On February 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sam (koala), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Please consider voicing an opinion in the AfD nomination for the vanity article. Too Beautiful to Live, as support for deletion is being overwhelmed by fans of this local radio show. 207.102.78.164 (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
sir i am Animesh Pant student of 6th semester NIT Raipur. sir i am very much interested in editing wikipedia's content. I have edited a few number of pages last year(2008) than i had an accident so i had to stop.Now i want to start contributing again .So i was thinking to get adopted by some genuine member of wikipedia.please give me a chance, i'll not let u down. I have also read all terms and conditions about this.
Animesh Pant
6th sem
computer science and engineering
NIT Raipur
Animesh1986 (talk) 04:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I was wondering if you can with a problem that has arisen with some articles I have nominated for deletion. All of the articles relate to the music of ABBA, and one user Axmann8 has posted the following comment on all the AfD pages: Keep, per nominating user paul75's obvious prejudice toward the band ABBA, based on the fact that he nominated 4 ABBA-related articles for deletion consecutively. This, of course is entirely not related to the deletion discuss and in turn could prejudice the outcome of the AfD. While I feel I shouldn't have to justify myself for operating within Wikipedia guidelines, I have no prejudice against ABBA at all, I am in fact a huge fan. Wikipedia, however is not an ABBA fansite!
I don't know if it is possible to remove his remarks for the AfD, but you are able to have a word with him, and any other advice you can give me, would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks! The articles in question are:
Yo, thanks for clerking the Rand case. I'm just wondering if the templates at Talk:Ayn Rand are really necessary – any ban-contravening editing by the named editors will be quickly reverted anyway, and the page suffers from a surfeit of templates already. Perhaps a small notice to the effect of "An Arbitration Committee ruling on this issue was passed in March 2009; the decision may be read here" might be more appropriate? Skomorokh 04:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Does this look better? - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 04:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Much better, thanks. Skomorokh 05:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Is it possible that some of the parties of Ayn Rand got missed out when giving out end of arb notifications? User:Stevewunder has posted to the talkpage but he doesn't seem to have been officially informed that he is not allowed to. Thanks.--Slp1 (talk) 12:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The JazzFan's one year banning from Wikipedia seems to be missing from the Ayn Rand talk page template. Was that intentional? J Readings (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to pile on, but the talkpage template reads "Stevewunder is banned from editing the Ayn Rand article, for a period ending 1 year (inc. talkpage).", but when expanded for User:Stevewunder, reads "Whilst the user is not prohibited from discussing or proposing changes to the article, on this talk page, they may not edit the article itself". This would seem to contradict Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Ayn_Rand#Stevewunder_topic_banned_and_warned; the editor has been posting to the talkpage [1][2], and seems to be confused as to whether this is okay.[3] If you could clear things up, it would be appreciated (if you're otherwise engaged, just let me know and I'll ask another clerk, no problem). Regards, Skomorokh 03:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Ouch, that's the problem with using templates. RfAr remedies take precedence; he's not supposed to edit the talkpage. I'll correct the templates right away. - Mailer Diablo 10:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah, thanks for the swift response, everything seems to be in order now. Cheers, Skomorokh 10:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
User:Mailer diablo/Archive φ has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Mailer diablo/Archive φ's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Mailer diablo/Archive φ!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! That made my day. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 00:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
How come you deleted the article about milani? whats wrong with having the article? and why do articles get deleted anyways? is there no space for them, does wikipedia have a set maximum of articles it can hold? I think shes pretty notable, seeing as shes pretty hot and has huge tits. Is there anyway it could be recreated? I think enough people have heard of her. Im sure there are hundreds of people who have pages that are far less important than milani. Just sayin.
You edited Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone, describing it as a "biochemical preparat." This looks wrong to me, I would have expected "preparation," but I'm not a biochemist (just a Wikignome who started with the CCCP dab page and got sucked in). A web search found one support for "preparat," but not on a native English page. Could you please either confirm the term as written or correct it?
Matchups 14:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Mailer diablo, now that the Aitias RFAR is over, would it be okay for me to delete User:Acalamari/RFC now? Unless I have to keep it, I don't particularly want an "evidence page" against a user hanging around my userspace (that's against policy anyway). Can the evidence be copied to the talk page of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Aitias for transparency and then deleted, can I go ahead and just delete it, or is it best for it to remain? I'm asking because it was used on the RFAR as evidence, and quoted by at least two users. Thanks. Acalamari 16:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
I've copied the evidence to the talk page of the ArbCom case and will delete my userspace page as soon as I've posted this. One person did edit the userspace page to certify the RFC, and it was that combined with the fact that the RFC had been linked to and used as evidence on RFAR that I felt it was best to ask someone with experience on ArbCom precedures before taking any action on the page. Thank you for your help. Acalamari 16:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Mailer diablo -- I had questions about a a draft motion which I posted on the Workshop talk page. In the absence of a response, I moved the draft to the Clerk's talk page; and then I saw a note at the top of that page which led me here.
There are two plausible formatting difficulties which may need to be addressed:
1. It has more words than the motions I studied in other cases -- perhaps too many words?
2. It presents diffs in a format which is unlike other cases -- perhaps configured poorly?
Please assist me in working through these format issues.
If I have posed this query in a fashion that makes it impossible to answer, please help me formulate a question you can answer within the scope of your ArbCom clerk's role.
If this question should have been posted somewhere else, please help me identify the proper venue. --Tenmei (talk) 00:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Mailer diablo -- I have adopted a tentative evidence strategy which would seem to be non-standard. It appears to me that the evidence templates presume a punitive outcome which I am unwilling to accept a priori.
Can you help me locate or access archived ArbCom cases in which a party's presentation of evidence abandoned the presumptive punitive objectives which I perceive in these models?
If the way I've posed questions here seems too pointed, then I still need help accessing archives of ArbCom cases beyond the ones listed on the project page. What procedure shall I follow in asking more appropriate questions?
Please assist me in working through these format issues. If I have posed this query in a fashion that makes it impossible to answer, please help me formulate a question you can answer within the scope of your ArbCom clerk's role.
If this question should have been posted somewhere else, please help me identify the proper venue. --Tenmei (talk) 00:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I am just a regular guy and basically I was just messing around with some people here in my room, friends and females and basically I got searching , very briefly for avena lee, what happened to her bio... why did you delete it?
She is really pretty and I just saw a video of her in youtube.com she is actually not bad looking at all. Why did you delete her bio?
regards
I need more time to make my contribution shorter. We have been encouraged to please submit our evidence "within one week, if possible." This suggests that I may reasonably ask for more time. --Tenmei (talk) 02:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
The rough draft will be cut tomorrow. I plan to finish editing on Friday. --Tenmei (talk) 04:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
In the context created by the following, I have no objection to deleting the evidence offered by Bueller 007, which -- for whatever reason -- seems to be what he/she wants.
The following shows that Bueller 007 reconsidered what was initially added to the Evidence page, deciding instead to add a comment on the Workshop page. Then, Teeninvestor reverted that change. When Bueller 007 tried to correct what Teeninvestor had done, it seems to have caught the attention of Coldmachine.
Evidence page history
1. (diff) 01:40, 9 April 2009 Bueller 007 (talk | contribs) (55,415 bytes) (→Evidence presented by {your user name})
2. (diff) 01:49, 9 April 2009 Bueller 007 (talk | contribs) (53,605 bytes) (i'm moving this to workshop, because i don't have the time to root up all the links that would make for actual "evidence")
4. (diff) 12:16, 9 April 2009 Teeninvestor (talk | contribs) (39,452 bytes) (Removed the comments of Bueller007. Workshop page is for discussing & talking proposals)
Evidence page edit history
5. (diff) 12:15, 9 April 2009 Teeninvestor (talk | contribs) (58,507 bytes) (→Evidence presented by {your user name})
6. (diff) 12:17, 9 April 2009 Teeninvestor (talk | contribs) (58,508 bytes) (Added this from workshop. Workshop is for discussing proposals, evidence belongs on evidence page.)
7. (diff) 06:03, 10 April 2009 Bueller 007 - (39,226 bytes) (yes, but i have presented no 'evidence', and i don't have time to go looking for the links. i've asked to have this removed. please don't add it back again. you do not have permission to do so)
8. (diff) 07:07, 10 April 2009 Coldmachine - (41,003 bytes) (Then strike it out - see WP:TALK which states "It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already...responded to your statement" (best to preview beforehand))
In addition to the diffs noted above, Bueller 007 amplifies his/her disinterest in participating further in this ArbCom case -- see short discussion threads here and here.
Since I don't know where this should be posted, I'm posting it on the talk page of both clerks and here. --Tenmei (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there Mailer. :) Today I was browsing my talkpage archives, and found this from seven months ago. Time seems to have gone by quickly by since that RfA, and I suppose I've gained some further experience since then in a couple of areas. There have been several times when I've really wanted those extra couple of tools to fix something or help a process like DYK when no other admin was available. :) I'm in no hurry, and by no means do I want to press forward with another request for adminship right now; but whenever you have time, I'd appreciate a casual editor review or just getting the ball rolling with some thoughts regarding the "when?" question. Best, Jamie☆S93 01:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could explain why the recent revision history of WP:RS/N has been pretty much hidden. Link. There are many different posts relating to different threads, and it just seems like an odd thing to do. ∗ \ / (⁂) 04:09, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
An couple of edits met the Oversight criteria and was supposed to be removed. Unfortunately there was a delay in reverting these edits and when everyone else added on to other discussions, their edits inadvertently contained the "tainted" text. The user is now being investigated by the Arbitration Committee. I hope this explains the situation. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 04:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Mailer, thanks for the reply. I had thought it would've been something similar to that, just you can imagine my surprise when I first looked at the history! :) ∗ \ / (⁂) 04:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
My RFA passed today at 61/5/4. Thanks for participating in my RFA. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the WP community has placed in me. Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Waseem Kayani, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waseem Kayani. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MBisanztalk 01:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Greetings, Mailer diablo! Since your National Slavery is over and you are waiting to enter university, I hope you have lots of free time. How about using some of your time to contribute to our National Day project? If you bring Singapore in Malaysia to GA status, it will appear in On this day on 9 August every year! For an experienced GA writer like you, that should not be too difficult - just get your hands on several good history books. Alternatively, you could write a DYK or two. (Zscout370 and Jacklee are focusing on bringing Flag of Singapore to FA status, while I am writing two GAs and two DYKs for our project.) Kindly tell me your plans by the end of the month, as we will soon need to move from planning to writing. --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 07:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Why did you delete the article on the movie "Never Forget?" It was a great movie and had a nice plot. Can you possibly bring this article back to Wikipedia? If you don't I will report you to wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.234.221 (talk) 12:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Mailer, would you please guide or warn Tenmei not to fill the Workshop with too lengthy and unintelligible arguments any more or lead him to reduce his comments? I've never seen editors use "collapsed boxes" in ArbCom cases because of their too lengthy statement. Those are totally difficult to follow what he is saying. --Caspian blue 20:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Is the case "Macedonia case? Well, if so, I have no problem following and reading them even though those are quite lengthy and many editors propose and bicker...., but not unreadable. Anyway, thank you for the kind answer. --Caspian blue 20:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, that is indeed a monster ArbCom case.--Caspian blue 20:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I finally got around to writing the article. Could you restore the deleted history of Heartless Bitches International, for attribution reasons? --Apoc2400 (talk) 11:05, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again! --Apoc2400 (talk) 11:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Mailer diablo, user: Gaia Octavia Agrippa has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Gaia Octavia AgrippaTalk | Sign 19:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi, I was wondering if you could comment on the Al Farooj Fresh article which got nominated for deletion. AFF enjoys wide popularity in the UAE (and also was the first restaurant that offered shawerma sandwiches and chicken meals) yet this is the second time it has got nominated for deletion. Thanks. --Roaring Siren (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
My RfA passed as you may already know - thank you for the nomination, and the support before and throughout the request! :) It really turned out to be pretty good, and not too stressful. I've just made my first admin action, with a tentative finger. ;) Thanks again, Jamie☆S93 19:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Clear_background2.gif
FlyingToaster Barnstar Hello Mailer diablo! Thank you so much for your support in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of 126/32/5. I am truly humbled by the trust you placed in me, and will endeavor to live up to that trust. FlyingToaster
You're an editor who seems to be present on the vast majority of things on Wikipedia. The work you do is amazing. Apologies I can't seem to find a suitable barnstar you don't already have! Computerjoe's talk 11:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my "RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (Ceoil, Noroton and Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received - but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
~~~~~
Well, back to the office it is...
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "User:Mailer diablo/Archive φ" page.
