User talk:Coretheapple/Archive7
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Coretheapple. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DYK nomination of Charles Winick
Hello! Your submission of Charles Winick at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Shooting of Samuel DuBose
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Samuel DuBose. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Charles Winick
 | On 18 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles Winick, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1971, Charles Winick found that American prostitutes earned little more than clerical workers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Winick. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Please comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 August 2015
- Travelogue: Seeing is believing
- Traffic report: Straight Outta Connecticut
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Talk:Lists of mathematicians
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lists of mathematicians. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Josh Duggar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Josh Duggar. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jadwiga of Poland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jadwiga of Poland. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
- In focus: An increase in active Wikipedia editors
- In the media: Russia temporarily blocks Wikipedia
- News and notes: Re-imagining grants
- Featured content: Out to stud, please call later
- Arbitration report: Reinforcing Arbitration
- Recent research: OpenSym 2015 report
Please comment on Talk:Rachel Berry (Miss Oregon)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rachel Berry (Miss Oregon). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Mizrahi Jews
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mizrahi Jews. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Chris Bell (politician)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chris Bell (politician). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 September 2015
- Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flow placed on ice
- Discussion report: WMF's sudden reversal on Wiki Loves Monuments
- Featured content: Brawny
- In the media: Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage
- Traffic report: You didn't miss much
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Talk:Joan Crawford
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joan Crawford. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kim Davis (county clerk)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kim Davis (county clerk). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Brian Austin Green
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brian Austin Green. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Your ArbCom statement
I noticed that you said in your ArbCom statement that you don't remember having edited GMO-related pages. Actually, about two years ago, you and I were both very actively editing March Against Monsanto. Perhaps you might want to correct what you said at ArbCom. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ah that is true, thank you. Coretheapple (talk) 00:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 September 2015
- Gallery: Being Welsh
- Featured content: Killed by flying debris
- News and notes: The Swedish Wikipedia's controversial two-millionth article
- Traffic report: Mass media production traffic
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Talk:John Connally
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Connally. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ali Khamenei
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ali Khamenei. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Messes
I meant infoboxes more generally. My take is roughly this (take it cum grano salis, I'm somewhat partisan on the "anti-"side): infoboxes are unambiguously appropriate for a lot of articles (chemicals, taxonomic entities, battleships, etc.) As you trail off into certain subject areas (biography, literature, music), there's a fuzzy area where they become less and less suitable; the key characteristics you want to highlight in one person are not necessarily the ones you want to highlight in another. There's one faction of technically-minded editors that have been trying to push infoboxes into as many articles as possible, including (in my—biased—opinion) deliberately trying to push them in controversial places to set a precedent. The other faction has mostly been pushing back to keep infoboxes out of opera and composer articles, but in the past few years, that's spilled over into other biographies like the one you edited. Naturally, as with any feud of that standing, it's become personal for many participants. IMO, the best thing to do would be to let WikiProjects curate their own guidelines on infoboxes and insist that anyone requesting exceptions for an article or group of articles argue on grounds specific to that article, but good luck policing that. Choess (talk) 00:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks much for clarifying and yes, I agree about Wikprojects. Coretheapple (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Shaun King (activist)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shaun King (activist). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Phineas Gage
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Phineas Gage. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 September 2015
- Editorial: No access is no answer to closed access
- News and notes: Byrd and notifications leave, but page views stay; was a terror suspect editing Wikipedia?
- In the media: Is there life on Mars?
- Featured content: Why did the emu cross the road?
- Traffic report: Another week
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Bot requests
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Bot requests. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Shaun King (activist)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shaun King (activist). Legobot (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 September 2015
- In the media: PETA makes "monkey selfie" a three-way copyright battle; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Featured content: Inside Duke Humfrey's Library
- WikiProject report: Dancing to the beat of a... wikiproject?
- Traffic report: ¡Viva la Revolución! Kinda.
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Talk:Rudolf Hess
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rudolf Hess. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Genetically modified organisms arbitration case opened
You may opt-out of future notification regarding this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 12, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC) on behalf of L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oh thanks. I need to get involved in this as much as I need to genetically modify the molecules in my brain. Coretheapple (talk) 22:39, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Frank Gaffney
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Frank Gaffney. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Bhalessa
Hello Coretheapple, thank you for contacting me regarding the Bhalessa article. Please note that the unsourced material has been saved to the page history for now, but if you would like to add sources for any of the material, please do so. I have copied the external links to the talk page with a mention so that this is not overlooked. If you have any other questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 01:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Maurice Cloud
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Maurice Cloud. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2015
- Recent research: Wiktionary special; newbies, conflict and tolerance; Is Wikipedia's search function inferior?
- Tech news: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen 'Alik Shahadah
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen 'Alik Shahadah. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:07, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration temporary injunction for the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case
You are receiving this message because you are on the notification list for this case. You may opt-out at any time The Arbitration Committee has enacted the following temporary injunction, to expire at the closure of the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case:
- Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for all pages relating to to genetically modified organisms and agricultural biotechnology, including glyphosate, broadly interpreted, for as long as this arbitration case remains open. Any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an arbitration enforcement action on users editing in this topic area, after an initial warning.
- Editors are prohibited from making more than one revert per page per day within the topic area found in part 1 of this injunction, subject to the usual exemptions.
For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) (via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC))
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration temporary injunction for the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case
Scope of case
Hi, @Coretheapple: just a quick note to reiterate what the drafting arb(s) have indicated, most recently this: [1]. I believe behavioral patterns are germane since the scope of GMOs intersects with certain medical articles, BLPs, insecticides, noticeboards discussing same, and the patterned behaviors of involved editors, editors who made statements, and a few peripheral editors who have demonstrated tag-team behavior to support the involved editors. I was added as an involved editor even though I don't edit GMOs (made 2 comments in an RfC for GMF, and a total of 6 edits at Atrazine). Diffs used against me are also not GMO related and focus on behavior. My involvement is primarily related to past interactions with Jytdog and again, focus on behavior; therefore, my evidence correlates key events that demonstrate behavioral patterns of tag-teaming, disruption, WP:OWN, etc. In a nutshell, behavioral patterns appear to be the nexus when determining scope, especially to demonstrate consistent disruption by the same players throughout WP, including topics in the periphery of GMOs such as BLPs, insecticides, noticeboards and RfCs and the like. Atsme📞📧 15:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- I hesitate because my interactions with Jytdog were totally unrelated to GMOs, but rather were almost entirely in BP and related talk pages. Also one or twice on Jimbo's talk page. But not related to health science at all, which seems to be the scope of the arbitration. Coretheapple (talk) 16:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Understood. If you haven't read it already, take a peek at [2]. Also keep in mind that ArbCom decides whether the evidence is relevant and worth considering. Guy's explanation to me was, the relevance is that I believe the original dispute is the context of your fight with with Jydog. As I said to DrChrissy above, I think you have issues, but I think your argument with Jytdog has ended up with you being added as a party when that argument is not in fact about GMOs. It's all rather confusing because I don't consider defending myself against Jytdog as my fight with him because it's actually my defense against his fight with me that's at issue. Anyway, the bottomline is that ArbCom decided to not remove anyone that was subsequently added to the list of involved which tells me they are probably considering extraneous behavioral patterns; therefore, my evidence will either broaden the scope of this case or it will be dismissed. What I do know is that if the evidence isn't presented, it can't be considered. I also greatly appreciate the fact that ArbCom requires supporting evidence which eliminates all those easily made damnations that we've had to defend. Either way, you're behind the wheel.
Atsme📞📧 16:31, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Understood. If you haven't read it already, take a peek at [2]. Also keep in mind that ArbCom decides whether the evidence is relevant and worth considering. Guy's explanation to me was, the relevance is that I believe the original dispute is the context of your fight with with Jydog. As I said to DrChrissy above, I think you have issues, but I think your argument with Jytdog has ended up with you being added as a party when that argument is not in fact about GMOs. It's all rather confusing because I don't consider defending myself against Jytdog as my fight with him because it's actually my defense against his fight with me that's at issue. Anyway, the bottomline is that ArbCom decided to not remove anyone that was subsequently added to the list of involved which tells me they are probably considering extraneous behavioral patterns; therefore, my evidence will either broaden the scope of this case or it will be dismissed. What I do know is that if the evidence isn't presented, it can't be considered. I also greatly appreciate the fact that ArbCom requires supporting evidence which eliminates all those easily made damnations that we've had to defend. Either way, you're behind the wheel.
- No one from arbcom responded to that very specific and highly relevant question. My first reaction is "screw 'em." I'm not a mind reader. Coretheapple (talk) 16:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Uh oh...now you're getting into Fringe/PS but at least you admit you can't read minds. Whew! I was sweating having to use telepathy to summon the Amazing Randi to debunk such a claim.
Atsme📞📧 18:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Uh oh...now you're getting into Fringe/PS but at least you admit you can't read minds. Whew! I was sweating having to use telepathy to summon the Amazing Randi to debunk such a claim.
- No one from arbcom responded to that very specific and highly relevant question. My first reaction is "screw 'em." I'm not a mind reader. Coretheapple (talk) 16:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Mickey Rooney
My apologies for writing to you via this channel. I have very limited skills regarding editing a page etc, so I tend to make my input via the talk pages and then the people who really know what they are doing can act or ignore me. Regarding your message to me on MR, my apologies. My comment was intended for user: SOFTLAVENDER, who introduced the rather specious Daily Mail argument.46.7.85.68 (talk) 13:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oh I understand. No problem. I'm just suggesting that Softlavender made that comment a long time ago and probably is not following the discussion. Coretheapple (talk) 13:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
STiki
Hello, do you know where the log of nonconstructive edits for STiki users is? I have STiki and I can't find it anywhere. Thanks, --Rubbish computer 17:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oh Lord I have no idea. Curious why you asked me. I'm not a STiki designer or anything like that, just a customer like you. Coretheapple (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks, but I thought you picked edits out of a big list when you used it. Am I wrong? --Rubbish computer 17:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- No, you click a button and the next edit comes up. There is no choice involved. If it's OK, you click "innocent" and another edit comes up. You might want to sign up for it, a very useful tool. Coretheapple (talk) 18:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've unzipped the file. Where is it? --Rubbish computer 18:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- I assume it's the executable "jar" file. Coretheapple (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- But keep in mind that you may need to get permission to use STiki, which you can get on the talk page for Stiki. Keep in mind too that I'm just an ordinary user, not the best source for all of this, and I'm still perplexed that you're approaching me of all people. Coretheapple (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks anyway. --Rubbish computer 17:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kim Kardashian
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kim Kardashian. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Eliot Higgins
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eliot Higgins. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Temporal anomalies
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective point of view it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly timey wimey...stuff. <winky face> Keri (talk) 03:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Elan Carr
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elan Carr. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 October 2015
- Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption
- Traffic report: Reality is for losers
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Talk:Aloysius Stepinac
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aloysius Stepinac. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Velliscig
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Velliscig. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Elan Carr RfC
Wanted to let you know I fixed the layout of the RfC and in the process, moved your second comment to the Threaded discussion subsection. Hope this isn't an issue. Thanks Meatsgains (talk) 00:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2015
- WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States
- News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate
- Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death
- Featured content: A fistful of dollars
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Talk:Deaths in 2015
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deaths in 2015. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Shooting of Samuel DuBose
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Samuel DuBose. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bebe Rexha
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bebe Rexha. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 October 2015
- Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"
- Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus
- Featured content: A more balanced week
- Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing
- Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Please comment on Talk:Philippine Senate election, 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Philippine Senate election, 2016. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Gary Cooper
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gary Cooper. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Vested contributors arbitration case opened
You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 01:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. For this case, there will be no Workshop phase. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz Read! Talk! 13:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Franjo Tuđman
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Franjo Tuđman. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help
- News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles
- In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA
- Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement
- Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth
- Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages
- Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Community letter: Five million articles
Please comment on Talk:Nancy Cruickshank
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nancy Cruickshank. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I started another RM; I invite you to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Anna Politkovskaya
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anna Politkovskaya. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
I thought you might enjoy this Help Desk request
- That's a reasonable request. Wikipediocracy owns its article, why not everyone else? Coretheapple (talk) 14:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)