User talk:Waggers/Archive 34

Latest comment: 1 year ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 1 August 2023

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
11   Wessex Lane Halls (talk) Add sources
330   Dulwich (talk) Add sources
129   Alliance Boots (talk) Add sources
692   2003 Formula One World Championship (talk) Add sources
10   2003 Ford 400 (talk) Add sources
34   Lace Market (talk) Add sources
38   M57 motorway (talk) Cleanup
54   M20 motorway (talk) Cleanup
16   A627(M) motorway (talk) Cleanup
175   Payless (footwear retailer) (talk) Expand
107   1998 in the United States (talk) Expand
12   St Mary's Church, Southampton (talk) Expand
9   Pentameters Theatre (talk) Unencyclopaedic
19   Big W (United Kingdom) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
260   Late modern period (talk) Unencyclopaedic
8   Hilalian invasion of Ifriqiya (talk) Merge
43   Peroxyacetyl nitrate (talk) Merge
3   Asian Pacific Film and Video Festival (talk) Merge
13   Storm David (talk) Wikify
36   2018–19 European windstorm season (talk) Wikify
49   2020–21 European windstorm season (talk) Wikify
3   I Lo-fen (talk) Orphan
2   Aaded (talk) Orphan
4   Balswaroop Raahi (talk) Orphan
11   Redbridge railway station (talk) Stub
9   Bitterne railway station (talk) Stub
6   Dr Sun Yat-sen Historical Trail (talk) Stub
14   Broxden Junction (talk) Stub
4   Macao Public Library (talk) Stub
11   Apsley railway station (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

  Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
2,258   Southampton (talk) Add sources
14   DfI Roads (talk) Add sources
24   M181 motorway (talk) Add sources
341   Torpenhow Hill (talk) Add sources
19   Wills Hall (talk) Add sources
6   Thurcroft Interchange (talk) Add sources
23   A404(M) motorway (talk) Cleanup
7   West Hall High School (talk) Cleanup
87   A3 road (talk) Cleanup
29   Fair Isle Airport (talk) Expand
1,094   Manchester Airport (talk) Expand
1,319   Queen Elizabeth 2 (talk) Expand
277   Jewel-Osco (talk) Unencyclopaedic
204   Alicante–Elche Miguel Hernández Airport (talk) Unencyclopaedic
4,030   Abortion in the United States (talk) Unencyclopaedic
817   Lemuria (talk) Merge
257   Tikhonov regularization (talk) Merge
18   Geography of San Marino (talk) Merge
985   Jet2.com (talk) Wikify
2,209   Dream SMP (talk) Wikify
159   Menorca Airport (talk) Wikify
2   Asikoe Festival (talk) Orphan
3   Albert Tschautsch (talk) Orphan
2   After the War is Over Will There Be Any "Home Sweet Home"? (talk) Orphan
7   Bill Archer (businessman) (talk) Stub
9   Nick Fanti (talk) Stub
4   Union Academy (Monroe, North Carolina) (talk) Stub
7   Sholing railway station (talk) Stub
61   Rosemarie Sonora (talk) Stub
6   Bentley railway station (Hampshire) (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

mail delivery!

edit
 
Hello, Waggers. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Smallbones(smalltalk) 16:36, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

edit

I deeply apologize

edit

I had a bad reaction to what you wrote for The Signpost and inexplicably flew off the handle. I am quite ashamed to have been so totally wrong. I retract everything I said; the fault was mine. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

No worries, no harm done. I saw this apology before I saw your comment anyway :) WaggersTALK 22:21, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

 

  Administrator changes

  Valereee
  Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • CapitalistroadsterSamsara

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

  Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

  Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

  Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
17   M31 motorway (talk) Add sources
14   M15 motorway (Great Britain) (talk) Add sources
686   2001 (talk) Add sources
18   Buena High School (Arizona) (talk) Add sources
95   College of Mount Saint Vincent (talk) Add sources
36   M180 motorway (talk) Add sources
186   M45 motorway (talk) Cleanup
437   M1 motorway (talk) Cleanup
80   M2 motorway (Great Britain) (talk) Cleanup
648   Ty Pennington (talk) Expand
2,501   University of California, Los Angeles (talk) Expand
494   COVID-19 pandemic in Canada (talk) Expand
688   Climate of the United Kingdom (talk) Unencyclopaedic
18   Sholing (talk) Unencyclopaedic
18   A6144(M) motorway (talk) Unencyclopaedic
146   Russo-Turkish War (1787–1792) (talk) Merge
8   Debashish Sethy (talk) Merge
4   Altshallan (talk) Merge
19   Edward Bodden Airfield (talk) Wikify
26   2017–18 European windstorm season (talk) Wikify
47   Gloucestershire Airport (talk) Wikify
4   Ariel Guarco (talk) Orphan
13   Alicia García-Herrero (talk) Orphan
2   Aleksandar Miletić (talk) Orphan
3   Thomas Magnay (talk) Stub
2   Ziga, Navarre (talk) Stub
6   Jitamitra Malla (talk) Stub
24   Johnossi (talk) Stub
3   1931 Gateshead by-election (talk) Stub
2   Noel Goldie (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Loofball

edit

This was just relisted yesterday and I was preparing a rebuttal to the weak keeps. Can you please reopen it? PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the discussion had been open for 25 days and that was its third relisting which meant it was added to the administrators' backlog - please see Category:AfD debates relisted 3 or more times for reasons why such discussions need to be closed and not prolonged further. On that basis I'm not minded to reopen it, but I won't be at all offended if you choose to request a deletion review or re-nominate it for deletion after a suitable amount of time has passed. I certainly accept that it was a close call, so obtaining a second opinion at deletion review might be a good option. WaggersTALK 10:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The problem is not just closure right after relisting, which I know you're entitled to do but closing it as "keep" rather than at least no consensus is misleading and makes your close a supervote. I'd rather not waste both our time at DRV. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deletion review for Loofball

edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Loofball. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ––FormalDude talk 10:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfD close

edit

I was wondering if you would reconsider your Keep close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devashish Nilosey (2nd nomination). Although Keep !votes are the numerical majority, consensus is not a head count and this type of local consensus does not override the community consensus which was established at a very well attended RfC earlier this year. I would encourage you to give appropriate weight (or lack thereof) to the !votes that cite criteria other than the current NSPORTS guideline or fail to address the lack of significant coverage, otherwise I'll be going to DRV. –dlthewave 12:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I second that request. Despite acknowledging that the delete votes were strong you still nevertheless closed as keep due to the sheer number of such votes, which is disallowed per WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS. WP:NSPORT says that biographies should provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline and include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, which the keep voters failed to do. A local consensus of editors cannot override the wider consensus as reflected in the guidelines, and if you're not willing to stand by the latter then I ask that you revert your closure and leave it for someone who is more familiar with the rules. Avilich (talk) 14:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I third the request, for the same reasons as above. NSPORT was specifically amended by global consensus to eliminate participation-based criteria, replace presumption of notability with expectation of SIGCOV for all criteria, and require at least one source of SIGCOV to be cited in the article for that expectation to apply in the first place. This was on top of the existing NSPORT requirement that all subjects meet GNG and that sourcing proving as much be demonstrated "eventually". JoelleJay (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi all. First, I absolutely did not make the decision on numbers of !votes; I'd ask you not to assume the rationale behind my decision without me explaining it. Telling other people what they think is never a good thing to do. While the numbers of participants expressing a particular view does go some way towards indicating a consensus, it is the strength of the arguments themselves as well as the numbers that led to my decision.
Most of the discussion focused on the apparent lack of available sources on one hand, with the likelihood that reliable sources exist but are not easily accessible on the other. I found that part of the discussion to be finely balanced. My own take on that discussion would be along the lines if "the article is old enough - if a source exists it would have come to light by now" - but that argument was not put forward in the discussion and to delete on that basis would be tantamount to a supervote.
However, the only other assertion that was made - and was not challenged or rebutted - in the discussion was StAnselm's invoking of WP:IAR: "Keep per WP:IAR. If the guidelines suggest deleting this sort of cricketer, it means the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction. It was somewhat reasonable deleting cricketers who had played a handful of FC matches, but not one with such a lengthy career."
The English Wikipedia's problem with systemic bias due to availability of sources in a easy-to-use format/language/medium is well known and well documented and I find StAnselm's argument compelling for that reason. WP:IAR is both policy and one of our five pillars; it has global consensus and as policy it "outranks" guidelines such as WP:GNG. Since StAnselm's argument is compelling and was not rebutted, on balance I still think "keep" was the right outcome. WaggersTALK 12:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
"Bias" is an essay with no official standing, and a single editor's proposal to ignore all rules is not a consensus to do so. Avilich (talk) 14:32, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Like Avilich said, one editor bringing up IAR does not mean there is a consensus to IAR, especially given the ROUGHCONSENSUS assertion that IAR should be under exceptional circumstances. Additionally, the claim that sources were likely to exist in his native language (what many of the early keep !voters were alleging) was rebutted: I searched in Hindi and found nothing significant. JoelleJay (talk) 17:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

  Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.

Regarding UP Halcyon

edit

Good morning, Waggers. I note your administrative action to close as DELETE the discussion over UP Halcyon, deleting the article. Your summary noted that the KEEP voters didn't attempt to rebut user HighKing's points, and you apparently weighed this into your decision.

Cordially, I think you were wrong here. Several of us corrected the basis for the original complaint about the page, which was a lack of citations. The detractors shifted their complaint to say that the nine new references we offered were either too close to the subject, or had some variety of notability concern. I and others had already rebutted those arguments in the earlier rushed deletion, and our comments were still germane: I thought that HighKing's bullying and persistent deletionist attacks were wordy but groundless, so speaking for myself, I didn't bother refuting him because I thought we clearly won the debate. We don't operate on a "last word wins" system here.

Several of the other DELETE voters were piling on, I think reflexively voting to delete without much thought about it.

I have no connection with UP Halcyon. I am a long-term volunteer, like yourself, and am moved to support this particular page because I am interested in articles about such college organizations. The Project to which I belong tracks and improves college fraternity articles. There are approximately 1,800 in this set, although we know of some 100,000 past and present groups that do NOT meet Wikipedia's notability rules and DO NOT merit articles. Hence, Project volunteers don't leap to support articles where a local chapter has less than ten years of activity. Where it is a national group, it must have chartered three chapters. We've expanded on WP's notability rules to clarify how these apply to fraternity and sorority articles in a standard methodology, here.

The UP Halcyon group meets that bar. It wasn't a puff piece, and the writing was solid. The group is notable at its university, and hence, to our view the argument that these references were too close to the group was dismissed by many of us. This, and similar campus groups often are "quiet performers" that only get broad media attention if they incur a crisis or get into trouble. I do not believe Wikipedia readers are well-served if we delete all such articles, only keeping those that concern groups which get into trouble, and are thus picked up as a national news story or written about in a book. That, in itself, would present a negatively biased, highly skewed perception of these sorts of groups. So we look for local media, and for mention by the various colleges on their websites.

Will you review your action here, and restore the page? Jax MN (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jax, thank you for your polite and well-explained request. I certainly take on board the point that "quiet performers" will lack attention from reliable sources while groups that get into some kind of trouble will end up with articles because there will be sufficient coverage of them. Unfortunately though, whether it's right or wrong, that is one of the consequences of Wikipedia's current notability policy and guidelines. As it happens I wrote an article in the Signpost a few weeks ago about how frustrating that can be - that seemingly obviously notable subjects only become notable in the Wikipedia sense if/when something drastic happens to them. Otherwise, often there simply isn't significant coverage in reliable sources for topics that we would intuitively deem to be worthy of note. So as much as I agree wholeheartedly with your sentiment, I still think the deletionists won the argument in this case on policy grounds.
As always, I would take no offence whatsoever if you choose to take this to WP:DRV; if anything I would encourage you to do so. WaggersTALK 08:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Waggers, I would like to think that you aren't including me in your reference to the deletionists? It isn't a label I'd expect an admin to use under most circumstances so I'm rather surprised to see it used in this context. HighKing++ 16:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, in this case it was just convenient shorthand for "those voting for delete" - I didn't mean to put all those well-intentioned contributors into a basket or imply they always vote delete. You're right, I should have chosen my words more carefully and I apologise. WaggersTALK 21:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

edit

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
746   Anti-communism (talk) Add sources
67   International Committee of the Fourth International (talk) Add sources
582   Jean-Jacques Dessalines (talk) Add sources
1,951   In vitro fertilisation (talk) Add sources
21   Science and technology in Ukraine (talk) Add sources
103   Communist Party of Canada (Marxist–Leninist) (talk) Add sources
51   A66 road (talk) Cleanup
26   Free Libyan Air Force (talk) Cleanup
1,031   Los Angeles Police Department (talk) Cleanup
803   OpenStreetMap (talk) Expand
107   Yuko Oshima (talk) Expand
125   Energy in Russia (talk) Expand
15   Ash Vale railway station (talk) Unencyclopaedic
170   Revolutionary Communist Party, USA (talk) Unencyclopaedic
273   Smart motorway (talk) Unencyclopaedic
252   West Slavic languages (talk) Merge
35   Seven Natural Wonders of Ukraine (talk) Merge
499   Ukrainian War of Independence (talk) Merge
157   Post–World War II air-to-air combat losses (talk) Wikify
77   National Highways traffic officer (talk) Wikify
2,279   Sukhoi Su-24 (talk) Wikify
53   Trevor Rainbolt (talk) Orphan
4   Communist Party of Italy (Marxist–Leninist) Red Line (talk) Orphan
3   Madison Guy (talk) Orphan
4   Michelle Ring (talk) Stub
4   Carla Chin (talk) Stub
10   Communist League of Great Britain (talk) Stub
71   Friarton Bridge (talk) Stub
8   Silvana Burtini (talk) Stub
4   James Lovat-Fraser (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 31 October 2022

edit

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 28 November 2022

edit

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

 

  CheckUser changes

  TheresNoTime

  Oversight changes

  TheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


WP:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Santos Laguna season

edit

Can you relist WP:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Santos Laguna season? I've been waiting for weeks for the October 19 DRV to close - but only just noticed that it had done so, and the AFD reopened. However, it wasn't relisted at WP:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Football until 4 days later on December 2 (diff)! Given the controversy of this set of AFDs, and the differing results at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Club América season and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Club Universidad Nacional season where a longer and clearer discussion were held, then I think we need at least a full week to discuss. Nfitz (talk) 17:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads-up, I hadn't realised the discussion had been put on hold. Re-opening per your request. WaggersTALK 10:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks - I saw your civility warning. I'm not sure if you are aware, but there was a lengthy ANI thread about the civility and this set of AFDs already at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1112#Concerns about articles nominated for deletion. During the process, the two worst offenders were blocked. Nfitz (talk) 22:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Neat little app. :) Thanks for including my map. Ittybittykittycommittee (talk) 20:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

Happy Seventeenth First Edit Day!

edit
  Hey, Waggers. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Chris Troutman (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

edit

RailReview

edit

I see that you were responsible for upholding the request to delete this page. Were you aware that I had composed a fairly detailed response to the proposition, but had placed this on the article talk page in error?

Also, I should point out that I had not, as the person who marked the page for deletion suggests, taken umbrage with them for quite the reasons suggested. I had tried from the start to communicate with this person but they refused to do so in any meaningful way, which unfortunately led to misunderstandings on both sides. What I was offended by, as I felt the comments were disrespectful and should have no place on Wikipedia, were some comments on their user page (which were not directed at me personally).

(Edwin of Northumbria (talk) 00:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC))Reply

Hi, thanks for reaching out. I wasn't aware of the conversation on the talk page but there was a very clear consensus in the actual discussion that the page should be deleted, or converted to a redirect. The harder part of closing the discussion was around which of those two was the "winning" outcome, which really came down to where the page would redirect to. Two possible targets were suggested with no overall consensus between the two of them, and a strong contingent arguing that there was no single suitable redirect target and the page should be deleted on that basis. Since there was no consensus for a single redirect target, the discussion as a whole supported that argument in my judgement, hence the "delete" close.
As always, if you'd like a second opinion on the outcome I won't take any offence if you decide to raise this at WP:DRV, that's what it's there for. WaggersTALK 10:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply and I will consider doing as you suggest.

It is disappointing to learn that effectively my argument was excluded from the discussion, and therefore the record of it also. Whilst I realise there was no requirement for you to check the talk page for comments prior to deleting the article, as a point of procedure it would be helpful (and, dare I say, polite) if clearly interested parties were informed that a discussion had taken place and invited to respond to the points raised. This would have at least alerted me to the fact I'd posted my comments in the wrong place. I also don't remember there being a link to that discussion on the article talk page, which would also have been useful. Particularly in cases where one editor has assigned a negative motive to the actions of another, in my view it should be obligatory to give that person the right of reply.

Sadly, I have to say that my experience over the past few weeks has raised considerable doubts in my mind over the mechanisms by which Wikipedia policies are enforced. Certainly, I would have never have allowed the charity of which I used to be chairman to operate in such a manner, and arguably one has to take even more in circumstances where matters are not being dealt with in person. Quite apart from anything else, certain aspects of UK employment law apply to voluntary organisations, and I could quite easily see a situation arising where Wikipedia's procedures were found wanting in this respect (I should stress that am not talking here about policies themselves, but the way in which they are applied).

(Edwin of Northumbria (talk) 08:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC))Reply

P.S. I intend no personal criticism here, as I can see that the procedures failed you just as much as anyone else!!

(Edwin of Northumbria (talk) 09:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC))Reply

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 9 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

edit
Ooh, two for the price of one! WaggersTALK 14:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry about that. This is a bug that's been unfixed on Phabricator since 2015. Apparently it just does this sometimes. I am manually reverting all two hundred and some of them, though... jp×g 20:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks (from a fellow 2006-vintage Wikipedian, incidentally)

edit

For you addition at List of places of worship in the Borough of Eastleigh. I'd better schedule another visit to take a pic! Cheers, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 12:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I found one on Commons so have just added it. Hoping to bolster with some additional references at some point - New Church Movement churches are notoriously hard to find documentation for! WaggersTALK 12:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Indeed – I've been working on some off-Wiki articles and a presentation recently which cover (among many other church-related topics) Newfrontiers, New Ground and other (neo)-Charismatic churches, and a lot of digging around, reading between the lines and drawing inferences is required! Thanks for adding the pic. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 14:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration


The Signpost: 26 April 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 8 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

  Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

  Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 19 June 2023

edit

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

 

  Administrator changes

  Novem Linguae
 

  Bureaucrat changes

  MBisanz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

edit

SmallCat dispute case opened

edit

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 4, 2023, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SmallCat dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

edit