User talk:Vankal

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vankal/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Vankal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello, I'm Shhhnotsoloud. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hmar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vanlallawmzuala Varte (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vanlallawmzuala Varte and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hiya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with anything that you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). See the conflict of interest guideline (or the plain and simple version) for more information. In short—

Please avoid editing or creating articles about anything you have a COI with; instead, propose changes using the Edit Request Wizard or submit drafts through Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and be sure to disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI).

Also, if you're being paid for your edits here, in addition to what's mentioned above, you are also required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use to disclose this your employer/client and affiliation—see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

If you think I made a mistake and you don't actually have a COI, or if you have any questions about this or editing Wikipedia in general, please let me know! Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 19:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Meriam L. Hrangchal. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Draft:Ricky Lalremsanga, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Lallukhum Fimate moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lallukhum Fimate. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:27, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meriam L. Hrangchal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Meriam L. Hrangchal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meriam L. Hrangchal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meriam L. Hrangchal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lalvarmoi Hmar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lalvarmoi Hmar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:32, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Daniel Langthasa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Daniel Langthasa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 12:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Langthasa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Langthasa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Langthasa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vankal. Thank you for your work on Boro Muolkoi. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please add the population along with a ref from the official indian census site

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of India Book of Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India Book of Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Book of Records (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 08:20, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Ricky Lalremsanga moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ricky Lalremsanga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:08, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Vanlal Tluonga Bapui moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vanlal Tluonga Bapui. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because many of the sources in the article are either unreliable or do not establish notability sufficiently; I believe there is a strong chance the author could be notable, but these sources do not establish it sufficiently. It also suffers from ref bombing. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 19:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vanlal Tluonga Bapui (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Significa liberdade were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

• meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
• or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
  

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vanlal Tluonga Bapui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade Thank you for taking the time to review my draft. I am a new Wikipedian and still learning about the guidelines and best practices. I understand your concern regarding a possible conflict of interest. My intention is only to create a neutral and informative article based on reliable sources, not to promote.

I will carefully go through the COI and neutrality guidelines to improve the draft. If you have any advice or suggestions for a new editor like me, I would be very grateful.

Thank you again for your guidance and patience. Vankal (talk) 20:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Can you state your connection to the subject? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade Thank you for asking about my connection to the subject. I am from the same community and I have written this draft as part of my effort to preserve and document the contributions of important figures of the Hmar people. Vanlal Tluonga Bapui is a significant person for our community—he was one of the earliest educated individuals from Boro Muolkoi Village, a respected teacher, church leader, and an important contributor to Hmar literature and Bible translation.

I do not have any financial interest, but I do have cultural and historical interest as a member of the Hmar community. My intention is to ensure that his life and works are recorded in a neutral, well-sourced way for future readers. If there are areas where I need to improve neutrality or sourcing, I would be very grateful for your guidance. Vankal (talk) 21:41, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, Vankal! As you continue editing, I recommend reading Wikipedia's guide to writing your first article if you haven't already. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:49, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade I am from the same community, and I wanted to create this article because Vanlal Tluonga Bapui is a very important person for the Hmar people. He was among the earliest educated individuals from Boro Muolkoi Village and went on to become a respected teacher, church leader, and social worker. He also played a leading role in Hmar literature, writing dictionaries, grammar books, and historical works, and contributed to Bible translation projects. Because of his lifelong service, he was recognized with a literary pension by the Government of Assam and an honorary doctorate from a Christian university.

For the Hmar tribe, his contributions in education, language preservation, theology, and community development make him one of the most significant figures of recent generations. My interest is cultural and historical, not financial, and my goal is only to present his life and works in a well-sourced and neutral way for the benefit of readers. Vankal (talk) 21:46, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeffrey Hmingchullo (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not notable beyond the one event for which he received a gallantry award - see WP:1E.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeffrey Hmingchullo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 20:18, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of One North East

Thank you for your interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:32, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:One North East (ONE) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:One North East (ONE). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:27, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One North East (ONE) (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One North East (ONE) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Resubmitting a draft

Hi Vankal, when you want to resubmit a declined draft, please be careful not to remove any of the Articles for Creation (Afc) templates, and don't add any code manually. Instead, please click the "Resubmit" button on the draft.

Please also make sure to address the reason(s) a deaft was declined before resubmitting. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 07:12, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Sikpui Ruoi when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:48, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sikpui Ruoi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sikpui Ruoi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Smallangryplanet was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 15:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One North East (ONE) (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:

Article formatting is a mess, see WP:MOS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One North East (ONE) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 16:51, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Debolal Gorlosa

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Debolal Gorlosa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Debolal Gorlosa

Hello, Vankal. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Debolal Gorlosa".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:26, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hmarkhawlien

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hmarkhawlien, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:10, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lallukhum Fimate

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lallukhum Fimate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pachhunga

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pachhunga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chawnhau Khawthlang

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chawnhau Khawthlang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:09, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Langthasa

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Langthasa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ricky Lalremsanga

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ricky Lalremsanga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:09, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vanlallawmzuala Varte

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vanlallawmzuala Varte, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jeffrey Hmingchullo

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jeffrey Hmingchullo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hmarkhawlien

Hello, Vankal. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hmarkhawlien".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 03:25, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lallukhum Fimate

Hello, Vankal. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lallukhum Fimate".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:27, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pachhunga

Hello, Vankal. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pachhunga".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:26, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chawnhau Khawthlang

Hello, Vankal. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chawnhau Khawthlang".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:26, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Langthasa

Hello, Vankal. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Daniel Langthasa".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ricky Lalremsanga

Hello, Vankal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ricky Lalremsanga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:43, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jeffrey Hmingchullo

Hello, Vankal. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jeffrey Hmingchullo".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vanlal Tluonga Bapui

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vanlal Tluonga Bapui, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:One North East (ONE)

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One North East (ONE), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:11, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar

Hello, Vankal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vanlal Tluonga Bapui

Hello, Vankal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vanlal Tluonga Bapui".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:One North East (ONE)

Hello, Vankal. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "One North East".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar

Hello, Vankal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:11, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thiek Language has been accepted

Thiek Language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Epsilon.Prota ^talk 21:57, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hmarkhawlien has been accepted

Hmarkhawlien, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tatupiplu’^{(she/her · talk · email)} 18:15, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

@Tatupiplu Thanks you so much for helping🙏 i need more improvement. Vankal (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

What improvements would you like? Feel free to add any information, just make sure it's properly referenced with citations. If you have any questions or get stuck, feel free to reach out. Thanks. - Tatupiplu’^{(she/her · talk · email)} 18:26, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

@Tatupiplu Hi! I was just wondering if you could give me some advice. I've seen a few articles get approved with fewer references, while I tried to add as many reliable sources as I could. Even so, my article was still marked as an orphan and moved back to Draft.

I'm sure there's something I might be missing. If you have any tips or can point out what I should improve, I'd really appreciate it. I'm still learning and would love to make the article meet Wikipedia's standards.

Thanks so much for your time! Vankal (talk) 18:33, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saron, Mahur has been accepted

Saron, Mahur, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 12:03, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazareth Lalthazuala Hmar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Thilsebatti (talk) 06:30, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Edit summaries and linking

Hi there. Thanks for leaving edit summaries, but they need not to be misleading. A couple of hours ago, you made a series of four edits with the summary "Fixed typo", but in none of those cases did you fix any typos.

Regarding the text that you linked with those edits, for future reference you ought to take a look at MOS:OVERLINK regarding unnecessary linking and linking the same term multiple times, and MOS:GEOLINK regarding what to link and what not to link in the name of a place. Largoplazo (talk) 13:16, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

@Largoplazo Sorry, it was my mistake. I shall be very careful in future🙏 Vankal (talk) 13:43, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Presbyterian Church of India

added links pointing to British, Welsh, William Carey and Pandua

Cape Verde

added a link pointing to Portuguese

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:57, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Independent Church Of India

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Independent Church Of India, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A ISBN error. References show this error when the ISBN value or formatting is invalid. Please edit the article to ensure the value is correct, that only one ISBN is used, that the proper optional separators are used, and that no other text is included. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:30, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of K. Laltluangkima

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on K. Laltluangkima requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~2026-33676-45 (talk) 13:39, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Miss Assam when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:32, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

@Zackmann08 Thank you so much🙏 Vankal (talk) 15:34, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dclemens1971. An edit that you recently made to Draft:Independent Church Of India seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:27, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

@Dclemens1971 Thanks. I will try to improve it Vankal (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Northeast has been accepted

Miss Northeast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

@Girdi45 Thank you for accepting my article. As a new Wikipedian, I am grateful for your review and assistance. Your help has encouraged me to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks again! Vankal (talk) 16:38, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Good Luck, Happy editing. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 08:33, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Ways to improve Hmar Welfare Development Council (HWDC)

Hello, Vankal,

Thank you for creating Hmar Welfare Development Council (HWDC).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi. By any chance, did you use AI to create this article?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fortek67}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Fortek67 (talk) 15:43, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

@Fortek67 🙏 I will try to improve it Vankal (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Vankal, thank you. If you did use AI, then the article requires significant improvements and cleanups. Fortek67 (talk) 18:04, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

@Fortek67 Please check Hmar Welfare Development Council (HWDC) whether it has been improved🙏 Vankal (talk) 19:23, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Independent Church Of India moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Independent Church Of India. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Hmar Welfare Development Council moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hmar Welfare Development Council. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:22, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

@Dclemens1971 Can you please check Hmar Welfare Development Council (HWDC) whether it has been improved or not? Vankal (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Vankal, you will have to submit the article via AfC (button at the top). The AfC reviewer will determine whether or not the article is worthy of being moved back to the article (main) space. Fortek67 (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Miss Assam moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Miss Assam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and the sources provided are primarily routine event coverage rather than significant independent coverage about the pageant itself. The article also has promotional tone issues and lacks substantive content demonstrating lasting encyclopedic importance. Please develop further in draft space with stronger reliable sources and submit it to AfC. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:31, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Hmar Customary Law moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hmar Customary Law. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it consists of machine-generated text and also this article relies heavily on predatory journals (JETIR, ICERT), self-published community websites (VIRTHLI, e-pao.net), and user-uploaded platforms (Academia.edu, Scribd) which do not meet reliable source standards. The article is also an orphan with promotional tone. Without legitimate peer-reviewed academic sources or established publications, notability cannot be verified. Please work on it and submit via AfC. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:35, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Independent Church Of India (June 24)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This draft appears to contain copyrighted material from https://www.ici.net.in/, which has been removed. Wikipedia strictly prohibits copyright violations. Assume all text is copyrighted unless released under a compatible license.

• We can only accept text if it is explicitly released under a compatible free license or is in the public domain.
• If the text is not freely licensed, you must rewrite or summarize it entirely in your own words. Changing a few words is still considered a copyright violation.
• If you own the text you cannot paste it here unless you formally release it via our release process.

Users who continue to post copyrighted material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

• Draft:Independent Church Of India may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page..

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

{{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 17:27, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Independent Church Of India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Independent Church Of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ici.net.in/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 17:27, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

@GearsDatapacks I am extremely sorry. I was collecting datas to my note, later pasted it and thought it was modified but not. I shall be very careful in future. Vankal (talk) 17:59, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saihapui V has been accepted

Saihapui V, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 21:04, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaitin has been accepted

Vaitin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 12:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

@Lynch44 Thank you🙏 Vankal (talk) 13:25, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: N. Chawnpui has been accepted

N. Chawnpui, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 12:06, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

@Lynch44 Thank you🙏 Vankal (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Independent Church Of India (June 25)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Asukite, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

LLM tag was removed, but I still have doubts there. This still lacks independent, reliable sources with significant coverage.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Independent Church Of India to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ASUKITE 18:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

@Asukite Thanks. I will try to improve it. Vankal (talk) 18:17, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daido, Mizoram has been accepted

Daido, Mizoram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 18:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Vervek has been accepted

New Vervek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 12:01, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

@Lynch44 Thank you🙏 Vankal (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tinghmun has been accepted

Tinghmun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 11:04, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damdiai has been accepted

Damdiai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 21:51, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mauchar has been accepted

Mauchar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zokhawthiang has been accepted

Zokhawthiang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 18:43, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lalthantluangi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lalthantluangi. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

@Greenman Please review once again, if it's okay, i will continue working on the early life and career Vankal (talk) 18:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lalthantluangi has been accepted

Lalthantluangi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 09:02, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Lalthantluangi when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 15:53, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

@Zackmann08 Thank you Vankal (talk) 17:00, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Passmore (July 2)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Bobby Cohn, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

All of the Team USA citations are not independent and do not contribute towards notability. Are there other sources that discuss the subject?

Next steps

• Edit Draft:David Passmore to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palsang has been accepted

Palsang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 22:40, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khawpuar has been accepted

Khawpuar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zohmun has been accepted

Zohmun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 08:54, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suangpuilawn has been accepted

Suangpuilawn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 14:23, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ratu, Mizoram has been accepted

Ratu, Mizoram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 21:17, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sailutar has been accepted

Sailutar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 13:02, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunhluchhip has been accepted

Sunhluchhip, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 17:53, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thingsat has been accepted

Thingsat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 13:53, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lungsum has been accepted

Lungsum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 15:37, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

@Lynch44 Kindly approve 🙏 Draft:Zawngin Vankal (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cindy Remruatpuii Colney (July 9)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Commandant Quacks-a-lot, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for sports. The draft requires either:

• evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for sports;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Cindy Remruatpuii Colney to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 19:03, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Tate McRae

Hello. I'm coming to you regarding your recent edits to Tate McRae. I have reverted them and would like to let you know why. First off, you copy-pasted List of awards and nominations received by Tate McRae into the article. If you intend to perform a merge, this is not the proper way to do it. I invite you to read Wikipedia:Merging to learn about reasons to merge (or not to merge) articles, how to discuss merging proposals with the community, and how to attribute merged content. Secondly, you wrongfully tagged all your edits as minor. Adding 30,000+ bytes to an article is by no means minor. I would suggest you read Help:Minor edit to familiarise yourself with what is and is not a minor edit so that you can tag your edits more accurately in the future. Thank you. Bizarre Bizarre^{Talk modern to me} 19:26, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bimal Oberoi (July 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Jerodlycett, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for creative professionals. The draft requires:

• evidence that the subject meets the general criteria for inclusion;
• or evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for creative professionals;
• or multiple published secondary sources that cover the subject or their work and:
  • provide critical attention: professional reviews, excluding user reviews from the general public;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of a creative work than of a person. If the person is not yet notable, but their work has received multiple in-depth professional reviews, consider writing about the work instead.

The sources need to be independent, reliable, and have significant in-depth coverage of the subject of the article. Zero meet that. Further, there are many duplicate sources provided.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Bimal Oberoi to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Jerod Lycett (talk) 02:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lamherh has been accepted

Lamherh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 19:46, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pachhunga Hmar (July 14)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, EaglesFan37, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Pachhunga Hmar to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

EaglesFan37 (talk) 13:18, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bimal Oberoi (July 16)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Bimal Oberoi to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Thilsebatti (talk) 06:59, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argentina-Spain football rivalry (July 17)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

In my opinion, we don't have at least three sources talking about how the teams have a rivalry, the sources primarily talk about their head-to-head record and make no mention of a rivalry. I wouldn't be surprised if we have more sources describing this after the World Cup Final, so if we can't find at least 2-3 more sources that support the fact the teams have a rivalry now it's probably best to wait until after the final.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Argentina-Spain football rivalry to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 19:26, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricane Wind and Fire Please recheck once again🙏 Vankal (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argentina-Spain football matches (July 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:

A rivalry article is certainly possible if there is coverage in multiple reliable sources, but an article of just the track record is too run of the mill. I suggest waiting to find more sources that talk about a rivalry after the final, and if we don't find at least three then, this topic is likely not ready for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Argentina-Spain football matches to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 15:26, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricane Wind and Fire Dear Sir...I have revised the title from “Argentina–Spain football rivalry” to “Argentina–Spain football matches,” in accordance with the earlier suggestion. The revised title is intended to cover the football matches played between the Argentina and Spain national teams and does not make any assertion that the two teams share a football rivalry.

In light of this change in both the title and the scope of the article, I am unclear as to why the submission was declined on the same grounds. The article now focuses solely on the documented history and details of matches between the two national teams. I would therefore respectfully request that the submission be reconsidered in light of the revised title and scope. Vankal (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

I recognize your view. However, an article simply consisting of head-to-head records is run of the mill and likely fails WP:NOTDATABASE. It was not declined on the same grounds, I was just noting you could possibly return to your original idea about the rivalry after the final if that information emerges from sources. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 16:04, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricane Wind and Fire I appreciate your explanation and guidance. I will keep the matter in mind and, after the Argentina–Spain final, I would be grateful if you could kindly guide me again on whether the available reliable sources support developing the topic into an article about a football rivalry.

Thank you once again for taking the time to explain the issue. Vankal (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricane Wind and Fire Dear Respected Sir. Upon encouraged, i added 3 sources. Kindly check Draft: Argentina-Spain football rivalry when you have a free time. Also, encourage if something is lacked🙏 Vankal (talk) 18:54, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk (July 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Timtrent, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:03, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Argentina-Spain football rivalry has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Argentina-Spain football rivalry. Thanks! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 18:57, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shilpi Dabas (July 22)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Nomadwikiholic1, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Please add atleast 2 in-depth secondary independent reliable sources which is discussing about the subject and re-submit. And after that you can ping me for another review. Thanks

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Shilpi Dabas to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 11:22, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk (July 25)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, EaglesFan37, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

EaglesFan37 (talk) 00:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Northeast, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:17, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sulfurboy. An edit that you recently made to Draft:Lalthomlien Hmar seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:01, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk (July 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

A few routine announcements of the opening of this does not denote notability.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:14, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk. Thanks! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:36, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 07:48, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk has been accepted

Aizawl Peak Resort Skywalk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:49, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

@Sulfurboy Thank you so much🙏 Vankal (talk) 09:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lalthomlien Hmar (July 31)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Jeraxmoira, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Lalthomlien Hmar to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lalthomlien Hmar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lalthomlien Hmar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

It is hard to say one is unaware of something under these circumstances

The items you removed had the comment

<!-- Do not remove this line! -->

present. It seems to me to be more than somewhat obvious that they are thus, how should I put this... Not to be removed. You will see them clearly available for inspection in the history tab.

I accept your assurances for the future, and thank you for them. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:07, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lalthomlien Hmar (July 31)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zawngin has been accepted

Zawngin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vgbypw (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indigenous People's Forum (August 2)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

We can't accept AI submissions

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Indigenous People's Forum to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ChrysGalley (talk) 19:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Hello, I'm Dr vulpes. An edit that you recently made to Draft:Lalthomlien Hmar seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:05, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indigenous People's Forum (August 3)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, CostalCal, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Appears to be a LLM generation.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Indigenous People's Forum to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

CostalCal (talk) 06:22, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Argentina-Spain football rivalry (August 3)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, CostalCal, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Rivalry isn't widely covered nor is it notable aside from WC final.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Argentina-Spain football rivalry to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

CostalCal (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hmar Welfare Development Council (August 3)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, CostalCal, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Appears to be an LLM generation.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Hmar Welfare Development Council to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

CostalCal (talk) 06:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huonveng (August 3)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, CostalCal, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Submission includes unverified sources.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Huonveng to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

CostalCal (talk) 06:28, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huonveng (Hjo) has been accepted

Huonveng (Hjo), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 20:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent misuse of large language models, as described in the AI noticeboard discussion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  — Newslinger talk 13:05, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vankal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Dear respected sir/madam. I am very ashamed for what i have done. I understand the reasons why i was blocked and wanted to correct my mistake raised on Ai noticeboard discussion. I admit that i misuse of large language models and i promise that it won't happen anymore in future. I would slso like to state that i don't have computer, i have only mobile phone to contribute to Wikipedia using the app. I should learn a lot of policies to become expert editor since my hobby is to be a wikipedian. I would also want to continue working on Wikipedia to correct my mistake. Therefore, i pray you to kindly unblock me. I shall be very obliged you could kindly unblock me at early convenient Vankal (talk) 15:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am unwilling to consier unblocking you without a WP:TOPICBAN on creating new articles or drafts, or moving pages, appealable no sooner than 500 constructive, non-trivial edits and six months, whichever comes later. You are free to make a new unblock request without accepting those conditions, though, and another admin will review it. Yamla (talk) 16:25, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vankal, I think that you should accept the conditions that Yamla has suggested. I also think that you should explain why you continued using AI after first being warned in § September 2025, and make an honest promise that you will not start again. ‑‑gurkubondinn 21:38, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Yamla, Upon thinking deeply, i agreed to the conditions made by you. Gurkubondinn, I promise you that i shall not use anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vankal (talk • contribs) 08:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

@Newslinger: As blocking admin, any objections to an unblock on this basis? No AI use, no new articles or drafts or page moves, appealable as mentioned above? --Yamla (talk) 09:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

No objections from me to an unblock under these conditions, Yamla. Thank you for responding candidly, Vankal. — Newslinger talk 09:44, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, Newslinger. Vankal, you are unblocked on that basis. No more AI use, and a WP:TOPICBAN on creating new articles or drafts, and on moving pages. This is appealable no sooner than six months from now and after no fewer than 500 constructive, non-trivial edits, whichever comes later. You may appeal to me, to Newslinger, or to WP:AN after hitting those targets. Please note that any violations may result in an immediate reblock, without further notice. --Yamla (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

@Yamla Thank you so much and i'll always remember the conditins. But it makes me so upset seeing affected all my article/pages which i spent whole day and night for several weeks. It's okay i learnt something from my mistake🙏 Vankal (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

How do you feel about all of the time and effort that other editors are having to spend on cleaning this up? ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:16, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

@Gurkubondinn I don't understand whether i should reply you or not. But as i got question, honestly, am very ashamed and upset too, because it has affected all the pages that i have created.

One of my aim included putting up all the villages which are under Sinlung Hills Autonomous Council as a stub to be developed later. All those were also affected even if went through Afc submission due to my activities. I spent many times to collect verifiable souces including my own village Boro Muolkoi. I need to learn many things🙏 Vankal (talk) 14:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

You've only talked about yourself and how upset this makes you. But have you thought about how much work you have created for other people? How you considered how much of our time that you have wasted, and how this has impacted people other than just yourself? ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi gurkubondinn, that is something Vankal can consider for their topic ban appeal later on, but Vankal's acknowledgement and apology here (as well as their promise not to misuse LLMs again) represent the direction we want to encourage editors in this situation to go, and I don't think it's necessary to ask for a more comprehensive apology right now. (An apology is cheapened when it's asked for, so it would be better for Vankal to have the opportunity to grow as an editor and come up with an appeal later.) — Newslinger talk 22:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I agree, @Newslinger. An apology is only sincere if it originates from the person giving it. I may have not phrased this as well as I wanted to, but this was meant to be a rhetorical question to maybe show Vankal a perspective that they might not have considered. I wasn't expecting an answer (and so I shouldn't have phrased that as a question in the first place), but I felt that their replies were absent of any consideration for how their actions had affected others around them. This is a collaborative project (as we keep repeating ad nauseam), and I wanted to encourage them to think about the people that they collaborate with before they get to the point of appealing the conditions that were imposed in the unblock. They are editing again now, and since I don't see any signs of the problems that lead to the block, I believe that they genuinely want to contribute and would like to help them if I can. Personally I believe that consideration for others goes a long way here, and it is something that I would like to see in an appeal if it were up to me.

To @Vankal, you really don't have to reply to me, this isn't a question that I wanted an answer to. I just want you to have thought about it. I hope that you stay, you clearly want to contribute to the project and that is a good thing. Just keep in mind that you are not alone here. That means that you can ask other people help when you need. But it also means that you should also help others, and you should think about how what you do can affect other people. Because those people also just want to contribute to the encyclopaedia, just like you do. ‑‑gurkubondinn 22:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

@Newslinger Thank you so much. I will try my best. Vankal (talk) 09:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hmar Clans (August 8)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Gurkubondinn, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Declined as AI-generated per WP:AIN § User:Vankal. The English Wikipedia does not accept AI-generated material.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Hmar Clans to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

‑‑gurkubondinn 21:31, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Passmore (August 14)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, EaglesFan37, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:David Passmore to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:17, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of K. Laltluangkima

The page K. Laltluangkima has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Presumptive removal of LLM-generated content, see AI cleanup investigation. Feel free to reinstate by following the procedures for disputing presumptive removal of LLM-generated content.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Assam (August 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Miss Assam to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:57, 18 August 2026 (UTC)