User talk:Hawkeye7/Archive 2023
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Hawkeye7. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives: |
2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 |
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Hawkeye7!
Hawkeye7,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 03:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello Hawkeye7,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js
to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
ITN recognition for Walter Cunningham
On 5 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Walter Cunningham, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 10:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Military Historian of the Year, 2022
The Silver Wiki | ||
Congratulations! You have been selected in second place for the Military Historian of the Year by a popular vote of your WikiProject Military history peers in recognition of your contributions to the English Wikipedia's coverage of military history. As one of the coordinators, it is my pleasure to present the esteemed Silver Wiki. We thank you for your efforts and your diligence and ask you to accept this as a token of our gratitude and appreciation. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign and Rhea Seddon scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above articles have been scheduled as today's featured article for 23 and 24 February 2023. Please check that they need no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurbs, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 23, 2023 and Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 24, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of these articles at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before they appear on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-02
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can use tags to filter edits in the recent changes feed or on your watchlist. You can now use tags to filter out edits you don't want to see. Previously you could only use tags to focus on the edits with those tags. [1]
- Special:WhatLinksHere shows all pages that link to a specific page. There is now a prototype for how to sort those pages alphabetically. You can see the discussion in the Phabricator ticket.
- You can now use the thanks function on your watchlist and the user contribution page. [2]
- A wiki page can be moved to give it a new name. You can now get a dropdown menu with common reasons when you move a page. This is so you don't have to write the explanation every time. [3]
- Matrix is a chat tool. You can now use
matrix:
to create Matrix links on wiki pages. [4] - You can filter out translations when you look at the recent changes on multilingual wikis. This didn't hide translation pages. You can now also hide subpages which are translation pages. [5]
Changes later this week
- Realtime preview for wikitext is a tool which lets editors preview the page when they edit wikitext. It will be enabled for all users of the 2010 wikitext editor. You will find it in the editor toolbar.
- Some wikis will be in read-only for a few minutes because of a switch of their main database. It will be performed on 10 January at 07:00 UTC (targeted wikis) and on 12 January at 07:00 UTC (targeted wikis).
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 10 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 11 January. It will be on all wikis from 12 January (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
A list of administrators
You might want to check out this list I created: User:Bri/Early sysops. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for George Pell
On 11 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article George Pell, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Sandstein 10:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2022
|
Shannon Lucid scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 14 January 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 14, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:04, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Gog the Mild: Something is wrong here. That article has not yet been promoted. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 17:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've tagged it. It is just waiting for the bot to do it's thing. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Um, okay, but why run it tomorrow? Wasn't Basiliscus originally scheduled? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've tagged it. It is just waiting for the bot to do it's thing. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of Shannon Lucid
Awesome
100+ Featured Articles | |
In acknowledgement and appreciation for an amazing tally of featured and other articles - an awesome asset. JennyOz (talk) 04:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC) |
happy new year |
---|
And today, Shannon Lucid is already TFA, "about the astronaut Shannon Lucid. She is the last of the original six NASA women astronauts chosen in 1978 to fly"! - --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:56, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
DYK for William Everett Potter
On 16 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Everett Potter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ferry General Joe Potter at Walt Disney World is named in honor of Major General William Everett Potter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Everett Potter. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William Everett Potter), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Tech News: 2023-03
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- The URLs in "prev" links on page history now contain
diff=prev&oldid=[revision ID]
in place ofdiff=[revision ID]&oldid=[revision ID]
. This is to fix a problem with links pointing to incorrect diffs when history was filtered by a tag. Some user scripts may break as a result of this change. [6]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 January. It will be on all wikis from 19 January (calendar).
- Some changes to the appearance of talk pages have only been available on
Talk:
andUser talk:
namespaces. These will be extended to other talk namespaces, such asWikipedia talk:
. They will continue to be unavailable in non-talk namespaces, includingWikipedia:
pages (e.g., at the Village Pump). You can change your preferences (beta feature). [7] - On Wikisources, when an image is zoomed or panned in the Page: namespace, the same zoom and pan settings will be remembered for all Page: namespace pages that are linked to a particular Index: namespace page. [8]
- The Vector 2022 skin will become the default for the English Wikipedia desktop users. The change will take place on January 18 at 15:00 UTC. Learn more.
Future changes
- The 2023 edition of the Community Wishlist Survey, which invites contributors to make technical proposals and vote for tools and improvements, starts next week on 23 January 2023 at 18:00 UTC. You can start drafting your proposals in the CWS sandbox.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Questionable MilHistBot assessment
I noted with interest that your bot MilHistBot today awarded a start-class automatic assessment in the WikiProject Military history, apparently for allegedly failing the B1 (insufficient referencing) and B2 (gaps) criteria. I wonder if you would care to comment, and especially point out instances of insufficient referencing and insufficient coverage of the subject. Or could it be that your bot itself leaves something to desire? Ereunetes (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Definitely. Do you know what article it was for? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- I am so sorry, I may have been so flustered that I forgot the most important thing :-) the article in question is Dutch States Army. Ereunetes (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hmmm. B1 is obvious, but B2 is not. The Bot bases its assessment of the article on Ores, which rated it as C class. (Which is indeed the correct rating.) It concluded that B2 was not satisfied. I find the C class rating curious here. I told it not to accept the C rating as this tended to cause too many articles to be assessed as B class. I may have to make this check more sophisticated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Does this mean the article is going to be upgraded to C-class? I could live with that. If you could give a few pointers on why the article is lacking in the field of references (it is not obvious to me), I would be appreciative.--Ereunetes (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- I think I now understand why your rating-bot disqualified the references in the Dutch States Army article. I found a number of "citation needed" tags there in the Precursors section, that I had not noticed before (I have not visited the article in a long time). The tags were planted by @Nederlandse Leeuw on August 22, 2022. I contest the criticisms implied in these tags. I started a discussion of the matter on Talk:Dutch States Army. You are invited to take a look and possibly to comment.--Ereunetes (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hmmm. B1 is obvious, but B2 is not. The Bot bases its assessment of the article on Ores, which rated it as C class. (Which is indeed the correct rating.) It concluded that B2 was not satisfied. I find the C class rating curious here. I told it not to accept the C rating as this tended to cause too many articles to be assessed as B class. I may have to make this check more sophisticated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have upgraded it is C class for you. Normally I wouldn't bother; the usual avenue for reassessment is Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests. I have left some comments on the talk page. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your very quick reply and for "upgrading" the rating. What you write about the lacking citations is certainly helpful. The faulty journal citation was put in by another editor; I don't even know how the journal-citation template works (so I am sure it was not mine), but I'll make sure it is corrected. As to your other points, I think I'd better reply to those on the Talk page. Ereunetes (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have upgraded it is C class for you. Normally I wouldn't bother; the usual avenue for reassessment is Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests. I have left some comments on the talk page. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
One more question. I first started the Dutch States Army article back in 2010 (see the revision history). Since then I have more or less lost track of it till very recently. I have a vague memory of a talk-page that was fairly busy. But maybe my memory is tricking me, because right now the only activity recorded is very recent, except for the B-class rating for the WikiProject Netherlands that dates back to August 2011 (!). So according to the revision history everything was quiet till on 14 January 2023 suddenly the WikiProject History was added to the top of the page. That seems like an extraordinary time lag to me. Has the article really remained under the radar for Military History for such a long time? Or has something happened to the revision history of this talk-page? I am sure the invitation to open a discussion that was at the top of the page was only recently added, as this is a relatively new feature. But that revision is not shown in the revision history. Do you happen to know what may have been going on here? I am a pure ingenue as far as Wikipedia administration is concerned--Ereunetes (talk) 07:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it has. SailingthroughHistory (talk) tagged the article as a Military History article on 15 January 2023. That caused the article to be listed in maintenance categories as requiring assessment and task forces. This triggered the MilHistBot and an editor watching the categories. We don't normally seek out articles; they are usually tagged by the creator or the New Page Patrol. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
AFL Women's season seven
Hey there – hope you're doing well. I recently nominated AFL Women's season seven as a WP:GAN#SPORT (I noticed you nominated the grand final article as well – keen to hopefully see more AFLW and related articles reach the level in the coming years), and just thought I'd reach out to see if you might have time to perform the review, if interested; if not, though, totally understand. Thanks! 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 12:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Jim Molan
On 23 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Molan, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 17:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-04
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Last week, for ~15 minutes, all wikis were unreachable for logged-in users and non-cached pages. This was caused by a timing issue. [9]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 January. It will be on all wikis from 26 January (calendar).
- If you have the Beta Feature for DiscussionTools enabled, the appearance of talk pages will add more information about discussion activity. [10][11]
- The 2023 edition of the Community Wishlist Survey (CWS), which invites contributors to make technical proposals and vote for tools and improvements, starts on Monday 23 January 2023 at 18:00 UTC.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Bot Sentinel
I had been waiting for a new hook on this one but I see it got promoted Preparation area 5. It looks like Leeky also had some questions in the nomination. Generally hooks are not promoted when there is a symbol other than green. File:Symbol possible vote.svg. I think it should be unprompted because the hook is not about the bot. Bruxton (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- It has the grey AGF tick. I only take them from Template talk:Did you know/Approved, which consists solely of approved hooks. If anyone was waiting for something - and there is no indication of that - it would not have been in the approved pile. I don't see "the hook is not about the bot" as being significant either. Hooks are often about minor points. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- You take from the approved section, but the last mark has to be a green. Promotors often patrol and put a stop on the nomination like I did with this symbol. File:Symbol possible vote.svg Bruxton (talk) 00:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just a note: I have unpromoted it so that the issues raised in the nomination may be addressed. Bruxton (talk) 00:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- If you state what they are, people might address them. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- To be fair, I think this illustrates a place where our process can do with some improvement. It really should be more obvious when a submission is in "Good to go" state and when it's not. The fact that it's on a list that is called "Approved" just adds to the confusion. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- You are doing a great job Hawkeye7! When I started I had promotions reverted because I did not carefully read the discussions. The idea is when an issue is not bad enough to send it back to unapproved, it needs a hook or some other item addressed, promotors stop it with a symbol. Myself I remove the symbol, after the issue is resolved and then it can be promoted. RoySmith I am open to better ways. Bruxton (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Carefully reading the discussions can be difficult when they are long and convoluted, or just vague. Sometimes I have trouble telling which hook is approved/preferred. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Not sure if I can think of a better way to do it though. Bruxton (talk) 01:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've been working on some software that can help. It's still very much a work in progress, but what I've got up now could help with this particular issue. Go to https://dyk-tools.toolforge.org/. Pick the template from the menu and click "Submit". And, oh wow, it less me that Bot Sentinel is approved. That's wrong! The last thing that happened was in Special:Diff/1135655699 where Bruxton gave it a {{DYK?no}}, which should have unapproved it. I guess I've got a bug I need to fix :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 01:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- RoySmith I do not think we want it to move to unapproved Roy. All promotors need to read the discussions. If it moves then it needs another reviewer and the whole process will be bogged. And I had my no-symbol at the beginning I just added another a bit ago. Bruxton (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- I've been working on some software that can help. It's still very much a work in progress, but what I've got up now could help with this particular issue. Go to https://dyk-tools.toolforge.org/. Pick the template from the menu and click "Submit". And, oh wow, it less me that Bot Sentinel is approved. That's wrong! The last thing that happened was in Special:Diff/1135655699 where Bruxton gave it a {{DYK?no}}, which should have unapproved it. I guess I've got a bug I need to fix :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 01:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Not sure if I can think of a better way to do it though. Bruxton (talk) 01:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Carefully reading the discussions can be difficult when they are long and convoluted, or just vague. Sometimes I have trouble telling which hook is approved/preferred. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- You are doing a great job Hawkeye7! When I started I had promotions reverted because I did not carefully read the discussions. The idea is when an issue is not bad enough to send it back to unapproved, it needs a hook or some other item addressed, promotors stop it with a symbol. Myself I remove the symbol, after the issue is resolved and then it can be promoted. RoySmith I am open to better ways. Bruxton (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- To be fair, I think this illustrates a place where our process can do with some improvement. It really should be more obvious when a submission is in "Good to go" state and when it's not. The fact that it's on a list that is called "Approved" just adds to the confusion. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- If you state what they are, people might address them. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Just a note: I have unpromoted it so that the issues raised in the nomination may be addressed. Bruxton (talk) 00:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- You take from the approved section, but the last mark has to be a green. Promotors often patrol and put a stop on the nomination like I did with this symbol. File:Symbol possible vote.svg Bruxton (talk) 00:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-05
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Last week, for ~15 minutes, some users were unable to log in or edit pages. This was caused by a problem with session storage. [12]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 31 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 February. It will be on all wikis from 2 February (calendar).
Future changes
- Wikis that use localized numbering schemes for references need to add new CSS. This will help to show citation numbers the same way in all reading and editing modes. If your wiki would prefer to do it yourselves, please see the details and example CSS to copy from, and also add your wiki to the list. Otherwise, the developers will directly help out starting the week of February 5.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
ITN recognition for Will Steffen
On 2 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Will Steffen, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 05:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Richard Woolcott
On 3 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard Woolcott, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 February 2023
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
Tech News: 2023-06
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- In the Vector 2022 skin, logged-out users using the full-width toggle will be able to see the setting of their choice even after refreshing pages or opening new ones. This only applies to wikis where Vector 2022 is the default. [13]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 February. It will be on all wikis from 9 February (calendar).
- Previously, we announced when some wikis would be in read-only for a few minutes because of a switch of their main database. These switches will not be announced any more, as the read-only time has become non-significant. Switches will continue to happen at 7AM UTC on Tuesdays and Thursdays. [14]
- Across all the wikis, in the Vector 2022 skin, logged-in users will see the page-related links such as "What links here" in a new side menu. It will be displayed on the other side of the screen. This change had previously been made on Czech, English, and Vietnamese Wikipedias. [15]
- Community Wishlist Survey 2023 will stop receiving new proposals on Monday, 6 February 2023, at 18:00 UTC. Proposers should complete any edits by then, to give time for translations and review. Voting will begin on Friday, 10 February.
Future changes
- Gadgets and user scripts will be changing to load on desktop and mobile sites. Previously they would only load on the desktop site. It is recommended that wiki administrators audit the gadget definitions prior to this change, and add
skins=…
for any gadgets which should not load on mobile. More details are available.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 24 March 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2023
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Lyste Thornton.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Lyste Thornton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — LittleDwangs (talk) 01:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-07
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- On wikis where patrolled edits are enabled, changes made to the mentor list by autopatrolled mentors are not correctly marked as patrolled. It will be fixed later this week. [16]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 February. It will be on all wikis from 16 February (calendar).
- The Reply tool and other parts of DiscussionTools will be deployed for all editors using the mobile site. You can read more about this decision. [17]
Future changes
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on March 1. This is planned for 14:00 UTC. More information will be published in Tech News and will also be posted on individual wikis in the coming weeks. [18][19][20]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Signpost: 20 February 2023
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
Tech News: 2023-08
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Last week, during planned maintenance of Cloud Services, unforeseen complications forced the team to turn off all tools for 2–3 hours to prevent data corruption. Work is ongoing to prevent similar problems in the future. [21]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 February. It will be on all wikis from 23 February (calendar).
- The voting phase for the Community Wishlist Survey 2023 ends on 24 February at 18:00 UTC. The results of the survey will be announced on 28 February.
Future changes
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on March 1. This is planned for 14:00 UTC. More information will be published in Tech News and will also be posted on individual wikis in the coming weeks. [22][23][24]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Your GA nomination of Bonnie J. Dunbar
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bonnie J. Dunbar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Hard as nails
Not wanting | |
Many thanks for another interesting article about logistics. Please accept this token of a horseshoe nail so that you shall not want. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:08, 23 February 2023 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Bonnie J. Dunbar
The article Bonnie J. Dunbar you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bonnie J. Dunbar and Talk:Bonnie J. Dunbar/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Albertdok in Antwerp
Dear, thanks for your quick reaction in the article American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign. I am fully willing to believe that the sources mention "Bassin Albert", however that is then simply wrong. It suffices to look at any map - check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197920661#map=15/51.2537/4.4047 for just one example - to see that the real correct local name is "Albertdok"; which I translated to English "Albert Dock" and I still hold that to be correct, since it is and was the correct local name. I can well imagine how the confusion arose, though: at the time, the Belgian military was largely dominated by French speakers (that's historical, and an interesting but sad story) and I can well imagine that the Belgian officers, with whom the Allied commmanders would normally communicate, gave the name in French, even if that was not the local denomination. The misnomer is explainable and understandable, still it remains a misnomer. And yes, cultures and languages in Europe are a complicated and delicate matter, sorry for that, it was not my doing :) Jan olieslagers (talk) 10:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- PS: this kind of confusion is widespread in articles especially on WW2, I already corrected quite a few in other articles, often basing upon UK sources. Such corrections were always silently acknowledged. Jan olieslagers (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- PPSS: looking at the article and its history, I must say I am quite impressed with the amount of effort and enthusiasm that you put into it. All my respect and appreciation!Jan olieslagers (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- The source says: "During October representatives of the two forces worked out an agreement, known as the "Treaty of Antwerp," by which the Americans were to use the basins north of a line drawn through the Bassin Albert, the British those to the south. River berths were to be allocated based on need."
- Since most British officers were fluent in French but few in Dutch it would make sense to communicate in French (assuming the Belgians didn't speak English). (I normally have this problem with World War I articles.) "Albert Dock" would be a valid translation. Added "Albertdok" as the local name. Didn't see much benefit in translating into English. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Myself see less benefit in keeping a French name, but I can imagine you are reluctant to go against your sources. I will not further insist, though I still regret the use of a language that is fully out of place. Thanks, at least, for going along with me by adding the local name, for polite and constructive discussion! Jan olieslagers (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- There's a issue with the English. Dock:
In British English, a dock is an enclosed area of water used for loading, unloading, building or repairing ships. Such a dock may be created by building enclosing harbour walls into an existing natural water space, or by excavation within what would otherwise be dry land.
ButIn American English, dock is technically synonymous with pier or wharf—any human-made structure in the water intended for people to be on.
The article is in American English, and so I (again following the sources) translated "bassin" as "basin" in several places. (My brother-in-law's folks come from Friesland but neither he nor they speak Dutch.) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- There's a issue with the English. Dock:
- Myself see less benefit in keeping a French name, but I can imagine you are reluctant to go against your sources. I will not further insist, though I still regret the use of a language that is fully out of place. Thanks, at least, for going along with me by adding the local name, for polite and constructive discussion! Jan olieslagers (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bonnie J. Dunbar
The article Bonnie J. Dunbar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bonnie J. Dunbar for comments about the article, and Talk:Bonnie J. Dunbar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 05:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-09
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Last week, in some areas of the world, there were problems with loading pages for 20 minutes and saving edits for 55 minutes. These issues were caused by a problem with our caching servers due to unforseen events during a routine maintenance task. [25][26]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 March. It will be on all wikis from 2 March (calendar).
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on March 1. This is planned for 14:00 UTC. [27]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
TFA
my daily stories |
Thank you today for Rhea Seddon, introduced: "Continuing my series on the first women astronauts. The fourth in the series is Rhea Seddon, a surgeon. (Her first name is pronounced "Ray".) She flew in space three times on the Space Shuttle."! - The image in your edit notice seems to have been deleted. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
... and today the regional festival - DYK of 13 years ago ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Thank you today for the TFA with a self-explaining title, American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:42, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 March newsletter
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
- Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
- Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
- FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
- TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
- Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.
The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, Trainsandotherthings, Lee Vilenski, Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, SounderBruce, Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-10
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Community Wishlist Survey 2023 edition has been concluded. Community Tech has published the results of the survey and will provide an update on what is next in April 2023.
- On wikis which use LanguageConverter to handle multiple writing systems, articles which used custom conversion rules in the wikitext (primarily on Chinese Wikipedia) would have these rules applied inconsistently in the table of contents, especially in the Vector 2022 skin. This has now been fixed. [28]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 March. It will be on all wikis from 9 March (calendar).
- A search system has been added to the Preferences screen. This will let you find different options more easily. Making it work on mobile devices will happen soon. [29]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The article is currently a featured article removal candidate. I heard you are good with this stuff, but I also heard you are busy, so you can ignore this if you want. Please fix the article. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Did PM Chris Watson support or oppose federation?
Hi Hawkeye7, I recently came across a clear contradiction in the artcles on the ALP and Chris Watson. The ALP lead says he supported federation, but the Chris Watson lead says he opposed it, both without cites. My knowledge of Australian history would barely fill Captain Cook's bicorne, but I don't think we should have a contradiction like that in two articles on important topics. I know you mainly do military history, but could you take a look at the messages I left on the edit pages? Thanks, Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Howard Florey
Hi. I agree that 'further reading' is for books not cited in the text. But the section listing items that are cited in the text is entitled 'References' (see this article for example Joseph Banks). My edit was therefore to correct the heading from 'Notes' to 'References' Thanks Point of Presencetalk 20:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- MOS:NOTES permits different styles. For examples, see USS Marmora (1862) and William D. Leahy, currently at FAC. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ok thanks. I'll resist the temptation to 'tidy up' in future then ;-) Point of Presencetalk 10:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Would you be willing to help Leonard W. Murray
Admiral Murray was a very important WW2 Admiral - not just my opinion - he was the only Canadian to command a theatre of war in WW2, and he is hoping to get to FA status in the next month. In time for the anniversary of the Battle of the Atlantic. I am trying to get a good peer review going before nominating for FA, and I really need an experienced peer reviewer who knows military history (not necessarily Canadian though). I would be most grateful if you could review the article and suggest improvements of any sort (we think it is pretty good already but an experienced second opinion is super helpful). Thanks Friendofleonard (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sure. No problem. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help. Friendofleonard (talk) 13:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hawkeye7 I will make some edits in the next couple of days (I am going to Navy archives tomorrow) and would you be ready to give it a review at the end of this week. Friendofleonard (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- I can have a look at the weekend. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- I have removed the peer review status and plan to get it into the FAC queue this weekend. I found it a little hard to navigate last time. Friendofleonard (talk) 03:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hawkeye. The article has been given a thorough scrubbing, with many thanks to you for your detailed review - from which learned a lot. The comparison with Leahy was very helpful. I have now posted it for FA nomination in the nomination queue, and would appreciate further advice or support at this point. Thanks again. Friendofleonard (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- I can have a look at the weekend. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for participating in 14 reviews between October and December 2022. Hog Farm (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 04:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Infobox at Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Aye, Hawkeye. I went ahead and restored the original infobox that has been in use for some time. As I think you agree, we should have more than a passing, day old, marginal consensus to make the sort of change proposed --by an editor with an apparent Single-purpose account who has a history of making veiled statements with this sort of thing. See these Talk page sections: 1, 2 and 3. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Discussion affecting AFL Women's season seven
Hey Hawkeye7 – hope you're doing well. There's a discussion happening at WT:AFL regarding the sequencing of sections in Australian rules football season articles, and thought I'd reach out in case you wanted to weigh in given you helped promote AFL Women's season seven to GA status and it would affect this article. Thanks! 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't this have triggered an ACM nomination for Auntieruth and myself? I wonder if that from a few months ago is cropping up again. Hog Farm Talk 14:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- I will investigate. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:39, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Getting the Bot to process these is a bit of work so I've processed them manually. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2023
|
Tech News: 2023-11
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 March. It will be on all wikis from 16 March (calendar).
- Starting on Wednesday, a new set of Wikipedias will get "Add a link" (Chavacano de Zamboanga Wikipedia, Min Dong Chinese Wikipedia, Chechen Wikipedia, Cebuano Wikipedia, Chamorro Wikipedia, Cherokee Wikipedia, Cheyenne Wikipedia, Central Kurdish Wikipedia, Corsican Wikipedia, Kashubian Wikipedia, Church Slavic Wikipedia, Chuvash Wikipedia, Welsh Wikipedia, Italian Wikipedia). This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [30][31]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
DYK for Esmond Venner Keogh
On 18 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Esmond Venner Keogh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Esmond Venner Keogh was awarded the Distinguished Conduct Medal in World War I and later protested against the Vietnam War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Esmond Venner Keogh. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Esmond Venner Keogh), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
Tech News: 2023-12
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Last week, some users experienced issues loading image thumbnails. This was due to incorrectly cached images. [32]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 March. It will be on all wikis from 23 March (calendar).
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will appear on Special:Contributions — some user scripts which previously added this link may cause conflicts. This feature request was voted #17 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey.
- The Special:AbuseFilter edit window will be resizable and larger by default. This feature request was voted #80 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey.
- There will be a new option for Administrators when they are unblocking a user, to add the unblocked user’s user page to their watchlist. This will work both via Special:Unblock and via the API. [33]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Wikipedia mobile apps teams. During the meeting, we will discuss the current features and future roadmap. The meeting will be on 24 March at 17:00 (UTC). See details and how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
DYK for Bonnie J. Dunbar
On 18 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bonnie J. Dunbar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that NASA astronaut Bonnie J. Dunbar (pictured) flew on five space missions and has spent more than 50 days in space? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bonnie J. Dunbar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bonnie J. Dunbar), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 10,394 views (866.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2023 – nice work! |
TFA
Thank you today for Jim Lovell, "about the second oldest living American astronaut after his Gemini 7 and Apollo 8 crew mate Frank Borman. He also flew the Gemini 12 mission with Buzz Aldrin, who is two years younger. Lovell was part of the Next Nine group of astronauts selected in 1962 that also included Neil Armstrong, and he was Armstrong's backup for the Apollo 11 mission. Today he is probably best known for his unsuccessful final mission, Apollo 13, which was made into the 1995 film Apollo 13, in which he appeared."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-13
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The AbuseFilter condition limit was increased from 1000 to 2000. [34]
- Some Global AbuseFilter actions will no longer apply to local projects. [35]
- Desktop users are now able to subscribe to talk pages by clicking on the Subscribe link in the Tools menu. If you subscribe to a talk page, you receive notifications when new topics are started on that talk page. This is separate from putting the page on your watchlist or subscribing to a single discussion. [36]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 29 March. It will be on all wikis from 30 March (calendar).
Future changes
- You will be able to choose visual diffs on all history pages at the Wiktionaries and Wikipedias. [37]
- The legacy Mobile Content Service is going away in July 2023. Developers are encouraged to switch to Parsoid or another API before then to ensure service continuity. [38]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
trivial diffs
Hawkeye7, are you aware that the diff that FACBot provides when closing a nomination sometimes compares an old version of a nomination with itself? for example, in this diff, FACBot provides this diff, which shows no difference between the two versions compared because they are the same version of the fac nomination. if this was the intended behaviour, please ignore me. dying (talk) 15:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
Tech News: 2023-14
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The system for automatically creating categories for the Babel extension has had several important changes and fixes. One of them allows you to insert templates for automatic category descriptions on creation, allowing you to categorize the new categories. [39][40][41][42][43]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 4 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 5 April. It will be on all wikis from 6 April (calendar).
- Some older Web browsers will stop being able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis from this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. If you have an old web browser on your computer you can try to upgrade to a newer version. [44]
- The deprecated
jquery.hoverIntent
module has been removed. This module could be used by gadgets and user scripts, to create an artificial delay in how JavaScript responds to a hover event. Gadgets and user scripts should now use jQueryhover()
oron()
instead. Examples can be found in the migration guide. [45] - Some of the links in Special:SpecialPages will be re-arranged. There will be a clearer separation between links that relate to all users, and links related to your own user account. [46]
- You will be able to hide the Reply button in archived discussion pages with a new
__ARCHIVEDTALK__
magic word. There will also be a new.mw-archivedtalk
CSS class for hiding the Reply button in individual sections on a page. [47][48][49]
Future changes
- The Vega software that creates data visualizations in pages, such as graphs, will be upgraded to the newest version in the future. Graphs that still use the very old version 1.5 syntax may stop working properly. Most existing uses have been found and updated, but you can help to check, and to update any local documentation. Examples of how to find and fix these graphs are available.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
April 2023
I've gone ahead with the re-nomination of the James Madison article. There is a rewritten Slavery section now per some of your comments from 2 months ago. Possibly you could finish the Source and Image review which you had started 2 months ago if time allows. Cheers. ErnestKrause (talk) 14:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award
On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Hawkeye7! Your work on Hanford Site has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 13:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-15
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- In the visual editor, it is now possible to edit captions of images in galleries without opening the gallery dialog. This feature request was voted #61 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [50]
- You can now receive notifications when another user edits your user page. See the "Edits to my user page" option in your Preferences. This feature request was voted #3 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [51]
Problems
- There was a problem with all types of CentralNotice banners still being shown to logged-in users even if they had turned off specific banner types. This has now been fixed. [52]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 April. It will be on all wikis from 13 April (calendar).
- Starting on Wednesday, a new set of Wikipedias will get "Add a link" (Moroccan Arabic Wikipedia, Danish Wikipedia, Dinka Wikipedia, Lower Sorbian Wikipedia, Ewe Wikipedia, Greek Wikipedia, Emiliano-Romagnolo Wikipedia, Esperanto Wikipedia, Estonian Wikipedia, Basque Wikipedia, Extremaduran Wikipedia, Tumbuka Wikipedia, Fulah Wikipedia, Finnish Wikipedia, Võro Wikipedia, Fijian Wikipedia, Faroese Wikipedia, Arpitan Wikipedia, Northern Frisian Wikipedia, Friulian Wikipedia, Irish Wikipedia, Guianan Creole Wikipedia, Scottish Gaelic Wikipedia, Galician Wikipedia, Gilaki Wikipedia, Guarani Wikipedia, Goan Konkani Wikipedia, Gothic Wikipedia, Gujarati Wikipedia, Manx Wikipedia). This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [53][54]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
This Month in GLAM: March 2023
|
Tech News: 2023-16
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now see nearby articles on a Kartographer map with the button for the new feature "Show nearby articles". Six wikis have been testing this feature since October. [55][56]
- The Special:GlobalWatchlist page now has links for "mark page as read" for each entry. This feature request was voted #161 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [57]
Problems
- At Wikimedia Commons, some thumbnails have not been getting replaced correctly after a new version of the image is uploaded. This should be fixed later this week. [58][59]
- For the last few weeks, some external tools had inconsistent problems with logging-in with OAuth. This has now been fixed. [60]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 April. It will be on all wikis from 20 April (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Promotion of William D. Leahy
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
ACR woes
Hi, I recently put Maurice Suckling back up for ACR after my last attempt was hijacked by enforced absence. I've clearly done something wrong with the nomination as it hasn't turned up on the review page. Any ideas what? Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
False accusation
You accused me of making an unconstructive edit when I was merely correcting an error in a date field in an article I stumbled across. I believe my edit was correct, as the date is the same as your subsequent revision. I don't appreciate your threat of loss of editing privileges just for trying to help. 64.43.178.132 (talk) 23:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Terribly sorry. My apologies. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Apology accepted. 64.43.178.132 (talk) 23:52, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-17
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The date-selection menu on pages such as Special:Contributions will now show year-ranges that are in the current and past decade, instead of the current and future decade. This feature request was voted #145 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [61]
Problems
- Due to security issues with the Graph extension, graphs have been disabled in all Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Foundation teams are working to respond to these vulnerabilities. [62]
- For a few days, it was not possible to save some kinds of edits on the mobile version of a wiki. This has been fixed. [63][64][65]
Changes later this week
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on April 26. This is planned for 14:00 UTC. [66]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 April. It will be on all wikis from 27 April (calendar).
Future changes
- The Editing team plans an A/B test for a usability analysis of the Talk page project. The planned measurements are available. Your wiki may be invited to participate. Please suggest improvements to the measurement plan at the discussion page.
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input until May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023 on Meta-wiki.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
Tech News: 2023-18
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The content attribution tools Who Wrote That?, XTools Authorship, and XTools Blame now support the French and Italian Wikipedias. More languages will be added in the near future. This is part of the #7 wish in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [67][68][69]
- The Video2commons tool has been updated. This fixed several bugs related to YouTube uploads. [70]
- The Special:Preferences page has been redesigned on mobile web. The new design makes it easier to browse the different categories and settings at low screen widths. You can also now access the page via a link in the Settings menu in the mobile web sidebar. [71]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 May. It will be on all wikis from 4 May (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
WikiCup 2023 May newsletter
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
- Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
- Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
- Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
- BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
- FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.
Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and AirshipJungleman29.
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Iconic image of Anna Fisher.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Iconic image of Anna Fisher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 7 reviews between January and March 2023. Hog Farm (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-19
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Last week, Community Tech released the first update for providing better diffs, the #1 request in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey. This update adds legends and tooltips to inline diffs so that users unfamiliar with the blue and yellow highlights can better understand the type of edits made.
- When you close an image that is displayed via MediaViewer, it will now return to the wiki page instead of going back in your browser history. This feature request was voted #65 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [72]
- The SyntaxHighlight extension now supports
wikitext
as a selected language. Old alternatives that were used to highlight wikitext, such ashtml5
,moin
, andhtml+handlebars
, can now be replaced. [73] - Preloading text to new pages/sections now supports preloading from localized MediaWiki interface messages. Here is an example at the Czech Wikipedia that uses
preload=MediaWiki:July
. [74]
Problems
- Graph Extension update: Foundation developers have completed upgrading the visualization software to Vega5. Existing community graphs based on Vega2 are no longer compatible. Communities need to update local graphs and templates, and shared lua modules like de:Modul:Graph. The Vega Porting guide provides the most comprehensive detail on migration from Vega2 and here is an example migration. Vega5 has currently just been enabled on mediawiki.org to provide a test environment for communities. [75]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 9 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 10 May. It will be on all wikis from 11 May (calendar).
- Until now, all new OAuth apps went through manual review. Starting this week, apps using identification-only or basic authorizations will not require review. [76]
Future changes
- During the next year, MediaWiki will stop using IP addresses to identify logged-out users, and will start automatically assigning unique temporary usernames. Read more at IP Editing: Privacy Enhancement and Abuse Mitigation/Updates. You can join the discussion about the format of the temporary usernames. [77]
- There will be an A/B test on 10 Wikipedias where the Vector 2022 skin is the default skin. Half of logged-in desktop users will see an interface where the different parts of the page are more clearly separated. You can read more. [78][79]
-
jquery.tipsy
will be removed from the MediaWiki core. This will affect some user scripts. Many lines with.tipsy(
can be commented out.OO.ui.PopupWidget
can be used to keep things working like they are now. You can read more and read about how to find broken scripts. [80]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
This Month in GLAM: April 2023
|
Tech News: 2023-20
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Citations that are automatically generated based on ISBN are currently broken. This affects citations made with the VisualEditor Automatic tab, and the use of the citoid API in gadgets and user scripts. Work is ongoing to restore this feature. [81]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 16 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 17 May. It will be on all wikis from 18 May (calendar).
- Starting on Wednesday, a new set of Wikipedias will get "Add a link" (Gorontalo Wikipedia, Hausa Wikipedia, Hakka Chinese Wikipedia, Hawaiian Wikipedia, Fiji Hindi Wikipedia, Croatian Wikipedia, Upper Sorbian Wikipedia, Haitian Creole Wikipedia, Interlingua Wikipedia, Interlingue Wikipedia, Igbo Wikipedia, Iloko Wikipedia, Ingush Wikipedia, Ido Wikipedia, Icelandic Wikipedia, Inuktitut Wikipedia, Jamaican Patois Wikipedia, Javanese Wikipedia). This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [82]
Future changes
- There is a recently formed team at the Wikimedia Foundation which will be focusing on experimenting with new tools. Currently they are building a prototype ChatGPT plugin that allows information generated by ChatGPT to be properly attributed to the Wikimedia projects.
- Gadget and userscript developers should replace
jquery.cookie
withmediawiki.cookie
. Thejquery.cookie
library will be removed in ~1 month, and staff developers will run a script to replace any remaining uses at that time. [83]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
Tech News: 2023-21
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The "recent edits" time period for page watchers is now 30 days. It used to be 180 days. This was a Community Wishlist Survey proposal. [84]
Changes later this week
- An improved impact module will be available at Wikipedias. The impact module is a feature available to newcomers at their personal homepage. It will show their number of edits, how many readers their edited pages have, how many thanks they have received and similar things. It is also accessible by accessing Special:Impact. [85]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 May. It will be on all wikis from 25 May (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Howard Florey
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Howard Florey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dancing Dollar -- Dancing Dollar (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Howard Florey
The article Howard Florey you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Howard Florey and Talk:Howard Florey/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dancing Dollar -- Dancing Dollar (talk) 09:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Howard Florey
The article Howard Florey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Howard Florey for comments about the article, and Talk:Howard Florey/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dancing Dollar -- Dancing Dollar (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-22
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Citations can once again be added automatically from ISBNs, thanks to Zotero's ISBN searches. The current data sources are the Library of Congress (United States), the Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library), and K10plus ISBN (German repository). Additional data source searches can be proposed to Zotero. The ISBN labels in the VisualEditor Automatic tab will reappear later this week. [86]
- The page Special:EditWatchlist now has "Check all" options to select all the pages within a namespace. This feature request was voted #161 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [87]
Problems
- For a few days earlier this month, the "Add interlanguage link" item in the Tools menu did not work properly. This has now been fixed. [88]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 30 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 31 May. It will be on all wikis from 1 June (calendar).
- VisualEditor will be switched to a new backend on small and medium wikis this week. Large wikis will follow in the coming weeks. This is part of the effort to move Parsoid into MediaWiki core. The change should have no noticeable effect on users, but if you experience any slow loading or other strangeness when using VisualEditor, please report it on the phabricator ticket linked here. [89]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
Tech News: 2023-23
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The RealMe extension allows you to mark URLs on your user page as verified for Mastodon and similar software.
- Citation and footnote editing can now be started from the reference list when using the visual editor. This feature request was voted #2 in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [90]
- Previously, clicking on someone else's link to Recent Changes with filters applied within the URL could unintentionally change your preference for "Group results by page". This has now been fixed. [91]
Problems
- For a few days last week, some tools and bots returned outdated information due to database replication problems, and may have been down entirely while it was being fixed. These issues have now been fixed. [92]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 June. It will be on all wikis from 8 June (calendar).
- Bots will no longer be prevented from making edits because of URLs that match the spam blacklist. [93]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Orphaned non-free image File:John Merryman Franklin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John Merryman Franklin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Wheelchair rugby at the Summer Paralympics category navbox
Template:Wheelchair rugby at the Summer Paralympics category navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2023
|
American logistics in the Normandy campaign scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the American logistics in the Normandy campaign article has been scheduled as today's featured article for the anniversary date July 24, 2023. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page blurb, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 24, 2023, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. If you wish to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article, you can do so at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 2023.
I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-24
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The content attribution tools Who Wrote That?, XTools Authorship, and XTools Blame now support the Dutch, German, Hungarian, Indonesian, Japanese, Polish and Portuguese Wikipedias. This was the #7 wish in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey. [94]
- The Search Preview panel has been deployed on four Wikipedias (Catalan, Dutch, Hungarian and Norwegian). The panel will show an image related to the article (if existing), the top sections of the article, related images (coming from MediaSearch on Commons), and eventually the sister projects associated with the article. [95]
- The RealMe extension now allows administrators to verify URLs for any page, for Mastodon and similar software. [96]
- The default project license has been officially upgraded to CC BY-SA 4.0. The software interface messages have been updated. Communities should feel free to start updating any mentions of the old CC BY-SA 3.0 licensing within policies and related documentation pages. [97]
Problems
- For three days last month, some Wikipedia pages edited with VisualEditor or DiscussionTools had an unintended
__TOC__
(or its localized form) added during an edit. There is a listing of affected pages sorted by wiki, that may still need to be fixed. [98] - Currently, the "Sort this page by default as" feature in VisualEditor is broken. Existing
{{DEFAULTSORT:...}}
keywords incorrectly appear as missing templates in VisualEditor. Developers are exploring how to fix this. In the meantime, those wishing to edit the default sortkey of a page are advised to switch to source editing. [99] - Last week, an update to the delete form may have broken some gadgets or user scripts. If you need to manipulate (empty) the reason field, replace
#wpReason
with#wpReason > input
. See an example fix. [100]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 13 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 14 June. It will be on all wikis from 15 June (calendar).
- VisualEditor will be switched to a new backend on English Wikipedia on Monday, and all other large wikis on Thursday. The change should have no noticeable effect on users, but if you experience any slow loading or other strangeness when using VisualEditor, please report it on the phabricator ticket linked here. [101]
Future changes
- From 5 June to 17 July, the Foundation's Security team is holding a consultation with contributors regarding a draft policy to govern the use of third-party resources in volunteer-developed gadgets and scripts. Feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome at Third-party resources policy on meta-wiki.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Your GA nomination of AFL Women's season seven Grand Final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article AFL Women's season seven Grand Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 11:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of AFL Women's season seven Grand Final
The article AFL Women's season seven Grand Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:AFL Women's season seven Grand Final for comments about the article, and Talk:AFL Women's season seven Grand Final/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 14:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Hey, Hawkeye7. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Mann Mann (talk) 02:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
Hello Hawkeye7,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp connect on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 6 June 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/June 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
my story today |
---|
Thank you today for the article, introduced (in 2019): "This article is about the British Army's Normandy campaign in World War II. Wrote it on my summer vacation last year." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Jörg Widmann is 50, and I began Stockholm pics. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-25
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
- There is now a toolbar search popup in the visual editor. You can trigger it by typing
\
or pressingctrl + shift + p
. It can help you quickly access most tools in the editor. [104][105]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Hawkeye7! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Howard Florey
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Howard Florey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of STEMinfo -- STEMinfo (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Congratulations. I reviewed the Howard Florey article you submitted for GA review, and found it to meet the guidelines of good articles. STEMinfo (talk) 00:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Howard Florey
The article Howard Florey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Howard Florey for comments about the article, and Talk:Howard Florey/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of STEMinfo -- STEMinfo (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany
The article American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany for comments about the article, and Talk:American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-26
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Action API modules and Special:LinkSearch will now add a trailing
/
to allprop=extlinks
responses for bare domains. This is part of the work to remove duplication in theexternallinks
database table. [106]
Problems
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 27 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 28 June. It will be on all wikis from 29 June (calendar).
- The Minerva skin now applies more predefined styles to the
.mbox-text
CSS class. This enables support for mbox templates that use divs instead of tables. Please make sure that the new styles won't affect other templates in your wiki. [109][110] - Gadgets will now load on both desktop and mobile by default. Previously, gadgets loaded only on desktop by default. Changing this default using the
|targets=
parameter is also deprecated and should not be used. You should make gadgets work on mobile or disable them based on the skin (with the|skins=
parameter in MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition) rather than whether the user uses the mobile or the desktop website. Popular gadgets that create errors on mobile will be disabled by developers on the Minerva skin as a temporary solution. [111] - All namespace tabs now have the same browser access key by default. Previously, custom and extension-defined namespaces would have to have their access keys set manually on-wiki, but that is no longer necessary. [112]
- The review form of the Flagged Revisions extension now uses the standardized user interface components. [113]
Future changes
- How media is structured in the parser's HTML output will change in the coming weeks at group2 wikis. This change improves the accessibility of content. You may need to update your site-CSS, or userscripts and gadgets. There are details on what code to check, how to update the code, and where to report any related problems. [114]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Review
Thanks for the review, appreciate it =) BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 11:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Simon Crean
On 30 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Simon Crean, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 04:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Howard Florey
On 1 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Howard Florey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Howard Florey led the team that developed penicillin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Howard Florey. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Howard Florey), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello Hawkeye7,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
(Double!) Four Award
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign. — Bilorv (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC) |
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign. — Bilorv (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
Tech News: 2023-27
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- As part of the rolling out of the audio links that play on click wishlist proposal, small wikis will now be able to use the inline audio player that is implemented by the Phonos extension. [115]
- From this week all gadgets automatically load on mobile and desktop sites. If you see any problems with gadgets on your wikis, please adjust the gadget options in your gadget definitions file. [116]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 4 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 5 July. It will be on all wikis from 6 July (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Your GA nomination of History of penicillin
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article History of penicillin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on History of penicillin
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of penicillin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 July newsletter
The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
- Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
- Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
- Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.
Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
[[William Sterling Parsons ]] scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 6 August 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 6, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: June 2023
|
Tech News: 2023-28
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Section-level Image Suggestions feature has been deployed on seven Wikipedias (Portuguese, Russian, Indonesian, Catalan, Hungarian, Finnish and Norwegian Bokmål). The feature recommends images for articles on contributors' watchlists that are a good match for individual sections of those articles.
- Global abuse filters have been enabled on all Wikimedia projects, except English and Japanese Wikipedias (who opted out). This change was made following a global request for comments. [117]
- Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool for administrators to help fight spam. It provides a clearer interface for blocking plain domains (and their subdomains), is more easily searchable, and is faster for the software to process for each edit on the wiki. It does not support regex (for complex cases), nor URL path-matching, nor the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist, but otherwise it replaces most of the functionalities of the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. There is a Python script to help migrate all simple domains into this tool, and more feature details, within the tool's documentation. It is available at all wikis except for Meta-wiki, Commons, and Wikidata. [118]
- The WikiEditor extension was updated. It includes some of the most frequently used features of wikitext editing. In the past, many of its messages could only be translated by administrators, but now all regular translators on translatewiki can translate them. Please check the state of WikiEditor localization into your language, and if the "Completion" for your language shows anything less than 100%, please complete the translation. See a more detailed explanation.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 July. It will be on all wikis from 13 July (calendar).
- The default protocol of Special:LinkSearch and API counterparts has changed from http to both http and https. [119]
- Special:LinkSearch and its API counterparts will now search for all of the URL provided in the query. It used to be only the first 60 characters. This feature was requested fifteen years ago. [120]
Future changes
- There is an experiment with a ChatGPT plugin. This is to show users where the information is coming from when they read information from Wikipedia. It has been tested by Wikimedia Foundation staff and other Wikimedians. Soon all ChatGPT plugin users can use the Wikipedia plugin. This is the same plugin which was mentioned in Tech News 2023/20. [121]
- There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed Third-party resources policy. The proposal will impact the use of third-party resources in gadgets and userscripts. Based on the ideas received so far, policy includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, some best practices and exemption requirements such as code transparency and inspectability. Your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on on the policy talk page.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of History of penicillin
The article History of penicillin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:History of penicillin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Leslie
Since you caught that moment of "where am I?" I'd like to invite you to where it was meant to go, the talk page of Barbenheimer, where discussion of the opening image is occurring. I've never done that before, although I edit on pages sometimes while looking for information. Please come by and improve the page as well, this article and discussions are fun edits. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
Tech News: 2023-29
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- We are now serving 1% of all global user traffic from Kubernetes (you can read more technical details). We are planning to increment this percentage regularly. You can follow the progress of this work.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 July. It will be on all wikis from 20 July (calendar).
- MediaWiki system messages will now look for available local fallbacks, instead of always using the default fallback defined by software. This means wikis no longer need to override each language on the fallback chain separately. For example, English Wikipedia doesn't have to create
en-ca
anden-gb
subpages with a transclusion of the base pages anymore. This makes it easier to maintain local overrides. [122] - The
action=growthsetmentorstatus
API will be deprecated with the new MediaWiki version. Bots or scripts calling that API should use theaction=growthmanagementorlist
API now. [123]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Iron Gwazi passed its FAC! Although I am a primary contributor to the article, your involvement was just as significant. The road to FA relies on community consensus and voluntary commentary. You dedicated your time and skills to help improve the article to its current condition. Without your input, the article would not have reached its status quo. You are a significant contributor! Whether you are a one-time commenter or contribute to other GA, PR, or FA candidates, I hereby award Hawkeye7 with the Teamwork Barnstar! Thank you for your efforts to improve the Iron Gwazi article. Adog (Talk・Cont) 04:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC) |
- Even the smallest contributions, even procedural, are helpful. Thank you for taking the time to look at the images. It is greatly appreciated! Adog (Talk・Cont) 04:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Oppenheimer
My wife and I just saw the new movie Oppenheimer this evening. I highly recommend it. Since I did B-class reviews on some of your "mad scientist" articles, I was able to recognize some of the principals involved that most people probably never heard of: Leslie Groves, Hans Bethe, Vannevar Bush, Ernest Lawrence, Edward Teller, Enrico Fermi, and the traitor Karl Fuchs. Who was the female secretary-assistant that you wrote an article about? I think she was in there too. Djmaschek (talk) 04:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- That would be Priscilla Duffield. I haven't seen the movie yet - it only just opened here - but am looking forward to it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I haven't had much to do with the article recently, but am glad you are watching it. Back when I started editing it, it was a pretty esoteric subject! Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 22:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- You did a great job. The article on Robert Oppenheimer has accrued over 4 million page views in the last three weeks. It has made the top 25 report two weeks in a row and racked up over 700,000 page views on Thursday alone. Fortunately, there has been none of the vandalism associated with appearing on the front page, but I have been flat out checking and correcting additions. There has also been activity on the Trinity article, and the associated articles on Kitty and Jean. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for your kind remarks, and thanks again for your work on this. I'll try to pitch in. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 22:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- You did a great job. The article on Robert Oppenheimer has accrued over 4 million page views in the last three weeks. It has made the top 25 report two weeks in a row and racked up over 700,000 page views on Thursday alone. Fortunately, there has been none of the vandalism associated with appearing on the front page, but I have been flat out checking and correcting additions. There has also been activity on the Trinity article, and the associated articles on Kitty and Jean. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- I haven't had much to do with the article recently, but am glad you are watching it. Back when I started editing it, it was a pretty esoteric subject! Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 22:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-30
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- On July 18, the Wikimedia Foundation launched a survey about the technical decision making process for people who do technical work that relies on software that is maintained by the Foundation or affiliates. If this applies to you, please take part in the survey. The survey will be open for three weeks, until August 7. You can find more information in the announcement e-mail on wikitech-l.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 July. It will be on all wikis from 27 July (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Battle of the Scheldt
Hi Hawkeye7 - Re your reversion of my alteration to British logistics in the Normandy Campaign I did not say that the opening of the harbour approaches was not necessary, but had emphasized that while Antwerp was captured on 26 June the port was not open until the approaches had been captured on 29 November. Hence Monty’s delaying of the capture of the Scheldt by the Canadians with his preoccupation with Market Garden affected Allied logistics, and allowed the Germans to bring up reinforcements! Admiral Ramsay had pointed out that Antwerp would be as much use as Timbuktu without the opening of the approaches. Hugo999 (talk) 04:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- The lead is a summary of the article. The article says: "Antwerp was captured on 4 September but the port was unusable until 29 November because the Scheldt estuary remained in German hands until after the Battle of the Scheldt". British logistics in the Normandy Campaign only covers the period up to 4 September. The details can be found in British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign. Antwerp was earmarked for British use, but Montgomery did not need Antwerp immediately, hence Market-Garden. Eisenhower did not give operation priority until 15 October. The approaches were cleared by 4 November, and there was three weeks of minesweeping required before it was opened on 26 November. Military historians disagree on how much earlier the port could have been opened had it been given priority immediately. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
american logistics in the normandy campaign
Hawkeye7, i had a few questions regarding this article and the associated blurb.
- the ruppenthal source cited for the number of u.s. troops in the u.k. mentions that these were the numbers "[b]y 31 May", while the blurb asserts that these were the numbers "[w]hen the invasion commenced". would it be more appropriate to replace "When" with "Before"? to me, it seems plausible for the numbers to have fluctuated during the intervening week. in any case, i assume that a substantial portion of the troops had left the u.k. for normandy when the invasion commenced.
- Tweaked the blurb as suggested. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- the caption in the article for the image of the depot at ashchurch states that "[a]bout 5,000 US personnel worked" at the depot. however, i could not find this stated in the cited pages of the ruppenthal source, although i did see the source noting that "[i]n August 1942 the depot had a U.S. strength of slightly under 3,000 men". are the 5,000 personnel mentioned elsewhere in the source?
- Possible typographic error. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- the blurb and article lead both state that the mulberry port used by the u.s. troops was abandoned after being damaged in a storm. however, the article body does not appear to explicitly mention this, only stating that rear admiral alan kirk "decided that [it] was a total loss, and should not be rebuilt". the article on the ports notes that "it was considered to be irreparable", but was repaired and put to use again within a week. do you know if the port was only temporarily abandoned, or perhaps not abandoned at all? i admittedly don't have access to the stanford source cited in the article on the harbours, and so cannot confirm if the statement is accurately sourced.
- There were two Mulberries: the American Mulberry (Mulberry A) and the British Mulberry (Mulberry B). The American Mulberry was written off. I do have Stanford and can confirm that Appendix Five gives tonnages over the beaches, not the Muulberry. I have removed that statement from the article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- also, the blurb and article lead both use wording that suggests that the storm that damaged the mulberry port lasted for three days, while the article body states that the storm lasted for four. is this a discrepancy that should be resolved?
- Corrected the date, per the sources, in both the article and the blurb. It should have been 19-22 June. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
dying (talk) 11:21, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for this. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- it looks like you edited the draft version of the blurb rather than the blurb itself, so i have propagated your changes to the blurb. the changes made the length of the blurb fall below the character limit, so i have added "that was" to a sentence to compensate. please feel free to edit the blurb further if i have missed anything, or if my addition is not to your liking.thanks for addressing these issues, and for looking into the stanford source for me! dying (talk) 21:59, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. The book is on the shelf next to me; I didn't even have to get out of my chair. I considered updating the Mulberry article at one point, but never did. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- haha, that's great! i'm glad that wikipedia has contributors like you with such extensive libraries to reference. dying (talk) 22:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. The book is on the shelf next to me; I didn't even have to get out of my chair. I considered updating the Mulberry article at one point, but never did. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The article on American logistics in the Normandy campaign has a sequel, American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany. You are invited to drop by Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany and comment. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
July songs my story today - Thank you for that, but today first for the other, introduced in 2020): "I realise that neither logistics nor the Second World War are popular subjects, but it is a subject close to my heart. I believe that events of 1944 are not comprehensible without an understanding of logistics, and that this article will therefore provide a valuable resource for readers." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
While today's DYK highlights Santiago on his day, I did my modest share with my story today, describing what I just experienced, pictured. I began the article of the woman in green. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Oppenheimer article mentioned in The New Yorker
High praise from The New Yorker! [124]
Leaving the theatre after seeing “Oppenheimer,” I was tempted to call it a movie-length Wikipedia article. But, after a look online, I realized I was giving Wikipedia too little credit—or Christopher Nolan, the movie’s writer and director, too much. A simple fact-heavy article about J. Robert Oppenheimer, the physicist whose leadership of the Manhattan Project, during the Second World War, produced the atom bomb, turns out to offer more complexity and more enticing detail than Nolan’s script does. And it has more to say about the movie’s essential themes—the ironies and perils that arise when science, ambition, and political power mix—than the movie itself does.
:3 F4U (they/it) 12:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Wow. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:31, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Well done, and a good reminder that Wikipedia articles are now sometimes the most useful works on the topic (sometimes the most comprehensive as well). Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Obviously my moving all the images around did the trick. You know it's the New Yorker when you read
A simple fact-heavy article about J. Robert Oppenheimer COMMA the physicist whose leadership of the Manhattan Project COMMA during the Second World War COMMA produced the atom bomb COMMA turns out to ...
. See one of the funniest things I've ever read, Dept. of Amplification: William Shawn and the temple of facts. EEng 15:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Obviously my moving all the images around did the trick. You know it's the New Yorker when you read
- Well done, and a good reminder that Wikipedia articles are now sometimes the most useful works on the topic (sometimes the most comprehensive as well). Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Recent Reversion of Edit
Hello, in the lead section of the article American logistics in the Normandy Campaign, you reverted my edit - placing a citation needed tag on the sentence “no one expected that it would.” I placed that tag there because it seemed to be very opinionated and was not backed up by any cited sources. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks! JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have re-checked the sources and decided to remove the sentence. My apologies. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! Have a nice day!
- JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 05:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-31
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Synchronizer tool is now available to keep Lua modules synced across Wikimedia wikis, along with updated documentation to develop global Lua modules and templates.
- The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. For example, you can hide edits that were made using an automated tool. [125][126]
- The Wikipedia ChatGPT plugin experiment can now be used by ChatGPT users who can use plugins. You can participate in a video call if you want to talk about this experiment or similar work. [127]
Problems
- It was not possible to generate a PDF for pages with non-Latin characters in the title, for the last two weeks. This has now been fixed. [128]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 1 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 2 August. It will be on all wikis from 3 August (calendar).
- Starting on Tuesday, a new set of Wikipedias will get "Add a link" (Georgian Wikipedia, Kara-Kalpak Wikipedia, Kabyle Wikipedia, Kabardian Wikipedia, Kabiyè Wikipedia, Kikuyu Wikipedia, Kazakh Wikipedia, Khmer Wikipedia, Kannada Wikipedia, Kashmiri Wikipedia, Colognian Wikipedia, Kurdish Wikipedia, Cornish Wikipedia). This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [129]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Signpost: 1 August 2023
- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
MILHIST A-Class preload
Hawkeye, didn't there use to be some sort of preload text when you created an a-class review nomination? I went through the process of starting an a-class review at Talk:John Bullock Clark, and when I went to create the nomination page through the MILHIST wikiproject template, it came up as a blank page. I'm also not seeing the link back to the a-class review page that use to be there on any of the existing nomination pages - did anything change with how ACRs are created? Hog Farm Talk 20:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- I had that experience too. I will investigate. I think I know what has happened. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:15, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
william sterling parsons
Hawkeye7, i had a quick question regarding this blurb for this article. the blurb states that parsons "became the deputy commander of the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project". is the use of the definite article before "deputy commander" appropriate here? i noticed that the article lead uses neither a definite article nor an indefinite article before "deputy commander", and am not sure why there is a discrepancy. the article body states that parsons and roscoe c. wilson were deputies of commander leslie groves, and is worded in such a way to suggest that parsons and wilson both served as deputies simultaneously, so i had been thinking of either dropping the definite article to conform with the article lead, or replacing it with the indefinite article if the original reason for the use of the definite article in the blurb was a desire to use an article before "deputy commander". dying (talk) 01:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- At first there was only one deputy commander, which was Parsons. Roscoe C. Wilson became a second deputy when the USAF became the third service in 1947, so all three services were represented. You can drop the definite article if you like. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- oh, that's interesting! i guess that means that all three options would technically be correct. however, since using the definite article may suggest that he never served alongside another deputy commander, while using the indefinite article may suggest that he always served alongside at least one other deputy commander, i am hesitant to use either article. on the other hand, i now realize that the definite article may have been added because the blurb uses the phrase "a rear admiral" later in the sentence (while the corresponding sentence in the article lead does not), so using an article before both "deputy commander" and "rear admiral" would improve parallelism.it was a tough call, but after your explanation, i ended up dropping the definite article to conform with the article lead, so that if someone at wp:errors questions why the blurb doesn't use an article before "deputy commander", at least we can say that it was conformed to the article lead. i also ended up rewording the rest of the sentence so that an article isn't needed before "rear admiral". please feel free to change the blurb if my edit is not to your liking. thanks, Hawkeye7! dying (talk) 04:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-32
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Mobile Web editors can now edit a whole page at once. To use this feature, turn on "⧼Mobile-frontend-mobile-option-amc⧽" in your settings and use the "Edit full page" button in the "More" menu. [130]
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
This Month in GLAM: July 2023
|
Tech News: 2023-33
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Content translation system is no longer using Youdao's machine translation service. The service was in place for several years, but due to no usage, and availability of alternatives, it was deprecated to reduce maintenance overheads. Other services which cover the same languages are still available. [131]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 15 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 16 August. It will be on all wikis from 17 August (calendar).
- Starting on Wednesday, a new set of Wikipedias will get "Add a link" (Latin Wikipedia, Ladino Wikipedia, Luxembourgish Wikipedia, Lak Wikipedia, Lezghian Wikipedia, Lingua Franca Nova Wikipedia, Ganda Wikipedia, Limburgish Wikipedia, Ligurian Wikipedia, Lombard Wikipedia, Lingala Wikipedia, Latgalian Wikipedia, Latvian Wikipedia, Maithili Wikipedia, Basa Banyumasan Wikipedia, Moksha Wikipedia, Malagasy Wikipedia, Armenian Wikipedia, Kyrgyz Wikipedia). This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [132]
Future changes
- A few gadgets/user scripts which add icons to the Minerva skin need to have their CSS updated. There are more details available including a search for all existing instances and how to update them.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
Promotion of Howard Florey
Tech News: 2023-34
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The GDrive to Commons Uploader tool is now available. It enables securely selecting and uploading files from your Google Drive directly to Wikimedia Commons. [133]
- From now on, we will announce new Wikimedia wikis in Tech News, so you can update any tools or pages.
- Since the last edition, two new wikis have been created:
- To catch up, the next most recent six wikis are:
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 22 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 23 August. It will be on all wikis from 24 August (calendar).
Future changes
- There is an existing stable interface policy for MediaWiki backend code. There is a proposed stable interface policy for frontend code. This is relevant for anyone who works on gadgets or Wikimedia frontend code. You can read it, discuss it, and let the proposer know if there are any problems. [142]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Protecting the TFA
I saw your comments at Pppery's RFA. If you haven't already seen it, I thought you might be interested in the discussion at WT:TFA#Enough is enough, which (though sort of stalled) seems to be leading to a proactive semi-protection of the TFA. Although maybe that discussion is what initiated your comments.
I think the back and forth at the RFA might be due to a lack of clarity of terms; when you say "admins uphold the right of vandals to attack the front page by refusing to protect it", obviously vandals can't edit the front page, including the TFA blurb; they can (currently) edit the TFA article itself, but that isn't on the front page, it's just linked from there. In fact, no article linked from the front page is automatically protected. The TFA section of the main page is protected exactly the same as the other sections.
Finally, gently, I'm a little taken aback by the claims that "admins" uphold the right of vandals ... by refusing to protect it. In my experience, the occasional proposal to automatically protect it was supported by a majority of admins, but was opposed by a majority of non-admins, who saw it as a slippery slope to eventually increase the number of pages that are fully protected. It's unfair to blame admins for following the will of the community as a whole. Maybe you were blaming "admins" at the RFA to make your point, but it's inaccurate, and (in my own case) somewhat insulting. If you want to blame the community for "upholding the rights of vandals", that's slightly more on point, but still pretty unfair and insulting. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- You are completely right. The routine surge of vandalism of the TFA article has been a major frustration to me. I accept your point about it being unfair, but you know, with great power comes great responsibility. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- In fact, it appears User:Courcelles was routinely semi-protecting the TFA for about 2 weeks in July. I'm not sure why he stopped. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Because I flat out started forgetting? Courcelles (talk) 23:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Which is why we need the adminbot. It shouldn’t depend on one person remembering, not being busy, not having the power go out, etc. Courcelles (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- I thought maybe you got yelled at. I'd agree with the admin bot. A bot already move-protects it. Would adding a semi-protection task require a Bot noticeboard discussion, or could someone... just do it? Floquenbeam (talk) 23:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Nope, never got yelled at. But between some busy days, some standard Summertime power outages, and being good at long term memorization but not at short term daily chores, sometimes I forgot. I did not like the porn in TFA, at all. Courcelles (talk) 23:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- As to doing it, I think there’s a BRFA on hold… Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TFA Protector Bot 3 is very much forgotten about. Courcelles (talk) 23:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Because I flat out started forgetting? Courcelles (talk) 23:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- I thought you had gotten yelled at too. Thanks for what you did. It was appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:23, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
my story today |
---|
Thank you today for the article about "the Naval officer who was the deputy head of the wartime Los Alamos Laboratory, and the commander of the mission that bombed Hiroshima."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Today is Debussy's birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-35
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- As part of the changes for the better diff handling of paragraph splits, improved detection of splits is being rolled out. Over the last two weeks, we deployed this support to group0 and group1 wikis. This week it will be deployed to group2 wikis. [143]
- All Special:Contributions pages now show the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. [144]
- Wikisource users can now use the
prpbengalicurrency
label to denote Bengali currency characters as page numbers inside the<pagelist>
tag. [145] - Two preferences have been relocated. The preference "Enable the visual editor" is now shown on the "Editing" tab at all wikis. Previously it was shown on the "Beta features" tab at some wikis. The preference "Use the wikitext mode inside the visual editor, instead of a different wikitext editor" is now also shown on the "Editing" tab at all wikis, instead of the "Beta features" tab. [146][147]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 29 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 30 August. It will be on all wikis from 31 August (calendar).
- New signups for a Wikimedia developer account will start being pushed towards idm.wikimedia.org, rather than going via Wikitech. Further information about the new system is available.
- All right-to-left language wikis, plus Korean, Armenian, Ukrainian, Russian, and Bulgarian Wikipedias, will have a link in the sidebar that provides a short URL of that page, using the Wikimedia URL Shortener. This feature will come to more wikis in future weeks. [148]
Future changes
- The removal of the DoubleWiki extension is being discussed. This extension currently allows Wikisource users to view articles from multiple language versions side by side when the
<=>
symbol next to a specific language edition is selected. Comments on this are welcomed at the phabricator task. - A proposal has been made to merge the second hidden-categories list (which appears below the wikitext editing form) with the main list of categories (which is further down the page). More information is available on Phabricator; feedback is welcome!
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
TFA for Howard Florey
Hi Hawkeye, does a TFA set for October 25 work for you? - Dank (push to talk) 03:38, 3 September 2023 (UTC) Btw, I'll take a shot at the blurb, but feel free to fix my mistakes. - Dank (push to talk) 15:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Should be okay. The article was only recently promoted. Unfortunately, I couldn't get History of penicillin through GA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- I would be happy to help with that if I didn't suck at GAN. - Dank (push to talk) 20:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-36
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- EditInSequence, a feature that allows users to edit pages faster on Wikisource has been moved to a Beta Feature based on community feedback. To enable it, you can navigate to the beta features tab in Preferences. [149]
- As part of the changes for the Generate Audio for IPA and Audio links that play on click wishlist proposals, the inline audio player mode of Phonos has been deployed to all projects. [150]
- There is a new option for Administrators when they are changing the usergroups for a user, to add the user’s user page to their watchlist. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. [151]
- One new wiki has been created:
Problems
- The LoginNotify extension was not sending notifications since January. It has now been fixed, so going forward, you may see notifications for failed login attempts, and successful login attempts from a new device. [153]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 5 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 6 September. It will be on all wikis from 7 September (calendar).
- Starting on Wednesday, a new set of Wikipedias will get "Add a link" (Eastern Mari Wikipedia, Maori Wikipedia, Minangkabau Wikipedia, Macedonian Wikipedia, Malayalam Wikipedia, Mongolian Wikipedia, Marathi Wikipedia, Western Mari Wikipedia, Malay Wikipedia, Maltese Wikipedia, Mirandese Wikipedia, Erzya Wikipedia, Mazanderani Wikipedia, Nāhuatl Wikipedia, Neapolitan Wikipedia, Low German Wikipedia, Low Saxon Wikipedia, Nepali Wikipedia, Newari Wikipedia, Norwegian Nynorsk Wikipedia, Novial Wikipedia, N'Ko Wikipedia, Nouormand Wikipedia, Northern Sotho Wikipedia, Navajo Wikipedia, Nyanja Wikipedia, Occitan Wikipedia, Livvi-Karelian Wikipedia, Oromo Wikipedia, Oriya Wikipedia, Ossetic Wikipedia, Punjabi Wikipedia, Pangasinan Wikipedia, Pampanga Wikipedia, Papiamento Wikipedia, Picard Wikipedia, Pennsylvania German Wikipedia, Palatine German Wikipedia, Norfuk / Pitkern Wikipedia, Piedmontese Wikipedia, Western Punjabi Wikipedia, Pontic Wikipedia, Pashto Wikipedia). This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [154][155]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Netball in the Cook Islands
Netball in the Cook Islands has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:57, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-37
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- ORES, the revision evaluation service, is now using a new open-source infrastructure on all wikis except for English Wikipedia and Wikidata. These two will follow this week. If you notice any unusual results from the Recent Changes filters that are related to ORES (for example, "Contribution quality predictions" and "User intent predictions"), please report them. [156]
- When you are logged in on one Wikimedia wiki and visit a different Wikimedia wiki, the system tries to log you in there automatically. This has been unreliable for a long time. You can now visit the login page to make the system try extra hard. If you feel that made logging in better or worse than it used to be, your feedback is appreciated. [157]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 September. It will be on all wikis from 14 September (calendar).
- The Technical Decision-Making Forum Retrospective team invites anyone involved in the technical field of Wikimedia projects to signup to and join one of their listening sessions on 13 September. Another date will be scheduled later. The goal is to improve the technical decision-making processes.
- As part of the changes for the Better diff handling of paragraph splits wishlist proposal, the inline switch widget in diff pages is being rolled out this week to all wikis. The inline switch will allow viewers to toggle between a unified inline or two-column diff wikitext format. [158]
Future changes
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on 20 September. This is planned at 14:00 UTC. More information will be published in Tech News and will also be posted on individual wikis in the coming weeks. [159]
- The Enterprise API is launching a new feature called "breaking news". Currently in BETA, this attempts to identify likely "newsworthy" topics as they are currently being written about in any Wikipedia. Your help is requested to improve the accuracy of its detection model, especially on smaller language editions, by recommending templates or identifiable editing patterns. See more information at the documentation page on MediaWiki or the FAQ on Meta.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
This Month in GLAM: August 2023
|
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
ITN recognition for Ron Barassi
On 17 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ron Barassi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 08:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-38
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- MediaWiki now has a stable interface policy for frontend code that more clearly defines how we deprecate MediaWiki code and wiki-based code (e.g. gadgets and user scripts). Thank you to everyone who contributed to the content and discussions. [160][161]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 19 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 20 September. It will be on all wikis from 21 September (calendar).
- All wikis will be read-only for a few minutes on September 20. This is planned at 14:00 UTC. [162]
- All wikis will have a link in the sidebar that provides a short URL of that page, using the Wikimedia URL Shortener. [163]
Future changes
- The team investigating the Graph Extension posted a proposal for reenabling it and they need your input.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Good article reassessment for Netball
Netball has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Kevin Neale
On 20 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kevin Neale, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 06:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Assessment for Aviatik C.VI
On the assessment request page, you reassessed this article as a B, but forgot to update the talk page accordingly. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't assess it. Edits to the page made it look like I did. [164] Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Curious, but thanks anyway.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello Hawkeye7,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for John von Neumann
John von Neumann has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of James Edward Moore
Hello! Your submission of James Edward Moore at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 00:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
nerva
Hawkeye7, i had a quick question regarding this article. the statement that uranium-233 "has a higher number of neutrons per fission event" [link removed] compared to uranium-235 thoroughly confused me, as i had believed that uranium-235 had two more neutrons than uranium-233, regardless of any fission events. after looking through the cited borowski source, i realized that what was of interest was that uranium-233 had a "large ν-value", where ν is defined on page 6 as "the average number of neutrons (both prompt and delayed) released per fission reaction".
would it be proper to replace "higher number of neutrons" with "higher average number of neutrons released", or perhaps just "higher number of neutrons released"? admittedly, i am not a nuclear physicist, so i don't know if how the passage is currently worded is reflective of the literature, but i thought i might make the suggestion to help prevent others like me from being confused. dying (talk) 00:57, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done This comes from knowing the topic all too well. Uranium-233 emits 2.5 neutrons per fission event on average compared with 2.4 for uranium-235. Tweaked the wording to make it clearer as to what I am talking about. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- looks good. thanks, Hawkeye7! dying (talk) 06:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-39
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Vector 2022 skin will now remember the pinned/unpinned status for the Table of Contents for all logged-out users. [165]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 27 September. It will be on all wikis from 28 September (calendar).
- The ResourceLoader
mediawiki.ui
modules are now deprecated as part of the move to Vue.js and Codex. There is a guide for migrating from MediaWiki UI to Codex for any tools that use it. More details are available in the task and your questions are welcome there. - Gadget definitions will have a new "namespaces" option. The option takes a list of namespace IDs. Gadgets that use this option will only load on pages in the given namespaces.
Future changes
- New variables will be added to AbuseFilter:
global_account_groups
andglobal_account_editcount
. They are available only when an account is being created. You can use them to prevent blocking automatic creation of accounts when users with many edits elsewhere visit your wiki for the first time. [166][167]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Wikipedia mobile apps teams. During the meeting, we will discuss the current features and future roadmap. The meeting will be on 27 October at 17:00 (UTC). See details and how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 14 September 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. I've also selected NERVA for September 28, 2023; the same applies to that. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 23:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Heads up. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Watchlisted. I am surprised that’s even lasting routine editing without semi. Courcelles (talk) 23:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- I know I would get yelled at for protecting a month in advance, though. Courcelles (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- There's been considerable discussion at WP:ERRORS and even WP:AN/I and I've pulled the article from the main page. See there for details. Wehwalt (talk) 13:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I know I would get yelled at for protecting a month in advance, though. Courcelles (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Watchlisted. I am surprised that’s even lasting routine editing without semi. Courcelles (talk) 23:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- I have WP:ERRORS watchlisted but, due to the time difference, it all occurred while I was asleep. The irony is that before I started working on the article, the bulk of the article was about the 2007 incident. I rebalanced it by expanding the other sections. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
my story today |
---|
Thank you today for NERVA, about "the NASA nuclear rocket project. Unlike its forerunner, Project Rover, it developed entire engines and not just reactors for them."! - Sorry that I missed thanks for Lisa Novak, so late thanks for balancing that article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
TFA
Hi Hawkeye. I am looking at scheduling British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany on 30 November. Do you fancy generating a blurb? Gog the Mild (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- I will generate a blurb. However, I would greatly prefer that Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign be run instead. Since British logistics in the Normandy campaign was run in June, the readers will get the articles in chronological order. It will also align with the time of year. I have prepared a blurb for Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany/archive1 too. Please check both for my usual typos, and let me know if you prefer different images for either of them. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign it is - good points. And thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- I expect that I will also be scheduling February and May. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- February would be a good time to run British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- And perhaps save the Americans for VE Day? Gog the Mild (talk) 00:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Have to get that one through FAC first. We should also work in Talk:American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign at some point. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. You have the reviewers queued up. It will just roll through. Gog the Mild (talk) 02:47, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- We decided to run British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign in November, yes? At least, I have it scheduled for the 30th. If you are ok with that do you want to have first go at the blurb or would you prefer me to? Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I've found it. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- We decided to run British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign in November, yes? At least, I have it scheduled for the 30th. If you are ok with that do you want to have first go at the blurb or would you prefer me to? Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. You have the reviewers queued up. It will just roll through. Gog the Mild (talk) 02:47, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Have to get that one through FAC first. We should also work in Talk:American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign at some point. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- And perhaps save the Americans for VE Day? Gog the Mild (talk) 00:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- February would be a good time to run British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- I expect that I will also be scheduling February and May. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign it is - good points. And thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 00:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Question
Hello, congratulations on getting NERVA to FA status. I went to the main page with the hopes of finding a good-quality article to use as a model and I found the one you wrote. I recently wrote this article [168], I've edited for years but only recently switched to the sfn template system. That article I've linked had a big number of newspaper citations despite initially believing I'd mostly write the article based on journals, so for the first time I applied sfn on some sources and the normal etiquettes <ref></ref> on others. Your FA also has variation, so my question was the following.
Could you explain to me when is sfn applied? As I understand it is used for journals and books, or for citations with pages. I don't know which one of the two. In my article there's two cited pageless journals, one is self-published (reference 16) and another is I believe a peer-reviewed journal (reference 5). I did not use sfn on the first but I did on the second. Would this be appropriate? Sorry for randomly coming here asking for help, hopefully you can lend me a hand. Regards, Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- {{sfn}} can be used for websites but is really only useful for books, journals and reports that have pages and therefore need a page number to locate the relevant textual source. Hence my style is to use it only for the former. The {{cite}} templates create the anchor and the {{sfn}} creates the appropriate links. They are easier to use than the older {{harvnb}} templates which require a name attrubute on the reference tag. This makes it simpler to add and remove text. Reference 5 could use a page number, being a book. Reference 16 is okay (I tweaked it to remove a warning); journals are a border case and some editors use sfn but others not, as the journal may be in (or is accessed in) electronic form. So your usage is fine and quite appropriate. I urge you to add access-date cards to the references, as this will allow the bots to create archive references when link rot occurs. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you a lot for your help. Generally I only add access-dates for websites that do not feature publication dates, I find it superfluous in any other case. As far as I know, bots still create archives without adding an access-date. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 18:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Alan Shepard scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 18 November 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 18, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
British logistics in the Siegfried Line campaign scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 30November 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 30, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Commiserations
The Lead Coordinator stars | ||
On behalf of the members of WikiProject Military history, in recognition of your re-election to the position of Lead Coordinator, I present you with the Lead Coordinator's stars, and wish you the best of luck for the coming year! You will need it, as while you are far and away the best candidate for the role, with an inspiring track record, I cannot but feel that a year of the attempted herding of cats that is MilHist constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. No doubt you will somehow manage to do the seemingly impossible with your usual efficiency and panache, for which all of us who appreciate the project will again be deeply grateful. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC) |
Uncivil conduct
I plan to report your actions on Relief of Douglas MacArthur to an administrator outside the content issue listed at Third Opinion. But I wanted to give you a chance to respond here first and potentially resolve the issue. My main concerns:
- 1. You are being dismissive when telling me to "read the article" multiple times when I asked for a source. Simply pointing to a specific citation will allow us to move the conversation forward.
- 2. You removed my citation needed tag, saying it was a blockable offense and "don't do it again." When I asked the source of authority for this offense you simply repeated the assertion without a source, ignoring my cited passage that indicates a different path you should have taken. I am well aware of the normal way of writing leads according to MOS:CITELEAD. But various situations call for a citation in the lead, such as (1) a quote of opinion in the lead, and (2) material in the lead that does not appear in the article (as in this case).
To be clear, I understand that some of the wording in the lead sentences I highlighted is sourced in the article. But the sentences, as written, do not appear in the article that I can see. Please restore the citation needed tags or point to the citations that support these sentences. Thank you. Airborne84 (talk) 01:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hawkeye's comments at Talk:Relief of Douglas MacArthur#Civilian control of the military, which is what I presume you're referring to, are perfectly civil. You appear to be basing your arguments on a master's thesis and a War on the Rocks article that agree with your views, when Hawkeye is rightly noting that this issue is debated. 'Citation needed' tag bombing the lead of a featured article is very unhelpful behaviour, given that the material is cited later in the article. Threatening Hawkeye with bad consequences if they don't go along with you as you are doing in the first para of this post is also an unhelpful and uncivil way to conduct yourself. I'd suggest dropping the stick here. Nick-D (talk) 02:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Nick-D, no, Talk:Relief of Douglas MacArthur#Civilian control of the military, is a different section with a separate topic. This is about the section above it called "Lead issues." And I did not "citation bomb" the article. The first thing I did was ask on the talk page for a citation for material that appears unsourced. It is unclear to me why pointing to the citation(s) is such a hard thing. I don't treat other editors so dismissively. That would be uncivil. Airborne84 (talk) 12:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please don't bite the newcomer next time Hawkeye7. You appear to value your time. I value mine. You wasted quite a bit of mine until someone else came along and provided the sources you would not provide (which were not in "Huntington" where you said I should read through). I hope you consider this the next time someone tries to improve an article you've working on, FA or not. Thanks. Airborne84 (talk) 00:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Nick-D, no, Talk:Relief of Douglas MacArthur#Civilian control of the military, is a different section with a separate topic. This is about the section above it called "Lead issues." And I did not "citation bomb" the article. The first thing I did was ask on the talk page for a citation for material that appears unsourced. It is unclear to me why pointing to the citation(s) is such a hard thing. I don't treat other editors so dismissively. That would be uncivil. Airborne84 (talk) 12:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-40
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There is a new user preference for "Always enable safe mode". This setting will make pages load without including any on-wiki JavaScript or on-wiki stylesheet pages. It can be useful for debugging broken JavaScript gadgets. [169]
- Gadget definitions now have a new "contentModels" option. The option takes a list of page content models, like
wikitext
orcss
. Gadgets that use this option will only load on pages with the given content models.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 3 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 4 October. It will be on all wikis from 5 October (calendar).
Future changes
- The Vector 2022 skin will no longer use the custom styles and scripts of Vector legacy (2010). The change will be made later this year or in early 2024. See how to adjust the CSS and JS pages on your wiki. [170]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Congratulations from the Military History Project
The Military history A-Class cross with Oak Leaves | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class cross with Oak Leaves for William D. Leahy, Eileen Collins, Miles Dempsey, British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany, and American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC) |
Congratulations from the Military History Project
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 5 reviews between January and March 2022. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Congratulations from the Military History Project
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for participating in 12 reviews between April and June 2023. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Congratulations from the Military History Project
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for participating in 10 reviews between July and September 2023. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-41
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 10 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 11 October. It will be on all wikis from 12 October (calendar).
- Starting on Wednesday, a new set of Wikipedias will get "Add a link" (Swahili Wikipedia, Walloon Wikipedia, Waray Wikipedia, Wolof Wikipedia, Kalmyk Wikipedia, Xhosa Wikipedia, Mingrelian Wikipedia, Yiddish Wikipedia, Yoruba Wikipedia, Zhuang Wikipedia, Zeelandic Wikipedia, Min Nan Wikipedia, Zulu Wikipedia). This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [172]
- At some wikis, newcomers are suggested images from Commons to add to articles without any images. Starting on Tuesday, newcomers at these wikis will be able to add images to unillustrated article sections. The specific wikis are listed under "Images recommendations" at the Growth team deployment table. You can learn more about this feature. [173]
- In the mobile web skin (Minerva) the CSS ID
#page-actions
will be replaced with#p-views
. This change is to make it consistent with other skins and to improve support for gadgets and extensions in the mobile skin. A few gadgets may need to be updated; there are details and search-links in the task.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
This Month in GLAM: September 2023
|
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
- Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
- Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
- Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
Tech News: 2023-42
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Unified login system's edge login should now be fixed for some browsers (Chrome, Edge, Opera). This means that if you visit a new sister project wiki, you should be logged in automatically without the need to click "Log in" or reload the page. Feedback on whether it's working for you is welcome. [174]
- Edit notices are now available within the MobileFrontend/Minerva skin. This feature was inspired by the gadget on English Wikipedia. See more details in T316178.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 October. It will be on all wikis from 19 October (calendar).
Future changes
- In 3 weeks, in the Vector 2022 skin, code related to
addPortletLink
and#p-namespaces
that was deprecated one year ago will be removed. If you notice tools that should appear next to the "Discussion" tab are then missing, please tell the gadget's maintainers to see instructions in the Phabricator task.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
DYK for James Edward Moore
On 19 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Edward Moore, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that James Edward Moore was the chief of staff of the Ninth United States Army, which Omar Bradley described as "uncommonly normal"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Edward Moore. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, James Edward Moore), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Your GA nomination of 2023 AFL Grand Final
The article 2023 AFL Grand Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2023 AFL Grand Final for comments about the article, and Talk:2023 AFL Grand Final/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Electricmaster -- Electricmaster (talk) 06:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
- News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?
- In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing
- Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements
- Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!
- Traffic report: The calm and the storm
- News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes
ITN recognition for 2023 AFL Grand Final
On 1 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 AFL Grand Final, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ed [talk] [OMT] 04:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations on GA status for this article! Electricmaster (talk) 07:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-43
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There is a new Language and internationalization newsletter, written quarterly. It contains updates on new feature development, improvements in various language-related technical projects, and related support work.
- Source map support has been enabled on all wikis. When you open the debugger in your browser's developer tools, you should be able to see the unminified JavaScript source code. [175]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 October. It will be on all wikis from 26 October (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
TFA again
my story today |
---|
Thank you today for Howard Florey, about "the scientist who led the team that developed penicillin. They developed techniques for growing, purifying and manufacturing the drug, determined its chemical and physical structure, discovered how it worked, tested it for toxicity and efficacy on animals, and carried out the first clinical trials. The development of antibiotics revolutionised medicine and agriculture. His discoveries are estimated to have saved over 80 million lives, and earned him a share of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1945."! - Thanks also for the other great achievements just on this page! - Did you know that the image in your edit notice doesn't show? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- I never got around to fixing it. Have now. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
A-Class Assessment
I am learning from the assessments and further comments on the History of military logistics review. It seems I need some catching up to do get up to speed on what is required for a review or various aspects of it. Great article. Trivial aside: I have a copy of the American Civil War railroad photo in the article, which I framed. Donner60 (talk) 03:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Those top-level articles are very hard to write. They have to cover a lot of ground and some of it I have little knowledge of. I tried to make the article as global as possible and not just restricted to Europe. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think you have handled it superbly. I have some familiarity with the topic but not over all times and all regions. I am not expert to be sure. I have found that some of the FA assessment information and instruction pages are applicable for A-class reviews. Now I have some information about aspects of the review that I did not fully understand earlier so I have some hope of being a useful reviewer of the higher class articles eventually. Donner60 (talk) 18:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- My field of expertise is the world wars, but only the English-speaking countries. I knew about the ancient period, and read a couple of books on the medieval period, including one that discussed meso-America, about which I know little. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think you have handled it superbly. I have some familiarity with the topic but not over all times and all regions. I am not expert to be sure. I have found that some of the FA assessment information and instruction pages are applicable for A-class reviews. Now I have some information about aspects of the review that I did not fully understand earlier so I have some hope of being a useful reviewer of the higher class articles eventually. Donner60 (talk) 18:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced comment?
This looks to be misplaced, somehow. I would have moved it, but trying to edit the full source of a large page makes my phone unhappy. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Caused by an edit conflict. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-44
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Structured Content team, as part of its project of improving UploadWizard on Commons, made some UX improvements to the upload step of choosing own vs not own work (T347590), as well as to the licensing step for own work (T347756).
- The Design Systems team has released version 1.0.0 of Codex, the new design system for Wikimedia. See the full announcement about the release of Codex 1.0.0.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 31 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 November. It will be on all wikis from 2 November (calendar).
- Listings on category pages are sorted on each wiki for that language using a library. For a brief period on 2 November, changes to categories will not be sorted correctly for many languages. This is because the developers are upgrading to a new version of the library. They will then use a script to fix the existing categories. This will take a few hours or a few days depending on how big the wiki is. You can read more. [176][177]
- Starting November 1, the impact module (Special:Impact) will be upgraded by the Growth team. The new impact module shows newcomers more data regarding their impact on the wiki. It was tested by a few wikis during the last few months. [178]
Future changes
- There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. You can help by reviewing this proposal and sharing what you think about it.
- The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello Hawkeye7:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Weird case changes
This is not constructive at all. It doesn't agree with the way anyone else on WP is writing, it's introducing confusing case inconsistency in the same page, it's WP:MEATBOT unconstructive and very unnecessary twiddling with code for no reader benefit of any kind, and multiple editors are reverting you. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- I was only following the advice in the MOS. MOS:PIPESTYLE:
Links are not sensitive to initial capitalization, so there is no need to use the pipe character where the case of the initial letter is the only difference between the link text and the target page.
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ken Mattingly
On 5 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ken Mattingly, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 November newsletter
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
- BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
- Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
- Epicgenius with 1518 points
- MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
- BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
- AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
- Sammi Brie with 520 points
- Unlimitedlead with 5 points
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
- Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
- MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
- Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
- MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
- BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
- Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
- LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
- MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
- Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
- Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
- Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015
- In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man
- Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023
- News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia
- Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades
- Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.
- Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
The article 2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. This article relies almost entirely on associated (non-independent) sources).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-45
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- In the Vector 2022 skin, the default font-size of a number of navigational elements (tagline, tools menu, navigational links, and more) has been increased slightly to match the font size used in page content. [179]
Problems
- Last week, there was a problem displaying some recent edits on a few wikis, for 1-6 hours. The edits were saved but not immediately shown. This was due to a database problem. [180]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 November. It will be on all wikis from 9 November (calendar).
- The Growth team will reassign newcomers from former mentors to the currently active mentors. They have also changed the notification language to be more user-friendly. [181][182]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Nomination of 2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: October 2023
|
Good article reassessment for Raymond D. Tarbuck
Raymond D. Tarbuck has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Tech News: 2023-46
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Four new wikis have been created:
Problems
- Last week, users who previously visited Meta-Wiki or Wikimedia Commons and then became logged out on those wikis could not log in again. The problem is now resolved. [187]
- Last week, some pop-up dialogs and menus were shown with the wrong font size. The problem is now resolved. [188]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 November. It will be on all wikis from 16 November (calendar).
Future changes
- Reference Previews are coming to many wikis as a default feature. They are popups for references, similar to the PagePreviews feature. You can opt out of seeing them. If you are using the gadgets Reference Tooltips or Navigation Popups, you won’t see Reference Previews. Deployment is planned for November 22, 2023.
- Canary (also known as heartbeat) events will be produced into Wikimedia event streams from December 11. Streams users are advised to filter out these events, by discarding all events where
meta.domain == "canary"
. Updates to Pywikibot or wikimedia-streams will discard these events by default. [189]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
Tech News: 2023-47
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week. [190][191]
- Starting on Wednesday, a new set of Wikipedias will get "Add a link" (Quechua Wikipedia, Romansh Wikipedia, Romani Wikipedia, Rundi Wikipedia, Aromanian Wikipedia, Tarandíne Wikipedia, Rusyn Wikipedia, Kinyarwanda Wikipedia, Sanskrit Wikipedia, Sakha Wikipedia, Santali Wikipedia, Sardinian Wikipedia, Sicilian Wikipedia, Scots Wikipedia, Sindhi Wikipedia, Northern Sami Wikipedia, Sango Wikipedia, Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia, Sinhala Wikipedia, Slovak Wikipedia, Slovenian Wikipedia, Samoan Wikipedia, Somali Wikipedia, Albanian Wikipedia, Serbian Wikipedia, Sranan Tongo Wikipedia, Swati Wikipedia, Southern Sotho Wikipedia, Saterland Frisian Wikipedia, Sundanese Wikipedia, Silesian Wikipedia, Tamil Wikipedia, Tulu Wikipedia, Telugu Wikipedia, Tetum Wikipedia, Tajik Wikipedia, Thai Wikipedia, Turkmen Wikipedia, Tagalog Wikipedia, Tswana Wikipedia, Tongan Wikipedia, Tok Pisin Wikipedia, Turkish Wikipedia, Tsonga Wikipedia, Tatar Wikipedia, Twi Wikipedia, Tahitian Wikipedia, Tuvinian Wikipedia, Udmurt Wikipedia, Uyghur Wikipedia, Uzbek Wikipedia, Venda Wikipedia, Venetian Wikipedia, Veps Wikipedia, West Flemish Wikipedia, Volapük Wikipedia). This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [192][193][194]
- The Vector 2022 skin will have some minor visual changes to drop-down menus, column widths, and more. These changes were added to four Wikipedias last week. If no issues are found, these changes will proceed to all wikis this week. These changes will make it possible to add new menus for readability and dark mode. Learn more. [195]
Future changes
- There is an update on re-enabling the Graph Extension. To speed up the process, Vega 2 will not be supported and only some protocols will be available at launch. You can help by sharing what you think about the plan.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Any thoughts on running this one on April 9 at TFA? - Dank (push to talk) 21:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- The 65th anniversary of their selection. Sure. Article is in good shape. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 10 December 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2023. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Also note that Oppenheimer security hearing will appear on December 17, 2023, same caution.—Wehwalt (talk) 21:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Bohr postponed to December 27. Thanks for your understanding. Wehwalt (talk) 15:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Capitalization in wikilinks
I'm wondering why you changed capitalization at least twice,[196][197] once after being reverted and the edit explained.[198] (Others have now fixed it.) I hope you haven't been doing this elsewhere. I have never seen that done, and that is not the way we do it. Why did you insist on doing it? -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- I haven't edited that article in nearly a month. The explanation is above at #Weird case changes: I was only following the guideline. If you don't think that is the way we should do it, seek consensus to change the MOS. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 17:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe that wording should be modified since you (alone) interpret it as you do. It applies to the last part of a piped link, in the following example the word "consensus" [[WP:Consensus|"consensus"]]. It does not apply to what's before it. Your interpretation is quite unique, and we have never seen others do it.
- I'm not even sure that section applies here. The examples don't illustrate such usage. It does apply to what comes after the pipe character (|). -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- The guideline seems clear to me:
Links are not sensitive to initial capitalization, so there is no need to use the pipe character where the case of the initial letter is the only difference between the link text and the target page.
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)- There is no dispute about that. This is more about changing something that doesn't need to be changed, especially reverting other experienced editors who reject your change. That's disruptive. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- It was only done while making another change (ie not a meatbot change). I wasn't the one being disruptive. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- There is no dispute about that. This is more about changing something that doesn't need to be changed, especially reverting other experienced editors who reject your change. That's disruptive. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 01:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- The guideline seems clear to me:
Tech News: 2023-48
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 29 November. It will be on all wikis from 30 November (calendar). There is no new MediaWiki version next week. [199][200]
- MediaWiki's JavaScript system will now allow
async
/await
syntax in gadgets and user scripts. Gadget authors should remember that users' browsers may not support it, so it should be used appropriately. [201] - The deployment of "Add a link" announced last week was postponed. It will resume this week.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
TFA
my story today |
---|
Thank you today for your share of Alan Shepard, introduced (in 2017): "This article is about Alan Shepard, the first American in space, and one of twelve men to walk on the moon."! - Nice to see him on his birthday! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
... and today for British logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany, introduced: "The concluding article in the series on British logistics in the campaign in North West Europe in 1944-1945, taking the story down to the conclusion of the war in Europe. (Its American counterpart is still in the works.) For some reason the campaigns of 1945 has not been covered in the literature or the Wikipedia nearly as well as those of 1944. Once again though, I have uncovered some striking images and maps and high quality sources."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Logistics
Hey Hawkeye, long time no see. I'm continually amazed that railways in warfare and railways in World War I are red links. I have quite a few books on the subject but mostly focusing on the UK and all in English. I'm not sure I could do it justice. As our resident expert in military logistics, do you have any thoughts? Does the material you have on logistics in general cover railways? How would you go about writing something like that from a global perspective? Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:48, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- These top-level articles are always difficult to write, and I already failed at FAC with History of military logistics. (Almost) all my sources are in English too (I have a couple in Russian):
- Pratt, The Rise of Rail-power in War and Conquest, 1833-1914 (1915) Covers everything up to 1915 pretty well. There's also:
- Hess, Civil War Logistics: A Study of Military Transportation (2017) is about the American Rebellion
- Showalter, Railroads and Rifles - The Influence of Technological Development on German Military Thought and Practice, 1815-1866 (1970)
- Patrikeeff & Shukman, Railways and the Russo-Japanese War: Transporting War (2007)
- Pratt, The Rise of Rail-power in War and Conquest, 1833-1914 (1915) Covers everything up to 1915 pretty well. There's also:
- So far so good, but when it comes to the Great War I have great sources for the British:
- Henniker Transportation on the Western Front (1937)
- Brown British Logistics on the Western Front (1997)
- Pratt British Railways and the Great War: Organisation, Efforts, Difficulties and Achievements (1921)
- But are lacking works on Germany, Russia and France.
- World War II is similar; I have good material on the UK (Red books) and US (Green books) but need material on Germany. I do have a Russian source (it's in English):
- Construction of New Railway Communications During the Great Patriotic War (on the Example of Construction of the Kizlyar-astrakhan Railway in 1941-1942) Vinogradov, Sergey V. ; Ubushaev, Vladimir B. ; Ivanova, Ekaterina A. Voprosy istorii, 2019 (12), p.124-130
- "The Trans-Siberian Railway and the Problem of Soviet Supply" A. J. Grajdanzev Pacific Affairs , Dec., 1941, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Dec., 1941), pp. 388-415 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2752258
- Mierzejewski The Collapse of the German War Economy, 1944-1945 : Allied air power and the German National Railway (1988)
- I would be willing to collaborate on such a project. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. At least you got some good feedback on that. The trouble you've got with such a broad article is the scope. At least we wouldn't have to worry about neolithic railways! I know wooden wheels on tracks go back millenia but it shouldn't be a stretch to scope it to mechanical trains. The equine equivalent articles, eg Horses in World War I, could be useful templates. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- I bit off more than I could chew. Structure wasn't really the problem, it was people continually asking for more, and the article swelled up in size. There were big gaps in my personal knowledge. Feedback was good, and gave me some areas to investigate. Boned up on warfare in pre-Columbian America. The advice to write the subarticles first was sound, but that would be a multi-year project for an individual editor. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. At least you got some good feedback on that. The trouble you've got with such a broad article is the scope. At least we wouldn't have to worry about neolithic railways! I know wooden wheels on tracks go back millenia but it shouldn't be a stretch to scope it to mechanical trains. The equine equivalent articles, eg Horses in World War I, could be useful templates. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
Tech News: 2023-49
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The spacing between paragraphs on Vector 2022 has been changed from 7px to 14px to match the size of the text. This will make it easier to distinguish paragraphs from sentences. [202]
- The "Sort this page by default as" feature in VisualEditor is working again. You no longer need to switch to source editing to edit
{{DEFAULTSORT:...}}
keywords. [203]
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week. [204][205]
- On 6 December, people who have the enabled the preference for "Show discussion activity" will notice the talk page usability improvements appear on pages that include the
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
magic word. If you notice any issues, please share them with the team on Phabricator.
Future changes
- The Toolforge Grid Engine shutdown process will start on December 14. Maintainers of tools that still use this old system should plan to migrate to Kubernetes, or tell the team your plans on Phabricator in the task about your tool, before that date. [206]
- Communities using Structured Discussions are being contacted regarding the upcoming deprecation of Structured Discussions. You can read more about this project, and share your comments, on the project's page.
Events
- Registration & Scholarship applications are now open for the Wikimedia Hackathon 2024 that will take place from 3–5 May in Tallinn, Estonia. Scholarship applications are open until 5 January 2024.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
GA mentorship
Hello from the former colony on the other side of the world! I'm about to embark on my first GA review and thought I'd enlist your help. The article in question is Secret Empire (1974 comic). Given the dreadful state of comic articles on WP, I was especially impressed by this one. Meets all the criteria from where I'm sitting, except that a couple of the sources may be questionable. I'd love your input and help with the process. Ta! Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:09, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sure. Ask away. I remember those issues. Steve Englehart wrote them about the same time as he was working on The Avengers. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm concerned about the state of sourcing in the article, in particular the use of Newsarama, 13th Dimension, and AIPT Comics. These sound more like fanzines than RS sufficient to meet GA criteria. There's also extensive use of primary sources, i.e. material created by Marvel itself. Have a look and LMK your thoughts. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- GA criteria require only "reliable sources" and not high quality ones like FAC
- There is nothing wrong with primary sources so long as they are used appropriately. In this case, Marvel is used as a source for publication information, and is an authoritative source for this. So that is fine.
- AIPT, Newsrama, Polygon and Scify are journalistic news site and not fan ones. They are okay.
- That leaves 13th Dimension. However, since the article in question was written by Steve Englehart, I would accept it.
- Therefore. the sourcing is fine. (Suggest including what I have written here in the review.)
- It would be nice if the bibliography was aligned and in alphabetical order, but this is not required. (And Dittmer and Weiner (2012) is not used.)
- Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! This makes it easier. I've claimed the article to review. I know I need to use the pass/fail templates, but is it required to use the GA review template as well? Or can I just write a few sentences explaining my rationale? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Use of the templates is not obligatory. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! This makes it easier. I've claimed the article to review. I know I need to use the pass/fail templates, but is it required to use the GA review template as well? Or can I just write a few sentences explaining my rationale? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm concerned about the state of sourcing in the article, in particular the use of Newsarama, 13th Dimension, and AIPT Comics. These sound more like fanzines than RS sufficient to meet GA criteria. There's also extensive use of primary sources, i.e. material created by Marvel itself. Have a look and LMK your thoughts. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The article is only a couple weeks old. Is that long enough to meet the stability criteria? Can an article be considered "stable" if it's only been online for two weeks w/ no chance for other editors to improve it?
Despite being new, the article has already been assessed as C Class by its own author. I didn't think editors were allowed to review their own articles and I'm not sure if I should accept the editor's assertion as a legitimate assessment. Said author/editor claimed they did it "as a placeholder" and admitted that nothing has been done to the article since then. If that's the case and if we accept the author's assessment, I'm tempted to say the article does not meet GA criteria, since nothing's been done to improve it since being assessed.
My tentative is to WP:GAN/I#HOLD the nom, but do I have grounds? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 22:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- In MILHIST we usually have another editor (or, more often these days, automatically bycat the MILHIST bot) assess the article but self-assessment is common in some projects. You don't need to accept their assessment because you are already reassessing the article against the GA criteria, and a GA rating will override the original rating. It is common for articles to be nominated soon after creation. Stability is usually taken to me that there is no edit warring or a major upgrade in progress. You have no grounds to put an article on hold unless you have provided a list of changes you wish the nominator to make in order to meet the GA criteria. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
Your edit to 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Whole sentences and close paraphrasing regarding Best-on-ground medal taken from: https://www.afl.com.au/aflw/news/1068653/what-time-does-the-2023-nab-aflw-grand-final-start-all-you-need-to-know-about-north-melbourne-v-brisbane-lions (copyvio report) ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 23:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
New Brill Companion
You may have seen this already -- but if not, Brill have just published a new companion to diet and logistics in Greek and Roman warfare. I haven't checked but should be available via TWL. Much of it seems to be about what soldiers ate, but Part 3 is dedicated to how they got that food out to the armies, and looks at Persia as well as Greece and Rome themselves. UndercoverClassicist T·C 18:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I had not seen it. I will see if I can get hold of a copy. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2023
|
Tech News: 2023-50
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- On Wikimedia Commons, there are some minor user-interface improvements for the "choosing own vs not own work" step in the UploadWizard. This is part of the Structured Content team's project of improving UploadWizard on Commons. [207][208]
Problems
- There was a problem showing the Newcomer homepage feature with the "impact module" and their page-view graphs, for a few days in early December. This has now been fixed. [209][210]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 December. It will be on all wikis from 14 December (calendar). [211][212]
Future changes
- The 2023 Developer Satisfaction Survey is seeking the opinions of the Wikimedia developer community. Please take the survey if you have any role in developing software for the Wikimedia ecosystem. The survey is open until 5 January 2024, and has an associated privacy statement.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
DYK nomination of 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final
Hello! Your submission of 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SounderBruce 08:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | |||
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from Krampus!
|
Tech News: 2023-51
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
- The next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 8 January 2024 because of the holidays.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 19 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 20 December. It will be on all wikis from 21 December (calendar). There is no new MediaWiki version next week. [213][214]
- Starting December 18, it won't be possible to activate Structured Discussions on a user's own talk page using the Beta feature. The Beta feature option remains available for users who want to deactivate Structured Discussions. This is part of Structured Discussions' deprecation work. [215]
- There will be full support for redirects in the Module namespace. The "Move Page" feature will leave an appropriate redirect behind, and such redirects will be appropriately recognized by the software (e.g. hidden from Special:UnconnectedPages). There will also be support for manual redirects. [216]
Future changes
- The MediaWiki JavaScript documentation is moving to a new format. During the move, you can read the old docs using version 1.41. Feedback about the new site is welcome on the project talk page.
- The Wishathon is a new initiative that encourages collaboration across the Wikimedia community to develop solutions for wishes collected through the Community Wishlist Survey. The first community Wishathon will take place from 15–17 March. If you are interested in a project proposal as a user, developer, designer, or product lead, you can register for the event and read more.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Guallatiri/archive1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Mass message sender granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "massmessage-sender" user right, allowing you to send messages to multiple users at once. A few important things to note:
- Messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to be interested in the topic.
- For regular mailings such as those for WikiProjects, localized events, or newsletters, users should be informed of how they can unsubscribe from future mailings.
- The mass messaging tool should never be used for canvassing with the intention of influencing the outcome of discussions.
- You can create a new MMS list of users by moving one from this page.
- It is usually best to send a test message to yourself, ensuring that the test message doesn't break talk page sections, and that the test message has a timestamp (for bot archiving).
- It is best to use {{No ping}} when linking to users, so that you do not receive hundreds of pings when sending the message.
For more information, refer to the guidance for use. If you do not want mass message sender rights anymore, just let me or any other administrator know and we will remove it. Thank you and happy editing! –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
TFA again
December: story · music · places |
---|
Thank you today for Oppenheimer security hearing, introduced (in 2015): "This article is about Robert Oppenheimer's 1954 security hearing, which resulted in his Q clearance being revoked. This marked the end of his formal relationship with the government of the United States, and generated controversy as to whether his treatment was fair, or an expression of McCarthyist anti-Communist hysteria."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Frohe Weihnachten! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, - singing pictured on my user page (and here) ;) - Thank you today for Niels Bohr, introduced 10 years ago: "Continuing the mission to bring the Manhattan Project articles to Featured, I present one of the most famous physicists of all time: Niels Bohr. The Bohr model is what comes to mind when most people think of atoms." - My story today is about a cantata first performed 300 years ago OTD, and on DYK in 2010. -Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
BAGBot: Your bot request AussieBot 1
Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AussieBot 1 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 13:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.
Happy New Year, Hawkeye7!
Hawkeye7,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.