User talk:TheNuggeteer/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

August 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from 2010 Pacific typhoon season into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 13:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Panda town

Why did you tag this new article for notability concerns, and then mark the page as patrolled? If an article is not notable, it should be draftified and/or deleted, but certainly not patrolled immediately after tagging until multiple people have seen it.

I see you've recently received the NPP bit. Generally speaking, "checking for notability" is a hot topic for NPPers (at least, according to WP:NPP#Notability). If you go into the New Page queue and take a look at all the oldest articles, you'll see them all marked for notability, and/or several other tags, because nobody particularly wants to sign and vet them out so they're always chilling at the back-end. (This also includes redirects that are recently converted into articles). If a page is tagged with "passable" tags that are not AfDable, such as a "too long lead" tag, those are safer to patrol as an article shouldn't be deleted for having "too few sections" or etc. But because notability is policy, if something isn't notable, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia, and shouldn't be patrolled immediately if there are notability concerns. Just something to consider moving forward.

I do believe the topic in question is notable, because clicking on the coordinates takes me to a populated, legally recognized place named "Panda", and populated places have presumed notability per the info contained in WP:GEOLAND, so I've removed the tag. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 13:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: 2025 in hip hop music

Hello TheNuggeteer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2025 in hip hop music, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 in hip hop music. Any fault here, either as Admin or just as a regular editor, is entirely my own. . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/No Poop July at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 13:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Chanthu

The reason i reverted Chanthu's GA nomination is because it is nowhere near ready for a GA Nomination and needs a very thorough expansion to tell the story of what Chanthu did, how it evolved and what impacts it caused etc. As for you not being a significant contributor, when you nominated the article you barely had 3 edits to the article, which barely added anything to the article. Compare Chanthu, to one of my GA's Cyclone Anne of 1988. Sure its not perfect but it tells the story and is probably the best summary of Anne out there, which is the standard required for a GA nomination.Jason Rees (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't think I barely added anything to the article, currently, XTools says I contributed 5,214 bytes or 48.4 percent of the article, making myself the top contributor (for authorship). For text added, the original creator, HyperSonicX, has 43.6 percent, while I have 37.7 percent of texxt added. Is this significant enough to nom? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 12:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

When i look at the three edits that you had perfomed before nominating it for GAN they didnt add anything major in. That is just my opinion though, however, your focusing on the wrong thing. Your priority should be to expand the article significantly to ensure it covers all available sources and not to come along do a couple of minor edits and nominate it for GA. Jason Rees (talk) 13:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

DCWC September update

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

• Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
• Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
• Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
• Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Iloilo Central Market

On 5 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iloilo Central Market, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the demolition of the Iloilo Central Market was criticized as being unlawful? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iloilo Central Market. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Iloilo Central Market), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
92		2017 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Add sources
170		2019 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Add sources
680		Ethnic groups in the Philippines (talk)	Add sources
8		Typhoon Nuri (2008) (talk)	Add sources
1,444		Tuareg people (talk)	Add sources
6		Adebayo Alonge (talk)	Add sources
1,092		Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (talk)	Cleanup
1,783		Lolita (1962 film) (talk)	Cleanup
696		Bridgestone (talk)	Cleanup
172		2018 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Expand
176		2021 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Expand
44		Cheese (recreational drug) (talk)	Expand
105		Girl math (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,128		Censorship of TikTok (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
194		California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
365		Sinopec (talk)	Merge
35		Transnational Corporation of Nigeria (talk)	Merge
1,438		Bariatric surgery (talk)	Merge
59		Tropical cyclones in 2022 (talk)	Wikify
29		Scout24 (talk)	Wikify
17		Qatar–United Kingdom relations (talk)	Wikify
2		Michael P. Link (talk)	Orphan
22		Edsel Galeos (talk)	Orphan
18		DrSmile (talk)	Orphan
2		Rebecca Trussell (talk)	Stub
11		Jean-Paul Proust (talk)	Stub
14		Dumarao (talk)	Stub
25		Serge Telle (talk)	Stub
41		Ronda, Cebu (talk)	Stub
5		Jean Herly (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Mayor of Pasay moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mayor of Pasay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)

The article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017) and Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 20:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of .tv

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article .tv you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sohom Datta -- Sohom Datta (talk) 01:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of .tv

The article .tv you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:.tv for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sohom Datta -- Sohom Datta (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Old Pacific typhoons, List of typhoons in the Philippines (1900-1929), and a check-in

Hey there TheNuggeteer. I saw you published List of typhoons in the Philippines (1900-1929). I see you have 1900-1902 done, but that's it. I wondered if you needed help finding the sources for the rest of the early 1900s. I know you've been using the Selga chronology, but there are plenty of other sources for that time period, especially pertaining to the Philippines. It also seems like you're trying to tackle a lot of different articles. I just wanted to check in how you're doing with your editing. It seems like you're really ambitious to getting stuff done, which I think is great and really admirable! However, it might lead to stuff getting rushed, or not properly researched, and maybe a rush to publish incomplete works. I've been editing for a while, and I know that some projects take some time to really get right. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

When I found the Selga chronology, I thought the chronology would boost the creation but instead made it slower, should I only include the typhoons or all systems? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 07:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)

The article Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TyphoonAmpil -- TyphoonAmpil (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

I have been busy all week, after offering to co-review this article last Saturday, and so hadn't had time to properly inspect the article. I was about to go through it this morning, but found that the article had failed the process as of a few hours ago. I re-read the article, and whilst I still think the prose problems can be resolved in a timely manner, I would recommend that a WP:GOCE volunteer review the article prose before it is renominated. This is assuming that the article isn't merged into the season article as Hurricanehink has proposed. Mr rnddude (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

@Mr rnddude I don't think I should request a CE, since one of my requests from July were still unanswered. You can review if you want :) 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)

Hello! Your submission of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Typhoon Nat (1991)

Hello! Your submission of Typhoon Nat (1991) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 23:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Your recent edit to your user page

Hey there, I saw you recently added your birthday and location to your user page. It's not a good idea for young users to add their age and location, on such a public website. Check out the page Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. If you want, I can delete the edit where you added that. I suggest removing your birthday and exact location for privacy reasons. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink You can revert that. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 22:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Done, just be careful in the future. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 07:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Kitab-ı Bahriye

I noticed your username when you promoted this DYK to a prep set because I hadn't seen you around DYK backrooms much. Just wanted to say thanks for working on the prep sets. They are kind of a hassle to do, and only a handful of editors build. Thanks and take care, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 04:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I regularly nominate and review DYKs, and wanted to work in the backrooms for once. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed Mox Eden to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as Lead Coordinator, and Miniapolis and Wracking returned as assistant coordinators. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here. Blitz: 13 of the 24 editors who signed up for the June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 169,404 words comprising 41 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 38 of the 59 editors who signed up for the July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 482,133 words comprising 293 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: 10 of the 15 editors who signed up for the August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 71,294 words comprising 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive. Progress report: As of 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 233 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,824 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle gab1978 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,325		Brazilian jiu-jitsu (talk)	Add sources
17		Slaughter alley (talk)	Add sources
135		Arcade cabinet (talk)	Add sources
5		Jacques Dupont (politician) (talk)	Add sources
4		2022 Basilan local elections (talk)	Add sources
644		Non-player character (talk)	Add sources
5		Typhoon Koppu (2009) (talk)	Cleanup
351		Communist Party of the Philippines (talk)	Cleanup
674		Japanese Brazilians (talk)	Cleanup
4		Timeline of the 2010 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Expand
42		1970 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Expand
789		2023 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Expand
801		Steak (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,567		Hamburger (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6,619		Al-Qaeda (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
95		2010 Pacific typhoon season (talk)	Merge
12		Controversies surrounding the eurozone crisis (talk)	Merge
14		November 2023 Brazil heat wave (talk)	Merge
268		2020s in music (talk)	Wikify
1,455		Remy Ma (talk)	Wikify
506		2020s in fashion (talk)	Wikify
2		Antonio Menchaca Careaga (talk)	Orphan
2		Baylor Teen Health Clinic (talk)	Orphan
2		Böðvar Guðjónsson (talk)	Orphan
64		André Saint-Mleux (talk)	Stub
15		Libertad, Antique (talk)	Stub
4		François-Didier Gregh (talk)	Stub
16		Maria, Siquijor (talk)	Stub
10		Hinabangan (talk)	Stub
13		Tayasan (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano

On 13 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that two kidnapped activists were released after claiming at a press conference that they were abducted by government forces? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abduction of Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Ernie Pike

Hey :) I've left some comments on the GAN for Ernie Pike recommending you close the review as a fail. If you disagree then let me know, else you should probably close the review. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tropical Storm Talas (2017)

The article Tropical Storm Talas (2017) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017) for comments about the article, and Talk:Tropical Storm Talas (2017)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 05:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010)

The article Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Severe Tropical Storm Lionrock (2010) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Slow down

Hello. Over the past couple weeks I've seen your edits and the issues over at GAN, and while I can appreciate wanting to be bold and work on what you can, you do need to slow down some, as you seem to be taking on more than you can chew. There were concerns raised on the GAN talk page about taking on things without finishing them, and the response to that now appears to be nominating something at FLC, which has surface issues that have already been commented on. To be honest, it's starting to cross the line from "I want to help out where I can" to not wanting to listen to the constructive criticism you are getting. The line between being productive and disruptive is unfortunately not as clear-cut as it probably should be here, and you need to take care to not ride that line too much. To start, I'd suggest just focusing on one process you want to work on and get good at that before branching out, rather than trying to tackle everything at once, as that's just going to be a recipe for disaster on both sides. Wizardman 16:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

@TheNuggeteer, I'll go a step further than Wizardman and explicitly say that I think you should step away from Good Articles entirely for now, both as a submitter and as a reviewer. I know this can be hard to hear, but your actions have been leaving other editors feeling really frustrated, and the encyclopedia works a lot better when we're all having fun writing it. No one's going to hold a grudge against you for very long if you take a step back, but if you keep doing the same kind of thing people are just going to get more and more annoyed. I don't want you to feel guilty or ashamed about leaving these reviews unfinished and needing to complete them: you can simply close them and move on, and for any that you haven't even really started, we can simply delete those and return them to the queue. It really will all be fine in the end.

Actually, if I can make a suggestion, I think it would be a really good idea for you to avoid all content review, contests, and editathons for a while. We run these for a variety of reasons; a major one is that it motivates editors to create good content and collaborate with others. But it really doesn't look to me like you need that motivation! I look at your contribution history and I see a new editor who is already highly motivated to help out and really excited to build the encyclopedia. You've created a lot of new articles, you've made thousands of edits, and you've joined all kinds of different projects. What it also looks like, though, is a new editor who is thinking more about the recognition they can get than the things they can do to make the encyclopedia better. Maybe that's true, in which case you really need to rethink your approach. Maybe it's not true -- in which case, I invite you to prove it, to us and to yourself. -- asilvering (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I would like to corroborate this. You really need to finish your GAN reviews before starting new ones, and often leaving them dormant for unnecessary periods of time. I had to directly tell you to finish a review you started but left dormant for nearly 3 weeks and seemingly ignored requests by the nominator to follow up, despite you being extremely active at the time and taking on more reviews. I'm glad to see you have now done it, but I don't feel like I should have needed to intervene like that. Thanks for bringing it up Wizardman. TheBritinator (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Tumor necrosis factor

I’ve been seeing a lot of you over at GA and I was wondering if you would like to collaborate on your review for the page Tumor necrosis factor. It’s a pretty big page and I’m interested in reviewing it but would also appreciate some help. I think we could both learn a lot this way. Usually with co-reviewing one person picks something to tackle but we could also just both work on the review together and share our process. If you’d prefer to collaborate via email as well I’m open to that as well. IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)