Polly
|
|
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 |
){kind=link}
![17 my recently uploaded image logo [Grain surfboards logo.jpg]](#my_recently_uploaded_image_logo_%5BGrain_surfboards_logo.jpg%5D){kind=link}
![18 my recently uploaded image [Canton Viaduct Proposed Changes.jpg]](#my_recently_uploaded_image_%5BCanton_Viaduct_Proposed_Changes.jpg%5D){kind=link}
![19 my recently uploaded image [CV_Postcard.jpg]](#my_recently_uploaded_image_%5BCV_Postcard.jpg%5D){kind=link}
![20 my recently uploaded image [CV_Postcard.jpg]](#my_recently_uploaded_image_%5BCV_Postcard.jpg%5D_2){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (File:AstraPlatformServicesLogo.jpg)
edit){kind=link}
Hi Polly, Thanks for your message/concern but this image IS now used - I uploaded it (yesterday) before I finished the article, ASTRA Platform Services (today). You were just too damn quick! Hopefully, all is now OK for the image to stay (see, poetry too) Satbuff (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Tomwhitman2 image
editHi Polly,
Thank you for your message. I was having some difficulty understanding which tag to use for my upload. I have permission from the owner of the image (Tom Whitman) to use the image on Wikipedia. It is an image that is easily found on the internet, and is on Facebook as well. It is not copyrighted in any way...really just a snapshot that has been used in the past on digital promotional materials in the past. Please help me notate it in the correct way so that I can stay within the Wikipedia guidelines.
Thanks much, Stephen --Srtheiss (talk) 21:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Unless it has been explicitly released under a free license then it must be assumed to be all rights reserved and not free. You could try contacting the copyright holder and ask thenm to release it under a free license, see instructions here. Polly (Parrot) 21:53, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Polly,
Tom Whitman owns the rights to the photo. He agrees to the free use of the photo. I am getting formal email confirmation for consent to use the image under the following agreement:
I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tomwhitman2.jpg ].
I agree to publish that work under the free license
 | The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other uses are permitted. |
I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
7/29/2009, Tom Whitman
Once I get that confirmation, do I post that with the image file?
Thanks,
Stephen
- Forward the email to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org Make sure to include the URL of the image. Then add {{OTRS-pending}} to the image page. Polly (Parrot) 00:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Polly,
I submitted the email to OTRS on Friday, and they they removed the warning about the licensing, but the pending notice is still there and I have not received an email reply. Should I expect to receive a reply email?
Thank you,
Stephen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srtheiss (talk • contribs) 02:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Cerceris images
editHi Polly,
I have an e-mail conformation from the owner of the website (http://www.cerceris.info/) to use all the images I have uploaded. I have followed your instructions and e-mailed the permission I received in e-mail in to the address you provided. I was given permission to use any images on the site as public domain. Is this sufficient or is there anything else I need to do?
Thanks,
Andrew. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Morse (talk • contribs) 23:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes just add this template to the image pages{{OTRS pending}}and remove the no permissions tag I added. Polly (Parrot) 23:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
About UTV_logo.jpg image
editHi Polly
I don't understand how UTV_logo.jpg is not linked to any article. It is very much linked to the article UTV Software Communications, the company to which the logo belongs. Please remove the warning template from the image page.
Thanks
Vijay Padiyar (talk) 21:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is now used, it wasn't when I tagged it. Template now removed. Polly (Parrot) 21:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, probably because I first uploaded the image and then added it to the article. Thanks, anyway! Vijay Padiyar (talk) 21:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I gave you all of six minutes before tagging it, that was rather too quick, my apologies. Polly (Parrot) 21:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, probably because I first uploaded the image and then added it to the article. Thanks, anyway! Vijay Padiyar (talk) 21:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Image deletion proposal
editPolly, please check replacement image Oxonhutch (talk) 22:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Polly (Parrot) 22:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Image / Picture of Sarfaraz Khan
editHi,
On the captioned, the photo is of a local cheiftain in India circa 1739-1740 and is most probably a court potratit. The photograph by default is the property of the Government of India, Department of Archaeology and is freely available for Public Use through the Victoria Memorial Hall, Museum, Calcutta [West Bengal] India.
You may upload the photo without risk.
Regards, Regards, Shantanu Das 05:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Shantanu Das —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantanu2806 (talk • contribs)
- Sounds like it could be public domain, just add a public domain license to the image. Polly (Parrot) 21:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
How is that done....please? 121.245.19.131 (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
How is that done....please? Regards, Shantanu 16:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantanu2806 (talk • contribs)
- All your relevant uploads are licensed for public domain, excepting those listed as possibly unfree images that you claim as your own work. Polly (Parrot) 16:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Metallic Falcons picture
editTo be honest, I have no idea how this free/non-free, replaceable/irreplaceable stuff works, so I just put anything. Can you tell me how to make it right? Othatzsokewl (talk) 05:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- If they are alive or a current band then only a free image would be likely acceptable. Polly (Parrot) 21:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Picture of Francesco Severi
editHello, I am writing you for the file permission problem about the use of Francesco Severi's photo: you can find the copyright data of the owner here. As you can find, in Wikipedia there are a number of already uploaded photos from the same source, as the entry about Sergei Sobolev, Louis Nirenberg, Jean Leray testify. Best regards, Daniele.tampieri (talk) 06:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK thanks for the info, have removed the tag. Polly (Parrot) 21:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Alan Coren -- trying to load a picture
editHi, I took some pics of Alan Coren back in April 1969 while visiting the offices of Punch Magazine. I wanted to upload one of them to his Wikipedia page, and I'm afraid that I couldn't get it right. I followed the instructions, but couldn't figure out how to link the location on his page with the location on wikipedia for the picture (Alan_Coren.jpg). I own the copyright to the picture, should I put up a copyright notice with it? If so, how? Thanks. John Williamson —Preceding unsigned comment added by AbbotSoule&Hoyt (talk • contribs) 15:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- The image has been deleted, if what you say is correct reupload with a Creative Commons license and mention that you took the photo. Polly (Parrot) 21:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry about your mother's passing.
editAfter I posted my note, I saw your note at the top of the page about your mother's passing. My sincerest condolences. John —Preceding unsigned comment added by AbbotSoule&Hoyt (talk • contribs) 15:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 21:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Condolences also. I note that Bk2006 (talk · contribs), who I've just blocked for a week for a really nasty edit summary, seems to be one of our problem users who ignores our guidelines on images. I sometimes give them notice that if they are not going to enter into dialogue and show that they understand and will try to comply with our guidelines, they may be blocked indefinitely (which can easily be lifted if they want it lifted). Any comments on this particular user? Dougweller (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I've gone through their uploads and made a few adjustments and listed a lot a PUI. This user seems to have no grasp of copyright law, they seem to think anything they find on Google images is fair game. Polly (Parrot) 22:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I caught him evading his block and making more insulting edit summaries (he's very anti-Indian to say the least), so I've given him an indefinite block. He was heading for one anyway.
reply
editYou disputed the {{Non-free use rationale}} for File:Zefnoon Safai, Legham Province, Afghanistan.jpg.
Were you aware that Afghanistan is not a signatory to any international copyright agreements, and has no domestic copyright protection laws?
Some wire services and freelance photographers treat images taken as if all the rights to them belong to whoever first publishes them in a country that does have copyright protection. IANAL, but I suspect this is nonsense.
Others have argued that images taken there remain in the public domain, no matter how and where they are published.
I've dropped some hints that the wikimedia foundation's lawyers should weigh in on the copyright issue of images taken in a country with no copyright protection. Until the lawyers weigh in I am going to upload images like this as "fair use", even though I suspect they are really PD. Geo Swan (talk) 03:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Given their source it's plausible they are public domain and a work of the US Federal Gov. Polly (Parrot) 03:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Do students of the service schools remain employees of the DoD? Do they continue to receive a salary while they study? Then I believe you are correct. I didn't realize that NPS == Naval Postgraduate School. Shall I add {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}}? Geo Swan (talk) 03:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think adding {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}} would be reasonable. Polly (Parrot) 15:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 19:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Rarebit
editPolly, as you can see, I did reduce. But, okay, I will reduce more. Pepso2 (talk) 04:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- It could ideally do with being a bit smaller, but then the text may become unreadable. Maybe just leave as is for now. Polly (Parrot) 15:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
This image is created by my self and In the summary of this file also I have stated this "I have created this image by my self using photos released into public domains. Deviathan (talk) 18:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)". So please guide me on what to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deviathan (talk • contribs)
- You need to show that each one of the nine images is public domain by providing a source for all of them. Polly (Parrot) 15:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Rock5410's images
editAfter you went through the images in Kuvempu University and tagged them per CSD, I see that Rock5410 went through and duplicated the images but with different names, this time claiming he's the creator and releases the images into the public domain. <sigh> I've been mostly focused on his copying of non-free text so far, but I'm wondering what I can do to help with his persistent image copyright issues. I haven't really delved into the media use on Wikipedia before, so I'm not sure what the processes are. How do you handle something where it's obviously taken from that gallery website and it's likely a false claim of ownership? I'm going to go try to explain it to him on his talk page. I have gotten a response via a non-template message there previously (or at least a change in behavior), so maybe I can get his attention that way. He just seems to delete the template warnings without reading them. Thanks for working on this! WeisheitSuchen (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- If he keeps uploading copyrighted images under false free licenses then a block will be needed until he shows some understanding of copyright. I'll send all the images to PUI, but if he reuploads them then you might want to drop a quick note at AN/I to see if a block is appropriate. Polly (Parrot) 16:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK, that sounds like a plan. Thanks! WeisheitSuchen (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just gave him an indefinite block with an explanation on his talk page, his latest talk age deletions were the last straw. Dougweller (talk) 18:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Probably for the best, at least until they learn something about copyright. Polly (Parrot) 18:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just gave him an indefinite block with an explanation on his talk page, his latest talk age deletions were the last straw. Dougweller (talk) 18:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK, that sounds like a plan. Thanks! WeisheitSuchen (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The deletion of my pic
editPlease, explain why you want to delete my picture? What's wrong with it? This is from my mother's personal collection, one of the last surviving photos of Shop national clothes from Pirot, it is therefore very precious. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhix (talk • contribs) 15:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- The image just lacks a copyright notice, please take a look at the free licenses here and select one and add it to the image page. You could also add a bit of detail about the image, approximately when it was taken and a brief description would be helpful. Polly (Parrot) 16:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
my recently uploaded image logo [Grain surfboards logo.jpg]
editHello Polly
I uploaded the image for the article of the same name which I am still currently working on to be able to appreciate the complete preview while I continue editing and I'm seriously not aware that I cannot upload a non-free logo for an article that I haven't finished yet and I really apologize for that. I'm still researching for the article I'm creating. That way I can be sure I entered all the right information. And would it be okay if I let you review the article before I submit it? Any suggestions and tips from you would be deeply appreciated. You may email me at sujirou@ymail.com
Sincerely... COMMITCHARGE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Commit charge (talk • contribs) 18:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I've removed the deletion template, but someone else or a bot might readd it. Hopefully your article will be ready for mainspace soon and hopefully it will meet wikipedia's notability guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 19:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
my recently uploaded image [Canton Viaduct Proposed Changes.jpg]
edit
This was an print I photographed in in the Town of Canton's municipal building. The Town of Canton is a public entity and the image has no copywright. What is the issue? User: Canton Viaduct
- No problem you just need to add this info to the image so it has a source, it just helps to do this to prove the image is public domain. Polly (Parrot) 20:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- How? I go to the image and there does not seem to be any place to add this information, please help.
my recently uploaded image [CV_Postcard.jpg]
edit
This postcard was printed in 1906, the photographer is dead and there is no copyright, so again, what is the issue? User: Canton Viaduct
- No problem you just need to add this info to the image so it has a source, it just helps to do this to prove the image is public domain. Polly (Parrot) 20:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- How? I go to the image and there does not seem to be any place to add this information, please help.
my recently uploaded image [CV_Postcard.jpg]
edit- How? I go to the image and there does not seem to be any place to add this information, please help.
- Just edit the image page and add this template {{Information |Description = |Source = |Date = |Author = |Permission = |other_versions = }}
and fill in as much info as you can in the sections. Polly (Parrot) 20:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I did it for one image: Canton Viaduct Proposed Changes.jpg but the Canton Viaduct Repairs 1906.jpg image page one doesn't show the "Edit This Page" tab - please help. And please remove the deletion tags from the photos.
- Tag removed, the edit tab is on the other image page. Polly (Parrot) 21:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- This page: File:Canton Viaduct Repairs 1906.jpg still doesn't have the edit tab even after refreshing, please help.
- I can see the edit tab but not the history tab, probably just some glitch that will right itself soon. Polly (Parrot) 21:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Since I can't edit it but you can, could you please add this:
| Description |
Canton Viaduct Repair |
|---|---|
| Source |
Postcard |
| Date |
1906 |
| Author |
Dead |
| Permission (Reusing this file) |
not copyrighted
|
Thanks!
- OK all done. Polly (Parrot) 22:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I added information to this file: Viaduct No.45.jpg. Please remove deletion tag.
- Done. Polly (Parrot) 23:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I hope it is OK now. Thank you. Inform me if anything is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhix (talk • contribs) 00:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- All looks fine to me. Polly (Parrot) 00:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Photographs
editI have uploaded two files – File:Making of Baluchari Sari.jpg and File:Cluster of Temples.jpg. Both the files are from Wikitravel. They were uploaded in Wikitravel by another person and I have copied his comments. The original pictures are, therefore, neither mine nor uploaded by me. I donot have the required permission from the original owners of the photograph. The person who initially uploaded the photographs does not seem to be active any more. However, in India, the public relations departments (PR deptts) of various companies, as well as government bodies distribute hundreds of pictures to the media for free publication. This is a standard practice in this country. Therefore, I do not feel that any copy right problems are involved in the publication of any such photograph. However, if you think otherwise fell free to delete both the photographs. I would only loose some valuable supporting visuals. Sorry, for the trouble. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 03:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately without a clear permission from the copyright holder these images can't remain under a free license. It can't be assumed that the copyright holder would find this licensing acceptable. Polly (Parrot) 00:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- If licensing is the only problem please suggest an acceptable licensing. Thanks. - Chandan Guha (talk) 05:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- A fair use rationale wouldn't really work as the images would be pretty easy to replace with free versions. So only a free license really works, if you can't show that the image has been freely licensed by the copyright holder then it will likely be deleted. Have you tried looking on Flickr for some freely licensed similar images? Polly (Parrot) 13:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Reg deletion of File:Deu-langkhui.jpg
edit
File:Deu-langkhui.jpg is my own work. So plz advise what would be the appropriate license tag for it. --Xeteli (talk) 04:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for File:Deu-langkhui.jpg. Best regards --Xeteli (talk) 11:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Fayiz Al Kandari Photo
editPolly, I did not create the file on my own and talked face to face with the Kuwaiti freedom committee founder and he has given me verbal permission to use the photo. I will however attempt to get a hold of him and will send him a permissions slip so that I can forward it to you as soon as possible. Thank you for the information and all assistance in this matter.
Def-sense —Preceding unsigned comment added by Def-sense (talk • contribs) 20:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Don't forward the permission to me, follow the instructions here. Polly (Parrot) 00:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Plotter Kill
editHi.. I had some problems uploading the images of the falls for this page, which reulted in a duplicate being formed. If you want to delete the two images then I will upload them again hopefully with the correct info and no duplicate... thanks Phil aka Geotek (talk) 15:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- No need to reupload just stick a free license tag (listed here) on the image not tagged for speedy deletion, then remove the no license tag. Don't forget to add a license to all the images you upload. Polly (Parrot) 15:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Saunders Picture
editI am not entirely sure what's wrong with the second one. Nibblonians (talk) 19:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- It's not a free image, when it comes to living people wikipedia's policy is usually only to allow free images. See section 12 here. Polly (Parrot) 20:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh, okay. Thanks. Nibblonians (talk) 20:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, Wikipedia's image guidelines and policies are a minefield. Polly (Parrot) 20:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh, okay. Thanks. Nibblonians (talk) 20:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Last Change
edithey you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aziz090 (talk • contribs) 03:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hey you too. Polly (Parrot) 18:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
When on enwiki this had been tagged as PUI as a possible promo photo,
Do you have more information? because Commons has tighter standards. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- That's going back quite a while, I can't recall anything though. Polly (Parrot) 14:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Mosley
editSurely all that was required was a caption linking to the case Max Mosley v News Group Newspapers Limited which proved the allegations to be false? Do you have a more politically correct suggestion for a News of the World cover? Francium12 (talk) 17:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes adding it to that article would be directly relevant. Any headline that doesn't libel someone should be fine. Polly (Parrot) 17:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Do not delete
editHello, How are you? Please don not delete the screenshot of TV Patrol Caraga. It did not violate the guidelines.
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.5.88.138 (talk) 02:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Images
editDear Polly,
As per your instructions I'm trying to follow step 1. add ({{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}) However it seems to already be there. Should I add it again? HarveyPrototype (talk) 18:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just add the above template to the image page and give your reason why you dispute it being replaceable. Polly (Parrot) 18:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Polly, I've added the template as well as given the reason on the source page, should I do anything else? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HarveyPrototype (talk • contribs) 18:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- That's all OK, an admin will decide on their fate. Polly (Parrot) 18:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
AOL TV (reply)
edit
Thank you for telling me about the file of AOL TV LOGO.jpg, However, The file is not removed from Wikimedia commons (DO NOT REMOVE IT). Also, If You Like, Fix the page & see The editing sorce for the page & edit it & you may fix the Infobox. —Preceding undated comment added 20:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC).
- Image added to infobox, and rationale now added. Polly (Parrot) 18:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Photos
editAll the photos I have uploaded were taken by me. How do I flag the copyright so I can reflect that I took those photos?
-Seattledude —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattledude (talk • contribs) 21:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I see you've worked it out, so all is fine now. Polly (Parrot) 18:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
File:FN SCARS.jpg is OK from FN
edit
I forget the ticket number, but we got an OTRS confirmation of license release by FN's US division for this image (and as a blanket, their other PR photos of their weapons products... they've been very helpful that way).
Someone else got the blanket release, but I had been working with them on a couple of specific images earlier.
Not a bad review, but the image is in fact factually fine licensing-wise...
Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for letting me know George. Polly (Parrot) 22:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
HBO canada (reply from User:Boyhere)
editYou may get rid of the file (Hbo Canada.gif) now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.164.2 (talk) 01:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the AOL TV edit (From User:Boyhere)
editThank you for editing the page's infobox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.164.2 (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
This is my own image
editThis is my own image
File copyright problem with File:Cage rotor.jpg File Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading File:Cage rotor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 16:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msdaif (talk • contribs)
- Just reupload the image with a free license template attatched. Polly (Parrot) 14:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Licensing?
editWould you happen to know the kind of licensing would fall under a some rights reserved image off of flickr?
Marauder09 (talk) 20:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Clicking on the some rights reserved line on Flickr will link you to the license. Polly (Parrot) 22:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
The user has a question about this file I can't answer, it looks like you might know. See Talk:Canton_Viaduct#Image_removal. Thanks – Sswonk (talk) 00:05, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like it's been dealt with now. Polly (Parrot) 00:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
File:HBOcanadcontent.PNG (reply from User:Boyhere)
editDo not remove HBOcanadacontent.PNG. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boyhere (talk • contribs) 00:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- That image is currently orphaned and lacking a fair use rationale. Polly (Parrot) 17:43, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Johnny Prill
edit
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Prill. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi
editHey there Polly ;), I was just poking around and helping out at WP:CSD by clearing the backlog of images that needed to be deleted, and I noticed your extensive work with pseudo speedy deletion in images. And I just thought I'd stop by and say that I appreciate all of the work you are putting into helping keep Wikipedia free of unnecessary non-free images and making sure that all non-free images meet policy :). I also wanted to say thank you for your welcome to wikipedia message that you gave me when I first joined wikipedia back in Feb of '08 :). The links in the welcome message were very useful to me when I was first starting out on Wikipedia, and heck now that I'm an admin I look back and see that those links really helped me to get started on wikipedia and to become the user I am today. So thanks for all of your dedication and kindness past, present, and hopefully in the future for a long time to come :). Best, Mifter (talk) 03:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you Mifter for the lovely and thoughtful message, I can't believe how quickly all that time has gone. It was great to hear that the welcome message was helpful and that you've gone on to become an admin. That welcome template with the links can be very useful, I still keep mine at the top of my talk page as it often comes in handy.
Image upload patrolling is pretty relentless and time consuming. Wikipedia's image use policies and guidelines can be very hard for established users to comprehend let alone newbies, so it's always nice when someone appreciates your efforts. Keep on doing what you do Mifter and may Wikipedia long continue to benefit from your presence. Polly (Parrot) 18:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
did I fix it?
editThe indivual images stated that they were not used so i put them on a page and therefore was able to take off the tag, was that all that was wrong or am I missing it?!--Jeffmeck22
- No they are fair use images so can't be used on User pages only articles. They are also replaceable fair use images so would really not be acceptable for articles either. Sorry to be the conveyor of bad news. Polly (Parrot) 19:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
what can I do though?
editwhat can I do to fix it though?Jeffmeck22 (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Virtually nothing, those fair use images as they are replaceable by free images will likely be deleted, see section 12 here. Polly (Parrot) 19:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Photo of the Prof. George Dvali
editHello. So should I contact to the München University to get the permission from the staff to use the photospecifically in the wiki article? They already published the media for the wide audience for educational purposes without restriction.Regards, --Zetalion (talk) 20:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- The image would need to be released under a free license that permits derivative and commercial works, see here for instructions about getting permission from an images copyright holder. Polly (Parrot) 20:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Image question...
edithi i was just warned about some of the images i uploaded, but was wondering what to do as 2 of the images were referenecd to source. i have seen other images on wikipedia that i have seen on the internet. is it still possible to properly reference the pictures that have already been uploaed? Thanks! J929 (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- If the images aren't your own then given their content they are likely to be considered replaceable by free images, so unfortunately deletion is likely. Polly (Parrot) 20:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Nano-Tera
editHi Polly,
I updated the Nano-Tera image description. Is this OK now?
Best Wishes,
John —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalgetty (talk • contribs) 11:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- It should be now. Polly (Parrot) 19:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Permissions For File:DaveGuard3.jpg
editHello Polly - I've received and noted your request for further information regarding this picture file, but I don't exactly see how either option can be applied in this case because this file has never been published before - it is a personal snapshot from the subject's family that's been scanned and sent to me. I cropped and sharpened it, but the original file has been posted only by the owner (Tom Guard) on his FaceBook page. Any brief advice you might give would be appreciated. Regards, Sensei48 (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- The copyright holders would need to release it under a free license, see the instructions here for requesting permission. Polly (Parrot) 23:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
image flagged for deletion
edithi polly, the image you marked as missing proof of copyright is an image i'd like to delete. how can i simply remove it? thanks. - Jm3 (talk) 00:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just add {{db-g7}} to the image page. Polly (Parrot) 00:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
check out File:Nick-tweed-simmons.jpg
editlook i edit File:Nick-tweed-simmons.jpg go check it out. .Pedro thy master (talk • contribs) 17:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- It might be OK for the TV show but not for the actor's article as he's alive and it is therefore replaceable by a free image. Polly (Parrot) 22:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
My photos
editre: my Talk page. please advise what's specifically missing with my photos cause i don't know what you're talking about. regards, --Arab Cowboy (talk) 23:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello?~ No reply? --Arab Cowboy (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
removal of my page
editI have noticed that my page has already been deleted and before I had a chance to respond. That is not fair. I thought I had seven days, obviously something is wrong.
I have read all the comments. Here is my response
1. I admit I am a newbie and perhaps I didn’t follow proper procedures. I find the instructions on Wikipedia written for computer nerds, but not for the average person like me. So I am doing my best to understand and anyone who has valid concerns, I am willing to read and respond accordingly.
2. That said. Let me make some preliminary remarks first. I do not know any of the people who are making these concerns. I don’t know if you are gay or straight. Whether you are a leader in gay rights movement or whether you were a large contributor to the Prop 8 campaign. I don’t know whether you are saying “nay” because you honestly do not feel my achievements are not worthy or whether you have a bias against gays and don’t want Wikipedia to show anything which would put gays in positive light.
One of the people who responded was a minister (I don’t see his comments now for some reason). Now I know that there are many denominations which are supportive of the gay community such as Quakers, Unitarians, United Church of Christ, Metropolitan Community Churches and Reform Jews. But there are many denominations which have caused a lot of pain to the gay community such as Mormons, Southern Baptists, and Assembly of God. So I don’t know where you are coming from.
I do not mind making some editing changes, but I do not want to be removed because of homophobes who has a bias against gays.
So let’s take a look at some of the concerns.
1. Polly said that I said I was the first gay school board member and she didn’t think that was correct. She is right. It isn’t correct, because that is not what I said. I am the first gay person in the country to win a seat on an elementary school board. I was also the very first gay person to be elected to a school board below college level in California.
Someone said where is the verification. I am not sure what verification you need, however you can verify what I said from a book called Out for Office which was published by the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund.
If there other things that you need to be verified let me know and I will provide that.
Someone said that being the first gay school board member, why is that so significant? Please refer to the Wikipedia page for Harvey Milk. He served in office less than a year before he was killed by a homophobe. He was elected to the city council of that city. As the Wikipedia page says he was elected as the first gay man in California. I have served on a school board for over 20 years. Are you saying that a gay person who served less than a year is more important than a gay person who has served for over 20?
So how can I appeal the decision to have me removed? Please respond to rosevillegarymiller@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmillerkc (talk • contribs) 01:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
HELLO POLLY
editI LOVE THE BEAUTIFUL PARROT ON THIS PAGE.
I COULD USE YOUR HELP IN ADDING SOME IMAGES TO MY USER PAGE. I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO DO THIS CORRECTLY.
THANKS IN ADVANCE, SCARY GUY Thescary1 (Talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC).
Fair use rationale for File:Matt Clark.JPG
edit
Hi Polly, thank you for your message. Did the description for the picture changed.
However, my English is bad, therefore I do not know how to change the license works.
I leave you, if it makes any circumstances. Thank you in advance.
Dear Polly, as I know you flagged the file http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nicolas_Reyes.jpg as candidate for deletion. the copy right holder sent an email some days ago and i additionally forwarded her email to permissions, but the photo is still flagged. could you check on that? thanks a lot! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.37.145 (talk) 08:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
dear polly, please revise the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nicolas_Reyes.jpg . copyrighter's permission has been sent to permissions. please remove the "candidate for deletion" tag. thanks alot! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.37.145 (talk) 08:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Dear Polly, please revise http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nicolas_Reyes.jpg . It has been flagged by you for deletion because of abscence of copyright. Now copyright permission was sent by owner to permissions a couple of dauys ago. I additionally forwarded their message to permissions. I hope you can remove the flag soon. Sorry for multiple posting - i had some network issues and i dont know if anything was really sent. Thank you.--Sadlayla (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
File:NathanGamble.jpg
edit
Hey. The owner of this file got rid of his copyright to the image. The site it came from no long even exists. --Ken Durham (talk) 15:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
The Silver Movement
editAbout a month ago a page for artist "The Silver Movement" was deleted. I request that this page be allowed back on WikiPedia due to the fact that the artist has had reputable articles about his work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.63.40.241 (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
hello polly
editI've just posted the article for Grain surfboards. It was quite an exhausting experience, PLEASE ADVISE FOR IMPROVEMENT. Thanks! Commit charge• contribs) Commit charge (talk) 00:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Image:Canada-ontario Martyrs-shrine MSf.jpg
edithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Av%C3%A9#Catching_the_Light-pic
The author and owner of the picture has given express permission for this image. Just today he reaffirmed this.
The permission was listed in the original posting. Please undelete. The taker of the picture still has the original website/blog online. He is disappointed in your speedy deletion... Avé[[]] 05:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Copyright issues advies
edithi Polly, i received from you the following message some time ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikinuno&redirect=no
and while i thank you for advising me about, i must let you know that when i edited those pages, i wrote that text myself from my own thoughts, and i've taken those pictures myself, and stated it on the picture pages. i tried to read anything about copyright issues, but it's too complicated. what i can do to repair my errors?
thank you. Wikinuno (talk) 09:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
edit clean up
editPolly, I made some changes to the wording of my post, I can not get it to look neet, can you help. Thanks Andy2159Andy2159 (talk) 14:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Request to restore wiki Human Design topic
editI am new here. I am not sure of the correct procedure or who to talk to about restoring the Human Design or Human Design System page to wikipedia.
Your name seems to be involved?
Thank you
Mikemahalo (talk) 14:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trevor Howard.jpg
edit
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Laurence Harvey1.jpg
edit
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Year of the Photo of Dana Plato
editdo you know what year the photo of Dana Plato that you've uploaded was taken? --Gh87 (talk) 22:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Volleyball players
editI have seen that you edited some volleyball articles. Some players articles, most of them looks outdated. I would like to improve players by country. Could you please choose a country to contribute with? Please take a look on Yekaterina Gamova, Hélia Souza, Serena Ortolani and Kenia Carcaces for a model to follow. Please can you please improve some volleyball players with infobox and some addons? References are very important. Let me know. Oscar987 23:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Copyrighted photos
editPlease, check out those uploaded images R. Kocharyan S. Sargsian, the user who had uploaded the photos is claiming that he is the copyright holder of those works. I wonder, how did he get an access to the presidential palace and took the photos of the presidents of Armenia? Those photos have been uploaded from official and copyrighted websites ([1]), which is against the rules of Wikipedia. --Kevorkmail (talk) 03:41, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Template:ScreenshotU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:John Mills.jpg
edit
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:D2.jpg
edit
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
edit New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Polly! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free media (File:John Le Mesurier B&W.jpg)
edit){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:John Le Mesurier B&W.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (File:Dave Allen.jpg)
edit){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:Dave Allen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (File:Morecambe and Wise.jpg)
edit){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:Morecambe and Wise.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Alan Bates.jpg
edit
A tag has been placed on File:Alan Bates.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dman41689 (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Kraftwerk The Man Machine album cover.jpg)
edit){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:Kraftwerk The Man Machine album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image File:Ian Bannen.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:38, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Q Planes poster.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Election 1999film.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Carry On Girls.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Patsy Rowlands.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Caron Keating.jpg listed for discussion
edit
Orphaned non-free image File:Harry Andrews.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Charles Hawtrey.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Election 1999film.jpg
editNote that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arnold Ridley B&W.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Talbot Rothwell.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:31, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bernard Miles.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mabel poulton.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:John Mills.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:John Mills.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Philroc (c) 12:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arnold Ridley B&W.jpg
editNote that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Anthony Newley.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tommy Trinder.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Anthony Newley.jpg
editNote that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jack Warner.jpg
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Margaret Rutherford.gif
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Margaret Rutherford.gif
editNote that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)