User talk:TheSwagger13

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Diannaa (talk) 21:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Cassel (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NegativeMP1 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Again, the only source here that seems to demonstrate notability is Business Insider. Nothing else here seems usable towards demonstrating notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Cassel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

λ NegativeMP1 00:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CapCut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EST. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Cassel (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Can you find better sources than WP:FINDAGRAVE and WP:YOUTUBE?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Cassel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, TheSwagger13! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Cassel (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LunaEclipse was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Cassel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 11:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flash2-5Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flash2-5Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RussianSleepExperimentGuy.png

A tag has been placed on File:RussianSleepExperimentGuy.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.drive2.ru/c/461398510797849926/ and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ирука¹³ 06:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:HarveyWillgoose.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HarveyWillgoose.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:11, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:PoliceAtAllSaintsSchool.png

Thanks for uploading File:PoliceAtAllSaintsSchool.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HarveyWillgoose.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HarveyWillgoose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Unsourced

TheSwagger13, please do not re-add poorly sourced content to CapCut, even with a citation needed tag. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. That description of the issue can reflect poorly on the company and the people managing CapCut's business model (saying they were accused of being "money hungry"), so it should be handled with care per the policy on living people. Sources that should be cited for that are publications, like newspapers or books, with reputable publishing standards, not random user-generated YouTube videos. ObserveOwl (talk) 21:37, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of 2025 Sheffield school stabbing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Sheffield school stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Sheffield school stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Billclinton1996 (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:PalauFlagCIA.png

Thanks for uploading File:PalauFlagCIA.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:FutureWave Software logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:FutureWave Software logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HarveyWillgoose.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HarveyWillgoose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AvengersSecretWarsLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AvengersSecretWarsLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:TurnerDoomsdayVideo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TurnerDoomsdayVideo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RussianSleepExperimentLab.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RussianSleepExperimentLab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Bellaism

Also create a draft for bellaism Userofwikiofusa (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

No, i don't think its THAT bad TheSwagger13 (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Text(PD).png

The file File:Text(PD).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused test image, WP:NOTFILESTORAGE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? - c) 20:30, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Erik Cassel Speaking at ROBLOX Rally.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Erik Cassel Speaking at ROBLOX Rally.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Spawnism

Hi, thanks for making this a redirect. I've been giving myself a crash course in the issue since I came across the earlier article today. I'm just wondering whether Roblox might be too broad for the redirect target. What do you think of redirecting to Child safety on Roblox instead, as that seems to be what some adults are concerned about? ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 04:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Probably. NegativeMP deleted my Spawnism statement, so Child safety on Roblox should be a better option. TheSwagger13 (talk) 04:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

I've boldly changed the redirect to the child safety article as the best target for the time being. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 05:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Ok TheSwagger13 (talk) 07:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Cassel (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GGOTCC was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please ensure everything under 'Roblox' and 'Health problems' is cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Cassel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GGOTCC 19:10, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Schlep raid on a roblox schlep tribute game.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Schlep raid on a roblox schlep tribute game.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. λ NegativeMP1 16:51, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Online Neo-Nazis in Roblox holding Nazi flags.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Online Neo-Nazis in Roblox holding Nazi flags.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Based5290 :3 (talk) 02:27, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:You Are An Idiot screen still.png

Thanks for uploading File:You Are An Idiot screen still.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: You Are An Idiot (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grumpylawnchair was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:You Are An Idiot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grumpylawnchair (talk) 22:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Didn't know you were here Swagger! I'm #Abhi. I also going to say that, MAKE PAGES OF QUALITY NEXT TIME lol. SeraphicDude (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		Valued Picture Barnstar
		Thanks for providing an image of the 67 McDonald's meal, very valuable. Also, hello from another editor from Dubai :) jolielover♥talk 15:48, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

👍 peak TheSwagger13 (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Roblox v. Schlep

Hello, TheSwagger13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roblox v. Schlep, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheLandOfSweetForever.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheLandOfSweetForever.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 10:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Erik Cassel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Erik Cassel. Thanks! Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

About that, I accidentally reverted to a part of the draft where it was in previous submission, so I had to manually put back the submit template. I did not intend to change the message drafts. TheSwagger13 (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Cassel (April 26)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, SomeoneDreaming, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Please stop resubmitting this article without substantial changes to the sourcing. See previous AFC comments.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Erik Cassel to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

SomeoneDreaming (talk) 14:54, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roblox v. Schlep

Hello, TheSwagger13. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Roblox v. Schlep".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Space song cover 2.jpg

The file File:Space song cover 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Proposed deletion under DEL12: "Files that are unused, obsolete, or violate the non-free policy."

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the file at any time. Boots the Blackfoot Ferret 14:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Keith Sapsford falling out of plane.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keith Sapsford falling out of plane.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Day the Crayons Quit

Hello, TheSwagger13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Day the Crayons Quit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Concern considering edit on Lesbian Space Princess

Your addition of content to that page has been reversed. Your description of "readding internet slandering the movie, though with less significance" is not only inaccurate, but the text you added "In late August 2026, out-of-context clips from the movie began circulating in social media, resulting in massive backlash and defamation towards the movie. Several fandoms united to further criticize and mock the film, temporarily setting aside their usual rivalries" did NOT summarize the articles accurately at all, implying you did not read those articles. Furthermore, the sources you used are not high-quality sources, and as such violates Wikipedia rules on reliable sources. There is no reason to think, at this present time, that what you have added is relevant enough to add UNTIL there are four to five high-quality sources available. Re-adding this content would not only violate consensus, but would start an edit war. If you would like to contribute to the discussion on your addition, you are welcome to do so at Talk:Lesbian Space Princess#Something on the online mockery?. As someone with over 1,000 edits, you should know better than to add this section to the reception section of this article. Please do NOT re-add such a badly sourced, unnecessary content to this page any time in the future. If you do, your contribution will be reversed. In solidarity - Historyday01 (talk) 17:32, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

@Historyday01, this is unnecessarily hostile. TonySt  21:54, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

You can say that all you want, but you are adding in a section which is uncalled for and does not help the page. Please get consensus for your addition before re-adding it. In solidarity - Historyday01 (talk) 22:09, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

@Historyday01, I am not the person you left the message for. TonySt  22:13, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought that you were. I fully admit I could have worded it better, but, I am tired of people adding in information like this, so I still support the spirit of what I said, and I added in good faith. I was sending the individual a warning. Next time, I will try to be more neutral and have it be much more concise, but it is too late to do that now. I can't change what I posted.In solidarity - Historyday01 (talk) 22:17, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

@Historyday01 Alright, I'll try my best to add verifiable sources. Next time though, please do remain neutral like @TonySt said; even if you have a valid crash out for me having 1,000 edits, this will definitely leave a bad impression about you. Thank you for your advice. TheSwagger13 (talk) 05:59, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

It isn't about having a "valid crash out" for the number of edits you have at all. I'm only trying to ensure that the rules on here are followed. As such, I implore you to get a consensus for your addition (which uses high-quality reliable sources) before adding it to the reception section boldly. In solidarity - Historyday01 (talk) 11:50, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Alright. Thank you very much. TheSwagger13 (talk) 12:25, 28 August 2026 (UTC)