User talk:RHaworth/2014 Jul 17

Archives

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

The Knowledge Centre for Agriculture Deletion

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Sheila Simpkins

Transferred to User talk:G S Palmer#Sheila Simpkins

Acharya Santosh Santoshi

Dear Sir, Greetings !!! I’ve create a page Acharya Santosh Santoshi three times...all times I got that this page is deleted. Kindly this is my humble request that please do'nt delete this page. kindly allow me to create this page. and be continue on this page. I did'nt copy any content on this page. there is not any fake information on this page. this is not of any duplicate/fake page of any duplicate/fake person. Kindly revert me back.. I am waiting for your valued response. Kindly reply me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manjeshkau (talk • contribs) 11:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

• Do the words "links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" suggest anything to you? I have replied, now you kindly reply to my question. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Amazon Malaria Initiative

Hi there RHaworth, I have received a notification that the page User:Amazon malaria initiative has been deleted for violation of G-11: Unambiguous advertising. I would like to vouch for the article by noting that this piece has no purpose of adverting or self-promoting, and moreover, it fill and important knowledge gap. The AMI article is unbiased and is supported by third party’s sources that are purely fact biased. The reason for attempting to publish this article on Wikipedia was not for a web-hosting space (AMI has an organization website) but rather to provide information about this particular subject Malaria in the Americas that otherwise may be unknown. My hope for having a Wikipedia article is to have others contribute their knowledge to the AMI article page, including organization such as USAID and PAHO , as well as people and organizations from countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Sincerely, michelle devlin 17:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdevlin54 (talk • contribs)

• Possibly a worthy project. Try following this advice. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes Thank you for that advice. I do plan on going back to article wizard and asking editors who have previously worked on PAHO and USAID page to contribute to my draft and steer my in the right direction. I also wanted to see if there was anyway you could send my text to me. I foolishly didn't saved my work to a separate word document and would like to have it as a guide for a new layout. — michelle devlin 14:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdevlin54 (talk • contribs)

• If you want people to think you are a Wikipedian, you will learn to sign talk page edits with ~~~~ and stop scattering <br/> everywhere. I have restored all your previous stuff under draft:Amazon Malaria Initiative but I think the present length of the article is better. Note that your latest submission will almost certainly be rejected because it lacks links to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.

I deleted three of your uploads consisting of logos. These should definitely stay deleted - you are creating an article about your organisation, not re-creating your website. File:Amazon facebook.jpg will probably be OK - if you get the licensing right. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

I wanted to thank you again for helping me relaunch my page and ask if I was on track regarding the the sources and content I added. — michelle devlin 14:44, 20 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdevlin54 (talk • contribs)

• Are you using ~~~~ for your signature? If not, why not? If yes, note that your custom signature must include a link to either your user page, your talk page or contribs, preferably all three. If does not, the SineBot will continue to follow you about. The content looks OK. I am a bit dubious about whether there are good independent refs but we will see what the AfC reviewer thinks. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello again, I went though article wizard and got decline for sources as you suspected. I've added a few more but still hesitant. I was wondering if you could take a look and tell me what you think. — Mdevlin54 michelle devlin 21:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

• I think you should wait for someone with no COI to write about it. But you could try finding a "sponsor". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

• I see where your coming from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdevlin54 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Fidelity Printers and Refinery

You deleted the article Fidelity Printers and Refinery. Could you please reinstate the article The company is the Banknote printer in Zimbabwe wholly owned by the Central Bank of Zimbabwe. apart from printing Banknotes the company is also involved in printing of other state and security documents like Ballot papers, passports, birth certificates, telecommunications recharge cards, National School Examinations question papers as well as refining of precious metals. The company also has Banknote and passport production contracts with other African countries. Fidelity printers and Refinery is the only licensed buyer of Gold in the country. The company also owns a subsidiary in Bulawayo known as the Zimbabwe Mint which strikes coins for the country and has contracts with other African countries — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogda83 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

• If you want to get an article in here, you have to be prepared to actually do some editing. Did you seriously expect a pathetic stub like Draft:Honey and Blanckenberg to be accepted? Fidelity Printers was better but it still needed a lot of work: Wikification, infobox, wikilinks and, above all, independent references. Look at De La Rue or Bureau of Engraving and Printing to see the sort of thing we need. And, of course start it in draft: space. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:06, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Buldana Urban

Respected sir, some data has been deleted from Buldana Urban Cooperative Credit Society. is it possible to get back. and modify as per your requirement. Awards and achievements section in our article..we have some photographs is it possible to use it as a reference. i will upload it on wikimedia. thanks and Regards, V S Dongre. Vsdongre (talk) 22:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

• Stop! My best advice is: do not touch this article at all. To put it bluntly: you have a blatant COI; your English is not up to the mark and you have very little idea of what a Wikipedia article looks like. You should thank Launchballer (talk · contribs) for raising the AfD. This has had the effect I expected of drawing experienced editors in. Anything you do to the article now is likely to be counter-productive. By all means upload more photographs; create a gallery for them on the Commons and add a link to that gallery in the Wikipedia article. Do not attempt to add the images themselves to the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Eke3e3

Hello Sir, user Eke3e3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is trying to create multiples unsourced pages about football players. Recently he/she has created Tornike Grigalashvili (that you recently deleted) , Nika Sabanadze, Lasha Shergelashvili , Otar Kakabadze and many more in his/her list, all are non-notable young players having no reliable sources. Plus, the user has also uploaded bundles of non-free images some days ago that were keep on deleted. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 18:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Sir, I'm almost 24-hours online editor and fighting against vandals, reporting them, tagging articles for CSD and keep my eye on each vandal. I do report rapidly to every admin when I find any user vandalizing. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 18:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

• The image uploads seem to have stopped. Hopefully, if you keep tagging ill-referenced articles, the user may get the idea. I fear that my "slow down" message may be a bit pointless - Eke3e3 probably thinks that the stubs they are submitting are acceptable complete articles. If things get worse, come back and I will consider blocking. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Sure sir, here is another one Brianschardt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) creating multiple copyvio pages like here and there. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 19:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Sir, thanks for deleting Swanneck and JX2 - Multi Utility Target Platform that I tagged for SD. Here is one more article with copyvio Equity estates A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 14:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

@RHaworth: Sir, how do you feel about my work ? A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 15:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

• You only use the {{reply}} tag when you are talking about me somewhere other than this page. You seem to be doing fine. Don't expect a barnstar - I don't do them. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello sir, after your warnings, user Eke3e3 has started creating unsourced articles again on football players like his recently article are Giorgi Pantsulaia , Nika Sabanadze , Avto Endeladze , Kakhaber Meshveliani and many more.A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 14:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked. I leave you to apply speedy tags. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done sir. Here is list Otar Kakabadze ,Lasha Shergelashvili , Mikheil Sardalishvili , Tornike Kapanadze , Giorgi Kukhianidze , Tedore Grigalashvili , Tornike Grigalashvili ,Kakhaber Meshveliani ,Nika Sabanadze. A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 17:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Hopesypert/sandbox deleted as spam

You deleted User:Hopesypert/sandbox under G11. It doesn't read that bad to me, and the topic seems notable enough, with international news coverage of the campaign. The author spoke to me over IRC and wants to work on the draft, which seems fixable. Would you consider undeleting it? — Huon (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

• Even if not spam, the author almost certainly has a CoI. Reluctantly restored to draft:Saving Eliza. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Let's hope we'll get a well-written article out of it. Huon (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Medicare

Re CMS 5 Star Rating Plan for Medicare Advantage: you appear to have deleted a useful (if not very complete or well cited) article on medicare advantage 5-Stars. Would you please restore it? I have cited this article in the past and went to look up some information that it contained to find it gone.

Medicare Advantage is a $200B portion of the US Medicare system (i.e. one of the world's largest health insurers). The 5-Stars is how CMS rates the plans themselves -- and how they apportion billions of dollars to the plans every year to hundreds of businesses including the largest private insurers in the country. (e.g. united, humana, kaiser, blue cross, etc) An article about the star rating system is decidedly not merely an advertisement about a particular product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.28.19.85 (talk) 21:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

• I hope you read this when you left your message. I am only replying because your wording suggests you are not a Wikipedia editor. But I cannot overlook another of the requirements in my edit notice: how do you expect me to reply if you do not provide a proper link to the page about which you are talking? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Heloo

How are you doing my mentor, admin. Rhaworth?. I hope you are not reali too stressed by vandalist? Just checking on you, and how do you access my performance this days? Cheers, (Wikicology (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC))

• Oh gosh, I am I your mentor? I access your performance via your contribs. history. If you want a quick assessment of it, I will say that it seems useful. The lack of complaints on your talk page is a very strong indication that you are doing things right. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you sir. You are my driving force. (Wikicology 00:57, 21 June 2014 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicology (talk • contribs)

Sydney Underground Film Festival

Please reverse your A7 on this. Showing works by notable directors certainly does not prove notability, but is at any rate a claim to possible significance. It's all too easy to use a7 for festivals etc simply because the article is inadequate. At prod or afd, the community has a chance to improve them. DGG ( talk ) 08:17, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

• It has already been prodded and deleted. But I have no objection to you restoring it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:22, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

about 3Dgamesforever

i heard that there was a article about it so i searched. And then it was gone, i really hope you add it again. Because you cannot delete a page before someone improves it. So i would be pleased if you add it back but WITH caution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.247.109 (talk) 12:55, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

DOUGIAS and GIANHAKIS

Greetings. I was trolling the deletion log (looking for bluelinks of recently A7/G11-speedied articles) and noticed your deletion of the above articles, and the note regarding possible previous versions. Having CSD-tagged the earlier articles, I can fill in the details: The earlier articles were DOUGIAS MURDOCK and GIANHAKIS PYGOUSIS, both created by Z136552455 (now indef-blocked) and recreated by his sock Jk1101201191 (also blocked). As per WP:DUCK, I'd say it's probably safe to block the new sock Jk123654 at this point. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 16:57, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft: Harrison Freed

Hello, I submitted this draft, and it was rejected. I would like to try to submit it again. The instructions said to contact you if I wanted to do so. When submitting it again, I will make sure to submit it in my own words. Please help. Thanks! Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etbrodie (talk • contribs) 02:35, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

• Needs to be longer and, above all, have independent references. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

• WP:42 ! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:42, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Union Tanguera

Good evening, RHaworth! You deleted Draft:Union Tanguera as a G12 of www.elsieman.org/artists/union_tanguera_2.html. However, it seems to back, copied/close-paraphrased from the same source. I've tagged it for speedy deletion, but wondered if you might have any salt handy? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:45, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Deletion is cleanup

Re User:Launchballer/Wikipedia:Deletion is cleanup: I will be moving this to mainspace soon. Given this comment, do you have anything you'd like to add to it? -- Launchballer 22:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Please be aware, User:Launchballer, that the contents of that page are not suitable for WP:mainspace, and if you move those contents there, I will be CSD'ing them with the quickness. -- Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:41, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

I included "Wikipedia:" for a reason - I meant projectspace. -- Launchballer 22:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

• Demiurge, Launchballer is pointing out the subtlety that to do a move like this you can select Wikipedia in the drop-down namespace field and put "Foo" in the title box proper. Or you can select (article) in the drop-down and put "Wikipedia:Foo" in the title box proper. But you must not put Wikipedia in both - as I have seen often enough! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

• Good; then when he means projectspace, he can say projectspace. -- Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

• Launchballer, reply on the talk page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:35, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Pissed Consumer

Hi RHaworth, My name is Alex, I am writing on the subject of Pissed Consumer article which was recently deleted by you. I am the author of this article. Thank you for your professional remarks. You mentioned that the article infringes copyright. But I did not publish it anywhere except Wikipedia. I would be very grateful for your assistance with my Pissed Consumer article (http://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/pissed-consumer.html). Now it is not available and I am settling the process of page recovery. I have added notable sources as demanded. Could you restore my article please? Thank you for your time and assistance, Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Syrov (talk • contribs) 13:15, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

• At the bottom of the Pissed Consumer website it says: "© All Rights Reserved". Reproducing text from it was a copyvio. But kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your website is notable and writes about it here. If you genuinely have no COI, submit a non-copyvio version via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

You deleted the wrong article

I am referring to 2014 Olsberg mid-air collision. Olsberg mid-air collision was almost certainly created by a sockpuppet of Ryan kirkpatrick. I have nominated it for speedy deletion per G5. FYI I told The Bushranger, he's the administrator who knows Ryan's MO (bad spelling and grammar and more) best. — ...William 21:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

• Restored. I shall take no further action in this area. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Quantium Solutions

Please would you look at this draft and consider unprotecting Quantium Solutions. If you feel unable to unprotect QS, please leave a comment on the draft mentioning the things that need to alter for it to be accepted as an article. Fiddle Faddle 10:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

xat.com page

Okay, I'm a newcomer. You maybe have seen me in a lot of wikis, so I know a lot about wikis of the experience that I had in various Wikia wikis.

I think it's necessary to have a xat.com page to be created. I mean over ten million users registered it (even though once upon a time I used it, never was interested on joining their wiki) so it should have a Wikipedia page. Not to mention that there's a page called www.xat.com that redirects to something irrelevant. It should be created. It's completely necessary for it to have a Wikipedia page heck, it even has has it's own wiki. -- ELMOYQUENOCHE2 (talk) 22:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

As a Wikia editor myself, I can say from experience that most Wikia wikis are specific to a particular topic and thus have far far lower notability standards.--Launchballer 23:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

I know, I've been editing in Wikia for three years straight, which Wikia was my big passion back in 2011, but now I have an on-and-off activity on it, which I'm semi-retired in Wikia. Annoying Orange Wiki was my center of attention, which I preferred Muppet Wiki as an alternative. What about the xat.com page? -- ELMOYQUENOCHE2 (talk) 02:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

• It is not xatly clear what you expect me to do about it. If you genuinely have no COI, submit an article via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:24, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Quantium Solutions

Hi there, I am writing in with reference to the decision to unprotect the article handle Quantium Solutions. Since the speedy deletion of my original article some time back, I have discovered that I can actually submit it as this draft for revision first rather than publishing it straight onto wikipedia. Through that channel, I have had constructive advice via another admin as per the conversation here as to how to improve on my article and my references cited. Please see through the conversation I have had with this admin with regards to the references cited as well as their justifications (eg. of the school paper) and I hope you can reconsider your decision. If I had known initially that I could submit it as a draft to get reviewed by admins before submission I would have done so, rather than highly risking it to be speedily deleted by submitting it directly. As of now, the admin felt that my article can be accepted after a few rounds of iteration between the two of us. It has been a productive and interesting journey to improve the article and I will not want to have it resulted in it wasting the admin's time and effort to go through a step-by-step review only to have it resulted in this. I have also made the article a stub for others to add on it in future when Quantium Solutions get more recognition. Nevertheless, can you advise how to move on from here? Many thanks! Fuzzster87 (talk) 03:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

• Please try and practice brevity. You have a blatant COI - I should really be giving you my standard mantra - search this page for "kindly". But I definitely want to know your relationship to Hieutrung.trinh (talk · contribs). You have mis-used the word admin five times in your message. It is a very important principle of Wikipedia that policy is made by the community, not just by admins. Reviewing of drafts does not require admin rights and @Timtrent: is not an admin.

As to your article: you have been working on it for a month but it is still, in your own words, a stub because the company lacks recongnition. What do you think of my suggestion that your text should be added to the Singapore Post article? I would of course be willing to create a redirect at Quantium Solutions. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) I imagine that anyone who reviews articles can feel to a new editor as though they have the magic powers often attributed to real admins, RH. Most of us are not. I am most assuredly not, nor do I ever want to be, as my user page says, somewhere. The COI stuff used to confuse me. It seems to be a tradition of WP:AFC that COI is allowed up to but not past the point of acceptance of an article, on the basis that the review process rips out any non WP:NPOV material. I don;t agree with it, but I am old enough and ugly enough to realise that it will take a major consensus building exercise to change it. We should have the same rules everywhere. Fiddle Faddle 22:03, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I am sorry for not knowing the very important principles of Wikipedia well enough as you. "Admin" or not, Timtrent has been willing and more helpful than any other "admins" I have encountered thus far. If you are saying my conversations with him are deemed useless because you have the ultimate power to make the final decision, then it is indeed an insult to him as he has helped me through and through. My relationship to the above user is not even relevant in this context - I am discussing about the contents of this article as it is. As a resolution, I will take your suggestion to include my text under Singapore Post, but if the content is just a copy n paste of the draft in which I have submitted - why does it make a difference where it resides in? If this is indeed content that we are talking about. Please try and practice brevity and tell me exactly how many sources does QS need in order for it to qualify as an article? Thanks.Fuzzster87 (talk) 07:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) Me again, Fuzzster87. A couple of cracking good references are sufficient for a WP:Stub article. QS is longer and requires every fact asserted to be referenced. This is the same whether it resides in a freestanding article or as part of a larger article.

Does it matter where it is (freestanding or part of a larger article)? No. But what does matter is editor consensus. But picture it differently. If it does not matter, then it does not matter for it to be within a larger article. So my advice is to go with the flow and copy it into a new section in SP, with references.

RH, ignoring the fact that F has just poked you a little with a stick it looks to me as if you poked him a little first. Honours seem to be even. Is there something happening of which I am not aware, coz, from the outside, this conversation looks unlike your usual measured tone, and came as a surprise to me. Fiddle Faddle 13:30, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

• Timtrent, so why are my comments here less "measured" than those anywhere else? Considering that I view Fuzzster as a spammer and possible sock puppet, they are receiving a remarkably mild response from me.

Fuzzster, please read my less measured comments. Did I give even the slightest hint that Tim's messages are useless? The difference where it resides is that QS are not notable enough to support their own article. It is not the number of references that matters but the quality of them. Text now merged. Please leave it to someone with no COI to propose a separate article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Half deletion

Thanks as usual for investigating deletion requests.

You may want to delete the talk page, Talk:Ostad Mohammad Baharloo. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:11, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:BNA access email

Hey RHaworth, just wanted to remind you that I sent an email 5 days ago detailing how to get access to BNA through The Wikipedia Library, please make sure to follow those instructions and complete the Google Form. Thank you, Sadads (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Herreshoff 12½ (keelboat)

Dear RHaworth, The page: Draft:Herreshoff 12½ (keelboat) was deleted because permission for use of the quoted PDF, was not adequate. Now the PDF carries an appropriate copyright, Creative Commons "CC BY-NC-SA 4.0", I'm requesting that the page be restored. Many thanks for your consideration, ttrbbr (talk) 23:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

@Ttrbbr: The "NC" means non-commercial use only, and Wikipedia doesn't allow content that's non-commercial use only. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn: Clarification please. I understood that images could not be "non-commercial use only", but did not know this of text. Please direct me to the appropriate wikipedia policy and/or explanation so I don't make this error again. I will request the author of the content reconsider. Thanks, ttrbbr (talk) 23:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

@Ttrbbr: See Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn: Is Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License preferred to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/? ttrbbr (talk) 00:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

@Ttrbbr: There is no preference order with licensing. All that matters is that the source license is compatible with CC-BY-SA 3.0. CC-BY and CC-BY-SA (and several other non-CC licenses) are, but CC-BY-NC, CC-BY-NC-SA, CC-BY-NC-ND, and CC-BY-ND (and several other non-CC licenses) are not.

@Jackmcbarn: Many thanks for clarification. ttrbbr (talk) 00:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn: http://www.herreshoffregistry.org/doc/Class_Description_12-footer.pdf has now been updated to carry the following CC license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Please review for wikipedia.org copyright compliance once again. Please also know, if/when that page is restored, that I am aware that an image on that page has not cleared review for copyright and I will be temporarily removing the image until I have that also resolved. Your assistance is very much appreciated. ttrbbr (talk) 13:28, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

@Ttrbbr: The license there is now acceptable. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Methods of measuring horizontal angles

Hi Why you have deleted the page methods of measuring horizontal angles. The page was not the part of article theodolite. it was a civil engineering topic and had reasonable sources. It was under construction and was created by owais khursheed. I removed the template because I was trying to improve it. You dont know anything about civil engineering and out of lack of knowledge and without understanding the topic you have deleted it. I think the topic did not entered your mind when you read it. Now I am going to challenge its deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jin khatama (talk • contribs) 05:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

HCL Infosystems

Can you please check and let us know that how our company, HCL Infosystems wiki page has been redirected itself to HCL Enterprise. Please activate the HCL Infosystems page at earliest. Even we had undo the previous version of the page & link again redirected to HCL Enterprise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.90.70.251 (talk)

• Originally in wrong place, unsigned, IP address - why should I answer it? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Can you please check and let us know that how our company, HCL Infosystems wiki page has been redirected itself to HCL Enterprise. Please activate the HCL Infosystems page at earliest. Even we have undo the previous version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.90.70.251 (talk) 10:02, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I've been doing a bit of deletion work recently, but nothing compared to what you are doing. Impressive. S Philbrick(Talk) 15:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC) Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Enhanced Retail Solutions

Dear Mr. Haworth, It has come to my attention that you deleted the Wikipedia page for Enhanced Retail Solutions (ERS) on or around 2013 December 11 due to “G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion).” Please note that when we created the page for ERS, we did not intend it to be interpreted as an advertisement. Much like Salesforce.com, Netsuite, and other businesses that have posted Wikipedia pages, our intent was (and is) to be informative about our company and the industry. We request that you consider our Wikipedia page from this perspective and please reinstate it. Please understand that this is our first posting on Wikipedia. If you still feel in your opinion that our page is an advertisement, please advise as to what we need to adjust so it is as acceptable as other businesses that are able to post a Wikipedia page. Thank you for your time and review. Best regards, David Matsil President of Sales and Marketing Enhanced Retail Solutions, Dmatsil (talk) 20:56, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you for declaring your COI so clearly. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Agility at logging in

Good morning, Mr. Haworth. I noticed that the Scaled Agile Framework site was taken down. It did sadden me to see it gone, where I noticed that the reason for removal was due to Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I would like to help rectify this issue, so that everyone can receive the benefits from this site. Was there something in particular that you felt needed to be removed? If so, is there something I can do to help maintain it; so the content is aligning with Wiki standards? Any of your help/ input would be most appreciated. Thank you -- 192.223.136.6 (talk) 11:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC) Rob Betcher

• Please learn the difference between a "site" and a Wikipedia page then read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Haworth, Here is the page, please let me know if this helps? Thank you. User:Betchplus/Scaled agile framework. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.223.136.6 (talk) 19:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

• Did you read read this and this? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

For some reason the signature did not post on this. Here it is again. I appreciate your patience for those of us who are still learning Wiki. Hello Mr. Haworth, Here is the page, please let me know if this helps? User:Betchplus/Scaled agile framework. Thank you. 192.223.136.6 (talk) 11:46, 8 July 2014 (UTC) Rob Betcher

• Please actually read this. Does it suggest anything to you? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Scaled Agile Framework

Roger, could you please offer a bit of assistance instead of insults, and help me understand what exactly, on the page needs to be corrected? Please post the exact sentence or sentences, and I will be sure they are corrected. Thank you. Betchplus (talk) 12:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

• Firstly, who are the "we" referred to on the talk page? The article is a mass of buzzwords: "publicly facing", "enterprise environment", portfolio, epic, etc. It is difficult to get a picture of what the methodology actually does. But the main problem is the lack of independent evidence. Does anybody apart from you and Dean Leffingwell think the idea is notable?

Preferably you should wait until someone with no COI thinks it is notable and writes about it here. But if you insist on trying to create an article, provide sound independent references and submit via Articles for Creation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Redirect ZSZ

RHaworth, you deleted the redirect ZSZ - however, it was discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 June 9#ZSZ with the suggestion to re-create it as a redirect to Zdob și Zdub. Since the band uses this redirect, there is nothing implausible about it. Ego White Tray (talk) 23:05, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

An IP has added a {{db-r3}} notice to the page twice now. I'm not reverting again. If he adds it a third time, could one of you intervene?--Launchballer 16:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Terry m. ananny

This page came up on new page patrol. I tried moving it to Terry Ananny but it was locked, and I assume by you. [1] I'm handing this off to you to decide what to do. I obviously don't have access to the 2008 article that was deleted so I don't know if there any new claims to notability. I would note that the 2008 afd was close. Anyway I guess either delete this new one or move it to the proper title. Thanks.--PinkBull 03:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

• See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Ananny. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Auto market

Shouting, first created by User:Oneautomarket2014, now by User:Yousefoneautomarket. You're usually a lot faster than UFAA and SPI. Sam ^Sing! 11:11, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

If I add One auto market the socking become obvious. Sam ^Sing! 11:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Deleted Content needed

Hi , I have created a personal article about me. I beleive Content has beed deleted by you. I request you to undo or send me the content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hari0109 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

• Text reluctantly emailed. Do not even think about reposting it to Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Samepage.io

Hi, I am inquiring about Samepage.io I recently joined the Samepage marketing team and would like to get a wikipedia page about our product published. Is there anyway you could send me the previous content that was deleted by you (that is if it still exists). When I revise the content, would you suggest any other corrections other than focusing on the importance of our product and fixing the A7 problem? Thank you. Tromele (talk) 22:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

• If we had an award for blatant unashamed spamming, you would be a good candidate to receive it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

You must not know the definition of spamming since this is clearly not it. This should help Spamming. Anyways, thanks for your help. Tromele (talk) 15:05, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

(stalking) The article appears to have been deleted via A7 three times before salting. My personal definition of "spam" is "the same unsolicited thing lots of times". This would broadly fit that definition. However, I do get annoyed where a one-off bit of blatant advertising is labelled "spam", which doesn't fit my view - a more accurate definition would be to post said advertising on 500 user talk pages. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

• In wikispeak WP:SPAM has a much wider meaning of any form of promotion with a COI. I was using that meaning. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Possible Sock Puppetry

Hi. I was wondering if you could use your admin powers to check for possible sock puppetry by looking at some deleted content. I'm relying on my own vague memory which is not admissible as evidence in a formal SPI submission. I have just spotted User:Swapper20000/sandbox, but will hold off on a U5 nomination for now. It's yet another fantasy Got Talent page. The contestants look familiar to me and I suspect this is a continuation of User:Challengetv100/sandbox, and User:Falack100/sandbox. In fact, I think these are socks that belong in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Talentbcian, and the material is similar to User:Australiacharlie88/sandbox. Your assistance would be appreciated. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 11:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

JayVaughn Pinkston

Just to let you know, the article on JayVaughn Pinkston was deleted in the past primarily because of little notability. At the time of first deletion, Pinkston was hardly a major part of the Villanova basketball team. Through the years he has become one of the better players in college basketball and even had his name on the Wooden Watch by some ESPN analysts. Pinkston could easily become a future NBA starter. Should've this page been deleted? Temple of the Mousy (talk) 13:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

• Unlike Pinkstonsa (talk · contribs) who created the first version, you appear to have no COI. Also nearly four years have gone by so I have restored your version to user:Temple of the Mousy/JayVaughn Pinkston. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion

I have no idea if Jean Grimaldi is notable without a proper search, but there is enough context: a person with exact birth dates and distinctive career is sufficiently identified. I DGG ( talk ) 14:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Similarly Coordinated Gene Activity in Pattern Sets (CoGAPS) has very clear context: it gives a reference to a specific published paper. It also is not A7-- its a scientific algorithm, not a person or company. Again, without a search, I can't tell notability, but thats for afd. DGG ( talk ) 14:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

• Sorry about two emails - forgot you are an admin. As T. S. Eliot says: this "is the greatest treason, to do the right deed for the wrong reason". Is it really worth restoring them so that we can delete them again with better reasons? But do it if you must. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Aerospace

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aerospace Physiologist Insignia. Since you had some involvement with the Aerospace Physiologist Insignia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Gecko G (talk) 04:18, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aerospace Experimental Psychologist or Aerospace Physiologist Badge. Since you had some involvement with the Aerospace Experimental Psychologist or Aerospace Physiologist Badge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Gecko G (talk) 04:18, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Three word budget

May I ask why three word budget was deleted? I felt it was significant for four reasons. It

1. explains an emerging new term or phrase
2. documents a significant use of Twitter and hashtags (in Australia)
3. contains a new type of public expression, in this case immediate public reaction to a government budget via Twitter
4. contains amusing and clever contributions from multiple people.

In other words the phrase (and hashtag) is a good example of the use of both Twitter and hashtags. — NingBing (talk) 12:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

• Before you added the refs The Drover's Wife (talk · contribs) felt it was not significant. Even after the addition of refs, I feel it is not significant. But you may get a different opinion at deletion review (DRV). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Is a deletion review the best way to do this? The "Wikipedia:Deletion Policy" page suggests an alternative might be just to put it back in its more complete form (i.e. complete with refs and asserted significance): "If an article was deleted for lacking content or for having inappropriate content (this applies to most speedy deletions) and you wish to create a better article about the same subject, you can simply go ahead and do so, with no need for review. It is especially wasteful to go to deletion review over an unsourced stub when the alternative of creating a sourced article is available." NingBing (talk) 14:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

• The article was sufficiently complete and asserted significance. The issue is whether it is actually encyclopedic. Therefore DRV is definitely the best route. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

John Fry (business man deleted article)

Just so you know, I tagged the article in good faith for deletion - There was no credible information pertaining to the founder of Fry's electronics other then complaints online. I was wondering if you could move the contents of this article to my personal sandbox page so I can work on this article and make it a valid encyclopedic article. The original author of the article had good intentions but the references were horrible. After deleting the refs it just appeared as a stub. Thank you. JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

• Please learn to provide links when you talk about articles. John Fry (businessman) restored to User:JasonHockeyGuy/sandbox and the two refs restored - there was absolutely nothing wrong with them. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Joe Montana (disambiguation)

Hi. At 23:36, 5 May 2014 you deleted the Joe Montana (disambiguation) page. Obviously unnecessary disambiguation page. I am sorry, but for me is not obvious, that Joe Montana is different from Joe Montana (actor). Is there only one Joe Montana? — Diszi (talk) 13:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

• You have answered your own question by providing a red link. Yes, as far as Wikipedia is concerned there is only one Joe Montana. (See de:Joe Montana (Begriffsklärung).) If and when either of Joe Montana (actor) or Joe Montana (musician) becomes notable enough to have an article, then an hat note can be added to Joe Montana. If both of them get articles, then and only then do we create the disambiguation page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. I understand the logic of this. I can accept it. However, from enwiki I am not able to get the info that Joe Montana (actor) is different from Joe Montana. Now I know from dewiki they are different. I still think it would be useful if this information would be available from enwiki, too. — Diszi (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Not to be pedantic but {{confused}} was specifically set up for such cases.--Launchballer 16:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

• OK, see if a {{confused}} tag without any link will be accepted. But it would be better if you were to create the Joe Montana (actor) article! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Rick Otton

The Wikipedia user profile for Rick Otton has been deleted. Please provide information on why it was deleted and if there's anything that can be done or changed so the page is put back up. -- Jessicamillerwbh (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

• What don't you understand about "G11: unambiguous advertising or promotion"? I could also have deleted it for U5: using Wikipedia as a free host. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks the guy is notable and writes about him here in a proper place. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Luxaviation

Greetings, Luxaviation was recently deleted. however I do not fully understand how this article was vastly different from the majority of other aircraft operators with wikipedia pages. Luxaviation's page was not fully complete at the time, however there were a substantial number of links and references. Luxaviation is now the largest private jet operator in Europe.

Nevertheless, due to the wikipage of luxaviation being delete I am unable to update the actual logo popping up on Google searches. It would be greatly appreciated if you could assist me. Best regards, Nick Reinertz Nreinertz (talk) 12:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

• "Substantial number"? There were two links both to the company's website and zero independent references. "Unable to update the actual logo popping up on Google searches" - this is gobbledgook. If you are trying to say that Google still provides a link to the Wikipedia article, then I can tell you that this will disappear within a few weeks. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks the company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Deleted article Clipperz

Greetings, I would like to reinstate the article you apparently deleted: Clipperz . I understand that you felt the article was not proving the site's notableness, I would like to put back up an edited version with links to sources which prove that this is a known company/service; e.g. alexa rank, media articles about them, etc.

I do this because I am a user of their services for several years now and strongly agree with their company philosophy and feel they deserve wider exposure, I am not affiliated with them in any way. Can you please send me the original text? Thanks in advance. Lebanese blond (talk) 13:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

• Why "apparently"? Clearly, I did delete it. Text restored to User:Lebanese blond/Sandbox. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Lebanese blond (talk) 13:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Shilpi Sharma (disambiguation)

There are two movie actress with the same name Shilpi Sharma and Shillpi Sharma. Although, there is a slight difference in the spelling, when we pronounce this name in any Indian language, they sound exactly the same. Both are models turned actresses. There is confusion amongst which actress is who and which movie they acted and such. Please allow this disambiguation page to make it clear distinction between the two artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajannamysore (talk • contribs) 13:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

• When there are only two names to be disambiguated we use the {{about}} tag. I have just fixed the mal-formed tag in Shillpi Sharma. There is no need for the disambiguation page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Dashlane

Hi RHaworth, it looks like you were the last admin to delete Dashlane in February. The title has been SALT'd. There is a draft article awaiting at AfC which, in my opinion, is abundantly sourced with major reviews of the app. I'd like to move it to mainspace, but would be grateful if you could de-SALT the title. Thanks. Sionk (talk) 19:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

• Unsalted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Suelong Sae Ma

Hello Sir, I was just curious about this post: Suelong sae ma. From what i know he is an upcoming football player here in thailand who suffered some major injuries the past years and wanted to know more about him.

Not quite sure if i request the page to be activated again (i mean you had your reasons why you deleted it), but i'm doing a project about Thaifootball wich involves player that are half Thai. Could you kindly give me more information? Regards, David — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.99.136.138 (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suelong Sae Ma should give you a clue. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Please also salt Suelong sae ma.--Launchballer 21:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Varsity InC

Hi there-- I'm a nursing student looking for some information related to high school students and undiagnosed traumatic brain injuries and was wondering if the page for Varsity Inc could be made accessible? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Varsity_Inc&action=edit&redlink=1

thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.2.88.178 (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

deletion of WUWM from Wikipedia

To whom it may concern

The nonprofit association 'World Union of Wholesale Markets (WUWM)' entry has at some stage been deleted from Wikipedia. Following the deletion link brings me to you here.

I would like to understand why this entry was deleted. It was created in reference and follow-up to a United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) article which explained what food wholesaling and food markets are (and WUWM collaborated with FAO colleagues at the time with regard to that article). WUWM is the only world entity to bring together nations and cities in support of, and promotion of, food markets. WUWM membership is mostly municipal management of wholesale and retail food markets. WUWM aims to help local and national authorities in their goal to provide a better service to the many millions of traders and consumers buying food from their local market. Local authorities, millions of small market traders, and the representative body for those markets - WUWM clearly do not have the logistical possibility or resources of 'supermarkets' to pay for mega advertising of a 'brand' anme. Is that why our entry - and not those entries - are deleted from Wikipedia?

Traditional food markets are the oldest community service to be offered citizens, and are vital to the health not only of local economies and communities but also local food production the world over. There is much ignorance about the true and original meaning of the word 'market' in our world today. Please could you explain why you have taken the position of deleting us from Wikipedia?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.160.86.71 (talk) 08:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)