User talk:Fang Aili/Archive8

This is an archive of inactive discussions. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page.

Archive 1: 9 August 2005 - 13 February 2006

Archive 2: 14 February 2006 - 21 March 2006

Archive 3: 15 February 2006 - 28 April 2006

Archive 4: 29 April 2006 - 6 June 2006

Archive 5: 6 June 2006 - 23 June 2006

Archive 6: 23 June 2006 - 1 August 2006

Archive 7: 1 August 2006 - 22 August 2006

Archive 8: 23 August 2006 - 2 September 2006

Archive 9: 2 September 2006 - 13 October 2006

Archive 10: 14 October 2006 - 6 November 2006

Archive 11: 6 November 2006 - 21 November 2006

Archive 12: 22 November 2006 - 20 December 2006

Archive 13: 21 December 2006 - 5 January 2007

Archive 14: 6 January 2007 - 6 February 2007

Archive 15: 6 February 2007 - 5 March 2007

Archive 16: 5 March 2007 - 28 March 2007

Archive 17: 29 March 2007 - 3 May 2007

Archive 18: 4 May 2007 - 20 June 2007

Archive 19: 1 July 2007 - 25 July 2007

Archive 20: 26 July 2007 - 13 December 2007

Archive 21: 14 December 2007 - 28 April 2011

Revert/block

Thanks for the backup. :) --Fang Aili ^talk 16:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

No problem :-) That was a really nasty threat/attack. —Mets501 (talk) 17:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

North Warwick and South Warwick

Yes these two were real places but the two towns werre dissolved in 2002 and absorb into the Warwick Shire.

Eyes Of The Father (Angela's Eyes)

Would you mind grabbing the content of Eyes Of The Father (Angela's Eyes), which you deleted, and sticking it in my sandbox User:Thatcher131/Sandbox1, or adding it to the episode summary table at Angela's Eyes? Thanks. Thatcher131 (talk) 17:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Never mind, the editor is adding them herself. Thanks. Thatcher131 (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Advice

Thanks for your advice on my user talk page. I'm a relative newbee when it comes to editing on wikipedia. If I do something wrong or if you have any suggestions, please feel free to tell me.

Jealma 18:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Atchy

Dear Fang Ali, I strongly object to your deletion of Atchy. It is a commonly used in a childs mind. The article was intended as a reference to a childs way of thinking. I think this deserves page if the word 'Galumphing' does. Also I am not sure what a sandbox is.

Ned Cooper3456173 (talk · contribs)

Sorry!

Sorry! I thought you deleted it. I'm new here at Wiki and I thank you for your help! Please understand that I did not create the page, Atchy to waste time.

Ned Cooper3456173 (talk · contribs)

Active User

But I am an activde user, given I signed up 5 days ago! Cooper3456173 (talk · contribs)

Active User

I mean i don't plan to live in wiki, but i plan to go on and edit at least more than twice a week! Cooper3456173 (talk · contribs)

biohol log entry

Dear Fang Aili,

If you look closely in your google search biohol(s) (I think you need to use the plural) you will find a first reference circa 2001 regarding ethanol in Brazil. I considered using biohols as the base word instead of biohol, but the wiki usually redirects plural versions. Any input would be appreciated.

Vinod Khosla uses this term in his white paper relating to ethanol fuel deveopment.

Saabnut Saabnut (talk · contribs)

An important suggestion

I suggest making the database of wikipedia (3.7 GB) downloadable so that it can be downloaded and burned into CDs and then distributed to people who don't have a fast internet connection. Just imagine having the biggest encyclopedia in the world on your computer. By the way, I don't mean downloading just a small part of wikipedia, but I mean the whole encyclopedia.I wrote especially to you because you were the administrator who left me a welcome message on my page.

meno25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.202.91.49 (talk • contribs) --Meno25 07:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Taxoboxes

Hi Fang Aili, I just want to ask this question to you. Is texobox color standarized such colors? Because somebody reverted other edits such as changing the colors on texoboxes. For example, Animal's texobox color is Pink, and Bacteria's texobox color is Blue, Plant's texobox color is Green. Is color really standarized such colors? Please, respond in my talk page. Cheers! Daniel's page ☎ 04:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Fang Aili,

I would like to thank you for your kind response for my suggestion.I knew that the database is 3.7 GB from here

--Meno25 15:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

hey fang

i have a problem. I wan't to upload an image for my sandbox, but it keeps deleting it. Help!

It was called atchy.jpg and ws a pic of a beard that i took a photo of. now the atchy page is being deleted, i saved the page in my sandbox, but my pic was deleted! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooper3456173 (talk • contribs)

aggg!

it's so annoying! i wan't to put a link in my sig but i cant! --cooper3456173[talk] 17:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

/yourself

Yeah, I'm fine, it's an internet meme. I made it sort of as a joke, but there's no real point to it, so I db-authored it when I saw it on RfD. --Rory096 21:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Why did you delete my article?

You recently deleted my article on "Tactical Sekt", I was wondering why. I would appreciate it if you would explain to me why you did and what I can do to improve the article so that it does not have to be deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LimeyFish8 (talk • contribs)

Why did you remove my request for immediate deletion?

Dear Erica, on 8/23 you removed my request for immediate deletion of the page PLANS.

I am the secretary of PLANS, Inc., the subject of the page.

The page has been written by devotees of Anthroposophy, the cult-like religious sect that PLANS exposes. The purpose and effect of the page is to damage the reputation of PLANS. Apparently scholarly references are actually to Anthroposophical propaganda sites. They are not neutral.

Unfortunately, the controversy about Waldorf Education (an activity of Anthroposophy) and Anthroposophy is strongly polarized and there appear to be no neutral sources of information--everything is either cult or anti-cult.

We need some kind of objective arbitration process. I was hoping marking the page for deletion might trigger that.

Please help!

Thanks, Dan Dugan http://www.waldorfcritics.org Dan Dugan, Secretary, PLANS, Inc. 22:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

gg

i tried to use sup in my Sig,but it wOuLdn't worK! ....--cooper3456173 ^talk</font> 12:28, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Cooper3456173 (talk · contribs)

yr Amazing!

ThanK-you once again! Your the besk admin ever!--cooper3456173 ^talk</font> 14:25, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Cooper3456173 (talk · contribs)

Jeprox

Recreated by Jeprox (talk · contribs). FYI. - CobaltBlueTony 15:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Land Rover Land e

Thank you for deleting this article. Please see Talk:Land Rover Land e. This has now been deleted /three times/ for copyvio. I request name space protection, please. BlueValour 16:07, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Warwick nonsense

Hi Erica, can you please reconsider your choice not to speedily delete the North Warwick and South Warwick articles. I live 20km from Warwick, Queensland and I can assure you the articles are patent nonsense. They were clearly added as a joke and should be removes ASAP.

BTW someone added what looks like some Chinese characters to the end of my user page. I don't suppose you could have a look and tell me what they mean

Thanks, --Dave 16:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Deleted page

hello, you deleted my page. what's the big idea? ted Ted.strauss (talk · contribs)

Patient Information Booklet

Why did you delete the Essure patient information booklet (PIB). This product is regulated by the US Food and Drug Administation. They wrote the PIB to make sure that consumers have all the safety information for the product. If you read the text you will see that it is referenced as a place for more information on this procedure. Please don't delete. Thanks, Debbie Donovan Conceptus 17:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Conceptus is the maker of the Essure system for permanent birth control otherwise known as sterilization. We are trying to educate anyone who is researching their options for sterilization. The Essure procedure has been available in the US since 2002 and tens of thousands of women worldwide rely on it for permanent contraception. Since the company owns the copy write and I am tasked with posting this information I will need to understand how to remove the copywrite notice so that the information can be available on wikipedia.

I noticed on your profile that you are a figure skater. As it happens so am I. I am a great spinner (sit is my best one even though I am almost 40 yrs old). Are you a great jumper--which is your favorite, axel, sal, loop, lutz, wally? I prefer the edge jumps--loop. I also love to skate on syncro teams--the last one I was on was a masters team out of San Francisco, CA called Ice Quakes. I am short so I am usually on the end setting pace and making formations (daredevil old broad you might say).

Anyhoo, hope you will check out the Essure procedure information to appreciate why we at the company need to post to Wikipedia.

Thanks, Debbie Donovan Director, Corporate Communications Conceptus, Inc.

p.s. check out our blog at essuredecision.blogspot.com

You deleted the Rick O Shea Page

but i won a prize off the radio so i dont mind...Owwmykneecap 17:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

more recreations

Sierra at Tahoe - was Sierra at tahoe. - CobaltBlueTony 17:26, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

done and done ... tagged a couple of others, too... Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony 17:41, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Notability

The problem is, it's not a person, group of people, band or club- it's a resort. Ral315 (talk) 19:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

No, indeed I'm not. But using CSD A7 is wrong, since it doesn't cover the subject of the article. Not to mention that having the article on our servers a few days longer while the already-open AFD continues isn't really a big deal. I've never been one to require everything be done through process, but when process works, there's no need to subvert it. Ral315 (talk) 19:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

That's exactly what I'm saying, that you can't use CSD A7 for anything other than what it says. If you want to delete it under some other terms, fine. But CSDs shouldn't be adapted just to delete a page now, rather than 6 days from now when the AFD closes. Ral315 (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Why did you simply delete the Enoch Mogusu article?

If I needed to improve the article in some way, it would have seemed much more appropriate to tell me so, than to simply delete the article. As for whether it should belong in the encyclopedia to start with, I would maintain that it is significantly unusual and noteworthy for an African craftsman, with a primitive workshop, to produce satellite dishes that were superior in quality and less expensive than those obtainable commercially from overseas. Moreover, it is noteworthy that he is doing this for the benefit of mankind and not to get wealthy. Also for him to provide an alternative to indecent programming on the regular stations is noteworthy.

Can you say, "George Washington Carver"? Alvinf 00:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Rec.sport.football.college

Hello, I hope you enjoy living in the city I was Born and raised in...

I have replaced the article that you deleted with a Paper I wrote last year on the group. I will contend that if we can have Articles based on obscure bands, then a newsgroup is equally worthy of at least something.

shoot me an e-mail at drjudsjr@verizon.com if you would like to discuss this further. Drjudsjr (talk · contribs)

I still fail to see how a consensus could have been met when the people who did the review aren't even American and therefore would consider the group to be as relevent as the memebers of the Group would consider Cricket to be important. Drjudsjr (talk · contribs)

Egyptian Actors

Hi Fang

Sorry for this mistake. I did not know what you wrote. As you know I am a new user of Wikipedia. I hope I will improve in the future.

--Meno25 06:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

A helpful tool

I found by accident a very helpful tool. You know the free browser Mozilla Firefox. There is an extention to it called StumpleUpon which is a toolbar that allows you to find random sites related to any subject you specify. The toolbar is divided into two parts: the first part makes you choose the type of content the toolbar searches:All web, News, Photos,Videos or Wikipedia. The second part consists of your favourite catagories like: physics, mathematics, ... etc.

You can download the toolbar-after installing firefox by pressing Tools/Extensions then Get more extensions. A web page will be opened which contains many extensions. You will find StumpleUpon among them.

I tested it for physics and came through many sites which exist as external links on Wikipedia pages. All the sites were OK regarding security.

This toolbar can be used by Wikipedia users to search for sites related to any topic which will save a lot of effort.

Try it. It's great!

--Meno25 07:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Jennifer Tinney

Hello, the above article which you deleted per A7 has been listed at WP:DRV. Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 August 26. Take care, trialsanderrors 16:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

LOTR Box

Thanks for your comment. That is what I am in the process of doing right now. All you need to do really is subst {{user LOTR}} with {{User:Royalguard11/userboxes/LOTR}}. I work on a Mac, so no AWB. I will get to everyone in time, but there are 300+ people that use this userbox, so it will take time. -Royalguard11^{TalkMy Desk} 03:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

There are several admins who would like to see all the non-encyclopedic userboxes moved out of template space, or else they may get deleted. I believe I might get some help from the many bots that are now running to do this too. A lot of userboxes are just moved, then its left up to the induviduals to subst it themselves.-Royalguard11^{TalkMy Desk} 03:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

rec.sport.football.college on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of rec.sport.football.college. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. BigDT 04:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Deletion of Image:Peter_Debnam.jpg

I am unsure why you deleted it, refer to QLD, NSW, Vic and SA state elections, all party leaders have a picture on wikipedia obtained legitimately. If Peter Debnam's is not allowed, then you should be deleting Morris Iemma, and all the others while you're at it. I'm re-uploading, please do not delete without discussion first. Timeshift 14:17, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Yep, ...

... you became an admin way ahead of me :) And thanks! Renata 16:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Warwick nonsense revisited

Hi Erica, Can you please take a look at the talk page for Talk:North_Warwick? You will find User:Peterwats has now admitted there is no such place and voted to delete his own article. With this in mind you might consider a speedy delete of both North Warwick and South Warwick articles. Watching Mr Watson with a view to blocking him as a blatant vandal might be in order too. --Dave 09:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Essure Procedure Article Removal 8/28/06

We followed all the instructions for loading copyrighted material including sending an email to permissions@wikimedia.com (the email was delayed all weekend and ultimately couldn't get through). Please help us understand what we are doing incorrectly so that the article + FDA mandated prescribing summary can be attached the the Essure procedure entry. Thanks, Debbie Donovan, Director, Corporate Communications, Conceptus Inc. --Conceptus 16:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Conceptus (talk · contribs)

Article quality

As Oleg is on a much-deserved break, I'll try to answer your question quickly (as I have to run to class soon!). You basically need to follow the instructions laid out at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot, and it should work fairly well. For example, in the WikiProject banner template, you can just add {{subst:class parameter|category=whatever}} and it should work. If you run into any issues, just poke me on my talk, and I'll try replying ASAP. Titoxd^(?!?) 16:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

USAEM

We were working on the USAEM page and it was suddenly deleted. Not sure why. Totally new at this altho I have looked this up on the wiki for quite a while. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohlman (talk • contribs)

Why did you delete my article?

Hi Fang, I'm new to wikipedia and would be grateful if you can let me know why you recently deleted my article on "Sierra at Tahoe". I would be happy to edit the article based on your feedback. thanks for letting me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.103.190.100 (talk • contribs)

why u delete Nothings Clear

nothings clear is a great band and we took the time to write it up so why delete it?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madmit (talk • contribs)

Welcome!

Big shiny welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Firefly WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Firefly's coverage of topics.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles? Our style guidelines outline some things to include.
• Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Firefly article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow Browncoat, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Keep flyin'plange 15:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

DSA

I know its fictional, but i dont think it is a real ship from Andromeda, it seems like a fan made ship. thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 21:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I did some more research and it is a real class of ships in Andromeda; However it is still riddled with OR/spec. I'll add it to my tod list for tommorow and ill try and watch the episodes tommorow, hopefully i can gt it upto an acceptable standard. thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 21:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

It might actually be best to take this to AFD. Just from the info i can find online it appeard once and only the once, i'm not going to be able to get much more then that it has 180 PDLs so it would just be a dead-end stub which would never grow once we remove all the OR/spec. thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 21:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Seems like a good idea. thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 21:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay; I've included all 3 ships in one article. I've rewriten it all without OR and speculation and refernced each episode. I think it is a big improvement. (see DSX (Andromeda)) thanks/MatthewFenton (talk • contribs) 19:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Dominickers (ethnic group)

Thanks for the welcome, Erica! And the zen moments, too; I needed that. I'm open to any suggestions you may have on my article Dominickers (ethnic group). I don't have a lot of documented facts to go on, but it's a topic that deserves more research, and I want my article to be all it should be. BTW, am I putting this on the right page, in the right place to "talk" to you?? Peace! Textorus 04:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Erica, I just found 2 more comments from you on my user talk page; there are too many talk pages around here, LOL; I'm still feeling a bit lost. But thanks for all your suggestions and edits. I've made more revisions and links this afternoon. Yes, I know it all sounds very tentative, but given the nature of the evidence, I'm trying hard to avoid making any undocumented, unverifiable claims here. I'm afraid interested readers will just have to examine the original texts of the various articles for themselves, available on the family tree link at the bottom of the page, and wrestle with the implications as I've done. Great idea about submitting for "Did You Know?" consideration; I'd love that. I think I've about got it all into fairly final form now; but let me meditate on it just a little more.

---

I've made lots of changes, added new material, and applied for DYK (hope I get it); it's more substantial now, based on suggestions from you and another editor, which I'm grateful for. But I am really pooped now; got to give it a rest for tonight. If you have a chance, take a look and see what you think. Textorus 05:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

---

Thanks, Erica. I'm delighted that it made DYK!

I've read the wiki policy on original research, but I'm not quite clear on how it applies here; though I'm open to enlightenment. I *have* deliberately avoided mentioning the results of my own genealogical research, and have kept the focus on statements made in works produced by other people.

The thing of it is, though, my little article, less than a thousand words at this point, and admittedly imperfect, represents state-of-the-art knowledge about this group at this time. Apart from census records, there has been nothing written on this group except the few short pieces I discuss in the article; a few mere *mentions* in scholarly works on other groups. But that's it. No extended discussion of this group anywhere else in the world at this point, as far as I've been able to find in the last six years.

BTW, another editor/contributor has commented on the seeming inappropriateness of the image PD licensing category. I think you fixed that for me. I don't see any categories that precisely fit this image. My general understanding is that any works produced before 1923 are all in the public domain. When you have a chance, could you please look at the licensing again and see if it needs correcting? Thanks much for all your help and comments! Textorus 22:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

---

Thanks, Erica! I really appreciate your encouragement and advice. Textorus 20:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

---

Awww, thanks so much for the butterfly! That makes me feel good. I can tell you I've worked a lot harder on this article than I intended to, nearly 30 hours this week. I've surprised myself, even; it appears I know more than I thought I did. BTW, I think I've figured out the right PD designation, finally. But I've got to stop adding things and get back to the rest of my life now. I really appreciate your kind words and encouragement, Erica. Peace. Textorus 05:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Need help on copyvio problem

Hi Erica, I could use some input on the article HIPAA_security_Risk_Assessment/Analysis. It's a cut-and-paste copy vio from a website offering consulting services. I repeatedly added a speedy delete tag, and each time the author would remove the tag. So I tagged it with the regular copyvio tag and blanked the page, and the author simply put the offending text on the temp page which is supposed to be for new, unoffending text. If you have time, would you mind taking a glance at this page? I still feel that a speedy is justified, and this guy is being a real pain. Thanks! Akradecki 04:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Answer to your message

Could you provide a link to a newspaper article containing the term "the woman"? That way it would be a more forceful argument for me to make. Also, could you have a look at this latest thing: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Talk Page message removal? It seems the situation is not under control after all. 有的人脾气不好，为什么？真可惜！Hardouin 17:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Illick's mill

You deleted and protected my article Illick's Mill Partnership. I have to say that i am a member of the partnership and have full authority to post that material in order expand knowledge about our non-profit organization. I wanted to know about how long a deletion review takes? Since i have the authority over the material on the article, it should have not been deleted but be allowed to post it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redpanther897 (talk • contribs)

Help Page post

Admins or Stewards or Bureos or some combination can remove items in a history (for getting rid of e-mails, other damaging things that we don't want) It appears that it what happened. --\/\/slack (talk) 21:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

RE: Impersonation Station

Thanks for the heads up! I doubt he's an impersonator, as well; account was created about a month after I joined up, and I was barely even known then. However, is he in violation of WP:NAME? As just for the record, I want to state that I have nothing against him; he can continue existing, as long as our signatures are different and such. Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{The Walrus!} 21:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Heh, see User talk:Master of Puppets#Curious. The "Impostor account" actually registered first. So if anyone was in violation of WP:NAME it would be... ;-) Prodego ^talk 01:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Re. Bureau Van Dijk Page

Hi Fang Ali, Regarding the Bureau Van Dijk page, yes please could you completely delete it. Many thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Went65 (talk • contribs)

• Bureau van Dijk

Response

Thank you. :) Anonymous__Anonymous 12:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)