Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 767

Archive 760

←

Archive 765

Archive 766

Archive 767

Archive 768

Archive 769

Archive 770

Context-awareness الوعي بالسياق

في مجال علوم الحاسوب، يقصد بالوعي بالسياق قدرة جهاز الحاسوب على إدراك البيئة المحيطة و التصرف طبقا لمعطيات تلك البيئة، للسياق أبعاد مختلفة منها البعد المكاني و الزماني بالإضافة إلى سمات مستخدم الحاسوب الشخصية، يرتبط مفهوم الوعي بالسياق أكثر بالأجهزة المحمولة الذكية، لمرونة الأجهزة المحمولة و تنقلها في سياقات بيئية مختلفة، مما يجعل الاستفادة من خاصية الوعي بالسياق في حالته المثلى. ينتمي الوعي بالسياق إلى مفهوم أكبر و هو الحوسبة المنتشرة pervasive computing, تعدد استخدامات الوعي بالسياق منها ما هو في المجال التعليمي و الأنظمة الخبيرة و غيرها.

المراجع: Wikipedia, context awareness

A Context-aware Mobile Application for Cultural Learning, by Hamdy Fadl , Aisha Zulal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.188.144.151 (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Please ask your question in English. Septrillion (talk) 02:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

في مجال علوم الحاسوب، يقصد بالوعي بالسياق قدرة جهاز الحاسوب على إدراك البيئة المحيطة و التصرف طبقا لمعطيات تلك البيئة، للسياق أبعاد مختلفة منها البعد المكاني و الزماني بالإضافة إلى سمات مستخدم الحاسوب الشخصية، يرتبط مفهوم الوعي بالسياق أكثر بالأجهزة المحمولة الذكية، لمرونة الأجهزة المحمولة و تنقلها في سياقات بيئية مختلفة، مما يجعل الاستفادة من خاصية الوعي بالسياق في حالته المثلى. ينتمي الوعي بالسياق إلى مفهوم أكبر و هو الحوسبة المنتشرة

pervasive computing

, تتعدد استخدامات الوعي بالسياق منها ما هو في المجال التعليمي و الأنظمة الخبيرة و غيرها.

المراجع:

Wikipedia, context awareness

A Context-aware Mobile Application for Cultural Learning, by Hamdy Fadl , Aisha Zulal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.188.144.151 (talk) 02:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Again, please speak English! Septrillion (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@154.188.144.151:

من فضلك لا تساهم في اللغة العربية في هذا الإصدار من ويكيبيديا. هذه هي ويكيبيديا الإنجليزية ويجب كتابة جميع المساهمات باللغة الإنجليزية. شكرا لكم.

Please do not contribute in Arabic in this version of Wikipedia. This is the English Wikipedia and all contributions must be written in English. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

ويكيبيديا العربية موجودة على https://ar.wikipedia.org فأنت مدعو للمشاركة فيها. Machine translation of "The Arabic Wikipedia is at https://ar.wikipedia.org you are welcome to contribute there." -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

help

how to insert a image on my userpage? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Kpgjhpjm, please read Help:Pictures. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

HELP

Can someone please give me a step by step way to write an article for submission?

I understand I need sources independent of a subject. But what else?

I need steps in consecutive order so I can do better.

I am writing about myself. I am a Reno Mayor Candidate in the 2018 election. I have my website as well as links to articles about me. Is that enough to be published? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azzishirazi (talk • contribs) 20:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@Azzishirazi: Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. What I have to say is probably disappointing- but I would suggest that you not attempt to write about yourself, for two reasons. One, merely seeking a political office does not merit someone an article. Please see the notability guidelines for politicians at WP:NPOLITICIAN. Unless you meet some other notability guideline,(such as being an athlete, actor, or you have extensive coverage in independent sources that would cause you to meet general notability) I don't think you would merit an article.

Two, it is strongly advised, though not forbidden, that article subjects not write about themselves. Please see the autobiography policy at WP:AUTO. This is because people naturally write favorably about themselves, among other reasons. Drafting an article for submission is the correct procedure if you merit an article- but as I said above, I don't think you do at this time. If you win the election, then you might. 331dot (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

You can also review the process described at Your First Article for more advice- but I would again encourage you to hold off. 331dot (talk) 20:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry, Azzishirazi, but I have nominated Draft:Azzi Shirazi Reno Mayor for deletion, as it reads like a political campaign advert. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

I have deleted the draft, Azzishirazi, because it is simply not acceptable for the encyclopedia. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

AWARDS

How to create a Barnstar? Kpgjhpjm (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Kpgjhpjm: See WP:BARNSTARS for more information. If you have an idea for a new barnstar and want it to be listed with all the others for everyone to use, you should first bring it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards to see if others agree. If you want to create a custom award to give out by yourself, you can use Template:Barnstar. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:07, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello @Kpgjhpjm:, as an additional general tip: when you are looking for information about a specific Wikipedia-related term, a lot of such terms are usually linked to a Wikipedia page with some general information (formatted as WP:search term for Wikipedia-related project pages). For example, links like WP:Infobox, WP:Bots, WP:Barnstars, etc. all link to basic information about the respective Wikipedia terms. But of course feel free to ask additional questions here if you need more specific advice, and editors will be glad to help. GermanJoe (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Kpgjhpjm: Given this is your first day as a Wikipedia editor, too soon to be creating a Barnstar, or for that matter, awarding someone else an existing Barnstar. David notMD (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

I have been editing for 3 months with an IP address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpgjhpjm (talk • contribs) 03:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Understood. David notMD (talk) 02:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

New Page

Will someone do VfL Herrenberg?Stombari2 (talk) 22:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Stombari2

Pages can be asked for at Requested articles. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:10, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Calculating the Hubble Constant

Hi, I have found a very simple way to calculate Hubble's Constant. The equation only requires the speed of light, Pi, and the numerical value of a 'par sec' to be inputted. It 'fixes' Hubble's Constant as 70.98047 kilometres per sec per meg parsec precisely.

This has been tested by a Professor at Imperial College, London, and he found it to be without error. He described the central Hubble 'fixing' equation as 'elegant'.

It is published on Amazon Kindle Books, under the title of 'The Principle of Astrogeometry'.

Because this calculating maths method precisely 'fixes' Hubble's Constant to 70.98047, it directly challenges the 'big bang' and most of theoretical cosmology as false.

I have been attacked by NASA, who I also believe also tried to get it taken down from Kindle. Amazon have assured me no one except myself or my publisher can do that.

Derogatory comments have been posted on Amazon reviews, and I suspect these are from NASA. They did not have the guts to give a name, but chose to

hide behind a number. Their strong opposition (without proper reasons) convinces me also that I have found a basic truth about the universe, and they don't like that, or what it implies.

I apologise for tampering with NASA's Hubble data on Wikipedia, but I feel annoyed at their attitude, and also their Hubble measured results are now

drifting too far from the calculated 70.98047 value. I realise now I was wrong to 'edit' NASA's now 'too high' (at 73.52) Hubble latest measurement.

I wonder if the 70.98047 Hubble calculated value can also be entered in the Wikipedia Hubble chart?

I am not good at Wikipedia entry procedures, and it's too involved for me to 'get my head around', so I hope a Hubble chart entry is possible.

I look forward to your reply.

With very kind regards, David — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Michael Hine (talk • contribs) 11:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

David Michael Hine, extraordinary claims need extraordinary sources, and if NASA itself is telling you there's something fishy about your content, then you definitely need good sources. It also might be worth reading WP:FRINGE. In summary, if you want to make any changes to the Hubble page, you will need reliable sources to justify any changes you make. Wikipedia is all about verifiability, not Truth. If it can't be verified, we can't have it. Primefac (talk) 11:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

David Michael Hine, the Hubble Constant is a measured quantity that is derived from the theorized rate of expansion of the universe and the actual, observed rate. As shown in the Wikipedia table, the "constant" changes over time based on what is observed at the moment and the methodology used to compute the rate. Your claim that you have somehow calculated the value of the constant without even factoring in imperical data makes absolutely no sense to me, and it goes against the current scientific consensus on the subject. As stated above, extraordinary claims need extraordinary sources; original research is not acceptable in Wikipedia articles. -- kewlgrapes (talk, contribs) 11:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Observed values of the Hubble constant

This is another way of determining Hubble's Constant by mathematics only. This method uses simple geometry with a little algebra, and 'fixes' the Hubble Constant to its precise value of 70.98047 kilometres per second per meg parsec. The full description of this 'maths only' method can be found on Amazon Kindle Books under the title of 'The Principle of Astrogeometry'. There are no need for any 'space probe' measurements whatsoever, only basic geometr ==

This maths method gives a numerical answer to the numerical value of Hubble's Constant as 70.98047 as described in 'The Principle of Astrogeometry. How does one 'verify' that??

NASA's claims are only 'observational guesses' regarding this important constant. The fact that each time and method produces a different result indicates observational

errors, depending on how it's measured. Planck got a low Hubble value of 67 -because they used a different method. So how can any of these conflicting

results be verified?? They can't be 'verified' any more than the maths method. At least that falls right in the centre of the various measured results.

It's going to be the truth, as it 'comes out right'. NASA and secular science does not like this, and will go to any length to suppress this.

The Professor at Imperial College said this will happen, due to 'vested interests'. Deceiving the public should never happen in science. It's unfortunately

something that happens often these days. It's something that just adds more lies upon lies.

With very kind regards, David. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Michael Hine (talk • contribs)

As the other users said, extraordinary claims need extraordinary sources. We do not accept original research. Septrillion (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@David Michael Hine: Also, if a theory is inconsistent with experimental evidence, then the theory is not valid. That is how science works, whether you like it or not. --Jasper Deng (talk) 17:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

David Michael Hine, to be perfectly frank, the only way Wikipedia will ever be interested in even taking a look at your theory is if it is first published in a reputable mainstream scientific journal. Short of that, we really don't care. As you have already been told, Wikipedia never publishes original research, it's an encyclopedia, not a journal. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

For what it's worth, @David Michael Hine:, I just took a quick glance at your book and it is quite generous to say that it is not even wrong. Your text is so riddled with hand waving and other nonsense that it has less than zero credibility. The burden of validating a theory lies on you, not us. You did not provide a proper derivation of your equation from accepted physical laws, just presenting it as if it were fact. Well, the fact is that the rational numbers are dense in the reals (and of course, themselves), and thus so is any subfield containing the rationals (if you do not understand what I just said, then you really have no business talking about the geometry of spacetime, which requires topological concepts like these). So I can come up with expressions containing $\pi ^{21}$, a radical sign, and rational numbers that is arbitrarily close to any particular value of H I want. Why your value is any better than the experimental ones was not shown (you are really begging the question). In fact, your choice to run roughshod over dimensional analysis shows even more succinctly that what you purported to have derived has no basis in the actual geometry of spacetime. It is already a waste of time for me to write this rebuttal. So please, do not waste any more of our time by any further advocacy of your text, because you are missing the fundamental basics you need to even have a discussion about Hubble's law.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Trying to correct incorrect information under the direction of the person themselves.

Well that puts the nail in the coffin for Wikipedia.. I was making the changes on direction of Raymone Bain herself.. There is a sector of the public that is on a mission to destroy this lady and they are probably Wikipedia people. I see you do not care to have accurate information and now make me wonder how many other things within this site also contain a slanted view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichGasper (talk • contribs) 17:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse, RichGasper. I see that you tried to add an image to the article with these edits, but I'm not sure that the image is appropriate. Also, do you own the rights to it? The bigger issue, however, is that in order for the article to mention the award, it really needs to cite a reliable, published source for the claim. If you know of such sources, it is best to now recommend them on the article's talk page, by following the instructions at WP:COIREQ. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, RichGasper. Nobody has commented at Talk:Raymone Bain in four years, and that is the proper place to discuss changes to the article. You have an admitted conflict of interest regarding this article, and if she is paying you, you must comply with our mandatory paid editing disclosure. Raymone Bain does not get to control the content of the article, although pointing out inaccuracies is welcomed. This is a neutral encyclopedia, not a social media platform like LinkedIt, Faceboook and Instagram. Accusing your fellow editors of bias without presenting evidence is not a good idea. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

To reinforce the above pertinent comments, RichGasper, please take on board that material should only be added to a Wikipedia article if it is cited to a published Reliable Source. What you (via your anonymous Account) claim (perhaps accurately) that the subject of the article claims (perhaps accurately) is not admissible without such corroboration, because it isn't possible for a reader to confirm it by examining the source. After all, we have no way of knowing that you aren't one of these supposed enemies of Raymone Bain attempting to insert false information about her. Such things do happen, so for her own protection we must insist on citations to third party corroboration as described in those linked instructions. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.217.209.143 (talk) 06:09, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I left notes explaining why I removed the award and the need for reliable referencing to both RichGasper and Mightypub1,(who I suspect is also linked to the subject) on their talkpages a week ago. I also introduced new and reinstated several references, and supported keeping the article at AFD, because I think that in spite of the damage promotional editing is doing to the article the subject herself is notable. So no..noone is out to get anyone. Curdle (talk) 10:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Bass Coast Festival

Hello all, I'm new and have never written an article before. However I was just browsing about an upcoming festival, Bass Coast Festival in Meritt, BC, Canada and realised there is no entry for this festival. Bass Coast has been running for about 10 years now and is mentioned on the town of Meritt's page but does not have its own entry. It is an independent music and arts festival, founded by two women, with no corporate sponsorship and has had some large acts headline over the years. There are several news articles dating back to 2009 on the festival. I did some reading about creating a page, and I believe I have a conflict of interest, although probably minor, which is this: this year I'm one of many artists doing an art installation at the festival. Do you think this is too much of a conflict to have a go at creating a page for the festival? Interested to hear your thoughts and guidance as this is all new to me! Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucymarie23 (talk • contribs) 04:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

If you can find substantial reliable secondary source coverage of the event, the conventional procedure is to submit a completed draft for review through the Articles for Creation process. When you go through the “Writing your first article” wizard, it explains how to add a conflict-of-interest (COI) tag to the Talk page. ー「宜しく 」 クロノ  カム  13:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Languages

Hello everyone! I was wondering how to state the languages I speak on my talk page, I believe it was called babble, but can't seem to find it anymore. Can anyone direct me to this source or paste the code I need to state my language? Thanks! Lightningboltz03 (talk) 13:12, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Lightningboltz03 5/08/18

Hi Lightningboltz03. It's usually stated on your user page User:Lightningboltz03 and not the talk page. See Wikipedia:Babel. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

How do I delete an article?

I used to know how to do it, but now, I forget.

ConnallES (talk) 15:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@ConnallES: - without the appropriate administration tools, you are unable to delete an article directly. Rather, you can use the Articles for Deletion process to nominate the article for deletion where, if a consensus amongst editors forms, it will be removed. To do so, nominate it using these guidelines. For particularly egregious cases, which fulfill the criteria underlined listed here, the article can be speedily deleted, but not by you, as you lack the user rights to do so. Hope this helps, Stormy clouds (talk) 16:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm new to all this, but i want to start creating artist bios. I've started one in my sandbox, i'm just wondering if anyone would like to help me in this quest.

The artist i'm working on currently is Omar Banos, aka Cuco, i know this is all a collaborative effort so i'm just seeing if someone has the time to help me. i'm currently researching all i can and looking for verifiable sources (as it is a requirement i was made to assume) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burnedupwaffle (talk • contribs) 16:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I am dubious, Burnedupwaffle if an artist known for one single will be notable in Wikipedia terms. But if you can supply the sources required, i am willing to work with you.

Below is some advice. Following these steps often gives good results. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 17:00, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

• First, review our guideline on notability, our policy on Verifiability, and our specific guideline on the notability of people. Consider whether your subject clearly meets the standards listed there.
• Second, read how to create Your First Article and referencing for beginners and again consider if you want to go ahead.
• Third, If you have any connection or affiliation with the subject, disclose it in accordance with our guideline on Conflict of interest. If you have been or expect to be paid for making edits, or are making them as part of your job, disclose this according to the strict rules of the Paid-contribution disclosure. This is absolutely required; omitting it can result in you being blocked from further editing.
• Fourth, gather sources. You want independent, professionally published, reliable sources with each discussing the subject in some detail. If you can't find several such sources, stop; an article will not be created! Sources do NOT need to be online, or in English, although it is helpful if at least some are. The "independent" part is vital. Wikipedia does not consider as independent sources such as press releases, or news stories based on press releases, or anything published by the subject itself or an affiliate of the subject. Strictly local coverage is also not preferred. Regional or national newspapers or magazines, books published by mainstream publishers (not self-published), or scholarly journals are usually good. So are online equivalents of these. (Additional sources may verify particular statements but not discuss the subject in detail. But those significant detailed sources are needed first.)
• Fifth, use the article wizard to create a draft under the articles for creation project. This is always a good idea for an inexperienced editor, but in the case of an editor with a conflict of interest it is essential.
• Sixth, use the sources gathered before (and other sources you may find along the way) to write the article. Cite all significant statements to sources. Do not express opinions or judgements, unless they are explicitly attributed to named people or entities, preferably in a direct quotation, and cited to a source. Do not use puffery or marketing-speak. Provide page numbers, dates, authors and titles for sources to the extent these are available. A title is always needed.
• Seventh, when (well perhaps if) your draft is declined, pay attention to the comments of the reviewer, and correct the draft and resubmit it. During this whole process, if you face any unresolvable editing hurdles, or cannot comprehend any editing issue, feel free to post a request at the Teahouse or the help desk and ask the regulars. Repeat this until the draft passes review.

Congratulations, you have now created a valid Wikipedia article. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 17:00, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

how to create, update, uploaded SVG map-images for election-results-wiki-pages, based on previous years' pages-maps

Hello ALL,

for the past few years, I've been transcribing the local council election results to wikipages, referring to SVG-map-images of the overall ward results, from previous years results/pages/other wiki-authors-before-me.

Unfortunately, the first time I 'managed' to copy a older wiki-map-insert image of ward-results, and found a free-online-svg-editor, and paint-fill'd in the latest ward-results-party-colours, and found out how to subsequently "upload back up to wiki's internal 'Commons' image-library" ... I didn't make a note of how-I-did--all-that, and of course - a whole year later, I could not find any easy-to-follow "how to guide", to do it myself/AGAIN - but occasionally, other wiki-editors have "jumped in and done it for me", but without leaving me any how-2-notes /// all I can do is "CLICK-TO-THANK" them.

most recently/previously, I've "THANKED" someone-else for editing the 'this year/not 4yrs ago' election-map for -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2018 & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2015 & — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrenlm (talk • contribs) 15:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2014

however, I still don't know how to replace the previous-four-year-old-2012-map, for the 2016-year-wikipage at -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2016

but I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW, how to-eventually replace the next 2019-year-wikipage, based on the 2015-map, myself -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2019

THANKING EVERYONE IN ADVANCE, Warren — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrenlm (talk • contribs) 15:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Assuming there is an existing electoral-results map from a previous election, with no intervening boundary changes, the process is:

1. Download the existing map onto your computer.
2. Change the colours of the districts to reflect the new results. For a .png image, like the first one you have listed above, this requires a graphics package, but is routine and quite easy. For an .svg file ike the others above, it can be done with a text editor such as Notepad, but the difficulty will vary enormously with how well-structured the svg is. It may be even easier than for a .png, or it may be effectively impossible (in which case you can display the .svg image on your screen, take a screenshot of it as a .png, and work on that).
3. Upload the file you have created, with a new filename.
4. Adjust the copyright field on your upload to reflect the one in the image you started from.

Which of these steps do you need help with? Maproom (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Problem with citation format

I would like to put the following 'British canvas, stretcher and panel suppliers' marks. Part 5, E to N.' in an article as a web reference (in the reference section). If I Google the above I get the URL www.npg.org.uk/assets/files/pdf/research/artists_materials_5_E_to_N.pdf. If I then go to the Cite Template and choose 'cite web', enter the URL, enter the above title as either the 'Website name' or as the 'Title' (along with a page number 14), I get something like the following in the reference section.

British canvas, stretcher and panel suppliers' marks. Part 5, E to N. (PDF). p. 14 [www.npg.org.uk/assets/files/pdf/research/artists_materials_5_E_to_N.pdf www.npg.org.uk/assets/files/pdf/research/artists_materials_5_E_to_N.pdf] Check |url= value (help). Missing or empty |title= (help)

I would appreciate assistance in obtaining an acceptable web reference.BFP1BFP1 (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

I'll have a shot at citing it, the way I would do it (I'm not an expert). Maproom (talk) 08:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Maproom again. Your example works fine.BFP1BFP1 (talk) 10:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@BFP1 and Maproom: A minor poijnt, but one worth noting. The |website= parameter (which is an alias of |work= which i prefer) should nbe the name of the web site, not its domain, unless it has no name but the domain. Thus I would cite the above as

<ref>{{cite web|title=British canvas, stretcher and panel suppliers’ marks. Part 5, E to N|url=https://www.npg.org.uk/assets/files/pdf/research/artists_materials_5_E_to_N.pdf|work=[[National Portrait Gallery, London| National Portrait Gallery website]]|publisher=National Portrait Gallery}}</ref>

which will render as

Many editors get this wrong, and it is something of a pet peeve of mine. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:22, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

References

Thank you both! BFP1BFP1 (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

having problems creating a new page in another language, any help?

Hi, i'm trying to make a page in english on a manga series called "suicide island" but i can't figure out how to really do it, I know it's very basic but i'm having a hard time on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by G12349 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi and welcome G12349. First, enter Suicide Island in the search box in the upper right corner of your screen. You will then see a prompt that says You may create the page "Suicide Island", but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered. In that prompt, Suicide Island will be highlighted in red. Click Suicide Island and you will have a blank space to begin writing the article. When you click the key titled "Publish Page" it will be live. If this is your first article, you may want to try submitting it through Wikipedia:Articles for creation. The article wizard (Wikipedia:Article_wizard) may also be useful. Chetsford (talk) 21:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

To add to what Chetsford says, G12349, I would strongly advise you to start by reading Your first article, and then using articles for creation. While it is perfectly possible to create an article directly as Chetsford says, you had better be confident that you can get it up to a sufficient standard at the very first attempt. Otherwise you are likely to have a very disappointing and frustrating experience. --ColinFine (talk) 03:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Pls help

re User:Zhiyun0630

pls help, don't know why I can't publish my first article. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhiyun0630 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello @Zhiyun0630: the issue is that you appear to be trying to advertise Petop Hotel Supply rather than to write a neutral article. Wikipedia is not Facebook or LinkedIn, we do not allow people to create pages to promote their business. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

3rd party photo attributes

Uploading a photo is easy. Getting it to stay there is not.

I'm trying to give the proper accreditation and copyright information to a third party photo. It has been freely distributed throughout the internet on multiple sites. There's a lot of scattered information about this (and links that won't work on the help pages), but no succinct way to upload something I don't own without it being removed quickly. Basically I just want to have the right line of code to put in so I'm not uploading something multiple times and having it flagged and taken down multiple times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thousandmilemedia (talk • contribs) 11:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Adding the {{OTRS pending}} template will grant time for the holder of the copyright to send in formal permissions. I uploaded a photo yesterday this way. It adds a tag to the file stating “An email containing details of the permission for this file has been sent in accordance with Commons:OTRS.” ー「宜しく 」 クロノ  カム  13:04, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

However, Thousandmilemedia, you should not use {{OTRS pending}} unless you have already obtained agreement from the copyright holder to release the image under a free license. If all you have is that it has been freely distributed throughout the internet on multiple sites, you should not upload it at all, unless by freely distributed you mean it has appeared with a free license applied. See donating copyrighted content and Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for more details. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 17:08, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Very helpful, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thousandmilemedia (talk • contribs) 11:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Why do one syllable words get hyphenated

Why do one syllable words get hyphenated? Reading article on Sally Yates, Michael Flynn’s surname gets hyphenated as Fly-nn. I would never do that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Turtlens (talk • contribs)

Where did you see this exactly? On the mobile website perhaps ? I've been running a test there to see if having auto hyphenation was potentially a useful addition. Auto-hyphenation depends a LOT on the browser. The browser does it all by itself, using a dictionary. I guess here it might have failed. Can you tell me what kind of browser and the version of that browser you use on that device ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 11:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Turtlens, welcome to the Teahouse. It's possible for a page to have an invisible soft hyphen which suggests to browsers where to insert a hyphen at line wrapping but none of the occurrences of "Flynn" in Sally Yates do this. It sounds like your browser is choosing it by itself with no instruction from Wikipedia. I see you posted at the mobile version so I assume you also read the article at the mobile version. Does it happen at the end of a line with your browser splitting "Flynn" between two lines? PrimeHunter (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

I've noticed that at least Safari on my Mac does this as well, and it seems clearly wrong to me. I've therefore filed a webkit ticket in the hopes that they'll at some point fix it. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 11:47, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Turtlens (talk) Probably Safari on iPad, probably Safari 11. Can’t find app version directly. And yes, the hyphen was at end of line. I realize software somewhere was auto-hyphenating, my plaint was that no normal person would hyphenate Flynn’s name like that.

A message on my talk page

Hi everybody!

I have a question. It will be great if you can answer it. Today I saw that I have got a message on my talk page. It was a welcome message sent by a bot. The strange point is the message is in Azerbaijani language, while I do not know any Azerbaijani and consequently have not authored anything in this language. Do you have any idea why I have got such a message?

Please if this question is not relevant here, let me know. Regards, Bkhh (talk) 07:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Good morning, Bkhh, and welcome to our Teahouse. Looking at your talk page on English Wikipedia, I cannot see the welcome message to which you refer, nor as any been removed from there. However, we now have unified logins across all language versions of Wikipedia, meaming that your user name is valid on all other Wikis. Your username is likely to be automatically 'attached' with another language wikipedia when you first visit that site - even by accident. I suspect you did that on 3rd May (see here for a global list of your attached accounts.) A user often receives automatic notification of a welcome message some time after visiting another Wiki - and I suspect this might have been what you saw. Does this make sense? Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 08:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Nick Moyes: Thank you for the response. Well the message is still there but (strange) I myself can see it when I go the Azerbaijani Wikipedia.But if this is is something that can happen accidentally, I am fine with it. It was just a wonder how such a thing is probable and if this is going to affect any article that I submit in future. Bkhh (talk) 09:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The message is there on your azb.wiki talk page, visible to everyone. It is not accidental, it's automatic, and it will not affect any articles you create at en.wiki or azb.wiki. --bonadea contributions talk 09:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Bkhh: azb is the South Azerbaijani Wikipedia. Special:CentralAuth/Bkhh shows your account was created there 3 May because you viewed a page while logged in. A bot posted a welcome to your South Azerbaijani talk page azb:User talk:Bkhh today and you were notified of this. Just ignore it. Many users are confused by automatic welcome messages in languages they don't know. Maybe this practice should be stopped for users who haven't edited the wiki and didn't originally create the account there. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you both! It is now very clear to me.:-) Bkhh (talk) 13:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

I need a superhero

Hi I asking for help on a page there two things I need help with on the page entitled List of highest grossing superhero films the frist thing is peaking the frist list on the page. The second is expending the highest grossing superhero section if anyone fancy help I will put a copy of the lists on the talk page so we can do it there thanks Fanoflionking 17:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanoflionking (talk • contribs)

Hello, Fanoflionking welcome to our Teahouse. Forgive me, but I'm not really sure quite what it is that you are asking help with, though I see you have now added detailed information to the Talk page for that article. That is certainly the right place to discuss issues around that subject. Here at the Teahouse we give general advice on editing. If you need specific help on film-related matters, you might find interested editors at WikiProject Film. Please accept my apologies for not understanding exactly what help you are seeking. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@Fanoflionking: Can I also ask whether you really meant to set your Talk Page to archive all its content when it reaches 10 bytes, and to collapse every message in it? You now have 124 separate archives since last summer, each seeming to have only one collapsed message each. (Changing to maxarchivesize = 10k would be far more reasonable.) Let us know if you need help making your archive work better for you. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The OP wanted 10 threads, and was told how to do that some time ago (WP:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 744#Archive my tal), but didn't want to take any notice of the advice. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:11, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Background information

Good day,

How and where do I edit the WEBSITE section in the BACKROUND INFORMATION of a living person's Wikipedia page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejacobszuk (talk • contribs) 11:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

A link to the official website is typically found either in the infobox or in an external link at the bottom of the page. ー「宜しく 」 クロノ  カム  13:11, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately some infoboxes pick up website addresses from Wikidata, which is outside the control of enwiki. The problems of using Wikidata in this way are under discussion at WP:Wikidata/2018 Infobox RfC. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

help

how to become an assessor(a person who does GA reviews). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpgjhpjm (talk • contribs) 11:19, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello and welcome, Kpgjhpjm. No special permission is needed to review articles for GA status and the instructions to do so can be found here. However, you may want to first focus on better familiarizing yourself with Wikipedia before conducting GA reviews as it appears you have fewer than 200 lifetime edits. Chetsford (talk) 15:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

how

how do you make a Wikipedia page?Good things come in small pakages (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi and welcome Good things come in small pakages. If you're a new editor, you may find it easiest to use the Wikipedia:Article_wizard to create a Wikipedia page. As you only have six edits, however, you may want to closely review Wikipedia:Your first article before beginning. Chetsford (talk) 15:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Fair use of a painting

Hi All. So i'm at a college which commissioned the following painting: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Earth_Creations.jpg . I'm not sure whether it is under fair use. A simple google search has allowed me to find it quite easily on pinterest (and a slideshow which took it from pinterest). The pinterest image seems to be a backup of an article that my university wrote and which has since been made inaccessible. I've sent a request to the university and am awaiting further access to the article.

The artist has very recently passed away, and I am wondering what route to go with the fair use? In the meantime i've taken a deliberately low quality version of the painting for the image used in the articles. While I do have access to the painting in person, i'm not sure whether I should just take a photo and try to make it square; i'm sure it would be a lot of effort to create my own low-quality image. The college has printed post-cards with the image on it. Would I be better to just scan it?

In general, what is the go with fair use for paintings like this kind. This specific painting isn't on any Australian art-registries as far as I can tell, unlike most (but not all) of the artist's work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chillybanana (talk • contribs) 14:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Chillybanana! Well, the first thing to do is probably to ask for the image to be deleted from Commons. You see, Commons does not accept fair-use images; it only accepts images that are truly freely-licensed, and from your description, it doesn't sound like this image is free. I've taken the liberty of nominating it for you. Don't worry, it's an easy mistake to make, and you can still potentially upload and use the image; you just have to go about it in a different way.

What you have to do instead is to upload the image locally, just to the English Wikipedia, which does accept fair-use images. First, make sure your image use follows the non-free use criteria; the restrictions are stricter than what copyright law allows, so read it over and make sure that this qualifies. If it does, then you can upload the image locally using the local file upload wizard; make sure to choose the "This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use" option in the source and copyright information, and fill out the rest of the form. You shouldn't have to worry too much about how hi-res the image is; there is a bot that should come along and automatically scale down the image for you to comply with that element of the criteria. Then, you'll be able to keep using it in the article. Hope that helps! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Edits Continually Removed

I made edits on a biography page of a living person (Shmuly Yanklowitz) which were immediately taken down and repeatedly removed by another Editor "Stop Vandalizing This Page". The edits were factual, not inflammatory, and cited. What is going on here?

FactChecker18 FactChecker18 (talk) 18:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi FactChecker18! Welcome to Wikipedia. As a general rule, when you don't agree with another editor, the best thing to do is to take it to the talk page. That way you can discuss the article and why they don't think that your additions improved it, you can argue why it did, and others can help out with how to proceed. I'd start a new topic there where you explain why you think your edits make the article better. /Julle (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

It might be good to know that Wikipedia typically disapproves of edit warring, i.e. when different parties try to change the text back and forth. You have a better chance of making others listen to you if you don't, but instead focus on the discussion on the talk page – then, when that is resolved, you can make the changes that the consensus on the talk page recommended. /Julle (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The talk page of the article (as linked above) is here (Talk:Shmuly Yanklowitz). That is the best place to discuss your changes, instead of repeating comments in edit summaries or using your own talk page. Dbfirs 19:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

FactChecker18: you asked the same question at the Help Desk, where I advised you to discuss the issue at the article's talk page. You have not done so. Now JulieJulle and Dbfirs have given you the same advice. If you take it, I expect the outcome will be favourable to you: you have been providing references for the material that has been repeatedly deleted. (Though the citation that starts "|url=chrome-extension" probably needs fixing.) Maproom (talk) 22:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

@Maproom, Dbfirs, and Julle: The "FactChecker18" person has now done what you recommended, and has offered their viewpoint on the talk page of the article concerned. Please could you advise what results they should expect from doing so? MPS1992 (talk) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

MPS1992, The user FactChecker18 might reasonably hope that other interested editors will engage with him or her, and discuss the appropriateness of the edits in question, or of the content being in the article, and of the sources now presented on the article talk page, and of such other sources as other editors may cite. Perhaps this will lead to a consensus on how the article should be changed if it should. Should no one choose to engage in discussion after, say, 30 days or more, that would imply that no one objected to the edits. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@DESiegel: thank you! Apologies for slightly leading matters on here, but my concern is that, immediately after posting on the article talk page as suggested here, and without making any other further edits -- other than, allegedly, two from an IP address -- FactChecker18 was indefinitely blocked for being WP:NOTHERE. When I have made enquiries about situations like this in the past, I have been told that the blocked editor merely needs to make an appropriate unblock request on their own talk page, so third parties complaining about it is not useful. Is that the situation, or is there something rather "off" about this? MPS1992 (talk) 00:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

MPS1992 I had not known about the block until you mentioned it. It is true that, in general, blocks should be appealed by the person blocked, not by a third party, but there can be exceptions to that. It is also the case the "Not Here" blocks, in particular, are judgement calls more than most other sorts of blocks. I cannot say why the blocking admin chose to act at that particular time. FactChecker18 had engaged in an edit war, being particularly persistent in reinserting challenged content over repeated reverts. That is never a good idea. I don't know if there were other reasons for the block beyond that war. I think i will ask the blocking admin. But if FactChecker18 requests an unblock, acknowledges previous editing mistakes, and manages to convince whoever handles the unblock request that s/he indents to edit usefully in future, an unblock could easily result. But it is not by any means guaranteed. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

See User talk:JzG#User:FactChecker18 DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

IMDB

If I want to update someones filmography on Wikipedia, do I need to find other sources for each film/TV show, or will their IMDB profile which is already listed at the bottom of the page be good enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danstarr69 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Danstarr69:, individual sourcing is always preferred to blanket IMDB cites because IMDB content is partially generated by its users and the general consensus of editors here is that it is not reliable as a source. I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Blocking anonymous user:Unnamed Forever

Hi I'm Kyle Vasallo of San Roque Parish Church in Pateros, Metro Manila, Philippines. Someone in my page "Santa Marta de Pateros" changing my contribution and replacing them with false facts removing known names such as Poderes de Sta. Marta de Pateros. Please help me block this user thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srppateros (talk • contribs) 10:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

• N.B. - the OP, and the user they are attempting to have blocked, are engaged in a clear edit war regarding Santa Marta de Pateros. As of today, both editors have violated WP:3RR, (evidence) and as such both editors are liable to be blocked for their actions on the article. If someone with the appropriate authority could review this and take action, that would be appreciated. Stormy clouds (talk) 11:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Srppateros, you do not have any "pages" on Wikipedia, and neither does anyone else. Wikipedia publishes encyclopedia articles, and any contribution you make ceases to be your to control as soon as you press the "publish changes" button. If you disagree with a change, you start a discussion on the article's talk page and try to work it out. Note that the subject of the article has no say in its content. Are you in any way connected to the subject of the article? John from Idegon (talk) 22:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

It's pretty clear from their userpage that Srppateros is in fact an WP:ORGNAME. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Possible vandalism reversion

Hello everyone! I was looking through a user's contributions, when some of his edits were marked with the tags [rollback][vandalism]. Do these messages imply vandalism? After reversion, how should I notify/warn users about this (talk page)? Thanks for the consideration! Lightningboltz03 (talk) 16:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Lightningboltz03 5/9/18

Hi, Lightningboltz03, welcome to the Teahouse! Those links are actually from a tool called Twinkle, which is designed to help Wikipedia users revert vandalism. They appear on all revertible edits regardless of how good they are, so their appearance has nothing to do with whether the edit is vandalism or not. Determining whether a particular edit is vandalism or not is a task for the human in the equation. :) As far as notification, if you use the [vandalism] link, Twinkle will notify the user for you. If you use one of the other links, you'll have to notify the user yourself if you want; Twinkle should also provide you a dropdown menu with some templates if you go to their talk page, or you can just write something yourself. Hope this helps! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Question?

how to change rating of an article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpgjhpjm (talk • contribs) 17:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

You had an answer at WP:Help desk#how to assess a article?, which also told you not to ask the same question in more than one place. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:47, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

K - This is your 8th or 9th Teahouse question, and yet you appear to be doing very little in the way of article editing. David notMD (talk) 18:14, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

How to read my full contributions pages

Hello I'm having major trouble finding half of one of my contributions that I wrote down, it comes up in my contributions area but it will only show me the beginning paragraph and not the rest. Please help. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodstockuk95 (talk • contribs) 11:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

It looks like you may have typed it into the edit summary rather than the actual article text window. - X201 (talk) 11:42, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

@Woodstockuk95: It also looks like you pasted a copyright notice in your draft. Wikipedia content is not copyrighted - it is free for reuse, distribution and adaptation, even for commercial purposes. It is also not owned or controlled by any one editor.

If you have copied and pasted the text from a copyrighted source, then this is a copyright violation and isn't permitted. Wikipedia articles cannot use copyrighted text unless the copyright owner agrees to donate the material to Wikipedia. In doing so, they would permanently and irrevocably release it for reuse, distribution and adaptation, as mentioned above. This applies even if you are the copyright holder. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:05, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Drm310, you ought to know that Wikipedia content is copyrighted. While "copyrighted"–"not copyrighted" is a useful heuristic for non-free and free content, it's sometimes misleading or, like here, simply untrue. If anything, misinforming the public about this makes us susceptible of Wikipedia's contents being infringed. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Finnusertop Duly noted, thanks for correcting me on that point. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

How to remove a defunct fake news site from the "List of Fake News Sites"

I bought the domain name of a now-dead fake news site. (It was awful and was often sued.) I bought it because it is similar to my company name. I'm was a journalism major, and it appalls me. Because the site has been inactive for years (and I will eventually have it point to my VALID website), I'd like to have it removed. How? Thank you!

I hope this is the right place to post this question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honestyforever (talk • contribs) 18:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Honestyforever: - what is the name of the website? I can look for an reliable source to verify its closure, and then remove it from the list. Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention. Stormy clouds (talk) 18:20, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse, Honestyforever. I disagree a bit with Stormy clouds. As an encyclopedia, we cover notable things from the past as well as the present. In my opinion, a defunct website should stay on that list, perhaps with a note saying that it has closed down. The proper place to propose and discuss the removal is Talk:List of fake news websites. As the current domain owner, you have a conflict of interest, so please do not remove it yourself. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Cullen328: - apologies for the confusion, it was not my intention to remove the site completely from the article. Rather, to report its closure with a citation, and then transition it to a section for defunct sites, or use a note. My bad for not explaining it fully. Stormy clouds (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

How do I change the name of our organisation on Wikipedia - I am a new user

I am a new user on Wikipedia. How do I change the name of our organization and change some information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.208.217.112 (talk) 15:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. We can help you better if you tell us which article you are referencing. 331dot (talk) 15:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, IP Editor. 331dot is correct that it will help if you tell us what organization. But in any case, you will need to cite one or more reliabel sources showing the correct name and correct info. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:10, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

I would add that if it is your organization, you will need to review the conflict of interest policy at WP:COI and the paid editing policy at WP:PAID before you do anything. 331dot (talk) 19:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)