User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Cory-Wright, Silston

Hi - you've deleted my entry on Cory-Wright, Silston - would you mind sending me a copy of the content, as I've made substantial changes and work on this, but didn't retain a copy. I'll review the material and resubmit, without breaching copyright this time. Thanks

Richcw

Trina Maeser

Hi - I am trying to post an article that is fully referenced and is completely public domain. I have spent many hours in effort to make this article completely plagiarism free. Could you please undelete my article and if you have any specific errors that you find, could you let me know. Thank you. Trina Maeser 09:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I was actually trying to use the 'Loan Modification' title. The reason that a lot of information is the same is because they are government guidelines and policies. What are your thoughts on uploading this particular type of information? Should I still put them into my own words? Trina Maeser 09:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for all of your help. I will work on those sections. One more thing? Is there any way I could change the header page to 'Loan Modification'. That was my original intention, but I didn't know how to correctly input it for the first time. Thanks again! Trina Maeser 09:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

That's great! Thank you for the quick response! Trina Maeser 09:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering when you get a chance, if you could review the article again? I just wanted to make sure that everything on the page was compliant so far. Thank you for the input! Trina Maeser 21:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! Trina Maeser 23:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Were you able to go over the rest of my page? Thank you for your time! Trina Maeser 15:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Wow! Thank you! You definitely made me feel great! I really appreciate all of your help! This was a fun first experience in researching and developing an article. I will definitely be interested in doing another. Thanks again. munch.. But really I think you deserve the cookie! cookie What a neat idea! :)

Trina Maeser 20:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Dan Hubbert

Hi - I am trying to post this article and I was not finished. I think I created links incorrectly as I was linking to other wiki pages. Can you please undelete while I work on it? Starcatcana (talk) 19:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Would you please do me a favor and look at the page again? I want to know if you see any reason to delete it again. I want to be sure I am in compliance! Also, is there a way I can upload the image? I do not know if I will ever qualify as an uploader, and would like to submit a picture for this article. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starcatcana (talk • contribs) 22:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Sunny Ghosh

Hi.. you deleted the page I create right away.. I was in the process of adding references to the article.. Could you undelete the page? YoungManBlues (talk) 07:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC) YoungManBlues

Thanks and if you do drop by let me know if theres anything wrong :? YoungManBlues (talk) 07:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Why

Why do you keep deleting the yu-gi oh abridged page I am making? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rane246 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Nice to see you again

Glad to have you back! I hope you don't get driven away again. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to ask. Cheers, and have a good evening! (or morning, afternoon... I have no idea what time it is for you) J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Tthanks for that revert! (Can't a guy commune with nature in peace? :P )

Anyways, I saw that sockpuppet report on AIV, and when it was gone, I looked to see who had block him/them, went to Luna's talk page and saw your post. Again, it's nice to have you back! Cheers! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 07:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Nuts.

Re your message: I noticed that you had returned. I was about to leave you a note when I got distracted and needed an ice cream break. Try not to let the vandals bug you. They're not worth the aggravation. That's great about fixing the plane. Perfect way to start a weekend with a test flight! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

D'oh! Well, just means you get to go out again for another flight. Glad to hear that the repairs look good. You know how they say the weld is stronger than the original metal, I guess the same thing is true with the epoxy. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Looks like another admin picked up the report and blocked the guy. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello, PMDrive1061. You have new messages at Nancy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You spurred me in to action

I just did what I probably should have done weeks ago and sent the whole of my stalker's sockfarm to checkuser for an IP check. Not sure what will come of it as fear that will require an unfeasibly huge range-block but if I don't ask I'll never know. So, thank you for finally making me realise quite how unacceptable the whole situation is. Cheers, Nancy ^talk 20:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Protected

Semi-protected your user and user talk. Also blocked the IP for a week for what it's worth (not a lot I fear). Nancy ^talk 07:41, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Not wanting to tempt fate.....

....but I'm going to, obviously. Since you and J declared your support on my talk page I have not had a visit from my little friends, that's five or six days now and considering they were on there every night for the past month I'd consider that a result. So THANK YOU a million times THANK YOU ....now stand by for an onslaught in the next 24 hours...... Still no movement on my request for an IPCheck but things seem to move at a snails pace over there (and to be honest the checkusers have a heap of far more encyclopaedia-threatening cases to deal with which rightly take precidence over my stalker problem. Cheers, Nancy ^talk 19:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please use edit summaries, particularly when requesting speedy deletion of articles. Thanks. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 08:23, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Wild Bill Shrewsberry

On 26 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wild Bill Shrewsberry, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ahhh, someone besides myself is working on a drag racing article! Royalbroil 05:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Cool! Too bad it ran overnight. I posted it at around midnight Central and it was gone by the next morning. If you do start a new drag racer article, buzz me. I have lots of free-use pictures of major drag racers. One of my flickr friends took lots of great pics from the 1960s to present. Royalbroil 12:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

RE:Genius

I declined his latest block based on that evidence; thanks. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 16:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Assumnig good faith, biting the newbies, and User talk:Goatsejames

Hello: I saw your comment on Goatsejames's user talk page and I wanted to drop you a line. You wrote on his talk page that "It's obvious by your username you have no intention of contributing in a constructive manner and have been reported as such." While it's quite clear that's an unacceptable username, I still think it's worthwhile to assume good faith and not bite the newbies in dealing with a situation like that. I checked the user's contribution history and they haven't made any edits yet, so it's hard to say whether s/he intends to be a vandal or not. It's always possible that it's a genuine new user with extremely bad taste in usernames. If it's even possible there's good faith and a mistake, rather than nefarious intent, it's always best to be nice, say something like "You may not be aware of this, but wikipedia doesn't allow just any username, and a username refering to goatse violates our policy against obscene usernames. You should feel free to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but I recommend you register a different account to do it under. Your username has been reported as obscene and will probably be blocked." That way, if it's a vandal, they're still locked out of the account, but if it's a kid with a bad sense of humor, but that would make good edits, he'll come back with an acceptable name, rather than walk away thinking that "those wikipedians are just a bunch of dicks." The bottom line is that it costs nothing to both report the username and also assume goof faith, so why not do so? ⇔ ∫Æ_S dt @ 00:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Sarah Geronimo

OK, so I've read about your comments about the article being a target by fans. Hmm, I guess they were driven by their ill obsession with Sarah (or with other artists) to sprinkle the article with POV and write it in an inappropriate and unnecessary tone. It's like those fanboys who routinely mess up the High School Musical article or Avril Lavigne, thinking that they can add anything and everything to it. I think these Sarah fanboys may should seek help for their obsession. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:On the money, bro.

I would like to have these fanboys slapped for good... Blake Gripling (talk) 01:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I admit, I am a Strawberry Shortcake fanboy, but I edit in a responsible manner and note that any fannish edits to the articles that I edit will be reverted. But these Sarah fanboys need to seek some help regarding their obsession. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding MascotGuy, yep, seen 'em. I'm an Eloise fan, and it seems as though this guy's been into messing things up in there. It is assumed that he has autism, and his mother limits his online time. There are two things that I think that can keep him from bothering us: have his mum block access to Wikipedia, or something like that. I feel sorry for the guy, but I guess he needs to cool down and stuff. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Catching that one vandal

Good work! But try to do it with as little ceremony as possible. Post on AIV with a terse note, tag his userpage, redirect his talk page to his userpage, and forget about it. WP:DFTT really does work. BTW, you really weren't kidding that he is stupid. Unfortunately, his ISP is too big for a rangeblock :( J.delanoy^gabs_adds 06:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Lyle123

Re your message: It certainly looks like him. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: We wouldn't want that now! Plastic is not good for you. Unless you want to buy an iPhone? Anyways, nothing to worry about now. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

• • Adding here with my best wishes (after you reversion of the comment on my talk page).

Hi PMDrive - my suggestion is in cases such as this (so that we are all following the AIV reporting rules) is that you either leave myself a note (or someone else) that you have another sock and I will monitor it out of the AIV spectrum to block immediately upon the first vandal edit. The fact is (whilst I am not at all naive) an editor who is legitimate might create a name that fits within Lyle's MO but isn't Lyle and s/he would be blocked illegitimately. The problem with your current reports (and I have noted your great work at AIV and believe I have blocked on your request before) is that you are giving us so very little information and technically are asking us to break the rules. That said, (as my administrator history will show) I will jump to the cause every time there is a vandal that needs to be blocked.--VS ^talk 08:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

• And here the second one - the other one is at my bar. Cheers again File:Icon beer.gif--VS ^talk 08:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Re your messages: I had gotten the one from today already. I picked up the one from yesterday. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Lol

Yep Yep. I want him to win. But I cant vote yet... 5 more years (gasp). Lol, cheers! II MusLiM HyBRiD II ^{MCCAIN FOR PRESIDENT!} 00:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Fun

Thanks, hehe. Yes... It can be very frustrating that kids do this kind of thing.. and you know what, I'm going to give you a secret:

I am a reformed vandal. A very, very, very, very long time ago, when this account was created, I went to high-school. My attempt at vandalism was uploading a modified picture: Basically, a, One cannot simply rock into Mordor meme. I uploaded the image, but then I couldn't figure out how to put it on the page, as I was not use to the code. Since I could not understand the markup, I quickly gave up.

A about a year later, I returned, and started constructively editing. I don't like to admit this, because it was ... well, I just don't like to .. I feel the need to prove myself, and that proof exists that I was an attempted vandal at some point is like a strike on my record as a constructive editor. After the Vanboto incident, I improved, at least in terms of civility. I don't think I'll ever be able to write an article, I don't feel up to the task. I'll just stay with reverting vandalism for now.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 06:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 07:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Akeldama (The Faceless album)

Hi
Just a friendly pointer: This edit was not vandalism to be reverted, any editor is allowed to remove PROD tags. Nonetheless, the album should of course be deleted, speedily even per WP:CSD#A9 (WP:Articles for deletion/The Faceless).
Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 18:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

problem with ANI thread you started

You need to leave the IP or username of the problematic accounts, so admins can look at the problems. The way it is right now, no admin will help you unless you leave more specific details. --Enric Naval (talk) 00:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

MG

FYI. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: It wasn't a public IP. It was another DSL IP. I don't think anybody is copying MG. I suspect that it is the same person and he just unfortunately has a neurological disorder. There is not much one can do except to WP:RBI and request another CU should new accounts show up. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

(undent) MG reminds me of Bambifan101 (yet again being discussed on AN [1] as you might have noticed) in the way both may have some neurological disorder, both target very specific articles and neither seem to be able to recognise the general damage they cause. That alone isn't unique, these issues have occurred before and most times IPs get locked down and RBI can be fully enforced but both BF101 and MG are different in that you cannot enforce it because they jump around so much and their IP pool(s) is/are so large that it's simply not possible to end it without creating an issue for other people. BF101 is a lot more prevalent because he targets a larger set of articles and also edits on Simple English wiki amongst others but as mentioned in that thread, neither are any more different than anyone else listed on WP:LTA. The thing is though that both happen to be fairly similar enough and rangeblocks have been put up for 3 different /19 ranges which BF101 have used and I can't see how the same thing can't happen in this case because they both have the same MO and both need to be stopped. treelo _radda 12:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: I added the account to the CU section. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Assist

Thanks for the assist. LOL ... what is more amazing, that they think we will fall for it, or that they think they can hop IPs or make ridiculous unblock excuses? Amusing ... Antandrus (talk) 06:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

uh

civility? Toddst1 (talk) 23:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made him happy and he'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again! Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 00:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:munch}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Kinda improvised that... anyway, sorry if my comment hurt; I just wanted to make that clear. Glad we're all good now! Anyway, I'm off to make a {{munch}} template. Cheers! Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 00:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, if I could learn parser functions I'd have more success, but thanks! :) Keep up the good work, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 00:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Hollaback girls

I'm pretty sure the thread title makes the subject pretty obvious. I hope this doesn't turn towards the abyss.— Dædαlus ^Contribs /_Improve 07:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Check yer Userpage

I added something. :) X MarX the Spot (talk) 07:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

The Nice Hollaback Girl

I just so happened to do a brief scanning of AN/I just now and I saw your thread about the user above. I see that Xmarks the Spot already gave you a barnstar, but I think I'll give you one too...

Anyway, I really appreciate what you did, there need to be more editors on this site like you. If you ever need help from me or an Rfa nom for ya', just drop me a line and I'll take care of it. Thanks for your work here. Jock Boy (t/c) Sign 04:21, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

You are very welcome. Jock Boy (t/c) Sign 04:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Looks like The Hollaback Girl's on a new leaf now... Maybe giving her a hand or at least giving her some tips on editing may do... Blake Gripling (talk) 04:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

nearly...

• ...that the Pacific Electric Railroad Bridge in Torrance, California is used as a symbol on the patch of the local police department? ... and add 500 characters or so Victuallers (talk) 17:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:AN#Indefinitely semi-protected user talk pages

Hi
Just FYI, I mentioned you user talk page at WP:AN#Indefinitely semi-protected user talk pages since it's one of a great number of indef semi protected user talk pages. I'm explicitly not complaining or reporting, yours just happened to be one that I used as an example, since it's in principle against WP:SEMI.
Cheers, Amalthea^Talk 22:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello there from your wiki friend

i am now officially an established user and can now edit your page and i just wanted to say thanks for believing me and stopping me from getting blocked. ♣HollabackGirl!☃ —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Nice Hollaback Girl (talk • contribs) 10:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Ack I screwed up

and blocked you instead of the person you reported. I am sooo sorry. :(

Mea culpa, I don't know how I can possibly make this up to you. I have never made such an error before, I cannot begin to express my consternation that I did this. KillerChihuahua^?!? 00:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

• Oh, I dunno...could I get an unblock, here? At least I know what the block template looks like! Too funny, and please don't worry about it. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his or her block be reviewed:

• PMDrive1061/Archive_1 (block log • ipblocklist • rangeblocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • creation log • unblock)
• Reason for unblocking:

I've been framed, I tell you. Framed! Just kidding; looks like I was clobbered by mistake. No hard feelings. It's funny, actually.

Note:

• In some cases, a user may not in fact be blocked, or their block may be expired. Please check your block log. If no blocks are listed, or the latest one has already expired, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
  

---

Administrator use only: If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following as notification.

{{unblock reviewed|1=I've been framed, I tell you. Framed! Just kidding; looks like I was clobbered by mistake. No hard feelings. It's funny, actually.|decline=reason — ~~~~}}

If you accept the request (note that you can NOT unblock your own account), replace the unblock template with {{tlx|unblock|reason}}, and post the following directly underneath the unblock template:

{{subst:Request accepted|1=reason}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PMDrive1061 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've been framed, I tell you. Framed! Just kidding; looks like I was clobbered by mistake. No hard feelings. It's funny, actually.

Decline reason:

Sorry but I'm not totally convinced Killer Chihuahua is barking up the wrong tree ;) - that said I know how she feels (I did the same recently - oh the mortification of attacking our best Vandal Slayers :( )— --VS ^talk 00:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

KillerChihuahua^?!? has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

You are too nice! I am glad you found my incompetence humorous rather than mortifying or aggravating. KillerChihuahua^?!? 00:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

AGF

Not sure your history with this user or any accounts he/she has had, but this strikes me as inappropriate. Feel free to slap me with a trout if I'm grabbing the wrong end of the stick.Ironholds (talk) 03:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough; I was assuming there was something like that. I take it you've applied to have his arse (or this account's arse) blocked? I'm monitoring newusers, so give me the info on the reasoning I should give and I'll keep an eye out for socks to apply for blocks on. Ironholds (talk) 03:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

That's alright. I'll get right on it. Ironholds (talk) 03:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I'll keep looking. I'm going to submit it as a standard report since a sock report would take too long to process and inform him that the game is up. Ironholds (talk) 03:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion, actually; see if you can find an online checkuser, get them to check the accounts and you can cut him off for at least a few more days. Ironholds (talk) 03:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Forget about it, everyone looses their cool sometimes. After looking at the LTA report I can understand why. Want me to look for a checkuser? Ironholds (talk) 03:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't think rollback would work, since yours were the first page edits. Checkusers are selected to give an equal spread to every timezone; I'll look around now. Ironholds (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I've left a message on Jayjg's talkpage; I'll poke you when the response comes through. If all else fails I can phone Jdforrester, but despite him saying a lot of people do it I cant see him looking kindly upon a checkuser request at 3:30 in the morning. Ironholds (talk) 03:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I think you mean get him on the defensive.:P Jayjg has replied; I'm just getting him up to speed on the situation. I'll update the LTA page when this is all over to add in the new accouts and also expand the "usernames" section for easier recognition in future.Ironholds (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Just got the all clear from Jayjg; IP matched and blocked :). Ironholds (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

new acct

A user you placed a DB tag on with a message of "not bothering to feed the tolls" just created a new account, User:Lovefooler. I have no clue what history you have with them just figured you may want to know about the new acct. On closer inspection it looks like they are seeding a sockfarm: [2] Cheers, --Terrillja _talk 03:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:All-Star 5000

I was confused by your edits to User talk:All-Star 5000. The user has no edits yet and no deleted contributions, so it was unclear what they had done that could be considered negative. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

• Never mind, somebody else has pointed me to an explanation of the problem. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Pacific Electric Railroad Bridge

On 20 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pacific Electric Railroad Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Krazy Komodo

It's possible that a RFCU might be a good idea I was looking at Special:IPBlockList and I noticed that "Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Krazy Komodo"." was at the top which means they are trying to edit. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

If you've done before it's probably best if you do it again. I've never done one due to usually noticing only the most obvious of things and the headache I got from reading the instructions. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

OMG thank you soo much

thanks so much for the barnstar my fist one ever, what an honour thanks :)The Nice Hollaback Girl (talk) 06:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

ZA WARUDO

I'm confused about your courtesy blanking and speedy deletion request on ZA WARUDO. Seems like a perfectly logical redirect to me. Something I'm not seeing here?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:AfC articles

For articles like this one, you can just go ahead and decline it as a joke or vandalism. It needs not be speedied. Cheers, ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 01:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

... for reverting SA's comment on my user talk page. It didn't exactly give one a nice homey feeling.(olive (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC))

The Bread for Bread editor

Hi. Thanks for pointing out the meaning of the username - its not slang I was familiar with. It's a little borderline but feel free to post it at WP:UAA - I'll leave the outcome to someone else with more knowledge of the term. You'll need to point out the account has deleted contributions as with the deletion of Bread for bread it appears they haven't edited.

Re sockpuppetry, the two accounts would have to be used abusively per WP:SOCK. There was no evidence of this in the article editing. Possibly the two comments on the talk page could be an attempt to show more support for the page than actually existed, but as the article was deleted anyway this had no particular impact.

Lastly, Bread for bread was deleted as advertising and possibly also lacking notability, but there was nothing to suggest its creation wasn't in good faith. The other editor's username suggests a conflict of interest but as with the sockpuppet claim that's probably something to look more closely at if the article is recreated or they edit further. Euryalus (talk) 03:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Heh, I agree new page patrol is addictive but a pretty thankless task. Still someone has to do it, and thank you for your continued anti-vandal patrols today also.

I'm just reading up on MascotGuy - so I know what to look for, what indicates "Wedding Bells Blues Guy" is his sock given no edits yet? Euryalus (talk) 03:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

OK, I see it. Blocked by User:J.delanoy. Thanks for the cookie, by the way. Euryalus (talk) 03:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

The LTA/MG talk page shows you've been dealing with bizarre issue for months if not years. Wikipedia is a strange place :) Euryalus (talk) 03:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Our Friend Pee Wee

No worries, I'm watching the user creation logs. If you get the chance...could you file a report at WP:RCU/IP on him? If they root out his IP, we won't have to worry about his little sock extravaganza for awhile ;).¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey PMDrive, I filed the request here instead. The IP section of RCU is precisely for these kinds of requests.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 01:16, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Cookie

NawlinWiki (talk) has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

 Thanks!  NawlinWiki (talk) 12:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

G1 on Get hitched

Heya, is there something I'm missing here? While the guy's username was pretty attention-grabbing, "Get hitched" is a fairly common phrase for getting married and it seems like a logical-enough redirect to me. Just wondering if there was more to this, as it seemed an odd use of "patent nonsense". Thanks ~ mazca ^t|c 01:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah the redirect is actually quite sane. The only red flag was his username :/...I just can't trust a guy who says he's going to run around and create redirects while "drunk." Even WP:U states that usernames that imply disruption to Wikipedia are to be blocked. Even his question seemed fine. He just got started on the wrong foot with that username.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 01:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

My assumption (which is possibly stretching WP:AGF a little far) is that the username meant that he usually edits as an IP, but created an account so he could create some redirects while drunk, though not necessarily with any malice intended. Agreed that it's an inappropriate username, but I don't think he's meant any harm. All good fun... :) ~ mazca ^t|c 01:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

What am I missing?

attack? Just as well. I found no indication of RS supporting notability. Cheers,

Better safe than sorry. After I deleted the thing, I found nothing on Google to suggest notability. You'd think such a prolific porn star would have RS. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 01:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind a little unsolicited advice...

but I don't think you are taking the right approach with the Bambifan socks. This person has piles of block-evasion sock accounts and has never been anything but a disruptive editor as far as I can tell. If I had been this person, your note on my talk page would probably have just encouraged me to keep up the "cat and mouse" games, like your current conversation on the latest socks talk page is likely to do. My feeling is that taunting vandals, telling them to "give it up" and so forth, is not a good idea as it just riles them up and keeps them coming back. In the case of a long-term persistent vandal and sockpupeteer like Bambifan, it is probably more constructive to not talk to them at all, and just undo their vandal edits and disruptive talk page comments, get them blocked, and move on. More information on this philosophy is here. Thanks for your time. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

• I'm sorry to report that it doesn't seem to have worked. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

A note

Hey. Just some advice; don't do this. You're abusing your rollback rights; there's no conclusive evidence that this user is related to the banned one. Try not to do that again. Thanks, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 06:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

That's ok. I admire someone who can go on a hunch. The problem is that going on a hunch can have repercussions here, especially if you effectively silence a user who may be innocent. Again, you may be right and this may be a sock of a notorious sockmaster, but until there is substantial proof for this the user shouldn't be treated as guilty. Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia safer, though; what you do is appreciated. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 06:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. You too. :) Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 06:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I may unblock him for a trial run. If you'd like to comment, User talk:Fangthebigblackdawg is open. Thanks, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 06:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

PMD, my very best wishes for the festive season stay safe and talk to you in 2009.--VS ^talk 11:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to you, my friend... God Bless and have a nice day... Blake Gripling (talk) 23:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Re:Thanks

Gee, thanks, dude... Blake Gripling (talk) 23:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

And who's that overly promotional guy anyway? Blake Gripling (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

"Days like this make me want to kick myself for giving back the admin tools"

If you left in non-controversial circumstances, you can request them back from any willing bureaucrat. I don't know the circumstances though, so I don't know if this applies to you. Thanks, — neuro^(talk) 04:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm happy to see that you got them back. :) — neuro^(talk) 21:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Galib is wishing you a Happy New Year. This card promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day much better. Best Wishes and Happy Editing!

Best To Reply At My Talk Page. Thanks.

Just Stopping by. Yours Truly, M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 15:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC) .

MG is not autistic

Given how he's now gone off to bug the guys at WhatTheFont, the various stories from people who aren't him don't seem to tie together well. I doubt it highly that anyone has made contact with anyone who can control him and I also doubt the autism which apparently two teachers and his mother says he has. The autism thing now seems like a front, the more I read the less I reckon there's any condition beyond that of being a sociopath. The kid is an out and out vandal but thanks to a mental condition nobody can confirm nor deny he's free from any hard action being taken against him and therein lies the twisted genius which allows a smart kid to play with us like fools by assuming the roles of parents and teachers to create reason for near-random actions. Of course, I just might be wrong but no autistic kid pretends to be two teachers to get one over on people trying to stop him. treelo _radda 18:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Cars Wig Wags

Better, but it's lacking... something... that would tie it into the film. It's still reading like WP:OR in that you saw something in the film and are equating it yourself to a northern california wig wag. The ref doesn't mention that there is only one place that has a double wig wag, nor does it refer to CARS. I know what you're trying to do, but other than point out where it's going wrong, I don't know if I can offer good advice. It would be like mentioning the WALL-E trash buildings were done in the design of 123 Main St in Anytown based on a photo essay of buildings designed by John Doe that, while he may have designed 123 Main St, doesn't have a photo of that specific building there. Bad example, perhaps, but I hope it made sense. SpikeJones (talk) 05:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your enthusiasm, I do. You may still have an issue with "with a signal arrangement similar to the one in the movie" as there is no attached reference that states that the filmmakers were inspired by it. Similar, according to whom? You? If so, then that's WP:OR. Need to have that independent 3rd-party reference somewhere. It's a tough call, as I trust what you're saying is correct, but WP policy is to not include casual observations. SpikeJones (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries, you just have to be careful about adding sentences that things "look like", "are reminiscent of", or "similar to" that don't have references that support this claim from the filmmakers (or whomever). Where YOU might think a vehicle is reminiscent of "Rat Fink", others may say that it's reminiscent of "Speed Buggy". Either case, we're looking at WP:OR opinion if it's not supported by a factual reference. An example would be Wall-E, where tons of fanboys were claiming that the character design was "reminiscent of Short Circuit" to the point where even when Stanton publically said it wasn't in response to those claims, they're still insisting it's true. This would be a clear case of opinion vs stated/citable fact. SpikeJones (talk) 18:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations

I'm happy to see this. Congrats, and welcome back! Antandrus (talk) 04:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

It's easy to get sucked back in isn't it? Glad to hear you've got the bit again & welcome back in to the fold. Kindest regards, Nancy ^talk 08:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

'bout time you took your bit back ;-) Just so you know, +rollback and +sysop are redundant, so you may want to remove the former. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Just noticed this while looking at the user rights log. Welcome back. --barneca (talk) 19:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Congrats. Enigma^msg 19:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd have to pass the RfA first. ;) Enigma^msg 21:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

• From me too PMDrive1061 - excellent.--VS ^talk 23:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Indef block

Hey, try not to indef block a minute after I give a final warning, cool? :-) Tan | 39 15:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Indef on Teletubbyfan66

Hi PMDrive1061. I am currently being tutored for adminship, and I have a couple of questions for you regarding this indef, which I hope you won't mind answering. If you do, fair enough, I don't mind :)

1: The account was created at 16:33UTC, 4 minutes later you had it indef blocked. Could you please tell me how you gathered evidence to make the judgment to block so fast?

2: I patrol the User Creation Log a fair bit, and I do see accounts of this type turn up, <something>fan<number>. What makes these ones so noticable as being socks of Bambifan101, when other users sometimes create legit accounts as genuine fans of something?

3: Could you please tell me, or give me some indication as to what to look for if it is a sock of Bambifan101, so I can pass on concerns from the User creation log if I spot names like this.

4: To confirm a sockpuppet, surely you would need a checkuser to confirm this. Are you a checkuser or did you make this judgement based on other evidence?

Sorry to take up so much space, and thanks for reading. If you don't want to answer, or you think I need to mind my own beeswax, you are welcome to trout me on my talk page! Otherwise, cheers! Regards, Thor Malmjursson (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art

First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject).

I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.

If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!

If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art#Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.

Thank you and I hope to see you there! howcheng {chat} 00:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

...

what was up with the page?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weezyf23 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

snooker one.. about a amature that will end up being a pro..

yeah, up to you. It's basically bits from the article about him

actualy, just delete it and i'll start over :)

You deleted my page

Can you tell me what I need to do to keep the Falling Blind page up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by One800jon (talk • contribs) 06:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Why can't we add company pages?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theboogster (talk • contribs) 00:30, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

It's because you need to be well-known before you are qualified for inclusion in an encyclopedia article. It doesn't make any much sense if you make an article about an insignificant or obscure person known only to his peers or relatives. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Talkpage edits

Hey, what was with the edit to my talkpage? The message was a (valid) comment on an article I'd prodded; just because said article has been deleted does not mean the message needs to be removed. Ironholds (talk) 06:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Well it wasn't really trolling, the user probably created the article in good faith and was understandably annoyed at having his work tagged for deletion. Asking nicely with good intentions and an attempt at reasoning (although without the involvement of WP policy) makes him the antitroll, really. Ironholds (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm also rather worried about the block. An indef block for creating a WP:MADEUP article and asking why it was deleted? Is there some further history here I'm not getting? Ironholds (talk) 07:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

How do you know it is 'feinged indignation'? It seems like you're assuming bad faith here. A single insult isn't reason for an indef block. The indignation might be 'feigned', and the 'I'm a fag' comment swings it that way, but alternately it could be someone understandably pissed at having their article deleted and trying to resolve it logically. Personally I feel you should have let it be to gauge their attitude with a wider sample of contributions available to you, but you are the man with the hammer, so I'll let it be. Ironholds (talk) 07:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :). I'm unused to things I say on WP actually making an impact :P. Ironholds (talk) 07:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure you will; I trust all users to act responsibly with any errors they make until they prove me wrong. Everyone starts with a default level of respect and trust, I don't require people to 'earn' it. The exception, of course, is the user who replied to me pointing out his misused tagging by saying that it was alright 'because people who come to correct the tag normally fix what is wrong with the page'. Hooboy. Ironholds (talk) 07:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem. And you're right, the site does need more users like me; one more. Then I can retire :P. Ironholds (talk) 07:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Unblock request of Boswashdevelopment

Hello PMDrive1061. Boswashdevelopment (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, — Aitias // discussion 18:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment: The user seems to request unblock in good faith and he says that he wishes to contribute constructively. — Aitias // discussion 18:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked user

Hi... In case the matter interests you, this concerns a block you issued. --Rrburke^(talk) 18:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

George A. Brooks is baaaack

You deleted George A. Brooks for blatent copyright violation, and an article of the same title is back. Not sure if this is still a wp:copyvio, but thought you'd like to take a look. I Googled a key unique phrase from the article, suspecting the same -- it reads like someone's Curriculum Vitae -- but did not find any matches. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Hot Rainbow Yoghurt

Hiya PMDrive1061. I made a Wiki earlier today called Hot Rainbow Yoghurt. It was my band's name. Why did you delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tofuskye (talk • contribs) 23:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Greeting

Thank you for your welcome. I hope this time people will be as polite as you've been! --TheAgeOfGod (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Hot Rainbow Yoghurt

Hey again. I thought you were just being mean, I'm sorry for thinking that now. I understand the requirements. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tofuskye (talk • contribs) 23:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Harry seiles Talk Page Post

You're post "Plausible titles with nonsense content have been done to death. If you continue to disrupt the project in this manner, you will be blocked" was a bit over the top. If you wish to warn a user, please use one of the warning templates, not posting something that might be considered bitting the newbies. Thanks, ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 00:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

A Warm Welcome

Thanks for the warm welcome =]. I'll work hard with my band to make HRY worthy to be on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tofuskye (talk • contribs) 21:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

George A. Brooks submission/ rejection

Hello:

My article was rejected because of copyright issues. Dr. Brooks was awarded the Honor Award from the American College of Sports Medicine. I referred to the website showing the award, which is apparently against your policies. I removed references to website during an edit, but the paper was still rejected for violating copyright. There are no copyright violations in this paper. I would appreciate an explanation.

Dr. Thomas Fahey California State University, Chico —Preceding unsigned comment added by Discusdoc (talk • contribs) 03:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

George A. Brooks submission/ rejection

--Discusdoc (talk) 03:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't enter the signature on my other user talk.

My submission on George A. Brooks was rejected for violating copyright regulations (I referenced a website showing an award he received). I removed the reference, but the article was rejected for the same reason. As far as I know, there are no copyright violations in this article. I would appreciate a response.

I did not delete your article nor establish the copyright violation, though I did notice that it did seem to have a biased point of view, i.e., it was very full of praise and appeared to lack substantive sources. I did not get the impression that his work fit Wikipedia's standards for notability. The issue did not appear to be with the external links, unless the external links contained the same text, which would be a copyright issue. If you can provide two or three external sites (not blogs or self-published sources) that cite his notability, you might have a reason to appeal the deletion and recreate the article, though it needs to be less of a puff piece. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I was copy/editing from a nike page. I noticed I forgot to remove the logo

Handwerpen (talk) 06:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Alexander, Jan 12 2009 thank you for double checking.

Ptahshepses article

Hi, I did not include a bibliography for the Ptahshepses article. I'm not sure why it was tagged as blatant copyright infringement - here is the bibliography. I believe it had references as well, which are indeed similar to a site on the internet. Unfortunately Miroslav is one of few writers on Ptahshepses and his mastaba complex, and there are few books and papers on it. Here are the references:

Baines, John and Jaromir Malek, Cultural Atlas of Ancient Egypt (New York: Facts on File, 2000), 153

Bard, Kathryn, An Inroduction to the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt (New York: Wiley, 2007), 145

Rice, Michael, Who's Who in Ancient Egypt (New York: Routledge, 1999), 159

Verner, Miroslav, Abusir: the Realm of Osiris (Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2003), 153

Verner, Miroslav, The Mastaba of Ptahshepses (Prague: Charles University, 1977), 136

Verner, Miroslav, Forgotton Pharaohs, Lost Pyramids: Abusir (Praha: Charles University, 1994), 117

I hope it is possible to undelete articles, as I didn't save a copy of the text before I pressed submit.

Ronfler (talk) 06:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)ronfler

It is indeed original.

Ronfler (talk) 06:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)ronfler

Vandalism Warning

Hello PMDrive1061 :)

Thanks for your message. It took me a while to figure out how to respond as I'm new to editing / using Wikipedia.

If you'd like me to change my username, I'd be more than happy to. I just picked the first thing that came to mind after reading Wikipedia's warning about choosing any usernames that might reveal my identity.

I'm also open to suggestions, as I really don't have an attachment to this username and if changing it would make things easier all around, then that's fine with me!

Spirituality Guy (talk) 08:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Spirituality Guy (for now?)

Need protection

Can you please change his block settings to not allow editing talk page? He just posted the "goatse" thing–Unpopular Opinion (talk) 08:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm...

Just saw your name in the deletion log. Good to see that you took your mop back. It still fits you quite well. I haven't been around these past few weeks because of an off-wiki issue that has needed my attention, but I'm back, though perhaps not as active as I used to be. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Re your message: Sounds like a good promise. Any time I get frustrated here, I just wander off for a bit and go edit something else. I sent you an email about an off-wiki item. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Boswashdevelopment

You might want to take a look at this user talk page. The person who owns it claims that the username is not a business one, that he intends to be an established editor. -w^{L<speak·check>} 11:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind. --w^{L<speak·check>} 23:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Yay page

Love the deletion summary. :D I was about to tag it –Capricorn42 (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Nikolai Tomsky

Hi,

I think you were very premature in deleting Nikolai Tomsky. A very quick google shows a number of references to his existence and his position as a soviet era sculpture. I think there was definitely the basis for a proper article there. --triwbe (talk) 16:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Akimbo (band)

See this comment from Awalters.pmi (talk · contribs). As you deleted and protected the article yesterday, perhaps you'd like to reply. (Please note that I haven't had a chance to check the article fully, so I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your decision to delete). Thanks. —  Tivedshambo  _(t/c) 16:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

chevy volt photo

I downloaded this photo from the GM web site and it specifically gave a Creative Commons 3.0 license prior to downloading. Please restore.

Jdoniach (talk) 18:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Decline of US dollar

Why you say POV rant? It's a fact that US dollar is very weak now. And guess what, will be weaker in the future,.. that's a fact. Qaz 1009 rfv (talk) 19:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

PM, I don't want to argue. But if you read FT (Financial Times), economic news and so on.. US dollar is declining. I can list you not one, but a lot of the sources, which are also reliable. But I don't care so much about US dollar, I do care about EUR which in my opinion is the future super-currency of the world. Cheers, --Qaz 1009 rfv (talk) 17:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

blocked page and username

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PMDrive1061 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. I am very new to Wikipedia and did not realize that there was an issue with my user name, catharticfilms, being the same name as the name of my company. This, SpacemanVJ, is my new username. I had created a page for a film, The Long Way Out, that I was part of. I think the page fits all the requirements of a wiki page. I have the films trailer posted on several sites, along with its poster. Also, the film is currently being processed to be posted on IMDB. If there is any other reasons that the page for the film wasn't posted, could you please let me know. I'd love to resolve the issue. Thanks so much. SpacemanVJ (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. —  Sandstein  20:22, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh, sorry, it seems that SpacemanVJ (talk · contribs) added this unblock request for you.  Sandstein  20:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Header inserted here by Sandstein while commenting on the above topic

I dont know why my page was deleted...please explain :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ih8uofa (talk • contribs) 20:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Element Skateboards

Greetings, why do you keep deleting the Element Skateboards page? All information is from mission statements referenced on the company website. List of team riders is a valuable source of information for defining the brand.. similar the list of the Los Angeles Lakers.

I work for for element and you are welcome to contact me at: media@elementskateboards.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elementaudiovisual (talk • contribs) 20:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

The Civil War: A Constitutional Conflict

You were wrong about my article The Civil War: A Constitutional Conflict being a blatant copyright infringement. I did the 3 yrs, of research for the book, wrote it, published it and copyrighted it! I am the author and also the webmaster of thje web site! Terry Jansen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjoveture99 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Barely Legal (tv series)

Hi there. You just deleted this identifiable, searchable page under the A3 criteria. I had already patrolled it, and I was just about to source it with this link. Can I ask you to please undelete this page? Thank you. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 23:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Disparaging comment

You said that I have left a disparaging comment on your talk page. Could you please elaborate on this as I do not feel that anything that I wrote here was disparaging to you. Thanks. --Bravo Plantation (talk) 23:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

But how exactly was I disparaging? I would like you to explain that to me. Because to other people looking at my talk page, they would assume that I had said something quite nasty to you which I would never do. I feel that at best your choice of words was misguided. So if you could kindly elaborate as to how you feel that I was being disparaging, I would be most grateful. --Bravo Plantation (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

It was NOT disparaging. You clearly have no understanding of the word otherwise you would not have used it in this context. --Bravo Plantation (talk) 00:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Apology accepted --Bravo Plantation (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I just think people need to know about my site.

Whoa! this isn't fair. i don't care if i get banned from wikipedia, but i can't even let people know about this site. i'm not advertising. oh, and i don't care if there is "no need" to make this article. I mean, you got a GameSpot page up. What's the significance of that page then? huh? I can't make a nice, friendly page without getting it deleted in 10 seconds? give me a reason why not to complain. i appriciatte your kindness in your messages, but man, i just want to let people know who the heck this site is. you got a GameSpot Page, An IGN.Com page...why not have mine. i'm not advertising. it took me 2 hours to make this flipping page, and i can't even publish it, show people the sit's logo, the url, the "signifigance" of my site. Well, why don't you help me on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uskb14 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Gibsisrib Hey why did u delete my page on gibsisrib it was legit man undelete it plz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibsisrib (talk • contribs) 00:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for your support. I just would like my site up there with the world wide web, which i guess can be called advertising, in a way. I am deeply sorry, for going-well, mad, if you would say, but anyway thank you, and i will continue searching and exploring Wikipedia. Oh, and yes, i have submitted my site on Google, Yahoo, AOL, & Ask.Com. My site, although does not show up on LIVE Search. I have not yet thought about Google Advertising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uskb14 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleted entry for Blowdart Game

You recently deleted a legitimate entry for a social game called "The Blowdart Game." I would like to know what I must do to have this page restored, or improve it to make it more accurate. I have seen similar game pages, but did not see one for this game, so I decided to make it, only to see it deleted seconds later. Thanks for any help! -DCPlatt

How would you like me to prove that this is not a made-up game? I'm sure within a few minutes, I could find so-called "made-up" games and other entries on wikipedia. Please contact me to tell me what I can do as I would like to have this entry on wikipedia for others to see and learn more about this game!

A quick google search turned this up: http://www.fictionpress.com/s/2620666/1/The_Darting_Game. I realize that this is a story, but I didn't write it, nor do I know the author. This has to give some credibility, and this game adds so much fun and laughter to my everyday life. I would love to spread the word and rules about this game! PLEASE GIVE IT A CHANCE! (while you ponder that, I shall be seeking more references)

Another, albeit a video: http://br.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=3931596. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DCPlatt (talk • contribs) 01:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey Man hows it going

hey long time no see, anyway i was wondering if you could help me out if its not too much trouble, i use an anti vandalism tool that shows me vandalised pages so i go to that page and I check it's history, now if I'm lucky the vandal in question would only make one bad edit and I can simpply revert it however if this vandal makes more than one vandalism when i revert the latest one all i'm doing is reverting to a previous vandalism which is pointless so could you tell me how to revert a group of bad edits. More importantly I hoped you had an awesome christmas and i know you will have a fun and produvtive 2009 see ya man. (don't forget to stay in touch)The Nice Hollaback Girl (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Blowdart desperation

Those are two independent, legitimate sites that I found. If that does not serve as proof, what does? Please answer me that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DCPlatt (talk • contribs) 02:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Could I then use that as a reference to make the real page? I want people to hear about a blowdart game, then go and google search to find more about it and, voila, there it is on wikipedia, THE information source that I use most often and has served me well... What rules do you not allowing me to procede?

PLEASE READ ABOVE.

If you will not allow me to make a page for whatever reason you have "made-up" (just kidding!), is there a way I could get the text I originally posted for the page?

What about this? http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=18345577840? Even if it has almost 3,000 followers? --DCPlatt (talk) 02:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Working on a subject

Dear, Wiki editors
I am working on a page which I may not be able to complete in one sitting. I was wondering if it could be undeleted untill I am finished. Note: I believe this subject is not on any other website so i will be going by the game website as well as the games themselves for the info. To conclude, I think this game would be a great addition to the already vast knowledge that wiki has. So please consider reopening the web page for further renovation.

P.S. The article name is Elebit Types. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBeyond (talk • contribs) 02:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Element Skateboards

A tag has been placed on Element Skateboards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Orange Mike | Talk 04:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Majestic MC

You deleted my profile on Majestic MC even though i sighted more than 1 reference. He is a big MC and is signed to Ministry of Sound. Just wondering why?

Speak soon =) - Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by G33k84 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Ramesh Dube

How did you come to the conclusion that Ramesh Dube was an A3 candidate? It stated his position in Indian government, and even contained a reference verifying his notability, so it couldn't have even been an A7. I'd appreciate it if you'd undelete it and take it to AFD if you think it should be deleted, thanks. --Closedmouth (talk) 09:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. And Jimbo's head is inside User:Krimpet/peek :) --Closedmouth (talk) 09:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

thank you

Thanks for the advice mate btw User talk:Nawlin Wiki & PMDrive1061 have anal sex. LOLThe Nice Hollaback Girl (talk) 11:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

User talk:E-whore

Hi, PMDrive. Could you please explain why you blocked that account without discussion with the user? It's a very borderline case, and I think a {{uw-username}} might have yielded some productive results. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

"Whore" might be a violation, depending on how it's used. In this case, "E-whore" implies that the guy just likes the Internet, I suppose. :) –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good, thank you. I'll keep an eye on the user's contribs. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 18:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Dear trigger happy wikipedia admins. Please note that the page for APFBA should be protected from any deletion due to the fact it is particularly important for the industry sector. it is not blatant advertising, it is purely informational and is seeks to help regulate the market. Please check your own terms for deletion before deleting this page again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredwilson7 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Dear PMDrive. I have read the guidelines and believe that there is 'prior art' - eg prior articles that do the same as my article listed throughout wikipedia, and hence I am following the procedure for listing. Fredwilson7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredwilson7 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC) dear pmdrive. i didn't see your last note. so thanks for your help and I'll wait for you to write the page under the correct name before I add anything to apfba. thanks ~~fredwilson7~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredwilson7 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC) dear PMDrive. thanks for your help. ~~fredwilson7~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredwilson7 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations

On asking for your adminship back and having it granted. It was nice to see a name get removed from WP:FORMER. :) Best wishes. Acalamari 21:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

You're very welcome. :) You've probably seen already that a few things about the interface have been changed (rollback granting, more protection options), but for the most part, the interface is still the same. Best wishes. Acalamari 23:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

post deletion

Hello, I was attempting to make a page about a sports blog that I have created, but you deleted it. Why?

Thank you for your reply. There are various other blogs on wikipedia who refer to our articles, within their own articles, Deadspin would be an example. Would recognition by these blogs that were considered notable make us notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willb241 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Farzan darabi

I think that before speedying that article you should have waited for confirmation that it is indeed self-promotional. The article was already listed at WP:PNT, so, since the language was either Arabic or Farsi, it would only have been a matter of minutes before that confirmation was issued by one of the regulars of that project. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Allison Huber deletion

I am Allison Huber, and I approve the inclusion of my definition as "a witch", with no conclusion as to whether I am a good witch or a bad witch. This definition is, in fact, true; therefore, it is not vandalism, and I seek to reinstate it. The original definition was made by a credible source, Joshua Conboy, whom I did inform regarding my witch-nature. Thank you. 131.230.28.30 (talk) 02:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Allison Huber, witch, but undefined as either a good witch or a bad witch.

Fermented Honeypot

PMDrive1061, thank you for your responsive edit. ISC Sans is a reputable security organization, and while the selected word choice used to describe the evolution of honeypot techonlogy may appear frivolous please understand this is not joke nor is it intentional devaluation of Wikipedia. Please confirm and view the references and restore the content as posted. From a security aspect it is perfectly applicable and valid. Please review all references inclusive of the multiple reported security vulnerabilities associated with RoundCube, the second-stage download via wget, and the respective server compromise.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Smeowpmeow (talk) 03:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case concerning Korlzor

You have been helping fight vandalism inflicted by various IP sockpuppets of the blocked User:Korlzor. You may be interested in a sockpuppetry case I have opened here. Best regards. Tennis expert (talk) 10:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Request for attention

As the blocking administrator, I felt you should be the one to handle this request for adminhelp. Regards SoWhy 14:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you Masonicmoron (talk) 21:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Also, Bagels

May I state that the speedy deletion of the Also, Bagels page was unwarranted? The reason for deletion was: "No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion" I claim that this was unfairly deleted, as you, the administrator, did not review the page properly. There is no indication that the article didn't meet the said guidelines, thus contradicting the "innocent until proven guilty" stand of this website. Comment? AlsoBagels (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Great, thanks. The site was recently launched, which is why it doesn't show up on google (on the first page), however it's fanbase is growing by word of mouth. I guess I'll wait until it meets the criteria of being eligible. As for the username, should I change it/create a new account for the future? AlsoBagels (talk) 05:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy

Hi PM. I was curious about the Speedy deletion St. Joan of Arc School. It was super short, poorly written, and while there seem to be several schools with this name, I couldn't seem to find the one that was being referred to, but it still doesn't seem to me that the criteria (nonsense) or the speedy deletion were on target. Am I missing something or way off base? ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

there was an earlier version that was nonsense, but the latest one h was not; I undeleted it under the assumption you hadnt spotted that. It now needs to be merged somewhere. DGG (talk) 03:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Okay, no worries. And I'm a little embarassed about my "like this?" edit summary. I wasn't asking if anyone liked what I was doing or being sarcastics, I was asking like this? as in is this how I do it? since I was having trouble targeting the redirect. I hope I didn't cause any misunderstandings. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Packer Storage

Hi there,

I wanted to figure out what I could do to get this page back up and edited so that it can stay up on wikipedia..I'm willing to do whatever it takes! I appreciate your time. Also could you please submit the article back to me at my email msanderson.a@gmail.com so that I can immediately edit the content to make it more "wikipedia friendly".

Thank you,

Michael —Preceding unsigned comment added by Casinovacrew (talk • contribs) 03:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Careful, Please

When you performed this move, you overrode the salt on protecting My Life Would Suck Without You. The proper action to take on an article that was deleted by AFD and has been recreated multiple times without satisfying the reason stated at the AFD (namely, actually charting), would have been to delete it. The article is create protected until Jan 19 for a reason.—Kww(talk) 04:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

It's got a CSD tag. Delete it, and make sure it is still create protected until Jan 19. Sometimes the create protection gets overwritten when things like this happen.—Kww(talk) 04:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Except that should have been "create=sysop". Close, but no cigar.—Kww(talk) 04:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Packer Storage

By the way, do you have the original copy as well. The first one that got marked or noted for being a blatant advertising attempt

Thank you very much,

Michael —Preceding unsigned comment added by Casinovacrew (talk • contribs) 04:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Packer Storage

Thank you very much for the original content. That is greatly appreciated.

Would a press release suffice or be an adequate 3rd party article that will allow myself to re-create the article and show the notability of the firm

Thanks,

Michael Casinovacrew (talk) 04:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Janet Henry

You speedy deleted this page, which is obviously correct, but for some reason you added G1 (patent nonsense) as a reason to the appropriate A7. The article was very clear and not nonsense at all, and for someone of 15 who has just seen the article on his dead mother deleted, it can be very painful to see your biography of her described as "patent nonsense". Please be more careful and less Wp:BITEy in future similar cases. Fram (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

LPKF

Hi, I believe you deleted my page before I was finished. I am new to this process and was hoping you could give some explaination as to why, Thanks for your help. ~ Mindy LPKFUSA (talk) 20:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Brent Libby balibby

hi, I can appreciate your desire to keep Wiki clean, but you deleted an article I was creating about a historic place in California. I, too, am new to this process and was hoping for a little grace (explaination as to why, etc.). While Forest Home is an on-going ministry, it has been in existence since 1938, having been the site of Billy Graham's commitment to ministry. While we may not share the same beliefs, Forest Home is cited on the Billy Graham webpage and there is a historical work on the ministry called "One Mile Nearer Heaven." Please undelete the page so I can continue to create worthy material. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Balibby (talk • contribs) 00:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

inappropriate page

Setosis (talk) 04:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)January 15, 2009

Hey PMDrive1061,

So I noticed that you deleted a page which I just created for a San Francisco based travel writer named Broke-Ass Stuart.

this was the message you sent me:

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I was wondering how this could be seen as an inappropriate page and if you could tell me what I can do to ensure that my article is up to your standards for being left alone in the wiki world. I am a new member of the wikipedia community, so your input would be much appreciated.

Thanks and take care,

Setosis

I have restored the page. PMDrive, I came here to se if you had reacted to my post about an incorrect speedy reason from yesterday. No reaction, but instead I see this and note that not only should it not have been speedied at all (clear claims to notability), but that you closed this perfectly valid article as vandalism, which it definitely wasn't. I am tempted to check all your recent speedies now, because two such errors in two days seem to indicate a more serious problem and not a simple mistake. Please, when you speedy delete things, be more careful, both in the deletion itself (if it has claims to notability, either don't delete or do a basic Google search) and in the deletion reason (if you had deleted this one as A7, it would be a simple mistake: now it is a very bitey one, again). Fram (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletions and incorrect reasons

Allright, I am now going through your recent speedy deletions. Many are correct, obviously, but from my spot checks, I noticed

• Shannon Marie, which you deleted as unverifiable vandalism, while it is actually a simple non notable A7 (it is verifiable, but it is an author of fanfiction, so has no place on Wikipedia).
• Connell wagner: you deleted is as blatant advertising. It seems that you just copied the reason from an earlier speedy, when it actually was blatant advertising: however, the article you deleted was not advertising at all, but a nuetral description. Even A7 would have been a stretch, as the article claims that the company has some 4,000 employees in 43 offices. The 250 Google News articles mentioning the company (at least some of them clearly about the company) would have been a further indication that this may well be a notable company.
• Conficker: the context was quite clear (it is a computer virus), and again, a simple search shows that it exists and has received a lot of attention. BEing very short in itself is not a reason to delete an article.
• Crudo: the article could have been al ot better by wikilinking some of the names, but a new band which is the collaboration between two very notable artists is notable, and again, it already has a few Google News hits to prove it.

This means that from your last twenty speedies alone, four were incorrect. Could you please be a lot more careful in the future, and use the more negative reasons (G11, A1, G1, G3) only when it is absolutely clear that no good intentions were behind the creation of an article? New page patrolling and speedy deletion are important and much needed tasks, but we need all the good editors we can get, and seeing a first serious attempt at creating an article (often their first edit) abruptly deleted with a very negative reason (and sometimes with a warning on their talk page to stop as well) is the best method to send good editors running. Fram (talk) 08:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

PS. The Conficker page is now at In the News and has been viewed nearly 80,000 times yesterday alone![3] Fram (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

What did I do wrong?

Hi there PMDrive1061. I never posted an article before this but apparently you have deemed that my post on the Buckhead Grand does not meet the Wikipedia grade. I honestly have no idea why you said it was "obvious advertising" so some advice on what I could do to make it less so...or even more "informational" would be nice. Thanks.... Jungliss (Jungliss (talk) 14:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC))

Sapai Look Tung

Hi. Since you deleted a previous version of Sapai Look Tung as a copyright violation, could you confirm that the current version is a fresh creation? --Paul_012 ^(talk) 17:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

ok thanks for your advice

Ok PMDrive1061. I will try to rework the article (Jungliss (talk) 23:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC))

You ignored my hangon

twice Guitmusic11 (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Funistrada thanks; help on category...

thanks for your work (admin and ed) on Funistrada. I'd like to categorize this also definitely in Food, Food preferences, and some sort of psych category I haven't figured out yet.

How do I do this?

Best, rob Shlishke (talk) 02:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

whyd you delete my article?

ERM is a real worldwide company. i was just about to add more stuff like a external link to the site and a bunch of info from the site when you deleted it.uup (talk) 03:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Unite Show

Hello,

I noticed that you deleted a page formerly named Unite Show for the reason that it had no indication that the article may meet the guidelines for inclusion. I was just wondering if you had the help page or any page for the guidelines because I wasn't done editing it before it got deleted, or if such an article should be created. Please get back to me as soon as you can.

Thanks,

--Blemo ɸ ^TALK • _{CONTRIBUTIONS} • _EMAIL • _MESSAGE

Thank you so much for your response and thanks for the advice. --Blemo 23 (talk) 06:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Japanese college

PM, why did you do that?

First the topic is encyclopedic - No. 2 you should wait until people have a chance to establish content . And No. 3. You should use Prod to notify people and give time.

The page said it was a university, so it clearly defined the topic. Be careful about deleting stuff WhisperToMe (talk) 06:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Darryl Robidoux

Hi can you tell me what you suggest for correction the page. Thank you Darrylrobidoux (talk) 06:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

FaMe soft

Dear sir. 2 months ago i was convinced to release a free version of my commercial game Super Plusha on GP32 checked GamePark wiki info and found MY company and MY game in the list.. So I just added a brief info "whe the company was founded and why". The info has been speedy deleted...

Please, settle it down. The game company that's bor in 1989 is harmless.... (Famesoft (talk) 07:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC))

Super Plusha

How could be the page deleted due to the copyrights. I'm the author of the other site. It's written everywhere: FaMe soft and Super Plusha. So there isn't any copyrights issues. I can't sue myself, can I?

The links to Super Plusha and to FaMe soft are listed at the GamePark, GP32 console wiki pages. I just had to fill the gap. Due to some recent news about the co. and the game.

(Famesoft (talk) 08:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)).

thank you for very polite and clear answers

I'll try to follow your advices, and add links to my co. and the game from IGN.com and other trusted sites. I was very pleased to get such friendly replies. Thank you. ^_- (Famesoft (talk) 10:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)).

That wasn't very fair

You see, you didn't give me any time to be able to fix all the red links in the article by writing or at least beginning the other articles that are related to my page I Hate Friday. I was just about to begin on writing the other articles that were related but needed information from my previous article, only to see it had been deleted. I feel it to be notable enough as the I Hate Friday series is still popular amongst Australian children, even today. Djskein79 (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank very much for that. I will endevour to finish the articles in the coming weeks. Djskein79 (talk) 19:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Question

Dear Sir, Can you tell me why the article you deleted a few minutes ago was -according to you- a "blatant copyright infringement"? I wrote both the text for the website of the ASC and the entry in the Dutch Wikipedia (under Vysotsky). Would you be so kind to restore the page? Joseph Damen —Preceding unsigned comment added by JosephDamen (talk • contribs) 23:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Western Pennsylvania Society for Clinical Hypnosis Entry

Why did you delete this page? There was no copywrite infringement. A member of the WPSCH created the page and had every right to use text from WPSCH's home page.

Western PA Hypnosis (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Rodger Boyce Coninuted

I didn't say anything out of the way to you. I was just upset because it seemed like you had your finger on the trigger ready to delete something before someone could finish. I only had good intentions. Next time wait 5 or 10 minutes and see if somebody is still working on editing it. I understand if I didn't have a source but I was trying to go back and forth instead of writing all this down then putting it on here. Patience is a virtue. Hopefully We both learned from this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by King Cobb (talk • contribs) 01:18, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleting Pages

You just deleted a page (Ron Pappin) I was in the middle of working on, not even a whole minute after I saved it for the first time. If you have a problem with some content, please respect the point of this site and maybe discuss it first! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brillpappin (talk • contribs) 02:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

---

That might be reasonable, but you didn't even wait 30 seconds. how do you know what was going to be in the article? I'll tell you what, I'll prepare something beforehand, get a few quotes and or pictures and post it all at once. Would that satisfy requirements?

brill (talk) 02:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

---

Better to prepare it. Although thanks you for your patiance.

brill (talk) 02:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome - Derek19CrownVicLover

Thank you for the warm welcome to Wikipedia. I will try my best to help the Wiki Community and read all the rules. I'm looing forward to contributing to Wikipedia, editing articles and having my articles edited for the common good.

BTW: Yeah, I have a 2001 Crown Vic Police Interceptor. I love it, it runs great. It's the best car I've ever driven. The first day I had it I was sold. Mine has custom blue paint, and so it looks great too. All my friends love it. You can see what kind of car I own and will continue to own for the rest of my life.

Thanks again for the warm welcome, I'm looking forward to my time here. =) --Derek19CrownVicLover (talk) 02:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PMDrive1061" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Derek19CrownVicLover (talk • contribs) 02:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, true. I saw that a while back ago and was very dissapointed. The Crown Vic had always been my favorite car since I was a very little kid, I still love it today.

Mine has all of the police package stuff too, so it runs great. Well I had them take out the spotlight and prisoner cage on mine, but thats just because it is my first car, and since I'm still very young, It's more of a "chill" car. However I've been saving up money already to buy my second one. My for the second Crown Vic, I'm going to leave everything alone except for the paint because I'm going to have it repainted. Around here the used copcar Crown Vics come by pretty cheap even in good condition so with my part time job, it should take me a little less than a full year, hopefully.

Still, No car could ever replace the one I have now, especailly it being my first car. --Derek19CrownVicLover (talk) 02:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I mean supervisor cars usually aren't put through the bashing most police cars go through. Well the guy that I bought this Crown Vic from gets them from Gonzales, LA. Gonzales isn't that crime filled, so the cars are kept in very good condition and are not usually bashed to a scrap. If the cars were from New Orleans, where I'm from, then I wouldn't exactlty trust the car as much. But at the same time, Some of my relatives own a '93 Crown Vic with more than 300,000 miles and it still runs, so that make me feel much better about my 01 CV.

True, detective cars aren't put through as much, but neither are small city PD cars, such as Gonzales.

I Saw a Commercial Enforcement Unit CHP Crown Vic on eBay not to long ago and it was great, same year as mine, fully loaded with lights in the deck and dash, pushbumper and all sorts of goodies. I wanted to buy it so much, but I still don't have enough money, and wont for awhile.

--Derek19CrownVicLover (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Communists and their impact on the enviroment

Uh... that wasn't an expired prod... :S — neuro^(talk) 02:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

There is no AfD discussion, only a CSD and prod. My point was that your comment in the log, "Expired PROD, concern was: Opinion piece, original research.", was incorrect, since the prod was not expired. — neuro^(talk) 03:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Plea for the case of Also, Bagels

Just asking about the page "also, bagels" that you recently deleted... It is now possibly elligible for submission, seeing as how your major arguements against it were it's violation of the WP:WEB and the WP:V, which it now conforms to. You had made the statement that you had "...Googled the term and it came up empty." You will find this is no longer the case, googling Also Bagels will bring it up as the first link. This was just the normal delay in Google's servers updating. I wish to republish the page and follow any direction given as far as quality and references needed. You had also mentioned that my username was self-promotional and was hoping that you could help change it. Thank you very much for your volunteer support. :) AlsoBagels (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Great, thank you, I've made a new name that isn't promotional. As for the page itself, can I upload it and tag it with a hold on deletion until you review it? Otherwise another moderator might start up on this... Thank you! WolfLogic (talk) 14:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Dan Mazar

Recreated after you deleted it not long ago. I put it up for Prod, the first line says he is a well known writer, some assertion of notability...--kelapstick (talk) 00:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

anyway the prod came off so i am putting it up for AFD--kelapstick (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello again

I didn't come here with a poor attitude, I was simply telling you what you did poorly.

The thing is, I made the page for the movie, yes. Then I was caught up in something (I made my self some dinner), not five minutes later I saw my page was deleted. I was going to add a plot, who stared in the movie and details, but you have to understand that I need time to put this together, I can't simply make it all in 3 seconds.

PLEASE respect my articles, and if I am somehow breaking a rule, PLEASE tell me so next time I won't be, and don't "help me" by deleting my work. Help me by giving me constructive criticism.

Thank you.

FUTURE2FUTURE (talk) 01:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your understanding, is there a way you could revive the page? I'm going to try and add a plot within the next few minutes.

Also I'm interested in little known films and rare music, so I might not know much about, however I want to start a page so others can expand the knowledge.

Thank you :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by FUTURE2FUTURE (talk • contribs) 02:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi

I have ben trying to construct a page and it has been deleted three times apperently and I ahve only just seen all the details on one of the messages left about it, I am trying to put up an article about a set of religious alws that govern the lives of a particular faith, as the transcribing was taking place the page gets deleted. Why is this article apparently not relevant when it covers an important topic. By the way this religious faith is recognised by the us government and I was trying to write about an area of that faith that has ot been covered yet, thankyou for your tolerance in dealing with this issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperchilled (talk • contribs) 02:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Process Systems Design and Control Laboratory

Please do not delete this page, I am preparing my Laboratory article. Nuvan (talk) 02:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Gort is GRAWP

Don't be clueless. If you have the tools, indef-block him. Warning is not appropriate. SBHarris 04:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry if that came out curt. Reading your warning on the talk page gave me a bad impression-- probably overly bad. I merely suggest in future checking the contributions of a nameuser before leaving them a warning of any kind. It can save you time, since if the contributions show you're dealing with GRAWP (as in this case) the warning is unnecessary. The solution instead, is nuke and waste no time doing anything other than nuke. But you're well aware of that, as you make clear. So, nothing left but say but: Welcome back to the dirty mop and bucket! :) SBHarris 23:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Undelete Magic Ball page

Hello, Could you please undelete the page please. It was a placeholder for a short time and should be filled. It was one of the video games pages thats listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Magic_Ball_(video_game) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_Network_games

What was your motivation to delete it anyway?

edit: thx for a prompt and fast reaction, page is now restored. Keep up the good work.

Murmur001 (talk) 10:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Silver | copyright infringement?

Hello,

Can you clarify this for me a little? I was under the impression that if you credit the source (which i did, in the references at the bottom) that you could cite information from other places?

if i'm completely wrong, i'm just curious to understand it better so i don't make the same mistake going forward.

thanks! --Cnuttin (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

thanks for the clarification! Sorry about that. --Cnuttin (talk) 16:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me....what exactly did I do?

How was starting an article on Calvin Coolidge's first inauguration "vandalism?" I don't understandEricl (talk) 23:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

again, what the heck did I do? Or is someone spoofing me?Ericl (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Calvin Coolidge's midnight swearing in was one of the major events of 1923. That's exactly what happened. They got up, read the telegram about Harding's death, His father swore him in by the light of a karosene lamp, and they went back to bed. There's more detail, but I wanted to save something before I went back with a more detailed narrative. That ain't vandalism.Ericl (talk) 23:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Chesaw, Washington page was deleted and re-directed to Okanogan County. I created a page with what info i had while continuing to research. I have more info now, but poof! the page is gone. And not more than a minute after creation...

Please un-delete, as i would like to continue filling in the information on this page, thanks! Nothingofwater (talk) 23:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Christopher Roberto Ortega

I think Christopher Roberto Ortega passes WP:ATHLETE because he appears to be playing for this professional club. Could you restore this article if this athlete does pass WP:ATHLETE? If he hasn't played for Club América and the Club América article is incorrect, feel free to not undelete it. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

sfdkfan

Can you at least let the Skulldropfoetuskick page stay for 24 hours? You can delete it after that, but I really would like it to stay. Why can't it? Sfdkfan (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Why not, and can you put a redirect to my talk page on that page so if people go there to see it they are redirected to my page where they can? Sfdkfan (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

The Super Game deletion

Why did you delete it? I was trying to imporve it but it kept getting deleted before i could even upload pictures or anything like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Americaneseian (talk • contribs) 02:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Slayerfanbuck

Hi
Huh, congratulations for being re-admined, I never knew that you were one :)
Could you review User talk:Slayerfanbuck, he is asking for an unblock, and says that his latest pages weren't copyright violations. I notice that he created a page in my user space, too, was that really a copyright violation? I asked him to provide reliable sources for the userfied article I still have there ...
Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea 02:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! --Amalthea 02:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Raymond M.

If you take a look at the name his was born under, before it was legally changed to Raymond, you will see hundreds of Google hits for his name and his internationally acclaimed research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemert (talk • contribs) 03:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Can you please unprotect the page so that the proper born name can be placed and you can Google his name and see his relevent Google hits that will confirm his biography —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemert (talk • contribs) 03:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

First name was legally changed to Raymond in 2007. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemert (talk • contribs) 03:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I believe the first name on the bio introduction should be listed as Raymond because that is now the legal first name, and only in the born ----- should the legal name at birth be listed.

Yesterday.sg

Hi,

I would like to request for permission to recreate a page on Yesterday.sg. I understand that it has been protected due to my repeated attempts to recreate the page. I am a fairly new wiki user so I do hope for your understanding in this matter. I editted the above-mentioned article for the third time as I firmly believe that it would benefit wiki users whom are interested in Singapore's historical and cultural sites. The aim of this page is NOT just solely to raise awareness about yesterday.sg. Rather, it is to provide an additional avenue for others to learn more about Singapore's historical heritage. We hope that individuals would be able to get a better understanding of Singapore's history through this page and to my understanding, that is what wiki is about; for individuals to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of a subject matter. I would appreciate it if you could enlighten me on the specifics of the page which do not meet wiki's standards and I will do my best to structure it in a way which is acceptable to your administration.

Thank you for your kind understanding. Appreciate any assistance which you might be able to provide.

Nhbccip (talk) 03:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleted category

I do not understand why you deleted Category:Disney's Hollywood Studios. The category is not empty, and your deletion comment is not clear (how can a category page be the result of a copy-and-paste page move?). You may wish to consider undeleting this page. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Pmpanta

Hi, I had a discussion in the help channel in IRC with Pmpanta explaining the notability criteria and so on. I suggested including reliable sources, and s/he showed me a couple articles that have been written about the company. I'm still not at all convinced that it'll ever meet the inclusion criteria (and I've told Pmpanta that). But I'm going to offer to unblock if s/he agrees to only work on the article only in userspace and not move it to the mainspace without experienced users' approval, is that ok with you? Thanks, delldot ∇. 20:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

five leaf clover

sorry. i just made the page again so i could take a screenshot..i was going to delete it right after..but i didn't have the chance to. Cougars2012 (talk) 23:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

thank you very much! the guys in the group say thanks lol..

Request to reverse deletion

You recently deleted the Ism (punk band) page in error while citing a blatant copyright infringement. from CD baby. In fact, the copyright you refer to is, in actuality, the CD copyright of "Journey Down Your Drain" available for sale on CD baby. The band bio is taken from the band's myspace page and just happens to be included below the item for sale for CD baby. The bio is public information and is not copyright protected in any way, shape or form. It is available to anyone wishing information on the history of the band and was written with that intention. It is the most accurate bio of the band available anywhere on the internet and certainly should be included in Wikipedia. If you go back to the CD baby page, you will realize how you mistakenly confused what was copyright material. The owner of the copyright of the CD has confirmed this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.179.92 (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Request to cease deletions of stubs

Editors create stubs to fill in information linked to other pages. In the case of the ZuZim, Emim, Rephdim, Nephelim, these are pastoral nomads of the Seir who were named in the excretion texts of the Egyptians and in various Biblical passages. The references for these people can't be completed if you delete the pages faster than they can be created. Please undelete and discuss on the articles pages.Rktect (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd only just started!

Hey! I'd only just started my article and you deleted about three seconds after I'd started working on it. I went to write the 'hangon' text and it had vanished :-( Onlineoracle (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)OnlineOracle

No, it wouldn't have established anything. I didn't get to write anything! As to the previous deletion, I note it was dated two years ago and might not even have been the same thing. Onlineoracle (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC)OnlineOracle

Thanks Onlineoracle (talk) 00:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)OnlineOracle

ryan west article.

--MFHethan (talk) 02:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Can you please be more specific.

This is all public information that is true. Im just trying to make the information more available with wikipedia.

Im not trying to break any copyright issues, please tell me what to do to make it acceptable for wikipedia.

Ravenbeauty

Hi There, I am new to Wikipedia and wonder what I did wrong? I wrote a well thought out article on soap maven Ravenbeauty. She is a very well known entity to the online community of soap fans. She doesn't charge fans for her weekly columns so there was nothing to gain by creating an entry for her. I had no idea I was promoting anything. We were all discussing how someone should start a page for her on a soap site where she was being discussed. The information was not taken from any other place. It was written by me, I did try to include links to her site and the sites she writes for (all free) to show that she is a real entity but those were unacceptable so what do I do? I thought it was actually well written and honest. May I resubmit? Your help would be greatly appreciated :)

BrittanyBleu

--MFHethan (talk) 02:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

So basically rewrite it and in my words and itll be acceptable?

All the links and information is done properly, I just have to put it into my own words. Correct?

Ravenbeauty

(BrittanyBleu (talk) 02:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC))BrittanyBleu

Hi There, I am new to Wikipedia and wonder what I did wrong? I wrote a well thought out article on soap maven Ravenbeauty. She is a very well known entity to the online community of soap fans. She doesn't charge fans for her weekly columns so there was nothing to gain whatsoever by creating an entry for her. I had no idea I was promoting anything. We were all discussing how someone should start a page for her on a soap site where she was being discussed. The information was not taken from any other place. It was written by me, I did try to include links to her site and the sites she writes for (all free) to show that she is a real entity but those were unacceptable so what do I do? I thought it was actually well written and honest. May I resubmit? Your help would be greatly appreciated :)

BrittanyBleu

Request to reverse deletion

I'm not sure if I responded in the correct section but will re-post here.

Thanks for the speedy response and info. I think it will be very useful to me in the future. However, once again, the site you refer is not copyright protected in respect to this article. You are seeing the copyright protection for the CD recording listed for sale. If you go to the official Ism website and click history of the band, they license the use of the article which both myspace and CD baby have used. See the footnote below the band bio. http://www.ism-punk.com/historyoftheband.html Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.179.92 (talk) 15:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent vandal warning

Regarding this post, there is evidence that that user was warned for creating any inappropriate prior to this "last warning". Starting with a "final warning" without any prior warnings is harsh and excessive. Why didn't you start with a softer warning?. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Autoblock collateral damage

Ccchambers (talk · contribs) is requesting relief from the autoblock you imposed on Gaytv (talk · contribs). His edits look OK to me. But I thought you'd want to take a look. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Adrian Silver page.

Hello, I created a Wikipage referencing the work done by a personal friend. This page was deleted by you, the deletion log stated that this page has to be about a real person-- this page is about a real person. I am respectfully requesting that you undelete this page as I will continue to update it with more information. Thank you. TWLISDCA (talk) 08:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello

thanks for your message but I have seen you have re-reverted all my actions; please review these especially for the lighting designer (which is true) and similar for K Mc Kenzie - these are not the acts of a vandal! Flissterm (talk) 16:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Didn't at first mean to put my own article for deletion - someone else was deleting it and I was trying to stop them, and then tried to delete the funny half deletion page that came up. I was confused as the rest, I telly ou! Flissterm (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Yep, I now realise this... I have seen the film and pretty sure it's called Debbie Does Salads but am going to leave it until I can find a sauce... also will have to watch it again because the only bit that really sticks in my mind is the bit with the cucumber and probably need more for the article as people will just rapid delete otherwise? Flissterm (talk) 16:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleting the article RapidFeeds

You have deleted an article I began and your reason was "No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion". I believe that only a few minutes after its creation you cannot have been in a position to make this decision. I went back to the article to add more content just a few minutes later. Also, when I was an active editor (years ago, true) Wikipedia was about collaboration when one started an article and others added to it. If there is a new guideline saying that one must provide a complete article at the very beginning, then I am sorry, I did not know about it. Vaganyik (talk) 17:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate that you restored the page and thanks for your polite and kind answer. I hope that I managed to write at least a stub for the article. If not, I am ready to face the consequences. :-) Vaganyik (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Young Game (rapper)

Hi, Could you salt this page as it has been created 3 times in a short space of time? Thanks --DFS454 (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

No Problem--DFS454 (talk) 20:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Bum Sullivan

Heya, just wondering why you deleted the page I made for my band. If there was something in it that made it unacceptable, please make me aware of how to change it. Thanks. :) Bennehjames (talk) 20:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Page deletion

Hello. I understand the reason why you deleted that page (Skye Harbour), but, this is not a simple garage band. --[[User:Sirgreene|Sirgreene]] ([[User talk:Sirgreene|talk]]) (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not 100% sure, but I thought you might have removed a speedy tag from Skye Harbour? If so, since I've seen your excellent work around in new page patrol, I'm sure you have a good reason and I'd be grateful to know it. My own contention is that it doesn't meet WP:MUSIC, even though there is an assertion of notability not only by the unsupported statement of the article's creator but the winning of some sort of "battle of the bands" -- my understanding is that that sort of competition doesn't lend notability, but I've been known to be wrong. Your comments will be welcome. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Could it be #9 of WP:MUSIC ... "Has won or placed in a major music competition." ... that is the basis of this? I'll gladly defer to your definition of "major" since my own knowledge is limited. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. From time to time, articles wobble on the border and I'm happy when we glean something useful... as I said, I see you working in New Page Patrol like me, and so you know how fast these things go by sometimes; fast decisions are not always the right ones. I always try to make it up to newbies who seem a little bitten, so I've offered as much help as I can. Accounting4Taste:talk 00:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

This Awkward Silence

Why did you delete This Awkward Silence it's a real band and i don't think you had the right to delete it. I wrote on the edit page not to delete cause i was gonna put more info into it later. Kyoxxoyk (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Oh and by the way it's the 26th today not the 27th. I think they have well enough popularity on myspace that should count here as well over 400,000 views on their page. I think they don't need to have millions of views on their page just be able to be on here. One last and final thing how can i get a job like yours? I know it's out of context but i think i could do good at it :).

Greece rotary

Hi,

I am trying to add a page to my title the Rotary of Greece New york receives its charter from Rotary International. I am receiving a deletion citing possible copyright infringement. I am not infringing on any copyrighted material. as a Greece Rotarian I am allowed by Rotary International to use any rotary information.

Thanks for you help is getting my page out Dan Barletta74.67.141.6 (talk) 01:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

So I can do one because the world wide web hasn't heard of them??

So I can do one because the world wide web hasn't heard of them?? Thats like saying someone found a star and because everyone doesn't know what the start is or even heard of the claim they trash it...

The group does Conventions and or Club shows in California, Washington State, Hawaii, Texas, Boston, Illinois, North Carolina... and because a population that out numbers the crowds that attend these shows is the reason why one can't post about them??

I read the policy, why would I make one if I feel that I'm in the right...a lot of hard work for nothing. I thought the point of the information hub/portal is to educate and share new things with others??? 7:56pm Jan26th —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodbeat (talk • contribs) 03:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, does info/links ...

Ok, does info/links from the shows and or venues count? I originally wanted to add on for info once I had a basis established but then wham bam thankyou man it was deleted before I can say abortion. I wanted to gather video links and more about passed shows from the venues. I've been struggling with the site for like 3 days is hard for me to us and as you can see its stressing me out, so i'm sorry. 8:04 Jan.26 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodbeat (talk • contribs) 04:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Trying to add a reference to a Keith Laumer novel...

Took me forever to remember the novels story. Since backed it up by rereading the first part. Rhockenberry (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 01/27/09

Further discussion and citations to reverse Ism (punk band) deletion. 3rd attempt to reach you...

I haven't gotten a response back after providing the originating links which license use of the article in question. The site which you refer to is not copyright protected in respect to this article. You are seeing the copyright protection only for the CD recording listed for sale. If you go to the official Ism website and click history of the band, they license the use of the original article article which both myspace and CD baby have been using and also Wikipedia until you deleted it. See the footnote below the band bio. http://www.ism-punk.com/historyoftheband.html

Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.212.179.92 (talk) 05:00, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

shakespeare by the Sea Deletion

Greetings, I am posting to inquire why the Shakespeare by the sea (San Pedro, CA.) was given a speedy deletion by you under the following guideline: (A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion)--------An article about a real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. A7 applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on. A7 does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion.---------

I believe our article implied out organizations importance as a local cultural organization that served over 15,000 audience and community members annually.

I am open to discussion about returning our post to open status.

Thanks so much.

Chris Cotone Production Manager Shakespeare by the Sea chris@shakespearebythesea.org www.shakespearebythesea.org

76.173.169.193 (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Philippine TV vandal

I've gone to AIV to ask for 122.54.242.47 to be blocked with no avail. Can you help block this guy or protect some of the articles? HkCaGu (talk) 06:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Other admins don't comprehend and I don't have time to write up a case. I just know this guy just turn Hong Kong TV shows into Filipino ones and vice versa, plus other unsourced edits about the Philippines (which I'm not familiar with). Too often his/her IP gets blocked for 1-3 days and he/she returns right after. If each time his/her IP gets a couple weeks, he/she is going to run out of IPs and it's going to be a real discouragement for further vandalism. HkCaGu (talk) 06:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

He/she reappeared at Special:Contributions/122.54.244.52. HkCaGu (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

He/she is now active at Special:Contributions/122.54.243.203. Can you put a stop there please? HkCaGu (talk) 03:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! HkCaGu (talk) 03:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Don't Delete This Article

You don't have to delete the article GATE Corporation (Prison Break). If you want to delete this article, you must delete the article scylla (Prison Break) too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Levis93 (talk • contribs) 16:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleted STORIS article

I am new to Wikipedia and would like additional detail on what I can do to improve my article. Thank you. STORIS (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The article has been edited. Would you please let me know if further editing is needed? Thank you again! PHMwrite0109 (talk) 17:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your guidance. There are new notes indicating that the article still needs to be improved and/or may not meet guidelines. Do you have any suggestions? I appreciate your patience with a new user! :) PHMwrite0109 (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Why did you delete entry

Can a word not exist outside of the norm??? A word that encapsulates 2 different issues and combines them into 1?

Have we all become that narrow minded that simply because a word has been used we don't understand has been defined it simply does not exsist???

if that is what happens please by all means delete my account as well I will not be part of a narrow-minded community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bengel333 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

You deleted my entry for furneckular.. Yes there is no 'Standard definition' but my colleagues and I use the term daily and kind of get tired trying to explain what it means to others.

You called the entry (G1: Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible) and deleted it without so much as a reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bengel333 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I accept your reason for deletion. You may remove my account also. The policy page is very clear and I did not see it prior to opening the account. As I stated earlier, I will not be part of a narrow-minded community, I understand the belligerent entries that happen (probably hourly) but when the definition includes the logic behind the term I fail to see how it can be dismissed as 'Patent nonsense'. Yes I now realize that it should have been placed in Wiktionary but as the policy you showed stated it would have just been deleted there as well. I respectfully thank you for your time on this matter. Please delete my account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bengel333 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC) ping

Deleted Article - All that work gone?

Hey there,

I noticed that you deleted my article on the band Sleep Room. I saw it was tagged for deletion, and inserted a (hang on) as I looked to ammend it (according to the requirements), but then you deleted it in a matter of minutes! Didn't really give me a lot of time to ammend it!

Trouble is, the whole thing is gone, and I had no idea all that work would vanish - don't I at least get a copy to re-edit? Seems a triffle heavy handed just to vapourise a new user's first article while he edits it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryucoo (talk • contribs) 18:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I've put the deleted content on your talk page. Ensure that the article meets the requirements at WP:BAND before you re-introduce it. –xeno (talk)

Hey there again,

Yeah - just spotted that, ta. And the WP:Band thingo. I believe my article about the band meets criteria 1 of "Criteria for musicians and ensembles". How do I go about 'proving' this? Do I provide links to the BBC and Josaka websites in an external links section (as I was beggining to do before the article was deleted, or is there another way I should be doing this?

Incidentally, does it matter if I am on personal terms with the band?

Ryucoo (talk) 19:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

(going to re-venue to your own talk page). –xeno (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleted Article - Ballships

Could you move that article that was deleted today to my user account? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt nemesis (talk • contribs) 19:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

omg!!!

i was just kidding ... you weren't supposed to take it seriously..sorry ...gosh!!! A girl can't just mess around?0.o —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emogirl532 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

i need help

yo i was just wunderin if u could help me find out how to catch vandilism and get badges —Preceding unsigned comment added by David20538 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

be happy

it's ok i've made that mistake b4 too..you have nothing to worry about —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emogirl532 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

What do I need to do to get Dangerbird (band) up and running?

Hello there! I was just wondering what I need to do to have my article 'Dangerbird (band)' fit for posting? Thanks so much for taking the time! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewdead (talk • contribs) 00:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

I will do that! Thank you again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewdead (talk • contribs) 00:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Patrick Ramos

I noticed that you deleted my bio for Patrick Ramos. I believe a bio for him is relevant as he is a co-lead singer and songwriter for the band +/- {plus/minus} and the drummer for Versus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amv70 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

hey PMDrive1061

I thought Wikipedia was a page where everybody could contribute his knowledge and share it with others. As you already said, i wasn't intending to provide wrong information.

So what am i supposed to do now ? And what would you do if i continued changing wrong articles ?

Greetings. Seehund1992 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seehund92 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey PMDrive1061

Thank you very much for your respect.

I use Wikipedia very often, people who change the text just to be funny are annoying me, of course, too.

You did a good job, keep on doing it. Thumbs up —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seehund92 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey PMDrive1061

yes, i totally see your point.

but just telling other people to stop it might not always help, it's true that some people really disrespect wikipedia but others who don't might be a little pissed off in the end because they were just trying to help and they got yelled at.

what about making them proof somehow that their changes are true ? (if possible)

just a little tip ; ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seehund92 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey PMDrive1061

and by the way, if there is any help i could give you with the whole vandalism thing, let me know, i would be glad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seehund92 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Request for releasing an autoblock

A user called Willydick is caught behind an autoblock of Poverty tim, who you blocked for sockpuppetry. Given the nature of this block, I would like your opinion before deciding about the autoblock. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Sebastian Plewinski

On WP:AN you said the article was well-sourced, but I've found no evidence it ever was. Still, I think speedy or prod is not the way to go. He appears to have won multiple contests and while the current prod tag says we don't have articles on them, that's hardly a good case for a country that suffers systemic bias. It's probably better to put it on AFD and contact a relevant WikiProject for help. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

thanks for letting me keep the Sphinx article as a stub.....I do have a bad habit of hitting the save key like a frat boy hits his bong! Buddpaul (talk) 02:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

CNBC UK

Thank you for the correction, you are correct that it should be in capitals! My bad, I appologise. Kevincoy (talk) 01:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

If you could help me infact, I would like to edit the CNBC Nordic page, because CNBC Europe only re-broadcast a different ticker, and no different programmes.... Whilst i think it deserves a page on wikipedia, it shouldn't be a carbon copy of the CNBC Europe page.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevincoy (talk • contribs) 01:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of 'Affliction' page

I've recently created (and subsequently had deleted) a page on a band named affliction. I was just wondering why the page i created had been deleted.I suppose as an arguement for my case, another band page, afflicted contains a lot less detail. Please excuse me if this seems uncivil, i'm not really sure how to word it. Thanks for reading and hopefully responding. TheKahuna90 (talk) 02:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Djsem

Why an indefinite block so soon? The user had only created a test page, twice. -- Longhair\^talk 23:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Innocence Protection Act

You have reminded me why I stopped contributing to wikipedia, both financially and substantively a while back. Geesh. The stub I added for the Innocence Protection Act had as much content as any other stub I've seen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura Anglin (talk • contribs) 00:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi,

I'll do my best to bring that article up to snuff. Thank you for your help.

Kevin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinh456 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Team BBN

This IS bull The BBN Company has every right to be on this site as coke a and pepsi and many other compannys are listed on this web site just beacse my company is small doesn't give you the right to get of it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.137.174 (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

my latest article

You have deleted Hanson Quarry for obvious reasons just as I was about to add a bunch of new information, is it possible you could bring it back to how it was before? thanks i'll add plenty more information —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corevette (talk • contribs) 02:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Pandagames org

I'd encourage you in the future not to immediately block someone based upon a single instance of spamming. I'd propose a less bite-y approach of moving the article to their userpage, sugesting that they change usernames, and pointing then to the COI instructions. Your milage may vary.

I've unblocked Pandagames_org. (Any and all adminstrative actions performed by me are reversable without prior discussion unless otherwise stated, and this Cabal stamp: ♠ means that such reversal cannot be considered wheel warring in any court of law up to and including Trenton NJ.)

brenneman 02:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirect of Slum brothers

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Slum brothers, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Slum brothers is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Slum brothers, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Getdata

A tag has been placed on Getdata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Algebraist 03:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, uhm, why are you telling him this? All PM did was move it. Anyway, userfied now. (Note to self: Must stop talk page stalking everyone.) - brenneman 04:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Because TW doesn't work too well in this situation. Algebraist 04:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

BobbyCro

I stumbled upon BobbyCro (talk · contribs) when editing Reheated Cabbage. Is he a sock or not? He's not blocked but he's got an "I'm a sock" template at the top of his talk page. Also, Talk:Reheated Cabbage says that his edit was made by a sockpuppet of a banned user. If he's not a sockpuppet someone needs to clarify that so it doesn't haunt him later. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Barack Obama (Comic Character) Image Help

Hello,

New to this, but trying to create a page about Barack Obama as a comic character. I'm having problems adjusting the image size. Can anyone point me in the direction of what I'm doing wrong? Thanks. Desiree —Preceding unsigned comment added by Desireeu22 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Infringement Mix-Up

I am an employee for award winning, world renown, celebrity, fashion, and beauty photographer Kenneth Willardt. The text that was placed in the article is the text that he wrote, approved, and would like to have on your site. I was wondering how it's copyright infringement if he himself wrote it? I understand you might have pulled it because of the similarity to the one on his website's biography, but since he, Kenneth Willardt, wrote it and wanted it to be on wikipedia, how is it infringing upon a copyright he owns? A copyright protects a persons right to their property, but since the bio is his property and he wants to put it on wikipedia it should not have been pulled. How can I go about reposting the article and getting it to stay online?

Studio529 (talk) 17:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Neutral Tone To Article

Thank you for your help. :) I'm still a tad confused on how to make it neutral. It's just a factual biography. Any suggestions on terms I need to remove or add?

Studio529 (talk) 18:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thank you so much!!! I really appreciate all your help. Have a great day. :) Studio529 (talk) 18:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

im the owner of Hi-tv

Ok! I got another warning, is unfair! Why do you delete my article is not copyright violation! we are promoting the analog switcoff in mexico, not publicity —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cybernardo (talk • contribs) 22:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

my page hi-tv

The hi-tv service and the page are of my property, why do you delete my page telling me its copyright infrigement! thats a big lie! i request to have my page again! we are a company that is promotinv digital television and the television analog switchoff in mexico, its not publicity! its just to help mexican people! this change to digital TV is happening all over the world! please i request my page back again —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cybernardo (talk • contribs) 21:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Harjinder Singh Dilgeer

Is this one a copyvio too? I can't find where it comes from. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Why may I ask did you delete my page? Jmcleod1101 (talk) 00:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

OK please remove the protected status

so if there are secondary sources they can be added for gpirate

also can u make me admin i m a uw computer science professor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisudia (talk • contribs) 01:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Violation

Hello, I created my first article yesterday called, "Barack Obama (comic character)." Everything looked good to go then the image I had up (an issue of the spider-man comic) was taken down by one of the bots for being a "copyright violation." I'm sure this is a mistake as a lot of other articles have comics on their pages and am pretty sure I just set the picture up wrong when I uploaded it. Can you point me in the right direction of what I need to do? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Desireeu22 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

OK please remove the protected status

so if there are secondary sources they can be added for gpirate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisudia (talk • contribs) 22:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

page deleted

hi my page i just made was deleted.. its my bio of myself and my music career and i havnt finished it and nothing is far from the truth its all dead on and i dont get it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brettfrana (talk • contribs) 23:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

page deleted

im not good with computers. im a member of 3 bands and mentioned on 3 pages and i just want to connect them to a bio of me? is that possible? or can i not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brettfrana (talk • contribs) 23:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Chen Chimutengwende - Inappropriate speedy deletion

I noticed that Chen Chimutengwende had been speedied for "Article that has no meaningful, substantive content"

The text said "Chen Chimutengwende served as the acting Information Minister in Zimbabwe."

A3 says "No content. Any article (other than disambiguation pages, redirects, or soft redirects) consisting only of external links, category tags and "see also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, chat-like comments, template tags and/or images. However, a very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion. Similarly, this criterion doesn't cover a page with an infobox with non-trivial information." from Wikipedia:CSD#A3 - The text of that article clearly did not correspond to the conditions of A3.

Also you did not notify me that the article had been speedied.

Please only speedy specifically according to the criteria. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

• Apology accepted :) - Next time be careful when deciding whether to speedy an article - Oftentimes I prefer to use PROD as it gives people time to correct any errors in the article. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

You deleted my stuff.

I created a page dedicated to Reclaimer Comic, and you swiftly deleted it. You cited some random rule that does not pertain to the situation, and I am now a sad panda. Please explain the action. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PikminGod (talk • contribs) 01:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

HMMM

I thought I had included a 3rd party sorce. I did it inside the article. The fact that it is listed on the Bungie Blog is a huge deal. Is there somewhere else I should post that or is that not enough? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PikminGod (talk • contribs) 01:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

So what do I need to do to establish notability? This is new to me. HALP!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by PikminGod (talk • contribs) 02:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

hi admin:

On the 29th of january you wrote "Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the PAK ABOAGYE article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted"

I wish to state that the biographical statements made on the page regarding Mr. Aboagye were in my own words.

The only copyrighted text are titles of his written books and I've attached web sources to avoid plagiarism.There is no text copied from those websites apart from the correct titles of books he wrote in the Nzema language.

Could you please point out the copyrighted statements apart from titles of his books?

Thanks so much for your great work in helping inform the world.

Krakue (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Adrian Silver-- deletion?

You replied saying that there is a notability issue-- if Adrian Silver is notable in that he is a distinguished young porn star, why is he not allowed to have a page? I can point out dozens of others on Wikipedia that has a page. If Adrian Silver is not allowed to have a page on here, then I suggest you start pulling all the other ones off of the wiki. This definitely does not exercise the original intent of a wiki. This is about as bad as the United Kingdom and China blocking off Wikipedia access.

Please reconsider.

TWLISDCA (talk) 03:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Page deleted.

Hi, I was curious why my page was deleted since I wrote the original article that was copyrighted. Can you please explain.

Thanks! Sadrummer (talk) 04:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Apple Wellington Poem Page

This page was deleted on the ground of being "patent nonsense," however, it does not fall under either definition of "patent nonsense" given by Wikipedia. Nonsense "falls into two categories: 1. Total nonsense, i.e., text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes sequences such as "sdfgdsfkgdyhkflmaololol;;'dsfg", in which keys of the keyboard have been pressed with no regard for what is typed. 2. Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever."

Wikipedia, Patent nonsense, available at, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PN (last visited Jan. 29, 2009).

The page had legible, comprehensible text. People were able to make sense of the text and its meaning. As a result, "patent nonsense" is not a valid basis for deleting the page. There may be other bases for deletion, but deletion on the basis of "patent nonsense" is an arbitrary and capricious use of your power to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wellingtonapple (talk • contribs) 21:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes it is patent nonsense, it's about some form of poetry you made up. Stifle (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Page deleted.

Hi, I am also curious why a page was deleted since I wrote the original article that was copyrighted. Can you please explain why you did not ask the author (me) or have a discussion before deleting? Please reinstate as this is open material, my material, and I give permission to use.

PS: I don't think you should be simply deleting articles without taking time to discuss or ask details.

Thanks!

Manyimages (talk) 07:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)manyimages

how do i nominate gpirate for keeps

how do i undelete gpirate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisudia (talk • contribs) 18:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Please Don't Delete my new Pages.

Hi, I really appreciate that you keep the Wikipedia clean.

I am in the process of creating few articles which I discovered during the visit of India.
Please don't delete those pages, as I am keep editing them to write full articles.

There are the articles, I am creating

1) Ramdwara
2) Swami Ram Charan
 : This is about a religions tradidition which is 500 years old.

Thnks for your support !

Please revert back the changes. I will be writing the whole article in separate file and will post. It include lot of lanuage translation.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahpura (talk • contribs) 04:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Azeituna

It just keeps getting created or what? §FreeRangeFrog 05:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

The Violin Diary

Hello, I've recently recreated an article that was deleted not too long ago. I think you'll find with the sources I've included that it is beyond notable and warrants an article. Please advise me on what else I can do to keep it. The woman that started the original is no longer editing Wikipedia, but I've been given full permission to place her words back into my article, but only once it has been accepted by the site's users. Woodyallenfan2004 (talk) 05:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Advertising

Can you please indicate what made the recently deleted "iLLusive Design Incorporated" article blatant advertising so I can make the needed corrections.

Casheus (talk) 06:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Are you a bot? I just did an intial save before continuing and the page got deleted (within about 5 seconds). thanks a lot. so much for sharing information, now I've lost the mood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eydaimon (talk • contribs) 07:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Archive

Hi
I just noticed, you set your archive up to start at /Archive 3, which is why your archive box at the top isn't showing anything. You might want to move it to /Archive 1 and change the "counter = 3" in the archive bot settings to "counter = 1".
Cheers, Amalthea 12:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

I was wondering why my archive counter wasn't working! Thanks for the incredibly timely help. I've fixed it, or so I hope. It seems to be working OK, but will it just keep dumping everything to the Archive 1 page? I never could get this to work right for me. Thanks again. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

It'll automatically switch to Archive 2 once it passes 250K (maxarchivesize = 250K). --Amalthea 16:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

You deleted a page I just created.. Words Now Heard.. There was 0 copyrighted material on the page.. I'm confused.. The first page I created was a bio taken from their site with permissions, but due to restrictions on wikipedia the 2nd post was completely original content.

--Josh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bikr (talk • contribs) 17:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

WordsNowHeard

Thank you for taking another look. I just found it odd that one of my favorite bands, even though local , didn't have a wiki article, so I wanted to create one for them , I will be editing it with more content asap, just want to make sure everything I do won't be deleted.  :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bikr (talk • contribs) 17:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Why did you delete my page?

I was just starting a page for a company that I and my father both work for. I saved it so I would not lose my progress if my computer or web browser crashed. I had only 2 lines of text written, and you deleted it. That is not fair, nor just. I am extremely unhappy with what you have done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WhatTheFehl312 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

BayBio page?

Hi there, Wondering why you deleted the BayBio page for "blatant copyright infringement"? Is there something I can do to fix that? Thanks! Kgbailey (talk) 00:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Navit page

You have deleted a new article on the open source software project navit for 'blatent copyright infringement', could you give a further explanation of what text you considered to infringe copyright, it doesn't take long to update users talk pages. Pl here (talk) 02:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the deletion Pl here (talk) 02:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Mystical Traveler

Hi there,

Please let me know why you deleted the 'Mystical Traveler' page.

Thanks so much, Zoegolightly (talk) 06:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

page deletion

YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND DELET THE ARTICLE . . . THE FAMILY WASN'T THRILLED WITH THE IDEA..... MusicianMuse (talk) 01:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring the article. . . could you possible edit a part that you question the tone on so I can understand? MusicianMuse (talk) 03:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I read the criteria you pointed me to, and this musician meets several of the criteria. MusicianMuse (talk) 02:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand why within just seconds the page I was adding was deleted. There are other American Idol contestant pages on wikipedia so why????? MusicianMuse (talk) 02:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Page Deletion for XPS Studio.

Hi,

As I know, you have deleted my writing on Dell Studio XPS, I acknowledge that it seems to be an extra useless article, but as you know the Studio XPS is rather a Studio/XPS Mutt so due to clarity reasons, I wrote it to improve searchability as well as the reason that the Studio XPS rather is not anywhere alike with the Studio and XPS lines since it got luxury and 16:9 aspect ratio. Please reply why you deleted it, any reply is appreciated.

~The CCTV on 02/02/2009 on 10:12PM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CircuitCityTeleVision (talk • contribs) 03:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Possibly, the user does not understand. I am not doing any promotion, but just describing the looks of the computer and what's the difference between the Studio XPS Line and Studio Line, XPS Line.

Exisisting article does not represent the Studio XPS Line, should be added to the XPS line as Dell did...

~The CCTV —Preceding unsigned comment added by CircuitCityTeleVision (talk • contribs) 05:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I just add the redirect link right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CircuitCityTeleVision (talk • contribs) 06:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Association of Moving Image Archivists

I am the secretary of this organisation, and am authorised to use the text from its website on the page you just deleted. Please do not delete it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LDGE (talk • contribs) 21:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Please also put this page back. I've lost the text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LDGE (talk • contribs) 21:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

There is no now text on this page copied directly from the website - only links. PLEASE LEAVE IT ALONE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by LDGE (talk • contribs) 21:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Saint Casimir's Catholic Church (Worcester, Massachusetts)

Dear PMDrive1061:

I recently created the page referenced in the subject line of this message. You immediately deleted it, citing copyright infringement as your cause for action. I am writing to inform you that I designed and built all of the pages at www.stcasimirworc.org, including the history page from which the information was taken. I have written permission from the author, who is a member of Saint Casimir's Catholic Parish, to re-print the information as she is elderly and does not have internet access. How shall I forward her notice of granted permission to you so that the deleted page may be restored?

Saint Casimir's Catholic Church in Worcester, Massachusetts is facing closure due to decreased spiritual life and a shortage of clergy in the Diocese of Worcester. It is a notable religious organization as it was the first Lithuanian Roman Catholic church in central Massachusetts. I, and others, would truly like to see the parish recognized for all that it has done in its 115-year history.

Thanks for your help, and I look forward to hearing from you.

DMMoulton (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)DMMoulton

RfD nomination of CATOMA OUTDOOR

I have nominated CATOMA OUTDOOR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Tagishsimon (talk) 22:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Donald Woodman?

Hello- I am trying to make a page for him. Please stop deleting it. Thank You —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanebennettcontemporaryart (talk • contribs) 23:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Indee.tv

I am very impressed by the speed of your reaction to the article. You had addressed the reason as (A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content: No notability, either)

Per Wikipedia guidelines in for Deletion Criteria A3: "this criterion doesn't cover a page with an infobox with non-trivial information."

I was in the process of fleshing out the article at least to a Stub Level with more relevant information when I noticed it had already been deleted.

I have also listed details of my COI on the talk page as Wikipedia had advised on the COI information page. Could you please advise me if there is something else I am missing. I will be including details about the service and website: http://www.indee.tv

Thank you. Sharan (talk) 23:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the detailed info. Much appreciated. Sharan (talk) 00:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

"Possible Cut and Paste" - Roberto Reyes Barreiro

You marked my submission for Reyes Barreiro as "Possible cut and paste"

Why?

GP —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guido.pilot (talk • contribs) 00:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

"Possible Cut and Paste" - Roberto Reyes Barreiro

"Hi. It looks as if it originated from another website or printed source, but I got no Google hits. If it's your own words, please accept my apology. It's just that copyright issues are taken rather seriously here. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)"

No, no cut and paste. They're my words from personal experience. I guess I shouldn't act like a writer and act more like an average guy. Maybe hire an attorney named "Frito"?

)

Apology accepted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guido.pilot (talk • contribs) 00:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

YUM! Thanks PM for the cookie. Also, most of the references to him are in Spanish. Google has him in Spanish, as well as his quotes. Oh, and of course, the Frito reference was to "Idiocracy"...

not a real person?

Hi, I was in the process of creating a page and was deleted in the middle of the process saying the person isnt a real person, when Im providing sources. why is that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simsimjazzyb (talk • contribs) 00:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I provided a publication, a magazine link and was in the process of putting more sources. Is there something you need to verify the person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simsimjazzyb (talk • contribs) 00:28, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

How many third party sources do you need? Because the link I added (the 1st source) was to a published magazine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simsimjazzyb (talk • contribs) 00:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Maybe Im not adding the sources correctly. Instead of adding the links after every fact about him, should I just add them in the external link section? --Simsimjazzyb (talk) 00:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the help! I figured it out and have started the process of adding sources. Thanks!--Simsimjazzyb (talk) 05:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Runes of Magic

Hello PMDrive, the above article has been protected from recreation, which is fair enough after being speedied three times already, but I've found a pretty decent source on Eurogamer and Kotaku has several pieces on it. I was wondering if it was possible to unlock that protection so I could create an article on it, or if it will be necessary to seek wider consensus at DRV? If you can/will remove the protection I'll have some text in place and sources cited within 24 hours. Many thanks. Someoneanother 02:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Cory-Wright, Silston

Hi - you've deleted my entry on Cory-Wright, Silston - would you mind sending me a copy of the content, as I've made substantial changes and work on this, but didn't retain a copy. I'll review the material and resubmit, without breaching copyright this time. Thanks

Richcw (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Richcw

My deletion

The information were from my own writing and from my own website. Could you please undo your deletion. There is no copyright violations there.

Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilufrog (talk • contribs) 18:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

BERTScope page

You have deleted the BERTScope. I was not trying to advertise but merely provide a quick reference of what is a BERTScope. I can remove any external links if that helps.

Please let me know. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fahsho (talk • contribs) 19:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Roy Van Den Brink Budgen

I find it outrageous how my page about this man was swiftly deleted so soon after creation. He is truly a great man, and his contribution to critical thinking, lunging and orgasmo-ideas should not be underestimated. He is the source of such inspirational phrases as "Yes, Yes, Yes, Oh God that's such a good idea..." and so on and so fourth. And with regards to the false information provided on the page, in my defence your honour, Hatton did it, then Diego unfortunately stole the evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roybudge (talk • contribs) 20:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Give 'em some time

Hey PM... I just wanted to drop in as I've noticed over the past few days you have been carrying out speedy deletions within minutes of the article's creation (i.e. Titanoboa - created 12:13, tagged 12:15, you deleted that same minute). Remember that some new editors will create an article with several smaller edits... so let's try and give 'em time to do so. cheers, –xeno (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm the person who created that article, and then recreated it after you deleted it. It is now listed on wikipedia's main page as a news item. Grundle2600 (talk) 23:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Shankopotamus

Please allow this to go through. Nothing in my copy is offensive, and simply relates to the original source. Copyrights are included.

Blinke (talk) 22:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC) Thanks, Blinke

50 Greatest Gunners

Hi, just letting you know, 50 Greatest Gunners was clearly not A7 material. — neuro^(talk) 22:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

No, it was definitely not ^whoops worthy of deletion, but it was certainly not A7. — neuro^(talk) 22:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Posting an Executive Order from the President of the United States is not Vandalism. Please stop deleting things as such.

Gurboura (talk) 01:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Jason

François Villiers

R U sure? I couldn't find the copyvio? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I know what you mean. I googled significant phrases and could find nothing, though. So I was about to rescue the tone. Unimportant. I don't feel strongly either way. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Go on then. Drop it into my userspace and I'll have a crack at it Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

A good start I think. Over to someone else now. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, buddy! You gets a cookie. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Yum! I want a glass of milk now! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

• LOL! Y'know, it might be time to create a {{subst:yummymilk}} template...! Gotta run. Take care and I'll see you here. Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Kyle Lerner

Why did you delete my page? Everything was cited, and just because you may not know who I am doesn't mean I do not reserve the right to have a page on myself to promote my band and facts. I HAD references. You're ruining my dream. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelerner15 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC) It took a lot of time to create that, and a simple username change could fix the conflict of interest issue. I am set to get this page up, as it hasn't broken any wikipedia rules and I've cited references. It's an opinion to say it is only a marketing/advertisement, when wikipedia is based on facts. Why do you have to be difficult for me to create a FACTUAL page that didn't have anything on it anyway. The "KYLE Lerner" page is now blank. It adheres to wikipedia's main rules: make factualy information which isn't opinoin based, and do not offend anybody. Not to re-mention that there has been nothing under the "Kyle Lerner" article, so why leave it blank when it can at least have some fact? Thanks for reading the long message. I would appreciate that email, thank you. Is there anything I could do to make the article more notable? According the Notability article in wikipedia, "Keep in mind that an encyclopedia article is a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject, not a complete exposition of all possible details. For example, the notability guideline for people states that lists of people are not meant to be exhaustive." Now although I do see your point, but Britney Spears, for example was not originally famous. She needed publicity. And although it sounds like I want a "lousy promotional page," I have done some notable work for the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Enough notice, at least, to be noted on the Stadium Arcadium page. And I do own my own personal business that is popular in the San Fernando Valley in California. I beleive that if a small single song such as Cheryl Moana Marie get its own page, why not me? Thank you very much. I appreciate all the time you put into this. Once I'm famous, I'll have a wiki page made about me by someone else ;)

Ben There, Dan That! deletion

Why was this deleted under A7? It's about a game, not a person or organisation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seregrail7 (talk • contribs) 23:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

If you do a quick google search you will find that it has been covered by a host of websites, including mainstream gaming sites such as Kotaku, and it also won awards on Jay Is Games, a very large casual game website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seregrail7 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Donkeyrock page

Sorry, I thought I was making a user page, but I guess it was a regular page. My bad. Donkeyrock (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Why Delete Kat Deluna

It is the real third single, and i was just starting to create the page until you deleted it. That was really dumb w.e. Kat Deluna can go all wrong for one Am I Dreaming ain't even a single. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moairguard (talk • contribs) 00:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Betchoice deletion

G'day PMDrive1061

Clearly this is all new to me. I tried to post the article "betchoice" I undertsand your point that it is percieved as advertising. But I went out of my way to check many articles about similar topics (companies) and felt that my article is less advertsiing than Wikipedia articles like Centrebet (similar company) which is approved and if anything I would suggest that the article is less "Blatant advertsising" than the Centrebet or any article I have read? I have made plenty of references and am using this article to learn all about wikipedia (to explain it and see if my kids can use it at school). I don't want to contact the company as they will turn into an ad!

I have read your all your help pages about writing articles and even asked my other staff memebers at the high school which I work at to edit the parts they found as advertising or didn't meet 'Deletion Policy'. By undertsanding the Wikipedia I hope to prevent plagarism in my classroom as well as use it as a tool myself. Thanks for your time.

--Parges (talk) 02:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Parges from Australia

Cars Characters

Information about the use of a license tag in other films is not appropriate for this page. If you would like to make a page detailing the history of hollywood-used license plates and their associated references, then add it there (linking "PCE" to it from this article). It would be similarly inappropriate to write about the history of buck-toothed hillbillies in Mater's section, or how flashy lightning tattoos were the rage in pre-colonial America. SpikeJones (talk) 03:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

No it is not nonsense

No, it's not nonsense. They are a world renowned business organization. Please give me an appropriate to why have deleted that page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schoolkaadon28 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

O, well sorry for the trouble —Preceding unsigned comment added by Schoolkaadon28 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not delete MeGlobe

MeGlobe falls under the same scope as Meebo in terms of its offering with the notable exception of offering real time translation to instant messaging. I don't understand why the page was deleted. Please explain. We have a significant web presence and offer a very useful solution to the barriers that language presents to globalization. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meglobewiki (talk • contribs) 01:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC) — Meglobewiki (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Your very wording (not to mention your username) displays your conflict of interest and desire to advertise your firm. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Editing

Hi: I'm new to all of this, and frankly it seems a little complicated. I simply want to post a bio piece about myself. I wrote it. I simply copied it. The piece is posted on several websites---Screen Actor's Guild, IMDB, etc. It's not a big deal. But you keep rejecting it. Can you help me instead of telling me I'm disruptive and that You're going to cancel my account? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohyea3410 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

More on Bio

I wrote the bio that you see. I simply copied it from my Word file. Are you suggesting that I re-write it for you? I like it the way that it is. It's my material, so I should be able to use it freely. I am the reference point on this piece. I'm not stealing it from any one. There is no infringement, as I see it. I want something that is separate from from other related links. This is the solo Andrew Amador link. Many other actors have done much the same. Thanks. Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohyea3410 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

More, More Bio

Ok. That makes sense. I'll alter it a bit and re-submit. Thanks, Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohyea3410 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Why

Hi, how are you. I was just wondering why you deleted the band Common Conversations wiki? many thanks bigjazone Bigjazone (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Is it okay now?

I think I posted it correctly. I re-wrote parts of it and posted the piece as you suggested. Thanks for your help. --Ohyea3410 (talk) 03:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC) --Ohyea3410 (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Bio Again

Hi: Someone else has decided to delete my bio. I thought we were good to go on this. PLease help. Thanks. --Ohyea3410 (talk) 05:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

recs of the flesh

Hi there - I am a listener of this band from Sardinia and I thought it might be Wiki worthy to put together a page about them. I created a subpage of my user, and I was wondering if you could help me out putting it online? you can check out the subpage here: [4] - Thank you very much for your time and attention! Daydreamjetset (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

First time poster (me!) obviously making mistakes asking for guidance

Hello. Could you help with guidance on how to make my first time ever post acceptable? I read all the guidelines and thought I had written it properly with "neutral content", but you deleted it. I'm not quite sure what I did wrong. The entry was for 'Green_Stuff_Absorbent'. Thank you for your time and help. Syosset1966 (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Syosset1966Syosset1966 (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for the reply. I did try to write the piece as dry as possible. I have regularly used this product (fire department) and took notes along the way. I went to the maker of Green Stuff Absorbents website to make sure my statements were correct. The rest of the material is my own creation. I added the three links at the end to verify what could be verified. At what point do words become copyright infringement or advertising? I was specifically trying to avoid those, but obviously failed. Any advice? Thank you again for your help. Syosset1966 (talk) 01:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello! First off, thank you for your help in getting my first time entry correct. I have added the text to my article in my temporary page within my own user space as you suggested. Please comment at the end on how to change wording so I don't violate Wiki guidelines by mistake. I am particularly curious as to which of my lines are examples of 'acceptable' and which are problematic. This will help me to learn best. Your guidance is much appreciated! Syosset1966 (talk) 14:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Excellent! Thanks again. The best I understand on the history part is that a company in Texas called Berryman Products owned and sold it before the current D2L Products. One of the external links goes to a Berryman page that still shows Green Stuff Absorbent so, the transfer had to be very recent. The salesman tells me the product was developed to be an improvement on the current clay-based "kitty litter" absorbents that have been the standard for the last 100 years. Our firehouse uses it and finds it to be a miracle product for common spills. We just don't have the room for the amounts of the clay absorbents needed and this Green Stuff saves us an amazing amount of space and weight hauling it around. They tout this as being "environmentally friendly" and reducing our "carbon footprint", which I suppose is probably true. I'm not quite sure how to say that in the post because it seems to me like 'hearsay' or the infamous 'blatant advertising'. How exactly can you cite something like that? The reason I wanted to post this product on Wiki is because other firehouses and businesses have been asking us about it and they wanted to get info from a source other than Green Stuff itself, which they assume will be too favorably biased. Again, I really appreciate your assistance in getting my work done right! Syosset1966 (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Wow!!! You know what you are doing!!! The salesman tells me that Berryman Products has fully tranferred the distribution of Green Stuff as well to D2L Products, so I guess that means Berryman is a past distributor. He thinks the transfer was indeed done sometime in 2008. Apparently, it was an amicable transfer. The product is exactly the same, just a new owner. Any thoughts on the "environmentally friendly" stuff? I'm torn as to whether that should be considered hearsay, although everyone in our firehouse agrees we are using way less energy with Green Stuff than our old clay absorbents and we are generating way less waste to be carted away. Syosset1966 (talk) 17:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I could see that to an extent. We didn't think it was notable when the sales guy first came by, but when we saw the live demo of it, our Captain was suddenly chattering with a million ways it could make a fireman's life easier! I think it is marginally notable at the moment, but it will be growing in importance as a useful "green" product. I suppose that is what Wiki is really all about, spreading the word on what things are in an unbiased, but firsthand way. I hope they keep our entry as I think people will use it and add to it as its use spreads in the market. It got me into Wiki as well! Syosset1966 (talk) 18:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! All clear for transfer? Do I cut and paste the entire piece including the links and the catagories on the bottom as well? Syosset1966 (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey there! I think it went through correctly! Could you just give it a peek to see if I missed anything? Thanks yet again. This collaboration has just made a loyal fan and poster on Wiki. I may well check in with you on future posts as you clearly know the lay of the Wiki land!

Syosset1966 (talk) has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

 Syosset1966 (talk) 20:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello again. Our post is up, but the dreaded 'This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion...' has appeared with it. Would it help if you added your own hangon note to it explaining why it should stay up? I suspect my opinion would carry little weight with a reviewer. Thanks! Syosset1966 (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello yet again! I think I see what you mean. Should I be concerned that it might suddenly be deleted with that current warning on it? Is there anything I can do to make it better or soothe the fears of that administrator? Syosset1966 (talk) 02:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Guess who, it's Syosset1966 again! Seems there is a more ominous message on my article now - AfD nomination of Green Stuff Absorbent I have nominated Green Stuff Absorbent, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Stuff Absorbent. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Nothing to distinguish this from other brands of superabsorbent polymer. Has been deleted twice as spam. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Can you add your more credible two cents to the link on why Green Stuff Absorbent to try and get him to let it stay? Thank you so much!!! Syosset1966 (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Philippine/Hong Kong TV vandal

He's been back a few times, but this one I couldn't get him blocked and he's still active: Special:Contributions/122.54.250.156. Also can you place a protection on Enjoy Yourself Tonight as long as possible? HkCaGu (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm beginning to think that it might be someone from the Philippines who had lived in Hong Kong who have since become mentally ill, now thinking that TVB is a Philippine TV network and EYT hosted by all these Filipino/as. HkCaGu (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Now that EYT is protected, he's moved on to other subjects he can build Hong Kong-Philippines "relationships", such as making Enchong Dee a Chinese singer. See Special:Contributions/122.54.246.192. HkCaGu (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/122.54.246.192 is still active after a warning. HkCaGu (talk) 15:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

PAK ABOAGYE, deleted

Hi Admin:

On the 29th of January 2009, you deleted my article entitled PAK ABOAGYE with a G12 code for blatant copyright infringement. I've been trying to find out from you which parts of the article were copyrighted since the biography of PAK ABOAGYE was written in my own words and I listed the web sources for some of the books he had written.

Please let me know

Krakue Krakue (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Loves Art LACMA meetup

Due to some unforgivable confusion on my part, the meetup on Saturday the 28th needs to be rescheduled. Please see Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Loves Art/LACMA rules#Rescheduling poll to vote for a day/time that works best for you. Thank you and I apologize for the inconvenience. howcheng {chat} 05:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

PalmerSport

Hello, after receiving help on this article from Acroterion (it has been written with his help in my sandbox) would it now be possible to unlock the page so I can make it an official Wiki page? Thanks Stremayne (talk) 11:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Question about CSD A7

Hey, question about CSDs. It is something I've been wondering for quite awhile but now I decide to ask about it. I was considering proposing Tony Hawk Underground two cheats (which you recently deleted) for speedy deletion, but I couldn't figure out which criterion it violated. I was considering A7 but there isn't really one for video games, et al. Is there a CSD for things that obviously should be deleted and speeedily (ie: very poorly written OR one of the criterion not listed in A7) but don't deserve an AFD or even a Prod? Whoever finally tagged it said A7 but I missed the actual tag. I want to know more about the intricacies of CSD before I attempt my eventual RfA. Thanks Valley2city^‽ 00:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

re: PAK ABOAGYE deleted

Hi admin:

Thanks for your feedback. I now understand where you are coming from. I copied the article from my word document where I created the Biography (is it not allowed to do that under Wikipedia?)Should I create the article directly under the Wikipedia page? I will provide the release under the GNU licence as suggested.

Krakue (talk) 03:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Micro-eco.com

Page was created again after your speedy delete. Tagged it again. Might want to gently block that user for a bit :) §FreeRangeFrog 03:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Acne.org

Thanks for salting! --Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Barracuda_Web_Server_SDK is not copyright infringement

The text was designed exclusively for Wikipedia. I like to know how you can come to the conclusion that it is a copyright infringement? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilfrednilsen (talk • contribs) — Wilfrednilsen (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Wrong. See this manual right here! --Orange Mike | Talk 04:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, the only common part between the wiki page and the page at the above link is the list of components. I’ll recreate the page without the list. Wilfrednilsen (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

My page got delted, my fault

My page was deleted. I made a mistake and resubmited the page instead of editing. It was a mistake. I am so sorry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebe_Price —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamerxt (talk • contribs) 04:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

thank you.

I will try to add more information on Price. I ran into the same problem with Lois Wickstom which was deleted for lack of content but reinstated once I formatted the article better and added more dynamic content.

Cameron Marshall

Marshall is a gay porn actor and many other actors have wikipedia entries on here. He deserves to have an entry also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CMFanSite (talk • contribs) 04:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deleted page

Hi. I tried to create a sandbox today, but instead of putting everything into User:Wikipedical/Sandbox I accidentally put it in Wikipedical/Sandbox, and you rightfully speedy deleted that page. However, I have lost all of what I was working on. Would it be possible for you to temporarily undelete the page to move it to my sandbox or could you just post it in my sandbox? That would be great, thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

I added new links including the NY post. I added a link from wikpedia. I will add more if needed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebe_Price —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamerxt (talk • contribs) 07:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Sayed Jalal

Hi,

I recently posted an article about Sayed Jalal. Sayed Jalal is a candidate in the run for President of Afghanistan. The Afghan Elections are an important topic that many people are interested in. I was unaware of the terms of this website and due to that my posting got deleted. I wanted to know if the article can get unblocked and I would make the changes necessary to meet guidelines.

Regards Helai —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helai Hashmat (talk • contribs) 16:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Unblock request of AnnHelen

Hello PMDrive1061. AnnHelen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards,  Sandstein  18:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Talk page

Please could you restore the deleted history of your talk page, now that you are no longer vanished. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 23:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for answering. I don't agree with you - you cancelled your RTV, and so there isn't really any good reason why editors should be prevented from seeing previous discussions here. DuncanHill (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

• There's no need to restore the vandalistic edits, but per Wikipedia:AN#Vanishing_.26_returning_admins, there's an emerging consensus that keeping the talk page history deleted is inappropriate. –xeno (talk) 23:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Um, I'm actually not sure what you mean PMDrive - if you mean edits from January (since you unvanished) I wasn't talking about them (and of course if they have been deleted than I can't see them anyway). I mean from before you vanished. DuncanHill (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

• • Just click here, "Invert selection", then uncheck the vandalistic edits and they'll remain deleted. –xeno (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
• By the way, now that I've become somewhat of a regular here, howsabout cleaning up those posts near the top that the bot isn't getting? ;> –xeno (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Looks like you forgot to invert the selection first. Delete your whole talk page, "Select all" (or invert), then uncheck the ones you don't want restored. –xeno (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok,  Done, Did I get 'em all? –xeno (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• But where's the stuff from before he vanished? DuncanHill (talk) 00:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• • OK, the problem is with the pagemove history. You have two archives User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive 1 and User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive1, and one of them at least was created by a pagemove from your usertalk page, so the histopry will have been moved with it too. Will copy to your talk page when it reappears again! DuncanHill (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Actually, three archives, see User talk:PMDrive1061/Archives as well. DuncanHill (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• • It's all there (now), less some childish vandalism (7 edits). Try refreshing your cache. –xeno (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Thanks everyone - seems to be OK now! Now, about sorting out the archiving..... :) DuncanHill (talk) 00:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• OK, with the archives - it looks like User talk:PMDrive1061/Archives is the first one, User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive1 is the second, and User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive 1 is the third (I think I've got that right!). DuncanHill (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi you mentioned that I should just write the article in my own words. Would I still be able to use the name "Sayed Jalal" ? I seem to be blocked from doing so....can this be unblocked? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helai Hashmat (talk • contribs) 00:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of article Jeffrey Prang

I am the co-author of the article about Jeffrey Prang the current Mayor of West Hollywood, having co-authored it with him. Can you provide some insights into why it was deleted, and what I can do to get it approved? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MktgMike (talk • contribs) 01:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC) MktgMike (talk) 01:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Greg Mercer

Originally I had posted accurate, legitimate information with references, not many but I was in the process of adding more, as I hit submit it states that my page was deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshinWinnipeg (talk • contribs) 02:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Greg Mercer

I understand that my second posting was crap, the first page was accurate and legit. I Was in the process of copying from my notepad on my workstation and as I hit save it says that the page was deleted??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshinWinnipeg (talk • contribs) 02:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

I will re-add the page with more detail, faster. I apologize for the frustration JoshinWinnipeg (talk) 02:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Gazinto & Gazottah

These are slang terms used in software engineering. These words are about as made-up as "Bawitdaba," (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bawitdaba). These terms are not spam or marketing, include citiation and are not slanderous or vulgar in any way. Please reconsider allowing this content.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibanezowner (talk • contribs) 03:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay thank you. I am going to work on a new text for resubmission. What are the precise steps I should take once I have the text ready?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helai Hashmat (talk • contribs) 04:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Okay thank you. I am going to work on a new text for resubmission. What are the precise steps I should take once I have the text ready?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helai Hashmat (talk • contribs) 04:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

---

Hello you deleted the page that I just set up for Brandon Raynor's School of Massage and Natural Therapes yet it was set up in the same format as the page for Health Schools Australia our partner school. I beg to ask you what the difference is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bala1811 (talk • contribs) 04:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Vinh Quang

Hi, thanks for your note; I don't really know about model airplanes; I work on main line HoSTC and HASTC companies; the reason being that it can be difficult to establish notability for VN corporate articles; for example see this temporally simultaneous discussion of Hai Ha Confectionery at this administrator's talk page - User talk:Jclemens#Hai Ha Confectionery. --Mr Accountable (talk) 05:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Sustainable Waterloo technical glitch

It seems that as I was tagging the Sustainable Waterloo article with lots of problems you were deleting it (I approve, by the way). However, I think by some wiki-glitch that ensured that the article still exists (just blank except for my tags which I've deleted). You may want to go and get rid of this spurious remaining version. --Quartermaster (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

deleting

hello i made a sensible article and was shocked to see that PMDrive deleted, i am trying to be polite but i have seen many other innocent people who have had their articles deleted. Would you please stop doing this as people do take time out to tell other people about usefull information to find it has been wrongly deleted by a mean person who is trying to spoil wikipedia for everyone.

I hope you will read this PMDrive1061 and take my advice to not delete peoples work that have done nothing wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dontthrowawobbla (talk • contribs) 17:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

CollegeWeekLive Deleted

PMDrive1061:

I am unclear as to why the page (CollegeWeekLive) was deleted upon including an external link. Please advise on how we can go about resubmitting this page.

Thank You —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salvatoreg (talk • contribs) 17:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Somchad Yimsiri

I am unclear as to why you deleted an article while I was on the verge of creating it, talk about jumping into a grave before it's even been dug ! I'd just put the name of the football team manager in and then suddenly a delete message came up, are you having a laugh at other peoples expense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryangiggs69 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi PMDrive1061, Sigh, sorry for being a bit OTT. I will remember not to save before I finish articles in the future. Thanks for the good advice though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryangiggs69 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Ryangiggs69 (talk) has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

! mmmm that was tasty.

CollegeWeekLive Follow-Up

PMDrive1061

Thank you for your response. I am still confused however, is there any way I can go back and edit the page which has already been created? How would I go about doing this?

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salvatoreg (talk • contribs) 21:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

The Better Life Band

I represent this band you keep deleting the page. What's the deal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tblb joel (talk • contribs) 00:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

How do I add a hyperlink when I am posting an article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.129.27 (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

deleted Curtin University Soccer Club Page

why did you delete it? i cant understand. you suggested it was unimportant or something? curtin university soccer club provides a service to many internation students comnig to perth to study. if they want to wikipedia it and find out more they cant... maybe you should use the resourses like curtinsoccer.com etc to write an article that is more suited to put in its place if you think the article is poor... but jsut deleting it seems a little harsh/unfair.

cheers OO —Preceding unsigned comment added by Owneroperator (talk • contribs) 01:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi, I see you've deleted Manhiem scandal as a copyvio. May I also direct your attention to Manheim scandal, which has been sitting around untagged for a few minutes? I think the two were identical, but I'm not comfortable flagging the correctly-spelled version as a G12 without seeing the copyrighted material myself (and Google turns up nothing). AnturiaethwrTalk 01:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Jazzberry Ram

I walk away for dinner after having put together the sidebar and tagged as a sub, come back to find it deleted. Come on! Sidebar had as much info as Hermitage_Bay, or 8108_Wieland. Ah well, added it as a request in the Requested Articles. Mr. Bene (talk) 05:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

PAK ABOAGYE

Hi Admin:

Thanks for your help with my first article. I've resubmitted the above biography as per your instructions. Please note the correct spelling of his name and edit the title.

kindest regards Krakue (talk) 14:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)