Webhat
Links
editChange detection links:
- Main page
- State leaders
- Birthday vanity
- Articles with broken citations
- Category:Holding cell
- Category:Wikipedia vandalism
- Category:Wikipedia soft redirects
- Category:Wikipedia_translation
- Requested_articles
CURRENTLY WORKING ON
edit"Gamblers call this 'playing with the house's money'".[1]
The term was first coined by economists Richard Thaler and Eric Johnson (economist) in their paper, 'Gambling with the house money and trying to break even'.[1]
So I was amazed that the following concepts where not discussed on WP:
AFAIK this is a little strange, I don't believe they are WP:GNG.
Links:
Asymmetric Follow is a core pattern for Web 2.0, in which a social network user can have many people following them without a need for reciprocity. Assmmetric Follow is unlike email for example, which tends to be within small groups, with all users knowing each other (newsletters are a clear exception here). If you see a social network where someone has 5000 followers and only follows 150 back – that’s Asymmetric Follow.
Interesting subject Webhat (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Fixed some disambiguation in the text of [[Calque] and created relevant disambiguation pages. Webhat (talk) 12:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Norwegian heavy water sabotage
editFix TV and movie references for Norwegian heavy water sabotage
Alex Haas
editZiff Davis related
editNotes on Yahoo!, ZDNet, Ziff Davis, Ziff Davis Media and CNET.
There are a number of errors which have been propagated by me to the sites above, I think I have them all. Confliction information between Yahoo! Ziff Davis and Ziff Davis Media caused this. My appologies of this is not yet all fixed. Webhat 02:28, Jan 20, 2004 (UTC)
Ziff Davis (Media) Inc.
edit- Ziff Davis (Media) Inc. Timeline
- Yahoo! Finance on Ziff Davis Inc.
- Yahoo! Search on Ziff Davis Inc.
- Ziff Davis Inc. IPO
- Yahoo! Finance on Ziff Davis Media Inc.
ZDNet
editYahoo!
editCNET Networks Inc.
editPlayboy
editPlayboy, Christie Hefner, Hugh Hefner, Hugh M. Hefner First Amendment Award
Unconnected
editBruce Lehman
edit- E.U. Patent issue
- Who is Bruce Lehman
- Yahoo! on Bruce Lehman (23 sources used)
Note: The term "submarine patent" refers to a patent application deliberately delayed and kept secret, sometimes for many years, waiting to surface strategically at some later time, with the weapon of its early filing date. This abuse of the U.S. patent system has become a serious problem.
Arlene McCarthy
editunknown
Robert Hammond
editRobert Hammond was a Colonel in the New Model Army commanding a regiment of foot, he was succeeded by his lieutenant-colonel Isaac Ewer in 1647 who had transferred to the New Model Army in April 1645.
Hammond then became the Parliamentary Governor of the Isle of Wight, when King Charles I of England was forced to flee from Hampton Court on 11 November 1647[2] believing Hammond to be sympathetic he came to the Isle of Wight. Hammond, however, was opposed to Charles, whom he confined in Carisbrooke Castle. Initially under the guise of protection.[3]
After November 1648 the Council of Officers sent Ewer to relieve Hammond of of his charge of King Charles.
Thomas Prince
editThomas Prince was one of the four Leveller leaders
John Woodville
editJohn Woodville is the brother of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward IV's queen. Brother of Anthony Woodville, 2nd Earl Rivers and Richard Woodville, 3rd Earl Rivers. And father Richard Woodville, 1st Earl Rivers.
That was nothing compared to the marriages the queen arranged for her family, the most outrageous being when her 20-year-old brother John Woodville married Lady Katherine Neville, daughter of Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmorland by Joan Beaufort, widow of John Mowbray, 2nd Duke of Norfolk and dowager Duchess of Norfolk. The wealthy Katherine had been widowed three times and was probably in her sixties.
Sir George Carey
editGeorge Carey, 2nd Baron Hunsdon is Sir George Carey Carisbrooke Castle Robert Johnson (composer) Newport (Isle of Wight) (UK Parliament constituency)
John Grey, 7th Baron Ferrers of Groby
editJohn Grey, 7th Baron Ferrers of Groby (d. 22 February 1461) In about 1452, Elizabeth Woodville married Sir John Grey, they had two sons from the marriage, Thomas (later Marquess of Dorset) and Richard.
Bradgate Park was cleared by the Greys of Groby in the 15th century; the construction of Bradgate House was begun in 14?? by Sir John, the ruins of the house are still visible at the centre of the park.
He was killed at the Second Battle of St Albans in 1461, fighting for the Lancastrian cause. (This was ironic, as Elizabeth later married Edward IV who was the Yorkist claimant to the throne.)
Jacquetta of Luxembourg Thomas Grey, 1st Marquess of Dorset Bradgate Park Richard Grey Baron Ferrers of Groby
Marion Giordan
editMarion Giordan[4] author of:
- Consumer Education_(book)
- Consumer Education: A Handbook for Teachers
- How to be Exploited_(book)
- The Consumer Jungle_(book)
Recent Modifications
editThese are ordered backward by date.
The Reichstag Fire
editIn regards to your comments in the talk page, I add what I hope will clarify some of the nuances of the recent judgement in Berlin. Have a nice day! --A.S. Brown (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Tonquin
editFrom the article Tonquin:
While trading with the local inhabitants, Captain Thorn tossed some otter pelts at a local chief that was on board the ship trading.[5] This insult lead to the locals returning to the ship the next day to seek revenge.[5]
After just watching this on Discovery I am no sure the demise occurred as quoted. According to the program there are a number of versions coming from both written and oral history. I believe some more research is required on the subject. Webhat (talk) 04:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Hasan Salaam
editCreated stub for Hasan Salaam Webhat (talk) 02:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Children of Dub
editCreated stub for Children of Dub Webhat (talk) 02:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Levellers
editIn the section Levellers#Origin_of_name there is the following text:
´´It first appeared in print in a book written by Charles I called 'His Majesties Most Gracious Declaration', first sold around 15 November 1647.[citation needed]´´
On the 11th of November 1647 the King Charles R send a message to the Speaker of the House of Lords[6] in which he talks about the Levellers, this is a letter in which he states that he is forced to flee from Hampton Court. The King arrived on the Isle of Wight on the 14th[7] and stays with the Governor Robert Hammond. And as the King was effectively being held a prisoner by Colonel Hammond[8] long after the 16th.[9] Which made me wonder who started selling the book, and whether the book was sold despite or because of the tumult. As this all occurs in between the First English Civil War, which ended May of 1646, and the Second English Civil War. Naturally at the time 'His Majesties Most Gracious Declaration' was published there was no foresight that predicted the Second English Civil War, but it might be considered slightly inflammatory. And although I don't doubt the book is genuine, it is plain that Charles I had little to do with the sale as he was on the Isle of Wight. Webhat 01:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- ^ a b [Do not be reckless with profits that you get unexpectedly http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/personal-finance/savings-centre/analysis/do-not-be-reckless-with-profits-that-you-get-unexpectedly/articleshow/9506547.cms]
- ^ "Message from the King; on His Escape from Hampton Court, that He will appear again if He can be heard, and will give Satisfaction.", Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 9, London, South East, South West, East, Midlands, North, Scotland, Wales: (History of Parliament Trust), November 12 1647, pp. 519–522
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|date=
and|year=
/|date=
mismatch (help) - ^ "Letter from Colonel Hammond, that he has ordered, no Persons shall come in or go outof the Isle of Wight without his Pass;—and desiring the King's former Allowance may be continued to Him.", Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 9, London, South East, South West, East, Midlands, North, Scotland, Wales: (History of Parliament Trust), November 18 1647, pp. 531–533
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|date=
and|year=
/|date=
mismatch (help) - ^ "Marion Giordan".
- ^ a b "Traders Insult Indigenous Peoples". Graveyard of the Pacific.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ "Message from the King; on His Escape from Hampton Court, that He will appear again if He can be heard, and will give Satisfaction.", Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 9, London, South East, South West, East, Midlands, North, Scotland, Wales: (History of Parliament Trust), November 12 1647, pp. 519–522
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|date=
and|year=
/|date=
mismatch (help) - ^ "Letter from Col. Hammond, that the King is come into the Isle of Wight; and that he will take Care of Him.", Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 9, London, South East, South West, East, Midlands, North, Scotland, Wales: (History of Parliament Trust), November 15 1647, p. 525
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|date=
and|year=
/|date=
mismatch (help) - ^ Charles_I_of_England#English_Civil_war
- ^ "Letter from Colonel Hammond, that he has ordered, no Persons shall come in or go outof the Isle of Wight without his Pass;—and desiring the King's former Allowance may be continued to Him.", Journal of the House of Lords, vol. 9, London, South East, South West, East, Midlands, North, Scotland, Wales: (History of Parliament Trust), November 18 1647, pp. 531–533
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|date=
and|year=
/|date=
mismatch (help)
Michael van der Vlis
editI've been modifying Michael van der Vlis. Webhat 21:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Woad
editWoad, Woad Warriors 06/Jan/2007
Are these guys in anyway connected to the Woad plant? If so, something like the following should be added: "Julius Caesar tells us (de Bello Gallico) that the Britanni used to dye their bodies with woad (vitrum), which made them look terrifying in battle. The Picts may have gotten their name (Latin Picti which means painted folk or possibly tattooed folk) from their practice of going into battle naked except for decorations made with woad war paint." Webhat 03:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Bold text
Talk To Me
editPlease write in complete sentences. Also, can you add anything to your stub on Cuba Coalition other than that it's in Chicago? What does it do? Does it have anything to do with Cuba? Wondering simply, -- Infrogmation 21:55, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)
I fixed the spelling mistake. Sorry about that. Best Wishes! Since you are new, i have some tips:
- Sign talk page entries with ~~~~, which is automatically converted to a name and date
- Ask questions on Wikipedia:Village pump
- Have fun.
-- Greenmountainboy 02:26, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Now I get the "Bunny Mother" - duh. Wake 04:29, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Re John Holter - go ahead. Salsa Shark 06:10, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- Cool. Sorry to have stepped on your toes. Salsa Shark 06:24, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Spam
editThe probability that an email is spam, given that it has certain words in it, is equal to the probability of finding those certain words in spam email, times the probability that any email is spam, divided by the probability of finding those words in any email:
Code Review
editTest
editBrick and Mortar media
editThe discussion for Request_board#Brick_and_Mortar_media is welcome here. Webhat (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. Doesn't Brick and mortar business provide the definition you're looking for? VernoWhitney (talk) 20:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thank. I assumed it was my search pattern that was weak, not WP. Webhat (talk)
- Glad I could help. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 21:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- I'm still in 2 minds whether Brick and Mortar Media, referring to Newspapers and Television (Old Media) should be redirected or should get a stub. Webhat (talk) 23:33, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Glad I could help. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 21:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thank. I assumed it was my search pattern that was weak, not WP. Webhat (talk)
Nomination of Passive drinking for deletion
editA discussion has begun about whether the article Passive drinking, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passive drinking until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 02:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned vs. Notable
editYour comments in adding the orphan tag to Pennsport (string band) and Adelphia (fancies) ("Is an orphan, and should be deleted under WP:GNG") seem to indicate that you believe the GNG requires that articles not be orphaned. I do not see any indication of this.
"If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." Both articles cite numerous reliable sources that are independent of their subjects. If, despite those sources, you feel they are not notable, AfD is the proper venue. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Whatever! You are free to continue this intelectual masturbation, you've already proven yourself to be a halfwit not worthy of my time. Have fun! Webhat (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Webhat, calling other folks "halfwit" is not very civil, and civility is encourages here, even required. But that's not why I'm here--I saw the SPI you started, and looked into the evidence you presented. Met alle respect, let it go: there is no evidence of sock puppetry there, and starting an SPI as a response to a deletion discussion smacks of knee-jerking. It isn't going to go any farther, and withdrawing it (with an apology) might be the best thing to do here. Het allerbeste, Drmies (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- I started the SPI based on the evidence of Sock Puppetry, the only knee jerk was examining the user's history. This led me to a valid Sock Puppetry accusation, you may think it's invalid. I thought your English was invalid, although you pretend to contribute at a professional level. Anyway although you are quite welcome to come to my Talk page to tell me what to do, now you can fuck off and not come back again. How is that for civil? Webhat (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I think that's pretty bad. You have no arguments for that ridiculous accusation, you got laughed out of court--a normal namechange was all it was. Then you go around insulting people who are actually contributing to the project, you take a stab back at me at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Michael Garland (unsigned, like your remark at the SPI), and you tell me to fuck off. Oh, I'll gladly fuck off--I got no business being here wasting time and words on rude people like you. Tot in de pruimentijd. Drmies (talk) 05:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm rude? You're the one who came to my Talk page demanding an apology, do you go into the houses of strangers and make demands of them too? I have been using and contributing since 2003, which I'm sure you know, so wikibots which auto sign messages do not come as a surprises to me, but apparently they do to you. While you were at it you proceded to butcher my native language; civility is encouraged here ; farther rather than further; not to mention the smattering of Dutch. Furthermore you should closely examine the dates of the contributions - this wasn't a knee jerk reaction as you suggested, I actually took my time - even in the case of a name change the dates of the dates on the contributions do NOT add up. Lastly I'd like to defend my calling SummerPhD a halfwit: the comment "Is an orphan, and should be deleted under WP:GNG" clearly makes use of an serial comma which I added to avoid ambiguity, which proves she can't read. And anybody who adds PhD to their name usually can't get through life on their own merit, anybody adding it to their handle is usually a halfwit. Anybody having a trigger finger on the Wikipedia delete button doesn't live up to the title the love of wisdom. Anyway I win, my contribution is still up and I get to have a fun flame war with an idiot on my Talk page. Webhat (talk) 23:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I think that's pretty bad. You have no arguments for that ridiculous accusation, you got laughed out of court--a normal namechange was all it was. Then you go around insulting people who are actually contributing to the project, you take a stab back at me at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Michael Garland (unsigned, like your remark at the SPI), and you tell me to fuck off. Oh, I'll gladly fuck off--I got no business being here wasting time and words on rude people like you. Tot in de pruimentijd. Drmies (talk) 05:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- I started the SPI based on the evidence of Sock Puppetry, the only knee jerk was examining the user's history. This led me to a valid Sock Puppetry accusation, you may think it's invalid. I thought your English was invalid, although you pretend to contribute at a professional level. Anyway although you are quite welcome to come to my Talk page to tell me what to do, now you can fuck off and not come back again. How is that for civil? Webhat (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Webhat, calling other folks "halfwit" is not very civil, and civility is encourages here, even required. But that's not why I'm here--I saw the SPI you started, and looked into the evidence you presented. Met alle respect, let it go: there is no evidence of sock puppetry there, and starting an SPI as a response to a deletion discussion smacks of knee-jerking. It isn't going to go any farther, and withdrawing it (with an apology) might be the best thing to do here. Het allerbeste, Drmies (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Webhat. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- This is starting to look like harassment. You lost, accept it and move on! Webhat (talk) 11:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Webhat/Asynchronous follow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- not a probably search term - probably created inadvertantly
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Webhat/Asynchronous follow for deletion
editA discussion has begun about whether the article Webhat/Asynchronous follow, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webhat/Asynchronous follow until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Webhat (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
William Gemmell Cochran
edit- I believe you have edited the article on William Gemmell Cochran back in 2006. I now did the following:
- I have added a reference to Cochran's C test.
- The list of articles already refered to the Cochran test, however this was Cochran's Q test. I have made the latter reference more specific by making it appear as such.
- --Rtlam (talk) 09:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Comment is Free
editArticles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Webhat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Webhat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Webhat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)