Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/09

2024

01 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user keeps removing a lot of content from the talk page. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 09:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined. IP user has been blocked by PhilKnight. Report to AIV if they resume. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Launchballer 10:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Potymkin (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IPs disruptive edits. Jingiby (talk) 11:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 185.100.244.0/24 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Stop IP edits made to add false information helping scammers impersonate the brand 147.161.234.174 (talk) 08:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 06:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Going to indef; this has been going on forever 2600:100C:B043:2526:EDCB:DC50:798:9769 (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The history is ridiculous 2600:100C:B043:2526:EDCB:DC50:798:9769 (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 00:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP changing editor that keeps changing the outcome. Perhaps a temporary edit protection makes it clear this won't work. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And again, another one. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:53, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If possible, the IP user could be engaged on talk. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article was protected for WP:EW. A discussion was open in the talk page to try to see if a consensus was possible. However, just like before, as soon as the protection was over, the article was edit by the person engaged in the previous EW. Despite having it's multiple IPs blocked, the problem persists. No discussion will be able to go forward as long as the WP:status quo of the page is respected and the IP has shown no interest in respect it or the consensus policy. Coltsfan (talk) 12:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already done by administrator Acroterion. Steven Walling • talk 00:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing & BLP violations by IP editors. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking 107.77.195.70 (talk) 14:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruption to vandalise the article cognitive nerative as obvious the intruder were always an unknown ip address in this case caste motive conflict of intrust you can see interaction timeline [1] >>the first attempt to vandalise the article integration 59.89.22.144 (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – multiple disruptive edits from socks, possibly by UAK, over a long period of time. ZZZ'S 17:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We can allow the constructive IP edits this way; also the article isn't getting disrupted too much. Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For at least a month. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 01:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of registered and IP socks of User:MariaJaydHicky over the last week or so. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm involved in the SPI for WP:LTA/Andrew5, and have been (and will almost certainly continue to be) targeted by their socks. The last several revisions have been back-and-forth reversions of my WP:DENY removal of a comment thread over the SPI by new or IP socks and good-faith autoconfirmed / extended confirmed editors. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can re-request if abuse persists after protection exprires. Steven Walling • talk 01:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disputing going on at the moment due to the release of Alien Romulus, there is a talk page discussion but IPs not paying attention. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: too many vandalism. BlueSpectre5 (talk) 20:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too much vandalism 2600:100C:B043:2526:EDCB:DC50:798:9769 (talk) 00:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 06:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Steven Walling • talk 00:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. Skitash (talk) 10:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Steven Walling • talk 00:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Every now and then, some random IP (probably the same person) comes and alter the sourced Infobox result from "British victory" to "Iranian/Persian victory". This has been ongoing since at least August 2023 [2]. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple template-editor creation protected non-template or module pages

Indefinite full creation protection: Template-editor protection is mostly used on templates and modules per WP:TPROT, and because most deleted and repeatedly created non-template or module pages are instead fully, extended confirmed or semi salted or creation protected. PK2 (talk; contributions) 07:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined This makes no sense. Bbb23 (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Amigao (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page has since been moved to Bash in Berlin since I made that report, for reference. Someone should probably review the report below this one. Fathoms Below (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Andrew5 socks seem to be disruptively editing the page. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 12.246.51.122 (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. for a year. It has also been globally locked for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:LTA/Andrew5 promised to continue socking this page until it's protected. See here. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 18:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like one of the very, very, very few times CRASHlock is justifiable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 01:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked: 12.246.51.122 (talk · contribs) blocked by Zzuuzz. for a year; the IP is also globally locked for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Growing/persistent disruptive editing, such as adding citations needed to a lead section (goes against the order/manual of style), as well as removing parts of the infobox. Noorullah (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Given how new the article is, I'm not seeing a lot of disruption yet as a portion of the total edits. I will put a CTOPS notice on the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of registered and IP socks of User:MariaJaydHicky over the last week or so. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Favonian (talk) 08:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. Mtarch11 (talk) 05:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 08:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Disruptive editing disruptive editing Growing persistent disruptive editing such as adding citations needed to a lead section goes against the ordermanual of style as well as removing parts of the Info on the Page fixed it so many times and IP users keep changing it users doing this as well Mikey551415 (talk) 04:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined @Mikey551415: It looks like disagreements are being sorted out on article talk as they should be. Johnuniq (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Theonewithreason (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The show is currently premiering, the participants list is secretive and is fully revealed in the premiere by 10 PM IST 1 SEPT 2024, however IPs are found to be adding so called leaked, predicted participants, this may continue till today's premiere completes. Hence semi-protection atleast for 24 hours requested to avoid unsourced and predictive additions to the article. Thewikizoomer (talk) 06:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The company now likely meet WP:GNG due to new developments since 2015. A number of reliable sources now cover the studio: [3][4][5][6][7][8]. A redirect to Koch Media or Embracer Group, or the creation of a new article is now likely. OceanHok (talk) 06:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not unprotected – There's currently a Draft:Vertigo Gaming, which seems to be about the same company. If it can be improved to the point where it passes WP:AFC, it can be moved to article space. Favonian (talk) 08:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Transcluded through Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida on all plant articles. Recent addition to the phylogeny, so the estimated number of transclusions given by the script (15,000) is much lower than the actual number (as all templates transcluding Template:Taxonomy/Archaeplastida also transclude this one). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Template protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by Indonesian troll 3skandar (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to improve some content from Imran Khan Prp people (talk) 11:15, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Imran Khan is not protected. Favonian (talk) 12:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page needs protection because of vandalism Prp people (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: (The redirect, not its target): The page was preemptively protected without prior deletion in logs. No prior history of vandalism. Requesting extended confirmed protection or autoconfirmed protection as WP:Featured articles is autoconfirmed-protected. 2003 LN6 07:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose: There is no reason for anyone to be editing it. I got into something like this when I tried to request the removal of the protection for 9/11 (the redirect, not the article). However, I could potentially support reducing it to ECP to change it slightly faster in case the template gets deprecated. For now I oppose however. CharlieEdited (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A page shouldn't be protected just because "there's no need" to edit it. In this case, reasons to edit it could include, say, improving the WP:RCAT if better categorization templates are found. If there is no apparent reason for either protection or editing, full protection should not be the default. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Unprotected, gingerly. Redirect shortcuts are lower risk than templates (see WP:HRT) as they do not transclude their content, which makes me err towards lower protection levels. A similar shortcut with similar page views and similar-ish links is WP:GAN, which is not protected. I will put this on my watchlist. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting it here first since the admin who protected it passed away. Protection has been ongoing for nearly 7 years, which is definitely long enough for at least a trial run of no protection. Plus, page views are quite low and edits are infrequent, making it probably not much of a target for the average Wikipedia user. I support no protection but if vandalism ramps up again I would also be fine with PC. Semi is probably overkill but I would be somewhat fine with it. Edit: Linked to redirect by accident CharlieEdited (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That page is a redirect. Do you mean Texas Revolution? Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. CharlieEdited (talk) 03:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Unprotected. I'm doubtful about the supposed lack of page views as it seems to have had 23,500 in August 2024, but it has been some time since the protection and edits are pretty infrequent after all. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP over a newly released film. Charliehdb (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 18:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 18:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Skitash (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 09:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Warnings have been given; a single disruptive user doesn't justify protection. —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of contentious material by drive-by IPs which has picked-up in recent months. The edits remain unaddressed and unexplained. A mid-term PP is needed on what is a perennial attractor of bad-faith actors (as witnesses by the page's history). Gotitbro (talk) 10:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issues are compounded by the fact that the term (or rather its acronym CECA) is also being used as a racial slur ([9]). Gotitbro (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism of contentious article by IP and new editors. Sciencefish (talk) 12:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS. Israel-Palestine. Borgenland (talk) 13:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 18:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content/unexplained removal. Thanks. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by unregistered users in recent days. AideDésintéressée (talk) 19:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Upgrading from PC. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Repeatedly recreated by well-meaning users despite AfD consensus for it to be a redirect until the election. Full protection could be a good way to avoid people wasting time on recreating the article before a consensus is established for notability. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined A good thought, but doesn't meet the very high bar for imposing full protection. GoodnightmushTalk 18:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Serious edit war. JacktheBrown (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 17:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talkedits) 20:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. C F A 💬 19:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined for now. There's some engagement on the talk page now, so hoping this won't require admin intervention. If it does, probably can start with a block, not protection. GoodnightmushTalk 19:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Possible future target for IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editors continually add an image of a human foot to the infobox, claiming (with no evidence) that it is Lardner's foot. DH85868993 (talk) 10:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war. JacktheBrown (talk) 16:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined I don't see any evidence of an edit war here. GoodnightmushTalk 18:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's an obvious edit war going on. what do you mean there is nothing? Zlad! (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zlad!: exactly! JacktheBrown (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If an edit war, it's a slow one. If we would protect, we would need to protect fully....frankly I don't see the need for that yet. Lectonar (talk) 10:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war. JacktheBrown (talk) 06:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If an edit war, it's a slow one. If we would protect, we would need to protect fully....frankly I don't see the need for that yet. See above, there was another request for the same page. Lectonar (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on the talk page. GnocchiFan (talk) 08:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined See Wikipedia:ATPROT, disruption not heavy enough. Lectonar (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Could become a target for IP Vandalism An guy with one grammatical error (talk) 08:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@An guy with one grammatical error: Please have a thorough read of our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Page is being vandalized/inflammatory content added again by IPs. Paris1127 (talk) 20:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done I've semi-protected the page for two weeks due to BLP issues (extended confirmed is not nessecary at this time). If they continue to be an issue after the protection expires, ping me and I'll extend it. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I'm going to change it to pending changes for six months because it looks like people are consistent in making the problematic edits over a period of months even if it isn't constant. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war by [10]; this is the same IP that was blocked yesterday for "edit war" ([11]). JacktheBrown (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This does seem to need protection, and I'm possibly involved. Valereee (talk) 16:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I hope that a reasonable consensus can be reached on the talk page for how to go forward in that time. GoodnightmushTalk 16:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated spam by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IndeedJob. C F A 💬 14:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Creation protected indefinitely. Valereee (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing and persistent IP edits changing Nanchang to Hong Kong despite no sources provided, and no findable evidence to support claims, not to mention the clear proof to the contrary from pre-existing source, and from the manufacturer's website stating JMEV is in Nanchang in no uncertain terms. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Editing based on player transfer rumours. WP:BLPGOSSIP, WP:NOTCRYSTAL. Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 18:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 19:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I enquir about myself 2600:6C46:6E00:B:F0A2:EB1E:982E:4567 (talk) 11:10, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged per WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI. Zinnober9 (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This request cannot be actioned.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not unprotected because there is nothing to unprotect. New editors should submit drafts for review. See WP:AFC for instructions. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already done by administrator EdJohnston. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent edit-warring between registered accounts. LR.127 (talk) 16:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already done by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism,[[12]] warned on their tp, continues to vandalise the page Theonewithreason (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 19:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs, with low levels of editing otherwise. Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 19:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – nazi flags. soibangla (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

03 September 2024

Reason: Incredibly high level of vandalism, misinformation, or just bad edits. Not a week goes by without someone either adding "pro-Russian" in the infobox, removing Euroscepticism and replacing it with pro-Europeanism, or vandalizing the article by calling the party a "Russian Dream" or its founder "Borys Ivanishvili". I think this easily warrants extended confirmed protection as it is a very contentious article about a very controversial party and protection will save it from being stuck for hours with vandalism until someone notices and reverts. Zlad! (talk) 20:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please invoke WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – IPs making unhelpful edits to the page of a public figure. Pending would allow helpful edits through while restricting gossip/vandalism. Paris1127 (talk) 20:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. To get through the election, at least. Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBPIA. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 20:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBPIA. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 21:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:10, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 23:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 20:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC):[reply]

Reason: Repeated unproductive IP edits 162 etc. (talk) 22:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The experiment of this page being unprotected has failed as the edit warriors and vandals have since returned. The idea of a topic regarding the far-right not being CTOP is clearly short-sighted here overall. CNC (talk) 23:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As for CTOPS, perhaps we should have post-2016 British politics and personalities. You're welcome to propose that to ArbCom (or, alternatively, as a community sanction), but we can't just up and do it ourselves here as much as many times we'd like to. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi, I'm renewing page protection for this month due to WP:VANDALISM and WP:CRIT. The Vice President of the Philippines Sara Duterte, is involved in several controversies, and her articles are prone, and bias. An IP user edited the name 'Shimenet' into Sara Duterte's article.

(For the context: The term 'Shimenet' related to VP Sara Duterte has become controversial and is often used in memes on social media, particularly following a Senate Hearing where she had a arguments with Senator Risa Hontiveros. Royiswariii (talk) 04:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unfortunately, someone is still trying to add defamatory contents that violate WP:BLP. It might appear well-referenced at first, but if you take a closer look you'll see that the text is poorly written, negative in tone, and that the references are bogus (duplicates, Russian-language unreliable sources, web archives, blog-based content, paid attacks, and even English-language sources that discuss the subject completely differently from how the article does). It has also triggered the "possible BLP issue or vandalism" tag, see [13]. Originally, this was all added by an autoconfirmed SPA sock account (Special:Contributions/Παλαβός) which has now resumed the edit warring. I suggest that the edits be reverted and the page be bluelocked to prevent future BLP violations. Thanks. 2A02:8308:F:9900:DC4C:EE8E:F4F:471A (talk) 06:31, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. For three days. The edits reverted were made before that. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; WP:CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am writing to request the semi-protection of the "Association of Malayalam Movie Artists" article. The page has become a hot topic recently and has been repeatedly targeted by vandalism. Despite a previous protection request that was granted, the protection lasted only a couple of days, and the vandalism has since resumed.

Given the article's current relevance and the frequency of disruptive edits, I believe that extending the semi-protection would help maintain the integrity and reliability of the content. A temporary protection period of 2-4 weeks should suffice until the topic cools down. Kaeez06 (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing name vandalism from multiple IPs. gobonobo + c 23:43, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP edits repeatedly changing pronouns despite warnings. Has been protected previously for same reason. StewdioMACK (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of unsourced content again and again by IPs. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP infobox vandalism (adding extraneous/incorrect detail). Nate (chatter) 16:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/CID. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi following sustained vandalism and brigading. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I've noticed that some edits from IP address users have been affecting the constructive development of the page. I've encouraged these users to participate in the Talk page discussions to share their perspectives and collaborate on making positive contributions, but they are failing to do and continue with their un-constructive edits. ReillyVega (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced content. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content to redirect, following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hung Cao (2nd nomination) in July. Wikishovel (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors. Adding unsourced genre and removing sourced genre without explanation. This has been going on since the article's creation. Here are a few examples: [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] Shout4Serenity (talk) 22:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However, this will not come without noting that a) you could have warned them in some form other than edit summaries, and b) "we can do this all day buddy" is more befitting an IP that gets blocked rather than a Wikipedian. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unfortunate abbreviation has resulted in high Battle-for-Dream-Island-related vandalism; last incident was on August 30; was unable to figure out if the Commissioner is aware of this 134.22.84.45 (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. related to some mod for Hearts of Iron 4 Daisytheduck quack quack 00:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple violations of WP:LISTPEOPLE on the artist section by multiple IP users in the past month. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Needs protection ASAPMikey551415 (talk) 04:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article redirect continued to be reverted back to a full scale article despite a successful deletion nomination and the original concerns not being addressed at all. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please consider page protection downgrade to Pending changes protection, there's no IP edits that are vandalism. 14.0.225.7 (talk) 04:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. It was your own disruptive edits from multiple IP addresses that caused this protection to begin with. Pending-change protection would simply create work for other editors if the disruptive activity resumed. And disruption isn't the same thing as vandalism. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't assume or accuse any editors to be disruptive. According to the Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Comparison_table, Semi-protection is only appropriate for pages that have been persistently vandalized by anonymous and registered users. All users should be free to edit, when there's no vandalism activity going on. AN INAPPROPRIATE PROTECTION IS A DISRUPTIVE ACTION. 14.0.225.7 (talk) 05:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 07:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repated violations of WP:NOVELPLOT by IP-hopping editor. DonIago (talk) 03:39, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2601:547:1583:4450:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandal 81.199.149.194 -- Pemilligan (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them a level one. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Major figure in the 2024 US presidential election not to have their page ECP'd. And it would be wise to do so for the next several months. Qutlooker (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s also to prevent sockpuppets of the banned user Buzzards-Watch Me Work from editing it 2603:8080:D03:89D4:F983:A52F:F09D:6622 (talk) 00:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 03:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Frost 13:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 114.10.103.179 (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of User:SHUBHAM788 at work adding unsourced genre "action thriller film" en masse in many articles. Digg for this one, as well as other articles [19], [20], [21]. If possible please protect those articles as well. Thanks. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2409:4089:2D48:B892:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso using IPs from Italy. Binksternet (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 5.90.136.0/21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. from that article for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of poorly unsourced content/false information. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 01:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seems to be mainly one user over a span of one day. I advise warning the user appropriately, and consider bringing it to WP:AIV if they continue. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 01:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined That was done, and the report was declined as they had made no edits since being warned. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The same user just vandalized this page again and is doing this to several other pages such as Candlebox and Skid Row. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 04:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have given him his last warning. If someone else had done that before, I could have blocked him. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked: 71.91.161.144 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours after he (unsurprisingly) ignored that last warning. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent attempts by the same user to vandalize this page for months - ever since the page was unlocked from last year, when it was locked due to high vandalism. Soon after it was unlocked, user "TBurnout" engaged in new attempts started to undo legitimate sources. The same user persistently posts "failed verification" and undoes legitimate, highly-credible links (i.e. links to national newspapers and the Government of Canada House of Commons) added to the page in order verify its content. Belladonna2024 (talk) 03:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 07:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:c44c:1600::/64 (talk · contribs). One month. Favonian (talk) 08:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently, the page has been subject to multiple edits by IP users who are adding false information. These edits have included the insertion of a fake person's name under the "Key People" section and listing countries where Trade Republic does not actually operate.

These misleading edits are not only spreading inaccurate information but are also leading to potential scams. Users who come across this incorrect information might be deceived into thinking they are interacting with the official company, which can result in significant financial and reputational harm.

Given the potential risks to the public and the repeated nature of these malicious edits, I believe that page protection is necessary to ensure the integrity of the information presented and to prevent further harm. You can check my user/email to prove legitimacy. Trade Republic (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Issue is the unsourced addition of a non-notable (and possibly inaccurate) staff members name. I seriously doubt there's any "risk to the public" but the to and fro of reverting is mildly disruptive so on balance have added a short semi-protection. There are also problems with the OP's username which I'll take to their talkpage. -- Euryalus (talk) 11:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Fourth time asking for protection. people keep adding a hoax name. I am requesting for INDEFINITE protection. IP trolls are not going away and probably won’t for an extremely long time. A few months of protection won’t cut it anymore because i’ll be back here -1ctinus📝🗨 11:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 11:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Fathoms Below (talk) 13:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuing IP disruption, I requested this before but Daniel believed there wasn't enough warranted activity yet. Seeing how this is continuing and yet another editor has reverted the IP, I think a protection is in order. Noorullah (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption still isn't heavy enough to warrant protection; OP: please read our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 13:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 12:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Thanks for bringing this up; as it is, the threshold for protecting talk-pages is generally higher than for other pages like articles, e.g., so one instance of disruption makes it not necessary to protect it. And we have a talk-page which is watched by plenty of administrator to boot. Lectonar (talk) 12:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:47, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 16:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A globally locked and indefinitely block in EnWIki LTA with undisclosed paid edits continues to turn articles into a news dump from various IPs. Please protect the articles due to constant sockpuppetry. If need information on what the LTA it is, I can provide it to CUs, or ping Bbb23, because you know who is that. --Mykola7 (talk) 11:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done, the first one for two weeks, the second one indef Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attacks by Piermark socks. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page target of disruptive editing due to recent news relating to game, likely requires short period of protection. Rambling Rambler (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 18:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Note: I've partial-blocked the /64 for a week, and invited them to discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Please let me know if problems continue. Joyous! Noise! 19:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 06:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism of a Transgender Paralympian. Qwerty123 (they/them) (talk) 08:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – As noted on the talk page, the contentious topics procedure applies to the article. M.Bitton (talk) 10:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to request protection, but I see you noticed that new accounts and IPs are at it again before I did. TarnishedPathtalk 10:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator SarekOfVulcan. Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS RUSUKR. Borgenland (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Charliehdb (talk) 15:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accounts persistently changing figures without any source. Shubhrojeet (talk) 10:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs and non-autoconfirmed users disruptively editing the article. Replicative Cloverleaf (talk) 11:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CTOPS notice left on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – As per every other article on this matter. RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Speculations resumed immediately after the last protection expired. Jalen Barks (Woof) 14:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Regular vandalism from TherealBengal and his IP's.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 16:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Someone with a possible COI has been adding unsourced content to this article ever since I created it 10 years ago. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism/unproductive edits with BLP concerns McPhail (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04 September 2024

Reason: Vandalism by anonymous ips (probably the same person as these ips) Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 09:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think here blocks need to be handed out. Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:AC05:FA00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two years. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 97.78.224.183 (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Proxy IPs, likely LTA 1319. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated BLP vandalism Orchastrattor (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit today after nearly two months with no edits whatsoever. Daniel Case (talk) 22:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Cullen328. Favonian (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I request to edit this article because there are not any articles that match this category Marklawrence2601 (talk) 07:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to happen.Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done. Wrong venue. You'd have to convince the community at MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist that the blacklist entry should be removed. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user using multiple IPs vandalizing the page to show as if communist parties like the German Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany won. Hlsci (talk) 09:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user abusing multiple IPs to show as if communist parties like the German Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany won. Hlsci (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user abusing multiple IPs to show as if communist parties like the German Communist Party and the Marxist-Leninist Party of Germany won. Hlsci (talk) 10:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by a user which has previously abused other IPs and vandalized other articles about German politics by showing as if the Communist Party of Germany won by 99.5%. Hlsci (talk) 10:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 10:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistently vandalized by a user which has previously abused other IPs and blocked twice today and vandalized other articles about German politics by showing as if the Communist Party of Germany won by 99.5%. Hlsci (talk) 10:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalized by a user which has been blocked twice today, abused multiple IPs, and vandalized other articles related to German politics by editing as if the Communist Party of Germany won by 99.5%. Hlsci (talk) 10:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistently vandalized by a user which has been blocked twice today, abused multiple IPs, and vandalized other articles related to German politics by editing as if the Communist Party of Germany won by 99.5%. Hlsci (talk) 10:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalized by a user which has been banned more than twice, abused multiple IPs, and vandalized other articles related to German politics by editing it so it redirects to Gulag. Hlsci (talk) 10:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple attempts at vandalism, appears to be a campaign over multiple German political articles. Ygolygydd (talk) 11:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP addresses -who might be the same one using entirely different addresses- keeps on editing the page adding very biased feelings about criticism of this music genre. Calls people who dislike deathcore "elitist", not only is this very emotionally fueled but also unsourced. Edits have been reverted for the last several days and it doesn't seem to ever stop. Lil Sad Lil Happy (talk) 11:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Massive disruptive editing Wikibear47 (talk) 13:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was protected two and a half weeks ago. That’s enough 2600:100C:B0AC:8464:9434:2773:98C4:AA38 (talk) 13:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruption by someone who thinks that calling a German company "Turkish" because it was founded by people with Turkish roots is the pinnacle of humor. IceWelder [] 07:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing. A bunch of new accounts and IPs keep adding "(and concord)" to the premise section in reference to the game being shut down. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 08:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 09:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistently vandalized by a user which has been banned twice today, abuses multiple IPs, and vandalized other articles about German politics, by editing it to redirect to Adolf Hitler. Hlsci (talk) 10:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05 September 2024

Reason: High level disruptive edits. Mehedi Abedin 03:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Mikey551415 (talk) 04:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was left in a vandalized state for 3 months. Frost 04:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This was declined twice before, with reasons to not warranted activity, but now theres an effective edit war of me and another user reverting an IP, there is imminent protection required now, please see the page history for the back and forth. Noorullah (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP edit-warring to insert preferred version of plot summary details. DonIago (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined for now. It looks like a productive discussion is taking place on the talk page. Also, it seems like the IP is editing against consensus, so not really an EW. GoodnightmushTalk 14:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since Md Al Islam Hamza blocked, various IPs are coming in and whitewashing the page. Happening at least once a day. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 15:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 06:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Just one IP. No disruption since the only warning they received. Ping me if a block ends up being necessary, but that would be the next step, not protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs are trying to close this AfD in violation of WP:NACIP. LibStar (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined for now. It's a little bit of work to revert, but it's only 2 NACIPs so far and it'd be ideal to keep this discussion as open as possible. Feel free to ping me if it gets worse. GoodnightmushTalk 13:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Xexerss (talk) 12:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Just one IP and they haven't edited since their last warning. Feel free to ping if it continues and I can block them. GoodnightmushTalk 13:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruptive editing and also revision history mostly filled with bunch of reverts. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Just the one IP in the last 5+ weeks. GoodnightmushTalk 13:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Zingo156 (talk) 13:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lorry Gundersen (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Claimed by Cambodia PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected. Joyous! Noise! 15:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 15:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued disruption after protection expired. – sbaio 17:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: GA – Persistent bad edits by unregistered users. Will be more in the coming days with the next England national football team matches. AideDésintéressée (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent IP vandalism, despite multiple attempts to tellSeyamar(245CMR)💬📜 19:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism on page changing boxoffice and budget numbers and using unreliable blog sources. RangersRus (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This was declined twice before, with reasons to not warranted activity, but now theres an effective edit war of me and another user reverting an IP, there is imminent protection required now, please see the page history for the back and forth. Noorullah (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP edit-warring to insert preferred version of plot summary details. DonIago (talk) 23:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined for now. It looks like a productive discussion is taking place on the talk page. Also, it seems like the IP is editing against consensus, so not really an EW. GoodnightmushTalk 14:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Since Md Al Islam Hamza blocked, various IPs are coming in and whitewashing the page. Happening at least once a day. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:18, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 15:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 06:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Just one IP. No disruption since the only warning they received. Ping me if a block ends up being necessary, but that would be the next step, not protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IPs are trying to close this AfD in violation of WP:NACIP. LibStar (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined for now. It's a little bit of work to revert, but it's only 2 NACIPs so far and it'd be ideal to keep this discussion as open as possible. Feel free to ping me if it gets worse. GoodnightmushTalk 13:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Xexerss (talk) 12:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Just one IP and they haven't edited since their last warning. Feel free to ping if it continues and I can block them. GoodnightmushTalk 13:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruptive editing and also revision history mostly filled with bunch of reverts. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Just the one IP in the last 5+ weeks. GoodnightmushTalk 13:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Zingo156 (talk) 13:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lorry Gundersen (talk) 13:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Claimed by Cambodia PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected. Joyous! Noise! 15:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 15:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 15:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued disruption after protection expired. – sbaio 17:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: GA – Persistent bad edits by unregistered users. Will be more in the coming days with the next England national football team matches. AideDésintéressée (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent IP vandalism, despite multiple attempts to tellSeyamar(245CMR)💬📜 19:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism on page changing boxoffice and budget numbers and using unreliable blog sources. RangersRus (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:Persistent Disruptive editing disruptive editing Growing persistent disruptive editing such as adding citations needed to a lead section goes against the ordermanual of style as well as removing parts of the Info on the Page fixed it so many times and IP users keep changing it users doing this as well. Disputes and disagreements keep occurring time to protection to be added. Mikey551415 (talk) 04:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Used by Substituted into template-protected templates, like {{Yes}}. George Ho (talk) 07:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC); edited, 19:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Template protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism immediately resumed after previous protection expired. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Kinu. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS. Mother article Timeline of the Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present) was split so also request protection for other branches, namely:

Borgenland (talk) 15:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. All. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is attracting hoax content from an Argentinian IP-hopper (two different IPs since 31 August). Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous vandalism and POV editing over many years, which had a spike in the last week. Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/EE, and possibly others. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unconstructive edits by IP users. Whenever the edits are undone or reverted, the IP users just get right back to it. Requesting maybe a week of protection. MannysMyName (talk) 21:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High risk of IP vandalism due to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and ongoing war in Gaza. MagyarNavy1918 (talk) 21:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:ECA5:4658:4484:BF34 (talk) 21:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:ECA5:4658:4484:BF34 (talk) 21:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Upgraded from existing indef PC ... it was not enough anymore. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 21:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Daisytheduck quack quack 22:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 23:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level ip vandalism with unsourced and unreliably sourced changes and pushing to not keep neutral tone for controversial subject. RangersRus (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Potentially as a precaution, since User:Memevietnam98 appears to be persisting in restoring copyright violations. ⸺(Random)staplers 02:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. They stopped after their last warning about 18 hours ago. Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. All of the IPs used. We should not semi-protect this page for very long if we decide to ... see logs. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Need an Extended Confirmed Protection due to this page is claimed by Cambodia and reference from Angkor Wat's statue as Kun Khmer. PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruptive edits in almost a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Edits by extended confirmed socks. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was just about to make this requets let me add more background about this place
For the past 8 months, the History of the chair has been vandalized by 4 Chan trolls removing information about chairs in sub-Saharan Africa, saying they didn't have any until Europeans gave it to them. I have made 2 reports in the past and gave proof of Africans having chairs before Europeans came, Which was supported by mods and added to the page debunking that claim,and gave proof that the attacks were coming from 4chan. It was given semi-protection(first report), which didn't stop them, And then later, given extended projection (second report). Even with this, they still find a way to bypass it and edit the page. It is also now being attacked by a well-known extended-confirmed sock abuser who dates back to 2007!, which is this guy.Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hamish Ross
My pass reports about it, This page has begin protection 8 times it should get Indefinite Full protection at this point
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1157#c-Nil Einne-20240530003900-Developed it entirely-20240530001300
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=1226339864 Developed it entirely (talk) 00:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked. All socks, and globally locked. With one exception that I know of, we do not put articles on indefinite full protection. Not without an extensive discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
extensive discussion? where would I go to make the case for it? like every two days a new socks just pops up. Developed it entirely (talk) 02:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by ip user. ModdiWX (message me!) 15:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/GENSEX IanDBeacon (talk) 20:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked: 2600:1016:B123:E315:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. For 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CTOPS notice left on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent removal of sourced content and violation of contentious topics policy (Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict) by user who then started trolling on my talk page.[22] Red Phoenician (talk) 18:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been persistent vandalism over the past few days. Steelkamp (talk) 03:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 10:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 05:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 10:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mass Vandalism Fragrant Peony (talk) 05:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 10:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

kalki 2898 collected 1158 cr not 1028 cr its not 5th place DollarAD2500 (talk) 10:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable source for this? Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined Can't be added without source. Lectonar (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Yamla. Favonian (talk) 17:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article was protected until 4 September 2024, post removal of protection, IPs resumed attacking the page. IPs are adding false eviction/winner statuses to the contestants whom they probably like/dislike. Eviction happens on Sunday and is secretive and kept secretive until the Sunday premiere. To avoid such and other false and unsourced additions. Requesting semi protection atleast until 31 December 2024 because the show conducts around 105 episodes every year, hence by the assumption the show should be ended around 31 December 2024. Considering the persistent disruptions by IPs requesting the protection. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, eviction etc. happens on weekly basis until the season ends. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 17:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – I protected this page for two hours, despite being WP:INVOLVED, due to frequent vandalism and BLP vios. I would like uninvolved input on either reversing or extending my protection. This article's subject is in the news right now, and the article sits at the junction of both the BLP and American politics contentious topics (+ a little Russia-Ukraine mixed in now). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Firefangledfeathers. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Favonian, did you look into this? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Firefangledfeathers: Of course not ;), but now I have. Favonian (talk) 18:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive IP-users have returned to this article again (after the end of previous protection). Addition of unsourced content, original research, and unhelpful changes/removals. Mann Mann (talk) 15:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only 1 or maybe 2 disruptions in 2.5 months since protection ended. GoodnightmushTalk 16:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Low frequency, long term spamming. Favonian (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 18:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced content, started again as the previous protection expired earlier Today. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 19:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Users with COI trying to remove anything vaguely negative and turn it into a promotional piece for the company. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with the semi-protection Ymblanter (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06 September 2024

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Borgenland (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bunch of IPs (possibly a single user but I am unsure) engaging in random content removal and edit warring. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 00:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please protect for a month to minimise the disruptive editing at the article for the rest of the season (as per my previous request). 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 12:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He HAD (not has) a pet cat named Niblo (2009 - 2022), which he adopted in Budapest. Jobraith (talk) 20:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment: The talk page is not protected. You should make a request there. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 00:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The article just got protected, but Talk:Anthony Hopkins isn't. Remember to include reliable sources for the demise of the feline. Even if they aren't covered by our policy regarding biographies of living persons, sources are required. Favonian (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HurricaneEdgar 12:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most edits are from established editors; this shouldn't be too much of a problem as the story/storm develops. Daniel Case (talk) 01:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is a lot of IP vandalism and the addition of awkward information Dushnilkin (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Never ending alteration of sourced info. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and sockpuppetry – Blocked user MariaJaydHicky using multiple accounts for genre warring in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level vandalism. Mehedi Abedin 15:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk since this is partly over the infobox. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is being vandalized. A full cleanup is required

1)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244185029

2)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244180041

3)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244184947

4)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244174430

5)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vinesh_Phogat&diff=prev&oldid=1244170253

Hu741f4 (talk) 15:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Vinu. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Aintabli (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under ARBKURD. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – After the protection expired recently, the vandalism (about the player club) is back. Alexcalamaro (talk) 16:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Currently a dispute over adding publisher parameters to citation templates. It is being discussed at my talk although other editors have continued to revert while the discussion is ongoing. Some protection may be in order. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous creation of topic sections that are unconstructive, poorly-written and forum-like. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 20:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More disruption again hamster717🐉(discuss anything!🐹✈️my contribs🌌🌠) 22:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two editors have been going back and forth since June. Either this article needs a week of full protection, or some heavy warnings need to be given out. But it needs to stop. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:26, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 22:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 23:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Disruptive editing disruptive editing Growing persistent disruptive editing such as adding citations needed to a lead section goes against the ordermanual of style as well as removing parts of the Info on the Page fixed it so many times and IP users keep changing it users doing this as well. Disputes and disagreements keep occurring time to protection to be added.. Protection was added for 3 weeks but was removed by someone for whatever reason Mikey551415 (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Yes, me. I semi-protected the article yesterday; it will remain protected until the 26th. There have been minimal edits since that protection.
    Also, the article had never been protected before; as for it being removed, well, three weeks is one of the options we have, so it probably just expired.
    More to the point, it sounds like you are getting confused here. Are you talking about another article? Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 01:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long term edit-warring dynamic ips and inexperienced editors. --Hipal (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of original research by anonymous editor. Ken Gallager (talk) 12:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2409:4073:200B:A8F6:293C:B4C8:B5CC:BCD4 (talk) 12:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Past instances of transphobic vandalism including dead-naming the Author of the webcomic 2601:586:8201:5750:39F1:DFDF:DB8C:A279 (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS under GENSEX. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent adding either unsourced or poorly sourced material by sock hopping IP addresses. There are numerous IPs that have made edits and I'm certain one of them is the same person as they all come from Santa Cruz. In fact, a year ago I requested that page be protected because of a particular editor making similar edits.[23] Now it looks like that editor is making edits while logged out. Kcj5062 (talk) 13:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 181.188.160.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for a week}} Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive editing - the same user who vandalised the page with my Care Bears fan shows in the past has been vandalising the page again after the six month protection expired. Refuses to listen even after I posted a talk page post. Luigitehplumber (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 86.15.45.211 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High risk of IP vandalism due to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Israel-Hamas war. MagyarNavy1918 (talk) 20:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear to me that this is a CT article. Hillel International is not protected either. Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Just created today, in any event. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to request protection for this page due to ongoing issues with persistent vandalism. Multiple anonymous or unregistered users are frequently adding and removing information, much of which is unsourced and unreliable. Despite efforts to revert these changes, the disruptive edits continue to occur at a high frequency, undermining the page's reliability and integrity.

I believe that semi-protection would help prevent further disruptions and allow for constructive, cited contributions from established editors.

Thank you for your consideration. Krishnpremi (talk) 21:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article hasn't been edited at all in six days. For disruptive edits you have to go back even further. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Empty Legacy section ThatTechGuy2008 (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done I've removed that empty section. If that's not what you had in mind, please read WP:ER for instructions on how to make an edit request. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You. ThatTechGuy2008 (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 22:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring about the number of sales Trade (talk) 01:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 05:38, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly being vandalised by IP editors and new users (probably kids). Obvious target for vandalism and hate speech. It was protected for two days last November and then immediately started to be vandalised again. IP editors have no need to edit the category. Mclay1 (talk) 11:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done (as WP:GENSEX). El_C 12:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be perpetual pointless IP fiddling going on on this page - and it's impossible to tell when the last good edits were. Golikom (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. About 80% of all edits to the page are by IPs, and at a cursory glance (me not being knowledgeable about the topic at all) I see no obvious vandalism. Lectonar (talk) 09:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by IPs, possibly the same user. —Bruce1eetalk 11:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP accounts, such as blanking pages. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 12:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The entire article has been vandalisied, nearly every other sentence now contains propagandist and historical revisionist claims, all of which quote a "source" that provides absolutely no mention of their wild claims. Iceylore (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP violations. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism after expiration of protections. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Two reasons after Daniel Case had changed protection to auto confirmed: (1) WP:ARBEE due to Russo–Ukrainian War and (2) WP:ARBPIA under the scope of the 2023 Israel–Hamas War as evidenced here. 70.51.215.103 (talk) 03:19, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put it on ECP since a) it's not directly relevant to the Israel-Hamas war, and b) while it undeniably touches on RUSUKR that is not the central focus of the article; it's considerably broader. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – basis for ECP upgrade not clearly outlined (volume of disruptive or otherwise contested edits by non-WP:XC users of restricted subjects). El_C 12:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Revdellable material repeatedly posted in Hindi. Giraffer (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant attacks by HoY. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurring and persistent unexplained and frivolous changes to height and/or weight from IP editors. It is not a constant issue, but it has flared up in the last few days. I believe temporary semi-protection is warranted. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But if it gets any worse, just ping me and we can semi or pending protect. GoodnightmushTalk 14:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This article has been repeatedly created by users with a conflict of interest, in violation of WP:COIEDIT/WP:PAID. Additionally, the subject appears to have questionable notability, so it should follow the AfC process. GSS💬 17:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Creation protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobanfasil, socks persistently gaming autoconfirm. Wikishovel (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. High level of disruptive editing from various IP addresses. Barry Wom (talk) 08:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of Wikipedia:Vandalism and misrepresenting sources, or removing text, or edit warring in the page Gowthamaprabu (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IanDBeacon (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-Protection: I would like to request for adding semi-protection for an indefinite period to this article as it is been repeatedly vandalised by random IP addresses and a group of new users who are against the article's contents in real life.Rourib Dutta (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. The article has been protected for two weeks which seems appropriate. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2409:40C4:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs). Partially blocked from several articles for disruptive editing after numerous warnings. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent efforts by the subject and associates to whitewash the article about him in his favor. 331dot (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have to be ECP- I picked that by accident in Twinkle. 331dot (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by some IP range; continuously adding ethnicity/background to the lead section[24][25][26]. Mann Mann (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most recent edits are just vandalism, I'm even wondering if they're socks. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 19:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending changes protection, given that more than half of the edits to this page over the last month are vandalism and BLP violations from seemingly an IP hopper. Leafy46 (talk) 19:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A week of semi protection because two IPs recently identified to be changing winner name of an ended season. Thewikizoomer (talk) 05:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism by IP and sock. Request escalation to autoconfirmed access. Borgenland (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There appears to be an inordinate amount of edits trying to skew the appearance of the film's reception as positive by adding in statements on the positive audience reception using metrics like IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes user scores which are highly suspect and easily exploited by positive and negative review bombing. IonicBreezeMachine (talk) 13:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It's time to at least try using the talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Shooting occurred at a nearby high school, please protect for at least 7 days. Thanks!. BryceM2001 (talk) 15:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 17:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – School had shooting recently, out of respect for victims, protect page. Thanks!. BryceM2001 (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Sorry, but that is not a thing that we do. El_C 17:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone is taking Salvatore Simeone and his titles away from the page, please protect this page from being edited only this account please Tkostudios (talk) 16:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tkostudios You express a desire to own and control this article. Please see WP:OWN and understand that this request is unlikely to succeed. Please also be aware of WP:PAID. I will copy this message to your user talk page. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Edit warring has resumed again, though progress has been made on the talk page, but player... 7? Has entered the chat and undone recent progress in discussions without consensus. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Right now, the only options that seem appropriate as per the guidance in the protection policy are full protection or no protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding poorly-worded nonsense to plot summary. DonIago (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People still jumping the gun on calling his date of death. CRBoyer 21:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. vandalism and DE Luhanopi (talk) 15:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeat users keep erroneously changing the information on this group which is not current to the information on the actual group's business pages. Thank you. Gaming222 (talk) 21:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done as this article does not exist. ----Kinu t/c 21:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gaming222: This is English Wikipedia. Administrators here cannot protect articles on Spanish Wikipedia. You need to ask for help on Spanish Wikipedia. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection or extended confirmed protection: This page is protected until 11 September 2024. However, the disruptive IP hopper will surely continue its disruption after leaving a message at Talk:Lindy Ruff#Semi-protected edit request on 17 August 2024 (2) (just like it was last time). – sbaio 07:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Academic Challenger. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) User:Favonian answered the same thing previously but then withdrew it very soon after.
I think User:Sbaio's question is whether the protection length on the article can be extended or not, based on a recent disruption that occurred on the article's talk page from the same IP editor. To @Sbaio:, what I'd do is wait 'till the current protection expires and then see what happens afterwards, and request longer page protection if necessary. Admins usually don't "pre-emptively" protect pages or extend them for that reason (it's part of the policy). From what I have seen, a good majority of IP vandals do actually go away and stop attacking a page after one or two protections, sometimes three. — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You got my idea right and thanks for suggestion. I am pretty sure this particular IP vandal will keep coming back here so I will make a new request when that happens. – sbaio 11:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08 September 2024

Reason: High level of IP and auto-confirmed vandalism who are changing the box office figures that is not said in the source. Some of these auto-confirmed accounts have also got multiple warnings. Please add an increased level of protection to this page. RangersRus (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This should be extended-confirmed-protected. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected. Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blocked user used own userpage to make homophobic attacks. It doesn't help that user has a homophobic name. Please also delete user's contributions as they contain offensive personal attacks. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Can't edit own talk page, should be all set. GoodnightmushTalk 18:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... I have also done the necessary RevDels to more or less disappear the username. After this page is archived the same should be done with the subpage. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started again after the protection from page was removed. Sid95Q (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – About a day from harassment. SuperMarioOdyssy101 (talk) 03:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by new users and IPs. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued and ceaseless IP vandalism changing details to conflict with the given sources and that which conflict with the company's website for factory locations. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The talk page has been edit protected before, there's an IP user from Germany who is showing stalker-like behaviour, disagreeing about Arjona's personal life. Now they're calling her names. Perhaps a somewhat longer edit protection this time? The talk page is barely used and the IP user needs to cut it out real fast. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced or otherwise questionable edits by IPs. Janhrach (talk) 06:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Time sink. Johnuniq (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Frost 07:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – continued block evasion from IP and new users. Happily888 (talk) 08:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users changing ownership repeatedly. Adriazeri (talk) 11:42, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Adriazeri (talk) 11:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caste disruptions

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent WP:CASTE disruption by different sock networks for years (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kroshta, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/True History 369), unlikely to stop anytime soon. Considering the sanctioned topic area and the EP at Yadav (with which the socking is connected) asking for the same here. Gotitbro (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Both articles, and logged at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Targeted by now-blocked vandal Mouchkjhh (talk · contribs) and their collection of rotating IPs performing identical vandalistic, unexplained edits. See also WP:ANI#Disruptive edits in politics-related articles. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from recently blocked IP editor that is now using different IP addresses. Xfansd (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from recently blocked IP editor that is now using different IP addresses. Xfansd (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. C F A 💬 16:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. C F A 💬 16:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Everytime, the users who are unaware of policies, change the caste of the subject. This need to be under watch as many a times, it goes unnoticed. Admantine123 (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry and disruptive editing, for more information check the SPI. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 18:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should be enough time to let the SPI work out. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, chronic disruptive editing by IP editors. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated major edits made with no sources or unreliable sources. Aadirulez8 (talk) 22:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP persistent addition of unsourced date(s). - FlightTime (open channel) 23:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IP. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IP. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IP. Pinging Ponyo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo's on holiday. Stop bothering her and let her enjoy her break. She'll sort me out when she gets back.2A00:23EE:2540:BD04:D5C5:4CDD:B466:9865 (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should also note that the IP is on a /64 now blocked for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Biggest city in the Eastern China Gigalopolis? Making it suspictible to heavy vandalisim pending changes protection please 2603:8001:6940:2100:3231:35E2:C35B:EC74 (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want indefinite semi protection 2600:100C:B058:5B21:40A0:BDDA:48A9:C843 (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 03:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vanadlism without proper source attribution and following a problematic source even after a warning Junsik1223 (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Latest socks globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the user talk page of a banned user, which is being targeted by WP:LTA/HR socks gaming extended-confirmed permission to vandalise this EC-protected page. As this page belongs to a user who was banned more than four years ago, I think we should just apply indef full protection so that the LTA vandal has less things to do. — AP 499D25 (talk) 06:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. indef and globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to recent events going on the following subject, a lot of IPs are vandalizing the article. James Conan Niag (talk) 06:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last revert is a week old. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the user page of a banned user, which is being targeted by WP:LTA/HR socks gaming extended-confirmed permission to vandalise this EC-protected page. As this page belongs to a user who was banned more than four years ago, I think we should just apply indef full protection so that the LTA vandal has less things to do. — AP 499D25 (talk) 06:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. indef and globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case I know it's just one user for the time being, but check out History of the chair for another page that has been targeted by this same LTA, which they've been at it with numerous EC-gamed sock accounts over a period of a week now. So I have no doubt they'll come back whenever they have the opportunity to, and vandalise the page more. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I told you or whoever it was, indef full is just not something I feel comfortable doing without a fuller discussion at AN or somewhere like that giving it consensus. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Notable alumni from the school's post-1980s being removed discriminately. HM2021 (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not much editing over the past couple of years. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism that changes the location to Cambridgeshire despite maps listing this place being in Bedfordshire. QUICKWITTEDHARE CONVERSE 18:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 94.192.32.22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing number of disruptive IP edits within the past 24 hours, making changes contrary to a highly reliable source. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in over a year. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (edit warring). Mzwanele Manyi is senior member of South African parliament and is a controversial, South African, political figure. His public profile is linked to his credibility which needs to be protected from unbalanced and inaccurate commentary. Mzansiknightsa (talk) 19:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It was bad at the end of July, but seems quieter now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Dawnseeker2000 21:24, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just drop a note here as User:Daniel Case comes by. I've actually started (or resumed, rather) a discussion on the article talk page here regarding the disputed content, and invited all involved editors to it. So far I got all the editors to join in the talk page discussion except for User:Stabwed, who is the only one constantly restoring their edit on the page without engaging in any discussion at all. I've noticed two things about that account, namely:
  1. it is a recently created account and its only (and first) edits were to restore that disputed version of the article. They've not made any edits to other articles or even other parts of the article whatsoever.
  2. They have not been warned or informed on their talk page about the edit-warring policy
I don't know of any sock farms out there who could be doing this kind of stuff to this particular article, so I'm going to assume good faith here and think that this is just a new user who started editing Wikipedia after noticing a big part went missing on an article that they read frequently. So, I've given them an edit-warring warning (the softer one, i.e. uw-ewsoft) and hopefully they will notice and read what I've said there. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked: Stabwed (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indef as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Subject recently won the US Open, and as such her article is receiving a lot of vandalism. Hard to keep up with it all.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  22:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has had a significant level of IP vandalism/unsourced additions for a while now. Also the subject of a possible transfer so is likely to attract more unconstructive editing Michaeldble (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Gave it 2 weeks. Can revisit after if problems recur. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has had a consistent level of IP vandalism for a while now - would suggest a longer protection Michaeldble (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done I gave it ten days. Can revisit with longer if continues Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Constant incorrect edits based on rumors and probably on fandom preference.The actress hasn’t confirmed a relationship with actor Fred Hechinger so it shouldn’t say they’re dating based only on paparazzi photos. Jvlslvr (talk) 23:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done I gave it a week. Can revisit of problems recur. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: requesting Extended Confirmed Protection per ARBPIA. history of problematic edits from non-ECR users Rainsage (talk) 00:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done as part of ARBPIA Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, including possible sockpuppetry. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done I've given it 3 weeks, we'll see if the problem persists afterwards. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obvious abuse of multiple accounts. Cysquatch (talk) 03:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done given it 10 days Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done tweaked protection now Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet editor. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2A00:23EE:2540:BD04:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 03:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined It's over now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. since one of the sock accounts is autoconfirmed. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA from User:Yawners' Cleaner et al., and please hide recent revisions from socks User:PowerMinersFan and User:Toa Mahri Kongu. Wikishovel (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And nonsense revision deleted. Johnuniq (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS Israel-Palestine. Borgenland (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consider long-term protection under arbitration enforcement for WP:ARBAP2. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 09:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page receives vandalism only edits. Rarely receives legitimate contributions. DaHuzyBru (talk) 10:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent long term disruption. IP range may merit scrutiny. 2601:19E:4100:710:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Disruptive edits By IP Address. Gunther :  Talk  12:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is an ongoing issue with vandalism on Circassian-related articles, where an individual is consistently removing content related to religions other than Islam, despite the presence of reliable sources. This user is evading detection by using different IP addresses and has been banned on some occasions, but continues to disrupt the articles.

The vandalism is not only removing relevant information but also undermining the neutrality and accuracy of the articles. I request that the Circassian-related articles be protected to prevent further disruption and ensure the integrity of the content.

I believe this measure is necessary to maintain the quality and reliability of the articles and to prevent further disruption. Thank you for considering this request. Flux500 (talk) 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term IP vandalism and removal of sourced content. Skitash (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 13:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism going on since late 2023. CaptainOlimar42 (talk) 14:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 20:29, 7 September 2024. Panian513 14:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA readdition of long-winded unsourced POV commentary by several socks today alone. Wikishovel (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing by lots of IP's MAL MALDIVE (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism by IP addresses on this BLP since 13:09, 3 September 2024. Panian513 19:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 8 years after the start of their hoax (various IPs) :

Although maybe "not enough recent disruption", they will not stop (and I don't want to play anymore)

Over to someone else now. 175.39.65.201 (talk) 15:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. At least 8 previous protections and vandalism has continued. That’s enough! 2603:8080:D03:89D4:A8F9:D254:9C47:7D12 (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Incessant edit-warring between User:GustavoCza and User:Rodericksilly. (The back-and-forth at Chris Martin could also maybe deserve a look, although they seem to have moved on from that one) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was the page's last version before Rodericksilly started to edit war. Please be sure to restore it before putting up the protection. As it's the version that remained stable for months without interruption. GustavoCza (talkcontribs) 17:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for the Chris Martin page, Rodericksilly insisted on a non-existing guideline and used WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to support it while my version is because I want the article to have a better division between paragraphs, also separating them between biography and achievements. GustavoCza (talkcontribs) 17:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user wants inappropriate editorializing language throughout articles which I have seen removed from other articles. All I have done is remove it. Rodericksilly (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To both of you: This is very much not the place to argue about who is right. You can go to the talk page if you want to constructively discuss it, but the WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality needs to stop from both sides. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't need protection, so much as a round of blocks for for all involved. Writ Keeper  17:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm more than happy to not get involved in anything else if the articles get restored to before Rodericksilly began to act like I'm a terrible editor who does everything wrong. GustavoCza (talkcontribs) 17:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Fully protected for a period of 24 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If this continues or resumes, I will be inclined to start dropping blocks. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinate semi-protection: The page is already protected until 2122, which does not make any sense to protect a page for 100 years only for it to not be protected when that 100 years has passed. I think an Indefinate semi protection would be best. 142.114.181.79 (talk) 07:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Declined I'm deferring to what Firefangledfeathers wrote in the log, that there is no practical difference here. Since none of us are likely to be alive (at least not in our present form) when protection expires, and further I really doubt there will be an appetite for actively disrupting this article in the early 22nd century, I don't think we need decide this now. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. High risk page. Protection requested as per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant addition of unsourced content by several IPs and unconfirmed users. CycloneYoris talk! 09:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user with a red nickname constantly deletes information from the source, adding information without a source Dushnilkin (talk) 07:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. NumberjacksFan2024 (talk) 09:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting reducing protection level of the page from extended confirmed to Semi-protection. Since the candidate lists is incomplete, and election issues and party campaigns sections are completely empty, more editors are needed to update the article. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not unprotected: you can discuss this with the protecting administrator at User talk:Daniel Quinlan if you want, but this protection is a contentious-topics restriction and can't be undone here (see WP:CTOP#Appeals and amendments). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09 September 2024

Reason: Persistent vandalism JeanMercier90 (talk) 14:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New target of HoY Piermark. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruption in the last two days. Come back if it resumes. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and IP vandalism. Skitash (talk) 20:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Sock edits spanning half a month; see page history. ZZZ'S 22:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Second time disruptive editing is happening after the protection removed. Need to protect the page for longer time. Mehedi Abedin 21:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism by multiple IPs. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 21:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs will not discuss on talk page about adding content that goes against the manual of style . Mike Allen 19:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined: not enough recent disruption. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent pious, wishful-thinking, and nonacademic intervention Temerarius (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: While an editor adding POV content from unreliable sources was recently banned for WP:NOTHERE, there is still a high amount of disruptive anonymous IP editing, specifically near-constantly adding the misleading category that the game was LGBT focused. (It's not, just a shooter about space mercenaries, people are just angry the cast was diverse). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 23:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Continued editwarring on infobox image, open discussion on talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we full-protect it, it will mean that when that full protection expires all protection will end as it is not currently possible to layer two levels of protection. I can set a W-Ping to reset it, but this will likely mean there will be some period where the article is completely unprotected. Would you be OK with this possibiility? Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I always set pending changes in these situations, which act as insurence for a period there is no other protection. Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined It looks like things have settled down. Come back if the problems start recurring. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 01:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Ad Orientem (talk) 01:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Likely a rapid sock vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: IP vandalism Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. /64 range blocked x 1 week. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Regular vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts to this BLP since 03:43, 27 August 2024. Panian513 02:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for quite a while. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by unregistered user, despite multiple requests to cease and discuss instead. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I've issued a warning for edit warring. If this continues either drop me a line or request assistance at WP:3RRN. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP still disruptive despite many warning. HurricaneEdgar 04:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Salt the earth - Repeated re-creation by sock-/meatpuppets; subject has been consistently rejected whenever a draft has been submitted due to an utter lack of sources. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 10:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 12:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users are actively edit-warring on this article to remove LBGT-related content. BOZ (talk) 13:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Create protection is no longer required because the page will be redirected to Royal Match. The company is not notable enough for its own article, but is best known for its creation of the game. This is the result of an AFC/R request. Original administrator has not been active since April, and a timely response is unlikely. Garsh (talk) 22:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done This doesn't seem controversial to me. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping @Garsh2. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protected for over a decade. However, both of the page protectors are likely inactive. Consider downgrading protection level and set a time limit?102.106.191.176 (talk)

  Question: Agree the disruption that led to the AfD being protected has long since ceased. But curious why anyone would need to edit this closed AFD from 2011. The deleted article title (VIBES FM Hamburg) is not protected so is theoretically available for recreation if the subject has since become notable. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment: There's no reason to edit it, so why unprotect it? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me ask you this then: why won't you at least let EC users fix Linter Errors in case if they notice any?102.106.191.176 (talk) 07:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does it have any? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sumanuil It's clean from all lint* error types that we regularly fix and I don't see any reason to need to edit that page for lint reasons.
 * The one "issue" that you'll see listed there in the lint info, "night-mode-unaware-background-color", is more a tracking category than a lint error, and it is predominantly being left alone by the experienced delinting editors since we don't really agree with WMF for it's classification as lint, and since the issues are not well defined with a high rate of false flags. Until then, those issues are to be ignored. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not unprotected I reduced the protection to WP:ECP. No reason for less than that. Johnuniq (talk) 10:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Was protected due to IP activity during the release of a popular film. It can be unprotected considering the history being calm, giving chance to potential improvements by new users. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If not possible protection until 1 January 2025 is more than enough according to me. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not unprotected @Thewikizoomer: In the history of the article (see links above), click "logs" near the top to see the protection action with reason. The links in that reason explain that articles in contentious topics are often protected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The user who requested page protection is a bully who reverted necessary edits. An entire paragraph was repeated in the article. When an IP cleaned up the mistake they reverted it. They also reverted the ips edit in unrelated pages. They have a personal vendetta gainst them. They protected dthe page and possibly used a sockpuppet to revert the page to the state they wanted it to be in. They have an agenda. So please unprotect the page Donteatgarlic (talk) 10:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not unprotected @Donteatgarlic: You must not accuse other editors of bad behavior unless accompanied with evidence and at a noticeboard for that purpose, usually WP:ANI. If you have a proposal regarding the article, suggest it at the article talk page, with reliable sources. Johnuniq (talk) 10:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the evidence. The editor reverted the ips edit in rape in Pakistan.Then they proceeded to revert another edit made by the same in nwfp referendum article. They clearly have a personal vendetta. They accused me of all sorts of stuff when I sided with the ip. My edit was very valid. There was an entire paragraph copy pasted from one place to another. So please consider my request. Donteatgarlic (talk) 10:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
they removed vandalism warnings from their talk page. Someone is being allowed to commit vandalism and block people who are trying to stop them Donteatgarlic (talk) 10:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by specific users/IPs adding false information with no reliable sources. Please review and take action against repeated vandalism. Here is a sample of the recurrent edits, adding false information about money laundering to the page without credible sources. It relies solely on a single website that is neither authentic nor trustworthy. As apparent in the history of the page, this piece of information was added and removed way too many times. • curprev 02:36, 9 September 2024‎ 2402:e000:508:5006:91e:d4d2:4870:e04c talk‎ 16,480 bytes +178‎ No edit summaryundo Tag: Undo • curprev 12:51, 8 September 2024‎ Urban Goodwin I talk contribs‎ m 16,302 bytes −178‎ Undid revision 1244666261 by 2402:E000:508:5006:91E:D4D2:4870:E04C (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 12:45, 8 September 2024‎ 2402:e000:508:5006:91e:d4d2:4870:e04c talk‎ 16,480 bytes +178‎ No edit summaryundo Tags: Reverted Visual edit • curprev 14:34, 4 September 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1243993554 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 13:39, 4 September 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1243945458 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 16:21, 2 September 2024‎ JohnFromPinckney talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Reverted 1 edit by Prash1998 (talk): Rv unexplained edit-warring deletion of sourced material. Also: deleting 1072 bytes (for the TENTH time!) is NOT a minor edit. undothank Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted • curprev 13:32, 29 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242865773 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 19:52, 27 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,302 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242511545 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted • curprev 14:42, 25 August 2024‎ Thenightaway talk contribs‎ 16,263 bytes +1,072‎ Undid revision 1242171894 by Prash1998 (talk) undothank Tags: Undo Reverted

Marina0804 (talk) 07:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined: this is a content dispute and something that should be discussed on the talkpage. I have however blocked Prash1998, who has been edit-warring to remove the content, from the page. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Xaosflux. Favonian (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Periodic BLP vandalism by newly-registered editors and various IPs over the past month. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 18:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As can be seen in the edit summaries and the edits themselves, apparently a group of IPs are hellbent on tarnishing the image of a certain Natasha Sandhu. They have even added links and bank details. I'd request revdel as well. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... (date of death is updated to 30/11/2024) . Jamesington (talk) 23:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Sophie Anderson (actress) is not protected. A reliable source for the information is required. Favonian (talk) 16:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism since last semi expired. MaterialsPsych (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. HorrorLover555 (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protection. A large number of edits are repeatedly reverting IP's who change the spelling of "alfa" to "alpha", despite the plain text being "al<--do not change-->f<--do not change-->a." — kwami (talk) 11:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bout of disruptive editing changing country names from a dynamic IP. CMD (talk) 15:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection Persistent IP vandalism JSFarman (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in IP vandalism since 04:25, 9 September 2024‎, adding the viral, disproven hoax of immigrants eating pets. Panian513 18:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by Indonesian trolls like User:Bagusekaf07 and IP. Would like longer protection period than one week. 3skandar (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Lahsim Niasoh (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 20:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of valdalism Nixx999 (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting bluelocking. The article is still subject to continued WP:BLP violations, sockpuppetry, and edit-warring. The sockmaster has been trying to add 12,000 bytes of defamatory material for the past two weeks, most recently, with his brand-new Ymberlen account.[29] I removed the text from the article per WP:BLPRS because I think it beats WP:3RR. See Special:Diff/1244038066 if you are interested in the details. @User:Daniel Case. Thank you. 31.30.111.66 (talk) 08:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Ymberlen (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indef as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Protection requested to prevent disruptive editing, unexplained content removal, addition of unreferenced material, and general attempts to change the nature of this article completely.

The users who were originally involved in this article have been blocked, and IP editors (possibly same individuals, or meat puppets of theirs) are now joining in. Basically, the aim is to whitewash this individual by making bad stuff vanish and good stuff magically appear. Semi-protection should put a stop to that?

For a background on this, see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Černetić / Talk:Stefano Černetić / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bajsikus/Archive.

If indef isn't justified, please apply whatever temporary duration seems reasonable, thanks. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. The page hasn't been protected previously so I don't want to jump straight to an indefinite protection. Aoidh (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from several different IPs today. Entranced98 (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 21:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10 September 2024

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by an IP user, whose keep restoring his edits when reverted. PJ Santos (talk) 05:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 11RR edit warring and continued insertion of plagiarized and copyvio content by IP despite multiple warnings. Borgenland (talk) 14:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 188.25.104.45 (talk · contribs) blocked by Cullen328. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to request semi-protected the Isamusa page to avoid any vandalism since the Isamusa is major Somali sub-clan. Jiilaal (talk) 19:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Hello Wikipedia administrators, I would like to request semi-protected the Isamusa page to avoid any vandalism since the Isamusa is major Somali sub-clan. Thank you. Jiilaal (talk) 19:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. GoodnightmushTalk 20:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated genre changing without explanation. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 19:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 21:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope an admin gets to this soon; the subject's death is attracting a lot of vandals to the article. Funcrunch (talk) 23:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 23:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; addition of unsourced (caste related POV) content; WP:GSCASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism still occurs after the protection expired, maybe indef protection?. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 20:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOPS Israel. Borgenland (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term vandalism and sockpuppetry. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 22:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked.   Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GFOLEY FOUR!22:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs edit warring. Belbury (talk) 16:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Which should stop the edit warring long enough for the SPI on one of the editors to work out. Daniel Case (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Mostly from an individual who uses different IP addresses. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 21:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism Hypnôs (talk) 23:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. They are eternal, after all. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hot topic with discussion underway on the Talk page re the form of the subject's name. However, there is edit warring in the article involving new users regarding the name. I think semi-protection is appropriate until things settle down. Nurg (talk) 00:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An ip keeps adding an incorrect parent category. Mason (talk) 01:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Various IPs adding category that doesn't appear to be supported by article. DonIago (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant disruptive edits. Catfurball (talk) 18:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:61C4:3B59:966:C93B (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

6 previous protection 2603:8080:D03:89D4:61C4:3B59:966:C93B (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The vandal was a Sacramento resident, according to the WHOIS 2603:8080:D03:89D4:E40C:F0FD:39E3:5EA1 (talk) 00:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked. Doesn't appear same as previous vandalism. Range already blocked Special:Contribs/2600:1010:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 GFOLEY FOUR!22:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – same issue of an ip repeatedly adding the wrong category, and slow edit warring. Mason (talk) 01:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs disruptive editing. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPs observed to be adding unsourced content repeatedly and disturbing certain templates. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Template is in the WP:ARBPIA CTOP area. TarnishedPathtalk 10:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:61C4:3B59:966:C93B (talk) 21:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done by Vsmith Babysharkboss2!! (Nomad Vagabond) 00:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the protection lasted for 1 year, not indefinite. I prefer indefinite for every article that is vandalized frequently, including this one 2603:8080:D03:89D4:E40C:F0FD:39E3:5EA1 (talk) 01:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too much IP address disruption since it was posted at the ITN. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 19:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User @1A8J6R5, who is paid to edit Wikipedia on behalf of Rider University, has made numerous edits to this page that have removed factually sourced information, in an effort to 'paint a rosy picture' of Dell'Omo's tenure as President of Rider University. JDankers (talk) 20:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be discussed with the user. If they are not responsive, a partial block or a sitewide block might be in order. There is currently no need for protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent subtle vandalism (fake/incorrect syllables) by a range of IPs, 9 reverts and counting since Sep 5th. Jpatokal (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2405:201:1D:E843:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by JBW. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, someone adding revival of GMA News TV, a defunct news channel in the Philippines, now known as (GTV) Philippine TV channel, or possible adding a TeleRadyo-like channel (Dobol B TV), even though no such teasers or series of test broadcast done by GMA. BeemoKincaid (talk) 01:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't appear to have been a reverted edit in almost three weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4CEA:FD5B:6E65:90A (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The history is ridiculous 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4CEA:FD5B:6E65:90A (talk) 01:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How long should we lock this page up? 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4CEA:FD5B:6E65:90A (talk) 01:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The vandal is a Berkeley resident 2603:8080:D03:89D4:4CEA:FD5B:6E65:90A (talk) 01:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked: 2001:5A8:450C:BD00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. I will also RevDel the edits since they possibly defamed an identifiable living person. Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. related to Palestine and Isreal Daisytheduck quack quack 02:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And not all that closely related to the topic. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP changing signatures, not contributing to article, harassing paid editor. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/73.211.173.173. Diff Special:Diff/1244740877. ⸺(Random)staplers 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Indeed, no pc-protection for talk-pages. And article talkpages are not usually protected, if semi-protected at all only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption. The disruption isn't severe enough here. Lectonar (talk) 07:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IPs adding information that is currently under dispute at article's Talk page. DonIago (talk) 02:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined User warned for edit warring. If the issues persist, report to WP:ANI or WP:3RRN as appropriate. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – almost immediately after the last 24-hour full protection expired, GustavoCza is back at it with another back-and-forth (albeit partial reverts this time) with a different editor, and they've completely ignored several requests to discuss at the talk page from their last dispute... the page either needs to be protected for longer to force GustavoCza to discuss, or they need to be blocked, whether it be from the site (for longer than their last block, which was less than a month ago) or from editing pages related to/involving Coldplay (with which they have serious and obvious ownership and civility issues) for a period of time. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 04:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See here and here regarding recent activity. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 04:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This can't be solved by escalating full protections, but should be tackled by more precise instruments like partial blocks, e.g.. ANI (again) or the edit-warring noticeboard should be tried first, as article talk doesn't seem to be used. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to page extend protection indefinite : High level of IP vandalism. Arunntr (talk) 04:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There aren't any IP edits in the last days. Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Very persistent IPs (possibly the same individual) have been repeatedly changing the box office gross. This has been ongoing for several weeks. Contributor19 (talk) 05:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Question: @Contributor19: why full protection? Lectonar (talk) 07:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar That was a mistake on my part. It doesn't have to be full protection. I think temporary protection would suffice. Contributor19 (talk) 07:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Semi-protection for a short period until the SPI is sorted would be useful - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TomWatkins1970. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. GoodnightmushTalk 13:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 13:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP repeatedly removing sourced information from the article, has ignored a talk page warning. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 13:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term high level of vandalism/test edits. Alexeyevitch(talk) 12:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations by IP editors. JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/BLP. Favonian (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. Trolling. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 16:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Extreme level of vandalism by IP address(es). Immediate action needed. TheProEditor11 (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2603:300a:108:100::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by RickinBaltimore.
  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: indefinite semi-protection - ongoing attempts by IP(s) over several months to remove unflattering information about the college. Wellington Bay (talk) 16:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent spike in IP vandalism and disruptive edits to this BLP since 09:27, 10 September 2024‎. Panian513 16:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Assorted Dubai IPs blocked as well. Favonian (talk) 17:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – As can be seen in the history, there seems to be a content dispute. I'd like to request a full protection. Thanks. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE (as the subject is a South Asian social group). Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by unregistered user. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been changing height for months. Nswix (talk) 15:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Either multiple IP users or an IP hopper is disrupting the article for a long time. So it needs to be semi-protected indefinitely. NitinMlk (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator GB fan. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IPs adding category unsupported by article text without editing the article body to justify the inclusion of the category. DonIago (talk) 16:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption by IPs, especially regarding his birthplace. StephenMacky1 (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per last block request, persistent improperly sourced contents addition by a Turkey editor with roving IPs. An admin has handed out IP blocks, but they keep coming back with new IPs. WP:DUCK as same article and same edits, but all from Turkey. Wikishovel (talk) 18:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/AI. Skitash (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same protection is needed for Goo Goo Dolls. Logged-out socks of User:Brettandelle are trying to insert the hired drummer Craig Macintyre as a full band member, without any announcement or new item in that regard. See Talk:Goo Goo Dolls#Touring drummer Craig Macintyre. Binksternet (talk) 19:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: News of his personal life and conduct has become a BLP issue. IP vandals want to use this as an opportunity to write things like “filthy cheat” in the article. I think protecting it so that only actual editors can edit will discourage / prevent even more IP vandals. Trillfendi (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IP user and sockpuppery. YannickFran (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined The article has been moved; you should request protection for September 2024 Al-Mawasi refugee camp attack. Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A user is disruptively adding unsourced text without proper references to support the claim without any discussion in talk page. Saurabh{Talk} 10:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Other than today's edits I'm not seeing anything long term. Your talk page discussion with them seems to suggest you see the possibility of sockpuppetry; you might find SPI a better forum. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Malappuram FC is the main team in the ongoing Kerala Super League[30] [31] Even with IP address, new users are wrongly editing this page Spworld2 (talk) 10:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of block-evader across multiple IPs (2402:8100:2738:B09C:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs)). AntiDionysius (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2402:8100:385B:AD72:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of block-evader across multiple IPs (2402:8100:2738:B09C:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs)). AntiDionysius (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2402:8100:385B:AD72:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of block-evader across multiple IPs (2402:8100:2738:B09C:B1B8:81D9:1675:B22A (talk · contribs)). AntiDionysius (talk) 13:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2402:8100:385B:AD72:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and a cause of dispute between users. JeanMercier90 (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring, COI editing HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will also warn the editor. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11 September 2024

Semi-protection: - IP disruption after appointment as Foreign Minister.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP-hopping editor since 15:28, 7 September 2024‎. Panian513 18:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2A02:C7C:6D8A:6A00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term sockpuppetry by autoconfirmed accounts of GENSEX POV-pusher Raxythecat since May 2023.

Socks by Raxy that edited this article (there could be more IPs):

Raxy seems to be an experienced sockpuppeteer and, judging by the number of reverts by his accounts, he has this page on his "watchlist", so a temporary semi-protection would have little effect here. And judging by the similar POV and article preferences, User:BreadCastle and User:Mushfluff could also be related to this, the article was protected for sockpuppetry in 2020 because of them. Badbluebus (talk) 22:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Aoidh (talk) 23:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user (Sira Aspera) since April 2024 is repeadetly editing back every correction of the page. I have been giving more detailed informations about the execution of Şehzade Mustafa, however, this user have edited back, with poorly written undetailed text, my corrections and editions despite the sourcings. Therefore, I request your protection of this site as of 10.09.2024, 13:32 UTC version. 94.254.118.178 (talk) 13:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we semi-protect the page you won't be able to edit it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated removal of sourced content; page was previously locked for a year. As soon as the protection was removed, the vadalism and deletion of high-quality, credible sourced content started again. Belladonna2024 (talk) 22:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 7 days by User:ScottishFinnishRadish, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if the underscore that was in {{pagelinks|Elisa_Hategan}} when the request was added caused this, but it is protected. Removed the underscore. - Aoidh (talk) 00:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. May this please the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war over information in this article that cause disruptive behavior. A consensus in the article's discussion area must be reached from one or more reliable sources before editing the disputed information. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 22:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Aoidh (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I am sick of restoring the caste of the subject as even after self identification, multiple attempts have been made to change the caste of subject by new users flooding from somewhere. This page need this protection in order to keep a track on this. Admantine123 (talk) 02:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on forever. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Request raising protection to indefinite ECP per WP:GENSEX CTOP due to repeated oversightable BLP violations to prevent further disruption. Raladic (talk) 03:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Moderated a polarized debate, going to get vandalized EditingCabbageLilly (talk) 03:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Series of disruptive edits to the BLP of one of the moderators of the US presidential debate tonight. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logging at AEL. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting page protection due to high traffic and potential for disruptive edits as the election date approaches. This topic is susceptible and has already drawn significant attention from various editors, leading to frequent edits and concerns over biased or unsourced information being added. Semi-protection (or full protection, if warranted) would be appropriate until after the election period to maintain the article's neutrality and accuracy. IDB.S (talk) 04:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Come back if the situation changes. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper keeps on coming days after days and months after months to change the town lead to suburb which it clearly isn't, they don't reply on their talk page, do nothing, they come change without sources at random times. The town is clearly has its own jurisdiction and miles away from Vijayawada, not even once source confirms that it is a suburb. The IP hopper is clearly not helping with holding a discussion. Requesting indefinite semi protection. Thewikizoomer (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very few edits in the last six months. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected: Repeatedly recreated. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Creation protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem The user who recreated these redirects is an extended confirmed user, so I think you should fully protect them. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 06:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary ECP due to edit warring by five users over either moving the page to draftspace or marking for AFD. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 08:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually nevermind, that page has been deleted two minutes after I requested protection for it. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 08:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 11:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting protection for the 2024 Men's Asian Champions Trophy due to repeated disruptive edits by some IPs and editors. They are prematurely adding match scores and removing the official title of the event. Protection would help maintain the accuracy of the page. NiteshTALK 09:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 09:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry and vandalism (genre change) by IP socks of User:SHUBHAM788 for whom every film is a 'thriller', 'political thriller' or an 'action thriller'. [32] [33] [34]. Similar edits by the confirmed socks [35] [36] and [37] [38]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 11:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: if this page got high views i think it would get protection to protect any frequent vandalism edits in future 2405:9800:B540:1367:6857:39F0:A38B:5A43 (talk) 07:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Johnuniq (talk) 11:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant changing of sourced content to WP:POVPUSH from probable socks and their logged out IP here here and here. cyberdog958Talk 10:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Cyberdog958: I blocked two editors indefinitely and semi-protected for a short period. I'm pretty sure WP:ECP would be permitted but I've forgotten where to look for the justification and I'm in a hurry. Ping me if problems arise at this or any related articles and I will properly investigate the options. Johnuniq (talk) 11:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same IP as the above report on Athisayan. [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45]. Similar edits by the confirmed socks [46] [47] and [48] [49]. Requesting a range block. Thanks. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 11:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of blanking and attempts to the move the page without consensus. Amigao (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 11:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want you to not let anybody except admins to edit this page RobertWikia9627 (talk) 12:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined ECP seems to be working fine here. I don't see any cause for WP:FULL. GoodnightmushTalk 12:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – ip keeps changing user talk. ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 14:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month by User:Valereee, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent/sporadic disruptive editing of users who've been trying to add flag(s) and maps that aren't accurate, they've been reverted by multiple users. This page has been protected before. Noorullah (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to move Draft:MGH Group to mainspace. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done already by Jimfbleak. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sockpuppetry. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 11:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq Please check the history carefully, as there has been enough disruptive activity in the past month. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 11:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is still being targeted. Two accounts were blocked but the sockmaster has now switched from Hungarian and Vietnamese IPs to Bosnian ones. Looks like someone's got some proxies at their disposal. I reverted the most recent disruptive editing but, nonetheless, I suggest bluelocking the article to prevent its continuation. @User:Daniel Case. Thank you. 46.135.15.226 (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has this been discussed anywhere? If there were a WP:BLPN discussion showing that the disputed edits are considered to be BLP violations, I would be a lot happier applying solid protection. Johnuniq (talk) 11:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq the IP is trying to whitewash the page and constantly removes the reliable sources and the page has been previously protected here. but right after the protection expired, the same paid IP removed again ties with Russia. the page should be frozen and reliable sources kept. 2A02:AB88:380E:C780:B4DB:ECE7:92A0:E8A7 (talk) 16:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. for two months. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  15:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Reason: Persistent vandalism and a cause of dispute between users (see history). And please let the block be like the ones the user Ronhjones (RIP) used to set. 201.244.117.61 (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection IP editor continues disruptive editing, persistently adding unsourced information to the lead paragraph of the article despite two previous protections. NJZombie (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes doesn't seem to be working, most edits recently are IP's vandalizing the page. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated RD-level vandalism on WP:GENSEX CTOP article. Request indef semi per arbitration. Raladic (talk) 15:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: IP disruption, falls under WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at RUSUKR Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism by IP addresses to this BLP since 01:45, 2 September 2024‎. Panian513 18:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism 1.64.127.60 (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: The page was disrupted frequently Tagr12 (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 221.126.255.66 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanently increase to Extended Confirmed Protection PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 16:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. No valid reason given. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last protection tag has expired and this page is now being constantly vandalized today. HurricaneKappa (talk) 19:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for one month. Escalating from previous protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed Protection fear of persistent vandalism PhilTheGreatLOL (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not an edit request. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism Bora83ns (talk) 14:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 77.29.128.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 18:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see one recent example of vandalism. Do you have others? OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Template only has 28 transclusions, not the 1000+ it had when BrownHairedGirl protected it as a highly-used template. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Unprotected in line with the main template. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent WP:DE. This article has been persistently edited by IPs adding the same disruptive, unsourced, and MOS:TV violation edits since at least April of this year. The various IPs (or one person IP hopping) never uses edit summaries, never explains their edits, never responds to talk page warnings, and just ends up getting blocked. An example of edit you'd see would be this, which includes: deletion of a citation to support genre, addition of unsourced genres (which usually are disambiguation links), deletion of explanatory hidden notes to hopefully stop DE, changing season/episode count before said season/episode actually airs (MOS:TV violation), adding unsourced casting/production information for yet-to-air seasons, and various other MOS:TV violations. Drovethrughosts (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing. MNWiki845 (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 00:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wburrow (talk) 22:16, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 00:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also within the scope of WP:CT/AP. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 21:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Favonian (talk) 05:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Rhain (he/him) 21:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – several ips are making a mess. Mason (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 00:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥  03:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 05:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level persistent IP vandalism, disruptive editing and has removed the reference sources that have been listed by silly person trolls like User:Anwegmann. Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – several ips are making a mess. Would like longer protection period than one month. Hesselink (talk) 01:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level persistent IP vandalism, disruptive editing and has removed the reference sources that have been listed by silly person trolls like User:Fix.bkl. Would like longer protection period than one month. Bagusekaf07 (talk) 02:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism along with baseless edits. MNWiki845 (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 21:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 07:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 07:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 07:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Abo Yemen 09:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Abo Yemen: Please identify the BLP problems with a diff or at least a timestamp from the article history. The situation might be resolved with the discussion on article talk? Johnuniq (talk) 11:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This article, which is about a living arab family, is currently getting lots of edits from indonesia, where almost all edits are about trying to disprove the family's lineage by basically doing WP:OR, or when they "cite" a source it's either a FamilyTreeDNA database which says nothing that supports what the indonesian editors are claiming, or some indonesian unreliable sources where the authors of the blogs they cite are not mentioned or, when it is mentioned, are not experienced in the subject. Just take a look at the sources used in the Ba 'Alawi sada#Disputes and rebuttals section please Abo Yemen 11:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There have been no further edits and no indication of which particular edit was a BLP problem but to move this on I protected it for a short period. Johnuniq (talk) 11:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 21:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism from ip adresses in the past few days. Diffs (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) Yvan Part (talk) 08:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 08:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 12:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's an IP changing editor, a block evasion, that has been going on for months. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. If that still doesn't prove to be long enough, just ping me. GoodnightmushTalk 12:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Broc (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I recently went through history of this page, I edited it and contributed a significant portion of its modern history in past, but after that I forget to keep a tab on it. Now, I can see that some ips have done numerous disruption in December and September months, like [58] here. But, after that someone also made useful contribution. This page is not patrolled by the patrollers and many disruptive edits goes unnoticed, making it very difficult to maintain quality of the page. Hence this need pending change protection, so that such disruption can be tracked. Admantine123 (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring like behaviour. Thewikizoomer (talk) 08:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 12:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP accounts, such as blanking pages. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. As per WP:CT/IPA Wikibear47 (talk) 07:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not yet logging as WP:ARBIPA , but noted in the protection summary, and probably to be applied next if and/or additional problems are shown. El_C 16:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request raising protection to indef semi, the edit log is just a continuous back and forth of IP disruption/vandalism in this CTOP WP:ARBPS / WP:GENSEX article, so request raising per arbitration to stop this. Raladic (talk) 15:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done and logged. El_C 16:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done and logged. El_C 16:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent user with multiple accounts removing information and references, trying to overly-simplify the page. ObeliskII (talk) 19:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request to slightly modify my comment to include "I have reported the user to T&S team". Ahri Boy (talk) 11:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done – Matter is moot, as the account is now both indef blocked on this Wikipedia and globally locked. Favonian (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On April 21, 2022, according to Forbes Magazine, Zelenskyy was worth roughly $20 million (US Dollars), based on reporting by Forbes Ukraine. Additional reporting by Forbes US puts that number at less than $30 million despite social media reports claiming he’s a billionaire. The Real Bob D Builder (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If Forbes is saying it, then mayhaps you could show your work by linking to the relevant article(s)? It'd make this request easier to do (given that this article falls into two CTOPs). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done – Your edit request in this regard has been rejected: Special:PermaLink/1245335398#Extended-confirmed-protected_edit_request_on_11_September_2024. Favonian (talk) 15:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Periodic vandalism by various IPs and newly-registered editors. Vandalism apparently has been ramping up since the beginning of August. Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/AP and, if possible, WP:CT/R-I IanDBeacon (talk) 16:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – +WP:CT/AP. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, the page got rid of semi-protection and was immediately vandalized. 2600:100E:B094:82D4:FC7F:4FDB:8311:CCD1 (talk) 18:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent IP vandalism BBQboffingrill me 19:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Changeworld1984 (talk) 19:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Continued disruption after page was protected twice. – sbaio 19:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Per WP:RUSUKR. Disruptive editing by non-XC editors on a documentary film specifically about the war. Mellk (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar issues as the ones which led to the main article being protected for two weeks. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target since 03:15, 9 May 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target since 18:53, 8 August 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target since 14:18, 31 May 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target since 18:52, 8 August 2024‎. Alith Anar 20:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism, would recommend pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very long history of ip and SPA vandalism that picked up after the previous protection expired. - Hipal (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 21:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/KURD Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 05:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism in the past week. MrBatteryBrain (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – 1 months. Adnan (ᵀᵃˡᵏ) 16:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13 September 2024

Extended confirmed protection: Page is constantly being edited by sockpuppets of Srimonbanik, please provide extended protection to this page, as it is being changed by several accounts (sockpuppets). ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 04:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. I have blocked both socks indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – High vandalism by IP and autoconfirmed users. Continued restoration of sock edits. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 04:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Mam Bong Tm (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Continued sock evasion in article. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 04:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. As with above. Daniel Case (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – High vandalism in article and sockpuppetry. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 05:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This political incident is best covered in articles about Trump & the 2024 election. A "See Also" link can be has been added. – S. Rich (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 18:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I understand the concern, but there haven't been any reverts of late. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spike in vandalism from new account since 11:58, 11 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Both accounts responsible have been indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The WP:SNEAKY IP-hopping vandal(s) noticed that the recent protection expired. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 186.134.80.0/21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended confirmed protection. Continued sock evasion in article.  oncamera  (talk page) 17:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Pumpkin at10 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 21:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Paulioua (talk · contribs) blocked by Asilvering. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 04:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps on changing the location again and again without any source or reason resulting in edit warring. Thewikizoomer (talk) 04:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewikizoomer: How is it known that the IP is wrong? The infobox at Vijayawada says its International Airport is Vijayawada Airport. Johnuniq (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the location is Gannavaram though Thewikizoomer (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 06:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced content by SPA. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator JBW. Favonian (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued spate of vandalism. Amigao (talk) 12:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected I think this is likely going to have to be dealt with through range blocks because there are so many targeted pages, but protected for now anyway. GoodnightmushTalk 13:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from similar IPs (after another IP was range-blocked yesterday, they continued today on a different IP range with the exact same edits). Felida97 (talk) 13:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think this is likely going to have to be dealt with through range blocks because there are so many targeted pages, but also protected for now. GoodnightmushTalk 13:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruptive editing from a lot of editors, I can't even figure out when the last good edit was.  miranda :3  02:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, frequently from TikTok users who have had their accounts suspended and are lashing out. Amigao (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 03:40, 11 September 2024. Alith Anar 13:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Kinu. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after two ranges were blocked yesterday). Felida97 (talk) 12:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: An even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (after this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks (all of which were active when the edits today were made) didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time. Felida97 (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator Goodnightmush. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday). Felida97 (talk) 12:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: An even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (after this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks (all of which were active when the edits today were made) didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time. Felida97 (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator Goodnightmush. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥  13:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator ComplexRational. Favonian (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ip vandalism after dolphins announced he got a concussion 45BearsFan (talk) 15:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent targets of Srimonbanik2007 socks, semi-protection has not helped much. Ravensfire (talk) 15:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wisdom-inc. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP made vandalism despite the fact the sources are clear that he became special assistant on 12 August, then have been given adviser status on 16 August Panam2014 (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For the past few months and years this page gets vandalized by IP address accounts and I just think this page deserves some protection for that. Whatcha gotta say? :) -ThaFDA (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This marks a significant moment in the history of the Bangladeshi people. It was the first step towards reclaiming control of their country from the hands of what they perceived as the authoritarian rule of Sheikh Hasina. The ‘India Out’ campaign was successful for these reasons, and now many are attempting to falsely claim credit and erase this history. Therefore, it is crucial to make this a semi-protected article to preserve its integrity. Syed Abu Shanjid Rafin (talk) 14:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Elli (talk | contribs) 14:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding non-notable Tom Merriman to staff list. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ban evasion by User:TyMega. Binksternet (talk) 06:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Insertion of WP:NOTNEWS content by IP sock of LTA [59] Borgenland (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 11:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP removing citations without reason and general disruptive editing. PadFoot (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Protection needed since the city was recently renames, and users and IPs are making changes in violation of WP:COMMONNAME. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page-move protection is also required. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Already move protected. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. AmritR012 (talk) 10:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing MAL MALDIVE (talk) 11:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article has been subject to vandalism and the addition of information that is not cited by the sources, and any information added is not found in the sources indicated. There is obviously a WP:SOCK hiding under all these accounts. Please block all of these accounts and protect the article because I can't update the article because my edits are always being canceled. Thanks!Walter286, Special:Contributions/NRGFanGirl, Special:Contributions/Ham7593, Special:Contributions/Herktik78, Special:Contributions/OneFootball925, Special:Contributions/Herectics35, Special:Contributions/Waouh7293, Special:Contributions/Helmut04687, Special:Contributions/Wiiiizzzz. Plugaru (talk) 11:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We informed you, if you force to remove every contribution, we may have to block your account and go into court with your IP address.
For information, Plugaru is non neutral third party working to remove every contribution that has been done in the past. We flagged the profile. Thank you. Herectics35 (talk) 15:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The capital city Port Blair was recently renamed, which caused IPs and even extended confirmed IDs, who are probably unaware of the WP:COMMONNAME policy to change the name violating the said policy - [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More edits violating WP:COMMONNAME related to Port Blair name change [66] [67]. Pining @Favonian:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP6 addresses appear to be in an edit war where one has a list of the episodes for this TV series and then another IP address changes the article to a REDIRECT page. This has occurred numerous times. Since the timings are days apart, it might be helpful to protect it for a a couple weeks. Thoughts?. — Mr Xaero ☎️ 14:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wiki talk pages are not meant for legal/local campaigns. There's currently happening a lot of disruptive editing on the talk page from a bulk of IPs. ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Similarly protected article as well. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP pushing placement of picture in lead Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 14:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Added article to existing partial block on 117.231.194.0/24 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced information. Proper sources are absent everytime (actually, there was no time when the article had a proper sourcing). Imperial[AFCND] 15:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Turns out I already put one there ... Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 15:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday and today; an even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks, all of which were active when the edits today were made, didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time). Felida97 (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued vandalism by 151.60.177.126 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), probably identical to Alebir (talk · contribs) and 151.60.187.14 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), for further details see the 2 requests from February for the same page. Mai-Sachme (talk) 17:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/FUERDAI target since 18:58, 15 August 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/FUERDAI target since 01:05, 13 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/FUERDAI target since 19:00, 15 August 2024‎. Alith Anar 19:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant unexplained removal of material by anon IPs. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2601:248:517F:4FD0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months as a likely TVFAN24 sock Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant and unexplained removal of material by anon IPs. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2601:248:517F:4FD0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months as a likely TVFAN24 sock Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent restoration of a poorly-sourced "Controversies" section by IPs. Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 20:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy🍁 03:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2409:4042:4D00:0:0:0:0:0/40 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case . for a week; this is not the only article they've been creating problems on. I'd also look closely at VolgaDnper1488, who made exactly the same edit and then hasn't edited since (and has that very possible white-supremacist dogwhistle at the end of their username). Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content and vandalism editing by User:42.153.130.67– IP keeps on changing the by changing silly things again and again without any source or reason resulting in edit warring. Hesselink Bagusekaf07 (talk) 04:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Srimonbanik2007 socks targetting article. Ravensfire (talk) 12:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent persistent vandalism (same edits) from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday). Felida97 (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: An even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (after this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks (all of which were active when the edits today were made) didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time. Felida97 (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined Outside of the two blocked ranges I'm not seeing much other disruption in the last few months. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2601:46:600:1566:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottisFinnishRadish. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Well-intentioned IP editors keep misinterpreting the articles about Peat's death and changing his DoD -- he died from his injuries two weeks after being struck by a car, which they interpret to mean "he died that day and the news broke two weeks later.". — GhostRiver 13:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued even after multiple IP ranges were blocked yesterday and today). Felida97 (talk) 15:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: An even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (before this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks (all of which were active when the edits today were made) didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time. Felida97 (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined Again I don't see much disruption over the past few months outside the two blocked ranges Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday and today; an even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (before this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks, all of which were active when the second batch of edits today were made, didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time). Felida97 (talk) 16:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined Again, most recent disruption has been dealt with. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from similar IPs (IP hopping; continued today even after some ranges were blocked yesterday and today; an even larger range, 2003:EE:9F00:0:0:0:0:0/42, was blocked today (before this request was made) but, to be safe, a bit of page protection would probably be a good idea, considering that the multiple previous range blocks, all of which were active when the second batch of edits today was made, didn't hinder them enough and the changes frequently include redirects, which obv have quite the drastic impact if the changes go unnoticed even for a short amount of time). Felida97 (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Per other requests by this editor with exactly the same wording. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 16:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous unconstructive edits from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: May be used in a few pages, but one of the pages is semi-protected and highly visible, potentially putting the template at risk. George Ho (talk) 17:02, 13 September 2024 (UTC); edited, 17:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Given that there's been no edits to the template in the almost two years since its creation, I'm not worried. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MappilaKhrais. C F A 💬 14:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like plenty of issues in the past, but any reason to protect right now? It's been quiet for a week and the SPI has resolved with blocks. GoodnightmushTalk 14:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose, but it certainly won't be long until another sock edits the article. MappilaKhrais came back today trying to canvass ([68][69]) people into editing for them which is ultimately why I requested this. C F A 💬 20:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Demographics vandal. Binksternet (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 49.228.235.140 (talk · contribs) blocked by AmandaNP. Globally, for 2 months. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Not necessarily vandalism but an almost certain case of WP:LOUTSOCK at work that has been disruptive in previous IP edits (e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/51.6.193.169); adding massive amounts of unsourced text. Biohistorian15 (talk) 20:03, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely LTA.[70] Biohistorian15 (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the above user left me a strange message on my talk. I am not the mentioned IP editor. The geolocation is completely different and I have nothing in common with the 51.6 IP's edits. Having briefly looked at Biohistorian's edits shows them making repeated frivolous sockpuppetry claims. 90.255.83.64 (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Notwithstanding the above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending semi-protection: Recent repeated vandalism Cabrils (talk) 01:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 01:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Block-evading vandal is constantly closing the AFD inappropriately. There has been two separate accounts blocked already and they've just created a third to go at it again. TarnishedPathtalk 10:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Marino

Reason: Remove protection 2600:381:F304:BA4F:75F5:7AC2:8F74:3BA3 (talk) 00:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not unprotected. Stop evading your block and get unblocked properly first. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent Vandalism — In addition unsources or poorly sources. 172.56.166.43 (talk) 23:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content by several IPs and unconfirmed users. This has been occurring for the past several weeks. Please protect at least for a month. CycloneYoris talk! 09:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2a0a:ef40:f0b:9801::/64 (talk · contribs). Sent off to join previously blocked Bloomsburybadboy (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 11:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by multiple IPs. TarnishedPathtalk 12:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Can we set this subtemplate to match the rest of the Template:Occupation by nationality and century category header protections? I'm currently the primary maintainer/developer of this series of templates, but I don't have template editing privileges (nor am I particularly interested in getting them other than to edit this template). Mason (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done. If you want the template editor right, just ask me, I'll grant it. You've been around long enough, that's for sure. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including British, Polish, Australian, and Irish nationals, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" is incorrect and should be reworded as

"On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including a dual US-Canada national, a Palestinian, three British citizens, an Australian, and a Pole, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" as per [71], [72]. 148.75.59.49 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done. The word "including" followed by a partial list isn't incorrect. Using "including" followed by a complete list makes no sense, and is unnecessary. Using "consisting of" might be better, but the terminology is inconsistent; in addition to "Pole" you may as well say "Brits" and "US-Candadians". ~Anachronist (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest adding to 'War Crimes' a section about the Sde Teiman detention camp. The use of concentration/torture camps is a very notable war crime and an important fact as it pertains to the ceasefire negotiations regarding hostage swaps. It is also relevant as many have been taken from Gaza and are being tortured under pretext of "interrogation." Jdftba (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done because the request is too vague. The administrators monitoring this page are not involved with that article. You need to make a specific request, in the form "change X to Y" or "add X after Y" or something similar, with appropriate citations. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under "casaulties and losses" Under "Syria" Add these events: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/israel-carries-intense-strikes-central-syria-killing-4-113503912 https://apnews.com/article/israel-syria-strikes-hama-iran-hezbollah-916f12c8f1fae066439733c2c0ba9980 Adjust total death toll accordingly. Beri98 (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done because the request is too vague. Make a specific suggestion in the form "change X to Y" or "add X after Y" with the exact text you are proposing including citations. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15 September 2024

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Ratnahastin (talk) 02:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. GoPurple'nGold24 05:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 21:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:8B5:A45F:FCD1:91C4 (talk) 20:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 21:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whyatt Beanstalk/Super Why (voiced by Nicholas Castel Vanderburgh in season 1, Nicholas Kaegi in season 2, and Johnny Orlando in season 3) 2601:152:5081:CB20:3309:33E9:B9F8:4ADE (talk) 20:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Super Why! is not protected. Remember to include reliable sources supporting your claim. Favonian (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Season 5 2018-19 2601:152:5081:CB20:3309:33E9:B9F8:4ADE (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Paw Patrol is not protected. Remember to include reliable sources supporting your claim. Favonian (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced/speculation edits by numerous IP users. Best to keep this article protected until January 2025. Areaseven (talk) 01:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced/speculation edits by numerous IP users. Best to keep this article protected until January 2025. Areaseven (talk) 01:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unrelenting vandalism for months by IP users. Swinub 04:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2601:145:80:C0F0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 22:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unrelenting vandalism for months by IP. Sush150 (talk) 05:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log as CTOPS action. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several IPs continuing to add broadcast information for Malaysia despite repeated removal. RunningTiger123 (talk) 06:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Just being on the safe side due to earlier one-month block over socking. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war still going on about a recent (read: 13 September 2024) announced name change. The Banner talk 10:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Fully protected for a period of the duration, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring over the correct name of Port Blair (per WP:COMMONNAME versus the new one announced yesterday. The Banner talk 10:28, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Fully protected for a period of the duration, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk. (This can be lifted once the RM is settled). Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced and promotional information by IP editors. Tacyarg (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A BLP unambiguously within scope of WP:ARBECR that is being edited mostly by non-EC editors and IPs. It should be extended-confirmed protected. Sean.hoyland (talk) 13:05, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of sourced content and additions of unsourced, including names of people without supporting the specific caste. Keeps edit warring. [73] [74] [75] and many other edits by this person as can be seen in the revision history. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky using IPs from Turkey. Binksternet (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article is attracting repeated additions of unsourced content, along with an editor (coming from various IPs) who keeps combining paragraphs into walls of text. There needs to be a permanent control on what content is added or changed. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 18:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 19:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Somewhat controversial subject with persistent vandalism from IPs for several months. It is likely to be a perennial vandal target. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 20:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS, under AP rather than PS because that's at the root of this. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is the focus of persistent and regular vandalism and disruption by IPs since the Russian-Ukraine war; being a BLP, it should have longer-term (a year) while the conflict is going on. Aszx5000 (talk) 20:48, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:RUSUKR. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/FUERDAI target since 01:04, 13 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 21:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LR.127 (talk) 21:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nxcrypto Message 00:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs after being protected for a year. Nyescum (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection requested till end of the election due to persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. QEnigma (talk) 02:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User using a different IP trying to vandalize this article again, in a situtation that is already happening for months, so i ask, if its possible to make this article with a much longer protection period or a permanent protection also because its listed as a "good article". This user appears all the time that the protection period ends with a different IP everytime and making the exactly same edit that many users already reverted in the numerous previous times it tried to "edit" the article. Thanks Liimkna (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced changes by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some vandalism and un-referenced claims being added. This article is a contentious topic some might consider so it will probably bring some trolling within the coming weeks. A semi-protection for a few weeks at least is warranted here I believe. TheOneTwoGo (talk) 02:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2. El_C 05:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Very heavily substituted; a search for its hidden comment returns over 60 thousand results. Charlotte (Queen of Heartstalk) 03:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Template protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Content removal constantly. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 12:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 160.248.11.216 (talk · contribs) blocked by UtherSRG. for year. The IP itself has also been globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. The IP and its sock account have been locally and globally blocked for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same caste POV pushing IP range adding unsourced and removing sourced content / sources, as well as edit warring about it - [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2405:201:4016:3138:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Malcolmxl5. For 48 hours. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism by a user under various IPs. Bahooka (talk) 17:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2600:1005:B23E:ECDF:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 18:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is a lie, I added a source by Billboard that says they broke up. 2601:47:4880:32E0:8092:4707:4FEF:60A1 (talk) 18:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked: 2601:47:4880:32E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 18:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Bukkie914 (talk · contribs) blocked by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Indefinitely; the IPs have been blocked as well. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full or semi protection: Edit warring/content dispute. 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:8B5:A45F:FCD1:91C4 (talk) 20:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was on 9/11 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:8B5:A45F:FCD1:91C4 (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have calmed down since then. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Both IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full or semi protection: Edit warring/content dispute. Similar dispute on rubidium 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:8B5:A45F:FCD1:91C4 (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Edit-warring going on. A lot of new users are disrupting the article violating the guidelines. Note that the topic is subject to an ongoing disinformation campaign by Indian media. Nomian (talk) 06:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC). Nomian (talk) 06:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us start with this one and see whether it helps Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOP (Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War) Hoben7599 (talk) 02:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 05:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Let's see how the AfD plays out. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 03:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. All socks indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated sockpuppet attacks. PamD 04:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 05:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked. Again, all socks indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced and/or poorly sourced information. Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 05:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 193.82.246.250 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm trying to create a translated version for Wikipedia en Español. It was a respectful translation but I can't upload it because of this error: "This page has been protected to prevent editing or other actions." Leandroid (talk) 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done The English page isn't protected. You'd have to take this up with the admins at the Spanish Wikipedia, where we have no authority. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion from the same IP range resuming within a few hours of the previous protection expiring. Belbury (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2a0a:ef40:e00::/40 (talk · contribs). 6 months partial block from an extensible list of pages, including the one proposed for protection. This is a recurring problem. Report again if they find a new IP range. Favonian (talk) 12:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent protection expired, same old nonsense is back again. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please update the relationship truth and accept so this has its calmness back because of the other misleading and false information about Adria. Jason Momoa was just hanging around and the other pulled the misleading information off only because of a picture and he is in a marriage commitment already with Nicolle A.Morea and she is being damaged right now for no reason while not being a lie and the other being a lie and please take Adria out and protect the page further, because the other are on who you know what and they aren't normal at all, they are having something and over doing it definitely with damaging people and they damaged over 200 tausend people on the Instagram of Jason Momoa as well and went on Nicolle A.Morea too and even twisted all and really done a big bubu. Adria is not to get to near to and the only she gets near is for the promotional points of the other movie and no dating a marriage committed man who is with someone else. 2A01:599:A30:B2F7:BBD9:EFEF:AFFB:B0BA (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done – Block evasion, WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Moreamomoa. Favonian (talk) 08:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing since July with regards to the ethnic labelling of its inhabitants. Indefinite protection should also be considered. Semsûrî (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 10:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 11:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi protection: Threat of vandalism has decreased substantially and it is very unlikely that potential vandals will return. Car234 (talk) 14:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Car234: This page was protected as Arbitration enforcement under the auspices of AP2 and cannot be unilaterally unprotected here. Appeal the protection at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Election denial movement in the United States is not protected. Favonian (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruptive editings. Mehedi Abedin 09:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/IPA. Favonian (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Cremastra (talk) 14:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – jawiki in Long-term abuse with a w:ja:LTA:LMG is continuous vandalism. Request a Semi-protection. Mt.Asahidake (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: protect this deletion query so that only self-confirmed editors participate and not anonymous IPs. Thank you. Alon9393 (talk) 08:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Zero IP edits ever. DMacks (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued sockpuppetry shortly after page protection expired. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See edit history and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brettandelle. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-disruption, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moreamomoa/Archive. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 103.247.23.192 (talk · contribs). globally blocked for two years. Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP and new user NPOV vandalism. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frost 12:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism IP by Malaysian troll User:42.153.130.67 and disruptive editing. Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content Hesselink Bagusekaf07 (talk) 13:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More socking again. After previous protection period recently expired. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 19:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Elli. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption from long-term abuse. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 (talk) 20:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement in AP2. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 21:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 September 2024

Reason: Protection was originally declined, with Daniel Case blocking socks instead, but this problem is not slowing down. Should absolutely be protected, beyond a shadow of a doubt. JeffSpaceman (talk) 11:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an IP-hopping vandal over the last month. The IPv6 range seems pretty wide, so I'm not sure if a range block is possible. MaterialsPsych (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Regular problematic edits by IP-users; e.g. BLP violation[82][83]. Mann Mann (talk) 21:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/PW. Daniel Case (talk) 23:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP keeps adding incorrect information despite being warned on their talk page. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 12:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by socks Johnj1995 (talk) 16:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. All socks blocked; AfD closed as keep. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sockpuppetry 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking resumed 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking resumed 100.33.107.250 (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. All socks blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent disruptive editing to relationship status2605:59C8:5286:B500:E8F8:FF1:AF20:68A5 (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Again, we only handle protection requests on this Wikipedia. I think you're better off going to a steward, since it seems the Greek Wikipedia has no counterpart to this page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! 2605:59C8:5286:B500:A01D:F991:5D07:463D (talk) 02:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 21:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 103.247.23.192 (talk · contribs). Globally. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edits in infobox without sources Ali aj809 (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: for the Greek language page - Persistent disruptive editing to relationship status by an erotomaniac woman who thinks she is in a relationship with Jason Momoa. 2605:59C8:5286:B500:E8F8:FF1:AF20:68A5 (talk) 21:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined We cannot help you with a protection request at elwiki since we do not have any authority there. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurrent unhelpful edits from logged-out users (eg changing to "German victory"). High notability topic so that's likely to continue (largest clash of tanks in armoured warfare history at the time). Suggest PC for low impact. Slowking Man (talk) 00:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and now the article is being redirected to another page but cant be reverted back by the system , seems disabled by the system Bennysubawa (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done: no such article exists. --Kinu t/c 03:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 20:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recuse myself from considering this as I've been involved in a discussion on the page. Not the one related to the request, but I think it would be ill-advised for me to be the protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. As this is always the same IP in the last days, so I do not think we need to shut down the whole talk-page; WP:UTPROT etc. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent low-level IP vandalism. About once a month someone changes his middle name to "Lamborghini". Neither the amount nor the recency matters, it should not be permitted to continue. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please I want to make a Wikimedia for an artist Mrrodney01234 (talk) 03:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrrodney01234: That isn't the kind of edit request that this section is for. If you want help with creating a new article, I recommend asking at the Teahouse. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined Wrong venue. Lectonar (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Iamsouravrana (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to natter, there have been 30+ vandalism edits so far. Can I ask for a push on protection please, if possible. Thank you so much. Knitsey (talk) 13:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request permanent semi-protection. A massive portion of the edit history is jingoistic IP edits from within the United States scrubbing well-verified and duly weighted information about United States war crimes as well as directly promoting the verifiably false idea that the United States has not committed war crimes. Within the last 100 edits, 27 of them are marked as reverted, and that's likely even an undercount. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 13:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Malinaccier (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 14:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 14:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various ip's disruptive editing. I think a few days protection might help? Inserting 'greatest' town, 'legendary' etc. Knitsey (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely agree, tons of non-neutral edits. I would even suggest a permanent protection just because of the town's name. TryAgainSooner (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing; WP:GS/CASTE. Ekdalian (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Huge, sudden spike in vandalism from a wide range of IP users. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. Frost 14:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated addition of unsourced and/or incorrect content (last edit removed fradulent label claims). Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. BlueboyLINY (talk) 06:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined Looks like an edit war between an IP and the OP. No idea why OP requested ECB protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and slow edit-warring. Previously, it was fast edit-warring and COI editing, such as Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#Legal_threat. 174.89.12.36 (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unreliable information is Published DrRamaKrishnanKalpathySundaram (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1Reason: Coimbatore Suburban Railway, Incorrect & wrong information is published in the last part of 2nd Paragraph under subtitle #Suburban_Stations as follows However, this connection became superfluous when Coimbatore was directly connected from Irugur side via Pilamedu and Coimbatore North in 1953, and accordingly, this link line was removed at that time. Since the doubling work between Irugur–Coimbatore section is in progress, these double lines will be utilised for suburban traffic if required.[13] DrRamaKrishnanKalpathySundaram (talk) 12:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of repeated vandalism and unsourced claims Ali aj809 (talk) 12:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined OP is edit-warring. Bbb23 (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 17:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Per WP:CT/A-I. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits from IP addresses since 00:01, 16 September 2024‎. Alith Anar 17:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 50 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP range persistently adding uncredited role without providing citation. DonIago (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected 3 months. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page (should have been done earlier given the way this story developed). Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. after you asked on my talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of sanction WP:CASTE cruft by a network of likely socks (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fancy vibēs). Asking for a temp ECP or similar till it subsides. Gotitbro (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – IP-users and some users add unreliable source for her relationship status. Mann Mann (talk) 15:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If IP users are causing the problem, semi is enough. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of recent valdalism by IP(s) trying to redirect the page to other pages, which have to be constantly reverted (and the page re-patrolled). Aszx5000 (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of new user / IP unsourced and unconstructive edits. Out of the past 50 edits, only a single one of them hasn't been reverted. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandals. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 03:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IPs continue changing release date & other unsourced changes... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 14:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want indefinite semi-protection 174.244.84.83 (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17 September 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism Sparkbean (talk) 17:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 129.205.240.79 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article has been vandalized on several occasions over the last couple of weeks, as a result it has been nominated for protection. Steve.A.Dore.4 (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet IP of Blaxstocatamazon is back and making similar legal threats see Blaxstocatamazon's contributions[84]. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 49.36.160.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User:Qalandar303 was banned indefinitely less than two years ago (ANI link). Several IPs have been making similar edits to the same page over the last five days, with the same tone of voice on the talk page (e.g. You have been reverted, and will continue to be so indefinitely. If you continue to misbehave, brow-beat and bully, rights are reserved to take furthermore action.).

Please semi-protect for a month. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 16:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:ED8F:EB00:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of personal attacks on my talk-page by different IPs in the last 10 days. Jingiby (talk) 16:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: 185.96.163.21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. for two weeks Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP 2406:3400:60D:B1E0:6C36:336A:BFD6:40F6/64 persistently edit warring to change the text to be contrary to what the sources say. This IP has already been blocked under this IP but continues to edit on the rest of their /64 (all the same person). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: I see that their block was, in fact, temporary and expired. But it remains the same disruptive user. Note, for instance, this previous attempt to insert this with deceptive edsum [85]. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  User(s) blocked: 2406:3400:60D:B1E0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Has been a target before, and with my most recent edits (thoroughly researched, and publicly posted before I made them), I'm anticipating a very high probability of further shenanigans. ShinyAlbatross (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. But I will put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: addition of poor quality content that conflicts with information that is already in this article. D4R1U5 (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not really seeing anything the editors aren't handling, and also I am hesitant to casually protect an article at AfD as either a) it will deleted and not be an issue, or b) it might keep editors who could add material that saves it from deletion from doing so. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is attracting nonsense from two newly-registered editors and one IP. Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Bishonen | tålk 00:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Arbitrarian editions by IP users.

I think semi-protection (for only auto-user cofirmed) could work. Thank you all. Rey1996ss (talk) 18:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done because there is nothing to do. The page is not protected, and this is not an edit request. If this is a request to protect, you put it on the wrong subpage, and also we don't protect to block one side of a content dispute. Furthermore, you have failed to engage in any talk page discussion whatsoever. You have received this answer on User talk:Anachronist already. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism and disruptive edits by IPs ongoing for months (ever since 1 year semi protection expired). Since the page is just a list of capitals, no regular edits are foreseen here. Requesting indefinite/ long term semi protection against such IP edits. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequently targetted page subject to sanctioned WP:CASTE disruption; as the page history would denote, unlikely to subside. Gotitbro (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High frequency of IP vandalism within the past week. Mellamelina (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talkedits) 22:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talkedits) 22:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article already has "Consensus Required" restriction on it, and multiple XC editors are reverting in violation of established consensus on the talk page (see Talk:Zionism#Revert for a previous round where, at the bottom of the thread, the established consensus about one line was re-affirmed), likely in response to recent high-profile posts on X (e.g., this post by Brianna Wu, this post by Hen Mazzig). (There is also non-XC disruption on the talk page.) Suggest short-term (few days or a week) full protection of the article, and ECP of the talk page, to force XC editors to go to the talk page to suggest changes in accordance with the Consensus Required restriction. Note the article is already ECP'd and the talk page is not protected; I'm suggesting boosting the article to full and the talk page to ECP. TIA, Levivich (talk) 22:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There is an annoying IP who insists on repeatedly changing Pia Mia's nationality which was supposedly should be Guam, an unincorporated territory of the United States like Puerto Rico which is also an unincorporated territory of the same, which only sangs several singles as an artist and featured artist and made several extended plays in English when The Gift debuted. 186.6.87.181 (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and SPAs making baseless requests to change far right to conservative etc. Dronebogus (talk) 02:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP-hopping vandals and new user. Sjö (talk) 06:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon editors and throwaway SPAs. Wikishovel (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 07:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: His page is already protected but may need another protection. Allan Lichtman has contined to push for updates to his own page, including on YouTube interviews last night, in contravention of Wikipedia conflict of interest rules and the consensus of the page's editors regarding his predictive record. Caraturane (talk) 13:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add: this is a request for an extension of the protection or whatever you feel is best given the situation. Ever since protection went up, the talk page has been consistent in its view as to his predictive record, as has the related The Keys to the White House talk page. There has not been widespread disagreement about what the pages should say, but he has continued to agitate for the edits on the side for most of the last month (including on his YouTube channel) and there is concern the pages will get edit spammed with edits, against the talk page consensus, once again. Caraturane (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to hold off on this until disruption resumes. Maybe semi or ecp will be sufficient? Elli (talk | contribs) 16:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined per Elli above. Protection has only just expired. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism luckymustard (talk) 19:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – continuous WP:BLP violations by IP users. NitinMlk (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP targeting Maleschreiber (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive (and tiresome and unimaginative) editing, mostly to the short description. Moscow Mule (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Plaqueta88 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article, for a week, rather than raise the protection to ECP. Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive (and tiresome and unimaginative) editing, mostly to the short description. Moscow Mule (talk) 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked: Plaqueta88 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for a week, per above. Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated unsourced additions by IP editors. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Wafflefrites (talk) 04:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Needs indef semi-protection due to problematic edits by IP-users. Please see protection log and pending changes log. Mann Mann (talk) 07:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Pending-changes protected Disruption not heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This redirect is fully protected because of an argument about whether it should be its own article. This dispute was settled over nine years ago, so this page's current level of protection is unnecessary. Cyrobyte (talk) 19:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spartaz: Protecting admin, back in the day. Favonian (talk) 20:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The imposition of a redirect was endorsed at DRV and the advice was to allow a discussion before considering any changes to the level of protection. I guess my question is why do you want to remove the protection? Spartaz Humbug! 12:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Not unprotected – Please create a sourced version of this article in a subpage or your userspace. When this is done, please make the request again, or ask any administrator to move the page for you. Favonian (talk) 09:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of Vandalism and disruptive editing. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 10:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Mostly from same individual with different IP address who keeps putting original research contents. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 11:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 14:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term disruption. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done, as WP:KURDS (again). El_C 14:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Please revdel latest ones. M/ (talk) 14:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse from French IPs. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/93.22.133.185. Binksternet (talk) 16:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: lots of crystalball violations of rfk buying third charter 45BearsFan (talk) 16:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @45BearsFan: I don't see enough of that specific rumor to justify protection, but the recent article history is full of unsourced additions being reverted and the page was recently protected for the same reason. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by IPs and new editors since past few weeks. They keep adding either unsourced or clearly incorrect information again and again. Requesting Semi-protection for 3 months. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:ARBIND. El_C 17:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ARBPIA + Lebanon. Borgenland (talk) 14:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. As WP:PIA WP:ECR. El_C 17:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is the target of block-evading IP-hopper(s). Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and personal attacks. Ronnnaldo7 (talk) 16:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Even after a revert by an admin@Daniel:[86] , disruption is still continuing. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC). Ratnahastin (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • I've been pinged in the above comment — I don't think my revert can be taken as any sort of supporting evidence that protection is required. I simply reverted an edit which I believe is against the clear consensus developing on the talk page (even if I'm not thrilled by said consensus personally). That discussion may eventually lead to a different consensus, or it may not. Daniel (talk) 11:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Talk-page discussion was started and is ongoing. Lectonar (talk) 14:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is harmful false information that needs to be changed....... . Am1115 (talk) 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC) There is a lot of false information on the page for Zionism that is extremely harmful. Please allow this page to be edited so that the false information can be fixed.[reply]

  Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics, so users must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic. Lectonar (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting creation of redirect to The Paz Show; Paz was the animated/puppet host of TLC/Discovery Kids' Ready Set Learn! during its relaunch era (2003-2010). Link was protected back at the end of 2007, and again in January 2012; to those with deleted-contribution access, please remind me if I missed much (more) back then. (Inspired by this contributor's latest article-rescue drive, en route to another DYK pitch soon.) Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 17:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done, created the redirect, but I don't see any protections applied to Paz the Penguin. It looks like the create-protection was canceled when I created it. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting creation of redirect to Warcraft (film), which came out a decade after this link's AFD and four years after its padlocking. (Via this 2011 title blacklist.) Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 18:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done, redirect created. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism IS NOT an ethno-cultural nationalism. It was NOT intended to colonize, but to decolonize regions of the Ottoman Empire that later became part of the British Mandate of Palestine. Hernanle (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your request is an assertion, presumably based on your personal opinion. See WP:EDITXY for a guide to writing edit requests in a way that makes them more likely to be accepted. Sean.hoyland (talk) 12:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined. This is not an edit request, it's just a complaint. You need to write a request in the form "change X to Y" and provide citations to reliable sources for verification. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... (Please correct the ranking order. As the page states, the ranking is based on the lowest gross, but one entry has been given special treatment. Additionally, it's widely known that the upper range figures cannot be used for ranking, as box office numbers in India are often heavily manipulated. https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/brahmastra-box-office-why-there-are-different-figures-for-the-film-everywhere-101663031644806.html https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment-news/telugu/exclusive-prabhas-salaar-fake-box-office-figures-proxy-booking-scam-decoded-article-106342910 https://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/tollywood/industry-bigwigs-baffled-over-fudged-box-office-figures-878975 https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/better-ott-deals-fake-perception-rise-in-star-fee-why-bollywood-is-rigging-box-office-with-corporate-bookings-and-what-exactly-is-it-9401271/ https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/gadar-2s-anil-sharma-says-makers-give-fake-box-office-numbers-buy-tickets-themselves-audience-says-ye-jhoothe-log-hain-8913097/ ) . W170924 (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined. Vague requests are not actionable. You have not stated specifically what should be changed. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist To be specific, in the Highest-grossing films table, Kalki 2898 AD should be at rank 7 and Pathaan should be at rank 6, since it's clearly denoted that the sorting is based on the lower range. Please change that. W170924 (talk) 18:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Done, then. Thank you for clarifying. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks:) W170924 (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent violations of WP:BLPRS due to a recent incident. CWenger (^@) 18:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:AP2, WP:ARBBLP. El_C 18:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the entire Lebanon pager explosion happened earlier today, I have seen numerous edits where people will vandalize the page, and I don't see it getting any better. SirMemeGod18:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This may be due for ECP due to the 2024 Lebanon pager explosions. This has been dragged into WP:CT/AI even when it shouldn't have been, as all of the edits have to do with the aforementioned event on today, 17 September. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:PIA, WP:ECR (related content). El_C 18:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruptive edits. Limegreencoral (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:HORN. I find it incredibly unlikely that this page would become problem free in the foreseeable future. El_C 18:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing from IPs over unsourced claims. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 19:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article unrecognizable in form, tone, and content since October 7th 2023 142.147.58.81 (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic (PIA) and cannot be unilaterally unprotected. Appeal the protection at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement or WP:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics, so users must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An editor is repeatedly restoring an article that was redirected under a 2023 AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somalia national under-20 football team). The editor is refusing advice to discuss on the talk page or seek a deletion review. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I believe the article you're referring to is Somalia national under-20 football team. The article you linked only has had one edit in the past two weeks. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's it. The article got reverted while I was filing my report so I think Twinkle sent it from the wrong place. The page creator is now seeking discussion on the talk page so this request may be moot, but we'll see. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Dclemens1971: You are both very close to being blocked for a WP:3RR violation. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not really a content dispute when there's an AfD expressing community consensus already in place. I know 3RR and I don't go exceed it. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As it says on the edit warring policy: Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense. Reaching out to the other editor earlier looks like it would have helped. They seem to have stopped once you did. Anyhow, if they resume, please report it to WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant IP sockpuppetry/vandalism. Catfurball (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Never ending WP:TENDENTIOUS editing by attempting to remove/alter sourced info. Looks like possible sockpuppetry right now too. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18 September 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated budget vandalism. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued unsourced/disruptive editing by dynamic IPs. Loafiewa (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 3 IPs have vandalized the page within the last few hours. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism related to the release date from an IP user. Sussywidget (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]