Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/12

2016

01 December 2016

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Right now transclusions amount is closer to 10,000. George Ho (talk) 04:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: If I recall correctly, extended confirmed protection is not to be used unless in cases where disruption is actively occurring and semi protection has failed or will not work. Souldn't template protection be considered instead? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Template-protection means no one (exactly no one) except an administrator or template-editor would accessibly edit this template. ECP allow others to edit... but not as many people as "autoconfirmed". Also, what about WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY, which discourages overly strict interpretations on rules, like WP:ECP? By the way, the protection on ECP is discussed at WP:AN. --George Ho (talk) 10:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oshwah is right - policy would show preference towards template protection in this case. ECP is only for after semi has proven insufficient. However, WikiProject templates do not typically have template protection according to my quick survey. Samsara 02:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I requested an administrator to downgrade protection of Template:WikiProject University of California from template-protect to ECP. In fact, that template is used by 2,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I reread WP:PAG#Adherence. It says, Use common sense when interpreting and applying policies and guidelines; there will be occasional exceptions to these rules. However, it also says, Conversely, those who violate the spirit of a rule may be reprimanded even if no rule has technically been broken. If the template is TP-ed, this implies that administrators may not trust EC users to edit this template. ECP might be up to administrators, but very little or less amount of EC users are vandals or sockpuppets... right? George Ho (talk) 02:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well... no. There's a big difference that we're missing here: We must understand that article content and template code are two entirely different things. Extended confirmed protection is to be used on articles and collaboration pages in order to protect the content from higher levels of disruption. Template protection restricts editing of widely-used or high-risk templates so that only users who have demonstrated competency and experience with the proper handling and modification of template code, objects, scripts, etc can modify them. This is due to the fact that making a mistake and pushing a change with bad code and without testing first can cause a very high level of damage and impact to the project in one save. These protection levels were designed from two entirely different processes, and placing ECP on templates is not the intended purpose of that protection level. I agree... common sense should always be used.... of course. Who wouldn't agree with that :-)? But this means that we don't (for example) chase administrators for applying ECP on an article when there's a clear need for it simply because he didn't apply semi first, then do it again. Although these protections levels do the same thing but at different user levels, they were made for entirely different areas and processes and are protecting pages for completely different reasons. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Total amount of EC users is nearly 30,000, while that of template editors is 147. Not many of people would request to become template editors. Why is that? George Ho (talk) 03:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think the idea is that people who need to edit templates should be given the template editor user right. You can request it at WP:PERM. I haven't worked in the permission-granting arena lately, but I would expect having the right granted would depend on prior experience in template editing. Samsara 04:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this asking for one of special rights? George Ho (talk) 05:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected The administrative toolset isn't the place to apply WP:IAR. We receive the tools from the community to use them as dictated by the community. Until there's consensus to apply ECP to high-risk templates, we're unable to just assume we're allowed to do so on a widespread basis. ~ Rob13Talk 19:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by SPA and IPs since previous protection expired recently. Lizard (talk) 18:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent spate of IP vandalism. Chubbles (talk) 18:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I would like to request protection for this page. The reason being that there has been a recurring problem with link spam from newly created accounts, and IP editors over the past few months. I have reported quite a few of these incidents recently, but I feel this could put a stop to it. To give you some idea of how bad things are, a few of the accounts I reported recently belong to this person. [1]. Apologies if this isn't in the right area but I would hope someone could help. 81.106.156.252 (talk) 14:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Linguist Moi? Moi. 14:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shrike (talk) 15:19, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from multiple editors today. Shearonink (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent editing by a blocked user from various IP addresses. See reports at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shingling334. Largoplazo (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent editing by a blocked user from various IP addresses. See reports at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shingling334. Largoplazo (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, edit warring. At the end of every month an anonymous user changes the first digit of every number in the 'Strength' section of the infobox to his own liking, so that 80,000 turn into 60,000, 46,000 to 86,000, 62,000 to 92,000 - all despite the numerous sources cited in the references (see: [2], [3], [4], [5]). Every number in the infobox is sourced and not identical to what he comes up with; i.e. there are 80,000, 46,000 and 62,000 mentioned in the books, not his 60,000, 86,000 and 92,000 taken from nowhere. Prior to those edits, he also made two attempts to remove all the references and leave only his unsourced numbers instead (see: [6], [7]). The user doesn't engage in discussion, his edits are clearly disruptive, misleading and cotradict both the article and the sources. Eriba-Marduk (talk) 13:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Harassment . Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 13:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I've also added full move protection to your user page as well. All set! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Long time temporary semiprotection - Persistent vandalism, resumed immediately after expiration of previous protection. DVdm (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 400+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 06:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor. --George Ho (talk) 06:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Closer to 250 transclusions. George Ho (talk) 06:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor. George Ho (talk) 06:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 100+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 06:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor. George Ho (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Justeditingtoday (talk) 10:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I blocked the range. ~ Rob13Talk 11:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 800+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 10:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined <1,000 transclusions, not a contentious topic area, and a rather simple template syntax. I wouldn't consider this particularly high-risk. ~ Rob13Talk 11:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Admin protected it stating that the page is undergoing persistent disruptive editing. You can see there no evidence of disruptive editing. There was a minor content dispute, but it did not get worse or even near it to protect the page. I think the protection is purely personal. 2405:204:D008:1DC6:4C5:A34F:BE0A:18AE (talk) 16:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Location map USA state templates (3,000+)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 3,000+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined ECP for high-risk templates is not yet supported by the protection policy, and TP is not needed here (yet). ~ Rob13Talk 11:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: In my userspace. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 00:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. No vandalism or other extraneous edits have occurred on the page. The only edits have been performed by User:ClueBot III in auto-archiving. If you want to disable auto archiving, refer to the User:ClueBot III page. North America1000 02:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Why would anyone want to vandal this?. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 13:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – There has been an influx of SPAs, throwaway accounts, and obvious IP hopping sockpuppets that make WP:NPOV frequent violating edits to the article. This has been ongoing for the past several months and has become worse since the election. It become a source of considerable frustration for regular editors who actually follow sources, use the talk page, edit other areas of the project, etc. - MrX 03:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @MrX: Let's try long-term semi first, as required by the protection policy. Many of the disruptive edits were by IPs or very new editors, so this may help. If it's still unmanageable, we could go in a few different directions. Note that this probably falls within the American politics topic area, which is subject to discretionary sanctions. ~ Rob13Talk 11:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject templates (30,000)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Transcluded by 30,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 09:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject templates (20,000)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Transcluded by 20,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 09:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Transcluded by 20,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 09:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Transcluded by almost 20,000 pages. George Ho (talk) 09:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Transcluded by almost 20,000 pages. George Ho (talk) 09:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 20,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 09:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Transcluded by 20,000 pages. George Ho (talk) 09:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Almost 20,000 transclusions. George Ho (talk) 09:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 18,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 09:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 18,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 09:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 19,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Almost 19,000 pages. George Ho (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 18,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 17,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 17,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected ~ Rob13Talk 11:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of vandalism from several new accounts (TWylie NZL, Jmpdunv, Bot7075843). Kinetic37 (talk) 11:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 11:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Location map USA state templates (4,000+)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 4,000+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See above. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather, each is used by 4,000+ pages. How is ECP less adequate than TP? --George Ho (talk) 06:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
George Ho. You are aware of the discussion at WP:AN. There is no consensus to reduce the protection. There have been no requests for edits to either of the two. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, CambridgeBayWeather, did you know that they are semi-protected, not template-protected? George Ho (talk) 06:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So why increase it if there has been no problem in over 3 years? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
....Oh. I guess I'll re-request those when the amount gets very large. George Ho (talk) 07:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: This needs an upgrade. The number of transclusions for this template is also that for Template:Ffd. Also, it's semi-protected. --George Ho (talk) 03:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Hitherto once given semi protection for a while, but, disruptions did not stop. ~ Irrigator talk 05:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Location map USA state templates (2,000+)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 2,000+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See above. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Closer to 500 transclusions. George Ho (talk) 06:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See above. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 400+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 06:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See above. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 200+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 06:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined See above. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 20:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Please SALT after deleting. Repeatedly recreated and repeatedly deleted. Unambiguous promotional material added multiple times. Lourdes 08:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Linguist Moi? Moi. 08:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Previous deletions were in 2015 - consensus can change. Report it again if it gets created again shortly after yesterday's AfD closure. Samsara 04:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hollyckuhno (talk) 00:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Fuzheado | Talk 03:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm hesitant to request protection of an article that's up for deletion, but an IP hopping anon keeps removing the BLPPROD tag without adding sources. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I've looked into this in some detail and decided to delete as hoax. Only trace I could find is that he made an "appearance" for Barcelona [8] that I consider as dubious. Samsara 04:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: More BLP violating edits by same IP-hopping user immediately upon expiry of last semi-protection. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 03:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations over the last few days. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:32, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since the last semi-prot expired a few days ago. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 06:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced, disruptive edits from IP users over a long period of time. jmcgowan2 (talk) 14:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For a just-about-to-be-released movie, this isn't doing too badly, and the most recent IP change was a helpful one. Situation may change. Samsara 02:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RolandR (talk) 00:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Multiple editors continue to try to include material about Trump winning the Electoral College despite it not having voted yet. To stop this violation of policy, this article should be FP'ed until January 6, when the electoral votes are counted by the Congress. Then we will know how the Electoral College voted and can write about it. SMP0328. (talk) 01:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 6 January 2017, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: 1,900+ pages. George Ho (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. See above. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 13:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Gone a bit stale now. Last year, there wasn't much seasonal impact - fingers crossed; I've watchlisted. Samsara 01:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs adding WP:BLP violations in form of promotional junk from sources that violate WP:RS. Sagecandor (talk) 17:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Protecting while AfD nominated is not a good course of action, as it may prevent needed improvements and "doom" the article. The "BLP violations" do not add up to much, it's more of a dispute over whether certain aspects should be included. On balance of those two things, I don't see a good rationale for protecting. Samsara 01:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: There is a disruptive editing on the Panthéon-Assas page. One user is not happy with the reputation of this university of "top law school of France" that all the sources state (he’s deleting in the lead, but there are more sources in the "reputation" section, so he’s deleting things with sources, and is doing only personal attacks on me in talk page (like I would be clearly protecting paid contribution!?)

Note that it’s part of a broader POV pushing on the Sorbonne in general. There is currently a push on Pantheon-Sorbonne_University and there has been vandalism through false edit summaries also on Sorbonne University (alliance) and Sorbonne Law School pages, or with no edit summary of Paris-Sorbonne University page. But for example my work on University of Lorraine or the good ranking that I add in Aix-Marseille University page is not vandalized because there is no link with the name Sorbonne. There was also Science Po but it has already been fully protected. I took care of the latter Sorbonne University and Sorbonne Law School, others are taking care of Pantheon-Sorbonne and Paris-Sorbonne, but the user is insisting on Panthéon-Assas (Sorbonne Law School) and is now attacking me personally on talk page.

--Launebee (talk) 21:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, cross-wiki disruptive contributions have targeted pages related to Pantheon-Sorbonne_University (or its rival, like Sciences Po which is already protected because of Launebee's contributions).
I have 30'000+ contributions on the French Wikipedia, and we had to deal with the same problem during the last months (same methods, same articles). But to put it simply :
To go back to this specific article, I have already mentionned (with references) on the talk page that a lot of mainstream newspapers rank this university far from the top places. It doesn't bother Launebee, and he/she keep putting again, and again, that the university "has always been ranked first in law in national rankings". He or she knows that the claim is false, but keeps putting it on the lead section. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 22:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. JTP (talkcontribs) 17:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism and edit wars. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 18:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 19:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP is repeatedly editing the Infobox in contradiction of the text of the article (i.e. winner of war). Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Fuzheado | Talk 03:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:CRYSTAL vioations - Encarnación is rumoured to be signing with the Houston Astros tomorrow but nothing reliable exists so far. Some anon editors have begun changing the page without reliable sourcing. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 02:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 40 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too much vandalism for pending changes to be viable. Lizard (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:34, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same BLP violating edits by same IP-hopping user immediately upon expiry of last semi-protection. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 03:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Note that List of wars involving Pakistan has been vandalised by the same group of IPs, and semi-protected as well. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Same issue and parties referred below on Indo-Pakistani War of 1947. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 19:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Matching protection on other article mentioned in OP. Samsara 01:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Loads of vandalism in the last few hours. Mtpaley (talk) 23:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously this needs a quick protection. I am wasting too much time reverting this page. Mtpaley (talk) 23:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC). Taken care of by Oshwah - thanks. Mtpaley (talk) 00:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Samsara 02:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by different IPs, could be the same person. Molecule Extraction (talk) 14:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:E0EC:247A:95A5:7797 (talk) 17:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 01:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 17:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing same nonsense being added by various users and IPs today. XyzSpaniel Talk Page 21:23, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Samsara 01:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the previous protection expired, the vandalism started right back up from three different editors. Opencooper (talk) 23:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over the past 48 hours. More expected, due to a high-profile feud with another boxer. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and general BLP disruptions. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

02 December 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The page hasn't been edited in almost 3 years. There is absolutely no reason to protect the page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and new accounts adding copyright violations (which are also unacceptably promotional) to the article. Previous protection was regarding the exact same issue. bonadea contributions talk 18:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Thekernelcompiler (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 19:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Documenting hoax article. Evking22 (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Is there precedent of any kind for this? Do we preemptively protect documentation pages? Vanamonde (talk) 05:53, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, yes. Looking here and here, they are both articles on the documentation of a hoax, and both are fully protected. Evking22 (talk) 15:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Regular targets of this LTA vandal, all of which have been protected before, some repeatedly. --Finngall talk 15:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent reinsertion of questionable material by IPs over period of several days. Drchriswilliams (talk) 17:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired yesterday and vandalism began again today. LTA by The abominable Wiki troll. -- Dane2007 talk 16:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent addition of unsourced or speculative information by IP editors on a time-sensitive topic. Requesting semi-protection for a month. — JFG talk 16:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:55, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the last several months - I think a semi-protection of similar length is needed. Deli nk (talk) 13:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obvious Sockpuppetry by Xparta. -- Dane2007 talk 15:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator The Wordsmith. Samsara 16:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts by a user whose registered account is now blocked to pretend she is this actor's girlfriend/wife. Largoplazo (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 90 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – CSD tags removed by multiple IPs. —teb728 t c 23:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined page deleted instead under CSDG4. Vanamonde (talk) 05:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism; article has high visibility. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 12:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 14:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 06:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 08:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 09:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry and ban evasion. Long-term abuse. Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bertrand101 and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Bertrand101. 2601:1C0:103:AEB0:95D7:57C3:A17D:2869 (talk) 05:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption infrequent, let's see if this can deal with it. Vanamonde (talk) 06:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:10A:56A6:A4F9:6283:7A07:D745 (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

full-protection:A request to extend page protection due to disruptive and upseting edits from random ips in the past (Before November 26 2015/Page was first locked) and again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kali&diff=752597441&oldid=752586650 UserK (talk) 05:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Full protection not justified at this point. Also, UserK, please place your requests at the bottom of this section, not at the bottom of the page. Vanamonde (talk) 06:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This was WP:SALTed in 2007, after someone tried to recreated it after an AfD. I want to make this a redirect to Maine gubernatorial election, 2018, as he is mentioned there as a potential candidate. I think a redirect is appropriate if someone comes searching for him. Here's a source: http://www.wcsh6.com/news/politics/two-years-to-the-next-election-who-will-it-be/355451058. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Seems reasonable. Vanamonde (talk) 06:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There already exists an article on Troy Duster. This sandbox should stay in the sandbox and not be moved to the Article space. I have notified the user multiple times. Primefac (talk) 18:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cripes, this is a weird one. I've move protected the page, and also warned the user. If the disruption resumes via a different title or something, please report back here, or feel free to contact me directly. Vanamonde (talk) 05:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by same user operating under multiple IP addresses. Does not co-operate with repeated warnings. Ajf773 (talk) 21:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Infrequent editing: Let's try PC protection. Vanamonde (talk) 05:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring.LM2000 (talk) 22:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Please one week for this article, the user MikaelF is adding unsourced name without adding a source. Beshogur (talk) 10:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question:. The page is not protected at all. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, edit warring on the same points. Repeatedly very new users: masterofthename and Orange Relish (probably the same person) have made edits to the religion and other details of this living person. The current religion in the article is sourced from multiple reliable locations, these changes he is adding are not. There have been other instances of vandalism and edit warring on this page. The user doesn't engage in discussion on the Talk, his edits are clearly disruptive, misleading and not supported by the sources. I do not understand his motive but it's messing up this article. The page has been protected before but as soon as the protection drops, the user creates a new account and makes unsourced edits. Truthseekr67 (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think they're the same person. One was asking for references and inserting referenced statements and generally improving referencing (masterofthename), the other is inserting unreferenced content (Orange Relish). Samsara 05:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:103:406:BD77:B561:A75F:234F (talk) 03:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:103:AEB0:95D7:57C3:A17D:2869 (talk) 05:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start with this and see how we do. Samsara 05:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism recently. Cotton2 (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article seems to be experiencing growing pains, especially from recent events. Although the rate of editing is on the high side (and will be, for the next few days) for pending changes, I think the potential gains are worth it. Airplaneman 00:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 1233Talk 00:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. In my eyes, the pending changes experiment has failed. The edit history is almost exclusively vandalism and vandalism reverts. Thanks for reporting, Airplaneman 00:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I hate to ask for protection for a talk page, but there has been a recent spate of vandalism with BLP violations. MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 02:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism on "Dream" page. Mike15678 (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Editing patterns suggest very few productive contributions; the edit history is almost exclusively vandalism and reverts. As such, I think semi protection would work best here. Airplaneman 02:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and BLP violations due to recent news events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 02:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Beginning EW by IP, then progressed to retaliatory edit and personal attack under second IP. Jeh (talk) 23:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article subject died today and IP address are either vandalizing the page or adding untrue information. Rockchalk717 00:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 00:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ra and Horus

Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopping vandalism. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 00:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (both pages). Looks like a long-term problem. Airplaneman 00:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP seems determined to put in the infobox that Cooper has been elected Governor of North Carolina, when in fact that isn't the case. Currently, the North Carolina gubernatorial race is still in dispute. GoodDay (talk) 15:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism related to head coaching vacancy/search. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some IP number is playing "pranks" on this living person's children listing. Semi protect? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what this answer means, but will just watch the page - that's okay. Carptrash (talk) 22:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (edit conflict) @Carptrash: The bot that clerks this page requires some non-intuitive code. I've protected it for 4 days. Cheers, Airplaneman 23:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: please protect for 1 week; sleepy article on old chemical. over the past, dribble of vandalism. then a rush of vandalism today. thx Jytdog (talk) 23:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Full protection is not used in this situation. Also, the blocked user has made no edits to his/her talk page since being blocked... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 15:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Full protection is not used in this situation. Also, the blocked user has made no edits to his/her talk page since being blocked... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article continues to be the target of IPs adding an unsourced 2017 event. Silverfish (talk) 18:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03 December 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered users keep adding false information. Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 09:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 10:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Could somebody please remove a dated 2009 move protection from this page? Thanks!. — JFG talk 20:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done @JFG: -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: BLP issues. Multiple IP editors persistently insert trivial negative (though accurately cited in RS) material about BLP subject's minor child. I have attempted to discuss this directly on user talk with one of the editors. I have taken this to BLP/N; an uninvolved editor there agreed with my position and removed the material. I have started a thread on page talk. IP editors will not engage, continuing to make their case in edit summary, creating an edit war situation in live pagespace. While this IS a content dispute, the issue is reinsertion of BLP vio material about a minor child by multiple ips. BusterD (talk) 15:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Came off a month of semi-protection due to persistent vandalism on December 1st. All edits since then are, once again, vandalism/removal thereof. . AddWittyNameHere (talk) 17:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leschnei (talkcontribs)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warrior making up dog breed. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarahSV (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection Per WP:ARBPIA3. 2601:1C0:101:D04F:BD85:8634:BAAB:FD07 (talk) 06:17, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: You have two different articles here. Which did you want?
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for Palestinian right of return CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of spam links by anons and newly-registered users. Given that this is an attractive target for spammers to promote Blogger-related sites or services, and has been a subject to such vandalism for quite some time, I think an ECP for this should be appropriate. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – PROTECT THIS PAGE FOR 3 DAYS... Mission Kashmir III 14:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined Your user page has never been created, by you or anyone. What you see on it is the content you put on Meta:User:Mission Kashmir III. JohnCD (talk) 14:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of POV / opinion text by (apparently) a single, IP-hopping editor. JohnInDC (talk) 12:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Class455 (talk) 13:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued BLP and NPOV violations during PC protection that have gotten worse since PC changes expired. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 17:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP hopping edit warrior who has stated a refusal to go to Talk page. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 17:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Class455 (talk) 14:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected BethNaught (talk) 14:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Zzuuzz. 73.96.115.71 (talk) 15:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More of Gestrid's pages

Indefinite semi-protection: User request. Yes, I know I've been requesting a lot of RP lately, but I'm requesting protection of pages that no new user or IP should have any need to edit. Since I like to work in anti-vandalism, I think it's warranted, given how that can attract vandals into my useerspace. Gestrid (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done BethNaught (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Frequent financial changes. Recently in a regular basis. 2405:204:D30B:CC6E:64A1:4EFE:E931:8B0F (talk) 09:15, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by another admin. BethNaught (talk) 13:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.

Been linked to a fairly prominent Australian political Facebook page, who he's antagonised - should only need to be semi-protected for a few days while it dies down. AGTWSAWSPE (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 14:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Article has been created in violation of the block of sockpuppets. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected BethNaught (talk) 14:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update to unlimited full protection The disruptive user does not want to talk and is ready to have the same behaviour as soon as the one week protectionn stops. When I undeline in edit summary that he needs to use talk page, he rerversed and wrote more than 20'000 bytes of discussion since April. The problems have already been explained, so it's time to remove the obvious PR gibberish. He thinks he has already explained enough so he is entitled to disrupte the page.

Now he’s beginning a personal vendetta against me in talk page, and explaining at all why he wants to supress statements with sources.

He’s even wanting to put in the article defamatory statements (imaginary criminal activity in this university, or imaginary reputation to this) (I menntionned it in ANI).

I’m not saying to block any change, but to protect the page so that an admin can watch it, until further notice, since this disruptive editing has been going for very long (you can see the edits in June 2016) and the user is not ready to stop.

--Launebee (talk) 00:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in the Talk:Sciences Po, there is a long discussion about Launebee disruptive contributions. A report as been done at the ANI, because a growing number of contributors are reporting problems about his/her contributions.
Launebee asked for the protectection of Panthéon-Assas University 4 days ago. It has been protected on his/her version. As you can see, he or she simply vanished from the talk page. He or she is just trying to push the same strategy that he or she has already used on an other article (Sciences Po‎, a rival school of Panthéon-Assas University). I have already check these articles histories, and anyone can see the result there. Launebee tries to keep the warning templates as long as possible on the Sciences Po‎ article, and tries to keep the same warning templates removed from the Panthéon-Assas University for as long as possible.
So I have nothing against a long protection if the warning templates are put back to the Panthéon-Assas University article. That probably the only way to bring him/her back to the talkpage. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I'm not going to give it indefinite protection. You need to use WP:Dispute resolution to work it out. Any further edit warring will lead to blocks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:15, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One recreation is not a problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 11:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP user is changing the article. I can't count this as vandalism but most of his edit doesn't fit here. Protection please. Beshogur (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Lizard (talk) 06:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Largoplazo (talk) 19:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BethNaught. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Previous protection expired less than 2 days ago and the same IP-hopping vandal is back again - David Biddulph (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Return of sock of User:Vote (X) for Change. Activity on both article and talk page. See WP:Long-term abuse/Vote (X) for Change. The article was temporarily semi-protected twice this year and twice in 2011 for the same reason. Sock puppet investigation also submitted. Jc3s5h (talk) 20:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical year has been protected by User: Future Perfect at Sunrise, unknown if in response to this posting or independently. I was mistaken about talk page activity (this time). Jc3s5h (talk) 20:53, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise. For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
DoneCambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request extended-confirmed protection, as one user in particular keeps "correcting" the page. MB298 (talk) 00:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, likely relating to the ongoing English football historic sexual abuse reports in the news. A long period, if not permanent semi-protection is needed as this has been targeted before. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:50, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Please semi-protect for 2 weeks. Under promotional pressure from series of IP editors, adding unsourced or poorly sourced promotional content. Jytdog (talk) 03:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Both constant edit warring and vandalism. Marquis de Faux (talk) 04:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Widefox; talk 09:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Previously protected on a number of occasions, but the same IP-hopping vandal is back again --David Biddulph (talk) 18:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A flurry of changes and modification has been happening for the past days. This is linked with current events in the Philippines where there is a propaganda effort to revise the history during the Martial Law years in the Philippines by followers of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos. Revisions are not made by Philippine historians. Please allow revisions from the National Historical Commission of the Philippines. Revert to entry version before the series of historical revisionism changes were made Ecsamson (talk) 19:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 86.189.219.174 (talk · contribs) blocked by Yamaguchi先生. Samsara 02:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Risk of edit-war --Dans (talk) 09:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have stopped. I've also warned the relevant users MusikAnimal talk 00:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iniced Sockpuppet and block evasion

Temporary semi-protection: These pages are continually been blanked by sockpuppets and IP's of Iniced. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Users are blocked, have talk page access revoked, etc, but note also in general it is perfectly fine to blank warnings on your talk page MusikAnimal talk 00:53, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: i want to update the page but my edits keep on getting reverted. 88.109.198.144 (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Too soon. Try discussing your edits on the talk page first. Samsara 17:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what these replays are, but I suspect it's another way of saying "Fuck off." Carptrash (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Carptrash: Is there any further problem that needs addressing? Your comment is a bit cryptic. Samsara 00:17, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ~ Rob13Talk 03:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming. 73.96.113.7 (talk) 02:44, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spamming. 73.96.113.7 (talk) 02:44, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. DarkKnight2149 20:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Individual autoconfirmed abusers should be dealt with on a warn and block basis. Think about WP:3RR. Samsara 00:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Understood. DarkKnight2149 00:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism. MB298 (talk) 00:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by sockpuppets of The Suix. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Samsara 02:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An anonymous vandal with a dynamic IP is trying to vandalize the page in order to turn it into an inane attack page. I think temporary semi-protection for a few days might dampen the vandal's inane spirit.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Concerted vandalism by multiple IPs. I think a lock for a day will spoil the fun. The Banner talk 19:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poorly sourced information from IP'S. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Oneforfortytwo (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Multiple IPs attacking this BLP. Not sure if they are annoyed that the captain is leaving his team, or annoyed at his play and wishing he would leave the team. Meters (talk) 22:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and newbie edits are not good at all, but PC1 is not working for now. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See edit filter log too. Dat GuyTalkContribs 22:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Zzuuzz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), redirected to UFS by Emir of Wikipedia (talk · contribs). Airplaneman 23:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 23:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gestrid's subpages

Permanent semi-protection: User request. No new user or IP user should have any reason to edit these. Many of these are transcluded onto various other pages of mine. Yes, I realize it's a rather large request. Gestrid (talk) 07:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: I added several more pages while you were handling my request. I apologize for that. Gestrid (talk) 08:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Think I got them all this time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Airplaneman 22:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikibaji 10:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 16:48, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: the Karl Blossfeldt article has been under a constant barrage of vandalism for years. It is (opinion) school based activity, a typical vandalism being adding the words "poo poo" to article, as happened today. In this case the same IP address removed the edit, but it still needed to be checked out, and it's tiring to see the same article come up again and again. Could you please not allow IP numbers to edit it? Forever? Thanks, Einar aka Carptrash (talk)

I don't understand what these replays are, but I suspect it's another way of saying "F**k off." Carptrash (talk) 21:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04 December 2016

Temporary full-protection:The CM of TamilNadu State has suffered a cardic arrest and edits like [[9]] at this time can cause serious law and order issues in the state. [[10]] Check here what happened when an earlier CM died. Khushank94 (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do this urgently. Tintin 17:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator DragonflySixtyseven. - or rather, DragonflySixtyseven has applied semi protection, which I think is sufficient. Yaris678 (talk) 18:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dawnseeker2000 17:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Zzuuzz. -- samtar talk or stalk 17:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:E968:5E2E:E1BB:14A8 (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 18:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 21:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC) 21:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions of the same inappropriate material by two different editors and an IP, semi-protection might help save the editor from digging him/herself into a yet deeper pit. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: one editor is the same as at Kathiawari, already protected for similar reasons by CambridgeBayWeather (thank you!). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Both of the editors have been blocked for 31 hours and they could have edited through semi anyway. The IP should be easy enough to deal with if not let me know. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aṭlas (talk) 12:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User Atlas is reverting without giving any explanations. I have initiated a talk page disucssion but User Atlas refuses to take part in the discussion at Censorship_of_Assyrian_genocide_and_blanking_of_human_rights_abuses_against_Christian_Assyrian_minority_by_User_Atlas and continues his blanking of content without explanation. --88.128.80.62 (talk) 13:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You just restored your edits, all this was removed by the admin Dianna in 20 November 2016. --Aṭlas (talk) 13:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No I most certainly did not do that, and you are giving no proof at all. Everything that was added since was rewritten according to rules of wikipedia. There is no more violation because it was rewritten.
I asked you on the talk page where you still see problems, so I can fix them, but you did not reply. --88.128.80.62 (talk) 13:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Looks like an edit war. Use the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

salt: from further page recreation as requested on AfD. As the David SK Lee article had already been salted to prevent page recreation following AfD discussion but despite this, this user Veri854 chose to recreate it as a draft article. Therefore he cannot be trusted anymore and needs to be under close watch in case he recreates the article again. Donnie Park (talk) 15:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP BLP violations. Widefox; talk 12:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151  Talk  13:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 14:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Linguist Moi? Moi. 14:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 14:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 11:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The content in this article is constantly altered without updating the sources. I am starting to sound like a broken record requesting sources. While I don't want to discourage editors from updating the article it definitely needs a mechanism to ensure that any changes are sourced so I would like to try out "pending changes" on this article and see if it addresses the problem. Betty Logan (talk) 11:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 11:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page should be protected for about a week due to an edit war over the list of instruments, where one new editor is adding something and removing the warning that says a consensus must be reached before adding new instruments. If you'd rather block the user, it's User:Lucajeter. Check the talk page for more information. Adotchar| reply here 02:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The new user has edited long enough that semi won't work. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term IP vandalism over a particular tidbit of the article. Perhaps a semi-protection can encourage the IPs to discuss their edits on the TP. Étienne Dolet (talk) 04:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edits were 30 November. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:47, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article continues to be the subject of addition of unsourced events (a 2017 event in particular) added by various IPs since protection was lifted on November 24. I also request protection for Bash at the Beach, which has had similar content added by the same IPs after a November 24 protection was lifted. I finally request protection of Halloween Havoc, as when IPs target the previous mentioned articles they also tend to add a similar event to this article. . Silverfish (talk) 09:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like Halloween Havoc and Bash at the Beach haven't been protected. Please can these be considered before this request is resolved. Silverfish (talk) 10:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and disruptive editing has resumed since expiration of the previous protection. Involved on the page, cannot protect, myself. . Vanamonde (talk) 10:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Ethnic-based edit warring over whether Scots is a variety of English or a Germanic-language variety. No consensus on talkp page, so numerous editors are making changes against the status quo of the article. See [11]. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Given you reverted yourself and there seems to be nothing much else happening not sure why at this time it needs it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Lmyers8965 was blocked yesterday for other edits, among them there is an unconfirmed cover-art to this article that he/she keep adding: he's now editing from IPs directions. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 07:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism over the past two days. When vandalising editor received a final warning on their talk page, a suspected sock puppet account emerged and made identical vandalising edits. Exemplo347 (talk) 08:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent trolling by, well, you know. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Materialscientist is online and aware, and as an admin can and I'm sure will do what is needed to his TP. Samsara 04:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from multiple IPs and new accounts since removal of temporary semi-protection. Usually takes the form of attempting to add "Yaoi", "BL", or "Shounen Ai" to genre ([12][13][14]); addition of commentary ([15]); and "fansite-style" content ([16][17]).

At the very least there should be long term semi-protection until new episodes for this season have stopped being released. RA0808 talkcontribs 01:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden but significant burst of vandalism as of about 10 minutes ago. Three different IP-editors (One IP4 & two IP6) simultaneously vandalizing the page. Suspect short-term semi will do the trick. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 01:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:42, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring by IP socks of block master Igaalbania (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Dr. K. 16:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Class455 (talk) 16:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring between creating a wholly unsourced page, which duplicates the target page, and leaving as a redirect. Onel5969 TT me 22:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 23:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent new user with disruptive editing, also some anon IPs and one possible sock or meatpuppet. Protect maybe 60 days until things settle down. Montanabw(talk) 23:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A spike in various IP vandalism edits. JesseRafe (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CRYSTAL. Beltran has reportedly agreed to terms with Houston. That's not confirmed, and the agreement could fall through before finalized. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RATT and Bobby Blotzer Pages Protection

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting temporary protection for a period of at least two weeks for the RATT and drummer Bobby Blotzer pages due to current legal proceedings and a High level of IP vandalism/disruptive editing without proper citations. Thank you. Dijares (talk) 20:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ratt and RATT don't seem to have been vandalized and Blotzer only twioe. Rmhermen (talk) 20:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. RATT. Or did you mean Ratt? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bobby Blotzer. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... I know. I declined the one and protected the other. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Has just been drafted in the 2016 AFL Draft, will make a redirect until he makes his AFL debut ref. The-Pope (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@RHaworth:--Ymblanter (talk) 17:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@The-Pope: For what it's worth, regardless if this title gets unprotected of not, I'd oppose creating this title as a redirect to 2016 AFL Draft. Such redirects have been nominated at WP:RFD in the past per WP:XY issues and most, if not all, have been deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 16:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't redirect them to the draft article but to articles like List of Fremantle Football Club players#Listed players yet to play an AFL game for Fremantle, as per {{R from member}}. That way people searching for the new player can see some basic information before he's notable enough for a full article. The-Pope (talk) 11:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done @The-Pope:. -- zzuuzz (talk) 04:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by accountless IPs. Marquis de Faux (talk) 02:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of repeat IP vandalism. oknazevad (talk) 02:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Unprotection needed to create redirect per request at Redirects for Creation. -- Dane2007 talk 21:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done (redirected) @Dane2007 and JamesBWatson: (basically the same article). -- zzuuzz (talk) 04:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Linguist Moi? Moi. 11:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zsinj. (PC1) Samsara 03:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 0x5849857 (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 03:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Якуб5 (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:25, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism. Calidum ¤ 01:57, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarahSV (talk) 22:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 02:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – To allow Template editors to edit. Flow 234 (Nina) talk 13:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell: (with 340,632 transclusions I'd be tempted to leave as is) -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:27, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm with Zzuuzz on this one. It's not a template that needs to be edited very often (nor a very complicated one), and given its prominenece and high transclusion rate, I think full protection is appropriate. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection against editors like the racist I just reverted. Thanks. Zerotalk 06:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also per WP:ARBPIA3. 2601:1C0:101:D04F:BD85:8634:BAAB:FD07 (talk) 06:17, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question:. Zero0000 you already protected it so why are you asking to change it? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I applied brief semi-protection to stop the immediate abuse, but I'm involved in the ARBPIA area so it would be better if a different admin applied indefinite extended-confirmed protection. Or even removed the protection; it should be decided by an uninvolved admin. Zerotalk 09:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term constant vandalism, long history of disruption according to page logs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I gave it a month Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The protection was lost after splitting some revisions in the history of Template:Afd-notice to User talk:RMCD bot/Afd-notice. The template with a hyphen was recently moved to the non-hyphenated title. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05 December 2016

Semi-protection: constant addition of unsourced claims of her death - was briefly fully protected, but that has lapsed and edit warring has started again - Arjayay (talk) 16:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

We currently have the bizarre situation of the talk page being semi-protected, but the article itself is unprotected - Arjayay (talk) 16:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Has now been semi-protected by User:SpacemanSpiff - Arjayay (talk) 16:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 16:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all the unregistered user edits have been reverted over the last several months. . Kautilya3 (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. DH85868993 (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent low-level vandalism by fans of Hamilton (musical), who add Alexander Hamilton as a son-in-law (as a nod to Hamilton's alleged relationship with Henry Laurens' son). tlesher (talk) 16:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Evking22 (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending sports transaction. Not confirmed by the team or the player, and requires passing a physical examination before finalized.[18]. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, and also persistent random vandalism unrelated to the sockpuppets. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of unsourced set list by IP and new users. Please semi-protect it temporarily. —IB [ Poke ] 18:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- ferret (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ok, protection is over, and vandalism started right away! please protect this again for a longer period of month. Axiomus (talk) 11:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two edits by one IP in 24 hours isn't much. If it persists let me know. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I can't watch this page. An administrator please WP:IAR and semi-protect this page for two weeks. Marvellous Spider-Man 12:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Heavy vandalism by a bunch of "new" user(name)s DVdm (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of sockpuppetry. 2602:306:3357:BA0:1856:CD51:E7BC:9F20 (talk) 16:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Subject:moving protection settings of this article.Please changes it's protection settings to pending changes so that good faith ip editors or new editors should be welcomed and bad faith edits should be deleted.Regards L.D. (talk). L.D. (talk) 18:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question:. Have you asked SpacemanSpiff? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's a BLP vio magnet so I'm not inclined to change to PC which will just cause more problems. —SpacemanSpiff 11:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. George Ho (talk) 09:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. 219.79.180.166 (talk) 10:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal adding same vandalism for 4 days. Wikishovel (talk) 13:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 13:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Nika de Hitch (talk) 20:48, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from socks of User:CommanderShinzon. User still insists that a sequel is happening even though it's been repeatedly debunked. User will just move from one account/IP to another. Crboyer (talk) 08:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Subject:Move of protection settings.Please change this article's protection settings to pending changes so that new user's or ip's should be welcomed and vandalize couldn't vandalize this page.Regards L.D. (talk). L.D. (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Considering the latest unprotection period, there is too much editing of which not enough is productive for pending changes to work. A 2013 attempt was aborted for this reason. Cenarium (talk) 22:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ssemi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 05:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 06:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Article creator (Veri854) chose to recreate an article of his that had been deleted now three times, one following AfD discussion. Salt request per WP:Articles for deletion/David SK Lee to prevent page recreation. Donnie Park (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – dynamic IP deleting references and well-referenced info. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of editor POV and often inflammatory commentary of a living person by various IP users or likely the same one(s). — TAnthonyTalk 06:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of a huge list of minor/guest appearances on variety shows that don't add any encyclopedic values to the article. The matter has been discussed on the talk page, but editor(s) kept on adding it back without any justification. Thank you. TerryAlex (talk) 06:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 00:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level disruptive editing and IP vandalism with misleading, false facts. Would be very helpful if the page is protected so that only the registered users can edit it. AkshayAnandTalk! 02:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started right back up again from both IPs and new accounts after prior semi-protection expired. Sagecandor (talk) 04:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Linguist Moi? Moi. 18:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An WP:IPHOPPER is constantly removing the {{Draft article}} tag without providing any reason and doesn't engage in any discussions that I have tried to initiate, both on the draft talk page and multiple IP talk pages. It's likely that the editor hasn't seen any of my IP talk page messages, because his/her IP address is constantly changing. The same goes for the Draft:Phonemetra, Draft:Turbo Store and Draft:Turbo Launcher pages. Dodi 8238 (talk) 20:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unconstructive editing from one user using a range of IP addresses. -- Fyrael (talk) 21:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-protection: WP:BLP with repeated insertion of evil devil type comments. White supremacist was recently inserted and stayed in for five hours , that is totally unacceptable for a living person - please protect - see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steve_Bannon&diff=753078587&oldid=753034929Govindaharihari (talk) 21:33, 4 December 2016 (UTC)-->[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:21, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing disruption due to off-site organization here. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 21:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 06:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism being reverted by multiple editors but doesn't appear to be stopping it.  — Calvin999 22:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 45.124.225.45 (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Ended a few hours ago, should be semi-protected. JustAGuyOnWikipedia (talk) 00:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - There is a disagreement and there is no discussion on the Talk page.

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:48, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:CRYSTAL violations relating to an unconfirmed free agent signing. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 00:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous IP users continued to add unsourced and unannounced singles on this page. Andrew (talk) 02:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has continued after previous semi-protection expired on Dec 3. Fisher has received a new contract, which seems to be increasing the vandalism now. BilCat (talk) 03:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection. Also, can you revert the last edit? Someone is adding irrelevant info, and I deleted it, therefore I had a warning. Beshogur (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Also the page is not protected. Cenarium (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by User:Ararat arev, started up again not long after previous protection expired. Osiris myth may need it as well. Sro23 (talk) 02:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple counts of vandalism relating to current events surrounding Last Tango in Paris. McFar54 02:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 03:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Subject:Moving protection Settings.Please change this article's protection settings to pending changes indefinitely so that it doesn't get vandalize and good faith edits of ip's in this article should be welcomed .L.D. (talk). L.D. (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The protection is temporary, having been applied recently and expiring in two weeks, and pending changes is not always efficient against sockpuppetry. Cenarium (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Came off a week of semi-protection 27 November. No edits since then (by anyone) to the page until today, when the vandals evidently figured out the page was no longer protected. 20+ edits in the past 2 hours, all of which are either vandalism or the removal thereof. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 22:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:10A:8BDA:B11A:A11C:6DEE:38D5 (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 23:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP's keep coming back to leave disturbing messages. Long-term disruption. Sro23 (talk) 01:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Multiple cases of vandalism by unregistered users since November 21. Rose (talk) 17:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the news at the moment, a lot of vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator KrakatoaKatie. -- samtar talk or stalk 22:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Please unprotect this article as it has become outdated and i need help from other ip editors or wikipedia editors to improve upon this subject. This article is protected since May 2011 and now the vandalism will not happen after 6 years because of the time lapse and this article needs some up gradation in references and information. Regards L.D. (talk) . L.D. (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cenarium: -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: . User is autconfirmed and can edit the article and has been since before this request. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:27, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've reduced it to PC1, as the initial disruption that motivated the protection was bad (required oversight), and though it may well have died down by now, we should still be cautious. Cenarium (talk) 13:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06 December 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kellymoat (talk) 15:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Brianga (talk) 16:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kellymoat (talk) 15:50, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Brianga (talk) 16:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by User Damien2016 (talk · contribs). Please intervene, thanks. Barthateslisa (talk) 16:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Brianga (talk) 16:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unofficial trade reports being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not to tangle myself into this dispute, but it looks like very-recent news results show that the sale may be confirmed. Do you still think the page should be protected, or can it be updated with a reliable source now? Brianga (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)1[reply]
Baseball trades are not considered official until one or both of the teams involved officially announce the trade. Neither team involved has announced it yet; all of the reports about it are from unofficial sources. --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 18:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Just reviewed WP:SPORTSTRANS again.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 Week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Brianga (talk) 18:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unofficial trade reports being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 18:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Brianga (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — MBlaze Lightning T 19:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Temporary semi-protection has been enforced at least twice, and when it expires, the vandalism resumes. Andreas George Skinner (talk) 19:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Babymissfortune 07:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – This page has been and is continually being vandalized. Please look at the page history and protection log. Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think extended confirmed protection is necessary. Yaris678 (talk) 13:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors keep insisting some songs are singles when they are not. They were released as part of the original album, never released as singles. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP removing well referenced info for no reason. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Recently some editors (in IP) are regularly replacing text in the film's cast section, lead and infobox with abusive Malayalam words. Inserting foul language. It been few days since it started. Last stable revision. 117.250.244.90 (talk) 08:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please Semi Protect this article for one month because their is a lot Ip disruption going on. Regards,. L.D. (talk) 10:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 12:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal is back, immediately after the 24-hr protection was lifted. Wikishovel (talk) 11:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 12:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption by socks of banned User:HarveyCarter. Binksternet (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Technically I'm requesting a salting of this article, but the page hasn't been deleted yet (though it has been tagged for speedy deletion). Anyway, the article has been repeatedly recreated (by sockpuppets no less), and title needs to be salted once the page is deleted. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted and served with a dash of salt -- samtar talk or stalk 12:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create-protection: Repeatedly recreated. Please delete before Salting; and if the closing admin can block the persistent spammers (like Materialscientist did with the previous socks like Thaana Serndha Koottaam), that would be great... Lourdes 11:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted and salted, I'll have a look at the editors.. -- samtar talk or stalk 12:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated WP:Vandalism from mobile IPs. Warning has been given, but IP block is (I believe) not possible, as the IP keeps changing. Has been going on for weeks, if not months. Along with a string of vandalism and disruptive editing beforehand.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: As before, as soon as page comes off temporary semi-protection the same edit is made from new IP address belonging to same ISP. Perhaps longer protection is warranted. Dhtwiki (talk) 02:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from ip editor. NPalgan2 (talk) 04:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 week. Also blocked the IP and protected the article. Let me know if problems continue. EdJohnston (talk) 05:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection: lots of editing contents came from unofficial information. Naturezhang5 (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Tengger Cavalry. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nature Ganganbaigal. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit war / content conflict. The Banner talk 22:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. 219.79.180.166 (talk) 23:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent addition of unsourced content by IP hopper. JimRenge (talk) 01:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recurrent vandalism by anonymous IPs. 64.88.2.2 (talk) 16:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:SPA keeps trying to change article to be about a different company. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Page has been deleted. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jean Stair (talk) 18:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2602:306:3357:BA0:1856:CD51:E7BC:9F20 (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Brianga (talk) 17:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same persistent IP keeps removing content despite being told not to each time. The talk page may also need to be protected, as this same IP keeps removing legitimate talk page comments that relate to the article removal. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let me know if the talk page removals pick up. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism over the last week. John from Idegon (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from a user with a dynamic IP insistent on inserting non-notable self-published original research and edit-warring to keep said original research in the article.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 22:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term persistent high level of IP vandalism. Many reverts in history. —DIY Editor (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07 December 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recipient announced this morning, which has led to vandalism. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Panthéon-Assas University

Update to a month protection One user says in PA talk page he’s wanting to put what is in fact libelous statement in the article, even if I explained him how libelous his statements are. All the rankings issues would not need protection for now and admins could change it, but libel is serious, and we should at least wait for the admins to say if it is libelous or not. Everyone can see by himself that the quotes provided are not at all saying what the user says, and that even if these articles were saying that, without any court decision collaborating these alleged (and not existing) criminal activities inside this university, they would be themselves libelous and should not be repeated in Wikipedia. But they are not saying that at all anyway.

There is currently a thread in the ANI (admin attention at Sciences Po - they say PA is a rival from SP, so if SP have scandals - even with official sentences -, PA page should include equivalent statements - even if it is based on nothing for SP), I suggest then we wait until the admins have said something.

--Launebee (talk) 19:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

: Declined Page protection is not appropriate for use in a purely preventative measure. The proper use of page protection is when it is used in both a reactive and a preventative measure. No edits on this page have occurred since December 1st. If disruption begins to occur or escalate, feel free to re-report. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Derp ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated entry of fake information to disrupt the page from mobile IPs. Already had requested a couple days ago, got declined, but it's still happening on the page. It's been happening since months. It happened today. It's getting silly. Something really should be done. Kyo~ (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of copyright violation text. There are numerous related accounts editing similar articles with these problems. A report at ANI is likely. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Not seeing the copyvio. Where was it from? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 17:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 17:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption. Sagecandor (talk) 17:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Not likely to have vandalism, and it has been protected for nearly 5 years. 219.79.96.172 (talk) 14:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question:. Have you asked JamesBWatson? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you think the article is "not likely to have vandalism"? It has been repeatedly protected from January 2008 onwards because of vandalism, and each time protection has ended, a flood of vandalism has come. That happened over the course of several years. What reason is there to suppose it would be different now? I can unprotect the article, but my bet is that it will need to be back under protection again pretty soon. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Observation: @JamesBWatson: Would lowering the protection level to pending changes possibly work here? And if the vandals return, then you could re-apply semi-protection when needed again. 73.96.113.64 (talk) 04:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My experience over the years is that with articles like this, where vandalism is endemic for year after year by numerous different editors, pending changes is not very effective. Pending changes merely means that only logged-in editors see the vandalised version of the article; we still get just as many vandalism edits, and it is still necessary for other editors to spend time cleaning up the vandalism. Checking in the period just before I applied protection the last time, I find that almost all editing consisted of vandalism by unregistered or new editors followed by reverting by other editors. The amount of time wasting saved by protection was enormous, and the amount of collateral damage virtually nil, as you need to search through hundreds of vandalism edits to find even one or two constructive edits by non-confirmed editors. I'll try switching to pending changes, and if I'm proved wrong then I'll be delighted, but I don't hold out much hope that it will be effective. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article is under heavy vandalism these days. Kouhi (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP violations related to Pizzagate (conspiracy theory) by lots of incoming IP address users. Sagecandor (talk) 16:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Brianga (talk) 16:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles in the Buzz! series

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes protection: Persistent long term disruptive editing. Previous protection expired and vandalism returned. - X201 (talk) 14:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. IPs & Autoconfirmed. Jim1138 (talk) 11:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not yet. Looks like it's disruption by one user at the moment. Will keep eyes on the article, but protecting seems unnecessary at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The subject died. People started to vandalise the page. Saqib (talk) 12:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His death news has been confirmed here and here. He died in PIA Flight 661 crash. But plz page protection needed, Thanks! M. Billoo 15:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of vandalism is there on the page as the singer is recently died.Umair Aj (talk) 15:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Jimfbleak., after request was logged. Yaris678 (talk) 16:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – too many disruptive edits, also an upcoming holiday. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 13:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 16:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes Persistent disruptive editing – The subject is college football coach currently reported to have accepted a new job but without any level of confirmation. Repeated attempts being made to post the new job as fact without cited evidence. krizoitz(talk) 14:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fences and windows. for 2 hours, after request was logged. Yaris678 (talk) 16:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lost history of persistent disruptive edits from IP-hopping individual from range starting with 2a02. Deli nk (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 16:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP edit warrior (three reverts within the last four hours) has returned after previous 48-hour semi-prot expired. Request longer duration. Jeh (talk) 14:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 14:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unofficial trade reports being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 14:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 15:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unofficial trade reports being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 15:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. George Ho (talk) 07:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending chnages seems to be working. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason this article is very popular today with IP vandals. Yintan  12:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 12:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant WP:BLP concerns amid disruption from multiple different IP sources. Sagecandor (talk) 23:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Going to keep an eye on this page for now. Holding off. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done The page has been moved and Pending Changes protection applied by another admin. All set! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hume42 (talk) 05:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Vanamonde (talk) 07:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sorry to bug you, but there's been a bit of a struggle over this redirect. Onel5969 TT me 11:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 11:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Renewed edit warring. --evrik (talk) 04:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Only one edit in the last 48 hours. Take it to the talk page. Vanamonde (talk) 04:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Genre page that's consistently vandalized. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 08:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High-risk templates with more than 2000 uses, but template-protection seems overkill at this point. 219.79.96.172 (talk) 08:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor making changes that are consistently rejected but will not discuss changes. Semi-protection may help push them to use the talk page to discuss their changes. Ravensfire (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not enough recent disruption, and even if that were the case... Extended Confirmed Protection is not necessary when the disruption is caused solely by IP editors. Did you mean to ask for semi protection? Either way, doesn't appear necessary at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Oshwah: Yup, I meant to select regular semi-protection. The edits are pretty simple to revert and they rarely seem to try to edit-war over them, but my main hope for the semi is to get them to use the talk page. It's a IPv6 address that's very consistent (small range of variations, /64 I think) but a new one each time so communication is impossible. Understand though. Ravensfire (talk) 03:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Babymissfortune 03:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Vanamonde (talk) 04:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:109:A23F:D9A0:56E1:4B26:4B21 (talk) 04:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. One or more IP-Users do for weeks vandalize the article along a "Chaldean nationalist" narrative based on the Bible as primary source, destroying the internal links of the article and inventing unsourced content, arbitrarily changing names of institutions and else. See article history. The IPs are active since the account User:FPP was temporarily blocked for the same thing and briefly two new accounts appeared on the talk page. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Vandalism"? Where? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized by two IPs recently, apparently in reaction to this news story. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protection: Repeatedly created. 2601:1C0:106:F094:25FF:B018:8C1C:9DDA (talk) 04:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Espresso Addict. Vanamonde (talk) 04:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Author recreated immediately after being deleted once and having the reason explained to him by an administrator. . TonyBallioni (talk) 21:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not yet. I'm going to AGF and allow the user to learn. If it becomes blatantly disruptive, re-report and let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Author recreated immediately after being deleted once and having the reason explained to him by an administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not yet. I'm going to AGF and allow the user to learn. If it becomes blatantly disruptive, re-report and let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip edit warring. NPalgan2 (talk) 03:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Babymissfortune 04:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 04:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator MilborneOne. Vanamonde (talk) 04:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 22:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JayCoop: Declined - I have placed the article under an arbitration enforcement 1RR discretionary sanction...any users who have been notified of the discretionary sanctions who makes more than one revert in 24 hours may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator as an arbitration enforcement action. Ks0stm (TCGE) 23:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. gobonobo + c 02:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also blocked two IPs involved. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism, as with other upcoming holidays. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by IPs are continuing. Those IP users keep reverting my edits. Can it be protected? Beshogur (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User Beshogur tries to delete content without sufficient explanation. Furthermore, and more important, he tries to delete the fact that Mehmed Talat Pasha was a perpetrator of the Armenian Genocide. A completely analogous case has been discussed recently: [19], see also discussion in [20]. User Beshogur should stop disruptive editing and edit warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:77:4F39:4B41:B48E:CD2:911B:3D78 (talk) 20:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks to be over a content dispute. Article is fully protected in order to guide the editors involved towards dispute resolution. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's and new users keep trying to add NPOV-violating material to the lede. Sro23 (talk) 23:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:58, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The word weeaboo was adopted by 4-chan which is a known troll haven. I don't want to do this but given the recent vandalism I feel it is a likely target. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 21:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection 2602:306:3357:BA0:E086:AE3C:9BD:F59D (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection This dab page has recently been repeatedly hijacked by socks and IPs to create an amalgam of biographies of a non-notable individual named Sanjay Kumar and a non-notable cricketer by the same name. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sanjay_Mehta_07. Sanjay Mehta Cricketer has been repeatedly recreated by the same sockpuppeteer and if it isn't already salted that might be a good idea too. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – definitely a vandal target, probably prone to WP:RECENTISM. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 21:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA3. Shrike (talk) 09:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That kind of defeats the point, though, doesn't it? BethNaught (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging User:Sro23 to see if this is what is wanted. Brianga (talk) 18:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No thank you, it's supposed to not be protected. Sro23 (talk) 18:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Brianga (talk) 18:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 23:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-IP, coordonated via Twitter (cf article talk page for source). I hardly can keep up with the vandals. Admin required. --Yug (talk) 23:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, semi-protected for one month by KrakatoaKatie. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 23:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08 December 2016

Jaguar (microarchitecture) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Uncited edits from IPs have been repeatedly added, and reverted. The discussion on the talk page has gone ignored. Dbsseven (talk) 16:54, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Brianga (talk) 16:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Deal with the Red Sox is still pending, not acknowledged by the parties involved. This editing is disruptive. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A couple of IP vandalism due to current elections in Ghana and tension around the elections. Flixtey (talk) 21:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least till it's release date i.e. January 25, 2017. Jean Stair (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean Stair: Semi-protected one week and Pending-changes protected until February 9, 2017. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: We need to move Tyler Jones (baseball) to this location.[21]. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Samsara 19:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, working through AfC backlog and found a draft that has some good sources so I was going to accept, but a page by this title was salted six years ago, and protecting admin has since retired. Could the protection level be reduced please? (To save time, I'll note that some of the refs are trivial mentions but the WSJ and China Daily are both solid profiles, hence my thinking it's worth restoring.) Thanks! Innisfree987 (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Samsara 19:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least till it's release date i.e. January 25, 2017. Jean Stair (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean Stair: Semi-protected one week and Pending-changes protected until February 9, 2017. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: We need to move Tyler Jones (baseball) to this location.[22]. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Samsara 19:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, working through AfC backlog and found a draft that has some good sources so I was going to accept, but a page by this title was salted six years ago, and protecting admin has since retired. Could the protection level be reduced please? (To save time, I'll note that some of the refs are trivial mentions but the WSJ and China Daily are both solid profiles, hence my thinking it's worth restoring.) Thanks! Innisfree987 (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Samsara 19:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hollyckuhno (talk) 10:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has returned to insert false same false credit for voice role.Page was only unprotected a few days ago but this is clearly an ongoing issue caused by a dynamic ip. Request also applies to Doraemon: Gadget Cat from the Future,Stand by Me Doraemon as well as Yuri Lowenthal (false credit insertion), Johnny Yong Bosch (sourced credit removal).

All listed articles have been edited by IP for same reason - to change legitimate castings to false ones. Given them all the same protection would ensure that none of the articles are targeted during the protection of the others. SephyTheThird (talk) 12:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit isn't a problem. If it persists then let me know. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal(s) keeps removing large sections. Yintan  18:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some recent IP hopping vandals that can only be stopped with page protection. Kellymoat (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent POV-pushing by a highly uncivil IP editor. Borsoka (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous editor constantly reintroducing material removed for being unsourced. But ip not providing a single source. . Osterrich (talk) 18:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous editor constantly reintroducing material removed for being unsourced. But ip not providing a single source. . Osterrich (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous editor constantly reintroducing material removed for being unsourced. But ip not providing a single source. . Osterrich (talk) 18:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FrB.TG (talk) 09:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's not about content dispute. The article has been vandalized quite a few times in the past week. – FrB.TG (talk) 12:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For over a week now, every single edit has been vandalism or reverting vandalism by new users with no other edits other than vandalism. Dream Focus 12:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 13:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can you add "Semi-Protection", also, on top of this at the same time? Is that possible? Lots of incoming WP:BLP violations. Sagecandor (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I second this, and recommend a keen eye to escalate to full if necessary. TimothyJosephWood 16:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 16:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: WP:CRYSTAL violations relating to an unofficial free agent signing. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 16:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected by administrator CambridgeBayWeather. for 1 week. Neutralitytalk 02:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request: The description page at Commons is tagged PD-ineligible, would it be possible to update the local copy here? Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 11:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marvellous Spider-Man 10:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template editor protection This module is gradually being expanded to replace some of the utility templates used in the automated taxobox system that are currently coded in the template language, e.g. {{Autotaxobox colour}}. Since taxoboxes are used on a very large number of pages, templates that are used in creating them have almost always been given template editor protection. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 10:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 11:38, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Babymissfortune 10:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: I would like to have no one to be able to mess with my page. MON5T3R (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined According to current practices, we don't apply preemptive protection even to user pages. Vanamonde (talk) 06:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Although the RM ended, several editors suggested alternative titles for the article in the talk page, indicating the disdain toward the current title. George Ho (talk) 04:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not seeing disruption here, and we don't protect preemptively. Vanamonde (talk) 07:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: For a brief period - BLP vandalized 3 times today. Either protection or a block on the IP/troll account. Darouet (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Please report back here if there is evidence of IP hopping. Vanamonde (talk) 07:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes - I don't know why Cpt,Aldo Rain requested it, but putting the header above another without rationale would cause confusion on the bots. From the looks of it, pending changes might be needed. Also, lowercased "equality" to fix redirecting error. --George Ho (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have to say, though, that your rationale is rather confusing. I protected it because I can see infrequent disruption by IPs in the page history...Vanamonde (talk) 07:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'll rephrase, Vanamonde: The request was inserted poorly. The person who initially requested it forgot to add a rationale and put it below the "Fake headline news" header (or something like that). See that in the revision link? George Ho (talk) 08:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection 42.109.197.82 (talk) 07:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bencherlite. See below (duplicate reports). BencherliteTalk 09:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 150+ edits in the last 24 hours adding all kinds of nonsense. Impossible to track good edits from bad. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 07:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Saw this stupidity on the BBC live text commentary, as it happens, and fixed it before I saw this report. He's out now, anyway, so hopefully that will calm things down. BencherliteTalk 09:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 03:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unofficial free agent signing rumors being added. A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 04:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Can this page be semi protected, so that IP editors and new editors cannot remove the content regarding the statement that Imee Marcos' father was a dictator. There is about a million reliable sources stating that Marcos was a dictator, so this shouldn't be a controversial edit. Thanks. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 06:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from multiple ip editors. NPalgan2 (talk) 22:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Majority of edits since it came off of protection are vandalism/reversions. Reil (talk) 23:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs since yesterday (possible socks). FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 23:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 03:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Like Emma Swan and Regina Mills this page has been subject to strange, repeated vandalism through the past 24 hours. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 01:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent, pervasive vandalism by what appears to be one user, operating from multiple IPs and likely a child, since mid-November. Various registered users have helpfully tried to revert some of the damage but not gone back far enough in the article history; I took it back to November 20 before all the hundreds (literally) of additions of this type of content: [23]; [24]. I am compiling a list of IPs for an SPI although I doubt it will be of much use since they aren't static. Julietdeltalima (talk) 01:54, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can this get semi-protection in addition to the pending changes? Lots of incoming vandalism and disruption from IP sources. Sagecandor (talk) 17:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Pending ain't working. !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CambridgeBayWeather (talkcontribs) 17:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism to the infobox (several accounts adding "true love" to both Regina/Killian) and continuing to do so after warnings. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 21:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 02:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Seems there is someone who thinks they can get a sequel to Chappie made just by adding it to this template. They are willing to create socks. Related discussion can be seen here User talk:C.Fred#Obvious sock. MarnetteD|Talk 23:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. for 1 week. Neutralitytalk 02:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – A7 speedily deleted more than once, author has also previously tried to remove deletion tag. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 16:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. There's only one editor creating the article, and only twice. The editor can be blocked if appropriate. Brianga (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User has been blocked. GXXF TC 19:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see any inappropriate edits in the user talk page's history. Also, revoking talk page access would be the correct way to remedy this problem as opposed to applying full protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent name and height changes. – 🐈? (talk) 20:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 01:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

09 December 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the disruption is relatively less frequent. Vanamonde (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and edit-warring (5th December to Current). Full protection because one of the edit-warriors has extended confirmed and so that would be entirely ineffectual. Refer to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Continued for the continuation of the closed AN/I thread on this topic and to Talk:Haredi Judaism for the actual discussion. I don't want edit-warring blocks to be handed out and this seems like an amicable solution to stop the disruption. Thanks, Mr rnddude (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrade to pending Page has been indef semi since 2009, but the indef is the only entry in the protection log, so there isn't an established pattern of expiration and resumption of vandalism. Putting this here since the protecting admin, Brandon (talk · contribs) appears to be online only sporadically. TimothyJosephWood 13:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can we give this a couple of days to see if Brandon is back. They were earlier today. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No reason why a few days vs a few years should make a difference. TimothyJosephWood 00:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected -- samtar talk or stalk 15:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 00:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 03:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Fangusu. Grayfell (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  13:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Also vandalism. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 14:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 14:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term period of vandalism, potentially before June of 2016. All vandalism is in same vein (changing gov't information to dictatorship or "dicktatership" and erroneously referencing Hitler/Stalin, Nazis, Fascism, etc...) . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 14:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Some good; some bad. Most of reverted edits are vandalism or addition of unsourced content. George Ho (talk) 10:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not needed. Only two edits that were vandalism over the last few days. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – heavy IP vandalism for months. Wikishovel (talk) 13:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism resumed shortly after last protection ended. ⁓ Hello71 13:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated edit warring and vandalism by a series of UK based IPs (similar edits and likely one editor behind all edits). This page has been semi-protected twice in short order because of this activity.(Nov 23rd and 26th [[25]], [[26]]) IP editor does not engage in talk page discussions, reverts edits with "rrv" tag. Please consider longer semi-protection term. Springee (talk) 13:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppeting IP-hopping vandal. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppeting IP-hopping vandal. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Slow-motion bizarre vandalism" has returned. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 14:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The page history shows it is a target of unsourced content/promotion of a non-notable person. Sanglahi86 (talk) 05:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Issue is with a single user who has not been warned. Samsara 07:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 11:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Due to 4000 use. GXXF TC 19:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Is there a problem with the current TE protection? Also did you ask MSGJ? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-creation three times in the three months after the AFD. Not much chance of him becoming notable in the next six months or so. Wikishovel (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit shorter in recognition of the September AfD, which we're thus relying on to cover us for a total of eight months. Samsara 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi protection due to large influx of vandalism immediately after prior protection ended. Sagecandor (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP restoring the same overlong "armed with Chinese developed cannons, naval mines..." version of the lede again. McGeddon (talk) 09:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-creation three times in the three months after the AFD. Not much chance of him becoming notable in the next six months or so. Wikishovel (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit shorter in recognition of the September AfD, which we're thus relying on to cover us for a total of eight months. Samsara 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi protection due to large influx of vandalism immediately after prior protection ended. Sagecandor (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP restoring the same overlong "armed with Chinese developed cannons, naval mines..." version of the lede again. McGeddon (talk) 09:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-creation three times in the three months after the AFD. Not much chance of him becoming notable in the next six months or so. Wikishovel (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit shorter in recognition of the September AfD, which we're thus relying on to cover us for a total of eight months. Samsara 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi protection due to large influx of vandalism immediately after prior protection ended. Sagecandor (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP restoring the same overlong "armed with Chinese developed cannons, naval mines..." version of the lede again. McGeddon (talk) 09:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-creation three times in the three months after the AFD. Not much chance of him becoming notable in the next six months or so. Wikishovel (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit shorter in recognition of the September AfD, which we're thus relying on to cover us for a total of eight months. Samsara 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi protection due to large influx of vandalism immediately after prior protection ended. Sagecandor (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP restoring the same overlong "armed with Chinese developed cannons, naval mines..." version of the lede again. McGeddon (talk) 09:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-creation three times in the three months after the AFD. Not much chance of him becoming notable in the next six months or so. Wikishovel (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit shorter in recognition of the September AfD, which we're thus relying on to cover us for a total of eight months. Samsara 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi protection due to large influx of vandalism immediately after prior protection ended. Sagecandor (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP restoring the same overlong "armed with Chinese developed cannons, naval mines..." version of the lede again. McGeddon (talk) 09:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-creation three times in the three months after the AFD. Not much chance of him becoming notable in the next six months or so. Wikishovel (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit shorter in recognition of the September AfD, which we're thus relying on to cover us for a total of eight months. Samsara 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi protection due to large influx of vandalism immediately after prior protection ended. Sagecandor (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP restoring the same overlong "armed with Chinese developed cannons, naval mines..." version of the lede again. McGeddon (talk) 09:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Re-creation three times in the three months after the AFD. Not much chance of him becoming notable in the next six months or so. Wikishovel (talk) 05:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit shorter in recognition of the September AfD, which we're thus relying on to cover us for a total of eight months. Samsara 09:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request temporary semi protection due to large influx of vandalism immediately after prior protection ended. Sagecandor (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Shifting IP restoring the same overlong "armed with Chinese developed cannons, naval mines..." version of the lede again. McGeddon (talk) 09:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi. Constant vandalism over the past few days. White Arabian Filly Neigh 00:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People have started putting out inaccuracies due to the on going Presidential election in Ghana. Rberchie (talk) 05:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ghana is having its presidential elections and it is likely people will want to put out inaccuracies here for political expediency. Rberchie (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. Samsara 07:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor keeps removing information on the phrase being used as an alt-right dog whistle. See here. The user most likely has sockpuppets, see this edit. . ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Samsara 07:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Near constant IP vandalism in that anonymous editors, possibly one editor with a dynamic IP, constantly make the same unsourced edits in order to insert the same demonstratively incorrect information into the taxobox. Same IP vandal(s) also do the same at Coelophysis bauri.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor keeps removing information on the phrase being used as an alt-right dog whistle. See here. The user most likely has sockpuppets, see this edit. . ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Samsara 07:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Near constant IP vandalism in that anonymous editors, possibly one editor with a dynamic IP, constantly make the same unsourced edits in order to insert the same demonstratively incorrect information into the taxobox. Same IP vandal(s) also do the same at Coelophysis bauri.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor keeps removing information on the phrase being used as an alt-right dog whistle. See here. The user most likely has sockpuppets, see this edit. . ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Samsara 07:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Near constant IP vandalism in that anonymous editors, possibly one editor with a dynamic IP, constantly make the same unsourced edits in order to insert the same demonstratively incorrect information into the taxobox. Same IP vandal(s) also do the same at Coelophysis bauri.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rumored transaction, that has not been announced as completed. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Near constant IP vandalism in that anonymous editors, possibly one editor with a dynamic IP, constantly make the same unsourced edits in order to insert the same demonstratively incorrect information into the taxobox. Same IP vandal(s) also do the same at Coelophysis.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing WP:BLP issues by sockpuppet of a banned user. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rumored transaction, that has not been announced as completed. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Near constant IP vandalism in that anonymous editors, possibly one editor with a dynamic IP, constantly make the same unsourced edits in order to insert the same demonstratively incorrect information into the taxobox. Same IP vandal(s) also do the same at Coelophysis.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing WP:BLP issues by sockpuppet of a banned user. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rumored transaction, that has not been announced as completed. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Near constant IP vandalism in that anonymous editors, possibly one editor with a dynamic IP, constantly make the same unsourced edits in order to insert the same demonstratively incorrect information into the taxobox. Same IP vandal(s) also do the same at Coelophysis.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing WP:BLP issues by sockpuppet of a banned user. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rumored transaction, that has not been announced as completed. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Near constant IP vandalism in that anonymous editors, possibly one editor with a dynamic IP, constantly make the same unsourced edits in order to insert the same demonstratively incorrect information into the taxobox. Same IP vandal(s) also do the same at Coelophysis.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing WP:BLP issues by sockpuppet of a banned user. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:29, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Resumption of multiple IP vandals related to a content dispute resolved months ago on both Talks. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption by the banned editor Bigshowandkane64 (talk · contribs). Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sockpuppet of banned user. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Source says they're "nearing a deal", not that they have one. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. There are multiple IP users and newly registered accounts persistently adding the change. AlexEng(TALK) 03:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. APK whisper in my ear 03:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs and recently registered accounts. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and vandalism over name of school. -- Dane talk 05:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Source says they're "nearing a deal", not that they have one. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. There are multiple IP users and newly registered accounts persistently adding the change. AlexEng(TALK) 03:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. APK whisper in my ear 03:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs and recently registered accounts. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and vandalism over name of school. -- Dane talk 05:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Source says they're "nearing a deal", not that they have one. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. There are multiple IP users and newly registered accounts persistently adding the change. AlexEng(TALK) 03:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. APK whisper in my ear 03:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs and recently registered accounts. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and vandalism over name of school. -- Dane talk 05:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hume42 (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 64.114.207.234 (talk · contribs). Samsara 22:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs edit-warring across many articles. Dr. K. 22:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Dr.K.: This looks like a dispute. Has a talk page discussion been started about this? Samsara 22:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This IP is making mass changes across many articles changing templates without discussion. The IP is using socks to make these mass changes. Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 79.56.133.135. Dr. K. 23:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you'll forgive me if I don't consider that evidence, as all additions to that category were made by you. Samsara 23:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
These are bona-fide IP ducks. If you'd like I can open an SPI but that would be a waste of time, given the amount of evidence, based on edits and geolocation. Dr. K. 23:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two of the three IPs have made a small number of changes - in one case four, in another case eight to six separate articles. We do not exclude dynamic IP addresses from editing unless they are clearly disruptive - same as any other kind of user. What I see here is that neither the IP users nor you have discussed the issue on any talk page - correct me if I'm wrong. Samsara 23:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Normally, dynamic IPs making mass changes across many articles through edit-warring are considered disruptive and articles get protected to avoid that disruption. Obviously you don't agree in this particular case. I disagree with your conclusion but I don't think this noticeboard is a suitable place to have a disagreement over this. Dr. K. 23:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated one time. GXXF TC 23:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 23:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hume42 (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 64.114.207.234 (talk · contribs). Samsara 22:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs edit-warring across many articles. Dr. K. 22:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Dr.K.: This looks like a dispute. Has a talk page discussion been started about this? Samsara 22:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This IP is making mass changes across many articles changing templates without discussion. The IP is using socks to make these mass changes. Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 79.56.133.135. Dr. K. 23:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you'll forgive me if I don't consider that evidence, as all additions to that category were made by you. Samsara 23:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
These are bona-fide IP ducks. If you'd like I can open an SPI but that would be a waste of time, given the amount of evidence, based on edits and geolocation. Dr. K. 23:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two of the three IPs have made a small number of changes - in one case four, in another case eight to six separate articles. We do not exclude dynamic IP addresses from editing unless they are clearly disruptive - same as any other kind of user. What I see here is that neither the IP users nor you have discussed the issue on any talk page - correct me if I'm wrong. Samsara 23:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Normally, dynamic IPs making mass changes across many articles through edit-warring are considered disruptive and articles get protected to avoid that disruption. Obviously you don't agree in this particular case. I disagree with your conclusion but I don't think this noticeboard is a suitable place to have a disagreement over this. Dr. K. 23:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated one time. GXXF TC 23:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 23:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hume42 (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 64.114.207.234 (talk · contribs). Samsara 22:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs edit-warring across many articles. Dr. K. 22:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Dr.K.: This looks like a dispute. Has a talk page discussion been started about this? Samsara 22:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This IP is making mass changes across many articles changing templates without discussion. The IP is using socks to make these mass changes. Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 79.56.133.135. Dr. K. 23:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you'll forgive me if I don't consider that evidence, as all additions to that category were made by you. Samsara 23:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
These are bona-fide IP ducks. If you'd like I can open an SPI but that would be a waste of time, given the amount of evidence, based on edits and geolocation. Dr. K. 23:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two of the three IPs have made a small number of changes - in one case four, in another case eight to six separate articles. We do not exclude dynamic IP addresses from editing unless they are clearly disruptive - same as any other kind of user. What I see here is that neither the IP users nor you have discussed the issue on any talk page - correct me if I'm wrong. Samsara 23:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Normally, dynamic IPs making mass changes across many articles through edit-warring are considered disruptive and articles get protected to avoid that disruption. Obviously you don't agree in this particular case. I disagree with your conclusion but I don't think this noticeboard is a suitable place to have a disagreement over this. Dr. K. 23:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated one time. GXXF TC 23:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 23:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hume42 (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 64.114.207.234 (talk · contribs). Samsara 22:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs edit-warring across many articles. Dr. K. 22:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Dr.K.: This looks like a dispute. Has a talk page discussion been started about this? Samsara 22:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This IP is making mass changes across many articles changing templates without discussion. The IP is using socks to make these mass changes. Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 79.56.133.135. Dr. K. 23:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you'll forgive me if I don't consider that evidence, as all additions to that category were made by you. Samsara 23:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
These are bona-fide IP ducks. If you'd like I can open an SPI but that would be a waste of time, given the amount of evidence, based on edits and geolocation. Dr. K. 23:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two of the three IPs have made a small number of changes - in one case four, in another case eight to six separate articles. We do not exclude dynamic IP addresses from editing unless they are clearly disruptive - same as any other kind of user. What I see here is that neither the IP users nor you have discussed the issue on any talk page - correct me if I'm wrong. Samsara 23:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Normally, dynamic IPs making mass changes across many articles through edit-warring are considered disruptive and articles get protected to avoid that disruption. Obviously you don't agree in this particular case. I disagree with your conclusion but I don't think this noticeboard is a suitable place to have a disagreement over this. Dr. K. 23:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated one time. GXXF TC 23:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 23:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hume42 (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 64.114.207.234 (talk · contribs). Samsara 22:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs edit-warring across many articles. Dr. K. 22:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Dr.K.: This looks like a dispute. Has a talk page discussion been started about this? Samsara 22:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This IP is making mass changes across many articles changing templates without discussion. The IP is using socks to make these mass changes. Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 79.56.133.135. Dr. K. 23:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you'll forgive me if I don't consider that evidence, as all additions to that category were made by you. Samsara 23:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
These are bona-fide IP ducks. If you'd like I can open an SPI but that would be a waste of time, given the amount of evidence, based on edits and geolocation. Dr. K. 23:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Two of the three IPs have made a small number of changes - in one case four, in another case eight to six separate articles. We do not exclude dynamic IP addresses from editing unless they are clearly disruptive - same as any other kind of user. What I see here is that neither the IP users nor you have discussed the issue on any talk page - correct me if I'm wrong. Samsara 23:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Normally, dynamic IPs making mass changes across many articles through edit-warring are considered disruptive and articles get protected to avoid that disruption. Obviously you don't agree in this particular case. I disagree with your conclusion but I don't think this noticeboard is a suitable place to have a disagreement over this. Dr. K. 23:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 23:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated one time. GXXF TC 23:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 23:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – It is a controversial person. . Lt Timothy Robinson (talk) 14:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Has semi-protection proven to be ineffective? Can you provide specific examples? Brianga (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting that the semi was returned by me after this discussion. My opinion is that semi has worked well for this article. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I'm not seeing much in the way of BLP violations, vandalism, or addition of unsourced content by autoconfirmed editors in the last couple days that hasn't been promptly handled. Plus, if any one user is too disruptive to handle, the article is under {{2016 US Election AE}} discretionary sanctions, which can be used to combat persistent disruptive editing. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Even after requesting over a dozen times to discuss on Talk page, some users keep on deleting controversy section, which is fully cited. Please protect the page for some time. Rakesh.goyal2019 (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2607:fb90:44aa:e197:20c4:7cfc:63d0:d0ec (talk · contribs) blocked by Samsara. Samsara 20:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – I/P conflict. Shrike (talk) 07:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring between registered editors, even though there is discussion on the talk page. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 17:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn Article appears stable now. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 18:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor per above. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Widr. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continuous edit warring despite being asked to take it to talk page for consensus and being offered reasonable alternatives. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 20:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Only one edit warrior...feel free to re-request if they return or edit warring otherwise resumes. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring from multiple IPs from Lima, Peru. Binksternet (talk) 21:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: I keep seeing cases like these where there's a dispute and no discussion is offered by either side; rather, the "winning" side keeps telling the other side to discuss without themselves volunteering a section on the talk page. As such, I grant semi-protection somewhat hesitantly in this case and only because the situation has already escalated - which might have been prevented. Please make sure in cases like these that you open discussion so that we can clearly determine who has shown willingness to actually discuss. Thank you. Samsara 21:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the protection and for the advice about going to the talk page. Binksternet (talk) 21:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 2602:306:3357:BA0:D061:BDC8:C883:AA6 (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP editor has been trying to add a massive listing of events that has been determined multiple times to not be suitable for inclusion in this article. Primefac (talk) 22:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 December 2016

Protection not working -- non-autoconfirmed users and IPs still editing, requiring editors to check every trivial but potentially dubious edit, especially by IPs (see [27]). Quis separabit? 18:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent uptick in the sock puppetry from John Daker. -- Dane talk 19:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DoRD. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism since 22 November. Zupotachyon (talkcontribs) Ping me with {{SUBST:reply to|Zupotachyon}} 19:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Palestine-Israel articles Arbitration enforcement. The notice comes up when editing, but protection is not on the article.Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP with issues keeps editing the page. Probably shouldn't have been created in the first place (my fault) but I think now only deletion or protection will solve the issue. Primefac (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 18:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent headlines surrounding SOS pick rumors has already increased false information and vandalism on the page. Semmendinger (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Fuzheado | Talk 19:26, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: and delete the recent BLP violations from the edit history. QuackGuru (talk) 21:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Perpetual808 (talk · contribs) blocked by Fences and windows. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by various IP and new users. BattleshipMan (talk) 05:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 73.96.112.161 (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by various IP and new users. BattleshipMan (talk) 05:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent socking by IPs/new accounts. BilCat (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent socking. BilCat (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully they'll lose interest after a week -- samtar talk or stalk 17:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant IP vandalism. Statik N (talk) 17:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 17:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent unhelpful edits/edit warring by IP users. E.g. removal of source content, changing of the date to US-time rather than date used where the pageant is hosted.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. per previous vandalism -- samtar talk or stalk 17:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Wario-Man (talk) 17:23, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. per previous -- samtar talk or stalk 17:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content. Qed237 (talk) 17:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. per previous -- samtar talk or stalk 17:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued removal of referenced details by subject, who has attempted to set up their own "management monitored" wiki page which was swifly deleted (it seems the subject or one of them doesn't want a previous band mentioned). Previously protected on 22 June for 2 weeks - clearly much longer protection is neccessary here as repeated warnings to the various IP addresses they've edited from and current user name ESRaw89 have gone ignored79.69.114.241 (talk) 12:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Really? So just let the disruptive editing continue then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.114.241 (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would concur with Oshwah on this, and add that from the diffs, it looks like you have also removed prose and references in your "restore" edit. As an uninvolved person, it is not immediately clear to me why this was done. It gives the appearance of a dispute. If they continue their attempt to create a circular redirect, we will certainly do something about it. Samsara 14:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User from China continues to revert, has failed to understand MoS, repeated information, which is WP:Overlink or too many links. Govvy (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Govvy: If this is about the MoS, please explain this edit. Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Section headings seems to be a relevant section of the MoS. Samsara 14:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because there are two separate lists one saying director, one saying producer, but in reality he has produced and directed most of his films, I combined it into one table to make it simple with notes saying what he has done. So the way I did it is less repeated information. But the user from the Chinese IP reverted it back to the confusing two tables split by his acting credits in the middle, the original layout at the article before I went to improve it, is very poor. Govvy (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't sound like the edit I was pointing to. Samsara 14:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not on about the headings, I am on lists or tables of MoS, you have two tables more or less the same. This is off topic now, I am going to restore the table I did and the Chinese IP is just going to revert me probably. He/she hasn't replied to my comment on the talk page of the article. :/ Govvy (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Give it time, it's only been a few hours, and they may not be online. Ultimately, I can't protect on the supposition that they will ignore the recently posted discussion. Samsara 19:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 19:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow-motion bizzare long-term vandalism. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 15:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 15:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Actor who turns 100 today. Several instances of IP vandalism related to that milestone. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to be the normal amount of positive vs. negative edits from IPs. Samsara 20:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RolandR (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See sockpuppet investigation into user:Johngalea24. Repeatedly recreated at over 20 titles. Boleyn (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 19:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – persistent recreation - more than 20 times under different titles, see sockpuppet investigation into johngalea24. Boleyn (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 19:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over interpretation of a source and other unsourced assertions. PC ineffective, editors involved are extended-confirmed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: pushing of a fringe theory by an IP user (quite obviously a sock of User:Bosnipedian}. Borsoka (talk) 17:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Samsara can we extend a similar page protection - maybe not indefinite though as it's not a high traffic article, maybe a week? - to Tropolje, the IP editor has hopped to a new IP and continues to re-insert the same vandalism on that page. My keen eyes will remain on the page anyway. Mr rnddude (talk) 12:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sockpuppet of banned user Bigshowandkane64. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by sockpuppet of the banned user Bigshowandkane64. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by sockpuppet of the banned user Bigshowandkane64. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by sockpuppet of the banned user Bigshowandkane64. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ) 18:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 190.92.43.1 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Samsara 19:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP's are adding unreliable and unsourced content and some of them are removing sourced content. Need protection for at least a week...Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a majority of edits on the first page of revision history is vandalism, all happened today by multiple users. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 18:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

coordinated attacks on school articles

Temporary semi-protection: A coordinated attack by multiple IPs on these two Sacramento school articles. Meters (talk) 18:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of unsourced content amid job speculation. Lizard (talk) 21:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent vandalism from several IPs. IagoQnsi (talk) 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – over inflation of sales numbers and certifications by ip users. Kellymoat (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 23:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Samsara 05:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: (very long term). Recurring abuse by indef blocked user Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asdisis. Page was protected many times before: see [28] DVdm (talk) 23:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile IP 89.164.239.247 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) is blocked now, but they'll be back with a new address before we can say "Oops!". - DVdm (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'll wait for this request to be resolved. You know, I have a good idea. In the future I'll post the sources on the talk page and the request for page protection here so person in charge can decide between those two. That will save some disruption and time for you. 89.164.128.42 (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long term semi needed after disruption came back. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Lizard (talk) 03:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Future film articles

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Too soon to have these articles. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 03:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Protected for 2, 3, 4 and 5 years respectively. Samsara 05:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP hopping vandalism. 20 revisions with that equal 0 change. *IP user/range is the same as user vandalizing Kings of Leon discography. Kellymoat (talk) 03:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated insertion of unsourced material from IPv6 editors. Pointless to try to engage in any User talk dialog, as the IP changes with nearly every edit. John from Idegon (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent trolling by a long term abuser with an limitless supply of IP addresses. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There no diffs to support the claim of "trolling by a long term abuser". 31.54.202.134 (talk) 04:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IP 31.54.202.134|31.54.202.134 is the latest incarnation of User:Vote (X) for Change. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Stupid bullshit like this. Zagalejo^^^ 04:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, like this, regarding the conference standing of Ohio State. Mudwater (Talk) 05:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Would have happily protected on the 5th or 6th, but now it seems to have run out of steam. Samsara 06:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of both unsourced content and unreliable sourced content. Alex|The|Whovian? 06:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has attracted a stream of BLP violations in the last three days. John of Reading (talk) 07:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editors removing content against consensus; May be sock puppetry. -- Dane talk 07:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. Samsara 08:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 08:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 08:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – History of vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think indef is justified quite yet. Vanamonde (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection it was vandalized several times, someone mistakes this article for Digital Distortion. Kinda funny, but annoying. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 11:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. MPS1992 (talk) 13:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. Already semi-protected earlier, but continuous vandalism once protection expires.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 13:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Bigshowandkane64 socks IP hopping to add unsourced content. Sro23 (talk) 14:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent block evasion by User:Bigshowandkane64. Sro23 (talk) 14:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From semi protection to pending changes protection. Page has been indef semi since 2011, but the indef is the only entry in the Protection log, it is too excessive at this point. 219.79.226.129 (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes is for pages with a low edit volume. Even with protection enabled, this article is still fairly frequently edited. Samsara 15:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Draft:Klemen Pisk is ready to be accepted at AFC. The subject has received critical acclaim and awards since previous article creation attempts. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Samsara 06:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued removal of referenced details by subject, who has attempted to set up their own "management monitored" wiki page which was swifly deleted (it seems the subject or one of them doesn't want a previous band mentioned). Previously protected on 22 June for 2 weeks - clearly much longer protection is neccessary here as repeated warnings to the various IP addresses they've edited from and current user name ESRaw89 have gone ignored79.69.114.241 (talk) 12:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:27, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Really? So just let the disruptive editing continue then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.114.241 (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would concur with Oshwah on this, and add that from the diffs, it looks like you have also removed prose and references in your "restore" edit. As an uninvolved person, it is not immediately clear to me why this was done. It gives the appearance of a dispute. If they continue their attempt to create a circular redirect, we will certainly do something about it. Samsara 14:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User from China continues to revert, has failed to understand MoS, repeated information, which is WP:Overlink or too many links. Govvy (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Govvy: If this is about the MoS, please explain this edit. Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Section headings seems to be a relevant section of the MoS. Samsara 14:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because there are two separate lists one saying director, one saying producer, but in reality he has produced and directed most of his films, I combined it into one table to make it simple with notes saying what he has done. So the way I did it is less repeated information. But the user from the Chinese IP reverted it back to the confusing two tables split by his acting credits in the middle, the original layout at the article before I went to improve it, is very poor. Govvy (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't sound like the edit I was pointing to. Samsara 14:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am not on about the headings, I am on lists or tables of MoS, you have two tables more or less the same. This is off topic now, I am going to restore the table I did and the Chinese IP is just going to revert me probably. He/she hasn't replied to my comment on the talk page of the article. :/ Govvy (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Give it time, it's only been a few hours, and they may not be online. Ultimately, I can't protect on the supposition that they will ignore the recently posted discussion. Samsara 19:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Samsara 19:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow-motion bizzare long-term vandalism. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 15:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 15:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Actor who turns 100 today. Several instances of IP vandalism related to that milestone. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to be the normal amount of positive vs. negative edits from IPs. Samsara 20:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RolandR (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See sockpuppet investigation into user:Johngalea24. Repeatedly recreated at over 20 titles. Boleyn (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 19:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – persistent recreation - more than 20 times under different titles, see sockpuppet investigation into johngalea24. Boleyn (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 19:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over interpretation of a source and other unsourced assertions. PC ineffective, editors involved are extended-confirmed. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sockpuppet of banned user Bigshowandkane64. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by sockpuppet of the banned user Bigshowandkane64. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by sockpuppet of the banned user Bigshowandkane64. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 17:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by sockpuppet of the banned user Bigshowandkane64. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ) 18:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 190.92.43.1 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. Samsara 19:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP's are adding unreliable and unsourced content and some of them are removing sourced content. Need protection for at least a week...Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a majority of edits on the first page of revision history is vandalism, all happened today by multiple users. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 18:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

coordinated attacks on school articles

Temporary semi-protection: A coordinated attack by multiple IPs on these two Sacramento school articles. Meters (talk) 18:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of unsourced content amid job speculation. Lizard (talk) 21:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of recent vandalism from several IPs. IagoQnsi (talk) 21:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – over inflation of sales numbers and certifications by ip users. Kellymoat (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 23:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Samsara 05:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: (very long term). Recurring abuse by indef blocked user Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asdisis. Page was protected many times before: see [29] DVdm (talk) 23:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile IP 89.164.239.247 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) is blocked now, but they'll be back with a new address before we can say "Oops!". - DVdm (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'll wait for this request to be resolved. You know, I have a good idea. In the future I'll post the sources on the talk page and the request for page protection here so person in charge can decide between those two. That will save some disruption and time for you. 89.164.128.42 (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long term semi needed after disruption came back. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Lizard (talk) 03:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Future film articles

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Too soon to have these articles. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 03:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Protected for 2, 3, 4 and 5 years respectively. Samsara 05:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP hopping vandalism. 20 revisions with that equal 0 change. *IP user/range is the same as user vandalizing Kings of Leon discography. Kellymoat (talk) 03:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated insertion of unsourced material from IPv6 editors. Pointless to try to engage in any User talk dialog, as the IP changes with nearly every edit. John from Idegon (talk) 04:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent trolling by a long term abuser with an limitless supply of IP addresses. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There no diffs to support the claim of "trolling by a long term abuser". 31.54.202.134 (talk) 04:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IP 31.54.202.134|31.54.202.134 is the latest incarnation of User:Vote (X) for Change. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Stupid bullshit like this. Zagalejo^^^ 04:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, like this, regarding the conference standing of Ohio State. Mudwater (Talk) 05:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Would have happily protected on the 5th or 6th, but now it seems to have run out of steam. Samsara 06:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 06:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of both unsourced content and unreliable sourced content. Alex|The|Whovian? 06:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 8 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has attracted a stream of BLP violations in the last three days. John of Reading (talk) 07:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editors removing content against consensus; May be sock puppetry. -- Dane talk 07:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. Samsara 08:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 08:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 08:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From semi protection to pending changes protection. Page has been indef semi since 2011, but the indef is the only entry in the Protection log, it is too excessive at this point. 219.79.226.129 (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Pending changes is for pages with a low edit volume. Even with protection enabled, this article is still fairly frequently edited. Samsara 15:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Draft:Klemen Pisk is ready to be accepted at AFC. The subject has received critical acclaim and awards since previous article creation attempts. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Samsara 06:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11 December 2016

Pending changes: Persistent blanking, replacement with promotional text, by IP editors over years. The article has never been protected and it's possible an IP might make a good contribution, such as digging out news sources. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive blanking over the past week: [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

pending changes: Persistent vandalism/BLP stupidity (no constructive edits in past three weeks) ... richi (hello) 20:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 20:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 20:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Meatpuppetry constantly blanking the asexuality section over the past couple weeks. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – People are trying to change his name to "rooster", I couldn't find sources relating to him being called a "rooster", maybe just an isolated incident. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 18:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing/vandalism which is likely to continue. Igor Bišćan (talk) 18:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent Malicious Vandalism disruptive editing – Continuous malicious vandalism, slander, direct insults on parents (the Russian Father) and towards the subject, addition of unsourced content by same group of people, various IPs (but lately from same person) 50.143.44.47 . Constant addings of slanderous and false statements and allegations about the subject which at his point are in the criminal realm of justice. All this has start it months ago at the same time with the divorce and custody battle of the subject. Requesting protection of the children from malicious reads about their father, no edits from unknown sources and full page protection until court case it is over. Thank you . I am the manager of Andre Birleanu www.supremeandre.com

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I would appreciate some eyes on this article -- samtar talk or stalk 18:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The 3rd creation after being CSD's each time. Promotional page. Cahk (talk) 08:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 17:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Many IPs are inserting the non existent title of "designated prime minister" at his infobox (see Talk). Alex2006 (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism stemming from several months. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 17:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP user has taken ownership of this page, and is deleting well sourced information. They've been questioned on this now, by other users in the talk page, and are acting in bad faith in that discussion.Senor Freebie (talk) 08:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 14:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated recent vandalism to national statistics; almost got missed a couple of times. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 15:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 15:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism. Don't know why it's being denied every time. A month or 2-3 weeks would do, for starters. Jean Stair (talk) 15:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. JimRenge (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 28 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Many IPs are inserting the name of Paolo Gentiloni as his (designated) successor at his infobox (see Talk at Gentiloni's article). Alex2006 (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anon vandalism all day today, since protection was lifted. Wikishovel (talk) 16:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP/POV-violating editing continued once partial protection expired. No subsequent discussion on the disputes on the talk page while it was protected. Ronz (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: An IP user has taken ownership of this page, and is deleting well sourced information. They've been questioned on this now, by other users in the talk page, and are acting in bad faith in that discussion.Senor Freebie (talk) 08:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 14:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated recent vandalism to national statistics; almost got missed a couple of times. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 15:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 15:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Slow-moving edit war about adding a section on the Kek Internet meme. Semi-protection has been ineffective and new editors keep adding it without obtaining Talk page consensus first, and this behaviour is likely to continue. Requesting escalation to 30/500 protection for 6 months. — JFG talk 09:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Some of the participants here have EC permission, and so EC protection would not be fair, since this seems to be a full-fledged, if not-quite-symmetric, content dispute. Vanamonde (talk) 10:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Rberchie (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP. Borsoka (talk) 14:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 14:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Primarily copyright infringement; perhaps a fortnight or a month of salting should do it (because I suspect the subject might be notable in some time, if not now). Lourdes 06:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined One recreation is not a problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP, Vandalism as reported at WP:BLPN. Sagecandor (talk) 11:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 11:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term protection for frequent bouts of namecruft. . John from Idegon (talk) 12:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think indef is justified yet, this has only been protected once before. Vanamonde (talk) 14:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IPs and new accounts, all sockpuppets. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 14:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 13:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 06:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The edits over the past couple of weeks cannot be characterized as vandalism. Please assume good faith. Even if the recent edits were vandalism, there wouldn't be enough activity to warrant protection. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. WNYY98 (talk) 10:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 10:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP accounts. Kellymoat (talk) 10:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three days of identical IP-hopping vandalism, since the last protection expired on the 8th. Wikishovel (talk) 10:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 04:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined IP editor already blocked. WNYY98, this does not meet the mark for protection; report at AIV (next time). Thanks, Drmies (talk) 04:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was not the reason I requested it, I did so because most recent IP/nonautoconfirmed edits were nonconstructive based on edit history. Perhaps pending changes protection would be better? --WNYY98 (talk) 04:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 08:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of random editing, possibly by COI users. PC for 1-2 weeks would help. Jean Stair (talk) 08:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:31, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent deletions of cited content. BilCat (talk) 05:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit-war between registered users over content dispute. Sagecandor (talk) 05:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hume42 (talk) 06:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same set of IPs have been adding unsourced content once again, even despite their previous blocks. Zappa24Mati 03:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Drbogdan (talk) 03:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and disruptive editing. -- Dane talk 03:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 01:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts to add unsourced content by IPs including a made up season title. I had recently scrubbed this article of unsourced content earlier today. —Farix (t | c) 02:03, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sight incress in number of vandal edits do in part to it being awarded to night. Dcheagletalkcontribs 02:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 daays, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Or indefinite extended confirmed, whichever works. Page has a long history of protection due to being targets of User:Jaredgk2008. Protection expired today and already the socks are back. Sro23 (talk) 15:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 20:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: apologies, I've edit conflicted with you and have opted to apply 2 weeks of protection to the article as it has been previously targeted by a long term socking vandal (The Suix). I'd welcome your opinion and will revert my protection if you believe this was inappropriate -- samtar talk or stalk 23:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine. Mine was in error. I thought that it was just one person harassing another. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the nature of the subject's audience and position as an online public figure, the page is at a high risk for widespread vandalism. KelliverLucklile (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- samtar talk or stalk 22:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 20:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not a popular page, but receives similar vandalism edits from IPs over a long period of time. Was protected last year but the problem persists. BurritoBazooka Talk Contribs 20:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 23:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Widr (talk) 23:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite or 6 month semi Protection May be Vandalism because of an Edit war. On The minecraft wiki, an edit war occoured, and afterword, extreme vandalism. Needs protection--Wyatt2049 | (talk)

Declined Semi would not prevent the edit war and one of the users has been banned " from the topics of social groups and religion (either separately or together) in relation to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan". CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits by IPs that are making it hard to keep this template accurate. I can't do it alone. Raymie (tc) 17:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 monthss, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 18:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We've got a decent consensus on the talk page, yet IPs and new users keep showing up and reverting well sourced stuff. It would be really helpful if we got this protected for a bit as has happened in the past. Thanks. Dbrodbeck (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: the article has been for years vandalised by a POV-pushing banned editor (Bosnipedian). Borsoka (talk) 20:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Article has previously been semi-protected for long periods at a time. Upon expiry of the most recent semi-protection an IP immediately added a large quantity of cruft / borderline spam to the article. Daveosaurus (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. opted to choose a slightly lower protection period and will watch the page. If it kicks off again after this lapse the next protection will be significantly longer -- samtar talk or stalk 22:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 22:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12 December 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The anonymous user is still changing the profile picture of Japanese voice actress Asami Imai and I think you guys have something to do with the blocked user Nipponese Dog Calvero who insists on vandalizing various items including this one. So protect this article indefinitely.148.0.113.38 (talk) 16:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrent, almost daily, but slow vandalism, mostly from anons. Perhaps a week of protection until the end of final exams in schools and colleges. . Caballero/Historiador 17:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renew pending changes protection: Please renew pending changes protection.VictoriaGraysonTalk 20:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article received once a protection period, but as it was some time ago, I'm going to justify the problem once again. Before I've promoted this to FL status, users added peak positions for Romanian charts - which btw is hard to find - without references; I found references and changed some positions when they were other like in the sources found by me. However, many IPs aren't ok with this fact and repeatedly change referenced peak positions with those unsourced ones from the past. Recently, there were as well unreferenced changes on her albums' sales figures. Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 16:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Widr. 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 19:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Drmies. 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 19:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-protection: High level of unregistered users vandalising the page. Dyolf87 (talk) 08:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I see a lot of editing but little in terms of reverting and vandalism. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of inappropriate comments by IP editors. . Magnolia677 (talk) 15:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 15:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Article was vandalised by LTA duck Sock not long after 30/500 protection expired. I strongly urge the reviewing admin to familiarise themselves with the sock as they often rotate their targets within the same group of articles to thin out the protection requests. This is not short term vandalism. SephyTheThird (talk) 11:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 9+ instances of vandalism since protection expired 5 days ago. -- ferret (talk) 12:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper repeatedly (going back several months) adding unsourced/hoax material on article about Philippine celibrity. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Examples include this and this. Seems to be the same IP, although they have been at it for days now.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Article was vandalised by LTA duck Sock not long after 30/500 protection expired. I strongly urge the reviewing admin to familiarise themselves with the sock as they often rotate their targets within the same group of articles to thin out the protection requests. This is not short term vandalism. SephyTheThird (talk) 11:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 9+ instances of vandalism since protection expired 5 days ago. -- ferret (talk) 12:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper repeatedly (going back several months) adding unsourced/hoax material on article about Philippine celibrity. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs after coming out of previous protection. Might need a longer duration. AIRcorn (talk) 02:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Mostly anonymous editors changing pronouns when this has been extensively discussed on the talk page. Subject does not actually identify as a male, changed her gender legally only to prove a political point. Pending change protection may be warranted here. — Confession0791 talk 08:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Player has been rumored to be going to another team. IP addresses are adding his new possible team without being official. GoPurple'nGold24 10:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection or pending changes: Persistent vandalism. 172.58.40.80 (talk) 21:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent level of IP vandalism. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 21:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive editing and reverts necessary, after IP editors clog article history. Alex|The|Whovian? 23:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 02:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:07, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Hopper vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 12:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Previous creation (before the one just deleted) was in 2012. Vanamonde (talk) 06:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Anonymous people repeatedly added an unverifiable birth year; I keep removing it over and over. This has been happening for two or three years. George Ho (talk) 19:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde (talk) 06:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also removed the current pending changes, though this can be re-added if necessary -- samtar talk or stalk 10:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP-hopping anonymous user. Removal of sourced material without explanation, addition of material without sources. Most edits are heavily POV, slanted to lessen the emphasis on the religion's white supremacist roots and doctrine. Rockypedia (talk) 23:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by another admin -- samtar talk or stalk 10:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Consistent changes of food to "edibles" based off of a pun, i.e. Pot and Cannabis, (edibles being a term for cannabis in pop culture.). Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:59, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous addition of unsourced content by IPs (presumably the same person) who have ignored notifications as well as in-article comments. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes level 1 protection: Ongoing edit war going back as far as 2013 whereby anonymous IP users keep re-adding two names to the list of 'other notables' against the consensus opinion of the regular, confirmed contributors — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curb Safe Charmer (talkcontribs) 18:08, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 06:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Following the 2016 US election, there is a lot of vandalism by IP users and new users since Donald Trump is a controversial president-elect. This is not likely to change for the near future. epicgenius (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by another admin -- samtar talk or stalk 10:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Probably only for a few hours because it's today's featured article. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 02:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socking user now trying cut-and-paste moves. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 02:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – As above. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 02:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. given the LTA -- samtar talk or stalk 10:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending changes, anonymous user keeps making unnecessary and unhelpful changes to article. MB298 (talk) 04:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals and drive-by edits a constant problem for this Featured article. Montanabw(talk) 05:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 10:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:24, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 09:59, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection: Lot's of edit-warring over contentious material in a BLP article. Étienne Dolet (talk) 05:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 09:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – File format used in many pages. GXXF TC 22:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 00:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Eric-Wester (talk) 03:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editing by IPs and new editor regarding Alexander Hamilton - John Laurens sexuality. Prior sock puppetry in the past over the same issue. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 22:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persisent block evasion by socker. Feinoha Talk 23:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Numerous IP's/new users making unsourced claims on this article. Sro23 (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 00:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant unsourced inaccurate IP vandalism. Frequent addition of information contradicting citations without edit summaries or countering citations. This is a discography page and the biography page for the group already has this level of protection. Cheetoburrito (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism without edit summaries or sources. This is a discography page and the biography page for the artist already has this level of protection. Cheetoburrito (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:08, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Council to all WikiProjects. GXXF TC 19:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BethNaught (talk) 21:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13 December 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected one month and Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the long history of vandalism and protections, Semi-protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fair amount of disruption lately, but the article also has a history of constructive edits by IPs/new users. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Regular LTA target--see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Teenage Fairytale Dropouts vandal. Has been semi'd four times in the past three months with durations ranging from ten to thirty days, with abuse invariably resuming shortly after expiration--within hours in most cases. --Finngall talk 17:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected one month and Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. This page (along with Heather O'Rourke) has been the target of the same IP hopping editor. The moment protection is removed from either page, the IP hopper starts up again. I ask that a lengthy period of protection is considered. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 15:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to request temporary upgrades to semi-protection if the volume of vandalism gets too high. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been the subject of nonsensical, unsourced and generally disruptive edits for several years. Editors have added unsourced content about intent to bury her in a specific cemetary, unsourced details regarding events that happened decades before the subject's birth, details about where the subject went to elementary school, changing terms such as "child" to "little girl" ([35], [36], [37], [38], [39]), adding deliberate factual errors ([40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]), referencing the individual wearing diapers while portraying a character in a TV movie, etc.
Please review the lengthy discussions on the talk page about these edits. The article has been protected twice already in 2016. Although this has been protected with pending-changes protection for one year, I am instead requesting indefinite full protection of this article. AldezD (talk) 18:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@AldezD: Fair enough. I really can't justify indefinite semi-protection or any protection level above semi-protection right now, so I went with semi-protection for one year and then pending changes for another year. If the disruption continues when the one year of semi-protection expires then we can consider indefinite semi-protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours and transfer can not take place until transfer window opens in January 2017. Qed237 (talk) 16:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 10 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to request an upgrade to semi-protection if the edit rate becomes too high for pending changes to be effective. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Soon after "Raymond" was reinserted in the title, another editor challenges it the second time this year. It was renamed back and forth in two RMs. I don't know whether the third RM this year makes the whole title debatable. George Ho (talk) 12:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Any admin can feel free to unprotect sooner than that if warranted. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal repeatedly removing referenced claim for several days. Wikishovel (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I.P.s have been vandalizing this page since Election Day -- Nov. 8, 2016 -- saying MSNBC has 'closed'. I don't expect this to stop anytime soon. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 13:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC). Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 13:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of five months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced collaborations being added repeatedly by an IP, possible block evasion per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johngalea24. McGeddon (talk) 13:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism is everywhere for this article... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 14:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara.. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FriyMan (talk) 15:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Feel free to request an upgrade to semi-protection if the volume proves to be too much for pending changes. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing of false numbers. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 07:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected three months and Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection edit warring against consensus by an anonymous editor using multiple IP ranges. Someguy1221 (talk) 09:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Randykitty.. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – If we take a look at the history of this article (e.g., in the last couple of months) it is persistently targeted by "funny" IP editors, especially during the Christmas season, so it might be advisable to put a semi-protection on the page, in order to discourage such nonconstructive edits. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 11:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protected similar to last year: Semi-protected one month and Pending-changes protected for a period of six weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism and addition of unsourced content. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 03:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – someone from multiple IP ranges insists on re-adding religion = Christianity in direct contravention of the template instructions and RS. Thanks. —ATS 🖖 talk 04:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Request to delete and create protect after that. Similar to Google Boys Arimalam which has been repeatedly recreated and has been create protected. If possible, spam block the editors please. Thanks. Lourdes 05:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MSGJ.. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 05:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection (perhaps 1 week) - move warring. Neutralitytalk 07:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No objections if another admin wants to remove/downgrade the move protection sooner than that, though. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Vandalbot + ARBCOM ruling. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 05:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 06:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. RSTech1 (talk) 06:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 06:31, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hume42 (talk) 04:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP edits here have high tendency to be vandalism, highly visible. WNYY98 (talk) 04:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The only vandalism this month has been from one IP today, so a block would be more appropriate. The IP stopped editing about 10 hours ago, so that's stale. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli conflict. WNYY98 (talk) 04:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a step ahead of you. Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 04:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated use of a primary source (twitter) to add negative material to a BLP. Vanamonde (talk) 03:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 14:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of a cited passage without adequate explanation. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 14:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Katietalk 14:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not indefinitely. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 14:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now made indefinite. 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 14:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued and relentless disruptive editing by anons regarding release dates. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the article is already under pending changes protection, and nothing happened in the last several days.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous user by IPs 2601:586:4b00:bf80:11b5:f1e8:e240:8f63, 2601:586:4b00:bf80:301a:3a1a:1a94:67cb, 2601:586:4b00:bf80:b9cb:1861:2dcb:5213 is engaged in an edit-war. The same edit-war is happening on High German languages, High German languages, High German languages. See also: Talk:High German languages#language family template. . ZH8000 (talk) 02:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - protection consistent with High German languages Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous user by IPs 2601:586:4b00:bf80:11b5:f1e8:e240:8f63, 2601:586:4b00:bf80:301a:3a1a:1a94:67cb, 2601:586:4b00:bf80:b9cb:1861:2dcb:5213 is engaged in an edit-war. The same edit-war is happening on High German languages, High German languages, High German languages. See also: Talk:High German languages#language family template. . ZH8000 (talk) 02:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - protection consistent with High German languages Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – rumors about where he will be coaching. WNYY98 (talk) 04:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There is too much activity to consider pending changes. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent IP vandalism, could be associated with end of semester/year in many schools, protected in past. WNYY98 (talk) 05:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of until Great Birnam Wood comes to Dunsinane Hill, or 3 days, whichever is shorter, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Tren Ligero GDL (talk) 21:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tren Ligero GDL: By <eswiki> do you mean this article is on the Spanish Wikipedia? I'm afraid we cannot protect articles on other Wikipedia projects - please contact the administrators on the Spanish Wikipedia -- samtar talk or stalk 21:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per the above. ~ Rob13Talk 01:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:101:B458:294F:5D86:34A8:5F22 (talk) 00:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Targeted by IP hopping sockpuppet, I posted an investigation at SPI but it has not received any attention from clerks/checkusers. WNYY98 (talk) 01:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. Working on other solutions. Don't worry! MusikAnimal talk 01:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous user by IPs 2601:586:4b00:bf80:11b5:f1e8:e240:8f63, 2601:586:4b00:bf80:301a:3a1a:1a94:67cb, 2601:586:4b00:bf80:b9cb:1861:2dcb:5213 is engaged in an edit-war. The same edit-war is happening on High German languages, High German languages, High German languages. See also: Talk:High German languages#language family template. . ZH8000 (talk) 02:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The radio station owner has an issue with me reverting them and now it seems they've resorted to edit warring as an IP, I've gone to the talkpage and have been ignored, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 02:43, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks AustralianRupert - much appreciated. –Davey2010Talk 03:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Derp vandal. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has repeatedly been vandalised. . Moamo (talk) 16:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. We are talking about two edit from the same IP, who has not even been warned.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, removal of sourced content. Nika de Hitch (talk) 19:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Once a month since September. Zupotachyon (talkcontribs) Ping me with {{SUBST:reply to|Zupotachyon}} 20:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP edits have high tendency to be vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continuous vandalism by IP (appears to be yet another sock) Meters (talk) 00:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately restarted by next sock when IP was blocked. Meters (talk) 01:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done for 2 days by Oshwah. 2601:1C0:10D:1BD1:54E4:7208:1CE2:E19F (talk) 02:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article has indefinite pending changes protection, which should not be changed or removed, but I was not sure if temporary semi protection could be added as well, given the recent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. JimRenge (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page has been move protected for over nine years now. It seems full protection was originally added in 2007 due to libel concerns, and then User:Causa sui reduced the protection level to move protection about a month later citing "enough protection". In that same spirit, and given that moves never were a problem for this page in the first place, I think we should remove the protection from this page. (Both protecting admins are now inactive; Causa sui stated that he was inactive in this discussion.). Brycehughes (talk) 21:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14 December 2016

Semi-protection: Consistently high levels of persistant IP vandalism, both current and historic, on the order of every other edit. Almost all are produced by unregistered IPs, including blanking, vulgarity, and apparent political motives. Kehkou (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Move protection unchanged -- samtar talk or stalk 21:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bouncing IP genre warring. Also The Dark Side of the Moon. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 21:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Widr -- samtar talk or stalk 21:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bradv 21:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP hopper. Jevansen (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP genre warring. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 21:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 21:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 21:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of fake players to squad from IP hopper. Jevansen (talk) 21:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 19:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 21:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 19:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am actually not sure that permanent protection wouldn't be justified, as there has been vandalism for a very long time. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – been deleted 4 times... 3 in the past 24 hours. . Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of indefinite time, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 21:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by new account. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Neutralitytalk 21:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is currently an edit war raging over the film's country of origin, with anonymous editors consistently going against both consensus and cited references to change the country from the United States (where the production companies are located) to Britain (because the film covers an incident in British history). No amount of discussion (on the talk page and at WP:Film) have dissuaded them. Temporary protection until more information is available should help. The Old JacobiteThe '45 17:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism for the last four days. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several editors (both IP and registered) adding unconstructive edits, verging on vandalism, to the lede. Mike1901 (talk) 18:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2607:FB90:8161:9BD2:0:47:3B24:3201 (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism since previous protection expired. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Page has been subject to several blankings in last 24 hours. WNYY98 (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 19:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors causing ruckus with insistent wordings and disruptive reversions, potential block evasion ViperSnake151  Talk  05:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Saqib (talk) 14:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism by numerous IPs since subject was sacked from the Birmingham club today. David Biddulph (talk) 15:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We Are Number One-related vandalism.  ONR  (talk)  15:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Drive-by tag bombing, BLP violations, non-neutral commentary, etc. etc. from new accounts. Drmies (talk) 17:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive IP vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 17:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 17:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Highly visible, stable, non-substituted template, could do with either semiprotection or template protection. Mike1901 (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Only around 500 transclusions, so I think semi is more appropriate MusikAnimal talk 18:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page should not exist but new users keep creating it either accidentally or as an act of deliberate vandalism. Everymorning (talk) 03:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson: I'll leave this one to you. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Everymorning: Thanks for pointing this out, and @Ks0stm: thanks for drawing it to my attention. Interestingly enough, I had no idea that this page had ever been created, let alone that it had been repeatedly created, as administrators just deleted it, without telling me. The first time, in 2014, was a good faith mistake, but all the others were vandalism by sockpuppets of one person. Since the vandalism creations were all in April and June of this year, there doesn't seem to be any pressing need to protect it, but I may as well, since there is no good reason for anyone to ever create it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Not only the article, two of us have a long dispute about linking the name of the person and using names. Can anyone reinsert "Raymond" or change the link back to "Raymond Chan Chi-chuen"? George Ho (talk) 07:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I have, however, warned both editors (Lmmnhn and George Ho) about edit-warring. In fact I very seriously considered blocking both of them immediately, as checking their editing history made it clear that they are both very well aware of the edit-warring policy, and so don't need a warning. Protection is not normally the way to deal with an edit-war between just two accounts. George Ho should also take note of the fact that asking for a page to be fully protected and one's own edit to be restored is not a good idea: that amounts to trying to use protection to "win" an edit-war, not to prevent disruptive editors from causing disruption to the page. See m:The Wrong Version. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as page protection expires, the same people (or person) is back to remove one specific paragraph off this BLP. It's clear the person or people will continue to remove the information if given the chance. IP address is too diverse to just do a range block. Cahk (talk) 17:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The problem has not yet been going on for long enough to justify indefinite protection. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism over several days. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 18:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP plot bloats. Snuggums (talk / edits) 09:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I have checked every IP edit for several months back, and every revert of an IP edit, and nothing there seems out of the normal range of content disagreement. There has been slow edit-warring over one detail, but if I were to take any action to stop the IP editor involved in that edit-war, then I would also block the other editor taking part in the same edit war, namely SNUGGUMS. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs repeatedly removing AfD template, no other edits since October. McGeddon (talk) 09:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 13:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I believe that all articles about countries should be protected. Today, the page was vandalised by ip user, which led to an edit war. . FriyMan (talk) 11:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also my related request on the Administrator noticeboard concerning the edit-warring by User:Balki Chalkidiki here:
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Balki_Chalkidiki_reported_by_User:2A1ZA_(Result:_)
It is in process for more than a day, I would very much appreciate an administrator to take action. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., can be extended to infinite after expiration if needed. There are occasionally good IP edits, and therefore pending changes are preferable.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 13:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see any recent evidence of confirmed accounts being used to disrupt the page, so I've opted just to semi-protect for now. Obviously if this does happen please re-request here or drop me a message -- samtar talk or stalk 13:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Comstant reversion of edits relating to downloadable content, which was removed through consensus on talk page. Nordic Nightfury 12:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nordic Nightfury: Not sure what exactly you want me to do, here. There's not really enough activity to justify semi-protection at the moment, but I could be persuaded to pending changes protect if you think that would help. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ks0stm: Ok, I will observe and re-nominate for PC protection when appropriate. At the moment editing seems to have died down on the page. Nordic Nightfury 07:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor (for the bot) tutterMouse (talk) 08:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and new user vandalism. First Light (talk) 08:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Protected by Materialscientist) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 03:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 05:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Just to protect the page. MON5T3R (talk) 03:14, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We need a reason to protect. From my own assessment, I can say disruption is infrequent and the article is already under pending-changes protection. No action needed MusikAnimal talk 05:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Page was hit by a vandal not 10 minutes after semi-protection wore off. He plays for the Dallas Cowboys; this will continue. Lizard (talk) 03:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. Previous semi was because the edit rate was too high for PC. Edit rate seems average now, so let's let PC do its thing MusikAnimal talk 05:14, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attracting a lot of vandalism today. Yintan  05:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: edit-warring after warning by multiple IPs (dynamic and probably too large to rangeblock) and a new account, all involving apparent ref-spam. DMacks (talk) 23:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent addition of information that is unsourced or poorly sourced. livelikemusic talk! 23:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 07:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Molecule Extraction (talk) 05:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – G doodle. Widefox; talk 00:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 05:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 03:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. but not EC-protected. I personally don't see enough related content to constitute WP:ARBPIA MusikAnimal talk 05:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 03:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 05:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 11:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended or indef semi Very nearly the only activity on this page for two years has been the addition and reversion of the same poorly sourced content. Looks like user:CambridgeBayWeather attempted to semi in October, but something must have gone wrong since disruption resumed two days later. TimothyJosephWood 20:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't semi protected, it was pending changes protected for one month. Looking at the history no edits by confirmed user or ips have been useful in a long time other than one revert by an ip of the poorly sourced material. The person who wants the info has yet to discuss anything. - GB fan 00:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is currently a very popular post on Reddit (https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/5i6ovu/slight_improvement_in_wikipedia_picture_caption/) and is getting a lot of IP vandalism in the past hours. This could go up as the reddit post gains even more traction. Lookunder (talk) 03:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sysops, I know it's not up for a vote or anything of the sort, but I'd like to echo Lookunder's sentiments. I tried to request protection only to find this request was already in. A few days' protection should suffice to keep away ill-intentioned redditors away. Doesn't even have to be semi-protection; I think pending changes would suffice. Amccann421 (talk) 04:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 04:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In this case, this appeared to be IP vandalism, so I've semi'd for a day. This didn't seem to be related to ARBPIA in that regard (though if an admin wishes to adjust this to EC, I'd be fine with that). RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected @RickinBaltimore: This was a government set up by Israel to govern only the territories that remain disputed between Israel and Palestine, so it is intrinsically part of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. My apologies for not asking you prior to raising protection; I saw your response here a while after I protected the page. ~ Rob13Talk 17:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of uncivil remark constantly being reverted. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death of high-profiled actor; extreme on-going editing happening on recent life event. livelikemusic talk! 02:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Dr. Neurosis (talk) 20:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – This person has an unknown number of autoconfirmed sleeper sock accounts so extended confirmed is needed to end this ridiculous edit war. Leave expiry time up to the protecting admin's discretion. . Sro23 (talk) 00:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Barek. MusikAnimal talk 00:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 02:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not seeing as clear of a connection to ARBPIA here. Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing key people parameter. -- ferret (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Many unhelpful/unsourced IP edits on this ongoing event. Mezigue (talk) 22:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If another admin wants to add ECP go for it. It seems semi will work just fine here, and in fact the vandal from earlier today seems to have moved on. The last spree of disruption before that was back in February, again from anons – making ECP unnecessary MusikAnimal talk 00:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP and WP:SPA vandalism from the minute the last protection expired. Wikishovel (talk) 20:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Previous protection expired, sockpuppetry resumed. Tesla (talk) 21:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Perhaps because it's a Christmas film, this article has become a sudden target for vandalism. Temporary protection should be sufficient to dissuade them. The Old JacobiteThe '45 21:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Eightnisan 08:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please feel free to re-request if the volume picks up somewhat. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – I think it would be better for I.P. editors and users not having extended confirmed status and higher to be blocked on editing this article. Too many vandalism made by both I.P. editors and some registered users. ~Manila's PogingJuan 15:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The current 'pending changes' status, I think, is not enough. ~Manila's PogingJuan 15:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The edit rate does not appear to be too high for pending changes recently, and I'm not seeing any recent vandalism from autoconfirmed users. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – disruption. Mainsacool (talk) 16:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random vandalism by IP's. Subject is currently in the news and the article is drawing more attention than normal. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected one week and Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is vandalized so often that its history shows more edits related to vandalism than to proper content. And all of them come from anons. Consider giving the article a low-level protection indefinitely. . Caballero/Historiador 20:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Fuzheado | Talk 22:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Heavy IP vandalism after being cut from team. Lizard (talk) 21:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Fuzheado | Talk 22:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I would like to create this page as I have found material and content that can establish notability and verifiability as per WP:Policies. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 10:43, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a draft article written? tutterMouse (talk) 14:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@TheMagnificentist: Done by reducing create protection to extended confirmed. Ks0stm (TCGE) 19:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15 December 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 15:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we get protection longer than 6 hours on here please? Vandalism is persistent. Brycehughes (talk) 16:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotional editing (look at the language in the lead, and the linkfarm) by now-block avoiding IPs. Drmies (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and unsourced BLP-editing by socks of AdnanAdnanAliAfzal and various IPs. GermanJoe (talk) 15:17, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 17:14, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – For two months, adding continuous speculative contestants from semi-registered users without giving sources. ApprenticeFan work 15:35, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism over the last 48 hours from multiple IP addresses on two Vodafone IP ranges. Closeapple (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Attempting to remove low-quality TV screenshot "logo" taken by camera which is well out-of-date and not needed in article per WP:NFCC#9 but IP continues to bounce addresses and restore the image despite several warnings. Need a week to allow the orphan process to propagate. Nate (chatter) 16:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:28, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Too easy for autoconfirmed users to come by and edit. Recommend full protection so that edits are parsed by experienced (and NPOV) editors. Terminate protection in 2 weeks. – S. Rich (talk) 05:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Too easy for autoconfirmed users to edit" is not a policy-based reason for protection, sorry. I'm seeing some disruption, but also some amount of consensus building on the talk, so holding off for now. Vanamonde (talk) 09:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: frequent IP edits that violate NPOV. The edits relate to a collision between Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg at the 2016 Spanish Grand Prix; the article states that they made contact and retired, but the IP editor keeps changing it to say Rosberg caused the collision. As Rosberg narrowly won the championship, the implication of these edits is that Rosberg deliberately took Hamilton out of the race and is an undeserving champion. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 10:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by multiple IPs. DrStrauss talk 12:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:20, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Babymissfortune 12:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Extended-Confirmed Protection: Per a large amount of edit warring, mostly by IPs and autoconfirmed users, I request permanent extended-confirmed protection until the edit warring is resolved and the subsequent users are warned or banned. Once the issue is resolved, I will issue a removal of protection order. The 3RR investigations should be all done by the end of the year at longest, but I am requesting permanent E-CP as an insurance policy to make sure it is resolved without issue. UN$¢_Łuke_1Ø21Repørts 13:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. I regularly look through the sockpuppet investigation list to see if I can makes sense of anything and possibly help out, and noticed this one. It falls under edit warring as well, which is why I opened both this request and an edit war investigation. BS like this editwarring-sockpuppet combination needs to stop. UN$¢_Łuke_1Ø21Repørts 14:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EC isn't warranted at this point. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Too many unsourced and unconstructive edits by IPs. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 13:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:06, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – massive vandalism, again, it must be protection for a longer period of time. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 14:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Own userspace. Babymissfortune 14:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The show has now finished, and there is no more additions of unsourced content, so I don't really see a need for Pending Changes any more. . Class455 (talk) 11:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging MelanieN (who last protected it) and Vanamonde93 (who added auto-review permission) per above statement. Nordic Nightfury 15:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I added semi-protection which has expired. Vanamonde93 added PC protection which expires Jan. 31. If the current history suggests PC is no longer needed, I think it should be up to Vanamonde to make that call. --MelanieN (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There have not been any reverts of pending edits for two weeks +, so okay,  Done. Vanamonde (talk) 11:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already unprotected by administrator Vanamonde93. For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IPs is increasing in frequency. No constructive edits from unconfirmed users for at least the last four months. Funcrunch (talk) 07:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:14, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Apparently someone thinks it's cute to keep adding a line about him being called "Frenkenstein". Different IP addresses....possible sock puppetry. RSTech1 (talk) 09:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Samsara 10:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – They really need to sort this out through RSN or an RfC, but in the meantime could someone fully protect this page to stop the edit warring?. Doug Weller talk 10:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism - Repeated changes to spouse's name, often to another actor by many IPs. - Flami72 (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 08:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC just isn't cutting it. Almost all of the IP/new account edits are vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:35, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: One recent vandal blocked by Materialscientist. Samsara 09:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree with the sentiment that PC allows too much disruption to occur at this point, no matter what blocks we make after the fact. Samsara 09:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Following an incident with this politician, 2 IPs, one almost-confirmed user, and two auto-confirmed users have added WP:BLP violations to the article. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 22:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of sourced section on sexual assault based only on user opinion. -- Dane talk 04:26, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of non-notable children names by various IPs. Not happening at Jensen Ackles b/c it is protected. Please protect this page for as long as possible. Thank you. Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders06:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 09:20, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon (talkcontribs) Ping me with {{SUBST:reply to|Zupotachyon}} 07:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – I.P. claims this file is {{PD-US-no-notice}}, but provides no proof. They don't want to search for themselves to prove their claim, and then the tell me to 'shut up'. IP seems to refuse to cooperate. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 23:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Edit warring seems to have died down on its own. I'll keep an eye on the page in case the issue recurs. Huon (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Being the fourth anniversary and all, I think these pages should get more attention. Info2Learn (talk) 00:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting is protected, and the other doesn't appear to need to be at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism to page. livelikemusic talk! 01:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:47, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing, more recently edit warring. Adog104 Talk to me 03:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism. —DangerousJXD (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism. —DangerousJXD (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Palestine-Israel articles Arbitration enforcement. The notice comes up when editing, but protection is not on the article.Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. (my first EC protection!) -- samtar talk or stalk 13:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Used in many templates. GXXF TC 20:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No unconstructive edits since May 2015, so no need for even semi-protection let alone full. BencherliteTalk 20:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after expiry of last protection; has increased over the past week. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: On-going content dispute. Efforts on talk page to come to agreement have failed. Current protection ends tomorrow. --evrik (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Extended confirmed protection will not help here. If you simply utilize the talk page to reach consensus, there is no need for protection, anyway. Please note edit warring is not acceptable, and we can't keep fully protecting the page because of it. Blocks may be in order if this behaviour continues MusikAnimal talk 18:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – noticed a lot of edit wars here. DrStrauss talk 16:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP Block evasion of 179.7.208.162 and 70.79.57.78. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 22:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by various IPs and targeted trolling by off-site attacks. KingAntenor (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gadfium. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Increased level of IP vandalism spamming affiliate links Techfs (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent, if low level, vandalism by IPs and new users since it became a GA in September. There is an additional problem that there seem to be very few other users "watching" this article - unsurprising considering how few active members there are of WP:CONGO. It means that the article quality could deteriorate very quickly if I were to take a wikibreak. Plus, I'm reluctant to open myself to charges of page ownership. —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – High level of IP edits where sources for items appear to be incorrect - the official trailer for the movie was released today,. Nordic Nightfury 19:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Diary of a Wimpy Kid (film series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: This Article has frequently been vandalized at least 3 times in a row for the past 3 months by an unknown user who keeps adding information to a movie that does not even exsist. Zucat (talk) 20:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – free agent signing not completely finalized as of now. WNYY98 (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Image vandalism from multiple IPs. This has been occurring since at least September 30, 2016. Sunmist (talk) 21:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:08, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16 December 2016

Semi-protection: IPs, who I do believe all represent one person, keep removing "derogatory" from the definition (disruptively IMO), and registered users have little chance against them unless they want to edit war. Bishonen | talk 17:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Will never stop otherwise. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 19:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Could be open to some vandalism as it is related to an upcoming holiday, protect until New Years. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 13:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 14:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – The past year has seen a lot of vandalism and a multitude of BLP issues on this page. Requesting permanent protection after someone changed the details around his conviction recently. Karst (talk) 17:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Karst, "full protection" would mean only admins can edit the article. I don't think that was what you wanted — anyway, it's not going to happen at present. Bishonen | talk 17:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I would like to create this page. I have found material that can establish notability and verifiability. - TheMagnificentist 07:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As articles of this name have been deleted four times previously due to lack of notability and verifiability, I'd suggest creating a draft article in your own userspace first before you try creating something in article space. Prioryman (talk) 12:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Please create a draft first. Katietalk 14:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Evking22 (talk) 03:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Went quiet after user warning. Watchlisted. Samsara 11:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – all editors added from a promotional or advertisment materials in WP:BLP content. Oripaypaykim (talk) 14:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. RSTech1 (talk) 16:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tempted to extended confirmed protect this under the WP:ARBPIA remedy, but I'm not sure it's related enough to that. Any other admins have opinions on this? Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Given the disruption was only from anons, I'd settle for semi. But I play by different rules :) If I were to go by the auto-ECP stuff, I would say this marginally meets ARBPIA. Content directly related to the conflict appears to be contained within one section, and with limited prose. Digging through, I see good edits from users who aren't extended confirmed, but it seems disruption from unconfirmed users is ongoing, so I wouldn't oppose a more lengthy semi MusikAnimal talk 00:54, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note that it was semi-protected by Ponyo for a day. After this semi-prtection expires, I would opt for a long-term semi (such as 6 months or a year) and see whether additional disruption arises.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd agree with the suggestion of long-term semi: and I'll implement it myself later, unless objections are raised. @Ymblanter, Ks0stm, and MusikAnimal: Vanamonde (talk) 09:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have at it, I'd say. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto MusikAnimal talk 20:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Marvellous Spider-Man 06:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Mafaz. Administrators can see the page creators name and file SPI. --Marvellous Spider-Man 06:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done by administrator MER-C. Katietalk 14:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of endorsements and advertising. Karst (talk) 11:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 14:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent reverting by an IP-hopping anonymous user. Prioryman (talk) 12:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 01:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rotating IPs keep removing content/blanking the page for about a week now. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User page harassment by multiple block-evading IPs. General Ization Talk 05:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and about to get much worse. Also, there's one named account who also appears to be participating in the hijinks, User:Rossbawse Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DMacks. Samsara 10:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 2601:1C0:104:8367:C952:30B9:C2AC:DB4C (talk) 23:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected MusikAnimal talk 00:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:10D:DF68:C4BF:61A:58AA:6A92 (talk) 00:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistently false information getting live again and again with a reference link on which content doesn't exists.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Widr (talk) 18:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP hopper has resumed sockpuppetry and edit warring. This is the third time the behaviour has resumed on this article after a period of semi-protection, so please could we get a long period of protection, if indefinite isn't possible?. Marianna251TALK 21:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Check talk page to see this person for who they are and there intentions are before blocking. Don't get blindsided.59.96.166.70 (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. Elisfkc (talk) 22:28, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 23:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by multiple IPs today. Deli nk (talk) 20:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:26, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As well, the person in the article recently died so I think it'd be good if we stopped the disruptive edits quickly. – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 20:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still being vandalized at a rapid pace by multiple people. – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 22:14, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much IP vandalism, a lot of reverts and removal of sources. it should be protected, as fresh subject. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 22:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing . TheWarOfArt (talk) 19:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP Keeps adding Syndicated shows that do not have specific air times . Digifan23 (talk) 19:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same nonsense that got the page protected the last time has returned. Majora (talk) 19:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:56, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP and new user vandalism the last couple of days. Deli nk (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article on main page and is being vandalized because of it. Tesla (talk) 21:55, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17 December 2016

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 12:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Open AfD, no hoppers. Blocks can be used if needed, not protection. Samsara 15:58, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 3RR issue. Karst (talk) 14:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done May be eligible for blocks and is now discussed at edit warring nb. Samsara 15:46, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant harassment by socks of User:Profile101. No reason for IPs to edit, but can set up a new (unprotected) page for IPs to place comments. Snöggletög Nightfury Happy Christmas!! 20:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Opted to just go for 1 month here - they may give up. Obviously, if this continues when the protection lapses we'll look at other options -- samtar talk or stalk 21:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nordic Nightfury: Quick ping to let you know I've done this, and to remind you to create a page for IPs/unconfirmed users to leave you messages -- samtar talk or stalk 21:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create-protection: Repeatedly recreated by multiple WP:SOCKs. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of disruptive edits from two anon editors who have received multiple warnings. Both using different IPs on same ranges.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  13:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Antiochus the Great (talk) 17:09, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Website is claiming it's sponsoring the bowl, when it, in reality, isn't: http://www.barstoolsports.com/chicago/presenting-the-official-logo-for-the-the-boca-raton-wet-the-beak-ponzi-scheme-awareness-bowl-presented-by-pardon-my-take-presented-by-barstool-sports/. X96lee15 (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Website is claiming it's sponsoring the bowl, when it, in reality, isn't: http://www.barstoolsports.com/chicago/presenting-the-official-logo-for-the-the-boca-raton-wet-the-beak-ponzi-scheme-awareness-bowl-presented-by-pardon-my-take-presented-by-barstool-sports/

This and the 2016 instance article have been vandalized because of this the past few days. X96lee15 (talk) 18:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping editor/vandal who persistently alters (against MOS:FULLNAME etc) subject's real name. Warnings no use because they keep changing their IP. Shearonink (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Same question as above. Samsara 19:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spa ip editor accusing another editor of vandalism which is not just removing weasel words and intricate detail that was previously removed. IP editor is making threats and multiple reversion a. Pleas protect for some period. Bythebooklibrary (talk) 13:42, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection (longer term than before): immediately after previous protection expiration, renewed numerology junk addition by ever changing IP (same person as before). - DVdm (talk) 16:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: High level of IP vandalism and spurious username edits, sensitive topic, article is in disarray with more and more new subsections exceeding recommended data limits. Slowing the stream of edits would likely be helpful. IronMaidenRocks (talk) 01:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as proposed because of likely collateral damage. @IronMaidenRocks: If the size problem really cannot be handled any other way, I would suggest full protection for a short time (i.e. hours, not days) while you work on a draft copy to reduce size, with a subsequent histmerge. Samsara 08:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the edit rate, I'm really not convinced it's particularly high - no edits yesterday between 8:19 and 16:15 (8 hours), and no human edits since 4:07 last night until I looked today. If a larger group of established editors is needed to help with shortening and/or vandal watch, I'm sure it can be found. Samsara 10:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  07:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 12:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 16 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The one editor who engaged in constant addition of images doesn't seem to be ready to discuss the issue. I think full protection is not working here and a block is in line if this happens again. Regards. —UY Scuti Talk 07:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question:. Have you asked MilborneOne? They were the protecting admin. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq
I dont have a problem with removing the protection as User:UY Scuti says we can deal with the editor for being disruptive if they carry on. MilborneOne (talk) 12:09, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected MilborneOne (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by a hopping IP 151.67.*.* over the last 10 days. The IP is trying to redo the template to make Buddhism/Jainism/etc appear as a part of Hinduism. Invitation to the user to read the extensive discussions and RfC on the page, as well to a direct request yesterday has been fruitless so far. Requesting a 2 or 4 week semi-protection, whatever makes sense in such cases. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 02:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ymblanter. We conflicted on that. Changed it back. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
CambridgeBayWeather, indefinite is even a better idea. I will configure it now.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page keeps being changed by IP users who are not citing sources. Groups such as these often face vandalism from those who dislike them. bojo1498 talk 04:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
04:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ Rob13Talk 05:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous semiprot expired, since then almost every edit has been further vandalism. -- ferret (talk) 01:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The last vandalism was 27 November. Vandalism count may be low, but it's been happening this year. George Ho (talk) 06:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:50, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 06:46, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:47, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/format breaking by single user including img violations. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 19:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 19:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-Confirmed Protection: Own user page. UN$¢_Łuke_1Ø21Repørts 19:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @UNSC Luke 1021: I won't grant EC protection in this case as it is only to be used in cases where semi has proven not to work, but I will give you semi. I assume you want it to be indefinite? Also, I looked at your contributions to confirm you are a user in good standing - can you please use edit summaries in future? Thank you. Samsara 20:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Just re-checked the policy, and it says no, as there is not a demonstrated need. Your userpage has never been vandalised, and we don't protect pre-emptively. Samsara 20:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 23:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuation of unconstructive editing from one user using a range of IP addresses. They waited until the previous protection expired. -- Fyrael (talk) 22:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As soon as the article became unprotected, IP Vandal returned. -- Dane talk 22:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Adog104 Talk to me 22:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The pageant finishes on Sunday. In the meantime IP editors are putting in the 'winner'. Page protection till the 20th would be helpful. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18 December 2016

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 08:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The page was protected to "pending changes status" by NeilN on 1 July 2016 for 6 months. The protection is due to expire in two weeks, and since being protected the disruptive editing hasn't ceased. Blocking won't help as the disruptive editing is done by IP's. Requesting to increase protection to semi-protected as "pending changes status" still requires editors to waste time reverting these disruptive edits, and regardless at the minimum current status should be extended. Thanks, --SuperJew (talk) 09:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, a large proportion of recent edits by Ips are constructive and have been accepted by PC reviewers.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I want to create this page. I have created a draft here and have established notability for music (charted album). GNG can also be established with reliable secondary sources such as 1, 2, 3. The draft is not finished. - TheMagnificentist 16:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you asked RHaworth? They were the protecting admin. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 00:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs only contributing POV, possible sockpuppetry. Qzd (talk) 03:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Infobox edit-warring from IP. Mezigue (talk) 11:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 19:09, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dennis Bratland (talk) 07:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Editorial disagreement that needs to be hashed out in article discission. The current version edited by Carlton should work, so as to stabilize the BLP until a solution can be found. Jack Sebastian (talk) 07:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Jack, for a case like this you want full protection. I'd up the request there. Daniel Case (talk) 07:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We aren't dealing with rampant IP vandalism; its just editorial disagreement, and no one has called anyone a feltch monkey yet,so i think we can all let our better natures prevail until we find a solution. Fullprot seems like overkill, or rather, 'a solution in search of a problem'. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 07:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should have blocked but... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:29, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Reversion war. Kenton M (talk) 03:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP, high IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 05:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The1337gamer (talk) 23:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Almost none of the stuff in that article seems to be sourced. Which is a really bad idea for a BLP. O_o Samsara 23:42, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address keeps blanking. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 23:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 23:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editors are being disruptive and some continue to remove the description of Hart's gender identity. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 23:42, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last activity was 27 Nov. Samsara 23:47, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated 3 times after deletion discussion. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 01:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected MusikAnimal talk 02:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of disruption from IPs. . K.e.coffman (talk) 16:47, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @K.e.coffman: I find it difficult to evaluate this as vandalism - at first assessment, it looks like a dispute over whether Swedish sources can be used to make statements about a Danish political party. Three sources are from Danish domains, the rest are Swedish and in fact duplicated (this would be a simple copy-editing fix). So I see that one side is potentially inflating sources, the other until recently was removing sourced statements, but seems to have now settled on leaving a POV tag at the top of the article, and is in fact clamouring for discussion. So my current inclination is to decline this request as a dispute and recommend dispute resolution. Do you have any further comments on this? Samsara 17:11, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'll shortly close this as declined (dispute resolution) - unless someone wants to offer a second opinion here. Samsara 20:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The IPs editing the article are removing perfectly well-sourced text in a tendentious way, IMO. Denying that the Swedish Expo is a reliable source is absurd. But I wouldn't exactly call it vandalism — it's more in the nature of using dynamic IPs to avoid being pinned down. But that's allowed (sigh). It may be as well to decline semi for now and see if dispute resolution will do anything, Samsara — if not, I may possibly semi it later, if things go from bad to worse. Anyway, I'll be watching the article. (I can read Danish and Swedish.) Bishonen | talk 20:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  • Great - thanks for the comment and the watching. With your Danish+Swedish expertise, you'll do a better job than I could have. I'll just mention for completeness that some ISPs dynamically reallocate IP addresses with no user input - I often see allegations of deliberate "hopping" from those who are not aware of the nature of dynamic IP allocation. It isn't always malicious. :) Samsara 21:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 21:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Seen a lot of vandalism . MON5T3R (talk) 19:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 20:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ViperSnake151  Talk  20:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 20:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 00:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 01:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism continued shortly after the previous protection had expired. Requesting longer period, to expire shortly after the contest has concluded (13 May 2017). Wes Mouse Talk 17:46, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I see a lot of editing but not much in the way of back and forth. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I think more anon users are going to put fake information in it.. Pachisu124 (talk) 22:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal who persistently alters (against MOS:FULLNAME etc) subject's real name. Warnings no use because they keep changing their IP. Shearonink (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Shearonink: In their latest edit, they added new material relative to the previous ones, but you reverted "as before". Was the addition inaccurate? Samsara 19:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that they are adding the military title as if it is the person's name. For instance, the George Washington article doesn't delineate the subject in the lede sentence as General George Washington or President George Washington...he is delineated as "George Washington [birthdate] was a soldier and..." I am AGF'ing here, but they are apparently hopping from IP to IP, and there has been no response to any of the various notices or warnings left on their talkpages. If it is the same person, so far the recent IPs have all been in the 41.137.59.xx range: 41.137.59.72, 41.137.59.80, 41.137.59.69, & 41.137.59.64. (Other IPs in the 41.137.59.xx range - like 41.137.59.117 - have been doing similar edits to related Warner/Dandridge/Washington family articles...but that's a matter for another noticeboard.) Shearonink (talk) 03:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Geez, I've been looking at some other articles for research and have found that some biographical articles have the title in the lede sentence (John Dandridge, George S. Patton), but then some don't (like George Marshall, Robert E. Lee). It still doesn't seem correct according to Wikipedia rules to have the military rank incorporated into the subject's name in the lede sentence. Shearonink (talk) 03:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you still haven't seen it, but in the latest edit they also added "was a Virginia planter, politician, and landowner", which you hard-reverted with an edit summary of "as before", even though it was not "as before". I fail to see how that particular change they made was bad. Samsara 08:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that before I checked in here. I'll go in and change the name back to the name Warner actually had and leave yet another notice that his name is his name for yet another IP. This editor has again changed multiple biographical articles in the same fashion, inserting the "Col." abbreviation for Colonel into the lede as if that is the person's name.... I suppose I'll change all those back to the actual name too - an ongoing issue is that the 41.137.59.xx editor (assuming that they are all the same person) has never responded to any notices or posts on their various user talk pages. Shearonink (talk) 15:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Besides the MOS:FULLNAME issue, did some further digging and was unable to find any references that back up claimed military rank. Shearonink (talk) 17:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Shearonink: If it's a pattern across multiple articles and they can be shown to have ignored already-initiated talk page discussions, it makes sense to protect all affected pages in the same fashion (i.e. we'd need to compile a reasonably comprehensive list of these and semi-protect them all). Right now, I see that the talk pages, Talk:Augustine Warner and Talk:Augustine Warner, Jr. are empty. Can you point to a venue where you have initiated discussion that they have ignored? Thanks. Samsara 17:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A venue...how about the notices on the associated user-talk pages, the various edit-summaries on the articles have all been ignored. It sounds like you think I should post a thread regarding MOS:FULLNAME, unsupported changes, etc., on the individual talk pages of every single Warner/Washington/Lee article that this pattern of editing by the 41.137.59.xx editor has emerged upon... Alrighty then. Shearonink (talk) 17:45, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Discussion continued at my talk page. Samsara 19:11, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now. Ongoing discussion as to more appropriate remedies. Samsara 20:21, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 23:58, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Widely-used guide, recent unnecessary IP tampering. Don't see need for IP to have instant access to edit (guide pretty much stands completed, that is, generally speaking). Pending changes could, perhaps, allow IPs to submit relevant changes if need be. JustBerry (talk) 02:47, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long-running dispute over nationality. prmcd16 👽 (u)(t) 17:50, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Prmcd16: If you have no evidence to establish that he is Czech, I suggest simply removing that statement altogether, and you have no dispute. Samsara 18:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: I think the statement's been there for a while, so couldn't removing it prompt yet another war of people replacing and removing it? --prmcd16 👽 (u)(t) 19:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Prmcd16: If it's unsupported by sources and contested, convention is to remove it. That is something I can enforce with reverts, protection, blocks, etc. as needed. I'm not going to protect a contested version unsupported by sources, which it sounds like you're asking us to do. Samsara 19:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[46], for example--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Given that it's already a dispute, perhaps a source that isn't either Polish or Czech would be even better. Samsara 19:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okiedokie. Just thought I'd ask. I withdraw the request. --prmcd16 👽 (u)(t) 19:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 00:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19 December 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppets attacking the article and remove the sources, it should be protected for some time . Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 14:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 15:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. A belligerent, already-twice-blocked IP is repeatedly adding, and adding back after removal (by at least two editors), unsourced and obviously unreliably sourced content to this BLP. Judging by past behaviour, they won't stop unless the article is protected or the IP is blocked. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 19:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Longterm target of IP and new user vandalism. --Ebyabe talk - State of the Union20:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism from multiple IPs. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 21:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A variable IP, of the 103.105.xxx.xxx range, keeps on removing the footnotes. –HTD 14:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    • Or pending changes could be used too. This is a variable IP so communicating with this person isn't a good idea as he/she wouldn't be able to read it once he/she edits again. –HTD 14:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I see no compelling reason for this to be in template namespace. If we move it to main space, we can apply pending changes, but not in template namespace. Samsara 15:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I could understand that, but this is an election results template that's standard pretty much everywhere. Granted, this is not how usually election results are formatted, though. –HTD 17:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As for pending changes, I guess there'd be no reason for this to be edited anyway, as this was an election held in 2001, and the terms of office those elected ended in 2007 (2004 for one winning candidate). In other words, there's no need for the template to be changed. If pending changes is not allowed, maybe a temporary semi-protection is in order? –HTD 17:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 20 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Libreboot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP regularly changes female name to male name. The person in question is transgender and her new name is fully documented in external sources. ~nmaia d 18:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 15 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is in response to ongoing disruption by IP sockpuppets of Shingling334 (WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Shingling334). Recommending one month of at least pending changes protection. Largoplazo (talk) 18:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users, they keep changing the word "Arabian" to "Persian". Abdelaziz1889 (talk) 18:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles in the Buzz! series

Pending Changes protection: Persistent long term disruptive editing. This is the third request, previous protections expired and vandalism returned. - X201 (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. for all. Samsara 18:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding transfer rumour. I don't want to get blocked for reverting this. SLBedit (talk) 17:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Numerous block evading IPsocks of Gerry1214 (talk · contribs · logs) SPI filed . Toddst1 (talk) 17:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Samsara 18:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Issue with IPs changing the season despite the hidden note telling them otherwise. JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Violations of Biographics of living person. 219.79.96.247 (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Dee03 16:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Only used on 15 articles. Why is this templateeditor'd?. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Fuhghettaboutit as most recent protection changer, Rich Farmbrough as original protector. Samsara 20:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected ping Rich Farmbrough Samsara 20:30, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I lowered the protection from full to allow template editors access when we first created the template editor right, but I was not considering when doing that, whether the original full protection was or was not not needed in the first place. Certainly you're right that it's not high use.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:47, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I just added it to Template:Trivia templates see-also as it seemed to belong there. It may not be used because of low visibility, or perhaps redundancy. One way or another, I wonder if its nondescriptive name has doomed it. Samsara 21:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would say semi is enough (not sure if we had semi back then). All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:18, 17 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
@KATMAKROFAN: Are you interested in working on this template, or asking out of principle? Samsara 23:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Samsara 16:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated copyright violations. Doug Weller talk 15:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal attacks returned today, just as the last protection expired. Deli nk (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism –

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if it's a sock or what but an IP has constantly vandalised these articles (changing various days and changing various days), This has gone since January[47] and clearly who ever this person is they're not ever going to go so I'm requesting indef protection, Temporary protection would obviously stop the issue however that'd only be temporary so once expired they'd simply return so am asking for indef, Thanks,. –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 14:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by deliberate factual errors. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by deliberate factual errors. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:: High level of vandalism by block evading IP jumper. TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring of unregistered IPs. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 13:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Used by over 10k pages at the moment, meaning a higher likelihood of unintentional breakage. Primefac (talk) 14:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 14:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 14:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of the article has left Fifth Harmony; as a result this will probably lead to increased vandalism/BLP violations on the page. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor off a recent ban for vandalizing this page is back. Request a PP cooling off period of a few days. Stesmo (talk) 07:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – last 50 edits have been mostly vandals and reverts, with next to no useful information added. Kellymoat (talk) 12:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 36 hours of heavy IP and new WP:SPA vandalism, since the last protection expired. Wikishovel (talk) 13:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As this gentleman is in the news at this very moment, the IP brigade are going doolally in his article. Can we please have a semi-protection for a couple of days till all the fuss dies down a bit? And so that the article can be rectified. Thanks. Jack | talk page 10:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 16 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page being constantly vandalised as it reflects the recent achievement of a player. Vensatry (talk) 11:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 16 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reduction in protection level: From full protection to template editor protection because the page needs an update according to independent sources and the latest developments. Page does not provide sufficent sources and does not include recent developments as stated in the latest ITU Bulletin from 01.12.2016 [1] or RFERL [2] . Also the informations about ownership of the dialing code are wrong since there is no such data available yet. Declaration on MTS d.o.o is also wrong according to the latest official statement by the EU on the deal. [3]

References

Declined. Template does not exist and never has. The article Telephone numbers in Kosovo is already semi-protected and I'm not removing it at this time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I think more people are going to put fake stuff in there. Pachisu124 (talk) 01:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 98.115.103.203 (talk · contribs) blocked by GorillaWarfare. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from anonymous users. Ostrichyearning (talk) 01:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The page was semiprotected in October 2012 before the release of the film. I don't know why it should remain protected four years later. 2405:204:5483:6140:2503:649:B33E:DBBF (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you asked Casliber? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected let's see how it goes Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over content. BilCat (talk) 23:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both editors CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very known programming language.. GXXF TC 00:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism, including users changing the results of the pageant (which happened 2 years ago). { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 00:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just until the next season ends, to prevent spoilers regarding possible returning players. Greggens (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 21:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some reason Zzuuzz is not protecting his own page? He's an admin and appears to be recently active. — Maile (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get easily offended, it's better there than elsewhere, and I also get the notification that it's time for another block. I'll not be here all night however, so if it gets boring feel free to protect it. It might defer elsewhere however, so more range blocks might be handy. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The most vandalised of three New Radicals articles. Group of IPs has been adding unsourced, opinionated and often BLP-violating statements since October. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 23:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – For obvious reasons. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BU Rob13. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. My Chemistry romantic (talk) 07:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry/disruptive editing. My Chemistry romantic (talk) 07:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, article's edit summaries are used as message board for threats and cheats. Yintan  07:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:55, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock puppets of a hoaxer keep targeting this template. Latest sock said in an edit summary, "I can keep on doing this all day long". See User talk:CommanderShinzon#Blocked for an explanation of this drama. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GB fan. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism --Bozalegenda (talk) 02:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 weeek, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Savage is being ravaged by IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 04:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kuru. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jean Stair (talk) 19:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Chase (talk | contributions) 19:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bad season, recently fired. See also EF log. Dat GuyTalkContribs 23:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Somebody dislikes the redirect and prefer to create a content fork of Lake (disambiguation). The Banner talk 15:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be the target of a vandal using floating IPs. 331dot (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The IP has been blocked. Oshwah is an admin who has the ability to protect his own talk page. — Maile (talk) 22:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits being added by multiple IPs despite there being a citation in place that contradicts the unsourced edits. I say maybe 1-3 days would be enough to wait this out. – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 18:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death vandal. Karst (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Deli nk (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stop edit warring and work it out on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 00:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent levels of IP vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple users keep adding unsourced content, most are not autoconfirmed and the latest are IPs. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 17:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – again, we must protect this again. Too much IP vandalism, removal of sources etc. Please, protect it again for a longer period of time . Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 12:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continuous disruptive and unsourced editing from IP editors. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 14:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A large number of "blanking" incidents, leading to the block of one editor followed by the rapid creation of another account who persisted with the vandalism. . Exemplo347 (talk) 14:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

comment can we maybe get ECP? User keeps making new socks. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz.. MelanieN (talk) 00:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Within my userspace. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 22:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20 December 2016

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent edits from ip users that need reverted. Kellymoat (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Explain it to me - the article says the single was announced on 4th Dec, with a source. Samsara 20:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Kellymoat: Pinging, see above. Samsara 20:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But the release date (not the announcement date) is only part of the reverted edits. All from IP users. Which is why the rpp.talk) 20:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
When is the release date? According to this, it's already charting. Samsara 20:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The latest single/song has charted, and actually charted before the announcement. I believe the release date was the 12th, others have other ideas.
But, this is the album page, not a song page. There is more needing reverted than just the date of a song. Kellymoat (talk) 20:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it has stopped. Samsara 17:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full move protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Requesting temporary move protection only. Rambunctious editors have been moving the article back and forth between titles. The current title has some level of consensus and any further moves should come from a new consensus. - MrX 13:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected – I've applied indefinite move protection. If you want longer semiprotection for the text, wait a bit and then re-apply. EdJohnston (talk) 21:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Linguist Moi? Moi. 19:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 week. EdJohnston (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I'm requesting page protection on this because of the recent events and disruptive edits (speculation) taking place on the page. There have been no links drawn to ISIS at all for the Berlin attack, but some editors are insistent on speculating. I'm requesting page protection for a week (pending changes) so the facts can be determined. st170etalk 11:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., today (not unexpectedly) too frequently edited for pending changes. If problems persist after the protection has expired, we can install pending changes.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same IP-hopping vandal attacking Lucifer, Ishtar, Soul, Lilith has been constantly adding WP:original research commentary so inane so as to border on blatant vandalism.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – user request, no longer using this page anymore. Sro23 (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 20:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we get semi protection on this article at least until the holiday is over, there is an increase in vandalism that requires pending change reviewers. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸(talk) 19:54, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Heated edit warring. Request temp full until issues resolved in the multiple talk page discussions. . Keri (talk) 09:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would not help IMO - one users is edit-warring against multiple users, and at the same time the discussion on the talk page is ongoing. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined One edit on December 20 (so far) - any edit warring that may have occurred seems to have stopped and it appears that proper dispute resolution is being practiced with relevant talk page discussions. If this changes, please re-report. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 11:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IOS changing sourced content, several editors reverting but a block or semi would be better. Doug Weller talk 13:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IP user should have been warned. Samsara 17:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring against multiple users to keep inappropriate external links on the page from a dynamic IP. Hasn't / won't engage on the talk page, lets see if a semi protect gets them there to discuss. MrOllie (talk) 15:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Beetstra. Samsara 17:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Too many unconstructive edits by IPs, just look at the first page of revision history. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 17:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandlism. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 02:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours`, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done tutterMouse (talk) 11:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:10D:6C7F:51C7:F676:3CA7:B49 (talk) 06:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. While the vandalism by the IP was certainly numerous and disruptive, I usually hold off from applying protection to an article if such disruption was made by only one user or IP. If more users or IPs begin to add vandalism onto this article, let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. —Farix (t | c) 10:26, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think just semi protection for a while would be fine. Brycehughes (talk) 03:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see a high volume of vandalism since the page protection has exired. If the rate of disruption or vandalism starts to increase significantly, please re-report. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – "Pinoy GTA"-related vandalism by a user obsessed with juxtaposing unrelated local celebrity references to Grand Theft Auto articles. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Disruption doesn't appear to be at a high enough rate to warrant protection at this time. If the rate of disruption becomes significant, re-report. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 07:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – BLP content unsourced and not NPOV edits have occurred. May increase due to current events. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I don't see it yet, but it's possible. Too early to call. Samsara 18:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 02:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Given temporary create protection in the past for two days, and recreated after expired. Possibly try for a week this time?. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:10D:6C7F:51C7:F676:3CA7:B49 (talk) 06:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 23:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks to be under control right now. Samsara 00:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks to be under control right now. Samsara 01:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Immediate continual of disruption after previous protection period expiry, last applied by Oshwah. 73.96.114.227 (talk) 04:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a constant flow of vandalism over the past 30 minutes from an IP address. Can the page be temporarily protected to discourage them, please?. BritishGuy (talk) 22:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 00:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an IP-hopping vandal who has returned to the page now that it has learned that semi-protection has expired.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to the controversial outgoing governor of North Carolina. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism/copyvios. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Recent (possible) terror attack. Speculation is rampant in the article, please reign in. --bender235 (talk) 21:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to be working fine right now. Samsara 22:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Class455 (Merry Christmas!) 21:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Admins are at the scene. Samsara 22:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 01:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – I only just realised, after this unconstructive edit that this template was not protected, unlike its companion templates {{infobox television}} and {{infobox television episode}}. AussieLegend () 02:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP address vandalism. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 02:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A large amount of disruptive vandalism and BLP violations since the latest temporary protection measure expired a couple of days ago. High-profile footballer. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Removal of sourced content/addition of unsourced content by multiple anonymous users. Slightly lengthy background: The article is about a Danish musician who goes by the name of MØ. The various anonymous users seem to be under the impression her name is pronounced like -oo, -uh, or other English vowel sounds, unaware that this is not an English sound. This sound has an article which shows that there is no direct English approximation.

MØ herself stated it is pronounced like "'mercy' without the 'cy'", attempting to approximate the vowel sound with a consonant. This sourced quote is in the introduction, and is frequently replaced by anonymous users with links to YouTube videos of MØ pronouncing her name because it sounds to them like she is simply pronouncing it at as -oo, -uh, etc., completely disregarding the quote where she actually describes the sound, rather than just pronouncing it.

These anonymous users have not contributed any other edits to Wikipedia besides these, and logged-in editors have not edited the article in such an egregious way. Bruto (talk) 00:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We had an RfPP for MOO earlier. Could be a pattern. Samsara 01:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He's an emerging football player, people are excited, and they're going to take it out on Wikipedia for a few days. EricEnfermero (Talk) 00:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 01:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Collateral damage. Samsara 18:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – previous 39 edits offer no change to the page. Vandalism and reverts. Kellymoat (talk) 19:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 19:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from red letter and IP users. John from Idegon (talk) 22:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 00:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced changes to relationship status. Invisible note does not seem to be helping. Ebyabe talk - Border Town21:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:56, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP-hopping editor that necessitated the last protection has returned. Deli nk (talk) 21:56, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21 December 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalising. . Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and vandalism following the end of the previous semi-protection. JTP (talkcontribs) 15:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some anonymous users are added a unconfirmed driver to the team chart, and will not stop even though the edit has been reverted. . – Nascar1996 (talkcont) 15:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Create protection specifically as well. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. clpo13(talk) 19:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 19:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 07:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 07:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopper has, from time to time, applied an unwanted template to my user talk page (example diff). At least one of the IP addresses has been blocked, but the addresses are so different it would be impossible to enact a range block. Therefore, I would like to request semi-protection for a week. Hopefully, the vandal will lose interest. Scjessey (talk) 14:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 100 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal has been hitting the article every day or two for the last couple of weeks. He's also targeting Image Comics, but to a slightly lesser extent, so semi-protection should be considered there as well. Deli nk (talk) 15:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator GiantSnowman. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary protection for 2/3 days, target of an unknown IP disruption. —IB [ Poke ] 17:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: the well-known vandal has again returned to make distruptive edits. Borsoka (talk) 17:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 17:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done by another admin -- samtar talk or stalk 18:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated genre vandalism over the last few days. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Userspace Talk to me! Stuff I have done 14:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or spurious content. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. —Farix (t | c) 11:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. —Farix (t | c) 11:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. —Farix (t | c) 11:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See also Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive#Generation Snowflake. . Keri (talk) 00:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Simultaneously discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:MaxBrowne_reported_by_User:Keri_.28Result:_.29. I'm not personally convinced that full protection will achieve much here. Discussion is already happening, but doesn't seem to be leading to consensus. This would probably be the right time for an RfC. Samsara 01:06, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MHP Huck reported by User:Keri (Result: ) Keri (talk) 01:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are basically 2 edit warriors at the article, editing against consensus and NOTHEARING other editors at multiple noticeboards. RfC is clearly necessary. FPP requested in the interim. Keri (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 07:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. WNYY98 (talk) 07:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 07:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Bertrand101 Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  10:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I had a talk with Mark Arsten. He told me to take the request to here. This year, I don't see much vandalism. The last vandalism would be either January of this year or December of last year. The PC was enabled three years ago due to vandalism by Kcoen, now blocked. I saw last year's logs of reverts based on vandalism. This year, I see some reverts but nothing on unsourced additions or vandalism. Nevertheless, an ArbCom case resulted in discretionary sanctions toward edits on BLPs. In this case, is PC protection still necessary?. George Ho (talk) 20:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected 06:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jean Stair (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full-protection including page moves: High level of POV sockpuppetry including page moves, reverted by several editors. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP hopping user recently unblocked. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Constant edit wars and vandalism by IP users. While investigation into the incident is on, speculations are being put up like facts. Vignyanatalk 14:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – I've applied indefinite move protection. If you want longer semiprotection for the text, wait a bit and then re-apply if still needed. EdJohnston (talk) 21:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is being vandalised by one user and it would be helpful if temporary protection is added to deter them. Thank you. BritishGuy (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 22:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Infinity Knight (talk) 22:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention an ongoing edit war. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Samsara 23:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 23:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I honestly don't know what to do here - the previous edit was five days earlier, I'd have to FP for two weeks for it to be meaningful to such a slow edit war. That's a rather long full protection. Given the choice, issuing warnings and blocks has some advantages. Samsara 01:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – This is not yet an edit war. Those who are interested in Burke's dissent from Amoris Laetitia should consider participating at Talk:Raymond Leo Burke#Untying the Knots, where User:Elizium23 and User:Contaldo80 have begun a discussion, When doing so I suggest that people avoid personal attacks. Note that there are sources about Catholic matters such as http://cruxnow.com which have a degree of independence and aspire to practice good journalism. Editors don't have to limit themselves to direct quotations from the contending parties. Secondary sources are available. EdJohnston (talk) 20:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 15:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – The title of the article needs protection. I am proposing a moratorium after another failed RM of all failed RMs. In the meantime, I am doing my best to ease tensions. George Ho (talk) 19:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Move warring? Where? I don't see any move warring in the article's recent history at all... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The IP user involved in disrupting this page was banned yesterday but another IP user has begun disrupting the page by removing information and failing to read the sources. I would report the IP user but their IP address changes all the time so I can't do anything about that. Semi-protection will be the only way to solve this problem. (101.160.4.171 (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP hijinks. The article is up for deletion [48] and it's about an internet forum known for coordinating to manipulate outcomes. Should be semi-protected at least as long as the AfD is ongoing.Volunteer Marek (talk) 16:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing enough disruption to warrant protection right now. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Same IP hopping block evader causing disruption at all these user's talks. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:32, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Four talk pages. Recently-active admins don't need it; they can handle their own pages. EdJohnston (talk) 20:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 23:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – just a few hours after the page protection was removed, an ip user is back inflating the sales numbers again. Kellymoat (talk) 22:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:20, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been repeatedly vandalised and protected for over a year, looks like its time for either Indefinite or suitably long protection. . KylieTastic (talk) 22:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection or pending changes. The article has been a vandalism magnet for years, and it's just too easy for BLP violations to slip through when there is multiple editor or tag-team vandalism. I don't know why this hasn't been done already; vandalism occurs just about weekly; I've reverted over 200 incidents of vandalism or BLP violations myself.[49] 23:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Part of the reason is probably that past protection settings become harder to discover after a page gets moved. Samsara 23:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22 December 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP and new-user vandalism, usually adding copyrighted lyrics from the musical. John Laurens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has already been protected for the same reason. Ibadibam (talk) 23:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, some are semi-protected, some had pending changes configured, Philip Schuyler does not require protection for the time being.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short protection requested to stop a bouncing Comcast IP. Maybe a school? Too many to block individuals. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Range-blocking 2603:3003:3500:ef0::/64 for a bit would probably work just as well. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Range blocked as per the above. ~ Rob13Talk 15:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – transcluded by 30,000+ pages; I won't request ECP on templates... not yet. George Ho (talk) 17:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Hut 8.5 19:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – this template is tagged as deprecated, but it's transcluded in 20,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 17:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Hut 8.5 19:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes 1: High level of vandalism that appears to be mischief-making. (See my talk page.) It sometimes comes from an IP address, but user has also tried to create accounts with which to vandalize, so I'd prefer PC1. (I'm a PC reviewer.) Otherwise, try semi and see what happens. StevenJ81 (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from a group of IP hoppers. Katniss 02:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @KatnissEverdeen: I believe they are all the same person, just their ISP is refreshing their IP. I noticed you have not attempted to contact them, either via their IP talk page or at Talk:The Simpsons (season 28). Edit summaries are insufficient. I have semi'd only in hopes the IP will discuss, but you are expected to do the same MusikAnimal talk 18:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Same or similar IP address continues to remove relevant sourced information.SnapMcCrackle (talk) 02:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Check the history, and almost all of the last page of edits have been vandalism and reverting for awhile now. Not going to end on its own. Dream Focus 02:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Extensive history of disruption, last protection period was for 3 years MusikAnimal talk 18:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are continually trying to redirect the page to Alaska. Slashme (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism by multiple IPs. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 13:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ranges blocked. ~ Rob13Talk 14:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalization from multiple accounts, page has vandalizing history. Drewmutt (talk) 18:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-level of vandalism coming from IP'S and anonymous editors, refusing to correspond on the talk page, by adding in information that is unsourced or poorly sourced, as well as in violation of other Wikipedia MOS and policies. livelikemusic talk! 23:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see a lot of unconfirmed editing but not as much that I would consider disruptive. Some of the undiscussed colour changes, etc, are from confirmed users, so we should try to reach out to them directly MusikAnimal talk 18:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For persistent vandal or otherwise disruptive editing, possibly all IP-based. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Genre warring by several editors (which takes up the first page of edits alone). Repeated removals of a cited genre with no explanation. 75.129.101.158 (talk) 01:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spike in vandalism by IP editors. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spike in vandalism by IP editors. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi No real idea who this guy is, but 60% of the article was controversy. I initiated an RfC because I didn't know who he was, and the consensus was not to include this content. Now IPs are warring it back in. No recommendation on how long it might take to make them lose interest. TimothyJosephWood 02:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, recent socking by AndresHerutJaim (talk · contribs). nableezy - 19:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC) 19:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated by bot - can we WP:SALT this?. Avicennasis @ 11:14, 22 Kislev 5777 / 11:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ~ Rob13Talk 15:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create Protection: In spite of multiple deletions due to lack of notability, the page has been recreated multiple times. Coderzombie (talk) 14:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ~ Rob13Talk 15:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of deliberately erroneous material (since September) by IP hopping vandal: [50], [51], [52], [53], [54]. Wikishovel (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring on inclusion of Donald Trump in election infobox, during a pending RFC on Talk page to remove him. — JFG talk 22:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's start with ECP, as most disruption seems to be from confirmed but not extended-confirmed users MusikAnimal talk 00:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect from creation. This was protected after being deleted at AFD as a possible hoax. However, more sources pertaining to this topic have popped up in the past two years or so, making it clear this is a real thing. See, for instance, [55] [56] [57] [58] [59]. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 05:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is likely to be controversial in terms of whether this is notable or not. Please create a draft and pass it through WP:AFC to ensure it passes the notability criteria. ~ Rob13Talk 10:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hurry!! This page is on fire!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.85.103 (talk) 04:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Materialscientist. 73.96.112.156 (talk) 06:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I'm requesting for an indefinite page protection for this article due to unstoppable attacks by a sock user who continuously adding weapon suppliers from countries such as Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Venezuela without giving any reliable sources although have been repeatedly asked many times before. Seems there is no co-operation from the user or mainly because due to the IPs lack of competency. Molecule Extraction (talk) 03:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by AustralianRupert. 73.96.112.156 (talk) 06:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A musician is likely the primary subject and the musician's fans are not enjoying sharing the spotlight. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Series of IPs from Peru are changing chart positions and certifications that contradict what sources say. Erick (talk) 22:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Linguist Moi? Moi. 23:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection to template protection - I would like to apply the standard notice stating that this is being discussed at RfD. That has now been accomplished, however, I still think this would be better served under template protection.— Godsy (TALKCONT) 10:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Wait for the RfD to be closed. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Used by Twinkle. GXXF TC 17:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MB298 (talk) 19:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of alleged uncredited roles by multiple IPs. DonIago (talk) 21:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.16 (talk) 22:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 23:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.16 (talk) 22:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.16 (talk) 22:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 23:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. MusikAnimal talk 00:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23 December 2016

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – People are still vandalizing this page. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 02:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I think blocks are probably better in this instance. If you have to revert more than three times again in a day, ping me and I'll up the protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Presistant Disruptive editing. 219.76.15.12 (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits today, try using the talk page to reach a consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined According to the logs, it hasn't been re-created since AfD round 2 last month. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I don't think this needs protection. I think it should be unprotected. It probably won't have much vandalism. If it does, let us know.68.224.116.208 (talk) 17:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More NFL color templates

Indefinite template protection: - More than 20,000+ transclusions. George Ho (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or, how about upgrade protection instead? High edit counts in the latter three templates indicate some activity, especially this year. --George Ho (talk) 23:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done the first one, would like to have a second opinion on the other three given the recent editing activity.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ymblanter. I would probably decline the other three of seemi at the best. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @CambridgeBayWeather:, let us indeed decline it.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been vandalize several times a day since at least the 20th. Doug Weller talk 17:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I meant temporary, obviously missclicked. Doug Weller talk 19:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by single-purpose editors. [60], [61], [62], [63]. DaltonCastle (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Fadinga (talk) 04:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks a bit like the local school has just discovered Wikipedia; suggest 24 or 48 hours protection until it blows over. GoldenRing (talk) 16:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to a youtuber pointing out an error on the page which has since been corrected. CaptainPedge | Talk 17:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too many editings in the past with inaccurate info about the artist. 98.113.139.24 (talk) 22:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, all bad edits in the past three months were done by just one IP, which needs to be dealt with.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too many editings in the past with inaccurate info about the artist. 98.113.139.24 (talk) 22:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, same as above--Ymblanter (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent new user/IP vandalism - persistent attempts to add unsourced/unreliable info about a potential breakup without providing reliable sourcing. Rusted AutoParts 15:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., pending changes remain to be configured until the end of January.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent contentious edits by IPs, not participating in the talk page discussion and ignoring edit-warring notices. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – high view redirect disruption by IP / unconfirmed recreation of (was BLP1E) article. Widefox; talk 12:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There are a few contentious tidbits on this page, which constantly invite edit-warring IPs. . Kautilya3 (talk) 14:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's try that for now, and if you find yourself reverting most IP edits, we can upgrade it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:10B:A7AE:988:56B3:861D:C84C (talk) 14:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP 67.10.167.124 is back after 7-day ban, again adding same content contrary to apparent talk-page consensus.  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 15:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat creation of hoax content. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Page deleted per CSD A7 (G3 would also have worked), I can't block Stelladixon43 as they have made no edits since their latest warning. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of nonsense from an IP-hopping anon obsessed with casting Filipino celebrities to GTA-related articles. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vand, from Google Doodle. Widefox; talk 09:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - just until the AfD runs its course. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate vandalisms and false certification additions started the moment old protection expired. —IB [ Poke ] 15:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Widr (talk) 15:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Up until February 1, 2017. Continuous additions of unsourced speculation of more returnees after last protection expired. ApprenticeFan work 04:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Long-term Pending Changes This page has undergone long-term attacks having to do with the reliability of the web site itself, the professional conduct of its staff, and, receently, the breakup of the marriage of the founders; all the attacks have, as far as I can remember, been based on blogs. The page was semi-protected for three days this past October but vandalism began again after the protection expired. A major actor (User:Boab) was permanently blocked through through WP:ANI but IP attacks began almost immediately afterward (along with a note that we had been included in Conservapedia!). I have an WP:SPI case pending on one IP, but this may be a case of IP hopping.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 14:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dan D. Ric (talk) 14:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.251 (talk) 04:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.251 (talk) 04:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.114.251 (talk) 04:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by various IP users. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:1C0:10C:15FA:ACB9:30B3:46AC:A61A (talk) 22:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.123 (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by numerous IPs despite warnings. Egghead06 (talk) 09:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – 10,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 18:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho:, did you ask to protect Template:GeoGroup? That one is protected, the redirect (which is the link above) is not.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I meant the redirect actually. George Ho (talk) 08:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There has been edit warring changing this between an article and a redirect off and on for a few weeks now. Requesting full protection to enforce the implementation of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 13#2017 Atlantic hurricane season, as edit warring has continued after closure of that discussion in favor of article creation. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We might need to wait a little bit, but at this point it looks to me like there is only one user who restored the redirect after an RfD close, the user got some explanations at their talk page earlier today, and so far did not continue. If they resume, I guess they should be warned again and then blocked. Unless other users start reverting, I do not see much room for a full protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: I suppose that's fair. I just figured I'd toss it here since I'm involved and can't take any administrative action regarding this. I'll re-request if other users get involved in the edit warring and make any reports as necessary to ANEW. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Let us wait until (European) morning, and, if it does not escalate, close it as not done.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple, repeated vandalism during the past 60 days. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 19:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes have been configured for this article and are doing just fine.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Amanaparts (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amanaparts (talk) 21:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Presistant Vandalism. 219.76.15.12 (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, pending changes are configured for this article.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalized for the second time. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 10:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is presently being used by an IP hopping block evader to cause disruption. Should be semi'd. RGloucester 17:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unfounded and unsourced transfer speculation by IP's. --Jaellee (talk) 17:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism for a couple of days by IP-hopping user who spams the word "unicorn" into the lede. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated additions of unsourced content relating to an unofficial free agent signing. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 01:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a reported free-agent signing for this player, but it's not official. Won't be able to keep it out of the entry unless we protect it. EricEnfermero (Talk) 06:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and users. Air.light (talk) 05:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. See editing history. 73.96.113.56 (talk) 05:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ip editor keeps attempting to create an uncited stub out of this redirect. No issue if this company has citations to show it passes notability. Onel5969 TT me 01:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This page has been subjected to a series of disruptive tagging by a series of IP addresses starting around one month back. Based on the type of edits and the Chicago based IP addresses initially used I suspect this is a sock edit by banned editor HughD (talk · contribs). The later edits are showing locations around the world but all are Amazon Technologies IPs and thus are likely a proxy. Springee (talk) 12:16 pm, Today (UTC−7)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current vandalism and article is about a controversial person. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 23:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No reason for new accounts to edit this page. Sro23 (talk) 01:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Continued additions of unsourced content. 73.96.112.159 (talk) 02:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rather large amount of IP vandalism. Primefac (talk) 02:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 18:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper. Sro23 (talk) 02:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting reasoning for persistent vandalizing of the article: User talk:2602:304:7830:2399:F589:9B79:4A24:F759 Jim1138 (talk) 06:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 18:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent addition of non notable student to article. Either block or protect. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. MusikAnimal talk 19:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated by bot - can we WP:SALT this?. Avicennasis @ 11:14, 22 Kislev 5777 / 11:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what's wrong with the bot but I think I've redirected to the talk page of the WikiProject it's trying to notify. Will advise its maintainer if that hasn't been done already. (Non-administrator comment) Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Redirect seems to have done the trick MusikAnimal talk 19:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Series of IPs attacking article. Justeditingtoday (talk) 00:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Sorry it took so long to get to this! I would have protected at the time, but now it looks like they've moved on MusikAnimal talk 18:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/adding incorrect information by 1 IP user. BilCat (talk) 01:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 18:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. MON5T3R (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Recent disruption seems to be an edit war between two users. Report to WP:ANEW if it continues MusikAnimal talk 18:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More high-risk templates

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – 20,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going through these. Hut 8.5 19:00, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected indefinitely. Hut 8.5 19:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP editors. Rural Tours of Mindanao has no base in Butuan City but an IP user insists.

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 18:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs.

Declined Warned the user MusikAnimal talk 18:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Close to 20,000 transclusions. George Ho (talk) 19:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected MusikAnimal talk 19:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 December 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Currently a redirect page; visible in 500+ talk pages. Also subject to WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 19:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator AGK. Since 2012. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – information has been spammed recently. Coder m (talk) 20:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent addition of unsourced content without consensus. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Can the page be restored to a version before the dispute ? - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was just checking when you pinged. Done. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended semi-protection: This article is being edit-warred over by editors not permitted to edit there per WP:ARBPIA3. Zerotalk 04:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: Transcluded by 5000+ pages. Also vandalized recently. George Ho (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 16:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 13:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
15:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Talk page has already been protected, but the relevant IP hopping block evader has continued to cause disruption in the article space with inflammatory edit summaries. Please stop this nonsense. RGloucester 16:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 16:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: One edit this year; also transcluded by 30,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 01:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Katietalk 05:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Seen many unsourced content. MON5T3R (talk) 03:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.  Meow 07:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There appears to be slow move warring going on here. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 08:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 10:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of recent IP vandalism, although this page has a chronic unexplained deletion problem. Dhtwiki (talk) 23:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have died down over the last 48 hours. Katietalk 05:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. This BLP article is getting a high level of vile vandalism because he is a highly visible investigative journalist and Trump critic, an epileptic, and a half-Jew, and he is suing a Trump supporter for sending him epileptogenic tweets. Best to semi-protect at least through the end of the holiday season while there will be a reduced number of page-watchers online to catch and revert the vandalism. Softlavender (talk) 04:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Really needs to be permanently semi'd.Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Probably a good idea; all of the vandalism so far has had to be revdelled and I'm sure more is forthcoming for the next four to eight years if it is only temporarily semi-protected. Softlavender (talk) 04:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oshwah, can you please explain why you only semi-protected for one day, despite the request for extended semi-protection? Did you read the logs on the article, including the previous semi-protections and the rev-dels? Vandalism started right back up after the previous semi-protection of one week ended. Normally when that happens, the next round of semi-protection is increased in length beyond the length that the previous semi-protection was for -- in this case, that would be, say, two weeks). Did you read the extended rationale behind the request above by two editors? If you are not going to permanently semi-protect, please at least semi-protect through the end of the holiday season, which would be until at least January 2 UTC, by which time more page-watchers will be online watching the article. Softlavender (talk) 06:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – An accident waiting to happen - a new editor moved the help page instead of his draft. John of Reading (talk) 08:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 08:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Pending changes protection: Semi protection has alreday been configured for this article. 219.79.97.236 (talk) 09:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Sometimes admins place both pending changes and semi-protection simultaneously on an article in order for the edits to still be reviewed. Usually the pending changes protection will last longer than the semi-protection anyhow. 73.96.113.126 (talk) 16:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have you asked Samsara and Zzuuzz? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I'm content with PC remaining in place after the protection expires, due to the high profile subject and probability of vandalism ... unless there's a good reason not to have both concurrently, which I'm not aware of. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CFB Standings templates

Upgrade protection: Don't know whether these are "high-risk" templates discussed in ongoing RfC. However, looking at the edits, the editors tried to make changes but then reverted them. Also, each of them is transcluded by 10,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 23:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: A redirect page transcluded by 3500+ pages. George Ho (talk) 01:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Katietalk 05:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: Transcluded by 30,000+ pages; some editing activity. George Ho (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Katietalk 05:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: 30,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 01:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Katietalk 05:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protection: Some editing activity; transcluded by 80,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 01:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected Katietalk 05:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated drive-by edits by IPs against consensus without discussion. Grayfell (talk) 02:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article might need an upgrade to regular semi due to numerous BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:25, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continuing after previous protection expired. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Persistant vandalism from socks. Several temporary protection statuses have failed to stop pattern of vandalism on page.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TheGracefulSlick: This is a very unusual situation. Let me talk to another administrator about possible solutions before committing one way or another. If your talk page were subject to ECP, would you be willing to set up an alternative talk page for non-extendedconfirmed editors to message you, linked to from your typical one? ~ Rob13Talk 10:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
BU Rob13 I would do that, but what would stop the vandal from moving to that page? I haven't had much problems when the protection was enabled with communicating with others so an indefinite ECP is not a bad option. I still have until the 28th so if you want to speak with another admin, I can wait a little.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think we should extended confirmed protect user talk pages. If there are autoconfirmed users causing disruption they should be reported and blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Before declining, please take a look at the page's protection log. This is obviously an exceptional case. Semi-protection has been tried many times before but it didn't work. The vandal has an unknown number of autoconfirmed sleeper socks, and having an expiry date for protection is only motivating them to simply wait it out. Sro23 (talk) 19:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging Ymblanter to the above. The level of disruption here is so great and persistent that I think an exception can/should be made if an alternative talk page is set up. I wouldn't say indefinite, but I can say long-term (2 months, probably). I know that I function in a big way off of the emails I get every time someone messages me on my talk page. This is ruining that big-time. TheGracefulSlick, this lets you skip the notifications every time you're vandalized. It could move to the alternate talk page, but it could also just as easily move to another user's talk page. By moving it off of the main one, you can just check the page every couple days and not worry too much about active vandalism. Getting back to the productive work of the encyclopedia, etc etc. ~ Rob13Talk 22:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would not be opposed to this solution, but I think asking CU to find the sleepers is more effective.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
BU Rob13 I did not realize I would not receive notifications from the alternative talk page. With that being said, I am much more willing to agree to this plan. Ymblanter this vandal has dozens of sleepers and constantly creates more just for the sake of going after me. CU will never get rid of them all.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Again, the sleeper accounts are old, so a CU wouldn't be able to help. Also, I don't think an unprotected talk page is a good idea, as the vandal would simply move on to that page. TheGracefulSlick isn't an administrator, vandal fighter, or really a patroller of any sort, so there's going to be less of a need for IP's, new users/non EC users to contact them. And I see no reason why the vandal would move to another user's talk; they've made it pretty clear who their target is. I know we normally try to avoid protecting talk pages, but if there ever was a time WP:IGNORE would be most appropriate, I think it would be right now. This user has endured so much harassment, and here's an easy solution to put an end to it, yet he is refused. That's very disheartening. You can go ahead and decline this request, but the cycle will continue. It's happened every time protection expired in the past. One last thing. Indefinite doesn't have to mean forever. Of course protection could be lifted after a while if there is evidence things have died down, I just think it's a bad idea to set an expiry date on the protection at this moment. Sro23 (talk) 02:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have TGS put a notice on their talk about how to ping them to a conversation, and explaining the protection, and then protect. Revisit in good time. TimothyJosephWood 02:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by Floquenbeam. Perhaps we can create Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Crazyaces489 and take discussion there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333 this vandal is not CA. Back when there was a SPI case, some of this current vandal's sockpuppets were mixed into the case, and were found by Mike V to be unrelated to CA's sockpuppets. I'm really dissappointed in this outcome because just looking at my talk page's protection history shows this ECP will be no different than the last.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Given that the need for extended-confirmed protection seems to have been recognised since October I find it very disappointing that no-one has given an extended application of it yet. Policy does require you to set up an unprotected talk subpage, but for your main talk page a protracted ECP is certainly appropraite in my books. Given how the troll explicitly taunts that they will return immediately on expiry, I do not believe indefinite would be inappropriate—unprotection could be tried after a certain unannounced period of time. I won't overrule Floquenbeam's decision at this time, but wanted to add my view. 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 22:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Previous vandals have been User:Hamish Ross, who some might not remember. Drop me a line if it carries on after this protection TheGracefulSlick, and I'll extend it long time. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
zzuzz thank you, unfortunately I am betting on talking to you soon. You mentioned this old vandal. Does a vandal that commonly writes "I'm not a massive fan" ring a bell to you? This seems to be his/her trademark.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is Hamish Ross. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done Considering the history, the vandal, and threats continuing at this time, I've extended the protection to indefinite. That's not infinite, but probably a very long time. @TheGracefulSlick: I suggest you set up an unprotected talk page, which won't pester you as much but will allow others to communicate with you if necessary, and we can review that if it becomes a problem. -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've never dealt with such levels of talk page vandalism before (with sleepers and all), but I have dealt with lesser degrees of vandalism and created a secondary talk page subpage (something similar to what Zzuzz mentioned above) once after my normal one was made inaccessible for awhile for IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. Vandals can still indirectly harass you, but at least they won't mess up with your normal talk page stuff. Anyway, I hope this works out for you. Dustin (talk) 02:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.96.113.90 (talk) 21:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated and persistent copyvio vandalism. . Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent hoaxing vandalism – The last good version seems to be by Shriheeran on 21 December 2016. 198.103.145.50 (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 99.249.33.254 (talk · contribs). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner talk 18:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection or IP rangeblock: Persistent vandalism, or at best edit-warring to insert an indefensible/repugnant POV, by a series of IPs in the range 2602:30b:37ba:e7e0 over the past few days. (I'm not sure how to request a rangeblock at AIV so here I am; if a better venue would have been appropriate, kindly advise!) In my humble unadministrative opinion, revdel warrants consideration. Thanks! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 18:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits in the last 24 hours Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent genre warring. Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 19:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 daays, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep adding that she has died without a source (my own searching revealed that, at the time of writing this report, this is false). JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 December 2016

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. George Ho (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Also reverts this year. George Ho (talk) 09:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 20:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Has been semi-protected since 2011. George Ho (talk) 09:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:45, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued addition of unsourced categories, also IP jumping. - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. New users and IPs removing valid, explicitly sourced, and—by consensus on article talk page—relevant information regarding origin. See edits by Youalrightbruv2017 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). DVdm (talk) 17:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Can someone please lock this redirect temporary till the end of this AfD if possible. The user continuously breaking redirect by using multiple IP addresses. I reported one of the IP which is currently blocked for 60 hours but the user starts with the new one. Thank you. GSS (talk) 17:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been moved to Andrew Almanza (skateboarder) so please considered protecting Andrew Almanza (skateboarder) instead of Andrew Almanza(skateboarder) if possible. Thank you – GSS (talk) 17:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just adjusted the report to show the page move, as shown above. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:46, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you very much! Mlpearc. GSS (talk) 17:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also protected the name as in the AfD. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP hopper is editing against consensus which is clearly expressed at the talk page. Three days semi should be sufficient. Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. Lanwi1 (talk) 15:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Repeated insertion of inflammatory BLP content or removal of sourced content by sockpuppets of blocked user Special:Contributions/Addeded. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 16:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soad Esri. GABgab 17:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Some vandalism and/or disruptive edits; also per WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 06:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Reverted one disruptive edit; also per WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 06:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Reverted unsourced addition; also per WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 06:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Highly visible template; 18,000+ pages. George Ho (talk) 05:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:45, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA. Some reverts this year. George Ho (talk) 06:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:46, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA; also possible vandalism. --George Ho (talk) 06:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Either vandalism or disruptive edits; also per WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 06:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA. Also a former article, now a redirect page. George Ho (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 21:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Transcluded by 20,000+ pages; highly visible. Over the years, the attempts to change the template resulted in errors per logs. George Ho (talk) 02:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA; also some reverts this year. George Ho (talk) 21:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 21:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request semi protection due to lots of test edit by multiple IP users. Matthew_hk tc 14:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.—Tom Morris (talk) 14:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Some edits reverted, including vandalism. George Ho (talk) 04:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP nationalist vandalism. Ip changes, so page protection may stop it. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 12:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 13:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 12:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 13:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Reverts this year; also per WP:ARBIP (not to be confused with the other). George Ho (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor My bad; not covered by motion. George Ho (talk) 08:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: per WP:ARBIP. George Ho (talk) 07:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor My bad; not covered by motion. George Ho (talk) 08:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBIP. Also a lot of reverts lately, and subject probably related to India-Pakistan conflict. --George Ho (talk) 07:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor. My bad; not covered by motion. George Ho (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: close to 600 talk pages transclude this template. George Ho (talk) 10:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. this and the one it points to (1200 transclusions in the latter case). Samsara 10:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What about Template:Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement, Samsara? George Ho (talk) 10:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@George Ho: I'm not sure I understand your question. In my opinion, they are both highly visible and should be template protected, which I have done. Template protection is standard for highly visible templates. Samsara 10:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That one is a redirect to what you refer to, yet that one is semi-protected. Upgrade? George Ho (talk) 10:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
When I look at them, they both have template protection enabled. Do you see something different? Samsara 10:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I see now that you were referring to the old name that it was moved from. Done. Samsara 10:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - TheMagnificentist 11:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3, though page now semi-protected until 2019. George Ho (talk) 11:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Changed to ECP with existing expiry. Samsara 11:58, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

increase in protection level

semi-protection: many inaccurate information regarding artist origins and bio from the past edits. Ownbjdi5082 (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please consider permanent semi; every time protection comes off this article, the driveby IPs start up again. Montanabw(talk) 09:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Montanabw: I could not find evidence this article had ever been protected - has it been moved? Thanks. Samsara 10:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism. Twitbookspacetube (talk) 10:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 10:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Vandalism from IP hopping account that has been ongoing for a few months now. Has been protected before. Given the time frame of the edits this is not the usual upset fan that edits straight after a game and then calms down, but a persistent one that is determined to say that Lauren is "the worst". I would probably try Pending Changes first, but will leave it up to the admin as to whether they think Semi is better. AIRcorn (talk) 04:04, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Would you reconsider this. The IP which has been making the same or similar edits since April (the article has only existed since January). Since then they have made about a dozen similar edits. As a BLP that has been targeted persistently over a relatively long period of time by a IP hopping account I was hoping it would be an ideal candidate for pending changes. AIRcorn (talk) 09:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Extremely high level of very vile BLP-violating IP vandalism which kicks back up the instant the page is unprotected. Softlavender (talk) 08:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: This BLP article has been getting a high level of vile vandalism since October (much of which has been revdelled by Boing! said Zebedee) because he is a highly visible investigative journalist and Trump critic, an epileptic, and a half-Jew, and he is suing a Trump supporter for sending him epileptogenic tweets. Two people requested extended semi-protection yesterday [64] but it was inexplicably protected for only 24 hours, in spite of the fact that the previous semi-protection was one week and the vandalism started up immediately after that. Since October the page has been vandalized 58+ times by 15 different accounts from widespread locations. This is likely going to continue all the way through Donald Trump's presidency (i.e., for the next four to eight years). Softlavender (talk) 08:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we're at the point of indef semi quite yet, but if it carries on after this expires then yes. Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 08:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done For the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Similar to Google Boys Arimalam and Google Boys Arimalam Studio. Spam. . Lourdes 12:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It was created and deleted once. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi CambridgeBayWeather, it has not been recreated once, but a multiple number of times. The previous titles (two of which I could trace) are already create protected by samtar and MSGJ. When the editors are not able to recreate the old titles, they modify the name and create the content under a slightly modified name. Given this, would you reconsider your decline? I'll await your reply. Lourdes 02:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And while you're reading this, can you also consider create protecting Arimalam Google Boys Arimalam, which also is a part of this list? Thanks. Lourdes 02:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done. I did the first and the second was already protected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much. Lourdes 07:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA. Also a redirect page to Israeli settlement. George Ho (talk) 21:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. -- samtar talk or stalk 21:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Disgruntled user persistent misuse of this page. - Mlpearc (open channel) 07:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by MelanieN 🎄BethNaught (talk)🎄 07:45, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 20:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA. Also, some IP edits reverted. George Ho (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Very high level of IP vandalism. 81.141.56.172 (talk) 03:02, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dawnseeker2000 03:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:39, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Also subject to WP:ARBPIA. George Ho (talk) 20:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for at least 3 months: Persistent vandalism and blatant POV edits by IPs. Additionally, I appear to be the only editor to check the article, and I only do it periodically myself. --1990'sguy (talk) 02:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent IP jumping. Dat GuyTalkContribs 22:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Tito Dutta (talk) 05:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Receiving threats. —cyberpowerMerry Christmas:Unknown 02:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung and Graham87: if anyone of you could step in here.—cyberpowerMerry Christmas:Unknown 03:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. WJBscribe (talk) 03:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

26 December 2016

Extended confirmed protection: Disruptive editing cannot stop by semi-protection. 223.197.133.203 (talk) 05:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Can you point to specific edits that you consider to be problematic? To me, it looks like there's a bit of back-and-forth, but it seems to be all good in the end. Samsara 09:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anon continues to add a forum and it's not clear if the subject is the notable one or not. Doesn't discuss. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

>Doesn't discuss.
That is a false claim. There is discussion on my taik page. 31.170.105.231 (talk) 20:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I recommend you discuss this on the article's talk page. Yaris678 (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Increased level of IP vandalism spamming affiliate links continued after previous protection expired Techfs (talk) 19:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Coffee. 2601:1C0:105:949C:B4C7:2D85:1784:D8EB (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 21:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. just about all the IP editing was disruptive and the article is Featured, so I figured semi protection was going to be less time consuming and more effective than pc. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same reason as last time. IP Hopper KDchan. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 18:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended semi-protection: Continued high levels of users changing the results and vandalizing the page. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 19:47, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Reverted one unverifiable change; also per WP:ARBPIA3. Page mentions Israeli intervention. --George Ho (talk) 07:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:43, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 08:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Haunted by socks performing original research. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 14:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 03:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13Talk 06:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – obviously no information date and cast would be unsourced. Oripaypaykim (talk) 14:06, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Series of unconstructive IP edits since an article was published suggesting the subject edited his own article. Hack (talk) 15:43, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – people keep changing her to dead when she isn't. DrStrauss talk 16:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. Superchunk22 (talk) 10:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant incorrect additions to the cast section by IP's. Several IP's looks to be a possible sock ignoring warnings. DrNegative (talk) 12:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —MBlaze Lightning T 13:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Longtime troll. Formality. —DangerousJXD (talk) 04:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 09:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This is an upcoming film. IP editors are changing sourced content and blanking citations: [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71]. The last diff adds a citation, but it's to an unrelated "about this company" page for a production company, and it doesn't even mention the film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued unhelpful IP edits. Such as WP:OR on the candidates hometown (sometimes confusing it as the birthplace) and height. Removal of references and edit war on the number of contestants.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP addresses and new users keep vandalizing this article for months now, perhaps longer. Is there a bot where you can count how many times the page had someone hit Undo or Rollback? The history shows that a considerable number of edits these past months have been vandalism and reverting vandalism. Dream Focus 02:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Yaris678 (talk) 08:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing attempts by IP/new users to declare subject dead (five times so far this month.) Claim is both unsourced and inaccurate. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Til Jan 2 (end of winter break). John from Idegon (talk) 05:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Set to expire January 5th; Editing history shows continued disruptive editing (the addition of the "And" between her names). Please extend Pending Changes settings. -- Dane talk 06:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – same editor has returned to edit war after previous protection. WNYY98 (talk) 01:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Katietalk 03:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The "Rogers Canada ENGVAR/Date Vandal", an IP which has been active for years, has continued to vandalize this article replacing Commonwealth English to American English and dates from DMY to MDY against WP:MOS and WP:ENGVAR. HkCaGu (talk) 01:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Rangeblocked. Katietalk 03:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. May require return to last good version, if possible to ascertain such. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated death hoaxes. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. No edits this year though. George Ho (talk) 09:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Just one edit this year though. George Ho (talk) 09:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phases of Oslo Accord

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. George Ho (talk) 09:45, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. I've not yet reverted additions by a blocked sockpuppet and one questionable addition by another user. You decide. George Ho (talk) 09:45, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. Also a Featured Article. George Ho (talk) 09:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. So many reverts this year. George Ho (talk) 11:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. One editor's edits reverted this year. George Ho (talk) 11:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. One vandalism. George Ho (talk) 11:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3; also some reverts. George Ho (talk) 11:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3; also some reverts. George Ho (talk) 11:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 11:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Given the ArbCom remedy, these should really be indefinitely protected. If the remedy is ever lifted, and I somewhat doubt it will be, then we would go through systemically and remove these protections. But until then, we don't want to have hundreds of pages to reprotect each year. ~ Rob13Talk 20:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
BU Rob13. Is there somewhere where it gives the length they should be protected? I did look some time ago but couldn't see anything. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CambridgeBayWeather: Well, the protection is just our method of implementing the indefinite restriction at WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, so I think the "natural" length is indefinite. Until ArbCom lifts the remedy, new editors are not allowed to edit in the topic area whether or not protection is in place, and the protection just serves to enforce that. ArbCom has been clear that there is no administrator discretion on this remedy; it's a blanket ban on new editors contributing in the topic area, essentially. ~ Rob13Talk 21:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Not comfortable with it but I changed them all. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 20:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 20:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 11:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Borcker. I'm not 100% sure that this is Borcker, but regardless, this article has endured a very long history of disruption. 2601:1C0:10C:150D:111:A468:2741:B5F2 (talk) 06:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ Rob13Talk 06:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 for both the article and the redirect. George Ho (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3; also, one sockpuppet's edits reverted. George Ho (talk) 19:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13Talk 20:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13Talk 20:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 19:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13Talk 20:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~ Rob13Talk 20:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Djadjko (talk) 23:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 00:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has had a very large number of unsourced additions recently. hwalk | talk | contribs 23:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - pending changes protection already in place; probably enough for now. AlexiusHoratius 00:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More redirects

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. A lot more of redirect pages to Arab–Israeli conflict. George Ho (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I'm going to decline this due to lack of necessity and the potential time sink this will create if we go down this rabbit hole. It's so unlikely that new editors will choose to edit redirects that ECP doesn't seem necessary to enforce the ArbCom remedy. There's thousands upon thousands of redirects like this to various pages in the topic area, and we can't field RFPP requests for all of them. ~ Rob13Talk 20:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@BU Rob13:I guess that depends on what we are trying to avoid. If the concern is just that new editors can get carried away when editing this topic, leaving redirects as they are makes sense. If the concern is that autoconfirmed accounts are being created specifically to be able to POV push in the topic area then it could be considered wise to ECP related redirects to avoid the creation of POV forks.
Perhaps we should seek clarification from ARBCOM.
I agree that the number is an issue. Can we give the task to a bot? Yaris678 (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued personal opinion and unsourced changes to band members, due to band re-formation . - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 03:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Too high an edit rate for pending changes: logjams building up. : Noyster (talk), 09:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Have you asked Oshwah as they were protecting admin.
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's layer semi-protection over this for a week. Katietalk 03:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP jumping editor is adding unsourced genre's and categories to Pink Floyd articles. - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has died and is likely to receive many edits. Telfordbuck (talk) 23:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. three days by another admin. AlexiusHoratius 00:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lower it to indef semi protection but don't use indef extended confirm. The vandal who vandalized that article was blocked I see along with his proxy farm. Just have Hank Goldberg article be indef semi and have it on a bunch of watchlists of Wiki editors. PottoMeesta (talk) 20:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Semi wasn't working and it isn't indefinite but for a year. Make a request on the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinian militancy templates

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. George Ho (talk) 09:08, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. George Ho please read through Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Extended confirmed protection policy 2 where it is clear that there is consensus not to use EC on templates. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. The RFC is about using ECP for 'high risk' templates. It doesn't relate to ARBCOM enforcement. Yaris678 (talk) 12:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent additioin of useless and low quality spam link in External links section by IP-shifter with same location. Block by wp:AIV will not be effective. All IP's warned on his user talk. DVdm (talk) 21:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Seriesphile (talk · ctb) 22:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 23:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

27 December 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term protection. Wolbo (talk) 21:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Consistent IP vandalism. Trumpetbum8794 (talk) 18:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 19:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – increase in refdesk troll activity. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸(talk) 20:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Favonian and Dragons flight. Samsara 20:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Very contentious article. Kerala has high literacy rate. And there are also Kerala Gulf diaspora (recent IP editor). There are many WP:SPAs whose editing resembles conflict of interest are active in this article. There is also meat puppetry. The way this organization is described by WP:SECONDARY sources, is disliked by people linked to this organization/political religious outfit and editors who use WP:PRIMARY sources to describe the organization as they want it to be. . Marvellous Spider-Man 10:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 12:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 16:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther :  Talk  14:41, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Per WP:ARBPIA3; also reverts this year. George Ho (talk) 04:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:37, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 04:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 04:41, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 04:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 04:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 04:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 04:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:24, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 04:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has become long term vandal Cow cleaner 5000's latest target. CC5's socks have a long history of inserting fake sourced content and libels against both individuals and entire companies. —Farix (t | c) 11:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Needs protecting for long enough for the IP-hopping vandal to get bored and go away. David Biddulph (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 02:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 02:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Israeli-Palestinian conflict. WNYY98 (talk) 01:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 02:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 02:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - TheMagnificentist 10:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:24, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 04:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Newly created dab page, was previously create-protected. Persistent IP and new user vandalism inevitable - see page deletion history. 82.132.226.198 (talk) 05:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I understand why you made this request, but… bruh, as per protection policy, pages are not protected pre-emptively. I've looked at the page's deleted revisions and seen little in the past 6 years regarding vandalism. Nevertheless, it's on my watchlist. I personally expect the page to be vandalized, so we'll see. Cheers, Airplaneman 07:39, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Account editwarring. I've taken it to ANI (as at the time he hadn't been warned, although since warning 3 more reverts and attacks in edit summaries) but he's also using IP addresses hence this request. Doug Weller talk 08:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 08:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Five IPs in the last three or four days have either added unsourced content or made edits which were not constructive. Looking thru the edit history, no edits by IP or new users over the last two weeks have been retained on account of being either unconstructive or unsourced content. MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 07:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:1C0:106:E401:458A:DC47:B54:7338 (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sad! Airplaneman 07:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Dpm12 (talk) 01:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 01:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Numerous insertions by IPs, over the past six weeks, of unsourced and dubious material into BLP. Worldbruce (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The information is wrong. I'm actually the world's most celebrated business tycoon. Airplaneman 07:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Vandalism. Back again removing Avidar sequals shortly after PP exired Jim1138 (talk) 07:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman 07:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Same disruptive ip editor as usual. Back again and at it with the unsourced nonsense and refusal of collaborate.★Trekker (talk) 03:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 04:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 04:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about the rest? George Ho (talk) 04:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Samsara 04:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended semi-protection: Page is constantly attacked by an IP-hopping vandal who repeatedly inserts New Age-sound WP:original research garbage, and who always hops to a new IP whenever it's blocked for its inappropriate behavior. Page has been semi-protected before several times to stop said vandal.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: This article has been a longstanding target of IP editors who have attempted to insert unreferenced, disruptive, and tendentious material. On November 23, CambridgeBayWeather turned on semi-protection for one month. After the semi-protection expired this month, the disruptive IP edits have returned. (see this and this). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Monday Night Football game in progress is leading to heavy IP vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 02:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Drmies. 172.58.41.231 (talk) 03:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP general vandalism. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: @The Blade of the Northern Lights Perpetual sock puppetry - Blanking. Those accounts are socks of User:UnderArmourKid. 208.110.210.81 (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: @The Blade of the Northern Lights: Perpetual sock puppetry - same as above. 208.110.210.81 (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Uncited OR trivia. 206.45.11.108 (talk) 01:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 02:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and socking as well. 73.96.113.111 (talk) 20:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I AfDed the article which hopefully solves all the problems.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dat GuyTalkContribs 22:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Samsara 01:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – was subject to a recent and now expired protection, ip vandalism has resumed since expiration. WNYY98 (talk) 00:20, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 01:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 12:51, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Hut 8.5 13:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Israel–Jordan relations

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:ARBPIA3. George Ho (talk) 12:56, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been under pending changes for a while, but almost all unconfirmed edits are getting reverted. I wonder if it would be better to semi-protect it now, and save people's time. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. SarahSV (talk) 23:51, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

28 December 2016

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism after being mentioned on the Hello Internet podcast. Persists a few months after being mentioned, so likely not going to stop. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 06:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 06:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 06:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Alex|The|Whovian? 11:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graemp and IanB2 could both be blocked for edit warring on this article. The only reason that I didn't was the fact that some discussion seems to be currently taking place on the article's talk page over different disagreements. I'm going to side with my gut hesitation and hold off; if edit warring continues by either user after the protection expires, they can be blocked for edit warring without further warning or notice. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users changing airliner to supersonic transport. . AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 18:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism over the past few days. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 19:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism from IPs and anonymous users by adding false tour dates and messing up the table. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 07:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be a lot of ip users adding spam links to the external links section (and it makes sense why this article would be a popular target). Just my thoughts. Lookunder (talk) 07:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits by a long-term disruptive editor. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Martial arts vandal. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IT'S repeatedly adding unsourced information. A day or 2 protection should stop this. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: For days now, anon IPs and one registered editor who may be a sockmaster have kept blatantly violating WP:BLP by adding a purported birth year that no reliable source can verify. In the last few hours they have stepped up their edit-warring to add this unverified, possibly fictitious year. --Tenebrae (talk) 06:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An anon is changing the lede away from the band article's lede. Protection for few days should do. Since the tour is over, there is unlikely to be any changes that couldn't go though a change request, but will leave permanent protection as an admin's option. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 06:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multi non autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits. Krimlopio (talk) 03:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: "Vandalism" in this case seems to be a PROD notice. Was apparently deleted on Swedish Wikipedia and might be worth an AfD. Samsara 04:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This will stop the PROD disruption and hopefully give others enough time to decide where this article should be placed. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 04:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were the one that started all this. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 05:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent death of Carrie Fisher is attracting increased IP editing tests and vandalism; Carrie Fisher article and that of her daughter Billie Lourd are also currently protected for similar reasons. — TAnthonyTalk 05:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – There have been numerous "new accounts", IPs, and accounts that have had no edits in the past five years suddenly appearing at the article to make nearly the same edit (most recently, changing the description of Breitbart from far right to right wing). These SPA editors typically don't leave edit summaries, and completely bypass the talk page.

I am requesting temporary, but relatively long term ECP protection to prevent damage to the integrity of the article from the obvious sock- and meat puppetry. Please ping me if further discussion is needed. - MrX 21:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 22:37, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multi non autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits. andrewhester (talk) 01:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. by Widr. Samsara 02:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Semi-protection worked to keep away IPs but login users keep warring. Jetstreamer Talk 00:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Drmies. 2601:1C0:101:42C0:D41C:CCEB:4328:40D (talk) 02:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 01:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 01:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, multiple IPs. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 01:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 01:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Today's death of Carrie Fisher has brought out a lot of editors to this page (and probably other pages too). Not all of them are nice, while others are simply not up to WP standards or formats. If we can get some page protection, at least from IP users, it will be a great assistance. Kellymoat (talk) 20:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There are some good edits from IPs, too. Samsara 20:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – potential target for rumors of new coaching positions. WNYY98 (talk) 23:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and general disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 00:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please put permanent semi on this article, the last request lasted barely a week and the second protection came off, the drive-by random IP vandals started up again. This article is a high-target for random vandalism and protection should not be removed. Montanabw(talk) 21:13, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Req: 5 day semi, please. I'm involved, or I'd do it myself. There seems to be a campaign in the last day or two both here and at List of highest-grossing Indian films to elevate the box office figures of Kabali, even though there is a documented dispute about the figures, which vary widely. My attempts to clarify the dispute rather than assert a single value have been met with resistance. Also, I suspect sockpuppetry (ARUL king and Arviirajmm) I can't help but wonder if someone's not trying to close out the calendar year with Kabali on top of the world... 5 days would get us through 1 Jan. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:52, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mother has recently died, leading to multiple unconstructive edits and somewhat rude edit summaries. DrStrauss talk 22:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 22:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Once again, series of IPs from Peru are deliberately changing the chart positions that goes against what sources sya. Erick (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. - Mlpearc (open channel) 21:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeatedly targeted by a disruptive LTA editor. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Martial arts vandal. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

29 December 2016

Full Protection: Persistent disruptive editing, removal, Vandalism & among Others. ZeEnergizer (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Irrelevant material on a modern Internet cult of Kek keeps being added despite semi-protection. Requesting a raise to 30/500 for a year. — JFG talk 09:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 17:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent & recent vandalism from multiple accounts today. Various editors (not just anons/IPs, includes an auto-confirmed editor) apparently think it is oh so funny to post erroneous death info to this article. Shearonink (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated self promo IP vandals. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 22:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced information by various IP Addresses. . Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again POV pushing by the same sockpuppet and IP in the article has started after the one month protection (which I requested on 23 November 2016) ended.

Sondrion (talk) 08:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 09:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Brianmagallano IP Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A84hg (talk) 12:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – constant slow vandal edits. Govindaharihari (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: will be adding edits by various IP addresses to start the new year. ApprenticeFan work 14:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For the record, this is because of observed disruption, not because we think they'll be disruption leading into 2017 (although it's probably safe to assume there will be :) MusikAnimal talk 18:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ) 15:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 16:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistents IP, fans edits adding their favorite groups with no source. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 18:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection; create/protect: Apparent autobiography referring to developmentally disabled person. Trying to get this speedy deleted, against the efforts of multiple IPs. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page deleted. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing related to the recent death of actress Carrie Fisher, who appears in this film. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 17:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – very silly edit war going on right now. Last time I looked it was at about 10RR. DBaK (talk) 23:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GFOLEY FOUR!03:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That won't work. The user in question is an IP hopper. He'll be back in no time. 88.105.177.23 (talk) 08:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 23:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. LTA. Sock of AnnalesSchool (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Hit article as soon as semiprotection expired. IP beat even Musik Bot removing the protection tag from the article. Please see also Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of AnnalesSchool. Dr. K. 11:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we get a bit of semi-protection here. Banned editor Mikemikev is being a nuisance and taking up other people's time and attention, which is probably his point. I don't mind the personal attacks but enough is enough. Doug Weller talk 11:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 20:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. WNYY98 (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 2601:1C0:10B:2EF5:E814:B09A:45A:8CBB (talk) 04:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 04:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violations. 2601:1C0:106:D113:358F:7599:9D34:6536 (talk) 06:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent violations of the biographies of living persons policy. 2601:1C0:106:3AFC:9577:81CD:F147:1063 (talk) 04:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Adog104 Talk to me 04:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IPv6. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be again persistent vandalism from ip users recently. Lookunder (talk) 05:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 00:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – recent death of mother/sister has led to vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 02:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It took less that 2 days for Borcker to show up again after the last two-month protection ended. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Borcker Meters (talk) 03:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Samsara 03:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 186 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 03:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 04:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent vandalism, seemingly related to an annual event occurring today; perhaps the page should be semi-protected for a day or two?. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 04:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:55, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users continually reinserting copyvios from Microsoft's website. Karunamon Talk 16:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – This appears to have been resolved a couple weeks ago. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring. 208.110.210.81 (talk) 01:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For this and two related articles affected by the same. Samsara 02:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please. Just look at the edit history, it's been a whirlwind of vandalism today. Shearonink (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal insistent on inserting nonsensical opinions which border on inane. This page, along with Nyx, Erebus, Lilith, Lucifer and Chaos (mythology), are its favorite targets.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – transfer rumors. WNYY98 (talk) 21:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Too much activity for pending changes, the majority being vandalism. Lizard (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 01:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal insistent on inserting nonsensical opinions which border on inane. This page, along with Ashtar (extraterrestrial being), Erebus, Lilith, Lucifer and Chaos (mythology), are its favorite targets.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal insistent on inserting nonsensical opinions which border on inane. This page, along with Ashtar (extraterrestrial being), Nyx, Erebus, Lilith, Lucifer and Chaos (mythology), are its favorite targets.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 18 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: With reports today that the actress who plays Supergirl has filed for divorce, anon IPs are repeatedly adding uncited claims based on non-RS anonymous tabloid stories. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Fairly persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content lately. --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – easy target for vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 23:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 23:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Tends to attract poor, unsourced edits. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JzG. Samsara 23:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and WP:SPA vandalism since last protection expired. Wikishovel (talk) 12:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Possibly divorce, IPs are adding unsourced content. Please unprotect a week or so after the divorce either goes through or fails. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 22:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – just suffered stroke and daughter carrie fisher died yesterday, fake death rumors. WNYY98 (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stronger protection is needed. The wave of unsourced death announcements isn't stemmed by the current measure. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Shown in 600+ pages, mostly articles. George Ho (talk) 23:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

30 December 2016

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent IP socking/block evasion, especially to reinsert copyvios - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chris M Pattinson/Archive and similar protection. Эlcobbola talk 11:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Current AfD candidate, disruption not severe enough given circumstances. Samsara 12:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 14:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. -- samtar talk or stalk 16:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 15:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- samtar talk or stalk 16:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking across the history, it's been the target of more than one person for a while now. So feel free to look into a rangeblock via WP:ANI, but I think this semi stands on its own "merit". Samsara 13:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandal yammering repeatedly at my talk page about his vandalism being reverted. Wikishovel (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly 24 hrs now of identical IP-hopping vandalism. Wikishovel (talk) 13:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 01:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection. JustBerry (talk) 04:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 12:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 01:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection. JustBerry (talk) 04:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 12:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs keep erasing information that has citations. I looked at the article's history and it looks like this has been happening for a long time. Statik N (talk) 00:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by IP-hopper, probably an attention-seeker. IP addresses used include 71.222.82.7, 67.5.156.157, 184.100.147.110, 97.120.240.176, 75.175.119.134, and 67.5.138.119. Various of these have been blocked. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 02:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent violation of BLP by IP-hopping user who has done this many times before despite repeated warnings. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism of financial details by IPs. Yackmann (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kudpung. Samsara 12:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Severe and persistent WP:BLP vio by dynamic-IP hopper at 2001:569:78b4:6900:b1c9:421:a768:8746 and others. He's just not stopping and consistently refuses to add a citation — largely because his claim appears to be rumor. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: IPs were waiting for block to end so they can keep up their disruptive edits. Indefinite or at least a lengthy semi protection will hopefully put an end to this. Rusted AutoParts 04:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection - Transcluded by 7,000+ talk pages. Most of edits done by one person who is also template editor. George Ho (talk) 04:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Someone apparently holds a grudge against this person, and regularly vandalizes it using different accounts. Please protect the article for a longer time. HandsomeFella (talk) 09:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued additions of either too many or inappropriate images by block evading IP. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 22:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Highly edited; so many reverts since the protection ended. George Ho (talk) 22:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Borcker. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 197 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was on semi-protection for a couple of weeks. It lifted this afternoon and it was immediately vandalised. I think we need indefinite semi-protection. . Kautilya3 (talk) 23:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Samsara 12:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection User:Borcker has a new target. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Borcker Rapid IP hops make blocks less than useful. Meters (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 197 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBlaze Lightning T 10:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Anon IP users have repeatedly deleted sections of the article that they feel contradict their POV. Judging by their edit comments, they appear to be experienced Wikipedians who are editing anonymously to potentially cover their tracks. :-/. Jm3 (talk) 04:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Given the precedent at Princess Diana. --Nevéselbert 20:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The1337gamer (talk) 22:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1337gamer was not giving his reason of removing, he didn't explain to me about it. That's another issue from him. 174.192.24.116 (talk) 22:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - TheMagnificentist 09:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 18:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits as User:Brianmagallano IP Sock. LG-Gunther :  Talk  09:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 18:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism after an edit through my IP address. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 14:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I would normally consider PC here, but it's been 4 months since the last edit. No protection seems necessary at this time MusikAnimal talk 18:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent death. RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 17:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MusikAnimal talk 18:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute; non-autoconfirmed editors once again edit-warring over statements about national origin. MPS1992 (talk) 01:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits since being warned about edit warring. If it persists please report to WP:ANEW MusikAnimal talk 18:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: High-risk template. 208.110.210.81 (talk) 02:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This class of templates is meant to be substituted, not transcluded - current transclusion count is 1. Therefore I'm not convinced of the risk. Samsara 03:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Agreed. I don't see any recent disruption either, so going by any standards there's no compelling reason to protect (even semi, much less full) MusikAnimal talk 18:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly transcluded by almost 800 pages, most articles. Also a redirect to the template-protected template:ko icon. George Ho (talk) 06:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Already semi'd, with no history of disruption, and that amount of transclusions warrants only semi by my standards MusikAnimal talk 18:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Propaganda and frequent vandalism from IP. Actually, rolling-stock in China is (claimed) designed to run at 350 km/h, or 380 km/h. But after Wenshou accident, speeds have been lowered to 300 km/h (for safety and economic reasons). Sources (when are not Chinese propaganda sources) used by IP vandal announce introduction of a new rolling-stock, able to run at 350 km/h as other trains. But no objectives sources support the idea that speeds have been raised to 350 km/h on the network. FlyAkwa (talk) 20:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protect until Monday when NFL playoffs are finalized. IP addresses have been making multiple unconstructive edits included one IP address who filled out the entire bracket despite only 4 seeds being set. Rockchalk717 20:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated attempts by IPs to added unsourced voice roles to the article. —Farix (t | c) 21:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article was initially being edited by a user bearing the same name as the person this article is about – a suspicious case of COI. Later an IP address has returned to make unreferenced edits, and keeps rolling back edits made to correct the use of promotionally watermarked photos, incorrect use of inline citations and took to embedding infobox with sole purpose of linking to personal website etc . sandioosesTextMe 19:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I would attempt to discuss with the user(s) first. The talk page is empty, as is the talk pages of the newest account to edit there (probably the same person), and the IPs before that. Some edits like this don't seem especially unhelpful MusikAnimal talk 18:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ip edit war. WNYY98 (talk) 21:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 18:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. WNYY98 (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

31 December 2016

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2600:1:92D4:C0C5:2D12:B89E:D70A:4C0B (talk)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., and Jimmy is an admin himself.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is tagged for speedy deletion as a blatant hoax but an IP is edit warring, removing the tag. Safiel (talk) 16:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor - Withdrawing my own request. Safiel (talk) 16:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: potential vandalism target due to cfp game. WNYY98 (talk) 20:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!21:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Appears to be repeatedly recreated. Nördic Nightfury 13:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I want some other admin eyes to look at this. @Jimfbleak: I think an IP from a competing group nominated this for G11 in bad faith; it survived an AFD, though that was a long time ago. Katietalk 14:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KrakatoaKatie, I did actually read the article and felt that it met the criteria, but as always I'm happy to go along with any decision made here. Please restore yourself if you wish, no big deal. Thanks for ping Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect notability is met, seems to attract a fair amount of news coverage. [72] From a quick survey of such news, there seem to be controversial aspects that weren't yet covered by the article, e.g. [73] [74] [75] [76] Three of those links are to The Indian Express. I do not know if this is some kind of pattern, or just a search algorithm quirk. Samsara 01:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@KrakatoaKatie: Is that what you were looking for as commentary, or were you going after a different angle? Samsara 03:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the AfD, I'm sure there's more credible sources available now but I'm sure that this is also one of those SEO magnets that'll immediately change to an advertorial if not semi protected at a reasonable version. —SpacemanSpiff 08:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Samsara: Commentary received. :-) Thanks, all. I'm going to restore it and Declined this request. I guess we'll deal with semi-protecting it when it needs protection. Katietalk 11:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism by IPs on this particular article is never ending. Please afford us some rest from the disruptive editing. . Atsme📞📧 15:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samtar.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 18:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article has been the target of various IPs adding an unsourced 2017 event to this page. After a block expired on December 18 two further IPs have again added a 2017 event without a source. . Silverfish (talk) 13:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article has been the target of various IPs adding an unsourced 2017 event to this page. After a block expired on December 18 three further IPs have again added a 2017 event without a source. Silverfish (talk) 13:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article has been the target of various IPs adding an unsourced 2017 event to this page. After a block expired on December 11 two further IPs have again added a 2017 event without a source. Silverfish (talk) 13:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 2601:1C0:102:2F4D:6DF3:516E:D45C:3715 (talk) 13:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection 45.124.227.105 (talk) 13:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBMAC page with a multi-day multi-IP edit war. Toddst1 (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced inflation of numbers etc etc by one or more IP-hoppers. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 09:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only persistant vandal on that page is you. I provided source for my every edit. 212.178.226.143 (talk) 10:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Before anyone here takes the IP's words for it I want to point out that the IP added sources (one of which is dubious at best) only after I requested protection here, and even then only parts of the edit were sourced, while the edits before that (among other things inflating the number of fighters of a certain type from 2 to 22, and helicopters from 30 to 43, and removing comments about how many of them are airworthy...) were totally unsourced. And this is just one of the IP's that have repeatedly been inflating the numbers in the article... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 12:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: - Persistent edit dispute. One user keeps adding unsourced suspect to list.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. nableezy - 18:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 18:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – I don't see this ever being an article. Dat GuyTalkContribs 08:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 10:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Longtime troll. Formality. —DangerousJXD (talk) 10:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent BLP vandalism or unsourced content Jim1138 (talk) 10:36, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 10:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 43 edits by 22 users, dating back to October 24, result in no change to the page. Kellymoat (talk) 04:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 80 edits by 25 users, dating back to December 4, equals no change to the page. Kellymoat (talk) 05:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: content dispute between ips and registered users. there are several sections on talk page to solve the related disputes but users just ignore. 188.158.70.155 (talk) 08:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 06:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cyphoidbomb.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I am requesting semi protection for 3 months. There has been a long term attempt to advertise one particular institute on this page and it has been going on for months. See diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4. At this point, it is disruptive and a time sink to constantly monitor this page. Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP's - requesting a month of protection given the number of attacks just in the past day. Jusdafax 06:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 07:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The fight just ended a couple of hours ago. The activity should die off shortly, so I think 3 days is sufficient. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 07:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP's - request a month given the number of vandals, also may require full protection. Jusdafax 07:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Closedmouth.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP is vandalizing several Pages. He's been at it for a few hours switching IPs and articles as soon as he is blocked. McSly (talk) 03:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – As well as socking... . EvergreenFir (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 172.56.42.152 (talk) 05:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:52, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent return of IP-hopping sock, likely of blocked member Wingard, by way of violating MOS:TV and the SoapProject. livelikemusic talk! 00:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs continuously changing the contents in Placements section. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 05:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A single IP User has been disruptively editing on this page and has failed to heed warnings by myself and another user to cease and desist from their actions. GUtt01 (talk) 20:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. MusikAnimal talk 00:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered users persist to add information that is either vandalism or completely uncited. The person in question appears to be a larger target due to his position. Zweeb101 (talk) 21:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism. Dpm12 (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism. Dpm12 (talk) 21:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Dpm12 (talk) 22:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IP (I'm assuming related to the BLP) is constantly blanking the AFD, Thanks, . –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:53, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thanks CambridgeBayWeather :), –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 01:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content. 73.96.113.105 (talk) 01:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – For months this page has been repeatedly vandalized. As you can see from the protection log, this would be the fourth protection if approved. There needs to be an ECP or extended semi-protection (the last one was for a month) to prevent the constant disruption. APK whisper in my ear 02:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and unconfirmed users repeatedly replacing name of actual director with "Korey Coleman" over the past two days for some reason. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP. The Banner talk 22:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by numerous ips, ignoring WP:IMOS, specifically WP:DERRY. Valenciano (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism typical of PPV events. Already started and will get worse as the card goes on. This event is also very likely to receive such attacks due to Ronda Rousey's return to the organization. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longterm Semi-Protection: Page sees lots of WP:Vandalism by an IP-hopping vandal hellbent on inserting WP:original research inanity into the article. Is the same IP-hopping vandal who also constantly vandalizes Lilith, Nyx and other pages with nonsense about "souls" and "curses"--Mr Fink (talk) 23:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ronhjones. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is constantly being vandalised because the person in question is a target as they are in the public eye. It is becoming difficult to stop IP's editing it and needs to be locked please!. Zweeb101 (talk) 23:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism – It has been historically protected several times so maybe its time to protect it permanently. Wrestlingring (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and resuming a previous edit war ignoring talk page discussion. Also suspecting sockpuppetry. Yackmann (talk) 15:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent additions of unsourced content relating to an unconfirmed signing. The page's protection expired today. Trut-h-urts man (TC) 18:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: Transcluded by 5,000+ pages. Edited by mostly those with TE rights. George Ho (talk) 19:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected MusikAnimal talk 00:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Page sees a constant barrage of vandalism by IP vandals constantly trying to rewrite the page as an inane joke-gay-romance fanfic page.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Probably should be a longer duration, but let's try this first MusikAnimal talk 00:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A lot of anonymous users are adding unsourced episodes. Pachisu124 (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – past 50 edits (in 6 days) contain 20 reverts and undos. Just about all of them are changing certification status to Platinum. . Kellymoat (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. With Hank Goldberg protected, block evading account has taken to vandalizing this article. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. MusikAnimal talk 00:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP edits. Again.   Aloha27  talk  16:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 16:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent genre changing by IPs, contrary to the sources cited, with no discussion or further sourcing whatsoever. This has been more frequent over the pas week or so. Kokoro20 (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP edits. 2607:FEA8:A29F:FDEE:B007:5B91:A66:276D (talk) 16:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MusikAnimal talk 00:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 17:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extensive history of disruption MusikAnimal talk 00:20, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor edit warring consensus on the talk page: calling it British, consensus to call it American. The consensus on the talk page is the result of a previous page protection. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Jauerback. 2601:1C0:10E:3FE0:6D44:396:25DB:60B3 (talk) 21:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

protection:The talk page of this article has been repeatedly vandalized by "new" users User:Godowdown, User:Whatofnadngtoday, User:Delete-zeitgay, and User:Zeitgay-is-dead, which all seem to be the same person and post the same message requesting immediate deletion. This has been going on since 3 November, 2016. The talk page should be protected from edits be new accounts. Dimadick (talk) 10:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, given the number of talk pages affected, blocks will be a better option. Samsara 13:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal is back. The page is just out of protection. McSly (talk) 22:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Widr. 2601:1C0:109:B6C6:548E:F7D9:F15:6BBA (talk) 23:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandal as the Boeing 737 page above with a dymanic IP. McSly (talk) 22:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Widr. 2601:1C0:109:B6C6:548E:F7D9:F15:6BBA (talk) 23:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]