!(un|)stalk(page|summary|user) <whatever> !stalkuser !usernamehere

Block templates

edit
edit

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam Wikipedia:Spam-blacklisting - Helpful guide for blacklisting of spam.

edit

MediaWiki:Titleblacklist MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist

Result Shorthand Longhand
Checking: :{{AIV|chk}} :{{AIV|check}}
wait :{{AIV|wt|Z}} :{{AIV|wait|Z}}
Warned user. :{{AIV|w}} :{{AIV|warn}}
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. :{{AIV|i}} :{{AIV|ins}}
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. :{{AIV|f}} :{{AIV|nfw}}
Stale warning. Last warning was issued Y ago. :{{AIV|ow|Y}} :{{AIV|oldwarn|Y}}
Will actively monitor user. :{{AIV|m}} :{{AIV|monitor}}
Question: :{{AIV|q}} :{{AIV|ques}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. :{{AIV|a}} :{{AIV|ani}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Usernames for administrator attention. :{{AIV|u}} :{{AIV|uaa}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Requests for page protection. :{{AIV|r}} :{{AIV|rpp}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. :{{AIV|sp}} :{{AIV|ssp}}
Note: :{{AIV|n}} :{{AIV|note}}
Note: IP addresses are generally not blocked indefinitely. Please see the blocking policy for more information. :{{AIV|in}} :{{AIV|indef}}
Appears to be a shared IP address, used by multiple users. :{{AIV|s}} :{{AIV|shared}}
User has been inappropriately warned. 4im warnings are appropriate for severe vandalism and defamation only. :{{AIV|4im}} :{{AIV|onlywarn}}
Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. :{{AIV|c}} :{{AIV|cont}}
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. :{{AIV|ns}} :{{AIV|new}}
Blocks are preventative, not intended to be used as punishment. :{{AIV|np}} :{{AIV|notpunish}}
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. :{{AIV|nv}} :{{AIV|notvandal}}
Page deleted. :{{AIV|d}} :{{AIV|del}}
Stale report. User has not edited in X. :{{AIV|e|X}} :{{AIV|stale|X}}
Report was good at the time, but is now stale. (X since last edit) Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. :{{AIV|sn|X}} :{{AIV|nowstale|X}}
merge :{{AIV|me}} :{{AIV|merge}}

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
...from administrators 2
Requests for unblock 102
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 70
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 45
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 19
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 10
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 57
Requested RD1 redactions 38
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 11
Open sockpuppet investigations 190
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

edit

Reports

edit

User-reported

edit
Consider reporting this at WP:ANI with evidence. PhilKnight (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
This user is a net negative, only unsourced POV edits. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
You hadn't warned them. I have given them a level 2 warning. PhilKnight (talk) 15:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
It is such a massive blanking of so many article talk pages. The editor seems to be going through music record album articles in alphabetical order by title and blanking article talk pages that have InternetArchiveBot notices on them. I skimmed their past edits and they didn't always do this, sometimes in the past they did move outdated article talk page posts to Archives. - Shearonink (talk) 17:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 4
Other candidates 8
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

edit
  • Jasper Deng, I fail to see how this is a username violation. What's misleading unless you can present evidence that this is two different people? The most likely explanations that I see is that they lost their original password or that this is an alt account for use in public places. Cullen328 (talk) 08:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

edit
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP user, whose keep restoring his edits when reverted. PJ Santos (talk) 05:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP changing signatures, not contributing to article, harassing paid editor. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/73.211.173.173. Diff Special:Diff/1244740877. ⸺(Random)staplers 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

  • More diffs now. Still changing IPs. Maybe the article would be better served under PCP, given the presence of a paid editor.⸺(Random)staplers 17:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since last semi expired. MaterialsPsych (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated vandalism by specific users/IPs adding false information with no reliable sources. Please review and take action against repeated vandalism. Here is a sample of the recurrent edits, adding false information about money laundering to the page without credible sources. It relies solely on a single website that is neither authentic nor trustworthy. As apparent in the history of the page, this piece of information was added and removed way too many times. • curprev 02:36, 9 September 2024‎ 2402:e000:508:5006:91e:d4d2:4870:e04c talk‎ 16,480 bytes +178‎ No edit summaryundo Tag: Undo • curprev 12:51, 8 September 2024‎ Urban Goodwin I talk contribs‎ m 16,302 bytes −178‎ Undid revision 1244666261 by 2402:E000:508:5006:91E:D4D2:4870:E04C (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 12:45, 8 September 2024‎ 2402:e000:508:5006:91e:d4d2:4870:e04c talk‎ 16,480 bytes +178‎ No edit summaryundo Tags: Reverted Visual edit • curprev 14:34, 4 September 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1243993554 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 13:39, 4 September 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1243945458 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 16:21, 2 September 2024‎ JohnFromPinckney talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Reverted 1 edit by Prash1998 (talk): Rv unexplained edit-warring deletion of sourced material. Also: deleting 1072 bytes (for the TENTH time!) is NOT a minor edit. undothank Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted • curprev 13:32, 29 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242865773 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 19:52, 27 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242511545 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 14:42, 25 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,263 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242171894 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted

Marina0804 (talk) 07:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined: this is a content dispute and something that should be discussed on the talkpage. I have however blocked Prash1998, who has been edit-warring to remove the content, from the page. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting bluelocking. The article is still subject to continued WP:BLP violations, sockpuppetry, and edit-warring. The sockmaster has been trying to add 12,000 bytes of defamatory material for the past two weeks, most recently, with his brand-new Ymberlen account.[1] I removed the text from the article per WP:BLPRS because I think it beats WP:3RR. See Special:Diff/1244038066 if you are interested in the details. @User:Daniel Case. Thank you. 31.30.111.66 (talk) 08:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; addition of unsourced (caste related POV) content; WP:GSCASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. HorrorLover555 (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: IPs disruptive editing. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

IPs observed to be adding unsourced content repeatedly and disturbing certain templates. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Template is in the WP:ARBPIA CTOP area. TarnishedPathtalk 10:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism by Indonesian trolls like User:Bagusekaf07 and IP. Would like longer protection period than one week. 3skandar (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Semi protection. A large number of edits are repeatedly reverting IP's who change the spelling of "alfa" to "alpha", despite the plain text being "al<--do not change-->f<--do not change-->a." — kwami (talk) 11:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism still occurs after the protection expired, maybe indef protection?. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Protection requested to prevent disruptive editing, unexplained content removal, addition of unreferenced material, and general attempts to change the nature of this article completely.

The users who were originally involved in this article have been blocked, and IP editors (possibly same individuals, or meat puppets of theirs) are now joining in. Basically, the aim is to whitewash this individual by making bad stuff vanish and good stuff magically appear. Semi-protection should put a stop to that?

For a background on this, see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Černetić / Talk:Stefano Černetić / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bajsikus/Archive.

If indef isn't justified, please apply whatever temporary duration seems reasonable, thanks. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: 11RR edit warring and continued insertion of plagiarized and copyvio content by IP despite multiple warnings. Borgenland (talk) 14:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: CTOPS Israel. Borgenland (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism from several different IPs today. Entranced98 (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bout of disruptive editing changing country names from a dynamic IP. CMD (talk) 15:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Various IPs adding category that doesn't appear to be supported by article. DonIago (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term vandalism and sockpuppetry. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Xaosflux. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of valdalism Nixx999 (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: IPs edit warring. Belbury (talk) 16:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism JSFarman (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Periodic BLP vandalism by newly-registered editors and various IPs over the past month. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 18:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

edit
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

edit
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


"On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including British, Polish, Australian, and Irish nationals, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" is incorrect and should be reworded as
"On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including a dual US-Canada national, a Palestinian, three British citizens, an Australian, and a Pole, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" as per [2], [3]. 148.75.59.49 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request that... (date of death is updated to 30/11/2024) . Jamesington (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Sophie Anderson (actress) is not protected. A reliable source for the information is required. Favonian (talk) 16:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

I suggest adding to 'War Crimes' a section about the Sde Teiman detention camp. The use of concentration/torture camps is a very notable war crime and an important fact as it pertains to the ceasefire negotiations regarding hostage swaps. It is also relevant as many have been taken from Gaza and are being tortured under pretext of "interrogation." Jdftba (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

edit

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

12 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Editinginterface (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/MediaWiki (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 Fully protected (log) Protected by Amalthea on 2011-05-31: "interface page, transcluded in MadiaWiki space"
User:HotArticlesBot/Config.json (request) 2024-08-27 11:03 User JSON page (log)
Template:Dablink (request) 2024-08-31 15:54 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ral315 on 2005-12-20: "High visibility, no need to edit it."
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Collapse top (request) 2024-09-04 04:57 Fully protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk template or module; used in system message"
User:Community Tech bot/Popular pages config.json (request) 2024-09-05 19:39 User JSON page (log)
Allan Lichtman (request) 2024-09-06 05:12 Fully protected, expires 2024-09-16 at 12:23:11 UTC (log) Protected by Primefac on 2024-08-16: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Template:Blocked text (request) 2024-09-06 21:08 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
File:Flag of Brazil.svg (request) 2024-09-09 06:12 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
20 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Football box (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Football box collapsible (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-08-17 15:53 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-20 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:MultiReplace (request) 2024-08-20 06:46 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikAnimal on 2017-10-09: "Highly visible template; 34,000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2024-08-23 19:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Template:Infobox election (request) 2024-08-24 13:40 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-03-02: ">9500 transclusions, set to change from SP/A to TE/TE"
Template:Talk header (request) 2024-08-24 22:41 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-12-13: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Coat of arms (request) 2024-08-25 01:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Module:Excerpt/config (request) 2024-08-27 04:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Johnuniq on 2020-08-30: "oops, meant to be TP"
Module:Routemap (request) 2024-08-28 17:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by Materialscientist on 2016-11-21: "Highly visible template"
Module:If preview (request) 2024-08-29 18:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2019-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:AfC submission catcheck (request) 2024-09-01 00:14 Template-protected (log) From Module:AFC submission catcheck: Modified by Courcelles on 2014-04-20: "Per RFPP request, "mother" template only template protected now"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2024-09-05 06:52 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Module:Commons link (request) 2024-09-08 11:55 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ymblanter on 2020-09-07: "Highly visible template: request at WP:RFPP"
Module:Science redirect/conf (request) 2024-09-08 13:03 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikAnimal on 2017-10-10: "High-risk module; 166,000+ transclusions"
Template:Self (request) 2024-09-08 15:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Anomie on 2013-11-17: "Allow templateeditors to edit, per WT:RFPP#Mass protection lowering from "sysop" to "editprotected" (script-assisted edit)"
Template:PD-chem (request) 2024-09-09 06:53 Template-protected (log) Protected by ST47 on 2019-07-01: "Highly visible template, restoring protection that was lost when it was deleted"
Template:Active politician (request) 2024-09-09 15:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system (request) 2024-09-09 18:22 Not protected (log)
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 08:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

WP:PERM

Requests for accountcreator

Account creator

edit

On Sept 21st I will be offering a training to beginner editors during the World Congress of Audiology in Paris We will introduce participants to Global Audiology. I anticipate I will need to allow the creation of some new accounts at the same time, so I ask for this user right from Sept 21 to 23rd. I already hold this permission with both Portuguese and testwiki.

Thank you TMorata (talk) 14:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

edit

Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Requesting autopatrolled for Chaotic Enby. Trusted user who already has NPP rights, articles are consistently well-written and well-sourced. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Created 407 articles, and only 2 were deleted—1 was soft deleted earlier in 2022, and the latest one was deleted per WP:A10, which is not a major issue. 99.5% or 405 of his articles are still live. I came across him while patrolling New Pages. I believe he is one of the users for whom this right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

edit


Requesting access for updating census data of highly populated Indian villages in Kerala state and other human settlements on this planet in future. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I just want to have a way to easily merge duplicate refs. I make that mistake a lot. Panini! 🥪 12:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I would like access to AWB to fix CheckWiki issues more efficiently than I currently do using WPCleaner. I also want to streamline typo fixing as part of WP:TYPO. I understand I have been denied it twice in the recent past, but I strongly believe that I am fit for getting the permission now, as I gained significantly more experience and done more constructive edits. Bunnypranav (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([4][5]). MusikBot talk 14:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

edit
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

edit

Can i please have extended confirmed rights back. I lost it because one day when i had a little less than 500 edits, i made about 45-55 edits in one hour in order to get to 500 edits. Im new to this site and didn't know gaming edits was against the rules. Ever since i lost the extended confirmed thing, I've made hundreds of edits i think are constructive and i stopped vandalism a few times and have a much better understanding of the rules. extended confirmed rights HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([6]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([7]). MusikBot talk 22:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

edit
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

edit
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

edit

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Jattlife121 (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@Jattlife121 I assume you didn't mean to submit a blank request? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
 Not done per lack of explanation. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Good day. I previously requested this permission but was declined due to lack of editing time on this account (I worked on an IP previously but have no way to prove this). At the risk of appearing too eager for this permission, I am requesting it again as I now have lengthier editing experience. I have demonstrated experience in AfC, AfD, CSD, draftification, and article creation. I also maintain rollbacker and pending change permissions. I believe I can be help bring down the NPP backlog and have the experience and policy understanding that is necessary to do so accurately. Garsh (talk) 01:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([8]). MusikBot talk 01:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
I think I can consider myself fully back from my wikibreak now and I'd like to request NPP rights again. I haven't participated in any AFDs or AFCs since I returned but hopefully that won't be a problem because I've only been away for about half a year. ~ F4U (talkthey/it) 03:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

edit


I have been editing since 2005 with over 15,000 edits without incident. I am requesting this permission so I am able to perform round robin moves when necessary. I am also open to assisting at WP:RM. James (talk/contribs) 21:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

@James Allison: I'm not seeing any problems, but you don't really have a lot of recent activity regarding moves. Do you expect to get much use out of this permission? Elli (talk | contribs) 19:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
I expect to contribute at RM if granted the permission. James (talk/contribs) 00:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm 2RDD. With over a thousand edits and experience in maintaining article quality, I'm eager to help with page moves. I understand the importance of accurate titles and want to assist in keeping our namespace organized. I've reviewed the page move guidelines and am familiar with the process. Granting me Page Mover rights would allow me to efficiently rename pages, reducing the workload for administrators. Thanks for considering my request! 2RDD (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 1199 total edits. MusikBot talk 10:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

edit

Hello! I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes. I want to become a pending changes reviewer. ZeetBaralWiki 15:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Oppose...has weak grasp of copyright/license, verifiability, and MOS. We're only a week-ish out from their block for contradicting citing sources and copy-pasting from AI. DMacks (talk) 18:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
 Not done agree with DMacks -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Noting for the record I have now DE/CIR-blocked them. DMacks (talk) 02:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

I edit AusPol pages, and I'd like to be able to approve edits made to them :) No stress if I need more of a track record of edits - I totally understand. Jy Sandford (talk) 23:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 94 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 23:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Heyo, I'm writing to request the Pending Change Reviewer permission. I'm well versed in the use of tools such as RCPatrol and after reading Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes I believe I'd be a good fit for the Pending changes reviewer permission. Thanks for your consideration,

Mark MarkRosenbaum (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

edit

Hello! I request for the permission - Rollback. ZeetBaralWiki 15:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello to anyone concerned.

I am requesting rollbacker rights, having done so before without the knowledge of having to warn users after undoing their edits, and I believe I now have a substantial track record of doing so ever since promising to fulfill that role. I now also have a good idea of how to use tools such as Twinkle effectively, which have greatly helped my work against vandalism.

Thanks for taking your time to read my request. Best regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([9]). MusikBot talk 17:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
You are still consistently failing to notify editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
The three sole examples of me not doing it from the past month and a half, which you are referring to, are the same single person, making the same changes over and over to player statistics tables through different IPs for the past 12+ months. I looked up different pages that match the categories of the ones I've undone, and the user has been warned multiple times, to no effect, making the same edit again and again. They then stop editing from that IP and start doing the same exact edits from a new one. They have been warned multiple times by multiple users for the exact same edit yet still repeatedly undo other users' work without any explanation when they are clearly in the wrong. Examples of this are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, etc., etc.; some of those edits were way over a year ago, and I am only referencing the ones that the user has been warned for (there are thousands of other such cases from tens, if not hundreds of different IPs) that they haven't been warned for by users who revert their edits. In this case, I have decided that reaching out to the user is futile and I believe that in such extreme examples, that should be an option. What is the point of a warning the user when it is clearly proven that they will keep doing it from new IPs and never read the original talk page anyway?
I have not failed to warn a single other user for the time period since I had promised to do so, which I believe is the whole point of rollback rights in the first place. I strongly believe that this specific, and definitely irregular, case is not sufficient to justify the denial of the rights. However, this is just my point of view on the topic and if you really believe that I am in the wrong and that I should repeatedly (and foolishly) warn the same user for the same thing that they will not stop doing, and expecting a different result, then maybe I do not really need rollback rights in the end if that is to be your final verdict.
Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

I believe I'm experienced enough to have this right. OhHaiMark (talk) 21:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi everyone, I'm 2RDD. I've been editing Wikipedia for a year now and have made over a thousand edits. I'm passionate about maintaining article quality and combating vandalism. I believe Rollbacker rights would help me make a bigger impact. I'm eager to take on this responsibility and contribute to our community's mission. Thanks for considering my request! Best, 2RDD (talk) 10:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([10]). MusikBot talk 10:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
 Not done Sorry, but you have very little experience reverting vandalism. Please request when you have a track record of reverting vandalism. Malinaccier (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I would like to request for the rollback permission because I am engaged in rollback activities very much for some time. This permission would be very helpful and will make my Wiki activity very easier. Moreover, I am experienced enough with enough edits and edit time in Wikipedia. I have read everything about this tool and will abide by all the rules too.! Thanking you! TheProEditor11 (talk) 10:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC) TheProEditor11 (talk) 10:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I would like access to rollback rights in order to use tools such as Huggle that require rollback rights. Most of my edits have been anti-vandalism work, and I feel that access to these tools would help me revert and warn more effectively. I would like to mention that there may be a few problems with my edits that anyone reviewing may bring up:

1. In my first few reverts (using only the built-in undo tool) before I was auto-confirmed, I did fail to notify some of the users I was reverting. This is mainly because I didn't yet have access to RedWarn, Twinkle, or Ultraviolet in order to warn users quickly. Secondly, I was not aware of the correct procedure to deal with Vandalism. Now, however, almost every revert has been using Ultraviolet or RedWarn and I have been giving warnings to every user. I believe I have a sufficient track record of doing this that you can see in my contribs. I have read all relevant procedures relating to Rollback and how to deal with Vandalism, including Wikipedia:Vandalism, Wikipedia:Rollback, Wikipedia:Reverting, as well as Wikipedia:Username policy. You can also see in my contribs that after I read the relevant procedures but before I was autoconfirmed, I manually warned some of the users that I was reverting.

2. I am applying slightly before I have one month of experience. If I need to reapply in two weeks or so, I will be happy to. However, I believe that my track record shows that a large majority of my reverts have been helpful and demonstrate good understanding of the policy as I've learned it.

Thanks TryAgainSooner (talk) 17:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 139 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 17:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn Totally thought I had more main space edits/reverts. Will re-submit when I reach a month and around 250 main space edits. TryAgainSooner (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)