User talk:Hawkeye7/Archive 2017

Latest comment: 6 years ago by TonyBallioni in topic New Years new page backlog drive


Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Military historian of the Year

  The Silver Wiki
For "[your] ongoing efforts to improve our coverage of the Manhattan Project and nearly everything associated with it (not to mention [your] efforts as a project coordinator and continued support in the form of MILHIST bot, and help improving other articles through our review processes etc)" I have the pleasure of presenting you with this Silver Wiki. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject, TomStar81 (Talk) 09:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Completing the Aussie trifecta with Rupert and PM -- great work, Hawkeye. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations, Hawkeye. Well deserved. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Seconded. Well deserved mate and happy new year! Irondome (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year Hawkeye7!

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Hawkeye7!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

2016 Year in Review Awards

  The Epic Barnstar
For your contributions to history related articles in 2016, I hereby present you with this Epic Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
  The World War Barnstar
For your contributions to articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Douglas MacArthur's escape from the Philippines, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which are related to World War II, I hereby present you with this World War Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
  The Nuclear Barnstar
For your contributions to articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which are related to nuclear warfare, I hereby present you with this Nuclear Warfare Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
  The Featured Article Medal
For your outstanding contributions to the Featured Articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Douglas MacArthur's escape from the Philippines, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which obtained Featured Article status in 2016, I hereby present you with this Featured Article Medal. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Request for comment/review

Hi Hawkeye7. Just letting you know I have a trifecta of M2M articles up for review: Shades of Purple is nominated for GA, M2M (band) is nominated for peer review (I intend to nominate it for GA once the peer review is closed), and The Big Room is nominated for DYK. I thought you might be interested in at least having a look at the improvements to the articles, if not commenting/reviewing one. I would be most happy to review one of your active nominations in return if you like. Have a nice day. :) Freikorp (talk) 07:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you for the Clinton Engineer Works, "the Manhattan Project's largest facility"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jean Tatlock

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jean Tatlock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 凰兰时罗 -- 凰兰时罗 (talk) 04:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quarterly Milhist Reviewing Award: Oct to Dec 16

  Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 3 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period October to December 2016. Your ongoing efforts to support Wikipedia's quality content processes are greatly appreciated. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for S-50 (Manhattan Project)

On 9 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article S-50 (Manhattan Project), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Manhattan Project's liquid thermal diffusion plant was the only production-scale plant of its kind ever built? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/S-50 (Manhattan Project). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, S-50 (Manhattan Project)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

19:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)

The article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:S-50 (Manhattan Project) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)

The article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:S-50 (Manhattan Project) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Salt Wells Pilot Plant

On 11 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salt Wells Pilot Plant, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on two occasions, aircraft carrying explosives from the Salt Wells Pilot Plant were struck by lightning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salt Wells Pilot Plant. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Salt Wells Pilot Plant), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


In this diff you added a sentence:
Lauritsen pushed for a decision, and in April it was decided to use the meting and casting method.
Was that supposed to be "melting and casting"? Shenme (talk) 01:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes. Thanks for that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jean Tatlock

The article Jean Tatlock you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Jean Tatlock for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 凰兰时罗 -- 凰兰时罗 (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye7, may I trouble you for a favor? I noticed that you are very experienced with GA nominations both on reviewing and being reviewed sides. Could you possible review my recent review of Jean Tatlock nomination? I'd like to know how my efforts conform to the "standards", and what were strong and weak points. If you feel you'll be more candid in private communication, please shoot me a short email. Thanks, 凰兰时罗 (talk) 18:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
I think you did a good job. I had no argument with your suggestions, but in some cases I was unsure about what you wanted. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Did it become clear eventually, or you are still having black spots on some of my suggestions? 凰兰时罗 (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
First of all I would like to say that the article is better for our interaction, which is all-important. Secondly, resolving problems like giving the wrong impression, or implementing NPOV invariably require another pair of eyes, which is why I put the article up for review. Such problems are hard to spot because I know what I meant when I wrote it. On the other hand, I sometimes employ the full force of the English language to address issues without noting them explicitly or to skate over controversial points by being ambiguous. Your suggestion to add the suicide note was most welcome, but I suspect is what you were referring to by "already moved beyond GA criteria". Jean Tatlock is as good as I could get it but I don't think it will ever proceed any further. I often submit articles which have been written as featured articles (although they may be unlikely to get there due to the restrictions at FAC) and reviewers often get carried away and start reviewing as it it were a FAC. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for a more detailed explanation. I completely agree with your approach, i.e. with the benefits of a second opinion. Here is what I meant by "already moved beyond GA criteria". I believe that a reviewer should not try to impose her/his style beyond GA criteria. So, when I see an issue, I'm often tempted to fix it in a particular way that is congruent with my style. However, I remind myself that my approach is no panacea, and the article's editor(s) can do the fixing in a way they are most comfortable with. In essence, by writing this phrase I was stopping myself from being too prescriptive. BTW I would apply this same logic to FA criteria. I think that there are infinitely many ways to write a featured article which will (a) satisfy all the criteria (b) will be enjoyed by the readers (c) will make the editor(s) and wiki-community proud. So, from my standpoint, a good GA/FA reviewer knows how to separate what objectively needs to be done from what he/she would do to achieve that. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Round8

The current template is somewhat screwed up. One of the lines contains a break, which ruins the aesthetics of the bracket. See here. It's specifically on that third semi finalist entry spot. Any thoughts? - J man708 (talk) 03:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

It works fine for me but I have a 3rdplace=yes card. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
I've adjusted your article (yes, I know) Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm so confused at what caused that! - J man708 (talk) 04:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Email

Hi Hawkeye7, I sent you an email. Go Phightins! 04:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Page mover

Would you like the page mover user right? I noticed your comment at ORCP that you'd prefer not to fiddle with redirects when moving pages, and that user right helps in many of those situations. You obviously qualify. ~ Rob13Talk 22:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes! I feel embarassed. I wasn't aware of this. I remember voting for it, but hadn't noticed that it had been created. It would have come in handy this morning. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for SS Broompark (1939)

On 14 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Broompark (1939), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in June 1940 the SS Broompark brought French scientists, heavy water, and diamonds to Britain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Broompark (1939). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Broompark (1939)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Bug report

Thx for the bot, it's very helpful. See WT:TFA#Recently featured again (not the part about Jan 4, the rest of it). I initially thought this wouldn't be an issue because it would be infrequent and I could fix it by hand ... and I can, but it's happening more often than I remembered that part of a title is italicized and part isn't, and I keep forgetting to do it. If this is going to be a pain, don't worry about it. - Dank (push to talk) 13:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

S-50

Thanks for the note about S-50 (Manhattan Project). Nice work! --Orlady (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Pioneer Cabin Tree

Were back and a full review is needed. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen () 17:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Clive Ward

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Clive Ward you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

Your Rio Photo

Just wanted to drop a quick note, great photo of you from Rio but if you attend a future major games event please don't post a photo that includes your accreditation/credentials. SportsMedGuy (talk) 19:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Mary Jackson

Hi! I saw your edit to Mary Jackson (engineer), and was just curious what your change accomplished. The edit summary says "rm annoying error messages," but I wasn't seeing errors on the previous version. I looked at the documentation of {{citation}} and still have no idea what ref=none does. GorillaWarfare (talk) 07:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

The error messages I got looked like warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFCzarneckiJackson1958. By default the {{citation}} template creates an anchor equivalent to that created by ref=harv when you are using {{cite journal}} or {{cite book}}. But with them ref=none (ie do not create an anchor) is the default. The anchors are normally used with references; the {{harvnb}} and {{sfn}} templates create nice links to them. So that when you click on the link in an inline reference, it takes you down to the book in the references section and highlights the book. You don't need them in a list of publications, because there are no inline references to them. (Note that I didn't add one to the journal citation, because it didn't need it.) The ref=none form is in the documentation of {{citation}}: see Template:Citation#Anchored citations.
As to why I can see the error message and you can't, the reason is that I seem to have a Javascript that runs a JQuery to spot these errors called User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js It's been in User:Hawkeye7/common.js since 13 November 2011; I guess I had forgotten all about it. It normally warns me that a reference is wrong. I should have marked the change as "minor", since it is invisible to the readers. My apologies for that.
Great job on the article! Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
(Belated) thanks for the explanation! I'll have to look into that script... Thanks for the DYK review also! GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for John Challens

On 21 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Challens, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the British scientist John Challens received the American Medal of Freedom for his work on the V-1 flying bomb and the V-2 rocket? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Challens. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Challens), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

20:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Herb Chen

Hey H., Noting your interest in physics biographies, I wonder if you might have a quick look at some point at the article I have been working on the past month: Herbert H. Chen. There are still some missing pieces (I have an inquiry in on Chen's dissertation title), but mostly I am sometimes foggy on some of the technicalities of Wikipedia articles. The Chen article is a little challenging - I knew him and by all accounts he was a brilliant and accomplished physicist; but he was struck down by leukemia at age 45 - hence did not become as notable as he might have. Cheers and thanks for all of your hard work on articles! Bdushaw (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

The main thing is that everything needs to be referenced. I have added his doctoral thesis. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jean Tatlock

  Hello! Your submission of Jean Tatlock at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew D. (talk) 18:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Clive Ward

The article John Clive Ward you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:John Clive Ward for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 02:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hawkeye7. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Champion3682 (talk) 06:05, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

18:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Feynman

My only remaining question is about that photo with the Swedish PD tag, but it's not a show stopper so I'll ask it here. Given the response by the other person who said it can go to Commons, do you now agree or disagree with him? ie, should it go to Commons or not? HalfGig talk 20:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

The image is definitely in the PD. Copyright expired in Sweden, therefore also in the US. But I went through this with James Chadwick. In that case, another (but slightly different) photograph of Chadwick was taken at the same session, but it was published in the UK, and therefore was not in the PD. We had a debate on Commons and the image was kept. Then one of their cowboy admins just deleted it anyway. So the rule is: don't move images to Commons if don't have to. If we do have to, we can substitute the OTRS image (the one in the Physics section) that everyone else uses, but I'd rather not.
It's two other images that are problematic; the one of the CalTech bookstore and the Feynman Lectures on Physics. They are on Commons, so all we can do is remove them from the article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm no super image license expert, but I'd lean to keeping those two in the article. HalfGig talk 21:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for James N. Post III

On 1 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James N. Post III, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Major General James N. Post III flew over 4,000 hours in the F-16 Falcon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James N. Post III. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, James N. Post III), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Carl Linnaeus

I read an article on the web that said this is the most viewed article on wiki, or at least most viewed bio. It's also a Top level article at WP:Plants. I was wondering what you think it'd take to get it to FA. Or as an alternative, who you'd think would be good to take a quick look at it. And congrats on getting Feynman to FA! HalfGig talk 15:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Request

This past July you reviewed and promoted the article on SPARS to a GA. Its talk page indicates this, but the article page does not. Might you consider fixing this apparent ommssion? Thank you. Pendright (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

A Bot is supposed to do that but did not for some reason. I've done it manually. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

CSS styling in templates

Hello everyone, and sincere apologies if you're getting this message more than once. Just a heads-up that there is currently work on an extension in order to enable CSS styling in templates. Please check the document on mediawiki.org to discuss best storage methods and what we need to avoid with implementation. Thanks, m:User:Melamrawy (WMF), 09:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

19:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of High Explosive Research

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article High Explosive Research you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of High Explosive Research

The article High Explosive Research you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:High Explosive Research for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for David Hawkins (philosopher)

On 9 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Hawkins (philosopher), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an interactive exhibit about the life and work of David Hawkins was called "Cultivate the Scientist in Every Child"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Hawkins (philosopher). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, David Hawkins (philosopher)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for John Clive Ward

On 13 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Clive Ward, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Clive Ward has been called "the father of the British H-bomb"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Clive Ward. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Clive Ward), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

18:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations!

  The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds
For your work in promoting Project Y, Dayton Project, and Ames Project, I am pleased to present you with the A-class Medal with Diamonds. For the Coordinators of the Military history Project. Parsecboy (talk) 01:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Jean Tatlock

On 16 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jean Tatlock, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jean Tatlock had a romantic relationship with Robert Oppenheimer, introducing him to poetry and politics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jean Tatlock. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jean Tatlock), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for High Explosive Research

On 16 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article High Explosive Research, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that whilst carrying out High Explosive Research, British scientists developed atomic weapons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/High Explosive Research. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, High Explosive Research), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Million award for Featured Article Richard Feynman

  The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Richard Feynman (estimated annual readership: 1,160,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Can you help me at FAC?

King Kalākaua's world tour has stalled after two supports and a couple of pretty hefty reviews. Can you add anything to the review? Either way, thanks. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Niels Bohr

Hi, the additional citation that I added in the article Niels Bohr about the invitation by Lord Cherwell was reversed by you. The reason given was that it's already covered by existing link. Can you please let me know that existing link, because I could not find it? Thanks for your information.--老陳 (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

The sentence was sourced to Thirsk (2006), p. 374. You are claiming that you checked that book and it did not cover the sentence? I don't have a copy on hand, so I'll have to take your word for it. I did check Powers, and the claim is supported on p. 237. Looking back through the change history, I have restored the original source, which is Jones (1985). p. 280. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply! Those 2 books do not have Google previews and Amazon look-insides. The source that I added has Google preview. It would do reader a service if that source can be included also.--老陳 (talk) 06:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Hurricane

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Hurricane

The article Operation Hurricane you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Operation Hurricane for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Hurricane

The article Operation Hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Operation Hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Operation Hurricane

  Hello! Your submission of Operation Hurricane at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Rob13Talk 05:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

GA on Hurricane

Congrats, Hawkeye. Well done. SkoreKeep (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Oh, and I suppose that column sort on Hurricane was somewhat superfluous. Thanks for that, too. SkoreKeep (talk) 23:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

19:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

Closure of Lead FAC!

G'day Hawkeye7, I think my ping to you, here, may not have registered. Thank you. Sandbh (talk) 01:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Now that's Lead FAC is over, problems raised remain?

Hi, Hawkeye. I would want to clarify a few points regarding your comments on the FAC page so we can make sure we'll get it there the second time.

First, you have listed a number of paragraphs we needed to "find citations for." Most of those paragraphs had some---that noted---citations at that point. I assumed there could be particular claims that were sort of asking for a source to refer to, and I checked around a half of them (maybe more) and couldn't find it. I assumed then I wouldn't act unless you explain me what must be done. I suggested it then---and I am suggesting it now---that you list the claims needing citations or add {{cn}} tags. May I ask you to do so?

Then, to quote the subsequent WT:FAC talk, "I also wanted to see locations for the books, publishers for the web sites and - although I'm willing to yield on this point - ISSNs for the journals." I genuinely don't understand a few points here. First, locations? They could be helpful when there are multiple publishers sharing the same name and there's some bibliographical tradition to include them. On the opposite side, we have the amount of work needed to put those in and my personal feeling that this is superfluous information. This, surely enough, would matter nothing if I had to put them in---there was a requirement or something---but to my knowledge, there isn't. And unless there is (please tell me if this is the case), this is a "what I like and what I don't" thing that you surely could agree are not things to influence the process of a FAC. (You did not reply to my original response, and I assumed this review this one of those partial reviews that were not aimed at supporting but only raising some prerequisite points. I was unpleasantly surprised that you in fact were watching the progress but stayed away from replying and then this "unresolved" issue came up at the WT:FAC talk as if it was something we had to do but didn't.) So please clarify why this is a requirement to comply with (aside from "a reviewer wanted it," as I see nothing more at the moment).

Then, publishers for the web sites. I see you're probably referring to this comment: "FN 64, 164 publisher?" If that is the case, then I satisfied your call for no. 164. This leaves one. I specified that according to Template:Cite web, I should not have provided a publisher for no. 64 (though I have reviewed my stance on this one since, so we must be good on this now. Are we?).

And then, the ISSNs. Again, why is this a requirement aside from personal preferences? As for me, I am reluctant to spend time on this one unless I have to---I don't see the point: hardly anyone wouldn't be satisfied with a DOI and, in general, I don't want that to be TMI. One such code helps uniquely define an article.--R8R (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

  • It doesn't matter at all that the paragraphs have some references. Nobody cares about that. Everything has to be cited. Every last thing. This is a sine qua non. And the refusal to do so is an immediate failure at FAC or GAC. We didn't proceed with the next step of verifying the claims cited against the sources.
You're sort of missing the point. I have nothing to reply to this with but with what I've already written. Let me repeat myself, "I assumed there could be particular claims that were sort of asking for a source to refer to, and I checked around a half of them (maybe more) and couldn't find it. I assumed then I wouldn't act unless you explain me what must be done. I suggested it then---and I am suggesting it now---that you list the claims needing citations or add {{cn}} tags." Just saying generic "everything" does not help in a particular case.
Added. But I provided a like of paragraphs with unreferenced claims. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Here's a quote from WP:FAC: "Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed [bold in the source]". That is what I am asking for. What claims do we need references for?--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Okay, thank you. That was what I was looking for.--R8R (talk) 13:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  • The claim that according to Template:Cite web you don't have to provide a publisher for web sites is utterly wrong. It isn't what it says at all! All web site citations require a publisher. As with the above, it either gets fixed, or the article will not pass FAC.
I was referring to this particular quote: "Do not use the publisher parameter for the name of a work (e.g. a book, encyclopedia, newspaper, magazine, journal, website)." Nevertheless, I did specify what you wanted here was done. Why are you still threatening with not passing FAC?--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm only reviewing. It's up to the delegate to pass it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  • It is traditional to provide locations for books. It is the normal citation style. The reason is that when the book is looked up manually, the location is required. Nowadays, the ISBN can be used to look up a book, so it is redundant. It is still the style to provide it anyway.
I don't see how "the style" is anything more than a personal liking. There is no particular style we have to follow here in Wikipedia as far as I know.--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Fair enough, but to look up a book you need either location-publisher-year or isbn. But not all books have isbns. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  • DOIs aren't much use really, but the ISSN is just a preference, like alt text, so I was willing to waive it. It is required by other language Wikipedias and is used when we translate the article.
Okay, noted. Won't act now but will have in mind in future.--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

It is good we've framed the amount of work to be done clearly. Thank you.--R8R (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  •   Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  •   Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  •   1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  •   Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Fair Use in Australia campaign update

I'm writing you this followup message, as you took the time to vote in support of a Wikipedia banner campaign for the introduction of Fair Use in Australia.
After much planning and coordination with the WMF, Australian Digital Alliance, and Electronic Frontiers Australia, as of Monday the banner-campaign is active on English Wikipedia to a portion of logged-out readers in Australia (technical details). The banners direct people to this page on Meta: FairCopyrightOz. That page, alongside lots of information, further directs people towards the campaign website faircopyright.org.au where Australians are invited to write to their local MP to express support of Fair Use. If you are interested in supporting this campaign, please, send a letter yourself using the template letter provided at that link.
Furthermore, and with the support of the ADA & EFA, we have received fantastic media coverage - with article "Fair Use: Wikipedia targets Australians in bid to change the law" appearing on page 2 of the Sydney Morning Herald and page 10 of the Melbourne Age on Monday's edition. It was for a time the 3rd most read article the Fairfax website, and Fair Use was "trending" on Twitter in Australia. We are running the account @FairCopyrightOz on twitter, and we are tracking other press-mentions on the talkpage on Meta.
Today, day 2, we published a detailed post about the campaign on the Wikimedia Blog, ran an "Ask Me Anything" Q&A session on the Australia page in Reddit, and [by happy coincidence of timing] the article History of fair use proposals in Australia appeared on the en.wp mainpage as a Did You Know. [The creation of that "history of..." article was a specific request arising from in the community consultation in which you voted].
And, most importantly, in a little more than a day nearly 800 letters to MPs have been sent encouraging them to support the Productivity Commission's recommendation to adopt Fair Use in Australia. I urge you - please add your own message.


Sincerely, Wittylama 16:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leon W. Johnson

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leon W. Johnson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

John Glenn article

John Glenn's article has passed GA; do you think it is ready for an A-class review, or does it need significant changes beforehand? Kees08 (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

23:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project E

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Project E you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Years of birth and death of N. Bohr's wife/widow

You undid (Niels Bohr 769071112) an edit by me where I added years for the wife/widow. What style would be more appropriate for this information? An individual who is not notable enough to have her own article? Should it be in the infobox at the beginning of the article? /JeppeSN (talk) 13:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

S-1 Executive Committee and the Manhattan project

There was no confusion with the Manhattan District. Mark Oliphant flew to the USA in August 1941. The US project was called The S-1 Executive Committee. This mission caused the S-1 Committee to take seriously the concept of a practical atomic bomb in December 1941. James Marshall chose 240 Broadway in Manhattan in June 1942 to be close to one of the main contractors. The names 'Manhattan District' or 'Manhattan Project' did not exist until then. Ref Pulitzer Prize Winning The Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. It is impossible that a project that did not yet exist could be expanded. This logic is irrefutable. Please restore my edit. JMcC (talk) 09:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC).

That's right. The Manhattan Project was codenamed S-1. The Army formed the Manhattan District in August 1942, named, as you note, after where it was located (as did all the engineer districts). The project continued to be codenamed S-1, but gradually the name "Manhattan Project" came to be applied to it, but even in 1945 you can still see documents referring to "S-1". The Manhattan Project came to an end on 31 December 1946, and its functions were assumed by the Atomic Energy Commission and the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project. The Manhattan District continued until 15 August 1947, when it was inactivated. The director of the Manhattan Project was Leslie Groves; the commander of the Manhattan District was Kenneth Nichols. The article is very carefully written to not confuse the Manhattan Project with the Manhattan District. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Project E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Streak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

FAC William Pūnohu White

Hello, I don't know if you came across Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William Pūnohu White/archive1. It was closed today because of no traffic and only 1 review after a month. The quality of the article is FAC material in my opinion. I did not ask anybody (except two users) in the initial run to review it since I was trusting that it will receive reviews. Now I am asking a couple of people here and there to see if there is enough interest to renominate it again as recommended by the closing admin. I will only go ahead and renominate it once I find a few people who wants to give it a review. Please let me know if you are interested. Thanks either way.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

I know what it's like. Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics was closed for lack of reviews twice. I'll give it a review next time it comes up, although it's outside my area of expertise. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much. Here is the second nomination Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William Pūnohu White/archive2. Look at it when you can. Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Do you have a fiat from the co-ordinator? You usually cannot re-nominate for two weeks after closure. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes, the closing admin Sarastro1 said "I've no problem if you want to renominate at once" on their talk page.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project E

The article Project E you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Project E for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leon W. Johnson

The article Leon W. Johnson you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Leon W. Johnson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

FACbot

Out of mild curiosity, is there any reason why the bot did not today run on the recently promoted/archived FAC pages? I only ask because I usually get pinged when it runs, and I just realised that I wasn't pinged! Sarastro1 (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

I get pinged when the Bot has a problem. The 11 March 2017 run did not complete. It may have encountered one of those database down events. I ran a debugging run today. This is a run where I set a flag and it chatters to me as it performs its work. No problem was encountered, and it promoted several articles. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

15:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Operation Hurricane

On 14 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Hurricane, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Operation Hurricane, an atomic bomb was exploded in the hull of HMS Plym? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Hurricane. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Operation Hurricane), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Project E

On 16 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project E, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the United States gave nuclear weapons to Britain as part of Project E? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project E. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Project E), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

President Truman's relief of General Douglas MacArthur
added a link pointing to Charles Ross
Robert Lyste Thornton
added a link pointing to Berkeley

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

FACBot

Hi Hawkeye. FACBot added a second maindate parameter for Rosetta Stone when the article ran on TFA a second time today. This broke the article history template. Would it be possible for the bot to avoid adding a maindate parameter when the template already has one, or has a maindate2 parameter?  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Sure. I don't think the possibility occurred to me. I'll let the FACBot know what to do. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar

  The Half Barnstar
Great work on the Truman/MacArthur piece. I realize my prose could be rather severe, but I think its' in much better shape largely thanks to you. Tip o' the hat--216.12.10.118 (talk) 21:08, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

22:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Hawkeye7. I added the refs that you requested. Would you kindly revisit the DYK nom? Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert F. Travis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert F. Travis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert F. Travis

The article Robert F. Travis you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Robert F. Travis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash

  Hello! Your submission of 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Robert Lyste Thornton

On 24 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Lyste Thornton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert Lyste Thornton returned to Berkeley in 1942 to assist with the development of the calutron? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Lyste Thornton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert Lyste Thornton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AWST. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Another FACbot query

Just noticed in passing that this was never closed by FACbot. Not sure if it was something that I did, or just a glitch, but I thought I'd mention it as the article was renominated so there are technically two nominations open at once which might cause a meltdown somewhere. Sarastro1 (talk) 15:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

The nomination was closed and then reopened on the same day, before the FACBot could deal with it. I have closed it by hand. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

John Glenn A-class

@Hawkeye7: Hey there. Would you have time to give me guidance or perhaps even conominate the John Glenn article with me? There are some answers that seem basic that I do not know (like should NASA's website be cited as website=NASA, and therefore italicized). Let me know, I would appreciate it if you did. Thanks either way! Kees08 (talk) 21:06, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Alright. I'll have to do a pass through it and adjust the references. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
That would be great. If you just let me know which path is the right path forward to take, I can take a stab at fixing the refs more too. Kees08 (talk) 04:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
I've done one pass through it. I'll do another tomorrow. In answer to your question: NASA is a publisher, not a website. The main problem, though, is inconsistency, with "publisher", "website", "work" and a couple of other being used for the same thing. Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

14:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton

On 28 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton used liquid methane experimentally to power a bus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

St Vincent-class battleship ACR

I've responded to your comments at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/St Vincent-class battleship a while ago, but I suspect that you've forgotten about them.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash

On 2 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 19 people, including Brigadier General Robert F. Travis, were killed when a Boeing B29 crashed with a Mark 4 nuclear bomb on board? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Robert F. Travis

On 2 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert F. Travis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 19 people, including Brigadier General Robert F. Travis, were killed when a Boeing B29 crashed with a Mark 4 nuclear bomb on board? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert F. Travis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Manhattan

G'day mate. I'm watching Manhattan (TV series) and thought of you. don't know if you've seen it? All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I watched it. Almost of the characters are fictional (with odd takes on Niels Bohr, Robert Oppenheimer, Jean Tatlock and Kitty Oppenheimer), but the sets and costumes are very authentic, and the issues are quite real. In their misfit status the team in the series does resemble Seth Neddermeyer's implosion group, but it even more closely resembles Edward Teller's Super group. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:42, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm quite enjoying it. It's entertaining but doesn't need so much attention that I can't dip in and out. I've been cross-referencing details with your articles! They do a good job of showing the strains of living under that sort of secrecy and the toll it took on family life. They also seem to be having a lot of sex (well, what else is there to do in the desert in the middle of a war!) and I'm not sure if that's a vital plot point or just a Game of Thrones-style cutaway to keep the viewer interested! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Edward Elliott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lord Kitchener, Athletics and Battle of Amiens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

WIR-YOS

[65]? Diff please to previous warning, as I've no idea what you're talking about. According to this, we've never even intersected on an article talk page and the only diff of yours on my talk page is unrelated. The article is listed at WP:WIRYOS, in the list of improved/created articles. I added the template created to add to those articles. In this case it appears to have been added because an image was restored and added to the article as part of the event. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

The article was created in June 2003, and I improved it to GA status in June 2015. I complained to Rosiestep about the attribution of articles that I have worked on in Esino Lario in 2016. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps you mistook my username for Rosie's (re: warning), or assume that we talked about your [presumably offline] conversation in Esino Lario? Regardless, the template says "This article was created or improved as part of...", similar to all the other WiR tags, education program assignments, edit-a-thons like Art+Feminism, etc. The bar is low to add such banners, and I don't think anybody reads them as necessarily meaning "the lion's share of work done to this article was done via this event" (and, of course, the vast majority of non-Wikipedians never see it).
If you would like there to be a higher bar to add it, or perhaps template parameters which allow whoever adds it to specify the sort of work done (e.g. "One or more images were added to this article as part of..."), that's a very sensible discussion to have, and I'd probably support some version of it. "Credit" on Wikipedia is obviously fraught and all kinds of sensitive (as an aside, I keep meaning to write an essay born of frustration with people creating articles when a draft with the same name of similar quality already exists), but I don't think it makes sense to use it on the talk page of every article edited as part of an event ... unless a major contributor to the page thinks it takes away from their own contribution. Granted, it's probably a gray area, since I don't know that there's ever been any linkable form of consensus that these should be added everywhere. Thoughts? (to be clear, I'm not so much arguing this particular article -- and don't intend to restore it there -- as much as general principle). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Each project is free to tag whatever articles it chooses as part of its project, so go ahead if you want to. And yes, it has been taken as meaning "the lion's share of work done to this article was done via this event" in the mainstream media. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations!

  The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds
For your work on Alan Shepard, High Explosive Research, and S-50 (Manhattan Project), promoted between February and April 2017. For the coordinators, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Milhistbot

G'day Hawkeye, I think Milhistbot didn't pick up that Kragujevac massacre was a joint nom at ACR. It seems to have credited 23 editor but not me. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Finschhafen

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Finschhafen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 10:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Gellibrand

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Gellibrand you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Gellibrand

The article John Gellibrand you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Gellibrand for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Jan to Mar 17 Milhist article reviewing

  Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of five Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period January to March 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Great work!

  In memory of Pompey
As an appreciation of your work on this article, I found and uploaded this image of Pompey! Kerry (talk) 08:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Gellibrand

The article John Gellibrand you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:John Gellibrand for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Edward Elliott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heliopolis, British Expeditionary Force and Battle of Amiens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harold Edward Elliott

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harold Edward Elliott you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Finschhafen

The article Battle of Finschhafen you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Battle of Finschhafen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 03:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harold Edward Elliott

The article Harold Edward Elliott you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Harold Edward Elliott for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harold Edward Elliott

The article Harold Edward Elliott you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Harold Edward Elliott for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Battle of Madang

G'day Hawkeye7, as we look to wrap up the Huon Peninsula articles, is there anything that you would like to add about that campaign to the Battle of Madang? AustralianRupert (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

I don't have my books at the moment, so I can't do anything myself until I return in May. The Madang article is a little incoherernt in parts "which had been secured by US and Australian forces in January – February 1944 by troops assigned to the Huon Peninsula campaign". Furthermore:
  • The main problem here is that the key point - that Madang was secured by forces moving along the coast in boats of the 532nd EBSR is obscured
  • The Japanese were not withdrawing from Saidor, but from the Finschhafen area past Saidor
  • Where were the Japanese withdrawing to? From memory, it was the Sepik
  • The article should state when Madang was occupied, as this was far from obvious too

Regards Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

G'day, Hawkeye, thanks for these points. I have tried to adjust the article to deal with these points now. Thank you for your time. Regards, 08:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
G'day again, Hawkeye, as I am now on Christmas leave, I am looking to do a bit more content work. I was thinking of putting this one up for GA. Would you mind taking a look to see if there is anything else you feel should be covered? Thanks for your time. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 02:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of John Gellibrand

  Hello! Your submission of John Gellibrand at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HaEr48 (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

X-10 Graphite Reactor

I was at a bit of a loss where to put this in the FA list; I went for history, but if you want it moving somewhere else, let me know. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Special Barnstar
For your excellent review of INS Vikrant (R11) at A-class review, which is now a featured article. Thanks for helping me towards my first FA. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for John Gellibrand

On 26 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Gellibrand, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite topping his class at Sandhurst, John Gellibrand found the prospects for promotion in the British Army so bleak that he resigned his commission and moved to Tasmania to grow apples? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Gellibrand. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Gellibrand), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Harold Edward Elliott

  Hello! Your submission of Harold Edward Elliott at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 21:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

And another FACbot query

For some reason, the bot never ran on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Philippine Competition Commission/archive1, which was archived a few days ago. Thanks, Sarastro1 (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm away at the moment, so it will take a few days. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward J. Drea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  •   Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
  •   1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
  •   Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
  • Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Archived FAC

Hi -- just doing some stats analysis on April FACs, and I found this, which doesn't seem to have been processed. Looks like the FAC is not linked on the article talk page -- is that why? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

The problem is that it was removed from the FAC category with this edit. I restored it to the category, and the Bot has processed it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
This is also unprocessed, though the FAC is linked on the talk page. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
I will investigate. I can't tell what is going on without checking the logs, and I can't do that until I return home. (I may get the Bot to put them in the drop box in future so I can read them remotely.) The Bot sends me error reports with logs when it has a problem, but it has not detected one. I will have to get back to you in a few days. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Now that I can see the log, the Bot says: "WARNING: FAC closed but Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Philippine Competition Commission/archive1 has NOT been moved to the archive page". This is true; I have made this change, and it was processed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
OK; if I see more untranscludede archives I'll look for those issues before checking with you. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bismuth phosphate process

On 3 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bismuth phosphate process, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the bismuth phosphate process was used by the Manhattan Project to extract plutonium for use in atomic bombs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bismuth phosphate process. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bismuth phosphate process), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Harold Edward Elliott

On 4 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harold Edward Elliott, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brigadier General Pompey Elliott convinced his men that his horse could spot men who were unshaven or incorrectly dressed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harold Edward Elliott. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Harold Edward Elliott), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 05:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar

  The World War Barnstar
Harold Edward Elliott. Three cheers! Nicely done! 7&6=thirteen () 15:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Edit summary

Can you please explain this edit summary: [93]. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Landing at Saidor

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Landing at Saidor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Landing at Saidor

The article Landing at Saidor you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Landing at Saidor for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

22:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your follow up question on my RFA. It made me look at the situation in a different light and think about aspects of it I missed the first time. There might still be layers there that I'm missing.~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 12:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

You still have my support vote. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

FAC bot

Have you considered expanding the capability of FAC bot to include GAN? From what has been discussed on the talk page, the current GA bot is not really maintained and the owner does not want to, and your bot already interfaces with GAs already. Just a thought. Cheers. Kees08 (Talk) 01:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

It wasn't contemplated, because there was already a Bot that does GA work. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Op-Ed?

I was looking through the World War I timeline page for inspiration for this month's Bugle op-ed piece and found the Battle of Messines (1917) and the introduction of the Gotha G.IV to be interesting enough for an op-ed; however, the more I read about the Battle of Messines the more I encountered Australian units. I recall that earlier you had written a particularly fine piece concerning the Australians on the Somme, so I thought I would drop you a line and see if you wanted to take this month's op-ed and discuss the Australians at the Battle of Messines. If not, then I will take up the Gotha G. IV and run with it for our June op-ed. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:05, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Sure. I'll write one on Messines for you. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Don't forget that there are still two book reviews at User:Hawkeye7/Book Reviews. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) Oops I'd missed them - posted, and thanks again. It's good to see the papers from the Kokoda conference published - I attended it, and the standard was very high. Nick-D (talk) 02:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Okay, you can find the Op-Ed at User:Hawkeye7/Sandbox5. Suggest moving it to the required location without redirect. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Hawkeye, many thanks for the op-ed and book reviews. In the latter, on the Kokoda book, was wondering if it might be worth clarifying just how "The consensus of historians has swung behind Generals Douglas MacArthur and Thomas Blamey" -- I have to admit some ignorance on this point and our readers might be in the same boat... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of British hydrogen bomb programme

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British hydrogen bomb programme you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

19:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of British hydrogen bomb programme

The article British hydrogen bomb programme you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:British hydrogen bomb programme for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

Thank you for your copyediting help at The Plot to Hack America !

Thank you for your copyediting help at The Plot to Hack America ! Sagecandor (talk) 23:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Strategy

As you were at the Melbourne meetup - and have probably fed back into the system in more than one way or other regarding the strategy - is there anything you would like to add in any way to the Australian conversation in reletion to the Cycle 2 stage - either on wiki or off? I do think your contribution is important due to your profile amongst the milhist community, and the foot in either community would be an interesting perspective - I am trying up my report in the next day or so - so I am not asking for an essay - any words in relation to what Katherine was talking about - or anything that you think is important relative to strategy, I would be interested to hear about - thanks JarrahTree 01:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

15:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye, how's it going? Isidor Isaac Rabi has been scheduled for the above date as Today's Featured Article. I'd appreciate it if you could check the article one more time to make sure it's up-to-date. You can edit the text that will appear on the Main Page if you like; I'll be trimming it to around 1100 characters. Thanks! - Dank (push to talk) 00:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

I've trimmed it down to the usual character count. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leslie H. Martin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leslie H. Martin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leslie H. Martin

The article Leslie H. Martin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Leslie H. Martin for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leslie H. Martin

The article Leslie H. Martin you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Leslie H. Martin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK for British hydrogen bomb programme

On 20 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article British hydrogen bomb programme, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first tests of the British hydrogen bomb programme were hailed as a triumph but in fact were failures? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, British hydrogen bomb programme), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk)) 05:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Alfred Starbird

On 27 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alfred Starbird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alfred Starbird directed the Operation Dominic nuclear tests which "significantly enhanced the security of the nation and the free world"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfred Starbird. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alfred Starbird), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar

  The Main Page Barnstar
Fantastic work at Alfred Starbird! One of the best non-GA articles I've seen on DYK in a long time. You should consider nominating this some day! Happy editing, ComputerJA () 02:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Precious five years!

Precious
 
Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Has it been that long? Gosh. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Yes ;) - Thank you for Project Y for TFA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
... and for Isidor Isaac Rabi on his birthday! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
... today for Chicago Pile-1 of which you said: "I find it fascinating that you can pile rocks in a heap, and strange and wonderful things happen. Based on the science of neutrons, whose existence was demonstrated just ten years before, and which cannot be seen, only inferred."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Have a Merry Christmas Gerda. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:06, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Apr to Jun 17 Milhist article reviewing

  Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history)
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 9 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period Apr to Jun 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

DYK for Landing on Long Island

On 10 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Landing on Long Island, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there was an amphibious invasion of Long Island in 1943? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Landing on Long Island. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Landing on Long Island), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 12:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Richard H. Carmichael

On 11 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richard H. Carmichael, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Richard H. Carmichael was shot down on 20 August 1944 while leading the 462d Bombardment Group in the bombing of Yawata, the first daylight air raid on Japan since the Tokyo Raid in 1942? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richard H. Carmichael. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Richard H. Carmichael), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations!

  The Military history A-Class Medal with Diamonds
I hearby award you an A-class Medal with Diamonds, for your work on Tube Alloys, Project E, and Ernest Titterton, promoted between May and July 2017. For the coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

not sure

whether you take it any particular way - close to a doppelganger there [139] JarrahTree 10:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign

On 25 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign relied on aircraft (example pictured) and "Fuzzy Wuzzy Angels"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Charles Moses

On 25 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles Moses, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charles Moses escaped from Singapore with Major General Gordon Bennett, led a cavalry regiment at the Battle of Buna-Gona, and crossed the Rhine with the British commandos? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Moses. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Charles Moses), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Martin F. Scanlon

On 26 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martin F. Scanlon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martin F. Scanlon was one of the Early Birds of Aviation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martin F. Scanlon. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Martin F. Scanlon), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quote at end of Oppenheimer article

This may seem like a bizarrely late comment, but I was just looking at the J. Robert Oppenheimer article, and I wanted to thank you for adding the Bhagavad Gita quote at the very end of the article on 27 February 2011. The quote provides the perfect conclusion to the article and helps give it the literary distinction which Wikipedia articles are often accused of lacking. Gildir (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Never too late. Thank you! Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Milhistbot

G'day Hawkeye. Ian Rose passed Talk:Bill McCann at ACR earlier today, but Milhistbot doesn't seem to have run as yet. He also passed a couple of others at the same time, and Milhistbot doesn't seem to have run for them either. Am I being impatient or is there a glitch? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Not sure. I may have been holding it up with some work I was doing here. It has run okay. I will keep an eye on it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

23:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Base development information

G'day, Hawkeye, hope you are well. Recently, I've done a some work on a couple of articles: Battle of Cape Gloucester and Land Battle of Vella Lavella. I wonder if you have any more information on base development (or any other aspect), that you might be keen on adding to either article? Thank you for your time. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I can add a section to each article. Give me a few days. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
I have added sections on base development to both articles. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, Hawkeye. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
G'day, again, I've expanded a couple more that could do with the Hawkeye touch if you are keen: Battle of the Green Islands and Battle of the Treasury Islands. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
I have added a couple of paragraphs on base development to each article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
G'day, Hawkeye, as part of my own island hopping campaign, I've finished working on the Landings at Cape Torokina article for the timebeing. If you get a chance, would you mind taking a look and adding the base development information as per before? I will move on to the battles of the perimeter shortly, with a view to finally rounding out the Bougainville campaign articles but it will probably take me until the end of the year at the my present rate of effort. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
G'day again, Hawk, sorry to bother you with this one again, but I wasn't sure if you've seen this or not. Would you be keen to add something to the Landings at Cape Torokina article? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Sorry. I missed it. I will have a look. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Shepards Grove

Happy to assist and recreate as a skeleton any pages that have to be deleted for copyvio purposes in the future. Deletion and recreation is much easier than rev-del'ing up to hundreds of revisions. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

I've just deleted Hahn Air Base for the same reason. I'll wait a day and recreate a skeleton article. Buckshot06 (talk) 01:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
I think that is a good way to do it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Project Emily

  Hello! Your submission of Project Emily at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dl2000 (talk) 00:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Project Emily

Hi Hawkeye7, 3 poss tweaks

  1. ) "Implicit in Wilson's to develop..." - missing word?
    "decision" Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  2. ) "Its first Thor missile arrived at RAF Lakenheath on a Douglas C-124 Globemaster II transport aircraft on 19 September, and was delivered to RAF Feltwell on 19 September." - same day?
    The first date should be 29 August. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
  3. ) "McNamara's decision Skybolt..." - something missing?
    "to cancel". Adfded. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Best regards, JennyOz (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for John William Alexander O'Brien

On 24 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John William Alexander O'Brien, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John O'Brien presided over the military court that tried and acquitted Japanese Admiral Soemu Toyoda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John William Alexander O'Brien. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John William Alexander O'Brien), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League

On 26 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Sydney Metro Blues (pictured) are the 2017 Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League champions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Mervyn Brogan

On 27 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mervyn Brogan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mervyn Brogan was the first Australian Chief of the General Staff to have a university degree? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mervyn Brogan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mervyn Brogan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Grapple

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Grapple you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:00, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

22:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Grapple

The article Operation Grapple you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Operation Grapple for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Grapple

The article Operation Grapple you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Operation Grapple for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

I changed Template:Announcements/New featured content to a tableless layout. Since I didn't touch the * lists, I didn't think I'd mess up FACBot. So this diff is my fault, sorry. I've added newlines after each list, like it was before — diff. I hope that fixes it. If not, I'll revert my changes. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 05:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

I thought it would be okay too. But I'm kind of lazy, which is why I use Bots. Your proposed fix should be okay. The Bot looks for the "Articles (15, most recent first)" line. It obtains the number to keep from that line. It adds the new entry, and then counts the lines from there. So ones beyond 15 are omitted. (This allows you to change the number of entries.) It assumes it has reached the end of the section when it reaches a blank line or the "Topics (15, most recent first)" line. I have just now told it to respond to your </div> card as well. So you shouldn't need the blank lines. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Looking good now — diff. Thanks! Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 00:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Ngo Dinh Diem presidential visit to Australia

Hi Hawkeye, this FA article is currently proposed to be included in On This Day on main page tomorrow, 2 Sept. In the last section, Aftermath, it has "Edwards and his deputy Jim Cairns led large anti-war protests." It looks to me like edits done 19 June 2011 made it read as if referring to the previously mentioned "Peter Edwards, a military historian at the Australian War Memorial". Can you please have a look at/reword it? JennyOz (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

It was referring to him. Originally it said "In 1970, Labor leader [[Gough Whitlam]] posed with the [[Vietcong]] flag,<ref>Edwards (1997), p. 290.</ref> and his deputy [[Jim Cairns]] led large anti-war protests." The first clause is untrue, misrepresenting the source, and then poor edits trying to correct this mistake mixed up the footnote with the text. I remember Jim Cairns. When I was at Monash Uni in the 1990s he used to show up on Fridays and sell books. But he was not Peter Edwards' deputy. I can only imagine the look on Peter Edward's face if he read this! Anyway, I have corrected it, and made some minor changes. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for so promptly fixing the nonsensical bit and for the extra changes. JennyOz (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

22:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

DYK for Wilfrid Oulton

On 8 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilfrid Oulton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wilfrid Oulton was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for sinking three U-boats in one month? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wilfrid Oulton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wilfrid Oulton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Four Award

  Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Project Y. epicgenius (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Four Award #2

  Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on High Explosive Research. epicgenius (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Bugle article

In the Battle of Pilckem Ridge, General Sir Hubert Gough attempts to break through the German defensive positions, and then push forward. The planned advance is still a limited one, the final objective about 5,000 yards (4,600 m) distant.

No, no a thousand times no! The green line was the objective, 3,500 yds distant at most. An extra (red) line was added to mark the limit of possible exploitations by fresh troops, where German resistance had collapsed or ground was undefended. The red line was not the objective. Troops who advanced beyond the range of their divisional artillery according to this scheme, were to be protected by medium and heavy artillery instead. It was a break-in not a breakthrough attempt. See the Pilckem article for the details. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 10:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hmm, I can't comment on the distance question but I will have to take responsibility for changing Hawkeye's original "break into" to "break through", simply because the original sounded like a burglary attempt to my ignorant ears...! I've since reverted the wording to "break into". Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
That term seems to have as many definitions as people who use it, which causes endless confusion. There's no doubt that the plan was for several bite and hold attacks but the truth of the matter is buried by decades of derivative garbage following Lloyd George et al. See History of the Great War 1917 Part II, not that I'm bitter mind. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 12:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
You're absolutely right. Corrected the article. The use of the medium artillery (the 60-pounders and 6-inch howitzers) was a Gough touch. During the advance to the Hindenburg Line it had been found that they could displace as fast as the field artillery. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Oh that's a good point, I'll work it into the article. Regards and thanks. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Frederick Brundrett

  Hello! Your submission of Frederick Brundrett at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Vensatry (talk) 12:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

19:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Non-diffusing subcats

Re: Category:American women mathematicians please read the language of WP:GHETTO and {{non-diffusing}}, particularly [emphasis added] "It includes mathematicians that can also be found in the parent category, or in diffusing subcategories of the parent." Someone in Category:American women mathematicians must also be in either Category:American mathematicians (the parent) or another subcategory of Category:American mathematicians (i.e. in the case of Nancy Farley Wood, Category:20th-century American mathematicians and Category:Mathematicians from Illinois and Category:Mathematicians from Missouri.) Since Category:American mathematicians is otherwise diffused by century and state (in addition to sub-field of study, such as Category:American geodesists), it is not necessary for the parent category to house any articles and can instead be fully diffused using at least two schemes. Please ping me if you respond here. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 20:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

@Koavf: We've been through this before. Category:American mathematicians is a marked as a non-diffusing category of Category:American mathematicians. All the articles in it must also be in the parent category. Any attempt to move them into an ghetto will be regarded as misogyny, and I will have to report you to ANI. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Did you read anything I wrote above? First off, Category:American mathematicians is not marked as non-diffusing of itself. Secondly, if you look at Category:American women mathematicians and also look at WP:GHETTO, you will see that biographies can be in a different scheme to diffuse the parent. Which this one is. Do you understand the language of the template itself? Why is it you think that Category:American mathematicians cannot be fully diffused by century, state, or some other scheme aside from gender? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Alternately, let me put it this way: If you were to post to WP:ANI, what would you write? If you tell me your thought process, I may be able to address your concerns. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
This seems to defeat the whole point of marking the category as non-diffusing.   We came under severe criticism for this sort of categorisation, which was portrayed in the mainstream media as proof that Wikipedia is misogynist, threatening my ability to contribute. Categorisation by state seems arbitrary and reduces the value of the categorisation. Confronts anyone looking at the category with precisely the view we wanted to avoid. Most states have only one person in them. Physicists are not categorised this way. Looking at Richard Hamming, I note that he is not categorised this way. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
They only have one because I am making it now. They will be more full soon. I think the criticism was that women were somehow segregated away and men were seen as normative in the parent category. (I don't agree with the assessment but still, that was the problem.) Subcategorizing by field/genre, century, or state provides a way to keep the parent category empty in the first place, which is precisely what will resolve the complaint. Some categories (e.g. Category:American mimes) are too small to need any diffusion but if there is a diffusion by men/women, there can be one by some other scheme as well. Again, I'm sorry if you misunderstood but please look at the actual text of the tag: subdividing by another scheme is entirely consistent with a category being non-diffusing and is exactly what WP:GHETTO calls for. Finally, as an aside, a category like "Category:Mathematicians from Ohio" also serves to diffuse up a larger hierarchy like Category:Scientists from OhioCategory:Academics from OhioCategory:People from Ohio. We don't need it so granular as Category:Geometers from Ohio but having it as broad as Category:People from Ohio would make for unnavigable categories. So a triple intersection of nationality, occupation, and location is very useful for subdividing all three of those parent schemes. Does that make sense? Are we on the same page? If there's something I'm missing, please let me know. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 22:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
We're on the same page. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Carry on then. Sigh. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks man. Cooler heads prevailed. Onwards and upwards. Etc. I'm glad that we could discuss it. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 01:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail

 
Hello, Hawkeye7. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Whiteghost.ink (talk) 03:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

I've just deleted this page, which was the former Turner Air Force Base, as a likely copyvio (Bwmoll3), unfortunate as it is. Happy to recreate a skeleton on request. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Upcoming book on Operation Grapple

Hi, Have you seen that the ANU Press will release a book on Operation Grapple later this year? (probably quite soon as they've started promoting it). The details are here. I think that the ANU press puts PDFs of all their books on the internet for free. Cheers, Nick-D (talk) 10:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

No, I hadn't seen it. Thanks for that! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
The book is now available here, Cheers Nick-D (talk) 09:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

The Italian nationalist impostor

I can't remember if you were involved but a while back, several of us went through a lot of Western Desert Campaign articles removing his interpolations. There was a list of articles to check and I wonder if Second Italo-Ethiopian War was one? The Analysis section looks a bit dodgy, could he have had a hand in it?

DYK for Project Emily

On 16 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Emily, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British crews launched Thor intermediate-range ballistic missiles (example pictured) from Vandenberg Air Force Base as part of Project Emily? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Emily. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Project Emily), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lorna Arnold

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lorna Arnold you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jackyd101 -- Jackyd101 (talk) 23:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Revolutionary War listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Revolutionary War. Since you had some involvement with the Revolutionary War redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Appah Rao (talk) 05:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lorna Arnold

The article Lorna Arnold you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Lorna Arnold for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jackyd101 -- Jackyd101 (talk) 10:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Freedom of Navigation operations

I'm looking for a couple of wise Milhist heads to provide a little outside expertise at Talk:USS John S. McCain (DDG-56)#Comparable articles. Would you please mind taking a look and putting your point of view? Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

GA reassess

Rommel myth, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. LargelyRecyclable (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Frederick Brundrett

On 24 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frederick Brundrett, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Frederick Brundrett, the UK's Chief Scientific Adviser to the Ministry of Defence, was one of Britain's oldest first-class field hockey players? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frederick Brundrett. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Frederick Brundrett), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

15:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement

On 26 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan described the 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement as the "great prize"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 01:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
Thanks very much for the review, and surrounding discussions! Take care, — fortunavelut luna 18:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

23:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Jul to Sep 2017 Milhist article reviewing

  The WikiChevrons
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 19 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period Jul to Sep 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Lorna Arnold

On 5 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lorna Arnold, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as UK secretary in the Economic Directorate of the Allied Control Council in post-war Berlin, Lorna Arnold slept with a revolver under her pillow? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lorna Arnold. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lorna Arnold), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 03:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Submissions for The 10,000 Challenge (Canada)

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its first anniversary. We'd love to have more featured content submitted, such as your article Montreal Laboratory, or any other well-sourced Canada-related articles you have created or expanded since November 2016.

You can use this link to submit articles to the challenge. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

A-Class medal with Diamonds

  The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds
On behalf of the coordinators of the Military History WikiProject, I hereby award you the A-Class medal with Diamonds for your work on Operation Hurricane, Philip Baxter, and Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign. Congratulations! Biblio (talk) 15:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project Emily

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Project Emily you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project Emily

The article Project Emily you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Project Emily for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project Emily

The article Project Emily you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Project Emily for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for John D. Hoffman

On 15 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John D. Hoffman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John D. Hoffman was the only member of the Manhattan District to be awarded the Soldier's Medal, the United States Army's highest award for heroism in a non-combat situation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John D. Hoffman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John D. Hoffman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 01:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes

Hi Hawkeye, thank you for reviewing all of these articles! I don't think I have ever had so many GA reviews on the go at once before. I was wondering if you wanted to sort out this 'first sentence' issue here rather than me try and discuss it in multiple places at once. Like I said before, that opening line is included as a quick introduction separately from the article overview per WP:TVLEAD, as is also done on the main series and season articles for the show. It is pretty basic information that can be confirmed by checking Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and/or watching the episode, and it has never been challenged before, so it never seemed worth trying to work into the body of every single episode article. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Since they were all pretty similar, I thought it best to review them all at once. The lead is fine. All we are down to is a reference for the series and episode number. I realise that this is pretty basic information. But the whole Plot section is based on the assumption that the reader hasn't watched the episode. Furthermore, I'm not sure where the episode number is in the credits. But as long as we can find this fact somewhere it is okay. I have looked through the Production sections, and I concluded that enough information is there. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
The episode number should be sourced in the development section where the title is first noted, and many references in the articles will note the series so adjustments could be made there if you felt that was necessary. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
I have passed all six. I had some trouble with the GA page. Suggest that in future that all episodes be disambiguated with "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D" whether they need it or not. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks again! I think there would be some blow-back from other editors if I started over-disambiguating articles. All of the articles for the series are collected in Template:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes anyway, and at List of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
Thanks for taking the effort to review the Agents of Shield episodes in such a short period of time. I had been trying to find the time to do so myself for weeks. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

Lancashire Fusiliers War Memorial

Hey! Looking for some help with this. I want a short paragraph on the Lancashire Fusiliers in WWI for background in the war memorial article, but I can't find anything reliable. Essentially I want a distilled version of Lancashire Fusiliers#First World War or something similar, but with less shitty sourcing (ie, not hobby websites). Can you suggest anything? Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Nvm, I think I've found what I wanted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
That's good. There was a book on their activities in the Great War, which is available online. Anecdotally I have been told that the Lancashire Fusiliers being nearly wiped out on 25 April 1915 was a traumatic experience for the local community. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

18:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salt Wells Pilot Plant

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salt Wells Pilot Plant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

00:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

  • Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
  • Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
  • Featured List –   Bloom6132 (submissions) and   1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
  • Featured Pictures –   SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
  • Featured Topic –   MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
  • Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
  • Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
  • In The News –   MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
  • Good Article Review –   Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Statement_by_Dank

Hi Hawkeye, it's been too long since we've chatted. I've decided I want to say something there, but first, I'm in search of clue. One way to get clue is to talk with people who disagree with me (particularly if they're making a statement at WP:RFAR, because people often truncate their statements drastically, and actually know a lot more than they're saying). You arrived at the opposite conclusion to mine. I don't think it's fair to say that Arbcom shouldn't take the case because they're not the best venue and they can't solve the whole problem, because there are parts of the problem that they and only they can solve. Arbcom is much more likely not to fix something that they could actually fix than the other way around; there is little chance that they will go all bull-in-a-china-shop. They may go the other direction, and do something minimal and limited to just the two principal parties. But even a minimal ruling can be one important step along the way, as people grapple with this very extensive and tough problem.

So, I'm leaving this note for both you and GoldenRing, for two reasons: 1. you guys are the only two who disagree with me (although we do have a few noncommital statements from others), so you're the ones in the best position to explain to me why I'm wrong, and 2. Arbcom is hesitating, and I can understand that ... they're not masochists. But I think it would be good to apply peer pressure to get them to step up and do the right thing, the necessary thing, and a unanimous case request would be a suitable form of peer pressure. IMO, Arbcom is a kind of single point of failure for Wikipedia ... if they turn away from disputes that can legitimately be framed as policy violations and that can't be solved elsewhere, then the whole dispute-resolution system fails. - Dank (push to talk) 19:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Actually, my position is much closer to that of HJ Mitchell, but he can say that because he's an admin. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the strike, I appreciate it. Keeping my fingers crossed. - Dank (push to talk) 23:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Hawkeye7 . I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

FAC reviewing barnstar

  The Reviewer Barnstar
FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the one FAC image review, two source reviews, and six prose reviews you did during October. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

18:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Something with MilHistBot?

Hi Hawkeye, looks like the bot is overwriting Nick's and my updates to the Bugle issue on Template:WPMILHIST Announcements -- see the edits on 7 October for examples... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

The MilBot doesn't update that. I checked the log, and your update occurred while it was running. It took about a half an hour to collect all the information on the announcements page. It took a copy of the page at the start of the run and modified it, then updated the page. No edit conflict was reported. Hence, your edit was lost. There are two ways we can go:
  • I can modify the run to assemble the information first, then get the page and update it, which will reduce the window down to a minute or less.
  • I can modify the run to update the Bugle issue for you, based on what Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News says is the latest edition
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
@Ian Rose: Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Richard F. Gordon Jr.

On 9 November 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard F. Gordon Jr., which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships

On 11 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Rollers won the 2017 Asia-Oceania Wheelchair Basketball Championships, while the Gliders came in second? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)


Your opinion about WW II

I added another reference about desertions in Italy in September 1943.I already edited Cassibile armistice to improve it.Thanks again.Kingofwoods (talk) 11:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Possible need for Milhistbot tweak

G'day Hawkeye, I see that you will shortly receive your last Diamonds. When that happens, Milhistbot will need to know that your next award with be an A-Class Cross. Is the bot set up for that as yet? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes, the MilHistBot is set up for this; but my next award will only be my 34th, so it should still be the A-Class medal with Diamonds. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Great. I meant the next one. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Another bot question

The bot does not seem to have run on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Carol (film)/archive1. I'm not sure why, thought some indecision over who the nominator was might have something to do with it. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

The problem was [this edit]. The Bot couldn't work out the name of the nomination page. I have given it an extra hint to allow it to deal with cases like this. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Annabelle Lindsay

On 17 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Annabelle Lindsay, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after being injured, Annabelle Lindsay relinquished a scholarship to play college basketball in the United States but has since been awarded another to play wheelchair basketball? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Annabelle Lindsay. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Annabelle Lindsay), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 13:40, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salt Wells Pilot Plant

The article Salt Wells Pilot Plant you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Salt Wells Pilot Plant for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

British logistics in the Falklands War

This sentence — "The loss of the helicopters forced the 3rd Commando Brigade to advance across East Falkland on floor." — strikes me as very odd. I would have corrected the phrase "on floor", but perhaps its a British dialect that I don't understand as an American reader. 7&6=thirteen () 18:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

A typo. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  Fixed 7&6=thirteen () 19:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Gillian Rolton

On 21 November 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gillian Rolton, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT♦C 01:38, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

 
Hello, Hawkeye7.

I noticed you've done some constructive editing recently.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 09:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

 

Hello Hawkeye7. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

As a personal note, I was very happy to see this request come through. Thank you for volunteering, even if it is only to help out in doses. Your content work is really remarkable :) TonyBallioni (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
As additional note, per your comments on the request page; while there are hundreds of users with the New page reviewer user right, almost all of the reviews are done by a very small number of reviewers, and the majority of users with the flag are not active. Any help that you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks very much. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 22:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

FL count

Hi, Hawkeye. I saw your edit here where you moved the total featured list count up by 3 and can't tell where you got the number from. The list you added had been present in another place (and under a different name), but I don't know how the figure would change otherwise. Where did you come up with the total? I looked through the most recent FL additions to see if one of us had forgotten to change the count, but it looks like we updated it properly, unless I'm missing something. Giants2008 (Talk) 16:30, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

I counted them. My problem is that Petscan indicates that there are only 3,224 featured lists. I removed several from the category yesterday that had been marked as featured lists but were not. (The creator had used another article as a template and copied the {{featured list}} template.) So the numbers don't add up. There could be duplicates, or (more likely) some lists that have been de-listed but are still there. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
That's odd. I'll alert the FL community on FLC talk and hopefully somebody there will be able to resolve the problem. Thanks for your diligence. Giants2008 (Talk) 16:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

Band of Brothers

Probably fifteen more AfDs.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 01:18, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Polaris Sales Agreement

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Polaris Sales Agreement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sp33dyphil -- Sp33dyphil (talk) 01:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Polaris Sales Agreement

On 27 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polaris Sales Agreement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the United States supplied ballistic missiles (example pictured) to Great Britain under the Polaris Sales Agreement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Polaris Sales Agreement. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Polaris Sales Agreement), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

MacArthur’s Knighthood

Thanks for the link to the earlier discussion, however I think as it’s now written the article is inaccurate, as it suggests that the Order of the Bath is an Australian honor, which it simply isn’t. Perhaps it would make more sense to just include the fact that it was given on the advice of the Australian Government over the British Government’s objection? JCO312 (talk) 03:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

It was an Australian honour. The official position is:

The Imperial system of honours and awards was applied across many countries in the Commonwealth of Nations but the system was administered independently in each country. Awards within the system were bestowed by the governments of each of those countries. Australians who received Imperial campaign medals for service in the Australian armed forces received these awards from a grateful Australian Government and people.[223]

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I actually still don’t think that answers the question. Campaign medals are different from orders of chivalry. Thus, while a Victoria Cross would be appropriately interpreted as an Australian honor if awarded under the circumstances you’re describing, the Order of the Bath is simply a British order. Put it another way, there is no such thing as the “Australian Order of the Bath.” JCO312 (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC) JCO312 (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

The text of the article is crystal clear: the Australian government had him appointed an honorary Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath. @Anthony Staunton: Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Australia was a full participant in the Imperial honours system so the recommendation and issue of campaign medals are no different from orders of chivalry. If the 'Victoria Cross would be appropriately interpreted as an Australian honor' then there should be no dispute about a lessor award. 83 Australian general officers receive the KCB or the CB, Macarthur received an honorary GCB and three other American officers received honorary CBs in the Second World War. They were all Australian honours. Anthony Staunton (talk) 09:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Doug Davis (aviator)

I'm not sure what you mean by "un-reviewed it again". I didn't review it, I wrote it. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

P.S. I have the autopatrolled user right. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

I don't know either. I know you wrote it. It wasn't on the New page patrol list; I went out there from a link you added to Paul Tibbetts. I mustr have donew something accidentally. My apologies for any inconvenience caused.
PS: Submit the article to DYK. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Done. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gen 75 Committee

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gen 75 Committee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gen 75 Committee

The article Gen 75 Committee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gen 75 Committee for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gen 75 Committee

The article Gen 75 Committee you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Gen 75 Committee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement

The article 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 15:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

FYI

recreation 1 | ˌrɛkrɪˈeɪʃ(ə)n | noun [mass noun] activity done for enjoyment when one is not working: she rides for recreation | [as modifier] : sport and recreation facilities | [count noun] : his recreations included golf and rugby. ORIGIN late Middle English (also in the sense ‘mental or spiritual consolation’): via Old French from Latin recreatio(n-), from recreare ‘create again, renew’.

recreation 2 | ˌriːkrɪˈeɪʃ(ə)n | noun [mass noun] the action or process of creating something again: the periodic destruction and recreation of the universe. • [count noun] a re-enactment or simulation of something: they enjoyed television's recreations of more confident times.

- Oxford American Sictionary
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
"Re-creation" is mandated by the Commonwealth Style Guide. (6.119) My (British) Oxford did not have the two under the same entry, and Debrett's had them as different. So thanks for that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement

The article 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hawkeye7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Polaris Sales Agreement

The article Polaris Sales Agreement you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Polaris Sales Agreement for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sp33dyphil -- Sp33dyphil (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Landing on Long Island

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Landing on Long Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 03:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for you help on Vietnam Veterans for Factual History

I appreciate the help. If you think the page is worth saving, please comment on the Afd page. Txantimedia (talk) 03:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)


Donn Eisele flight experience

@JustinTime55:I am having issues finding a source for Donn Eisele's flight experience. Do either of you have a book source or better Google fu than I have? Kees08 (Talk) 03:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

I checked his book, and another I have here, but I cannot find a source for the first two sentences. Thewy were inserted by an IP in 2016. They are probably correct, but I cannot find a source and suggest that they be removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the prompt help. I have removed the sentences. When I work towards taking these articles to GA/FA, I plan on gathering as many books as I can for sources, which should fill any holes I am make by removing unsourced content. Thanks again! Kees08 (Talk) 07:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Mario Alberto Avilés

Hello Hawkeye7,

After creating the last 30+ new Catholic Bishops' pages, clearly I don't see what the problem is. I use the same template to create them and use two distinct references to corroborate the fact. The only thing missing from this one is the date of consecration(installation). It hasn't been announced yet since he was only appointed yesterday morning by the Pope. Roberto221 (talk) 10:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

My thinking was that he isn't a bishop, and won't become one until next year. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

 
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.25% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
  • Our priorities for December:

Seasonal celebrations First ladies Go local #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Landing on Long Island

The article Landing on Long Island you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Landing on Long Island for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 23:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Review request

Thank you for your quick message Hawkeye7. I'd just like to ask you for a favour – could you please have a look at the short article Sukhoi Su-37, which is up for A-class review atm? The review page hasn't seen any activity for two weeks. Thank you, --Sp33dyphil (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Query re: pending ACCs

G'day Hawkeye, just wondered if I should create a new section on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Awards for ACCs, or whether you see them going under the existing Nominations for the A-Class Medal section with new wording? Given the different qualification requirements, it might be clearer to separate them, but I don't want to create work for you in tweaking Milhistbot. Let me know? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

I'd need to alter the way the Bot processes them. Since I'm going away, this would have to wait until January. OTOH, it is unlikely that this will be needed before then. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
I agree there is no rush, you need another five before it kicks in, but I thought I'd create the section now while I think of it. Is that OK? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

A-Class Medal with Diamonds

  The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military history coordinators, I hereby award you the A-Class Medal with Diamonds for your outstanding work on developing for Operation Grapple, British hydrogen bomb programme, and Project Emily to meet the A-Class criteria. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hi, I suspect that you need new ideas for articles about as much as you need a hole in the head, but there's scope for a really interesting article on the logistics for the 1999 INTERFET deployment. As you may have seen, over recent years a number of historians and military officers have published fairly detailed works arguing that INTERFET was actually a near run thing due to the state of the ADF's logistics capabilities (though they're over-egging things a bit IMO given that the operation was highly successful) and it does seem to have lead to some important improvements. Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

There was a hopelessly misguided effort to increase the Army's teeth-to-tail ratio. I do have the material to write this, but I'm away at the moment, and do not have access to my books. I will do it in the New Year. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Only if you see fit! I'd be happy to help. Nick-D (talk) 07:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Milhistbot not running?

G'day Hawkeye, sorry to disturb you on holidays, but I think there might be a glitch with Milhistbot not running. Rupert passed Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Waterloo Bay massacre a day or so ago, but the bot hasn't done its thing as yet. Is it running less often with you away or something? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bot stopped running. I have processed it with a special run. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Hawkeye7, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your reversions

Hi Hawkeye,

I am attempting to categorize the notable members of the Century Association. There have been about 11,000 total. 1,700 already have been identified and categorized. This is a large endeavor that will help people to identify members and their professions, affiliations, etc. through cross-category searching, and will also help me to develop the Century's articles. If you doubt any person was a member, perhaps search their name here: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/006068741, at the yearbook for any date they were a member (especially, usually, the year of their death). As an example: Vannevar Bush (appears in every book from 1939 to 1962). That should give you some verification. Some of these yearbooks are not fully public online, and yet that text search should pretty much confirm. However, the publicly-accessible Century Association Archives Foundation has these books as well; you could verify there in-person as well (WP:OFFLINE). I could go there myself and take photos of book pages as well, if you wish. Is that okay for you? ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 03:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Citations for Bush, Compton, Conant, and Pegram ca be found on pages 369, 372, 372, and 397, respectively.[1] How would you prefer to implement? ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 03:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Commager, Henry Steele; Pringle, Henry F.; Burlingame, Roger (1947). The Century, 1847-1946. New York, New York: The Century Association. Retrieved December 12, 2017 – via Century Association Archives Foundation.
Further discussion takes place here: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_12#Category:Century_Association_members. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Never mind, I had overlooked that you already participated in that discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

S-50 (Manhattan Project) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the S-50 (Manhattan Project) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 22, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 22, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

WWII

FYI Talk pages discussions at World War Two have re-opened. You contributed relatively recently, so please chime in. -Chumchum7 (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Gen 75 Committee

On 18 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gen 75 Committee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ernest Bevin told the Gen 75 Committee that Britain should acquire atomic bombs "whatever it costs... We've got to have the bloody Union Jack flying on top of it"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gen 75 Committee. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gen 75 Committee), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rudolf Peierls

The article Rudolf Peierls you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rudolf Peierls for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of MAUD Committee

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MAUD Committee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frisch–Peierls memorandum

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frisch–Peierls memorandum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Bot query

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Golden jackal/archive1 wasn't closed by the bot, but not sure why. Sarastro (talk) 18:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bot is looking for a {{FACClosed}} card on the review page, and cannot find one. I can't find one either. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Ah, my mistake! For some reason, I never saved the page when I added the closed template. I'll either blame my computer or seasonal exhaustion. Whichever is less embarrassing. Sarastro (talk) 20:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Landings at Cape Torokina

G'day Hawkeye, I hope you are well. I am thinking about putting the Landings at Cape Torokina article up for GAN and was wondering if you would like to be a co-nominator. Depending on how the nom goes, I would also look to potentially put it up for A-class review in early 2018, as well. Please let me know what you think. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Sure. No problem with that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Cheers, Hawkeye. The review page will eventually be here: Talk:Landings at Cape Torokina/GA1. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:12, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign

The article Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Template:WPMILHIST Announcements

G'day Hawkeye, just checking if Milhistbot is maintaining this template at present. I've manually removed some passed and failed GANs, but it doesn't seem to be adding new GANs either since about 9 December. I'm happy to add them manually while you're away if necessary. Let me know? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Looks like the announcements run needs to be run manually as well. I will ensure that it runs daily from now on. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign

The article Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

  The WikiProject Barnstar
For your content contributions and ongoing tech support to the project in the form of Milhistbot I am pleased to personally award you with this barnstar and add you to my 2017 New Years Honours List. Thank you for your contributions to WikiProject Military History. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas gift

Hawkeye7, any chance you can return to your review of this Christmas hook and check the new ALT hooks? We're running out of time to get this onto the main page. Many thanks for anything you can do; I realize you're on vacation, but was hoping you'd be editing again soon based on your recent contributions. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

  Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:33, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

 

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

And to you and yours! I never knew you were from the North until now. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

  Holiday barnstar
You deserve a holiday barnstar, but this barn flake was as close as I could come. And best holiday wishes to you. Thank you for making Wikipedia a better place. 7&6=thirteen () 18:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Buzz Aldrin citations

Hey Hawkeye. I am close to getting Buzz Aldrin to a B-class article (nowhere near a GA though IMO), but I am having issues finding the awards he won during his military career. Do you have a good source for this? Kees08 (Talk) 06:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

His citations here. Then there's his own list. But it falls short... I have an awful feeling that the medal bar is based on File:Buzz Aldrin black and white dress uniform photo portrait.jpg. (There is a full list of these here). Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Your work on the astronauts has been very impressive. It would be nice to have at least the 1959, 1962 and 1963 ones all up to GA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I had noticed those two sites but I was not sure if the first was reliable and if I could use the second because its a primary source. I suppose they are better than nothing, I will try to find a book source for the rest. I couldn't find anymore citations for his awards.
Thanks! I have been working really hard on them, trying to get the first five or so classes to B. I do plan on getting them to GA, but life is pretty busy right now so I have not had time to sit down and work on them. I should start having time in a couple of weeks. Kees08 (Talk) 19:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frisch–Peierls memorandum

The article Frisch–Peierls memorandum you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Frisch–Peierls memorandum for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and All That

Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and best wishes in all things!  Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 11:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Quebec Agreement

On 26 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quebec Agreement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that under terms of the Quebec Agreement, the United States had to seek British agreement to use nuclear weapons against Japan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quebec Agreement. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Quebec Agreement), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 00:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nassau Agreement

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nassau Agreement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nassau Agreement

The article Nassau Agreement you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nassau Agreement for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nassau Agreement

The article Nassau Agreement you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Nassau Agreement for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Rudolf Peierls

On 28 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rudolf Peierls, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rudolf Peierls was awarded the Medal of Freedom, but was later refused entry to the United States because he was suspected of being a spy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rudolf Peierls. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rudolf Peierls), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for British logistics in the Falklands War

On 29 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article British logistics in the Falklands War, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British logistics in the Falklands War depended on ships that were STUFT? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British logistics in the Falklands War. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, British logistics in the Falklands War), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Hawkeye7, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)