Wikipedia

User:ZfJames/sandbox/templates

< User:ZfJames | sandbox

page name! Edits Reverted (October 2024)

edit

Information icon Edits Reverted    Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)


User:ZfJames 10 2024

edit
FYI: Edits Reverted

Hullo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more of your recent edits to the User:ZfJames page since this is a test of my template. BLAH BLAH BLAH! As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thank you for editing! —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 15:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

page name! Edits Reverted (October 2024)

edit

Information icon Edits Reverted    Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)


page name! Edits Reverted (October 2024)

edit

Information icon Edits Reverted    Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 19:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 100
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 74
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 12
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 37
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 25
Open sockpuppet investigations 53
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

edit

Administrative backlog

edit
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

edit

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

edit

Bot-reported

edit

User-reported

edit


CSD / PRODs

edit

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 6
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 4
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Other candidates 19

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 14 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 8 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

edit

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

edit

User-reported

edit
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

edit
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Shkreli (tribe)

edit

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – L. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

  User(s) blocked. Blocked the /64. BusterD (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Transformers One

edit

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There appears to be some kind of active edit war going on over the budget in the infobox. The page was recently temp protected twice in response to disruptive editing. Lenny Marks (talk) 20:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Note It seems that at least some of the previous edits that resulted in the protection were related to the same content about the budget in the infobox. Lenny Marks (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

List of national flags of sovereign states

edit

Indefinite semi-protection: Before it was turned into a redirect and still now, Gallery of sovereign state flags has been semi-protected to prevent disruptive editing. For some reason, the article it now redirects to is not also semi-protected. Can this be fixed?. ―Howard • 🌽33 22:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

  Note: This page has never been protected (of course), the linked redirect has never been protected, protection was moved from a previous namespace eleven years ago. Other more experienced admins may choose to protect, but this page hasn't been protected on the merits for many years. The case presented today for indefinite semi-protection is unconvincing; it's not currently under attack. As an aside, page stability is normally a part of featured anything criteria, which is why I hesitate. Input from other sysops? BusterD (talk) 13:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
  Note: I was looking at this on and off for some hours, but was on the fence about protection or not. I do not see an urgent need to protect, tbh. To be on the sure side, we could perhaps move protect only (although there was no attempt to move), as moves might present some danger. Lectonar (talk) 13:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Fahad Shaikh

edit

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
  Already protected by administrator BusterD. Favonian (talk) 13:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Longlegs

edit

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keep adding "transgender" to describe the serial killer in this film with no sources. It's not true and their other edits have been on pollical pages. Mike Allen 10:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

  User(s) blocked. IP blocked from the article for 48 hours. Other non-disruptive edits from IPs, so blocking avoids collateral damage. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Rojava conflict

edit

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. WP:ARBKURDS 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ 【=◈︿◈=】 13:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

edit
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page

edit
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Gaza genocide

edit

My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[1] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Bonus: there can be cases where something isn’t criminal, but can be restricted in other ways, for example due to different burdens of proof or social pressures. FortunateSons (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[2][3][4].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[5]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[6] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[7] VR (Please ping on reply) 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[8]][[9]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide 2

edit

Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
@Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[10][11] and a form of Holocaust erasure[12], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[13][14][15][16]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@Vice regent: Would you please make this change, so we can close this request? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

edit

Stated Israeli tank losses in casualty and losses infobox are incorrect, attributed article from Business Insider states "The IDF again had problems with anti-tank missiles during the 2006 war in Lebanon, when Hezbollah employed Russian-made Kornets. Though about 50 Merkavas were damaged, only five were destroyed, according to the IDF, which also struggled with poorly maintained vehicles and ill-trained crews." Casualties and losses box states this number as if it was from current conflict. Article does, however, state that "Israel has lost nearly two dozen tanks during fighting with Hamas since October 7." I believe losses of tanks in the infobox should be fixed to reflect this. 155.225.2.98 (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

edit
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

17 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (request) 2024-10-08 19:31 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-forbidden-edit (request) 2024-10-08 19:31 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Noarticletext-nopermission (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist-custom-editnotice (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotice load (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice load/notext (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Template:Editnotice/notice (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-02-14: "Highly visible template: and included in a high-risk template"
Template:Editnotices/Group/Template:Editnotices (request) 2024-10-08 20:04 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
MediaWiki:Titleblacklist (request) 2024-10-09 18:48 MediaWiki page (log)
Module:Gadgets (request) 2024-10-09 23:46 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
MediaWiki:Bad image list (request) 2024-10-29 04:22 MediaWiki page (log) Protected by Redwolf24 on 2005-10-23: "Like all pages in the MediaWiki: space"
Module:Separated entries (request) 2024-10-29 12:19 Fully protected (log) Modified by Amorymeltzer on 2018-12-17: "High-risk Lua module: Over 2M transclusions"
Template:TextLicenseFreeUse (request) 2024-10-30 15:39 Fully protected (log) Protected by Dcoetzee on 2005-04-09: "Need to protect licenses from modification"
Brianna Wu (request) 2024-10-30 23:52 Fully protected (log) Protected by Courcelles on 2023-06-24: "Arbitration enforcement"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
13 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-09-25 22:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Infobox sportsperson (request) 2024-10-06 11:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-10-07 06:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-10-10 09:41 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:MultiReplace (request) 2024-10-17 22:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:College color (request) 2024-10-18 00:22 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2024-10-20 08:40 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Designation/colour2 (request) 2024-10-22 11:02 Template-protected (log) Protected by Alex Shih on 2017-09-04: "Highly visible template"
Template:League icon (request) 2024-10-24 02:51 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Unsigned IP (request) 2024-10-25 20:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Salvio giuliano on 2014-03-16: "Highly visible template"
Template:Canadian election result/top (request) 2024-10-27 21:12 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Coat of arms (request) 2024-10-30 09:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Wikipedia:WikiProject/Popular pages config.json (request) 2024-10-30 15:57 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-09-28: "protect at TE level"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)


WP:RFA

edit

RFA= Requests for adminship

WP:RFP

edit

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Tesleemah

edit

I have created more than 25 good articles and have insight to how English Wikipedia works. I will like to ease the workloads of reviewers by obtaining the autopatroller right Tesleemah (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

When you are referring to "good articles", do you mean it in the sense of WP:GA, or in the sense of "articles on notable topics that are of reasonable quality"? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Reasonable quality, Unfortunately I am not granted the right as at this time. I have some exams coming up, but afterwards, maybe I will create more articles to demonstrate my deleted articles were during the period of navigating here as a newbie Tesleemah (talk) 10:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
I’ve just edited Ondo State Youth Network to show you the expected quality before autopatrolled is given out. Schwede66 19:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, I will edit previously created articles and create more articles in the coming days putting this in mind. Tesleemah (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
  Not done Of the last ten articles, three have been deleted. Schwede66 06:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Davidindia

edit

Davidindia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te) He has created a remarkable total of 647 articles on English Wikipedia, with only 4 deletions. This impressive accomplishment highlights his expertise and dedication. Primarily, he focuses on biographies of sportspersons and politicians, demonstrating a strong understanding of these subjects. Additionally, he treats fellow editors with respect and professionalism. Thank you! Jannatulbaqi (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Though all the articles they have created cover notable subjects, almost all of them are missing a talk page, which are then created by NPPs. Some older articles are missing default sort, DMY formatting and very short articles do not need multiple sections; rather, they should be consolidated into a single Life or Career section. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:AxonsArachnida

edit

They have created 545 clean articles, none of which have been deleted. Their creations focus on spider species articles, so I believe their articles no longer need to go through NPP review. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 06:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

User:J.avanzado

edit

I have made 533 edits in a span of 10 months, mostly catering to logos and Philippine law templates in citations and references. I also took interest in reviewing film receptions. I would like to request autopatrol rights so I may refine logos that need improvement. Thank you and hope you would consider this request. Good day. J.avanzado 08:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Hey J.avanzado, the autopatrolled permission has nothing at all to do with editing files or templates; it's meant for prolific creators of articles. Are you sure you're in the right place? You may be thinking of the autopatrolled permission on Commons. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation


Confirmed

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Walluu2

edit

Reason for requesting confirmed rights

I am requesting autoconfirmed user rights to contribute more effectively to Wikipedia. Having these permissions will allow me to make edits and create pages without the restrictions placed on new accounts, and I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines. I have a good understanding of Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing requirements and wish to participate constructively. Walluu2 (talk) 18:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

  Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 18:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Cevennn

edit

Reason for requesting confirmed rights I am writing to formally request confirmed rights on Wikipedia. My primary reason for seeking this status is to enhance my ability to contribute meaningfully to the platform while adhering to Wikipedia's core principles of accuracy and reliability. As an active editor, I am committed to improving the quality of content within various topics I am passionate about. Having confirmed rights would not only empower me to edit more effectively by increasing my edit privileges but would also enable me to participate more fully in discussions and decision-making processes related to content updates and policy enforcement. I believe that my validated contributions can assist in maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia while fostering a collaborative environment among fellow editors. Cevennn (talk) 19:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

  Not done The standard for automatically being granted this right is incredibly low, but it exists for several good reasons. If you intend to be an active editor you will have it in a few days. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 20:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for file mover

File mover

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Bigeditingideas

edit

Reason for requesting file mover rights: Sometimes when I upload a file on Wikipedia, I name it something wrong. I want this privilege so when I do this, I can rename that file easily without any trouble. Bigeditingideas (talk) 02:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

  Not done sorry, but you don't really have enough file namespace edits for this. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Nuvolet

edit

I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:10, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

A reasonable number of moves, but I not seeing any WP:RM/TR requests and am concerned by this RM which – based on the previous RM – seemed doomed to fail in the first place. This discussion also looks to be going against you. Primefac (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
I only can say I'll be responsible if you grant me this right. I can participate in more TM, I just need to get usedd.to them. Yes it failed however I understood the norms and moved similar articles to Countryname. I opposed to Anatolian plateau because there are other geographical units that use capitalization in similar contexts. — Jɑuмe (dis-me) 01:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  Not done sorry, not convinced that there is enough of a need here. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Cactinites

edit

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

  Not done - no demonstrable need. You rarely undo edits and you also do not use edit summaries. Please start using edit summaries if you are looking to request additional permissions. Anarchyte (talk) 08:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Gonzafer001

edit

To review pending changes on Wikipedia Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

  Not done - no clear need. Very inconsistent editing patterns. Limited experience undoing edits. Anarchyte (talk) 09:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Yovt

edit

I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I have been active on Wikipedia for a while, focusing on improving content quality and helping maintain the integrity of articles. I am not new to reviewing edits, as I use edit-request tools to answer several requests by unregistered/registered editors that wish to see changes on several articles. I have read all policies on how to handle this right and know the responsibly that comes alongside it. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 16:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

  Not done solely on the basis of this. Anarchyte (talk) 09:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Imconfused3456

edit

I like helping out and reviewing recent changes, and I would like to be able to contribute further by receiving pending changes reviewer rights. Imconfused3456talk 01:31, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

  Done Anarchyte (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:BittersweetParadox

edit

I would like to help contribute to the Wikipedia community and help reviews happen quicker. I am passionate about unbiased true information being presented and I think this would be a good privilege for me. BittersweetParadox (talk) 07:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

User:RangersRus

edit

I have been reviewing changes on many pages made by editors and IPs and helped by improving and protecting pages from vandalism. My editing history will prove that I am very capable and can be great help. I did set aside time and read and understood guidelines for vandalism, Reviewing pending changes and Protection policies before submitting this request. RangersRus (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

  Done Anarchyte (talk) 09:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:TyphoonAmpil

edit

I've been patrolling Recent Changes since August 28, 2024, and I helping to review pending changes. Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 02:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([17]). — MusikBot talk 02:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikibear47

edit

The pending changes reviewer will help me improve my ability to combat vandalism on Wikipedia. I have a good understanding of the relevant policies. Wikibear47 (talk) 13:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Edasf

edit

Expand my works on Wikipedia.I want to counter vandalism and help Wikipedia by reviewing pending changes fastily and correctly. I have read all guidelines and policy I have also created some articles.Edasf (talk) 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Someone who's wrong on the internet

edit

I've been patrolling recent changes for a while and thought this permission might be helpful. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 05:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

  Done Anarchyte (talk) 09:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Bunnypranav

edit

I have been patrolling recent changes from the past month and a half. I am familiarized with the policies of vandalism, BLP, NPOV and verifiability. I believe am experienced enough to receive this right and would like to accept pending changes. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Requests for rollback


Rollback

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:QEnigma

edit

With reference to my previous request for rollback rights submitted on 24 September 2024link and the advice received, I would like to re-submit my request. I have actively patrolled recent changes, reverting unconstructive or disruptive edits, addressing vandalism, and consistently warning editors. In more severe cases, I have reported offenders to administrators for further action and also requested for page protection. I have primarily used Twinkle for these tasks, alongside performing manual reverts. I believe that rollback rights would be a valuable addition to the tools currently available to me and going forward. Thank you. QEnigma (talk) 00:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([18]). — MusikBot talk 01:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  Question: How did you determine that this edit was unconstructive? Malinaccier (talk) 13:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
An IP user was making numerous changes to articles containing Korean language links without providing sufficient explanation. Lacking familiarity with the language, I initially considered this a potentially disruptive mass-edit event. I reverted some of the edits and posted warnings to the user, which went unanswered. I subsequently reported the matter to the administrators, where another user pointed out that, although the changes were not necessarily unconstructive, the editor should have provided much clearer edit summaries. QEnigma (talk) 15:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

User:TyphoonAmpil

edit

I've been patrolling Recent Changes since August 28, 2024, I've revert vandailsm and LTAs, I'am over 200 reverts form vandalism, and I'am interested the tools named AntiVandal and SWViewer, so I can patrol more faster. Criteria to make Successful:

  1. ✅️ At least 200 mainspace edits.
  2. ✅️ At least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges.
  3. ✅️ Wait 1 month your request.
  4. ✅️ No recent history of edit warring.
  5. ✅️ A track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. [19]

Thanks.   (please   mention me on reply)
Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 02:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([20][21]). — MusikBot talk 02:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
I do for ~99% vandalism reverts, and +210 warns. 2 forgotten reverts and 1 LTA revert. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 13:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Yes, and I try do it also, I warning editors, and sending messages saves form the UV menu. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 09:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily diffs
  1. WP:DENY, Toad4707 is a LTA, does warn.
  2. No explanation.
  3. bad faith revert no exlanation
Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 08:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Toad4707 wasn't locally blocked or g-locked at the time you made the revert. Unless you've got a crystal ball, how could you possibly have known that? Not that it matters anyways, in this situation WP:DENY isn't a valid excuse to skip warnings. Also, I see you've neglected to leave notifications again for these reverts (1, 2) -Fastily 08:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Yes WP:DENY isn't a valid excuse to skip warnings. 2 forgots, and ~99% warns, also do not bite the newcomers. also reporting SRG, LTAs global locks. Also WP:DENY, LTA reverts. 1st on Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing very old revert, dose not warn. 2nd on Talk:Camera, No explanation forgot it. Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 09:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
RC Patrol isn't a race to see who can perform the most reverts. If you're having trouble keeping the quality of your reverts high, then you need to slow down. Also ,1 is not a "very old revert". Why would you think that? -Fastily 09:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily yes, RC Patrol isn't a race to see who can peform most reverts is fast. (1:37 UTC (9:37 PHT) time to 10:00 UTC (18:00 PHT) time), Yes isn't "very old revert" diff, while adding "Hame burger chess burger big Mac whooper", undid edit because vandalism. All my reverts is very high track record. No problem. Thanks. Ampil (Ταικ • Cοnτribυτιοns) 09:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

User:RCSCott91

edit

I enjoy Disambiguation links and a certain small portion are the result of vandalism. About a week ago I found myself matching links on an article for a very young children's show, it had been vandalized with some crude language and I'm assuming they placed links in order to fool the filter.

I was in the situation of having to manually undo and I have in the past painstakingly gone through line by line, because although I just wanted to Disambiguate some links, I can't leve an article like that, especially one that children might go to. Luckily, this time I was able to ask a sysop who had recently edited the page for help. Since then I've been going back and forth as to whether I should make this request.

I know, I meet the minimum requirements and I definitely feel like my request is for the correct reason. I have no doubts that I could probably find some sysop willing to trust me but having my edit history scrutinized and questioned officially seems the more appropriate route even if my request is not granted.

I meet the mainspace edit requirement. I have previously patrolled recent edits fairly closely but currently only patrol it once or twice a day. A few monthes back I had an accusation of edit warring which was stricken out, it can be found in my talk page archive. I generally try to have communication with editors even if I'm not undoing their edit directly, communication and edit summaries are very important to me. RCSCott91 (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

  Done Elli (talk | contribs) 20:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Wikibear47

edit

I have been working on reverting vandalism and disruptive edits for some time now. Roll back permissions will allow me to use tools such as Twinkle etc. more effectively. I have a fairly good understanding of the policies involved. Wikibear47 (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

  Done Elli (talk | contribs) 20:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Royiswariii

edit

I want to have a rollback rights because i am committed to support anti-vandalism here in Wikipedia. I have experienced tools like Twinkle and Ultraviolet that helps me to tags and revert some unnecessarily sources and obvious vandalism like IP Address or new users. By giving this grant of rollback, I can contribute more effectively here to maintaining the integrity of all articles in Wikipedia. If it's any wrong reverts or not necessarily to revert, I would take full responsibility on my actions but I will be more careful and to be lesson in the future. Royiswariii Talk! 15:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

  Not done OP is blocked -Fastily 06:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Rin

edit

Hi, I previously had Rollback rights but requested them to be removed ([22]) due to stepping away for a while. I'd like to request Rollback again in order to be able to use Huggle to deal with vandalism faster, as this will likely be the primary area I help out with on the project. Thanks for the consideration. Rin (talk) 01:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

  Done -Fastily 06:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Bunnypranav

edit

I would like access to rollback to use Huggle and other tools for more efficient vandalism reverting. I am re-applying after a month since my last request, based on a comment by Fastily. I have gained more than a months experience, a meet the minimum requirements. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([23]). — MusikBot talk 11:00, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Hilst

edit

I'm requesting template editor rights so that I can perform template mergers more easily (like the one me and Rjjiii completed over at {{Archive}}) and for moving prep areas to queues at DYK. – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 21:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1.  Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~3)
  2.  Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~20.5k)
  3.  Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~600)
  4.  Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5.  N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 2)
  6.  N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3)
Primefac (talk) 21:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Footer

edit

Policies and links


    end ----------------------------------

    Template:Dashboard

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:ZfJames/sandbox/templates&oldid=1088308402"