CAVEAT: all the |show=
parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
editAdministrative backlog
editAIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
edit- 76.64.125.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. SpencerT•C 05:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- 49.180.2.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Velma Larkin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: Please see the comment(s) at the top of filter 1311 before taking any action. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- Arun GKA (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block. Still disruptively adding redlinks and unsourced content despite warnings and a block just two days ago. CNMall41 (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- 70.24.143.31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Line 5 Eglinton: vandalism after recent release of block. Persistent addition of unsourced dates. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Helloworldallayna (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Eric talk 00:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:46:600:4EAD:69E6:CB84:41FA:86E0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Usopp: Also see Roronoa Zoro, adding slurs to articles. miranda :3 01:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:46:600:4EAD:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – block evasion 0f 2601:46:600:9B30:8C9D:F3BA:AFB5:1E95. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tiberriberc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. This is most likely 73.114.22.156 (talk · contribs). Dawnseeker2000 02:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Amxf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Not here. Vandalism and multiple personal attacks directed at me. See my user page [1], my talk page [2], his talk page [3] [4]. User is an SPA restoring socks' edits on an article, but did not answer when asked if he is the same editor. Meters (talk) 03:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Christinasop41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Talk:Cuff It (diff): vandalism after final warning. Binksternet (talk) 04:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- 108.14.115.159 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Break My Soul (diff): vandalism after final warning. WP:LOUTSOCK of Special:Contributions/Christinasop41. Binksternet (talk) 04:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Salebot36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Repeatedly removing content without explaining in the edit summary. Username gives the impression it could be a bot. R0paire-wiki (talk) 04:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:4453:668:1A00:BC85:2012:F331:F99E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Block evasion of 2001:4453:6F3:5D00:0:0:0:0/64 with same behaviour of adding unsourced MOS:TVINTL materials. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:4453:668:1A00:92:3880:84D8:811F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Block evasion of 2001:4453:6F3:5D00:0:0:0:0/64 with same behaviour of adding unsourced MOS:TVINTL materials. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- 131.150.182.112 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Project GAMMA (diff): vandalism after final warning. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- 112.198.97.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Nothing but rapid-fire image vandalism on health related articles. Obvious block evasion of 6-month block on 112.198.104.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). Meters (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- JusticeForChester (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – disruptive editing on the Mike Shinoda page; also the username sounds inappropriate because it's referring to Chester Bennington. Mxhyn16 (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
---|---|
User requested | 1 |
Empty articles | 0 |
Nonsense pages | 0 |
Spam pages | 1 |
Importance or significance not asserted | 2 |
Other candidates | 6 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
---|
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 29 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Angelofdarknessunderworld (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Tayloredwebsites (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Usernames are cool let me use this name jeez wiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
edit- PrekCali (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. Named after WW2 Axis collaborator Prek Cali. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 03:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Skibbidi 1233334 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Daisytheduck quack quack 00:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hollowoaxmusic (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Wikishovel (talk) 03:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Salebot36 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps on changing the location again and again without any source or reason resulting in edit warring. Thewikizoomer (talk) 04:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Thewikizoomer: How is it known that the IP is wrong? The infobox at Vijayawada says its International Airport is Vijayawada Airport. Johnuniq (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- But the location is Gannavaram though Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. AmritR012 (talk) 10:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wisdom-inc. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Extended confirmed protection. Continued sock evasion in article. oncamera (talk page) 17:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Pumpkin at10 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 21:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Paulioua (talk · contribs) blocked by Asilvering. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: An IP made vandalism despite the fact the sources are clear that he became special assistant on 12 August, then have been given adviser status on 16 August Panam2014 (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant unexplained removal of material by anon IPs. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant and unexplained removal of material by anon IPs. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruptive editing from a lot of editors, I can't even figure out when the last good edit was. miranda :3 02:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy🍁 03:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: For the past few months and years this page gets vandalized by IP address accounts and I just think this page deserves some protection for that. Whatcha gotta say? :) -ThaFDA (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 04:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content and vandalism editing by User:42.153.130.67– IP keeps on changing the by changing silly things again and again without any source or reason resulting in edit warring. Hesselink Bagusekaf07 (talk) 04:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
=== [[Mees Hilgers === * Mees Hilgers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)]]
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I suggest adding to 'War Crimes' a section about the Sde Teiman detention camp. The use of concentration/torture camps is a very notable war crime and an important fact as it pertains to the ceasefire negotiations regarding hostage swaps. It is also relevant as many have been taken from Gaza and are being tortured under pretext of "interrogation." Jdftba (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Under "casaulties and losses" Under "Syria" Add these events: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/israel-carries-intense-strikes-central-syria-killing-4-113503912 https://apnews.com/article/israel-syria-strikes-hama-iran-hezbollah-916f12c8f1fae066439733c2c0ba9980 Adjust total death toll accordingly. Beri98 (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
edit
15 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC) |
14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Account creator
edit- TMorata (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
On Sept 21st I will be offering a training to beginner editors during the World Congress of Audiology in Paris We will introduce participants to Global Audiology. I anticipate I will need to allow the creation of some new accounts at the same time, so I ask for this user right from Sept 21 to 23rd. I already hold this permission with both Portuguese and testwiki. Thank you TMorata (talk) 14:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
edit- SerChevalerie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Chaotic Enby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting autopatrolled for Chaotic Enby. Trusted user who already has NPP rights, articles are consistently well-written and well-sourced. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Jebiguess (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Created 407 articles, and only 2 were deleted—1 was soft deleted earlier in 2022, and the latest one was deleted per WP:A10, which is not a major issue. 99.5% or 405 of his articles are still live. I came across him while patrolling New Pages. I believe he is one of the users for whom this right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Brandon Downes (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting autopatrolled rights to help with the backlog I create when making articles related to major sporting events mainly covering athletics but sometimes also cycling and swimming. The articles I create are/will be individual sports results pages connected to large sports events like the Olympics/Paralympics/Summer University games/World Championships etc. I've had no issues with the articles I have created and they are normally reviewed very quickly however when a competition can have 20-40 events meaning 20-40 pages this small amount of time to review could be saved if I had autopatrolled. Brandon Downes (talk) 03:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
File mover
edit- Muhandes (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I upload image files quite regularly, and occasionally notice (or make) typos that I would like to correct with non-controversial moves. I thought it's about time I stop bothering other editors and get the permission myself. Muhandes (talk) 11:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
edit
- Cavarrone (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have over 90,000 edits since 2008, over 5,000 pages created, clean log, no ANI reports or significant controversies etc. I was going to put a request at WP:RM/TR when I realised I am probably experienced enough to request and use page mover rights without the risk of making mistakes. I do not plan to close WP:RM, except if I stumble on them and they are really clear-cut cases, and would basically just use moving rights to make non-controversial moves. --Cavarrone 09:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- James Allison (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing since 2005 with over 15,000 edits without incident. I am requesting this permission so I am able to perform round robin moves when necessary. I am also open to assisting at WP:RM. James (talk/contribs) 21:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- @James Allison: I'm not seeing any problems, but you don't really have a lot of recent activity regarding moves. Do you expect to get much use out of this permission? Elli (talk | contribs) 19:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Request withdrawn. James (talk/contribs) 15:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
edit- Jy Sandford (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I edit AusPol pages, and I'd like to be able to approve edits made to them :) No stress if I need more of a track record of edits - I totally understand. Jy Sandford (talk) 23:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 94 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 23:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. With all due respect, 94 edits to the mainspace is simply not enough editing experience for me to determine whether you'll be able to use the right appropriately. Please spend a few months establishing a track record of positive contributions before reapplying, thanks. -Fastily 23:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- MarkRosenbaum (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Heyo, I'm writing to request the Pending Change Reviewer permission. I'm well versed in the use of tools such as RCPatrol and after reading Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes I believe I'd be a good fit for the Pending changes reviewer permission. Thanks for your consideration, Mark MarkRosenbaum (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Heyo, Just wanted to add that I was recently granted the rollback permission. MarkRosenbaum (talk) 17:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Elli (talk | contribs) 23:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Kingsmasher678 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to be able to help with the backlogs present in this area, and feel that I have enough experience to help out. I feel that my track record in this general area is quite good. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 19:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- TyphoonAmpil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
See Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback#User:TyphoonAmpil i anti-vandalism edits 🌀TyphoonAmpil Tools 04:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had an account for 17 days. — MusikBot talk 04:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- JuxtaposedJacob (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hey, Just want to help with the backlog in this area specifically by helping new users contribute to Wikipedia. Thanks so much! JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 02:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
edit- Vasil3fonov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello to anyone concerned.
I am requesting rollbacker rights, having done so before without the knowledge of having to warn users after undoing their edits, and I believe I now have a substantial track record of doing so ever since promising to fulfill that role. I now also have a good idea of how to use tools such as Twinkle effectively, which have greatly helped my work against vandalism.
Thanks for taking your time to read my request. Best regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 17:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are still consistently failing to notify editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- The three sole examples of me not doing it from the past month and a half, which you are referring to, are the same single person, making the same changes over and over to player statistics tables through different IPs for the past 12+ months. I looked up different pages that match the categories of the ones I've undone, and the user has been warned multiple times, to no effect, making the same edit again and again. They then stop editing from that IP and start doing the same exact edits from a new one. They have been warned multiple times by multiple users for the exact same edit yet still repeatedly undo other users' work without any explanation when they are clearly in the wrong. Examples of this are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, etc., etc.; some of those edits were way over a year ago, and I am only referencing the ones that the user has been warned for (there are thousands of other such cases from tens, if not hundreds of different IPs) that they haven't been warned for by users who revert their edits. In this case, I have decided that reaching out to the user is futile and I believe that in such extreme examples, that should be an option. What is the point of a warning the user when it is clearly proven that they will keep doing it from new IPs and never read the original talk page anyway?
- I have not failed to warn a single other user for the time period since I had promised to do so, which I believe is the whole point of rollback rights in the first place. I strongly believe that this specific, and definitely irregular, case is not sufficient to justify the denial of the rights. However, this is just my point of view on the topic and if you really believe that I am in the wrong and that I should repeatedly (
and foolishly) warn the same user for the same thing that they will not stop doing, and expecting a different result, then maybe I do not really need rollback rights in the end if that is to be your final verdict. - Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- You're clearly missing the point. The notifications aren't for you, they're of value to the patrolling admin and anyone interested in curtailing/tracking abuse. If you had tried the tools I linked above, you would know that notifying an editor takes a grand total of 3 clicks and 5 seconds. If that's still too much effort for you, then it's high time for you to explore other aspects of Wikipedia that don't involve counter-vandalism. The very fact that you spent more time to compose this nonsensical essay for the sake of argument strongly suggests to me that you are not ready for rollback. Nonetheless, I have reviewed your contributions since your previous request and you haven't made enough reverts for me to determine whether you'd be able to use rollback correctly. -Fastily 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I can totally agree with the final sentence and I think that would've sufficed. I can't figure out how to use Twinkle and that's on my end. When I use the "rollback" or "vandalism" button, it just opens the user's talk page and I need to manually put in the specific warning template each time. That's more effort than you've pointed out and not something I'm willing to do in cases such as the one you've labelled "nonsensical". And now that I've mentioned the "case", that user is already reverting my reverts of their edits despite the issued warnings on their other IPs' talk pages, but I suppose that's not something that can be dealt with by any available tools to me or the admins.
- And just to be clear, I wasn't arguing for the sake of it, I really do believe I've missed the point of rollback in general, so I will withdraw my request and won't submit one in the future. Vasil3fonov (talk) 20:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's not accurate. We have multiple avenues for dealing with long term abusers, namely WP:AIV, WP:SPI, WP:RFPP. According to your edit history, I see you've made a handful of requests to RFPP, a single edit to AIV, and no edits to SPI. I do suggest you try those first before throwing up your hands and proclaiming that all is lost. To be clear, I'm happy to grant you rollback if you can both demonstrate a need for it and understanding of how to use it appropriately. Apologies if I sounded harsh above. If you do decide to take up RecentChanges patrol, then I hope to see you back here. Closing as Not done per your request. -Fastily 00:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- I will look into other ways to counter the issue then, thanks for the advice. And I see my previous mistake, it's definitely not your fault for replying in that way, so no offence taken. Cheers, Vasil3fonov (talk) 07:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's not accurate. We have multiple avenues for dealing with long term abusers, namely WP:AIV, WP:SPI, WP:RFPP. According to your edit history, I see you've made a handful of requests to RFPP, a single edit to AIV, and no edits to SPI. I do suggest you try those first before throwing up your hands and proclaiming that all is lost. To be clear, I'm happy to grant you rollback if you can both demonstrate a need for it and understanding of how to use it appropriately. Apologies if I sounded harsh above. If you do decide to take up RecentChanges patrol, then I hope to see you back here. Closing as Not done per your request. -Fastily 00:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- You're clearly missing the point. The notifications aren't for you, they're of value to the patrolling admin and anyone interested in curtailing/tracking abuse. If you had tried the tools I linked above, you would know that notifying an editor takes a grand total of 3 clicks and 5 seconds. If that's still too much effort for you, then it's high time for you to explore other aspects of Wikipedia that don't involve counter-vandalism. The very fact that you spent more time to compose this nonsensical essay for the sake of argument strongly suggests to me that you are not ready for rollback. Nonetheless, I have reviewed your contributions since your previous request and you haven't made enough reverts for me to determine whether you'd be able to use rollback correctly. -Fastily 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are still consistently failing to notify editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- TyphoonAmpil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello i have Over 200 mainspace edits. Im patrolling Special:RecentChanges. i use Ultraviolet. i Don't have edit warring. i Meet Criteria for Rollback. 🌀TyphoonAmpil Tools 03:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you started actively editing 2 weeks ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month gaining experience editing Wikipedia before assigning you advanced permissions. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 06:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- TheWikiToby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have a nine or so months of experience on Wikipedia now. If you check my editing history, you will also see my experience at fighting vandalism. I think it would be very useful to have the rollback tool. Thanks. Note that I am also a pending changes reviewer. TheWikiToby (talk) 19:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you started actively reverting vandalism a little over a week ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend more time gaining experience fighting vandalism before assigning you advanced permissions. Keep up the good work, and consider reapplying in a month. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 21:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
editPolicies and links
DYK
editCount of DYK Hooks | ||
Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
---|---|---|
July 18 | 3 | 1 |
July 19 | 1 | |
July 25 | 2 | 1 |
July 26 | 2 | |
July 27 | 1 | 1 |
July 28 | 4 | |
July 29 | 2 | |
July 30 | 1 | |
August 1 | 3 | |
August 3 | 1 | |
August 4 | 1 | |
August 5 | 4 | 1 |
August 6 | 4 | 2 |
August 7 | 4 | 4 |
August 8 | 2 | 1 |
August 9 | 1 | |
August 10 | 8 | 5 |
August 11 | 5 | 2 |
August 12 | 4 | 4 |
August 13 | 2 | 2 |
August 14 | 9 | 6 |
August 15 | 6 | 5 |
August 16 | 6 | 3 |
August 17 | 8 | 4 |
August 18 | 9 | 8 |
August 19 | 7 | 3 |
August 20 | 5 | 3 |
August 21 | 3 | 1 |
August 22 | 5 | 4 |
August 23 | 9 | 2 |
August 24 | 7 | 1 |
August 25 | 10 | 4 |
August 26 | 5 | 2 |
August 27 | 13 | 9 |
August 28 | 14 | 6 |
August 29 | 16 | 6 |
August 30 | 21 | 7 |
August 31 | 9 | 6 |
September 1 | 7 | 5 |
September 2 | 9 | 4 |
September 3 | 7 | 3 |
September 4 | 7 | 5 |
September 5 | 5 | 3 |
September 6 | 7 | 4 |
September 7 | 9 | |
September 8 | 8 | 4 |
September 9 | 9 | 2 |
September 10 | 7 | 2 |
September 11 | 6 | 1 |
September 12 | 1 | |
Total | 299 | 137 |
Last updated 09:25, 12 September 2024 UTC Current time is 05:20, 13 September 2024 UTC [refresh] |