Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 286

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Graeme Bartlett in topic أمل المرزوق
Archive 280←Archive 284Archive 285Archive 286Archive 287Archive 288→Archive 290

Micko Westmoreland

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I spent a considerable time on this article and I have just had a baby so I haven't had time to re submit it, if it's at all possible to retrieve it I'd be most grateful. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathitchcock (talk • contribs) 19:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC)

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Reached out to RACC board of directors for clarification on a few items, which took some time to receive. Now that I have this information, I believe the page can be reasonably completed and accepted for publishing. —Amgray19 (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Azamara Club Cruises

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I wanted this page restored yet again because I believe it was yet again unfairly deleted even after I tried to recreate the page. This is an information about a cruise line and its vessels are still sailing with the cruise line and I believe the page should be restored again because there is still information about it, also I want to update it, so that it is up to date. —Angelgreat (talk) 21:10, 22, October 2017 (UTC) —Angelgreat (talk) 02:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment I tried to talk to the administrator, but he wouldn't reopen the debate or restore the page, even I tried to reconstruct the page, but it immediately got deleted, so I need to know why I can't reconstruct a deleted page? —Angelgreat (talk) 21:08, 23, October 2017 (UTC) —
My guess is because you didn't pay any attention to the reasons the page was deleted in the first place, as detailed in the original deletion debate. If the page is re-created in such a way that it addresses any and all issues brought up in the deletion rationale(s), then G4 does not apply, simple as that. If it doesn't make any effort to address the issues, it's a textbook G4. You need to take this to WP:Deletion review if the deleting admin will not restore. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:49, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

List of countries by telecommunications equipment exports

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion rationale was "Dated list which appears to be a product of original research based on 2012 data. No encyclopedic value at this time." So I dont remember what the date of the data was, but more recent figures will now be available, and out of date data isnt a criteria for proding. Quite how it is OR when its referenced to impeccable sources is beyond me. Data on significant aspects of the global economy is inherrantly encyclopedic. Proder is an administrator; I request that another admin explains to him that he is proding articles innapropriately. Thanks. —Willy turner (talk) 12:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Willy turner:   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:49, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

List of countries by maize exports

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deletion rationale was "OR based on 2012 data; also appears to be part of a walled garden around The Observatory of Economic Complexity." Quite how it is OR when its referenced to impeccable sources is beyond me. Date of data isnt a valid criteria for proding. I attempt to create links to and from the rest of wikipedia in all my articles; I feel that accusing me of creating a walled garden isnt assuming good faith. Data on significant aspects of the global economy is inherrantly encyclopedic. Thanks —Willy turner (talk) 12:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Vibha Batra

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Daphinevadhera, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daphinevadhera (talk) 13:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Daphinevadhera: it seems you already re-created the draft article. I have restored the deleted contribution history for your reference, if it contains anything useful. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:53, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nouveau iDEA

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I, Tunadkat, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tushar Unadkat 15:59, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Makin' This Boy Go Crazy

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

please restore article to my user space —Jax 0677 (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Seraphimblade: As the deleting admin, do you have any objection? ~Anachronist (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Provided it's not returned to the encyclopedia without first addressing the AfD concerns, no. Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
@Jax 0677:   Done, userfied to User:Jax 0677/Makin' This Boy Go Crazy. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Gothic Assassins

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Paul Lavern (talk) 20:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Pstocker13/sandbox

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I, Pstocker13, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pstocker13 (talk) 14:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

i wish to correct the errors and try again —Pstocker13 (talk) 14:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

@Pstocker13:   Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:June Julian

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

June Julian was undeleted and moved to Draft:June Julian. The same thing should be done with the talk page as well, which should then be moved with no redirect to Draft talk:June Julian. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

  • @GeoffreyT2000: the only content on that talk page was a few Wikiproject banners with ratings, which I assume aren't applicable now the page is in draftspace. Hut 8.5 06:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @GeoffreyT2000: I went ahead and restored the talk page, as I usually do when moving an article from main space to draft. There's a benefit to having WikiProject templates in draft talk pages; such templates may attract users to the draft so that it can be worked on and improved. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Selman Munson & Lerner

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This page was deleted because of a PROD. Nobody at the law firm was notified of the complaint or the deletion. Once the page is restored, we will consider the complaint and make any necessary changes. —74.213.7.194 (talk) 20:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

There is no requirement to notify the firm of anything going on within Wikipedia, because it is not "your" article; you have no claim whatsoever to the article or any of its content. That said, the user who created the article was notified, at User talk:Arielgraves. Your firm also has no business making any substantive changes to the article, because you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
Because it was deleted in accordance with WP:PROD, it qualifies for restoration by request, so I have restored it. However, the article looks unsuitable for Wikipedia, so I have nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selman Munson & Lerner. You are welcome to make your case, grounded in Wikipedia policy, why the article should be kept. Merely existing is not a valid reason to keep an article about a company. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Update: The article has now been deleted again, following the closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selman Munson & Lerner. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

eXo Platform

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It is a software company page that exists for years now in Wikipedia, its content is not about advertising a product since the company really exists for years, and it is business oriented with a professional intent this is why we are looking to feature eXo Platform page again —Nour-hm (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

@Nour-hm: Who is this "we" you refer to? If you have any sort of financial relationship with the firm (employee, paid consultant, etc.), you must comply with WP:PAID to disclose your paid editing status.
That said, I have deleted the recently-created Draft talk:EXo Platform (Software), restored the original main space page, and reverted it back to a version prior to your changes that made it seem promotional and led to its deletion. Since you seem to have a conflict of interest about this company, DO NOT attempt to make substantial content changes. Propose your changes on the talk page instead. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Underwater noise pollution

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Scottveirs, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Scottveirs (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:2015 European heat wave

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Breggen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Breggen (talk) 08:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Anupam Basu

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Sougatobose, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sougatobose (talk) 10:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Macrobond_Financial

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Pqd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pqd (talk) 11:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nadia Hashimi

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Mr. Guye, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Riya Kodali

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Anawave (talk) 07:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Instructional Technology Coach

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Having worked on this page for many months and hours, mainly relating to the need to write in a more 'encyclopedic' way, now the latest reason for denial of publication related to its supposed lack of 'notability', something I find hard to accept considering:

A Google search for"instructional technology coach" produces 238,000 results

A Google intitle search: 1370 results

Google Scholar search for "instructional technology coach”:

98 results spanning a wide range of notable, authoritative academic sources

A Google Scholar intitle search - two results, one book, one journal

This is just based on the role as described 'Instructional Technology Coach', a search for variations on this nomenclature (described in the article itself) such as 'Digital Literacy Coach' or 'Educational Technology Coach' (EdTech Coach) would lead to a combined total that is far higher.

If a quarter of million specific references to this specific role does not count as notable, then what does?

I revised the title of the article based on feedback in order to use a term with more common usage in Northern America, the original title (commonly used in International Schools) is also notable:

If you Google 'Digital Literacy Coach' you'll see many educational institutions who use this term or the related terms in the article, eg 'Tech Coach' etc. These schools all use the term, and that's not including its derivatives:

https://www.uwcsea.edu.sg/Learning/Technology http://solutions.asf.edu.mx/jobapplication/Admin/Files/2017%20-%202018%20Digital%20Literacy%20Coach%20announcement.pdf http://manaraacademy.org/jobs/digital-literacy-technology-coach/ http://www.langleyteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Digital-Literacy-Coach-flyer-final-2013.pdf https://www.cis.edu.sg/learning/digital-literacy

These peer reviewed journals also use/refer to the term: O'Connor, D. L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2003). Today's Coaches Prepare Tomorrow's Mentors: Sustaining the Results of Professional Development. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED482676 Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J., Cramer, J. E. F. F. R. Y., Hanson, L. A. U. R. A., Huang, W., Lee, Y. E. K. Y. U. N. G., ... & Um, E. J. (2005). Professional development coaches: Perceptions of critical characteristics. Journal of School Leadership, 15(1), 52-75. https://books.google.com.sg/books?hl=en&lr=&id=VpYjBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA52&dq=%22digital+literacy+coach%22&ots=idt-SWfzn6&sig=FrDtkuqb6_1P0nqkACFLjs6QpR8 Trainin, G., & Friedrich, L. A. (2014). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in teacher preparation: Impact of coaching professional development and mobile devices. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsgpirw/29/

https://conference.iste.org//2015/?id=94325430 and https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/coaching-for-digital-literacy/id608805196?mt=11 and http://solutions.asf.edu.mx/jobapplication/Admin/Files/2017%20-%202018%20Digital%20Literacy%20Coach%20announcement.pdf will help with that.

I have yet to receive a reasonable response to this beyond 'because I think so', which strikes me a rather subjective, not to mention displaying a complete disregard for a fellow Wikipedian's work. —MisterMcHugh (talk) 03:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC) --MisterMcHugh (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

  • I suggest you speak to the deleting admin, User:Premeditated Chaos, or go to deletion review. This process isn't for restoring pages deleted through a deletion discussion. Note that merely being mentioned by a source is not considered sufficient to establish notability, the source has to devote significant coverage to the subject (i.e. devote a substantial amount of text to discussing it) to qualify. Hut 8.5 20:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

ONYC Hair

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Per my check the subject is notable, and the deleted administrator said the reason for speedy deletion is because the article has been deleted before, per my check i wasn't the one that wrote the article in 2015, i believe overtime articles should be improved and if there's any issue with an article it should be stated on creating admin's talk page or article talk page considering the stress one has to go through finding sources and an writing an article from a neutral point of view while avoiding Tabloid Journalism, for this reason the deleting administrator's point doesn't seem valid, per Neutral point of view the article should be allowed for more improvements in this case. —Is Nutin 07:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

I am not going to undelete it. It was essentially an advertisement for the company. DGG ( talk ) 17:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Department of Arkansas Heritage

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In order to edit and provide additional external sources —23.31.127.201 (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

  Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Stem

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, AcidPanic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AcidPanic (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sound Bites

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Legosbuild, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Legosbuild (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Suga (musician)

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2A01:598:8081:9D2A:F8EB:5E16:57CC:92E0 (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Andy Koçoğlu

Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

For some reason these were soft-deleted, which opens them up for a refund. This refund came through VRTS ticket # 2017102710003093. As I personally disagree with the close itself (and feel that it should have been an outright deletion) I am posting it here so an un-philosophically-involved admin can deal with it. Please ping me when a decision is made so that I can respond to the customer. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

@Primefac: After looking at the deleted articles and the OTRS ticket, I would say that it would be inappropriate to restore either of these to main article space unless these individuals are actually notable footballersplayers. They were soft-deleted because only one editor Fenix down (talk · contribs) showed up to comment in both AFDs, but that editor left a rather detailed rationale for deleting rather than just a "per nom" comment, so it seems there's a good case against them being notable subjects. Had I closed those AFD discussions I wouldn't have closed them as soft delete. I don't see the problem in restoring them to draft space for the time being, however. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll update the customer. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure what restoring to user space will Do, seemed to me like this is an inherently non notable individual. Unless someone is saying that htye think there are additional sources they can use to show notability I think this would be a waste of time. Fenix down (talk) 21:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
@Fenix down: @Primefac: Well, the deleted article claims that player is in the highest-possible Turkish ice hockey league, so would be notable if the player performed in professional games and not just sat on the bench as a backup. Therefore notability is uncertain, and unproven in the article, but due to the level of the league, notability is certainly possible. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Notable how? I see nothing at NHOCKEY that suggests he would pass the ANY, so that leaves GNG. Whatxsources have been provided to indicate this is not simply a case of restoring a non notable article to user space? I see nothing to suggest the Turkish league is professional nor anything that suggests merely playing in a professional league is sufficient for the presumption of notability. NHOCKEY is quite clear which leagues are sufficiently notable for players to be presumed notable if they have featured in them and the Turkish league is not one of them. This is a player who must be shown to pass GNG. Fenix down (talk) 22:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Pon Ondru Kandein

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The film will starting shooting from the second week of November, but I think the deleted article can be resurrected as a draft and remain so until shooting has begun. —Kailash29792 (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: Please ask the deleting admin SpacemanSpiff (talk · contribs) if restoring to draft space is OK. Otherwise:
  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pon Ondru Kandein, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user SpacemanSpiff (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Heinz Wernicke.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

image was deleted as F5 because article Heinz Wernicke had been redirect but it has now been restored —KylieTastic (talk) 10:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Safaa Hadi

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Improve and add reliable sources "Save page" button below —Mraslat (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Bassim Ali

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Improve and add reliable sources and then click the "Save page" button below —Mraslat (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bassim Ali, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 16:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Glenn Mena

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

the reason I wish to have the article undeleted is because he is a notable musician and has done many things notable. I found many references to complete the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruth NK (talk • contribs)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Mena, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 16:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Haneen Adwan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Haneen Adwan (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I, Cdnwpe018, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cdnwpe018 (talk) 01:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I was working on this page and didn't realize it would be deleted - I firmly believe that the subject Donald Ivan McLeod is noteworthy, many of his contemporaries have pages and I intend to meet Wikipedia's criteria - hopefully with help from some other editors. I'll admit it is only my second page creation, and would appreciate help from the community to ensure that we can help with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_McLeod disambiguation page. If I could just have the information copied back into my sandbox that would be great! —Cdnwpe018 (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I've copied the page back to my sandbox and so Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod can be deleted until I've done more on it. Thanks. —Cdnwpe018 (talk) 00:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Captain Shripatrao Vishwasrao

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Captain Shripatrao Vishwasrao (talk) 09:10, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

It gives the information about the Indian soldier who has shown exemplary performance in IndoBritish army in World war II. Also the Indian hero that he is, is the lost legend, he envisioned a better India, reforming his surroundings with education, opportunities and inspiration.

Request not to delete the page.

makan map

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The Makan Map is the first online interactive and multi-language atlas of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China. It provides valuable geographic, administrative and socio-economic baseline data for this region of Xinjiang in four languages: English, Chinese, French and Uyghur.I am working on the second version of Makan Map —Yoljigda (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

@Yoljigda: (Non-administrator comment) I doubt that this page ever complied with Wikipedia policies to begin with, though PROD'd pages can be recreated. ToThAc (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Shafeeq Gigyani

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I hope you will be fine. I want to restore this article, I think it was deleted when he tried this article himself —Wisalahmad523 (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Robert Weiß.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Image lost when Robert Weiß (pilot) redirected as F5 - article now restored —KylieTastic (talk) 19:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Martin E. Cirulis

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Spoonflower, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spoonflower (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Vanessa Beeman

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, could you please refund Vanessa Beeman to my userspace (at: User:A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver/Articles/Vanessa Beeman). I am asking the AfD was closed softly, see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Beeman. Thanks. —Dysklyver 22:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File:ShrinivasKulkarni2016Modified.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Uploader left a note on my talk page claiming that the image had previously been restored owing to the existence of an appropriate permission, which would also confirm the source. Undeletion requested in good faith. —ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

  • The only text on the image description at the time of deletion was "Original file that got proper copyright release and permission from the copyright holder was cropped and color modified for clarity." There wasn't any reference to OTRS confirmation or even an indication of who the copyright holder is. It's possible it might have been restored at another title, that file was never restored. Hut 8.5 07:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Permission for the file from which this image was extracted (cropped) from was present on the original over on Commons, on that basis, I've restored and moved the file to Commons, and added the appropriate ticket number from the original file. If you upload files to both English Wikipedia and Commons, you need to make sure you inform the OTRS agents that there are two (or more) files on two or more projects that need permission added, by default, OTRS agents will only check and add permissions tags on Commons. Nick (talk) 08:00, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Department of Arkansas Heritage

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, MimosaTree15, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MimosaTree15 (talk) 18:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Beijing Flickers

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I request to have this page undeleted because this movie is fairly notable in China. Also, the page did have sources last time I read it. If undeleted, I will contribute to making the article larger than a stub and cleaning it up as well. Thanks Goveganplease (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Iran Party logo.png

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The image has been deleted for lack of source. I found the source: Investigations of Iran Party on Iran–UK oil agreement, Iran Party Publications (in Persian), vol. 1, 1951. —Pahlevun (talk) 15:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto University of Law and Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Dewan University

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I want to restore these article Wisalahmad523 (talk) 08:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

  • The first one only had the URL of the university www.szabul.edu.pk/, and other stuff was made by a banned user but was not much anyway. So this means it is best if you start writing again from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Arsalan Taj Ghumman

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

{deletia; text of what is presumably the deleted article in its entirety at time of deletion -—Jeremy v^_^v Bori!} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farah Lodhi (talk • contribs) 12:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Posting the entire contents of the article here isn't a valid reason to undelete, and even if it were this page explicitly does NOT overturn the results of deletion debates. As such, to help lower the size of the page, I've removed the article text. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 15:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Glenn Mena (2)

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

the reason I wish to have the article undeleted is because he is a notable musician and has done many things notable. I found many references to complete the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruth NK (talk • contribs) 17:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. You were told this above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

2017 Pikeville protests

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would appreciate if this article could be moved to my userspace. I'd like to see if there's anything there worth merging into the page on Nationalist Front (United States), the group behind the event. The event is briefly mentioned in the "Front" article. Thank you. —K.e.coffman (talk) 02:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Bree Mills

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm coming to reedit the page because we now have updates to the criteria for which this articles recieved a negative review. we have awards and plenty of articles to prove notoriety of this page. —Lukus.uhlman (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:I Liq Chuan

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Vivliofika, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vivliofika (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Euromnis

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

EurOmnis is a yearly conference for developers using Omnis Studio, last held a couple of weeks ago. It has been renamed Omnis World, http://www.omnisworld.co.uk/ so a change of title would be good. —92.16.110.221 (talk) 13:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Dale Mitchell (ice hockey)

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, could you please refund Dale Mitchell (ice hockey) to me in some way? Then I can work on the article, so it becomes better and more reliable. Thank you - JonasJepsen (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Do you realize that this was deleted twice at AFD? You can see a copy here: https://memim.com/dale-mitchell-ice-hockey.html. You can ask the deleting admin User talk:Ansh666 to userfy it for you perhaps. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Samskip

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Samskip, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samskip (talk) 09:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

  Declined. I don't see anything worth restoring, it's just an advertisement, and Wikipedia is not to be used for publicity or promotion purposes. You are welcome to start over, but before you do, keep the points in Wikipedia:Golden rule in mind. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Samskip

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

We have collected new information from external sources to be placed on Wikipedia. We will put this in the draft version. —Samskip (talk) 09:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done We don't restore advertisement to main article space, particularly if there's no evidence that the company fails to meet any WP:CORP criteria for inclusion. Feel free to start over in draft space as recommended above. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Pankaj Sahay

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Pankaj Sahay is a senior political leader and the current national president of the political party Jai Prakash Janta Dal so there should be a Wikipedia Page under his name. Moreover the references put by me in his page was correct so when the information is right the page shouldf be there. —Neel Preet (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

  Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

BeeBoard

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Product was granted US Patent #9,753,489 B2 on Sep 5, 2017 and is significant in terms of the evolution of physical bulletin boards as it is the first combination bulletin board that combines physical and digital information. —Genbosmit (talk) 15:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

The patent only proves it exists, not that multiple third party news organisations have written about it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
...and after that, I moved the article to Draft:BeeBoard because it definitely isn't ready for main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The One Religion

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Arpadsooky, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arpadsooky (talk) 02:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

That's a self-promotional puff-piece that misuses Wikipedia as a publicity platform. I'm not going to touch this although if another admin disagrees, they're welcome to restore it. But I recommend starting from scratch, and have a look at WP:Golden rule first. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mark Groubert

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Amityville73 (talk) 06:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto University of Law and Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Dewan University

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I want to rewrite these article with reliable sources because the first one was deleted having only the URL of the university www.szabul.edu.pk/, and second one was made by a banned user —Wisalahmad523 (talk) 12:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

William Haynes (comedian)

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Page was deleted under false pretenses —82.0.241.161 (talk) 15:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Selena Zhao

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Selena Zhao's page deserves to be maintained--she is a respected figure skater who barely missed qualifying for the Junior World's long program by 2 spots (or 1 point), and earned 3rd (medal position) in the long program at a senior international with a strong field, defeating two olympians (representing Japan and Australia). Although she only won the junior national title, this is in Canada, a very large and prominent country with a strong ladies field, as opposed to many other countries with weaker ladies fields. If you compare her personal best scores to many senior national champions in other nations, her scores are well above theirs. She is also a notable athlete-scholar, as she is attending Harvard University (graduating 2020) and likely has future accomplishments and articles that will continue to be published to substantiate the page. I understand that Wikipedia is attempting to streamline the site for extraneous pages but I truly would appreciate keeping this page, and really appreciate your consideration for a very borderline case. —65.112.8.193 (talk) 03:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

  Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selena Zhao, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Saurabh Sharma

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I, Satyam.chatterjee, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Satyam (talk) 07:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Anton Klingspor

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article has verifiable sources and the subject has gained traction across multiple platforms —2600:6C5E:17F:FB11:9CD2:1BDF:19FB:E3A4 (talk) 03:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done There may be half a reference worth of significant writings. But most references seem to be minimal mentions, or contain material written by the subject. So notability is unproven. Not only that but there was almost no claim of any importance, and yet the tone was promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Wang Qun (actor)

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I feel he was notable enough, and if undeleted, I'll spend time working on the article. —Timmyshin (talk) 13:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

AppyStore

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The page was deleted with concern Fails WP:CORP. Sources only indicate that curated app stores are notable, not this app store. Sources also mention it in passing or as source of a report, as Indian Express. As per my understanding, the organization has been assumed to be an app store when it is actually a mobile application. The parent company for this application, Mauj Mobile, has been in existence for over 20 years. Other competitors similar to this like Flintobox, a new player in the market has a page on the encyclopedia. Please consider review and see if the page can be undeleted —RajkGuj (talk) 13:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Steven Lamprell

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted by PROD but many biographical references in Google News —RAN (talk) 01:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Neurological basis of Patanjali's Ashtanga Yoga

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

could not revise due to preoccupation —Drking1234 (talk) 06:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

أمل المرزوق

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —89.148.63.79 (talk) 11:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_286&oldid=1136434631"