Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

edit
Hello Nick22aku! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Kukini
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
 

Kukini 22:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Fox Meadow Drive.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Fox Meadow Drive.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Fox_Meadow_CC.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Steve Burns (architect)

edit

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Steve Burns (architect), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Steve Burns (architect). If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Masterpjz9 05:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wayne County, Ohio

edit

Thanks for your Township nav box for Wayne County, Ohio. However, I would suggest / argue strongly in favor of making Nav Boxes for the whole county (i.e. all cities, villages, townships, and census-designated places) and not just townships. I especially think it premature to make such a township only nav box when there are no township articles for Wayne County (they are all red links).

For examples of two styles of county nav boxes, see Northumberland County, Pennsylvania and Alameda County, California. I prefer the former style. There is a discussion on this starting at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. counties if you are interested. Yours, Ruhrfisch 02:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

PS I see you have worked on / added such Township nav boxes to Ashland, Geauga, Hamilton, Lake, Portage, and Summit Counties too. Same suggestion applies to these.Ruhrfisch 03:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

That is nice of you adding a image of the Madison Township water tower to the Madison Township article. I thank you so much on that one because Madison Township is where I grew up in.

I thank you so much for adding a image of the Richland County Court house to the Richland County, Ohio article and that was what we needed there. Those are nice image's. Keep up the good work! ---Ohioan 02:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Template:Townships in Ashland County, Ohio

edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Townships in Ashland County, Ohio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

nothing links to this except the user who made it originally. Has been replaced by Template:Ashland County, Ohio and was just a redirect page. Ruhrfisch 22:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Townships in Ashland County, Ohio|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ruhrfisch 22:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:Townships in Richland County, Ohio

edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Townships in Richland County, Ohio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Nothing links here but the user page of the user who made it - has been replaced by better Template:Richland County, Ohio. Ruhrfisch 22:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Townships in Richland County, Ohio|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ruhrfisch 22:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:Townships in Wayne County, Ohio

edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Townships in Wayne County, Ohio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Template links only to user page of user who made it and an old tfd, replaced by better Template:Wayne County, Ohio Ruhrfisch 22:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Townships in Wayne County, Ohio|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ruhrfisch 22:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:Townships in Auglaize County, Ohio

edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Townships in Auglaize County, Ohio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

not used, links only to user page of user who made it, replaced by better Template:Auglaize County, Ohio Ruhrfisch 22:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Townships in Auglaize County, Ohio|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ruhrfisch 22:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:Townships in Logan County, Ohio

edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Townships in Logan County, Ohio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not used, links only to page of user who made it, replaced by better Template:Logan County, Ohio Ruhrfisch 22:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Townships in Logan County, Ohio|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ruhrfisch 22:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of municipality and township sections and locator maps from Ohio county articles

edit

Hi Nick, while I agree that the information in the county nav boxes duplicates that in the articles, the Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. counties calls for the section and map you are deleting, as well as a county infobox, which would include the map and duplicate othe info. Ruhrfisch 13:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

...Then I will halt, thanks for the heads-up. Nick22aku 19:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion

edit

Speedy deletion of Chester Township, Knox County, Ohio

edit

A tag has been placed on Chester Township, Knox County, Ohio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No such township appears on the map.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nyttend 03:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Manchester Township, Noble County, Ohio

edit

A tag has been placed on Manchester Township, Noble County, Ohio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No such township appears on the map.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nyttend 03:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of The Buchtelite

edit

A tag has been placed on The Buchtelite, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ohconfucius 09:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Categories

edit

Please be careful not to place parts of your user page in categories, like the articles in progress page is. It's confusing, and I don't think your page is an Ohio navigational box :-) Thanks! Nyttend 05:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yikes! I could not agree more. I have made the same suggestion to other users in the past who have included their userpages in cats... and now I contribute to the same confusion myself? Oversight on my part now corrected. Nick22aku 04:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mike Wood (baseball player)

edit

Hi ... I just wanted to let you know that I've added a speedy delete tag to an article you recently created because it's redundant with another page that already exists. You created Mike Wood (baseball player). The existing article is Mike Wood (baseball). --Sanfranman59 20:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem. However, I would recommend a redirect in these type of situations (which is what was ultimately done anyway). Reason: If deleted, all existing links of Mike Wood (baseball player) would return to redlinks (not what we want since there is already an article for Mike Wood at Mike Wood (baseball)). A redlink suggests an article needs to be created (again, this is not the case since there is already an article for this player). A redirect, not a speedy delete, works best here. Nick22aku 04:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maximiliano Ramirez

edit

I went and put Maximiliano Ramirez over at afd, since he's still a long way from even AAA ball yet. Since you're the author of it and you've had your afd battles on baseball players of similar "notability", I figured you might want to take a look.--Wizardman 17:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Jordan Brown (baseball player)

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jordan Brown (baseball player), by Tecmobowl, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jordan Brown (baseball player) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jordan Brown (baseball player), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Jordan Brown (baseball player) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

College Baseball Project

edit

Hello, I noticed that you have edited a College baseball related article. You may be interested to know that there is a college baseball WikiProject which you can join if you like. We would love to have you!

Kinston article up for deletion

edit

I was wondering if you were aware of THIS. Would welcome your opinion.Kinston eagle 03:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ramirez/Lofton Trade

edit

Wow. A single A player being traded for a veteran major leaguer? That seems to make him pretty notable.Kinston eagle 00:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

True. I see you working.  :) Nick22aku 00:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kudos

edit

Thanks for your recent creation of several articles about baseball players -- I'd been "watching" the non-existent Brian Williams (baseball player) article for a while, and it's nice to see it appear. -- JHunterJ 14:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem, I'm still working on a lot more. In fact, I plan to create an article for every player that played for the Cleveland Indians from 1995-present that currently does not have an article. So far, every Indian from 1995-2002 is now on Wikipedia and I hope to create all missing Indians from 2003-present by the end of the weekend. In the near future, I plan to create all missing Indians from around 1980-1995 and all missing Montreal Expos from 1990-2004. Nick22aku 20:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Medina, Ohio CIMG3091.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Christian Parker

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Christian Parker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. NrDg 01:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Category speedy deletion

edit

A tag has been placed on Category:Common Ohio township names, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It was previously deleted, under the name of Category:Common township names in Ohio, as the result of a categories for deletion discussion, as seen here (CSD G4)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Category:Common Ohio township names|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nyttend 14:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

University of Houston Wikiproject

edit

I'm considering proposing a new Wikiproject for the University of Houston. I'm looking to see if other Wikipedians would be interested in being involved in such a project. Are you? Thanks for your response! Brianreading 06:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rayner Noble article

edit

Thanks for creating the Rayner Noble article! I've added this article's wikilink to the UH Navbox. Please consider joining the WikiProject University of Houston. It's a great place for us to all consolidate our progress of UH related entries. Thanks again! -- Brianreading (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Minor league rosters / flags

edit

Hi, Nice work with those roster pages. Don't forget MOS:FLAG. Flags shouldn't be used in the rosters by a player's name. {{MLBplayer}} is more appropriate than {{player}} since it doesn't include flags. MLB roster temps no longer use flags, so MiLB rosters shouldn't either. Otherwise, keep up the good work. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 02:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Noted ...but confused as to why they accepted here in NBA rosters but not accepted here and here in MLB rosters? Nick22aku (talk) 03:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
It beats me about the NBA rosters. I'd say that either no one cares or no one is aware of it. (I didn't see any discussions related to flags at WikiProject NBA) -NatureBoyMD (talk) 04:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Buchtelite

edit
 

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article The Buchtelite, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

NBA WikiProject Newsletter

edit
     
The NBA WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 1 • April 9, 2008 • Written by: Basketball110
News

Project and league news:

Features

Featured NBA articles of the week:

Project Collaboration
  • This feature isn't available yet. You will be notified when it is ready.
ArchivesNewsroom
If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from this list.
This newsletter was delivered by Basketball110 pick away....

NBA WikiProject May Newsletter

edit
     
The NBA WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 2 • May 5, 2008 • Written by: Noble Story
News
Improved Content
Current Projects
Collaboration of the Month

Magic Johnson has been chosen to be our very first Collaboration of the Month article. Although this is article is already a Good Article, it still can be improved. The goal is to improve this article by the end of May so that it can be nominated for Featured Article status. In particular, free-use images should be found for the article, all Manual of Style guidelines should be followed, and a neutral point of view should be maintained throughout the article. If there is anything you can do to improve the article, then please help out.

ArchivesNewsroom
If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from this list.
This newsletter was delivered by Noble Story (talk)

Category:Canton/Akron Indians players

edit

I saw where you created this category, but should it not be Category:Canton-Akron Indians players? Jackal4 (talk) 04:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good point. Lets look into this first before changing it though. The reason I chose "Canton/Akron Indians" over "Canton-Akron Indians" is because I saw teams like "Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Yankees" use the "/" opposed to the "-." Nick22aku (talk) 04:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Armando Camacaro

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Armando Camacaro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wizardman 03:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Repost of Template:Kinston Indians roster

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Kinston Indians roster, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Kinston Indians roster was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Kinston Indians roster, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jordan Lyles

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jordan Lyles, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No establishment of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wizardman 18:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Lonnie Chisenhall

edit
 

I have nominated Lonnie Chisenhall, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lonnie Chisenhall. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Wizardman 18:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

what the eff do you think you're doing?

edit

see above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.185.134.135 (talk) 04:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:Arkadelphia CIMG8801.JPG

edit

File:Arkadelphia CIMG8801.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Arkadelphia Water Tower.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Arkadelphia Water Tower.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Evan Turner

edit
  On March 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Evan Turner, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 06:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Jeanmar Gomez

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Jeanmar Gomez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. T3chl0v3r (talk) 01:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

2009 International League season - team specific articles

edit

Hey, I created and am updating the 2009 Toledo Mud Hens season article and noticed that you did the Charlotte and Columbus. I was wondering if you would want to team up and we can create/update 2009 season articles for the rest of league and get rid of all those red links in 2009 season template box. Sound like a plan? Rik (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am up for it - just give me a few days before I get started on it. Nick22aku (talk) 23:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Pérez (baseball)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Alex Pérez (baseball) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bmg916Speak 02:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Priscilla Barnes

edit

Please do not add material to articles without citing a reliable, verifiable source per WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:RS, as you did with this edit to Priscilla Barnes. That material has been reverted about a dozen times already for this reason. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 23:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

My fault. I did not relize the edit history you speak of. I noticed that birthdate and birthplace info were missing so I added it per imbd.com - I figured that website was reliable and verifiable. I guess not. It's cool with me. Nick22aku (talk) 03:51, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Nick22aku! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 333 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Joe Inglett - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Dave Maggard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Alex Adams - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Damjan Rudež - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Rodrigo Rosario - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Stephen Head - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Tom Romano - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Edward Campusano

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Edward Campusano. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Campusano. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Edward Campusano

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Edward Campusano. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Campusano. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Rich Albert

edit

I have nominated Rich Albert, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Albert. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 21:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA reassessment of KInston Indians

edit

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Kinston Indians/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Neil Wagner

edit

I have nominated Neil Wagner, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Wagner. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. (talk) 07:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Neighborhoods in Medina, Ohio

edit

 Template:Neighborhoods in Medina, Ohio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –Schmloof (talk · contribs) 00:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Normandy Park, Medina, Ohio

edit

I have nominated Normandy Park, Medina, Ohio, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normandy Park, Medina, Ohio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Imzadi 1979  06:48, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Fox Meadow Estates, Medina, Ohio

edit

I have nominated Fox Meadow Estates, Medina, Ohio, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Meadow Estates, Medina, Ohio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Imzadi 1979  06:49, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Rustic Hills, Medina, Ohio

edit

I have nominated Rustic Hills, Medina, Ohio, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rustic Hills, Medina, Ohio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Imzadi 1979  06:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Javi Herrera

edit

I have nominated Javi Herrera, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javi Herrera. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Muboshgu (talk) 04:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rosters within Cleveland Indians organization

edit

 Template:Rosters within Cleveland Indians organization has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Muboshgu (talk) 02:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rosters within Houston Astros organization

edit

 Template:Rosters within Houston Astros organization has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Muboshgu (talk) 02:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Boston Red Sox minor league players for deletion

edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Boston Red Sox minor league players, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Red Sox minor league players until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jmlk17 05:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 1980 Lynn Sailors season for deletion

edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article 1980 Lynn Sailors season, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1980 Lynn Sailors season until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tracy Thorpe for deletion

edit
 

The article Tracy Thorpe is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Thorpe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

 Template:Rosters within Cleveland Indians organization has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Edward Campusano for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Campusano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Campusano(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dewelar (talk) 17:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Convention Center.JPG missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Convention Center.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have to agree with Sfan00 IMG, and I'd also like to point out that it really needs a new name as well. This is a nice picture that should be preserved and uses, and I really don't want to see it deleted. ----DanTD (talk) 16:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just out of curiosity, this wouldn't happen to be the Raymond F. Kravis Center for the Performing Arts, would it? ----DanTD (talk) 18:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Convention Center.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Convention Center.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:1998 Aeros CIMG9608.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1998 Aeros CIMG9608.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:1999 Aeros CIMG9612.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1999 Aeros CIMG9612.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2000 Aeros CIMG9613.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2000 Aeros CIMG9613.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2001 Aeros CIMG9614.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2001 Aeros CIMG9614.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:02, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:2003 Aeros CIMG9616.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2003 Aeros CIMG9616.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:06, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Juarez CIMG8464.JPG

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Juarez CIMG8464.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with File:2005 Aeros CIMG9618.JPG

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:2005 Aeros CIMG9618.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:23, 2 April 2012 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with File:2004 Aeros CIMG9617.JPG

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:2004 Aeros CIMG9617.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Columbus Clippers seasons

edit
 

The article Columbus Clippers seasons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All the individual season articles have been deleted. WHat little else is here can be put in the main article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 14:49, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim minor league players for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim minor league players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim minor league players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:49, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karexon Sanchez

edit
 

The article Karexon Sanchez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Wes Hodges for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wes Hodges is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Hodges until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 20:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carlos Rivero (baseball)

edit
 

The article Carlos Rivero (baseball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable minor league ballplayer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spanneraol (talk) 21:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Steve Burns (architect) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Burns (architect) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Burns (architect) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 14:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:AICU CIMG8241.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply



File:1997 Aeros CIMG9609.JPG listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1997 Aeros CIMG9609.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:2002 Aeros CIMG9615.JPG

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2002 Aeros CIMG9615.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Bulgarian Orthodox Church CIMG0248.JPG

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bulgarian Orthodox Church CIMG0248.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Corey Smith (baseball) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corey Smith (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Smith (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spanneraol (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tracy Thorpe for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tracy Thorpe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Thorpe (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spanneraol (talk) 00:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jared Goedert for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jared Goedert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Goedert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spanneraol (talk) 20:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chuck Lofgren

edit
 

The article Chuck Lofgren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable minor league baseball player

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spanneraol (talk) 21:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:2009 International League season by team

edit

 Template:2009 International League season by team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William 14:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


Category:1990 International League season has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:1990 International League season, which you created, has been nominated for merging to Category:1990 in baseball. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 18:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chuck Lofgren for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chuck Lofgren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Lofgren (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 17:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Masa Kobayashi

edit

Hello, Nick22aku. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Masa Kobayashi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Masa Kobayashi to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 01:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Masa Kobayashi for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masa Kobayashi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masa Kobayashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 18:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Oakland Athletics minor league players

edit
 

The article Oakland Athletics minor league players has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article largely consists of potted biographies of people who played in this league but are not otherwise notable, WP:BLP1E. The first twelve sections can be cut on those grounds. The rest possibly can stay.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Si Trew (talk) 22:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:SD CIMG0516.JPG listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SD CIMG0516.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gulf Coast League Reds roster

edit

 Template:Gulf Coast League Reds roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mack Rhoades for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mack Rhoades is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mack Rhoades until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Beau Mills for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beau Mills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beau Mills until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 06:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Current Appalachian League team rosters templates

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Current Appalachian League team rosters templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:00, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wachesaw Plantation

edit
 

The article Wachesaw Plantation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's a country club, not a settlement or a community. Non-notable, doesn't meet WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 18:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nick22aku

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Nick22aku requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 20:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Current Midwest League team rosters templates

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Current Midwest League team rosters templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Lynn Sailors has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Lynn Sailors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Akron RubberDucks

edit

 Template:Akron RubberDucks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vermont Reds has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Vermont Reds has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vermont Mariners has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Vermont Mariners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:42, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hagerstown Suns roster

edit

 Template:Hagerstown Suns roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mustangeagle (talk) 22:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Current Florida State League team rosters templates

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Current Florida State League team rosters templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Current South Atlantic League team rosters templates

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Current South Atlantic League team rosters templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Current California League team rosters templates

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Current California League team rosters templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gulf Coast League Yankees East roster

edit

 Template:Gulf Coast League Yankees East roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Spanneraol (talk) 22:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Staten Island Yankees roster

edit

 Template:Staten Island Yankees roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Salem-Keizer Volcanoes roster

edit

 Template:Salem-Keizer Volcanoes roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Current Northwest League team rosters templates

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Current Northwest League team rosters templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Batavia Muckdogs roster

edit

 Template:Batavia Muckdogs roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kane County Cougars roster

edit

 Template:Kane County Cougars roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Orem Owlz roster

edit

 Template:Orem Owlz roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tri-City ValleyCats roster

edit

 Template:Tri-City ValleyCats roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vermont Lake Monsters roster

edit

 Template:Vermont Lake Monsters roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Auburn Doubledays roster

edit

 Template:Auburn Doubledays roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Wes Hodges for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wes Hodges is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Hodges (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Williamsport Crosscutters roster

edit

 Template:Williamsport Crosscutters roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Trenton Thunder roster

edit

 Template:Trenton Thunder roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:West Virginia Black Bears roster

edit

 Template:West Virginia Black Bears roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Pioneer League team rosters for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Pioneer League team rosters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pioneer League team rosters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jonesey95 (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:State College Spikes roster

edit

 Template:State College Spikes roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Grand Junction Jackalopes roster

edit

 Template:Grand Junction Jackalopes roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Boise Hawks roster

edit

 Template:Boise Hawks roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Missoula PaddleHeads roster

edit

 Template:Missoula PaddleHeads roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Frederick Keys roster

edit

 Template:Frederick Keys roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

The article Hammock Dunes Golf Links has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks notability. No WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 12:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply