Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/10

2022

01 October 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 95.80.28.51 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see a longstanding pattern of vandalism and adding unsourced content, but not frequent enough to qualify for semi-protection. Let's see what PC can do. MelanieN (talk) 00:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. General Ization Talk 21:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see a need for EC protection at this time. The socks do not appear to be autoconfirmed users, and they seem to get blocked before they can do much. Ask again if that situation changes. MelanieN (talk) 00:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 22:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper switched to another series but still removing sourced info and suspended flights as being cut. The Banner talk 22:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Probable sockpuppetry by IP users. MelanieN (talk) 00:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper switched to another series but still removing sourced info and suspended flights as being cut. The Banner talk 22:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper switched to another series but still removing sourced info and suspended flights as being cut. The Banner talk 22:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper removing maintenance templates, source requests and suspended flights. The Banner talk 22:39, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopper removing maintenance templates, source requests and suspended flights. The Banner talk 22:42, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The page is too heavily edited for PC protection to work well. MelanieN (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A bunch of various IP editors are apparently interpreting that today's shutdown of Olympic Channel (American TV channel) by NBCUniversal also means the demise of the IOC's international over-the-top service with the same name and logo, even though there is no indication this is the case. WCQuidditch 23:41, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Magnatyrannus: The edit-warring editor has been blocked and I think that might end the problem. Feel free to ping me if issues arise and I will investigate further. Johnuniq (talk) 00:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq, the problem is that the user might continue after his block has expired, so we might have to keep a lookout/watchful eye. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We are supposed to help the editor concerned understand how Wikipedia works, with a longer block if necessary, but this might help them join the discussion. Johnuniq (talk) 01:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP(s) disruptive genre warring with original research. Lapadite (talk) 01:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Extended-Confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't think I've ever requested ECP before, but since Semi-Protection didn't help... Thegreatluigi (talk) 01:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadishMelanieN (talk) 01:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing Justificate (talk) 01:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Elizium23 (talk) 23:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This reporting is not just based on social media, it is also sourced to the IndependentMelanieN (talk) 00:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death; Lots of IP vandalism/edit wars about date of death (e.g. Sept. 30 or Oct. 1). Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 02:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disagreement/misunderstanding might be based on which side of the International Dateline you are on.  MelanieN (talk) 02:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Autoconfirmed socks are getting through the protection. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. When the EC protection expires, be sure to notify an admin to restore the indefinite semi-protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 23:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LilianaUwU: The WP:VAND link you used refers to things like adding poop. Edit warring over a category that appears to assert that side X did bad thing Y is not vandalism. There is nothing on talk. Something like this needs to be thoroughly discussed and, if agreed, there needs to be a link to that discussion in an edit summary and a brief explanation (with link) on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined If necessary, ask again after resolution at Talk:War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine#Category:War crimes in Ukraine vs Category:Ukrainian war crimes. Johnuniq (talk) 01:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 23:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LilianaUwU: The WP:VAND link you used refers to things like adding poop. Edit warring over a category that appears to assert that side X did bad thing Y is not vandalism. There is nothing on talk. Something like this needs to be thoroughly discussed and, if agreed, there needs to be a link to that discussion in an edit summary and a brief explanation (with link) on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 00:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined If necessary, ask again after resolution at Talk:War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine#Category:War crimes in Ukraine vs Category:Ukrainian war crimes. Johnuniq (talk) 01:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please create-protect the page with autoconfirmed protection, to prevent vandalism. Also no need for anyone else to edit this page other than me. Taiwanrailtransportfan (talk) 01:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. User pages are automatically semi-protected, so your page does not need any additional protection.  MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Autoconfirmed protection per user's request. Taiwanrailtransportfan (talk) 01:04, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No one else has tried to edit your sandbox, so there is no need to protect it. MelanieN (talk) 01:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 04:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:14, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unprotected in July, and the only contributions in the last 50 edits were mostly along the lines of reverting or vandal edits. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 04:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months Commons, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed: High level of IP vandalism, connected to Russian-Ukraine War. Gtgamer79 (talk) 07:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done that, JalenFolf. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Pretty sure there is no need at all for this page to be moved and almost certain that this page will not be moved anytime in the future. Still leave the semi-protection on there too, just requesting to add move protection on top. Jeuno (talk) (contribs) 09:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: I assumed your unprotection on February 2020 was meant only for the sysop-level edit protection and restored the previous move protection. Please correct me if that's wrong. Move protected indefinitely. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Enough warring over the map is taking place that this needs to be locked until the (very lively) talk page discussion settles it. I've reverted it back to the pre-dispute state. Tartan357 (talk) 03:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mini-note by non-admin - If an admin does decide to add temporary full protection, make sure it goes back to the old protection state before the expiry date, or else we will get a situation like the One Direction article back in 2015; had to report that article to WP:RFPP back then all because a full protection of an otherwise semi-protection ended, and then the vandalism pops up again immediately afterwards. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 04:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One Direction has a map? Crazy. El_C 06:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to discrepancies of protection log stuff for another Wikipedia article; the topic doesn't really matter except for the fact that One Direction was a "hot topic" at the time. Specifically about discrepancies was between this full protect page log, this semi-protect of the page immediately about a few hours of automatic unprotected status, and then the page is corrected in semi-protection to be reverted to full length. Now, it isn't so serious for a pop band, but for something like Russia, you better watch out. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 09:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Blue Edits (talk) 11:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. DatGuyTalkContribs 11:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of hood films edit 174.247.252.156 (talk) 05:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. The page does not exist. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Special:Diff/1076304548/1083024132, Special:Diff/1083024609, Special:Diff/1083194606. 寒吉 (talk) 06:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:15, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page should have Extensive Protection on, it has no form of protection, not even semi protection. 5TheHunter (talk) 13:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. 5TheHunter, though there is a lot of disruption on this highly-sensitive page, that is not a sound protection rational. El_C 14:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by someone. Trup001 (talk) 14:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 15:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sevastopol is Ukraine, not Russia. The page is created by Russia and states that Crimean Sevastopol is Russian. That is not true! 2406:3400:409:A2E0:3D1A:A0CA:2985:9D7F (talk) 08:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This isn't a request for unprotection. If you have suggestions for improving the article, make them on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Major event, globally. 5TheHunter (talk) 12:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Extended Confirmed Protection)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: (Extended Confirmed Protection) This page should have extended protection due to the constant vandalism I've seen on the page and her controversial/transphobic comments against the LGBT community. 5TheHunter (talk) 12:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Semi-protection seems to be working. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent (30 September - 1 October) pattern of IP vandalism repeatedly reverted. Serious BLP issue. Geoff | Who, me? 16:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 103.67.158.248 (talk) 13:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - no article specified. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page should have a protection since there is some controversy of this person and due to the biography of people. 5TheHunter (talk) 13:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: i has a lot of reason to can answer (your should un protect hemorrhoid) 1.is long time semi protect over 12 year and is the great reason----> 2.not need semi protect because semi protect long time. by this reason your should unprotect or Extended confirmed protection hemorrhoid why your not unprotect the acticle has not bad edit by ip to 12 year(1 july 2010 to present)? and i sorry to harassment your admin พนรนร (talk) 14:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done History has shown this is a constant target for vandalism. And the reason no IP has vandalized the article is because no IP can edit the article, demonstrating that the protection works. I would also note that your English might not be adequate for editing prose on the English Wikipedia anyway. Dennis Brown - 14:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
what is the damage if you un protect hemorrhoidพนรนร (talk) 14:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page displays a current event that is happening. It should have some form of protection. 5TheHunter (talk) 13:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 14:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and unverified users continue to make unsourced edits, while others are more helpful. Protection will help us see what changes they want and verify if they're correct. Paris1127 (talk) 17:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 18:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A persistent number of edits trying to falsely label this entity as having been annexed by Russia, despite the Russian Duma, Federation Council, Constitutional Court, and President Putin not having given final approval to the annexation yet. Source for my claims: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-informs-russian-parliament-plan-annex-ukrainian-regions-2022-09-30/ AxolotlsAreCool (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As with the DPR article, a persistent number of edits trying to falsely label this entity as having been annexed by Russia, despite the Russian Duma, Federation Council, Constitutional Court, and President Putin not having given final approval to the annexation yet. Source for my claims: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-informs-russian-parliament-plan-annex-ukrainian-regions-2022-09-30/ AxolotlsAreCool (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected upgrade for the duration. El_C 18:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Editormallu (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Salt the earth - Repeatedly used by a banned user to try and push a vanity piece. Leave the draftspace title alone so that it can keep being used as a honeypot.Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protectedFavonian (talk) 20:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Added to title blacklist. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Poor bot gets confused by the info template succeeding the protection one. Favonian (talk) 21:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unconstructive edits. Ijkal (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

02 October 2022

Reason: Requesting extended confirmed protection or semiprotection to prevent future disruptive editing to an article that used to be a hoax. WPEditor42 (talkcontribs) 15:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ Amory (utc) 18:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 16:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Userful honey trap, and salting is too easy to get around. Favonian (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "userful honey trap"? Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 17:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think they mean honeypot. El_C 18:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see, thanks for the clarification. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 18:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
He does indeed. Favonian (talk) 18:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Armut ayva 78.190.75.187 (talk) 20:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This request is severely lacking context. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The request is unclear (they appear to be saying 'pear quince' in Turkish but that tells us nothing). Malcolmxl5 (talk)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 15:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1017:b000::/40 (talk · contribs) blocked by Evergreenfir. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 15:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1017:B024:3AC5:6D9A:32EF:889E:C9BD (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Also unsure why indefinite semi-protection would be appropriate here. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary semi-protection in light of recent flurry of obvious vandalism by unregistered IP users. ➤ Zᴇᴇx.ʀɪᴄᴇ ✪ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 20:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Fanny Flomin (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Next time take it to AIV. DatGuyTalkContribs 21:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temperory extended confirmed protection: High level of vandalism. The page was approved of semi protection for 10 days, so many fan pages have created wikipedia ids recently and adding fan content or news from unreliable sources. Please extended confirmed protection for two days.Imsaneikigai (talk) 03:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced date for future episode release; sources only conform October, not a date. -- Alex_21 TALK 11:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 17:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruption by either one vandal intentionally changing IPs or a series of meatpuppets. Disruption re-started almost immediately upon expiration of previous semi-protection. There has not been a productive IP edit to this article since July, so protection for a month or more would be justifiable. Sable232 (talk) 21:47, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Uhai (talk · contribs) 04:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Chris G.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Uhai (talk · contribs) 04:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Chris G.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection due to a recent spike in POV edits caused by the election happening today, including the introduction of undue labels in the lead, the removal of sourced content without an adequate explanation, and the addition of supportive material directly quoted from the subject's political campaign and bordering copyvio. Yue🌙 07:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 00:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Uhai (talk · contribs) 04:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Chris G.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Uhai (talk · contribs) 04:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Chris G.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper repeatedly restoring removed unsourced trivia list without explanation. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. firefly ( t · c ) 06:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP user consistent vandalism. Same IP user who's been vandalizing the Allison Stokke and Chapman University articles. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 03:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. firefly ( t · c ) 06:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP user. Areaseven (talk) 04:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sock of User:Dedy Tisna Amijaya is persistently adding random and poorly sourced / unsourced content into this article. Austronesier (talk) 09:35, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Press in Bangladesh has taken note of the vandalism: [1]. Archer1234 (talk) 06:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism disruptive editing on article of a recent event. Angga (formerly Angga1061) 08:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Schwede66. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism started again once the protection expired. Layah50♪ (喋ってください!) 12:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Firefly. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ViperSnake151  Talk  14:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 15:39, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeat target of serial vandal. $chnauzer 16:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ip usser want add new picture and replace longstanding infobox pictures with a new picture [[2]] I asked him that he should start discussion if they want change longstanding consensus (ussed years) picture but they ignores. Shadow4dark (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shadow4dark, looks like a content dispute rather than WP:DE. El_C 17:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP spamming Skyerise (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Big dispute regarding the "Among Us" image. Edit warring, no consensus on image as of yet. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Oshwah. El_C 17:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: May as well protect this indefinitely due to the Lokesh vandal. Skyerise (talk) 16:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page title has been vandalized, changed from Gaston. Drdpw (talk) 11:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean page move vandalism. Anyway, the errant editor has been blocked, I think. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. And page returned to correct title. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This title is the result of vandalism and the associated page history belongs with 2022 Atlantic hurricane season article. Drdpw (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page move vandalism. The article has been moved back and the errant editor blocked. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. And page returned to correct title, leaving a redirect. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: sock puppetry issue Magherbin (talk) 17:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 17:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Being vandalized by HelloBroFist:

Ref: [3] Averedjoe (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. Averedjoe, they have made no further edits since a final warning was issued to them, so maybe it's over...? (déjà vu) El_C 16:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The Philippine President is being attacked by dissenters and destabilizers. They edit his page and make him look bad in the international community. Averedjoe (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. Averedjoe, it's been 4 days, so maybe it's over...? Also, dissenters and destabilizers — wtf? El_C 16:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I request to add Semi-protection to the Uruguay article since it has been the victim of several vandalisms made by unregistered users. Most countries have this protection, even small ones like Iceland. Wikimanedit98 (talk) 18:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wikimanedit98, I doubt that's the case. For example, I just looked at Peru (I chose it somewhat randomly because it's easy to type), which is unprotected atm. Beyond that, we don't generally do trend-protections like that (even for DS/GS), but we do give a lot more leeway for country articles before we protect them, especially indefinitely. El_C 19:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption of disruptive editing after protection expired. Tartan357 (talk) 00:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tartan357, I actually looked at this and wondered if I should protect it, but I blocked the range (and then removed TPA because of likely underage behavior) and figured we could wait and see. But I'll leave this open for the next admin to see. Drmies (talk) 00:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now. Holding off. Please relist if disruption resumes. Oh, and looks like I'm the last protecting admin, what do you know? El_C 17:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This subject has already had two different AfDs; there should never be another. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 20:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – For the same reason as the other article with a different spelling. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 20:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

03 October 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Nardog (talk) 06:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or I guess "Professor Ed Gein" is better characterized as vandalism. YMMV. Nardog (talk) 06:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Nardog, WP:DIFFs? Also, weird title — wouldn't she be a Queen? El_C 16:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Compare Special:Contributions/Cinemarating (e.g. Special:Diff/1113398185) and Special:Diff/1113579836. Not my call, but queen is ambiguous (thx patriarchy) and "The Queen Regnant" doesn't have the same ring to it. Nardog (talk) 21:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. BangJan1999 18:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. BangJan1999, what sock? I see one IP that edited twice today and seems to have now stopped. Otherwise, this page is relatively inactive. Not seeing any other attempts to speedy it, at least in 2022. El_C 19:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent IP vandalism over several months - Eastwood Park and strabane (talk) 20:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well, that didn't last long. El_C 20:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent weekly vandalism by multiple IP addresses. PizzaKing13 (Hablame) 06:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 98.46.111.62 (talk) 11:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The usual bickering about the film's gross proceeds. MelanieN (talk) 23:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant removal of redirect to create a hoax page. Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 23:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article is high-traffic after it's recent release, and has been subject to numerous unconstructive edits as well as vandalism. BlueNoise (talk) 22:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. IPs are doing a lot of constructive editing and only occasional vandalism. MelanieN (talk) 23:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IP address keeps disrupting the 2022 FIVB Volleyball Women's World Championship article. EndlessKai (talk) 05:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DB1729talk 01:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably due to his current stream here where he pulled up the article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-2vNXqdHcw -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant recreation of hoax page. Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. GedUK  08:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps extended confirmed protection will be needed but I'm trying the following first. Please notify me if the LTA resumes. I semi protected the following for an extended period. Some of them had come off 6 or 12-month protection and I protected them for 6 or 12 months. Others were generally 3 months. Sorry that I extended some recent protections for short periods without consulting the protecting admin since I thought it was sufficiently difficult dealing with this and something drastic is needed.
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been edited by multiple IPs adding College Gameday to their upcoming game in an attempt to use as the "gamename" parameter which is intended for rivalries and bowl games, not being named what is essentially ESPN's game of the week. Rockchalk717 18:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can somebody please review this? The edits have picked up a bit since I requested this.--Rockchalk717 18:50, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I at least, don't understand what's happening, though I'm not a sports guy. Who made that hidden note? Does it enjoy consensus? What is GameDay? How is it one word? Anyway, it's all quite confusing. El_C 19:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: I added the note last night after it was announced, College Gameday is a College Football pregame show on ESPN and they host it at the stadium that has the game of the week. Kansas vs TCU has been selected as the game of the week. While Template:CFB schedule entry doesn't say it, in the examples it shows the "gamename" parameter in this template is to identify Rivalry Games or Bowl Games (postseason college football games). It's not for identifying what is basically amounts to ESPN's pick for game of the week. Not sure why it's one word, but that's the official branding of the show from ESPN and the Wikipedia page is titled to match it --Rockchalk717 20:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And what is happening is despite that note being there, multiple IPs have attempted to add it since it was announced last night and the IPs are either ignoring the note and adding it, or they are removing the note and adding it.--Rockchalk717 20:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't understand, like, pretty much any of that. I'm probably the wrong person to review this. But I doubt you're allowed to exempt yourself from 3RR to keep a hidden note you created last night and whatever it pertains to (which, again, I don't understand). But maybe...? Who knows (not I). El_C 20:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Add what? Are you providing a citation for whatever... that is? El_C 20:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: Add gameday to the "gamename" parameter. To word so someone who isn't a sports fan can understand it, IP addresses are misusing a parameter in the CFB schedule entry template used on the article despite me adding a note explaining the proper use of that parameter.--Rockchalk717 20:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator C.Fred. GedUK  08:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant BLP violations and vandalism that is going un-reverted for long periods of time. 75.244.19.189 (talk) 02:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism over the past few weeks. Caldorwards4 (talk) 03:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly every IP edit has been reverted since the last protection expired. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre🚐 00:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 08:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The school is in the news as it was besieged by the Islamic Republic and the wp entry is a target for non-encyclopedic edits. Nightdevil (talk) 03:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unreferenced controversial text, involving the IP ranges Special:Contributions/2600:1010:B147:90B0:0:0:0:0/64 and Special:Contributions/2600:1010:B141:3304:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 05:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This talk page is being spammed by several IPs in the same IP range as the talk page's IP address. User talk:103.137.24.249 was also targeted by the same IPs and was protected last week. —Bruce1eetalk 06:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre🚐 00:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to extending protection here or at Russell Crowe, but I was going to wait to see if they had another autoconfirmed sock in their drawer before protecting. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Guess you found one, or they found you... Andre🚐 00:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't confirmed yet, at least. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like Oshwah got this. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Oshwah. GedUK  09:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 07:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Migsmigss: Semi protection for a short period to stop the current turmoil might be possible, but articles are very rarely protected for a long period such as indefinite. I looked at article talk and some recent IP edits but I don't see anything that I can recognize as vandalism. Please identify three recent edits satisfying WP:VAND. Johnuniq (talk) 08:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator BusterD. GedUK  09:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 08:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temp protection should be given for this page, high amounts of edits. 5TheHunter (talk) 22:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's a lot of edits, but there's not a lot of disruptive ones. GedUK  08:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some edits are being deleted, temporary protection should be given for the page. A edit I made was recently deleted. 5TheHunter (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Your reverted edit was made by a user with 14 years editing and 200,000 edits. Page protection isn't going to stop that. If yuo've got a content issue with their edit, discuss on the talk page or with the user directly GedUK  08:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: LeaveMeAlone2 (talk · contribs) blocked by Muboshgu. BusterD (talk) 08:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Per WP:Deceased Wikipedians/Guidelines, confirmed by his family here. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 11:13, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: what is the damage if you unprotect hemorrhoid. --->it is my final harassment ผมชอบโหนกระแส (talk) 07:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC) question from :https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Decrease&diff=1113463314&oldid=1113446938[reply]

Declined @ผมชอบโหนกระแส: The English used above indicates that it might not be a good idea for you to edit articles here. You could try an edit request at the article talk page. Johnuniq (talk) 08:13, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As a featured article it's likely to be subject to disruption. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for a featured article, it's not that bad. Ive blocked the most disruptive IP. GedUK  09:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  09:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dream (YouTuber)

Temporary extended confirmed protection 'Reason: Recent face reveal causing high levels of disruptive editing and vandalisminvolving inappropriate use of non free images. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined tricky one this. Edit count is way too high for PC to be effective, there'd just be dozens of edits waiting to be approved and they'd end up being repeated. The repeated photo addition is annoying, but I don't think it's worth the pain of the Edit Requests to handle it. As the vast majority of the users editing that page are confirmed, semi protection isn't going to help. GedUK  09:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject of the article is a very controversial figure, and numerous IPs and auto-confirmed users have deleted huge amounts of information about him. These edits have been consistently reverted by extended confirmed users, so it would be very helpful this to not only be semi-protected, but EC-protected. Cpotisch (talk) 02:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. Cpotisch, I did not see any auto-confirmed users engage in the removal. Feel free to link any in case I missed it. El_C 13:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs Poirot09 (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP accounts restoring unsourced and false information to the article which borders on WP:HOAX Volunteer Marek 12:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. VM, that page has no lead! El_C 13:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs, restarted shortly after expiry of last protection. The Banner talk 09:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Quite a few protections this year — perhaps a spillover from the final season of Better Call Saul (which was great!)...? El_C 14:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly. I don't really keep track of what is affected by what unless I have a reason to care. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn't expect you to know, regardless if you care or not. It's just a nothing-comment which notes that prior to 2022, the last protection was in 2015. El_C 14:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Huh... that is rather interesting. I figured it was just cause of what seemed like a sudden jump of popularity. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Recent unconstructive edits by IPs (reliably sourced info removed, bad formatting and fluff inserted), especially involving SM Mall of Asia in the largest mall list. Pending changes protection should keep their edits in check. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same as above. IPs restoring unsourced and false information to the article that borders on WP:HOAX Volunteer Marek 12:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. VM, that page has no lead! El_C 13:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I know it has no lede, because it's currently about something which doesn't actually exist. I guess you could have an unsourced lede along the lines of "Zaprozhye Oblast is an oblast of Russia which may exist at some future point according to some Wikipedia editors" or something. Volunteer Marek 13:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I like the "according to some Wikipedia editors" part. El_C 13:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C it really needs full protection,, I see accounts adding unsourced OR> Doug Weller talk 15:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for the duration. Doug, I hope your surgery went well. Best wishes, El_C 15:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C thanks. It did but exhausted and a bit of pain. Doug Weller talk 15:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: *virtual hug* El_C 15:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 13:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Today's featured article, 20+ disruptive edits in the last 10 minutes Mannofthomas (talk) 16:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mannofthomas - The front page of the history is literally all vandalism! Apparently the anniversary for this event was yesterday, not today October 3rd. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ — That Coptic Guy (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 09:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:13, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Reoccurring and persistent level of IP vandalism. Nauseous Man (talk) 09:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Nauseous Man, looks like a content dispute that should be adressed on the talk page, a talk page which has not been used by anyone, ever. Feel free to link WP:DIFFs of the "vandalism," though, if you think I overlooked something. El_C 13:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be okay if Joshua Rush should be added to the Members of the Democratic Socialists of America category, since he's a member of it[1] Stark578 (talk) 21:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Archived copy". twitter.com. Archived from the original on 9 April 2020. Retrieved 23 June 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
Not done – Looks like you were able to make the change yourself. Favonian (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent spamming by a registered autoconfirmed editor, not responding on his/her talk page whatsoever. Possibly with a conflict of interest. The Banner talk 09:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. I have given the editor a final warning. I could have applied Extended Confirmed protection to the article, but that would be inappropriate since the problem is coming from a single editor. If they do it again, let me know. MelanieN (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from multiple SPAs. gobonobo + c 15:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A banned user and then a sequence of IPs are trying to push the old "Nazis were socialists" POV. Talk page consensus and the reliable sources don't support the push. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:50, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit-warring IP, almost certainly block evasion - this article has needed page protection previously, and this may be the same individual. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Ah yes, our 'friend' from Brescia. I think Beyond My Ken knows them well. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent trolling and IP hopping by same IP range[4][5][6][7] for days of days. Frequently harassing a particular user by canvassing many editors against him.[8][9] >>> Extorc.talk 15:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Rash of disruptive editing from a range of IPs, including some apparent logged-out block evasion from recently blocked User:AndrushkaA. MrOllie (talk) 17:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Reaper Eternal. Favonian (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent WP:FILMPLOT violations. Semi might work as well ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I have warned the two editors who were doing this most recently (which had not been done), and this hasn't happened since you posted the inline note. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Visible to users 64.114.207.63 (talk) 18:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's never a valid reason to request protection for a page. If it were then every article on Wikipedia could be protected since every article is visible to users which is the entire point of an encyclopedia. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Not a reason for protection, see WP:PROTECTION for more information. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Autoconfirmed socks are able to get past the protection. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:20, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 22:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi might be enough; gonna hold off on ECP. El_C 22:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 22:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. WP:PCPP for a few weeks should be enough here. Reptain (talk) 22:04, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Infinite Through the Fire and Flames! El_C 22:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04 October 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I started out on this page in an administrative capacity by blocking a few socks, but am now probably involved as I've nominated it for deletion. Would another admin please consider whether semi protection is warranted, or just block the latest account (which is likely MEAT rather than SOCK). Cheers. Girth Summit (blether) 22:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GS, you're also an adaptive surfer, admit it! El_C 22:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I imagine I'd have to be pretty adaptive if I ever tried it. Put me down as a splashy, shark-baity surfer. Girth Summit (blether) 23:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Removal of the RfD notice. 37.106.73.29 (talk) 22:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. El_C 23:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and persistent disruptive edits.Thus request indefinite semi-protection.Imsaneikigai (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – unregistered users keep reverting necessary edits. Greggens (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, we don't fully protect articles indefinitely. El_C 22:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fair amount of activity from Jagdeep singh bittu socks. Ravensfire (talk) 00:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RoySmith. El_C 01:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive and unconstructive edits as well as users failing to abide by Wikipedia's guidelines. Everm4e (talk) 01:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor repeatedly changing archive settings. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. A proxy. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article and the talk page are plagued by proxies. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's out of hand. I protected the article earlier, but after reverting the archive changes I was too involved for any more action. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term target of persistent BLP violation vandals. JavaHurricane 03:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 03:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: A consensus was established at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_9#Minor_Attracted_Person to soft-redirect this page to Wikt:minor-attracted person, however it was recently subject to vandalism from an anonymous user who redirected it to Pope Francis. There is no reason to let anyone edit this page title at this time. It should be indefinitely protected to uphold the discussion consensus and prevent further vandalism. silviaASH (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 06:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Just one incident; semi-protection should be enough. Lectonar (talk) 07:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits (non-sourced, with obviously inflated data) by the same non-registered (IP only) user. Klačko (talk) 08:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Klačko: Sorry but an admin here cannot recognize that the data is obviously inflated. I don't see any explanation on talk. Please post a new section at article talk with a polite and brief explanation of how it is known that a recent edit is incorrect. Proving that something is incorrect might be difficult and I'm not asking for that. However, you are confident that it's inflated so give a reason for thinking that and point out that the addition is (I think) not sourced, with a link to WP:V. Ideally you would try to engage the IP with that discussion. An admin here would then be able to assess the situation. If I'm missing something, please spell it out. Johnuniq (talk) 09:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Johnuniq (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Autoconfirmed socks are able to get passed the protection. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 11:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 12:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 166.205.153.13 (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can’t just say what someone can’t edit duh freedom of speech you crazy people

Yes we can. Unless you want to argue you aren't allowed to restrict what someone says or does in your house.Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Page not specified. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sock disruption

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking by IP-hopping socks of User:Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala, ongoing for more than a year and does not appear to abate anytime soon. Asking for a mid-term semi here. Gotitbro (talk) 08:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Gotitbro: I only looked at the last 2 articles of the list: disruption there is sparse...weeks to months have gone by between edits. So be so kind and 1.: read our protection policy if you haven't done so already, and 2.: make single requests for every single page you want to have protected; we can't process this huge list in one go, as it is rathr time-consuming. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, some of the articles here do have continous disruption but putting up the whole tranche was ill-adviced on my part. Getting the ranges blocked is likely a better solution. Thanks. Gotitbro (talk) 09:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Slow edit warring. Adakiko (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. At need, report IP 43.xxx to AIV. Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from many IP Addresses. The usual player owns franchise meme every time a player has a career game against an NFL Team. This time it’s “DeeBo Samuel owns the Rams and his children is Aaron Donald and Jalen Ramsey”. Swagging (talk) 11:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs claiming the series/movie is still ongoing without providing a reliable source. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 15:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of vandalism GeoCyberwolf (talk) 11:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple different IPs adding unsourced "spouse" claim to this BLP. – Archer1234 (talk) 16:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit-warring taking place over multiple days. One IP editor has been blocked (after being told to discuss on the talk page) but has returned on another IP. Requesting protection as the edit-war seems likely to continue. Edderiofer (talk) 17:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's been 7 instances of vandalism from multiple IPs (and one single-edit account) since September 30, all taking aim at same section/statement: [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. The article has seen a huge spike in visitors (see pageview statistics here here) during this period, presumably due to a recent political controversy over zellige/zellij between Morocco and Algeria that's been fairly widely reported (e.g. [17], [18], etc). The vandalising edits seem to reflect the emotions of that controversy. So far it's manageable, but a temporary page protection would block further vandalism while hopefully allowing the story to blow over a bit in the meantime. (I'd suggest maybe a week, but I leave it to the admin of course.). R Prazeres (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:51, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent vandalism by sock of the IP/LTA ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeatedly being vandalized by an IP. First last week, the IP made several edits before self-reverting. Today same IP has edited and been reverted twice RedPatch (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 15:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of vandalism 64.114.207.63 (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous IPs / new accounts attempting to make large changes to a contentious article without discussion. New Democracy (Greece) may also need protection. Black Kite (talk) 18:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruption. نعم البدل (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 17:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Venkat TL (talk) 19:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Venkat TL: During a content dispute it isn't appropriate to use protection as a tool to lock out one side of the participants. Work it out on the talk page, not in revert warring. I reverted the article back to 28 September before the edit warring started. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Repeated mentions of adding the video by Internet Historian. As that video released a few days ago, temp protection might be needed. Eridian314 (talk) 20:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are always going to be trolling on this talk page. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05 October 2022

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by IP over fringe/minority view point. ARoseWolf 19:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ARoseWolf: I see hardly any constructive contributions from IP addresses in the entire article history; allowing all users is a net negative for this article. After protection expires, the next escalation should be indefinite semi. I see no justification for extended-confirmed protection as requested. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Keeps getting changed to 'retired' without adding a ref. Nswix (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aircorn (talk) 21:27, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert to WP:STATUSQUO. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@FlightTime: I'm happy if someone else wants to protect and revert but speaking for myself, I would want to see an explanation of the issue on article talk. Encourage the IP to engage on talk. Even if they don't, it's likely that others will need an explanation in the future and the best place is on article talk, not a couple of words in an edit summary. Johnuniq (talk) 08:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq: The user has been blocked. (regarding both pages) Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 00:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 177.192.17.84 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert to WP:STATUSQUO. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@FlightTime: Same as above but more so (last post on this talk was a year ago). I'm happy if someone else wants to protect and revert but speaking for myself, I would want to see an explanation of the issue on article talk. Encourage the IP to engage on talk. Even if they don't, it's likely that others will need an explanation in the future and the best place is on article talk, not a couple of words in an edit summary. Johnuniq (talk) 08:27, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 177.192.17.84 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for now. Disruption has come from two IPs, 78.86.7.102 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 213.107.84.101 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), which seem to have stopped. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Pmsrich (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. Magnatyrannus, please see the first paragraph of the protection policy: "Pages are protected when a specific damaging event has been identified that can not be prevented through other means such as a block." We do not protect pages for disruption from a single IP/account. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:1C0:CF00:8900:69F8:D228:D55E:8FB6 (talk · contribs) blocked by Cyclonebiskit. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Xymmax: It's a single IP. Why doesn't what I said to the filer at #Kaitlyn Dever not apply? Sdrqaz (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC); edited 00:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're right of course, as a general proposition. However, when I looked at the article history and page logs it appeared to me that the IP was likely evading a block, which had resulted in recent protection of the page previously. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 01:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 184.55.127.158 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. One piece of vandalism is nowhere near enough. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but it's possible that the IP might come back in the form of another IP. It's probably not worth the risk. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please see what I wrote to you above. Protection is not for single IPs or accounts. Nor is it applied pre-emptively, or because an IP might come back as another. This is not how protection on Wikipedia works; please read the protection policy thoroughly before making new requests. Moreover, the Dyer article is currently on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article, which usually brings with it increased vandalism. The threshold for protection will be higher for such prominent articles. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please add the flag(s) of afghanistan in the left side too LeonardoGCoo (talk) 22:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Per the comment in the table, consensus is WP:NPOV requires the name of the country here to simply be Afghanistan, without a flag. The situation is explained in the further information column. --Kinu t/c 23:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sockpuppetry? I couldn't judge when there are so few disruptive edits. Just one IP for the moment. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: (temporary semi-protection) High level of IP vandalism, coming from at least 5 different IPs in a short time. WPscatter t/c 03:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional info: the sudden popularity of this article is because of this popular tweet [19] WPscatter t/c 03:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. I just came here to request this, it’s insane on that page right now. t/c 03:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs persistently removing maintenance templates and random destinations. The Banner talk 14:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs coming in past couple days to add nonsense about it being part of Czech Republic due to social media campaign. Mellk (talk) 07:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit from IP address user to make the article more favorable to the subject. Same IP is also changing polling results for this party in Opinion polling for the next Greek legislative election. FantinoFalco (talk) 10:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The three missing new shows are not on the Television shows section. 82.37.139.114 (talk) 20:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be an edit request. This can be handled on the article talk page. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Raise this as an edit request on the article talk page. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: the game is releasing today and people might flock to Wikipedia if the game does not turn out as they assumed. the current reviews are mostly positive but major streamers are upset about changes and they might influence others to get upset. Tdfem 18:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thedefender35. What are you requesting here? ‘Temporary semi-protection'? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Not clear what is being requested here. The page appears to be appropriately protected. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: According to Wikipedia rules this protection was never necessary. Sources were clearly cited for change is made, yet some controlling editors decided to change it back and block others from correcting it. RSmusiceditor (talk) 19:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like there’s a content dispute there. Best to reach agreement on the article talk page; consider WP:Dispute Resolution. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:14, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Content dispute. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, discuss and reach agreement on the wording to be used on the article talk page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This protection was put into place by a controling editor who in unknowledgeable about the subject. He has minipulated every correction and change that been properly docunmeted. The editor shoukd be removed feom wikipedia. RSmusiceditor (talk) 01:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a bad faith request. I suggest you strike it or better remove it entirely. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Bad faith and duplicated request. Be careful in what you say. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add mention of The Walk In starring Stephen Graham on ITV from Monday 3rd October 2A00:23C8:1697:6A01:61D0:587B:B375:9584 (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Make an edit request on the article talk page (and be a bit more specific about the change you want to make). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 11:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So fast! Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending changes. Looking back over a period of several months, very few of the IP edits have been helpful ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 12:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time (i.e. not much gaps in activity to justify it). El_C 14:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 13:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am Jesse's brother trying to fix untrue information. Luke2047 (talk) 09:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please use the article talk-page to discuss changes. Also see WP:BLPEDIT Lectonar (talk) 10:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Simeone001 constantly is controlling page and does over this page and regularly manipulating facts. Luke2047 (talk) 10:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Duplicate request; see above. Lectonar (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persistently removing maintenance templates or removing random destinations. The Banner talk 14:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And there is the next IP]. The Banner talk 20:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  14:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persistently removing maintenance templates or removing random destinations. The Banner talk 14:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And the next IP is there... The Banner talk 20:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  14:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 02:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. El_C 14:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit war. Snuish (talk) 02:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. El_C 14:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and one revert rule arbitration discretionary sanction placed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: The past few days the article has been repeatedly vandalized by IPs changing a photo caption (Examples: [20], [21], [22]). Most have come from different IPs that geolocate to southeast Arizona, so this is likely mostly driven by one person who probably just needs a few days away from the article. Egsan Bacon (talk) 02:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Nardog (talk) 03:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. El_C 14:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary Full-protection: Controversial film recently released. Persistent disruptive editing from both IPs and new users who keep edit warring and removing sourced content (from reliable sources) for no valid reason while adding words and sentences to the lede that aren't even mentioned in the body of the article and refusing to cooperate (Chairmaind2 and FMSky in particular, the latter refuses to stop and seems to be biased towards any criticism regarding the film and has an history of trying to own articles). Zoolver (talk) 10:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP user continuously changes polling result for one party in their favor (and against the facts). Does also do bad faith edits in that party‘s article. Reported that separately FantinoFalco (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Billing wars; the credits go Saif then Hrithik, but fans do otherwise. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multi-year issue with COI IPs and socks representing the Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr public relations team. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. Requesting indeffinite protection as it seems that the issue will persist as long as the firm does. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Horse Eye's Back, that page has never been protected before, so indef or even a lengthy protection isn't really an option at this point (i.e. that's usually reserved for egregious cases, not relatively benign WP:PROMO). El_C 15:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, procedure is procedure for a reason. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 16:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism by several IPs removing and readding a single letter dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 16:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:22, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined let's see. Relist if necessary GedUK  14:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GedUK  14:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unnecessary changes were made by authorized personnel of the Iranian Authority in order to change the narrative of the movement and discredit the 2022 Mahsa Amini Protests movement. Arfaz 21:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Question: Arfaz, how do you know that the changes were made by authorized personnel of the Iranian Authority in order to change the narrative of the movement and discredit the 2022 Mahsa Amini Protests movement? Can you link to a few WP:DIFFs of disruptibe editing? "Unnecessary changes" wouldn't necessarily be that, though. Also, could you please start using edit summaries? Thanks. El_C 14:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
edit clash! GedUK  14:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not really seeing a lot or any edits that require protection. If there's 'problematic' edits, then there needs to be a discussion on the talk page as a starting point. GedUK  14:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – user obsessively inserts copyright violations. FMSky (talk) 14:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Firstly, since only one editor is involved, it makes more sense to consider a block on that editor, rather than making editing the page impossible for other editors too. Secondly, the editor had not been warned at all. I have now warned the editor, and only if the problem still continues after that will it be suitable to consider possible further action. JBW (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of vandalism, semi is more appropriate than pending changes. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persistently removing maintenance templates or removing random destinations. The Banner talk 20:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism, likely by IP hopper. BattleshipMan (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after previous protection expired. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Favonian (talk) 19:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 19:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – It's the page about our beloved encyclopedia that remains sensitive, I guess that's why that security is needed. Drummingman (talk) 17:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No protection: No longer necessary. Protected in 2009 for socks with no disruption after. Sockmaster hasn't been active in years. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected BusterD (talk) 23:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Fixed my error. Now page is completely free to be edited by anybody. BusterD (talk) 23:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to include that Chrystia Freland was inspired to begin a career in journalism by her grandfather Micheal Chomiak (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krakivs%27ki_Visti) with a link to his page as the public should know her family's anti semetic history as he was an active participant in the Nazi party according to his Wikipedia page. My edit would say 'Chrystia Freeland was inspired to become a journalist by her grandfather Michael Chomiak' with a link to his Wikipedia page. It is not proper for a politician to have a protected page as this limits freedom of speech. Her office has denied this connection, making it clear that she wants to deny this connection when it is factual. Sphynxxy (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: Please provide a reliable source for your proposed edit. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06 October 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism by several IPs. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article is evidently the target of an active sockmaster.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Pretty much none of the recent edits by non-autoconfirmed users have been constructive ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent defamatory vandalism on BLP by several IP editors. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:52, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper keeps adding the same baseless OR despite being reverted by multiple editors. M.Bitton (talk) 22:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been going on for almost a month, so I went with two weeks to see if that dissuades them. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption due to a social media meme, e.g. [23]; [24]; [25]; [26]. A week-long protection to let the meme die down would be great. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Giving it three days. If it keeps up after that, we can extend the protection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Page is being brigaded by reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/Star_Trek/comments/xvx3pc/which_one_of_yall_is_responsible_for_this/. HarryKernow (talk) 00:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that gives the off-wiki stuff time to die down. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP adding unsourced material. I did some searching and can't find any mention of this. I also started a thread on the talk page which the IP has ignored. Hopefully a protection will send them there. MarnetteD|Talk 23:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Looks like it was just a single IP. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Proxy editors immediately adjusting archiving settings after protection expired. Probably needs a week or more. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolmxl5, got a moment to look into this again? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's pretty blatant: the shifting IPs (one of which is now a blocked proxy) belong to one person who is tendentiously wikilawyering to use Wikipedia to promote a minor hacktivist. Johnuniq (talk) 01:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To my knowledge there's been at least half a dozen proxies blocked from this one editor that I'm aware of. Unfortunately I don't see this dying down any time soon, as the article's edit history has this sort of behaviour ongoing for several years now. Sideswipe9th (talk) 01:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism. Mason uses They/Them pronouns and multiple users are vandalizing the page in violation with Wikipedia's policies, replacing the correct pronouns with "He/Him", as well as with transphobic descriptions of Mason as "misidentifying" as non-binary. Augur (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An editor <Bon courage> has been repeatedly removing the scientific accomplishments of a female scientist (Krista Varady) claiming that they are "self-promotional". However, each statement about her work is supported by several peer-reviewed scientific articles. Moreover, the way that her contributions are listed, are similar to how things are presented on the pages of other male scientists , e.g. Linus Pauling.

These actions seem to be rooted in sexism. It is already very difficult for women to edit anything on Wikipedia, as 90% of editors are males. Some male editors seem to have complete disregard for content generated by women editors, and pages that cover the accomplishments of females. These systemic issues have been covered by the mass media (see Atlantic article below) and I am surprised they are still allowed to happen.

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/how-wikipedia-is-hostile-to-women/411619/

Ejacobs8990 (talk) 18:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ejacobs8990. This appears to be a content dispute. Wikipedia is a collaborative project where disagreements are resolved by discussion; follow WP:DISPUTE RESOLUTION. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Sorry Ejacobs8990 but this is the wrong place to complain about other editors. It might have escaped your attention, but Linus Pauling is super notable because a large number of independent reliable sources have written about him and his work. Wikipedia (where anyone can edit) has to follow independent reliable sources to avoid chaos and an unfortunate side effect is that many good people will not have extensive articles since they have a career of just a few years. Johnuniq (talk) 01:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user is continually vandalizing this page from multiple IP addresses. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Storchy (talk) 02:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, indef-semi because it's been protected heaps and even got vandalised with indefinite PC (although that got removed), plus it's a page about a well-known city (the largest in Australia). 49.181.166.10 (talk) 02:00, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected I have put it back on pending-changes for the time being; I don't think disruption rises to the level where indef semi is needed atm. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Guanaco killer (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 04:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Editor blocked by another admin. @Magnatyrannus: Something is going wrong when you post but that doesn't matter for now. You wanted Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase. The article as also been semi-protected because it will be appearing on the main page soon. Johnuniq (talk) 04:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder why it posted here instead of there. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 04:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 03:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not needed at the moment, and AN is on the watchlist of so many administrators that a protection will be applied very fast once it is needed--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism and neutrality issues, hope to restore it back to extended-confirmed status given current developments. Nag-Eedit si Mang Robert (talk) 08:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected I restored it to semi-protection; can be extended-confirmed again at a pinch. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No protection: No longer necessary. Low grade of edits overall, seems like a relatively low risk of long-term disruption that indef semi is usually used for. Sennecaster (Chat) 21:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Bearian, the protecting administrator, for their thoughts. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Though I’ve just realised Bearian is no longer an administrator. I must have missed that. Still, his input may be useful. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected and happy to see Bearian's datestamp. BusterD (talk) 09:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user is continually vandalizing this page from multiple IP addresses. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I don't want any socks to further show up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 03:14, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 09:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism reappearing; a minor edit war on head paragraph. Previously semi-protected on October 2nd by Schwede66 (talk · contribs) for 2 days; expired on Oct 4th. Dhio (talk?) 08:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've semi-protected it once more for one week. Schwede66 09:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. GedUK  11:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war about to break out (2 reverts already). The Banner talk 10:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Better to block one or two users than lock the whole article. GedUK  11:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting for Verdis and Free Republic of Verdis to be unprotected or lowered in protection and turned into redirects for Croatia-Serbia border dispute because of connection to Verdis (micronation) as per discussed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_August_25#Princedom_of_Ongal MicroSupporter (talk) 11:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected here and here, as consensus can change. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page has been protected since 2011. It doesn't attract enough attention to merit this. Please unprotect. 199.119.233.164 (talk) 12:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected here, as a reasonable period has elapsed. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various users, adding unsourced shows and dates. Page was previously protected for those reasons. BrickMaster02 (talk) 13:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One last try before indef. GedUK  15:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Last year the article on this controversial Iranian festival, which was held in October 2021, saw heavy disruption until it was protected. This year the festival runs from 5 October to 23 October, and the same type of disruption has already started. Please protect it for three weeks. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 14:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.GedUK  15:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High amounts of vandalism in a short amount of time due to an external mention of the page LivelytheTrain (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  15:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Vandalism/socking The Casual Scholar (talk) 15:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsurprising considering it is today's TFA. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  15:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IPs changing Mario movie title to "The Super Mario Bros. Movie" despite it not having been officially confirmed yet ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  15:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Blaze Wolf, I don't think the bot parses everything immediately (while it attends to multiple tasks), so that might account for that one minute delay. Also, only I may speak to the bot — don't steal my thing! El_C 16:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fairly sure I've done it before and you haven't noticed but eh. Ah that'd make sense. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP has started an edit-war in order to remove numerous WP:RS and replace it with his own POV. -. LouisAragon (talk) 15:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Shadow4dark (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shadow4dark, next time, you'd save the reviewing admin time if you were to link to who the sock is. I mean, no big deal, it took me 2 minutes — still, you already knew in advance, while I didn't. El_C 16:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping to restore same content without explanation. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Very little constructive non-autoconfirmed edits recently ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Blaze Wolf, you don't need to qualify patent nonsense with "unsourced" lol. El_C 18:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, technically it was unsourced. Wasn't pure nonsense. Some of the things there probably could be verified (such as Paloma is Pigeon in Spanish which, based on the rest of the edit is probably not true at all). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:14, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again persistent vandalism. palmipedTalk 19:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject recently came out as trans, several IPs have reverted the pronoun updates. Cerebral726 (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Reason: Several IP addresses (socks) changing her year of birth. The correct year is 1919. Antique Rose 19:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Antique Rose: please restart the discussion on the talk page. NY Times and allmovie (which is referenced in the lede) say 2 February 1920, Turner Classic Movies says 4 February 1924, etc. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP tendentious editing despite warnings, possible sock AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Misguided attempts to PROD the page Volunteer Marek 17:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 17:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP addresses continuing to add items to ideology field of political group with no source despite prior warnings. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and misinformation are being edited onto the page. Catsanddogs123456 (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07 October 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 1989 (talk) 19:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the sockpuppetry? DatGuyTalkContribs 19:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DatGuy: See here. 1989 (talk) 19:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined - The SPI case is pending resolution. DatGuyTalkContribs 20:12, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Historic target of vandalism and troll edits. The Casual Scholar (talk) 20:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protection is usually only used if there's recent and ongoing disruption, not just because the article was vandalized before. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 20:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (CC) Tbhotch 22:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but I don't want more socks to show up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: As an FA it is likely to be subject to disruption. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. For the bot. MelanieN (talk) 01:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – People going crazy about an inexistent character. (CC) Tbhotch 01:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. TheresNoTime installed semi-protection, which looks like enough. Also, several recent problem users have been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent Spike in vandalism edits, Only expected to increase due to the recent trailer of the other mario film. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 20:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LizMelanieN (talk) 23:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN @Liz This page is currently not edit protected and is only move protected. To clarify, i am requesting autoconfirmed confirmed protection. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 23:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see enough problem edits to require semi-protection at this time. If problems continue or become more frequent, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several edits made to air dates without any evidence. users should be made to provide evidence to ensure their edits are trustworthy CyberJudoon (talk) 20:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi protection. Long term issues with spam and vandalism. If you look through the page history the only productive edits in the last month were Pppery removing a word from the lead and citation bot filling in a parameter. Every other edit has been either bored children vandalising the page or people spamming links to their study skills websites. This is not untypical, other months are just as bad, and I think is just an unfortunate consequence of the topic of the article. 192.76.8.81 (talk) 23:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 MelanieN (talk) 01:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring and non consensus changes. Joey Camelaroche (talk) 01:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (And please keep your edit summaries civil. When I first reviewed the article history I thought you were the vandal). Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting lifting of protection so draft can be published. Have reviewed draft and ready to move into mainspace. MurielMary (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected here; changed request to the mainspace page instead of the draft, as it is the article that is salted. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Actually they unprotected Lubna Marium the mainspace target. The draft isn't protected. GedUK  15:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High number of different IPs consistenly vandalizing, edit warring, and violating BLP policies on the article since the IP user 160.39.59.123 got initially blocked for vandalizing the page numerous times. ImJustSaying215 (talk) 01:55, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is concurrent with the block on the IP. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced IP WP:BLP violations ([27], [28], [29]); related to the ongoing Iranian protests. TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 02:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:30, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 78.174.182.186 (talk) 02:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism of the page by unregistered users. An AKA fighter has a championship fight soon, so there is increased media attention. Perhaps semiprotection until some time after the fight has occurred (Oct. 22) could be implemented. Jeicex1 (talk) 23:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then could you block users like these 2601:2c5:457e:2590:4910:3671:3006:5509, 2601:2c5:457e:2590:d19a:86f6:e8f3:68d0, 2601:2c5:457e:2590:3544:8595:ae58:8f2d (i think its just one person) from editing? He keeps making vandalizing edits (which happen to be racist/islamophobic like renaming the Mexican head coach to beaner or Muslim fighters to imbreds) Jeicex1 (talk) 01:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request protection against ongoing vandalism by unregistered editors WWGB (talk) 04:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I need to protect the Coverage of Google Street View page, in which it has been seen that several IPs like this one or this one (they only contributed to add false information like for example that Zambia was going to have street view in addition to adding a lot of islands to the list). The site has been protected using Pending Changes since 2019, but not much has resulted from this, as people keep posting information without sources, overlinking country names or adding countries that have no coverage. And well as you can see in these reverts the pending changes have not worked and usually end up being 90% of rejected. I have been editing this page since 2021 and well the pending changes have not helped much, and it is difficult to organize the information because most of them do not help. In comparison the main Google Street View page has no pending changes and requires users to be registered and autoconfirmed, I would like to apply the same protection for the GSV Coverage page, but first I need to remove this protection so they can put the other protection that requires registered and autoconfirmed accounts, I would be very grateful if someone could do it, I have been working for more than a year on this page (In fact in my sandbox, I am trying to reorganize the article to make it easier to read) and it has been chaos just reviewing the information and adding viable sources with a lot of new IPs and accounts.

TLDR: The page has Pending Changes, but they haven't helped much because a lot of it is vandalic or unsourced contributions, so I need to remove this one first and then add the other one, thanks. Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 21:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to post this in WP:RPPI? LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 03:14, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. I have rarely seen PCP be an effective deterrent to vandalism, and in this case it hasn't served to reduce the workload for trusted editors. I have replaced PCP with indef-semi. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The series hasn't ended yet, but various IP editors keep putting unconfirmed info on the page. I suggest this article should be semi-protected for at least 3 weeks. ASTIG️🙃 (ICE-TICE CUBE) 05:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – "Leaked" content keeps getting added to the tracklisting, even though the leak has not been confirmed as legitimate, nor has Swift confirmed the titles of those tracks yet. aaronneallucas (talk) 05:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's been protected for over a decade, not likely to be a recurring vandalism target now, so requesting WP:TRYUNPROT. Pelliesh (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined although I am willing to be overridden by another administrator. I disagree that an article about a popular food item is "not likely" to be a recurring vandalism target unless pizza has become an obscure topic or has experienced a dramatic decline in popularity. It is only semi-protected, and anyone who cannot edit it is always free to propose a change on the talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is not necessary because it was recently edited to falsify certain information like the age of the said individual in preparations for the upcoming Nigerian presidential elections 2A02:A310:8244:DF00:E4FB:B0B2:FE11:4FC5 (talk) 23:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. You just made the case for why protection is necessary. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Violations of the BLP policy. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the person died, and the request is moot, but we still need reliable sources in the article confirming death.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:53, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Has been sourced now. Lectonar (talk) 07:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [] 07:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism EnormityOP (talk) 08:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Narwhal's, as catogorized by the World Wildlife Foundation (WWF) and others state that the approximates 75,000 Narwhals in nature make them AT THE LEAST, "Near Threatened" species (and I would appreciate someone making that adjustment reflected on the Narwhals' (the arctic aquatic "unicorn" animal, by the way) page, specifically the extinction portion in the summary at the top right of the page.

All I'm asking for is for the summary to accurately reflect the Narwhal's current situation in nature (and I think anyone with a mind can realize 75,000 of anything left on earth is not nearly enough for a legacy of security aka, threatened) 2607:FEA8:A781:1A30:88E8:9541:EE5F:A94B (talk) 16:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make an edit request on the article talk page. Be specific about the change you would like to see. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Indeed, see above. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page has some heavy vandalism with many edits being undone. There isn't much verification at all. 5TheHunter (talk) 00:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have suggestions for improving the article, make an edit request on the article talk page. Be specific about the change you would like to see. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Indeed, see above. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user keeps changing a section of the page to the way they want the page to be. They've received a warning for starting an edit war, but show no signs of stopping their disruptive edits. The section they edit makes it too wordy. Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 01:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's being handled by reverts and warnings. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This probably is a request for increasing protection, but as mentionened above by my esteemed colleague: this is being handled. Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent IP vandalism - Eastwood Park and strabane (talk) 10:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:09, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent adding of Kaliningrad. FromCzech (talk) 10:53, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See reopened Sockpuppet investigation. Same issue that got Pixel Bath its current protection. QuietHere (talk) 14:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:06, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption by socks of Chamroshduty, who recently vowed to keep making IPs (to disrupt Wikipedia) [30]. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Two socks aren't enough and pages aren't protected to preempt vows of sockmasters. If disruption increases, rerequest protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 11:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Per IP edits on October 4 and 7, it would be good to protect this one. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 15:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Storchy (talk) 15:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Includes addition of unsourced content, and an infobox containing said content, without much else warranting the infobox. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:16, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous users on the internet (could be a single person) continue to vandalize the article by insisting that Intel 7 is not a 7nm process despite multiple sources in the industry factually proving otherwise. This edit war has been going on for several months already.

Sources: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/7_nm_lithography_process https://semiwiki.com/semiconductor-manufacturers/intel/314047-intel-4-presented-at-vlsi/. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 15:08, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Numerous users on the internet (could be a single person) continue to vandalize the article by insisting that Intel 4 is not a 5nm process despite multiple sources in the industry factually proving otherwise. This edit war has been going on for several months if not years already.

Sources: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/5_nm_lithography_process https://semiwiki.com/semiconductor-manufacturers/intel/314047-intel-4-presented-at-vlsi/. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 15:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This mostly looks like IPs. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persistently making random removals. The Banner talk 08:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs making random removals. The Banner talk 08:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also looks like just one ip. That can be handled at AIV or ANI if the disruption resumes. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. disruptive editing. Venkat TL (talk) 09:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 13:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent whitewashings. Ogyen Trinley Dorje appears to be in legal jeopardy. Adakiko (talk) 11:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. Possibly resolved. Issues seem to be limited to one user atm, though, which would make the page ineligible for protection. @Adakiko: courtesy ping. El_C 13:16, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing article. Jip Orlando (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 16:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 16:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism, edit warring, with no use of the talk page Frietjes (talk) 16:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page was given semi-protection of 10 days due to high level of IP vandalism. But soon after its expiry the IP vandalism has again started. Thus request semi-protection of 3 months. Imsaneikigai (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OMG, will these requests to protect Bigg Boss (Hindi season whatever) ever end? Imsaneikigai, maybe you know? El_C 18:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
people really hate the show ig Tdshe/her 18:11, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I hate it and I haven't even seen it! Also, why is the word "big" misspelled? thedefender35, maybe Juno? El_C 18:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
its the direct translation from Hindi into big Tdshe/her 18:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll pretend I understood that. BTW, you forgot to capitalize the beginning of your comments and to add full stops to at the end. El_C 18:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have had IP editors changing the Classification from Anglican to Protestant despite WP:EDITCONSENSUS & a discussion at Talk:Church of England/Archive 1#Protestantism that resulted in no change from the status quo. Yes, this is a bit nuanced, but the change from Anglican to Protestant is basically WP:OR, especially without any citations. Peaceray (talk) 19:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: While browsing I noticed Template:Collapse bottom and Template:Collapse top are both full protected, but Template:cot (10k transclusions) is template protected, while Template:cob (11k transclusions) is not protected at all. Mlkj (talk) 14:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh actually looks like it is protected, just missing the template icon. Never mind! Mlkj (talk) 15:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Added {{R from template shortcut}} which also adds the topicon. For bot: Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. DatGuyTalkContribs 15:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, it's the {{Redirect category shell}} that adds the topicon. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:00, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to AIDS Healthcare Foundation's involvement in affordable housing advocacy, detractors continuously introduce biased content that solely focuses on housing, to the exclusion of the foundation's other work such as HIV treatment programs outside the US. I am not against factual, referenced information, but the edits deliberately cherry-pick biased information. Beltoforion (talk) 16:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Beltoforion, kinda weird having you, an WP:SPA whose only edits are to this page (and whose talk page is a red link at the time of my writing this), be the one to file this request. El_C 18:07, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08 October 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warring going on with users not being able to come to a conclusion about the situation. Tdshe/her 18:01, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both disputants p-blocked for violating 3RR (by a lot). El_C 18:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07, recently blocked as Special:Contributions/176.92.14.181 and Special:Contributions/46.177.128.0/19. Currently using the Greek IPs Special:Contributions/2A02:1388:2181:68CE:0:0:61F4:893C and Special:Contributions/62.74.47.44. Binksternet (talk) 23:08, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The page protection expired today and we are back with the same BLP violating editing from an IP. I think this needs to be indefinite protection. Iamreallygoodatcheckerst@lk 01:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No objections if someone extends this further. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP and new account vandalism. Jon698 (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several IPs have been constantly adding unsourced content. CycloneYoris talk! 01:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully another week will be enough for the disruption to die down. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't want autoconfirmed socks to pop up, so ECP ASAP. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a content dispute with a bit of edit warring thrown in. Hopefully it has stopped. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolutionMelanieN (talk) 02:48, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 21:08, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Series of IPs edit warring in an area under discretionary sanctions. Note that a previous 1 year protection recently expired. MrOllie (talk) 23:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. If 1 year didn't work, then indef semi is the next escalation step. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. 1 user vandalizing the page across multiple different IPs ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the contribution history, a shorter-term protection wouldn't make sense. Likely the article needs indef semi, however. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism to widely used shortcut redirect. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. I'm surprised such a high-visibility and heavily-used redirect was not already protected given the disruption that appears in the contribution history. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why should it be restricted to only administrators? Shouldn't it be only restricted to extended-confirmed users? Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 05:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's a standard protection level for high-visibility templates, so I just applied the same thing here due to that precedent. Why would this redirect need to be edited? If it does sometime in the future, I'm happy to reduce the protection. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: no consensus has been made an me and another user are not able to make a decision about the content. might be worth to block both me and the other user for 1 week from the page. Tdshe/her 20:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. And while you discuss, do not revert each other. MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism related to host country issue. Yogwi21 (talk) 21:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, there are many constructive edits from IP users which would be blocked by semim-protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent IP vandalism. Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over a year of nearly all edits being reverts of vandalism. High profile article for the project and a waste of editor resources to keep babysitting the nonsense. Montanabw(talk) 22:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Problem edits are few and far between, so indefinite PC is exactly what this article needs. MelanieN (talk) 03:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent changing of the name to all caps despite the hidden note saying to leave it ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 07:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and editing disputes Opm581 (talk) 07:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High and repeated level of IP vandalism. Chronikhiles (talk) 07:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I had the page protected twice before (3 and 21 days respectively). Each time after the protection ends, the self-promotion is inserted again. The IP address adding the self promotion comes from Volgograd, Russia, and the scientific article which gets inserted in to the wikipedia article was also written by someone from Volgograd. Maltimore (talk) 07:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continual disruptive editing and mass removing by an IP editor who changes IPs frequently. BlueNoise (talk) 23:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @BlueNoise: In fact, I partially-blocked the entire IP address range 122.162.0.0/16 for six months. That range can still edit Wikipedia, but cannot edit articles related to Bandbudh Aur Budbak. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. USers appear to be in a content Dispute over info ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 01:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - full protection is usually used when there's a multitude of warring parties. This is better handled at WP:AN/EW and also currently is (EW report was made 15 minutes after RfPP). DatGuyTalkContribs 07:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and spamming. Mehedi Abedin 08:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page was semi protected 10 years ago due to persistent vandalism. There has been no recent disruption in the article, so it is worth unprotecting. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 10:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protecting administrator has retired and request seems reasonable, let's give it a go. Unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing and removal of cited content by user @Ifuvuebeifhsuchd Chronikhiles (talk) 08:26, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP user repeatedly adding unsourced content, including copy bio material. Tacyarg (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some of the imfomation is wrong Nationnsnss (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you've discussed this on the talk page and requested an edit there? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:EDITWAR between a EC user and various IPs. In which, that EC user has reverted more than 10 times ... wow. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 17:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Relatively frequent vandalism from random IPs. DFlhb (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 17:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change Wikipedia to word Unambiguously 142.189.82.235 (talk) 12:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Incomprehensible. Favonian (talk) 13:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism Theoder2055 (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism 71.201.5.117 (talk) 13:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 17:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 71.201.5.117 (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. firefly ( t · c ) 17:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP users with a range of 119.95.0.0/16 have been continuously adding "City Hunter War of Life" in the GMA's section "No definite date" without provided sources available. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 14:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs and non-autoconfirmed adding a spam link to this article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I support this protection, it's probably an attempt to scam the elderly with whom the subject has appeal. Filmman3000 (talk) 17:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism restarted after the previous page protection expired. I think it needs a longer period of protection given the media coverage of the group. Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: While most disruptive edits on that page come from an IP address that is removing the partner of the subject from the page. There have been many other types of vandalism on this page. The subject is an actor who was accidentally shot on a film set.

I do believe that the person who is doing that is mentally unstable and should not be editing on Wikipedia. The subject is highly detailed, the article follows an established format and doesn't need much more work. So it's not beging the unregistered user to come and add stuff.

Filmman3000 (talk) 17:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected. Much as I detest PCP for the additional workload it creates for established editors, I don't see enough vandalism from anonymous IP addresses to justify semi-protection, especially when there are plenty of constructive edits from such addresses. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. 103.249.233.126 (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive nationalist editing: IPs and newly registered WP:SPA. Jingiby (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by several IP users. Areaseven (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/CASTE. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 19:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 15:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. There's been one instance of autoconfirmed vandalism, warn and report to AIV. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent recent WP:DE addition of unsourced content from dynamic IPv6 editor. --IJBall (contribstalk) 15:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. firefly ( t · c ) 17:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from Helloiamauser. BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – New user and IP sockpuppet edit warring. Esiymbro (talk) 17:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - I see you've started a discussion on the talk page which is good. I've warned the user for possible WP:LOUTSOCKing DatGuyTalkContribs 19:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 20:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is some LTA I believe. Drmies opened an AN thread about it a few weeks back, but I don't recall the outcome. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In the past weeks, this article has been thrashing (repeated changes and reverts), various IPs, new accounts, blocked users. Should probably be reverted to a past stable version but I can't identify which one. MB 16:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP disruptive edits. ℛonherry 18:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article has been protected for over two years, and most of the drama hungry people have lost interest. LordEnma8 (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret: last protecting admin...any thoughts on that? Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar No, I really don't agree. The new editor is autoconfirmed now so there's no reason to lower protection for them. -- ferret (talk) 13:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Agreeing with ferret. Favonian (talk) 19:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's a talk page 71.8.142.200 (talk) 18:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - page isn't currently protected. Shouldn't there be a boilerplate template for this response? Seems it's rather common. DatGuyTalkContribs 18:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DatGuy: Just use {{subst:RFPP|d}}. I changed it for you. For some reason your response appeared only when editing the section, not when displaying the page ~Anachronist (talk) 19:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism by multiple IP users dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. This FA has been repeatedly vandalised because of recent news and political advancements. Akshaypatill (talk) 20:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is recurrent but not very frequent. The last disruptive edit was a week ago. Let's see what PC can accomplish. MelanieN (talk) 22:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced and poorly sourced content by IPs. The page needs permanent protection as these issues have existed for more than a year now, starting with this edit on 6 September 2021. Since then, edits have become a vicious circle of IP users adding dubious claims, more experienced users removing or correcting those claims, and so on. As the timespan shows, temporary protection is unlikely to solve the problems. – Zsovar3 (talk) 20:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09 October 2022

Reason: Edit-warring by ip's and new SPA over major rewrite by the SPA. Looks like dynamic ip that is or is working for the SPA. Hipal (talk) 22:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs and one recently registered editor continually try to keep info regarding Operation Rhodes off the page. The current edit warrior has been adding commentary in the article itself rather than attempting to discuss the issue on the article's Talk page.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. 1 person on multiple IPs removing stuff for no reason ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from many, many, many IPs. Seems to be the same disruptive person throughout most of the IPs over the past two years (looking through the article history, seems to have begun on *this* article around December 2020). See User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 28#Need Some Assistance, re: List of American television programs currently in production and User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 29#Tunisia IPs for more on this issue.

There seems to be many other similarly targeted articles such as List of programmes broadcast by MBC 4, which similarly seems to have started becoming a target of this DE/vandalism around November 2020‎. Magitroopa (talk) 19:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A few recent additions have been unsourced, but virtually nothing in this article is sourced, so I'm not sure what the basis is for calling them disruptive. This article needs more help than semi-protection can provide. MelanieN (talk) 22:29, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism in the football club article SabyaC (talk) 19:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption, the specific request for indefinite ECP rather than temporary semi is to follow the closure of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal: Extended-confirmed restriction for all articles related to the Russia-Ukraine War. CMD (talk) 23:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 01:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Transphobic vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 04:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. I also indeffed the user. Johnuniq (talk) 04:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. I think this is the 10th protection. 49.180.176.214 (talk) 04:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: There looks like a significant amount of disruption from IP and new editors today, and based off the edit summary from this IP's edit [32], it's based of an off-wiki social media call to action. Hardly any of these new editors are using the talk page. Egsan Bacon (talk) 04:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edits made by IP users which are disruptive and changing box office figures without citing a reliable source. Theoder2055 (talk) 06:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page had it's current squad vandalized with random stats by more than a month before i noticed... Without page protection, it can be a spoonful to vandals. Skydream1721 (talk) 23:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite is rarely used and while I share the skepticism, the same reasoning for protection could be applied to millions of pages. Johnuniq (talk) 06:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some BLP violations and disruptive editing in the last few days. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 23:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 01:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Spencer. Favonian (talk) 06:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption, one user at multiple accounts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA (talk) 02:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Introducing external links in the page which seems to be inappropriate to our encyclopedia Theoder2055 (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 08:46, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Merged]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Wikiwow*_* (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 08:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There’s a persistent pov-push lately where different editors keep changing sourced info about the origins of the slogan. Semsûrî (talk) 08:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 08:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 11 years of protection is quite long time as one as it violates WP:SEMI at Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred or to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes. as protection made was commented as exactly by first mentioned reason despite made obviously according to second one denied. Anyway what was mentioned as "vandalism" obviously outdated. 85.238.103.38 (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Orangemike: – protecting admin. Favonian (talk) 20:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already unprotected by administrator Orangemike. Favonian (talk) 06:46, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! 85.238.103.38 (talk) 07:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. - jampol 00:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 07:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnuniq, @Kosack: So, uh, which is it? Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:50, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I must have closed the protection window without saving the protection change. As can be seen in the article history, Kosack protected for two days. I am usually a bit heavy handed when it comes to protection on the principle that those having fun at the article may need a significant period to break their habit. Let me know if problems persist. Johnuniq (talk) 09:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – As a FA it is likely subject to Autoconfirmed disruption. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indef-protection per WP:ARBEE. 49.180.176.214 (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. 49.180.176.214 (talk) 04:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended-confirmed-protection per WP:ARBEE. 49.180.176.214 (talk) 04:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Article has reached 2,000 views and a big number of unhelpful edits in within 24 hours since its creation. Super Ψ Dro 07:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 71.201.5.117 (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined discussion of recent announcements about his personal life are not vandalism. Nthep (talk) 13:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 13:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 13 years of protection is quite long time. Also it violates WP:SEMI at Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred or to privilege registered users over unregistered users in (valid) content disputes. as what was called "vandalism" then is now obviously outdated. 85.238.103.38 (talk) 19:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The protecting administrator Carlossuarez46 is no longer with us. I note that the reason for protection was "Excessive vandalism: consistent, persistent BLP violations by anons". -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So who will "judge" then? As of protecting reason - probably there was some real vandalism - I just don't understand that edits at all to evaluate, but that was 13 years (long time) ago... 85.238.103.38 (talk) 07:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[33] seems to be the straw the broke the camel's back. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Another administrator will evaluate your request in Carlossuarez46's absence. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Dennis Brown - 11:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 13:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DatGuy. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations as soon as the previous protection expired. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sock puppet vandal, who is falsely responding to an unblock request Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamla. Favonian (talk) 20:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10 October 2022

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and non-ECP editors warring over which version of the flag should be in the infobox, a dispute which regularly recurs on this article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 16:57, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit waring, involving misinformation over a bracelet. 13 edit/reverts so far in the last 24 hours. 82.23.20.168 (talk) 21:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Venkat TL (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Missed a field goal, irate fans taking it out on the article. Schazjmd (talk) 23:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous user keeps removing extremely well sourced information - cannot get him/her to understand that the database she is relying on exclusively for her opinion has a technical glitch. see discussion on my page for details Jlvsclrk (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have been sourcing info that shows my claims. Half of the sources cited contain error in correct date and other things. It is not vandalism by Wikipedia terms. Equibase is definitely not a false source and I doubt any GLITCH would just make desormeaux appear as jockey 8 races after he should be in hospital. 50.81.166.34 (talk) 03:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(moved comment from request) This user who is editing is removing info that is sourced from the sources I Cite and are up to date. The database is cite as well, is said to be official database of horse racing and is told to be credible. It has record of Kent Desormeaux racing 8 times when should of been out and it does not seem like some, “glitch” would make it appear 50.81.166.34 (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jlvsclrk: Sorry to ask you to do more but please encourage other editors to not discuss content on a user talk page. The discussion should be at article talk so other editors have a chance of seeing the reasoning. That applies for anyone now (such as myself looking for a reason to protect), and for the future if the issue arises again. After moving the discussion to talk, ping me and I'll have another look. Or if any admin wants to protect now, please do so. Johnuniq (talk) 06:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. This page looked stable during the previous regime of two years semi-protection. As a BLP, this deserves a reasonable chance at stability, which it can't seem to obtain without semi-protection. BusterD (talk) 03:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have also blocked the IP for 72 hours for edit warring. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 16:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. BusterD (talk) 04:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – 24.219.36.2 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) keeps adding an unsourced DOB. I'd link diffs but it's literally all of their contribs. Templated warnings up through level 4 have been unsuccessful (maybe they can't hear me). Protection or a p-block might force some discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Page blocked for one month. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:57, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Karadakli230 (talk) 11:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: After a Request for Move stagnated (majority opposed), a user who did not partake in the discussion attempted to force move the page and introduce changes consonant with those of the users in favour of the move. This user had also attempted to remove content in August, and has done similar edits to other related articles. After reverting this user, an IP attempted to remove sourced content twice. Another IP did the same a few days ago, and if ee go a couple lf months back, this happened as well. Would appreciate move protection and page protection, if possible. Ostalgia (talk) 12:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also move-protected. Commented on the protection at the move discussion for transparency. BusterD (talk) 04:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Near constant disruptive edits by a person continuously making new accounts. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It looks like semi-protection should catch the problematic accounts; if disruption continues please bring it back. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have also partially blocked one of the editors involved in the recent edit war from the article for 72 hours so that he must use the talk page and not revert before the discussion ends. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have a persistent troll. Can we page protect this for a year?. Peaceray (talk) 03:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One previous protection and the disruptions seem episodic and brief. Let's try a one year regime of pending changes; we can upgrade to a shorter semi-protection if pending changes fails to discourage the troll. BusterD (talk) 04:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have a persistent troll. Can we page protect this for a year?. Peaceray (talk) 04:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No previous protection and the disruptions seem episodic and brief. Let's try a one year regime of pending changes; we can upgrade to a shorter semi-protection if pending changes fails to discourage the troll. BusterD (talk) 04:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Accesscrawl (talk) 04:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Added BBC source detailing the subject's recent demise. BusterD (talk) 04:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Seems to be an edit war between two users concerning the subject's status. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 04:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism, mostly the usual flagrant disregard for MOS:GENDERID. 3mi1y (talk) 05:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some specific IP range changes her height and weight (unsourced changes to sourced content).[34][35]. This article is prone to this kind of disruptive edits and BLP violation (protection log). So I request indef or 1-year semi-protection. Mann Mann (talk) 06:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socks targeting this article always making the same edits Magherbin (talk) 23:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Magherbin: Sorry but an uninvolved admin such as myself cannot easily see what is meant by "making the same edits" and I did not see anything on talk. If there is socking evidence, perhaps you could ask the previous blocking admin for advice? At any rate, there is only one edit in the last month and that does not warrant protection although any admin with an understanding of what's going may like to protect. Johnuniq (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent refspamming by multiple newer users, as well as persistent issues with WP:MEDRS compliance. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: SPREADING LIFES (talk · contribs) blocked by Firefly. BusterD (talk) 03:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 71.201.5.117 (talk) 11:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is now a redirect following a page move. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumption of vandalism after protection expired - recent disruptive edits by new accounts. Geoff | Who, me? 12:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Some of the editors are auto-confirmed and more will follow. Johnuniq (talk) 09:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism (eg, this diff, this diff, and this diff; requesting short term pending changes protection. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Edit warring over budget, gross, plot. multiple IPs Adakiko (talk) 16:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Two instances of IP vandalism due to new meme, expecting further attempts ISaveNewspapers (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Qzd (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Racist vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 06:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 09:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is quite a lot of vandalism from IP users because the term "ratio" is a popular term on the internet but it has nothing to do with maths. A pending changes protections would be very helpful. Bigeshjen (talk) 09:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wretchskull (talk) 09:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... DatGuyTalkContribs 10:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: The premier cricket tournament will start from 16 October and ends on 13 November 2022. Already persistent vandalism, non-constructive edits. Need of protection for above mentioned date span.Kirubar (talk) 16:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected until 15 November 2022, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended protection: This is the sub category page of 2022 ICC Men's T20 World Cup. The premier cricket tournament will start from 16 October and ends on 13 November 2022. Already persistent vandalism, non-constructive edits. Need of protection for above mentioned date span.Kirubar (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Long term edit war by IP user. I reverted one of those edits last week. User seems very persistent. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, most likely only needs short term protection as the page is about a holiday which takes place on October 10. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 03:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: The majority of the revision history for many years has been repeated, consistent IP vandalism. It's making the history totally unbrowseable. DFlhb (talk) 05:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start off with this. Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal adding one specific entry. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 08:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism is happening in the page especially at the box office part. Continuous disruption of the page with unwanted words and sentences, unwanted hyperlinks, comic comparisons all are happening in the page. Please do the needful to protect the page from disrupted editing as the page is watched by many as it's an important film of Telugu and Hindi audiences. Rajeshbieee (talk) 10:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Pattern of WP:DE/edit-warring from same IP editor going back over 2 months now. Either needs a relatively long semi-protection, or a block of the IP at the article, who has been at this long enough. --IJBall (contribstalk) 22:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @IJBall: I blocked the IP from editing that page and left a message their talk. Johnuniq (talk) 09:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 71.201.5.117 (talk) 12:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WP:ARBBLP. DatGuyTalkContribs 12:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Newly created accounts and IPs adding Ukrainian regions to Russian territory lists. Following the consensus agreed here about Russia-Ukraine articles can ECP be placed on these articles. Cambial foliar❧ 12:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by the same user using different IPs. An IP user consistently adds original research and removes sourced information related to casualty figures. There have been dozens of edits like this over the past year on this page by the same user. The editor also makes the same type of edits on various battle pages where they normally change the casualty figures to lower NVA/VC deaths in the infobox. On pages including Easter Offensive, 1975 spring offensive, Battle of Khe Sanh, Battle of Dak To and more. These pages could also benefit from protection to limit vandalism from this user. Karsdorp85 (talk) 22:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:EE0:4A60:0:0:0:0:0/46 (talk · contribs). For 2 months. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection: Target for Concernsavant (talk · contribs) sockpuppets; part of the sockmaster's MO is to edit archived discussions in a futile attempt to continue arguing their case. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 09:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Spread across too many pages and not frequent enough. Whack-a-mole for now. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not asking for multiple pages to be protected - just this one as it's one he's already hit multiple times. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 10:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They've hit it twice in June, a year apart. Yes, there's generally no need to edit archives, but there's also no need to protect it. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: a user name Ramparkashkohli editing without any sources and unexplained edits. It is needed to block this user. 106.204.112.248 (talk) 03:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs, removing references, random destination removals and removals of suspended destinations as being cut. The Banner talk 09:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs, removing references, random destination removals and removals of suspended destinations as being cut. The Banner talk 09:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive edits. ℛonherry 09:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive edits. ℛonherry 09:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP and account socks of Eswaran Naveen. Ravensfire (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing violating WP:CRYSTAL. Xexerss (talk) 14:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The higher level of protection for a footballer is rather ridiculous. I am a Wikipedia contributor of many years and many edits, and I only wanted to set a service tag to review and edit this very overlong article. Ghandi has a much smaller and less protected article. Something has gone wrong here and needs to be corrected. Robe4x (talk) 22:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Ronaldo, as a living person who's got people who love him and people who hate him, is subject to disruption in a level where 'regular' semi-protection is deemed ineffective. Don't hate the player, hate the game. You may request a change on the talk page using an edit request. DatGuyTalkContribs 12:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article currently in media [36] and disruption is going on. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Until 31 October 2022. DatGuyTalkContribs 15:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent edit warring by block evading socks and IPs of User:Hillary1900. MrOllie (talk) 16:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. BusterD (talk) 16:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent vandalism and disruption after driver won the 2022 championship. TylerBurden (talk) 16:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Last protection (six months) expired just a few weeks ago. BusterD (talk) 16:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection level unnecessarily increased to new level, I was involved in a discussion and I can no longer engage, this is not fair! 122.104.54.229 (talk) 13:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – The page was protected nearly 3 months ago, so your involvement is hardly recent. Anyhow, the current situation makes it inadvisable to lift the protection. Create an account and wait for it to become auto-confirmed, then you can request changes to the article. Favonian (talk) 13:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiply times tried to remove some part of article which have reliable source to verify it. please protect this article, sample edit [37] ZEP55 (talk) 12:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution.
ZEP55, your edit summaries fall short. Please avoid automated edit summaries for content disputes. The header for WP:ONUS reads: Verifiability does not guarantee inclusion, so please keep that (and WP:DUE) in mind in your argument for inclusion. Singularitywiki, when you write in an edit summary that: "I am well on top of this topic," that has a strong hint of WP:OWNERSHIP, which should generally be avoided.
The fact is that neither one of you had attempted to use the article talk page (here) to resolve this dispute. Edit warring while failing to do so is sanctionable, so I highly suggest you take it there. If somehow you still find yourselves at an impasse after doing that, there are dispute resolution requests, like WP:3O, WP:RFC or WP:RSN (WP:DRN not recommended) which you could avail yourselves of. Good luck. El_C 15:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. The points that are being focred by my friend @ZEP55 in the article is not relevant to the arrest of Shervin Hajipor and it is not a reaction to his arrest. The content is linked to rs yes, but again rs news has nothing to do with the reaction to arrest of the subject. It is an overall reaction to Death of Mahsa Amini protests, and not subject. my friend tries to connect something irrelevant. And by on top og the topic, I mean I am following it news, and it is in my own native language. So apologies for giving impression of COI. Singularitywiki (talk) 16:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I retract my comment, the source does indeed mention the point @ZEP55 is trying to make in article, but very small, and I missed it. Apologies for time wasted. Singularitywiki (talk) 16:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Just in case an user messes up with my sandbox. Weegee1000 (talk) 13:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well then you wouldn't be able to edit it either. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 15:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, disruptive edits, many sources aren't verified, the page, Multiverse needs a form of protection. 5TheHunter (talk) 14:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I guess I was looking at the OP's conduct on that page, whose addition to the opening sentence Ohnoitsjamie himself had reverted (latest edit at this time). Colour me confused. El_C 15:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution.
5TheHunter, please stop edit warring against multiple editors. Your talk page note (here) that speaks vaguely about about "vandalism," etc. (see WP:NOTVANDALISM), is inappropriate. Please make a substantive effort to argue for your position, by citing pertinent sources and policy (like WP:DUE). The opening sentence of a page is perhaps its most important component. You can't get your way simply by saying things declaratively. It doesn't work like that. Also, please start using edit summaries, in general. Thanks. El_C 15:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, didn't catch that the requester was the source of the disruption. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, makes sense. There's the added comedy, though, that you, yourself, were among those they accused of "vandalism." ☻ El_C 16:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We take our entertainment when it presents itself. The irony burns. BusterD (talk) 16:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In another universe Ohnoitsjamie is the disruptive editor. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
With the goatee. BusterD (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it's this universe? DatGuyTalkContribs 16:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mullet in C-131. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple IPs deleting the Indian army website reference + statement + making unsourced pro-Jat claims - Arjayay (talk) 17:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 17:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11 October 2022

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from multiple IPs since October 7 (sports vandalism of "ownership" with the ongoing preseason/expected start of season). Leventio (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 18:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre🚐 19:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Don't see a reason for extended confirmed protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, removing information backed by reliable sources. Page was protected a few times in the past, but the vandalism comes back. Previous attempts at discussion always failed. Coltsfan (talk) 19:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I locked the page for two days to give the edit-warring user a chance to use the talk page. I posted an explanation and warning on their talk page.  MelanieN (talk) 23:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP vandalism by 2405:201:1003:107a:8402:d790:ec98:4621 - removal of party color templates and making content unreadable. Exactly the same lengthy edit was made by 2409:4081:E94:7539:4047:B536:C4EC:5C4 and many times by User:Rashtra Nayak who was given multiple level 4 warnings for the same edit in the past. Earlier 3 IP addresses who made the same vandalistic edit were blocked 1 2 3 Dhruv edits (talk) 19:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Pesistent vandalism by "YT tuzz" IP ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism on a biographies of living persons page. Karinanw (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article may be at risk from (and is already receiving) vandalism XxLuckyCxX (talk) 19:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Subject is currently ITN after being charged with six counts of sexual assault [40][41] From what I've seen at least, cases like this often result in persistent vandalism towards the subject's article. May be worth protecting it for a short period of time? XxLuckyCxX (talk) 20:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection. Yarosurafu (talk) 00:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. No reason given. El_C 00:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
please cancel the request, it was a mistake Yarosurafu (talk) 00:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure np.  Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 00:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP addresses regularly disassemble the page, adding things that do not belong there, or simply removing them altogether. The page should not be editable for IP addresses. Uwdwadafsainainawinfi (talk) 20:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per the recent consensus on AN/I this should be Extended-Confirmed Protection to enforce the community sanction (500/30 on all Russo-Ukrainian war articles); see AN/I discussion. (If that thread is archived prior to this request being actioned, please change the link to the archived thread.)Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 23:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MelanieN: FYI the log is now at WP:GS/RUSUKR (due to... reasons). El_C 00:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from IP addresses Betoota44 (talk) 21:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandalism as on Talk:Turning Red. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 23:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator AcroterionMelanieN (talk) 00:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request temporary full protection due to content dispute between multiple editors reverting back and forth. 3 days to a week should be OK. I'd protect it but I am now WP:INVOLVED. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sock puppetry on this article goes back to June 15th, perhaps increase protection? Magherbin (talk) 21:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for the duration. AE log updated. El_C 00:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP block evasion and sockpuppetry by new accounts
17:59, 15 June 2022‎ user:Azazmeh with a brand new account adds reverted content previously published by user:WorldCreaterFighter sockpuppet user:WikiEdit2204
10:23, 12 August 2022‎ 90.20.4.185 re-added content by user:Azazmeh who was blocked as a sockpuppet of user:WorldCreaterFighter
23:00, 20 September 2022‎ 77.56.174.16 added self-published content to the lead
11:09, 21 September 2022‎ 178.197.221.41 added the same self-published content to the body
21:21, 21 September 2022‎ 77.56.174.16 added the same self-published content after reversion
14:37, 8 October 2022‎ user:Sami Beni Mellal added the same self-published content after reversion of IP edits. User is blocked for edit warring and logged out edits
10:18, 10 October 2022‎ 165.51.11.97 added the same self-published content after reversion of blocked user:Sami Beni Mellal
22:01, 10 October 2022‎ 196.237.180.130 added the same self-published content after reversion of other IP edits
Efekadu (talk) 23:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Efekadu, too much bold! El_C 00:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This wikipedia article has recently experienced high levels of vandalism, such as an image portraying the Houthi leader to be reading the "big nate" comic book instead of the Quran, and making references to big nate in the article text. I would like the article to be protected from further vandalism of this nature. Aldanimarki (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Since October 2nd, there have been multiple IPs and new users editing her article and calling her a 'kitten murderer'. ◇HelenDegenerate21:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HelenDegenerate, I guess she admitted to drowning kittens in her youth or something, which is fucked up. El_C 00:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant messing by IPs with the height field. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 22:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What, no crypto? El_C 00:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Also, the page has been semi-protected by administrator DatGuyMelanieN (talk) 23:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper hoaxing. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 00:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection – Same IP editor resumed the same WP:DE immediately after article came off previous semi-protection for the same. Either need longer semi-protection, or range block of IP editor. --IJBall (contribstalk) 02:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IJBall, as far as I can see, that page was not semi'd previously (this being is the first). El_C 04:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has experienced vandalism or BLP vio almost every day since the last protection period lapsed on October 4. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism and continuously deleting the sourced content. MRRaja001 (talk) 04:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not active enough for semi-protection at this time. El_C 04:59, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. The article was semi-protected three times for this reason in July and August. Thanks. --Phikia (talk) 04:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued IP vandalism in Personnel section. HorrorLover555 (talk) 05:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Librex Computer Systems (red link is currently salted). DigitalIceAge (talk) 06:37, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Repeated attempts by the same IP user (86.1.36.142) to remove a game that Arsenal lost 1–2 to Brentford since 14 August 2022 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). These edits except the recent one (8) were all reverted (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). There's too much for me to undo without breaking WP:3RR. Thanks. Phikia (talk) 03:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Phikia, you are expempt exempt from 3RR when reverting disruptive editing, like as vandalism. El_C 04:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for your help. --Phikia (talk) 06:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, but I misspelled exempt! :( El_C 06:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Known vandal magnet. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 06:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism, as it's on the front page at the moment. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Two IP edits in the last week. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A banned user continue his disruptive editing. 5 nm process & 7 nm process articles were already protected a few days ago due to the same user editing behavior. Alawadhi3000 (talk) 09:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – This list has for as long as it has existed been the subject of additions of software products from companies where neither the product nor supplier has an article. Just recently there has been repeated edits by IPs to add particular products. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Pending changes protection would make the problem invisible to readers, yet probably have no effect on the frequency of the promotional editing, and the persistent need for reverts. It's helpful against vandalism, but this is a case where – due to a lack of vandalism – I wouldn't use it.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. GedUK  13:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:E5B5:EDA8:CCA:997F (talk) 12:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism of IP users. King.Nexus.1 (talk) 11:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 15:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing. Jingiby (talk) 12:57, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 15:14, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A group of IP addresses that all geolocate to Oxford are repeatedly vandalising the page. Probably some kind of student humour. I don't find it funny. Tercer (talk) 14:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Significant IP vandalism – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Constant IP Vandalism FishandChipper 🐟🍟 14:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users repeatedly add a link to "cannabis selling website". Noktonissian (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism. May need to impose WP:ACDS. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:58, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 15:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Ghdfghmp (talk) 11:11, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined article hasn't been vandalised, barely edited, in a week. GedUK  13:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple vandalisms. Ghdfghmp (talk) 11:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  13:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP socks keep overwriting random list entries with "Kamalakannan (born 1993), India – Improvement in Healthcare" Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: LTA "Disney's Pete Is a Wolf" Vandal is returning to this page to resume editwarring in order to protect his WP:OR opinions there. Mr Fink (talk) 14:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  14:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. None of the recent non-autoconfirmed edits to the talk page have been constructive at all. Many violations of WP:NOTAFORUM by various different IPs ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Looking back, it seems this has been going on for so long that I take this step of making the first-ever protection of this talk page indef. Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeat sock IP vandalism inserting images from blocked user Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Favassafeer (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 15:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: this gets vandalized with random nonsense a lot for some reason 208.118.175.250 (talk) 16:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Another page where this looks like the best solution. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP sockpuppet evasion from blocked user Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12 October 2022

Reason: This page is created by me and i want to request protection for it because it is a very underrated but true information and people should get to know about this so, kindly let this page be protected so that many people can get inspired and can thank Wikipedia for publishing such an underrated information. regards, QP-SOFDEL. QP-SOFDEL (talk) 15:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Page does not exist at this time. El_C 15:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Requester has been blocked as a promo only account. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits since October 10. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued Breaking Bad meme vandalism after recent expiration of protection. Uhai (talk) 19:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. None of the recent edits by non-autoconfirmed users have been constructive at all. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from one or more editors using multiple accounts. ElKevbo (talk) 21:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 22:26, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 23:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Favassafeer (talk) 00:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by autoconfirmed accounts on TFA. echidnaLives (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR, to match similar ECP on other related articles. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An uptick in vandalism in the last few days. RPI2026F1 (talk) 03:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruptive edits by non-confirmed users. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 01:59, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Named account blocked. The ip could be editing in good faith, we'll see if it settles down. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently created accounts used for joking edits about claims to rulership of sovereign Bir Tawil & subsequent fictitious microstate politics. Appears to be two editors playing with one another. Pathawi (talk) 02:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:DOB issues recurred immediately after previous semi-protection expired. Toddst1 (talk) 05:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 05:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting indefinite semi-protection due to persistent page blanking, most likely by one committed person or group of persons who jump from IP to IP to avoid temporary IP blocks. Vandalism immediately reoccurred after semi-protection wore off, and the vandal immediately jumped IPs to make the page blank again. Yue🌙 06:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IPs and new accounts, mostly childish micronation claims. --Finngall talk 00:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple autoconfirmed accounts. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 00:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant spam. RPI2026F1 (talk) 01:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. This page has had a fair amount of activity lately pushing fringe theories. TartarTorte 01:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject to ongoing vandalism. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeat removal of sourced information over five months with increased frequency this week; potential sockpuppet activity. ~ Pbritti (talk) Pbritti (talk) 17:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. IP changing words to more complicated versions of themselves. I have started a discussion on the talk page however I have no way to notify the IP since I can't ping IPs ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably better classified under LTA sockpuppetry. Gsquaredxc (talk) 19:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Gsquaredxc: Agreed. Didn't realize it was an LTA since the behavior didn't really match what was described on the LTA page for them. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks of Eswaran Naveen‎ pushing challenged material. Ravensfire (talk) 17:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Patanjali Project. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP user 174.247.65.110. BrickMaster02 (talk) 22:53, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep adding factual inaccuracies and even vandalism and I am fed up with it. Thanks. Blanchey (talk) 08:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needed to address spate of non-autoconfirmed roving IP disruption. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption on strongest storm. Hurricane Fiona is the strongest in terms of barometric pressure, not wind speed, therefore Ian is not the strongest storm of 2022 Atlantic Hurricane Season. 1. Sarrail (talk) 17:20, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Reason: Persistent vandalism from IPs. Zoolver (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add a few things to this article speaking from the experience of my elder family memebers Angela-einestien (talk) 06:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – The article is not protected, but if this contribution of yours is indicative of your intentions and skills, Wikipedia can do without you. Favonian (talk) 06:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent spike in vandalism and bad-faith edits (October 10th and 11th) PerryPerryD Talk To Me 17:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's today's featured article. It'll be better tomorrow. Uhai (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
that wouldnt explain the vandalism spike yesterday. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 22:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure the featured article changes over at midnight UTC. The first vandalistic edit was about a half an hour after this time. Uhai (talk) 23:04, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Seems to be over (unless I just jinxed it!). El_C 09:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of removed trivia. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:58, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. I'm not seeing enough problems atm relative to the obviously greatly increased activity. RIP. El_C 09:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated editing by unregistered editors to try to promote unreleased film into article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Robert McClenon, well, isn't that the point of a draft? In any case, I'm not seeing any recent issues (i.e. days rather than weeks or months). El_C 08:53, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and brand new accounts disruption. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 07:51, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Callanecc: The disruption i was talking about is from yesterday onwards, sounds quite recent IMHO.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 08:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing copyvio images being added by new users and IPs since the start of October, presumably some offsite call to update the article. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 12:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Road. El_C 13:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous unreferenced pov push by new SPAs or IP account to add word "jat" despite the fact that reputed reference doesn't call him as such. Akalanka820 (talk) 12:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Blazin777 (talk) 13:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lolkikmoddi (talk) 13:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of sockpuppet activity and threats. 4me689 (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a discussion at Talk:2022 to semi-protect said page, because of persistent sock puppetry from Niko the Biko, who has used sockpuppets for making False Consensus on the Talk:2022, especially for stuff like Marsha Hunt and the Cuban gay marriage law, He has repeatedly threatened to use more sock puppets. There have also been other sockpuppeteer that have been doing bad things too, like CountingStars500 who has used socks To make fake consensus to include Gilbert Gottfried, and their is the 2020 person who has asked nonsensical questions like "what if 2020 was a person" and "what if 2020 came to your house" and other non stuff by using random IPS, talk 2022 needs to be protected till the end of the year, because of the after mention stuff, @Black Kite: wanted me to bring this here, with enough of that said I'm going to Ping everyone who attribute to the other discussion, @PaulRKil:, @TheScrubby:, @Jim Michael 2:, and @InvadingInvader: 4me689 (talk) 13:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. 4me689, this is a very busy talk page, regardless, so I'm not sure protecting it is the solution against... whatever that is. But feel free to provide recent WP:DIFFs (days rather than weeks) in case I've understated the problem. El_C 13:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry/vandalism, seems to be stemming from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Klmi95. At this particular article, it seems to have (possibly) started from Hehrrbrbr in November 2020... plenty more of what appear to be linked accounts since then, and the last time the article was protected was January 2019?! Magitroopa (talk) 16:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High and recurring level of IP vandalism Smerus (talk) 17:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent hoax edits / block evasion by IPv6 editors. Range blocks have not put a dent in it. MrOllie (talk) 17:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone is writing vandalism on plot 122.178.118.36 (talk) 13:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs in the last week. RPI2026F1 (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:29, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple cellular IP6s making the same significant unsourced edits changing personal details (e.g., photo, DOB, parents, etc.). In particular, there is a several months-long campaign (back to, at least, Feb. 2022) by a sock to remove the photo from the article (see the talk page discussions). Protections against disruptive editing are an annual thing going back to 2018. – Archer1234 (talk) 14:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption and unsourced edits, possibly by sockpuppet, from several accounts and IP's either way. TylerBurden (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please also consider WP:ACDS. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IanDBeacon, probably not yet, but if and/or when there's a next time, definitely (i.e. for longer and logged). El_C 18:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of persistent disruption from IP users. Harbouri, an alt: Let's talk! (on my main) - What have I done? 18:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slay! El_C 18:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP block evasion/disruptive editing- see my report here for further details regarding some of the IPs (many of which can already be seen on the first page of the article's history). Magitroopa (talk) 18:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temperory Semi-Protection: High level of IP vandalism. Imsaneikigai (talk) 19:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This article has been a repeated source of BLP violations. The subject is the former Attorney General of Ontario and was charged with manslaughter, which was withdrawn by a special prosecutor in 2010. There is a vocal community that believes that decision was unfair, and we regularly get anon and brand new editors who edit the article to create major BLP violations (either directly by calling the subject a murderer, or indirectly by adding their own unsourced commentary to question the basis why the charge was withdrawn).

Last protection expired in June 2022. There's been some BLP violations in September and October 2022 - the last BLP violation stayed up for a 3-4 days before I removed it.

I leave duration up to an admin. Normally I would ask for temporary semi-protection, but given how much there's been in the past, and given how long it has stayed up in the past because there aren't a lot of watchers of the article, I'm wondering if permanent should be considered. Singularity42 (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. The best I can do for you is indef pc. The activity from June to now has been way too sparse (and that June protection was for only 2 days). El_C 20:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism has resumed after protection expired. See filter log. Jip Orlando (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WarnerMedia lol. El_C 21:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent block evasion of the "YT Tuzz" vandal (that's what I call them cause that's the only vandalism they do) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Goats? El_C 21:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ماكرفت 188.161.49.108 (talk) 16:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Looks like you landed on the wrong Wikipedia. Did you by any chance mean ar:ماينكرافت? Favonian (talk) 16:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 18:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well, I guess blocking the /64 (by HJ Mitchell) didn't work, because it's now showing a /25 for some reason (blocked by JJMC89, which doesn't even display), which also has a whole bunch of p-blocks, so I'm wary of messing with its other /64, but they're still vandalizing other pages, so I blocked just that one IPv4, which probably won't hold. ←One sentence! I have no idea how any of this works! Someone who knows a router from a different router should look into it, though. El_C 21:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I'll refactor at ANI just in case this slips through the Cyberbot crack pipe. El_C 21:33, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Note WP:TROUBLES for possible enforcement of WP:ACDS. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IanDBeacon, I remember Timeline of Ulster Defence Association actions like it was only earlier in the day! El_C 21:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It is a talk page for the article of a video game. It should be available to edit for all users. Even talk pages of articles like YouTube can be edited. (I want to add a new topic on the talk page.) Pola8976 (talk) 05:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. It was just protected yesterday by Ohnoitsjamie due to extensive disruption. @Pola8976: If you want to edit that page, then get 5 more edits to become autoconfirmed, and you should be fine. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13 October 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 22:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 22:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:TROUBLES. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IanDBeacon, I remember Timeline of Real Irish Republican Army actions like it was only an hour ago! El_C 22:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism regarding Ken's birthdate and age. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 22:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Qzd (talk) 23:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. RPI2026F1 (talk) 23:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The previous year-long ECP, which was very effective in reducing disruption, expired last month, and the sockpuppetry (from Nitin Malik Nitinmlk and History1458) promptly returned. Would appreciate a long-term or indef ECP per WP:CASTE. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal removing content. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 23:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Mz7 (talk) 02:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Mz7 (talk) 02:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: vandalism comes from the IP requesting page protection. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 00:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Paul Erik Please protect this article. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Mz7 (talk) 02:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Mz7 (talk) 02:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism Roundishtc) 00:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Mz7 (talk) 02:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant spate of IP vandalism after recent expiry of protection. Toddst1 (talk) 02:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page just got vandalized, so I think its protection needs to be elevated to a higher level. Hsija (talk) 02:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please don't post to this noticeboard unless you understand our protection policy. If we protected every article that was vandalism, there wouldn't be any unprotected articles. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the section "Distribution and habitat" there's a link pointing to Green_Mountain : it should be pointing to Green_Mountains (plural). Padelsart (talk) 08:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you, the old link went to a mountain on Ascension island. Lectonar (talk) 09:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2600:1700:D980:4400:41C8:D9E0:F968:85E1 (talk) 02:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Kosack (talk) 11:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor continues to make unsourced and unexplained changes to numbers. Bahooka (talk) 03:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 12:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent slow motion, insertion of large amounts of unsourced, falsified content into the page’s plot section by either a single IP vandal or a group of IP vandals over several months. At least one of the IPs involved was blocked in September, but the vandalism persisted, so I have a suspicion it’s the same person hopping IPs, or a group of coordinated IP editors conspiring to vandalise this page. Semi-protecting it should be enough to deal with them for now. BrayLockBoy (talk) 07:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 12:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent re-addition of poorly sourced material. silviaASH (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 10:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The additions are by a new editor in seemingly good faith. Hopefully this gets them to engage rather than persistently readding. Kosack (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:E45F:39:7BCE:DC4D (talk) 12:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page was protected for many times. Last the protection was removed from the page, a 16 days old user edited the page and put misinformation. I was busy so I couldn't see it. Today a person tell me about that. In past these spam edits were made from IP. Now they are creating Wikipedia account to make them reliable. So I think the page need full protection with longer time. I know it is not enough reason for approval but I reverted their actions and soon they will try again and spam the page. So from my experience with Bangladeshi film related articles I can say we need to protect the page but with increased level. Mehedi Abedin 22:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If there is disruption, you can report the perpetrators at WP:AIVLectonar (talk) 09:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – >90% of the edits to this page are vandalism, no point having pending changes protection. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending-changes is working aas intended, as the edits don't go "live". Not enough disruption for semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Khirurg (talk) 03:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Already asked for protection yesterday, it was declined, but the disruption is going on (IP and brand new accounts). ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 07:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest an indefinite ECP, as the page is a regular (one could also term it traditional) target of disruptive editing. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Yeah, enough is enough. El_C 13:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A dynamic IP is repeatedly adding some quite undue text with questionable sources here. CMD (talk) 09:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Ongoing RfC, but new users (I have filed SPI) are disrupting the page Venkat TL (talk) 12:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started to spread. Layah50♪ (喋ってください!) 04:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of content from an editor on multiple accounts claiming to represent the company. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 06:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 14:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent roving IP disruption linked to a set IP range and currently the subject of an ANI discussion. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 14:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content & BLP violations.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 14:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see WP:TROUBLES. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This has probably run its course for now. 2 edits by an IP which has now been blocked. Please renominate if further disruption emerges Kosack (talk) 11:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I see admins trying to cool things down on this hot-button user talk page. This mini-flurry of IP and new account vandalism can't be helping. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 14:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unconstructive edits, and multiple editing wars/Persistent vandalism. Brotherbenz (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. The unconstructive edits will continue to happen. The page was protected recently to prevent Wikipedia:Vandalism. (i.e: Cleveland Indians Hall of Fame vs Cleveland Guardians Hall of Fame) Brotherbenz (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No it wasn't. THat was literally just 1 edit. And the last time is was protected was for edit warring, not vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Two different editors reverted the attempt to change the article a few weeks back because said change was inaccurate due to the Hall of Fame name having been changed along with that of the team. The article has been stable under that name since November 2021, the last time someone briefly tried to reintroduce the old, and therefore no longer accurate, name. That time, the change was swiftly reverted without controversy. Rather than go to the talk page to build a new consensus as strongly suggested by WP:BRD, you came here asking for the page to be protected. Now you claim an edit war when the article was once again reverted to its state prior to this round of disruption in an edit that remained uncontested for four days until you once again returned to champion your inaccurate change and a different editor not even involved the first time once again attempted to return the article to its unvarnished state. For context, every article about an inductee was updated after the Hall of Fame officially changed its name, and they have all been stable in that state with the exception of your attempts to change the name to something else on this one page without trying to build a consensus for said change. It's a very interesting tactic to disrupt an article and then seek protection for the disruptions. Indrian (talk) 16:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism of Shoeless Joe Jackson article
I presume you are not overly familiar with Major League Baseball, for that is the only reason I can think of why a persistent act of vandalism would be labeled a "content dispute." To elaborate, the Cleveland baseball club was named the Indians from 1915-2021, at which time it was renamed the Guardians due to concerns over the name. This was a controversial decision in the so-called "culture wars" in the United States. When the team changed its name, all the organizations that it owns and operates also changed their names, including the Hall of Fame, which is now the Cleveland Guardians Hall of Fame. Our own page on the topic has been updated to reflect this name change, while every article about an inductee has been updated to reflect the current name of the institution in which they have been enshrined. Sadly, a sizeable contingent of the fanbase refuses to acknowledge the new name for a variety of reasons. The Shoeless Joe Jackson article appears to have been targeted by those that are unhappy with this situation. Regardless of one's views, however, it is a fact that the name is now the Cleveland Guardians Hall of Fame. The "Cleveland Indians Hall of Fame" quite simply no longer exists. It was pretty brazen for a user vandalizing an article to request protection for the article they were disrupting, but I find it even more shocking that an admin upheld a vandal's position. Protect the page by all means, but the vandalous edit should also be rolled back. Indrian (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I presume you are not overly familiar with Wikipedia talk pages, for that is the only reason I can think of why you would not understand that this is not Talk:Shoeless Joe Jackson. I presume you are not overly familiar with Wikipedia:Vandalism, for that is the only reason I can think of why you would not understand that what the other person was doing isn't vandalism. No matter how much you want to call it that. It may surprise you to know that I don't have to be "overly familiar with Major League Baseball" to be able to follow the changing of various racist and derogatory team names in North American sports, Edmonton Elks and Washington Commanders for example. Just curious but are you familar with "you (can) catch more flies with honey than (with) vinegar"? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 20:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So you are just an incompetent admin. Thanks for clearing that up. Happy editing. Indrian (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I stand by my statements. Brotherbenz (talk) 16:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate you standing by my statement regarding your vandalism. It's good we could reach an agreement on that point. Happy editing. Indrian (talk) 16:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I stand by my statements that the name he was inducted under is the Indians, not your statements therefore it still stands. Happy editing. Brotherbenz (talk) 16:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The page was still protected. To further this commitment, in the Spirit of Larry Doby, the first African American in American League history and who later was inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame as a Cleveland Indians player This is directly from the teams website. Even that still says Indians player[1] Brotherbenz (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not an article talk page. I concur with the request to archive. If you want to change project consensus, do it in the proper forum. Indrian (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ {{cite web |title= Job Opportunities |url=https://www.mlb.com/guardians/official-information/job-opportunities |website=MLB |date=13 October 2022 |access-date=13 October 2022}
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article has been persistently edited by new or anonymous users to add unsourced content or make NPOV-violating edits, such as this, this and this. silviaASH (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 09:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one such edit this month. I'd impose WP:PC, but there seems to be enough attention on this page atm. Relist if there's an escalation. El_C 13:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism Hsija (talk) 14:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced edits from various IPs. David Biddulph (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. David Biddulph, please see WP:NOTVANDALISM. Vandalism is one narrow subset of disruptive editing, like, for example, repeatedly adding unsourced content, which does not inherently constitute 'defacement.' In any case, I've added a source confirming that he's been elected by the Iraqi parliament as the new president, so I think we're good now. Thanks. El_C 16:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism due to "meme" after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 19:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Include an External Audio Box in the (3.3) Music and records paragraph to create a link to the archived performance by Adriana Caselotti singing the song Whistle While You Work from the soundtrack of the original Disney movie Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) Thanks for your consideration. See the talk page for the text which can be used to create the link. 160.72.81.86 (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)GCL160.72.81.86 (talk) 19:58, 12 October 2022 (UTC)GCL[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 16:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change GDP $460.70 billion (nominal; 2022 est.)[4] to $396.543 billion (nominal; 2022 est.) Change GDP per capita $2,784 (nominal, 2022 est.)[7] to $ 2361(nominal, 2022 est.)

Source:https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2022/April/weo-report?c=513,&s=NGDP_R,NGDP_RPCH,NGDP,NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDP_D,NGDPRPC,NGDPRPPPPC,NGDPPC,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,PPPSH,PPPEX,NID_NGDP,NGSD_NGDP,PCPI,PCPIPCH,PCPIE,PCPIEPCH,TM_RPCH,TMG_RPCH,TX_RPCH,TXG_RPCH,LP,GGR,GGR_NGDP,GGX,GGX_NGDP,GGXCNL,GGXCNL_NGDP,GGXONLB,GGXONLB_NGDP,GGXWDG,GGXWDG_NGDP,NGDP_FY,BCA,BCA_NGDPD,&sy=2020&ey=2027&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1 Robin1311 (talk) 03:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 16:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Good-faith repeated vandalism, refusal to discuss edits on template's, editor's and editor sock puppet's talk pages. CLalgo (talk) 07:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Continued high level of IP additions of unsourced material/edit warring and now vandalism. Previously requested temporary semi-protection in late Sept. and was granted 1 week. -- Wikipedical (talk) 16:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. PErsistent socking by LTA BKFIP. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14 October 2022

Reason: Long-term campaign of IPs making wholesale and wide-ranging changes without sourcing and with no explanations. Some might be blocked user User:Annamargarita0. Previous protections of 3 months in Jan 2022 and Jun 2022 haven't disuaded the disruptor(s). – Archer1234 (talk) 08:53, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. There seems to have been none of these edits since the /64 that had been doing most of the recent ones was blocked through January two days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many edited 2401:4900:52F9:1765:98AF:E86F:C27:C0BB (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP edit-warring, autoconfirm requirement ought to do the trick. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Valereee (talk) 22:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor keeps removing sourced content and adding unsourced to try to neutralise article. QueenofBithynia (talk) 21:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA IP hopper (see article's revision history), has managed to find ranges that have remained unblocked since the last range block.(see; [42]) -. LouisAragon (talk) 22:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page experience vandalism time and again which makes it hard for editors like me and others as we have to keep a close eye on what's added to the article consistently, please do something about it. shelovesneo (talk) 22:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Good-faith repeated vandalism, refusal to discuss edits on template's, editor's and editor sock puppet's talk pages. CLalgo (talk) 07:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism over last eight hours. Grey Wanderer (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RPI2026F1 (talk) 23:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still more IP vandalism, might need longer-term protection. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 00:28, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. BangJan1999 18:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just ask an active admin to revoke their TPA. Bbb23 gave them a warning and they haven't edited it since. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:20, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, as protection is not the solution to a single account's disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 162.193.22.59 (talk · contribs). Magnatyrannus, thank you for reporting, but I previously told you that we don't protect pages for disruption from single accounts/IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of doubtful info to the page by IPs. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 05:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 15:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant IP vandalism Horse Eye's Back (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism for page associated with political candidate before election. Request semi-protection until after November. Hyderabad22 (talk) 02:44, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 05:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by a bunch of IPs. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:43, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 05:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Blanking of sourced information. Khirurg (talk) 00:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khirurg wants to get it protected in his version, where he has added entirely incorrect statements. Please refrain from doing so until this incorrect information is removed, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Botushali (talkcontribs)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 05:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism/haphazard edits from unregistered users. ComradeNapCal (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 05:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism. ManaliJain (talk) 05:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Geniac. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. 120.150.226.104 (talk) 09:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 09:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's wait for the press-conference. Lectonar (talk) 11:03, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, indef semi. 120.150.226.104 (talk) 10:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Lectonar (talk) 10:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long term edit warring and removals of large amount of sourced text closely related to the subject; i.e. a politician involved in Northern Epirus politics (human & minority rights of Greek-Albanians). A c. 1 week p.protection may calm things down and all related parties will probably sit and participate at the talkpage. Alexikoua (talk) 00:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this will require full protection. Is that what you want? Daniel Case (talk) 20:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly.Alexikoua (talk) 02:16, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This seems to have died down somewhat; it would be helpful if the discussion on the talk-page would continue. Please relist if disruption picks up. Lectonar (talk) 11:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 17:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User Jp114 removed infobox image with no explanation and continued to revert for over a week. He has been ignoring my attempts to contact him. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The previous semi-protection has expired, and the disruptive editing from IP editors has returned. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 10:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Previous protection expired more than a month ago. Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 11:09, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high level of IP vandalism. Wesoree (Talk) 12:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. El_C 14:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 13:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 13:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 14:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just been appointed Chancellor, so likely this will continue/increase. WJ94 (talk) 14:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by different IPs and new accounts adding Wilbur Soot despite being told that he is not from Utah. Same edits resulted in page protection in early September. Suonii180 (talk) 09:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring by IP who is baby sitting the page for removing sourced content. 103.240.204.243 (talk) 12:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 15:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP continuing disruptive edits (removing sourced content) after socks Connor19986 and Papa11126 were blocked. – Archer1234 (talk) 12:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism HearUnitedSing (talk) 21:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HearUnitedSing, please make an effort to use edit summaries consistently. These sports pages are very challenging to examine on this board, largely because for some reason few editors bother to explain what it is that they're doing. There's a reason why your request is the oldest live request here right now. Thanks in advance. El_C 15:46, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Administrators please semi-protect this page for a period of atleast 1 month as IP users again started doing Unconstructive edits on a daily basis as aoon as previous 1 week protection was expired. Pri2000 (talk) 04:31, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:41, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is the perennial target of a disruptive roving IP user that appears to be a blocked sockpuppet. A discussion is ongoing at ANI [43]. The disruption here has been on and off for more than six months. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBEE, vandalism and BLP violations; indefinite extended-confirmed protection. 120.150.226.104 (talk) 09:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 15:10, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Kazamzam (talk) 15:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged GS action. El_C 16:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: there is no consensus that continued protection is necessary because No more edits are required on this page and if the protection is removed, then anyone will be able to improve page easily. please removed protection of page. 103.249.239.58 (talk) 14:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Reason given for unprotection is contradictory. Lectonar (talk) 14:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: there is no consensus that continued protection is necessary because No more edits are required on this page and if the protection is removed, then anyone will be able to improve page easily. please removed protection of page. 103.249.239.58 (talk) 14:03, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Reason given for unprotection is contradictory. Lectonar (talk) 14:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mass of edit-warring - claims and counter-claims of consensus on the TP - Arjayay (talk) 12:31, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 15:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and content blanking. I'm afraid it'll go on for way too long. Inferiorshiny Say it to my face. 13:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 14:48, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death, the usual IP vandalism. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 17:12, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 17:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Breaches of WP:RS/AC. tgeorgescu (talk) 07:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Seems to be resolved. Tgeorgescu, RE: @Eggventura: Please obey WP:RS/AC (bold is my emphasis). Please use observe or something like it — "obey" is too much. Thanks. El_C 15:31, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot to add: if that IP returns, relist or list at WP:AIV. El_C 15:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – IP is back with vandalism shortly after last protection expired. The Banner talk 12:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Pending changes won't reduce the amount of work needed to deal with these edits, yet there's no real harm to be prevented by not showing them to readers. Pending changes protection is thus not a solution. Also, there have been quite few protection attempts, so indefinite protection would be an excessive jump.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One sock keeps falsely responding to unblock requests. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Only disruptive editing since the last protection expired. 2409:4073:4E9C:3CDD:85EC:3A16:F286:72F (talk) 17:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Members appear to be creating accounts to remove portions they don't want on the page, claiming sections of it are private information. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15 October 2022

Temporary semi-protection. Maybe a 3-7 days or so. Reason: IP (has used multiple) appears to be trying to write themselves into the article. Has been reverted three times by three different users (two separate IPs used). Did it was reverted, tried a couple hours late, reverted again, will likely try again RedPatch (talk) 20:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 23:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tropicalkitty (talk) 00:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadishMelanieN (talk) 00:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. FMSky (talk) 21:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 00:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article was never vandalised, so please unprotect it! 119.42.86.176 (talk) 22:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You know that we can see your edit history? – Muboshgu (talk) 22:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent promo and adding of unsourced text and rosters. The Banner talk 13:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 05:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. MelanieN (talk) 00:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, Politically Motivated Vandalism... Krqftan (talk) 00:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism over the last 24 hours, requesting a short, temporary lock CeltBrowne (talk) 00:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism from a number of different IPSs; making unjustified edits including that the massacre was 'justified' etc. Compusolus (talk) 03:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 05:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Weird vandalism by non-autoconfirmed users and IPs. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 03:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Weird threats being posted by IPs. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 04:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP sock puppets of Eswaran Naveen. Ravensfire (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So quick bot! Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Obviously this is a developing situation; noticing some disruptive editing in addition to some really great contributions, so could be worth adding some degree of protection just in case. ɯɐɔ 💬 04:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring on what is definitely a contentious issue. ɯɐɔ 💬 04:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Sockpuppetry. Semi-protection has proven insufficient to prevent socks of a banned user editing this page. Will need to be for at least 6 months, they've been at this for over a year now. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mako001, I'll leave this to someone else, but I should mention that I couldn't understand what's happening on that page. The diffs I sampled were confusing. El_C 07:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, I figured it out. Extended confirmed protected for the duration. El_C 07:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@El C:I understand why, the edits by WP:3X-banned editor Jellywings19 are apparently constructive, or at least seemingly harmless, but also include some totally fake stuff. A majority of edits are either them or other editors reverting them. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Sockpuppetry. Semi-protection has proven ineffective at preventing the socks of a banned user editing this page. They are very persistent, and have been at it for over a year now, so the protection will need to be fairly long. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for the duration. El_C 07:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection; vandalism and WP:ARBPIA. 49.180.176.214 (talk) 06:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unrelated to ARBPIA, however. El_C 07:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP going around putting the Philippines at the start of lists. CMD (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 05:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP going around putting the Philippines at the start of lists. CMD (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 05:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP going around putting the Philippines at the start of lists. CMD (talk) 03:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 05:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by IP editors. 2pou (talk) 06:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. WP:ARBIPA. Content Dispute/Edit Warring by new users against consensus. (I have filed SPI) are disrupting the page Venkat TL (talk) 07:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This seems to have become part of the Ukrainian war. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 07:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of anti-Ukraine (and unsourced) vandalism, including edits labelling it as a 'terrorist' organisation. Compusolus (talk) 08:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected, Elon Musk strikes back.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please open it for editing for information and History about Sangri State. Raj172027 (talk) 06:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because there is nothing to do. Neither title exists on Wikipedia, and neither are protected from creation. @Raj172027: You cannot create an article because your account is too new. You need to prove some minimal amount of experience by becoming an autoconfirmed editor. In the meantime, because you are new, it is best that you create an article in draft space first and submit it for review. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation and follow the instructions. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. It is this page Sangri State Raj172027 (talk) 07:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – @El C: the redirect disruption goes on, this time with users who have autoconfirmed status. Austronesier (talk) 19:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hm hm hm hm.
No action yet, from my side. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can't take any action. Clearly, I'm involved. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It took me a while to see what you mean. 🙂 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Feelin' finicky! El_C 05:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, blocks will help better if this disruption continues--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many users are adding spam links to this article. Hajoon0102 💬 07:56, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism. Compusolus (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 12:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent “hilarious” vandalism by IPs. GimliDotNet (talk) 07:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, most IP edits are constructive, and protecting because of two bad edits three days apart will cause collateral damage.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It’s been over the course of a month. But whatever, I won’t bother fixing the vandalism anymore. Just leave it to the ip vandals. GimliDotNet (talk) 10:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced changes to show's status by an IP-hopping editor (all the IPs geolocate to the same area). May be related to blocked editor User:Vcchnx a blocked sockpuppet who also made the same changes to the article. All of the edits since at least June have just been the back-and-forth between the inserting and reverting of this unsourced change. Aoidh (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Evry edit since expiration of protection (starting with this one) is either an attempt to whitewash the subject's pseudoscientific opinions or its reversal. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 09:46, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 14:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. No constructive edits recently to the talk page ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 12:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The current protection level is not helping the ongoing content dispute. TheWikiholic (talk) 12:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple unregistered users are removing content on this page. Many are also vandalizing by adding unnecessary stuff on the page. Wallflowernepal (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 13:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Need for semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism. Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MarcusTraianus (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection Mindless edit warring with these 2 editors[44][45] citing a 2016 discussion to overturn consensus in 2018. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I'll make a note on the talk page, though. El_C 16:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This user has on multiple occasions ([46], [47], [48], [49], [50],) removed the strike rate column in the Champions list section in the past year. Other editors and myseld have had lengthy discussions about this: discussion 1 and [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tennis_Masters_Series_singles_records_and_statistics%7Cdiscussion 2]] and have reverted his disruptive edits time and again but to no avail. They can't be dissuaded otherwise. Qwerty284651 (talk) 15:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC). Qwerty284651 (talk) 15:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: the protection no longer neccessary because no one can't give too much wrong info on this page. 103.249.239.58 (talk) 13:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The request is just as nonsensical as the one you made yesterday. Favonian (talk) 15:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – We can't let anymore socks come in and falsely decline an unblock request. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 18:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure ECP is needed atm. El_C 19:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:20, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – relentless anon vandalism over the past year, should have been pp'd a long time ago, sigh. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 19:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anastrophe, that page is so inactive, ordinarily, it wouldn't even be eligible for pc. But seeing as stuff is falling through the cracks, might as well. El_C 19:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:7810:33A5:ABBD:7FC7 (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:7810:33A5:ABBD:7FC7 (talk) 17:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite-Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 16:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Favonian just restored semi-protection after the EC expired. Let's see how this goes Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: I don't want IP editors to edit my user page. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Geraldo Perez, WP:UPROT says: User pages and subpages within their own user space may be protected upon a request from the user, as long as a need exists. Pages within the user space should not be automatically or pre-emptively protected without good reason or cause (emphasis added). I don't see how your request establishes such a "need" or constitute such a "good reason or cause." As far as I can see, the last IP to have edited your user page was back in 2014. El_C 19:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by editors persistently trying to insert a specific viewpoint about historic events to the article even though other editors clearly disagreed with that. They avoided using the talk page to resolve the dispute. [51], and they keep re-adding the content back to the article without showing any interest in resolving it through discussion. Time and again but to no avail. They can't be dissuaded otherwise. - SilentResident (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 19:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SilentResident, it's only been a few hours since you posted that comment, so maybe give it a bit more time...? El_C 20:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is yet another argument on who is still currently voicing the character. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 20:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversy rising against Hideki w/ regards to Bayonetta 3's voice actors. - pivotman319 (📫) 21:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high IP vandalism surrounding a recent event. Anwegmann (talk) 21:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16 October 2022

Reason: vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:7810:33A5:ABBD:7FC7 (talk) 17:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Elder Scrolls on mobile? Now I've seen it most! El_C 19:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 23:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been semi-protected indefinitely since 11 February 2012, while the only significant history of disruptive editing is one large spree of vandalism that occurred on the same day. Given that the problem only happened on one day ten years ago, I believe the protection is no longer needed. Entranced98 (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Please report back if the problem resumes. — Diannaa (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the AfD for this page was opened there seem to be a bunch of anon users actively disrupting it to add commentary about keeping it. The IPs doing this keep changing, so temporary protection seems more likely to work than blocks of individual users. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 01:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done by ScottishFinnishRadish. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No active vandalism or disruption for years. Last message was posted around the invasion of Ukraine, so it seems okay to remove the protection 71.17.235.137 (talk) 22:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As per Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2016, this is an Arb restriction and should be appealed at WP:AE. Dennis Brown - 22:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unprotect. I would rather have my (barely-used) talkpage unprotected to be hit, for specific reasons. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you request. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Page should be temporarily protected until 25 October, which the final episode of television series The Masked Dancer. Happily888 (talk) 00:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 04:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Kamiya-related vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 02:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mifter. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. —VersaceSpace 🌃 02:30, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Migsmigss (talk) 03:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 04:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-autoconfirmed users vandalizing the page. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 04:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 04:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Don't want anymore socks to show up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and harassment from a proxy hopping IP editor. Sideswipe9th (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not protect. Let's just say I have my reasons for wanting him to spam my talk page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:41, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per user request. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by IP-Editors.
Der HON (talk) 11:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from PikiranHati Tellisavas (talk) 11:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IP-Editors.
Der HON (talk) 11:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:30, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandalism, but a stubborn IP-hopper insisting on bizarre formatting despite failing to get consensus on the talk page. I agree protection is needed. – Uanfala (talk) 09:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent nuisance vandalism over past 24 hours. BilCat (talk) 09:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism, updates without references. Huz98 (talk) 10:31, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:50, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits. Doug Weller talk 11:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Certain IP editors keep changing the article to past tense and adding unsourced closed date despite still operating even after the reported merger with Warner Bros. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 12:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same COI / sock edits restarted 3 days after expiry of 6-month semi-protection. Multiple range-blocks have been tried, (please see User:Arjayay/Italian Telecom) but as it is COI from a telecom company, these have been repeatedly evaded. Arjayay (talk) 12:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The actress is no more, the news broke out today so high level vandalism. Please provide Temperory semi-protection for 10 daysImsaneikigai (talk) 12:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: WP:ACDS Eastern Europe. IanDBeacon (talk) 01:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 11:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range making disruptive edits to Cast section. DonIago (talk) 07:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 11:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Firestar464 (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 11:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of occurrences of Vandalism, politically sensitive topic. DaniaAscii (talk) 08:55, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: DaniaAscii, can you links three of the most recent WP:DIFFs of vandalism? El_C 11:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ignore my Request then, I double checked the history and there doesn't seem to be that many, apologies. DaniaAscii (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Copy that. Withdrawn by requestor El_C 11:51, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from unregistered IP users and newly created users. It has been continued for months, which involves replacing the name or codename with words or phrases. OThreeSys (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OThreeSys, recent disruptive edits on that page are too sparse to merit WP:SEMI right now. And since there isn't much of a delay in reverting these, there's not really a point in applying WP:PC at this time, either. El_C 13:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Andrew Henderson (talk) 13:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism - Eastwood Park and strabane (talk) 15:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism - Eastwood Park and strabane (talk) 15:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Activists representing this group were recently the subject of a controversial popular tweet in which they threw soup on a Van Gogh painting. The article has seen a fair bit of IP vandalism as a result. Requesting temporary semi protection until the moment passes. [52] [53] [54] WPscatter t/c 16:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism w/ threats (see revdels), block evading. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 16:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this article also is WP:PROD, so maybe protection is inappropriate since it'd eliminate the ability of unconfirmed users to contest deletion. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 16:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the PROD, going with a short approach until the threats subside, an anon/new editor can place an edit request if needed for the period of protection to remove the PROD tag. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 16:22, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:3805:646A:7997:B366 (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – examples: Special:Diff/1116388918, Special:Diff/1115970319, Special:Diff/1115115957/1115485427. Kleinpecan (talk) 16:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 16:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Socks keep coming to this talk page making spurious responses to unblock requests. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 16:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17 October 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I know one can't protect pages in advance, but I just edited it, so I'm almost 100% sure that one vandal with go and vandalize it. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 05:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of one's own userspace is actually something there's a bit of leeway on, and given what's been going on tonight I don't think anyone's going to view it as premature. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:55, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your user page is already protected by an edit filter to the equivalent of semi-protection. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. For the bot. MelanieN (talk) 18:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated hoax edits and block evasion from IP6 editors. MrOllie (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 16:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting protection. The page is currently attack by vandals and disruptive editors. I expect more to come and continue their unconstructive behavior. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Since this season is among the most viewed season, high level vandalism take place. Sockpuppetry of editing runner-up to winner takes place often. Please provide temperory semi-protection.Imsaneikigai (talk) 19:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits from IPs. ScienceFlyer (talk) 22:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and repeated attempts at doxxing Volunteer Marek 17:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps ECP under Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War could work here. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 19:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Already protected by @Mifter:, both Semi and PC. --IanDBeacon (talk) 22:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:41, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Resumption of deleting cited information from the Indian Army, following the expiry of the last semi-protection on 13 October - Arjayay (talk) 18:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Excessive IP vandalism by unregistered users, claiming he is immortal and replacing content with insults. Hajimesuku (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The user who previously edited was engaged in edit war. Request for admin only protection Joytotherainbow (talk) 18:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • User(s) blocked. I've partial-blocked two edit-warring IPs, and given you a warning for removing well-sourced material without an adequate explanation. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    sorry about removing the info without the explanation, I removed the info now with the explanation. Which was equibase, cited on page has record of a minor fall but shows he was fine. Joytotherainbow (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I need a 3rd opinion to prevent an edit war, bloodhorse says it was 597, wins equibase doesn’t update late disqualification after final results recorded but equibase says that Kent raced same day of when he was in hospital
    nearly dying, after the claimed fall. I believe it was false the fall cause equibase having record of him actually riding day after fall. So I need a 3rd opinion Joytotherainbow (talk) 22:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As an FA is it likely to be subject to auto-confirmed disruption. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Magnatyrannus, the article is semi-protected for 2 days. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 00:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's more auto-confirmed socks on the loose. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected. Protection upgraded. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. since the film releases this weekend, High level of IP vandalism take place. Huz98 (talk) 00:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Individual is currently experiencing a high number of negative troll edits due to recent criticism they've received on social media and in the news. 2603:6081:4600:593C:13:F2D7:DCAD:C12F (talk) 18:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Across multiple IPs. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:27, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Severe edit war over the legitimacy of a particular poll, back and forth insertions and removals. Talk page discussion was ineffective in curbing the dispute. Apologies for the inconvenience. 91.127.69.193 (talk) 02:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive and suboptimal edits by IP and newly registered users. KyleJoantalk 18:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Long-term disruption from various confused new users. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre🚐 02:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also blocked 219.78.77.203 for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by IP-hopping user refusing to WP:LISTEN. First request, so lemme know if it's premature! Looking for just temporary protection. Generously (talk) 16:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If they continue to revert war then protection may become necessary (and please feel free to re-report). Thanks, Mifter (talk) 21:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, thanks! Generously (talk) 01:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR, given slow history of vandalism. Please also invoke WP:BRD or WP:CRP as authorized under WP:ARBEE. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article is only a month old and I do not see any evidence of vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: will request again if vandalism picks up.  Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 04:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 03:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LilianaUwU, is it normal to ECO a user talk page indefinitely? From what I've seen, they're usually protected for only a few days, though this case might be different. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 03:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:Nythar, this case is different. User:LilianaUwU, I've already dropped protection for three months--perhaps that user will have grown up by then. Drmies (talk) 03:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Drmies, for peace of mind, I think we can keep it without a clock. Revisit in 3 months or 6 months, whenever. El_C 04:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 03:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry by BScharbach2 ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 05:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Mifter (talk) 06:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As soon as the previous protection was removed, anonymous IP started started changing the subjects name as before (Olivia Kate Cooke -> Olivia Catherine Cooke Wilde) with no new source. Sciencefish (talk) 10:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

change the number from 98 to 99 2603:8000:A401:30DC:71CB:A721:8638:2BE0 (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Request not specific enough. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Almost every edit since protection expired has been "fixing" what isn't broken (like file names) or unsourced page moves, or reversion of such. Sumanuil. 06:33, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Move protected indefinitely. El_C 13:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated messing up of sentences, addition of poorly sourced info, etc, by various IPs. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Add defamation content depending on unreliable sources. Kcx36 (talk) 07:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP users due to an incident at yesterday's race. Areaseven (talk) 10:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Needs semiprotection for 24 hours. The new PM takes over tomorrow, but lots of editors don't understand the process. Sjö (talk) 11:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – example: Special:Diff/1116602736. Kleinpecan (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Previously protected due to IP vandalism. Since protection has lapsed, vandalism has repeatedly reoccurred. Felixsv7 (talk) 09:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant changes to content without adding a new source to back up changes. Maurice Oly (talk) 12:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Maurice Oly, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page, if the warning to that autoconfirmed user fails to work. El_C 13:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. mediafanatic17 talk 13:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For Unconstructive Edits editing by random users and they also deleting references which provided by previous editors. Prathmesh Bhale (talk) 08:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Prathmesh Bhale, random? This page is open to editing by all at this time. But as mentioned, you can't just offload an unformatted list of references to the bottom of the page and call it a day. As also mentioned, use the article talk page (here) to seek guidance on how to add that list correctly, and perhaps also on whether other editors even think it'd be worthwhile to do so in the first place. Thanks. El_C 13:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase protection duration to ~6 months to demotivate a very persistent LTA. Believe me when I say 6 months - the last protection from July to October did nothing to stop the LTA. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 13:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: CactiStaccingCrane, can you link to a few diffs that show how the last protection from July to October did nothing to stop the LTA? Thanks. El_C 14:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Awolf58 and the sock's latest edit: [55] (context: [56]). CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CactiStaccingCrane, wow, they were able to get the user name NeutraI? That's kind of impressive. Or at least that's what EI_C would say. ;)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page under attack by IP editor(s). Again.   Aloha27  talk  15:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism happening right now Linneass (talk) 17:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Possible if not a high degree of vandalism akin to the Trumpism article! 2601:183:4A80:E570:8485:1962:9F37:ACBB (talk) 16:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please don't post to this board unless your familiar with our protection policy. 17:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 16:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 42.105.196.223 Frryan404 (talk) 16:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs and SPA accounts. Beccaynr (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ponyo. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I want to nominate this redirect for deletion as there is virtually no information on the person on the TV show page making the redirect useless, but I cannot nominate it if the page is fully protected. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 08:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already unprotected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 21:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism over past few months NiceWikiEditor5 (talk) 18:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of childish vandalism from IPs NiceWikiEditor5 (talk) 18:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Persistent socking too. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent uptick in vandalism from various IPs, possibly COI interference. Dl2000 (talk) 20:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1, not just from the same user previously but now it is. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can it now be ECP'ed? Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Can I get it ECP? Somehow ACP is not working with these new accounts. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18 October 2022

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Isabelle Belato, wish to protect it? Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will extend if needed. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Isabelle Belato, but this is my userpage, and no one other than me should be editing it, so it must be indefinite. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are some few cases where other users might need to edit your user page, see also WP:UOWN. If disruption persists, I will escalate protection time. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, I really don't see any situation where a non-ec user would have the need to edit any userpage. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Because some of the informations are wrong in the page Vaadhoohattu (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism, seemingly from one particular user posting from several different IP's Saget53 (talk) 14:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Socking by various IPs of the "YT tuzz" vandal ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For now yes. But they will return on a different IP and continue the same vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Blaze Wolf: It seems to be a recent and sporadic set of vandalism. If they do return, I'll reconsider protecting the talk page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:10, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous disruptive editing Dennis Dartman (talk) 21:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Crossroads -talk- 23:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see it was protected before, but it took a while for disruption to start again after it expired. If it starts up after this expires something longer term is in the cards. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

kjoe 12.0.168.226 (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Meaningless request. Favonian (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is an Ip who, for quite some time now, has kept on deliberately adding false, made up nonsense, and I am really fed up with it. Please can someone increase the protection level, thanks!. Blanchey (talk) 11:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The PC protection will persist after the semi-protection expires. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Been subject to misinfo edits from IPs for the last few days, including potentially fake credits being added to cast. Recently released series, so I figure that will die down with a short period of protection. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 22:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The edit warring is being done by just one person, while many people revert them. I have given that person a final warning on their talk page. MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – People keep coming in and changing concert attendance to wrong numbers. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 22:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following 4th paragraph incorrectly blends fascism and nazism. "Fascism rejects assertions that violence is inherently bad and views imperialism, political violence and war as means to national rejuvenation.[11] Fascists often advocate for the establishment of a totalitarian one-party state,[12][13] and for a dirigiste[14][15] economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky (national economic self-sufficiency) through protectionist and economic interventionist policies.[16] Fascism's extreme authoritarianism and nationalism often manifests as belief in racial purity or a master race, usually blended with some variant of racism or bigotry against a demonized "Other", such as Jews. These ideas have motivated fascist regimes to commit genocides, massacres, forced sterilizations, mass killings, and forced deportations.[17]

The fascist doctrine conceived in Italy did not advocate war or racial inferiority or superiority but a system of government based on socialism and marxism followed by a forceful policy of implimentation. All people regardless of race were part of the fascist revolution provided they were loyal to the state. The use of the term fascism as a motivation to the ills mentioned above is illogical, for example Genocide practiced on the Philippine people during the spanish american war (1.4 million as young as 10 years of age) massacres based on race (KKK) and american indians, forced sterilizations (60,000 americans, based on state laws and upheld by supreme court justice O.W. Holmes), ethnic concentration camps (japanese americans over 100,000) forced deportations or barring jewish refugees entry, were never instituted or practiced in Italy on Italian soil or colonial territory under fascism and Mussolini. To imply these actions practiced by the United States, Turkey and Nazi Germany as "fascism" would redefine Mussolini's government as non-fascist. Historical documentation and recent book authors confirming this fact would include Emmanuelle Sica, Nicholas Farrell, L. T. Samells, Orwell, Zeev Sternhell, Clara Zetkin, and many others. Bgg6006 (talk) 14:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to want to be more specific as to what sources you intend to cite, providing the necessary bibliography if it's a nonfiction book source (title, author, publisher, year of publication, pages cited, ISBN/OCLC#) or a research whitepaper (title, authors, journal, year of publication). As it sits the lack of hard sources provided makes this request an easy candidate for a decline, especially given the history of objectors to this article's content. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined If you have suggestions for improving the article please start a discussion on the article talk page and obtain consensus for the changes you propose. Keep it short, be specific and cite high quality sources. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They can't do that, Malcolmxl5 - they're not yet autoconfirmed. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 23:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I didn't realise the talk page was protected too. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgg6006. Be specific about the change you want to make. What text do you want to replace, what text you want to replace it with, what specific high quality sources you will cite. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For whatever reason, there is a dynamic IP repeatedly changing the subject's sourced age at death to a vague age range. They are over WP:3RR by now: [57] [58] [59] [60]

While I figure this IP is probably acting in good faith, it's not clear from these summaries what they're trying to do, and I'm not sure how to contact them because they have at least three addresses at this point. Could this page be semi-locked, please (and their latest edit reverted)? Maybe they can explain themselves on the talk page if so. Nohomersryan (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 03:46, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because the United Nations considers 'Taiwan' as a province of China with no separate status, and the '"authorities' in 'Taipei' are not considered to enjoy any form of government status. So I think in the sentence "Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC) is a country in East Asia" is wrong , it should be changed to be a disputed province of China in East Asia. Ellazyx123 (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Muboshgu (talk) 04:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive IP editing on BLP of candidate for election. Recommend this be semi-protected through November election. Neutralitytalk 02:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Brojam (talk) 04:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: repeated (recent) cases of vandalism by IP accounts DJ (talk) 07:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep changing the tournament dates without any source. Nehme1499 08:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 08:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs once again changing "Her" to "His" without any sources citing the change has officially happened yet. Steel1943 (talk) 23:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 2 edits in the 3 weeks since protection expired is a little light to be moving it straight back in. Kosack (talk) 08:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's about the Russo-Ukrainian War, which is normally extended protected. RowanJ LP2 (talk) 01:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Kosack (talk) 08:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly removing the word "Chinese" from the description of Haier, with no rationale. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:46, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 12:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Talk page appears to have no consensus for inclusion of race yet some insist on including it anyway. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please also invoke WP:ACDS for Gun Control. IanDBeacon (talk) 12:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IanDBeacon, how is this a gun control matter? El_C 15:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting an increase (or change) in page protection settings to permanently lock out anonymous users. From a reader's standpoint the pending changes have been beneficial because they are not immediately redirected to F1 Circus as a joke. From an editor's standpoint, nothing has changed; the same vandal hops across different IPs and we cannot range block because that is too broad of a range, and the article is restored and reviewed over and over every day. I know someone else might point out that permanently disabling editing privileges for an article for anonymous users needs very strong justification, and I think this constant vandalism is it. I think the benefit (not having the article wiped once or twice a day by one committed vandal) far outweighs the consequence I just mentioned. If anyone would like to make a constructive edit but does not have an account, they can request it on the talk page. Yue🌙 06:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, plus this is probably covered by multiple arbitrary enforcements such as the American politics one, etc. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 07:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 16:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 11:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bot check! Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A high percentage of edits to the page are IP vandalism, for several years now; revision history is cluttered as a result, which makes peer-reviewing proper edits more difficult. DFlhb (talk) 12:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 12:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent removal of sourced genres by anonymous users. Bowling is life (talk) 13:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – This page is seeing constant vandalism and BLP violations from IPs and registered users. Jtrrs0 (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Temporary Protection For 2 Months Only. Adnan (talk) 14:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 16:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 15:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Btspurplegalaxy Fyi, requested above. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate request. Already Done. El_C 16:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A variety of new accounts keep adding "(greeting) (name)" to the article. Has gone on for about 2-3 weeks. Blue Edits (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism Huz98 (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 16:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been quite a high volume of vandalism since protection to this page expired. Would recommend "indefinite" protection. Altair110 17:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Seeing as the previous 4-year protection that expired in Sept wasn't enough, might as well. El_C 18:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism due to current public dislike. Had to go back over five hours to find a "clean" version to revert it to. AnselaJonla (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now. Let's see if EdJohnston's WP:SEMI works before going a level up. El_C 16:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. I was initially going to request semi but wasn't sure if it would be appropriate considering an ec user was involved in the edit war. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism by Seraphimblade and others CanadianPolitics2022 (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This has been salted for 7 years. We have a french page for this band, but it's a borderline WP:NBAND. Regardless, it has potential and we shouldn't be restricting it. - Floydian τ ¢ 12:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Considering the borderline notability, we should wait for a draft to be created and approved at AfC. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19 October 2022

Reason: Intentional interference by an editor who has opening voiced disdain for paid editors and is now deleting valid contributions despite disclosures that all paid contributions have ended. Contributions have been discussed and demonstrated valid by numerous Wikipedia precedents for similar pages. This is clearly a personal vendetta by the editor, who is determined to delete relevant and important information to an important article. Danceswithedits (talk) 17:46, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

article name is actually United States Civil Rights Trail. Theroadislong (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User Talk Of Blocked User. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Favonian (talk) 19:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Wasn't exactly sure where to ask since I don't want to keep bothering the same few admins to revoke TPA. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 23:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by Isabelle Belato. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs constantly adding their short story segments into this article. Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A viral tumblr post comparing the page title to an erotica genre has popped up, high levels of vandalism expected Synapticrelay (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Also requesting ECP here. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You meant the article, not the talk page, it's been locked by ScottishFinnishRadish. 

For the bot,

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:13, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, it must be ECP'd, no one wants any auto-confirmed socks. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I see it now, thanks for the vigilance. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism BattleshipMan (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to protect this article because it is being a subject to vandalism and digital reputation damage. Please protect or lock it to preserve the encyclopedia. Theseankyle (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Theseankyle: You might want to raise any pertinent issues at the article's talk page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is being targeted by various IPs, who are changing the URL for the Cuevana website. BlueNoise (talk) 03:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Dispute over naming format. 3 moves in last few days. A weeks move protection requested in order to discuss. Nthep (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 06:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 06:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various ip addresses have been disruptive editing by adding unsourced content and ignoring WP:NOTCRYSTAL non-stop. — YoungForever(talk) 21:46, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 06:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. persistient vandalism from autoconfirmed socks. Wesoree (Talk) 23:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Kosack (talk) 06:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Constant nationality dispute/warring by newbies and IP. This has been an ongoing problem. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 18:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Kosack (talk) 06:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Kosack (talk) 06:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please make it ECP ASAP. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish, please, ASAP. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:06, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Kosack (talk) 06:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 00:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 06:38, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Potential violations of BLP policy. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 02:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:813:47B8:7793:A7DE (talk) 12:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Size: There is an inconsistency between the text and the illustration in this section of the article, though both cite the same reference. Could an expert resolve this, please? John M Brear (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@John M Brear. You have linked to the article talk page. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5 Yes, indeed I have.
An edit to the 'Size' section of the Megalograptus page seems to be needed, but I don't know what it should be. Ordinarily I would raise the question on the talk page - but that too is protected.
So how/where should I progress this?
Could someone who can edit the article talk page raise the question on my behalf?
Thanks. John M Brear (talk) 21:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Malcolmxl5 Thamks! Talk page now accessible and I've raised my question John M Brear (talk) 09:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Brand new account vandalism. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 06:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive vandalism by IP-Editors.
Der HON (talk) 10:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by IP Editors since the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine war. Investigation about it is running. Requesting page protection for a longer period of time so that I don't need to check the page on a daily basis wether there has been vandalism again or not. Thanks
Der HON (talk) 10:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I have to disagree.
There is an investigation about it running:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#46.17x_airport_article_disruption
Which clearly states the problem there is with greek IP editors violating the guidelines in regard of air services from and to Russia.
Der HON (talk) 11:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Last disruption was 2 days ago; @Der HON: if you haven't done so already be so kind and read our protection policy. Lectonar (talk) 11:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unexplained / poorly explained content removal by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, for now. Disruption is coming from two IPs and appear to have stopped for the last eight hours or so. Given that it is coming from two IPs, it'd probably better to opt for blocks instead of protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition and several subsequent reversions of the removal of the same spamlink. —twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 11:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 111.88.32.0/20 (talk · contribs). Partially, from said article, for a month. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and sock puppetry/IP hopping, single purpose IP accounts keep coming to this and other pages to re add Cyber Anakin content, most of them are blocked now for being proxies. Softlemonades (talk) 14:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lolkikmoddi-h3t3 :D (talk) 14:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and sock puppetry/IP hopping, single purpose IP accounts keep coming to this and other pages to re add Cyber Anakin content. Softlemonades (talk) 14:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit-warring involving many ips since early this month, in a BLP involving American Politics and the Russia-Ukraine War. - Hipal (talk) 16:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The protection was added due to an LTA or something persistently vandalizing my talk page (and coming back with socks). It appears that disruption was brief and I no longer see a need for my talk page to be protected. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of IP Vandalism Realtent (talk) 19:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. None of the recent non-autoconifrmed edits to this page have been constructive ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because nobody do wrong edits . Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 16:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – The absence of "wrong edits" probably has to do with the article being protected. It's curious that you argued vociferously for protection yesterday. Favonian (talk) 16:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The protection was put in place just a few hours ago. And it's only semi-protection. Anonymous IP addresses and unconfirmed accounts can always propose changes on the talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Wikipedia users can edit stuff now JoshuaArcilla7816 (talk) 16:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Considering your recent activities on the talk page, we won't let you anywhere near the article. Favonian (talk) 16:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IP hopper. Loafiewa (talk) 00:38, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:38, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 19:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20 October 2022

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consent addition of unsourced information about him being the new home secretary. Maurice Oly (talk) 16:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my request as a reliable source has been found. (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor. Favonian (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by persistent IP sock in range 2607:fea8:7a0:1c4:, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Filmfanatic03/Archive. Storchy (talk) 19:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. IP will return to continue vandalizing this page ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Bgsu98 (talk) 02:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent target of IP vandalism. Requesting semi-protection. oknazevad (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Long term, due to frequent long term protection in the past. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP (possible sock puppet) keeps restoring unsourced material. Armegon (talk) 23:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One IP editor frequently reverts edits, adding unreliable sources to the article and removing parts from the "controversies" section even if they've been properly cited. I suspect it's the same person who has been doing it in the past, see my previous request for page protection here. IP's: 1 2 3 ReneeWrites (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New IP ReneeWrites (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JayJayWhat did I do? 19:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Likely subject to disruption as well. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and other disruption. This would be the fourth protection. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 05:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Edit warring/Content Dispute. Quotennial (talk) 14:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Likely to high degree of vandalism. (Someone with an 2600 IP address already tried to do that.) 2601:183:4A80:E570:E545:8DC0:8E36:7689 (talk) 18:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war going on over the number of casualties in this conflict. Half that is coming from a bunch of different anonymous IPs who are likely a single person (see similar language preemptively put on talk pages at User_talk:158.181.230.137 and User_talk:193.106.51.54, for instance). Requesting page protection there, see also AN3 report filed on a user account participating. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 14:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blockedMelanieN (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Due to bad edits, I am requesting you to add PP. Trinity112233 00:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Bad edits. Trinity112233 00:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Due to persistent issues and likely to a lot of vandalism! 2601:183:4A80:E570:437:CCD:7A18:550D (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2601:183:4A80:E570:437:CCD:7A18:550D, no one has edited that article in nearly three weeks. — Nythar (💬-🎃) 02:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Italian LTA target. --Mtarch11 (talk) 04:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is continuously created without sources. ––FormalDude (talk) 08:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Surge in pointless talk comments and violations of WP:NOTAFORUMBlaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Meh...one disruptive edit or two every other day isn't a surge in my book. If someone else wants to protect, go right ahead. Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and false information. 23.93.182.149 (talk) 07:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add image DC01208 (talk) 19:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request at Talk:Maize to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Remember to specify which image you want added. Favonian (talk) 09:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 67.186.70.187 (talk) 12:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: An IP user at the talk page wants to try unprotecting this article, which has been semi'd since 2010 and (according to the IP, and my own judgment based on watchlist activity) is unlikely to receive more vandalism than other chemical element pages. I didn't need to contact the protecting admin, since he is deceased. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 14:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected 12 years of protection is long enough to give unprotection a try. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection should be lowered to semiprotection because there haven't been any disruptive edits for over 12 hrs. Coolman2917 (talk) 15:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Wikipedia has an infestation problem. Some low-grade troll spends their pointless existence vandalizing TFAs using auto-confirmed throw-away accounts. Favonian (talk) 16:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ok. Didn't know people stored up autoconfirmed accounts... that's just cruel. Coolman2917 (talk) 17:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly-used redirect that is a frequent target for vandalism. There is also no reason for any editors other than administrators to be able to edit this redirect. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 05:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not sure 2 vandalism edits in the last 12 months, and less than 50 edits total since 2008 qualifies as "Persistent vandalism". ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 16:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Eejit43 (talk) 16:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Eejit43 (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – persistent addition of unsourced programme listings from IPs in the UK.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator ONUnicorn. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 00:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They're still continue with the vandalism, justifying themself with a source not inherent in the rules of wiki projects  – Vandalism. --- « Ðømīnīk Cåpuån » 18:21, 20 October 2022 (CET)

Already done by administrator Ad Orientem. --- « Ðømīnīk Cåpuån » 19:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute, discussion is occurring on talk page. CMD (talk) 05:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Ymblanter. --- « Ðømīnīk Cåpuån » 19:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Dynamic IP adress edit warring without discussion at talk page. Ecrusized (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 67.186.70.187 (talk) 12:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 67.186.70.187 (talk) 12:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: User is deceased. See de:Benutzer:Mehlauge/Kondolenzliste. Eyesnore 19:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the heads up and my condolences. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – DE and harass. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 09:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Adding user attributed sources on a BLP. – Meena15:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued insertion of promotional and uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 17:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalistm. Jacona (talk) 17:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pattern of BLP violation edits starting 19 October. Geoff | Who, me? 20:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 20:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User Talk Of Blocked User. Not using their talk page for anything constructive ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Favonian (talk) 17:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User LeaveMeB, who's now permanently blocked, persists with their disruptive edits anonymously. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 18:06, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User LeaveMeB, who's now permanently blocked, persists with their disruptive edits anonymously. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 18:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User LeaveMeB, who's now permanently blocked, persists with their disruptive edits anonymously. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 18:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21 October 2022

Reason: Edit-warring by dynamic ip to include poor and unreliable sources into a BLP. - Hipal (talk) 23:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:8001:2F00:600:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case., as well as 2603:8001:2E07:2D00:0:0:0:0/64, both for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frenzie23 (talk) 09:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with Template:Cite CIA World Factbook. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism even under current protection levels. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Cordyceps-Zombie (talk · contribs) blocked by RickinBaltimore. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I still believe that this page, as well as others relating to British politics, need to be more fully protected given recent events. But thanks to RickinBaltimore for taking action here! QueenofBithynia (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism as predicted on the talkpage, possibly by IP sockuppet due to similar editing nature. Ckfasdf (talk) 20:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Better ECP this - wouldn't want auto-confirmed socks showing up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Better ECP this as well, - wouldn't want auto-confirmed socks to show up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish Yes, ECP it please, before an auto-confirmed sock shows up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:53, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More WP:RD2 crap from IP. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 18:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd wait a little longer. If it continues then yes. But this was brief disruption. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. A person in Georgia (talk) 21:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - I don't see the vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:36, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre🚐 01:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Related to CWC, don't think the IP vandalism is going to go away in the short term. Cannolis (talk) 01:28, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 60 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I know the ip vandalism has been going on for some time, but let's give it a few weeks and see where we are. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:19, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre🚐 01:40, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continual removal of sourced content by IP editor even after a protection period. HarrySONofBARRY (talk) 02:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent addition of unsourced info ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:40, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of disruption by the IP range Special:Contributions/2600:1702:3200:D3B0:0:0:0:0/64 which was blocked twice. Binksternet (talk) 21:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandals incessantly adding links that spread virus despite reverts. ℛonherry 01:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:28, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism/disruptive editing. This is a political party page that was involved in an election within recent days. Requesting semi-protection for a week for first application of protection. Cable10291 (talk) 09:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – "Roland Oklahoma" is also suspected sockpuppet. — Tulsi 24x7 09:53, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Goodvibes500 (talkcontribs) 10:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Moxy- 10:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 67.186.70.187 (talk) 12:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 67.186.70.187 (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Czello 13:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 05:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been the target of vandalism going back as far as spring of this year. BlueNoise (Désorienté? It's just purple) 04:53, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP user(s). Hey man im josh (talk) 14:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and also sockpuppetry by IPs and socks of User:Eswaran Naveen for cast tampering. Likely to increase with the film releasing tomorrow. 2409:4073:4D8E:6605:D0F2:4F98:89A3:F7C8 (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Some recent BLP violations and disruptive editing. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 06:05, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 06:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: New users constantly warring that a clone of a main character with 2 major roles, 2 cameos, and 2 absences in a 6 episode season is somehow a main character herself. Unnamed anon (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do not know if she is a clone yet. If she is not, then she was a main character in the previous seasons already. If she is, she is a new character. Coimenda (talk) 16:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Unnamed anon and Coimenda, the two of you need to stop reverting each other or putting in your own version. The way to work this issue out is to discuss it on the article talk page, explain your position and your evidence, and try to reach consensus. MelanieN (talk) 04:49, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: New users constantly warring that a clone of a main character with 2 major roles, 2 cameos, and 2 absences in a 6 episode season is somehow a main character herself. Unnamed anon (talk) 09:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do not know if she is a clone yet. If she is not, then she was a main character in the previous seasons already. If she is, she is a new character. Coimenda (talk) 16:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolutionMelanieN (talk) 04:51, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs, now with a second range (I suspect) due to thr samr modus operandi: Removes links to other Greek airports even when referenced. Removes maintenance templates (source requests) from Thessaloniki Airport and from links to this airport. Also removes random links from other Greek airports. Has the opinion that suspended routes to Russian airports are cut.. The Banner talk 09:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 09:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 04:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being vandalized by multiple usernames. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:52, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP addresses keep making the same unhelpful changes to the lead without seeking consensus or engaging other editors, causing multiple editors to revert back to previous versions several times. Cerebral726 (talk) 12:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 05:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Now that the article itself has recently been protected (for a whole year!) due to the disruptive edits over the past months, now that same disruptiveness has spilled over to the talk page, where what appears to be the same disruptive person continuously making edit requests for their same disruptive edit to be put back in (see recent history from this past month), despite already being told no (Talk:Blue's Clues & You!#Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2022). Magitroopa (talk) 12:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably also be noted that one of the IP ranges was recently blocked from editing the article itself for 3 years. Magitroopa (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We are hesitant to protect talk pages (because they are the only place for possible input when the article itself is protected) unless the disruptive editing is very frequent.  MelanieN (talk) 05:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Getting a lot of vandalism edits from IP editors. – numbermaniac 15:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Khronicle I (talk) 15:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 05:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism. Bbraxtonlee (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. MelanieN (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increased amount of vandalism to page prior to election. Political opponents making increased edits to the page. Request for 24 hour protection of the page due to vandalism. Kendingro (talk) 15:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially IP 216.xxx. Lectonar (talk) 07:27, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The IP apparently decided they owned the article. They have previously been blocked for edit warring, but since they IP hop every time protection seems to be the only reasonable option, and would leave a chance for other users to restructure the article. Note that the topic area is under discretionary sanctions. Ymblanter (talk) 05:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued edits from IPs changing 'Taiwan' to 'Taiwan Province, China', which is not consistent nor correct. Compusolus (talk) 08:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Newly created accounts adding Ukrainian regions to Russian territory lists and altering maps with no supporting sources. Following the consensus agreed here about Russia-Ukraine conflict can ECP be placed on this article. I'm filing a similar request at Commons Protection. Cambial foliar❧ 19:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitelyMelanieN (talk) 16:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – NBA referee (no article) with the same name and similar age just died. Qzd (talk) 04:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resurgence with current controversy and resignation. Suggest longer term protection, as it's likely to continue. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:26, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent attempt to create autobiography. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:56, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Move protection requested - Page has been moved 12 times in the past 24 hours.  — Amakuru (talk) 14:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Whac-A-Mole: Multiple IPs continuing edit wars for 3+ months to add unsourced claims and malformed edits to a BLP. – Archer1234 (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsupported promotional editing. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 16:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of poorly sourced material to BLP. Squeakachu (talk) 16:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Curbon7 (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive IP vandalism 45BearsFan (talk) 17:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many IPs keeps making disruptive edits and unnecessarily stretch the page's length. Ok123l (talk) 07:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Most of the editing by IPs that I see appears to be constructive. MelanieN (talk) 16:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Various IP editors have been, trying to change the definition of the status of the subject. The subject is a publicist and media personality. That was decided by a group of five editors. There is no evidence for him being a historian, which makes this a fail on WP:NPOV. scope_creepTalk 13:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I don't see any discussion about this on the talk page, which is where this dispute should be resolved.  MelanieN (talk) 16:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editings by new accounts within a short period of time all deleting official sources and government statements recognising a Jewish figure within the Arab World, all the new accounts and an IP are in group seem to be systematically contributing in disruptive editing with far less reliable source than official announcements. Kindly the page needs to get extended-confirmed protection given the troubles and hate conflicts in that region. Fragrant Peony (talk) 14:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 16:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Whac-A-Mole: Multiple IPs continuing edit wars for 2+ months to add unsourced claims (e.g., change of DOB) and malformed edits to a BLP. – Archer1234 (talk) 15:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 16:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion. MrOllie (talk) 18:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Yesterday an anonymous user posted hate speech and a death threat. Bridges2Information (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We very rarely protect talk pages, and this isolated instance is not sufficient reason to do so. Favonian (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion. MrOllie (talk) 18:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Typical IP disruption, not adding references, etc. Nswix (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: After page protection expired recently, there has been constant edit warring on the article. As it is a sensitive subject for many editors, I fear some might not want to get involved. Equine-man (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 09:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 16:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruption continued immediately after the protection expired. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:40, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22 October 2022

Reason: IPs keep making disruptive edits, unnecessarily stretch the page's length. They also have not replied to any of the talk page articles regarding the dispute and keep reverting to their preferred version which goes against WP:CONSENSUS and WP:ONUS. They also want to keep a daily journal of the event on the page which quite clearly breaches WP:SUMMARY. They dodge arguments on the talk page and do not let anyone trim the article. Some examples of their reverts: [61], [62], [63], [64]. If not permanent protection then atleast please temporarily semi-protect the page until a consensus is reached on the talk page. Ok123l (talk) 19:33, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP hoppers aims at a large restructuring of the article, gets reverted but refuses to discuss. The topic area is under discretionary sanctions. Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Most IP edits here are fine, however, some get through that are not appropriate. I think PC is more than enough here. BangJan1999 17:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OhnoitsjamieMelanieN (talk) 02:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: edit warring Frietjes (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Two hours after previous week-long block expired, a sock resumed disruptive edits removing reliably-sourced content. Request longer protection and block of the sock. – Archer1234 (talk) 21:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:31, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chamroshduty. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DrmiesMelanieN (talk) 02:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Better ECP this - wouldn't want socks to show up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but you have seen the previous vandals on the previous FAs. They were autoconfirmed. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wouldn't want socks to show up here as well. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been several anonymous users that have added songs without confirmation by Ubisoft. 104.247.238.154 (talk) 18:16, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirm Protection: The page is given 3 week semi-protection and was also given extended-confirmed protection for 10 days, but still new wikipedia ids have been made and constantly vandalising the article and putting unsourced information. Kindly give extended confirm-protection for atleast 2 weeks. Imsaneikigai (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. MelanieN (talk) 02:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:19, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Temporary Protection For 2 Months Only. Adnan (talk) 01:21, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject of the article was reportedly in a plane that disappeared off coast of Costa Rica. IPs and other new accounts are ham-handedly trying to update the article saying he has died and are doing it incompetently (malformed edits). Could use a week of semi-protection to give time for reliable reports to come out and be reflected in the article by more experienced editors. – Archer1234 (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resuming almost immediately after previous protection expired. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Random IP users changing box office collection without citing a reliable source. Theoder2055 (talk) 14:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1, they add an unsourced budget and change the "box office" field to not match the source provided. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:79AE:567:AFAF:1729 (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Attempts by IPs to remove a low score from the ratings box. —VersaceSpace 🌃 02:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. The album was just released, most of the ip edits are good faith, and many are helpful. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Xymmax: would you please reconsider? Look at the page history: the majority of IP edits are harmful (most removing the above-mentioned low score). Very few would be harmed by an autoconfirmed restriction. No helpful contributors would be affected at all by a pending changes lock. —VersaceSpace 🌃 04:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I still don't think it is to a point that we need to restrict editing on an article that attracts so much interest. However I don't specialize in this area and wouldn't consider it a problem if another admin disagrees. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 11:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Pending changes protection is not working here. Of the past 50 edits:

  • 19 have been unregistered users adding contend that unduly highlights Sanger's racist or eugenicist views
  • 18 have been experience editors reverting such edits
  • 13 have been experienced editors making unrelated improvements

No edits during this period were useful edits by unregistered or non-autoconfirmed users. FYI, the article is covered by abortion-related DS. I encourage a lengthy protection period, as previous semi-protection periods of a few days to a week have resulted in quick resumption of disruptive editing upon expiration. The last such period had disruptive edits beginning the day after semi-protection expired. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 18:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Don't want anymore IPs making PAs. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 18:48, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yeah, it expired. Favonian (talk) 21:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption. Nswix (talk) 19:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23 October 2022

Reason: High level of IP disruption. Novemberjazz 17:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Content has been taken out ΔΙΟΝΥΣΗΣ ΜΑΚΡΥΠΙΔΗΣ (talk) 19:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please contact the Greek Wikipedia administrators instead. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 22:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent issues with new users and IPs adding garbage here. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 10:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The disruptive IP was range blocked yesterday, the same edits (which includes inserting a personal opinion into the article) were continued by a non-extended-confirmed account. The topic area is under discretionary sanctions. Ymblanter (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism recently. -- Cosmic (talk) 19:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:19, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 01:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:09, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption, block evasion by Detroit-based IPs. Blocked as Special:Contributions/73.18.231.246, Special:Contributions/108.72.93.169, and the range Special:Contributions/2600:1702:3200:D3B0:0:0:0:0/64. The current disruption comes from the range Special:Contributions/2601:408:C500:0:0:0:0:0/40. Binksternet (talk) 02:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 02:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Several vandal targets

Plus maybe some more.

Reason: These pages have been vandalised recently by a few users and all could be protected per WP:ARBEE. So, with that being said, on a case-by-case basis either extended-confirmed-protection or semi-protection on all or some of the articles. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 06:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thiscouldbeauser: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User(s) blocked: HeLlOwOrLdYoUaReDeAdNoW (talk · contribs) blocked by Kinu. Beyond the aforementioned user's vandalism, the frequency of disruption is way too low for semi-protection, let alone extended-confirmed – Warsaw was three days ago and before that was only vandalised on 1 October; Yeltsin was 7 October; Lithuania was 17 October; Moldova was three days ago and disruption before that was on 7 October; Estonia was on 6 October. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Occasional ethno-nationalistic disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 18:54, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Twice in two minutes is concerning, yes, but beyond those there doesn't seem to have been anything else since or for a long period before. Please re-request if frequency increases. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various ip addresses have been disruptive editing by adding unsourced content and ignoring WP:NOTCRYSTAL non-stop again. It was just previously semi-protected by admin Kosack which was just expired yesterday. — YoungForever(talk) 19:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 23:11, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BangJan1999: Declined, as it's a single IP. We don't protect pages for single IPs. User(s) blocked: 2601:640:c780:da90::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Stereorock (talk) 17:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional the self-proclaimed owner of WKEY-FM keeps trying to add promotional material about the station in violation of WP:ADVERTISING & WP:NPOV. Stereorock (talk) 17:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined I have warned the user instead, something that hadn't been done since February. Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since Oct. 1, 3 IP4s/2 IP6s have been adding/editing the same unsourced claim. A warning to the most recent IP was ignored when they reinstated the unsourced claim. Archer1234 (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Unsourced edits are not vandalism, Archer1234. A quick online search verifies that claim. Wouldn't it have been better to search for a source? I'm not convinced that the information is sufficiently controversial to qualify for BLP protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sdrqaz, thanks for the response. Definitely not vandalism. That was a mistake on my part in Twinkle in inadvertently picking the wrong menu option when I submitted the request. I just now struck that out above. The IPs are running all over the place making similar updates on multiple BLPs. I was hoping we could slow 'em down a bit at the page/article level instead of playing Whac-a-mole getting them blocked. The idea is to get them to provide the sources themselves instead of relying on other editors to do their work for them. But to answer your question, no, I don't think it would have been better for me to search for a source. But that's just my opinion. People in good faith can disagree with me on that. – Archer1234 (talk) 02:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – In the aftermath of Littlefeather's passing, her siblings have apparently come forward recently with some controversial claims. Pre-emptively requesting a temporary increase in page protection, particular due to some hostile IPs on the talk page who don't want to wait for reliable sourcing. TNstingray (talk) 02:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism by 2 IPs Toomanyyearskodakblack (talk) 03:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see one IP that's clearly been disruptive in the last day or so. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: POV pushing by IP who ignore calls to participate on the talk page Aréat (talk) 09:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most likely an LTA that I know is responsible for this vandalism. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 09:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hut 8.5 09:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most likely an LTA that I know is responsible for this vandalism by adding nonsense at the end of the article. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 09:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hut 8.5 09:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At the head of that Talk page, a Talk section containing the string, "User:Ksherin" has been misplaced, so that a Talk page entry is confounded with Liz's Talk page header. Because editing at that Talk page is restricted to registered users and admins, I cannot call this to her attention, and only ask that you do so via this request tool. Thank you, cheers. 2601:246:C700:2:F9F3:A287:684E:12E (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: This matter is probably best left to the proprietor. The misplaced item popped up in this edit, 5 days ago. Favonian (talk) 10:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done - While Favonian is correct, I feel I know what Liz would want well enough to move it, as she might not see it otherwise. Dennis Brown - 11:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most likely an LTA that I know is responsible for this vandalism, making nonsense edits as usual. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 09:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JBW. Favonian (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the last days the page is targeted by IP range 2601:5CC:8201:F50:8000:0:0:0/66 who keeps putting religious rants. Lone-078 (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism 𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙧-𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙚-𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚(🕷) - (✉) 10:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Venkat TL (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BusterD. Favonian (talk) 10:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Good faith edits is not allowed for your edit. Anti-blocker111 (talk) 12:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C080:38C0:79AE:567:AFAF:1729 (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 09:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The festival has begun today and the page will be receiving high traffic for a week. Protection for a week. Wallflowernepal (talk) 13:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: Persistent unsourced disruptive editing by IP users. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been started by India-based IPs[65] and is expected after the recent T20 World Cup Pakistan vs India match result. Kindly protect it as soon as possible! USaamo (t@lk) 12:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kosack (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs keep writing stuff like this [66] on my talk page. This happened yesterday as well. My request is temporary. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 20:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Article is in early stages of creation and is receiving persistent vandalism. Likely this will continue due to the popularity of Doctor Who XxLuckyCxX (talk) 20:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:41, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

24 October 2022

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism, mostly from IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 19:15, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism, tied to Kiwi Farms harassment due to the site currently being down. If you look at the site itself, you'll see it contains defamatory remarks (and presumably encouragement to place them in pieces about me). The current edits have been oversighted away, but I expect there to be more unless semi-protection is added. Lizthegrey (talk) 21:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent death. Jibran1998 (talk) 23:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:43, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an ongoing edit war between an article by Whoforwho and a redirect by Carlstak and Sirdog. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an edit war related to this article and the redirect above involving Whoforwho and Carlstak. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring by multiple registered users. BilCat (talk) 18:50, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 23:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 23:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from various users; claiming that the series ended this past Friday, despite no official source stating it. BrickMaster02 (talk) 22:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 23:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is continuous unreferenced pov addition by new accounts, with just adding "Jat" to it. I think the page needs protection here. Akalanka820 (talk) 06:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent significant uptick of single-edit accounts inserting ref spam. There doesn't appear to be any classroom assignment focused on the article announced (a possible explanation for the sudden appearance of new accounts focused on one article). Plus the additions have all included links to commercial sites as references. oknazevad (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. محرر البوق (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from several IPs. CodeTalker (talk) 00:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A series of non-constructive IP edits. Protecting the page for a couple of days should hopefully resolve the problem. (The edits all revolve around the announcement of a new head coach, which is expected to happen in the coming days.) Renerpho (talk) 04:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism is ongoing. Please protect the page. Renerpho (talk) 03:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two or so disruptive edits per day are enough disruption to warrant protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Talk pages have a higher threshold but this is pretty persistent. Fish+Karate 11:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 04:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection reason: Persistent disruptive editing, which includes both vandalism and attempts to contact the world's richest dude that include personal information. Likely to continue as long as Musk remains a headline item. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 16:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No such request in last 24 hours on talk page. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:06, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is an edit notice on the talk page and someone has helpfully updated to address this problem. Let's see how that works out. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 02:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced porn actresses by various IPs (probably the same editor). Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jonas kam (talk) 06:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seems to have started because you keep removing content without explaining why. Fish+Karate 09:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 09:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Once in the past week is not persistent. Fish+Karate 09:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 09:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The edit you reverted looks like a good faith edit which just lacks a reference. Not vandalism. Fish+Karate 09:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. I was lucky to revert these. 85.101.222.203 (talk) 01:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one was lucky, so it wasn't reverted. It was very bizarre. 85.101.222.203 (talk) 01:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing with apparent BLP policy violations, but I am not able to view the complete edit history. This article is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Shimoda per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, e.g. the request includes "I have I edited the damaging I claims against me but they just get restored." Beccaynr (talk) 02:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The AfD will run its course, of course. Lectonar (talk) 10:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Rishabisajakepauler, using IPs from Texas. Binksternet (talk) 03:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit by a blocked user, since reverted, does not require semi-protection. Fish+Karate 09:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Xexerss (talk) 08:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't see any vandalism Fish+Karate 09:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fish and karate: The pronunciation of the title was previously discussed on the talk page. Weeks have passed and this user insists that the wrong pronunciation is correct. I have reverted their edits three times and they continue; I don't want to be engaged in an edit warring. Xexerss (talk) 10:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Xexerss: Then don't engage in an edit war. The talk page reads like nobody else agrees with you. Page protection is not a tactic to get things to go your way in a content dispute. Fish+Karate 11:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Currently trending Reddit post may encourage petty vandalism for 48 hours or so: https://www.reddit.com/r/FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR/comments/yc2lzw/fuck_you_england/Justin (koavf)TCM 10:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. There has been one edit, swiftly reverted, at this point. Fish+Karate 11:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change from; (paragraph 4)

Fascism rejects assertions that violence is inherently bad and views imperialism, political violence and war as means to national rejuvenation.[11] Fascists often advocate for the establishment of a totalitarian one-party state,[12][13] and for a dirigiste[14][15] economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky (national economic self-sufficiency) through protectionist and economic interventionist policies.[16] Fascism's extreme authoritarianism and nationalism often manifests as belief in racial purity or a master race, usually blended with some variant of racism or bigotry against a demonized "Other", such as Jews. These ideas have motivated fascist regimes to commit genocides, massacres, forced sterilizations, mass killings, and forced deportations.[17]

To;

Fascism rejects assertions that violence is inherently bad and views imperialism, political violence and war as means to national rejuvenation.[11] Fascists often advocate for the establishment of a totalitarian one-party state,[12][13] and for a dirigiste[14][15] economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky (national economic self-sufficiency) through protectionist and economic interventionist policies.[16] Nazism's extreme authoritarianism and nationalism often manifests as belief in racial purity or a master race, usually blended with some variant of racism or bigotry against a demonized "Other", such as Jews. These Nazi ideologies (Mein Kampf) have motivated Nazi type regimes to commit genocides, massacres, forced sterilizations, mass killings, and forced deportations.[17]

Add to end of 4th paragraph;

(Although Italy and Germany were dictatorial alliances, and the word fascism has now become synonymous with evil, interestingly fascist doctrine conceived in Italy did not include racial inferiority or superiority but loyalty to the State by all, and Mussolini did not allow for - or practice the establishment of concentration camps for ethnic groups, genocide, or forced sterilization as exhibited in Germany, Russia and the United States [regarding Japanese Americans, American Indians, African Americans, and in the Philippines of 1.4 million during the Spanish American War]. In respect to forced deportations, the Italian Fascist government and military prevented the incarceration of the Jewish community by the Vichy government under Nazi orders in Italian occupied France and allowed for the entry into their zone of other French Jews saving over 40,000 people from deportation to German concentration camps. A larger number is estimated in the other Italian held regions of Croatia, Greece, and Tunisia. [Sources include "Mussolini a new life" by Nicholos Farrell, and Mussolini's Army in the French Riviera, by Emanule Sica, to include their documented sources] Bgg6006 (talk) 12:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - You didn't post on the article's talk page, which is required before posting here. Dennis Brown - 11:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dennis, as previously noted, the talk page is semi-protected. I've disabled your declination to prevent the bot from archiving this. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I copied the above text to the article talk page so that editors there can discuss it. I would recommend that Bgg6006 find a few other edits to make, so in a few days, they can join in without having to have their comments relayed. Dennis Brown - 16:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Channeled to the right page. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Band members section of infobox is regularly vandalised TechnicalNewt (talk) 11:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Thommy (talk) 11:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, may be more likely in the long term with incoming Prime Minister role XxLuckyCxX (talk) 13:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Fences and windows. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... duplicate request. El_C 15:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi Protection Reason: Consistent vandalism including changing of names eg. replacing Boris Johnson with Theresa May changing number of endorsements to 0 Encyloedit (talk) 14:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by autoconfirmed users. Jibran1998 (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Jibran1998 and Joseph2302: how is WP:SEMI not working? It was just imposed minutes ago. El_C 15:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh nm, the latest was a move protection. Checking to see if protection is necessary. El_C 15:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for now. El_C 15:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for now. El_C 15:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated redirect overwriting with copyvios by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Chlod (say hi!) 05:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first picture lists objects in "counter-clockwise" direction, not the state "clockwise' direction. 75.63.120.203 (talk) 13:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Disregard my last request. The caption on the main page is correct. The caption when clicking on the photo is just reversed but makes no mention to clockwise vs. counter-clockwise. 75.63.120.203 (talk) 13:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by requestor – Favonian (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: I have requested this once before, (check October 22 2022 archives) the IP doing the edit warring got rangeblocked but they are reverting it back from another IP even when 3 editors in talk page agreed with content which was reverted by them. Many other IPs have also started to make unconstructive edits: [67], [68], [69]. Please semiprotect the page, almost all of the IPs doing edits are doing unconstructive edits. They want to keep a daily journal of the event on the page, which is 6 months long, violating WP:CONSENSUS, WP:ONUS and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Ok123l (talk) 05:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Reverted again, @Ohnoitsjamie or any other mod, please semi-protect the page. Ok123l (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also think this page needs to be semi-protected. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism with removing reliably sourced content, repopulating refs with already used links, and disruptive editing persistent since it was last protected. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given all the previous protections, it's time to just protect it through the release date and then some. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Better semi this, wouldn't want sock showing up... Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Repeated attempts by IP socks (86.146.244.xx) to remove lots of sections of the article since 15 August 2022‎. The article had been semi-protected twice for this reason. Phikia (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism with the addition of unreliable sources, changing and removing reliably sourced information, disruptive editing persisting from prior months. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs continuing to make changes to nationality (which is already well sourced and discussed) after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 07:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses in Malta. Peaceray (talk) 20:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 03:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 18:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Favonian (talk) 21:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Multi IP addresses continue to change figures which get reverted by two registered users with the previous user stopped reverting once they'd already made three reverts. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 20:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lolkikmoddi-h3t3 :D (talk) 21:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

25 October 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent nationalistic disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if the issue persists after protection has expired. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP-hopper insisting on including unsourced content and removing any request for a citation. Last summary was "You'll have to lock the fucking thing before I'll stop. Now knock it off assholes.". Meters (talk) 21:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. ~ Amory (utc) 23:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a trade. Swagging (talk) 23:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Tdshe/her 19:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses in Malta. Peaceray (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses in Malta. Peaceray (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses in Malta. Peaceray (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses in Malta. Peaceray (talk) 20:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses in Malta. Peaceray (talk) 20:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses in Malta. Peaceray (talk) 20:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IPs entering blatantly false information. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 21:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Protection for only 2 month. Adnan (talk) 12:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced social media gossip by new SPAa and IPs (probably all the same source).  Velella  Velella Talk   14:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 15:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 15:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm seeing driveby IPs, so I think semi should do it. The most recent IP in particular loves the airport pages and could be blocked on principle. They clearly are aware as they went right up to the limit and stopped. - CorbieVreccan 01:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses in Malta. Peaceray (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism PoliceClarity (talk) 14:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's really just the one IP /64, and even that hasn't been much. ~ Amory (utc) 23:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been the subject of pov-editing for at least a decade now. Two brand new users are currently engaging in pov-pushing, attempting to remove 7k sourced information through edit warring. This seems to be connected to the massive off-wiki campaign aimed at disrupting Wikipedia, see [70]. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 15:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm seeing a lot of disruption there. Coolman2917 (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 15:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism by ips, was several times protected. Shadow4dark (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There have been severe vandalism on the page without verification so I would like to request for protection. Loibird90 (talk) 08:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Yadplayz (talk) 08:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yadplayz: please be so kind and point out the "high level of vandalism". Lectonar (talk) 11:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 07:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. BangJan1999 15:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Kosack (talk) 06:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The game is coming out and people will flock to Wikipedia to voice opinions Tdshe/her 19:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Kosack (talk) 06:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive edits from IPs and brand-new users. ℛonherry 08:54, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 09:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There have been many unconstructive edits by new users to this article lately which take a lot of time to review and then revert. The edits are not as such spam but they seem to just pick out a random publication and then take some content that is vaguely related to sustainability from that publication. I wonder if there is a student assignment going on somewhere (no information about it has been put on the talk page). These new users are so far only editing the sustainability article and nothing else. Quite time consuming to clean up after them. Can we have this article protected for at least a few months? Thanks. EMsmile (talk) 10:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant vandalism Yarrowfes21 (talk) 19:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war, and an anonymous (IP) user (who might be also abused WP:SOCK) continues to a persistent editing which removal of a sourced content and violating WP:CITE. IP user seem emotionally outbursts and difficult to interact with. Page protection is required. Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 06:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of vandalism Yourfathersgods (talk) 10:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Yourfathersgods, Not done. this seems to be a Hindi Wikipedia-related request, you have to post it on (for readers, it is the RfPP alternative page on Hindi Wikipedia). We can't change protection of another-language Wikipedia here. -- Titodutta (talk) 11:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A series of IPs keep reverting all edits made by registered users. This has been going on for 10 days. The page consensus is that the 8-day acting president should not be added to the list, and that the 8-day acting president did not vacate the position of president pro tempore, yet the IP keeps making edits contrary to consensus. Additionally, the IPs (who may all be the same person) keep reverting to restore their version of the table, but in the process they just mass revert, thereby eliminating edits to URLs, edits to photos, edits to content, etc. which have nothing to do with restoring the acting president to the table.

This is happening at both President of the Los Angeles City Council and Los Angeles City Council. OCNative (talk) 22:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks both, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Every few weeks, IP vandalism surges in this page. Most recently, an IP user removed references and made all sorts of changes to portray one of the candidates of this election at his best light. Since the elections are taking place soon, I believe the article would benefit from temporary semi-protection. Pugliese23 (talk) 22:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New IP is creating further disruption. It is getting really messy. I left a message on the discussion page of one of them. But they do not want to engage. These are probably accounts associated with the campaign of one of the candidates. The new IP suggests sockpuppeting. Pugliese23 (talk) 10:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:39, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Storchy (talk) 12:08, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Users are leaving blank requests in the feedback. This page should be used for what users liked and disliked about the page. Interstellarity (talk) 13:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Yes, ideally it should be used just for that. But disruption here is minimal, and "empty" answers do no harm. An editnotice might do some good. Lectonar (talk) 14:35, 25 October 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism, may continue with it being an important event in the UK XxLuckyCxX (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: In accordance with its sister pages Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Rishi Sunak also being greylocked. High level of vandalism in recent (1 full day). PerryPerryD Talk To Me 16:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User MelanieN Declined semi-protection after commenting: "Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Most of the editing by IPs that I see appears to be constructive.' But user Daniel Case is semi-protected. I think the page needs un-ortection to improve further. 2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 13:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the IP attempted to falsify such a comment in the archives: [71]. MrOllie (talk) 13:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined and blocked the /64. Good catch MrOllie. Dennis Brown - 13:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various IP addresses have repeatedly adding episode titles without a reliable source for several days now. — YoungForever(talk) 22:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More than a month of edit-warring from the London IP range Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:5D26:FA00:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 01:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It can be lifted before then if it is confirmed reliably that the band has broken up, and it looks like they will never play again Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temperory extended-confirmed protection: High level of vandalism by new Ids. Continuous violation of Wikipedia policy by predicting the future and bias editing towards their favourite participants.Imsaneikigai (talk) 15:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. This is the remainder of the active protection period. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: User Talk Of Blocked User. Just being used for personal attacks. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Blaze Wolf, you know that we don't protect pages due to a single user's disruption (and they were autoconfirmed anyway, so semi-protection would've been pointless). Why didn't you contact the blocking administrator instead of reverting some very mild personal attacks over and over again? Sdrqaz (talk) 16:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware that you don't do that. And I didn't contact the blocking administrator since I wasn't sure if they were currently online or not. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you knew that protection wouldn't come out of your request, then RfPP was not the place to post it. https://apersonbot.toolforge.org/recently-active/?admins and ANI are available. These reversions are not worth your time: see what I wrote a few days ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user keeps editing this page without any really reliable sources. Lewis de Black (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Analyzing the recent edits,
Do you have a reference that the band broke up? The main issue here is edit-warring between 2-3 users total. Which would not usually be enough to sustain greylock. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 17:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. See above request. Daniel Case (talk) 19:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper edit warring unsourced article. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 17:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Greatminton (talk) 05:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 07:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 18:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that this draft be moved into article space under the full title of the film, Is That Black Enough for You?!?. I cannot move it myself as it says there are forbidden characters and I must request a move. Thriley (talk) 22:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected talk redirect, so I'm requesting here. Please append the following:
{{Redirect category shell|
{{R from remote talk page}}
{{R from move}}
}}

Thank you, Clyde!Franklin! 00:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

26 October 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The edit warring that got the page protected previously has resumed immediately the page protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Canterbury Tail. For the bot. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Random new users/IPs constantly try to change the sourced information in this article. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This article has been semi-protected almost continuously for years.  MelanieN (talk) 00:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 20:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users aren't using adequate sources to add something to it. Dr Salvus 21:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple WP:BKFIP socks edit this page. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 01:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – For the same reasons as the above request. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:08, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple new accounts and IPs keep trying to add a terribly promotional/COI version. MB 03:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Multiple IPs and newly created accounts have been removing a section on sexual assault allegations, generally with similar edit summaries. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 03:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 134.139.30.37 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editor. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 134.139.30.37 (talk · contribs) blocked by Materialscientist. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and disruptive editing during the month of October. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC) Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. There are also many good IP edits to the article, but I decided to protect it because some of the vandalism is really bad, and there are more bad edits than good ones.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article is not related to the so-called "Russian invasion of Ukraine", which was the cited reason for protection. Madame Necker (talk) 18:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done General sanctions are broadly construed, and the article history makes clear that as recently as yesterday editors were attempting to give Ukraine and/or Russia preeminence in the article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by sockpuppets of User:Αθλητικά (please see this report). The main edit being abused is this, but other vandalism edits have been made by 3 (to date, and only 9 games have been played in the season) IP sockpuppets of User:Αθλητικά, such as this and this - in both the user accuses other people of writing wrong stuff, while they themselves are doing the vandalism edits. I have mentioned about both issues in my comment in [this report. It should be noted that the user is capable of doing view edits, as can be seen here (the account is a confirmed old sockpuppet of User:Αθλητικά), so semi-protection must be enforced. SteliosGR (talk) 01:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 08:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Reason: Persistent vandalism by sockpuppets of User:Αθλητικά (please see this report). The main edit being abused is this, but other vandalism edits have been made by 3 (to date, and only 9 games have been played in the season) IP sockpuppets of User:Αθλητικά, such as this and this - in both the user accuses other people of writing wrong stuff, while they themselves are doing the vandalism edits. I have mentioned about both issues in my comment in [this report. It should be noted that the user is capable of doing view edits, as can be seen here (the account is a confirmed old sockpuppet of User:Αθλητικά), so a high protection must be enforced. SteliosGR (talk) 01:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruption after last protection expired. Another account, but likely the same person who will not engage i*n any discussion. MB 04:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Agathoclea. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. And could protect themselves if they wanted to. Lectonar (talk) 06:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar (talk) 06:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high vandalism pleas click on link and lock the hindi wiki page Yourfathersgods (talk) 06:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We cannot lock pages on the Hindi-language Wikipedia from here. Lectonar (talk) 06:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add a subtitle after the first paragraph or change the name from " The Yom Kippur War" to the " The Yom Kippur War from the Israelian Point of view", then continue with the article with no other changes, In-order to prevent any misuse of the article by any researcher searching for neutral information.

Side note: It's the sole purpose and job of Wikipedia and its editors to ensure neutral and accurate information validated from all sides in case of any article about an ongoing conflict, despite the capabilities/willingness of either side to offer the resources and/or the dedication to edit. 83.110.195.201 (talk) 06:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This is essentially a request to move the title, so this is the right venue. Lectonar (talk) 06:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors keep introducing the same change, which is not mentioned in the target article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And please see this: this. Wikipedia isn't a source for itself. Lectonar (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AGuy271 (talk) 01:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 02:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from 24.222.235.14, reverting the article and others related to it. The show has not aired a new episode in over a year, and he keeps reverting with no explanation. BrickMaster02 (talk) 03:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Variety of IPs and newly created users adding random Spanish phrases to the page, renaming the subject, and changing links—seems likely to be a single user block evading. Dylnuge (TalkEdits) 06:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 12:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Nythar (💬-🎃) 01:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 14:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent changes in regards to nationality, primarily by IP addresses. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 11:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 15:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Tesla is a company with many haters that have recently vandalized its page. I suggest not allowing new users to edit it. Since it is considered a "good article" I believe it should be upgraded to a semi-protection or pending changes. Thanks for your consideration. PennyGray (talk) 12:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 14:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism GordonGlottal (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The only edits to the page for the past several months have been disruptive edits by an IP-hopping editor who always uses the same edit summary ("Derogatory remarks deleted"). Bennv123 (talk) 13:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD04:20B:D0BC:676B:87E1:DBEF (talk) 11:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Indefinite ECP salting due to recreation by socks. – dudhhr (1 enby in a trenchcoat) talk contribs (he/they) 14:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 15:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection. Persistent disruptive editing by IP users. Thanks,  oncamera  (talk page) 16:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism since page was unprotected, including name changes. Kbabej (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Better semi this, wouldn't want socks showing up... Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 14:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 15:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism since February 2021. Last PP was for six months, and within less than 10 hours after it expired, the vandalism has restarted. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 16:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent personal attacks (is this an lta?). ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 18:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 18:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism by IPs replacing names with other persons not involved in the subject. Also several additions of unreliable info. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – long term vandalism from IPs, resumed like 2 weeks after last protection expired. Probably does not need to be protected forever but until "sussy" falls out of favor this page will be targeted. Cannolis (talk) 06:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of Vandalism Recently from students of this school. I would recommend pending changes for this page. PennyGray (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repetitive incidents of vandalism, disruptive and unsourced edits by IPs and new users. Especially edits to the box office gross. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. REpeated attempts at censoring information on the page by multiple different users, stating that the information should not be put it without contacting the organization (which is not how Wikipedia works) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was DM'd on Discord by some rando over this. Also, the changes are still happening. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent GENSEX disruption in this BLP. Given previous protection requesting at least two months semi. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a second, couldn't you protect yourself, given that you're an admin? Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Magnatyrannus: I have made a content edit to the article. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. :) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of references and edit warring on BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 12:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And it's not stopping. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. None of the most recent 50 edits have been anything close to constructive use of the talk page. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by various IP users Theoder2055 (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – He has reportedly been traded to a new team, however this trade has not been confirmed by either team as of posting this request and IPs are adding the trade before the confirmation. Just needs protected for a couple days until it's officially announced. Rockchalk717 21:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

27 October 2022

Reason: Over the article's existence, a series of IPs have repeatedly inserted a certain "Ibambe L'Monsein" into the article. In doing so, they have also claimed that "Ibambe L'Monsein" is mentioned by references which do not mention him at all. In fact, I could not find any proof of "Ibambe L'Monsein" even existing at all, so these IPs are probably vandals. After a period of a few weeks during which the IPs did not restore the probable fantasy figure to the article, they have recently become more persistent in repeatedly (re-)adding "Ibambe L'Monsein" into the article, so the article needs protection. Applodion (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Passing remark without reviewing the page history: "mon sein" is French for "my breast", although that doesn't preclude it being a real person's surname. Not sure what "Ibambe" would mean though, as a gag name. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 22:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page should be protected until the sources have settled down (some say he has died, others not). — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 22:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully sources firm up. If disruption continues after that we can protect further. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP disruption. Nswix (talk) 23:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP and autoconfirmed editor User:MitwallyAbdelrhman vandalism since 19 October, nothing constructive. Fram (talk) 08:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JBW. The other user has been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 23:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent incidents of edit warring and removal of reliable sources without plausible reasoning. Iaof2017 (talk) 15:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, users like Iaof2017 are constantly updating the page with unreliable and irrelevant information, so protection to this page would be phenomenal. Thank you so much. Swedishbrittisk (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Also, the user above has been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is constantly being edited disruptively by a couple school IPs who do not respond to warnings. The disruption itself actually goes back to at least 2017. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – People keep arguing over whether hand to hand combatant should be listed or removed on Thor page to point of starting to get a bit uncivil. P.greenlink (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both of the combatants need to take it to the article talk page. And yes, things are starting to get a little uncivil. I will post a warning on both of their talk pages. MelanieN (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: hatred campaigning taking place against global actor Vijay in his wiki page by users Ab207 and Themodifie7 by tags placing and vandalising the article 14.183.232.46 (talk) 12:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring or similar WPEditor42 (talkcontribs) 13:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent unsourced addition of an album track as a single from IPs. NØ 14:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Random unsourced new data and Vandalism ... SunnyKambojLive (talk) 15:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 21:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 21:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:240:CD04:20B:D0BC:676B:87E1:DBEF (talk) 12:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of incorrect information by adding false figures without citing a reliable source. Theoder2055 (talk) 14:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can move to indef if edit-warring IPs resume disruption at that point. - CorbieVreccan 21:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@FilmandTVFan28: in the future, come here before the edit-warring gets flagrant. You and the IP were both far, far past 3RR. - CorbieVreccan 21:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 173.44.103.206 (talk · contribs). - CorbieVreccan 22:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 22:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: users Shshshsh, Ab207 and Themodifie7 are Vijay haters and constantly placing unnecessary tags and vandalised the Vijay article. I see it as a well referenced article with proper sources but still they are doing this I request high level of protection to this page. 176.215.19.234 (talk) 02:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is not an endorsement of your message here. Do not call other editors haters or say their edits are vandalism, as these are considered personal attacks. Discuss the tags on the talk page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry: Sockpuppets of user Αθλητικά who led to 2022–23 Super League Greece page becoming protected, have repeatedly edited this template (which appears in 2022–23 Super League Greece) as well. SteliosGR (talk) 22:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Please add temporary page protection until November 15, 2022 to alleviate constant "Mayor" change for recent Ontario municipal elections that do not come into effect until November 15, 2022. Thank you!. — WILDSTARTALK 23:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I request you to remove the vandalism fan pov tag placed by user Ab207 and block him from editing the Vijay page permanently. I see a hate campaign taking place against the actor in his talk page. This actor Vijay has got more number of abusers than fans in social media platforms. so I see it as a personal hate agenda. 116.58.229.220 (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

not going to happen Chip3004 (talk) 03:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Better semi this, wouldn't want more vandalism to show up. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:04, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...even though the IP is already range-blocked. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 04:45, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. @Magnatyrannus: if you haven't done so already, have a thorough read of our protection policy. Lectonar (talk) 07:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism by same IP, please grant temp protection Toomanyyearskodakblack (talk) 01:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No one would vandalize a good page like banana 2604:2800:4000:A0C8:A5B9:DB5A:662D:D1E8 (talk) 05:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Unfortunately they would. Lectonar (talk) 07:04, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: IPs have been edit warring in this article today, and from the looks of things, have been for at least several days. Egsan Bacon (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. WP:ARBPIA. El_C 15:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Users reach a consensus on the content. Caio Wiki Editor (talk) 00:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This rationale doesn't address the issues that led to the protection (i.e. using Wikipedia for campaigning). There's also no actual discussion on the talk page, and so no way to prove that there is any sort of consensus. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 02:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined See above. Lectonar (talk) 09:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The bad think in this page is mistaken information. Latvia has not a regonized languages. So please remove latgalian and livonian languages from this page. I am latvian and i am angry about this case. Latgalian is a dialect and livonian is non a alive language. Only official language in Latvia is latvian and I have onorr to be native speaker of this language. Senlatvietis (talk) 18:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This should be requested on the talk page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Indeed, see above. Lectonar (talk) 09:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Character Boy123123 (talk) 11:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not clear which edit is supposed to be made. Lectonar (talk) 12:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same kind of vandalisms from before the last protection. —twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 04:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 41 out of last 100 edits contain the word "reverted". –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs/new accounts re-adding dubious item to list. I can see this is coming from social media (which includes meatpuppetry). Few days should suffice. Mellk (talk) 12:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurrence of persistent vandalism. There is apparently a focused effort being promoted on Reddit: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/yejzrg/ryan_cohens_wikipedia_alleges_he_masterminded_a/>. Geoff | Who, me? 12:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of relevant and cited content. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism including budget, boxoffice total and Director. Vandalism by new users and Ip's. All three subjects within the article are referenced. Knitsey (talk) 14:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content: recently deceased, unsourced claims of assassination, multiple wives, etc. Storchy (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 08:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, by IP hoppers. Skjoldbro (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:04, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: MelanieN Declined semi-protection after commenting: "Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Most of the editing by IPs that I see appears to be constructive. [72] But Daniel Case Protected "Bharat Jodo Yatra": Persistent disruptive editing. I think 3 months of protection is unnecessary. 2405:201:D01B:60BD:1C72:AE31:22A5:E32B (talk) 13:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined After looking at the page-history, I concur with the protecting admin. Duration is conclusive. Lectonar (talk) 13:45, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article of Milan since last year is experiencing a high level of vandalism, I would ask for an increase in the time it is "protected" to try to avoid this. Ywetapap888 (talk) 12:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 15:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ lol1VNIO⁠👻 (I made a mistake? talk to me) 17:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page appears to be a fairly repetitive target of non-constructive single-purpose IP account editing, which confirmed editors just ending up reverting the pending changes again and again. Surely semi-protection would just be simpler?. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse. Doug Weller talk 17:51, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 19:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced change since the results of the Ontario municipal elections that do not take effect until November 15, 2022. Please add temporary page protection for 1 month. Thank you!. — WILDSTARTALK 05:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 20 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing made by various IP users Theoder2055 (talk) 08:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – He has reportedly been traded, IPs are prematurely adding the trade before the official announcement is made. Rockchalk717 16:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism: The same IPv6 keep adding the same nonsense stuff about OPASB, a fictional YouTube channel serving a non-existent place, and the same 5570 nonsense text. Bastewasket (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Though there are several studies showing the liver injury due to the formulations prepared using this plant (for example: https://www.jcehepatology.com/article/S0973-6883(21)00182-1/fulltext), the information is being removed by people having commercial interest with this plant. Balaji (Let's talk) 17:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IPs keep adding "competing" or "against" van models that the subject belongs to the segment and some editors remove it as it is redundant but the IPs keep readding back for no reason. Please make the protection last for atleast a few months so that the disruptive IPs can't readd it back. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 18:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, especially to lede, for a polarizing BLP. Kbabej (talk) 18:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Religious outlook🔗 There are many proven works of Mevlana. Some of the documents mentioned in the article do not belong to Mevlana. [Ref. No: 81,82,83,84,85,86,87,89,90,91]

What exactly is necessary for the protection of a work on Wikipedia? If it's about how full the page looks, no problem, but if it's about keeping the page content away from untrue information, then I'm in the right place Please check the reference numbers above. Which of the links shown as sources belong to Mevlana? Yes, there are sentences belonging to Mevlana in it, but who is the author of this content? Is it Mevlana? If your answer is no, Why do you use the name of the mawla with false quotations and protect it?

Please we are all sane mature people who want things to improve. The fact that a third person who does not belong to the owner writes a book in detail and documents it in their own way does not show that the information in it is 100% correct. I think there is a major overlooked omission. This information is of no use to anyone and creates more controversy.

Writing a book takes imagination, time and desire. Nobody wants to create an environment where someone with these can use wikipedia's resources as they wish. Otherwise, let me create a library of Mevlana's books translated from Persian. Then I will make a perception operation on wikipedia by citing this as a source.

We do not want to manipulate pages by impersonating the person we want using Wikipedia and translation books. We are not gangs. We are not uneducated people. We just want things to evolve. We know the purpose of Wikipedia and produce and protect content accordingly. We do not like to impersonate the person we want with some manipulations such as translation books.... Right?

If your answer is defensive, please do not write it. I don't want to know that Wikipedia is such a place. vSky 16:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Politically motivated editing used to disparage, libel, or malign the image of a public figure during an election season. 76.187.177.14 (talk) 15:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There have only been seven edits this entire month, and one of those was a punctuation edit. Six substantive edits in October, even fewer in Sept (four overall), and even fewer still in Aug (three overall, one of which was a minor CE) does not make sense for page protection IMHO. --Kbabej (talk) 18:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 18:49, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by IP - 5 times this week. Requesting semi protection for a month. Dhruv edits (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Full protection for this page - vandalism keeps happening at current protection levels. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why should it be indef? Articles shouldn't be fully protected indefinitely. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 19:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Full protection would be overkill given that the user that was edit-warring is now currently p-blocked. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 21:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Repeated vandalism and test edits on the page, mostly from IP users. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple-day edit war Dinoz1 (chat?) 13:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

True. An agreement has been reached, though, it seems. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 17:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 18:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism in the tour dates section. HorrorLover555 (talk) 18:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 201.76.237.214 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. YT Tuzz vandal is back and continuing to vandalize the talk page despite multiple previous IP blocks ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:49, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 20:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Frequent disruptive edits and unsourced claims. Scotsglens (talk) 21:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Samsara. The page has been pending changes protected since October 2017. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IP-hopping editor. 25stargeneral (talk) 22:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

28 October 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High traffic due to recent stabbing. Nehme1499 21:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Current levels of protection are not enough - there still seems to be a lot of IP back-and-forth editing over "Queen" vs "Queen Consort", which isn't going to end soon. QueenofBithynia (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • There was no level of classical protection, just indefinite pending changes.
Fully protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism for Kanye West's private school. Kbabej (talk) 23:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More vandalism by IPs. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the wake of the Musk acquisition closing tonight. 25stargeneral (talk) 02:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 19:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: game comes out tomorrow. People will most likely vandalize this page depending on how the launch plays out. maybe 3-4 days would be good. Tdshe/her 20:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP (User:Dedy Tisna Amijaya) vandalism AlhyarJy (talk) 20:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, not vandalism, but sockpuppetry. But, yeah, unfortunately it's getting disruptive and socks are sprouting like mushrooms... –Austronesier (talk) 21:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP (User:Dedy Tisna Amijaya) vandalism AlhyarJy (talk) 20:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dito: not vandalism, but disruptive sockpuppetry. –Austronesier (talk) 21:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors (both IPv4 and IPv6) keep adding articles about individual works instead of their franchises to this navbox, despite source text saying not to do so. This includes article redirects with a "franchise" disambiguation that currently redirect to an article about a single work (i.e. Willow (franchise) redirects to Willow (film)). –WPA (talk) 23:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added note: They also added Star Wars under 20th Century Studios even though the franchise is solely owned by Lucasfilm. –WPA (talk)
Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In the news due to Elon Musk Takeover. Page being edited without sources. Shreerajtheauthor (talk) 00:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 05:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Salted in 2008, blocks accepting of Draft:Benjamin Sellers, about a completely different person than the one from 2008. No such user (talk) 07:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The draft awaits review; can be unprotected once the draft is accepted. Lectonar (talk) 08:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar: As I hinted, I'm about to accept the draft, but the script won't let me: Darn it, "Benjamin Sellers" is create-protected. You will need to request unprotection before accepting. You're making a catch-22 for me. No such user (talk) 08:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm...can't one accept the draft and not move it at the same time? I seem to remember this is usually handled in that way. Anyway, I have downgraded to ec-protection, which should do the trick. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lectonar (talk) 09:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Highly visible page from PLDT users and edit warring. Please see the page history for evidence. 143.44.165.14 (talk) 02:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only 12 transclusions; and zero edits in 2022, so quite Stale. El_C 07:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Some serious BLP violations in the month of October. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edits due to bad press. The posts are generally unverified Twitter screenshots and original research. Edit comments include editorializing. Mpen320 (talk) 04:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 07:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 04:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: You're missing the point, though, Lectonar. Magnatyrannus was introducing the error that the IPs were correcting. See my edit summary here. El_C 07:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Looks like the bot interprets a "Note" as "Jury's still out". Favonian (talk) 11:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Tulsi 24x7 07:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk archives and subpages of inactive users

292 pages to unprotect

Reason: Requesting removal of full protection from these User talk archives and other User talk subpages of inactive users who have no edits in 2 years. Many of these pages have Lint errors, fixing of which is being blocked. There is no longer any benefit with the pages remaining full protected. See "User talk archives of inactive users" section from last year RFPP for a similar bulk unprotection. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 09:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Doing... DatGuyTalkContribs 10:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is taking a bit longer than I'd like it to. @Primefac: would making a script to unprotect these pages be considered a bot? Or does it trend towards semi-automated editing if I manually check each protection? DatGuyTalkContribs 10:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DatGuy this can be made easier using Twinkle. ToBeFree has explained how it is done here. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 11:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I never used the batch features before, thanks. Unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 11:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of brigading from crypto enthusiasts adding non verified info about their preferred crypto coin. Please lock the page 93.36.216.198 (talk) 10:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 12:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 11:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 14:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: "Protection should due to persistent diruptive deletion edits that seek to remove that has been dicussed on TALK page where no valid criticism can or will be presented to discredit the sources of material which indeed are authentic. The page should be protected to ensure LGBTQ content stays otherwise truthful, validly sourced content will be deleted. Persistent disruptive editors seek to delete LGBTQ content which is based in reliable sources where 100% of discussion participates in TALK page to current date had reached a consensus as to reliablility of edit where even if future participat objected to additional material it would not be based in truth , as this future participant would be NOT able to present valid criticisms because in truth the sources are reliable and verifable from reliable sources" TruthQuester1234 (talk) 11:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - Sock blocked. DatGuyTalkContribs 12:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - only two parties (besides the hopping IP). @MrOllie: I very strongly considered blocking you for edit-warring. You should know better. Discuss it on the talk page or take the article to WP:AfD. DatGuyTalkContribs 14:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: MelanieN Declined semi-protection after commenting: "Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Most of the editing by IPs that I see appears to be constructive. [73] But Daniel Case Protected "Bharat Jodo Yatra": Persistent disruptive editing. I think 3 months of protection is unnecessary. Examine IP EDITS PRIOR TO DECLINE AND ADMIN BHVAHER 2405:201:D01B:6957:2051:65D4:D0C0:E9E5 (talk) 13:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Archiving without action a request from someone blocked for block evasion or sockpuppetry to remove a protection against their edits.
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the article does not receive much vandalism anymore and I feel that it would be better to let everybody edit the article so that the article is able to achieve higher standards. ― If we can make even the darkness shine, it will become a starry sky | Dulcetia 15:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was semi'd three times before it was indef-semi'd. That's not a promising track record. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's actually pretty quickly; I am surprised about the low amount of protection attempts before indefinite semi-protection was applied. As that was over a year ago and the disruption in game articles is likely to decrease over time, I have replaced the semi-protection by a month of pending changes protection. Let's see how that works out. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from various users, reverting that the show has ended...even though it has been OVER a year since the last new episode aired and no news about a renewal was made. BrickMaster02 (talk) 13:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. DatGuyTalkContribs 14:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP user 175.158.37.236, adding unsourced (and most likely false) information. BrickMaster02 (talk) 13:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Besides, indefinite full protection? DatGuyTalkContribs 14:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page is being rapidly edited by multiple IP-only editors due to the recent retirement of Crue's guitarist Mick Mars. There is confusion/debate on whether his replacement is a full member of the band. A talk page discussion for consensus is open on this. SanAnMan (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page could use temporary protection - lots of IP vandalism due to a big rivalry game tomorrow. Zeng8r (talk) 18:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent addition of a random Youtuber's version of Tic-tac-toe with the only ref being to a Youtube video ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also seem to recall a sockpuppet that's obsessed with sultanate flags. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Moka Mo using IP address socks adding disputed information.   Aloha27  talk  19:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: 90% of the entire edit history has just been childish vandalism. So it makes perfect sense to have it this way. It is now a redirect, so just for good measure. Scotsglens (talk) 16:48, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs over a period of weeks vandalizing. StartOkayStop (talk) 20:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It’s Due to vandalism. 2001:569:7C22:E300:7883:E32E:83DA:AEBD (talk) 06:35, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

29 October 2022

Reason: High level of interest in the page and to avoid vandalism. I request for page protection at least until the election of 4th November. Caio Wiki Editor (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - no vandalism since protection expired today. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Last vandal changed chair of the board to adolf hitler. Teddythedev (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Close, but Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Curbon7 (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism for BLP of politician Nancy Pelosi's husband, who is involved in a current event. Kbabej (talk) 18:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and removal of sourced content on the same article, anonymous IP already warned several times by multiple editors. GenoV84 (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 74.70.220.192 (talk · contribs) blocked by EdJohnston. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing, vandalism. RF23 (talk) 18:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 22:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. DanCherek (talk) 01:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. DanCherek (talk) 02:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Going to try my first protection ask in a while: persistent vandalism due to Netflix series featuring this serial killer. wizzito | say hello! 02:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism resumed after expiration of previous protection. Lennart97 (talk) 21:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User(s) blocked: 99.226.80.217 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. There was a single IP yesterday, with disruption prior to that coming over a week ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 09:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple new accounts and IPs changing infobox image repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:18, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stop edit-warring and using rollback in a content dispute, Krimuk2.0. Sdrqaz (talk) 09:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:3RRNO exemption applies for sockpuppetry. Multiple accounts Iwishuhappy69, Shreyas190 and IPs such as this, this, this, and this were used for edit-warring to either duplicate an image already used in the article, or to change the image to one with a watermark, both of which are undesirable for the infobox.Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That exception only applies for when the edits are made in violation of a block/ban. Was there one being violated? Sdrqaz (talk) 11:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Wikipedia:Featured article criteria is only semi-protected. 123957a (talk) 06:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: WP:ARBIPA DS, socking. 25stargeneral (talk) 22:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 16:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism, recently deceased musical celebrity. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content.[74][75][76] Dalba 03:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 16:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP editors. Bgsu98 (talk) 04:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism 86.146.145.235 (talk) 07:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 16:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 09:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism. Hardyplants (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Blablubbs. Not a candidate for full protection, or even just WP:ECP, at this time. El_C 17:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive edits by multiple IPs Brunton (talk) 09:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-ed by Blablubbs for 2 days Justiyaya 10:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done — for the bot. El_C 17:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive IP edits Brunton (talk) 09:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. El_C 17:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing IP edits that add uncited materials and remove cited materials, seems like a bunch of IPs are trying to improve the reputation of the subject, but without merit. CT55555 (talk) 13:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 17:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent negative unreferenced blp violations. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Multiple IPs vandalizing. Roundishtc) 16:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from what appears to be the same user under several IP addresses. Warnings posted for user but edits have continued (total five times). Tacyarg (talk) 13:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 17:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent disruptive editing anonymous IP. LancedSoul (talk) 14:19, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not a candidate for full protection, or even just WP:ECP, at this time. El_C 17:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same unexplained mass removal of content and addition of poorly written sentences, after previous protection expired. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user who has already been blocked numerous times continues to vandalize the article by adding the same type of "false information" for which he was blocked, now without an account, continues to act in the same way. so I would ask the Milan article to have a longer protection time, as this has been happening since last year Ywetapap888 (talk) 15:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Irrespective of the WP:SOCKING. El_C 17:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The Oct 28 episode of Atlanta used a fictionalized version that implied how this film was made (which is in no way true), but we're seeing IP edits trying to bring that information into this article. Masem (t) 15:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and unexplained removal edits anonymous IP. LancedSoul (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – This is the last time I'm requesting this, because I have had enough. Someone please add protection to this page, because people have constantly reverted, and reverted, and reverted my edit saying that the show has ended, and it has. It has been OVER A YEAR since the last episode aired. Warning people will NOT do anything, as they will continue to undo my edits. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Another solution might be to set a partial block on Special:Contributions/175.157.0.0/18. Binksternet (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism with different accounts & IP adresses ExplainsTrains (talk) 17:27, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: Expiry of protection period; High level of IP vandalism and new id vandalism. Courtesy Tagging- Daniel Case Imsaneikigai (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Most frequent flyer at RfPP recently for some reason. El_C 16:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting retaliatory editing from haters. Blackstar (talk) 17:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. BangJan1999 19:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:10, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article 2022 International Court of Justice judges election is currently protected due to persistent disruptive editing by IP users seeking to promote the candidacy of Leonardo Nemer Caldeira Brant. A user (Caio Wiki Editor) now reintroduced the entire promotional version that the anonymous users had created of the 2022 International Court of Justice judges election as a section of the article of one of the candidates, Leonardo Nemer Caldeira Brant. At the same time, he removed tags and introduced promotional content. I believe the Leonardo Nemer Caldeira Brant should also be protected during the elections. The user Caio Wiki Editor might also be worth keeping track of. Pugliese23 (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Pugliese23, we don't usually protect when the reported disruption concerns only one user. El_C 17:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 18:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing from IPs over a long period of time HouseBlastertalk 20:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping editor going back and forth with MOS:ERA changes. Aoidh (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Based on the protection logs, enough is enough. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. nableezy - 21:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC) 21:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged arbitration enforcement action. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GPL93 (talk) 22:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

30 October 2022

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 10:36, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan 23:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 10:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like we have an IP hopper. Some of these could be blocked, but they do seem to stop after warnings. - CorbieVreccan 23:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, see the user Pugliese23, that is trying to change personal informations. I ask for the page to be protected until 4th November 2022. Caio Wiki Editor (talk) 19:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. OP indef p-blocked from the page in question (see here). El_C 20:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism! The user Pugliese23 is purposely changing the meaning of sentences to harm Leonardo Nemer Caldeira Brant. Caio Wiki Editor (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Duplicate request. El_C 20:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Excessive IP vandalism is often seen on the page, and people say he did not die. Hajimesuku (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The main article is semi-protected and the talk page has not seen an edit in more than a month. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 23:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Also, due to socking, Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Zimbabweed (talk) 23:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 00:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mass IP vandalism Toomanyyearskodakblack (talk) 23:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Longer semi-protection: I think a mistake was made because as soon as the previous semi-protection of one year ended the vandalism resumed and the page was only protected for one week. Shouldn't this page be protected longer? Leisterian (talk) 00:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator WidrMelanieN (talk) 00:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 10:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism, identical edit each time over the last few months. Ocscok (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ocscok: I see an IP adding something sourced to a Reliable Source three times, and you deleting it as vandalism three times. This looks like a content dispute and you should take it to the article talk page.  MelanieN (talk) 00:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It was discussed on talk page that episode list/story arcs won't be added because it's too lengthy but some IP keep adding them. [77] [78] [79] Yuugone (talk) 02:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protected for three years now. No evidence of recent edit warring. 199.119.233.204 (talk) 03:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearcat: any thoughts on that? Lectonar (talk) 07:29, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected by Bearcat (talk · contribs), but autoconfirmed pending changes protection added. For the bot. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A look to the page's edit history [80] reveals theres a severe problem of IP vandalism on it, examples here [81][82][83] Pob3qu3 (talk) 00:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism. protection needed for 1 month. Huz98 (talk) 04:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Italian LTA target. --Mtarch11 (talk) 04:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can look into longer if it continues, but you should probably still have an onwiki way for people to contact you. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Prevent moves to new names without discussion. Request by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 05:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP kept posting random nonsense discussions. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 05:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dislike doing this, but Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by various IP users Theoder2055 (talk) 07:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 02:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.  Actively monitoring the page for continued disruption... DatGuyTalkContribs 09:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Current online discourse resulting in vandalism Jor3122 (talk) 05:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. The Banner talk 09:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. @The Banner: please take better care when requesting protection. Looking at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/10, about a third of your requests are declined. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting indef ECP under WP:GS/RUSUKR. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 10:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant ethno-nationalistic IP disruption, altering sourced information and whatnot. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, sock puppetry invasion [too many new accounts with exact same behaviour] Fragrant Peony (talk) 12:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after previous protection expired. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing edit dispute between multiple editors, culminating in a large series of reverts over a contentious editing dispute. Requesting page be temporarily fully protected to the last stable version while discussion is ongoing. Toa Nidhiki05 18:11, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kbabej (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same problems as in Srivijaya. An IP sock of User:Dedy Tisna Amijaya is persistently adding poorly sourced content. Austronesier (talk) 17:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 18:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Isabelle Belato, nope, your protection is longer, we go with that. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism 98.46.108.133 (talk) 13:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 19:01, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: On behalf of the 1768 Foundation Inc, a CT-state incorporated entity and 501(c)3 public charity that oversees the trust of Brothers in Unity: protection for the wikipedia page to avoid defacement by rival societies and incorrect information due to lack of insider knowledge. Andrewsong49 (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Slow burn IP edit war over an Oxford comma. One of the IPs may formerly be known as SchroCat, fwiw. — HTGS (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article does say to "use British English", so the added commas do qualify as vandalism. MelanieN (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anti-semetic trolling. $chnauzer 20:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 20:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increased vandalism after missing two field goals against the Atlanta Falcons costing the Panthers the game. Swagging (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator JBW. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

31 October 2022

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from IP addresses after he was struggling against the Seahawks today. Swagging (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Antisemitic troll. $chnauzer 00:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: History of trolling has resumed on the page. SunilNevlaFan 19:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. However, if it continues, the page might be a candidate for long-term PC protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism in the last few hours. Requesting protection for at least a day. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 20:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 00:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 01:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't football season without the "player owns franchise" vandalism! Love to see it! Swagging (talk) 01:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. Migsmigss (talk) 21:23, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism, spam, etc. recently. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 21:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 01:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 18:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP keeps changing the status from "Least Concern" to "Critically Endangered". Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. We don't protect a page based on the actions of a single editor. If multiple instances of vandalism are occurring from different editors, then we can protect the page. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My proposed edit is to include the more recently discovered fact that the (previously thought to be) 9 subspecies are not in fact subspecies of the Jaguar but are simply just different genetic phenotypes of the same species; Panthera onca. I also intend to include that there is evidence of more diverse genes in certain populations compared to others which may lead to speciation. source:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162377 CalebTeslow (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. @CalebTeslow: See the banner above; you need to make an edito request on the Talk:Jaguar first. And your proposal should be phrased in the form "change X to Y" or "Insert X after Y" or something similar, and include the citation. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – [WP:A/I/PIA]]. nableezy - 15:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC) 15:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 05:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism despite semi protections محرر البوق (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 05:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. 25stargeneral (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 05:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Have the same problem as a few months ago. Been a few chats about this with a ruff consensus reached on talk. Just need editor to that talk. Moxy- 02:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Moxy, that user is already autoconfirmed, so WP:SEMI would have no effect. El_C 05:56, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Yeti Dai (talk) 05:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Archive of talk page, currently the target of the globally banned user WP:LTA/GRP who is known to abuse proxies massively to disrupt the project. No need for anons to edit this page in any case. JavaHurricane 08:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 12:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Autoconfirmed User:CarlostheJackal01 socks are able to get past the protection. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 08:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. Magnatyrannus, recent disruption from autoconfirmed socks, yes, but they did so after the one year semi had expired (Oct 4). Relist for an ECP upgrade if needed. El_C 12:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article now attracting significant FRINGE/misinformation edits from new accounts and IPs. Suggest semi until the heat has gone out of COVID disinformation (12 months in first instance?). Bon courage (talk) 10:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 12:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 11:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 11:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New user edit warring, stated intention to continue. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 2001:448A:50E2:AC82:74E8:34FE:B5D5:2372 (talk) 14:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent IP block evasion, other blocked socks in recent page history (TruthQuester1234, FriendOfGodChen). DanCherek (talk) 14:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems like 1 day protection failed. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 04:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Liz. Favonian (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Moxy- 05:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected — seems to be resolved. El_C 06:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP keep making changes in "list of episodes" without even explaining why, I reverted several times but they keep changing it. Yuugone (talk) 14:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Vorsprung durch Technik Audi Fanboy (user) (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially the IP you have already warned. Lectonar (talk) 15:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because , some haters are tried to change the history which is no more related to this particular ....... . Rosariovento (talk) 03:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC) we need to correct it with subsequencial Typo and links[reply]

Editing of this page is restricted to registered users with at least 30 days' tenure and at least 500 edits. If you have suggestions for improving the article, you can make them on the article talk page. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To expand on what Malcolmxl5 says, this is protected as a general sanction under WP:GS/CASTE; it can only be unprotected via a formal discussion to remove it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 18:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Moves that have caused a lot of disamb assist and redirect work. Request by James Lewis Bedford (talk) 22:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalisms Riktetta (talk) 16:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – On the page history of this article, you will see that a collection of IP addresses have edited the article which immediately gets reverted by registered users who are quite close of breaching 3RR themselves if not careful. The issue has been discussed on a couple of user talk pages with no signs of stopping. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. People are impatient and are trying to change what team he is on before the official announcement ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive IPs are persisting. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This is a redirect of {{Hover title}} which is being merged with {{Tooltip}} per this TFD. This redirect will need to merged as well. Since it no longer has any transclusions, it can be unprotected. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected – well, lowered to EC, but it should do the job. Favonian (talk) 21:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Do what I mean! Favonian (talk) 21:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TFD template replacemnt in two talk archives

{{Hover title}} is being replaced with {{Tooltip}} per this TFD. Gnomes and bots have replaced most of the transclusions, these two protected pages are among the last few left. In both pages, replace


{{H:title|This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this.|(Not watching this page)|link=no|dotted=yes}}



{{Tooltip|2=This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this.|1=(Not watching this page)|link=no|dotted=yes}}


ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 14:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Done – using this drastic template to (maybe) get around a bot issue. Favonian (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is already a temporary auto-correct for here but I think it should be permanent because of the fact that people keep putting the fact that Gordon Freeman from Half-Life died because of Half Life VR but the AI is Self Aware. Waylon111 (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent socking by various IPs of the YT Tuzz vandal. Blocking is insufficient as they always come back on a non-blocked IP ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – recent WP:BLPCRIME violations due to a suspect being arrested. Eridian314 (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 20:18, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]