User talk:Charles Matthews/Archive 44
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Charles Matthews. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 40 | ← | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | → | Archive 48 |
Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018
Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018
 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Around 2.7 million Wikidata items have an illustrative image. These files, you might say, are Wikimedia's stock images, and if the number is large, it is still only 5% or so of items that have one. All such images are taken from Wikimedia Commons, which has 50 million media files. One key issue is how to expand the stock. Indeed, there is a tool. WD-FIST exploits the fact that each Wikipedia is differently illustrated, mostly with images from Commons but also with fair use images. An item that has sitelinks but no illustrative image can be tested to see if the linked wikis have a suitable one. This works well for a volunteer who wants to add images at a reasonable scale, and a small amount of SPARQL knowledge goes a long way in producing checklists.  It should be noted, though, that there are currently 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons, of which P18 for the basic image is just one. WD-FIST prompts the user to add signatures, plaques, pictures of graves and so on. There are a couple of hundred monograms, mostly of historical figures, and this query allows you to view all of them. commons:Category:Monograms and its subcategories provide rich scope for adding more. And so it is generally. The list of properties linking to Commons does contain a few that concern video and audio files, and rather more for maps. But it contains gems such as P3451 for "nighttime view". Over 1000 of those on Wikidata, but as for so much else, there could be yet more. Go on. Today is Wikidata's birthday. An illustrative image is always an acceptable gift, so why not add one? You can follow these easy steps: (i) log in at https://tools.wmflabs.org/widar/, (ii) paste the Petscan ID 6263583 into https://tools.wmflabs.org/fist/wdfist/ and click run, and (iii) just add cake. 
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Charles,
- Is there a list of the 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons images? You wrote:
It should be noted, though, that there are currently 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons...
- Also if it's not too late to update the post, could you hyperlink "53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons" to point to that list?
- Thanks,
cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 15:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
@Cmglee: It's actually in the next paragraph: this query. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Excellent; thanks! cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 20:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Old wikitext editor retirement
The deprecation described in this announcement might affect you - I think you might be using that old toolbar? Deryck C. 11:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. A button went missing, so a sign of the times, it seems. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Dilemma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dilemma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilemma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paradoctor (talk) 01:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Charles, please check this problem
Hi Charles, please check vandalizing edits made by user Moalli [1] who has continuously deleted the entire sourced content of a section in the article Cantonese intentionally [2] (31 October), [3] (14 November), under the mask of Clean up section despite having this user's vandalism reverted. Thanks. 153.205.14.229 (talk) 21:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Charles Matthews. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Metallic currency listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metallic currency. Since you had some involvement with the Metallic currency redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018
| Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
GLAM ♥ data — what is a gallery, library, archive or museum without a catalogue? It follows that Wikidata must love librarians. Bibliography supports students and researchers in any topic, but open and machine-readable bibliographic data even more so, outside the silo. Cue the WikiCite initiative, which was meeting in conference this week, in the Bay Area of California.  In fact there is a broad scope: "Open Knowledge Maps via SPARQL" and the "Sum of All Welsh Literature", identification of research outputs, Library.Link Network and Bibframe 2.0, OSCAR and LUCINDA (who they?), OCLC and Scholia, all these co-exist on the agenda. Certainly more library science is coming Wikidata's way. That poses the question about the other direction: is more Wikimedia technology advancing on libraries? Good point. Wikimedians generally are not aware of the tech background that can be assumed, unless they are close to current training for librarians. A baseline definition is useful here: "bash, git and OpenRefine". Compare and contrast with pywikibot, GitHub and mix'n'match. Translation: scripting for automation, version control, data set matching and wrangling in the large, are on the agenda also for contemporary library work. Certainly there is some possible common ground here. Time to understand rather more about the motivations that operate in the library sector.
Account creation is now open on the ScienceSource wiki, where you can see SPARQL visualisations of text mining.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Feedback a good link is last week videos from SWIB Semantic Web in Libraries in Bonn playlist - Salgo60 (talk) 12:06, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
::Ah, thanks! Charles Matthews (talk) 12:19, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Background color for Facto Post
Since the change in background color from green to blue I have been unable to read Facto Post without first editing it to remove the color. The contrast between such a dark blue and the black text is too small, as is the contrast with the blue wikilinks. Please reconsider the color. Thankyou. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I think it must depend on the browser. Charles Matthews (talk) 18:36, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've tried two other browsers now with the same effect. The color setting is just an instruction passed on to the hardware to set pixel intensities. The browser shouldn't matter. But a user's screen settings will. I am old so I need a bright screen. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Chamberlain (poet), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Your objective opinion is needed
Hi. It's been a long time, I think, since we've spoken. I hope everything is going well. Years ago, you participated in some of the initiatives intended to resolve the problem of a serial policy violator. For some time now, I've been having trouble with an editor who's been exhibiting similar persistent behavior, and he seems to be escalating. I could really use your help. I've outlined the evidence of his behavior here. A summary list of his behavior is located near the bottom of that post, beneath the heading "Summary", in case you want to read that first. If you could offer your objective opinion on that evidence, I would appreciate it. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:25, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
@Nightscream: Some better approaches needed. Draft articles, before the event, can reasonably be written in the Draft: namespace. Talk pages for articles/drafts are the appropriate places for suggesting improvements, and coming to some consensus. I find it is generally better to let minor stuff go by, rather than making it a matter of principle, which is not to say that I'm agreeing with them. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- It's not minor. This guy has been causing trouble with his arbitrary changes, his misrepresentation of policy/guidelines and various other behaviors since he started editing the South Park articles. It's not going to stop, and I dont' see how writing drafts has anything to do with it. Nightscream (talk) 14:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
I understand that there is a dispute. I don't feel that ANI necessarily resolves disputes, and I have much more experience of the ArbCom approach to which you made some reference above. I certainly got it that you are annoyed, but one thing I recommend is to de-escalate. Look, these things can become a time sink, as we all know. There are expectations of everyone who edits here, and they are symmetric: the two parties in a dispute can expect to hear the same things from me. You only have to look around the world today, to see that the divisive and the adversarial can be pretty unhelpful. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
IETF/ISOC
As discussed: IETF Newcomers Presentation (2016) Zazpot (talk) 18:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
DOAJ
I think you made a note of this, but in case not: Directory of Open Access Journals. Zazpot (talk) 19:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Zazpot:, thanks, that was a helpful steer. On this topic, do you consider List of open-access journals satisfies WP:LSC? Charles Matthews (talk) 20:57, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- List of open-access journals seems to me to satisfy WP:LSC, except perhaps in that none of its entries possess footnotes justifying their inclusion. WP:LSC states,
In cases where the membership criteria are subjective or likely to be disputed ... it is especially important that inclusion be based on reliable sources given with inline citations for each item.
- There has been some discussion, but not necessarily "dispute"; nor do the membership criteria seem to me, at the moment, to be sufficiently subjective to warrant serious concern. So, the article (well, list) is probably OK. I am quite tired, though; it is possible I have overlooked or misunderstood something. If you feel that I did overlook or misunderstand something, please ping me and I will take another look when feeling fresher! Zazpot (talk) 22:19, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- List of open-access journals seems to me to satisfy WP:LSC, except perhaps in that none of its entries possess footnotes justifying their inclusion. WP:LSC states,
Books & Bytes, Issue 31
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
- OAWiki
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Precious
plaudits for historic bios and kindness
Thank you for quality articles such as biographies in neglected fields, working from lists such as English and Welsh endowed schools, such as Giovanni Francisco Vigani and François de Pâris, for thoughts about COI, for activity at meetups and for fighting systematic bias, for earning plaudits for kindness, - Charles (repeating from ten years ago): you are an awesome Wikipedian!
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.6
Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 Participation: This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Now 100 supportersAt 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100! A demo wiki is up and running!You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!
Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018
| Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Zotero is free software for reference management by the Center for History and New Media: see Wikipedia:Citing sources with Zotero. It is also an active user community, and has broad-based language support.  Besides the handiness of Zotero's warehousing of personal citation collections, the Zotero translator underlies the citoid service, at work behind the VisualEditor. Metadata from Wikidata can be imported into Zotero; and in the other direction the zotkat tool from the University of Mannheim allows Zotero bibliographies to be exported to Wikidata, by item creation. With an extra feature to add statements, that route could lead to much development of the focus list (P5008) tagging on Wikidata, by WikiProjects. There is also a large-scale encyclopedic dimension here. The construction of Zotero translators is one facet of Web scraping that has a strong community and open source basis. In that it resembles the less formal mix'n'match import community, and growing networks around other approaches that can integrate datasets into Wikidata, such as the use of OpenRefine. Looking ahead, the thirtieth birthday of the World Wide Web falls in 2019, and yet the ambition to make webpages routinely readable by machines can still seem an ever-retreating mirage. Wikidata should not only be helping Wikimedia integrate its projects, an ongoing process represented by Structured Data on Commons and lexemes. It should also be acting as a catalyst to bring scraping in from the cold, with institutional strengths as well as resourceful code.
Diversitech, the latest ContentMine grant application to the Wikimedia Foundation, is in its community review stage until January 2.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Audland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magdalen College School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Captions in January
Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)
My apologies if this is a duplicate message for you, it is being sent to multiple lists which you may be signed up for.
Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...
Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 January or Thursday, 10 January 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:
- Read over the help page for using captions - I wrote the page on mediawiki.org because captions are available for any MediaWiki user, feel free to host/modify a copy of the page here on Commons.
- Test out using captions on Beta Commons.
- Leave feedback about the test on the captions test talk page, if you have anything you'd like to say prior to release.
Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.
Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Parturient listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Parturient. Since you had some involvement with the Parturient redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samuel Butler (cricketer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dunkerton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Place names has been nominated for discussion
Category:Place names, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Comments appreciated. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- My comment is that I don't think DYKs should be such a big deal. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Great French War listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Great French War. Since you had some involvement with the Great French War redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ribbet32 (talk) 05:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Savoy Conference has been nominated for discussion
Category:Savoy Conference, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:13, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 20 – 31 January 2019
| Facto Post – Issue 20 – 31 January 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Recently Jimmy Wales has made the point that computer home assistants take much of their data from Wikipedia, one way or another. So as well as getting Spotify to play Frosty the Snowman for you, they may be able to answer the question "is the Pope Catholic?" Possibly by asking for disambiguation (Coptic?). Headlines about data breaches are now familiar, but the unannounced circulation of information raises other issues. One of those is Gresham's law stated as "bad data drives out good". Wikipedia and now Wikidata have been criticised on related grounds: what if their content, unattributed, is taken to have a higher standing than Wikimedians themselves would grant it? See Wikiquote on a misattribution to Bismarck for the usual quip about "law and sausages", and why one shouldn't watch them in the making. Wikipedia has now turned 18, so should act like as adult, as well as being treated like one. The Web itself turns 30 some time between March and November this year, per Tim Berners-Lee. If the Knowledge Graph by Google exemplifies Heraclitean Web technology gaining authority, contra GIGO, Wikimedians still have a role in its critique. But not just with the teenage skill of detecting phoniness. There is more to beating Gresham than exposing the factoid and urban myth, where WP:V does do a great job. Placeholders must be detected, and working with Wikidata is a good way to understand how having one statement as data can blind us to replacing it by a more accurate one. An example that is important to open access is that, firstly, the term itself needs considerable unpacking, because just being able to read material online is a poor relation of "open"; and secondly, trying to get Creative Commons license information into Wikidata shows up issues with classes of license (such as CC-BY) standing for the actual license in major repositories. Detailed investigation shows that "everything flows" exacerbates the issue. But Wikidata can solve it.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of conjectures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shafarevich conjecture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Sobia Tahir
Hello, Charles Matthews. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sobia Tahir".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Note to self: fr:Sobia Tahir. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
The Linux Command Line, etc
William Shotts's book; helpful, I hope: http://www.linuxcommand.org/tlcl.php/ Zazpot (talk) 13:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Timothy Richard Matthews
Hello, Charles Matthews. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Timothy Richard Matthews".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Watts (translator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 32
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- New and expanded partners
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019
| Facto Post – Issue 21 – 28 February 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Systematic reviews are basic building blocks of evidence-based medicine, surveys of existing literature devoted typically to a definite question that aim to bring out scientific conclusions. They are principled in a way Wikipedians can appreciate, taking a critical view of their sources.  Ben Goldacre in 2014 wrote (link below) "[...] : the "information architecture" of evidence based medicine (if you can tolerate such a phrase) is a chaotic, ad hoc, poorly connected ecosystem of legacy projects. In some respects the whole show is still run on paper, like it's the 19th century." Is there a Wikidatan in the house? Wouldn't some machine-readable content that is structured data help? Most likely it would, but the arcana of systematic reviews and how they add value would still need formal handling. The PRISMA standard dates from 2009, with an update started in 2018. The concerns there include the corpus of papers used: how selected and filtered? Now that Wikidata has a 20.9 million item bibliography, one can at least pose questions. Each systematic review is a tagging opportunity for a bibliography. Could that tagging be reproduced by a query, in principle? Can it even be second-guessed by a query (i.e. simulated by a protocol which translates into SPARQL)? Homing in on the arcana, do the inclusion and filtering criteria translate into metadata? At some level they must, but are these metadata explicitly expressed in the articles themselves? The answer to that is surely "no" at this point, but can TDM find them? Again "no", right now. Automatic identification doesn't just happen. Actually these questions lack originality. It should be noted though that WP:MEDRS, the reliable sources guideline used here for health information, hinges on the assumption that the usefully systematic reviews of biomedical literature can be recognised. Its nutshell summary, normally the part of a guideline with the highest density of common sense, allows literature reviews in general validity, but WP:MEDASSESS qualifies that indication heavily. Process wonkery about systematic reviews definitely has merit.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Just to let you know, this draft is stale and is eligible for a G13 speedy deletion. -- Dolotta (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Charles Henry Blake
Hello, Charles Matthews. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charles Henry Blake".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:12, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
John Cornford Family
Hello. My husband’s uncle was John Cornford and I wanted to say hello. I have some questions about historical family members and I wonder if you might be able to help me. Let me know a good place to message. Thanks, Sandra Kethertomalkuth (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
- You can mail me from the sidebar link. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Zarghoona Hassan
Hello, Charles Matthews. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zarghoona Hassan".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremiah Smith (Manchester Grammar School)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jeremiah Smith (Manchester Grammar School) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Smith,_Jeremiah_(1771-1854)_(DNB00). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sheldybett (talk) 07:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Sheldybett: Contested. The text is old: see the attribution link at the bottom. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Just a heads up, I have just moved a speedy deletion notice because I accidentally thought is a copyright infringement that it's clearly not for purpose. Sorry for the inconvenience. Sheldybett (talk) 08:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- OK, good faith error then. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Spelling error
In the February issue of the Facto Post there is a spelling error in the last rectangle of the image File:PRISMA flow diagram.jpg. I don't think it is a big deal but thought you might like to know. Best Regards, Barbara ✐✉ 02:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. It is a JPG, and so not so easy to edit, I guess. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019
| Facto Post – Issue 22 – 28 March 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Half a century ago, it was the era of the mainframe computer, with its air-conditioned room, twitching tape-drives, and appearance in the title of a spy novel Billion-Dollar Brain then made into a Hollywood film. Now we have the cloud, with server farms and the client–server model as quotidian: this text is being typed on a Chromebook. The term Applications Programming Interface or API is 50 years old, and refers to a type of software library as well as the interface to its use. While a compiler is what you need to get high-level code executed by a mainframe, an API out in the cloud somewhere offers a chance to perform operations on a remote server. For example, the multifarious bots active on Wikipedia have owners who exploit the MediaWiki API. APIs (called RESTful) that allow for the GET HTTP request are fundamental for what could colloquially be called "moving data around the Web"; from which Wikidata benefits 24/7. So the fact that the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint at query.wikidata.org has a RESTful API means that, in lay terms, Wikidata content can be GOT from it. The programming involved, besides the SPARQL language, could be in Python, younger by a few months than the Web. Magic words, such as occur in fantasy stories, are wishful (rather than RESTful) solutions to gaining access. You may need to be a linguist to enter Ali Baba's cave or the western door of Moria (French in the case of "Open Sesame", in fact, and Sindarin being the respective languages). Talking to an API requires a bigger toolkit, which first means you have to recognise the tools in terms of what they can do. On the way to the wikt:impactful or polymathic modern handling of facts, one must perhaps take only tactful notice of tech's endemic problem with documentation, and absorb the insightful point that the code in APIs does articulate the customary procedures now in place on the cloud for getting information. As Owl explained to Winnie-the-Pooh, it tells you The Thing to Do.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- I have done my best to ignore the topics in these past few issues, but with a good intro and links to further reading from a trusted source I have run out of excuses :) Thank you Charles, sincerely, cygnis insignis 12:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- "Just doing my job." @Cygnis insignis:, you are very welcome. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Complete Works for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Complete Works is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Complete Works until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --woodensuperman 09:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Cudworth
Hi Charles, Thanks for your notification about Ralph Cudworth (died 1624). After spending ever so many hours on the four articles about Ralph Cudworth, its offshoot Ralph Cudworth (died 1624), James Cudworth (colonist) and Damaris Cudworth Masham, over several years, they are now all being furiously tweaked and re-tweaked, and many bold headings added in and careful wordings "compressed", without very substantial content improvement (or verification) by an editor without a userpage - who has so far declined to communicate with me in any way at all (despite an opening gambit on my part), and seems determined to apply his/her reformations to nobody else's work but mine. That, of course, is Wikipedia, but it has made me feel rather disheartened with those articles altogether. Personally I prefer sentences to contain verbs (and I don't think "Snr" is an improvement on "the elder"). But to complain could only cause trouble, so I just keep hold of my own versions for my own use and turn elsewhere. There are plenty of other centuries to keep one amused on a rainy Sunday in the shadow of Bigod's Tower. Thanks again, and kind regards, Eebahgum (talk) 15:00, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Eebahgum: That's someone without a great deal of editing experience, so AGF applies. Thanks for alerting me. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Fuzon (Blake) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ElectroChip123 (talk) 02:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi Charles Matthews since you created the article: is this Richard Rouse Bloxam (Q50888399) the father of John Rouse Bloxam? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Lotje: Correct. The date of death agrees with the ODNB article about John Rouse Bloxam, and that article also says the father was rector of Brinklow, which is what the CCEd link says. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019
| Facto Post – Issue 23 – 30 April 2019
The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
 Talk of cloud computing draws a veil over hardware, but also, less obviously but more importantly, obscures such intellectual distinction as matters most in its use. Wikidata begins to allow tasks to be undertaken that were out of easy reach. The facility should not be taken as the real point. Coming in from another angle, the "executive decision" is more glamorous; but the "administrative decision" should be admired for its command of facts. Think of the attitudes ad fontes, so prevalent here on Wikipedia as "can you give me a source for that?", and being prepared to deal with complicated analyses into specified subcases. Impatience expressed as a disdain for such pedantry is quite understandable, but neither dirty data nor false dichotomies are at all good to have around. Issue 13 and Issue 21, respectively on WP:MEDRS and systematic reviews, talk about biomedical literature and computing tasks that would be of higher quality if they could be made more "administrative". For example, it is desirable that the decisions involved be consistent, explicable, and reproducible by non-experts from specified inputs. What gets clouded out is not impossibly hard to understand. You do need to put together the insights of functional programming, which is a doctrinaire and purist but clearcut approach, with the practicality of office software. Loopless computation can be conceived of as a seamless forward march of spreadsheet columns, each determined by the content of previous ones. Very well: to do a backward audit, when now we are talking about Wikidata, we rely on integrity of data and its scrupulous sourcing: and clearcut case analyses. The MEDRS example forces attention on purge attempts such as Beall's list.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
 |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Muir of Huntershill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Erskine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear Charles Matthews/Archive 44,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- I accept. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samuel Romilly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chancery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019
Facto Post – Issue 24 – 17 May 2019 The Editor is Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Two dozen issues, and this may be the last, a valediction at least for a while. It's time for a two-year summation of ContentMine projects involving TDM (text and data mining). Wikidata and now Structured Data on Commons represent the overlap of Wikimedia with the Semantic Web. This common ground is helping to convert an engineering concept into a movement. TDM generally has little enough connection with the Semantic Web, being instead in the orbit of machine learning which is no respecter of the semantic. Don't break a taboo by asking bots "and what do you mean by that?" The ScienceSource project innovates in TDM, by storing its text mining results in a Wikibase site. It strives for compliance of its fact mining, on drug treatments of diseases, with an automated form of the relevant Wikipedia referencing guideline MEDRS. Where WikiFactMine set up an API for reuse of its results, ScienceSource has a SPARQL query service, with look-and-feel exactly that of Wikidata's at query.wikidata.org. It also now has a custom front end, and its content can be federated, in other words used in data mashups: it is one of over 50 sites that can federate with Wikidata. The human factor comes to bear through the front end, which combines a link to the HTML version of a paper, text mining results organised in drug and disease columns, and a SPARQL display of nearby drug and disease terms. Much software to develop and explain, so little time! Rather than telling the tale, Facto Post brings you ScienceSource links, starting from the how-to video, lower right.
The review tool requires a log in on sciencesource.wmflabs.org, and an OAuth permission (bottom of a review page) to operate. It can be used in simple and more advanced workflows. Examples of queries for the latter are at d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource project/Queries#SS_disease_list and d:Wikidata_talk:ScienceSource_project/Queries#NDF-RT issue. Please be aware that this is a research project in development, and may have outages for planned maintenance. That will apply for the next few days, at least. The ScienceSource wiki main page carries information on practical matters. Email is not enabled on the wiki: use site mail here to Charles Matthews in case of difficulty, or if you need support. Further explanatory videos will be put into commons:Category:ContentMine videos. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Marga Gil Roësset
Hello, Charles Matthews. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marga Gil Roësset".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 03:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Ashley (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Howard Furness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Open loop for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open loop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open loop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dicklyon (talk) 15:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Blake (novelist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Munro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
- Partnerships
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Hans Droysen listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hans Droysen. Since you had some involvement with the Hans Droysen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. RekishiEJ (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Alighieri Dante listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alighieri Dante. Since you had some involvement with the Alighieri Dante redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Participants in the Savoy Conference has been nominated for discussion
Category:Participants in the Savoy Conference, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 17:16, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benedict Kiely, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tubercular (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Young Charles, hope you're well. I was surprised to see this article missing. Just took me a few hours to do that, I've lost my old diligence of editing, I find it fiddly writing articles nowadays! The source says something about brown becoming the norm by the 19th century yet I associate medieval monks with brown. Can you check the facts on this and expand it if you can as I remember the Franciscans were in your realm. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Good to hear from you. I've never found it easy to keep the medieval mendicant orders sorted out: Blackfriars were Dominicans, Greyfriars Franciscans, Whitefriars were Carmelites. The other medieval mendicant order was the Servites. The Capuchins, being 16th century, were formed as part of the Franciscans, and were called Brownfriars (and hence the coffee connection). Of course monks generally means something different from friars, both being regular clergy subject to a rule, but operating differently. To complicate matters of religious habit, it seems that Franciscans do wear brown, but St Francis began by wearing grey sackcloth, peasant dress in Italy of that time. The brown woollen habit is associated with penitence. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:50, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying Charles. Sometimes when you can only find scraps (at least with what you're permitted to read online) it can get contradictory or confusing. As long as the article is accurate! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:47, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
"Döblin" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Döblin. Since you had some involvement with the Döblin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Chris857 (talk) 04:06, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
William Mitchell Ramsay
There is a problem with the sentence about Ramsay's education which appears to have been introduced to the article by you - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:William_Mitchell_Ramsay#Andrew_Mitchell --PeterR2 (talk) 18:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of conjectures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Marcus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Charles. I notice the population data is way out of date, a lot of them have lost half of their population since through younger people moving to larger towns. I was wondering if you could get the lists to feed off of Wikidata which has 2018 figures? Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Looks like the best that can be done is 2013, at least in some cases. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Adradas uses 2018 from wikidata but I think it's estimated. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:33, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, OK, confused by the numbering. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: So this query works to extract the data you want: [4].
Suppress columns, use the download button options and so on, to wrangle things further. Let me know how you get on. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Eeks, I presumed there was some sort of bot you could use to update the table using wikidata figures!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- Well, yes, the Listeria bot can make tables from queries like that one. But as far as I know it is not allowed in mainspace here. It could be set up in your userspace, and some use made of it that way. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
"The Real Definition of a Republic" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Real Definition of a Republic. Since you had some involvement with the The Real Definition of a Republic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gnu57 14:56, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Navratilova, Martina
A tag has been placed on Navratilova, Martina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
redundancy - it just a revers of a name and redirect
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Loginnigol 09:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
@Loginnigol: Take this to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion, where there were recent related debates. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Your qid
Hi. I'm building {{WiR_table_row}} to help automate the Wikipedians_in_Residence table. Do you have an existing qid? T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 12:53, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Evolution and evolvability: No, I don't. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Structured Data - blogs posted in Wikimedia Space
There are two separate blog entries for Structured Data on Commons posted to Wikimedia Space that are of interest:
- Working with Structured Data on Commons: A Status Report, by Lucas Werkmeister, discusses some ways that editors can work with structured data. Topics include tools that have been written or modified for structured data, in addition to future plans for tools and querying services.
- Structured Data on Commons - A Blog Series, written by me, is a five-part posting that covers the basics of the software and features that were built to make structured data happen. The series is meant to be friendly to those who may have some knowledge of Commons, but may not know much about the structured data project.
- @Keegan (WMF): Wikidata is under-documented. It looks like SDoC is going the same way. Serious consideration should be given to providing actual documentation of basics. Blogposts are not the same thing at all. Charles Matthews (talk) 04:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, Charles. The blogs are not meant to supplant canon documentation. Is there a particular type of documentation are you looking for? Technical? Community policy on usage? Something else? Perhaps I can help you find it, or work towards filling the gaps if I can't. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Keegan (WMF): Well, a dozen years ago I was facing the writing of How Wikipedia Works, from an outline supplied to a publisher, as co-author. This is going to be a "call me old-fashioned" moment. But there is nothing resembling an O'Reilly book for Wikidata: I mean a reference work, and there is also nothing resembling that No Starch book. For SDoC you cannot make assumptions about technical background.
- I'll put it another way. It is well known that developers dislike writing documentation, except as peer-to-peer, in other words expert writing for expert fashion. Having worked with developers on a Wikidata+Wikibase project for 12 months, it is quite clear to me that Wikimedia has an issue with its documentation also assuming people come to it from a MediaWiki background: which was not the case with the two developers in question.
- "Informative and useful" is always relative to audience. Please consider the need to be inclusive. Charles Matthews (talk) 03:55, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Charles, there is an edit war going on here. Someone is refusing to allow the LibDem candidate Siobhan Benita to be there, and also Rory Stewart. I hope this can be fixed. All the best meanwhile ixo (talk) 13:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have taken a couple of steps there. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for your wise input ixo (talk) 16:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)