User talk:Zyxw/Archive 3

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Trashbag in topic Coordinates for airports

Archive of User talk:Zyxw for 2007

Template:Airlines of the United States

edit

Hi. I just created Template:Airlines of the United States and wanted to know if you thought it was a good idea and also whether you had any edits you think should be made to it. Lots of other countries have such a template, so I think it's in good form, but I still think it could use some work. I'm also wondering also whether it should be split to continental US and Alaska only airline templates, as Alaska in particular has a lot of little airlines, many of which have no articles to their name. Anyway, let me know what you think, or just edit away. Or if this isn't up your alley, then nevermind. :) Thanks. --Allstar86 07:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Looks good to me. I'm just hoping someone will create the missing articles for those small airlines in Alaska which provide scheduled passenger service. If anyone is interested, here's a partial list taken from the Essential Air Service article (also, a few of these are missing from your template):
40-Mile Air - http://www.40-mileair.com
Alsek Air Service - http://www.alsekair.com
Copper River Air Taxi - http://www.copperriverair.com
Ellis Air Taxi - http://www.ellisair.com
Harris Aircraft Services - http://www.harrisaircraft.com
Island Air Service - http://www.kodiakislandair.com
Servant Air - http://www.servantair.com
Taquan Air - http://www.taquanair.com
Warbelow's Air Ventures - http://www.warbelows.com
Ward Air - http://www.wardair.com
If not, I will get around to it... eventually. -- Zyxw 12:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

List of people from Delaware

edit

That page was intentionally deleted because it was turned into the category. It wasn't an AfD and there's no reason you can't recreate it... but, I just wanted to let you know. gren グレン 03:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I am adding a navigation box to all the articles titled List in people in <state> and noticed that only Delware and South Dakota did not have such a list. -- 03:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Template:Airport frame

edit

I was trying to get the templates out of Category:Airports since they are not really part of the encyclopedia. Vegaswikian 09:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have removed Category:Airports from {{Airport frame}} and all the other templates associated with airport infoboxes: {{Airport title}}, {{Airport image}}, etc. This category being added is my fault: I originally did it in response to {{Airport infobox}} being tagged as {{uncategorized}}, then left it there when I later added the more appropriate Category:Transportation infobox templates. -- Zyxw 10:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

edit

Thought you might be interested in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Infobox#Infobox overhaul as I brought up your new Template:Infobox Airport. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for mentioning my proposed new airport infobox template at Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Airports/Infobox #Infobox overhaul. I planned on starting a new topic there to gauge the interest in using it, but got sidetracked with other projects. It was only after your message on my talk page that I realized it has been 11 days since I moved it from my User space to Template: Infobox Airport. Guess it's time I headed over to that WikiProject page and posted a message. Thanks also for the suggested improvements which I'll attempt to add to the template. -- Zyxw 13:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I had seen it some time ago but figured you wanted to work on it some more, so didn't mention it. It was only when it came up in the discussion I that I thought it better discuss it than start a third one. The Template:Infobox Weather is the one that allows for the metric/imperial switch. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images listed for deletion

edit

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 06:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I see that your PNG crusade bot uploaded PNG conversions of these GIF images and updated the associated articles to use the new image:
I have no problem with the old images being deleted since they are now orphaned. - Zyxw 12:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vancouver Harbour Water Aerodrome

edit

I needed to get the image, with caption, in at a reasonable size so I used your new template. I like the way that it does not automatically link the location/serves as it leaves more scope for multiple links. One odd thing I noticed is I can't get the statistics to show up. If you look at Toronto Pearson International Airport you can see what I mean. It would be good to have that available as an optional part of the box as several airports have it tacked on to the bottom. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. That looks great now. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I see that you noticed my updates to Vancouver Harbour Water Aerodrome and Toronto Pearson International Airport to use the new statistics parameters of the {{Infobox Airport}} template. If you have any other suggestions, I've posted an update and request for comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Airport Infobox. Thanks for all the input you've provided so far. -- Zyxw 07:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi Zyxw, I've been trying out your template examples at Template:Navbox_generic/doc and would like some advice/help. My templates are at User:Ctbolt/RAAF4. What I want to do is to have my list within the Navbox left aligned so it is easier to view. In "{{Navbox generic" I couldn't work out how to left align the list however in your examples "{| border=0 class="navbox collapsible"" I could. However, I'm having trouble setting the state to collapsed and the colour to 'lightsteelblue'. Can you help? thanks - Ctbolt 03:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

In reply to your question about {{Navbox generic}} and making the list items left-aligned in User:Ctbolt/RAAF4, I looked at your template right after you asked and noticed you figured it out a few minutes later in this edit. There is still one small bit of code remaining from converting the table to a template: on the line that starts with |text-align = left|list1 =, you can remove |text-align = left. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. – Zyxw 17:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

edit
 

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

As you have shown an interest in Template:Infobox Airport we thought you might like to take an interest in this new WikiProject.
You might like to take an extra interest in our Airports subproject
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Infobox Airport

edit

I just thought of another possible addition to the template. Right now you have seperate lines for owner and operator. I wonder if a third line as "Owner/Operator" might be useful. This came about because I just redid the London Gatwick Airport and Edmonton City Centre (Blatchford Field) Airport. The disadvantge is that it might make the line too long. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

As per your request, I've updated {{Infobox Airport}} to support a new line labeled Owner/Operator. Take a look at London Gatwick Airport to see it in use. If you specify a value for the new owner-oper parameter, the infobox displays that and ignores the current owner and operator parameters. -- Zyxw 02:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. It looks fine. Will make life easier for the newer editors who aren't sure what to use. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just to say...

edit

...I think your addition of the even/odd styling to some Navbox instances works well, at least in those I've seen so far – thanks for your work!  Best wishes, David Kernow (talk) 19:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Templates

edit

Please be careful while fixing the templates, in this one, Template:Presidents of the Constitutional Court of Turkey, somehow the diacritics disappeared making half the template full of redlinks. I fixed them, but please make sure to pay attention to it in the future. Cheers! Baristarim 14:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing that out. I have fixed those errors on some other templates I edited. -- Zyxw 15:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
 
I, Chochopk (球球PK) , award this Barnstar to Zyxw for his tireless contribution to convert {{Navbox generic with image}} to {{Navbox generic}}

What you did is inline with Wikipedia talk:Navigational templates#Style guideline for footer templates. I see that you have not participated the discussion. So I thought you might be interested. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 00:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the barnstar. I have followed the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Navigational templates#Style guideline for footer templates and agree that some consolidation of those templates is in order. I will keep an eye on that page and join in if I have something to add. -- Zyxw 06:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

McNary Field on Oregon List

edit

Greetings, you moved Salem Municipal Airport, McNary Field, from commercial air service to general aviation on the List of airports in Oregon. This was done stating that airport does not have 2500 passenger boardings per year. Can you explain why an airport that will be having Part 121 Commercial Air Service in four weeks and carries a Part 139 certificate does not qualify as commercial service other then the number of enplanements? thanks, -Trashbag 19:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I changed McNary Field back to "GA" (general aviation) on the List of airports in Oregon because the Role column is based on the airport categories defined in the FAA's National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) Report for 2007-2011 [1]. According to the FAA, "commercial service airports are defined as public airports receiving scheduled passenger service and having 2,500 or more enplaned passengers per year". [2] This is then further broken down into "Primary" (10,000+ enplanements per year) and "Non-Primary" (2,500 to 10,000 enplanements per year). There are a number of airports in the U.S. which have scheduled commercial airline service but do not meet this requirement. One example is Ogdensburg International Airport in New York which has scheduled service via Delta Connection, but is classified as "GA" because it only had 2,078 enplanements in 2005. Hope that answers your question. -- Zyxw 20:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Zalpa Bersanova

edit

Hey, thanks for the correction on that article. )) --Samian 02:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. I always try to add Persondata when I come across biographical articles without it. -- Zyxw 07:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:PiHKAL

edit

You (somewhat) recently changed the commas in this template to dots. How does one create these dots (you missed one)? -Use the force (Talk * Contribs) 01:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the bullets used as separators between the list items in Template:PiHKAL, I took a look and added the only one I found missing, between Ortho-DOT and Proscaline. To answer your question, the simplest way to add a bullet would be to copy one that's already there and then paste it where you want it. You could also add one by placing &bull; where you want the bullet to appear. -- Zyxw 21:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Use the force (Talk * Contribs) 21:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Dfw brand.gif

edit

Hello, Zyxw. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Dfw brand.gif) was found at the following location: User:Zyxw/Infobox Airport. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This image was used in the infobox of the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport article until a recent edit removed it. The image has been restored to that article and the image summary updated to show it is "fair use" to illustrate the airport article. The page in my user space that contained it has been removed. The only other page using this image is Template:Infobox Airport/doc since the DFW airport infobox is used as one of the examples. The image on that page can be replaced if needed. -- Zyxw 17:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Kentucky Parks

edit

Wow, thanks a lot for improving that template. I created it because it was needed, but templates are really not something I'm good at. It looks so much better now. --W.marsh 14:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. -- Zyxw 16:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi, I thought you might be interested in

--ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 11:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing those out. Nothing to add at this time, but it was of interest. -- Zyxw 06:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Protected areas of Washington

edit

Hey, I found all those templates, and decided to work up the Washington one. Would you wanna check it out before I officially make it? It's in my sandbox here. Cheers! Murderbike 03:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

{{Protected Areas of Washington}} looks goods and I like that you defaulted it to collapsed due to the large size. I made the following corrections: (1) fixed the red link on State Forests by linking to List of Washington state forests, and (2) the link to Illinois Department of Natural Resources was changed to Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. -- Zyxw 06:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Awesome! Thanks a lot. Murderbike 17:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for Image:HNH-a.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:HNH-a.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. MECUtalk 17:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. -- Zyxw 05:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo-armee-de-lair.jpg

edit
  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-armee-de-lair.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. -- Zyxw 07:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

No comments yet on Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/Biman Bangladesh Airlines. Care to take a look? Cheers. Aditya Kabir 14:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up. Biman Bangladesh Airlines looks like a good article and it is certainly well-referenced, but I don't have any comments to add at this time. -- Zyxw 23:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gardner Municipal Airport (Kansas)

edit

Thanks for fixing that. I can't believe I missed an entire runway. I was taking shortcuts and forgot to check out the sat images. Can you look at this version of Gardner Airport and see if you know which one the editor was talking about. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Another question. What's the purpose of "display=inline" in the coordinates? Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
-- Zyxw 19:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the info. I linked to the wrong edit. He added a prod tag. The originator was User:Islandman104. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
In that case, his only other edit was Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, so I'd guess he was referring to Gardner Municipal Airport (Massachusetts). -- Zyxw 23:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Biography templates

edit

Good work on the biography templates! If {{Infobox Person}} now has all the fields in {{Infobox Celebrity}}, can't the latter be deprecated? Did you notice that these templates now use the hCard microformat? See Wikipedia:WikiProject Microformats for more, and please feel free to join! Andy Mabbett 11:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I have noticed the hCard format and have experimented with those using the Operator (extension) for Firefox. As for your first question, yes, {{Infobox Celebrity}} could be deprecated and redirected to {{Infobox Person}}. There are only three slight differences in the display: Celebrity places the name above the box, defaults image_size to 220px and uses right aligned field headings, while Person places the name inside the box, defaults image_size to 225px and uses left-aligned field names. -- Zyxw 06:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Cheers, I proposed a merge; see Template talk:Infobox Person#Merge. I also suggested we consider a merge into {{Infobox Biography}}. Andy Mabbett 07:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your recent, very helpful, edits towards the latter goal. I'm not sure whether the final template should be called ...person or ...biography. I'm going to raise that, and the general idea of a merge on the "project biography" talk page. Andy Mabbett 09:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template help

edit

You seem to know templates, well. Can you help with this request, please? Andy Mabbett 09:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Was unable to locate this request as it was gone by the time I checked the link above. -- Zyxw 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Infobox Writer

edit

Hi. I cannot really tell why, but photos have disappeared from the infobox in a number of article (see Tudor Arghezi). If this is related to recent changes, could you please correct it? Thank you. Dahn 15:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi again. Would you please answer my query above? I find the changes in the template very hard to trace, and I cannot understand where the error occurred. If this is indeed because of the recent changes, could I trouble you to see why and where, and could I ask of you that you make sure such changes do not harm the infoboxes in the future (or, at least, tell me what changes I should make in to those infoboxes)? Thank you, and looking forward to a reply. Dahn 16:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I reverted Zyxw's edits to the template rather than leave all those broken pages out there. If Zyxw comes back they can fix it themselves. --Jaibe 21:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Mea culpa. I had removed a trailing vertical bar from [[Image:{{{image}}}|{{{imagesize|200px}}}| ]], which prevented the image from displaying if the imagesize parameter appeared without a value ( imagesize= ). I did review my changes by checking some articles using the infobox, but never saw any that had this problem.
  • After becoming aware of the problem, I started checking ALL the 2000+ articles using this template. In the first 1000 or so checked, only about 40 articles had been affected (and those were fixed when my edits were reverted).
  • There is another problem which existed before my edits: using imagesize without a value displays the image at its native resolution, expanding the infobox if width is larger than 250px. For an example, see Jonathan Coe.
  • Back in June I started fixing the affected articles to include the actual image width if smaller than the default of 200px (the original intent of the imagesize parameter). I will get back to this project shortly and once I've gone through the remaining articles I will update the template to use the default width when the imagesize parameter is omitted or blank.
Zyxw 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:South Florida metropolitan area

edit

I noticed that your last edit to this template (in May) breaks the template when it is collapsed, displaying a big chunk of raw code instead of virtually disappearing. It's find in its expanded state. Could you take a look at it and see what is wrong? Thanks. Horologium t-c 15:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. In response to your recent message, I looked at this template using three different Windows browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Opera) but could not replicate the problem you had with it not displaying properly when collapsed. If that problem continues to appear, please feel free to revert my edits. -- Zyxw 09:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm, truly bizarre. I just checked, and the problem seems to have disappeared. My apologies. I don't know what the problem was yesterday, as I checked on several pages, and the template had the same issue on all of them. Horologium t-c 14:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Coordinates

edit

I thought that you might be interested in Template talk:Coord#Sentence meaning. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up about Template talk:Coord#Sentence meaning. I guess that means the airport article infoboxes should use {{coord}} with "display=inline" or else just stick with stick with {{coor dms}} for now. -- Zyxw 19:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
From the looks of this it would seem that "display=inline" is the way to go. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template

edit

Thanks. I was thinking that if any other countries use a non-ICAO code then they can be added and linked to their regulatory agency. I was just trying to figure if I can use AutoWikiBrowser to update the infobox at the same time as I do the airport codes. Ah, just clicked on save and see that you also updated the documentation. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

IATA codes

edit

I see you have been busy removing and correcting. I suspect that someone just removed the "C" from the LID and used that as an IATA. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re this. I started using the other template after I'd done about 100+. Once I get finished I'll start over and do the ones I missed. Also I got AWB set up to replace the infobox and I'll do the CY & CZ airports after I finish the non-ICAO ones. I was wondering, are you familiar with "regex"? Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
In response to your comment: this edit only done because in the prior edit I added the IATA code but forgot to update the template. I have noticed that you are updating all the Canadian airports via AWB, so I've only edited those articles for other reasons (at the moment that is primarily related to adding or correcting IATA codes). And in answer to your question: I'm familiar with regex but by no means an expert. I'm registered to use AWB and have experimented with it. -- Zyxw 01:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Like I said I've got AWB working on replacing the infobox but it's poorly done. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar

edit
  The Working Man's Barnstar
For taking the time to sort out all the IATA codes. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. -- Zyxw 10:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I removed the CAQ3 LID from Vancouver Harbour as the CFS lists it as the Coal Harbour ID. I think that the great circle mapper made the error on the names as the Vancouver Harbour is also called the "Coal Harbour" and the "Coal Harbour Water Aerodrome" is on Vancouver Island. I used a different reference for the IATA. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't sure about the Great Circle Mapper reference... it is one of the few sites that does a decent job of cross-referencing ICAO and IATA codes, but it's not 100% accurate, so I try to find a backup reference. In this case, that was seeing CAQ3 in List of Canadian airports by location indicator: CA. What I missed was the fact that Coal Harbour Water Aerodrome is not the same location as Vancouver Coal Harbour Seaplane Base (a.k.a. Vancouver Harbour Water Aerodrome). Thanks for picking up on that and making the correction. -- Zyxw 07:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
The names have caused confusion before and no doubt will again. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:CRW_logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:CRW_logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 03:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Done. -- Zyxw 07:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of Kirk Fraser

edit

Im sending you a request. I've look over the deletion of Kirk Fraser, The original article had the incorrect spelling of his last name. Check out the (http://www.answers.com/topic/kirk-frasier) the article is still wrong. We originally created a new page on Wikipedia with the correct spelling and paste the content from Wikipedia with the incorrect spelling of Frasier. It was shortly deleted, we once again created it again, and it was also deleted. We don't know what to do. It seems like once it's up it taken down again, when it was originally put up by some one else. We just wanted to change the spelling of the Last name and fix the content that was wrong. Can you please help me in guiding me to correct this issue. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by YousoCrazy (talkcontribs) 18:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not sure what to tell you on this. Some people nominate articles for deletion if they feel is it not about a notable person or topic. The first paragraph of Meta:Deletionism describes this as follows:
Deletionism is a philosophy held by some Wikipedians that favors clear and relatively rigorous standards for accepting articles, templates or other pages to the encyclopedia. Wikipedians who broadly subscribe to this philosophy are more likely to request that an article that they believe does not meet such standards be removed, or deleted. Conversely, Wikipedians who believe that there ought to be a place for an article on almost any topic in Wikipedia, and that there should be few or no standards barring an article from it, are said to subscribe to inclusionism.
I tend to be an inclusionist and in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirk Fraser I voted to keep the article, but it seems the deletionists won that debate. I think it is ridiculous that an article can be deleted from Wikipedia based on the votes of only 3 people, but I don't make the rules here. Your next step would be to request a deletion review. -- Zyxw 04:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Your edits Template:Blethen consisted primarily in switching it from Template:Dynamic navigation box to Template:Navbox generic. This doesn't offend me, but it makes me curious. Is there any reason I shouldn't be using Dynamic Nav Box to create templates in the future? Is Navbox Generic somehow superior? ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p ``` 20:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your question about my updating Template:Blethen from {{Dynamic navigation box}} to {{Navbox generic}}, there is nothing wrong with using the former, but it doesn't do anything the latter can't. I changed it because there is a move to consolidate the large number of navigational templates, which also include {{Dynamic navigation box with image}}, {{Navigation}}, {{Navigation with image}}, {{NavigationBox}}, etc. One discussion about this can be found at Wikipedia talk: Navigational templates #Style guideline for footer templates. -- Zyxw 03:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Airport Infobox

edit

I saw that you are the creator of the newer airport infobox template. I started a discussion on the WP:AIRPORT talk page about what to do about having two different infoboxes. Personally, I think we should switch all articles to your template, as it works better, looks better, and other people seem to like it as well. But there has been no official talk about switching, so I started one. If you have any comments, please reply to my post on the talk page link provided. Thanks. --Pilotboi | talk 14:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Too late! I just replaced the old one with yours. If you get any complaints send them to me. It had been discussed before and nobody was against it. Also I just edited User talk:Zyxw/Archive 1 to remove soume double redirects. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the heads up. I agree that {{Infobox Airport}} should be the recommended template for adding new infoboxes, since it does everything the old template did and incorporates a number of suggested improvements. Regarding a massive conversion of the older infoboxes, I posted a comment here. -- Zyxw 08:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template: Mets

edit

I see that you know what you're doing when it comes to templates, so I was hoping you would be able to answer my question. For a template such as Template:Mets, although it is set that a player's name is bolded in the box when it appears on his article page, this does not work when the article name does not exactly match the player's name, like for Joe Smith (baseball) or David Wright (baseball). It does, however, work for Howard Johnson (baseball player) even though it should run into the same issue. Any ideas how to make it work for everyone? Thanks. -- Amazins490 (talk) 03:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

This problem is caused by redirected links in the {{Mets}} template. For the name to appear in bold on the player's page, the link in the template needs to match the exact page name. For example, Howard Johnson is in the template as [[Howard Johnson (baseball player)|Howard Johnson]] and Howard Johnson (baseball player) is the correct page name. However, Joe Smith is in the template as [[Joe Smith (baseball player)|Joe Smith]], but Joe Smith (baseball player) is a redirect to the actual page Joe Smith (baseball). I'll go through the template and fix these. -- Zyxw 14:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Excellent. Thanks! -- Amazins490 (talk) 22:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox Airport

edit

Just noticed that when the "metric runway" is set to "yes" the helipads are still listed feet/metres. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the info. I have fixed the helipads header so that "m" (meters) is displayed before "ft" (feet) if metric-rwy is set, just like the runways header. I also updated the template documentation to give an example which includes the helipads header in "metric first" format. -- 19:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Cleveland Indians

edit

Problem with this template. I like that it now collapses and gives you the option to "show" or "hide" but in the "show" option it wipes out the bottom portion of the page. This happens on all the team pages. Is this a problem with the browser or the box or just me? Thanks.69.68.238.142 18:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

UPDATE - When in "show" mode, it seems to wipe out all other templates. On the Kinston Indians page, I moved this template to the bottom of the templates and it seemed to solve the problem. Still wouldn't mind to see if this can be fixed though for the rest of the pages affected.69.68.238.142 19:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for all the help.69.68.238.142 21:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The problem of clicking [show] on a collapsed navigation box "wiping out" the contents below the box appears to a browser-related issue. I looked at Kinston Indians (revision as of 17:49, 27 July 2007) and found that Template:Cleveland Indians expanded properly when using Internet Explorer 7, Firefox 2, Opera 9 and Safari 3 on Windows XP. I was only able to replicate this problem when using Internet Explorer 6 and even then it only happened when I was not logged in. This problem also occurs on other pages with a mix of collapsible and non-collapsible navigation boxes, such as Columbus Blue Jackets. One solution I found was a combination of placing the non-collapsible boxes first and making the collapsible boxes use the full width of the page.

Before
{{MLB Indians franchise}} <-- collapsible
{{Cleveland Indians}}     <-- collapsible, not full width
{{Carolina League}}       <-- non-collapsible
{{North Carolina Sports}} <-- collapsible
After
{{Carolina League}}
{{MLB Indians franchise}}
{{Cleveland Indians|width=100%}}
{{North Carolina Sports}}

When I made all the baseball team navigational boxes collapsible I also made them full width, but my changes were all reverted by another editor who didn't like the templates full width (see this diff for user's name and comments). Therefore, as a compromise, I added an optional "width" parameter so the templates could be made full width on specific pages as needed. -- Zyxw 02:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Historical currencies of...

edit

Again, I commend you for consolidating nav box templates. I just have one question about templates like {{Historical currencies of Hungary}}. Is there no way to use wiki mark up for table inside navbox generic? --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 05:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regarding {{Historical currencies of Hungary}}, normally all it would take to convert the template is changing "Dynamic navigation box" to "Navbox generic" and "body" to "list1". For some reason which I haven't had time to explore, Navbox generic would not properly display the embedded wiki table markup, so I converted it to HTML.
Before:
{{!-}}
{{!}} '''Coins'''
{{!}}style="border-left:1px #aaaaaa solid;"{{!}} [[Coins of the Austro-Hungarian gulden{{!}}coins]]
...
After:
<tr>
<td>'''Coins'''
<td style="border-left:1px #aaa solid;">[[Coins of the Austro-Hungarian gulden|coins]]
I don't think the HTML is any harder to read than the {{!-}} and {{!}} templates used previously. -- Zyxw 04:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry. I was just curious. =) --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 07:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Infoboxes Person & Biography: merger proposal

edit

I'd be grateful for your assistance in completing this proposal to merge {{Infobox Person}} and {{Infobox Biography}} et al. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 15:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I added comments at Template talk:Infobox Person to help answer questions about merging the three templates. I see you already redirected {{Infobox Biography}} to {{Infobox Person}}, while {{Infobox Celebrity}} is protected and therefore awaiting the assistance of an admin. -- Zyxw 06:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:S-civ/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:S-civ/sandbox, by KuatofKDY (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:S-civ/sandbox fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

This template is no longer in use and may be deleted. Please remove, thank you!


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:S-civ/sandbox, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

No objections to this. -- Zyxw 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Infobox Writer (part 2)

edit

Hello. I'm using the Infobox Writer here and there but I've noticed certain limitations of it. In the article Bruno Maddox I have to put his sister under the parents parameter. Would you be able to fix this problem? Is Infobox Writer the way to go anyways? I've noticed you guys fixing up Infobox Person which is why I ask.-BillDeanCarter 03:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The confusion is probably because the current implementation of {{Infobox Writer}} has a parameter named relations which is displayed with the label of Parents. I can fix this, but first want to finish another project related to some of my prior edits there that had caused a problem (see #Infobox Writer above). And while {{Infobox Person}} does provide more fields for relatives, you'd lose use the writer-specific fields found in {{Infobox Writer}} (such as the debut_works field that you are using in the Bruno Maddox article). -- Zyxw 06:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:FEUS

edit

Template:FEUS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master sonT - C 23:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

No objections to this. -- Zyxw 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Random Smile!

edit

-WarthogDemon 06:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.   -- Zyxw 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oakes Municipal Airport

edit

Thank you for your contribution to Oakes Municipal Airport. I am from Oakes and started the article but didn't know what to put in it beside the sentence I wrote. Your contribution makes it a much more informative article. -AndrewBuck 19:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. -- Zyxw 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox Airport/doc

edit

Can you make a change to the documentation. It turns out the infobx must have "display=inline,title" or it's not picked up by Google Earth and many airports have already vanised for it. I would have done it but I didn't want to end up with multiple title coordinate links. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree it would be nice for Google Earth to pick up the airport coordinates, but if we recommend people use "display=inline,title" then we are back to the format that a lot of people disliked, with the coordinates displayed at the top right of the page and again in the infobox. I see there was already an earlier discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Infobox Airport#Google earth. Perhaps before recommending this in the documentation we should start a new discussion on that page or at Template talk:Infobox Airport? That discussion could include the possibility of removing the coordinates from the infobox and using {{coord|...|display=title}} instead. -- Zyxw 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I will follow up on that in a while. I have left some examples of airports at Template talk:Coord#Using display=inline. If there is an agreement to have the coordinates at the top of the page all that needs to be done is change the line in the box to "display=title". It will will disappear for the box and appear at the top of the page, see User:CambridgeBayWeather/Airports with no infobox 01. That would be the best way and then all the changes could be done with AWB. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've been thinking about this and I agree the best solution is to display the coordinates in the title only. Since that appears directly above the infobox, displaying it again inside the infobox is redundant. It also makes for a cleaner look since the coordinates take up two lines in the infobox thanks to the new globe icon. I originally tried leaving the coordinates inside the infobox:
| coordinates  = {{coord|49|27|16|N|002|06|46|E|type:airport|display=title}}

However, that caused that coordinates to appear in the small font size of the infobox text (which is made even smaller because the title area text uses font-size:85%):

Therefore, I believe the best solution is to move the {{coord}} template outside the infobox. An abbreviated version of the template code from Paris Beauvais Tillé Airport follows:

{{coord|49|27|16|N|002|06|46|E|type:airport|display=title}}
{{Infobox Airport
| name         = Paris Beauvais Tillé Airport
| IATA         = BVA
| ICAO         = LFOB
| type         = Public
| city-served  = [[Paris]]
| coordinates  = <!--listed in title-->
... etc.

Of course, the coordinates parameter could also be left blank or omitted entirely. -- Zyxw 23:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I got distracted and forgot about this. It doesn't look too bad as it's not a duplicated in the box and is the same as other geographical articles. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Also, I forgot to mention that using a title-only {{coord}} template inside the infobox causes an empty box to be displayed next to "Coordinates" (see this edit for an example). -- Zyxw 00:27, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've just posted a rather long comment on this issue over at Template talk:Infobox Airport#Moving coordinates out of the infobox. -- Zyxw 08:01, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Creating a template for an HTML form using the "post" method

edit

Unrelated question. Is it possible to make a template that will pass 4 letters to the "Aerodrome ID" box here? Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The page referenced in your question contains a form using the "post" method which sends the form input (i.e. the 4-letter aerodrome ID) via HTTP. Sometimes these forms will also work via the "get" method which passes the form input via the URL. An easy way to find out is to save the HTML source to your computer and edit it. First add <base href=" "> (with the original URL inside the quotes) at the top of the page so relative links (i.e. "/cgi-bin/Fore-obs/metar.cgi") will link to the original web site. Then search for <form and change method="post" to method="get" (some pages will have more than one form, in this particular case the line we want is <form method="get" action="/cgi-bin/Fore-obs/metar.cgi"). Now open the edited page in your browser, fill in the form input and click submit. If it works, the resulting page contains the URL that will need to be used in the Wikipedia template. In this case, the resulting URL was: http://www.flightplanning.navcanada.ca/cgi-bin/Fore-obs/metar.cgi?NoSession=NS_Inconnu&format=raw&Langue=anglais&Region=can&Stations=CYUL&Location= and since "&Location=" can be dropped from the URL, the code for your template would be: http://www.flightplanning.navcanada.ca/cgi-bin/Fore-obs/metar.cgi?NoSession=NS_Inconnu&format=raw&Langue=anglais&Region=can&Stations={{{1}}} -- Zyxw 21:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I'm just quitting for the day. Work at 4:00 am so I should get some sleep but I'll work with it later. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:59, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks. The Template:Can-arpt-wx works perfectly and enables the removal of these. I found 206 airports that were showing weather. There is another 186 to recheck that may have some weather available later in the day. I just went through the ICAO codes (CY/CZ) so I still have 1,050 non-ICAO left to check. Thanks again. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Infobox church2: Help needed

edit

Hi, I wonder if you're able to help to fix (or provide some advice on fixing) "{{Infobox church2}}". I don't really know how to use the complex markup needed to create infoboxes, and so have just been making simple edits to the template. However, I don't know how to fix the following problems:

  • It's not possible to leave out empty fields. At present, the template requires all fields to be listed, even if they are blank, otherwise the name of the field appears in the infobox in curly brackets.
  • The "(s)" in "Senior Pastor(s)" wraps around to the next line.

Thanks in advance. Cheers, Jacklee 19:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at this and edit it to make all the fields "optional" (so they don't display if they are blank) plus fix the wrapping of "(s)" to a new line. -- Zyxw 06:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Much obliged! Cheers, Jacklee 07:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

{{Infobox Person}}

edit

OK, I've had this template on my watchlist as I've been watching someone's uh... probably good faith but misguided edits all over. I'm guessing that something you've done, from your Edit Summary, enables you to locate all the uses of the template that include the use of the image size parameter, most likely so you can go and find the ones using it that don't need to and remove them. So... firstly is there a tutorial on making/understanding the inner workings of templates? And, do you want help finding and fixing those incorrect uses? — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 00:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

As you surmised, I made a temporary edit to {{Infobox Person}} to locate pages with certain parameters that have more than one name. After edit some of those pages, I removed the temporary code from the template. As for a tutorial on templates, the only one I am aware of is Help:Template (but if you have any specific questions I'll be glad to answer them). And lastly, thanks for the offer to help, but I've already finished. -- Zyxw 11:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:800px-Alvin Hall booksigning.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:800px-Alvin Hall booksigning.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

This image uploaded in error and can be deleted. The correct updated image can be found at commons:Image:Alvin Hall booksigning.jpg -- Zyxw 08:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Infobox Writer (part 3)

edit

Hello. I'm using the Infobox Writer here and there but I've noticed certain limitations of it. In the article Bruno Maddox I have to put his sister under the parents parameter. Would you be able to fix this problem? Is Infobox Writer the way to go anyways? I've noticed you guys fixing up Infobox Person which is why I ask.-BillDeanCarter 03:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The confusion is probably because the current implementation of {{Infobox Writer}} has a parameter named relations which is displayed with the label of Parents. I can fix this, but first want to finish another project related to some of my prior edits there that had caused a problem (see #Infobox Writer above). And while {{Infobox Person}} does provide more fields for relatives, you'd lose use the writer-specific fields found in {{Infobox Writer}} (such as the debut_works field that you are using in the Bruno Maddox article). -- Zyxw 06:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Okay, no I'll wait. Infobox Writer is quite good, and it is just the confusing Parents label that is a problem. If you could fix it I would appreciate it very much. Best, BillDeanCarter 13:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re:Airport Plugin

edit

Hi, Thanks for pointing out, and fixing the problem.

Just a note, that that edit was back in july, when i was still writing/testing it, and have made various changes since then. Im also being more careful when editing the pages

Thanks

Reedy Boy 10:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I figured that you had resolved the issues with User:Reedy Boy/Airport Infobox Migration Plugin that caused the missing runway data at Ajaccio - Campo dell'Oro Airport, but wanted to make a note of it. Thanks for the response. -- Zyxw 08:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use disputed for Image:2W6 logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:2W6 logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure what is causing this bot to tag this image, since it contains both a {{Non-free logo}} copyright template and {{Non-free media rationale}} template which gives all the required information as per Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline. This is an low-resolution airport logo, which is fair use for illustrating the airport's Wikipedia article. I have expanded the fair use description a bit and removed the disputed image template. -- Zyxw 08:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RUT logo.png)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:RUT logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

This image no longer orphaned. The image and description were also updated. -- Zyxw 01:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

For you!

edit
  The Working Man's Barnstar
For tirelessly updating airport pages and related lists and categories. Wonderfull! Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 02:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. It's always nice to know that others appreciate my contributions. -- Zyxw 15:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

{{Infobox Airport}}

edit

I just added the references to the Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport article. The airport's infobox still needs to be updated just like you just did to the Bellefontaine Regional Airport article that I saw.---OHWiki 23:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Done. -- Zyxw 02:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

{{Template doc inline}} deprecated

edit

{{Infobox Airline}} and {{Infobox Airline/sandbox}} updated with {{Documentation, template}} which tries /doc then ../doc in /sandbox and /testcases. – Conrad T. Pino 02:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

{{Template sandbox notice}} improved

edit

Visit updated {{Infobox Airline/sandbox}} to see how it might help you. – I just love that full copy/paste from /sandbox. – Conrad T. Pino 02:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mobile Downtown Airport

edit

As a consistant contributor to the Mobile Downtown Airport article, I wanted to get your input. Although this facilty seems to be called by many names, the Mobile Airport Authority operates the site as the "Brookley Complex", see Mobile Airport Authority for details. What are your thoughts on moving it to that? My initial wish was to create a Brookley Complex article, thinking that the Mobile Downtown Airport was just one facet of Brookley, but as I've done more research have realized that this is not so. I have plans for a major expansion to include the various aerospace and industrial companies, expand the history (especially its WWII history), touch on its status as a free-trade zone, and to include more on the site as a whole. I'm putting together my info and references now, waiting for some responses before doing a move. If you have time to comment, please respond on the article talkpage. Many thanks in advance. -Altairisfar (talk) 06:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up on that. I've posted a comment on the talk page. -- Zyxw 13:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
No problem. I appreciate your prompt response. So we'll keep the title as it is. My knowledge of the intricacies of airports is limited, so I'll try to leave that part of it to the more qualified. I have two university-published books that detail the history of the site, so I'll be using those to expand on the history. I want to find a reliable source for the other major companies located at the site also, but thus far no real luck on this. I notice that the Mobile Airport Authority website isn't updated in some areas as you would think it would be, so I can't completely go by them. I live in Mobile, so I hope to get over to Brookley eventually to snap a photo or two for the article too. -Altairisfar (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Am I missing something

edit

I noticed that you were adding the word "none" to the ICAO/IATA lines in the infobox, see here. Is there a particular reason for that because your infobox already does it, see here. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

There isn't any particular reason I changed those infoboxes from "IATA=" to "IATA=none". The program I wrote to generate infoboxes for U.S. airports puts "none" in there. Then I just manually copy any differences from the existing infobox before replacing it with the new one. I should probably leave those fields blank or remove them, since I do prefer the look of the automatically generated none in italics. Thanks for pointing that out. -- Zyxw (talk) 15:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Google earth again

edit

I just noticed that airports that only have display=inline are now being shown in Google Earth. I know this applies to Cambridge Bay Airport and Cambridge Bay Water Aerodrome but who knows if it will last. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the info. It appears the Google Earth team fixed that bug in their coding, since coordinates assigned to an infobox parameter named "coordinates" (as is the case in the articles you mentioned) were supposed to be accepted by Google Earth regardless of whether the {{coord}} template used "display=inline" or "display=title". -- Zyxw (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I looked on their site but couldn't find anything. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

List of airports in Turkey

edit

Hi Zyxw! I changed the capitalization of the table headers, because I believed MoS is in use also there. I wonder why it is not the case. Maybe you know better. Cheers. CeeGee (talk) 21:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

While making other additions to List of airports in Turkey, I changed the table heading text back to upper case because most of the other airport lists have it that way. I hadn't really thought about the Wikipedia: Manual of Style. If upper case goes against that, then I suppose most or all of the articles in the category: Lists of airports need to be changed. I'll leave that for someone else to do, since I actually prefer it in upper case. -- Zyxw (talk) 12:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

We have to start somewhere. Do you think it is good at the List of airports in Turkey? CeeGee (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Coordinates for airports

edit

Good day, a while back you added a template to show coordinates from the airports in a category to the Category:Airports in Oregon. Could you guide me on to how this works? I have been creating articles for the airports in OR but I do not see the recently added articles populating the .XML file. I am curious if I am goofing up on my end or what. An example of a recently added article is Propst Airport. Thank you for the assistance --Trashbag (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

The template you are asking about is {{GeoGroupTemplate}} and there was a discussion about this on that template's talk page. As per User: Para, author of the tool (http://tools.wikimedia.de/~para/cgi-bin/kmlexport) used in the template's first two links:
"With an article name the tool pulls the article from the live Wikipedia, but the more resource intensive category request uses the coordinates from Wikipedia-World, which is updated from the dumps."
Unfortunately, the Wikipedia-World project does not seem to have updated their data since 29 July 2007. That is why the Propst Airport article you mentioned (created on 22 December 2007) doesn't appear when using the GeoGroupTemplate link found at Category: Airports in Oregon. -- Zyxw (talk) 08:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Cool, thanks for info. I'm still figuring my way around. --Trashbag (talk) 19:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply