Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/09

2017

01 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Okay yes this version was last created in June, but upon looking it up as I was looking for alternate spellings of a page just added, it has been recreated over and over again

Also PP:

Roki Vulovic

Rodoljub Roki Vulović

There is also Roki Vulović which I created as a redirect before I realized it was recreated over and over again. Wgolf (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from a number of IPs. Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TParis . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Anon IPs adding unsourced negative information into a BLP and are also using unreliable blogs and personal websites as sources for other negative material. v/r - TP 20:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: There's been persistent disruptive vandalism being made on this article by an editor and a few IP users. I checked the IPs out, and found they are under investigations for being sockpuppets of the editor. This article needs urgent protection, until something can be done about the disruptions. GUtt01 (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. John from Idegon (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Excessive disruption from 2001:4528:6021:5bf::178a:70a5 and similar addresses is eroding our most precious resource, the time of bona-fide editors. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Muzammil (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent single-IP (2601:xx) insertion of unsourced material within the past two days. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Following the misconduct of a SLC not-quite-a-cop beating up a nurse this mornin', tons of IP vandals are pouring in to vandalise and disrupt the article. L3X1 (distænt write) 21:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 21:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – I propose a temporary ECP on this page because of several users who appear to be quacking trying to overturn the consensus at a move request. The RM had to be closed early due to the abuse of single purpose accounts, most of which were autoconfirmed. One of them tried to start an RfC to "circumvent naming policy" as well as a bit of WP:GAME. See the article's talk page and User talk:Robert McClenon for more. DrStrauss talk 10:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Debarghya89 (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 10:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From semi protection to no protection. This page has been semiprotected for more than 4 years, for no good reason. There was not any unusual or egregious level of abuse back in 2013 when it was protected, and I don't see how an article like that would warrant indefinite protection. Please remove the protection, at least to see if there is a problem. posted on behalf of 192.31.106.34 by -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:45, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting admin Maxim Samsara 16:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected for the bot CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The edit protection is removed but the move protection remains. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Enigmamsg 21:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Enigmamsg 21:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. Darius robin (talk) 11:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nyttend (talk) 11:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Toddst1 (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I can see exactly why you'd want to protect, but there has been other activity beside the two main feuding editors. I'll have a word with the pair of them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Requesting temporary protection of this talk archive so a script I use would fail if it tries to archive something here.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  15:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Leave me a message on my talk if you want this to be removed sooner. Anarchyte (work | talk) 16:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Memdreamer (talk) 10:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this primarily a 6-month content dispute between Memdreamer (WP:SPA who has repeated the same edit enough to get past semi-protection) and an anonymous user on various IPs (who repeats substantially the same edit but can never surpass semi-protection)? --Closeapple (talk) 13:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent victim of repeated unhelpful IP edits, particularly from one user who keeps continuously re-adding the same things. TheDisneyGamer (talk) 16:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Violation of Manual of Style for films as well as WP's policy in identifying reliable sources from an IP. SLIGHTLYmad 09:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 139.0.117.49 (talk · contribs) blocked by Black Kite. Samsara 10:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The page was already semiprotect, but now there is editwar again. Article on it.wiki is also semiprotect for the same reason. Holapaco77 (talk) 12:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent additional of unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP's/anonymous editors of forthcoming musical release. livelikemusic talk! 13:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's a lot of IP traffic on that page, and at least some of it is good-faith, so pending changes sounds like a better bet. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article had to have some recent edits deleted via oversight - naming individual residents as criminals, etc., (without convictions). A different IP has now added further allegations against residents. Can we get semi-protection for a couple of weeks to a month, please?. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I mulled over whether to do this, or flat-out semi-protect, but since an IP helped remove the BLP violations in the first place, semi-protection would shut them out doing it again, so I'd rather go for pending changes instead. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Asked for a week of semi-protection the last time; a day after it was removed the IP vandals returned anew to load the article with false and impossible information. Longer term needed as the children's show vandals are relentless. Nate (chatter) 06:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 216.8.41.252 (talk · contribs) blocked by Mz7. Samsara 08:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 11:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Nyttend (talk) 11:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Samsara. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is subjected to various IP address vandalism attacks. Do have a look on [1], [2], [3], [4]. Therefore a protection request is mandatory. SuperHero👊 11:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 23:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 23:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of edit warring and vandalism. 2600:1:F10A:3A63:90C3:8B96:3C47:DA97 (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) OP, are you sure you have the right page? This one is redlinked. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm assuming they meant LGBT rights in India. I've gone ahead and fixed it. —MRD2014 Talk • Edits • Help! 02:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Adding improperly sourced claims. And possible chance for edit war. 103.15.255.131 (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. All information has been changes to invalid information. Shafiqabu (talk) 17:40, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism on BLP. Ambiguosity (talk) 07:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article has been vandalized by multiple IP addresses possibly connected to longterm vandal User:Dan Joshua B. Apura after the initial protection expired last July (the protection was set for one year). The said vandal keeps on adding hoax information on this article, indicating that Myx, a Philippine music TV station similar to MTV became a 24/7 news channel. See this most recent hoax edit and this edit from 2016 as evidence. -WayKurat (talk) 07:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alex ShihTalk 04:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alex ShihTalk 04:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alex ShihTalk 04:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Repeatedly created. Cahk (talk) 07:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I feel page will benefit from pending changes protection to stop the disruptive/vandalism to the page to try remove Israel/Palestine entry’s. NZ Footballs Conscience(talk) 20:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I will note that I've range blocked the IP addresses causing the most disruption for one year, but I'll leave the rest to another admin. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:37, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Also with the Lists of World Heritage Sites is List of World Heritage Sites in Israel that could also benefit from pending changes protection too with disruption to the article. NZ Footballs Conscience(talk) 21:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – please change the protection level to something stronger, pending changes level is rubbish and doesn't work well. Govvy (talk) 22:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from unregistered users, dating over two years, mainly by adding an inordinate number of irrelevant presenters. awu1996 06:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring by IP hopping editor.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kosack (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Thepersoncalledme (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP genre warring Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 05:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previous block of two weeks has not discouraged this IP from repeatedly putting in incorrect credits on this page, in an inconsistent manner, claiming IMDb as a source, which is not considered reliable. Gothicfilm (talk) 15:05, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 05:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The entry for Green Day's album Dookie is constantly being vandalized with unsourced sales figures and higher RIAA certifications that it has actually received. StyrofoamChicken (talk) 04:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 04:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP's which change sourced content. There is no attempt to explain their edits or discuss on talk page. . Adamgerber80 (talk) 16:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor. Self-tag. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism resumed within a day of previous protection expiring. Toddst1 (talk) 20:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., if vandalism returns after a year, we will need to apply indefinite protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 02:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (I know it's the featured article and will unprotect it in a bit. The IP has been blocked anyway.) AlexiusHoratius 02:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Nakon 08:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: series of edits pushing a fringe theory by User:Bosnipedian. Borsoka (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC) : DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nakon 09:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nakon:, please revise your above decision. User:Bosnipedian is a banned user. He is always using several IPs to make his POV-pushing edits. Borsoka (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 16:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, defamatory. One disgruntled fan using multiple accounts. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 18:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing shown by IPs. B.Lameira (talk) 09:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 09:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing behaviour shown by several IPs. B.Lameira (talk) 09:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 09:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:17, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nakon 08:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 08:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. No1lovesu (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 08:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is still being vandalised after previous protection expired. . SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 00:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 08:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, IP editor has been blocked. Nakon 08:20, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by IP Address long term vandal. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nakon 08:20, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full move protection and long-term semi-protection for both articles: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term semi-protection plus full move protection requested because of endless disruptive editing, with IPs and new user accounts making endless POV changes from the common name Belgaum to Belagavi (Belgaum and Belgaum district are in a border area between two Indian states, and claimed by both states, with Belgaum being the common name, and the name used by the majority of the population, and Belagavi the name used by the other side in the conflict...). Belgaum is currently PC-protected until 27 July 2018, but there's an unreasonable number of unconstructive pending changes to revert. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 10:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for Belgaum district along with 1 month move protection. Belgaum is already PC protected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: long-term abuse by IP editors constantly adding unsourced content to articles. It's the same group of editors on all three articles. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 10:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. 2 weeks, 4 days and 4 days. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Reoccurring IP vandalism/edit warring. Consensus on the Talk page was to remove non-notable entries, external links, etc. An IP editor keeps reverting with the spurious edit summary "adding email address". The article was protected previously but the reverts continued once protection ended. Woodroar (talk) 01:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Nakon 08:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Highly vulnerable page.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  03:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Nakon 08:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent addition of unsourced promotional content my multiple IPs and registered users.. Jim1138 (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Barek. Nakon 08:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The previous vandal with multiple sock puppet accounts/IP addresses has returned after the 1-month temporary semi-protection has expired, adding the same unsourced content under numerous IP addresses.Nqr9 (talk) 07:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nakon 08:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of non constructive IP vandalism. ThinkHat (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How foolish to assume this was "vandalism." Apparently this editor doesn't get the concept of WP:AGF. How can pluralizing an initialism POSSIBLY be "vandalism"?

This is the logic I posted to the talk page:

Declined - looks like the reverts have stopped for now. AlexiusHoratius 02:40, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Unsourced IP natter, vandalism and 'what the network will be airing because I said so' programming additions in the run-up to next week's re-launch of this channel as Universal Kids. Asking for at least two weeks so when the network changes over we don't have to deal with awful copy-paste moves to the new title too. Nate (chatter) 01:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
At least make it until the 11th please (the network changes branding at 4pm US ET/10pm GMT on the 9th); there hasn't been an American children's channel article move to a new title that's gone smoothly because of IP cut-and-paste moves and vandalism. This is already panning out to be just as painful. Nate (chatter) 03:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  Space-Age Meat  21:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. 2601:1C0:106:1FD6:257D:8C24:EBF:1165 (talk) 23:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of un-autoconfirmed vandalism. 24.91.248.60 (talk) 23:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

03 September 2017

Semi-protection: Dynamic IP user edit warring over an extended period, made no effort to discuss when article was semi'd before. RivertorchFIREWATER 15:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Samsara 21:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –72 (talk) 19:33, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Got repeatedly created since over a year ago, initially was mostly for self promotion, then it was created for pure vandalism. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 19:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the listed version:
Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For the correctly capitalised version:
Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Offensive BLP violations and disruptive editing since the last temporary protection measure was lifted. Some recent examples: [5], [6] and [7]. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 20:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FrB.TG (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. —MBlaze Lightning T 04:52, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the full protection of the entry, but the version should be [8] which contains the China's opinion on the standoff not only the India's. --解放的高加索 (talk) 14:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: I briefly looked at this, and I couldn't make out a typical edit war. @MBlaze Lightning and 解放的高加索: Which section is being reverted back and forth? Samsara 15:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – (ec) One of the parties has just been blocked per a complaint at WP:AN3, so let's see how the article goes from here. EdJohnston (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – a new user replaces Sea of Japan by East Sea. Helgi-S (talk) 09:50, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: As per Sea of Japan naming dispute, this seems to be a dispute; however, the currently used link only goes to a disambiguation page. I've put it on full protection, but second opinions are welcome. Samsara 11:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have indef blocked the user as it is a clear-cut case of WP:NOTTHERE (all their 9 edits are changing Sea of Japan to East Sea), and I hope we can close this nomination.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If the user was worth blocking over changing to East Sea should not the final time they assertion this (here) also be reverted? Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@KylieTastic: The article is no longer protected.
For the bot:
Not done Samsara 15:33, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 19:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 18:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war between a regular editor and an IP; IP only appears interested in commenting about the regular on the Talk page and neither editor is discussing the issue. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Decided not to just block the editors, but let me know if you see them return to edit warring. Malinaccier (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP hop vandal. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 18:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 18:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Keeps getting vandalized by IP sock. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 18:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 18:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LinguistunEinsuno 11:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Linguist111: I've semi-protected for now, but I noticed that one of the sections that changes were made to did not seem to be referenced in the first place. Are we sure the "call-out order" table is, in fact, correct? Samsara 14:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The list of contestants is correct, referenced by the official site. The call-out order was being blatantly falsified by IPs (it has the correct contestants now), but the site did list the call-out order and I will add it as a reference and correct any errors. Thank you. LinguistunEinsuno 14:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 25 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've now removed the call-out order table as there are numerous errors in the official sites' pages and no other sources can verify it. LinguistunEinsuno 15:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Potential COPYVIO or PLAGIARISM. Dynamic IPs adding large amounts of unsourced content that is likely copied from some unknown location. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Above said 3 weeks, protect is for 3 days. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Geraldo Perez: Three weeks was intended - thanks for the ping. Fixed now. Samsara 16:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Visible in 28000+ articles. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User(s) using multiple IP addresses and accounts keeping changing the subject from an Indian tennis player to a Pakistan lawyer (so possible political motives as well). Has been advised to create a new article but keeps reverting this one. UPDATE: Looks like the reason is because Akhtar Ali Kureshi is protected from re-creation. KylieTastic (talk) 12:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ... discospinster talk 14:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent changes to his date of death by IPs/new users in the last few days, this occurring more than two years after he died. Appears to have happened about a year ago as well, when semiprotection was applied then. A relevant talk page discussion at Talk:Wayne Dyer#What date did Dyer die, August 29 or 30, 2015? was started by me shortly after his death since sources were saying both dates and the present consensus, though only established by me and one other editor, suggests the earlier of the two dates. Allowing a change to this date would affect not only this article, but also at least two others - see 2015#August_2 and Deaths in August 2015#29, which both list Dyer's date of death as August 29, 2015. MPFitz1968 (talk) 13:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper incorrectly categorizing the article. . SLIGHTLYmad 04:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper continues to disrupt page. Another page National Space Organization has already been protected. Per User:Mfb/Taiwanese_articles. Adamgerber80 (talk) 07:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article currently has full protection, due to a supposed edit war. However, I was reverting a worldwide sales claim added by a sock puppet IP of TomWatkins1970, for which no reliable source was provided. Reverting unsourced content is not something that requires consensus.Nqr9 (talk) 09:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected I see you asked Nakon who declined to unprotect it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected--Nakon has self-reverted his full protection--thus restoring the semi-protection.Winged Blades Godric 16:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 14:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 00:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been happening throughout PC protection period that ended a week or two ago; at least PC should be restored so this vandalism doesn't become publicly visible. Everymorning (talk) 04:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper continues to disrupt page. The page was recently protected and disruptions resumed immediately after it was unprotected. Per User:Mfb/Taiwanese_articles. Adamgerber80 (talk) 06:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Anachronist. Samsara 11:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after protection expired. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 10:41, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 01:45, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. Samsara 11:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 23:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the only IP seems to have stopped reverting after a warning.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP resumed. Favonian (talk) 09:29, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 06:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users to topic in the news today. BilCat (talk) 09:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page created by a COI editor and now the company is recruiting its customers to edit the page to prevent deletion. See comments regarding coordinated editing: [9]

This appears to be part of a walled garden of articles where the record company's wikipedia article gives credibility to the no-name bands that they promote, and the bands' wikipedia articles give credibility to the record label. Toddst1 (talk) 22:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. @Toddst1: To be honest, I see zero chances for the article to be speedy deleted: for example, a Guardian reference clearly mentions the company. I would recommend converting speedy to AfD with a usual warning against sockpuppetry.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Back for the third time in the last couple of weeks asking for protection on this one. IPv6 vandal just won't quit. I'd appreciate longer semiprotection this time – at least a month. --IJBall (contribstalk) 22:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 23:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Extensive protection history and since the last temporary protection measure was lifted recently on 30 August 2017, the disruptive editing has resumed again. Please see examples [10], [11], [12] Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Removing sourced content, adding unsourced and unencyclopedic. I've asked for a user block, to no avail. It's a weekend. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vandalism. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs removing the same sourced content without discussion. Meters (talk) 06:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:26, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – long term pattern of promotion by numerous socks of EdelweissofNE (talk · contribs). Toddst1 (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason the talk page (and maybe the project page itself -- can't remember) is a magnet for fools posting their personal info. [13] It's been like this for ages. [14] It's hard to see how this page needs to be one neophytes need to edit. EEng 17:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC). EEng 17:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather, this is worthless. Didn't you follow the history link? This has gone on for years. Apparently the page is on some stupid website somewhere or something in India as the place to post your resume. But maybe if you protect for a year that will break them of the habit. EEng 22:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I followed the link. But one edit since unprotection isn't a problem, especially as it has had hardly any protection at all. 6 months then. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. EEng 23:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IEsuredI (talk) 20:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 21:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recently released - highly coveted free agent. — Chevvin 21:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – While my previous request for semi-protection was declined, the article has been protected three times so far this year, with vandalism occurring almost immediately after the previous protection expires. Pending-changes protection would ensure that the article wouldn't be vandalised, and would still allow regular users to edit constructively. . SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 21:38, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 21:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 22:17, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:47, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip havoc. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 17:58, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive edits such as 1 and 2. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 18:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An Ip does not understand what "discussion is over" means. Jetstreamer Talk 19:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted three times. JMHamo (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No recent constructive edits from IPs. Home Lander (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by multiple users on current event. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 08:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected Nakon 08:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Per discussion on my talk page. Nakon 11:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 16:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months. EdJohnston (talk) 21:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been protected before, persistent vandalism when page isn't protected. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 17:51, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 16:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Sro23 (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Amortias (T)(C) 20:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion from MariaJaydHicky. Sro23 (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 20:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and new user vandalism. Mentions of "cinnamon roll" or "cinnamon bun" keep being added. Elisfkc (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 21:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs to spread a rumor. —Farix (t | c) 11:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Deryck Chan. Amortias (T)(C) 19:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Long term vandalism, edit warring. 2601:188:180:11F0:4510:6B10:E9EA:E8F6 (talk) 12:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 19:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of pure vandalism mixed with unsourced additions in the last few days. Sjö (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 19:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Oh dear, Year 8 are back and bored. Can this poor article please get a break? Thanks. DBaK (talk) 19:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Indef, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 19:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Amortias (T)(C) 19:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Article keeps being edited by various IP's claiming the subject has died on September 3, 2017, but never give any source even I reverted with a reason that a reference should be cited. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 00:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An admin has cited a source properly. However the other IP's before this were also adding non-English contents, as well as messing up the infobox. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 00:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined There has been no activity since Deor's edit at 00:47. It looks as though the issue has been resolved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 09:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. We will try this again since there are good edits in with the bad. Malinaccier (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 10:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 05:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alex ShihTalk 07:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 10:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As you can see it's page history this page need's protection for 3 months because there is lot of disruptive editing by various ip's on this page. Regards, . Jack Shukla AKA TKSS & Paplesh. (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 15:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from Vietnamese. Vinhhien323 (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 15:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals changing "online-only" to "offline". jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 07:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism addition by different IP's and new accounts. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 04:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 07:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 07:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Benniejets. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 07:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: All entirely new editors, SPAs. tedder (talk) 05:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the ~90 minutes since requesting, there have been 50+ edits by new/SPA type editors. I IAR'ed and page-protected it. I'm hoping another admin reading this will go back and make sure you agree. If not, feel free to revert. tedder (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done The revision history is a mess, possibly WP:SOCK. I think it was a good call. Alex ShihTalk 07:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ware had a bit of a Twitter incident a few hours ago. Guess the trolls decided to take advantage of it. ZappaMati 06:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 07:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Used in 28000+pages. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 06:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 07:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same editors as U.S. National Video Game Team at it again. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism; persistently adding a joke candidate (cartoonist Alex Barrella) that failed to officially qualify for the race, thus he legally is not a candidate. Temporary should be sufficient as the election will take place this November, run-off in December. Droidman1231 (talk) 03:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated creations by IPv6 addresses. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alex Shih. MelanieN (talk) 06:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of vandalism by IP's and anonymous editors; continued addition and/or removal of information that is not supported by sourced content, or adding content that is NOT sourced. livelikemusic talk! 04:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Random acts of vandalism as it is in the news now. Sherenk1 (talk) 04:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too frequently edited for the time being.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant removal of spoilers by unconfirmed editors while discussion concerning the issue is still active on talk page. -- AlexTW 06:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Pillowfluffyhead (talk) 15:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 04:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by numerous IPs. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor 15:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso. Binksternet (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 06:28, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism--adding porn to front page article. IAmNitpicking (talk) 00:35, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Daily vandalism and blanking. An earlier one week protection did nothing, nor did blocking an IP address. Asking for an indefinite semi-protection. - Damnedfan1234 (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from an IP which appears to be a sock of Japanmomo. - SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions) 23:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from an IP which appears to be a sock of Japanmomo. - SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions) 23:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent socking by MariaJaydHicky again. SummerPhDv2.0 21:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Both editors appear to be approaching 3RR. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Empty genre protected for three weeks. Samsara 23:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For the bot:
Not done Samsara 23:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent socking by MariaJaydHicky. SummerPhDv2.0 21:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Empty genre protected for three weeks. Samsara 23:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For the bot:
Not done Samsara 23:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edits from IP socks of banned User:HarveyCarter. The article either needs to be semi-protected, or the socks (86.133.84.53, 5.81.222.208, 2a00:23c4:638d:d500:a4fc:5b75:577f:9d52, 2a00:23c4:638d:d500:997b:abb0:8935:e537) should be blocked; semi would appear to be more appropriate, considering the probability of future attempts to edit by this persistent pest. This has been going on since mid-July. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  IP blocked. GABgab 01:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption from a particular user adding unrelated "see also" links to Pentecostal churches; as far as I know, Pentecostals usually don't put much emphasis to Mariology compared to Catholics. I am requesting full protection (as opposed to semi or ECP as this user has been editing (disruptively) for more than five years, and short of blocking him, a temporary full protection seems to be in order. See this ANI discussion thread for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined A block is more appropriate. This is the likely result of the ANI thread. Malinaccier (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Same rationale as with Our Lady of Arantzazu. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:34, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See above. Malinaccier (talk) 18:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Han Chinese & Yuan dynasty

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. One new user and some IPs continuely edit unreliable sources (such as Non academic blog and Tianya Club) and content on these pages. I have already described it on the talk pages. No1lovesu (talk) 08:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 19:49, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05 September 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking. Zortwort (talk) 19:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent blanking of some sections from multiple IP's. No attempt to discuss or explain edits. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生. GABgab 19:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: IPs violating WP:BLPSOURCES and repeatedly adding citations to the banned BLP source, the Daily Mail Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Home Lander (talk) 22:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It appears that Black Kite took care of it. If the problem starts again repost the request. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) This, and every other Nigerian University (like the two articles listed immediately above) are subject to multiple attacks from User:Dave Ramsey socks, trying to run a phone scam. Unless all Nigerian Universities, polytechnics and private schools are protected, all semi protection will do is move the scam to other pages. May I suggest trying Pending changes - as with the two articles above - which may confuse the scammers for a while? - Arjayay (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – This article is continually being hijacked as a POV platform and attack page. . Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 15:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. three days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 18:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Five months of unsourced claims by IPs and new accounts that this child actor is gay. Started up again immediately after one week protection ended. Meters (talk) 17:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly Created as Rahul Haridas. Cahk (talk) 07:17, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RHaworth. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Ongoing edit war. Kimpire (talk) 08:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism of unsourced image usually added by non-confirmed users See edits123 4. --Cs california (talk) 09:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent phone number scam added to the page almost regularly. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 1989 01:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes seem to be doing the job.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nonymus ip addresses 87.202.182.135, 75.165.105.50 and others keep to to reimpose deleted impose, which were added to page by Tiptoethrutheminefield who is blocked in definitly within en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Meowy. Change protection level, so only registered and extended confirmed user can edit. Musifq.mehdiyev (talk) 06:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sabotage edits and edit wars. W.nimanimaei (talk) 06:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. It appears that you are both engaged in an edit war. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive unsourced and defamatory additions by IP and new user. One IP just got blocked for adding such material, then comes back with a registered autoconfirmed user. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 01:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Vsmith. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:DMGUSA. Binksternet (talk) 03:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper keeps on making an indiscriminate list in the infobox. SLIGHTLYmad 04:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:37, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Taylor Swift album

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism by IPs addresses adding unsourced/fake information. Alexataylor07 (talk) 13:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. MelanieN (talk) 03:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 06:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism of facts, especially in the Judge Cuts section. Someone keeps spamming x's in the wrong columns. I have already fixed those, bu if the vandalism happens again, please fulfill this request. Thissecretperson (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term history of vandalism/edit-warring by anon IP users. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by Wikidestruction vandal. 183.171.180.247 (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blocked IP. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism and stop dispute/edit warring. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 11:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Looks stale. Samsara 23:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection: persistent addition of unsourced content or content with questionable reliability without discussion. Protection is only needed for two days. Knope7 (talk) 21:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Perennial target of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/David Adam Kess. . EvergreenFir (talk) 22:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 00:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by various IP's. Tdts5 (talk) 01:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Noting that the range 212.94.223.0/24 has been globally blocked until 4 December for cross-wiki abuse --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5: Requesting that the page be indefinitely semi-protected. It's a perennial target for Gabucho181. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:27, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Amortias (T)(C) 19:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – information on page deleted several time, temporary protection may be necessary. Musifq.mehdiyev (talk) 19:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism. Drchriswilliams (talk) 20:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 9 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 23:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 10:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent addition of unsourced sourced content for casting. Also check protection log. - Brojam (talk) 18:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Wouldn't full protection be a bit overkill for this? Most of the vandalism seems to be coming from IP editors, so semi-protection would work better, and still allow autoconfirmed users to edit the article constructively.non-administrator comment SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 19:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, semi-protection would be more appropriate, but for an extended period (something like 4-6 months) since the temporary protections seem to have no effect with the disruptive editing resuming immediately after the protections expire. - Brojam (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-Confirmed Protection: Ongoing disruptive editing and Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Rajinimurugan1977 (talk) 10:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous IP users has continued to put down defamatory content concerning for Taylor Swift. Raritydash (talk) 16:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continuing. More evidence that Pending Changes is a placebo. KMF (talk) 23:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LinguistunEinsuno 18:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent addition of unsourced content and changing of sourced content, primarily by IP and new editors. Ss112 21:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

06 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism or addition of unsourced info from multiple IPs. Minima© (talk) 15:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 19:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple new editors. -- Dane talk 19:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 19:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article is woefully out of date after today's news of Trump ending DACA. Semi-protection would allow confirmed editors to make improvements. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I vote for extended confirmed protection, at least for the time being. Funcrunch (talk) 18:00, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protection would be great. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I say keep up to date with the facts, like by sourcing the story reported here about the repeal http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/05/politics/congress-reaction-daca-end-jeff-sessions-donald-trump/index.html.JoetheMoe25 (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment from involved administrator (I edited through the protection to add the recent news): I endorse the proposal to decrease the protection, with the proviso that if even ONE person resumes the edit warring about undocumented-vs.-illegal, then full protection would be restored. --MelanieN (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging User:Samsara, the protecting administrator, who should be the one to make this call. --MelanieN (talk) 20:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done The full-protection has expired so this request is moot. MelanieN (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Iloveartrock, using 179.7.xx IPs. Binksternet (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months. I notice some WP:ECP in the article's protection log so if another admin believes that is needed, please go ahead. The issue that can be seen in the edit history appears to be genre warring by socks. EdJohnston (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High-risk page; was just recently blanked. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 14:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2.146.59.191 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Self-tag. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 15:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 18:51, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Sudden rapid vandalism following impact of Hurricane Irma - Arjayay (talk) 12:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @Arjayay: If it picks back up, please ping me, or re-request. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anarchyte: It is continuing. It is currently linked on the main page so it is pretty likely to continue. -- Dolotta (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected – 2 days by User:AGK. EdJohnston (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

pending changes: Multiple IP user is constantly adding the same unreferenced content and have no intention to stop:[15][16][17]. Oleola (talk) 12:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —MRD2014 (public) 📞 14:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected – Indef. EdJohnston (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 09:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hasn't been edited all month. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:31, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Observed occasional edits that are disruptive in nature. Request temporary page protection status for the same. Vinyl Guy (talk) 11:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. i'm not seeing enough activity to warrant any protection at all, even PC. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism or addition of unsourced info from multiple sockpuppets. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 17:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MPS1992 (talk) 17:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If if persists, semi-protect for longer.Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Article was deleted into a redirect via AfD, keeps being re-creating as article dispite numerous reverts. — IVORK Discuss 00:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Anon with constantly changing IP edit warring even after being asked several times (by ES) to discuss on talk. Jim1138 (talk) 04:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. This is a content dispute, so please discuss it on the talk page. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:08, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 17:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated edit-warring to insert poorly sourced material by two recently created accounts. MPS1992 (talk) 22:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP vandalism. Instantmatter49 (talk) 06:20, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:10, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent BLP vandalism by two IPs so block not likely to be effective. Jim1138 (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Kosack (talk) 07:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 07:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant speculation about the invited national teams. Jonas kam (talk) 23:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Neutrality. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 23:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 00:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Typical start of school vandalism. Please protect a couple weeks. John from Idegon (talk) 02:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: More than half of the recent edits to this page are vandalism. This article has been the subject of extremely high levels of vandalism for the nine years I have been watching it. Protecting the page for six months would be inadequate, as is the current pending changes protection. It needs permanent protection form all IP edits. Freikorp (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The frequency of edits here seems to me to confirm PC1 as the correct measure. Samsara 14:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 14:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, watching article. Seems a little on the low side for semi-protection just yet -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: - Persistent edit warring.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Subject of mass deletions by dynamic IPs from Hanoi - Arjayay (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (Looks like article has been quiet since then.) AlexiusHoratius 18:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page cannot go a week without suffering from IP vandalism. BangJan1999 14:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 18:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content within article. livelikemusic talk! 20:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism . Joshq1234 15:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MusicLover650. Binksternet (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MusicLover650. Binksternet (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: One IP account and three accounts created today have vandalized the page in the last 24 hrs. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Amortias. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MusicLover650. Binksternet (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by multiple unregistered editor (and one of them is a banned user who regularly evades the ban to edit this article). ElKevbo (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent increase in edit-warring by WP:SPA accounts. --Ronz (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Amortias (T)(C) 20:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

07 September 2017

Semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring which most of the time gets reverted by User:Mean as custard with redirecting page to another.User:Mean as custard Deprtcsa (talk) 09:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If you keep removing the AfD notice from that article, you're likely to get blocked. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:55, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already got pending changes - what's wrong with that? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:36, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of unsourced changes, disruption, and subtle vandalism since last protection ended. A high-profile article, something serious has to be done. Long-term target for attack. Pending changes and Semi-protection hasn't seemed to have worked.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  16:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Sagaciousphil: is keeping an eye on it, so I'm hopeful it won't deteriorate into complete crap. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No evidence of sustained vandalism. —Kusma (t·c) 16:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. (not by me) Report at WP:AIV if problem continues. —Kusma (t·c) 16:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. —Kusma (t·c) 16:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Most IP edits are arbitrary removals of content.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  16:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —Kusma (t·c) 16:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent introduction of copyrighted and promotional material, removing AfD template, by multiple IPs. Note one IP address blocked for 6 months already. Muhandes (talk) 06:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 18:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: To prevent page deletion and vandalism.Deprtcsa (talk) 10:02, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – So that template editors may edit. (This request refers to downgrading the move protection.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Courtesy ping for Courcelles. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – So that template editors may edit. (This request refers to downgrading the move protection.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Courtesy ping for AGK. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UAMG Content

Temporary protection: Editor ignores source against adding "UAMG Content LLC" to each of these article and is inciting an edit war. Spshu (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sort it out on the talk page, please. Both of you should know better than to be edit-warring. Vanamonde (talk) 09:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanamonde93:, we are on the talk page. One, you are an administrator and should honor request for page protect as the other party does not care about edit warring and the only way to get them to the talk page is to either page protect or continue to reverse their edit. Other administrators indicate I should come here first to halt potential edit warring. Thus, you are supporting edit warring despite your statement that "Both of you should know better than to be edit-warring." This statement will not stop them. I do know better, but administrators seem to prefer to trap editors into edit warring or allow the article to go awry. Second, now he is attempting to intimidate me by threatening to take me it ANI if I don't agree with his supposed "common sense conclusion" of information not in source. --Spshu (talk) 13:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There has been removal of sourced material. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 17:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and sock puppetry. Pillowfluffyhead (talk) 01:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Kusma (t·c) 16:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 04:29, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Was going to request this myself just now as the vandalism is continuing. PureRED | talk to me | 15:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 9 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also a month of PC protection. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 11:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Enigmamsg 16:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 13:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long term genre warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:06, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I despair Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 15:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:37, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I know this was declined recently, but the rest of America woke up and decided to play around on the page. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 16:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has had and continues to have numerous cases of vandalism . IEsuredI (talk) 03:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Enigmamsg 16:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Armenian POV editor keeps adding information which is sourced with tabloid journalism and libelllous material. Divot only access to wikipedia to edit Azerbaijani pages in english version . Musifq.mehdiyev (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Enigmamsg 16:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending Changes doesn't seem to suffice. Many vandals today alone. . Hummerrocket (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Most IP edits appear to be constructive, no gross vandalism in the last few hours. Vanamonde (talk) 09:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RHaworth. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bishonen. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full Create-protection: Repeated creation by socks of User:118 alex. 128.90.62.212 (talk) 02:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 13:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been a large quantity of unhelpful and/or vandalism edits in the past few days. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 13:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 13:51, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued and extensive edit warring from IP users. PureRED | talk to me | 20:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected – 2 months per a complaint at WP:AN3. Edit warring by both IPs and newly-registered accounts who may be reincarnations of the IPs. EdJohnston (talk) 00:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been persistently disrupted by IP's . -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 22:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The article has been protected temporarily three times in the last year and the issues persist. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 09:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This refers to the username of a rather prolific account of the LTA/sock puppeteer Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young. There doesn't appear to be a case for it to be created legitimately. –72 (talk) 09:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: you may also wish to protect the related talk page too [18]72 (talk) 09:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done (both) by Lectonar -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP of high profile undocumented immigration activist is a habitual target of IP and new SPA vandals making libelous and biased edits, which ramped up again after DACA announcement. Indefinite semiprot would protect the integrity of the article and hence the encyclopedia. Tvoz/talk 19:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected, should be sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism to page. mode94015/talk 19:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason this page repeatedly gets vandalized by different IP's. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 19:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:48, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Potential edit warring. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Wait for one more recreation. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP's. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We are getting a slew of crystal ball updates on this high profile tennis player. her ranking will change on Sep 11 assuming no unforeseen circumstances, but before. Could we get a semi protection or extended confirmed protection until Sep 10? That will help against IPs even though editors with accounts are also doing this. (But those I can leave messages that will be read on their talk pages). Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Or at the very least, please keep an eye on this one. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 21:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 6 months. EdJohnston (talk) 01:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruptive editing, including removing reliable sources and inserting POV text.--Seiya (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 19:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced anti-piracy crack that even Dissident93 disagrees with. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 15:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors changing the table and not taking head-to-head into account which IS the first tiebreaker. The official website sadly just uses that after the group is completed. Kante4 (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There are a lot of anonymous editors making valid contributions here. If the recent trend keeps up, please re-request. Malinaccier (talk) 19:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: due to consistent vandalism of Congressman's page, possibly intended to influence upcoming primary elections this month ([19]). Quis separabit? 04:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigmamsg 17:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes or Semi-protection: Long-term persistent/steady vandalism overtime. 68.186.201.121 (talk) 20:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Malinaccier (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Black Kite (talk) 22:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

08 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on changing the URL of this offline website. --Frmorrison (talk) 13:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LynxTufts (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deor (talk) 17:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lahore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 17:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated questionable edits by unregistered editors. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 17:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – from two IPs. SLIGHTLYmad 15:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection edit warring for days. Capitals00 (talk) 15:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vanamonde (talk) 15:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Only recreated once. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Under attack from spam. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 15:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Vanamonde (talk) 15:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of questionable SPA IP text devoid of reliable sources that might be be well meaning but it seems promotional (but could also be vandalism). I cant tell and did not explore it. I am involved in editing that page and rewrote it recently to meet WP standards but the article is now getting back to a bad state again and needs the the same type of constant maintenance that I provided. Request semi-protection for editing only by registered users. Thank you. Johnvr4 (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: page protection waa recently lifted, but unsourced content was added to the articles almost as soon as the articles were opened up. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 07:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – frequent vandalism/BLP violations. Denniss (talk) 11:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Data was deleted. Misinformation. It is about Malaysia national football team. Shafiqabu (talk) 10:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, even if there was vandalism it already stopped. Apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of previous warrior. Grayfell (talk) 01:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent inflation of sales figures from multiple IPs (mainly one), but even if the IP was blocked, with these types of discographies, the editors come back to inflate the figures with different IPs. Ss112 01:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 02:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See both Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fabulousdiana and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alisha Actress. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs post Unite the Right rally; likely to continue in the future, so pending-changes protection might be beneficial. . K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. too busy for PC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lmthrowaway222 (talk) 23:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of death date when person hasn't died, significant amount of vandalism in past few days. Tdts5 (talk) 00:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Fans persistently changing the post-release reception section to make the reviews seem better than they actually were. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – School ips most probably; continuous vandalism; 2 or 3 day semi protection should do right now. Lourdes 08:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30+ pages about ships which begin with 'USS' e.g.

etc. Semi-protection: Sock Puppetry (My Royal Young), on certain days, the series of users repeatedly replaced content with same phrases/words/junk which most of the time gets reverted by ClueBot NG with lots of bytes recovered, usually in the thousands. Thanks, 86.183.222.236 (talk) 09:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined per my comments elsewhere on this page. -- zzuuzz (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP disruption since last round of semi-protection expired. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 19:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unexplained removal of content by an ip-hopping editor. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent edits adding un-sourced content to the page or editing current sourced information without adding a new source to back up their edit. Various users are doing this every day or two. Jeffhardyred (talk) 20:40, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I've warned an editor who keeps vandalizing the article, but can this be protected temporarily to avoid further vandalism?. --Another Believer (Talk) 20:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Magnet for crazy. VQuakr (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 12:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RHaworth.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Fifaclubs (talk) 15:52, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing with new editors adding fake mirrors of the deleted bittorrent website. --Frmorrison (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Affected all datas and information that cannot be revert anymore.Shafiqabu (talk) 17:37, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple IPs adding Spam concerning Envirosafe Pest Control Orlando VVikingTalkEdits 18:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recently used to bypass protection of Alisha Panwar. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alex Shih., though if this is really vandalism (which I have no opinion of), the user must be blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and adding of unsourced content. Haveyouseenthisboy (talk) 06:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 07:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. User blocked. MelanieN (talk) 01:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SirGents(talk) 17:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, particularly exacerbated today for who knows what reason and some arguably "worthy" of revdel, by schoolchildren versus peers. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 22:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looked like cyber bullying. Some edits revdeled and some blocks handed out too. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:37, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

09 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of unsourced and/or poorly sourced content by IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 12:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RHaworth. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LinguistunEinsuno 13:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Redgro (talk) 09:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Better protection level. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 12:00, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 12:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 12:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is a continual target for disruptive editing and pending changes isn't doing enough. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Temporary semi-protection: Persistant disruptive editing by IP, spammy stating "unreliable sources" w/o specifying, using aliasing tool.. AVS (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing starting in early August. One user, his socks and IPs continuously making similar edits: adding a unsourced family member to the subject. The editor had been warned and blocked, but edits continue form varying IPs. The page had been temporarily protected, but edits also continued immediately after the protection expired. Therefore requesting permanent protection. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Salting G4 article: Copyright violations. AaronWikia (talk) 21:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined only recreated once. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of uncited material to the Cast section, even after notes were placed specifically stating not to add without a reliable source. For a full breakdown of the situation, you can see Talk:Leatherface (2017 film)#Persistent original research (Cast section) and, of course, the edit history. DarkKnight2149 02:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 03:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Wgolf (talk) 04:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 06:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Legacypac (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued BLP vandalism after release of last protection expired. - FlightTime (open channel) 05:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spammy link being inserted by IP. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent insertion of spam link. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:08, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of done, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent insertion of spam link. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neighborhoods of Jerusalem

Semi-protection: WP:ARBPIA enforcement Wrestlingring (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: High level of IP vandalism, edit wars, and violation of policy of biographies on living people. Rajinimurugan1977 (talk) 19:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been too many recent edits without any source. Many unregistered users are even changing the official source related materials with their personal data. Anyone can add or edit things in Wikipedia but, the provided information must have to be resource based. According to my knowledge there is a huge possibility of violating the terms of the content authenticity of this page, that's why i am requesting for a protection for this page. Sabbire.p (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Widr (talk) 20:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and new account editwarring, RevertSJW is now removing cutations. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: same disruptive editing by Euexperttime (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has resumed after last expiration expired. MarnetteD|Talk 23:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: disruptive editing by Euexperttime (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has resumed. MarnetteD|Talk 23:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IPs (probably the same user) adding irrelevant, kooky material. -- WikiPedant (talk) 23:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and most recent IP blocked for 31 hours. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary or long-term semi-protection: Same disruptive IP-hopper from before, engaging in WP:IDON'TLIKEIT behavior. The article had to be semi-protected before because of the IP. A little after the protection has worn off, the IP is back at it again. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption from IP-hopping edit warrior. Sro23 (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 20:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Promotional seemingly COI edits and sockpuppetry occuring over a longer period of time. Needs indefinite protection. Carl Fredrik talk. Carl Fredrik talk 22:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather — I specifically requested indefinite protection, because the problematic edits have happened over a long period. There is nothing to indicate that one-week protection is sufficient. Please consider this as a second request for indefinite protection. Carl Fredrik talk 23:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It has never been protected before. Usually the length of protection increases over time and I rarely protect something indefinite. Of course you can try for a second opinion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – BLP policy dispute and edit war. Tornado chaser (talk) 21:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by globally banned user Yahadzija. In only past ca. month, at least four sock accounts (Pokoyac, Poglavar, Wagabundo, BosGenius) have focused on this article. Related article (Šiprage) is already protected for this reason. Эlcobbola talk 18:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going GWAR by socks of MariaJaydHicky et al. SummerPhDv2.0 14:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • See the article's recent activity, both me and Tomica have been trying to deal with the inclusion of unsourced content that SummerPhDv2.0 keeps adding and she has clearly broke the 3RR. Tinaaquas (talk) 15:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Tinaaquas has been blocked as a sock of a blocked editor. --Ronz (talk) 19:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And now ip's are edit-warring. --Ronz (talk) 19:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well you've edited as both Ronz and SummerPhDv2.0 so you should be blocked 2A02:C7F:DE55:6400:E49E:DC1D:7819:8DDF (talk) 19:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The ip's are edit-warring on the article talk page as well, so that might be best protected as well. --Ronz (talk) 19:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 14:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lots of spamming, trolling and unsourced edits being added. TropicAces (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – ip based blp vandals with multiple IP ranges. . ResultingConstant (talk) 19:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced BLP-information from dynamic IPs despite clear notices. GermanJoe (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple users and IPs are persistently vandalising this page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 20:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

10 September 2017

The whole set of pages on the Template:Arleigh Burke class destroyer template

Semi-protection to prevent sock puppets for a good length of time: Possible sock puppetry of the series of users, lead by My Royal Young, who vandalises the pages in the template which, in most cases, gets automatically reverted by ClueBot NG. The programme has reverted a number of pages today along with what happened in the past in a short amount of time which we know about. The amount of bytes ClueBot NG has recovered is unbelievable, usually in the 5 digit range and today I feel like this is the action to take. 86.183.222.236 (talk) 08:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined per my comments. -- zzuuzz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sudden vandalism attacks from multiple IPs - Arjayay (talk) 18:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 18:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs in the same range adding defamatory information. Cahk (talk) 19:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of twelve hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Targeted by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young. –72 (talk) 01:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — Maile (talk) 12:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Targeted by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young. –72 (talk) 01:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected — Maile (talk) 12:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Evking22 (talk) 02:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. — Maile (talk) 12:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptions by multiple IP's. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 05:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 11:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Direct (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: to prevent IP vandalism on the page. Multiple accounts of vandalism from the same entity over a period of more than 3 years using different aliases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gotitbro (talkcontribs) 07:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 11:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2 or 3 days protection should be enough; either that or block the two ips who are repeatedly vandalizing the page. Lourdes 09:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not a suitable case for pending changes. Each weekly episode brings a long string of edits.There are complex disputes over content and formatting, and those of us who don't read Korean are unable to verify edits to distinguish correct updates from vandalism. : Noyster (talk), 08:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, well, if you prefer edit-warring, fine.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same as AEK F.C.. Target of sock IPs adding unsourced BLP information. Article is completely unsourced, as is the usual MO of the master, for which he was blocked in the past. Created by master Marios2134454. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marios2134454. Dr. K. 16:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of illegal movie-hosting sites. Joeyconnick (talk) 00:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 01:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – targeted by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young. –72 (talk) 01:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Morretor (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Major edits. W.nimanimaei (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: W.nimanimaei (talk · contribs) blocked by CambridgeBayWeather. how is that subject to AE? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only recreated once. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been removal of sourced material.Semi protection removed just yesterday. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 07:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassment. Home Lander (talk) 19:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. AlexiusHoratius 21:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 21:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant biased edits regarding ethnicity and historical revisionism by users who keep changing IP. AntonSamuel (talk) 18:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. (the other articles listed.) AlexiusHoratius 21:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:18, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent promotional disruptive editing from a couple of IPs; semi- protection may not be the best solution. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: This page was created, redirected back to the Premier League and then created again (under PROD). It contains absolutely no content, mainly for the reason that no team has qualified for this season and none will be sure to until about April next year. If this has already been created twice, what's going to stop it being created again 20 times until we know even the smallest thing? Harambe Walks (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of Months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected the redirect until 2018-05-15 0600 UTC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sock disruption has resumed soon after expiry of previous protection . Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marios2134454. Dr. K. 16:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP users are repeatedly attempting changes with no sources. Zefr (talk) 16:13, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No IP edit has been constructive since August 26th. Many choose to include "Flavortown" in the article. . Hummerrocket (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A great deal of IP edits who have only edited this particular article. Socks?.   Aloha27  talk  16:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:08, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping troll, see 73.99.93.34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) for starters. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well maybe if you didn't keep making personal attacks and trolling me it would be ok. You don't need to keep restoring comments on my IP talk page after I revert them as the trolling they are. You did it on my talk page and I did it on yours. If you stop doing it on mine I will return that gesture to you as well. 73.99.94.146 (talk) 13:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.. Ping me or re-request if it picks back up. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Bonvallite (talk) 13:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 13:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP vandalism. Instantmatter49 (talk) 14:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Sikhism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection edit warring. Capitals00 (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent spamming from moving companies, business directories and promotional bloggers. GermanJoe (talk) 15:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous anon IPs targeting BLP article for vandalism and unsourced changes. Egghead06 (talk) 17:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring from IP addresses, constant non-productive editing. NoGhost (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Rather, it was created to bypass an existing blacklist; note there's an L instead of an I. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Salted as an offensive name.— Maile (talk) 20:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent death of his son is prompting speculation. Requesting temporary protection until reliable sources cover it. James J. Lambden (talk) 19:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 21:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

11 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 18:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 18:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP socks keep adding unsourced programme lists to articles, Would prefer indef as these socks won't ever stop, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP socks keep adding unsourced programme lists to articles, Would prefer indef as these socks won't ever stop, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent IP BLP vio edits. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A month or two of PC would work also. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mattis has quite the reputation with Uncle Sam's Misguided Children. Please provide indefinite semi-protection at least until he leaves office or Chuck Norris dies, which ever comes first. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 18:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism from IP socks. PureRED | talk to me | 18:07, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previous protection was removed, disruption continued. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Since none of you have used the talk page or edit summaries, you're all being disruptive. Start a talk page thread. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Simply adding content without a source is not "disruptive editing" unless done repeatedly, against consensus, and where all attempts to locate a source have failed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please semi-protect for 6 months. These were being minded by a formerly undisclosed paid editor; they have been tagged with COI and not cleaned up yet, and an IP-hopper keeps coming and removing the tags. Wasting yet more of our time. You can see from the history of any one of those that they have done this five times now. Jytdog (talk) 17:04, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All three protected. Hopefully this takes care of it. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, Unsourced additions,addition of time slots which is against WP:NOTTVGUIDE policy, good faith edits etc --:Sidaq pratap/talkMonday 11 September 2017; 16:26 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Still being vandalized by VHS/Drexel Hill/African-American culture LTA. KMF (talk) 00:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. - Shickorbob (the main problematic editor) blocked for 24 hours. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hummerrocket (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No IP edits for 24 hours. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Long term edit-warring by multiple COI accounts, adding inadequately sourced content. SPI may be in order. 2601:188:180:11F0:E4BC:E454:2513:3405 (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Benniejets; see page history). Third new sock so far today, the two latest of them having been IPs in a mobile network in Italy, IPs that are cheap and can be changed after each edit, making warning and blocking pointless. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 15:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Alisha Panwar et al. Largoplazo (talk) 15:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continuing disruption on AEK FC-related articles by IP socks and master. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marios2134454. Dr. K. 00:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Last protection was 1 week; escalating accordingly. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple vandal edits by IP user 24.187.50.53 (six on September 10, and nine on September 8). Brankestein (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is not obvious vandalism, and the IP has not been warned.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, only recreated once--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Just look at it and its the same person, who keeps on making the same changes over and over. Crazyseiko (talk) 11:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does its slove the issue? --Crazyseiko (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent IP vandalism. Bowling is life (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see how PC goes, and if all the IP edits are bad, we can upgrade protection then. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 22:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Modernponderer (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous users. I have frequently reverted their disruptive edits and they keep coming for more. . CycloneYoris (talk) 02:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant vandalism and disruptive addition of false, unsourced information by IP users. NoMoreHeroes (talk) 02:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: This page, and other Bros articles, have been vandalised by sock puppet accounts/IP addresses belonging to TomWatkins1970 over the last year on a regular basis. This page has had several periods of temporary semi-protection, but this user always returns to vandalise the page (adding unsourced, false and exaggerated sales figures, fictitious chart positions and certifications, and deliberately bad spelling, punctuation and grammar) once the protection has expired.Nqr9 (talk) 05:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Widr. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection Constant vandalism after scandal about this artist from IP's, whole sections deleted, infobox altered and words changed to make the page near libelous. This has been constant for the past two days. WolvesS (talk)

For the last two days, it looks like edit-warring to me, and you are one of the sides.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like either vandalism or a BLP violation, or possibly both. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Please protection from anonim vandalism. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. - I've never seen an instance where a non-confirmed user has had a legitimate reason to edit a LTA page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing edit-warring by IP editor.   Aloha27  talk  11:38, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism from IP addresses after a prior semi-protection was expired. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A fair level of recent vandalism from multiple sources. DoctorKaufman (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalismc by a bunch of newly created usernames. There's probably one singe person behind this. DVdm (talk) 09:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending Changes has not stopped continual attempts to add unsourced information, either non-notable gameplay details better suited for a player's guide or frequent attempts to add various supposed release dates, especially for Android. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by a slew of probable IP socks of User:Hoggardhigh. BilCat (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – from IPs. SLIGHTLYmad 10:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protection require of high traffic page until 1 october. . Saqib (talk) 10:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent unsourced POV. Charles (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: continuous disruptive vandalism from IP users. JayB91 (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As soon as the protection was reduced, disruptive editing began on his alleged death. . Hummerrocket (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: continous POV-pushing edits by IP socks of banned user Bosnipedian. Borsoka (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Spam. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 13:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive edits from IP users: Recently I added some internal wiki links to the article Shanghai(e.g. Yu Garden, Nanjing Road)(i.e. this edit), however, some IP users from Taiwan have been persistently removing these links for "too much link" or "bad link"(e.g. 1 and 2. Please semi-protect this article and help restore it to the previous version.117.136.44.234 (talk) 13:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant changing of the infobox parameters without explanation from several IPs. I don't know who's right, but forcing discussion would probably be a good idea. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – 1300+ transclusions; was recently vandalised to spam a link. John of Reading (talk) 07:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent reverting by IPs and new SPA accounts (all likely the same banned editor) without engaging on the article Talk page. Xenophrenic (talk) 12:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least until Hurricane Irma clears in a couple of days. Also Key West, Florida should be protected for similar reasons. Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel04:04, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs editwarring. . Doug Weller talk 06:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Promotional seemingly COI edits and sockpuppetry occuring over a longer period of time. Needs indefinite protection. 1 week protection is useless, because nothing indicates it will serve any purpose at all. Problematic edits occur regularly with intervals of a few weeks. Carl Fredrik talk 05:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP-hopping vandal is back, repeatedly deleting sourced information; long-term semi-protection seems the only solution. The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP-hopping vandal is back, repeatedly deleting sourced information; long-term protection seems the only solution. The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The threat from the sockpuppet seems to be minimal now. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: did you ask Redrose64? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:23, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good point! @Redrose64: My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 07:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP-hopping vandal is back, repeatedly deleting sourced information; long-term protection seems the only solution. The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by There'sNoTime. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Poorly sourced POV pushing, likely socking. . Vanamonde (talk) 17:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: (one week) for persistent IP and new-account vandalism (as per talk page). Stelio (talk) 20:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 23:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – An A7-band article that has been repeatedly created by different users in these two days. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 22:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MPS1992 (talk) 23:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations involving the greatly exaggerated "cheating scandal" section started after protection ended, most likely originating from one user controlling multiple IP addresses. Pending changes could work, although there have been no constructive auto-confirmed edits for a long time. — Quasar G. 14:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for a year. Edits are infrequent enough to handle using pending changes but will keep an eye on this. Will also look into a school block and revdel. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism, have tried to explain and give them warnings, but they're not responding or listening. . VietPride10 (talk) 18:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 19:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 19:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep adding false/unsourced info regarding the owner of the stadiom. Tornado chaser (talk) 22:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 23:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12 September 2017

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by IPs which have to be reverted multiple times. Redgro (talk) 12:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The changes are all a week old. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – various plugging of silly band's new record. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated plugging of a band's new song (as Pied Piper of Hamelin above). - Arjayay (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralizationsAreBad. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unexplained or unsubstantiated deletion of sourced content. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Though I'm verging on giving it semi, I think you should try to discuss his origins with the IP. If they're unwilling, then re-request. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last 6 IP edits have been reverted. Minima© (talk) 15:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated plugging of a band's new song with same name. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Given the lengthy thread at AN about Taku, the creator, this will be changed unless protected. . Legacypac (talk) 05:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - I looked at both Draft:Nakano's vanishing theorem and Nakano's vanishing theorem - I don't see a content dispute or edit war to the level that justifies full protection, let alone even considering indefinite full protection. Please let me know if I'm missing something. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – There's a lot of reverting of poor edits by autoconfirmed users going on. Could be that it was the anniversary yesterday but a temporary ECP might be a good idea. DrStrauss talk 10:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's now September 12, the 9/11 conspiracy theory brigade will be laying low for another year. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 11:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant disruptive editing by IP, spammy stating her death from unreliable sources, when she's still alive. Can someone look into this please? L1amw90 (talk) 13:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like the cause of death vandal, but other IPs have reverted, so pending changes sounds best. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Repeated content deletion with no explanation from Salt Lake City, Utah IP addresses including, but not limited to: User talk:40.140.56.190 and User talk:2605:A601:F3FE:F00:8064:C088:7552:5056 Anon1-3483579 (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Possible BLP/promotional issues. Alex ShihTalk 03:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 11:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users have been removing content completely without a proper notation or reason. Requesting semi-protection. Crazycoolguy11111 (talk) 02:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Alex ShihTalk 02:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Every edit is disruptive. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 02:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Repeated reversal by IP users (sock?) of content supported by a source. Zefr (talk) 04:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, disruptive editing. The protection should last till after the election. Ammarpad (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going IP-based attempt to misgender the subject, which is a BLP matter. Nat Gertler (talk) 05:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Childish vandalism from IP-Hopper. User will just find a new IP when one is blocked. Crboyer (talk) 05:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuous erroneous additions of who is leader. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 03:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 19:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 03:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yunshui. Alex ShihTalk 03:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I can't identify the last time an anon made a useful contribution to this article - it is just a timesink for repeated reverts by established contributors due to lack of sourcing and notability. Pending changes won't alter that timesink issue. Sitush (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 03:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism, requesting semi protection for 1 week. Apriestofgix (talk) 20:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 03:33, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been receiving extra attention from vandals, etc while on the main page. Dolotta (talk) 20:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 03:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP and newly registered editors. -- Dane talk 21:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 03:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many socks vandalizing this article right now. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 23:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 03:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 01:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 02:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from an IP hopper. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 02:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kosack (talk) 19:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Highly visible page today. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 19:55, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem justified. So far, there have been less than 20 edits today, most of them fairly minor, and only 4 reverts. — Maile (talk) 20:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Indef. semi applied by Fastily in 2010 when pending changes wasn't working/was under review. Asked Fastily in August and he directed me here. I recognize the high risk on this page given its association with Rickrolling and that it is subject to WP:BLP. Thus, perhaps dropping to pending changes is appropriate? Thanks. --Policy Reformer(c) 01:01, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 01:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick action!! I see the changes in the logs, but when I log out, it looks like semi still applies. It's been awhile since I was on RFPP, so perhaps I misunderstand pending changes? Thanks for your time.--Policy Reformer(c) 01:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Zawl 13:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. For example, this edit by an IP looks like a good-faith improvement, and supplies a source. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:01, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Legally not confirmed. Reddevil0728 (talk) 18:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both Therequiembellishere and Reddevil0728 CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Deleted since AfD consensus as "delete", but then repeatedly created. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 23:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Indef. — Maile (talk) 00:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 14:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Lot of editing but not much back and forth. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated removal; likely by IP hopper. Example replacement. Sourced by The Economist and The Atlantic. Jim1138 (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kosack (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

13 September 2017

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 15:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Obviously somebody's editing with a conflict of interest, but go easy on them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal for the last several hours. Four IPs involved. Dawnseeker2000 19:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – dynamic IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 13:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 13:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism has resumed. The page was semi-protected a week ago. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The new season is about to begin, and this topic is relevant. Cites can now be added for episodes and normal editing should resume. See also discussion on article South Park season 21 -- SanAnMan (talk) 12:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected – The title had been fully protected (by me) as a redirect due to a previous edit war. See Talk:South Park (season 21) for the sequence of events that led to unprotection and the creation of a free-standing article on the new season. At present I wouldn't see any reason to lift User:Samsara's indefinite semiprotection on the main List of South Park episodes. EdJohnston (talk) 17:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring while an RFC on the disputed content is underway. RFC is underway here. Toddst1 (talk) 14:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring surrounding Lucina's VA. ULTRA-DARKNESS:) 2 CHAT 16:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bennv3771 (talk) 17:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:14, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant disruptive editing by IP, spammy stating "unreliable sources" w/o specifying, using aliasing tool. AVS (talk) 07:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 13:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Homechallenge55 (talk) 23:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 13:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page has been semi-protected multiple times by now, as a mobile IP keeps editing in false information. Requesting indefinite semi-protection. Last time I requested semi-protection, it was said it would happen, if after the temp semi-protetction lifts, the edits happen again, which was back in April. It's consistent disruptive editing, and has been going on for over a year, if not longer.  Kyoushu~  ►Talk Page  09:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constantly adding unsourced info, ignoring all warnings, etc. -. LouisAragon (talk) 11:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Similar case as with Khosrow Soltan Armani. - . LouisAragon (talk) 11:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The user Taras bulba 47 keeps vandalizing the page. . TPTB (talk) 12:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeated recreation for promotional purposes. PureRED | talk to me | 14:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. I've moved the page to Draft:Dye & Durham Corporation, hopefully they'll get the hint. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection - target of disruptive editing from an IP-hopping vandal. Entranced98 (talk) 15:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I can't see any good-faith reason for an IP to edit that page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. JohnInDC (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated insertion of some bullshit about guys walking around with their "schlongs" out one day a year. The "schlongs" theme is being mirrored on my talk and unprotected talk, along with some vandalism to user talk warnings I've issued. This "schlongs" crap has come from a blocked registered editor, IPs registered to both the University of Michigan and the University of Idaho, a mobile IP in the city where U of I is, mobile IP s in Seattle and Lansing, Mi. John from Idegon (talk) 16:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued problems with related IPs - supposedly associated with one of Dyer's children - changing the date of his death, but failing to provide reliable secondary sourcing to their claim about it, not to mention failing to seek consensus to change the date, since it's been mentioned on the talk page about sources conflicting about this info. Recent semiprotection edit requests to change the date by these IPs (from the last time the article was semi'd) have been denied, but the IPs keep claiming that they (or Dyer's long time book publisher) know his date of death. Whether their claim is true or not is not the point; they are not providing independent sources (completely unrelated to Dyer) to back their claim, and the IPs have been repeatedly reminded of that on the talk page. If they continue to be disruptive and not provide the independent sourcing being asked for, or just keep ranting on the talk page via multiple semiprotection edit requests without providing these sources, I'm afraid this article may be coming back to RPP repeatedly and seeing longer semiprotection periods. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @MPFitz1968: See my comment on the talk page. Maybe this can finally be resolved? Samsara 17:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by disruptive IP Users - seemingly school kids mucking around. Majority of edits for changes in text are just reverts, averaging several times per month. Suggest a reasonable period so registered Users can only modify. Arianewiki1 (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bairavaa and Loham are prime targets for vandals changing box office numbers - may be same vandal hitting both. Atsme📞📧 09:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The existing pending changes protection would seem to suffice for the minute. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done We usually look for at least 2 recreations (three entries in the deletion log) before protecting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 13:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Editing warring. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 13:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Picked right up after last protection expired. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 14:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: I've used this page as an example. Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:51, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On Sept 5, the page was protected for "Persistent disruptive editing from (auto)confirmed accounts)". Less than an hour after protection expired, the disruptive edits were added again by an editor whose recent edit summary shows they refuse to take the matter to the talk page, even though three different editors have asked them to. Edward321 (talk) 01:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 8 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent issue of IP and new user vandalism, generally changing a few letters. Α Guy into Books § (Message) -  07:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iclaprim (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection -- article about drug candidate is under heavy promotional pressure from IP-hopping editor with WP:APPARENTCOI, removing negative content and adding hype. Please semi-protect for a month. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 10:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
fixed, thanks bot. Jytdog (talk) 10:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Maile66. Samsara 11:51, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Gabucho181 back at it again. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 06:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent distruptive editing. Constant distruptive edits over the past couple weeks. Simplexity22 (talk) 06:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent long-term Wikipedia:Disruptive editing and Wikipedia:Vandalism by various IP addresses. --Jklamo (talk) 07:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent long-term abuse of Wikidestruction vandal. 115.164.54.199 (talk) 03:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent long-term abuse of Wikidestruction vandal. 115.164.54.199 (talk) 04:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User pages for Stelio

Indefinite semi-protection: Following semi-protection of International Securities Identification Number (as per talk page) the frustrated vandal has taken to attacking my personal user pages. See for example recent history including the comment "Updated Stelio and will never dtop" (typo for stop). The vandal uses multiple accounts, and the particular IP address for these edits has also done some good work, so I request indefinite semi-protection on my few user pages rather than a block of the IP address.

Thanks, Stelio (talk) 01:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Protected the ones that have been affected, but left the other two as we don't protected things preemptively. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. Hopefully I won't need to come back here next week. :-) -Stelio (talk) 09:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – from an IP hopper. SLIGHTLYmad 05:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Much of the most recent stuff was oversighted, so based on what I could see (and the assumption that if it was oversighted it might be pretty bad), I've given it 2 weeks. @KrakatoaKatie: Do you believe the oversighted edits would have warranted longer protection? Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anarchyte: Yep, it was pretty bad, but let's start with the two weeks. Locks are cheap. ;-) Katietalk 11:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection - Edit warring. Capitals00 (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much vandalism since semiprotection ended. :(.   — Jeff G. ツ 07:38, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 04:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 04:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-stop disruptive edits by IP-hopper. He removes the sourced info. Wario-Man (talk) 04:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., edited unfrequently so I configured pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Navarre0107 (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Enigmamsg 02:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism and mass deletions of content by IP user. Farolif (talk) 20:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:BOLP violations continued after protection expired. Eden5 (talk) 03:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring. Bowling is life (talk) 03:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

extended confirmed protected + ARBPIA (1RR) - edit war between IPs on whether this is Hezbollah vs. Jews/Israel. Should be under standard ARBPIA restrictions.Icewhiz (talk) 11:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

extended confirmed protected + ARBPIA (1RR) - edit war between IPs on whether this is Hezbollah vs. Jews/Israel. Should be under standard ARBPIA restrictions.Icewhiz (talk) 11:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

extended confirmed protected + ARBPIA (1RR) - edit war between IPs on whether this is Hezbollah vs. Jews/Israel. Should be under standard ARBPIA restrictions.Icewhiz (talk) 11:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jsknoll (talk) 02:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP-hopper repeatedly adding unsourced remake rumour. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: I only see the Pending Changes applied. No semi as of this post. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 02:51, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Samsara 03:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 19:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MilborneOne. Samsara 02:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 20:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 20:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Much vandalism since start of school year. See this. PC is appropriate due to this article's status as a FA. John from Idegon (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 01:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 20:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Already pending protected and only two edits by one IP so far this month, who is now blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP resumed immediately after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending changes isn't helping at the moment with disruption in the form of frequent MOS-violating changes to one of the tables. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection:editors trying to get editor in good standing into edit war. Please protect until discussion on talk page. Thank you.TeeVeeed (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Left a comment on the talk page. Samsara 18:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Provisionally:
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 02:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 19:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. However, I did block User:AbbygaelMTaylor1. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:33, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 20:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits by IP's and new accounts. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 23:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – To allow template editors. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you asked Dragons flight? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Done, [21] - FlightTime (open channel) 01:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semiprotection: Persistent addition of copyright violations by unconfirmed editors. --IJBall (contribstalk) 13:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 14:01, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 14:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Pending changes isn't helping. IPs continue to insert unsourced speculation. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ritchie333 . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Attacks by Gabucho on his own investigation. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If a sock is daft enough to pop onto their SPI, they can expect short shrift and a fast banhammer. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A person is hopping around IP numbers (that all seem to be associated with the school) to add a hazing allegation, sourced to some anonymous person on Reddit. The edits come with wild edit summaries, mostly from IP numbers that start with 129, and three semiprotections since February haven't stopped this person from coming right back after they're expired. 2602:306:BC31:4AA0:480B:1D12:4102:2962 (talk) 16:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Taking previous protections and escalating accordingly. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie333: The most recent lock was for a month. Could you maybe consider two months? 2602:306:BC31:4AA0:480B:1D12:4102:2962 (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing airliners

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 16:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Widr (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Rumors of the band changing their name, no reliable sources to support. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator The Anome.. Already create protected for one year by The Anome, that will be sufficient for now. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Edit-warring with multiple editors including an IP-hopping editor whose disruption has caused these articles to be protected before. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 17:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent vandalism. Taffe316 (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 19:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14 September 2017

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Controversy and canvassing, multiple accounts created to further either side. Dark-World25 (talk) 06:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It does not look too bad. The closing administrator will sort out the spam votes. Malinaccier (talk) 14:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to request Indefinite pending changes in addition to the semi-protection, as this article appears to be a major target for vandals. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Samsara. Somehow they forgot to tag for the bot. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 18:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 17:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. This protection was bought to you by Drmies Sock Woofers Ltd. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – frequent 'bear' vandalism. Denniss (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign-language Oscars

Temporary semi-protection: IP jumping vandal is adding unsourced info to both these pages for the official Oscar submissions. The same thing happened about this time last year too. Request protection until 2nd October, by then each country will have made their selection. TIA. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Samsara:} - just a note that the Chinese page seems to be protected for three days, and not weeks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, thanks. For the bot: Samsara 18:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP's and new accounts. Adamgerber80 (talk) 15:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. Deli nk (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Admins! It is request you to kindly enable the protection on the pages due to repeatedly change in the content without reliable sources. These are the recently released films, thus some anonymous user is changing the box office gross amount using several IPs. Thanks! M. Billoo 02:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Both articles). Malinaccier (talk) 14:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP's removing cited info. Adamgerber80 (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The article currently has pending changes protection, can it also be semi-protected as well? The article receives a high-level of IP edits that is essentially all vandalism and it just clutters up the edit history. Drovethrughosts (talk) 15:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent misgendering of a trans man. Funcrunch (talk) 16:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - semi protection wouldn't work as there are too many confirmed accounts involved in the revert. If there is still a problem after protection expires, I think this page would be suitable for Extended Confirmed protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry from vandal TomWatkins1970, a user intent on vandalising Bros-related articles and reverting the edits of those who revert their vandalism.Nqr9 (talk) 01:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same WP:NOTHERE IP hopper whose mass disruptive edits resulted in Khosrow Soltan Armani and Allahverdi Khan (Armenian) getting Semi'd. -. LouisAragon (talk) 07:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Conflict of interest editing by multiple IP editors. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 12:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indef Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, predominately POV but also a few BLP violations too. This is common as it is a popular Youtube channel and may only get worse after each Arsenal matchday. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 13:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Attempting to perform a WP:PARALLEL merge of page content to Universal Kids due to a pagemove process to the new page title botched by low-edit accounts and IP vandals, but title keeps being moved by low-edit accounts without knowledge of WP:PAGEMOVE without permission or consensus. At least a week requested. Nate (chatter) 01:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Mrschimpf, please notify me when you're done, so I can unprotect it. Nyttend (talk) 12:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry from vandal TomWatkins1970, a user intent on vandalising Bros-related articles and reverting the edits of those who revert their vandalism.Nqr9 (talk) 01:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection was done by Widr, not by me. Nyttend (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued pattern of behavior by adding-in unsourced or poorly sourced content by IP's and anonymous editors. livelikemusic talk! 02:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 12:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. dalahäst (let's talk!) 03:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 12:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 6 different IPs in the last few hours. –72 (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 12:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained content removal. Jetstreamer Talk 01:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the IP got the last warning and must be blocked if they continue.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism especially by IP address 66.203.31.49. MitchellLunger (talk) 04:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 66.203.31.49 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 04:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 05:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP-hopper insists on edit warring to insert WP:UNDUE material into the article. I am the second editor to revert that IP user. . Jasper Deng (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent controversy over [of Gaming Platforms] and suspected canvassing leads to multiple instances of vandalism, and disuptive editing. Dark-World25 (talk) 06:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Dark-World25 (talk) 06:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Brojam (talk) 23:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism by IP editors, especially over past week. Kbseah (talk) 00:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection. Rohit.khisti (talk) 20:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm thinking, actually, that this page is a CSD G4 candidate notwithstanding that the AfD was in 2008. It is plainly a repost of the same content and remains substantially identical to the deleted article. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Rohit.khisti: See also WP:OWN. You are the only significant contributor to this article so far. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 23:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Article deleted. Samsara 00:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 00:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring by autoconfirmed users on a BLP. Miles Edgeworth Objection! 00:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 01:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: User C.J. Griffin added edit against RfC consensus available in the article talk page. I reversed, he restored, this will lead to an edit war if the page is not protected. Dryfee (talk) 01:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 01:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Samsara, the talk page has been already used and dispute resolution in the form of WP:RFC reached a consensus. Please take time to review the talk page before making a hasty decision. Dryfee (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the RfC closing rationale, read CJ's edit summary. They match. Samsara 02:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 15:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Semi from who? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather - I assume from the user Jackatley, who created this article and continues to edit it regularly - I'm seeing obvious conflict of interest and autobiography issues here (and apparently you do as well - seeing the messages you've left on his talk page). The article went through AFD (link), which was closed on July 30 as Keep. I think that protecting the article would exclude editors that are making good contributions and edits to it. The best solution to this situation is to treat all edits made to the article the same - WP:BLP applies regardless of who is editing this article. Unreferenced and poorly referenced content can be challenged and removed, and editors who repeatedly and persistently add unreferenced or poorly referenced content to it per WP:BLP can be blocked, and edit warring / 3RR still applies (I just warned the user for edit warring due to the reverts made just today). It looks like we've tried repeatedly to talk to this user about COI and Autobiographies - I think the logical next step from here is WP:ANI. Thoughts? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oshwah I see they haven't edited it in 24 hours so maybe they are paying attention now. Semi won't work as the editor has been here since 2009. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather - Agreed. I think we should leave things as-is and see where things go first. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The latest remark that it isn't eligible for speedy seems wrong to me. While the AfD was closed "keep", the only "keep" vote was one that thought the nomination was invalid - and the closing rationale explicitly said so. Surely an invalid nom can't be a showstopper of anything? Pinging General Ization. Samsara 03:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll accept your reasoning that the previous AfD doesn't preclude a speedy delete. However, the deletion criterion specified was G11: "it serves only to promote or publicise an entity, person, product, or idea, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic." I do not see that as valid deletion criterion for this article, a) which has existed on Wikipedia for more than 8 years; b) in which the subject is clearly notable (even if they now claim they would like not to be); c) it includes citations that establish that notability; and d) it has now been extensively edited by editors other than the article creator. At the very least, another AfD should be required to consider its deletion. General Ization Talk 03:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And yes, I can see now that semi wouldn't have been helpful in dealing with Jackatley. General Ization Talk 03:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism since early 2017. Bernie44 (talk) 00:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 9 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by various IP users. BattleshipMan (talk) 02:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 03:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not much editing or vandalism has happened lately. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 13:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Pinging Samsara as protecting admin. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It was low this time last year, too. I think the end of December will be a better time to have this discussion. Samsara 11:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Favonian (talk) 17:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – One user, Special:Contributions/Pantheera.eesh, as there first edit is insisting on replacing the content of the page with their version which is poorly written and poorly formatted with fundamental English language and Wikipedia errors. JesseRafe (talk) 19:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 20:05, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 20:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 20:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Primefac. Samsara 00:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection In spite of lengthy discussions in talk page, some users continue to regularly delete tons of sourced content (with summaries in foreign language by the way). We need one month full protection, the time they understand they need to follow consensus. --Launebee (talk) 22:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By "they", I assume that Launebee is talking about me as s/he is reverting only my contributions[22]. But hey, no need to notify me, right ? This strategy of mass revert/page protection has been also used on the SciencePo article (a major rival of this university). As anyone can see, I have explained every single change on the history, and Launebee has reverted everything, and didn't seek any discussion on the talk page. S/he is trying to get the page frozen for a month on his/her version. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 06:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There was a consensus on SP article, it is why it has been protected from disruptive editing. There was a consensus here, and XIII is doing the same type of disruptive editing (in spite of consensus reached with Mr Nurdule on many points and clear sources. See talk page.). --Launebee (talk) 07:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
""There was a consensus here"" Ok then, can you provide a diff to prove your statement ? XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer to the talk pages of the articles you are talking about and stop using French in a manner people can't understand. You have to reach consensus before deleting sourced content.--Launebee (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So you can't provide any evidence to back your affirmation. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 15:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say that I support the protection of the page, as a swarm of IPs have started to target the article[23]. They are trying to remove the warning templates (POV, advert, lack of reliable references...), so the protection should definitively manage to keep this templates to warn the readers. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be a trick from this user. He is edit-warring in spite of consensus on talk page. Please block him for a few days. --Launebee (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

XIII is putting in the articles banners with no consensus even though the article is clearly sourced, and its content has followed thorough talks. He is also deleting sources. --Launebee (talk) 21:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: – If one editor is far in the lead in terms of reverting I would hesitate to apply full protection. Just now I left a message for XIIIfromTOKYO and hope he will agree to take a break from the article, to avoid sanctions. EdJohnston (talk) 22:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The semiprotection is to stop the IP possible sockpuppetry. The rest of you, work it out on the talk page, staying civil please. I will post a couple of more detailed warnings on relevant user talk pages.MelanieN (talk) 22:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC) (Sorry, EdJohnston - edit conflict)[reply]

Isha Ambani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection - This page has seen a lot of vandalism with many users editing the content so that it reflects some random individuals as those related to Isha Ambani. We have seen vandalism with regards to this entity's name, relations, etc. Would request semi-protection so that these edits, nearly all of which are done by users who don't have an account (Their edits are showcased as IP addresses since they don't have accounts) are reduced. LukeShred (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Shoaiborakzai90 (talk) 18:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Yamaguchi先生 is protecting admin, but I doubt they'll do anything with this user blocked. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Samsara 11:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

16 September 2017

Semi-protection: Getting fed up of playing slow-motion whack-a-mole with an editor hopping IPs in order to insert unreferenced nonsense into this article. The IPs are all socks of blocked Brentford1889 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - 81.145.165.215 (talk · contribs), 81.145.165.214 (talk · contribs), 86.153.2.146 (talk · contribs) and currently blocked 86.173.128.125 (talk · contribs). ◦ Trey Maturin 11:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Maile66: Given the IP is using the exact edit summary used by Brentford1889 here, I'd say it's certainly block evasion. Protection will help deal with the IP hopping.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks, Ponyo. — Maile (talk) 21:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from multiple IP's. Adamgerber80 (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 18:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --No1lovesu (talk) 14:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 18:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – article keeps getting added phrase "to keep drunk drivers on the road" by hopping IP's. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 18:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 19:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. —MRD2014 Talk • Edits • Help! 20:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

16 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 12:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not come to the same conclusion. Samsara 14:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 14:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: 30/500 per Arab-Israeli conflict enforcement and the Syrian Civil War/Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant related articles. Wrestlingring (talk) 14:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Syrian_civil_war_articles. Samsara 14:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 14:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: There have been reverts in the past few or several days. --George Ho (talk) 20:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's a bit of an understatement. Samsara 21:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 12:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi-protection would not work here, as the recent edit conflicts come from auto-confirmed users. No IP edits since August. — Maile (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – from an IP. SLIGHTLYmad 14:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurrent vandalism from IP users or recently-registered accounts. Please implement long-term protection, as with other Youtube personalities' articles (cf. Joe Sugg). Hazhk (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – lots of attention in recent days due to record breaking win streak. WNYY98 (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:35, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —MBlaze Lightning T 09:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  02:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Hercules123!. Binksternet (talk) 03:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any recent disruptive edits by confirmed users.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – September appears to be an active vandal month for Amphiprioninae. Atsme📞📧 03:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Nyttend. Samsara 12:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits were not vandalism, I was removing unsourced information. Everytime I do it, he cries vandalism and comes here to whine to the admninstrators. I think he needs to be banned for abuse of power. 2600:1004:B02E:D4C6:E09C:69D7:47F6:D057 (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Samsara 12:07, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP is edit warring and, despite being reverted by four different editors, appears unwilling to participate in the talk page discussion; hopefully semi-protection will encourage the IP to discuss rather than continually reverting?. SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly replacing the main image with an unrepresentative, gaudy photograph that was created to support a sales pitch (= spam). --Sitacuisses (talk) 10:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – From November 2016 due to 59.167.222.122 & 155.143.77.56 edit this page lead to continuous editing war. 155.143.77.56 and another IP continue to edit war without discussion since September 15th.It is necessary to understand what is "History cannot be compressed selectively, especially for Tibet cf. Template:History of Mongolia" & "It is too long.And it is a breaking changes to this template".Is the last resort to block edit or protect page.Dispute resolution may require a history expert. O1lI0 (talk) 02:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:49, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 02:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism by multiple users. Mistakenformatt (talk) 02:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated trolling from IP/new editors, when people are trying to form a consensus. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see lots of arguing but very little trolling. Protecting a talk page has a high bar and this does not seem to meet it. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive and unsourced edits. 103.15.255.140 (talk) 12:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Non-encyclopedic editing style, promotional and unsourced or poorly sourced edits. 103.15.255.140 (talk) 12:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs claiming that her stage name refers to shaved genitalia. RA0808 talkcontribs 00:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BLP violations. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous users. . CycloneYoris (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Yet again, IP editors are trying to post information about a political party that has repeatedly failed notability. This has been going on for years, and picks up again the moment temporary semi-protection is lifted. If possible, permanent semi-protection would be appreciated. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 20:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruptive IP additions are not terribly frequent, so let's see what PC can do. MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Removal of sourced contents.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 21:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, suggested Temporary protection . Kind regards ChocolateRabbit 23:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Indefinite protection probably no longer needed, the addition of poor content etcetera was occurring in the wake of its release and will have died down by now. Pinging Nightscream. DrStrauss talk 20:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the addition of the aforementioned content is no longer an issue, then I concur. Thanks. :) Nightscream (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected MelanieN (talk) 00:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Pinoyverifiededits (talk) 14:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not true. Enigmamsg 18:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Involved in a recent PewDiePie controversy. FallingGravity 17:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.--No1lovesu (talk) 17:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. MelanieN (talk) 23:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent page blanking. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 19:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Before vandalism by one editor today, last edit was more than 2 weeks ago. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Indef extended confirmed SHOULD prevent the VHS vandal. KMF (talk) 19:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most of the socks are not autoconfirmed so semi-protection should be adequate. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Getting fed up of playing slow-motion whack-a-mole with an editor hopping IPs in order to insert unreferenced nonsense into this article. The IPs are all socks of blocked Brentford1889 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - 81.145.165.215 (talk · contribs), 81.145.165.214 (talk · contribs), 86.153.2.146 (talk · contribs) and currently blocked 86.173.128.125 (talk · contribs). ◦ Trey Maturin 11:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Maile66: Given the IP is using the exact edit summary used by Brentford1889 here, I'd say it's certainly block evasion. Protection will help deal with the IP hopping.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks, Ponyo. — Maile (talk) 21:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from multiple IP's. Adamgerber80 (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 18:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. --No1lovesu (talk) 14:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 18:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – article keeps getting added phrase "to keep drunk drivers on the road" by hopping IP's. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 16:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 18:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 19:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. —MRD2014 Talk • Edits • Help! 20:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17 September 2017

Extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm ambivalent about this one. Seems to have normal vandalism expected of any of our articles, and not much of it. One diff contained a childish remark about terrorism. Not sure it's worth more than a shrug. Samsara 19:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 11:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. —MRD2014 Talk • Edits • Help! 02:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With great reluctance as there hasn't been disruption in years. Samsara 02:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – the lede content repeatedly removed is sourced in the body of the article - the unregistered editor(s) offer no explanation for repeatedly removing it. MPS1992 (talk) 12:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant biased edits regarding ethnicity and historical revisionism. AntonSamuel (talk) 01:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This appears to be a single editor who can be reported to AIV if they continue making disruptive edits. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ignoring sources and adding own thoughts. TropicAces (talk) 03:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Declined There also appears to be a high rate of good edits from IPs. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page appears to be persistently vandalised in the past few days by the IP address Special:Contributions/2405:204:B109:9780:B2DB:16A8:769A:FF6B / Special:Contributions/2405:204:B005:458B:EE38:A98C:409A:EE5F to push a POV that everyone living in Assam would be an indigenous Assamese, where the word "indigenous Assamese" itself is debatable as the Constitution of India is yet to clarify someone as an indigenous Assamese by definition. The Assamese people is referring to the communities which have the first language as Assamese, and associate with the Assamese code of conduct regarding food, social structure etc., however, many of the tribal groups that do not identify themselves as Assamese, especially the Bodos, having an autonomous territorial council within the state, would need to be differentiated from the Assamese speakers, in general to bring distinction to the various sub-groups within this mixed group of Assamese people. The User has been constantly editing a few statements to reduce the clarity that has been provided in its current form, and hence requesting page protection. AnjanBorah (talk) 05:15, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2405:204:B109:9780:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 12:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like it's calmed down a bit now. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual blp violations. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit war between two editors, both of whom have gone way beyond 3RR, but not been adequately warned. Chaheel Riens (talk) 15:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined They've both been warned now, if they continue please report to WP:ANEW. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Several IP editors trying to add YouTube as a reliable source, many of which after being warned not to do so... 80.107.86.120 (talk) 23:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 06:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked the IP and the user. @FilmandTVFan28: If they continue, ping me and I'll give it semi. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP disruptive editing. --Hameltion (talk, contribs) 14:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent vandalism. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent vandalism. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Redirect to current template, but the redirect was hijacked, see history, causing vandalism to appear in many articles that still use the old link. . CrowCaw 17:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Brojam (talk) 03:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 03:14, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.41.25 (talk) 03:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. IPs keep adding unsourced content. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection - Edit warring. Capitals00 (talk) 10:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More reverts since request. Capitals00 (talk) 10:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone? Call it difference between timings, but talk page and recent reverts show that edit warring has not stopped. Capitals00 (talk) 01:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: The article is repeatedly target by indefinitely blocked user [[User:Marcigyerek1|Marcigyerek1]. While the main account remains blocked, an IP sock of the user has come of its block and returned to vandalising the article. I suggest temporary semi-protection to avoid IP socking. Jeppiz (talk) 21:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Original account and new IP are currently blocked (both by Ritchie333). Let's see if they return. Samsara 23:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistant unexplained removal of sourced content. Likely POV pushing. "bank's fault" to "government's fault" Jim1138 (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Jim1138: Try to discuss it with them on the talk page. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Hercules123!. Binksternet (talk) 03:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of Talk page while blocked. Does not seem to want to appeal. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He blanked his block notice. So what? He's not allowed to blank a denied unblock request while still blocked, but he didn't make one. Meters (talk) 03:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I don't see this as requiring any action. Samsara 17:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 02:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent spam in several articles

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by same IP after previous semi-protection expired. Antonfire (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 218.81.68.124 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. Samsara 02:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Antonfire (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 218.81.68.124 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. Samsara 02:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is persistent adding of a spammy, unverified reference. Once the previous protection wore off, the reference was quickly added again. . siddharthist (talk) 23:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 218.81.68.124 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. Samsara 02:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:30, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 118.70.177.64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Samsara. Samsara 23:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 20:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism picked up soon after last protection expired. MarnetteD|Talk 00:09, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MPS1992 (talk) 01:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: This article has been deleted three times in the last year. The subject is the estranged father of footballer Dele Alli. That's it. To ensure the privacy and protection of someone who is not notable or a public figure, this article should be salted. Although it hasn't been recreated since March there is no reason whatsoever for it to ever be recreated. Harambe Walks (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: Request to User:CambridgeBayWeather - This is nothing to do with vandalism, but this page should be protected under Arab-Israeli conflict enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 14:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Wrestlingring: I looked at ten reverted edits and did not find any Arab-Israeli conflict related disruption. Can you provide diffs for where this has occurred? Samsara 14:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Examples 1 and 2 can be the case. But since the Israeli cuisine page was protected, this anthem should too since new editors below 500 edits and IPs can't edit this page just for the record. Wrestlingring (talk) 14:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I had looked at both of those and did not conclude them to be Arab-related. Israeli cuisine had edits from non-extended confirmed users that specifically referred to Palestine, e.g. [24]. Samsara 15:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wrestlingring take a look at Wikipedia talk:Requests for page protection#ARBPIA3 500/30. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 21:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 15:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 15:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 16:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Don't think you meant to ask for 30/500 here. Courcelles (talk) 00:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 18:09, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alexf. Alexf has semi-protected the page until 20 September. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal-magnet because of a YouTuber listed in this dab page. PamD 21:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

18 September 2017

Semi-protection: IP vandalism by blocked user Richeaglenoble. This one's not in my userspace, so I'd prefer if it was semied before I have to make any reverts. Hijiri 88 (やや) 10:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heck, is there a way to just get indefinite semi-protection for every page in my user page and one-week semi-protection for every article/talk-page I've worked on for the last two weeks? This is going to start getting ridiculous... Hijiri 88 (やや) 10:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Malinaccier (talk) 13:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporari semi-protection: High level of PoV-pushing, disruptive-editing, edit-warring, IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Malinaccier (talk) 13:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Brady Haran and CGP Grey run a podcast called Hello Internet. Fans of this podcast are known as "Tims". While most of them are just people who like a podcast, a few of them have taken to vandalising Wikipedia persistently to insert fancruft into these three articles (and also to a lesser extent Grenfell Centre, which is a topic that has been discussed on the podcast). Particularly egregious examples of this fancruft have been edit wars over what should be the "official flag" of the podcast and now this insistence that Haran should be referred to as "vice-host" instead of "co-host" of the podcast. The point that using such in-jokes and neologisms will only confuse the readership has fallen on deaf ears as the people doing this are editing for their own entertainment, not in any hope of contributing to the building of an encyclopaedia.

Unfortunately, and probably unwisely, it seems that Grey and Haran have let it be known that they find at least some of this vandalism amusing, which only encourages it and it is becoming a long term source of low level disruption and annoyance (For details and discussion see Talk:Brady_Haran#Semi-protected_edit_request_on_25_August_2017).

Accordingly, I propose indefinte semi-protection of all three articles. This has gone on too long for temporary protection to do any good. Two of these articles are BLPs and, while Grey and Haran may have been foolish in encouraging this, it is not in either Wikipedia's interests or theirs for their biographies to be full of neologisms and other fancruft that just makes them, and us, look silly. DanielRigal (talk) 20:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done It's a bit of an extreme step, but when the podcast itself encourages nonsense edits, it's unfair to expect watchers of the pages to constantly have to revert the waves of vandalism coming. Enigmamsg 20:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short-term full protection of page but not its talk page. Ongoing "civil PoV" and editwarring/revertwarring, over a matter still under discussion on the talk page, and slated for an RfC people keep claiming they're going to draft and then don't. WP guidelines should never be reverted back and forth in this manner; it has a destabilizing effect and is not how WP:Consensus is formed about WP:P&G matters.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  08:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The edit war has been calm for over 10 days. All users involved are experienced and should know to discuss this on the talk page if they're interested. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple obviously related IPs who repeatedly add totally unsourced fancruft, plus promotion for pageants (Miss Supranational and Miss Grand International) that have been found non-notable at AfD, treating the article as if Wikipedia was a fanblog. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:57, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Andrew Swallow (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs which try to remove content regarding some institutes. Requesting longer term of protection. Muhandes (talk) 09:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. JimRenge (talk) 11:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 13:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LinguistunEinsuno 12:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. JTP (talkcontribs) 12:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 13:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. — Film Fan 21:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Many of the edits I've seen from glancing over the history have been good faith changes. Not enough disruptive activity to justify protection at the moment. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – i keep getting constant vandalizing edits, i only want registered users to be able to edit my wiki. Ashhhalvarez (talk) 07:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. We don't protect pages prematurely. There hasn't been enough vandalistic edits recently to warrant protection. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalized by unknown people/person. This page is a stable topic, semi protectionshould not deter any good faith editors here. Α Guy into Books § (Message) -  10:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, including the addition of unsourced material. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to this article from multiple IPs + 1 registered user (who has been blocked). -- Dane talk 01:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. CR4ZE (tc) 02:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like it's stopped. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism by blocked user Richeaglenoble. Hijiri 88 (やや) 10:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper continually readding a deprodded prod, in a way that vandalizes the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2606:A000:484F:D700:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip keeps adding unsoured info. Digifan23 (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip continues to add unsourced info . Digifan23 (talk) 22:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive removals from multiple IP addresses, and I wouldn't be surprised if they're all the same user given their common number beginnings and editing habits. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:15, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Saqib (talk) 09:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. There are two accounts acting very similarly, possible sock puppetry? @KrakatoaKatie:. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long term protection: Childish vandal. There will be more IPs they'll find. Crboyer (talk) 07:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Redirect to Monstercat was reviewed by KGirlTrucker81 at WP:AFCRD and is awaiting creation. Protecting admin has pings turned off. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've left a message for the protecting admin. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Materialscientist (talk) 07:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 18:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from multiple IP's. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Monaco

Hi, please can Tony Monaco be unprotected as I am accepting Draft:Tony Monaco to move there. He seems to be notable IMO as he has coverage in 7 articles on All AboutJazz, also Jazz Times and NYT. The protecting admin User:Xoloz seems to be inactive, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarry1250: The protecting admin. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm not really. Atlantic is right: Xoloz is. See log. - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 12:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 20:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 20:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An anonymous IP is adding a lot of unsourced material to a content fork of the main article DreamWorks Animation. I restored it to a redirect but the IP is likely to change it back. An admin has given three warnings here but the person shifted to another IP address after the block warning. I left a warning at that IP talk page [25] and a note on that Admin's page [26] --- Steve Quinn (talk) 04:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:08, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Users are editing the page and adding prose which fulfills a particular political agenda. Many mobile edits are also being done with uncited info and repeating same source link many times. A lot of weird IP edits too. Wikiboy2364 (talk) 04:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by multiple IP editors starting with 2600:8805:5800:1d60. theinstantmatrix (talk) 18:49, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've gone for a month as there is a good IP edit there too. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Samuel Johnson is the current Google doodle so the article is being vandalised. SagaciousPhil - Chat 05:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IPs posting BLP-violations. For the past 3 days IPs keep adding the unsourced claim that Bourdain "threatened to poison" the president, based apparently on some off-the-cuff joke he made at an airport. A week or two of semi-protection seems in order. Softlavender (talk) 05:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 06:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of misplaced EL by IP-hopper. Toddst1 (talk) 20:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: A wave of IP vandalism as soon a soon previous protection wore off. Lizard (talk) 03:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still gets persistent disruptive edits/vandalism by IP's and new users ("owned by baker mayfield" and such) right after protection ends. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 03:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of deletion tag by same person changing his IP address. 208.73.21.13 (talk) 04:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: This has been vandalized this month, especially within a few days. --George Ho (talk) 19:19, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

long term protection: Childish vandalism from recurring troll. Crboyer (talk) 19:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Genre warring by user who's been blocked before for same thing. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:19, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:29, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Blatant MOS:GENDERID violations about a living person. Almost every edit is to change their gender. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 03:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection - edit warring by non registered editor. Capitals00 (talk) 16:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would also recommend long-term pending changes since this is a frequent target of said vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 17:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's talk about possible PC after the semi-protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 17:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly getting vandalized by IP's and new users, recent edits from these couple months have been almost all vandal/reverts, nothing much practical content being added. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 🖉 16:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long term Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We are dealing with a sockpuppet with countless accounts. last a semi protection kept him away for few months and probably that's the only solution. I also nominate those pages for semi-protection for the same reason.

Mohsen1248 (talk) 16:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to Asian Wrestling Championships, Asian Gymmnastics Championships, World Wrestling Championships, Asian Canoeing Championships, and Asian Fencing Championships. The problems at these accounts are longstanding. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to Asian Taekwondo Championships, World Weightlifting Championships, Asian Archery Championships, and Westling World Cup. The problem at these accounts appears more recent. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from the same sockpuppet on my talkpage, (see above) I would like it more if someone could remove his personal attacks on my talk page entirely. Mohsen1248 (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor continues to add dubiously sourced information to this article. He was blocked a week ago, but has returned with a new IP. Protection is the only reasonable course of action. The Old JacobiteThe '45 15:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor replaces sourced content that are linked to CORRECT award winners to dodgy and unhelpful links with WRONG award winners. Neverrainy (talk) 15:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is persistent but not very frequent; let's see what PC can do. MelanieN (talk) 23:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing made by IPs. B.Lameira (talk) 15:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have an IP that is persistently and disruptively adding unsourced and dubiously sourced content. I don't want to edit-war with it, but the edits are persistent and have ignored talk page warnings. I think semi-protection would stabilize the page until the editors pattern of behavior can be addressed. Alephb (talk) 04:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update. Similar behavior is now continuing with a freshly registered user whose sole edits so far have been to The Exodus. Alephb (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The dispute involves many accounts and IPs and from a diverse range of experience and user rights. This will encourage all users involved to discuss the dispute on the article's talk page. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I didn't even consider full protection, but it's probably for the best to slow things down a bit. It was getting very complicated and moving very quickly. Alephb (talk) 21:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism, removing cited content and replacing it with content that isn't cited. Hattiedog (talk) 19:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing Repeated IP vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeafK1 (talkcontribs) 19:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

(edit conflict) Original request:

Full-protection: Edit warring. 103.75.119.110 (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

To protecting admin: please consider which request to take. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm sure that it'll probably need to be extended when it expires, but lets try starting at this duration and re-evaluate from there. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite long-term extended protection: 30/500 enforcement and incorporate this template in some articles. Wrestlingring (talk) 15:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: for fellow admins: Should we ask for evidence to be provided of Arab-Israel conflict based disruption by non-extended confirmed users for submissions like this one? Samsara 15:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Ever since the ArbCom ruling, it's been a game amongst editors to find as many articles as possible tangentially related to the conflict so they can say it's arbitration enforcement. I do not like this and if the editors are not going to make a case for protection, these requests should be summarily denied. Enigmamsg 20:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I try to read the articles and find it myself, but this example here (where there are tons listed) is why I understand why an admin would ask the reporter for it. I've also noticed this trend at times, where editors locate articles and get them listed. It almost comes off as WP:POINT to me at times... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've been responding to a lot of reports in the last couple of months and there must have been several hundred of pages reported (like this, there have been other mass reports with 5+ pages listed and individual reports) with no explanation other than "arbitration enforcement". Users are just trying to find anything that could be tangentially related to the subject so they can get it protected, as if it's a competition. I would recommend declining all these types of reports. Enigmamsg 00:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately this remains a confusing situation for all involved (except it appears, Arbcom), but my opinion is also that there is a consensus among admins that there should be some signs of disruption before any level of protection. I don't particularly mind how it's demonstrated, but a request like this one has not demonstrated it. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully, most of the confusion has been addressed by Wikipedia:Rough guide to extended confirmed protection#As arbitration enforcement.
This rough guide is now linked to from the text near top of this page.
I have looked at the last few on the list and wouldn't describe any of them as having editing disputes. One of them has a few reverted edits several months ago, which I wouldn't call a dispute.
Perhaps User:Wrestlingring would like to highlight any cases where there are disputes involving newer editors.
Yaris678 (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please decline requests on the articles that have no log history except for the articles that have been protected and are named "Israel" and "Palestine" Thanks. Wrestlingring (talk) 15:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Only tangentially related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. A cursory check shows no evidence of editing disputes. Yaris678 (talk) 17:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Financial vandalism and addition of weasel words to promote a newly released movie, which has not been doing good business. Most of the IP edits recently have been for financial vandalism. The only major exception being 103.15.255.140 who is probably a fan of this actor's main rival (most probably a sockpuppet who is in his cooling off period, who I don't want to name without proper evidences) and who had also asked for RFPP at the end of pruning down a lot of this article. Jupitus Smart 15:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of article deleted through AFD process. Onel5969 TT me 15:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See also protection log. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism from shifting addresses, replacing photos with off-topic ones. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – too much vandalism activity in the past few months, almost no content addition, most edits are vandals and reverts. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 17:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Going to start with one month. After it expires, lets re-evaluate and see if it needs to be extended from there... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 13:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ritchie33. Enigmamsg 16:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 16:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 15:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated recreation of content-fork of British Vietnamese International School Hanoi. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I would point out, as I just did on Justlettersandnumbers' talk page, that these are in some senses two separate schools. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, zzuuzz is right, as I was wrong – this is not a content-fork. This request should probably be archived, sorry! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per comments. -- zzuuzz (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated WP:NOTLYRICS violations by IP. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have only been two IP reverts recently, and none for 6 hours. If another one turns up, ping me and we can protect then. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Tendentious edit warring by IP and new editor. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate05:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The warring editor has stopped and is using discussion pages. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Following prior one-week semi-protection, the persistent vandal is back straight away. See talk page for detailed diffs. Thanks, Stelio (talk) 06:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since I can see new and IP editors wanting to adding good faith edits to the article, let's give pending changes a go. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Super; thank you very much! -Stelio (talk) 12:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been semi protected for 1 week but as soon as it became unprotected, IP vandalism continued. Redgro (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 12:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandals constantly changing information. . TheDoctorWho (talk) 12:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 12:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism likely due to the subject being featured on the Google Doodle. 48 hours would likely be adequate. Ysdog (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sounds like the Cause of death vandal to me. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive IP-hopping editing. Users keep rearranging Priyanka Chopra in the cast list/infobox with no explanation (sometimes deleting Chopra's name from the Infobox). They're now bloating the infobox with names not on the poster. It's gone on for a few days now.Crboyer (talk) 06:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected, I do not see any recent disruptive edits by autoconfirmed users, and semi-protection should do the job.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent misgendering of a recently deceased non-binary subject. Funcrunch (talk) 23:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Primefac. Enigmamsg 02:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The IP was blocked for edit warring, and I agree that this isn't blatant vandalism. If the IP continues to edit war after the block expires, or under the /64 range of thier IPv6 address, let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: It was already protected. Enigmamsg 03:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user has made several unconstructive edits, reverting substantial prior editing. Zefr (talk) 04:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to post this as well. Since Northamerica1000 just edited there, I'll ping them in case they want to consider adding the protection. This is by multiple IPs (all Ohio based), so semi seems to be the only way to go right now. Kingofaces43 (talk) 04:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 05:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 01:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently experienced a wave of vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:32, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need a quick semiprotection, page is being vandalized by different IP users. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 03:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Assistance in searches. Wumbolo (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: Protecting admin. FWIW I agree that it should be unprotected and redirected to Jordan Maron. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Created by admin Acroterion. Bot archiving can be requested, or I will do so later. Samsara 15:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Enigmamsg 05:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unexplained content removal. Jetstreamer Talk 23:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations from an IP hopper over the past few weeks. Simplexity22 (talk) 23:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. MelanieN (talk) 01:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism from registered and unregistered editors. John from Idegon (talk) 02:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kudpung. Enigmamsg 02:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing by multiple IP addresses. Hrodvarsson (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip vandal continues to add UNSOURCED info to this page . Digifan23 (talk) 20:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandal continues to add unsouced info . Digifan23 (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from one account and IP. Adamgerber80 (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. --MelanieN (talk) 01:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection - Content dispute between me, Redrose64 and The Rambling Man - nobody else is editing the article so it's best a completely uninvolved admin takes a look. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever picks this up should read Talk:London Waterloo station/GA1 to see why the edits were being made. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See my comment at the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 01:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated removal of sourced content related to "The Khazar hypothesis" by IPs located in Los Angeles and the L.A. area of Northridge. Almost certainly block evasion by sockpuppet Ultrabomb (talk · contribs) (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ultrabomb/Archive) who vandalized same article for months. Sundayclose (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MYS77 18:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NAOFC (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nickag989talk 19:22, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by unregistered editors. ElKevbo (talk) 17:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandalism because the coach lost on Saturday. BLP violations by falsely reporting that the coach has been fired. - BilCat (talk) 17:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously declined; still receiving considerable disruption and needs protection. -- Dane talk 16:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently some meme is active concerning the chromosome count of CNN staffers, and it is being repeatedly added to this article. General Ization Talk 17:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – This is a GA rated article about a living person that that has become reliant on fansites for some of its statistical information. The issue has been discussed at Talk:Ronnie_O'Sullivan#Referencing and there is agreement that fansites are not acceptable and that the article should transition to proper sources. Vlord1994 has undertaken the task of reforming the article and has the full support of the snooker project (via a RFC consensus) but the changes are being repeatedly undone by anonymous IP editors (see the "heavy red" edits throughout September). I was hoping we could give PC a try which would help bring in support from the wider community. Betty Logan (talk) 19:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating based on previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

20 September 2017

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 15:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Primefac (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Bobherry Talk Edits 15:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Primefac (talk) 17:40, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.Oh its sehunnie (talk) 16:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Primefac (talk) 17:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Requesting semi-protection due to multi-vector IP and new account vandalism. Sadly, this article has been protected for about half of its existence on Wikipedia (see log) as it has frequently been the target of disruptive editing. The most recent protection which stood for six months expired about five weeks ago. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: For the past day or two, a dynamic anon IP with an apparent axe to grind has been adding half-baked "controversies" to the page that two editors, independent of each other, have reverted. As I wrote in one edit summary, "There undoubtedly could be a Controversies section, but it would need a much more balanced approach than this." --Tenebrae (talk) 23:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Multiple IPs edit warring over incorrect data. Capitals00 (talk) 04:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 17:58, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism by Multiple IP Address. LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 17:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 23:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Enigmamsg 15:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LinguistunEinsuno 14:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 mo, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LinguistunEinsuno 14:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LinguistunEinsuno 14:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 17:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – disruptive editing continues; could we perhaps try a rather longer period of semi-protection? Or would pending changes work better here?. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 17:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users may have jumped in too soon and say he has left his managerial position without official confirmation from reliable sources. Iggy (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 17:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of persistent IP vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Primefac (talk) 17:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Number 57 10:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandal. Trivialist (talk) 10:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Number 57 10:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism from several IPs, who have been unnecessarily making edits in relations to the speculated trade destinations involving this hockey player that has not officially happened up to this point. Unnecessary edits have started picking up, and I suppose it continues while the trade speculations continue until he officially gets traded. User:Jacked14 (talk) 10:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: After semi-protecting Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 4, the mobile IP simply advanced to other akin pages, so I'm just requesting to semi-protect them all. Is there nothing one can do to ban this user?  Kyoushu~  ►Talk Page  22:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @DarkKyoushu: I did a range block that should take care of this. Let me know if it starts up again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of POV rants from some disgruntled student. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Number 57 10:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – From various IPs, resuming quickly after previous protection expired. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Number 57 10:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent extended confirmed protection. I'm the bot owner of User:FA RotBot. The bot has three configuration pages that will be vandal magnets: User:FA_RotBot/button, User:FA RotBot/exclude, User:FA RotBot/include. -- GreenC 15:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. WP:UPROT doesn't explicitly mention any particular protection types and ECP seems sensible so I am happy to go with this. Yaris678 (talk) 17:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Trying to clean up citations and sources but edits being undone and replaced with old unsourced content. Tokyoyo (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP disruption; IP editor(s) continuing to ignore the WP:CRYSTAL policy and the advice of other editors on the talk page. Rockypedia (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Trolling, adding unsourced info and needless spoilers where they don't belong. TropicAces (talk) 22:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent and repeated addition of lyrics in violation of WP:NOTLYRICS; said hymn should've been more suited for Wikisource instead. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Enigmamsg 05:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have a new WP:SPA editor who oddly enough appears only interested in pushing his/her WP:POV in this obscure article. I think because it is an obscure article, it semi protecting for a bit will get their attention. I am One of Many (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not yet. I've warned the user for edit warring in hopes that it will help the user to stop doing so. If it continues, let me know. I don't want to protect the page due to the fact that it will block editors from making legitimate contributions to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. Batternut (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I think this page should be unprotected as there is a problem with as there it is a double redirect. I would like to fix this double redirect so that there will be a single redirect. Secondly, I don't think there is any need to keep this page fully protected. It as already been protected for the last nine years. If there is any concern, semi-protection would be appropriate but I don't think full protection is required anymore. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @NawlinWiki: protecting admin. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Pkbwcgs: -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:04, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not yet. The last IP that was vandalizing it has since stopped. I'm going to hold off on protection unless it picks back up. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Three IP accounts have in the last three days tried to insert blatant self-promotion into the Wikipedia article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IPv6 range has been blocked for disruptive editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We again have alt-right clowns trying to make their use of term disappear. Six months of semiprotect ought to prevent further problems. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21 September 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page facing some vandal edits some what badly. I request to protect it until 25th September because the show ends on Sunday . Joshq.JQ 23:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Potential edit warring by I dream of horses and 2601:547:1202:96d0:8d40:e84b:f2b5:3d15. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mvc66b3r: One reversion of potential vandalism doesn't constitute edit warring. -- I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 16:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shina language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Declined, the discussion seems to be ongoing on the talk page--Ymblanter (talk) 16:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing fancruft with sales/certifications. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Samsara, the inflations are continuing even with semi-protection, so it would help to give this ECP and/or block Linda Lundmark for WP:IDHT behavior. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like they stopped after the second warning. We'll see. Samsara 17:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Please restore indefinite semi after full protection expired. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 17:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 17:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of inacurracies. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long semiprotection or Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP and suckpuppetry vandalism and edit warring (see: Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mulugheta alula roma; on it.wiki see it:Wikipedia:Utenti problematici/Ferdi tal/SP). The connected article about Zerai Deres has been already semiprotected two times for the same reason (also on it.wiki). Holapaco77 (talk) 07:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page has been used to bypass create protection at Joshua Travagli and Joshua travagli. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 16:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Anon editors keep changing date of death from May to September because there was a flurry of news reports recently months after we originally listed and cited death. The May date even appears in these reports but people are not reading carefully. —DIYeditor (talk) 22:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite protection: Users with only an IP address are repeatedly adding someone to the cast list whose involvement has not been verified by any of the sources cited. The vandalism of this page has been confirmed as such because those who continue to insert the information are ignoring the requests to provide a reliable source for verification. The situation is quickly devolving into an edit war between these anonymous editors pushing the inclusion of false information without verification and registered users that have tried to start a discussion of this matter on the talk page to no avail. This cannot continue. --Jgstokes (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Qzd (talk) 02:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: semi-p granted previously. Article is repeatedly subjected to the machinations of editors who (daily) edit portions of the article such that the sources no longer reflect the cited text, as shown in this typical example. Edit summaries have become a bit tongue in cheek. A good portion of the edits are by ip editors. longer-term semi-protection would give everyone a break from maintaining this page and hopefully the time spent elsewhere would have the effect of improving the project. Edaham (talk) 06:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Been over a year of this nonsense. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/David Adam Kess. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Oshwah, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 10:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 03:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.. Both IPs have been blocked. Hopefully this'll stop it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:09, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit warring and content dispute between several users and IPs since Feb 2017. One of the involved users, V t I (talk · contribs) was blocked due to sockpuppetry but the article still suffers from non-stop edit warring and IP-hopping. Wario-Man (talk) 06:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism/disruptive editing. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 20:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kosack (talk) 20:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:59, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruptive editing.   Aloha27  talk  21:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 00:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Used to be protected, but since protection expired, again prey to constant vandalism. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate07:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced change/add of information by IPs users. TheDeviantPro (talk) 03:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Primefac (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 02:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Upgraded the existing PC to semi because of the amount of ongoing vandalism and because the edit rate is too high for PC (WP:PCPP: Pending changes protection should not be used on articles with a very high edit rate, even if they meet the aforementioned criteria. Instead semi-protection should be considered.) Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has remained stable since 2010, don't see a need for semi-protection anymore. Miles Edgeworth Objection! 22:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Protecting admin hasn't edited in 5 months. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP repeatedly removing bolding (using innappropriate edit summaries) across several articles despite it being explained to them why it's done like that. The other articles on which they're repeatedly making the same edits are:

Cheers, Number 57 08:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request appears to be intended to resolve a content dispute. 95.145.130.78 (talk) 08:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The IP (the one commenting above) has carried out another set of reverts since this report and is continuing with the inappropriate edit summaries. Number 57 09:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The manual of style applies to all articles, even ones you wish to WP:OWN. This remains a content dispute and the request for protection is spurious and malicious. 95.145.130.78 (talk) 09:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The IP has now made yet another round of reverts and given me a vandalism warning. Any chance this could be prioritised? Cheers, Number 57 09:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Any chance this could be deleted from the page with no action, as specified at the top for requests intended to resolve a content dispute? Take it to the correct venue, Number 57. And stop working so hard to violate the MOS. It's extremely disruptive. 95.145.130.78 (talk) 09:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reverting is still continuing with inappropriate edit summaries. Number 57 10:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Primefac (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: It's not vandalism, nor is it really an ANI issue (their inappropriate edit summaries aren't really enough to block them). It's a simple refusal to accept WP:BRD and the request to gain consensus for their edits (ANI almost never acts on that in my experience); the IP seems intent on reverting indefinitely, although they won't breach 3RR (or get sanctioned for that) because I won't go past that myself. In the meantime, there doesn't seem to be any way to get the articles back to the original state without getting them semi-protected. Could you reconsider? Thanks, Number 57 18:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Protecting a page to "win" a dispute is not the proper way to go about things. Primefac (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: Who said anything about winning a dispute? I want the stable version restored. Number 57 19:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah who said anything about winning a dispute? He just wants to win a dispute. How about someone remove this spurious request now? 95.145.130.78 (talk) 22:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - one blanking does not constitute persistent vandalism. Primefac (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: It is just not all about one IP blanking, 90% of all IPs' edits were just nothing but vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pkbwcgs, if one IP is vandalising multiple pages, you take them to AIV, not protect one page. Primefac (talk) 18:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac: I agree with the nominator. Looking at the IP edits throughout the history of the article, almost zero were constructive. That's the whole point of protection, to increase the signal to noise ratio and improve stability. Right now all we get from IP addresses in this article is disruption. I would apply indef semi to this, or at least indef PCP (but my objection to PCP is that it doesn't reduce anyone's workload). ~Anachronist (talk) 22:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I think indefinite semi-protection would be appropriate as it is a major target for IP vandals as it is the actual user page of the founder of Wikipedia. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You'd think Jimbo could do this himself if he wanted. I'm hesitant to protect a user page when the user hasn't requested it. I won't object if another admin does it though. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Jimbo has said on several occasions he does not want his user page permanently semi-protected. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 13:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 19:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Please apply protection per ARBPIA restriction. Existing notice on talk page is not sufficient to prevent disruption. Hertz1888 (talk) 14:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Number 57 14:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This article gets on-again, off-again IP vandalism and POV editors. PC1 (ad infinitum) would allow us to prevent those reversion from being visible before they can be checked. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:00, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:00, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Since the last temporary protection measure for persistent disruptive editing was lifted on 12 September 2017, there has continued to be further disruptive editing on the article. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:04, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The IP itself has been blocked, and the user performing identical edits has received a "final warning" (and has not edited since then). Primefac (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The misgendering vandalism resumed a day after the last protection went away. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Single-IP vandalism; IP has been blocked. Primefac (talk) 18:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 02:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Vandal IP has been blocked. No prejudice if another IP comes along, though. Primefac (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors unable to keep up with vandalism. —hike395 (talk) 06:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Total amount of "vandalism' reverted was about three wikilinks, which over "one year" doesn't really seem like much vandalism. Primefac (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This page used to be semi-protected (must have ended 1-2 weeks ago), but is now rife with vandalism. It's getting incredibly difficult to keep track of edits and what the last stable version is. Confirmed accounts are held up by the 3RR rule, while IP accounts are vandalizing the page. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is repeatedly vandalized by IPs with offtopic images. Previous block was just for a few hours, but less than a day after, the same images began reappearing. Requesting longer block. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I didn't go far back in the contribution history, but if nearly zero IP edits have been constructive, we can escalate to indef. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22 September 2017

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lots of trolling and intentionally putting wrong info/scores. TropicAces (talk) 13:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)tropicAces[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 20:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A target of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw. 90-days Semi, or maybe just PC1, should last until he gets bored. Little lost in a long semi as this is a DAB page that hadn't been edited in 3 years till he showed up in August. . CrowCaw 21:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Need protection for this page for 4 days. Show ends on Sunday I. e.., 24th September 2017. Joshq.JQ 06:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long semi-protection or Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP and suckpuppetry vandalism and edit warring (see: Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Mulugheta alula roma; on it.wiki see it:Wikipedia:Utenti problematici/Ferdi tal/SP). The same sockpuppets have already vandalized (also on it.wiki) many articles about Ethiopia and Eritrea (like Zerai Deres and Monument to the Lion of Judah), that now are all semiprotected. --Holapaco77 (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:59, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Just came off of a few days of semi-protection. IP immediately went back to edit warring and not using the talk page. Requesting longer-term protection such as two weeks this time around. Kingofaces43 (talk) 12:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Basically a copy/paste of the RfPP for Lauren Southern. This page is overloaded with IP editors who make edits typified by this example. The editors who watch and revert such edits could be freed up for other tasks if a reasonable period of semi-protection were enforced. Edaham (talk) 06:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would not like to suppress edits such as this that may be made in good faith and, once improved according to guidelines (in this case, primarily sourcing), may find a reasonable place in the article. Samsara 15:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 15:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Articles such as one are causing a lot of IP vandalism. I've edited so I'm not doing it, but I would give it at least a month, probably at least 3. . Doug Weller talk 16:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There are a lot of poor, unsourced edits coming from anon and newly-registered accounts. Sitush (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of improperly sourced information. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring from multiple IPs and new accounts. Might be the same person IP jumping, so semi-protection would stop that. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Muboshgu: It looks like a dispute to me. I would suggest looking into rephrasing the disputed passage to see if that diffuses the conflict - perhaps attributing the source more explicitly and/or linking the statement more explicitly to the subject of the article. IMO, the sentence currently hangs rather loosely within the article and may fare poorly in a BLP review. Samsara 17:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: This has been hashed out on the talk page over the last nine months. This is a vandal editing from a POV. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Help me here - I searched the talk page for "Lazarus" and "Liberty" and got only one hit on the latter (and none on the former), and that did not seem to discuss specific phrasing proposals. In fact, the remark I found was about WP:BLP. Samsara 17:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That was discussed at Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)#8/2/17 Press Conference. If you decide to protect it as a content dispute, that's fine with me too. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Samsara 15:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resuming quickly after previous protection expired. Simplexity22 (talk) 10:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Childish vandalism for the last couple of days. Although talk page protection is often not a good idea, protecting this page for a day or so may "break the cycle" and cause the vandal to lose interest. Deli nk (talk) 14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: New wave of IP vandalism after previous protection expired. Esiymbro (talk) 13:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I remove the spam(vandalism) from IP.@Ymblanter: That was edit war. Esiymbro and I are involved in this war. --Tr56tr (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There were unhelpful IP edits, and I protected the article against them. Autoconfirmed users should know how to use a talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: So you think the talk page is not used by the IPs. At least Autoconfirmed should be used.--Tr56tr (talk) 10:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The IP hopper was using the talk page but continued reverting at the same time. This is disruptive editing. If you guys continue edit-warring I can just block you. I hope you are reasonable and can find some way of figuring things out without edit-warring. If you can not you should not be editing Wikipedia.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: The last question, if more than one account to participate in the editorial war to avoid 3rr, claim that this is everyone's consensus. How would you deal with it?--Tr56tr (talk) 10:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is difficult. If these are single-purpose accounts, administrators or even CUs have to be involved. If this is genuinely a conflict, one needs to pursue dispute resolution avenues.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long time edit war between 2 editors....and no one talking. Let's lockup the page... see if that gets them to the talk page. ...if not affective when page unprotected will request blocks. See desire for protection here by one editor over a block Moxy (talk) 05:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 12:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resuming quickly after previous protection expired. Simplexity22 (talk) 10:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing - repeated removal of subject's nationality (1, 2). 1.10.135.13 (talk) 03:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, we do not protect pages against a single user. Pls try to find consensus and, if this is not possible, seek administrative intervention against the user.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Heavy vandalism since previous protection wore off a few days ago. Given the subject's reputation the vandalism likely won't end any time soon. Lizard (talk) 03:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple unregistered editors or one editor using multiple IP addresses. ElKevbo (talk) 04:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- AlexTW 11:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MelanieN (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think this request was malicious and highly disruptive. The user is clearly trying to game the system to "win" a content dispute, and dishonestly describes three edits in 10 hours as "persistent", and obviously good faith edits as "disruptive editing", while themselves reverting without bothering to explain why. I think a strong warning to the user should be issued, in the hope of preventing further such gaming of the system, with sanctions applied if they do it again. 95.145.130.78 (talk) 22:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You have been warned multiple times about edit warring (warnings that you have blanked), on different articles. I suggest you cease your combative attitude and take advantage of the various ways we do dispute resolution here. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you take action against people who file spurious RFPPs, rather than pestering higher quality contributors who do not do such things. 95.145.130.78 (talk) 00:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent vandalism and disruptive editing, mainly by IP users, probably due to subject's controversial status. Inter&anthro (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prolonged vandalism by changing English air dates from IP in the 47.136.94.x and 47.136.87.x ranges without citing a reliable source and is in conflict with the cited reliable source. IP editor has also repeatedly changed dates on several other articles in the past, including List of programs broadcast by Toonami and List of programs broadcast by Adult Swim. —Farix (t | c) 23:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations. Artoasis (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal since today. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 04:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – This article was created by a Traditional Parsi to pay respect to a great Parsi saint. The article was changed later on by a new user to include controversial statements about conversion which are not agreed to by a majority of the Parsi community. The name of the saint is being misused as a result. . Porus Homi Havewala (talk) 10:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like a slow-motion edit war. Use the talk page, please. MelanieN (talk) 22:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite long-term extended protection: 30/500 enforcement Wrestlingring (talk) 14:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Based on this incident of disruption, I have granted the requested protection in accordance with the ArbCom decision. Samsara 15:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 15:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs who repeatedly add information about Nazism despite many reverts and warnings. SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 22:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Addition of abusive words in Hindi. RRD (talk) 15:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment looking at the protection history, this seems to be more a candidate for indefinite semi-protection. It was semi-protected for a year from 2015-16 for vandalism and BLP violations. Meanwhile I see no reason to stop autoconfirmed users editing it, all the recent malicious activity is from IPs and new accounts. – filelakeshoe )³ 15:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Likely target of IP vandalism (one example already), given Donald Trump's recent, erroneous, use of the name. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Nick. MelanieN (talk) 22:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Appears to be the target of some IP editors and newly created accounts (seem to have been created just to edit the page) who delete the article's content. They appear to be motivated by national rivalry (e.g. removing or changing content that mentions Indonesia). Hzh (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Mass vandalism from large range of IPs - Arjayay (talk) 16:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anons are at it, again. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 13:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 14:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 14:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The club is in the process of changing name, but no official name change has been announced. ATK is a temporary name, not official change. . Coderzombie (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fenix down. MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, the same unexplained and unsupported edits, but by different IP addresses. --1990'sguy (talk) 12:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Bobherry Talk Edits 12:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy vandalism is also occurring on the page too. I would support a temporary semi-protection instead though. —JJBers 16:56, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kosack (talk) 09:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:56, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kosack (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and content blanking.  — Calvin999 09:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:00, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors continuously changing Celebrity Big Brother date to 2017 when sources clearly state 2018, while a new editor (Blocked now) vandalized the page before eventually blanking the whole thing. TheDoctorWho (talk) 12:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

23 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors persistently adding invalid fields to the infobox that only serves to add the article to the error category Category:Pages using infobox television with unknown parameters. I've had to fix this article 3 times in a few hours now. AussieLegend () 20:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced genre. 115.164.179.204 (talk) 03:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 12:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – different ips adding the conspiracy theory that the former Spanish Prime Minister was the head of a death squad, which is obviously a blatant WP:BLP violation. Valenciano (talk) 16:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Editing to date of death due to article here. Source itself beleived to be a satire site and no other sources reporting so far. Appreciate only one edit so far, but just trying to nip it in the bud. Badanagram (attempt) 10:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continual disruptive edits by unregistered/newly registered users. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding in game stats. Kante4 (talk) 15:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Kante4: And when does the game finish? Samsara 15:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ten minutes... Kante4 (talk) 15:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 minutes, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 16:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article is featuring in Google India's Doodle today. Heavy traffic and experimental editing expected. Anamdas (talk) 00:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Anarchyte. Samsara 12:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced genre. 115.164.179.204 (talk) 03:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued disruptive editing from last protection; addition of unsourced content to the article. livelikemusic talk! 12:54, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite long-term extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Revised from a earlier request that was denied. Wrestlingring (talk) 14:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Wrestlingring: Your earlier request was declined as there was a consensus among admins attending to the case that the required disruption was not evident. A suggestion was made that future similar requests should be accompanied by evidence of such disruption. Can you provide relevant diffs for the above articles, showing that non-extended confirmed users have caused disruption that is related to the Arab-Israel conflict? Samsara 15:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following edits seem to be disrupted: Hamas Covenant, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Israel, Islam and antisemitism, Ruhollah Khomeini, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, etc... Then again Samsara, the countries that are still at war or have relations with Israel can also be protected. Wrestlingring (talk) 18:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The vandalistic edit inserting, Ayatollah Khomeini looks like Sean Connery lulz does not fall under Arab-Israel conflict imo, but I'm open to other views. In my opinion, if articles only receive the normal level and type of vandalism expected of any of our articles, they are not to be put under ARBPIA3-motivated ECP. The diff for Hamas Covenant was more convincing, and so I have put that article under ECP. Samsara 12:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: Since it was your diff cited above, I thought your insight might be valuable here. Samsara 12:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dee03 09:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent disruptive editing

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 22:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The last 20 revisions (the earliest being revision 800599939, 15:00 UTC, 14 September 2017) are forth-and-back reverts. There is ample and extensive dispute resolution attempts, hence it is not an edit war. Nevertheless, there is no end in sight. Codename Lisa (talk) 08:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing creation protection The page was, in the past, repeatedly made and wasn't at all notable due to the artist not fulfilling anything on the the criteria for WP:MUS but as you can find now by going here or here, this artist Lil Pump has fulfilled WP:MUS #2 by charting at 81 on the Billboard Hot 100 WolvesS (talk)

(Non-administrator comment) @Cryptic: Protecting admin. Page in question is Lil Pump, but the current draft is not ready for a move to the mainspace. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There's a better draft at Draft:Lil Pump (2), which has been in the AFC queue for some weeks now. I consider myself utterly unqualified to assess articles about musicians (unless they're as poor as the ones that were in mainspace). Happy to unprotect once there's a draft in place that's been passed by someone other than its author, or for any other admin to unprotect at their own discretion. —Cryptic 18:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined - there is a Draft, so no need to unprotect the Article at present. Bring the Draft up to standards first. Primefac (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 08:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lazz_R 11:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 21:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

24 September 2017

Couple of days semi-protection: Repeated anti-consensus edits to subject's nationality by changing IPs, likely the same editor every time. Not high volume but very persistent. A few days' semi might put a brake onto that? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Protection expired on 16 September, IP socks of Marios2134454 started the usual disruption on the 17th which continues on a daily basis until I saw it today. Please see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marios2134454. Dr. K. 17:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Vanamonde (talk) 17:51, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. As it's a high-use template, there should be no edit-warring at all, as it will degrade performance. If you can confirm any of the editors involved are template editors, I'll revoke their permission. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:16, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Simplexity22 (talk) 18:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems one IP hopper is ruining it for the others. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – False certification entries continue with or without semi-protection . Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like a content dispute, so a full protection will force them to discuss. If that doesn't work, we'll revisit. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:00, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Hummerrocket (talk) 20:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced genre. 115.164.91.208 (talk) 12:51, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 18:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Day of election, highly-visible article. Mélencron (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I checked the first two diffs from IPs and they looked like good faith edits. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hang on while I rustle up a surprised look ...... nope, can't do it, sorry. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long-term protection requested because of persistent addition of material that isn't only unsourced and dubious but in many/most cases also pure fantasy, in an attempt to portray mediaeval Norway as a great empire that among other things "colonised North America" and "controlled the global slave trade". Since whoever is doing it is repeatedly adding the same material, and all edits use a similar writing style, I believe it's a single individual using many different IPs, but their persistence and IP-hopping makes it difficult for other editors to remove the BS without breaking the three-revert barrier... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 11:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Infrequent edits, don't know that long-term semi-protection is yet justified. If they do not stop when they realize their stuff is not getting published, we can upgrade. Vanamonde (talk) 17:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anons have been hitting the article hard for ages and not a single one of their contributions has been accepted. It is becoming a timesink and pending changes wouldn't reduce that effect. Sitush (talk) 12:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected Indefinitely. I'm a little unsure about jumping to indef, so let's see if the combination can dispose of them. Vanamonde (talk) 17:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed or full protection: This article is already under indefinite semi, but it should be full protected. The player has agreed a transfer to another team but it won't be completed until the start of 2018. I have put hidden text to this effect to stop disruptive and false editing, but it is being ignored. This can't carry for three more months! Harambe Walks (talk) 14:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Harambe Walks: Initially, I would prefer to try blocks and semi - I think you may want to warn Christian Hiero Dirks about his edits. Samsara 14:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: I have now warned him as well as SossieLondon. I wouldn't want full protection myself because it goes against Wikipedia's motto of "anyone can edit", but I saw that the extended (30 days and 500 edits) setting was put on the Neymar page amid transfer rumours. Harambe Walks (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I believe Neymar was under 30/500 longer than ideal or intended. I have changed that. Samsara 15:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. MarkSewath (talk) 10:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LisaRaye McCoy

Temporary semi-protection: Same as last time. Edit-warring resumed soon after last protection was lifted. None of the ip's involved have contributed to the talk page discussion. --Ronz (talk) 16:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite long-term extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 21:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There has been no disruptive editing. See WP:ROUGHECP. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite long-term extended protection: 30/500 enforcement. Wrestlingring (talk) 21:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There has been no disruptive editing. See WP:ROUGHECP. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Even confused ClueBot. -- Dane talk 08:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.. Blocked the logged in user that was using their account for vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that'll dissuade them from continuing. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:32, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of improperly sourced information. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Protection is for dealing with disruption from multiple sources; for individual vandals, see WP:AIV. However, the user has only just been warned for the first time, so any admin intervention would be disproportionate and premature at this point, imo. Samsara 15:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@FlightTime: I saw that discogs is now used as a source - is this also considered unreliable? Thanks for clarifying. Samsara 13:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Last I knew (from some discussion somewhere, sorry) that discogs would not be accepted as a reliable source. I'll try and locate that discussion and ping you here or on your talk if needed. The user that was the latest issue on this page and Emerson, Lake & Palmer has been blocked as a sock. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term protection requested. Going back the last year almost every anonymous edit has been vandalism. Expected given the subject matter. . — nihlus kryik  (talk) 03:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IP evading block. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated unexplained removal of the word "pseudoscientific" by various IPs . Tornado chaser (talk) 23:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Within an hour of the last lock expiring another new editor added similar unsourced content to the article. The last time the article was protected it was for two days. How about two weeks (or even two months or two years)? There's not going to be any news about the subject that can't be dealt with through a locked edit summary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – persistent long-term edit war (several years) / BLP violation (poorly sourced) / ORTS submission BLP issue (per talk) / NOTCENSOR (per SPI) / COI (undisclosed-disclosed per talk and SPI) / paid issue (per SPI). Which one trumps is not clear -> WP:COIN. Widefox; talk 00:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent NPOV and vandalism. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 03:31, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. --Lanwi1 (talk) 05:39, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Reports about Jenner being pregnant have surfaced and has not been confirmed. All sources are just purely speculation and add no credibility, which violates WP:GOSSIP. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 06:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: One of the two accounts that made edits fitting this pattern is already extended confirmed. Both accounts apparently desisted after being reverted for the first time (i.e., 1RR). Currently looks like no further action is needed. Samsara 08:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I blocked the user's access to their own talk page instead. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Terahfrancisco IP sockpuppet. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:38, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.
An edit on 24/5/2016 about unspecified political events should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.29.112 (talk) 13:25, 21 September 2017‎
Note: The edit referred to is [36] - in case anyone else wants to take a stab at guessing what the supposed problem is. Otherwise I or someone else can probably close this tomorrow or so. Samsara 21:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Readers of Wikipedia don't want their time wasted by deliberately vague talk about unspecified political events. COI is involved.
You will need to be more specific about what you want changed - that's how it works with edit requests. Otherwise, I will close this as unactionable. Samsara 08:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip edit warring, over 5 reverts today, no talk page activity... Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 19:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This looks like a dispute between you and the IP over the copyright status of some material. That's not vandalism. BTW I see only three reverts today, and I do see discussion at the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 23:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued trolling by LTA under transient IPs. — fortunavelut luna 05:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Protection had been added by another administrator but was removed by administrator Edgar181. MelanieN (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Last semiprotection was 1 month. The sock who vandalizes Zeitgeist articles returned to this article within 8 days of protection falling off. -- Dane talk 02:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 02:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing again from multiple IPs, following two short term protection periods, asking for a much longer period. Muhandes (talk) 21:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit warring. Karst (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --MelanieN (talk) 00:14, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Saqib (talk) 09:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent addition of unsourced content to a WP:BLP. --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hummerrocket (talk) 21:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:00, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Binksternet (talk) 05:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After the semi-protection expires, the PC protection should remain. MelanieN (talk) 23:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 10 IPs/accounts in the last hour or so. –72 (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hut 8.5 17:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This is another double redirect and I would like to fix this double redirect and I don't think protection is required anymore. If there is any concern then please reduce protection level to semi protected but full protection is not required. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Pkbwcgs: I've fulfilled your edit request. If you feel there is more to be done here, please first ask the protecting admin as he has been active recently. Thank you. Samsara 18:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

26 September 2017

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Clayc313 (talk) 13:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 13:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Joaquinito01 (talk) 14:43, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This guy is a vandal. He is running around CSD tagging random new submissions as vandalism and reverting random edits and warning newbies for vandalism they didn't commit. I'm currently following him and reverting edits until someone stops by AIV and bans him (again). If an admin sees this, please ban him again. — InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 14:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And as a side note, this user is requesting to be an admin right now. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 14:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 16:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: unconstructive edits by multiple IPs. Capitals00 (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  16:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

26 September 2017

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kosack (talk) 17:51, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Connormah. Samsara 21:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent 48-hour semi protection didn't work so a longer period of semi protection is required. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Connormah. Samsara 21:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated, vandalistic BLP violations. ScrpIronIV 21:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high proportion of non-autoconfirmed users' edits are vandalism. Minima© (talk) 17:46, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a massive target for IP vandals as a lot of image-related vandalism in this article. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Connormah. Samsara 21:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting long term protection. Almost every edit to this page is vandalism going back the last year. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 21:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been repeatedly adding defamatory Hindi phrases to the article off late. --. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:40, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 77.44.34.77 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Samsara 14:35, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:35, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP and Lynviking (possible WP:COI) vandalism inserting unsourced personal notes, and removing language used by the sources, e.g. [37],[38],[39],[40],[41]. Darouet (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Alex ShihTalk 16:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stuart Harold Pot. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 16:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JDDJS (talk) 16:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 16:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users such as 8Dodo8 and GrizzlyBear2002 keep vandalising the page. . TPTB (talk) 08:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Disruptive editing, editing tests, and addition of hoaxes. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 11:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 11:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple users and IPs vandalising this page for about 20 minutes. 65HCA7 12:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 12:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP (or group of IPs) continually makes many changes to Births and Deaths sections including (1) changing "English", 'Welsh", or "Scottish" to "British"; (2) adding deaths where we only have an article on the person's murder, (3) linking religions (whether or not the religion should be in the person's description); (3) adding people known only for being "blessed", "venerable", or "sainted"; (4) adding multiple-image templates; (5) vandalizing the invisible comments on births and deaths. There may be other objectionable types of edits. I've noticed many of his edits to images have been reverted, but I don't know the precise reasons. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 124.106.250.182 (talk · contribs) blocked by Samsara. Samsara 06:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Edit warring by multiple IPs, likely same person. Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Matt7899 (talk) 09:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Terahfrancisco IP Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:32, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator There'sNoTime. Samsara 11:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection Procedural request for indefinite protection per WP:ARBPIA3#General Prohibition. The page, specifically that portion thereof relating to the 1967 war (although that's redundant, since virtually the whole text of the article relates to the war), has been edited several times in the past year by IPs and/or new accounts, in violation of the prohibition. (Honestly, I'm not sure if I'm stepping on toes by not posting this at AE or ARCA or somewhere else, but AE lists its functions as requesting enforcement against editors violating sanctions, or requesting page protection or the like where disruption is currently taking place, and I've seen the General Prohibition enforced by random wandering admins -- courtesy ping -- apparently as a result of them randomly happening to read something I wrote, so this seems okay...? If I am violating procedure in some way, could someone tell me where requests of this kind are normally supposed to be taken?) Hijiri 88 (やや) 00:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hijiri88. No it was this that caused the protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Check out [[Talk:Wikipedia:Requests for page protection]] and the archives. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Wait, so User:Shrike came to this page and requested indefinite extended confirmed protection, without evidence of recent disruption, on a page that was loosely related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, but now that a page that is also related to the conflict (arguably moreso) has come up, evidence of recent disruption is required? I don't understand what the difference is, but at least I know I came to the right place. Hijiri 88 (やや) 02:44, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 06:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very persistent addition of a spammy, unverified reference. See page history. . siddharthist (talk) 06:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 07:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@There'sNoTime: I just blocked the evader. Since a large number of articles are potentially affected, it might be better to work with blocks than protections, imo. Samsara 07:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Quite right - I've reduced the above protection to 3 days, but I agree it'll be better to block from here on -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 07:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection IP confused as to what WP:V is Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @Ritchie333: I see that you found the relevant reference - unfortunately, the situation is a bit murky because of WP:LEADCITE. HTH, Samsara 12:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There's a talk page discussion I started : Talk:Abbey Road#Sales figures that goes into more detail Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've notified the user and Talk:List of best-selling albums of your query. Samsara 12:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More shilling for some YouTuber. Largoplazo (talk) 00:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Only contribution from IPs/new users is spam [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. 58.166.93.233 (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple named accounts and IPs attacking page. Meters (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Image owner keeps replacing file while consensus discussion is ongoing. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:54, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 03:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 04:32, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism. Chubbles (talk) 04:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 04:43, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from rotating IPs. Home Lander (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alexf . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection was granted a matter of hours ago, and then reduced. And the problem still exists.Film Fan 21:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Home Lander (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute over inclusion of Laver Cup. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent genre warring and block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet (talk) 22:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. - Bokmanrocks01 (talk) 22:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The article has degenerated into an edit war between the pro-conversion and no-conversion thoughts in Zoroastianism. The current state of the article as edited by Porushh is unbiased in that it does not refer to conversion or universalism, but reports the Mazgaon incident. This is a compromise to avoid unnecessary controversy between those who believe in conversion and those who do not. We are requesting page protection at the current stage (last edit by Porushh). . PorusHH 04:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:40, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taffe316 (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:44, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – On the same day the previous protection expired, the article was attacked by the brand-new sock of /Marios2134454. I have opened a new SPI case.

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marios2134454. Dr. K. 19:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:46, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely long protection: Protection was lifted hours ago and now childish troll's gone back to bugging me. Please make it extremely long term. This has been going on since April. Crboyer (talk) 00:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Does this work for the time being? — Maile (talk) 00:32, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Crboyer: You might want to change your user page. Pictures, or links, or anything but the message you've been putting there. It's the power of suggestion. Some drive-by see that and goes, "Hmmmm. I never thought of doing that. Think I'll give this user page a whack." — Maile (talk) 00:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How would that work? Wait, my user page or, I was thinking my usual warning to vandals? Crboyer (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Clayc313 (talk) 13:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 13:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Joaquinito01 (talk) 14:43, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This guy is a vandal. He is running around CSD tagging random new submissions as vandalism and reverting random edits and warning newbies for vandalism they didn't commit. I'm currently following him and reverting edits until someone stops by AIV and bans him (again). If an admin sees this, please ban him again. — InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 14:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And as a side note, this user is requesting to be an admin right now. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 14:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Samsara 16:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: unconstructive edits by multiple IPs. Capitals00 (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  16:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

27 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multi-IP disruption over the last few days. –72 (talk) 15:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article was previously protected against vandalism, and now the vandal returned. I will also appreciate rolling vandalism back, I do not touch this article due to the obvious COI. Thanks. Ymblanter (talk) 16:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If pending changes is the thing that worked before, let's do more of that? Samsara 17:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spamming & other vandalism soon after previous protection expired . Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High proportion of IP edits are vandalism. Minima© (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP addresses and new users constantly change the information and restore sourced content. For a while, I and ClueBot has managed it but indefinite maybe right because it was vandalized soon after page's unprotection. . SahabAliговорити 17:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010. —MBlaze Lightning T 17:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock puppetry and disruptive COI activity. Connormah (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've not managed to get to the bottom of this and am running out of time for the day. There seems to be a copyvio claim against an image used, and I haven't found where this claim has been rebutted. Certainly, someone saying they will report a copyvio is not an excuse to not investigate it. Rather, it would be a mandate to do so. Samsara 22:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image in use there now is not a copyright violation. That's confirmed. There's an image that was uploaded to Commons that is a copyright violation, and that has been placed for deletion. No attempt was made to use it here on Wikipedia as yet though. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, the disruption seems to have stopped--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ymblanter: No, it hasn't. A brand new account with it's very first edit has removed the image from the article yet again. Now they are trying to claim the image violates copyright, which is blatantly false. The image was taken by @Connormah:, a long time contributor and administrator here. He has contributed more than 500 images to Commons. This particular image is taken from this one that is part of his photostream on Flickr. Given his history here and metadata on the image and its derivative, it is blatantly obvious this is not a copyright violation. The person disrupting the article has refused to engage in discussion (see discussion, has variously claimed the image is some form of an attack by someone (Connor, supposedly) working for a competing political party, vulgar, lies about where the image was taken, and now is claiming it is a copyright violation. The person so motivated to attack this article has used two new accounts and an IP to try to edit war the image out of the article. Further, the person in question has made an implied legal threat which they have so far refused to retract [51], has been informed of our policy on paid editing and has refused to comply with our requirements under that policy (see warning) and has a conflict of interest in editing the article. The article must be protected to stop this disruption. I realize at the time you denied the protection nothing had happened for a while, but I assure you the disruption has not stopped. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism almost every day. Given the subject, unlikely to improve. agtx 13:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extreme recent vandalism by unregistered users. Redgro (talk) 14:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. TPTB (talk) 18:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute. Pls stop bringing the Steaua articles here, follow dispute resolution avenues--Ymblanter (talk) 07:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A user has abusively edited Otto Dix's page using both his IP address and his account named Kenzoeedgar09. Matt7899 (talk) 11:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Almost a yearly tradition at this point; The UPN Vandal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)/Joseph Raymond Hahn hunting and pecking for IPs to throw on his award category and hosting predictions for the 2018 ceremony, so the page needs an IP vacation unfortunately. Nate (chatter) 13:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing addition of the same unsourced, muddily worded grand claim that can't be "fixed" because there's no clear source for the specifics of the claim. Largoplazo (talk) 01:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Samsara 09:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing edit-warring over U.S. broadcast dates; sockpuppetry involved. Areaseven (talk) 02:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's a content dispute IMO, so I've given it a bit of full. The source says something, but it's clear people aren't abiding by it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Modernponderer (talk) 08:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 09:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article just came off of 1 week's protection for persistent vandalism, so something a little longer would be nice. - BilCat (talk)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Hoax edits by User:Bertrand101 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  05:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Ashburning (talk) 06:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Alex Shih. Samsara 07:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Terahfrancisco IP Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  06:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and POV unsourced additions from multiple IP's. Adamgerber80 (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. agtx 18:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 22:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: This user (real name Stillman "Tim" Westbrook) died in 2010, so the page should be protected per WP:DWG. http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/delawareonline/obituary.aspx?n=stillman-foote-westbrook&pid=145867000. Everymorning (talk) 01:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GABgab 22:49, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mobile IP user, persistent vandalism. Zefr (talk) 03:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rmhermen (talk) 04:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: . 37.217.202.56 (talk) 05:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Why? Samsara 06:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LynxTufts (talk) 20:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:43, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of WP:NOR by IPs and autoconfirmed users as seen in these edits: [52] [53] [54]. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 20:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I would honestly wait to see if the user you might be thinking of, re-offends, and then use blocks. Samsara 22:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Samsara It appears another IP has vandalised the article just now. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and repeated hoaxing and/or addition of nonsensical content by anons and newly-registered users targeting articles pertaining to children's media. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Has been moved four times in the last nine hours, two of which were reverts to the stable title. Requesting temporary move-protection while the RM is in progress, to prevent either side from moving it during the debate.  ONR  (talk)  19:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notify when the dispute is settled to unprotect. Samsara 21:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Content dispute/edit warring. CLCStudent (talk) 19:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent scandal in the news. shoy (reactions) 20:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – article is attracting a lot of vandalism over a long period . Tornado chaser (talk) 21:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017

29 September 2017

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article subject has recently got in some trouble, disruptive edits from IPs introducing BLP violations. Hack (talk) 03:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Had two reverts and a warning. Possibly stale now. Samsara 06:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Samsara or another admin: Could you please reconsider this? It's multiple IPs/new accounts, and many of the issues are BLP violations. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:35, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP edit War. And, please, some watch the page since I am quite not active on EN WP. I'm an administrator on IT WP and I'm here because an IP had posted the same request in IT WP. Thanks a lot. Regards. Pierpao (talk) 10:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 188.60.32.254 (talk · contribs). for 72 hours. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing for a long time by IPs. Redgro (talk) 12:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – from an IP hopper. . SLIGHTLYmad 12:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither version was sourced. Samsara 13:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 13:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: The IP restored the unsourced revision; you'd be obliged to either temporarily semi-lock the article or block this user which I suspect of socking. SLIGHTLYmad 15:12, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:49, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs - 3 blocked so far today - Arjayay (talk) 13:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – four times in two days. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 14:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Kudpung. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes protection is sufficient for the moment--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. As always. As it will be until the end of time. Is it possible to have permanent semi-protection? Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please protect. JMHamo (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong spelling anyway, therefore:
Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: For the past day, there have been no less than 5 separate IPs that have vandalized the article with similar MOs. 20:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 21:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive persistent IP. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

29 September 2017

Semi-protection: Not quite vandalism but definitely a BLP issue.  Volunteer Marek  12:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I don't see the BLP issue - both statements seem to be verifiably true. It's more a matter of due weight and Wikipedia style. If we appeal to Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning as precedent, then both articles list the profession first and accusations second. I believe the IP deserves to be given an accurate reason why the edits might not be quite what we're looking for. Samsara 13:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've left them a note. Samsara 13:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mr. Bot, but I don't remember actually saying it was... Anarchyte (work | talk) 22:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 21:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent and sometimes racist IP vandalism. Thanks, User:ST15RMwikipedia 17:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 20:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent vandalism. Ernio48 (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. This was requested once and granted, which helped. Protection expired, vandalism returned, then it was requested again and denied(?) Please do something. Hornpipe2 (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 19:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Although the page has suffered from chronic IP vandalism, lately it has increased in frequency. Something needs to be done about it. --SILENTRESIDENT 18:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 19:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring. – S. Rich (talk) 18:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 19:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs have constantly been disrupting this page and I don't see it stop as she is a big person in the world of politics. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The case for indefinite semi is not particularly strong. There's been a moderate uptick in IP disruption due to the article temporarily being on the front page, but it's actually surprisingly sporadic, and certainly nothing that should merit a permanent blanket ban on any and all IP editing. I will note that the first IP edit I reviewed was the removal of unsourced information on a BLP. Not exactly something we should be rushing to suppress. Swarm 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: In the days before, during, and after this referendum, it may be subject to vandalism as the article covers a considerably controversial topic. Low-level protection should be sufficient for now. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 14:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I don't think the protection is needed just yet. If it picks up over the coming days then re-request. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying, I should have read WP:PREEMPTIVE BrendonTheWizard (talk) 14:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting a quick semiprotection as article is vandalized by different IP's. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 18:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | talk 18:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I would like this page to become unprotected because I would like to fix the problematic double redirect. If there is any concern, reduction of protection to semi or extended confirmed would be appropriate. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pkbwcgs: I've fixed the redirect issue, but it's up to Ymblanter to decide whether to unprotect it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer it to be protected for sometime, the article went for AfD twice, last time in June. Thanks for fixing the redirect problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected See above. Redirect fixed. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked the most recent IP for block evasion, though I doubt that alone would've stopped it. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – spam, check history. μTalk 07:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The user's also been blocked. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various anon. IPs (probably the same person), continuously add a non-notable doctoral student in the infobox. Most likely as a means of self-promotion. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 13:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent BLP vandal, semi-protected before but vandalism resumes once protection ends. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 13:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. LG-Gunther :  Talk  22:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Only deleted once. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This football player just put a dirty and vicious hit on another player in tonight's football game and now is article is being flooded with retaliatory vandalism. Safiel (talk) 03:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor Page protected even as I was making this request. Safiel (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please protect this page indefinitely, due to an edit dispute between Parsis who believe in conversion and Parsis who do not believe in conversion. The current state of the page removes all mention of conversion so is non-controversial. . PorusHH 14:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done We can't lower full to full, and this is the wrong section to request a longer protection time. We rarely give articles full indef. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of IP socks of Marios2134454. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marios2134454. Part of a wide range of AEK F.C. articles, and now Aris F.C., edited by master and dozens of IP socks edit-warring unsourced player vital stats information. Dr. K. 18:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Edit warrior has been warned. If they do it again they should be blocked. Drmies (talk) 03:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 03:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined John from Idegon, I threw a bunch of blocks at that article; if that doesn't help, we'll protect, ok? Drmies (talk) 03:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Otay by me, Doc. I wish I had a meme for that, but I'm not the meme king. John from Idegon (talk) 03:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 15:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kosack (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Drmies (talk) 03:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: BLP policy violations; asserting the death of a religious leader when he is merely unable to appear at a major religious event. Page protection is being requested to stop a potential edit war between one person asserting the information and those who have repeatedly undone such revisions. --Jgstokes (talk) 05:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Over the past few months, this page is being attacked, most recently by RobertodonneII96.

86.46.18.112 (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I have checked the recent editing history of the article, including that by RobertodonneII96, and I don't see how the article has been "attacked". If it has then you will need to explain exactly what has been wrong with the editing, not just describe it as "attack" without saying why. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There is certainly not "persistent vandalism. The only vandalism that has happened within the last ten months was done by one IP address over a period of five minutes, and that IP address has been blocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 102 edits in the past 15 days consisting mostly of anon vandals and reversion. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article subject has recently got in some trouble, disruptive edits from IPs introducing BLP violations. Hack (talk) 03:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Had two reverts and a warning. Possibly stale now. Samsara 06:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Samsara or another admin: Could you please reconsider this? It's multiple IPs/new accounts, and many of the issues are BLP violations. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:35, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP edit War. And, please, some watch the page since I am quite not active on EN WP. I'm an administrator on IT WP and I'm here because an IP had posted the same request in IT WP. Thanks a lot. Regards. Pierpao (talk) 10:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 188.60.32.254 (talk · contribs). for 72 hours. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing for a long time by IPs. Redgro (talk) 12:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 17:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – from an IP hopper. . SLIGHTLYmad 12:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither version was sourced. Samsara 13:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 13:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: The IP restored the unsourced revision; you'd be obliged to either temporarily semi-lock the article or block this user which I suspect of socking. SLIGHTLYmad 15:12, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:49, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs - 3 blocked so far today - Arjayay (talk) 13:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – four times in two days. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 14:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Kudpung. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jdcomix (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes protection is sufficient for the moment--Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. As always. As it will be until the end of time. Is it possible to have permanent semi-protection? Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please protect. JMHamo (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong spelling anyway, therefore:
Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: For the past day, there have been no less than 5 separate IPs that have vandalized the article with similar MOs. 20:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayjg (talk) 21:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive persistent IP. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 21:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 September 2017

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Recent disruption related to WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 04:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 11:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 hour, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm going to reach out to them and explain how it all works. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected(edit conflict) You're really on the ball today, aye Mr Bot. I've discussed the issue with the user and I believe everything's sorted. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The page continues to be vandalized by supporters of rival clubs. Please protect it. TPTB (talk) 20:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taffe316 (talk) 10:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism / unsourced edits from IP users. SempreVolando (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed when previous protection expired. Perhaps a PC setting as opposed to an actual semi prot?. CrowCaw 16:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits and vandalism by multiple new users. Please take a moment to check edit history since late September and put down blocks on these single-purpose accounts if necessary. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 19:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Indefinitely banned user SchoolcraftT is again using IP-based sockpuppets to circumvent his ban. The article has been temporarily semi-protected twice in the past and he has returned each time. Can we get either long-term semi-protection or have it made indefinite?. Bitmapped (talk) 17:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bitmapped: Can you say which IP addresses that have edited the article are SchoolcraftT, and how you can tell? To an outsider with no prior knowledge of the case it is not at all obvious. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SchoolcraftT and his socks have historically tended to focus on this article and Mountain Parkway Byway, which already has semi-protection because of IP-based sockpuppetry. SchoolcraftT has a tendency to revert his own edits, generally without explanation, and his edits and comments frequently have spelling issues. I'm seeing these same behaviors with IPs 184.15.53.53 and 50.110.93.45 this month. I'm guessing that 184.15.173.170 also belongs to SchoolcraftT since it made the same URL updates as 184.15.53.53. All three IPs are from Frontier Communications, a phone company that provides DSL and dial-up Internet in West Virginia. I suspect the IPs are different because of use of dial-up Internet. Bitmapped (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Stale, last edited two days ago. Let's hope they've found something better to do. Re-request if the sockpuppetry picks back up. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edits not conforming to any guidelines or quality source material happening over time. Additionally, has also been the target of frequent vandalism when protection has not been present. Would it be possible to have this page protected for a year or so? VP101 (talk) 05:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 19:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: User talk is protected as an arbitration enforcement action currently. Editors are now editing on the talk page in "protest"; classic WP:POINT. This is making things worse. ~ Rob13Talk 20:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BU Rob13 - No one is making a point Rob, if his talkpage is locked then where is one meant to leave a message ? ... Exactly there is no place so his userpage is the next best place, If after his block he wants messages gone then he can remove them himself. –Davey2010Talk 20:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You aren't meant to leave a message publicly. That's the point. Would you create an alternative article in response to protection of an article? No, that would be POINTy, as is this. Though, see Special:EmailUser if you want to do so privately. ~ Rob13Talk 20:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If any article is protected .. you go to the talkpage don't you ? ... If an editors talkpage is locked then one has no other choice but to post on their userpage and hope they see it?, Yes EmailUser is great however due to privacy concerns I don't reply to any email under any circumstances (unless it's an admin) so again in my case I'm left with no other alternative here, I do agree with Ymblanter we should discuss this at AN/ANI, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think this is the page where the decision should be taken. I guess WP:AN (appending to the topic) would be better.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Harrias. This should be discussed at WP:AN instead of at RFPP. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 22:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Final Warning issued. If this persists report to AIV or 3RRN. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Home Lander (talk) 01:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 04:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Persistent creation of page on this person, allegedly a performer on Disney musicals. They may exist - they have an IMDB page, but there's no evidence that they are notable or that their claimed recordings to be published next year exist. I get the feeling that this is the person's fantasies. Blythwood (talk) 04:05, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 04:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Same reasoning as the Constantine Ganosis article - recreated twice and shows no signs of being a notable or even real topic. Blythwood (talk) 04:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 04:08, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 16:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits since warning issued. Come back if edit warring resumes. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 16:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits since warning issued. Come back if edit warring resumes. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 16:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits since warning issued. Come back if edit warring resumes. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sustained attack by multiple, most likely related IPv6s. . General Ization Talk 02:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 03:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sustained attack by multiple, most likely related IPv6s. General Ization Talk 02:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 03:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sustained attack by multiple, most likely related IPv6s. General Ization Talk 02:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Swarm 03:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP ignoring frequent warnings that he is violating WP:GALLERY by dumping random images of the subject into a "Gallery" section in the article. Before calling this a content dispute and asking to seek talk page consensus, please read the linked guideline, specifically "However, Wikipedia is not an image repository. A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article...One rule of thumb to consider: if, due to its content, such a gallery would only lend itself to a title along the lines of "Gallery" or "Images of [insert article title]", as opposed to a more descriptive title, the gallery should either be revamped or moved to the Commons." Harambe Walks (talk) 14:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined After reading your request, I still think this should be discussed on the talk page before coming here. Page protection is generally seen as a last resort due to its likely impact on uninvolved editors and should only be employed in cases of obvious disruptive editing when lesser measures have either been attempted and failed, or common sense demands immediate action to prevent damage to the project... i.e. naked vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Given today's news, semi-protection for a few weeks would seem to be wise. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 01:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 17:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Bongwarrior has edited today, and would presumably semi the page himself (or ask here) if he wanted it done. Bishonen | talk 20:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alex ShihTalk 20:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we switch this to semi? History is just a wall of reverting disruptive edits. – Nihlus (talk) 23:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although there were some positive changes from an IP recently, they were minor and probably partly resulted from overlooked vandalism earlier in the timeline. On balance, the article might be better off without the reverts cluttering up the history. Samsara 00:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 00:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent adding of, unsourced, self commentary and removing content of "Origin" section which is sourced from Britannica by IP user(s). Ammarpad (talk) 16:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡o) ? 20:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism related to "Wednesday frog" meme. Dseriyes (talk) 23:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gilliam. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism in this article by two IP addresses (maybe sockpuppetry). Matt7899 (talk) 15:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IP user 146.198.149.151 disrupts edits and is promoting a spam commercial source, apparent WP:PROMO. Zefr (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A series of IP addresses with no autoconfirmed or confirmed access, are edit warring on this article with no explanation or discussion. This page has been protected recently for the same reason. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism after recent release of semi-protection. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ymblanter. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The last 15 revisions are disruptive editing. I thought I've seen everything but this is new. This person insists on adding the information to the wrong place. His info is okay; we have no dispute. But his change is breaking. I've told him where the correct place is but he still refuses to go there. I reassured him that I would listen any problem he has... but I am sorry to report that for the narrow-sighted people who do not see the full consequence of their actions beyond one article, the revert button is more appealing than the talk page. Codename Lisa (talk) 21:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Consistent and frequent long-term vandalism; Multiple IPs have the same pattern of vandalism. --Cyberdoomslayer (talk) 06:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. MelanieN (talk) 23:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 10:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. IP-hopper repeatedly removing well-cited pertinent information. Softlavender (talk) 11:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: IPs are edit warring and keep inserting the wrong information. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent adding of unsourced content from various IP addresses. Adamgerber80 (talk) 11:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Genre-warring from Maine, using multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 19:47, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:32, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and hoax edits by User:Bertrand101 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  01:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: BLP policy violations. KH-1 (talk) 02:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mz7. MelanieN (talk) 23:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anon who is IP hopping is misapplying MOS:NICKNAME. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alex ShihTalk 21:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]