User talk:Ealdgyth/Archive 94
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ealdgyth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 90 | ← | Archive 92 | Archive 93 | Archive 94 | Archive 95 | Archive 96 | → | Archive 100 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:57, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Calvin (horse)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Calvin (horse) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 09:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
- An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.
Technical news
- The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
- The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please email Madalina Ana.
Arbitration
- An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
- The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.
Miscellaneous
- The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
- Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.
WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Lightbreather appeal
The Arbitration Committee is considering an unban appeal from Lightbreather (talk · contribs). You are being notified as you participated in the last unban discussion. You may give feedback here. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:29, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
TFA
 |
Thank you today for William the Conqueror, introduced (in 2012): "I am nominating this for featured article because after extensive work and revamping, I feel this is the best article possible for the subject. Everyone should know about William the Conqueror - his invasion of England in 1066 is one of "those dates" that even Yanks can remember. But there is a lot more to William than his invasion of England, and this article tries to put him in context of his entire life. After numerous copyedits, an extensive peer review process and lots and lots of work (including the most excellent family tree charts by Agricolae, who has no idea I just co-nom'd him for this... surprise!) This is what it looked like when I began work this January. It's doubled in size and the sourcing has been greatly improved as I've done a complete reread of the two main biographies of William to update the sourcing. I've also incorporated a number of other works on the Conquest and the time period, but the major sources remain the scholarly biographies of William. This is a wikicup nomination for me, but it's been a labour of love for myself as well as all my wonderful helpers. I present - William the Bastard who became William the Conqueror, a rather dour but extremely important historical figure."! - On a smaller scale, we have expanded Lars Vogt from a short article focused on conducting tenures. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Robert II of France
What are your thoughts concerning this section? Robert_II_of_France#The_King_of_the_year_1000 --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- The whole article is hugely bloated. 15,000 words (not counting quotes!) for someone who is ... basically a rather obscure Capetian, who ruled not much territory and didn't have a huge impact on history beyond managing to keep his dynasty going. William the Conqueror comes in at 8200 words, for a monarch with a much larger impact. Gees. The specific section you raise is utterly WP:UNDUE and pretty much WP:SYNTH, as very little of it relates to Robert. Ealdgyth (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. I believe the "bloat" was added by Aldebaran69. I will make a sweep through the article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Calvin (horse)
The article Calvin (horse) you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Calvin (horse) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:22, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Taking over two GA nominations
I provided a second opinion at the GAs for SS Manasoo and PS Keystone State, but looking at how busy you seem to be I thought I'd ask: would you like me to take over both reviews and just finish them? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please. I do not like the sourcing at all, but I feel bad if I fail them and I'm not around to deal with the fallout. And I'm going to be busy for the next couple of months.. heh. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Will do; no problem. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Your revision of my edit to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Val-%C3%A8s-Dunes
You state: (unsourced (and the 1841 monument should not be considered a reliable source compared to academic works used in this article))
I note that there are only three academic works listed on that page as sources, only one of which focuses on William the Conqueror. I'm interested to know which of them are you using, and on what authority, to overturn the date of the battle as recorded on the monument on the battle site, and also at French Wikipedia (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bataille_du_Val-%C3%A8s-Dunes). You may verify by that page's edit history that I did not write that date at French Wikipedia. Don Hollway (talk) 16:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Article content should be discussed on the article talk page. However, the date is given merely as "summer 1047" in Douglas in his biography of William the Conqueror. You'll note it's sourced in the article. Nor do Hagger or Bates give an exact date for the battle in their biographies of William. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Ealdgyth:
I’m not as experienced at Wikipedia as you are. This was the best way I could find to contact you directly. If you want to continue this discussion on the article talk page I’ll try to follow you there.
That said…August 10 should surely count as “summer 1047.” If one author (Douglas) was unaware of, or neglected to specify, a date apparently known to the French for some 200 years or more, are we as Wikipedia editors not at liberty (indeed, are we not responsible) to make the information available and more accurate? If the date is approved by French Wikipedia editors (again, I did not write it there and was unaware of it when I made my edit), shouldn’t that make it OK for English Wikipedia users?
Don
PS: I own two Thoroughbreds, one quarter horse, and one mongrel Pinto/Westphalian. :-) Don Hollway (talk) 17:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Another wikipedia is not a reliable source. Nor is a battlefield monument without any sourcing that dates from 1841 a reliable source as compared to three academic biographies from the last 60 or so years. You'd need other academic sources that give the date to make such a claim on this wikipedia. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
“Wikipedia is not a reliable source” is strange coming from a Wikipedia editor. And I take it by “academic source” you mean as academic as defined and approved by you? Like those two sources on the page only tangentially related to the subject? Don Hollway (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
“…Val-ès-Dunes having been fought in 1047, on August 10, according to the Abbé Le Cointe, which indeed is only what might be supposed from the dedication to St. Laurence (August 10) of the chapel built in conmemoration of the victory upon the little hill where the final defeat of the rebels was accomplished.” 'J. Le Cointe, "Conspiration des Barons Normands. . . . et Bataille du Val-des-Dunes" (Caen, 1868, 8vo.) https://books.google.com/books?id=YAxBAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA354&lpg=PA354
https://www.normandythenandnow.com/rebellion-and-the-epic-gallop-of-william-duke-of-normandy-in-1046/ https://www.totallytimelines.com/william-i-the-conqueror-1027-1087/ https://www.wikiwand.com/en/1047 https://www.understandingwars.com/801ad-1500ad/11th-century/val-es-dunes-battle-of-1047/
If you simply Google “date of the battle of val-es-dunes” you get August 10, 1047 Don Hollway (talk) 18:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think you really should acquaint yourself with what a reliable source is for wikipedia. Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability have a bunch of helpful information to read over and digest. The rest of this does indeed belong on the article talk page - which is located Talk:Battle of Val-ès-Dunes Ealdgyth (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that if the rationale for a block depends on information that is not available to all administrators, that information should be sent to the Arbitration Committee, a checkuser or an oversighter for action (as applicable, per ArbCom's recent updated guidance) instead of the administrator making the block.
- Following an RfC, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of FoxNews.com is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.
- Community comment on the revised Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines is requested until 8 October.
Technical news
- The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.
Arbitration
- Remedy 8.1 of the Muhammad images case will be rescinded 1 November following a motion.
- A modification to the deletion RfC remedy in the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been made to reaffirm the independence of the RfC and allow the moderators to split the RfC in two.
- The second phase of the 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review closes 3 October.
Miscellaneous
- An administrator's account was recently compromised. Administrators are encouraged to check that their passwords are secure, and reminded that ArbCom reserves the right to not restore adminship in cases of poor account security. You can also use two-factor authentication (2FA) to provide an extra level of security.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections open 2 October and close 8 October.
- You are invited to comment on candidates in the 2022 CUOS appointments process.
- An RfC is open to discuss whether to make Vector 2022 the default skin on desktop.
- Tech tip: You can do a fuzzy search of all deleted page titles at Special:Undelete.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Dragovit block
Bedivere.cs is caught in the hardblock you put on this user and is requesting that it be softened. Are you OK with doing that, or should we just address it through IPBE for the duration? They have edited since 2009 with no blocks or other issues AFAICT. Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- No problems at all with softening. I’m busy this morning…can you deal with it? Ealdgyth (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Germanic
GizzyCatBella and I have a bit of a history and although we haven't interacted in a while, I suspect that she (for some reason) has out of the blue followed me to Germanic peoples to revert me. Just to explain a bit of the tension.--Ermenrich (talk) 20:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- What history? I don’t remember you (?) @Ermenrich Please ping me next time while talking about me. - GizzyCatBella🍁 21:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)