Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron/Members

ARS Code of Conduct

Note that this wikiproject is only intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting votes or vote-stacking. Be sure to follow the guideline on canvassing. This means, in part, that you should use Template:Rescue list on the deletion discussion page when you list the discussion here.
Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.

Shortcuts

To join ARS

To join the Article Rescue Squadron, add your name to the New Members section of the list.

Don't forget to add your name to the ARS newsletter recipient list to receive the ARS Newsletter!

Userbox

Feel free to place the below User box on your User page by adding the following code:

{{User Article Rescue Squadron}}

This user rescues articles for the Article Rescue Squadron.

All Members

New Members

To join, just add # and your name and the current date automatically by typing four tildes, like this: # ~~~~

If you'd like, you can also add a comment after your name.

Please post new entries at the top of the list.

Raladic (talk) 18:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
9t5 (talk) 02:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aaron Liu (talk) 22:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
coding lover, cooldudeseven7 (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Testeraccount101 (talk) 16:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Starixxgamerrix (talk) 11:25, 7 April 2024 (CST)
Avignonesi (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Endersslay (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Treydaprogdude (talk) 3:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC) I've had too many of my acceptably sourced articles and edits removed. Time for revenge that actually benefits humanity.
Geardona (talk) 15:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Erin1973 (talk) 00:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
1keyhole (talk) 00:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mundagenta (talk) 17:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Misc Practice (talk | contributions) 14:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC) Hey there![reply]
Theepicosity (talk) 14:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC) yay![reply]
Pandelver (talk) Pandelver (talk) 05:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wil540 art (talk) 06:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Atsme 💬 📧 12:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mycranthebigman (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC) Alamkan to the rescue![reply]
CT55555 (talk) 08:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC) to the rescue[reply]
Super (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tiredmeliorist (talk) 12:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Should have done this sooner[reply]
Scorpions13256 (talk) 12:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BusterD (talk) 15:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Herostratus (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lightburst (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC) The first rule of ARS is you do not talk about ARS. The second rule is you do not talk about ARS. Since 2019 - I have been contributing. I love to do research: I am active in the navigation areas of the project, and I frequently do deletion sorting. i also start articles, my interests are varied. Lightburst (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I found the logo on simple wiki. I then thought, I'm too lazy there, so why not do it here. Elytrian (talk) 09:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 14:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Z929669 (talk) 15:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Narsk (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Saturn Lover! (talk) 18:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ProudMallu (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
TigerScientist (talk) 08:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
— Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 18:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC) I am glad this community exists and happy to have found it.[reply]
User:susheelgiri(talk) 14:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
marshmir (talk) 15:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Em-mustapha ^talk 20:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bibliof (talk) 15:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Samsmachado (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bowtiesarecool06 (talk) 16:54, May 1 2020 (UTC)
Santoshdts (talk) 20:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AncestorHunter06 (talk) # ~~~~
Gilded Snail (talk) 18:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC) I've been trying to do this for a while and never realized there was a community for it. Hello![reply]
AbhiMukh97^Speak 10:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
E.3 (talk) 12:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Often content can be very easily improved, and from my experience deletion often scares away new editors.[reply]
Kirbanzo Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 17:15, 18 April 2019 (UTC) I mainly tag issues that could result in articles being considered for deletion, so that they can be fixed.[reply]
Mccull415 (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
econterms (talk) 22:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
airuditious (talk) 04:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aurornisxui (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC) I just spent time in AfD, but I would rather fix articles than delete them.[reply]
LovelyLillith (talk) 23:28, 13 December 2018 (UTC) I do this a lot, in particular for WP:Women and Women in Red.[reply]
Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 15:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Benjamin (talk) 09:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Philharmonic Phil --Philharmonic Phil (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Clikity (talk) 23:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bbarmadillo --Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Goodtiming8871 Goodtiming8871 (talk) 03:17, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mortee (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Twinky995 (talk) 01:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TriNitrobrick (talk)|(contribs)|(sandbox) 08:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
StrayBolt (talk) 08:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Vpresha (talk) 14 April 2018 14:40 (UTC)
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 12:50, 22 March 2018 (UTC) --- I often clean up articles for readability and verifiability, so why not join the professionals?[reply]
8==8 Boneso (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thsmi002 (talk) 23:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
AmericanAir88 (talk) 23:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC) I am a huge Wikipedia Cleanup Guy, I am dedicated to improving Wikipedia. Lets go save articles.[reply]
CJK09 (talk) 17:47, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Syrenka V (talk) 22:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SomewhatSpurious (talk) 19:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
—usernamekiran[talk] 03:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Erfson (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
TopCipher (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Skamecrazy123 (talk) 10:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Edwmgs Edwmgs (talk) 05:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Omni Flames
CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 20:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Inter&anthro (talk) 21:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mstomasik (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC) - WP:BEFORE should never be ignored[reply]
Ras Benjih (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bfpage |leave a message 21:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC) - this is something that really needs to be done![reply]
Jpbrenna--Jpbrenna (talk) 05:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 06:50, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hugo Stepniowski (talk) 06:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
SparrowHK (talk) 04:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)SparrowHK[reply]
CutestPenguin^Hangout 15:40, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jinkinson talk to me 12:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC) I have been doing this for a while, I'll rescue an article about almost anything.[reply]
Montanabw ^(talk) 17:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC) . Been leaning toward the inclusionist realm for a long time, many AfD's often could be saved with a suitable merge, and with far less drama. Systemic bias issues also contribute to too many AfDs.[reply]
User:Ekabhishek. Happy to be here. Was doing this already, for a few years now.. Ekabhishek^talk 14:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Epicgenius (talk) 18:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wuzh (talk) 12:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Z929669 (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Skr15081997 (talk) 11:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Happy to help in article rescue work.[reply]
Vjmlhds (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Saved 1 article already (Jeff Phelps)[reply]
Nowthis (talk) 00:17, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Auric talk 11:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC) Happy to be able to legitimize what I already do.[reply]
Balablitz (talk) 21:38, 2 November 2013 (UTC) Am good at retrieving informations both online and offline. Happy to help here and do the best.[reply]
Have a nice day! Darylgolden (talk) 07:52, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
RedRobinRed (talk) 00:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC) Have used Wikipedia for years and years, have some time on my hands and want to use this as my way to contribute.[reply]
Anne Delong (talk) 13:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC) I've been doing this already in the Afc.[reply]
Cdtew (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rhonan (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
TheBlueCanoe 05:21, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Happy to help where I can[reply]
andrewman327
The Steve 04:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC) The first article I recall rescuing was MENS in 2004[reply]
Faustus37 (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rambutaan (talk) 07:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
kieranian2001 Kieranian2001 (talk) 11:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Francoisalex2 (talk)
Tideflat (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tito Dutta (Message) 19:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sarah (talk) 13:47, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mojoworker (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AuthorAuthor (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
--В и к и T 17:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uncle Ed
--DThomsen8 If you cannot answer a man's arguments, all is not lost, you can still call him vile names. Elbert Hubbard (talk) 19:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Paffordmd72 (talk) 13:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Juggalo1010 18:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mr. Wikipediania Let's do this! -- Mr. Wikipediania ^Talk 04:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Zappa O Mati 22:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
MIVP I make attempts to save PRODs here and there so will have no problem stepping up to AfDs.
Rajaram Sarangapani (talk) 13:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PinkTruffles123 (talk) 19:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)PinkTruffles123 I would love to help you guys out.[reply]
Crtew (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2013 (UTC) I have been rescuing articles about journalists and journalism.[reply]
Jay Starz (talk) 15:41, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
BlueHenState28 (User talk:BlueHenState28) 11:50, 4 April (UTC)
Kieran207 (talk) 20:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
RAJIV RV (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 02:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
IdeaGuy3D Autodidact in Engineering ^[1] Ideaguy3d (talk) 23:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Members

0-9

2fort5r 2fort5r (talk) 04:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
7&6=thirteen (☎) Been rescuing articles for years. Saving and maintaining content, and contesting untoward proposed deletions is important for the project 09:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A

@pple complain 16:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aaron Walkhouse (talk) 19:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC) I just fell into this thing naturally by starting a rescue before I knew the Squadron existed. Now that I found it, count me in too. ;][reply]
Aarsalankhalid (Talk)
AdamBMorgan (talk) 23:40, 22 August 2009 (UTC) - I added the userbox to my page a while ago but didn't notice this list until I was invited to sign. I consider myself a member and now I'm on the list.[reply]
Agari (talk) 08:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC) - thanks for the invite, this is indeed going to be a good and useful project.[reply]
Airplaneman ^talk 22:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC) I think it's time I'd join. When patrolling new pages, I often spruce up articles to make sure they don't get deleted and am happy to join the team :).[reply]
AL_LOCKE|^talk 23:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC) I'm in[reply]
Alansohn (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC) I had never heard about this before the current MfD, and had been doing this solo for years. What can I do to help.[reply]
✰ALLST?R✰ ^echo 07:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Andrewa Looks a very worthwhile addition to Wikiculture. See User:Andrewa/creed.
Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 14:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC) I am one that believes a lot of articles get delted just because of poor work, something is new so notabitly is hard ot prove but not necessarily not htere, and that there is a lot of editors out there that do not care about the topic or do not research it more[reply]
AndyJones. Count me in. 12:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Animeronin (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Glad to be of service to the community. :)[reply]
Ankit Maity | ^{Talk • contribs} 11:15, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Arbiteroftruth (talk) 04:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Arteyu ? _{Blame it on me !} 09:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC) — I really hate deletions, so count me in![reply]
AStanhope (talk) 22:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Avanu (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC) (Let the bad go, and the good stay.)[reply]
avs_dps I am totally into it! (talk)
AWHS (talk) 10:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)What a great idea[reply]

B

Baronnet 17:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Be Bold In Edits (talk) 03:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC) I'm a bit brash but hopefully I can help.[reply]
Belugaboy ^{Talk to Me!} Milk the chicken!! Articles shouldn't be deleted if they might do good, they should just be improved, even if drastic measures are taken and we have to 'Send Superior' instead of the 'town ambulance system,' which for me is another word of saying more people working more time on the project. 01:32, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ben Kenobi151 (talk) 22:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
BenA (talk) 16:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Benjitheijneb (talk) 02:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
BenRussell (talk) 20:26, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bearian (talk)
Beth Wellington (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)--Nice to know where to come for help in cleaning up articles, rather than endlessly debating their failings : )[reply]
bibliomaniac 15 ^{BUY NOW!} 05:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bigmantonyd (talk) 05:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC) Quality only grows with time, predatory deletion is counterproductive[reply]
Bilby (talk) 12:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bleaney (talk) 23:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
BMcCJ (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Boracay Bill -- I've been doing this sort of stuff as a WP:Wikignome and as a WP:ICU member. Sign me up. 00:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Borgarde^talk 08:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BRG (talk) 14:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC) This is a great idea and I agree with just about everything that has been said above. Of course, please count me in![reply]
Brian Fenton (talk) 19:21, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Let's do it.[reply]
brighterorange (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC) (admin) This is a good idea. I really hate seeing a borderline article, spending effort to fix it, and then seeing that effort wasted because of the 6 delete votes cast before I started![reply]
Bubbles02 (talk) 04:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Thought I'd join, although I have very little practice at this. But, I suppose I'll learn as I go along[reply]
BsBsBs (talk) 04:49, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Happy to help![reply]
Buster7 (talk) 02:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)This ain't no party...This ain't no disco...This ain't no foolin' aroun'[reply]
BMW (drive) 12:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC) I seem to be doing this already ...[reply]

C

Canadian (talk) 14:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Canley 11:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC) - My proudest moments on Wikipedia have been rescuing articles from the jaws of AfD with a spot of referencing and rewriting. I'd be delighted to be a part of this much-needed team.[reply]
Captjosh (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC) - Love finding hard-to-find but NPV citations.[reply]
Carcharoth 00:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cartman005 (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Catherine\^talk 05:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC) - I'll help where I can.[reply]
Cdogsimmons (talk) 06:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Subjective notability arguments for deletion are driving me crazy.[reply]
Cerejota (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC) Had the box since forever... but got welcomed so now I sign...[reply]
Chamal ^talk 13:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chaosdruid (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC) DOH thought I added my name last years but obv something went wrong lol[reply]
Ched (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Just call me the patron saint of lost causes.[reply]
Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:54, 14 October 2011 (UTC) I seem to like doing this, so might as well do it officially...[reply]
Christopher (talk) 16:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC) - believe this is A Good Idea on the whole, and support its aims.[reply]
Chubbles I am ace at determining the notability of musicians and musical ensembles. I'm happy to be contacted about any problem cases.
Citizen-of-wiki (talk) 00:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC) The deletionists are not evil people they just get a little carried away sometimes. Someone needs to provide a balance to prevent Wikipedia from being deleted off the face of the earth. "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." By Burke, Edmund in his "Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents and the Two Speeches on America." [ Published 1770. Sixth Edition, Dodsley, 1784.][reply]
Code Hydro 05:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC) less talk about what's wrong and more time to spend on fixing, I say![reply]
Cortal UX^Talk? 12:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC) - I'll help where I can.[reply]
Cricket02 Yes, good idea. Lately I'm finding articles nominated for deletion with just minutes of its creation. To me that is biting the newcomers. I'll agree there are plenty that don't belong, but there are many that need saving too. ? Cricket02 01:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cyclopia (talk) 09:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC) -- I'll do what I can.[reply]
Cynthia Shubert (unregistered) 22:39, 23 March 2009 (PDT) A noble cause; I'll help where i can.

D

DanielZimmerman (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Davewild 19:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC) - Where I can help will do so.[reply]
dbabbitt (talk) 14:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC) might help.[reply]
Dean B (talk) 06:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DGG (talk) 04:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC) - The key is balance, and willingnesss to improve articles--if everyone participated in one Afd and fixed one article and found one hopeless article to delete, we could really improve WP.[reply]
Dhartung | Talk 21:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC) This is a lot of what I do already. I vote delete on things, but many times salvageable articles are deleted just because nobody cares to try. Nominators who fail to do research first are only part of the problem.[reply]
DickClarkMises 20:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DiverScout (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dipankan001 (talk) 14:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Better to improve a article rather than deleting it is a very good policy,and I heartfully support this![reply]
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 12:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC) --- I often clean up articles for readability and verifiability, so why not join the professionals?[reply]
DragonFly31 (talk) 07:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dream Focus 18:18, 26 February 2009 (UTC) When reason fails, societies break apart, and civilization crumbles around them. We must strive to stop the insanity here and now, not just to put out the fires others keep starting, but to rebuild what they have destroyed, restoring what was lost to us, so that the wikipedia can once again be what it was meant to be. Wiki means "casual", it an encyclopedia where anyone can edit, and add to as they see fit, without fear of overjudgmental people picking apart every little thing they do, and trying to erase it if it isn't just perfect by their standards.[reply]
Dreftymac. dr.ef.tymac 16:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dromioofephesus (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 18:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC) It all began when one of my own articles, Bananagrams, was nominated for deletion about 8 minutes after I created it. I knew it had merit, so I saved it and made this userbox. Then I happened upon an article with a rescue tag -- I was wondering if there was something like this?[reply]
Drrll (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dsmdgold I am especially interested in the misuse of the criteria for speedy deletion. Dsmdgold 12:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E

EagleFan (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ebikeguy (talk) 15:57, 19 October 2010 (UTC) - Primarily interested in bicycles and electric vehicles[reply]
Eidetic Man (talk) 02:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC) User Talk me if you ever need help, i'll keep an eye out, this is a great project.[reply]
Eldumpo (talk) 16:55, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the invite.[reply]
Elm478 (talk) 06:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC) Always ready to help keep and improve the article if it is worth it[reply]
Enric Naval (talk) 01:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC) The good work saving PRODded unsourced BLPs has convinced me to join.[reply]
Esowteric (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Sometimes need to work like crazy to get a new article sorted before it's jumped on.[reply]
evalporevalpor Evalpor (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Everyking (talk) 01:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC) I suppose I should at least show moral support.[reply]
Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 09:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC) CSD patrol mostly. Forwarding or saving article's that do not really need to be removed, just rewritten or cleaned.[reply]
|Exit2DOS2000]]^•T•C• 16:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC) - Somehow I seem to find a lot of Citations for Shopping Centres.[reply]

F

FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC) A most worthy project![reply]
Flavio Villanustre (talk) 13:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Glad to help![reply]
Ford MF (talk) 03:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC) E-mail me if you need me.[reply]
Forridean 03:06, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Is there a club for people who forget to log in, too?[reply]
Fosnez 20:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC) - Sign me up![reply]
Francium12 I loathe deletionism! Francium12 18:10, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fuzheado | Talk - I suppose I'm obliged to sign up as my blog post instigated much of this. :) There is too much emphasis on pruning, filtering and destroying, but without the cooperative community discussion, {{sofixit}} culture, and a roll up your sleeves attitude.
hey_pal (Friend.hey)^(talk) 13:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC) Friend.hey (talk) happy to contribute![reply]

G

Germanname1990 (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC) I have always been passionate about helping others for good causes, no matter how significant these causes are. This is another cause I am eager to help out on. Even if there are topics that I have no knowledge of, I'll do what I can to fix them.[reply]
Gnan garra - notability is a corner stone of Wikipedia it cannot be ignored.
Gongshow ^Talk 06:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC) I'm happy to help where I can.[reply]
Gordonofcartion. Fine idea. I do lean toward deletionism, but (as others have said above) it's always good to turn around AFDs based on article weaknesses that can be quickly mended. Gordonofcartoon 21:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Guy Macon (talk) 09:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC) Especially interested in rescue of worthy engineering, technology and science articles.[reply]

H

Hangakiran 01:18 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Harland1 (talk) 16:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Havok (T/C/e/c) 16:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hazillow (talk) 07:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hdt83 ^Chat 09:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC) I've come across several AFDs where the article was in bad shape but the subject was notable. A good way to help improve Wikipedia. --Hdt83 ^Chat 09:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hotspot I'm in, you don't know how many of my images have been removed. Without images things can be harder to understand and then you have to go on a search engine and find an image yourself which can be hard for something that isn't popular like a video game or a show.(Hotspot) 12:06 PM September 20? 21? 2009 (UTC)
HowardBGolden (talk) 01:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC) I'm especially concerned with academic software AfDs[reply]
Huwmanbeing ☀ ★ 12:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hydroxonium (talk) 05:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC) - I'm willing to help[reply]

I

User:I.am.lost formerly QueerAsFolk, 18:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ichormosquito I feel at home. Thanks, Fosnez! Article creation should always be encouraged. 05:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Iswearius (talk) 07:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
J04n(talk page) 09:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
KF5LLG --KF5LLG (talk) 00:05, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's Malpass ⁹₃! (_drop me a ^___) 15:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC) I'd love to help out![reply]

J

Jamison Lofthouse (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
JDDJS (talk) 00:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC) My article has been saved from deletion. I want to help return the favor.[reply]
Jethwarp (talk) 07:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC) Oh!! I have done this for many of my articles!! Like to do for others also!![reply]
Jheiv (talk) 04:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jim Miller I didn't even know there was a project for something I've been doing anyway. With that nifty life preserver logo, what else can I do but jump right into the pool! Jim Miller (talk) 20:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
jjska®ate ??|?® 08:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC) Delete, delete and delete. No mercy to many beginners or to some articles that needs help. Delete.[reply]
Jmbranum (talk) 06:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jminthorne (talk) 04:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
JNF Tveit (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 12:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
John Z (talk) 08:32, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jojalozzo (talk) 19:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jokestress (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC) I cannot abide deletionism, especially its most virulent form, speedy deletion.[reply]
Jordan "Eck" Samuel (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Joshdboz 10:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC) This is a great idea. I can't stand when articles are deleted even when the notability of the topic is admitted![reply]
Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
JT72 Count me in too!
Junius49 (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

K

KeptSouth (talk) 22:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keresaspa (talk) 17:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kevin Murray 20:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kingturtle (talk) 16:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kitty53 (talk) 04:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC) I am so glad something like this exists! I want to save articles on Wikipedia! I don't know why such good articles get deleted, but if I should ever bump into an article that needs our help, I will be there when I have time! I mean, those poor, innocent articles, they deserve to exist on Wikipedia! I wish I was part of this eversince I joined Wikipedia. All that should be deleted are articles that view nonsense, and accidental creations! Articles that view very little info should be expanded, not deleted! Very small articles/stubs should just be expanded enough to stay on Wikipedia for all eternity!Kitty53 (talk) 04:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kizor. No particular qualifications, but I've been around WP for a while; drop me a line if you need a hand. 00:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ks64q2 (talk) 04:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC) I'm happy to help out.[reply]
Kuralyov (talk) 02:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

L

Laualoha 11:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC) I can help with whatever is needed, as time & drama permits, but can especially try to help with minority articles that are having a hard time being understood as valid. Do my best, anyway.[reply]
Leifern (talk) 01:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Eclectic interests, sporadic participation, but a particular emphasis on Norwegian history.[reply]
Libertyguy (talk) 15:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Liz (talk) 08:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC) - I'm in. Took me a while to join up, but I'm here now![reply]
Lumos3 (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC) Many AFDs I have encountered are ways of pushing a POV agenda.[reply]

M

Machete97 (talk) 12:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC) Inclusionist, would like to help against rampant deletion of notable topics.[reply]
maestrosync ^talk — 01:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mandsford (talk) 12:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Count me in. I think all information can be saved somewhere, even if not all individual articles can be rescued.[reply]
ManicSpider (talk) 23:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Marcusmax(speak) 17:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Marhawkman (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Sure, deletionists annoy me.[reply]
Marshmir 08:13, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Great idea to rescue the articles from deletion, as Wikipedia is knowledge center, and every article is knowledge, deleting article is not good job and its very easy to simply delete articles, but hard is to keep it undelete and improve it by collecting and assembling information about article.[reply]
MASEM 14:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mathieas (talk) 21:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mathmo ^Talk, because I am a wild-eyed inclusionist. ;)
Matt Yeager ? (Talk?) 07:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Thank heavens for something like this.[reply]
Matthewrbowker
MaverickSolutions (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC) - We're happy to help on any technology-related articles.[reply]
MC10 (T•C•GB•L•EM) – I check in when I have the time to.
Metty (talk) 16:59, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Seems everyone that I admire the most for their comments in AfD is a member of this group. Looks like the place to be. (:[reply]
Milowent --Milowent (talk) 13:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Defending The History of Earth! :-)[reply]
Mkativerata (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC) I don't have the time to try to help rescue every article for which I !vote keep, but I try when I can.[reply]
Mohamed Magdy (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC) - Very nice idea of course, I have always been thinking of it that way, when you see something broken you should attempt to fix it, before you destroy it completely. Thank you.[reply]
Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 21:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC) - Something needs to be fixed about deletion, and this is one good place to start.[reply]
Mostlyharmless (talk) 23:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mr. Brain (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Definitely interested in having some of my articles retrieved.[reply]
MR.' Pre'Z 23:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
User:musically ut is rolling up his sleeves. musically_ut (talk) 03:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My76Strat (talk) I would be happy to assist in this regard.My76Strat (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

N

Nappyrootslistener (talk) 23:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NBeale (talk) 12:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC) This is a great idea - I wish I had known about it before.[reply]
Neil ? - I am a deletionist, and will happily delete all kinds of rubbish. But topics that should be on Wikipedia but the article is so crappy it needs rescuing from AFD must be saved. I've recsusitated a few myself from AFD by improving them.
Neo12345292 Neo12345292 (talk) 03:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC) We shall Save the World![reply]
Netmouse (talk) 17:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC) I think deletion is one of the processes most relevant to questions facing the Strategic Task Force on increasing reader contributions. I invite everyone here to join us in considering these questions.[reply]
Netrat (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Already set the userbox to my userpage.[reply]
Nick carson (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nihola (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC) I'm in.[reply]
Novickas. Have felt good about various rescues. Novickas (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Novinha (talk) 16:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nuujinn (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O

OlYeller^Talktome 20:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 21:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)- I like the idea, and I'll try to help as much as I can.[reply]
otherlleft (talk) 03:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC) I still don't know if I'm a deletionist, inclusionist, or just plain Wikipedian, but this project makes sense.[reply]
Ottre 22:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P

Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 23:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Picapica (talk) 16:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pink Bull 18:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the invitation![reply]
Plasma Twa 2 07:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC) - Saw this during the afd for Television series considered the greatest ever. Sounds like a noble cause. Sign me up.[reply]
Puchiko About a hundred articles are proposed for deletion every day. Surely, not all of them can be hopeless cases. 16:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Quistisffviii (talk) 08:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC) I believe people should be checking for vandalism, not locating an article to delete. I also believe that notability is in the eye of the beholder.[reply]
Racconish ^Tk 16:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

R

Radiopathy (talk) 02:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rak-Tai Rak-Tai (talk) 02:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Randall Bart Talk 21:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ratzer (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC) I hope to help with geographical articles pending deletion[reply]
Rebecca 02:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC) - Count me in.[reply]
User:Reinyday, 17:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ritchie333 (talk) 10:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC) Semi-regular dumpster diver saving articles from deletion via CSD or AfD with numerous resulting DYK credits, particular expertise on geography and bands.[reply]
rkmlai (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Robotnick2 ^Messages? 15:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC) I was Anikin3, I've changed usernames. Still very happy to help :-D[reply]
Ronabop Brilliant! 13 September 2007 (UTC)
RoninBK _{T C} 20:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC) I like this idea, this is why I started patrolling AfD in the first place.[reply]
Rothorpe (talk) 00:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
roy<sac> ^Talk! .oOo. 21:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Deleted Content is lost content. The destruction of world libraries, archives and encyclopedias are the primary cause for the losses in knowledge for mankind.[reply]
Rubinkumar

S

Sabine McNeill (talk) 20:48, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sandman30s (talk) 18:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC) I stopped adding new articles when my video game articles were deleted. To hell with notability. What about 'the sum of all knowledge of mankind' in the founder's words?[reply]
SarekOfVulcan 20:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC) - I'm in: I love fixing articles.[reply]
Sasawat_{can talk and Edit} 20:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Scieberking (talk) 22:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC) I'm more than willing to help.[reply]
Scouto2 (talk) 23:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC) I'll join to keep articles from falling into a state of disrepair.[reply]
Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC) I'd much rather fix the damn pipe than stand around complaining about having wet feet.[reply]
Secret formerly Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC) - Only when it's certain sports articles[reply]
Sehmeet singh Talk 17:10, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User:shanem201 --Shanem201 (talk) 00:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Shanoman (talk) 22:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sherurcij ^{(speaker for the dead)} I can't very well ask others to save my articles, if I don't save theirs!
Shirishag75 (talk) 15:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ShoesssS ^Talk 17:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC) The topic says all that needs to be said.[reply]
Shunpiker (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Hurrah for redemption![reply]
SifaV6 (talk) 09:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
SilkTork *^YES! 10:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC) I'm in. I have been doing this already, so it's good to know there's a collective to share ideas and alert each other to articles that need attention.[reply]
Silver seren^C 09:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
SimonP 17:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sjc 09:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC) - Long overdue. Wikipedia is not paper [1] - keep that link to hand, it is the number one weapon we have in our arsenal against the rapine depredations of the deletionists.[reply]
What about a squirrel? (talk) 23:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC) In the name of Chipmunk accuracy![reply]
Skitzo (talk) 10:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC) I will probably be most use of English football related articles but I'll lend a hand with most articles.[reply]
Skyler13 (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)--Skyler :^|[reply]
SL93
Smallman12q (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Hardcore inclusionist all the way![reply]
Smartcom5 ^(Talk ?) Glad to see someone who is also dedicated ! ?-User too ! Lock'n load guys. :-)
SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 14:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC) Why? Pretty much exactly what DGG said above. This Wikigroup should not (and presently does not seem to be) an rabid inclusionism force, but rather a balancing factor against the entropy of extremist deletionism, which is clearly rampant.[reply]
Smerdis of Tlön (talk) - AfD is probably one of the most significant sources of new article ideas for me. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
SMSpivey (talk) 07:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC) - yea, forgot to add my name here[reply]
Sngourd (talk) 15:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sotonfc4life (talk) 21:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC) Encyclopedias are supposed to be the font of knowledge, the internet is supposed to share that knowledge, and Wikipedia should be integral to that. Deleting articles like hungry sharks eating fish is counter productive to those aims.[reply]
Speeda psx (talk · contribs) 15:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC) Some guys deleted some of my hard work that had time to improve.Inclusionist giving help to you guys![reply]
Squamate (talk) 02:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Tired of people who seem to live for deletion.[reply]
Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} ^Guestbook ^{Hate Comments} 18:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Count me in[reply]
Stereorock I do not like deletion!Stereorock (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strummer25 (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC) I'm glad to join.[reply]
SunCreator (talk) 12:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
superstooge (talk) 21:00, 28 August 2009
Suraj T 04:45, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Swatkatz14 (talk) 12:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Syed Kazim | Talk 20:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

T

T L Miles (talk) 00:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Per user "MQSchmidt" (120, above). Know something of West African History, and France and UK 19th century history, some football (soccer) and leftist stuff.[reply]
T1980 (talk) 04:06, 7 November 2009 (UTC) count me in![reply]
ThaddeusB (talk) 15:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Guess I should probably make this official now. :) In addition to being an editor who tries to save articles, I am also an admin & bot operator. As such, I am willing to help out in admin/BOT areas when the need arises (time permitting of course). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 00:51, 14 October 2010 (UTC) - Mostly aircraft and military stuff.[reply]
the wub "?!" 23:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Theleftorium (talk) 21:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thespian 10:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC) - This proactive sort of movement warms the cockles of my inclusionist heart.[reply]
Thewinchester ^(talk) 03:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Having had to advocate for the deletion of bad articles such as Out Now Consulting and save Karrinyup Shopping Centre from crazed deletionists who don't know how to use cleanup tags, I can totally understand the purpose of this group.[reply]
Timeshifter (talk) 08:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tim Vickers 05:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC) - Drop me a note when biology or medicine articles are nominated as having questionable accuracy/notability. I'll be happy to look into it.[reply]
Tinucherian (talk) 01:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TomCat4680 (talk) 06:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Thanks for inviting me, glad to be here. I hate it when people nominiate pages I made for AFD.[reply]
Trackinfo (talk) 05:25, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Good idea. I've already rescued and sourced several hundred "unsourced BLPs" that are at the heart of the current debate. I've been quite outspoken about the unnecessary deletion of articles, so I may as well be part of your group.[reply]
Trey (talk) 03:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC) A noble cause i'll help where i can.[reply]
Tvoz/talk 20:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC) As usual, DGG has it right - delete if it's hopeless, but fix if there's any hope. WE ARE NOT PAPER. Tvoz/talk 20:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Txtrooper (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tyranny Sue (talk) I'll have a go :) --Tyranny Sue (talk) 03:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

U

UnicornTapestry (talk) 00:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC) • Now I don't feel as much an outsider as an outrider.[reply]
Unionhawk (talk) 21:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Count me in![reply]

V

^{Veraladeramanera} _T _C Hi, I want to join ARS because I want to rescue articles on Wikipedia that have been AfD nominated because they lack "Encyclopedic info". That is not a good reason to Nominate them for deletion, no matter how little info they have! The only time an AfD nomination is really legitimate in my opinion is when they lack encyclopedic topics!
Verbal chat 08:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC) If it's worth keeping then keep, but sometimes a fresh start is better. I do not support canvassing, and hope this group moves away from it.[reply]
Verdatum (talk) 19:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Victor falk I like that "Sofixit Spirit" stuff. --Victor falk 14:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Victor Silveira (talk) 05:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]