User talk:Anna Frodesiak/archive54
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Anna Frodesiak. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Talkback at Talk:Mirwais Azizi
Sorry - neglected to ping you! Yunshui 雲水 23:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Spam blacklist
Hi, Anna Frodesiak. Last week, you asked about how you can have Baidu Baike added to the spam blacklist in this discussion. I noticed that the discussion was archived before you got a response, so I'll answer here on your talk page: just go to MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist and follow the instructions to make a new "proposed addition". Be sure to include a link to the blacklisting discussion from WP:RSN to support your case. Thanks! — Newslinger talk 23:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Bring in the noise
Not sure about the rest of the world, but for the US, this site owned by The Atlantic covers city noise: [1] [2] you may also try a search like [3]. Sorry, if only slightly helpful, at most. Alanscottwalker (talk) 23:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Alanscottwalker. Google is blocked where I am, but the others are interesting. I'm not sure if that content is reliable or how it can be used in a potential List of cities by noise pollution level.
By the way, are you referring to The Atlantic?Many thanks, nonetheless. It is appreciated. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)- Sorry about the google foo. I do see this there [4] may lead to similar. Alanscottwalker (talk) 23:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for that Alan! What do you think of this? Reliable? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, citiquiet.com just cannot be a reliable source. :( Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:29, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Afraid not, nor the hearing loss company itself, perhaps underlying data. Alanscottwalker (talk) 23:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, thank you, my friend. I guess it is an article that will not happen for a while. I'm much obliged. Thank you kindly. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sadly, it looks like there might be all kinds of issues with all kinds of urban stats internationally. [5] Alanscottwalker (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Rats. Another fly in the ointment. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sadly, it looks like there might be all kinds of issues with all kinds of urban stats internationally. [5] Alanscottwalker (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, thank you, my friend. I guess it is an article that will not happen for a while. I'm much obliged. Thank you kindly. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Afraid not, nor the hearing loss company itself, perhaps underlying data. Alanscottwalker (talk) 23:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry about the google foo. I do see this there [4] may lead to similar. Alanscottwalker (talk) 23:17, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Anna Frodesiak, You might try the World Health Organization. Good luck! Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, DA Sonnenfeld. I'll give it a try. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Here are some more, posted here because I cannot post on the Reference Desk. Hope you can access these pages.70.67.193.176 (talk) 21:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- [6] Based on the Mimi research you were looking at above, but reported on by a secondary source - I do not know if that makes it more reliable. Ten noisiest are Guangzhou, Delhi, Cairo, Mumbai, Istanbul, Beijing, Barcelona, Mexico City, Paris and Buenos Aires. Ten quietest are Zurich, Vienna, Oslo, Munich, Stockholm, Dusseldorf, Hamburg, Portland (US), Cologne and Amsterdam.
- [7] Forbes (good source) citing this consumer testing company which in turn again uses the Mimi data.
Hi all. Sorry for the late reply. Thank you for the input. I will look at it shortly. I have some off-wiki stuff to look after right now. Many thanks! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Alanscottwalker, DA Sonnenfeld, and 70.67.193.176. Okay, all things considered, I just do not trust these sources. The Forbes list conflicts with other lists I've seen and is blog-sourced. I think we need to wait a few years. Many thanks to all for finding what could be found. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:13, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
I don't normally do barnstars, but...
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
Thanks for your efforts Deb (talk) 13:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC) |
- Thank you Deb!! :) Sometimes if you don't laugh, you cry, or, or ...break your monitor. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Dear Anna,
I came across you from the last edit to the Nuseir Yassin page. If you check the edit history from the last couple of hours, I had deleted links to LinkedIn and Facebook visible in the References list numbered 1, 2, 7, 13, and 14. Another editor reverted the edits citing WP:External Links policy, saying "this is an article on a high profile Facebook Show, hence FB lnks are passable".
Since you are an administrator here, I thought of reaching out and ask for your opinion on the same. My WP experience says the links should not be there in the "References" section. They can go in the "External Links" section. Ref no. 9 is a Crunchbase link. Shouldn't this be removed?
Have a nice day & thanks for your time. Csgir (talk)
- Hi there Csgir. That is really more of a content issue. I suggest raising the subject at the article's talk page. You can also hunt for policies and guidelines on the matter. Search youtube and facebook at Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites. Sorry I can't be of more help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Question
Hello Anna. I seem to recall that edit summaries were of particular importance to you (I know my rate has been over 90% ever since you discussed them with me all those years ago). I was wondering if you would consider discussing them with another editor?. They have been asked by four different editors over the past 6 months to add summaries to their edits, but they have thus far stead-fastly refused, except in very rare instances when apparently making a point. I thought you could use that ambassadorial-like charm and discuss this with them in that diplomatic fashion you are always demonstrating at ani. They have been making a lot of changes to high profile pages, such as blp's and infoboxes on political pages, creating work for others that have to double-check the changes. Just think of it as a favour for the project. We thank you in advance for your assistance. - wolf 04:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Thewolfchild. How are things? Ninety percent is fantastic, and hugely appreciated. Thank you!
- Okay, I posted!
- And to you, thank you! I think we are both dedicated to Wikipedia, so my post at ANI was for a good cause. We want you around indefinitely making thousands of edits every year. That's the bottom line.
- And for you, the bottom line is the efficiency and insane power of honey. So, pour on that honey. Drown 'em in honey. Inject honey into their veins! Leave 'em glistening and all covered with bees and ants and bears and all diabetic and stuff. Okay, too far. Seriously: go kill 'em with kindness! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- I just saw it. It was like a... tsunami of honey. But, we'll now it goes over. Thank you for the comment - wolf 05:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- That was a tsunami. :) Yes, we'll see. From my experience, those requests usually do not work. So, kudos to you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- I just saw it. It was like a... tsunami of honey. But, we'll now it goes over. Thank you for the comment - wolf 05:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi Anna Frodesiak! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Well, whoop-dee-doo. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Chicken powder
- I think it is mainly MSG. The bottle says "Ingredients: MSG, yellow dye, and cancer chemical 459." Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- MSG is not good for you! Have a Carrot Instead! --Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 02:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Or some bread with marmite, Anna's favorite! North America1000 07:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- MSG is not good for you! Have a Carrot Instead! --Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 02:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thegooduser and North America, I suppose one could compress all the chicken powder MSG and marmite into some sort of carrot shape. Then, they could be gathered and blasted into space. Earth would be the better for it. Of course, aliens would die or be horribly grossed-out. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:20, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nah, Just vacuum seal it and give it to NASA for space "Instant Noodles with MSG" lol. --Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Silly, NASA stopped giving MSG and Tang to astronauts because they all kept having strokes. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nah, Just vacuum seal it and give it to NASA for space "Instant Noodles with MSG" lol. --Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thegooduser and North America, I suppose one could compress all the chicken powder MSG and marmite into some sort of carrot shape. Then, they could be gathered and blasted into space. Earth would be the better for it. Of course, aliens would die or be horribly grossed-out. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:20, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your quick action with the block on the new IP. (It is a shame, if the disruption level weren't so high they would make a useful contributor.) --JBL (talk) 01:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi JBL. Not only disruptive, but it appears he is a sock. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, it's the "better known for" IP.--JBL (talk) 12:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- It appears so. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, it's the "better known for" IP.--JBL (talk) 12:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Merry
Happy Christmas! | ||
Hello Anna Frodesiak, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 07:49, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
- Thank you!! Happy holidays!! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you
Hello again. Thanks for the protection at the RD. You should know that PC is not very effective since the edits and edit summaries will still need rev/del. I have found that it is better to prevent them entirely. I'm not insisting just suggesting. Now it is possible that this troll may stop but you might keep the desk on your watchlist and if they return take what action you deem needed. Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 09:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- I see you've already changed them while I was typing - Many thanks!! MarnetteD|Talk 09:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- MarnetteD, hello. I noticed others revdelling and didn't want to step on their toes. What's a PC? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:15, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is my shorthand for "Pending Changes" protection. When I saw this edit summary I thought that was the protection that you had added but now that I look at it again I think you add normal protection and just had that in your edit summary. When that troll gets going it can be a pain to catch up :-) MarnetteD|Talk 09:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Ha ha, I had to ask at IRC what PC was. :) I'm terrible with acronyms. Cheers. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:19, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is my shorthand for "Pending Changes" protection. When I saw this edit summary I thought that was the protection that you had added but now that I look at it again I think you add normal protection and just had that in your edit summary. When that troll gets going it can be a pain to catch up :-) MarnetteD|Talk 09:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- MarnetteD, hello. I noticed others revdelling and didn't want to step on their toes. What's a PC? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:15, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect revert
Hello. Your revert [8] was incorrect. You might like to consider rolling back that revert. I won't do it because my edits were of relatively little consequence. With best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi RobbieIanMorrison. Sorry if I've made a mistake. It seems, though, that all three posts were responses to the original question, and so each should get a single colon. Was I wrong? Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Okay. I learnt something today! Sorry. With best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- No worries at all, my friend. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:12, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Okay. I learnt something today! Sorry. With best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
Hello Anna Frodesiak: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Adapted from {{Season's Greetings}}
- Thank you, happy holidays, and enjoy the season. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
"Provide a valid and informative explanation including, if possible, a link to the Wikipedia principle you believe justifies the reversion...if the reversion is not adequately supported then the reverted editor may find it difficult to assume good faith."
"restore disputed revert. please discuss this at talk" is not a valid or informative explanation. 146.90.39.222 (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- How is this? Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Doesn't refer to any policy or guideline that justifies overriding WP:IG and WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. Reinforces the impression that you're reverting just to start an edit war. You've reverted twice, I reverted once. You should stop being disruptive. 146.90.39.222 (talk) 14:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- There is a big difference between a policy or guideline. This is about guidelines and is a garden-variety content dispute. The disruptive party is the one who tries to force a change to a stable version of the article. Now, I will not revert and neither should you. I am happy you are using the article talk page and you are making a good point there. I will join you there, my friend and we will see what the community wants. Happy holidays to you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Doesn't refer to any policy or guideline that justifies overriding WP:IG and WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. Reinforces the impression that you're reverting just to start an edit war. You've reverted twice, I reverted once. You should stop being disruptive. 146.90.39.222 (talk) 14:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.39.222 (talk) 14:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
| |
Hi Anna Frodesiak, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas |
- Thank you, happy holidays, and have a relaxing time! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
圣诞节快乐!~ メリークリスマス!~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Hello, Anna Frodesiak! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
- Thank you, and happy holidays to you! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Season's Greetings!
- Thank you, and happy holidays! And cats are gross and ambushy. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- No way, cats are awesome, simply because I say so! North America1000 03:08, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Cats rule, dogs drool! North America1000 14:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, and is "ambushy" even a word? North America1000 22:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- n00b sez: It should be. You've seen that bushy jiggle just before the pounce, I'm sure. I appreciate both of you from afar, despite all that I don't understand about the anonymous loons who hover about in wiki-!space. Be well, NA1000, AF... I hope y'all'll find a way to tame/team/meat/mate § me into usefulness. I love the photo, because cats & Christmas. Merry Christmas. ~ 🐝 ~ SashiRolls t · c 23:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- We both appreciate you, SashiRolls. And it is a bit of a loony place, isn't it? :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Ambushy is a real word, just like stalky, attitudy, and pouncy. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy holidays! North America1000 15:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- And to you too, old friend. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Season's Greetings!
Hi Anna,
Wishing you and your family a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2019. Csgir (talk) 10:20, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. You too, and have a wonderful year ahead. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:52, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Austral season's greetings
Austral season's greetings | |
Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
- Ah, what a coincidence, the Pomegranate Meringue Ka-pow is a traditional favourite here as well! Enjoy the pies. It looks bizarre but good. Happy holidays! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:36, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
Whether you celebrate Christmas, Diwali, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa,
Festivus (for the rest of us!) or even the Saturnalia,
here's to
hoping your holiday time is wonderful
and that the New Year will be an improvement upon the old.
CHEERS!
- Shearonink, thank you. Happy holidays to you too. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy Christmas Anna
Dear Anna, You are very witty and must make for entertaining company.
Happy Christmas and all my best wishes for the new year.
Love ChemWarfare (talk) 09:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, ChemWarfare. I entertain in such a concentrated way, that people usually cannot stand more than a few minutes. When they walk out of the the room, I take it as a deep, deep compliment. Merry Christmas. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello Anna Frodesiak, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
- Thank you, my friend. May you have a wonderful year ahead. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Userboxes on your page
Hi Anna, I noticed you have no userboxes on your user page. I lately have been wanting to find more about you but your user page doesn't have userboxes and as such I think your user page could be greatly improved (no offence). If you reply please notify me through my talk page just in case I somehow don't regularly check your talk page. Thank you.211.27.126.189 (talk) 08:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi there. Sorry for the late reply. I do not much care for userboxes and have never had any. I prefer homemade things. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- 'Homemade things' I don't know what you mean.211.27.126.189 (talk) 10:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- I mean that I don't really like those boxes that everyone uses. I like to make things myself, like my userpage. Best wishes and happy new year, by the way :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Why not?211.27.126.189 (talk) 13:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- I don't like mass-produced things. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Why not?211.27.126.189 (talk) 13:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- I mean that I don't really like those boxes that everyone uses. I like to make things myself, like my userpage. Best wishes and happy new year, by the way :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Anna!
Some celestial fireworks to herald another year of progress for mankind and Wikipedia. All the very best , Anna,
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, old friend. I wish you a wonderful new year too. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! North America1000 13:55, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
- Thank you, North America. May this year be fantastic for you. Play with puppies. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- You mean like these kind of pups? Ha ha! Happy New Year and happy editing! North America1000 09:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
2019
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Gerda Arendt. Thank you dear! You have a wonderful new year as well. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Russell Crowe's jockstrap
On 3 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Russell Crowe's jockstrap, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the money from the sale of Russell Crowe's jockstrap allowed the Australia Zoo to establish a koala chlamydia ward? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Russell Crowe's jockstrap. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Russell Crowe's jockstrap), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yay! I mean, gross! I mean, yay and gross! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ha ha ha! Nice. North America1000 04:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Continuing the userbox conversation
Hi. I'm the same person as 211.27.126.189 (not sockpuppet- just a coincidence in where I'm at when deciding to edit Wikipedia). How else can I find more about you now that you've archive that discussion? Preferably ping me at the other IP's talk page. Thank you.123.243.100.66 (talk) 06:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- You can look through my archives to read what I've written about myself. Other than that, there is nothing I wish to reveal. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- I've read them through whilst at the other IP but nothing interesting.123.243.100.66 (talk) 07:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- That is because I am not that interesting. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- I wonder whether this goes beyond the scope of Wikilove partially at least because Wikipedians aren't supposed to know each others names, but since I know your name is Anna, I guess it's not as far beyond as it otherwise would be: Anna is my favourite name.211.27.126.189 (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm a little uncomfortable continuing this post. You know, I'm just here to build the encyclopedia. No offense intended. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- I wonder whether this goes beyond the scope of Wikilove partially at least because Wikipedians aren't supposed to know each others names, but since I know your name is Anna, I guess it's not as far beyond as it otherwise would be: Anna is my favourite name.211.27.126.189 (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- That is because I am not that interesting. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject Brands
Hello, Anna Frodesiak.
You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. |
You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 11:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Already done. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 10:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done. I handled this matter, blocking talk page editing access. After being blocked, the user added blatant advertising to their talk page, which at this point is an indicator that the account is solely intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. See the block log for more information. North America1000 12:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Review
Do we have a review that supports this?
Not seeing it in either one of the sources listed? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:15, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Okay found a ref https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=17192123 Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Change yer browser width, dude, haw haw!
Arrrrgh! Bikers. 100% width. North America1000 19:19, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- My father made me promise never to ride on a motorbike. They are terribly dangerous. I hope you do not use one. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- When handled properly, they are quite safe on average. One has to be wary of motorists in cars who are not paying attention, don't check their blind spot before changing lanes, etc., though. North America1000 17:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- True, North America, true. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Motorcycle or Bicycle? Choose one. --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 04:14, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- True, North America, true. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- When handled properly, they are quite safe on average. One has to be wary of motorists in cars who are not paying attention, don't check their blind spot before changing lanes, etc., though. North America1000 17:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Arrrrgh! Bikers! North America1000 03:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
2019 PS
If you have a moment, check out User:Gerda Arendt/Images 2019 (formerly Christmas), for a smile, and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), and resolutions. I wanted that for 1 January, but then wasn't sad about having our music pictured instead. Not too late for resolutions, New Year or not. DYK that he probably kept me on Wikipedia, back in 2012? By the line (which brought him to my attention, and earned the first precious in br'erly style) that I added to my editnotice, in fond memory? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Gerda Arendt. I love Ray's Rules. It is so sad he died so young. I love the photos! Thank you. :) Nature is great. Pity we broke it. I hope it can fix itself after we're all gone. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Agree! - If you can't avoid arbcom, absolutely turn to his guide. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- That is good advice too. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Agree! - If you can't avoid arbcom, absolutely turn to his guide. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Ion Propelled Aircraft
Hello Anna,
I am the inventor of the first ion propelled aircraft in history that can carry its power supply. I have been working on these devices for over 19 years. My invention has been been able to lift its power supply vertically or horizontally for over a decade. Previously, the power supplies were almost 3 orders of magnitude too heavy to be carried by such crafts.
I own the patent for this technology. Please see US Patent No.10,119,527. This is a legal document that states that I am the first inventor by law to have made an ion propelled aircraft that can carry its power supply. The document also gives me legal claim over anyone that makes or sells any ion propelled aircraft that carries its power supply since 08/06/2014.
While I have made well over 100 videos of my invention in flight carrying its power supply over the years, there are 4 that I have made public on YouTube so far. All of these versions of the craft predate the MIT device and all Produce over an order of magnitude better lift to weight ratio and efficiency in general. The device has been demonstrated to many news organizations, NASA personnel, GLIDE in Cleveland, Ohio, as well as to other official observers, all are easy to authenticate if needed. I have collected a lot of news articles, as well as the US Patent, flight videos, and a reasonably thorough explanation of how the device works, on my website, a link is provides as one of my references, so that anyone can verify these facts without the slightest ambiguity. I think that Dr.Steven Barrett and his students may very likely have been aware my patent application online, but did not consider carefully that the ideas shared in it clearly do result in a better performing machine. I find it improbable that the entire team didn't google "ion" and "aircraft" to immediately see my patent application during the nearly 3 years the application was posted before they built theirs. It is reasonable to suppose they didn't believe it was real because they considered it mathematically impossible according to their last couple of papers. Further, they may not have realized that my patent was made into law on Nov, 6th 2018. The Nature Magazine article and video where the students and Barrett say they were "the first in history to fly any kind of ion propelled aircraft," was released on about Nov, 21rst or 22nd, 2018. Since then a great number of news and magazine articles have come out repeating the Nature story. Repeating a thing does not make it correct though! If you take just a moment to read the references I have provided on this subject you will see that there is no dispute or historical controversy. It is very disturbing that there are so many news sources that are now just plain wrong! I don't blame you for listening to Nature Magazine or MIT. etc. I know what I am talking about regarding this matter. Please forgive the long letter. Thanks for your time, Ethan Krauss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethan Krauss (talk • contribs) 00:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ethan Krauss, you sound like a very nice person and this must be very frustrating for you. I know little about the subject and will stay out of it. I am happy that others who know about this subject are communicating with you. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Question
I have come across an editor who does a LOT of little/itty-bitty edits - they'll do ten different edits on a single article and each edit is maybe 2 or 3 bytes. And it's driving me crazy - I'm not sure yet if they are some kind of hidden vandal so I have to go through and check Every. Single. Edit...
Is there some policy or guide line that says to avoid this? I seem to remember something along those lines but can't find the pertinent WP-page. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 04:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Shearonink. I do not think there is a policy. However, if it is really extreme, then it may be considered disruptive, which would make it actionable. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Shearonink (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Here's another page that could do with a table and illustrations for the four critters within......(see gallery at bottom)Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Cas Liber. I'll have a look. I'm a bit busy off-wiki, though. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- No hurry at all, I just rememberd the last bunch you did and came across one that needed one sometime Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Don't know where to ask
But realized probably a revdel of some old info might be needed at Talk:Johnson & Johnson. Look in the edit history... Thanks, Shearonink (talk)
- Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 23:25, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Did I get it all? :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Request for help with User:28wikiedits28
I noticed that you previously banned User:28wikiedits28 for disruptive editing, especially on biographies of politicians. This user seems to be continuing that behavior on Ernesto Lopez now that they are unblocked. They also vandalized my user page (here) for apparently no reason. They recently blanked their own talk page and removed the information about their previous ban. Could you please help? Thank you. Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:05, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Wallyfromdilbert. He is now blocked. Please do not forget to use edit summaries. It helps. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help and advice, Anna. For the edit summaries, are you talking about on the Ernesto Lopez article? I am pretty new and I did not use edit summaries often when I first created my account, but I have been trying to use them for all my edits recently, especially once I began using Twinkle. If you have any examples or any other advice where I can improve my editing, I greatly appreciate it, although I know you are busy as well. I try to read as many policies as I can, but I am not good with some of the more technical aspects especially. Thank you again. Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- You are most welcome, Wallyfromdilbert. Yes, I was referring to the Lopez edits, but I see you are now using edit summaries. That is good. If there is anything you ever need or have any questions, please ask. Thank you, and happy editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:43, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help and advice, Anna. For the edit summaries, are you talking about on the Ernesto Lopez article? I am pretty new and I did not use edit summaries often when I first created my account, but I have been trying to use them for all my edits recently, especially once I began using Twinkle. If you have any examples or any other advice where I can improve my editing, I greatly appreciate it, although I know you are busy as well. I try to read as many policies as I can, but I am not good with some of the more technical aspects especially. Thank you again. Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Upage
I LOVE your Userpage! Never realized the pictures were clickable until now, I am clicking every one. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Well, I came here today. Its awesome!-Nizil (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Well, I came here today. Its awesome!-Nizil (talk) 11:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
New food
Check it out. Any Chinese foods missing from the new list? North America1000 19:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- I cannot think of any that are not already covered. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Empennage?
Hi, as you have some experience of WP:COMMONNAME, would you mind taking a look at the article on the aircraft empennage or tail, and the discussion at Talk:Empennage#Suggested_move? A key issue seems to be whether or not a less-common technical term should be used for the title because the more common name needs disambiguating. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:43, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, Steelpillow. I know little about the subject. I'll leave it to others to decide. Sorry I cannot help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- I was hoping that you could cast some light on how we usually handle the balance between disambiguating a common name or using a less common name. I could then apply your knowledge to the specific technical issue in question. Or, is the balance always taken on a case by case basis? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 09:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
General discussion on talk pages
Hi. Please look at this link ([1]). In particular, why are the posts inside the dropdown boxes general discussion of the subject? Even though the IP posting those messages isn't the same as the one posting this message (however you pinged on their talk page linking to this talk page in particular a discussion on userboxes on your user page), the 2 edits were made by the same person. Thank you.211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm sorry, but I am not sure what you are talking about. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:27, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Why are the messages in the dropdown boxes general discussion about the topic?211.27.115.246 (talk) 08:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- You are the IP from before, right? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes.211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I cannot help with your matter. Please ask someone else. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes.211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- You are the IP from before, right? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Please support the Sustainability Initiative!
Hello Anna Frodesiak, I saw that you are one of the authors of Greta Thunberg article. Because I am looking for ways to reduce the environmental impact of Wikipedia itself, I wanted to ask you to check out the Sustainability Initiative and to add your name to the list of supporters so that I can show that many community members are behind this effort. Thanks! --Gnom (talk) 08:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Vrooommmmm!
Wheeeeee! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 03:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Vrroooooommmmm! A HD Fat Boy is better! North America1000 04:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Nice new one: Comic book advertisement. Gotta love that dribble glass! Ha! Whoopee! North America1000 04:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Gratitude
Thanks for the clarification... I will be careful next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainswift (talk • contribs) 12:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- You are most welcome, Brainswift. I am here to help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Tom King Infobox portrait discussion
Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- Happy to, Nightscream. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
I need help reverting vandalism.
I need your help in reverting vandalism. Please check out my contributions to see what I've previously done. Thank you and please ping me when you reply.211.27.115.246 (talk) 12:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) per WP:ECHO, IP contributors can't receive pings. ——SerialNumber54129 12:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Serial Number 54129, hello. I am just off to bed and very tired. Would you be a dear and see what this is about? Many, many thanks if you (or another stalker) can help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry! Sleep tight :) wilco. ——SerialNumber54129 13:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Serial Number 54129, hello. I am just off to bed and very tired. Would you be a dear and see what this is about? Many, many thanks if you (or another stalker) can help. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Admins
If you're champing at the bit to nominate someone, I have a few people in mind, as does Amory. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, Ritchie333. Well, I'z ain't a makin' no promises, but if you email me a couple, I'll have a gander. (Sorry about all the western talk. We've been a talkin' this way round the ol' homestead lately tryin' to drive each other crazy with it.) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- What, Drmies talks like that 24/7. It's the way in 'Bama. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- .... anyway mail sent, with thoughts. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Got it and chewin' on it. Thank ya kindly.
- So, Drmies is an Alabaman country doc, eh? Well I'll be derned. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- They actually have cities in Alabama. And Immigrants. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 19:28, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Well, the entire Wikipedia article says, and I quote: "Alabama is basically just rolling hills and a lot of banjo factories. There are no cities." Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- No rolling hills down here, unfortunately. They have em up north--and they are pretty. Go see Little River Canyon if you ever have the opportunity. Drmies (talk) 21:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm kidding of course. I drove through it years ago. It was lovely and the people were lovely too. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Some of the greatest songs ever were recorded in Alabama. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- True. Plus, a lot of these people were born there, including the wonderful activist Helen Keller. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:25, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- User:Ritchie333, you're pointing at Muscle Shoals, aren't you. I think one of those swampers died recently; it's their time, of course. I went to that studio (and got the t-shirt, haha); it's quite an amazing thing. There's a PBS documentary on them, which is also a story about a strange little place in Alabama where race mattered less than anywhere else in the state. And Anna, it's gorgeous up there, close to Tennessee. There's a spectacular dam on the Tennessee river right there, and it's near weird places like Coon Dog Cemetery and the Rattlesnake Saloon (the food is alright, and it's a total redneck place, but to sit under that ledge is cool). Drmies (talk) 02:57, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Some of the greatest songs ever were recorded in Alabama. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm kidding of course. I drove through it years ago. It was lovely and the people were lovely too. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- No rolling hills down here, unfortunately. They have em up north--and they are pretty. Go see Little River Canyon if you ever have the opportunity. Drmies (talk) 21:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Well, the entire Wikipedia article says, and I quote: "Alabama is basically just rolling hills and a lot of banjo factories. There are no cities." Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- They actually have cities in Alabama. And Immigrants. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 19:28, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- .... anyway mail sent, with thoughts. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- What, Drmies talks like that 24/7. It's the way in 'Bama. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Drmies, I'm sorry I made fun of Alabama. After looking at lots of pictures and learning more, I think I really like the place and people. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:45, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
userpage
Somehow don't think I've ever really taken in your userpage. That means I've either somehow not been to your user page or didn't stop to look at what it was all about. The first would be strange, but if the latter is true, then I don't know myself as well as I thought I did. Just leaving a note to let you know that it made me smile, and maybe even snicker a bit. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 23:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, Rhododendrites. I suppose I looked a bit daft going overboard with that userpage way back when. And now that you mention it, I think I'll add some pics to the backroom wall. I haven't done anything with that since 2012. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Yum!
I love strawberry cakes! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you! It looks delicious. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Mandatory use of Show Preview
Hi Anna,
Is there any way the use of Show Preview option can be made mandatory across Wikipedia as some editors keep making edit after edit rather that properly reviewing the article before posting it ?/
In my personal opinion, it is cheating to increase the number of edits made. Superfast1111 (talk) 05:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, Superfast1111. I do not think there is a way. And do not worry about how many edits people make. There are editors with only several thousand edits who produce fantastic stuff. (I just started an article and put it together with a couple of dozen edits. I could have done it with one, I suppose.) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input Anna. To be honest with you, in some of the video games I play which involve weapons, I prefer the single shot Sniper rifle to a scatter gun Assault rifle.
- Maybe that's why I prefer to use show preview to have a single near perfect edit.
Superfast1111 (talk) 06:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- A single, near-perfect edit would be pretty good. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thanks for blocking a user for indefinite duration because of his/her inappropriate username! 211.27.115.246 (talk) 12:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC) |
- Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Yum!
I love strawberry sauce! North America1000 13:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- That looks like someone murdered a dear, innocent sponge cake. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Venison's good eatin'. North America1000 22:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Six years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, Gerda. You are the most precious! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, just precious has no ranking. Some get it for their first DYK, some for gnomish work, and some write tons of featured articles. - I like "most precious" much better than "intentionally inflammatory" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Actually Gerda, according to Precious Magazine, there is a ranking. The March 2019 issue lists Vlad the Impaler as "least precious" and Nina Simone as "most precious". I know the editor there, and the April issue will feature Gerda Arendt on the cover. Congratulations in advance. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
How user warnings can be funny
The uw-vandalism1 template (or 2) referencing an article to do with construction. That's funny. This is how it might look to a Wikipedia user (no offence - this would never be addressed towards you):
Hello, I'm 211.27.115.246. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Construction have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.211.27.115.246 (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm sorry. I do not understand. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- The article construction and non-constructive edits.211.27.115.246 (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I still do not understand. What are you asking me? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not really asking anything, Just wanting to show you something funny. That result is funny because imagine working on a construction site and doing something that's not helpful. That something just so happens to not be constructive (as if to the structure the workmen are building!).194.223.33.237 (talk) 04:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- I still do not understand. What are you asking me? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- The article construction and non-constructive edits.211.27.115.246 (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Moustache
Thanks for joining the discussion. I have restored the content. I saw you introducing BARE URLs. you can use citation bot to autofill the refs. if in a hurry. steps here. User:DBigXray/ref--DBigXrayᗙ 12:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
- And thank you, DBigXray. Actually, per BRD, he can remove it. But it's back and nobody seems to mind, so that's good.
- I usually use reflinks, but didn't then because the article was busy and the url wasn't going 404 anytime soon. I knew someone would arrive and reflinks the page soon.
- Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Abhinandan moustache for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhinandan moustache is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhinandan moustache until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 21:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Busy bee
Hi: just thought of you when I discovered this : 'Extinct' bee found on the outskirts of Perth at https://m.phys.org/news/2019-03-extinct-bee-outskirts-perth.html. Cheers, BhagyaMani (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
And the original contribution to the Journal of Threatened Taxa at https://www.threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/view/4610. Cheers again, BhagyaMani (talk) 02:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Very interesting. The article exists under the genus title Hesperocolletes and I hope we get an image soon! Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
New article
juice. North America1000 20:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Very nice idea! Good job! I didn't know the stuff existed. Of course, there are cherry popsicles, but they don't contain actual cherry juice.
- Saaayyyyyy, you know we don't have a pic of an actual good ol' North American popsicle. Got a nickel and camera on that phone? :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- That was my juice of choice as a kid. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Cherry was pretty good, probably my favourite too. Also good: orange. Bad: blue. Maybe blue was only Freezies, I can't remember. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- That was my juice of choice as a kid. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Can you imagine, we used to suck on those freezies after all those kids were touching them in the freezer and the shop guy cut off the end for you with those never-washed, sticky scissors. Yucky! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Request for help and guidance
Please could you provide your input at Talk:Abhinandan_moustache under the section I created just now "Please clarify". Thank you. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 08:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Mention in Slough
Hello Anna Frodesiak, I hope you're well. It may be unwelcome news that I mentioned and summarized an earlier comment of yours here. Not sure if you would be able to offer a more positive view than I have, but I just realized that I should probably notify you of the mention as a courtesy. MPS1992 (talk) 19:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, MPS1992. Thanks for the notification. I will leave it to others to decide. Best wishes. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi Anna Frodesiak! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
- Well, if at first you don't succeed, try, try again, right? North America1000 21:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- In my case: at first I did not succeed, then for ages I did not succeed, and now I still do not succeed, cry, cry again. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Hi Anna, I'd love to help out on that page. However, I have two questions. First, I can't commit to constantly being available to maintain the page, but I'd be happy to contribute to it when I can... would that be alright? Second, and more importantly, how do we find images about such subjects? Just randomly search all over Commons?--SkyGazer 512 My talk page 03:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for starting such a page, by the way, it's a really cool idea!--SkyGazer 512 My talk page 03:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- SkyGazer 512, hello! First, yes, please feel free to work on it if and when and how much you can. Any little bit helps. Second, yes, Commons. One way is to look at List of XXXXX and see what is redlinked, then go to the commons parent category and see if we have images for that thing. An example is List of lighthouses in Prince Edward Island and compare to the Commons category linked at the bottom of that page. Another way is to look at a genus article and compare that to the commons category. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Awesome, thank you!--SkyGazer 512 My talk page 13:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- SkyGazer 512, hello! First, yes, please feel free to work on it if and when and how much you can. Any little bit helps. Second, yes, Commons. One way is to look at List of XXXXX and see what is redlinked, then go to the commons parent category and see if we have images for that thing. An example is List of lighthouses in Prince Edward Island and compare to the Commons category linked at the bottom of that page. Another way is to look at a genus article and compare that to the commons category. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for starting such a page, by the way, it's a really cool idea!--SkyGazer 512 My talk page 03:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Hi Anna, I'd love to help out on that page. However, I have two questions. First, I can't commit to constantly being available to maintain the page, but I'd be happy to contribute to it when I can... would that be alright? Second, and more importantly, how do we find images about such subjects? Just randomly search all over Commons?--SkyGazer 512 My talk page 03:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
New article
juice. North America1000 19:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Have a blast. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Your lead image is wrong. That is a lump of coal. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- How do we not have a single commons image of the juice? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- I looked, basically nothing at Commons. Flickr didn't provide anything usable that also corresponds with Commons' requirements. Bummer, dude. North America1000 23:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- You could take one for the team and buy a jar. :) Might be good for ya. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Just might. North America1000 23:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- After you do, you'll be bounding around like a spring gazelle. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Just might. North America1000 23:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- You could take one for the team and buy a jar. :) Might be good for ya. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- I looked, basically nothing at Commons. Flickr didn't provide anything usable that also corresponds with Commons' requirements. Bummer, dude. North America1000 23:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Well, per an addition to the article by another user, "the Klingon character Worf is introduced to prune juice by Guinan. He declares that it is a "warrior's drink" and he then drinks it in subsequent episodes". North America1000 23:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Aaaarrrgh! Add something to the article, if you dare! North America1000 23:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Well, per an addition to the article by another user, "the Klingon character Worf is introduced to prune juice by Guinan. He declares that it is a "warrior's drink" and he then drinks it in subsequent episodes". North America1000 23:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Northamerica1000: I take it you’re looking for a photo? Because a search turns up quite a few old ads, that aren’t in c:Category:Plum-based beverages. (I only looked at the first couple pages of search results, but didn’t see any others with a picture.)—Odysseus1479 02:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
tacky
You re revert a section you added and then tell ME to do BRD ? I usually applaud your work, but think you're wrong to re revert your own work without discussion and then say I am the one in the wrong. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, my friend. I added a section. It stood for many edits. That means it is part of the last stable version. You came along and removed it. I restored it, per BRD. The onus on on you now to make a case and get consensus for its removal. That is how things work here. My best wishes. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- NewsAndEventsGuy, I see you mentioned at article talk that it was less that 24 hrs. But it was more than 60 edits. Maybe I was wrong, maybe not. If you can guide me in defining "last stable version", please do?
- Please, let's work this out. Please think up a way to have one table and all countries listed somehow. That would fix the problem. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sure we'll figure it out. At article talk you have left some comments I have not yet seen. This will be my last post here unless you ask me something specific. We can do the rest at article talk. I'll just say, in reply to your comment "one table and all countries listed", at article talk if you haven't already done so, maybe you can explain why the existing table is incapable of doing that? Because it sure looks like it does it to me. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- Please, let's work this out. Please think up a way to have one table and all countries listed somehow. That would fix the problem. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sanya University logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sanya University logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- For the record: newcomer added new logo with no permission. reverted. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sanya University logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sanya University logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Орден для вас!
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
Thank you for your diplomatic approach to the situation, for trust and understanding. Thank you! Happy editing! --Norvikk (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2019 (UTC) |
- I thank you! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ɱ (talk) 15:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah! Indef block for three edits made in January ! :p :) ——SerialNumber54129 15:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Jeez Louise. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- How does one objectively assess if an image is "objectively terrible"? MPS1992 (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Jeez Louise. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ahhhh, MPS1992, that is a very good question. I guess that is a bit of a figure of speech, actually. I think I was thinking that it would be broadly considered by almost everyone on Earth as terrible.
- An example: I think it fair to say that a lead picture of, say, a fruitcake should be a picture of a fruitcake. If it were, say, an iced cake showing absolutely zero fruitcake, that would be, as the old saying goes, an "objectively terrible" image choice. But I do see your point, my friend. And, the link: [9]. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- You can freeze the unused portion of that fruitcake and then put it back out next Christmas...North America1000 11:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- The tradition is that you freeze it for a few months, then come to your senses, and throw it out. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Fruitcake is promoted and celebrated as a healthy meal on its own! by the lobby group Insulin Manufacturers' Association. 11:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- If you get the prune juice, you can thaw out last year's fruitcake to go with it! North America1000 12:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yuk! Talk:Fish as food#More fish made me hungry and this thread cured me. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Fish is brain food (NYT). North America1000 03:36, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- So sorry, NYT is blocked here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Fish is brain food (NYT). North America1000 03:36, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yuk! Talk:Fish as food#More fish made me hungry and this thread cured me. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- If you get the prune juice, you can thaw out last year's fruitcake to go with it! North America1000 12:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- You can freeze the unused portion of that fruitcake and then put it back out next Christmas...North America1000 11:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Did you read that article called "Brain is Fish Food"? You won't be eating scrambled eggs for a while. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:40, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Norvikk
Hi Anna, just a heads up that I reblocked Norvikk for socking with NavalDirk (talk · contribs · count), as well as very heavy block evasion with IPs going back many months.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Bbb23. Dear, oh dear. I'm very disappointed. Okay, thanks for letting me know. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
An article you created or have contributed to has been nominated for deletion
| |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Nice one! You got me good. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- I got a day off of School today, Beginning to question if it's legit. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 22:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Regarding
"you got me good"
, did I really, or are you just foolin' me? North America1000 00:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)- Really, you got me good, and I should know. I'm great at April Fools jokes. My favourite is deep knee bends till you're out of breath, then phone a friend and say Washington got nuked and quick turn on the TV. The out of breathness really sells it and it works 90% of the time. Another good one is patting your chest with two hands really fast so when you talk, it sounds like you are in a helicopter. Then you call a friend and tell them you got a helicopter tour and are above their house and tell them to look out the window into the sky. They always do. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Regarding
- I got a day off of School today, Beginning to question if it's legit. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 22:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Requesting your opinion
Hi. A conflict has arisen on the Adam Hughes article. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion? It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 21:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Nightscream. I'm not sure I'll be so useful on this one. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks anyway! :) Nightscream (talk) 22:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- No problem, Nightscream. But do ask next time there is a photo to pick. I like those. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks anyway! :) Nightscream (talk) 22:16, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- LOL. Okay. I'll be sure to do so. Nightscream (talk) 23:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
April 2019
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
You have been blocked for a period of '6691 years the reason provided is I don't know Furthermore your talk page access has been removed. If you want to appeal this block you may do so through WP:UTRS. --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 22:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Ta'Kaiya Blaney for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ta'Kaiya Blaney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ta'Kaiya Blaney until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- For the record: I have no memory of starting that stub, and am not sure why I did. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Great job at Tax returns of Donald Trump. DannyS712 (talk) 06:39, 5 April 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you! And thank you for fixing up my muddled edits. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:40, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States
On 7 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fees and penalties charged as part of criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States may lead to the justice system becoming both a result and a cause of poverty? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, Cas Liber. That's great news! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:21, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
before and after
Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 22:34, 20 April 2019 (UTC)