Menu: User Page | Talk Page (+) | Sandbox | Reference | Subpages | Contributions (alt) | Dashboard
This page is optimised for Mozilla Firefox and a screen resolution of 1280x1024 (minimum: 1024x768)
CAVEAT: all the |show=
parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
editAdministrative backlog
editAIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
edit- 2601:80:ca00:f970:7098:a520:cf63:c4a9 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- 108.88.36.134 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Persistent spamming of my talk page after I removed vandalism they committed with the IP address 2600:1702:1BD0:C970:3D4B:AB1E:E32A:BC00. Vepr157 (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- 100.4.146.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Tahalariby (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) POV-pushing and persistent addition of unsourced WP:OR. Skitash (talk) 19:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Rhekmat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 103.191.119.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Arshad Nadeem: vandalism after final warning; account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. aggarwala2727 (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 77.246.75.107 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Deliberate factual errors and block evasion. CRBoyer 21:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 74.193.91.249 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- John Lewis Rick (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Anti-Israel vandal. Felicia (talk) 22:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 160.19.36.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Broke: calling Malik Masonto broke. Daisytheduck talk to me 22:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 95.251.108.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – LTA (sandbox troll, see edit filter log). Jdcomix (talk) 22:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1011:B13D:D9DE:9801:FC7F:2339:39C1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Gross vandalism, see edit filter log. Jdcomix (talk) 22:36, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1012:B200::/40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. On range. Final warnings on talk page of individual IPs. BLP violations, Adding bogus height info to bio infoboxes is only edits. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Alexaviertorres08 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent disruptive editing. WP:CIR. Xexerss (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 121.203.175.123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – LTA. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 27.32.53.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On :Mod subculture: adding unnecessary profanity. Daisytheduck talk to me 23:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 2A00:20:D008:523C:73CF:2DD2:8095:7F1E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On National People's Party (diff): 8 edits, all vandalism. Nath1991 (talk) 23:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 167.179.133.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Jesse Palmer (Australian footballer): he is changing his date of birth. Daisytheduck talk to me 23:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- 122.56.185.93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block. 1-week school block, returned with blatant vandalism [1] and [2]. Meters (talk) 00:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- 36.73.46.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – disruptive editing across current events. C F A 💬 01:28, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
---|---|
User requested | 0 |
Empty articles | 0 |
Nonsense pages | 0 |
Spam pages | 5 |
Importance or significance not asserted | 3 |
Other candidates | 4 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
---|
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 111 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Testes12 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "testicles" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- SFAFootballRecords (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MihaWhyIsthisnamealwaysoccupade (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
edit- JimmyCarterLover1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. Salvio giuliano 20:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- NevadaStateMarketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Wburrow (talk) 21:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- User has changed their username. I have pagenlocked them from Nevada State University. Cullen328 (talk) 00:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- TheRealtyFair (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:AbuseLog/38415852. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
editPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
- Arjuna (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sahadeva (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: constant persistent vandalism by User talk:DraupadiPandavas (latest sock account of User: Kairakairav). Warnings given, no response, others pages like Kunti, Pandu, Madri were earlier requested as well. Banning the user doesnt help as sockmaster make similar disruptive edits using diff alt accounts and IPs..245CMR.•👥📜 19:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: Consistent disruptive editing by IP users and DraupadiPandavas (talk · contribs) after previous protection gor over including removal of several key characters played by less recognised actors and cameo characters played by recognised actors and addition of fake information for several characters by removal of actual information. Please protect this page from this particular User DraupadiPandavas (talk · contribs) too as she is also constantly doing same disruptive editing like IP users. Pri2000 (talk), 23:58, 07 August 2024 (UTC)
- Commemt: User: DraupadiPandavas(talk) is a sockpuppet of consistent sockpuppet user from around years Kairakairav. So consistent disruptive edits are done by this sockpuppet and other IP users.
Pri2000 (talk) 01:46, 08 August 2024 (UTC)
- List of analog television stations in the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Adding false stations again by a unregistered editor. Page has also been added false stations June 11, 2024 onwards. 120.29.79.203 (talk) 10:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring vandalism. Please provide semi-protection, at-least till 23rd Aug (National Space Day). Samuel Johnson (talk) 13:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Rolling IPs copying different article into this one. The same person vandalizing International Commerce Centre (the sister building). A page protection was added a few days ago to that article, this one needs also. This is a LTA involving many buildings, still researching extent. GreenC 15:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been vandalism for the last few months by IPs and recently registered users. Felicia (talk) 15:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Falls under the purview of Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – IPs adding unsourced information, including death claims, to a BLP. DonIago (talk) 17:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/AC target. Panian513 19:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/AC target. Panian513 19:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent messing around with broadcast years by ip hopper. CRBoyer 19:16, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopper keeps restoring claims of greatness with really poor sourcing. Drmies (talk) 19:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Recent allegations of pedophilia and other misconduct and the amount of edits being made to the page in response AML KING (talk) 20:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Everyone is fighting over whether the Indian or Pakistan athlete should be in the main photo. Knitsey (talk) 20:13, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Part of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Felicia (talk) 20:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~delta (talk • cont) 21:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism arie (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 22:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. Daisytheduck talk to me 23:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 00:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 00:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GraziePrego (talk) 00:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring on use of the phrase "from Catalonia" in lead. Roasted (talk) 00:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 01:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editPlease request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
The title is misleading - there have been none in Wales. The page mentions N Wales Police sending reinforcements, and says that there were anti-fascist gatherings in Cardiff to protest expected events that did not happen and 'some far-right demonstrators outside the Senedd, though no conflict materialised' So no riots in Wales. StillMum (talk) 01:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
edit
6 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
26 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
edit- PARAKANYAA (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Has created roughly 30 articles by my count; only one stub, my spotchecks found nothing concerning. Diverging Diamond (is Queen of Hearts's alt; talk) 19:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Is there any indication that the user wants autopatrolled? I don't want to throw rights at someone who would prefer that their creations be reviewed by NPP/AfC. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 10:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk: Unlike other PERMs, third party nominations for autopatrolled are welcome (preferred even), because it's primarily a tool used by NPP to manage its workload rather than a tool used by the holder to edit. If someone really doesn't want it for some reason, they can of course ask for it to be removed. – Joe (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk I would be open to having it. Hypothetically I like the idea of someone else checking my articles or critiquing them, but no one who has patrolled my articles has ever really made a significant change or tagged anything, so it hasn't really helped there lol, so if it reduces the NPP workload and gets the page indexed faster I don't see why not. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- In that case, I have no objection to granting the right. — Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 13:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done Elli (talk | contribs) 00:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission autopatrolled. — MusikBot talk 01:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Overriding the bot... Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Losipov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Jordanroderick (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reviewer Aszx5000 has messaged me twice that I should be autopatrolled. I don't care for my sake, since the process works fine for me, but I don't want to be a burden on the reviewers. Please either grant or deny this status based on whatever you think is best for the community. Thanks! Jordanroderick (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
edit
- KingSkyLord (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- ToadetteEdit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Robertsky (expires 00:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- PadFoot2008 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I was granted pagemover rights nearly a month back, but due to mistakes on my part, the rights have been now revoked. So, I am requesting the rights again on Primefac's advice, explaining why I made the mistakes and how I shall avoid those mistakes going forward.
- On 5 July, Liz told me at my talk page about the terrible quality of my page swap on Polish–Russian War (1609–1618) which I had moved after closing an an RM discussion in the talk page, and that I had left a dozen broken redirects that she had to clean up. This mistake was due to my inexperience, as it was my first page swap. Following that, SilverLocust recommended me User:Ahecht/Scripts/pageswap to prevent such issues, which I have been using ever since, and there have not been any more such errors.
- On 8 July, SilverLocust informed me about MOS:DUALNATIONALITIES after I moved Polish–Russian War of 1792 to Polish-Russian War of 1792. I was not aware of MOS:DUALNATIONALITIES at that time, and since then I've taken up the task to fix other article titles violating it as well. I had been aware of and had read the WP:Article title policy, but I had not completely read through the WP:MOS at that time. I've completely familiarised myself with the guideline now and hence hope to minimise mistakes I might make relating to that.
- On 30 July, I moved British Indian Army to Indian Army (1895–1947) after which Celia Homeford informed me that the move had been unilateral, following which I immediately proceeded to check the talk page of the article for previous RMs, which I did find and had resulted in the move of Indian Army (1895–1947) to British Indian Army. I hadn't checked the talk page before swapping the page and thus had not been aware of this RM when I had swapped — a mistake on my part. I had checked the WP:COMMONNAME of the article and sought to make the article title WP:Consistent with other historical army related articles like German Army (1935–1945) for instance. I should've checked the talk page and it's archives for any previous RMs and discussions before making the swap. That is what I usually do before making a move or a swap, but this step had slipped my mind in this case. In future, I shall make sure to always check the talk page and the archives for RMs and discussions regarding the article title without fail before making a move or a swap.
I've learnt from my mistakes and hope not to repeat them. I also aim to minimise any chance of any other mistakes on my part. PadFoot (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 18:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. I'm surprised this wasn't instantly declined... Your rights were removed, give it more time to show that you've learned instead of immediately re-applying for the perm. For the time being, utilize WP:RM/TR. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC) Link fixed. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
edit- AlexBobCharles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Adriazeri (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I’ve been editing for a little while now, I’ve requested page protection and reverted edits which are not appropriate on various pages. I am pretty devoted to editing on Wikipedia and I have an extensive Watchlist so I think this permission would be useful. Adriazeri (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Bexaendos (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am well familiar with wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thank you! Bexaendos (talk) 14:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
edit- Lordseriouspig (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now, using Twinkle to warn members. I have over 200 mainspace edits, and I'm extended confirmed with over 700 edits total. I've also been doing NPP for a little too. I'd like to use rollback for more advanced tools such as Huggle and AntiVandal. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 06:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 10:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t believe I'm not, @Fastily:, I warn people using twinkle, here is my warn logs: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Lordseriouspig&namespace=3&tagfilter=twinkle&start=&end=&limit=50. Lordseriouspig 20:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I reviewed your contributions from last month and found these within seconds: 1, 2, 3. I'll repeat what I said above: it's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’m unsure why I forgot to add a warning for those, @Fastily, considering Twinkle automatically opens the talk page, but I usually warn members, and tools like Anti-vandal or Huggle would probable negate me forgetting warns. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 10:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, thanks for your honesty. Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 23:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I’m unsure why I forgot to add a warning for those, @Fastily, considering Twinkle automatically opens the talk page, but I usually warn members, and tools like Anti-vandal or Huggle would probable negate me forgetting warns. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 10:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I reviewed your contributions from last month and found these within seconds: 1, 2, 3. I'll repeat what I said above: it's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don’t believe I'm not, @Fastily:, I warn people using twinkle, here is my warn logs: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Lordseriouspig&namespace=3&tagfilter=twinkle&start=&end=&limit=50. Lordseriouspig 20:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission rollback. — MusikBot talk 11:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- LR.127 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been viewing recent changes for a while with Twinkle, and would like to keep using the Android app to prevent vandalism, which requires rollback permissions.
I am aware, after reading others' requests, that warning users after edits must be done every single time. While there are moments in which I have forgot to do this in the past, I will ensure to make it a consistency going forward. LR.127 (talk) 00:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? -Fastily 11:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
- Win8x (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been monitoring Recent Changes for around a month now and would like to use Huggle to help me do it, but this requires rollback. I just want to admit it here: at the start I did not always warn users but I do warn all the time now. Either way, thank you! win8x (talking | spying) 01:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? -Fastily 03:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, but that's what I was already doing. My last like... 200/300 edits are all warned. But sure, I will continue to do so. Thanks! win8x (talking | spying) 04:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see reverts from just a few days ago in which you failed to notify the editor (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Like I said, please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users. A few dozen reverts would be ideal. Confirm below once you've done this and I will re-review. Thanks, Fastily 04:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done! Just to clarify, is a welcome message such as Template:Welcome-delete an acceptable alternative to Template:Uw-delete1, for example (if it's a new user)? Thanks. win8x (talking | spying) 23:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes that's fine. I did see you failed to notify an editor after making this revert today. Why? -Fastily 00:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- I reverted myself back immediately after. I thought about it, and thought that the edit the user made was actually valid, just with formatting mistakes. So after reverting them, I reverted myself, and then fixed the formatting error. win8x (talking | spying) 00:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks for the clarification. Done -Fastily 23:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- I reverted myself back immediately after. I thought about it, and thought that the edit the user made was actually valid, just with formatting mistakes. So after reverting them, I reverted myself, and then fixed the formatting error. win8x (talking | spying) 00:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes that's fine. I did see you failed to notify an editor after making this revert today. Why? -Fastily 00:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done! Just to clarify, is a welcome message such as Template:Welcome-delete an acceptable alternative to Template:Uw-delete1, for example (if it's a new user)? Thanks. win8x (talking | spying) 23:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see reverts from just a few days ago in which you failed to notify the editor (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Like I said, please now go do some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users. A few dozen reverts would be ideal. Confirm below once you've done this and I will re-review. Thanks, Fastily 04:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, but that's what I was already doing. My last like... 200/300 edits are all warned. But sure, I will continue to do so. Thanks! win8x (talking | spying) 04:12, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Wburrow (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been patrolling recent changes since late June and believe access to more advanced tools like Huggle would enhance my anti-vandalism work. I understand the importance of warning users after every revert and believe I have been consistent in doing so. Thanks for your consideration. Wburrow (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make, particularly if the edit was made in good faith. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 22:24, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- For the edits you picked, I explained the reasoning for the revert in my edit summary instead of using a warning template on their Talk page because I felt that approach would come across as friendlier/less hostile. My understanding was that reverting required either a talk page warning or an explanatory edit summary, but it seems that understanding was mistaken, and I can commit to leaving a talk page notification for all future reverts. Wburrow (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 00:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- For the edits you picked, I explained the reasoning for the revert in my edit summary instead of using a warning template on their Talk page because I felt that approach would come across as friendlier/less hostile. My understanding was that reverting required either a talk page warning or an explanatory edit summary, but it seems that understanding was mistaken, and I can commit to leaving a talk page notification for all future reverts. Wburrow (talk) 04:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Footer
editPolicies and links