done by the Community Tech team. [65]
Structured discussions [More information • Help pages]
Recent changes
- Structured Discussions extension has been uninstalled from wikis not using it. However, it is still possible for a community to request a trial of Structured discussions. [66]
Problems
- It was not possible to opt-in and opt-out Structured discussions on wikis using it as a Beta feature. It is now fixed. [67]
Future changes
- The visual editor and 2017 wikitext editor interface is going to change for consistency. The toolbar, dialogs and menus will appear slightly bigger; some icons will look different. Content or functionality will not change. That change will apply to Structured Discussions as well. [68]
Collaboration team's newsletter prepared by the Global Collaboration team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
12:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
edit- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
Administrators' newsletter – April 2018
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
- 331dot • Cordless Larry • ClueBot NG
- Gogo Dodo • Pb30 • Sebastiankessel • Seicer • SoLando
- Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
- Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
- The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
- The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.
- There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.
- The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.
- A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
- The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.