Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 29

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< September 28
September 30 >

September 29

edit

Template:Mexican Figure Skating Championships

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template is outdated and consists of mostly redlinks. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I see 9 valid blue links. Incomplete? Yes. But still a valid and useful navigation template. The Banner talk 21:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Useful navbox, per above. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 23:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above Hansen Sebastian (Talk) 12:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2024–25 Scottish Women's Premier League table

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus is against using single table templates, most recently discussed here. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 15:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Module:Inflation

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to the module sandbox as proposed. Primefac (talk) 12:38, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module. Move to user's sandbox (Module:Sandbox/<username>/...) if they still want to work on it. Gonnym (talk) 17:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All sub-modules also unused. Gonnym (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym I can't speak for the subpages as DaxServer created those, but I had proposed using this to implement {{Inflation/year}} at Template talk:Inflation/Archive 3#New sandbox version and then forgotten about it. It should be ready to go, so if you're willing to withdraw the nomination I'd like to re-propose it on Template talk:Inflation. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you're planning on using it, sure. Are the sub-pages part of your module implementation or will those still be unused? Gonnym (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym The subpages are not used by my implementation, and appear to be instead used by DaxServer's version at Module:Inflation/sandbox. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template talk:Inflation#Lua version of Template:Inflation/year --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And it's now implemented at Template:Inflation/year. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 07:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commenting for the log: The module wasn't working correctly and its implementation was reverted, so still currently unused. Gonnym (talk) 19:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Northwest Caucasian languages

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:North Caucasian languages. Izno (talk) 17:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Northwest Caucasian languages with Template:North Caucasian languages.
Target template already has the content from the nominated templates, no need for the duplication. Noting that if merge is the close, templates should be redirected because there will be {{r with history}} due to a lot of weird copy/pastes and partial histmerges over the years. Primefac (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Even if there's some dispute whether NWC and NEC are part of a NC language family, that issue can easily be clarified via a disclaimer stating that it's a proposed language family composed of two language families. All language families are essentially proposals too. DA1 (talk) 08:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Import style

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, deprecated after both of it's main styles were spun off into separate (and better) templates. – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 11:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jctint/core/doc

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The module page was moved and this is now outdated. There is also no reason to redirect it as this offers no actual value. Gonnym (talk) 11:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RČesma

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plaintext template. Not used anywhere --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 07:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Module:User:DMBradbury/sandbox/SuperUserbox

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was moved to Module:Sandbox/DMBradbury/SuperUserbox. (non-admin closure) Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what this is for and is a duplicate of Module:Userbox. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm a bit confused, am I not allowed to work on playing with my own ideas for new features in my own sandbox? Why is this being monitored? DMBradbury 05:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Matthew 13

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not display on mobile, and the forward/backward chapter links are redundant to the inbox infobox (which does display on mobile) and Template:Gospel of Matthew (which does not). The only remaining substantive link (Commissioning of the Twelve Apostles) happens in a different chapter (Matthew 10). There is no nav template like this for other similar chapters with no per-verse articles (Matthew 17-26). -- Beland (talk) 02:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Display on mobile is not a real issue or reason for deletion from what I see. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Over two thirds of our readers use the mobile site, so if a template doesn't display on mobile, then it's mostly not doing its job. There would need to be some other way of accomplishing the same goal for mobile readers, but whatever that way is should also work for desktop readers, so I would argue in general desktop-only mechanisms shouldn't exist. -- Beland (talk) 01:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_29&oldid=1251166005"