User talk:Deb/Archive 16
If that doesn't help, read these FAQs.
1. Why did you delete my page when I hadn't finished writing it?
- Answer: Don't create new articles unless you are sure they meet wikipedia's criteria, particularly notability and verifiability. If you want to practice, there is the sandbox facility and Wikipedia:Articles for creation where you can get a second opinion from a more experienced contributor. And if you really can't help yourself, use {{underconstruction}} so other people will know you are still working on it.
2. Why did you delete my page for advertising? I wasn't trying to advertise!
- Answer: Read Wikipedia:NPOV for guidance on how to word an article so that it doesn't sound like an advertisement.
3. Why did you delete my page for advertising? It was about a non-profit organisation!
- Answer: Non-profit organisations advertise all the time - it's still promotion and the rule applies to them just as it does to commercial bodies. See no 2 above.
4. Why did you delete my article without warning?
- Answer: Because you are not entitled to a warning if you don't follow the guidelines. See no 1 above.
5. Why didn't you do a google search and find references for my article and put them in for me instead of just deleting it?
- Answer: Because I don't have time to do the boring bits for you. I have enough boring bits of my own to work on, thank you.
And please SIGN YOUR POSTS, otherwise I don't know who is asking me the question!
Archives: 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
RE: Deletion of Obsidian Key Page
editHello Deb, on my profile talk I provided a list of resources about O.Key the page (as you requested), I can provide more, also please note that on the official website there are plenty of reviews all provided by external sources like soundout.com, soon there will be extra reviews (just waiting for their publication on the internet), so please let me know if you need more ref/resources etc... thanks. Phantomz73(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of "Rollglider" Page
editHello, Rollglider is an amusement attraction as are many others in Wikipedia. A brief search led me to Swing boat. Ali Baba (ride) and Roll-O-Plane which give pretty much the same information but are available and not deleted. The information I've given is about the product - its way of construction etc. and is in no way bias. I may used 1 or 2 adjectives, but is that ground for instant delete? Pkalotov (talk)
Hello again, Deb, Thanks for sharing the Other things exist page, as it may be visible, I am pretty new to Wikipedia and am not familiar with all the rules of the community. To be constructive I would like to ask what would you advice me to do so I can upload the page. I've read the verifiability page and as far as I understand it - you expect me to find media coverage of the ride so it can stay as an article, is that so? Or if no - please, tell me what should I do to keep it. Thanks in advance.Pkalotov (talk)
Deletion of "C.Start" Page
editC.Start is a university incubator, and we just tried to create a page for it. Incubators are institutions which help startups to grow. How is this advertising? Prakhar Bindal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebetaguy (talk • contribs) 09:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Moving of "Sweet Freedom album" to "Sweet Freedon (Michael McDonald album)"
editWas this really neccessary as the original title was unique and you lost the link from Michael McDonald discography page by not leaving a redirect. Delangle9
- Yes, it was really necessary as there is already an article about another album called this.Deb (talk) 15:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Why didn't I get a disambiguity then? (although I am a relative newcomer to Wiki) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delangle9 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
This is confusing as I've had exactly the opposit happen before. A long title I put in like yours was shortened to a title like my original by another "watcher".
I start by writing a page in Word then creating a link from the artist's discography page to get a new empty Wiki page, copy/paste from Word then check everything is OK with Wiki. Usually if the title I give it in the link already exists then I don't get an empty page so I go back the the link and expand the title as you did to get an empty page. The latter didn't happen in this case so I assumed the title was unique. I haven't yet tried using the sandbox, but will get round to it sometime.
I'm Ok with this album taking second place as it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delangle9 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Cracker Loc
editThe article was deleted for being too short. but does the article itself need to be long when all the info on the person (which included their works) was provided via links within the article?
Dear Deb, I would ask you to reconsider your swift deletion of my page. It wasn't any more of an 'advert' than any of the other pages in the Category:Molecular_dynamics_software, many of which, incidentally, are also on the topic of commercial software. Indeed, I was careful to maintain a neutral perspective and list only facts. The article I wrote was referenced and meaningful for a reader interested in the wider subject. Yes, it was short (many others in the category are similarly so), but it's hardly encouraging me to expound upon the topic if my work gets deleted in the time it takes me to go and make a cup of tea. talk
Aljadidah is a arabic news platform with a notable number of users and the first arabic news portal focusing on women rights in Austria. The extension of the article with info and refs was in progress while the article was deleted by you. Is it possible to reactivate or at least to move into my sandbox for further enhancements? David.trattnig (talk) 13:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Mike Fulton Charlie
editYou've stated no legitimate reasoning in deleting the page especially since it is under construction and needs a lot of work to be done to it till it is completed. The page was legitimate and or it was stated previously that more information would be depicted as it was compiled and written about him. Please refrain from issuing a deletion of the page until it is fully constructed or at least constructed to a somewhat better level of structure, if after it is fully constructed and does not have meaning behind the page you are free to delete it. Commodore4eva (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC) commodore4eva
Deletion of Nanda Mallawaarachchi
editYou deleted Nanda Mallawaarachchi with a log reason of "G2: Test page)". The creator has inquired about this at the Help desk. The page does not look like a test page to me. It looks like an WP:AFC draft created in the wrong namespace. I am asking you to please undelete it and move it to the proper position, or indicate your reasons for not doing so. DES (talk) 01:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- The Infobox had some additional coding that caused the page to display as this. I restored the article and fixed it (I hope you don't mind) : ). - -Jreferee (talk) 02:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing that. I couldn't see any content. Deb (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Frank louis allen
editYou deleted Frank louis allen with a logged reason of A7. The article included the text "Despite this he is a successful artist who has had work published and displayed in Hollywood Gallery's, as well as various Exhibitions around California." While clearly not enough to survive an AfD, I think this does constitute a 'claim of significance' sufficient to avoid an A7 Speedy. The article is somewhat promotional, and may well be an autobiography, but those issues can be dealt with through editing. Would you consider undeleting this? DES (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- It is a claim, but not a plausible one. I'd say that the fact he's had work displayed in a gallery in Hollywood is not an indication of success - for all we know, his work may be on display in the toilets, or it may be some very minor gallery. However, I can move it to his user page, which may be what he really intended.Deb (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- I agree this is far from proof of notability. It could indicate someone of no significant accomplishment or someone about whom a very good article could be written. By my standards that is enough to decline an A7, although not enough to survive an AfD without improvement, nor enough to pass a review at AfC. DES (talk) 12:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- The more I look at it, the more I feel it doesn't even qualify as a claim of notability. It doesn't seem to me to meet the criteria in WP:ARTIST. However, I did google on the gentleman before I deleted it and couldn't find any indication of notability there either. Deb (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- It is my position that a claim under A7 need not and often will not meet any of the specialized notability guidelines, nor the GNG. Any allegedly factual statement that is not preposterous, and that might indicate that if research were done notability might plausibly appear is sufficient. While I can't say there is a clear consensus for that standard, there is a clear consensus that a claim that passes A7 is a "much lower bar" than establishing true notability, and that a claim need not be referenced at all. I had a good deal to do with the debates that created A7 and then expanded it to other kinds of subjects, and I think the "lower bar" concept was widely accepted from the first, and essential to A7 being adopted as a CSD. Note that the CSD wording is not "claim of notability" but "claim of significance". I would also say, if you have to Google to be sure, it isn't an A7, it is a PROD (although i am glad you did check) DES (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, sorry, I don't agree. For me, having had paintings displayed in "Hollywood galleries" would never be a claim of significance for an artist, nor would having had "exhibitions in California", nor indeed would being "successful". However, had I found some evidence of notability in a google search, I might have cut him a bit of slack. Deb (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- It is my position that a claim under A7 need not and often will not meet any of the specialized notability guidelines, nor the GNG. Any allegedly factual statement that is not preposterous, and that might indicate that if research were done notability might plausibly appear is sufficient. While I can't say there is a clear consensus for that standard, there is a clear consensus that a claim that passes A7 is a "much lower bar" than establishing true notability, and that a claim need not be referenced at all. I had a good deal to do with the debates that created A7 and then expanded it to other kinds of subjects, and I think the "lower bar" concept was widely accepted from the first, and essential to A7 being adopted as a CSD. Note that the CSD wording is not "claim of notability" but "claim of significance". I would also say, if you have to Google to be sure, it isn't an A7, it is a PROD (although i am glad you did check) DES (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- The more I look at it, the more I feel it doesn't even qualify as a claim of notability. It doesn't seem to me to meet the criteria in WP:ARTIST. However, I did google on the gentleman before I deleted it and couldn't find any indication of notability there either. Deb (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- I agree this is far from proof of notability. It could indicate someone of no significant accomplishment or someone about whom a very good article could be written. By my standards that is enough to decline an A7, although not enough to survive an AfD without improvement, nor enough to pass a review at AfC. DES (talk) 12:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Ashwini Kumar Chopra
editYou deleted Ashwini Kumar Chopra under A7. The deleted text includes "senior journalist, Resident Editor, Punjab Kesari" and "Ashwini is well known for his daily page one, Special Editorial with bold and popular wording." I think that, taken together, these form a "plausible claim of significance". Obviously the article needed significant work, but i don't think an A7 speedy delete appropriate. DES (talk) 02:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- I think there is a case for restoring it, so I've done that. I hope someone will work on it to bring it up to standard. Having said that, the wording you quote is at best subjective. My initial googling came up with very little, but a search on the name of the paper helped me find some evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 11:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Block of 119.160.119.85
editHi Deb, you blocked 119.160.119.85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) indefinitely per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yasir72.multan, would please consider reducing the block to a month or three (especially since any innocent users the IP may get assigned to aren't able to appeal on wiki)? Assuming the IP is very static, a couple of months is still a reasonable period of time for a sockmaster who hasn't been active for very long. Thanks and regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page.Deb (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Visionborne
editHi Deb, can you help me to write a better description for this company? You deleted my description and I can't understand what was wrong with it.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca986 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of AdTrap page
editYou deleted the page AdTrap citing "A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content". I understand the reason but I was right in the middle of fleshing out the article. I haven't been active on Wikipedia in some time so I was not aware of the sandbox feature. Could that page be restored so I can move it into my sandbox to further develop the page? --BiloxiGeek (talk) 11:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Page protection
editHi again. I think Mind Your Manners (Pearl Jam song) is another page that needs protection. IP editors adding non-notable trivia myself and another user keep removing. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- And thanks again. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Family of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge page protection
editHi Deb. In the meantime, could you please restore the consensus version that Virgosky reverted four times today, either with no valid reason specified or no reason specified at all? (it is not the final version because I refrained from reverting in the heat of the moment, and I don't see why I should be penalized for that) HelenOnline 15:49, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
You Should Be Aware
editHi Deb, thank you for your assistance. I just wanted you to be aware about the notice below, which I copy and pasted from my own Talk page [1], because you were the Administrator who assisted us. Virgosky (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
editHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Virgosky reported by User:HelenOnline. Thank you. HelenOnline 16:56, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please note I did not post this notice here and I am sure it is not appropriate to copy and paste a signed talk page post to a different talk page. Rather add a diff link to the actual post (since removed). HelenOnline 18:15, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please see WP:TALKNO for talk page behaviour that is unacceptable (including this). HelenOnline 18:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
editMessage added 16:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You deleted my page Toby Vaughan
editDeb is a bit-ch. Some people has to feel the power of the computing and posting :-) In your deletion you mentioned attacking as the reason but I didn't say anything derogatory at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobe le rone42 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should have worded it more carefully then. Deb (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, which part did you take offence to to make you remove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobe le rone42 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- The bit that was a hoax. Deb (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
None of it was a hoax. Why would you be so arrogant to think that my life and work in my band which were very well known in North London, Herfordshire and Essex is a hoax?? Could you please reinstate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobe le rone42 (talk • contribs) 10:14, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment: It seems like the article is about the user himself. If so, it wouldn't make sense if the user would attack himself, would it? --HYH.124 (talk) 12:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- You would be surprised how many people set up accounts in other people's names in order to say insulting things about them! Deb (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- '(Friendly (talk page stalker) Rather like this perhaps. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 17:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds faintly obscene, actually! :-) Deb (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ha, ha! I can understand what you mean. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 18:24, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Re: Derogatory pages. This one is correct. And I don't think it was made by him. Just sayin' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Ferguson Ssmith2013 (talk) 16:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my page?
editYou are deleting a legitimate entry for a real magazine that has a large following. Can you explain why I am unable to add Celtic Guide magazine to Wikipedia? Why have you blacklisted the website for it?
Csemerick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csemerick (talk • contribs) 19:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Screenshot of IE8 glitch.jpeg
editThanks for uploading File:Screenshot of IE8 glitch.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Past tense of 'bear'
editSee this link. It seems like "beared" is a word. I am puzzled. Any idea? HYH.124 (talk) 12:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Re: Article title
editYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Signature
editJust to notify you that you forgot to sign off at User talk:Tobe le rone42. Please remember to sign off next time. I signed on behalf of you. --Huang (user page | talk | contribs | info) 10:53, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
killer kittens is mad
edityou end my page of the the dead kid
Killer kittens (talk) 14:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Bit weird....
Mike Fulton Charlie
editCould you have a look in at Commodore4eva's talk page? I'm sure both of us are talking English, but we don't seem to be communicating... Peridon (talk) 22:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Metro Manila malls
editHi. I see that you have been deleting articles on three notable shopping malls of my metropolis so far, without even nominating those articles first for AFD so that contributors are given a chance to improve and rescue them. What is with this unilateral deletion without getting consensus? I am telling you those malls you deleted are all notable given their size, popularity and location, Isetann Cinerama Recto and Forum Robinsons are connected to metro/MRT stations for instance and are popular shopping centers by the five biggest mall developers in the Philippines.--RioHondo (talk) 01:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Deb, I noticed you tagged LambdaNative as being an advertisement, which is clearly not what I intended. If you look at Marmalade (software), which I tried to write this in parallel to, it is quite similar in structure and content, albeit a bit shorter as it doesn't have as much history. There are a reasonable amount of references, but I would appreciate if you could point me to the places you feel need to be rewritten. Thanks MatthiasG (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Notion press
editDear Deb, Earlier, you had deleted this page due to lack of sufficient references and notability. Now I have a few source (newspapers) that state the publisher as the first free-publishing company in India. Also I want to know if yourstory.com can be considered a reliable source. I have posted the article here. Can you please see this and let me know if this passes the notability criteria? Regards--Challengethelimits (talk) 01:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Deb. I will reword a few sentences and launch it to the main space. I will, in the process, add some newspaper references of regional languages.--Challengethelimits (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Am I returning?
editNo, probably not. Wikipedia has become a prime example of the Iron Law of Oligarchy.
This section appears to be a random sample of what the problems of Wikipedia are and will always continue to be. If my objections to it need clarification, send me e-mail. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 06:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. Feel free to notify my talk page, or send me an e-mail, if you have any question on which I may be helpful. I am more likely to see the e-mail. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
PWCT or Programming Without Coding Technology or etc..
editHi Deb,
I must admit I am rather confused about this 'new' page which you deleted back In October. [2].
It seems to have been re-created, as PWCT (software) then cut and pasted to PWCT (programming language) by Mahmoud Fayed (talk · contribs), then cut-and pasted again to PWCT by another editor Msfclipper (talk · contribs). And 212.57.215.5 (talk · contribs) also gets involved adding and removing spurious AfDs, while IIRC still editing the original page that had not been redirected.
Active Afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PWCT (programming language) Regards, 220 of Borg 10:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Advertisement Tag for *REDACTED*
editHi Deb. Many thanks for your notification and review of the Academy of Financial Trading page. I have to say, I am however a little confused regarding the decision to list the page as an advertorial. Having read through the terms on conditions of wikipedia on many occasions, I'm struggling to see the connection when comparing this page to others of a similar nature. From my personal perspective, this particular page contains an almost identical information flow and similar method of citations as the page which it was initially based on; *REDACTED*. That being said, the particular proofing of the information provided on the page has been removed of any flamboyant terms and language that users may consider to be advertorial, following a similar template of that used by other companies in the Online Education field.
I would truly relish the opportunity if you could provide me some further insight into how you believe this page could be improved upon, as with the ever growing presence of Online education firms, I know many agree that documentation of these providers is becoming essential!
Kind Regards IgniyteJames (talk) 12:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Authority Brand
editHey Deb, first of all thanks for your time for checking out the new articles i've posted. The one you deleted was one of a "system" of definition for brands present in a book i've recently read. In some ways you are right about the book cited as reference being the only one presenting this kind of definition (as far as i know). This was not intended to be an advertising for the book, but to complete the categorization of brands present in the book. If instead of deletion you would like some refinements about the article i will be glad to do it. Since i am also pretty new in the wiki scene, i'd like to know how to put the article back online (if you agree).
Thanks again for your time, Fabio.pisano (talk) 13:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Fabio
Deletion of Vadde Ramesh
editHello Deb, You have recently deleted an Article Vadde Ramesh, who was notable indian telugu film producer, passed away on 2013 November 21. I dont know on which basis you deleted the article. you could have try to know about him before deleting the article or could have informed me before doing so. It took me more than two hours to create that article and you simply deleted it with one click. I request you to notify the authors before doing so as such actions will highly discourage the authors from adding reliable content to wiki. for your information, I am not a new Wiki user, rather a very old (from 2007) wiki member, who has added notable number of articles. An Interwiki article about Vadde Ramesh is available in Telugu wikipedia వడ్డే రమేష్
For more information about Vadde Ramesh, I request you to refer this linkVadde Ramesh On Internet Search--Sultankhadar (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- So you think it's my job to find references and put them in the article for you? It isn't. Deb (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Comebuy.com
editHi,
I see that You deleted my page. Why? It wasn't promotional or something like that. I spent 2 hours trying to write a new article, as well as improving other articles about Singapor. Could you please put it back, and maybe open a discussion about it? I think it's wrong to delete it just like this. --PearToPear (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Pavletic111 Unnecessary attempt of deletion of couple of year old Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia pages
editI have noticed that you deleted a couple of pages I tried to create with all the proper links and connections, as well as all the necessary International publications, as well as proper and legitimate connections and articles. Why? Also I have on top of that also noticed that you attempted to delete, or suggested deletion of a couple of year old Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia page https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavletić
- This is what I call disingenuous. Way back last year you were warned not to create articles promoting yourself and your work. You should have listened to that advice.Deb (talk) 13:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Pavletic111 unnecessary attempt of deletion of couple of year old Serbo-Croatian pages
editThe original creator of the "VIlla Maria" page, who had originally made the official connection to this Serbo-Croatian link, has also inquired about this at the Help desk. The page does not look like a test page, or any such anonymous self-promotional attempt. This page has been created couple of years ago, and since then has been added, cleaned up, and corrected by multiple people. I am asking you to please not touch this official Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia page, and remove your unnecessary comments, as this has also been brought up to at the Help Page, as deliberate attempts of deletion of anything connected to my name Pavletic, due to this username Pavletic111, or any personal un-objective reasons of any personal nature. Therefore please refrain from further attempts of deletion of such or any older Serbo-Croatian sites, as such attempts will be brought up further to the Help Desk. As well as deletion of the official movie 476 A.D. Chapter One: The Last Light of Aries. At the same time, I'm asking you now to please also undelete the pages for the official film 476 A.D. Chapter One: The Last Light of Aries, which has all the necessary links to it, and move it to the proper position, or indicate your reasons for not doing so. However, please refrain from further attemts to desrupt any older Serbo-Croatian pages. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavletic111 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- No idea what you are talking about. I am not aware of having touched the article Villa Maria. Deb (talk) 13:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
deletion articles Marina Oceania
editHi Deb
I am writing to you about deletion articles '''Marina Oceania''' in Cambodia. I want to explain my motives of writing this article. This is the first professional marina in the country's history. And the opening of the marina is really significant. Construction of the marina agreed and supported by the Government of Cambodia. Local and foreign media wrote about the marina.
I want to rewrite the article again in an abridged version.
Please do not judge strictly, and I hope for your understanding.
If you give me some advice on how to write an article about this event, I will be very grateful to you.
My regards, amantula (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Deb
Thank you for your help. With regard to the marina in Cambodia, I tried to play by the rules and watched Wikipedia page about marinas - a list of marinas. I looked for other information marinas and wrote an article on the model .. Hundreds of marines in this list and each of them can produce notes. But how else to do?
And more. Information about this marina in Wikipedia is not advertising, because there are not the target audience and is not a place for customers. Information is available only in addition the general list of marinas.
I would love to discuss this issue and would take advice, but do not know where in there is a discussion and who else to talk about? Give me a simple way to debate, please. With all due respect,amantula (talk) 10:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Differentiation Colruyt Group vs Colruyt Supermarket
editHi Deb,
Thanks for your message - I agree that the page looked too promotional, so I took out all statements that could be seen as promotional and resorted to facts only. I think this is now in line with the G11 requirements (An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for deletion criterion) Note that it's important to differentiate between the "holding" and the "supermarkets", which was the prime reason for creating the article. A similar differentation has also been made on the Dutch sections and is already been accepted there for 3 years and subject to review by multiple authors.
David — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rademakd (talk • contribs) 15:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
The content of this page is written like an article and seems to be highly promotional in tone. If I hadn't seen that you had moved it to the user page, I would have speedied it on sight as a spam user page. I'm not prepared to override a GF edit by another admin, but I wonder if you should either reconsider keeping the text, or editing out all the promotional stuff (most of it). What do you think? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:27, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
geworkbench features
editHi Deb - I have posted a question regarding your August 14 2013 edit of the "Features" section title of Geworkbench to the Talk:Geworkbench page. Kncsmith (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
TVbeople
editmay i know why have a speed delete with the article TVbeople? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdee (talk • contribs) 10:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- that is quoted with reference and also have the article in Chinese version for years.--TINHO (talk) 10:18, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- that is the offical website and you should ask me for more reference but not have a a speed delete with that. I deeply disappointed with your action that without any notification.--TINHO (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleting
editYou deleted my page before I was even done building it. I am not using this as a promotion, nor advertising, nor for recruitment.
I have read soapbox section you sent me. I would ask you allow users to finish their sections before you delete them. -Kelly Rubash
Answer
edit- I am still learning how to use this site
- You deleted my page and have given me no explanation.
How long does it take for an answer, does anyone know? Kellyrubash (talk) 18:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)kellyrubash
- What is the question? Deb (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted Article BODYARMOR SuperDrink
editHi Deb, you recently deleted an article I wrote on BODYARMOR SuperDrink citing it as Unambiguous Advertising. I have since read the Wikipedia: NPOV on your talk page and have rewritten the article in an attempt to make the article objective and neutral. It is currently on my sandbox, my username is ianvor. I would like to get your input as to whether it is ready to publish. Should I just republish the article and see if it receives any admin feedback? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianvor (talk • contribs) 18:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the timely response to my question. I have read the NPOV Tutorial that you suggested and updated the article on my sandbox to incorporate your comments. Would you mind taking another look? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianvor (talk • contribs) 19:22, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you again for your feedback, you have been very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianvor (talk • contribs) 20:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted
editYou just deleted the lizzy sports complex article. I wish to inform you that I have no personal interest in the Lizzy Sports Complex article I only thought it would be of interest to other people as I noticed there were no article to that respect on Wikipedia. I however believe this is an important landmark that should be found on Wikipedia since its the first of its kind in Ghana. so if you still don't see the need then I won't thank you.Flixtey (talk)
Thanks Deb for this. Perhaps you could add to "from the film" The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011 film), the American remake, which makes the comparison with the novel even greater. Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 15:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Angela Curran
editHi I was wanting to know why my article Angela Curran was deleted with no reasons left? CDFW (talk) 16:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Okay many thanks, I will keep my eyes open for them and if I see anymore I will be in contact. Many thanks CDFW (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Deb. I can't see what was there but this article was on my watchlist. There is pretty substantial coverage for it as here. Could you please move the article to my userspace so I can work on it and address any promotional issues? There may be content and soruces to use in the article and its history, even if it was advertorial at the time of its deletion. Thanks. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Deletion for : No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event
editYou deleted my page citing the reason "No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event" when the page I was creating was for one of the biggest heat source manufacturers in the UK and Ireland which is searched for thousands of times per month. I don't agree with you that this should have been deleted as it deserves a reference in Wikipedia for the people that are trying to find out more about the company. More content would have been added as I have requested the people who are involved with the company add their parts - I just laid the foundation. Please reconsider. Grahammayfly on behalf of the Grant Engineering company.
Lee Garim
editThanks... I try to follow the rules, I just don't always exactly know them^^ Ccmontgom (talk) 23:15, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
i am starting an artical serious about stone manufacturers in Qatar and the gulf area, if you like it or not, but it should be useful for others — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rokyrock (talk • contribs) 12:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleation of EL Alfy Qatar for marble & Granite
editMircosoft even have a page here does this considered advertisment? i am starting articals about stone suppliers in Qatar what is your answer to my question?????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rokyrock (talk • contribs) 12:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Deb, how are you? Here it's toooooo cold, brr brr...
I made yesterday this page anout a South-African jounalist. Please, I'm askink 5 minutes of your time to correct the mistakes I've written from automatic translator. I know it's not the best way, but I don ask to my Wikifriends everyday.... please!!!
Thank you very much for your precious help
Dendyard
editI will check the article Poramadulla Central College again and submit to you. It would be great if you could review the article and show me what information should be changed. And there is another article about Go Assembly tool GoASM. I'm happy if you could check the article. Thank you.
Thank you. I appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dendyard (talk • contribs) 15:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
FAQ on deletion
editHi! Have you considered adding standard PR-ish "polite" language to the deletion FAQ to make things sound softer?
For instance No. 5. could be phrased like "I wish I could help you but unfortunately I do not have time to do your research for you. Please ask another editor for help with research. Learning research skills is an invaluable skill in your Wikipedia career."
I understand that there has been issues with user retention on the English Wikipedia and non-editors have a perception of administrators being arrogant or unhelpful. It might help to read this Reddit thread's comments http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1p4eft/the_decline_of_wikipedia_wikipedias_community_has/
Also using italics still emphasizes the point but doesn't look as "loud" as bold all-caps. "Please sign your posts."
Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but this isn't something new. At one point I stopped doing deletions altogether because I was getting so much hate mail on my talk page and even on other websites that I didn't know existed! I'm talking six or seven years ago. Then I felt I wasn't pulling my weight so I started spending more time on administrator tasks again. You only have to look at this page to understand how sick I am of hearing the same moans over and over again from people who don't read the guidelines before they start and then blame me because they've done it wrong. Most of my activities (certainly over 50%) are directed at deterring spammers, and I really don't much care if I offend them. So, whilst I can see your point, I don't see any need to change the wording. If people want to come to this page to grumble, that's fine, but I really want to be a contributor rather than a policewoman. Deb (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- I am not actively involved in administration matters and I imagine that I too would be grumbled and fed up if I did this day after day. I do think that in terms of good faith contributors it may be helpful to understand their POV as they may be intimidated by the mass bureaucracy and experience of other editors.
- I simply hope that there will be good editors to replace me and hope they aren't deterred from contributing. I've been contributing heavily for 10 years, and I know it won't be forever. Someday I'll have to stop mass editing due to work, or I may die suddenly. Either way for me it will end. I don't want human knowledge not covered because there was nobody to replace me. Sorry if it sounded alarmist but that's how I feel.
- WhisperToMe (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) I have heard that some experts on topics had gotten upset about uninformed and plain old vandalism, and I can see where they are coming from too. I do think that a sense of firmness can go well along with politeness so there is a sense of authority as well as a sense of openness. Something like "Please refrain from XXXX, I understand that YYY, but ZZZ." or "Kindly stop doing XXX. If this is not corrected, YYY will have to happen, because of ZZZZZ." WhisperToMe (talk) 17:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
User template - use on wikivoyage?
editThanks for adding the 'newbie' template (Living Paths Wikiproject new user). I'm creating my user page on wikivoyage, is it possible to use/create a similar one for wikivoyage as it doesn't like the copy and pasted wiki markup? Cleopatra Browne (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Page protection request
editHi Deb. Please could you look at Young & Beautiful and protect if you think it's needed? A blocked sock added this edit about an alt. title and now an IP editor is on a crusade to add it back in. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- Many thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 20:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Protection of Jitendra Ravia
editI don't think "templateeditor" is meant to be used to control protection of article-space pages.
Consider changing this to plain old sodium cloride. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
removal of advertising tag
editHi. On Dec 2nd you placed an advertising tag on Cobthorn Trust. I've been working on the article and I was wondering whether you would be happy for the tag to now be removed. If you still have concerns about the article, I would appreciate if you can identify these so I can correct them. All the best. __DrChrissy (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing the tag and looking at this so quickly.__DrChrissy (talk) 19:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Deletion of Safer Wholesale
editMy page was not promotional, and is no more or less ambiguous than https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinavasion is. Please restore my page.TheDailyFlows (talk) 11:14, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
I totally disagree your assessment. If this verbiage is considered promotional, the entire realm of Wikipedia would fail to exist. My page made no suggestions to buy, make no arguments as being 'the best', and is nearly identical in word choice as Chinavasion. Please restore my page and put in BOLD what you constitute as 'promotional'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheDailyFlows (talk • contribs) 11:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Emailed you
editjust now about that list at AfD. Dougweller (talk) 13:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
FFS, I'm only new here and still getting to grips with wikis editing. Sheesh!!! Why delete my article???? How do I make it private (hidden) until I get up to speed? Is that too much to ask?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssmith2013 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. I have received an email from Deb with help. Thanks. Ssmith2013 Ssmith2013 (talk) 15:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Harbour City Opera
editWould you please restore the page Harbour City Opera and its talk page. An opera company in Sydney cannot possibly fail because of "no indication of significance"; see Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance. How long did the article have to establish these criteria? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:12, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
HornAfrik Media Inc
editI've unmarked the review status of this article but I can't move it with the redirect in place or create the talk page from review. What should I do? Crtew (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Nevermind, another editor took care of this after I unchecked the review.Crtew (talk) 18:44, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Merge
editWhile you're assisting me with this HornAfrik problem, could you also merge the histories of User:Crtew/Norberto_Miranda and User:Crtew/Norberto Miranda Madrid together into User:Crtew/Norberto Miranda Madrid article. I can carry out the merge once the histories are there for copyright. Thanks for your help, Crtew (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I was able to find the help I needed to fix this too! Crtew (talk) 20:12, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Deb, Thank you for all your work! Crtew (talk) 14:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to give you heads up, because I saw you've moved User:Mirza shaariq baig page, but it appears to me that that particular page may not be in accordance with our child protection policy so it should be deleted. Alex discussion ★ 15:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe there are some children even amongst admins, but as for legal aspects, child is anyone under the age of 18, and I think detailed personal information (including date of birth and place of residency) should be deleted, so Wikipedia could not be legally liable, and possible incidents would be prevented. Alex discussion ★ 17:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you think the information should be suppressed, email WP:OVERSIGHT about it. Given the age of the person concerned, and the relatively small amount of information involved, they may not agree with you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
User:Zhaoweixiong
editHi, I know that this is going to sound very strange but I was digging through ANI for no reason and found a User:Zhaoweixiong, who was apparently creating some bad mass-produced Chinese stubs roughly the same time I was. The ANI discussion is linked here and you said that you suspected that he was in some way linked with me - I assure you that until today I have never heard of that user in my life! Don't worry, I find that mass-produced controversies are quite funny, having creating 10,000 Chinese articles and having nearly all of them deleted! :) Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 23:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
John Galea
editNote also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johngalea24. AllyD (talk) 11:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Talkback notice re Simon Curtis
editYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
User:Akron Children's Hospital.
editActually 'Joe at Bloggsco' is an accepted format for a username - WP:ISU. I've not unblocked because I want to know what his editing intentions are, bearing in mind the removal of a referenced controversy. Peridon (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- You're not the first to miss that one. I'm sure I did too once. No-one knows the whole lot of the policies - or if someone does, they'll have no time for editing (or be totally knackered...). 8-) Peridon (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I disagree with it, but it's better than the German system of allowing company names. Peridon (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
My mistake on misplaced userpage
editThank you for fixing my mistake of placing an incorrect CSD tag on an article. I did not realize that moving the page would be a much better option. I will make sure I don't do the same thing in the future. (I blame my mistake partially on the fact that I'm exhausted after a long day, but that is no excuse.) Thank you! TCMemoire (talk) 09:30, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Tiger Wheel & Tyre
editDeb, I've unblocked this editor to allow for a name change. They've proposed an alternate that is acceptable, and have given an answer to the standard COI follow up questions. Sorta, kinda. Will watch. Kuru (talk) 22:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Deb (talk) 22:23, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Advertising
editCan you please specify, where did you saw advertising in this article Moustafa Youssef? Thanks. If is his CV that bothered you which I put in, please read WP:Prof and WP:Academic where it says that using CV's are O.K.!--Mishae (talk) 22:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Then show me a policy which says that using CV's aren't O.K.! Plus, why are you so sure that he wrote the CV?--Mishae (talk) 23:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you have been a good faith editor you would have put it on AfD, rather then deleting it. I would advise you to restore it and move to AfD or to my subpage, since according to me and user @Randykitty: he is notable. Upon failing to do so, I will need to take other measures.--Mishae (talk) 21:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, as Mishae says, I think this person is notable. Not being an admin, I cannot see what was wrong with the article, but I'm sure that I can help Mishae to make a neutral stub out of it. I gave Mishae some advice on my talk page on what CVs can be used for and what not. Anyway, given that this academic is from Egypt, sources may be sparse, but then perhaps not, as someone of his stature might generate some coverage in his homeland. Could you perhaps userfy the article to either Mishae's or my userspace? We'll work on it and when done I'll tell you so you can have a look before we move it back into main space. Thanks and Happy Holidays! --Randykitty (talk) 23:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you have been a good faith editor you would have put it on AfD, rather then deleting it. I would advise you to restore it and move to AfD or to my subpage, since according to me and user @Randykitty: he is notable. Upon failing to do so, I will need to take other measures.--Mishae (talk) 21:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
editMerry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and yours. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi!
editImploring that Deb enjoys a sumptuous Christmas holiday and a naughty New Year! First play this → → →
Now play this!
I dare you to tell me that you did not smile.
Cheers!
— | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 02:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
editThanks Deb! I'll hopefully try a new and better subject, that is written in line with the Wikipedia's guidelines! Aadityasardwal (talk) 05:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC) |
Dmitri Jurowski
editWhy did you make this revert? That article is a sentence-for-sentence Close paraphrasing from this website, and is certainly blatant plagiarism and almost certainly close enough to be considered copyright violation as well. Mogism (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, Mogism, and thanks Deb for removing that tag! In the current situation I don't know what happened. On one hand the article need to contain a list of people and places at which he worked. On the other hand then it will be copyvio, how do I write an article which will be factual without it being copyvio?--Mishae (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- It would be impossible to create an article about a conductor without mentioning those theatres and productions by their correct titles, and therefore, from what the Duplicate Detector Report showed me, there was no copyvio, so I believe the bot was misleading in this case. Deb (talk) 09:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Please return my post
editHi, I'm James Salute. I wrote a post about Ahmad Ali Karim, a very young blogger which appears to be the youngest in the world. But the post was deleted and I hope you could return it back. If you don't believe me about the boy, go to ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com
--James Salute (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
You used the {{Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access. |
Dear, this article is well published, I am just uploading it on Wikipedia, I have also given reliable sources and references but you have deleted it Jhon prince (talk) 10:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- I just blocked this account as a sockpuppet of User:Princeneil. He has been trying to publish his theory for a long time. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- It appears to be something for Deb to answer; for less risky page creation and more feedback, you can also use the wizard. Gryllida (talk) 10:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Merlien Institute Conferences
editHi, and thank you for the info you shared on my talk page. I'm not going to whine about the deletion, but after you deleted it i removed some words and statements and tried to stablish a more neutral point of view. I guess the "notability" requirement is beyond doubt since these are international conferences with many important and relevant people. So please check the changes i've made (since the article is deleted i don't know if you can still read it), and if you still think i'm making this as some sort of advertising or promotion, you can point out to me what sectons to improve, change or delete so the article stays neutral. Thank you.Elandroid (talk) 10:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
MBC.net
editDear Deb,
Thank you for your contributions, please note that I work at MBC Group, and I am designated to create wikipages for informative non advertising purposes, I would appreciate it if you would undelete the page I created and support by giving tips instead of deleting my work hours. the pages has information about mbc.net
Happy New Year
Issa Younis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Issa.younis (talk • contribs) 11:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
MBC.net
editI understand you concern but I have created other pages that didn't dace the same issue, there is no conflict of intrest as we want our pages to stay we are investing time and money to create informative pages NON-Advertising, and we understand that Wikipedia the rules of writing very well, I hope you have a great new considerate year 11:15, 31 December 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Issa.younis (talk • contribs)
HI Deb, you deleted my page before I even finished it, citing advertising. However my article is written in a very similar format to articles of the same industry already on Wikipedia. (Servus Credit Union and Vancity.)Can you please explain how my article is any more promotional than these? Thanks. Lislamo (talk) 19:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Garri Parri Page
editIn few sentences, what part of the 'Criteria' did my Garri Parri page not meet? Yemiolutoye (talk) 13:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)YEMI
- I answered your question on your talk page, but I see you have deleted my explanation, so I take it you no longer require any assistance. Deb (talk) 14:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion of CinemaSins
editHi. You deleted the page that I created earlier today, CinemaSins, with the rationale that it is not notable. I wasn't given the chance to contest this speedy deletion. And with the sources/inline citations that I have put in the article, it should have been enough to indicate that the topic is notable. If you can, please get back to me with a specific reason or explanation. Thanks, Tal Brenev (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev
- I just noticed that you replied to me on the talk page of Bbb23. You said that I didn't cite any reliable sources, even though I remember doing so. Perhaps a vandal deleted them or I forgot to put the reflist template? Tal Brenev (talk) 17:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev
- IMDb was not a source on the CinemaSins article. I had the actual subject as a source, a news/blog website (which should be a reliable source), and a video statistics website. Tal Brenev (talk) 18:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev
- Thanks for restoring the article. I'll try to improve it as best as I can. Tal Brenev (talk) 18:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev
- IMDb was not a source on the CinemaSins article. I had the actual subject as a source, a news/blog website (which should be a reliable source), and a video statistics website. Tal Brenev (talk) 18:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev
RE:
editYea right, whatever, I hear you. I will write better articles. Yemiolutoye (talk) 18:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)YEMI
Happy New Year!!
editHi Deb,
Happy new year!! Sorry for the delayed response but I've started off the new year with a cold and a 102.5 (39.167 Celsius) degree fever. Hopefully, this means that I will be healthy for the rest of the year. :) Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
User:Black Hangar Studio
editHi. I have changed your "Your username is the only reason" block to a {{uw-softerblock}} because they are clearly here to promote themselves: "We are one of the most versatile and unique studios in the UK and Europe. What makes us unique? Read below..." etc. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
User: Mande40
editHi Deb, you deleted my first page so I wondered whether you could look at my sandbox to see whether the content was okay for posting? Any help would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mande40 (talk • contribs) 12:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of Agence de notation extra-financière
editYou deleted Agence de notation extra-financière as non-notable. Given that the article discusses a class of businesses that have arisen based on recent business laws passed in France requiring increased sustainability, I think the topic is notable (even if the article did not do a great job in asserting that). Could you please undelete, so that the original author's attribution is retained when I create the translated version? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:32, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I've got this, a reference from the Government of France website defining the concept. Enough for a start? I admit the article is not much more than a stub now, and I'm no expert in French business law to expand it, but if the stub exists, expansion may happen. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Reflexology in Europe Network
editCan not see any good reason for deleting a page that is 2 minutes old. I was working with putting content into it. Please wait at least an hour before you delete. :-( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blindvei (talk • contribs) 16:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of Aimery Caron
editYou may not think Aimery Caron is interesting, Deb, but many other people ARE interested in the history of the African American people. Especially non-racists, and especially now that films such as 12 Years a Slave, The Butler, Django Unchained and The Help are drawing large audiences and inspiring them in the subject. Dr Aimery Caron, professor Emeritus (chemistry) at the University of the Virgin Islands, has done important research work in this field and his monographs are of interest to many students in African American and Caribbean studies. I HAVE NOT invented any of the references, and I will continue to rewrite the Wiki article on him, every day if need be, until you allow his page to stand. Thanks ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gallura (talk • contribs) 19:23, 7 January 2014
- Yet another example of how not to get your way. Deb (talk) 21:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Deb, I guess you see Wikipedia as a means for people to either get, or not get, their own way. It was supposed to be something so much more than that. Something genuinely of use to mankind. Shame on you. I'm cancelling my funding contributions and writing to Jimmy Wales about you. N.B. Have you ever considered getting some therapy, or perhaps trying some herbal preparations for hormone balancing? -:) ~~
- Oh, so you're not dedicated enough to take the trouble to find the references you need to demonstrate the subject's notability? I guess it's not that important to you then. Deb (talk) 17:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 10 January
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Mário Wallace Simonsen page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of "Centre for Economic Performance" Page
editI edited the article on the Centre for Economic Performance that you deleted previously. Let me know if it is now acceptable. Regards MP 11:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Mondpanther(talk)
Maurice J. Power
editThanks for the edit. Maurice I think has a category on Wikimedia Commons but I'm not sure how to link the article to it. Can you assist?
Sidpickle (talk) 10:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks Sidpickle (talk) 12:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Gina Gers(h)on
editHi. Not that I much mind, but a sanity check, please. Did I get something wrong in what I wrote here? -- Hoary (talk) 12:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I did take the trouble to create the (non-) article as a redirect to Gina Gershon. (Again, I'd never even heard of this Gina Gerson till a few hours ago.) Nobody objected to that redirect, and in the deleted talk page I suggested that reversion to this state would be better than deletion. May I restore the very first edit, thereby regenerating the redirect? -- Hoary (talk) 13:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Your old edit
editWhat is the source of this? In particular, the part about Kalininskaya Oblast is very dubious and contradicts sources known to me. - Altenmann >t 03:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
The Internet Must Go
editHi Deb, I've created the wikipage "The Internet Must Go" which is an independent docufiction film.
I've tried my best to include all the sources and to indicate that it needs more independent sources.
You speedy-deleted the page with the reason of being promotional.
My intention with writing the page was to make it clear it is a docufiction, as it is not very straightforward due to the nature of docufiction. I added some facts about the movie I found meanwhile like casts, etc.
Could you pin-point me which part did you found promotional? To answer sections in Wikipedia:NPOV#Achieving_neutrality:
- naming: I intentionally included the word "docufiction" in the page title ("The Internet Must Go (docufiction)") to make it clear that it is a film that mixes documentary and fiction for narratic effect. This is the main intention that I've created the page.
- Wikipedia:NPOV#Point_of_view_forks I did not do POV forks
- Wikipedia:NPOV#Due_and_undue_weight I included information on creators as in the Template:Infobox_film, I grouped and removed many of them to keep the list clean, citing the rest of them with reference.
- Balancing aspects The movie is about a topic. I didn't want to include aspects except "aftermath" which includes events that are directly related to the topic of the movie. I cited the sources that made the events known to me and I noted via Template:Third-party-inline that the section needs more third-party sources.
In the first section, I did include a link on net-neutrality that may have seemed biased that I've since removed. If that was the reason for your deletion please note that to me.
- Wikipedia:NPOV#Controversial_subjects The movie is about a perhaps controversial subject. However as noted in Wikipedia:NPOV#Making_necessary_assumptions I don't think it's the task of the movie's page to debate over this subject. The factual information that the movie is about net neutrality was presented.
The sources I cited tended towards pro-net neutrality. However the most of the sources was dealing with the information about the movie. The most detailed information is on the primary source which is the movie's website, which is of course biased towards its own standpoint. However I've also cited other sources like independent articles from Wired and Digital Trends.
I've also included in the references the corresponding pages on Youtube or Facebook. The latter may have seemed promotional but I included them solely to make the claims of the achieved number of viewers and followers verifiable. If this was the reason for your deletion please tell so and since these are the primary sources for this information please help me how should I word it. Most articles I've checked about internet phoenema link the same way about page views in order to inform the reader about these numbers, like The Fox (What Does the Fox Say?).
I've spent many hours making this article. I am not in any way affiliated with its creators (by the way, unlike them and like you, I live in Europe, too).
I hope the reasons of the deletion can be cleared up and looking forward for your cooperation in restoring an acceptable version of the page.
Thanks, -- User:Naxa
- Thanks for your insight, I've tried to add reliable sources from Huffington Post, The Washington Post, Network World and several other sources. I will attempt to re-create the page hoping your supervision. Naxa (talk)
Hello, you deleted my entry for Teletrade on Jan. 7. I need to know how I can successfully post this article, I was not trying to be promotional, just informative. Can you please direct me to instructions for how to edit the article so I can try again? Is there any way I can know which parts you thought were promotional so I can change them?
thank you
RichardACox (talk) 13:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)RichardACox
Astore deletion
editHi, I'm korean. I don't have any relations with spanish Astore company. But Astore is kit sponsor of many south korean professional clubs including Jeju United FC Also La liga club Real Sociedad's kit sponsor.
I think Astore have notibility. I don't know difference of Joma or Jako asnd so on.
Please refer to belows. http://www.astore.es/ http://www.astore.es/en/compania/historia/ https://www.facebook.com/astore.officialpage Footwiks (talk) 11:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
"Trade Mark Evaluation" deletion
editThanks for the guidance, Apologies for poor English. I will surly benefit of "Peer-Reviews" feature you proficiently having here. In case of any further amendments don't hesitate to contact. Appreciating All Wikipedia’s professional efforts to initiating and keeping such valuable world asset to the world - please deliver my greetings to everybody on the team, Big "Well-Done" :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WesdomSeeker (talk • contribs) 19:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Appreciating All Wikipedia’s professional efforts
editHonor Award a good Referal | |
Appreciating All Wikipedia’s professional efforts to initiating and keeping such valuable world asset to the world - please deliver my greetings to everybody on the team, Big "Well-Done" :)
Best regards, Mohamed Baghdady, PMP. WesdomSeeker (talk) 20:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC) |
Recent Page Deletion
editGreetings,
Recently you deleted the Wikipedia page for the applications and games company, Twyvel Apps, stating that there is no explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event)). The page was in no way advertising the company, it in no way gave links to purchase the products - it was a fully functional, information fuelled article on a mid-lane iOS gaming platform company that attracts tens of thousands of users world-wide on it's applications. Wikipedia even states that it "has grown rapidly into one of the largest reference websites". An article referencing a large iOS based company (with the required referencing added) seems to fit this description and policy quite nicely, which for the record, Twyvel Apps's Wikipedia page was constructed alongside this iOS/Game development company's article (Backflip Studios) so the page was well in it's rights to be created, live and active.
Furthermore, Wikipedia is known for providing background information on companies and persons who form/run these companies, however having no research page available ceasing interested users/other companies from researching the Twyvel Apps company - which is what Wikipedia is all about - researching information on just about anything.
I ask that you please Rollback the deletion of the article.
Thank you so much in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xsile (talk • contribs) 12:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
How do you get rid of this?
editUser:Ericl/Jeanne Hulit It's now stuck to my page and I can't get it off!!!!!!! EEEEEEEEK!Ericl (talk) 18:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Professor Greg Whyte
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Professor Greg Whyte, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 17:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Cross Rhythms versus Cross Rhythms
editWell, I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to correct this on the article that I created. I just wanted to inform you that before August 2005 it goes to Cross Rhythms the magazine, and it should be in italics like you did. However, the reviews done September 2005 onwards should go to the website Cross Rhythms, and should not be in italics. I know it is rather confusing and all!HotHat (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- By the way, you can tell by going to the review and seeing if it was printed in the magazine because it will be listed up on the date row.HotHat (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Message for IzzyGregson
editI have received an e-mail from this user. Unfortunately s/he has not given his or her wikipedia username, so I am unable to reply. I would recommend this user submits the draft article through Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Deb (talk) 10:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear Deb
editDear Deb, I would ask you to reconsider your swift deletion of my page. It was on category living people and it a real person as Singer, and we need mor time to fixed it. You can see all about she on youtube videos facebook and itunes please do not more delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ledireal (talk • contribs) 14:20, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion of JetsterPack
editHi, hope you doing well
It seems to me that you don't have anything to do other than deleting other peoples work, anyway good luck with your job (deleting other peoples work) the worst part is this wikipedia is not even yours to claim. Grow Up man!
A barnstar for you!
editThe Admin's Barnstar | |
For putting up with stuff like the above for over ten(!) years. NeilN talk to me 17:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC) |
User talk:Dr. Samuel Goldstein
editI think you put a template on User talk:Dr. Samuel Goldstein which has a typo. I think the article you were referring to Glenn doman was deleted. Congratulations for ten years of hard work! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 12:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia Help
editHi Deb,
Thank you kindly for the response. I will certainly look into that.
Regards, Alicia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alicia Ford (talk • contribs) 11:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Please Archive
editHello! I just wanted to request that you archive your user talk page. While it may not be bothersome to you, many editors have slow connections, and having a very large talk page can hamper communication. If you need help, just check out the guide over at Help:Archiving a talk page. Thanks! Ankit Maity «T § C»«Review Me» 12:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's not that large, honestly. I archive quite regularly. Deb (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)