Wikipedia:WikiProject Holiness Movement/Assessment
Holiness Movement articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
B | 3 | 3 | 11 | 12 | 9 | 38 | |
C | 2 | 10 | 13 | 39 | 20 | 84 | |
Start | 2 | 39 | 41 | 105 | 117 | 304 | |
Stub | 1 | 10 | 16 | 83 | 47 | 157 | |
List | 2 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 19 | ||
Category | 170 | 170 | |||||
Disambig | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
File | 46 | 46 | |||||
Project | 6 | 6 | |||||
Redirect | 1 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 18 | ||
Template | 1 | 15 | 16 | ||||
Assessed | 8 | 65 | 96 | 247 | 252 | 196 | 864 |
Total | 8 | 65 | 96 | 247 | 252 | 196 | 864 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 2,918 | Ω = 4.98 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Church of the Nazarene WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Church of the Nazarene related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{NazareneProject}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Church of the Nazarene articles by quality and Category:Church of the Nazarene articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
General information | |
Main project page | talk |
Christianity project page | talk |
Members | talk |
Project category | talk |
Assessment | talk |
Templates | |
{{ChristianityWikiProject}} | |
{{User WikiProject Church of the Nazarene}} | |
{{Nazarene-stub}} | |
{{Church-stub}} |
edit |
Frequently asked questions
edit- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Church of the Nazarene WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
editQuality assessments
editAn article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{NazareneProject}} project banner on its talk page: {{NazareneProject|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Church of the Nazarene articles) | FA | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Church of the Nazarene articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Church of the Nazarene articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Church of the Nazarene articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Church of the Nazarene articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Church of the Nazarene articles) | Stub |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Church of the Nazarene articles) | ??? |
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale
editClass | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance assessment
editAn article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{NazareneProject}} project banner on its talk page:
- {{NazareneProject| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top |
High |
Mid |
Low |
??? |
The following values may be used for importance assessments:
- Top - The article is about one of the core topics of the Church of the Nazarene. Adds articles to Category:Top-importance Church of the Nazarene articles
- High - The article is about the most well-known or culturally or historically significant aspects of the Church of the Nazarene. Adds articles to Category:High-importance Church of the Nazarene articles
- Mid - The article is about a topic within the Church of the Nazarene field that may or may not be commonly known outside the Church of the Nazarene community. Adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Church of the Nazarene articles
- Low - The article is about a topic that is highly specialized within the Church of the Nazarene field and is not generally common knowledge outside the community. Adds articles to Category:Low-importance Church of the Nazarene articles
- Unknown - Any article which has not yet been assessed on the importance scale is automatically added to the Category:Unknown-importance Church of the Nazarene articles.
Importance scale
editLabel | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editor's experience | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
Top | The article is one of the core topics about Church of the Nazarene. Generally, this is limited to those articles that are included as sections of the main Church of the Nazarene article. | A reader who is not involved in the field of the Church of the Nazarene will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. | Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. | Church of the Nazarene |
High | The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding the Church of the Nazarene. | |||
Mid | The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of the Church of the Nazarene. | Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. | Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand The Church of the Nazarene. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people involved in the Church of the Nazarene will be rated in this level. | |
Low | The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of the Church of the Nazarene. | Few readers outside the Church of the Nazarene field or that are not adherents to it may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. | Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of The Church of the Nazarene, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most practices and infrastructure of the Church of the Nazarene. |
Requesting an assessment
editIf you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
Assessment log
editChurch of the Nazarene articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record. |
August 2, 2010
editRemoved
edit- A. Gordon Wetmore (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Africa Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Aguiar Valvassoura (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Ambrose University College (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Anthony Davis (linebacker) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Arkansas Holiness College (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Asia-Pacific Nazarene Theological Seminary (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Astou Ndiaye-Diatta (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Ben Zobrist (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Beverly Carradine (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Bill Boner (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Bresee Theological College (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Bryan Stone (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- C. W. Ruth (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Carl E. Olson (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Carl Miller (basketball) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Cecil R. Paul (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Cedric Minter (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Central Nazarene College (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Charles H. Strickland (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Charles W. Akers (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Church of the Nazarene (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Top-Class (rev · t).
- Church of the Nazarene Foundation (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Dan Boone (Minister of religion) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Daniel Agina (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Daniel Vanderpool (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Darlene Hooley (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Darrel R. Falk (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Debbie Reynolds (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Debbie Stafford (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Don Lee (college football) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Donald A. Yerxa (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Donald Hustad (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Donald Owens (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Donna Fletcher Crow (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Eastern Nazarene College (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Ed Blakely (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Edgar Ellyson (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Edward F. Walker (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Edward Lawlor (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Edward S. Mann (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Edwin Edwards (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Eldon C. Hall (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Eugene Stowe (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Eugenio Duarte (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Evan White (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Evelyn Witthoff (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Floyd Nease (politician) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Floyd W. Nease (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Fred A. Hillery (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Fred J. Shields (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Gary Hart (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Gary Richardson (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- General Superintendent (Church of the Nazarene) (talk) removed. Quality rating was List-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- George Coulter (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- George Lyons (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Georgia District Church of the Nazarene (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Gideon B. Williamson (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Grace Tsutada (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Greg Laswell (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- H. Orton Wiley (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- H. Ray Dunning (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Hardy Powers (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Harmon Schmelzenbach (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Hiram F. Reynolds (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- History of the Church of the Nazarene (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Hoku (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Howard Hendrick (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Howard Miller (minister) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Hugh C. Benner (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- J. B. Chapman (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- J. E. L. Moore (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- J. K. Warrick (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- J. Kenneth Grider (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- James Diehl (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- James Dobson (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- James R. Cameron (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Japan Christian Junior College (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Jerald Johnson (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Jerry D. Porter (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Jesse Middendorf (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Jim Bond (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Jim Bunn (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Jim Foglesong (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- John A. Knight (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- John C. Bowling (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- John E. Riley (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- John S. Rigden (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- John W. Goodwin (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Jordan Escusa (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Joseph G. Morrison (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Joseph Widney (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Karl W. Giberson (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Kaye Dacus (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Kenneth H. Pearsall (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Kent R. Hill (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Kevin Bradshaw (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Korea Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Leah Marangu (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Les Parrott (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Linda N. Hanson (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- List of Church of the Nazarene conventions (talk) removed. Quality rating was List-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- List of Church of the Nazarene schools (talk) removed. Quality rating was List-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Lori Easley (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Louie Weaver (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Lyman C. Pettit (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Mae Beavers (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Manuel Narvaez (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Marty McLeary (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Mary Lee Cagle (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Michael Cartwright (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Michael Lodahl (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- MidAmerica Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Mike Cochran (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Mike Ekstrom (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Mildred Bangs Wynkoop (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Mount Vernon Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- NYUK (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene Bible College (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene Bible Institute (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene Caravan (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene International Education Association (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene Missionaries (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene Publishing House (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene Theological College (Australia) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene Theological College (England) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene Theological Seminary (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was Disambig-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Ndèye Ndiaye (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Nina Gunter (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- North County Christian School (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
- Northwest Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Noël Riley Fitch (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Olive Winchester (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).
- Olivet Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Orval J. Nease (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Orville Jenkins (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Patti Anne Lodge (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Paul Cunningham (minister) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Paul McGrady (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Paula Jones (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Peniel College (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Pentecostal Collegiate Institute (New York) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Pentecostal Collegiate Institute (Rhode Island) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Phill Kline (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Phineas F. Bresee (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Point Loma Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Protestantism (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
- Quincy Mansion (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
- R. Wayne Gardner (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Ralph Earle, Jr. (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Randall J. Stephens (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Raymond Hurn (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Richard G. Colling (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Richard S. Taylor (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Ron Bradley (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Roy T. Williams (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Russell V. DeLong (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Samuel Young (General Superintendent) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Sawyer Center (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Smithville Seminary (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Southern Nazarene Crimson Storm (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Southern Nazarene University (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).
- Stan Toler (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Stephen Parke (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
- Stephen T. Franklin (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
This log entry was truncated because it was too long. The entry continues in the previous revision of this log page.